WEBVTT - Grandson of a Paper Son

0:00:15.411 --> 0:00:23.811
<v Speaker 1>Kushkin. Hi, everyone, this is Liddy Jine Kott back with

0:00:23.890 --> 0:00:28.370
<v Speaker 1>another special bonus episode of the Chinatown Sting. Earlier in

0:00:28.371 --> 0:00:31.211
<v Speaker 1>this season, we heard about how US immigration laws helped

0:00:31.251 --> 0:00:35.011
<v Speaker 1>create Chinatowns, especially a law called the Chinese Exclusion Act

0:00:35.171 --> 0:00:39.330
<v Speaker 1>passed in eighteen eighty two. This act banned Chinese workers

0:00:39.331 --> 0:00:43.091
<v Speaker 1>from entering the country and it prohibited Chinese immigrants from

0:00:43.091 --> 0:00:47.171
<v Speaker 1>becoming citizens. And it wasn't until nineteen sixty five that

0:00:47.291 --> 0:00:51.731
<v Speaker 1>immigration quotas based on ethnicity were finally banned. In Chinatowns

0:00:51.851 --> 0:01:00.971
<v Speaker 1>truly became bustling family neighborhoods. I can't think of anyone

0:01:01.011 --> 0:01:04.011
<v Speaker 1>better to talk with about this history than Judge Denny Chin.

0:01:04.691 --> 0:01:07.131
<v Speaker 1>Not only did he and his family live through this history,

0:01:07.450 --> 0:01:10.851
<v Speaker 1>he now teaches it to law students and lave lawyers.

0:01:11.810 --> 0:01:14.531
<v Speaker 1>Judge Denny Chin sits on the United States Court of

0:01:14.571 --> 0:01:17.651
<v Speaker 1>Appeals for the Second Circuit, a court that's right below

0:01:17.651 --> 0:01:21.571
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court. Over the course of his career, Judge

0:01:21.691 --> 0:01:26.131
<v Speaker 1>Chen has overseen many high profile trials, including the two

0:01:26.131 --> 0:01:31.411
<v Speaker 1>thousand and nine trial against financial fraudster Bernie Maidall. He's

0:01:31.491 --> 0:01:35.411
<v Speaker 1>taught courses on Asian American legal history at Fordham University,

0:01:35.891 --> 0:01:38.971
<v Speaker 1>Harvard and Yale, and he's the co author of a

0:01:39.011 --> 0:01:44.451
<v Speaker 1>forthcoming textbook called Asian Americans and the Law. In addition

0:01:44.531 --> 0:01:46.971
<v Speaker 1>to all of this, as you'll hear, Judge Chen has

0:01:47.011 --> 0:01:50.091
<v Speaker 1>also written and performed a series of re enactments of

0:01:50.251 --> 0:01:55.451
<v Speaker 1>historic cases involving Asian American litigants. I talked to him

0:01:55.571 --> 0:01:58.891
<v Speaker 1>about how those litigants have shaped American law and challenged

0:01:58.931 --> 0:02:06.211
<v Speaker 1>the status quo. We met in his chambers at the

0:02:06.251 --> 0:02:09.331
<v Speaker 1>Thurgood Marshall Courthouse in Lower Manhattan.

0:02:09.451 --> 0:02:12.851
<v Speaker 2>And we are actually sitting in chambers once occupied by

0:02:12.891 --> 0:02:17.250
<v Speaker 2>Thurgood Marshall himself when he was a judge on our

0:02:17.370 --> 0:02:21.891
<v Speaker 2>court in the sixties. He actually sat in these very chambers,

0:02:22.451 --> 0:02:25.571
<v Speaker 2>and it is an incredible honor for me to be

0:02:25.651 --> 0:02:29.611
<v Speaker 2>sitting where the great Thurgood Marshall himself once sat.

0:02:30.091 --> 0:02:33.491
<v Speaker 1>Judge Chen was born in Hong Kong in nineteen fifty six.

0:02:33.531 --> 0:02:35.691
<v Speaker 1>When he was two years old, his family moved to

0:02:35.691 --> 0:02:39.731
<v Speaker 1>New York City. When they arrived, they reunited with his grandfather,

0:02:40.091 --> 0:02:43.090
<v Speaker 1>who had already been living in Manhattan's Chinatown for decades.

0:02:44.011 --> 0:02:48.491
<v Speaker 2>My grandfather lived in one of those railroad apartments on

0:02:48.571 --> 0:02:53.131
<v Speaker 2>Bayard Street and in each room there would be a

0:02:53.171 --> 0:02:58.331
<v Speaker 2>single man without his family, but they were sharing the apartment,

0:02:58.611 --> 0:03:02.091
<v Speaker 2>and my grandfather, like the others, each month he would

0:03:02.131 --> 0:03:06.731
<v Speaker 2>send a money order home to his family in Hong

0:03:06.851 --> 0:03:13.651
<v Speaker 2>Kong or China. He came to this country illegally in

0:03:13.771 --> 0:03:19.411
<v Speaker 2>nineteen sixteen. Back then there were Chinese exclusion laws on

0:03:19.651 --> 0:03:22.411
<v Speaker 2>the books, and you could not come into this country

0:03:22.491 --> 0:03:26.210
<v Speaker 2>at all if you were Chinese unless you were the

0:03:26.251 --> 0:03:28.651
<v Speaker 2>son of a US citizen. You may have heard the

0:03:28.771 --> 0:03:33.651
<v Speaker 2>term paper sons. My grandfather was a paper son. He

0:03:33.771 --> 0:03:38.011
<v Speaker 2>bought a piece of paper pretending to be the son

0:03:38.131 --> 0:03:41.211
<v Speaker 2>of a US citizen, and that's how he was admitted

0:03:41.331 --> 0:03:45.851
<v Speaker 2>to this country. And he worked as a waiter in

0:03:46.051 --> 0:03:50.051
<v Speaker 2>Chinese restaurants. He went back to China only two times,

0:03:50.851 --> 0:03:55.491
<v Speaker 2>first in the nineteen twenties when he got married, second

0:03:55.611 --> 0:03:59.211
<v Speaker 2>in the nineteen thirties when my father was born, and

0:03:59.331 --> 0:04:02.851
<v Speaker 2>both times he had to leave his family behind because

0:04:02.891 --> 0:04:07.451
<v Speaker 2>of the immigration laws. But in nineteen forty seven he

0:04:07.571 --> 0:04:11.011
<v Speaker 2>became a US citizen. And actually on that wall there

0:04:11.931 --> 0:04:17.251
<v Speaker 2>I have his naturalization certificate. Oh wow, and he was yeah,

0:04:17.291 --> 0:04:20.010
<v Speaker 2>And I believe I'm not one hundred percent sure, but

0:04:20.051 --> 0:04:24.210
<v Speaker 2>I believe he was sworn in as a US citizen

0:04:24.371 --> 0:04:27.451
<v Speaker 2>in this courthouse, in this building. On the back of it,

0:04:27.451 --> 0:04:31.130
<v Speaker 2>it says sworn to an open court. In nineteen forty seven,

0:04:31.491 --> 0:04:34.651
<v Speaker 2>there was only one courthouse, and this is it. And

0:04:34.731 --> 0:04:38.731
<v Speaker 2>because he became a citizen, and because the immigration laws

0:04:39.171 --> 0:04:43.010
<v Speaker 2>were finally relaxed, he was able to bring us here

0:04:43.651 --> 0:04:48.811
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen fifty six. My father, my mother, my older sister,

0:04:48.891 --> 0:04:51.331
<v Speaker 2>and my younger brother. We came in in fifty six.

0:04:51.851 --> 0:04:54.891
<v Speaker 2>And there was a law passed in nineteen fifty three

0:04:55.611 --> 0:04:58.731
<v Speaker 2>called the Refugee Relief Act, and it was intended to

0:04:58.771 --> 0:05:04.171
<v Speaker 2>help people fleeing from communism, and my parents fled China,

0:05:04.971 --> 0:05:07.291
<v Speaker 2>wound up in Hong Kong, where they met and fell

0:05:07.331 --> 0:05:10.371
<v Speaker 2>in love, and we were admitted under that statute. So

0:05:11.211 --> 0:05:16.010
<v Speaker 2>we were actually political refugees. And when I was a

0:05:16.051 --> 0:05:19.851
<v Speaker 2>district judge and occasionally now even as a circuit judge,

0:05:20.091 --> 0:05:23.611
<v Speaker 2>I've been able to do the naturalization ceremony to swear

0:05:23.651 --> 0:05:27.531
<v Speaker 2>in new American citizens. And I take that certificate off

0:05:27.531 --> 0:05:29.731
<v Speaker 2>the wall frame and all, and I show it to

0:05:29.771 --> 0:05:32.771
<v Speaker 2>them and I tell them the story of my grandfather

0:05:33.051 --> 0:05:33.851
<v Speaker 2>and my parents.

0:05:34.331 --> 0:05:38.571
<v Speaker 1>Wow, that's really that's really moving. And your mom was

0:05:38.611 --> 0:05:39.931
<v Speaker 1>a garment worker in.

0:05:40.291 --> 0:05:43.771
<v Speaker 2>My mother initially when we were young, she made jewelry

0:05:43.891 --> 0:05:46.171
<v Speaker 2>at home. She would be paid by the peace, and

0:05:46.211 --> 0:05:50.891
<v Speaker 2>then eventually she became a seamstress in Chinatown garment factories,

0:05:51.051 --> 0:05:54.531
<v Speaker 2>and my father was a cook in Chinese restaurants. They

0:05:54.690 --> 0:05:59.731
<v Speaker 2>both my mother spoke virtually no English. My father learned

0:06:00.131 --> 0:06:00.450
<v Speaker 2>a bit.

0:06:00.771 --> 0:06:03.651
<v Speaker 1>Do you have memories of as a kid, like visiting Chinatown,

0:06:03.651 --> 0:06:06.330
<v Speaker 1>Like what Chinatown was like and the garment factories and such.

0:06:06.611 --> 0:06:11.531
<v Speaker 2>Chinatown was certainly a center of life for both my parents.

0:06:12.371 --> 0:06:17.331
<v Speaker 2>I do have memories. Like many Chinese and other Asian families,

0:06:17.971 --> 0:06:21.851
<v Speaker 2>we went to language school. My sister and I went

0:06:21.891 --> 0:06:26.051
<v Speaker 2>to Chinatown every day after regular school. We'd get on

0:06:26.051 --> 0:06:30.331
<v Speaker 2>the subway, go down to Chinatown and take Chinese lessons.

0:06:30.411 --> 0:06:34.571
<v Speaker 2>We did that for a while every day. Yeah, we

0:06:34.611 --> 0:06:38.971
<v Speaker 2>spoke twice on these originally, but this would have been Cantonese,

0:06:39.051 --> 0:06:43.971
<v Speaker 2>and eventually it became once a week. But I remember Chinatown.

0:06:43.971 --> 0:06:48.291
<v Speaker 2>Then my grandfather eventually retired, but he would hang out

0:06:48.331 --> 0:06:51.211
<v Speaker 2>in a hardware store in Chinatown, like he'd.

0:06:51.131 --> 0:06:53.011
<v Speaker 1>Just hang out there, like chatting away with the other

0:06:53.091 --> 0:06:54.731
<v Speaker 1>older guys exactly.

0:06:55.411 --> 0:06:58.931
<v Speaker 2>And in fact, when I was at Princeton. I did

0:06:58.971 --> 0:07:02.251
<v Speaker 2>my senior thesis on called the Old Ones of Chinatown,

0:07:02.331 --> 0:07:05.531
<v Speaker 2>and it was on the Chinatown Senior Citizens and I

0:07:05.571 --> 0:07:09.251
<v Speaker 2>took some photos. I did some interviewing of people who

0:07:09.451 --> 0:07:16.811
<v Speaker 2>I and different facilities and services in Chinatown. I enjoyed

0:07:16.811 --> 0:07:19.651
<v Speaker 2>doing my thesis, but I wound up going to law school,

0:07:20.131 --> 0:07:22.251
<v Speaker 2>largely because I didn't know what to do with myself

0:07:22.291 --> 0:07:22.811
<v Speaker 2>at the time.

0:07:23.131 --> 0:07:25.491
<v Speaker 1>What did you like about the law and you went

0:07:25.571 --> 0:07:26.131
<v Speaker 1>to law school?

0:07:28.011 --> 0:07:31.531
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, I went to law school unsure of

0:07:31.571 --> 0:07:33.571
<v Speaker 2>whether I would become a lawyer. I had never met

0:07:33.571 --> 0:07:36.811
<v Speaker 2>a lawyer, certainly not a judge as I was growing up.

0:07:38.091 --> 0:07:40.811
<v Speaker 2>My parents must have had lawyers to help them with

0:07:41.571 --> 0:07:45.891
<v Speaker 2>the process of becoming naturalized, but I never met any

0:07:46.491 --> 0:07:51.731
<v Speaker 2>and went to Fordham Law School. That first summer I

0:07:51.811 --> 0:07:55.771
<v Speaker 2>got an internship with a judge. In this courthouse, I

0:07:55.811 --> 0:08:00.851
<v Speaker 2>saw some trials. I remember a bank robbery trial. The

0:08:00.971 --> 0:08:05.491
<v Speaker 2>judge let me draft some opinions which were then edited

0:08:05.531 --> 0:08:10.131
<v Speaker 2>by a law clerk. Being at the center of the

0:08:10.131 --> 0:08:15.411
<v Speaker 2>administration of justice was something I very much enjoyed, and

0:08:15.451 --> 0:08:17.891
<v Speaker 2>I decided that summer that I wanted to come back

0:08:17.931 --> 0:08:22.411
<v Speaker 2>one day and be a judge in the courthouse, and then,

0:08:22.571 --> 0:08:25.771
<v Speaker 2>of course, many years later, here I am again right

0:08:25.811 --> 0:08:29.211
<v Speaker 2>on the edge of China, exactly as a federal judge.

0:08:29.611 --> 0:08:32.851
<v Speaker 2>At one point when I was a district judge in

0:08:32.891 --> 0:08:36.090
<v Speaker 2>the other building, and right across the street from the

0:08:36.131 --> 0:08:41.050
<v Speaker 2>other courthouse is Columbus Park. We played basketball there once

0:08:41.131 --> 0:08:43.851
<v Speaker 2>a week at seven point thirty in the morning. We'd

0:08:43.930 --> 0:08:48.090
<v Speaker 2>have a pickup game. We'd have prosecutors, law clerks, a

0:08:48.170 --> 0:08:52.771
<v Speaker 2>variety of people in New York City playground basketball. There

0:08:52.810 --> 0:08:56.290
<v Speaker 2>was one full court, and we wanted to run full court,

0:08:56.570 --> 0:09:00.690
<v Speaker 2>but there were senior citizens doing tai chi, there were

0:09:00.690 --> 0:09:06.330
<v Speaker 2>other community folks, and there was a little bit of competitiveness. However,

0:09:07.050 --> 0:09:10.450
<v Speaker 2>I started getting a lot of attention with the made

0:09:10.491 --> 0:09:13.891
<v Speaker 2>Off case and getting nominated to the circuit, and the

0:09:13.970 --> 0:09:18.251
<v Speaker 2>Chinatown newspapers would cover this, and at some point the

0:09:18.290 --> 0:09:21.490
<v Speaker 2>folks realized who I was, and then they started offering

0:09:21.530 --> 0:09:24.370
<v Speaker 2>me tea and cookies in the morning and letting us

0:09:24.891 --> 0:09:28.491
<v Speaker 2>have the full court. And that's why.

0:09:31.251 --> 0:09:34.331
<v Speaker 1>After the break, how Judge Chin began writing and performing

0:09:34.410 --> 0:09:54.491
<v Speaker 1>reenactments of famous cases brought by Asian Americans. I'm back

0:09:54.530 --> 0:09:57.851
<v Speaker 1>with Judge Denny Chin a while back, he and his

0:09:57.891 --> 0:10:01.891
<v Speaker 1>wife Kathy Herodicin started writing and staging re enactments of

0:10:01.970 --> 0:10:06.210
<v Speaker 1>famous cases involving Asian American litigants. They performed one every

0:10:06.290 --> 0:10:09.371
<v Speaker 1>year at the National Asian Pacific Bar Association in New York.

0:10:10.170 --> 0:10:13.891
<v Speaker 1>I asked Judge Chin about how exactly these reenactments come together.

0:10:14.930 --> 0:10:24.730
<v Speaker 2>We take excerpts from trial transcripts, judges' opinions, briefs, historical

0:10:24.810 --> 0:10:29.651
<v Speaker 2>newspaper articles. We weave those excerpts in with original narration

0:10:30.170 --> 0:10:34.290
<v Speaker 2>that Kathy and I wright, and then we present these

0:10:34.330 --> 0:10:38.330
<v Speaker 2>with a cast of lawyers who are would be actors,

0:10:38.810 --> 0:10:41.011
<v Speaker 2>many lawyers, particularly trial lawyers.

0:10:42.011 --> 0:10:44.250
<v Speaker 1>You know, this part of it is the performance.

0:10:44.330 --> 0:10:47.810
<v Speaker 2>Part of it is performing, and so these are performances,

0:10:48.251 --> 0:10:53.170
<v Speaker 2>but they raise issues that continue to be important. They

0:10:53.251 --> 0:10:59.931
<v Speaker 2>tell compelling stories about the early Asian Americans. For example,

0:11:00.011 --> 0:11:06.450
<v Speaker 2>we have a really interesting reenactment about twenty two lud

0:11:06.530 --> 0:11:12.771
<v Speaker 2>as an LWD Chinese women, allegedly lued I should say.

0:11:13.210 --> 0:11:17.131
<v Speaker 2>They arrived on a boat in San Francisco in the

0:11:17.210 --> 0:11:21.970
<v Speaker 2>eighteen eighties, and the California authorities wouldn't let them off

0:11:22.570 --> 0:11:26.530
<v Speaker 2>unless they posted a five hundred dollar bond. Each five

0:11:26.570 --> 0:11:30.210
<v Speaker 2>hundred dollars was allowed money back then? Why why wouldn't

0:11:30.210 --> 0:11:33.451
<v Speaker 2>they let them off? Well, they were women traveling alone,

0:11:33.530 --> 0:11:36.570
<v Speaker 2>and they were Chinese, and they were suspected of being lewd,

0:11:37.170 --> 0:11:40.491
<v Speaker 2>of being prostitutes. And there was a trial on whether

0:11:40.530 --> 0:11:43.530
<v Speaker 2>they were prostitutes. And the case went up to the

0:11:43.530 --> 0:11:46.170
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court of the United States. And it's a case

0:11:46.251 --> 0:11:50.491
<v Speaker 2>that is still raising important issues. How was it decided

0:11:51.330 --> 0:11:54.611
<v Speaker 2>the women won? Oh that's good, Well, that's good. But

0:11:54.651 --> 0:11:58.970
<v Speaker 2>what happened to them? They probably were being trafficked. They

0:11:59.090 --> 0:12:05.571
<v Speaker 2>probably were the victims of trafficking. They were represented by

0:12:05.570 --> 0:12:08.611
<v Speaker 2>a very good lawyer, a former judge. How could they

0:12:08.651 --> 0:12:11.330
<v Speaker 2>afford to hire such a good lawyer?

0:12:12.651 --> 0:12:13.331
<v Speaker 1>The gangs?

0:12:13.611 --> 0:12:17.491
<v Speaker 2>It was probably the trafficker or the gangs who wanted

0:12:17.530 --> 0:12:23.771
<v Speaker 2>to protect their investment. But can a state take matters

0:12:23.851 --> 0:12:28.771
<v Speaker 2>involving immigration into its own hands when it feels the

0:12:28.771 --> 0:12:32.930
<v Speaker 2>federal government isn't doing enough? And that was very much

0:12:33.570 --> 0:12:37.690
<v Speaker 2>an issue a few years ago. Now it's the opposite.

0:12:37.771 --> 0:12:41.450
<v Speaker 2>Now it's the federal government thinking states are chewing too

0:12:41.491 --> 0:12:45.250
<v Speaker 2>much to interfere with the immigration authorities. But you can

0:12:45.251 --> 0:12:52.450
<v Speaker 2>see how these legal issues are still important. So how

0:12:52.491 --> 0:12:54.491
<v Speaker 2>did I get into this I was a member of

0:12:54.530 --> 0:12:58.731
<v Speaker 2>something called the Federal Bar Council in of Court and

0:12:58.810 --> 0:13:02.811
<v Speaker 2>when I joined, each month a team led by a

0:13:02.891 --> 0:13:06.491
<v Speaker 2>judge would do some kind of presentation. We did the

0:13:06.530 --> 0:13:11.690
<v Speaker 2>trial of fl Rosenberg, and incidentally I I played mister

0:13:11.891 --> 0:13:16.450
<v Speaker 2>rosen Perk because it was the smallest part, and we

0:13:16.491 --> 0:13:19.771
<v Speaker 2>reenacted the sentencing and I had the death sentence imposed

0:13:19.810 --> 0:13:23.210
<v Speaker 2>on me, and it was no fun, even though it

0:13:23.251 --> 0:13:26.970
<v Speaker 2>was pretend having the death penalty impost on me and

0:13:27.891 --> 0:13:29.491
<v Speaker 2>it was It was actually very good for me as

0:13:29.530 --> 0:13:32.170
<v Speaker 2>a judge. I was a judge like it. Yeah, I

0:13:32.210 --> 0:13:34.771
<v Speaker 2>mean I played the defendant and I had the lawyers

0:13:34.771 --> 0:13:37.570
<v Speaker 2>pointing at me and saying I was stupid but not criminal,

0:13:37.690 --> 0:13:41.970
<v Speaker 2>that kind of thing, And it gave me some appreciation

0:13:42.330 --> 0:13:45.891
<v Speaker 2>of the difficulties of going through the process.

0:13:46.371 --> 0:13:49.491
<v Speaker 1>Wow, in a way, like what you're yeah, what you

0:13:49.570 --> 0:13:51.730
<v Speaker 1>do with those reenactments is like what we're doing. Did

0:13:51.731 --> 0:13:53.690
<v Speaker 1>we trd to do with this podcast, which is taking

0:13:53.731 --> 0:13:56.690
<v Speaker 1>the court docs, taking codes from people taking a legal

0:13:56.771 --> 0:14:01.490
<v Speaker 1>case and kind of like reenacting it. Understand it.

0:14:01.651 --> 0:14:04.611
<v Speaker 2>We think of it as courtroom theater. There's a lot

0:14:04.651 --> 0:14:08.091
<v Speaker 2>of drama in the courtroom, but beyond that, you know,

0:14:08.131 --> 0:14:11.170
<v Speaker 2>there are compelling stories about the people, and then there

0:14:11.170 --> 0:14:13.891
<v Speaker 2>are important issues that are still important today, whether it's

0:14:13.970 --> 0:14:18.971
<v Speaker 2>human trafficking or racial violence. Now, because of all these

0:14:19.051 --> 0:14:23.171
<v Speaker 2>reenactments of the Asian American cases, I developed a real

0:14:23.291 --> 0:14:26.411
<v Speaker 2>love for Asian American legal history.

0:14:26.251 --> 0:14:29.571
<v Speaker 1>Like what have you found is unique about the Asian

0:14:29.571 --> 0:14:32.291
<v Speaker 1>American experience and the laws focusing on that.

0:14:33.931 --> 0:14:38.771
<v Speaker 2>Well. First of all, even though the numbers of Asian

0:14:38.771 --> 0:14:43.811
<v Speaker 2>Americans in the early days the Chinese in the US

0:14:43.891 --> 0:14:49.571
<v Speaker 2>population was very, very low, there were lots of cases,

0:14:49.571 --> 0:14:52.251
<v Speaker 2>brought quite a few cases all the way to the

0:14:52.291 --> 0:14:55.971
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court. Asian Americans have been at the center of

0:14:56.210 --> 0:15:04.771
<v Speaker 2>many many different issues, immigration, citizenship, violence, there were many massacres,

0:15:05.090 --> 0:15:11.651
<v Speaker 2>the civil rights cases currently in addition to the pandemic

0:15:11.731 --> 0:15:16.571
<v Speaker 2>and the anti Asian violence, affirmative action, and the early

0:15:16.691 --> 0:15:22.731
<v Speaker 2>litigants were folks of very limited means, women suspected of

0:15:22.771 --> 0:15:30.571
<v Speaker 2>being prostitutes, cooks, laundrymen. One of the first cases to

0:15:30.611 --> 0:15:34.411
<v Speaker 2>be studied in con law is the laundryman case. San

0:15:34.451 --> 0:15:37.850
<v Speaker 2>Francisco passed the law that if you wanted to run

0:15:38.210 --> 0:15:42.371
<v Speaker 2>a laundry, it had to be in a stone or

0:15:42.411 --> 0:15:45.970
<v Speaker 2>brick building. You couldn't have it in a wooden building,

0:15:46.531 --> 0:15:51.970
<v Speaker 2>ostensibly because of the fear of fires. There was an exception.

0:15:52.090 --> 0:15:56.331
<v Speaker 2>You could apply for an exception so that you could

0:15:56.371 --> 0:16:00.331
<v Speaker 2>continue to operate your laundry in a wooden building, and

0:16:02.531 --> 0:16:06.611
<v Speaker 2>two hundred Chinese applied for the exception. There were many,

0:16:06.611 --> 0:16:11.371
<v Speaker 2>many Chinese laundries in San Francisco. Every single one was denied.

0:16:12.371 --> 0:16:19.091
<v Speaker 2>There were eighty applications by non Chinese, everyone but one

0:16:19.451 --> 0:16:23.330
<v Speaker 2>was granted. The one that was not granted was a woman.

0:16:25.691 --> 0:16:29.651
<v Speaker 2>And so it's you know, a law can be discriminatory

0:16:30.251 --> 0:16:34.931
<v Speaker 2>as apply even though on its face it appears neutral,

0:16:35.210 --> 0:16:39.331
<v Speaker 2>it's applied in a way that is discriminatory. So that

0:16:39.451 --> 0:16:42.291
<v Speaker 2>was a very important ruling that the Supreme Court. So

0:16:42.330 --> 0:16:44.811
<v Speaker 2>it's very important not just for the Chinese, but for

0:16:44.931 --> 0:16:47.771
<v Speaker 2>many You can't take a law that is on its

0:16:47.811 --> 0:16:51.371
<v Speaker 2>face neutral and apply it in a discriminatory way. And

0:16:52.131 --> 0:16:57.091
<v Speaker 2>it also said that equal protection applies not just to

0:16:57.131 --> 0:17:02.330
<v Speaker 2>citizens but to all persons. And even though most all

0:17:02.691 --> 0:17:06.411
<v Speaker 2>of these Chinese launchermen were not US citizens, they were

0:17:06.451 --> 0:17:11.051
<v Speaker 2>still entitle to the protection of the US Constitution. So

0:17:11.131 --> 0:17:15.171
<v Speaker 2>this is a great example compelling stories that there were

0:17:15.251 --> 0:17:19.531
<v Speaker 2>actually two laundrymen involved. They had run their laundries for

0:17:19.611 --> 0:17:23.931
<v Speaker 2>decades in San Francisco. People limited means, yet they were

0:17:23.931 --> 0:17:30.691
<v Speaker 2>bringing these really innovative, creative legal theories. These were important

0:17:30.771 --> 0:17:34.371
<v Speaker 2>rights and there were benefits not just for them but

0:17:34.451 --> 0:17:38.411
<v Speaker 2>for many, many others. And so, you know, doing the

0:17:38.491 --> 0:17:43.011
<v Speaker 2>reenactments helped me really learn this Asian American legal history.

0:17:44.051 --> 0:17:47.531
<v Speaker 2>And then at some point I decided that we needed

0:17:47.651 --> 0:17:51.171
<v Speaker 2>to have a seminar to teach it. My colleague and

0:17:51.211 --> 0:17:56.370
<v Speaker 2>I at Fordham Law School in twenty seventeen developed a

0:17:56.411 --> 0:18:01.131
<v Speaker 2>seminar on Asian Americans and the Law. There are now

0:18:02.571 --> 0:18:07.291
<v Speaker 2>fourteen or more law schools using our syllabus, at least

0:18:07.291 --> 0:18:11.291
<v Speaker 2>as a start, using our reading tearials and offering a

0:18:11.331 --> 0:18:17.691
<v Speaker 2>similar summinar on Asian Americans and the Law.

0:18:20.371 --> 0:18:23.291
<v Speaker 1>Coming up after the break, Judge ten and I talk

0:18:23.331 --> 0:18:26.851
<v Speaker 1>about the Chinese Exclusion Act and the violence it unleashed.

0:18:40.131 --> 0:18:42.771
<v Speaker 1>One of the really fun parts of making the season

0:18:42.891 --> 0:18:46.251
<v Speaker 1>of the Chinatown Sting was getting to record the movie

0:18:46.491 --> 0:18:50.571
<v Speaker 1>and Broadway musical actor Kelly Leong. He's been the voice

0:18:50.651 --> 0:18:53.651
<v Speaker 1>of the court docs in the series. When he came in,

0:18:53.891 --> 0:18:56.251
<v Speaker 1>it was just clear that we were in the presence

0:18:56.291 --> 0:18:59.090
<v Speaker 1>of a talented professional, and we also asked him to

0:18:59.131 --> 0:19:02.931
<v Speaker 1>record a portion of the original language of the Chinese

0:19:03.011 --> 0:19:07.330
<v Speaker 1>Exclusion Act that Congress passed in eighteen eighty two. I

0:19:07.371 --> 0:19:10.011
<v Speaker 1>brought that recording with me when I interviewed Judge Chen,

0:19:10.731 --> 0:19:13.931
<v Speaker 1>and I played it for him. Here's that reenactment from

0:19:13.971 --> 0:19:14.531
<v Speaker 1>Taly Leon.

0:19:15.571 --> 0:19:19.051
<v Speaker 3>Any Chinese person found unlawfully within the United States shall

0:19:19.091 --> 0:19:22.091
<v Speaker 3>be caused to be removed. Therefrom to the country from

0:19:22.091 --> 0:19:25.011
<v Speaker 3>whence he came by direction of the President of the

0:19:25.091 --> 0:19:28.091
<v Speaker 3>United States and at the cost of the United States,

0:19:28.451 --> 0:19:32.291
<v Speaker 3>after being brought before some justice judge or commissioner of

0:19:32.291 --> 0:19:35.051
<v Speaker 3>a court of the United States and found to be

0:19:35.091 --> 0:19:38.931
<v Speaker 3>one not lawfully entitled to be or remain in the

0:19:39.051 --> 0:19:40.411
<v Speaker 3>United States.

0:19:41.051 --> 0:19:43.610
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, I guess that's what you think when you

0:19:43.651 --> 0:19:44.610
<v Speaker 1>hear those words.

0:19:44.931 --> 0:19:49.891
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's very moving to hear the words, and that

0:19:49.931 --> 0:19:54.850
<v Speaker 2>person read them very well. The Chinese Exclusion Act of

0:19:55.091 --> 0:20:00.850
<v Speaker 2>eighteen eighty two and the subsequent amendments and extensions is

0:20:00.891 --> 0:20:05.451
<v Speaker 2>a very important part of Asian American legal history. Why

0:20:05.851 --> 0:20:11.211
<v Speaker 2>was this happening, What was driving Congress to pass this.

0:20:12.291 --> 0:20:18.691
<v Speaker 2>It's often overlooked that the China towns contributed greatly to

0:20:20.291 --> 0:20:24.091
<v Speaker 2>the broader American society as well. You know, the trade

0:20:26.131 --> 0:20:31.131
<v Speaker 2>shipping goods back to China, bringing goods from China. There

0:20:31.131 --> 0:20:36.051
<v Speaker 2>were all sorts of taxes imposed on the Chinese, and

0:20:36.091 --> 0:20:40.811
<v Speaker 2>the Chinese paid, you know, the Chinese contributed. There were

0:20:40.851 --> 0:20:44.731
<v Speaker 2>massacres of Chinese gold miners, but many of the early

0:20:44.811 --> 0:20:50.091
<v Speaker 2>Chinese gold miners would come in after a location or

0:20:50.131 --> 0:20:53.971
<v Speaker 2>a mine had been abandoned by the original miners, and

0:20:54.011 --> 0:20:57.491
<v Speaker 2>then they would try to like do the leftovers almost

0:20:57.571 --> 0:21:00.131
<v Speaker 2>but they would find ways to get more gold out

0:21:00.171 --> 0:21:05.090
<v Speaker 2>of it. And I don't know, and you know, originally

0:21:05.451 --> 0:21:10.011
<v Speaker 2>the Chinese were welcomed. There was more curiosity city than

0:21:10.091 --> 0:21:15.771
<v Speaker 2>anything else. But then in time these feelings grew. Part

0:21:15.771 --> 0:21:20.291
<v Speaker 2>of it was political. When Governor Bigler was running for reelection,

0:21:20.891 --> 0:21:24.571
<v Speaker 2>he seized on the Chinese question and he was in California.

0:21:24.691 --> 0:21:27.651
<v Speaker 2>He was in California, he was facing reelection and he

0:21:27.851 --> 0:21:31.891
<v Speaker 2>used this as a campaign theme. What the Chinese are doing,

0:21:31.971 --> 0:21:35.211
<v Speaker 2>They're taking our goal, sending it back, et cetera. You

0:21:35.251 --> 0:21:42.491
<v Speaker 2>could see efforts being used, politicians and others using these

0:21:42.531 --> 0:21:49.451
<v Speaker 2>things to rally the masses. In the eighteen eighties, many

0:21:49.651 --> 0:21:55.291
<v Speaker 2>communities around the country literally drove out all their Chinese residents.

0:21:57.571 --> 0:22:01.491
<v Speaker 2>The Chinese were expelled from the towns, and one of

0:22:01.531 --> 0:22:06.610
<v Speaker 2>them was Eureka. In California, there were a prince and

0:22:06.651 --> 0:22:09.411
<v Speaker 2>professor has done research on this. There were one hundred

0:22:09.491 --> 0:22:12.650
<v Speaker 2>it's sixty eight communities at least that drove out all

0:22:12.691 --> 0:22:16.931
<v Speaker 2>their Chinese residents, like the West Coast on the West

0:22:16.971 --> 0:22:27.251
<v Speaker 2>Coast California, but also further north Seattle, Bellingham, Washington. Wasn't

0:22:27.291 --> 0:22:32.171
<v Speaker 2>just the Chinese and Bellingham, it was the South Asians.

0:22:32.771 --> 0:22:36.731
<v Speaker 2>Many of them were Sikh, although they were called Hindus

0:22:37.331 --> 0:22:42.251
<v Speaker 2>at the time, and in Eureka the numbers vary, but

0:22:42.331 --> 0:22:44.691
<v Speaker 2>it was two hundred, three hundred, As many as eight

0:22:44.731 --> 0:22:49.251
<v Speaker 2>hundred Chinese were driven out of town.

0:22:50.011 --> 0:22:52.131
<v Speaker 1>What was the driving out? How did the driving out work?

0:22:52.171 --> 0:22:52.651
<v Speaker 3>What was it?

0:22:54.011 --> 0:22:57.051
<v Speaker 2>Several hundred people banned it together but including leaders of

0:22:57.091 --> 0:23:01.771
<v Speaker 2>the community, and physically forced them out and put them

0:23:01.811 --> 0:23:04.571
<v Speaker 2>on boats and sent them off to San Francisco. Oh well,

0:23:04.931 --> 0:23:07.491
<v Speaker 2>many of them were where could they go? And many

0:23:07.491 --> 0:23:12.131
<v Speaker 2>of them wound up heading east. There were some lawsuits

0:23:12.131 --> 0:23:16.251
<v Speaker 2>brought as a result of Eureka, and there was one

0:23:16.331 --> 0:23:21.691
<v Speaker 2>case where I think it was approximately fifty one residents

0:23:21.731 --> 0:23:26.371
<v Speaker 2>and merchants. Chinese residents and merchants brought what was essentially

0:23:26.411 --> 0:23:27.251
<v Speaker 2>a class action.

0:23:28.131 --> 0:23:29.611
<v Speaker 1>Were there class actions already then.

0:23:29.651 --> 0:23:31.850
<v Speaker 2>No, there were class actions back then. There was no

0:23:31.971 --> 0:23:34.411
<v Speaker 2>such thing as RUL twenty three of the Federal Rules

0:23:34.411 --> 0:23:37.451
<v Speaker 2>of Civil Procedure. So this is yet another example of

0:23:38.011 --> 0:23:41.850
<v Speaker 2>creative innovative lawyering. They filled out forms and put in

0:23:41.931 --> 0:23:45.931
<v Speaker 2>their individual details and then put them together into one complaint,

0:23:46.331 --> 0:23:48.451
<v Speaker 2>and so it literally it was like a class action.

0:23:48.571 --> 0:23:48.811
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:23:49.531 --> 0:23:51.411
<v Speaker 2>Two of the fifty one who were part of the

0:23:51.491 --> 0:23:54.771
<v Speaker 2>complaint were women, and one of them, in her form

0:23:54.811 --> 0:23:59.571
<v Speaker 2>put in parentheses woman. She wanted to tell the court

0:23:59.651 --> 0:24:03.091
<v Speaker 2>that she was a woman. Now that case was eventually

0:24:03.131 --> 0:24:03.811
<v Speaker 2>dismissed and.

0:24:03.771 --> 0:24:05.531
<v Speaker 1>They were asking to be able to stay in Eureka.

0:24:05.691 --> 0:24:08.331
<v Speaker 2>No, they were asking for money damages. But so these

0:24:08.411 --> 0:24:14.251
<v Speaker 2>individuals sued damages. And another creative innovative aspect about this,

0:24:14.371 --> 0:24:18.451
<v Speaker 2>they were trying to hold the city of Eureka responsible

0:24:18.531 --> 0:24:22.691
<v Speaker 2>for failing to control the rioters. Yeah, and they were

0:24:22.731 --> 0:24:26.330
<v Speaker 2>asserting this. It failed, but it sent a message that

0:24:26.651 --> 0:24:29.651
<v Speaker 2>we're going to fight back, you know. And so there

0:24:29.691 --> 0:24:35.051
<v Speaker 2>were many instances of the Chinese being driven out of

0:24:35.091 --> 0:24:40.571
<v Speaker 2>the community in Seattle. The Rioters rounded up the Chinese,

0:24:40.691 --> 0:24:44.171
<v Speaker 2>brought them down to the wharf. They collected money to

0:24:44.251 --> 0:24:47.931
<v Speaker 2>pay for their passages on a boat so that they

0:24:47.971 --> 0:24:53.571
<v Speaker 2>could be sent off, and they were even willing to

0:24:53.571 --> 0:24:54.731
<v Speaker 2>put in their own money.

0:24:54.531 --> 0:24:56.731
<v Speaker 1>To do this. I guess I'm wondering, of course, your

0:24:56.731 --> 0:24:59.011
<v Speaker 1>students are going to, you know, come away with a

0:24:59.051 --> 0:25:01.850
<v Speaker 1>lot from the class. But if, like you know, years

0:25:01.891 --> 0:25:04.251
<v Speaker 1>down the line, when they're remembering their Asian Americans in

0:25:04.331 --> 0:25:06.171
<v Speaker 1>the wall class, if they were to just come away

0:25:06.211 --> 0:25:09.011
<v Speaker 1>with like one sentence, their one memory from that class,

0:25:09.611 --> 0:25:11.531
<v Speaker 1>what would you want them to hold on to from

0:25:11.531 --> 0:25:12.211
<v Speaker 1>the experience.

0:25:13.091 --> 0:25:18.971
<v Speaker 2>I think Asian American legal history teaches us a lot

0:25:19.131 --> 0:25:26.251
<v Speaker 2>about how the constitution is supposed to work, how sometimes

0:25:26.251 --> 0:25:32.931
<v Speaker 2>it works, but unfortunately, how often it doesn't work. It

0:25:32.971 --> 0:25:40.531
<v Speaker 2>teaches us that committed, resourceful, courageous people can do a

0:25:40.571 --> 0:25:44.491
<v Speaker 2>lot to help make things better.

0:25:45.411 --> 0:25:49.931
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, having studied you know, Asian Americans in the law

0:25:50.091 --> 0:25:55.211
<v Speaker 1>and seeing how, you know, sometimes cases are decided in

0:25:55.291 --> 0:25:57.971
<v Speaker 1>ways in retrospect that seem wrong, or like, how that

0:25:58.011 --> 0:26:00.131
<v Speaker 1>makes you think about your role as a judge in

0:26:00.171 --> 0:26:03.411
<v Speaker 1>a system that is quite platantly from the textbooks imperfect.

0:26:03.851 --> 0:26:06.850
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, our system is imperfect, but I think, based on

0:26:07.211 --> 0:26:09.811
<v Speaker 2>thirty one years of being a judge, I think we

0:26:09.931 --> 0:26:13.251
<v Speaker 2>usually get things right. It works pretty well. It is

0:26:13.291 --> 0:26:18.531
<v Speaker 2>not perfect. Now studying these cases, there are a couple

0:26:18.571 --> 0:26:19.091
<v Speaker 2>of things.

0:26:19.331 --> 0:26:19.531
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:26:19.611 --> 0:26:24.531
<v Speaker 2>One is to be creative and think broadly about things,

0:26:25.531 --> 0:26:34.451
<v Speaker 2>but two is scrutinize things. Don't just blindly defer to

0:26:35.011 --> 0:26:39.610
<v Speaker 2>the executive branch during interment. I do not believe the

0:26:39.651 --> 0:26:48.531
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court sufficiently put the government to its proof. One

0:26:48.611 --> 0:26:51.891
<v Speaker 2>hundred and twenty thousand Japanese Americans on the West coast

0:26:51.971 --> 0:26:58.051
<v Speaker 2>right military necessity. We don't have time to individually consider

0:26:58.931 --> 0:27:03.411
<v Speaker 2>whether someone is a danger a job, a particular Japanese

0:27:03.491 --> 0:27:08.531
<v Speaker 2>person is a danger in terms of espionage and sabotage.

0:27:09.091 --> 0:27:12.851
<v Speaker 2>We don't have time to have hearings or individual consideration.

0:27:13.811 --> 0:27:18.491
<v Speaker 2>And the Court just accepted the government at its word

0:27:19.491 --> 0:27:23.811
<v Speaker 2>instead of pressing back, instead of saying, show us what

0:27:23.811 --> 0:27:28.411
<v Speaker 2>are the examples of sabotage? Take away the children, take

0:27:28.411 --> 0:27:33.971
<v Speaker 2>away the older people, take away the women. Women really

0:27:34.011 --> 0:27:37.571
<v Speaker 2>weren't part of the military then and were less of

0:27:37.611 --> 0:27:41.051
<v Speaker 2>a threat. Two thirds of the one hundred and twenty

0:27:41.051 --> 0:27:44.571
<v Speaker 2>thousand were American citizens. When you start looking at it

0:27:44.611 --> 0:27:48.091
<v Speaker 2>more carefully. Did we actually have the time to give

0:27:48.171 --> 0:27:50.771
<v Speaker 2>them hearings and to look at their at least to

0:27:50.811 --> 0:27:54.851
<v Speaker 2>do an interview of some kind, And instead the government

0:27:54.851 --> 0:27:59.011
<v Speaker 2>took months to build assembly centers and then ten internment camps.

0:28:00.091 --> 0:28:05.011
<v Speaker 2>So you know, one lesson is, don't just accept the

0:28:05.051 --> 0:28:08.611
<v Speaker 2>government at its word. Put it to its proof. That's appropriate.

0:28:08.971 --> 0:28:12.331
<v Speaker 2>And I think we're seeing that these days. Many of

0:28:13.371 --> 0:28:17.291
<v Speaker 2>the lower courts, the trial judges are making decisions where

0:28:17.331 --> 0:28:22.371
<v Speaker 2>I think they are indeed requiring the government to support

0:28:22.451 --> 0:28:27.131
<v Speaker 2>what they are asserting and not just blindly accepting their say.

0:28:27.171 --> 0:28:32.691
<v Speaker 1>So, as I said goodbye to Judge Chin, he stood

0:28:32.771 --> 0:28:35.571
<v Speaker 1>up to find something for me. Something He says he

0:28:35.651 --> 0:28:39.291
<v Speaker 1>never lets anyone leave his chambers without Everyone.

0:28:39.011 --> 0:28:40.531
<v Speaker 2>Should have a pocket constitution.

0:28:40.971 --> 0:28:45.171
<v Speaker 1>Uh, thank you. I so appreciate Judge Jenny Chin taking

0:28:45.251 --> 0:28:47.771
<v Speaker 1>the time to talk with me. He sits on the

0:28:47.891 --> 0:28:50.931
<v Speaker 1>United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and

0:28:50.971 --> 0:28:54.011
<v Speaker 1>he's the co author of a forthcoming textbook called Asian

0:28:54.051 --> 0:29:04.531
<v Speaker 1>Americans and the Law. This episode of the Chinatownsting was

0:29:04.531 --> 0:29:08.331
<v Speaker 1>produced by Sonya Gurwit and edited by Julia Barton. It

0:29:08.451 --> 0:29:13.171
<v Speaker 1>was engineered by Sarah Bruger. Our executive producer is Jacob Smith.

0:29:13.851 --> 0:29:17.051
<v Speaker 1>Our music was composed by John Sung, with additional music

0:29:17.091 --> 0:29:22.091
<v Speaker 1>by Jake Gorski, all voiceover work by Tally Leong. The

0:29:22.171 --> 0:29:25.771
<v Speaker 1>Chinatowns Day is a production of Pushkin Industries. To find

0:29:25.811 --> 0:29:30.131
<v Speaker 1>more Pushkin podcasts, listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:29:30.611 --> 0:29:33.851
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to podcasts. I'm Lydia gene Cox.