1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:02,279 Speaker 1: Back to the UK now and the Chancellor Rachel Reeves 2 00:00:02,320 --> 00:00:05,400 Speaker 1: has been making her pitch to the financial services industry. 3 00:00:05,440 --> 00:00:08,200 Speaker 1: In her first Mansion House speech, it included a promise 4 00:00:08,240 --> 00:00:11,520 Speaker 1: to rethink regulation of the sector and efforts to boost investments. 5 00:00:11,680 --> 00:00:14,080 Speaker 1: Joining us now to discuss is Nigel Wilson, chair of 6 00:00:14,120 --> 00:00:17,000 Speaker 1: the Canary Warf Group, former CEO of Legal and General 7 00:00:17,120 --> 00:00:19,800 Speaker 1: of course and a regular visitor to these Bloombag studio. 8 00:00:19,880 --> 00:00:22,720 Speaker 1: So very nice to see you once again, Nigel. You've 9 00:00:22,760 --> 00:00:25,600 Speaker 1: also shared, of course the recent Capital Markets of Tomorrow 10 00:00:25,720 --> 00:00:28,040 Speaker 1: report looking at the challenges facing the city. So well 11 00:00:28,040 --> 00:00:31,240 Speaker 1: placed to review Rachel Reeves and everything we got from 12 00:00:31,320 --> 00:00:35,479 Speaker 1: Mansion House. How did you read her comments on rethinking regulation, Nigel, 13 00:00:35,479 --> 00:00:38,280 Speaker 1: because this is part of this is part of a 14 00:00:38,320 --> 00:00:42,199 Speaker 1: push to perhaps refocus some of the regulatory bodies we 15 00:00:42,240 --> 00:00:43,879 Speaker 1: have in the city around growth. 16 00:00:44,320 --> 00:00:47,360 Speaker 2: Yeah. I think the growth agenda came back. You know, 17 00:00:47,479 --> 00:00:50,040 Speaker 2: we had a sort of ideological diversion for the budget 18 00:00:50,440 --> 00:00:52,160 Speaker 2: and then we've gone back to the growth agenda, which 19 00:00:52,200 --> 00:00:55,280 Speaker 2: is a good thing. And I think the upbeat message 20 00:00:55,320 --> 00:00:58,880 Speaker 2: around growth has been central again is actually what we 21 00:00:58,920 --> 00:01:01,840 Speaker 2: should be spending up time on because you know, you know, 22 00:01:01,880 --> 00:01:05,880 Speaker 2: the economy is muddling through growth dynemic. Everybody's panicking about 23 00:01:05,880 --> 00:01:08,800 Speaker 2: how they handle the NIX issues and the various other 24 00:01:09,360 --> 00:01:12,800 Speaker 2: incremental taxes that have come through the budget. We've got 25 00:01:12,800 --> 00:01:14,720 Speaker 2: to get back to the bigger picture, which is how 26 00:01:14,760 --> 00:01:17,640 Speaker 2: we're going to grow. And the fact that they're going 27 00:01:17,720 --> 00:01:23,760 Speaker 2: to give the regulators the dual objective of delivering growth 28 00:01:23,800 --> 00:01:24,880 Speaker 2: I think's really positive. 29 00:01:24,920 --> 00:01:26,880 Speaker 1: And you think we'll get the balance right there? 30 00:01:26,880 --> 00:01:27,200 Speaker 3: Will we? 31 00:01:27,319 --> 00:01:29,000 Speaker 2: Because of I'm sure we won't get the balance right. 32 00:01:29,160 --> 00:01:31,120 Speaker 2: We're going to get the direction of travel right, yeah, 33 00:01:31,160 --> 00:01:32,880 Speaker 2: which I think is what we haven't had for twenty 34 00:01:32,880 --> 00:01:35,760 Speaker 2: five years. And whether that's the water industry or the 35 00:01:37,200 --> 00:01:41,240 Speaker 2: telecoms industry, along the financial services industry, we have not 36 00:01:41,360 --> 00:01:45,080 Speaker 2: got the growth agenda anywhere embedded in the regulations of 37 00:01:45,200 --> 00:01:47,800 Speaker 2: those of all those industries. And that has to be 38 00:01:47,840 --> 00:01:50,120 Speaker 2: part of the long term growth strategy that we have 39 00:01:50,160 --> 00:01:52,080 Speaker 2: as a country. We definitely don't have it right now. 40 00:01:52,360 --> 00:01:55,960 Speaker 3: Will the simple shifting of our addition to those mandates 41 00:01:55,960 --> 00:01:59,080 Speaker 3: of those regulators, they'll be enough to encourage more risk 42 00:01:59,240 --> 00:02:02,760 Speaker 3: taking and thus spur the investment that reads is helping 43 00:02:02,760 --> 00:02:03,280 Speaker 3: that a well? 44 00:02:03,960 --> 00:02:06,840 Speaker 2: No, I think the culture of the organizations needs to 45 00:02:06,920 --> 00:02:10,799 Speaker 2: change dramatically because sometimes the messages the top get diluted 46 00:02:11,080 --> 00:02:13,880 Speaker 2: when they come to implementation. And I know we used 47 00:02:13,880 --> 00:02:16,760 Speaker 2: to spend sometimes years trying to get a new asset 48 00:02:16,760 --> 00:02:20,400 Speaker 2: a class approved by the regulator for investing in the UK, 49 00:02:21,040 --> 00:02:23,600 Speaker 2: and often as a consequence of that, we ended up 50 00:02:23,639 --> 00:02:26,880 Speaker 2: investing outside the UK in an asset class which already 51 00:02:26,880 --> 00:02:29,560 Speaker 2: existed in America. And that's not a good outcome, and 52 00:02:29,600 --> 00:02:32,280 Speaker 2: that was because they didn't have a growth agender. They 53 00:02:32,320 --> 00:02:35,200 Speaker 2: were excessively risk averse, and as a consequence of that, 54 00:02:35,240 --> 00:02:38,440 Speaker 2: we took action which allowed us to deliver on a 55 00:02:38,440 --> 00:02:41,440 Speaker 2: global thing, the right outcome, but definitely not the right 56 00:02:41,480 --> 00:02:42,280 Speaker 2: outcome for the UK. 57 00:02:43,160 --> 00:02:45,080 Speaker 1: And that takes us on to the pension activity that 58 00:02:45,080 --> 00:02:47,000 Speaker 1: we've seen from Rachel Reeves and this idea that you 59 00:02:47,080 --> 00:02:49,840 Speaker 1: pull these pension assets together to make these mega funds, 60 00:02:50,000 --> 00:02:53,600 Speaker 1: and maybe that increases some of the investment that we 61 00:02:53,680 --> 00:02:56,840 Speaker 1: see from pensions into infrastructure projects in the UK, although 62 00:02:56,960 --> 00:02:59,399 Speaker 1: not necessarily in the UK. So Nigel tell us your 63 00:02:59,520 --> 00:03:01,120 Speaker 1: response to where we've got to. 64 00:03:01,160 --> 00:03:04,320 Speaker 2: On this, Yeah, but not necessarily in the UK, which 65 00:03:04,360 --> 00:03:07,959 Speaker 2: is because what we've seen is in LGPS for example, 66 00:03:08,800 --> 00:03:11,800 Speaker 2: Legal and General manage a huge amount of money for LGPS. 67 00:03:13,160 --> 00:03:15,440 Speaker 2: Thirty eight percent of their investments used to be in 68 00:03:15,560 --> 00:03:19,320 Speaker 2: UK equities. It's now about nine percent. So the first 69 00:03:19,320 --> 00:03:22,919 Speaker 2: wave of consolidation which we've seen in LGPS didn't result 70 00:03:23,000 --> 00:03:26,440 Speaker 2: in more investment in the UK, resulting in entirely the opposite, 71 00:03:26,480 --> 00:03:30,440 Speaker 2: which is a big decrease in UK equities. So you 72 00:03:30,560 --> 00:03:33,000 Speaker 2: give the necessary conditions, but it's not sufficient conditions. 73 00:03:33,000 --> 00:03:34,080 Speaker 1: So scale isn't everything. 74 00:03:34,080 --> 00:03:36,640 Speaker 2: What else Scale isn't and everything it's actually here. We 75 00:03:36,640 --> 00:03:38,840 Speaker 2: have to create the planning opportunities which allow us to 76 00:03:38,840 --> 00:03:41,800 Speaker 2: have these investments, but also the risk appetite to want 77 00:03:41,840 --> 00:03:44,920 Speaker 2: to do these things. You know, America leads the way 78 00:03:45,120 --> 00:03:47,360 Speaker 2: in lots of these asset classes, and they have some 79 00:03:47,440 --> 00:03:50,560 Speaker 2: amazing companies, you know, the Brookfields and Blackstones and Apollos 80 00:03:50,600 --> 00:03:55,240 Speaker 2: and Kkrs who've been developing these assets in private marketers. Indeed, 81 00:03:55,280 --> 00:03:57,480 Speaker 2: you know JP Morgan and the other banks have. We 82 00:03:57,560 --> 00:04:00,280 Speaker 2: haven't got that capability at the moment in the USE. 83 00:04:00,320 --> 00:04:03,360 Speaker 2: So if we're not careful the assets, people will invest 84 00:04:03,400 --> 00:04:06,560 Speaker 2: in those assets, but not necessarily in the UK in 85 00:04:06,600 --> 00:04:09,320 Speaker 2: those assets, which is what we saw over the previous 86 00:04:09,320 --> 00:04:12,680 Speaker 2: fifteen years in UK equities for the decline from almost 87 00:04:12,680 --> 00:04:14,400 Speaker 2: forty percent down to less than ten percent. 88 00:04:14,480 --> 00:04:16,159 Speaker 3: But isn't it always going to be the case that 89 00:04:16,560 --> 00:04:19,000 Speaker 3: you know, comparing yourselves to the US is is an 90 00:04:19,040 --> 00:04:22,520 Speaker 3: extremely difficult thing to make the case for. How do 91 00:04:22,600 --> 00:04:25,599 Speaker 3: you what encouragements do? I mean you're talking about the 92 00:04:25,600 --> 00:04:28,279 Speaker 3: local government pension schemes as the changes that rate res announced, 93 00:04:28,360 --> 00:04:32,120 Speaker 3: But do pension funds need a mandate? Doesn't need to 94 00:04:32,120 --> 00:04:34,320 Speaker 3: be very clear that they have to push x amount 95 00:04:34,320 --> 00:04:34,640 Speaker 3: of assy. 96 00:04:34,839 --> 00:04:38,599 Speaker 2: I'm flavor of soft compulsion, which is as that look like, 97 00:04:38,880 --> 00:04:41,680 Speaker 2: which is a bit like auto enrollment. You know, people 98 00:04:41,680 --> 00:04:44,680 Speaker 2: are encouraged to invest in things and if they don't 99 00:04:44,680 --> 00:04:46,839 Speaker 2: want to, they opt out. But we certainly should be 100 00:04:46,839 --> 00:04:50,200 Speaker 2: setting targets or frameworks which allow them to invest more 101 00:04:50,240 --> 00:04:52,960 Speaker 2: in the UK so that over a long period ten 102 00:04:53,080 --> 00:04:56,560 Speaker 2: twenty thirty years we see more of these moneys being 103 00:04:56,600 --> 00:05:00,520 Speaker 2: flawed into risk assets in the UK as are paused 104 00:05:00,560 --> 00:05:04,600 Speaker 2: to too much of the assets in cash and guilts 105 00:05:04,640 --> 00:05:05,239 Speaker 2: to be frank. 106 00:05:05,160 --> 00:05:06,760 Speaker 1: Why do you think they've stopped short of doing that? 107 00:05:06,839 --> 00:05:09,600 Speaker 1: Because this was a criticism of the last administration as well, 108 00:05:09,720 --> 00:05:12,520 Speaker 1: that they didn't mandate that the money had to stay 109 00:05:12,520 --> 00:05:14,240 Speaker 1: in the UK, and it might be because well, if 110 00:05:14,240 --> 00:05:17,679 Speaker 1: you want best execution for future pensioners, you need to 111 00:05:17,720 --> 00:05:19,960 Speaker 1: be able to invest abroad. But you could attach it 112 00:05:19,960 --> 00:05:22,359 Speaker 1: to text benefits and say okay, put it in the 113 00:05:22,440 --> 00:05:24,080 Speaker 1: UK and then you get these tax. 114 00:05:23,839 --> 00:05:27,359 Speaker 2: Breaks absolutely, and cash isis are probably the best example 115 00:05:27,440 --> 00:05:29,640 Speaker 2: of that, where we give everybody a tax brik for 116 00:05:29,720 --> 00:05:31,360 Speaker 2: investing in cash with the only country in the world 117 00:05:31,360 --> 00:05:35,240 Speaker 2: that does. Add that's a three hundred billion pound asset 118 00:05:35,240 --> 00:05:38,599 Speaker 2: class and imagine if we fiers that out over time 119 00:05:38,680 --> 00:05:41,920 Speaker 2: and got people to invest in other assets which are 120 00:05:42,040 --> 00:05:45,960 Speaker 2: of greater strategic value to the UK and deliver better 121 00:05:46,040 --> 00:05:49,800 Speaker 2: returns over the long term, that would be a good outcome. 122 00:05:50,080 --> 00:05:52,039 Speaker 3: I'm curious to know more about your view of this 123 00:05:52,120 --> 00:05:55,359 Speaker 3: idea of setting targets. What should what's the idea level 124 00:05:55,400 --> 00:05:57,640 Speaker 3: for a target for investment in the UK assets? What's 125 00:05:57,680 --> 00:06:00,400 Speaker 3: going to do enough to spur the growth that then 126 00:06:00,440 --> 00:06:02,040 Speaker 3: creates the business case behind us. 127 00:06:02,120 --> 00:06:05,120 Speaker 2: Well, I feel look at DC Pensions, which was kind 128 00:06:05,120 --> 00:06:07,320 Speaker 2: of where richual was talking talking about, and I think 129 00:06:07,480 --> 00:06:09,120 Speaker 2: much of you know it, it's quite a good It 130 00:06:09,160 --> 00:06:11,400 Speaker 2: was a good speech by Richual. I thought, and I've 131 00:06:11,480 --> 00:06:13,240 Speaker 2: now read it twice and listened to it last night 132 00:06:13,240 --> 00:06:18,480 Speaker 2: as well. The challenge in DC it's growing very quickly. 133 00:06:19,560 --> 00:06:22,720 Speaker 2: Most people invest in the default fund. It's the it's 134 00:06:22,760 --> 00:06:24,919 Speaker 2: the middle one on the first page, in the middle box, 135 00:06:24,960 --> 00:06:28,039 Speaker 2: and people tick that and they very rarely change from that. 136 00:06:28,520 --> 00:06:30,919 Speaker 2: So the default fund can be used as a vehicle 137 00:06:31,240 --> 00:06:33,960 Speaker 2: for nudging in the right direction. And I would say, 138 00:06:34,160 --> 00:06:38,120 Speaker 2: let's give UK infrastructure a five percent allocation within the 139 00:06:38,160 --> 00:06:40,440 Speaker 2: default fund. And that's an easy. 140 00:06:40,160 --> 00:06:41,760 Speaker 3: Need to be huge what it doesn't need to be 141 00:06:41,800 --> 00:06:42,720 Speaker 3: a huge It doesn't need. 142 00:06:42,600 --> 00:06:44,800 Speaker 2: To be huge, and it doesn't you know, you know, 143 00:06:44,880 --> 00:06:47,880 Speaker 2: everybody being very weird about it being non competitive and 144 00:06:47,880 --> 00:06:50,839 Speaker 2: all the rest of it. We've got a huge infrastructure deficit. 145 00:06:51,080 --> 00:06:53,279 Speaker 2: How we're be going to fill it is actually get 146 00:06:53,320 --> 00:06:55,520 Speaker 2: people to be nudged in the right direction, in the 147 00:06:55,560 --> 00:06:58,080 Speaker 2: same way that young people should be investing in young companies, 148 00:06:58,600 --> 00:07:01,440 Speaker 2: you know, their friends and setting up these new companies, 149 00:07:01,720 --> 00:07:05,440 Speaker 2: and maybe have a two percent allocation for that. Again 150 00:07:05,720 --> 00:07:07,040 Speaker 2: not massive allocations. 151 00:07:07,200 --> 00:07:09,440 Speaker 1: And why are those things not there already? Then, Nigel 152 00:07:09,520 --> 00:07:12,320 Speaker 1: just remind us, since long we've spent a long time 153 00:07:12,360 --> 00:07:13,200 Speaker 1: getting at this place. 154 00:07:13,320 --> 00:07:16,200 Speaker 2: I've failed miserably is one of the reasons they're not there. 155 00:07:16,240 --> 00:07:19,120 Speaker 2: I've tried very hard for fifteen years to get this 156 00:07:19,320 --> 00:07:22,560 Speaker 2: to happen in the in the UK, and there's always 157 00:07:22,600 --> 00:07:25,040 Speaker 2: been a reluctance to doing it. But now we can 158 00:07:25,080 --> 00:07:27,720 Speaker 2: see there's no growth, the tiny amount of growth, and 159 00:07:27,720 --> 00:07:28,120 Speaker 2: it's been. 160 00:07:28,000 --> 00:07:30,280 Speaker 1: About risk aversion. Has it that those things weren't there? 161 00:07:30,320 --> 00:07:34,480 Speaker 2: Well, it's sort of an ideological objection to actually some 162 00:07:34,600 --> 00:07:38,679 Speaker 2: soft compulsion, and that I think is the wrong approach 163 00:07:38,800 --> 00:07:41,440 Speaker 2: when there's such an urgent need in the UK for 164 00:07:41,480 --> 00:07:45,080 Speaker 2: this real, real money to make a difference to everybody's lives, 165 00:07:45,160 --> 00:07:47,400 Speaker 2: and everybody thinks it's a good idea, but you've got 166 00:07:47,400 --> 00:07:50,160 Speaker 2: to give a bigger nudge than we've been giving so far, 167 00:07:50,640 --> 00:07:53,160 Speaker 2: and we're not saying go wild and reckless and do 168 00:07:53,240 --> 00:07:56,560 Speaker 2: all things. That's why the growth objective is so important. 169 00:07:56,720 --> 00:08:00,000 Speaker 2: Then the regulator can approve these asset classes much quicker 170 00:08:00,320 --> 00:08:04,440 Speaker 2: and we can see much greater growth in these businesses 171 00:08:04,520 --> 00:08:05,120 Speaker 2: in the UK. 172 00:08:06,480 --> 00:08:08,760 Speaker 3: I want to kind of put to ask you, for 173 00:08:08,800 --> 00:08:11,000 Speaker 3: a want of better word about the vibes right because 174 00:08:11,400 --> 00:08:13,520 Speaker 3: I'm sensing you're quite positive about what you heard from 175 00:08:13,560 --> 00:08:16,880 Speaker 3: Rachel Reeves last night, good ideas, you know, moving us 176 00:08:16,880 --> 00:08:19,520 Speaker 3: in the right direction. That's contrary to the narrative that 177 00:08:19,520 --> 00:08:22,360 Speaker 3: we've had since the budget, particularly from business groups. Weren't 178 00:08:22,400 --> 00:08:25,440 Speaker 3: happy about employers' national insurance contributions going up as well. 179 00:08:25,640 --> 00:08:27,360 Speaker 3: Do these things cancel each other out? 180 00:08:28,360 --> 00:08:30,200 Speaker 2: I'm not sure they cancel them out From a business 181 00:08:30,200 --> 00:08:31,880 Speaker 2: point of view. I think people are still very grumpy 182 00:08:31,880 --> 00:08:34,800 Speaker 2: about the budget and that's going to mess up a 183 00:08:34,840 --> 00:08:36,640 Speaker 2: lot of business plans and a lot of change. 184 00:08:36,679 --> 00:08:39,000 Speaker 3: And are you seeing that, you know, people looking at 185 00:08:39,000 --> 00:08:40,400 Speaker 3: Canary War for example. 186 00:08:40,200 --> 00:08:41,959 Speaker 2: And not really looking at Canary Wolf. But I think 187 00:08:42,080 --> 00:08:45,240 Speaker 2: as I travel across the country and meet lots of people, 188 00:08:45,320 --> 00:08:50,280 Speaker 2: you know, I think that's definitely the case. The direction 189 00:08:50,400 --> 00:08:53,800 Speaker 2: of travel was good last night. And talking to the 190 00:08:53,800 --> 00:08:57,200 Speaker 2: Treasury as well, which I did, was they think the 191 00:08:57,280 --> 00:08:59,240 Speaker 2: speed of travel has been going to be real queer. 192 00:08:59,600 --> 00:09:01,839 Speaker 2: But but are we doing enough fast enough? I think 193 00:09:01,880 --> 00:09:04,160 Speaker 2: the answer to that is not. But the direction of 194 00:09:04,160 --> 00:09:07,040 Speaker 2: travel is better than definitely better than what we saw 195 00:09:07,040 --> 00:09:07,600 Speaker 2: in the budget. 196 00:09:07,960 --> 00:09:11,040 Speaker 1: And on the big picture questions, Nigel, let me ask you, 197 00:09:11,840 --> 00:09:13,560 Speaker 1: we're coming towards the end of this year. We know 198 00:09:13,640 --> 00:09:16,400 Speaker 1: that next year is going to be to some degree 199 00:09:16,800 --> 00:09:18,840 Speaker 1: of our own making, but here in the UK, but 200 00:09:18,880 --> 00:09:21,679 Speaker 1: to some degree dictated by others. And we have a 201 00:09:21,720 --> 00:09:23,720 Speaker 1: return to the White House in the United States that 202 00:09:23,760 --> 00:09:26,280 Speaker 1: will have a big impact on so many people's lives 203 00:09:26,360 --> 00:09:30,880 Speaker 1: and finance in many places. Do you think that the 204 00:09:30,920 --> 00:09:33,280 Speaker 1: growth plans in the UK are sort of trump proofed? 205 00:09:33,720 --> 00:09:36,840 Speaker 1: Are you watching with anxiety what might happen? 206 00:09:37,440 --> 00:09:39,000 Speaker 2: Yeah? I think everybody's got to watch you with a 207 00:09:39,000 --> 00:09:43,040 Speaker 2: bit of anxiety as to what might happens, because you know, 208 00:09:43,080 --> 00:09:46,440 Speaker 2: there's a lot of contrarian approaches to solving problems that 209 00:09:46,480 --> 00:09:49,400 Speaker 2: are going to happen, and there's some very addish appointments 210 00:09:49,440 --> 00:09:52,040 Speaker 2: that have been made already, which you guys have been 211 00:09:52,440 --> 00:09:57,360 Speaker 2: talking about. And yes, we'll see some compromise on tariffs, 212 00:09:57,800 --> 00:10:00,200 Speaker 2: but they're still tariffs, and we know that there's there's 213 00:10:00,240 --> 00:10:02,880 Speaker 2: all sorts of negative consequences as a part of that. 214 00:10:03,400 --> 00:10:05,599 Speaker 2: The whole defense and defense spending in the role of 215 00:10:05,679 --> 00:10:07,880 Speaker 2: NATO is going to have a big impact on Europe. 216 00:10:08,320 --> 00:10:12,120 Speaker 2: I hope personally that again, and kiss Sarmus said that, 217 00:10:12,160 --> 00:10:14,560 Speaker 2: and Rachel said that. Indeed, Governor Bank of England said this, 218 00:10:15,000 --> 00:10:17,320 Speaker 2: let's get together and be closer to Europe. You know, 219 00:10:17,320 --> 00:10:20,960 Speaker 2: Brexit was a mistake, but actually, let's move forward and 220 00:10:21,080 --> 00:10:23,800 Speaker 2: figure out how we can develop better partnerships with the 221 00:10:23,800 --> 00:10:26,360 Speaker 2: rest of Europe. And Trump may prove to be the 222 00:10:26,400 --> 00:10:29,120 Speaker 2: catalyst that makes that happen, and so that may be 223 00:10:29,800 --> 00:10:31,840 Speaker 2: the positive outcome of all of this, is that we'll 224 00:10:31,840 --> 00:10:35,480 Speaker 2: all be treated in a certain way and that actually, 225 00:10:36,440 --> 00:10:38,520 Speaker 2: as a consequence of that, we may all get together. 226 00:10:38,760 --> 00:10:42,240 Speaker 2: Because you know, the German economies is in a mess. 227 00:10:42,280 --> 00:10:43,800 Speaker 2: The French economy, I think, is in a mess. The 228 00:10:43,800 --> 00:10:47,319 Speaker 2: Italian economy has got no growth whatsoever. Some of the 229 00:10:47,360 --> 00:10:51,240 Speaker 2: smaller countries are doing reasonably well, but net net, it's 230 00:10:51,280 --> 00:10:55,080 Speaker 2: a pretty miserable show. And the Europe's going to muddle 231 00:10:55,120 --> 00:10:57,319 Speaker 2: through as well. Next year, the UK has going to 232 00:10:57,400 --> 00:10:59,920 Speaker 2: muddle through. We've got to work together in partnership and 233 00:11:00,040 --> 00:11:02,000 Speaker 2: figure out how we can grow together and how we 234 00:11:02,000 --> 00:11:05,160 Speaker 2: can invest so much more because we've got the capital. 235 00:11:05,240 --> 00:11:09,360 Speaker 2: It's all sitting around. We've had regulators been overly risk averse, 236 00:11:09,400 --> 00:11:11,839 Speaker 2: which has ended up with companies being overally risk averse. 237 00:11:11,880 --> 00:11:15,240 Speaker 2: Our politician's been risk averse, and the outcome of this 238 00:11:15,440 --> 00:11:19,680 Speaker 2: excessive risk aversion is low growth, and that's been a 239 00:11:19,760 --> 00:11:21,679 Speaker 2: terrible outcome for US as a society,