WEBVTT - Hold The Line w/ Buck Sexton - 07-05-22

0:00:11.657 --> 0:00:14.937
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Buck Sexton Joe podcast, make sure

0:00:14.937 --> 0:00:17.977
<v Speaker 1>you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or

0:00:17.977 --> 0:00:23.377
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts. A mass shooting in a

0:00:23.417 --> 0:00:26.537
<v Speaker 1>wealthy suburb of Chicago left seven n and at least

0:00:26.577 --> 0:00:29.697
<v Speaker 1>thirty injured on Monday. According to police, twenty one year

0:00:29.777 --> 0:00:33.857
<v Speaker 1>old suspect Robert Cremo allegedly opened fire on the Highland

0:00:33.857 --> 0:00:36.937
<v Speaker 1>Park Fourth of July parade, airing off seventy rounds from

0:00:36.937 --> 0:00:39.577
<v Speaker 1>an a R fifteen rifle while disguised as a woman.

0:00:39.897 --> 0:00:42.177
<v Speaker 1>Will have the latest on the shooting and the reaction

0:00:42.377 --> 0:00:50.897
<v Speaker 1>on Tonight's All the Line Welcome Hold the one. I'm

0:00:50.937 --> 0:00:58.297
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sexton. Another weekend of horrific violence across the country,

0:00:59.097 --> 0:01:04.857
<v Speaker 1>many shooting incidents in major cities, but notably this mass

0:01:04.937 --> 0:01:09.137
<v Speaker 1>shooting event that occurred just about twenty miles north of

0:01:09.137 --> 0:01:13.777
<v Speaker 1>the city of Chicago. It was targeting. An individual targeted

0:01:13.897 --> 0:01:18.657
<v Speaker 1>a Fourth of July parade, shooting everybody in sight, the

0:01:18.697 --> 0:01:23.937
<v Speaker 1>elderly children. An act of horrific mass murder that just

0:01:23.977 --> 0:01:30.097
<v Speaker 1>seems incomprehensible to anyone who is not a completed utter psychopath,

0:01:30.137 --> 0:01:35.097
<v Speaker 1>as this individual clearly is and now we know more

0:01:35.137 --> 0:01:40.377
<v Speaker 1>details about this. Lake County Police spokesman Chris Pavelli today

0:01:40.417 --> 0:01:44.977
<v Speaker 1>address this and said that the shooter, Robert Crimo, planned

0:01:44.977 --> 0:01:49.897
<v Speaker 1>the shooting in advance. We do believe Cremo pre planned

0:01:49.897 --> 0:01:53.777
<v Speaker 1>this attack for several weeks. He brought a high powered

0:01:53.897 --> 0:01:57.017
<v Speaker 1>rifle to this parade. He accessed the roof of a

0:01:57.097 --> 0:02:02.297
<v Speaker 1>business via a fire escape ladder and began opening fire

0:02:02.497 --> 0:02:08.737
<v Speaker 1>on the innocent Independence Day celebration goers. It's a horrific event.

0:02:08.977 --> 0:02:13.617
<v Speaker 1>There is the shoot who everyone who sees his photos,

0:02:13.617 --> 0:02:15.657
<v Speaker 1>which are now all over the internet along with his videos.

0:02:15.657 --> 0:02:19.377
<v Speaker 1>He had some kind of a rap channel that he

0:02:19.457 --> 0:02:21.497
<v Speaker 1>set up on YouTube that was taken down. There's a

0:02:21.497 --> 0:02:25.337
<v Speaker 1>lot of this guy's content online. I mean he looks

0:02:25.377 --> 0:02:27.537
<v Speaker 1>crazy too most both. I mean, he looks like somebody

0:02:27.537 --> 0:02:29.777
<v Speaker 1>who is deranged, exceeding in his eyes, the face and

0:02:29.857 --> 0:02:33.537
<v Speaker 1>neck tattoos. It looks like somebody who if a red

0:02:33.577 --> 0:02:38.097
<v Speaker 1>flag law won't stop him, who will? Which Illinois has

0:02:38.137 --> 0:02:41.297
<v Speaker 1>red flag law in place? By the way, who does

0:02:41.337 --> 0:02:43.697
<v Speaker 1>a red flag law stop? You start to wonder about this,

0:02:43.737 --> 0:02:45.417
<v Speaker 1>If it won't stop an individual like this, and so

0:02:45.457 --> 0:02:48.817
<v Speaker 1>then is it the takeaway that a red flag law

0:02:48.857 --> 0:02:51.937
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't even be or isn't even effective, despite all the

0:02:51.977 --> 0:02:57.257
<v Speaker 1>conversation recently about them. This is an instance of mental

0:02:57.297 --> 0:03:01.817
<v Speaker 1>health breakdown for this individual. Obviously he's crazy, and it's

0:03:01.897 --> 0:03:06.777
<v Speaker 1>also a case where someone is evil. But immediately anytime

0:03:06.817 --> 0:03:09.257
<v Speaker 1>there's a shooting like this, there is an effort to

0:03:09.337 --> 0:03:13.217
<v Speaker 1>politicize it and make it all about gun control. Here

0:03:13.297 --> 0:03:16.017
<v Speaker 1>is the mayor of Highland Park, Illinois doing just that.

0:03:17.497 --> 0:03:19.617
<v Speaker 1>My recollection of him was as a sweet little boy.

0:03:21.177 --> 0:03:25.497
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm sorry that we're glorifying what he put

0:03:25.537 --> 0:03:27.977
<v Speaker 1>on social media. I don't want to encourage other people

0:03:27.977 --> 0:03:32.017
<v Speaker 1>to think that this is a way to lead into

0:03:32.057 --> 0:03:34.777
<v Speaker 1>this kind of violence. We need to have a very

0:03:34.777 --> 0:03:38.937
<v Speaker 1>real national conversation about why we're okay with allowing weapons

0:03:38.937 --> 0:03:41.777
<v Speaker 1>of war on our streets and why we're okay with

0:03:42.017 --> 0:03:47.097
<v Speaker 1>weekly having mass shootings. Okay, what is that conversation supposed

0:03:47.137 --> 0:03:48.777
<v Speaker 1>to be? We hear about this all the time. What

0:03:48.897 --> 0:03:53.297
<v Speaker 1>is the conversation? There are tens of millions of a

0:03:53.457 --> 0:03:57.097
<v Speaker 1>R fifteen style rifles already in circulations, tens of millions

0:03:57.097 --> 0:03:59.657
<v Speaker 1>in this country right now. There are literally millions of

0:03:59.657 --> 0:04:02.977
<v Speaker 1>people who own them and who never break anymore, and

0:04:03.097 --> 0:04:06.457
<v Speaker 1>pose no threat to anyone except perhaps a tyrannical government

0:04:06.537 --> 0:04:10.737
<v Speaker 1>or a home invasion criminal. So what is the national

0:04:10.737 --> 0:04:14.297
<v Speaker 1>conversation supposed to be exactly? They never say, this is

0:04:14.337 --> 0:04:19.937
<v Speaker 1>just about poking and prodding their political opponents and using

0:04:19.937 --> 0:04:23.977
<v Speaker 1>this moment of tragedy and emotional upheaval to achieve that.

0:04:24.697 --> 0:04:28.657
<v Speaker 1>And then that brings me to the Governor of Illinois, JB. Pritzker,

0:04:28.777 --> 0:04:33.697
<v Speaker 1>who honestly strikes me as a total imbecile on the

0:04:33.737 --> 0:04:36.337
<v Speaker 1>issue of guns, and perhaps far more than just that.

0:04:36.817 --> 0:04:38.657
<v Speaker 1>I don't care that he's very wealthy. I don't care

0:04:38.657 --> 0:04:41.817
<v Speaker 1>that he's the governor of Illinois. He's a jackass. And

0:04:41.897 --> 0:04:45.017
<v Speaker 1>here he is saying that. I mean, this is of

0:04:45.057 --> 0:04:47.177
<v Speaker 1>all the arguments you hear around the Second Amendment and

0:04:47.217 --> 0:04:51.577
<v Speaker 1>guns and gun violence, the it only protects muskets is

0:04:51.657 --> 0:04:54.017
<v Speaker 1>probably for the dumbest people. I mean, that's the one,

0:04:54.457 --> 0:04:56.697
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's the one where you say, this argument

0:04:56.777 --> 0:05:03.097
<v Speaker 1>is so obviously absurd and stupid, so intellectually subpar. How

0:05:03.137 --> 0:05:05.417
<v Speaker 1>could anyone make it with a straight face. Well, here's

0:05:05.417 --> 0:05:07.817
<v Speaker 1>the governor of Illinois saying, the founders thought, you know,

0:05:07.857 --> 0:05:10.697
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't have had an assault weapon. Maybe it. Watch,

0:05:11.577 --> 0:05:16.857
<v Speaker 1>our founders carried muskets, not assault weapons, and I don't

0:05:16.857 --> 0:05:18.937
<v Speaker 1>think a single one of them would have said that

0:05:19.057 --> 0:05:21.817
<v Speaker 1>you have a constitutional right to an assault weapon with

0:05:21.937 --> 0:05:26.737
<v Speaker 1>a high capacity magazine. Supreme Court's already dealt with this.

0:05:27.017 --> 0:05:28.937
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this has already been addressed by the highest

0:05:28.977 --> 0:05:30.577
<v Speaker 1>court in the land. And it does make you sit

0:05:30.617 --> 0:05:34.217
<v Speaker 1>here and say to yourself, what are the British Red coats?

0:05:34.217 --> 0:05:36.217
<v Speaker 1>We just had Independence Day weekend. What are the British

0:05:36.257 --> 0:05:40.737
<v Speaker 1>Red Coats carry? Oh? Yeah, muskets. So they were carrying

0:05:40.737 --> 0:05:45.217
<v Speaker 1>the same thing that the colonists were able to carry,

0:05:45.617 --> 0:05:47.377
<v Speaker 1>so that they can actually meet them on a battlefield

0:05:47.417 --> 0:05:50.737
<v Speaker 1>and be a weapon against tyranny. Oh right, so weapons

0:05:50.737 --> 0:05:53.697
<v Speaker 1>in common usage. Supreme courts already looked at this. If

0:05:53.737 --> 0:05:55.897
<v Speaker 1>anyone who needs a little more assistance on the constitutional

0:05:55.937 --> 0:05:59.297
<v Speaker 1>interpretation side of it. Yeah, they didn't know that assault

0:05:59.377 --> 0:06:01.657
<v Speaker 1>rifles would exist in seventeen seventy six. They also didn't

0:06:01.657 --> 0:06:04.017
<v Speaker 1>know the Internet would exist. So does free speech not

0:06:04.057 --> 0:06:08.377
<v Speaker 1>include the internet? You utter moron, Governor Pritzker. But it Yeah,

0:06:08.417 --> 0:06:10.497
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to believe he's actually that dumb. It feels

0:06:10.537 --> 0:06:13.417
<v Speaker 1>like maybe he's just playing some kind of a political

0:06:13.497 --> 0:06:16.097
<v Speaker 1>game here and playing to his bass because when he

0:06:16.137 --> 0:06:17.737
<v Speaker 1>definitely doesn't want is for people to look at the

0:06:17.857 --> 0:06:21.857
<v Speaker 1>primary the largest city in his state, Chicago, while there

0:06:21.937 --> 0:06:25.977
<v Speaker 1>was this horrific seven fatality mass murder of the weekend

0:06:26.777 --> 0:06:30.577
<v Speaker 1>from this clearly deranged little psychopath who's now in custody

0:06:30.617 --> 0:06:32.417
<v Speaker 1>and facing charges. Put him in prison the rest of

0:06:32.417 --> 0:06:34.337
<v Speaker 1>his life. I mean, if you believe in the death penalty,

0:06:34.377 --> 0:06:37.897
<v Speaker 1>he should definitely get the death penalty. And yet in

0:06:37.977 --> 0:06:41.057
<v Speaker 1>Chicago there were seventy one other shootings over the weekend.

0:06:41.097 --> 0:06:45.257
<v Speaker 1>Seventy one people's shot, eight were killed. Now this is

0:06:46.097 --> 0:06:48.697
<v Speaker 1>almost all handgun violence, by the way, this is all

0:06:48.697 --> 0:06:50.737
<v Speaker 1>with handguns. So all the talk about asault rifles would

0:06:50.777 --> 0:06:53.657
<v Speaker 1>do nothing to stop this. And this is just what

0:06:53.817 --> 0:07:01.057
<v Speaker 1>is now considered somehow the new horrific normal in a

0:07:01.097 --> 0:07:03.937
<v Speaker 1>city like Chicago, that over a holiday weekend in the summer,

0:07:04.297 --> 0:07:07.857
<v Speaker 1>you're going to have not even just a few dozen,

0:07:08.177 --> 0:07:11.097
<v Speaker 1>seventy one people shot, eight people killed in one weekend

0:07:11.097 --> 0:07:13.817
<v Speaker 1>in one city. It's a lot of shootings, it's a

0:07:13.817 --> 0:07:17.137
<v Speaker 1>lot of people getting bullets put in them by criminals,

0:07:18.177 --> 0:07:20.857
<v Speaker 1>a lot of murderers running around in the city of Chicago,

0:07:21.737 --> 0:07:24.097
<v Speaker 1>what is the governor doing, what's the mayor Laurie Liffeld doing?

0:07:24.137 --> 0:07:29.177
<v Speaker 1>Obviously nothing, complaining about white supremacy, talking about the insurrection

0:07:29.417 --> 0:07:35.057
<v Speaker 1>something like that, you know, not actually handling the outrageous

0:07:35.057 --> 0:07:40.057
<v Speaker 1>surge of criminality that continues to rip through Chicago in

0:07:40.097 --> 0:07:41.937
<v Speaker 1>a number of other cities. But Chicago is really in

0:07:42.257 --> 0:07:45.457
<v Speaker 1>for a large city, in a class by itself, and

0:07:45.617 --> 0:07:47.817
<v Speaker 1>the violence that occurs there is occurring in what is

0:07:47.817 --> 0:07:52.017
<v Speaker 1>effectively the most restrictive gun law city in the country,

0:07:52.737 --> 0:07:58.377
<v Speaker 1>in Chicago, DC, maybe New York. So what exactly are

0:07:58.377 --> 0:08:01.697
<v Speaker 1>they achieving by lecturing us on a national conversation about

0:08:01.697 --> 0:08:05.057
<v Speaker 1>firearms that focuses on assault rifles and says we can

0:08:05.057 --> 0:08:08.697
<v Speaker 1>only have muskets when there are gangbangers killing dozens and

0:08:08.737 --> 0:08:12.057
<v Speaker 1>dozens of people every weekend with handguns in their main

0:08:12.137 --> 0:08:16.577
<v Speaker 1>city run entirely by Democrats. They have no answer. They

0:08:16.617 --> 0:08:20.137
<v Speaker 1>just want to talk more about the insurrect Love more

0:08:20.177 --> 0:08:23.657
<v Speaker 1>on this with retired FBI from James Gagliano in a moment. First,

0:08:23.657 --> 0:08:25.497
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk to you about protecting your online data.

0:08:25.497 --> 0:08:27.817
<v Speaker 1>A lot of companies promise your privacy is guaranteed, but

0:08:27.857 --> 0:08:30.017
<v Speaker 1>that's just not true. That's why you need a new

0:08:30.017 --> 0:08:33.537
<v Speaker 1>privacy and cybersecurity application tool called Secure. It's spelled sek.

0:08:33.857 --> 0:08:37.257
<v Speaker 1>You are. Secure is using proprietary encryption and offering secure

0:08:37.337 --> 0:08:40.737
<v Speaker 1>instant messaging and email with secure all of your communications

0:08:40.737 --> 0:08:43.337
<v Speaker 1>based on servers and data centers hosted in Switzerland without

0:08:43.377 --> 0:08:45.817
<v Speaker 1>using any of the big tech platforms. Privacy is a

0:08:45.817 --> 0:08:48.937
<v Speaker 1>big issue now. Without real security, people can read your emails, messages,

0:08:49.017 --> 0:08:52.137
<v Speaker 1>even your bank information. Secure will never mind your data

0:08:52.177 --> 0:08:54.337
<v Speaker 1>and never ask your phone number. You can send emails

0:08:54.377 --> 0:08:57.097
<v Speaker 1>your doctor, banker, lawyer, or anyone else with total confidence

0:08:57.097 --> 0:08:59.177
<v Speaker 1>you're not being spot on by your internet provider or

0:08:59.257 --> 0:09:02.257
<v Speaker 1>big peck. Secure is your solution to stop the constant

0:09:02.257 --> 0:09:04.417
<v Speaker 1>theft of your digital identity. Costs only five dollars to

0:09:04.497 --> 0:09:06.897
<v Speaker 1>the messenger, only ten dollars to the messenger and email

0:09:06.897 --> 0:09:09.657
<v Speaker 1>combination package. Go to secure dot com and take back

0:09:09.697 --> 0:09:13.777
<v Speaker 1>your obviously today that's seku are dot com and use

0:09:13.817 --> 0:09:16.417
<v Speaker 1>promo code buck for twenty five percent off. We'll be

0:09:16.497 --> 0:09:24.137
<v Speaker 1>right back with more. Hold the line. There was no

0:09:24.257 --> 0:09:27.297
<v Speaker 1>signs of trouble. I saw no signs of trouble, and

0:09:27.337 --> 0:09:29.497
<v Speaker 1>if I had to sease signs, I would say something.

0:09:30.057 --> 0:09:34.617
<v Speaker 1>But there's no signs of trouble. That was Paul Krimo,

0:09:34.977 --> 0:09:38.497
<v Speaker 1>the uncle of the alleged Highland Park gunman, telling local

0:09:38.537 --> 0:09:42.057
<v Speaker 1>media that he saw no warning signs from his nephew,

0:09:42.097 --> 0:09:45.777
<v Speaker 1>the alleged mass murderer from the fourth of July Parade

0:09:45.777 --> 0:09:50.257
<v Speaker 1>shooting over the weekend. Police alleged that his nephew, Robert Kremo,

0:09:50.377 --> 0:09:53.257
<v Speaker 1>as we said, had been planning the shooting for weeks

0:09:53.297 --> 0:09:56.137
<v Speaker 1>in advance that left seven dead. They have yet to

0:09:56.217 --> 0:09:59.137
<v Speaker 1>uncover or discuss a motive. Publicly joining me now to

0:09:59.137 --> 0:10:03.257
<v Speaker 1>give his insights into yesterday shooting, retired FBI Supervisory Special

0:10:03.297 --> 0:10:06.457
<v Speaker 1>Agent James Deagliano. James, thanks for being one of us.

0:10:07.577 --> 0:10:12.497
<v Speaker 1>It would it be with you, bub So that's tough. Right,

0:10:12.537 --> 0:10:18.857
<v Speaker 1>We sit here again another discussion about a vicious mass murder,

0:10:18.937 --> 0:10:21.937
<v Speaker 1>shooting of innocent people, and there's a lot of we'll

0:10:21.977 --> 0:10:24.817
<v Speaker 1>take a step away from the part is in finger pointing,

0:10:24.857 --> 0:10:27.257
<v Speaker 1>it happens right away. The mental health side of this,

0:10:27.497 --> 0:10:31.257
<v Speaker 1>I think that's one place where both sides can agree.

0:10:31.657 --> 0:10:34.737
<v Speaker 1>There's clearly a problem right that these individuals. I mean,

0:10:34.737 --> 0:10:36.977
<v Speaker 1>this guy's a psychopath. You don't have to have a

0:10:37.537 --> 0:10:41.217
<v Speaker 1>degree in psychiatry to know that. How do you catch

0:10:41.257 --> 0:10:43.017
<v Speaker 1>this stuff? James? I mean, I'm seeing some of your

0:10:43.017 --> 0:10:47.097
<v Speaker 1>former colleagues and the FBI who are profilers going on

0:10:47.137 --> 0:10:50.897
<v Speaker 1>TV to talk about it. Is that something that might

0:10:50.977 --> 0:10:54.417
<v Speaker 1>be applicable, useful in advance of these incidents? How does

0:10:54.457 --> 0:10:58.737
<v Speaker 1>that all work? I mean, buckets we talked in in

0:10:58.777 --> 0:11:01.057
<v Speaker 1>the wake of a number of mass shootings like this,

0:11:01.137 --> 0:11:05.217
<v Speaker 1>and it's a complex issue. As you know, there exists

0:11:05.257 --> 0:11:08.617
<v Speaker 1>no panacea. I mean, there's no profiler in the world

0:11:08.617 --> 0:11:10.977
<v Speaker 1>that's going to get these things right every time. And

0:11:11.017 --> 0:11:15.177
<v Speaker 1>I think you alluded to it at the top. Evil exists.

0:11:15.697 --> 0:11:18.377
<v Speaker 1>You want to tie it into mental health, of course,

0:11:18.417 --> 0:11:22.257
<v Speaker 1>you want to tie it into a proliferation of weapons, okay,

0:11:22.417 --> 0:11:25.337
<v Speaker 1>but there's not one set thing that we could do

0:11:25.457 --> 0:11:28.137
<v Speaker 1>to stop this. Now. This guy fit the profile right

0:11:28.777 --> 0:11:32.777
<v Speaker 1>disaffected or disenfranchised. And I'm not a psychologist or a

0:11:32.857 --> 0:11:35.937
<v Speaker 1>sociologist either, but I think we can make that leap

0:11:36.017 --> 0:11:39.617
<v Speaker 1>to say that this was a disenfranchised young man between

0:11:39.617 --> 0:11:42.897
<v Speaker 1>the ages of eighteen and twenty five. And to your point,

0:11:43.257 --> 0:11:46.577
<v Speaker 1>they come in all shapes and sizes and colors, and

0:11:46.617 --> 0:11:51.457
<v Speaker 1>they hewed to different ideological ends of the spectrum. So

0:11:51.497 --> 0:11:54.497
<v Speaker 1>there's not a one size fits all here. But it

0:11:54.537 --> 0:11:57.617
<v Speaker 1>was a legally obtained weapon, and you had somebody that

0:11:57.777 --> 0:12:00.577
<v Speaker 1>did clearly have and again I'm not trying to diagnose

0:12:00.617 --> 0:12:02.937
<v Speaker 1>it on your show, but clearly had some type of

0:12:03.777 --> 0:12:08.457
<v Speaker 1>mental issues. And I've been describing this all day as

0:12:09.017 --> 0:12:15.337
<v Speaker 1>these people are grievance collectors. Something happened, something triggered it,

0:12:15.457 --> 0:12:18.417
<v Speaker 1>whether they were an in cell, or whether they felt

0:12:18.417 --> 0:12:21.137
<v Speaker 1>like they were marginalized, or whether or not they got

0:12:21.177 --> 0:12:24.897
<v Speaker 1>online in their parents' basement and were radicalized, or heard

0:12:24.977 --> 0:12:29.617
<v Speaker 1>some sirens call, some clarion call to go do something.

0:12:29.697 --> 0:12:32.137
<v Speaker 1>Now we know of none of those things right now

0:12:32.177 --> 0:12:34.537
<v Speaker 1>that exist because police have not released any of it.

0:12:34.857 --> 0:12:38.097
<v Speaker 1>But if this goes to form, that's what we're gonna find.

0:12:38.217 --> 0:12:42.297
<v Speaker 1>Somebody on the periphery, somebody marginalized, somebody that had been

0:12:42.337 --> 0:12:46.937
<v Speaker 1>collecting grievances and decided to take it out yesterday in

0:12:47.097 --> 0:12:50.857
<v Speaker 1>Highland Park, Illinois and kill. We just now know that

0:12:50.897 --> 0:12:54.217
<v Speaker 1>there are now seven people dead and buck over two

0:12:54.257 --> 0:12:59.137
<v Speaker 1>dozen wounded. James the state of Illinois, I understand it

0:12:59.217 --> 0:13:03.337
<v Speaker 1>does have red flag laws, right, so this falls under

0:13:03.377 --> 0:13:07.377
<v Speaker 1>the okay we keep hearing, if only we had the following.

0:13:07.417 --> 0:13:12.577
<v Speaker 1>The state of Illinois has red flag laws. Illinois has

0:13:12.617 --> 0:13:16.617
<v Speaker 1>a number of measures in place to prevent people from

0:13:16.657 --> 0:13:22.417
<v Speaker 1>getting firearms, certainly illegally. I believe they have an assault

0:13:22.537 --> 0:13:24.457
<v Speaker 1>rifle band, but I might need to check on that

0:13:24.497 --> 0:13:27.497
<v Speaker 1>one in the state. I think it's it's difficult generally.

0:13:27.817 --> 0:13:30.417
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry they don't have a sault rifle band. But

0:13:30.537 --> 0:13:33.657
<v Speaker 1>this would have fallen. This would fall under a case

0:13:33.697 --> 0:13:36.977
<v Speaker 1>where the individual was even with the elevated age that

0:13:37.017 --> 0:13:39.737
<v Speaker 1>people have talked about recently and the most recent legislation,

0:13:40.057 --> 0:13:42.137
<v Speaker 1>he was twenty two, so he wouldn't have been covered

0:13:42.457 --> 0:13:47.137
<v Speaker 1>in that restriction. So what are we supposed to think

0:13:47.537 --> 0:13:49.977
<v Speaker 1>would have been What is the measure other than this

0:13:50.057 --> 0:13:54.977
<v Speaker 1>guy's crazy lock him up indefinitely that law enforcement could

0:13:55.057 --> 0:14:01.737
<v Speaker 1>take in advance of him actually engaging in this heinous plot. Sure,

0:14:01.897 --> 0:14:04.697
<v Speaker 1>and we live in a free and open society and

0:14:04.737 --> 0:14:07.977
<v Speaker 1>we don't want to live under martial law. And in

0:14:08.097 --> 0:14:09.737
<v Speaker 1>order for us to live in a free and open

0:14:09.817 --> 0:14:14.457
<v Speaker 1>society and cherish our civil liberties, these things are going

0:14:14.537 --> 0:14:16.977
<v Speaker 1>to happen, and people are gonna push back and say, well,

0:14:16.977 --> 0:14:19.977
<v Speaker 1>you've got to stop it. Well, every time somebody says

0:14:19.977 --> 0:14:23.777
<v Speaker 1>something hateful and bigoted, you can't lock them up for it. Yes,

0:14:23.817 --> 0:14:28.457
<v Speaker 1>we know the difference between fomenting and inciting riots or

0:14:28.697 --> 0:14:32.857
<v Speaker 1>hate speech designed to get people hurt. We understand those differences.

0:14:33.137 --> 0:14:35.777
<v Speaker 1>But the bottom line is the First Amendment doesn't protect

0:14:35.817 --> 0:14:39.057
<v Speaker 1>the right to free speech that you and I like, Buck,

0:14:39.337 --> 0:14:44.217
<v Speaker 1>It protects free speech that we abhore. Now you mentioned Chicago.

0:14:44.697 --> 0:14:46.977
<v Speaker 1>This is a city much like the city of New York,

0:14:47.017 --> 0:14:49.617
<v Speaker 1>which is sixty miles south from where I live, and

0:14:50.377 --> 0:14:52.897
<v Speaker 1>I spent twenty five years there as an FBI agent,

0:14:53.257 --> 0:14:58.297
<v Speaker 1>some of the most draconian laws related to weapons. Right now,

0:14:58.657 --> 0:15:02.257
<v Speaker 1>this past fourth or July weekend that just concluded, I

0:15:02.297 --> 0:15:05.137
<v Speaker 1>want to give you some staggering statistics about the city

0:15:05.137 --> 0:15:08.137
<v Speaker 1>of Chicago, which is only twenty miles away from Highland Park,

0:15:08.897 --> 0:15:12.417
<v Speaker 1>seventy one people shot this weekend Buck. Eight were killed.

0:15:13.017 --> 0:15:15.737
<v Speaker 1>Last year over the Fourth of July weekend in Chicago

0:15:16.177 --> 0:15:21.057
<v Speaker 1>one hundred plus shot, nineteen killed twenty twenty, the height

0:15:21.137 --> 0:15:25.497
<v Speaker 1>of the pandemic. Buck in Chicago over Fourth of July weekend,

0:15:25.937 --> 0:15:30.337
<v Speaker 1>seventy nine shot and fifteen killed. So look, that's not

0:15:30.377 --> 0:15:34.177
<v Speaker 1>a red herring. I'm not trying to you know, point

0:15:34.177 --> 0:15:37.257
<v Speaker 1>people in another direction. But it's important we understand when

0:15:37.257 --> 0:15:40.177
<v Speaker 1>we talk about mass shootings, which are generally described as

0:15:40.617 --> 0:15:45.017
<v Speaker 1>three or more people wounded or killed. These go on

0:15:45.257 --> 0:15:49.457
<v Speaker 1>in perpetuity and in big cities, in large cities, they

0:15:49.497 --> 0:15:53.137
<v Speaker 1>happen multiple times every weekend. That's where we have a

0:15:53.217 --> 0:15:57.017
<v Speaker 1>proliferation of illegal weapons. Now, I wish I could have

0:15:57.057 --> 0:15:58.617
<v Speaker 1>and I know you would have done the same thing,

0:15:59.137 --> 0:16:05.897
<v Speaker 1>stopped this depraved miscreant, this Cretan who perpetrated this awful, awful,

0:16:06.137 --> 0:16:09.097
<v Speaker 1>heinous crime. But if you're gonna live in a city

0:16:09.417 --> 0:16:12.457
<v Speaker 1>or in a date, we're in a country that doesn't

0:16:12.537 --> 0:16:16.177
<v Speaker 1>hue to martial law. Buck evil exists. We do the

0:16:16.217 --> 0:16:17.857
<v Speaker 1>best we can to get out in front of it

0:16:17.897 --> 0:16:21.377
<v Speaker 1>and prevent it. But it's not a perfect, full safe system.

0:16:21.417 --> 0:16:24.657
<v Speaker 1>Anything that you see here, James, that you think so far,

0:16:24.737 --> 0:16:26.537
<v Speaker 1>I know, we're still getting a lot of details. But

0:16:27.177 --> 0:16:31.417
<v Speaker 1>law enforcements miss the red miss the red flag, miss

0:16:31.497 --> 0:16:35.017
<v Speaker 1>the indicators here, or is this just too hard to

0:16:35.057 --> 0:16:39.057
<v Speaker 1>catch in advance based on the info we have so far. Yeah,

0:16:39.537 --> 0:16:41.537
<v Speaker 1>we're always going to get that where people are gonna

0:16:41.737 --> 0:16:45.297
<v Speaker 1>are understandably gonna push back and go how come you

0:16:45.337 --> 0:16:47.617
<v Speaker 1>didn't know this, or how come you didn't stop this?

0:16:47.937 --> 0:16:51.497
<v Speaker 1>Or if this person was quote unquote on your radar,

0:16:51.937 --> 0:16:54.177
<v Speaker 1>how come you didn't take them off the street. Well,

0:16:54.217 --> 0:16:57.697
<v Speaker 1>we can't arrest people just because we think they might

0:16:57.777 --> 0:17:01.297
<v Speaker 1>do something. There has to be two parts of a crime, right.

0:17:01.337 --> 0:17:03.897
<v Speaker 1>It has to be the actual act the actors rays,

0:17:04.217 --> 0:17:05.737
<v Speaker 1>and then it has to be the men's ray the

0:17:05.857 --> 0:17:08.497
<v Speaker 1>thought process to do it. A lot of times you

0:17:08.577 --> 0:17:11.057
<v Speaker 1>can't hit these things off in a buck. I think

0:17:11.177 --> 0:17:14.137
<v Speaker 1>one thing that strikes me is police are still referring

0:17:14.137 --> 0:17:17.537
<v Speaker 1>to this person as a person of interest. Now, person

0:17:17.617 --> 0:17:21.777
<v Speaker 1>of interest is not somebody charged with a crime. This individual,

0:17:21.857 --> 0:17:24.177
<v Speaker 1>to my knowledge now it could have happened and they

0:17:24.257 --> 0:17:27.177
<v Speaker 1>just haven't announced it yet, has not been charged with

0:17:27.417 --> 0:17:30.017
<v Speaker 1>a crime. So he's considered to be a person of

0:17:30.217 --> 0:17:33.657
<v Speaker 1>interest who was possibly involved in a crime. So it's

0:17:33.657 --> 0:17:35.697
<v Speaker 1>going to be interesting to see as the police are

0:17:35.777 --> 0:17:40.257
<v Speaker 1>gathering information. They're certainly scrubbing the internet where where this

0:17:40.417 --> 0:17:45.977
<v Speaker 1>individual was involved in tons of disturbing imagery and postings,

0:17:46.177 --> 0:17:48.297
<v Speaker 1>and they're obviously going to be doing good old fashioned

0:17:48.337 --> 0:17:51.577
<v Speaker 1>detective work talking to people and finding out who this

0:17:51.737 --> 0:17:55.137
<v Speaker 1>person came in contact with, did anyone inspire him or

0:17:55.217 --> 0:17:57.577
<v Speaker 1>direct him to do this hateful act, and if so,

0:17:57.977 --> 0:18:00.977
<v Speaker 1>was there some type of conspiracy and roll those people

0:18:01.097 --> 0:18:03.017
<v Speaker 1>up as well. We'll know more than the next few days.

0:18:03.177 --> 0:18:06.697
<v Speaker 1>Buck James. Always appreciate the expertise in the perspective. Thanks

0:18:06.737 --> 0:18:11.297
<v Speaker 1>for joining us, Thanks for having me. With calls for

0:18:11.337 --> 0:18:13.897
<v Speaker 1>a stricter gun control likely to increase in the coming weeks.

0:18:13.977 --> 0:18:16.577
<v Speaker 1>The state of New York has passed a new measure

0:18:16.657 --> 0:18:19.697
<v Speaker 1>that essentially nullifies the Supreme Court's recent ruling on concealed

0:18:19.777 --> 0:18:22.097
<v Speaker 1>Harry permit. We'll have more on that with senior legal

0:18:22.137 --> 0:18:25.297
<v Speaker 1>correspondent at the Federalist Margot Cleveland. Coming up first, let's

0:18:25.337 --> 0:18:27.337
<v Speaker 1>talk about pro checking your most viable asset, your home.

0:18:27.377 --> 0:18:28.697
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you saw this, but there was

0:18:28.737 --> 0:18:31.457
<v Speaker 1>a recent story about an Arizona real estate agent that

0:18:31.497 --> 0:18:33.217
<v Speaker 1>found the home she lived and was listed for sale.

0:18:33.257 --> 0:18:35.617
<v Speaker 1>The problem was he wasn't selling her home. She was

0:18:35.657 --> 0:18:38.697
<v Speaker 1>the victim of home title fraud, a devastating crime happening

0:18:38.737 --> 0:18:41.017
<v Speaker 1>all over the country. According to the experts at home

0:18:41.097 --> 0:18:43.897
<v Speaker 1>title lock, the crime is incredibly profitable and hard to detect.

0:18:44.217 --> 0:18:47.177
<v Speaker 1>An identity thief simply creates a fake title transfer for

0:18:47.217 --> 0:18:50.017
<v Speaker 1>your home and refiles as the new owner. Then he

0:18:50.057 --> 0:18:51.857
<v Speaker 1>can take out loans on your home or sell it.

0:18:52.217 --> 0:18:54.977
<v Speaker 1>Typical identity theft services don't cover you, and neither does

0:18:55.017 --> 0:18:58.817
<v Speaker 1>homeowners insurance. Home title lock does. Home title Lock puts

0:18:58.857 --> 0:19:01.497
<v Speaker 1>a barrier around your home's title the instant they detect

0:19:01.537 --> 0:19:04.017
<v Speaker 1>anyone tamper with their home's title, They help shut it

0:19:04.097 --> 0:19:05.977
<v Speaker 1>down and help get your home back in your name.

0:19:06.377 --> 0:19:08.177
<v Speaker 1>Here's what you should do. Go to home title loock

0:19:08.257 --> 0:19:11.137
<v Speaker 1>dot com and read the testimony from FBI agents and

0:19:11.257 --> 0:19:14.577
<v Speaker 1>government officials. Then register address to see if you're already

0:19:14.577 --> 0:19:16.297
<v Speaker 1>a victim and don't even know it. And when you

0:19:16.377 --> 0:19:18.257
<v Speaker 1>protect your home, tell them Buck sent you to get

0:19:18.337 --> 0:19:21.937
<v Speaker 1>thirty free days of protection. Home titlelock dot com. That's

0:19:22.017 --> 0:19:24.657
<v Speaker 1>home titlelock dot com will be right back with more.

0:19:25.057 --> 0:19:34.337
<v Speaker 1>Hold the line. Two weeks ago, the Supreme Court made

0:19:34.337 --> 0:19:37.777
<v Speaker 1>it clear that the Constitution guarantees law abiding citizens the

0:19:37.937 --> 0:19:40.897
<v Speaker 1>right to keep and bear arms for self defense, both

0:19:40.937 --> 0:19:43.417
<v Speaker 1>in their homes and in public. But on Friday, New

0:19:43.497 --> 0:19:45.737
<v Speaker 1>York Governor Kathy Hukill signed into law a new gun

0:19:45.817 --> 0:19:49.417
<v Speaker 1>control legislation that effectively nullifies the High courts pro Second

0:19:49.457 --> 0:19:54.537
<v Speaker 1>Amendment decision the Supreme Court's decisions were certainly setbacks, but

0:19:54.657 --> 0:19:57.777
<v Speaker 1>we view them as only temporary setbacks because I refuse,

0:19:57.937 --> 0:20:00.137
<v Speaker 1>as I've said from day one, I refuse to surrender

0:20:00.257 --> 0:20:03.017
<v Speaker 1>my right as governor to protect New Yorkers from gun

0:20:03.097 --> 0:20:06.497
<v Speaker 1>violence or any other form of harm. We're not going backwards.

0:20:06.937 --> 0:20:09.137
<v Speaker 1>They may think they can change our lives with the

0:20:09.177 --> 0:20:12.697
<v Speaker 1>stroke of a pen, but we have pens too. I

0:20:12.777 --> 0:20:16.297
<v Speaker 1>would say that Governor Hokel is rejecting federalism, but she's

0:20:16.417 --> 0:20:18.817
<v Speaker 1>a moron and doesn't know what federalism is. So there's that.

0:20:19.297 --> 0:20:23.897
<v Speaker 1>Jolie Outh reaction. Senior legal correspondent at The Federalist, Margot Cleveland. Margot,

0:20:23.937 --> 0:20:27.297
<v Speaker 1>thanks for being with us, Thanks for having me. Okay,

0:20:27.337 --> 0:20:29.537
<v Speaker 1>so first just tell us. I mean, you wrote an

0:20:29.577 --> 0:20:33.177
<v Speaker 1>in depth piece about New York's decision to tighten already

0:20:33.297 --> 0:20:37.737
<v Speaker 1>very strict and unconstitutional in fact gun laws. So what

0:20:37.977 --> 0:20:40.857
<v Speaker 1>have they done? This hasn't gotten a lot of media play,

0:20:41.017 --> 0:20:44.777
<v Speaker 1>yet what have they done in response? So, Buck, they

0:20:44.897 --> 0:20:49.297
<v Speaker 1>passed a law that actually did two very problematic things. First,

0:20:49.537 --> 0:20:53.897
<v Speaker 1>they put in very specific provisions for someone to apply

0:20:54.297 --> 0:20:58.617
<v Speaker 1>and obtain a concealed carey permit, and among other things,

0:20:58.697 --> 0:21:03.337
<v Speaker 1>that required very extensive training as well as background checks

0:21:03.537 --> 0:21:06.857
<v Speaker 1>and things along those lines, which is not the problem.

0:21:07.097 --> 0:21:10.697
<v Speaker 1>The problem is that it also requires the individuals to

0:21:10.857 --> 0:21:14.297
<v Speaker 1>turn over the names of any social media accounts they've

0:21:14.377 --> 0:21:17.657
<v Speaker 1>used in the last three years. And the problem there

0:21:17.937 --> 0:21:20.977
<v Speaker 1>is are they going to be looking at what an

0:21:21.017 --> 0:21:25.257
<v Speaker 1>individual's speech is to deny them the permit. Now, obviously,

0:21:25.537 --> 0:21:28.697
<v Speaker 1>when you have people on social media saying I'm going

0:21:28.777 --> 0:21:33.457
<v Speaker 1>to kill someone, things along those lines, completely legitimate issues.

0:21:34.017 --> 0:21:36.297
<v Speaker 1>But not if they're all of a sudden looking at

0:21:36.497 --> 0:21:38.617
<v Speaker 1>things such as we're going to fight back, we're not

0:21:38.737 --> 0:21:42.177
<v Speaker 1>going to election fraud happen, is that going to be

0:21:42.297 --> 0:21:45.697
<v Speaker 1>a basis to exclude it. So that's one part of

0:21:45.737 --> 0:21:49.297
<v Speaker 1>the opinion that's problematic. It sounds like they are going

0:21:49.337 --> 0:21:52.377
<v Speaker 1>to be looking at an individual's speech, and we're not

0:21:52.537 --> 0:21:57.177
<v Speaker 1>talking about violent speech threats, but just speech in general.

0:21:57.697 --> 0:22:01.697
<v Speaker 1>But the bigger problem is what the statute did. It

0:22:01.897 --> 0:22:07.217
<v Speaker 1>went through a through sub I think t sort of

0:22:07.497 --> 0:22:11.457
<v Speaker 1>places that it defined as sensitive places. I can I

0:22:11.497 --> 0:22:14.657
<v Speaker 1>Actually we have the Governor of Margo saying those sensitive

0:22:14.657 --> 0:22:16.297
<v Speaker 1>places I want to have your react to it. Go ahead,

0:22:17.457 --> 0:22:24.217
<v Speaker 1>shots ring out, flags come down, and nothing ever changes

0:22:25.937 --> 0:22:28.897
<v Speaker 1>except here in New York. In New York, we are

0:22:29.017 --> 0:22:33.057
<v Speaker 1>taking bold, strong action. We're tightening the red flag laws

0:22:33.297 --> 0:22:37.057
<v Speaker 1>to keep guns away from dangerous people, and we're raising

0:22:37.177 --> 0:22:40.977
<v Speaker 1>the age of semi automatic weapons so no eighteen year

0:22:41.017 --> 0:22:43.937
<v Speaker 1>old can walk in on their birthday and walk out

0:22:43.977 --> 0:22:48.457
<v Speaker 1>with an AAR fifteenth. Those days are over. Sorry, she

0:22:48.657 --> 0:22:50.577
<v Speaker 1>actually was going to list the places. That was a

0:22:50.617 --> 0:22:54.137
<v Speaker 1>different clip. So tell us about the places. Sure, So

0:22:54.417 --> 0:22:57.497
<v Speaker 1>the places are so broad it would have been easier

0:22:57.537 --> 0:23:00.457
<v Speaker 1>to say where you could carry a weapon, which it

0:23:00.657 --> 0:23:04.177
<v Speaker 1>sounds like is from your house walking down the street

0:23:04.377 --> 0:23:08.057
<v Speaker 1>to your car, because it excludes any places where the

0:23:08.137 --> 0:23:13.297
<v Speaker 1>public well come together. Could be in a protest, it

0:23:13.337 --> 0:23:16.497
<v Speaker 1>could be at Times Square, it could be at a

0:23:18.337 --> 0:23:22.297
<v Speaker 1>gathering to listen to, a music festival, a museum. It

0:23:22.497 --> 0:23:27.457
<v Speaker 1>goes through and details all of these places as sensitive places.

0:23:28.017 --> 0:23:31.017
<v Speaker 1>And the reason this is key is the Supreme Court

0:23:31.337 --> 0:23:34.737
<v Speaker 1>made clear the right to keep in bear arms is

0:23:35.297 --> 0:23:39.537
<v Speaker 1>bearing arms outside the home for self defense. And the

0:23:39.737 --> 0:23:45.537
<v Speaker 1>exception in the opinion spoke of sensitive places such as

0:23:46.017 --> 0:23:52.617
<v Speaker 1>polling places, the legislature, and schools. It didn't expand it

0:23:53.017 --> 0:23:56.137
<v Speaker 1>beyond that. And in fact, the Court said you can't

0:23:56.177 --> 0:23:59.257
<v Speaker 1>just say, someplace being populous is enough to make it

0:23:59.297 --> 0:24:03.137
<v Speaker 1>a sensitive place. So what New York did, and they

0:24:03.217 --> 0:24:06.897
<v Speaker 1>don't look like they're embarrassed by, they're actually proud, is

0:24:07.097 --> 0:24:09.497
<v Speaker 1>that they said, yeah, that's what the court said. But

0:24:09.657 --> 0:24:13.857
<v Speaker 1>work going to define sensitive places so broadly that the

0:24:14.057 --> 0:24:19.417
<v Speaker 1>right to bear arms in self defense is virtually a nullity, yea, Margot.

0:24:19.577 --> 0:24:23.897
<v Speaker 1>So how does this work in terms of possible legal challenges,

0:24:24.017 --> 0:24:27.737
<v Speaker 1>because it seems like what New York State's responses to

0:24:27.897 --> 0:24:31.137
<v Speaker 1>a constitutional ruling here is we're just going to find

0:24:31.257 --> 0:24:38.817
<v Speaker 1>a way through bureaucratic shenanigans essentially to achieve the same result,

0:24:38.897 --> 0:24:41.417
<v Speaker 1>which is to prevent people from legally being able. I mean,

0:24:41.457 --> 0:24:43.537
<v Speaker 1>that's clearly what they're trying to do, right. This isn't

0:24:43.577 --> 0:24:45.657
<v Speaker 1>stopping criminals who are buying guns out of the back

0:24:45.697 --> 0:24:48.817
<v Speaker 1>of cars illegally, because they're buying them illegally, So it

0:24:48.937 --> 0:24:51.217
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make any difference to those people. So for those

0:24:51.377 --> 0:24:53.257
<v Speaker 1>like me who are residents of New York. By the way,

0:24:53.297 --> 0:24:56.137
<v Speaker 1>so this is particularly interesting given that I think I'm

0:24:56.177 --> 0:24:59.457
<v Speaker 1>about to be applying for a concealed carry permit at

0:24:59.537 --> 0:25:03.417
<v Speaker 1>one point, is it no longer in keeping with the

0:25:04.497 --> 0:25:07.137
<v Speaker 1>law here and keeping with the response of this sort

0:25:07.137 --> 0:25:09.177
<v Speaker 1>of the decision of the Supreme Court, I mean, can

0:25:09.217 --> 0:25:11.617
<v Speaker 1>they say, yeah, sure, you have a right to conceal

0:25:11.737 --> 0:25:13.577
<v Speaker 1>car it's just going to cost you a ten thousand

0:25:13.617 --> 0:25:16.377
<v Speaker 1>dollar feet and you got away five years. I mean,

0:25:16.697 --> 0:25:19.937
<v Speaker 1>at some point, is it just obvious that they're refusing

0:25:20.017 --> 0:25:24.617
<v Speaker 1>to actually obey the constitution. So that point's already here,

0:25:25.097 --> 0:25:27.737
<v Speaker 1>and I would expect either this week or next week,

0:25:27.897 --> 0:25:30.737
<v Speaker 1>you're going to have what's called a facial challenge to

0:25:30.817 --> 0:25:34.457
<v Speaker 1>the law. And a facial challenge is where someone sues

0:25:34.537 --> 0:25:38.737
<v Speaker 1>and says, just the way it's written it is unconstitutional.

0:25:39.217 --> 0:25:41.337
<v Speaker 1>And I think you're going to see two arguments there.

0:25:41.417 --> 0:25:45.337
<v Speaker 1>You're going to see the argument that requiring me to

0:25:45.457 --> 0:25:49.297
<v Speaker 1>turn over my speech my social media, especially if if

0:25:49.417 --> 0:25:54.337
<v Speaker 1>someone doing it anonymously, violates my First Amendment rights, and

0:25:54.497 --> 0:25:57.177
<v Speaker 1>you can't force me to give up those rights to

0:25:57.337 --> 0:26:00.697
<v Speaker 1>exercise my Second Amendment rights right. And I think that

0:26:00.777 --> 0:26:03.977
<v Speaker 1>you're also going to have a facial challenge saying, on

0:26:04.137 --> 0:26:09.297
<v Speaker 1>its face, these sensitive places are not sensitive places. We

0:26:09.457 --> 0:26:13.697
<v Speaker 1>need the Core to declare that because otherwise I could

0:26:13.697 --> 0:26:17.097
<v Speaker 1>be subject to a felony, which is what the Court septs.

0:26:17.697 --> 0:26:21.497
<v Speaker 1>But you're also going to have as applied challenges. That

0:26:21.577 --> 0:26:24.097
<v Speaker 1>would be when someone like you goes in and applies

0:26:24.777 --> 0:26:27.497
<v Speaker 1>and you're waiting, and you're waiting and they say, oh, no,

0:26:27.657 --> 0:26:31.297
<v Speaker 1>we need ten thousand dollars and where we looked at

0:26:31.337 --> 0:26:33.737
<v Speaker 1>what you said online, we don't think you get it

0:26:33.897 --> 0:26:39.737
<v Speaker 1>because you said maybe something that seemed right wing. Then

0:26:39.897 --> 0:26:42.857
<v Speaker 1>you can sue and say they denied it based on

0:26:42.977 --> 0:26:46.697
<v Speaker 1>my speech, not based on my moral character, but based

0:26:46.737 --> 0:26:51.497
<v Speaker 1>on my viewpoint speech, or because it took so long

0:26:51.657 --> 0:26:54.177
<v Speaker 1>and it costs so much money, to other things that

0:26:54.257 --> 0:26:57.657
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court talked about in the opinion. They said,

0:26:57.777 --> 0:27:01.777
<v Speaker 1>it's fine to have these permitting schemes. What is not fine, though,

0:27:02.297 --> 0:27:06.137
<v Speaker 1>is if they have rules that are so stringent that

0:27:06.297 --> 0:27:10.857
<v Speaker 1>it prevents an ordinary American from exercise their right to

0:27:10.937 --> 0:27:14.057
<v Speaker 1>bear arms. And it's is it possible, Margot? It seems

0:27:14.097 --> 0:27:18.057
<v Speaker 1>like the game that some of these Democrat governors in

0:27:18.097 --> 0:27:20.577
<v Speaker 1>place like New York will play now is all right.

0:27:20.577 --> 0:27:24.617
<v Speaker 1>They'll just keep on coming up with new unconstitutional restrictions

0:27:24.697 --> 0:27:27.257
<v Speaker 1>and force it through force the challenge. Force the challenge,

0:27:27.457 --> 0:27:29.297
<v Speaker 1>I mean, can a governor be held in content by

0:27:29.297 --> 0:27:32.057
<v Speaker 1>a federal Court, like, I just wonder, is there any

0:27:32.257 --> 0:27:34.617
<v Speaker 1>is there any mechanism here to protect people from just

0:27:35.017 --> 0:27:39.217
<v Speaker 1>the continued bad faith violation of state law or a

0:27:39.337 --> 0:27:44.417
<v Speaker 1>federal law rather by a state governor. Not really that's

0:27:44.457 --> 0:27:46.937
<v Speaker 1>an answer. There isn't. And in fact, you make a

0:27:47.057 --> 0:27:49.657
<v Speaker 1>great point is what's going to happen is it's going

0:27:49.737 --> 0:27:52.817
<v Speaker 1>to start with litigation and it will go up to

0:27:53.297 --> 0:27:55.937
<v Speaker 1>the Second Circuit Court of Appeals and then up to

0:27:56.057 --> 0:27:59.737
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court. If the Second Circuit okays it, Supreme

0:27:59.817 --> 0:28:01.977
<v Speaker 1>Court might decide, you know what, we're not going to

0:28:02.057 --> 0:28:04.817
<v Speaker 1>talk about this for a while. It was almost twenty

0:28:04.937 --> 0:28:07.057
<v Speaker 1>years or maybe a little over twenty years since they

0:28:07.137 --> 0:28:10.417
<v Speaker 1>took their last Second Amendment case. The good thing, at

0:28:10.497 --> 0:28:13.737
<v Speaker 1>least with the latest ruling by the Supreme Court was

0:28:14.217 --> 0:28:17.297
<v Speaker 1>it gave a lot of guidance. And that's why when

0:28:17.337 --> 0:28:19.977
<v Speaker 1>I did my analysis, I could say, hey, this is

0:28:20.017 --> 0:28:23.577
<v Speaker 1>what the Supreme Court said, and this is definitely crossing

0:28:23.657 --> 0:28:27.337
<v Speaker 1>the line when you define sensitive places that broadly. But

0:28:27.577 --> 0:28:31.577
<v Speaker 1>the short answers know that the state legislative branches and

0:28:31.617 --> 0:28:34.337
<v Speaker 1>the governors they can pretty much just thumb their nose

0:28:34.497 --> 0:28:38.097
<v Speaker 1>at the law and the consequence is just going to

0:28:38.137 --> 0:28:42.217
<v Speaker 1>be mortal litigation. Amazing, Margot, great work on this, Thanks

0:28:42.217 --> 0:28:47.297
<v Speaker 1>for being with us, Thanks so much. Fame. Psychologist Jordan

0:28:47.377 --> 0:28:50.137
<v Speaker 1>Peterson is refusing to back down after being suspended from

0:28:50.137 --> 0:28:54.937
<v Speaker 1>Twitter for mis gendering transactor Elliott Page. Author and commist

0:28:55.017 --> 0:28:57.257
<v Speaker 1>David Marcus joins us to give his take on the controversy.

0:28:57.337 --> 0:29:06.777
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, Twitter is dropping the censorship hammer

0:29:06.857 --> 0:29:11.937
<v Speaker 1>once again. Latest victim is psychologist Jordan Peterson, who was

0:29:12.417 --> 0:29:16.177
<v Speaker 1>recently suspended from the platform for tweeting remember when pride

0:29:16.337 --> 0:29:19.337
<v Speaker 1>was a sin and Ellen Page just had her breast

0:29:19.417 --> 0:29:23.417
<v Speaker 1>removed by a criminal physician. Question Mark now struck in

0:29:23.457 --> 0:29:25.697
<v Speaker 1>a battle with Twitter over his suspended account. The only

0:29:25.737 --> 0:29:28.697
<v Speaker 1>way he's allowed back on the platform is to acknowledge

0:29:28.737 --> 0:29:32.977
<v Speaker 1>what he tweeted was against the Twitter guidelines, and he says,

0:29:34.017 --> 0:29:38.817
<v Speaker 1>no bleeping way, no bloody way, as Jordan Peterson would say,

0:29:39.097 --> 0:29:43.017
<v Speaker 1>Jodian I to discuss authored columns David Marcus, David, what's

0:29:43.097 --> 0:29:46.577
<v Speaker 1>up man doing? Well? Buck? I like when he like

0:29:46.777 --> 0:29:49.337
<v Speaker 1>car says a little bit too. Yeah, you know, I

0:29:50.177 --> 0:29:53.057
<v Speaker 1>know that Canadians say bloody, but apparently Jordan Peterson says

0:29:53.057 --> 0:29:56.897
<v Speaker 1>it all the time about Canada. Ay this is from

0:29:56.977 --> 0:30:00.377
<v Speaker 1>your piece in the Daily Wire. There are many myself included,

0:30:00.657 --> 0:30:04.977
<v Speaker 1>who have sprung themselves from Twitter jail by just deleting

0:30:05.017 --> 0:30:07.897
<v Speaker 1>the tweets. So the logic here, being a Twitter is

0:30:07.937 --> 0:30:10.337
<v Speaker 1>so clearly engross the acting and bad faith, choosing only

0:30:10.457 --> 0:30:14.657
<v Speaker 1>one side to punish. So yeah, I mean, this is

0:30:14.697 --> 0:30:18.937
<v Speaker 1>what they do, right, bend the knee or you're off. Yeah,

0:30:19.017 --> 0:30:20.977
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, I'm sure you're a surprised buck to

0:30:21.057 --> 0:30:25.337
<v Speaker 1>know that I've been suspended from Twitter for maybe intemperate

0:30:26.057 --> 0:30:29.697
<v Speaker 1>tweets once or twice. Yeah, that's my approach. My attitude

0:30:29.777 --> 0:30:31.857
<v Speaker 1>is I'll delete the tweet, I'll spend my time in

0:30:32.417 --> 0:30:35.057
<v Speaker 1>Twitter jail like it's good fellas, and jump back on

0:30:35.137 --> 0:30:38.537
<v Speaker 1>the platform because these people clearly aren't acting in good faith.

0:30:38.817 --> 0:30:40.937
<v Speaker 1>So when I saw the video of Peterson saying he

0:30:40.977 --> 0:30:44.217
<v Speaker 1>would rather die than do that, I was interested, and

0:30:44.297 --> 0:30:46.497
<v Speaker 1>I thought about it, and I realized it makes perfect

0:30:46.577 --> 0:30:50.897
<v Speaker 1>sense because this guy's whole philosophy that has really helped

0:30:51.017 --> 0:30:53.697
<v Speaker 1>millions of people around the world is rooted in the

0:30:53.777 --> 0:30:57.177
<v Speaker 1>concept of radical truth, that what you say has to

0:30:57.297 --> 0:30:59.497
<v Speaker 1>be honest, not just for the benefit of the person

0:30:59.577 --> 0:31:02.137
<v Speaker 1>that you're talking to. Although that too, but for your

0:31:02.177 --> 0:31:05.857
<v Speaker 1>own benefit, right. This is why he won't use people's pronouns,

0:31:05.937 --> 0:31:08.617
<v Speaker 1>and this is why he will never delete that tweet.

0:31:09.377 --> 0:31:12.817
<v Speaker 1>And although I don't share his philosophical perspective, I have

0:31:12.897 --> 0:31:14.937
<v Speaker 1>a hell of a lot of respect for it. By

0:31:14.937 --> 0:31:18.657
<v Speaker 1>the way, you mentioned this, he's drawing quite a line

0:31:18.697 --> 0:31:20.937
<v Speaker 1>in the sand on this one. This is doctor Jordan

0:31:21.017 --> 0:31:25.097
<v Speaker 1>Peterson telling everybody over his dead body that tweet gets eleted. Watch.

0:31:26.097 --> 0:31:31.097
<v Speaker 1>I've essentially been banned from Twitter as a consequence. I

0:31:31.297 --> 0:31:37.017
<v Speaker 1>say banned, although technically I have been suspended, but the

0:31:37.137 --> 0:31:40.777
<v Speaker 1>suspension will not be lifted unless I delete the hateful

0:31:40.857 --> 0:31:43.857
<v Speaker 1>tweet in question, and I would rather die than do that,

0:31:45.297 --> 0:31:47.697
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully it will not come to that, although who

0:31:47.777 --> 0:31:53.017
<v Speaker 1>the hell knows. In these increasingly strange days, indeed, who

0:31:53.057 --> 0:31:56.697
<v Speaker 1>the hell knows, it feels like it does keep getting crazier.

0:31:56.777 --> 0:31:58.297
<v Speaker 1>I think there was a little bit of a moment

0:31:58.377 --> 0:32:03.457
<v Speaker 1>here where Elon must it seemed, put a little bit

0:32:03.497 --> 0:32:07.097
<v Speaker 1>of fear into the Twitter Rottie. But they are back

0:32:07.177 --> 0:32:09.137
<v Speaker 1>at their old games, it seems, I mean, there is

0:32:09.177 --> 0:32:11.977
<v Speaker 1>Elon I'm still hoping buys Twitter and manages to turn

0:32:12.017 --> 0:32:14.617
<v Speaker 1>it into a platform for the free exchange of ideas.

0:32:14.657 --> 0:32:17.697
<v Speaker 1>But one thing I found fascinating about the Jordan Peterson

0:32:17.777 --> 0:32:22.097
<v Speaker 1>situation here is it's not even clear to me what,

0:32:22.417 --> 0:32:24.617
<v Speaker 1>like was this a dead naming issue? Like well, like

0:32:24.777 --> 0:32:27.257
<v Speaker 1>even in the crazy rules that Twitter uses. I was

0:32:27.257 --> 0:32:29.657
<v Speaker 1>sitting to say, wait, why was he suspended for this one?

0:32:29.777 --> 0:32:31.897
<v Speaker 1>Like I've said worse stuff than that on Twitter? I

0:32:31.977 --> 0:32:35.937
<v Speaker 1>think No, I mean, I have no idea. One of

0:32:36.017 --> 0:32:39.497
<v Speaker 1>my Twitter suspensions was it was right after Trump took

0:32:39.537 --> 0:32:41.977
<v Speaker 1>out Suleimani and there was all this talk about, oh no,

0:32:42.097 --> 0:32:44.537
<v Speaker 1>the Iranians are going to attack New York and I

0:32:44.617 --> 0:32:47.057
<v Speaker 1>tweeted something to the effect of if they touched New

0:32:47.137 --> 0:32:49.737
<v Speaker 1>York will turn it into a parking lot. And I

0:32:49.897 --> 0:32:53.057
<v Speaker 1>was suspended, I guess for insulting the nation of Iran.

0:32:53.217 --> 0:32:56.977
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Buck. These aren't rules, right, there's no rules.

0:32:57.417 --> 0:33:01.057
<v Speaker 1>There's just angry twenty somethings with colorful hair and pronouns

0:33:01.097 --> 0:33:03.297
<v Speaker 1>in their bios who want to control your life. I mean,

0:33:03.377 --> 0:33:07.177
<v Speaker 1>that's all there is. That's the that's the entire moderation process.

0:33:07.497 --> 0:33:10.177
<v Speaker 1>That's why Donald Trump can't have a Twitter account, and

0:33:10.297 --> 0:33:12.777
<v Speaker 1>the eyetola can. I mean, you try to figure it

0:33:12.777 --> 0:33:15.417
<v Speaker 1>out because I can. You know, Jordan Peterson put out

0:33:15.417 --> 0:33:17.177
<v Speaker 1>a statement on the suspension as well. He said, there

0:33:17.177 --> 0:33:19.137
<v Speaker 1>are This is about the rules issue. There are no

0:33:19.297 --> 0:33:21.217
<v Speaker 1>rules on Twitter except don't do what we don't like.

0:33:21.417 --> 0:33:24.617
<v Speaker 1>Today they are always applied post hoc by algorithms and

0:33:24.697 --> 0:33:27.657
<v Speaker 1>idiots bent on maintaining their woke superiority. I just think

0:33:27.697 --> 0:33:31.537
<v Speaker 1>it is worth everyone noting because so much of now

0:33:31.577 --> 0:33:34.577
<v Speaker 1>our communication, but really also national perception, at least in

0:33:34.617 --> 0:33:36.937
<v Speaker 1>the news world and news cycles, is driven by these

0:33:37.017 --> 0:33:40.457
<v Speaker 1>social media platforms that they did used to claim for

0:33:40.697 --> 0:33:46.217
<v Speaker 1>years that there was no ideological bias. It was just algorithms, man,

0:33:46.617 --> 0:33:49.017
<v Speaker 1>It's just the machine that you can't even see with

0:33:49.137 --> 0:33:52.657
<v Speaker 1>all the fancy numbers that that we're doing this. And

0:33:53.097 --> 0:33:55.657
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't like they were going after conservatives and we

0:33:55.777 --> 0:33:58.017
<v Speaker 1>were crazy for saying they were targeting us. I remember

0:33:58.057 --> 0:34:00.777
<v Speaker 1>this twenty fourteen, twenty fifteen. If you said it, oh

0:34:00.857 --> 0:34:04.057
<v Speaker 1>you're conspiracy, there's now they just straight up tell you, yeah,

0:34:04.097 --> 0:34:07.697
<v Speaker 1>that's right, Ben the Nee or else peasant, No, I

0:34:07.777 --> 0:34:11.937
<v Speaker 1>think that's right. And a big problem with this larger

0:34:12.017 --> 0:34:15.297
<v Speaker 1>than just the Peterson situation or the trans issue. I mean,

0:34:15.777 --> 0:34:18.417
<v Speaker 1>you go back to COVID, and you look at everything

0:34:18.537 --> 0:34:22.257
<v Speaker 1>that was censored and deleted and and taken offline, not

0:34:22.417 --> 0:34:26.577
<v Speaker 1>just by social media, but by our news media. We unfortunately,

0:34:26.617 --> 0:34:29.577
<v Speaker 1>at this point, have a historical record of the period

0:34:29.617 --> 0:34:34.177
<v Speaker 1>of twenty twenty and twenty twenty one that is utterly biased,

0:34:34.897 --> 0:34:39.777
<v Speaker 1>utterly incomplete, often completely inaccurate. And twenty years from now,

0:34:40.217 --> 0:34:43.097
<v Speaker 1>when students and historians go back to study this period,

0:34:43.457 --> 0:34:47.057
<v Speaker 1>the most consequential thing you have is the contemporaneous accounts. Right,

0:34:47.057 --> 0:34:48.537
<v Speaker 1>They're going to be going to the New York Times,

0:34:48.577 --> 0:34:50.777
<v Speaker 1>They're going to be going to the Washington Post and

0:34:50.937 --> 0:34:54.497
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and Facebook, and they're going to be seeing wise

0:34:55.257 --> 0:34:56.817
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know what we do about it. I

0:34:56.817 --> 0:35:00.817
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I really like this this fellow. I've had

0:35:00.897 --> 0:35:04.657
<v Speaker 1>him on my shows a few times. Zubie I'm sure

0:35:04.737 --> 0:35:07.377
<v Speaker 1>you're familiar with Zubie Um he put out does does

0:35:07.497 --> 0:35:09.777
<v Speaker 1>great work. I mean, I'm like, legitimately a fan of

0:35:09.817 --> 0:35:11.737
<v Speaker 1>a out of the stuff that he puts out. He

0:35:11.977 --> 0:35:14.457
<v Speaker 1>wrote that a society that punishes people who tell the

0:35:14.577 --> 0:35:17.857
<v Speaker 1>truth and rewards those who lie is not sustainable in

0:35:17.897 --> 0:35:20.817
<v Speaker 1>the long term. I think that's where we are now

0:35:20.857 --> 0:35:23.857
<v Speaker 1>as a culture. I think the people are punished for

0:35:23.937 --> 0:35:26.817
<v Speaker 1>telling the truth and rewarded for telling lies. And that

0:35:27.057 --> 0:35:28.857
<v Speaker 1>is not a bug, it is a feature. This is

0:35:28.897 --> 0:35:32.537
<v Speaker 1>almost a desired a desired status by those who are

0:35:32.537 --> 0:35:36.857
<v Speaker 1>in positions of power to direct the conversation. Yeah, and

0:35:36.977 --> 0:35:40.697
<v Speaker 1>it's and it's why I'm sympathetic to Peterson's position. And

0:35:40.937 --> 0:35:43.057
<v Speaker 1>you know, a friend of mine who's who I worked with,

0:35:43.137 --> 0:35:45.897
<v Speaker 1>the Federalist who's still there, John Davidson, is also banned

0:35:45.937 --> 0:35:48.937
<v Speaker 1>from Twitter right now. He does, honestly some of the

0:35:49.097 --> 0:35:52.177
<v Speaker 1>best reporting from the border. He knows it, you know,

0:35:52.257 --> 0:35:55.377
<v Speaker 1>he lives there, and he's in the same boat. He

0:35:55.457 --> 0:35:59.737
<v Speaker 1>won't delete it. I respect the choice. I think it's

0:35:59.777 --> 0:36:04.297
<v Speaker 1>a hard choice. But yeah, as to Zoobie's point, there's

0:36:04.337 --> 0:36:07.257
<v Speaker 1>something to be said for I'm not I'm not gonna lie,

0:36:07.937 --> 0:36:09.737
<v Speaker 1>and if that means I can't tweet, I can't tweet,

0:36:10.057 --> 0:36:11.737
<v Speaker 1>you know. And I've been talking about this. You remember

0:36:11.737 --> 0:36:15.057
<v Speaker 1>the I think it was was in Souls and Eatson's

0:36:15.617 --> 0:36:19.457
<v Speaker 1>addressed to Harvard University where he said live not by lies,

0:36:20.097 --> 0:36:22.897
<v Speaker 1>and that was really the theme of the speech. And

0:36:23.337 --> 0:36:25.577
<v Speaker 1>what we see increasingly is now we are a society

0:36:25.697 --> 0:36:30.417
<v Speaker 1>where wokeness and Therefore the Democrat id the the center

0:36:30.497 --> 0:36:34.377
<v Speaker 1>of the Democrat Party these days demand that you live

0:36:34.457 --> 0:36:36.297
<v Speaker 1>by lies. Actually, you know, men or women, women or

0:36:36.337 --> 0:36:38.617
<v Speaker 1>men up as down, down as up. I mean, this

0:36:38.897 --> 0:36:43.017
<v Speaker 1>is where we are actually as a society. Yeah, I mean,

0:36:43.137 --> 0:36:46.377
<v Speaker 1>I think that's exactly right. And I think everyone does

0:36:46.497 --> 0:36:49.937
<v Speaker 1>have to draw their lines. I think, you know, in

0:36:50.057 --> 0:36:52.457
<v Speaker 1>the piece I mentioned, there's polling that shows that Americans

0:36:52.497 --> 0:36:54.937
<v Speaker 1>are actually moving away from the idea that men can

0:36:55.017 --> 0:36:59.417
<v Speaker 1>become women. There's there's been this shift in the direction

0:36:59.537 --> 0:37:03.217
<v Speaker 1>of biological sex as determining gender. But that same poll

0:37:03.297 --> 0:37:06.097
<v Speaker 1>shows that that Americans really want to be nice to people, right,

0:37:06.137 --> 0:37:09.497
<v Speaker 1>They want to be kind, They don't want to be jerkes. Um,

0:37:09.577 --> 0:37:11.497
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, man, we might be getting to the

0:37:11.577 --> 0:37:14.217
<v Speaker 1>point where we have to risk being a jerk every

0:37:14.257 --> 0:37:16.697
<v Speaker 1>once in a while just to tell the truth. I

0:37:16.857 --> 0:37:18.257
<v Speaker 1>think that is where we are, by the way, and

0:37:18.297 --> 0:37:21.297
<v Speaker 1>I do believe that the left actually exploits the innate

0:37:21.457 --> 0:37:24.257
<v Speaker 1>kindness and decency of the American people on a regular

0:37:24.297 --> 0:37:28.377
<v Speaker 1>basis to get through the agenda. Essentially, go along with this,

0:37:28.697 --> 0:37:32.657
<v Speaker 1>just be polite to people, We'll just be polite to people.

0:37:32.777 --> 0:37:37.497
<v Speaker 1>Very quickly turns into celebrate drag Queen Story Hour with

0:37:38.057 --> 0:37:43.777
<v Speaker 1>you know, five year olds having grown men dancing in

0:37:43.857 --> 0:37:47.817
<v Speaker 1>their faces, you know, provocatively, like this is what ends

0:37:47.857 --> 0:37:50.017
<v Speaker 1>up happening with. Just be polite to people, so I

0:37:50.057 --> 0:37:52.817
<v Speaker 1>think people have had enough or else you're a bigot. Yeah,

0:37:52.897 --> 0:37:55.537
<v Speaker 1>or else you're a bigot, exactly, David always incifu, Matt,

0:37:55.537 --> 0:38:00.977
<v Speaker 1>thanks for being with us. Comedian Samantha b used a

0:38:01.097 --> 0:38:04.937
<v Speaker 1>recent monologue to incite pro abortion activists to harass Supreme

0:38:04.977 --> 0:38:07.017
<v Speaker 1>Court justices. We'll have the video for you in tonight's

0:38:07.017 --> 0:38:17.017
<v Speaker 1>Wickets Stay with Us. Samantha b incites the mob against

0:38:17.057 --> 0:38:22.337
<v Speaker 1>conservative Supreme Court justices, and Congresswoman Ilhan Omar of the

0:38:22.577 --> 0:38:25.857
<v Speaker 1>Squad got an unpleasant reception at a recent concert in

0:38:25.977 --> 0:38:28.857
<v Speaker 1>her home state. We have those stories and more in

0:38:29.017 --> 0:38:31.337
<v Speaker 1>quick Hits. Let's dive into it. Look, the lives are

0:38:31.337 --> 0:38:37.097
<v Speaker 1>not handling the restoration of the Supreme Court to a

0:38:38.137 --> 0:38:43.017
<v Speaker 1>deliberative body based upon constitutionalism instead of what they had had,

0:38:43.217 --> 0:38:46.777
<v Speaker 1>which is a left wing super legislature that just decides

0:38:46.897 --> 0:38:50.017
<v Speaker 1>what is best for people and then puts it from

0:38:50.297 --> 0:38:53.097
<v Speaker 1>drops it from on high like some eat it from

0:38:53.137 --> 0:38:55.937
<v Speaker 1>the heavens, or some people would suggests from another place

0:38:56.017 --> 0:39:00.017
<v Speaker 1>given some of the outcomes. So that's what's going on here,

0:39:00.577 --> 0:39:03.897
<v Speaker 1>and they're very upset. They're irrational, Their arguments don't hold up,

0:39:03.897 --> 0:39:08.737
<v Speaker 1>their arguments don't actually make much sense. Here is Samantha Bee, though,

0:39:08.977 --> 0:39:13.057
<v Speaker 1>trying to use the comedy platform. She's a comedian, aha

0:39:13.857 --> 0:39:19.497
<v Speaker 1>comedy platform. She has to call for the harassment of

0:39:19.857 --> 0:39:24.337
<v Speaker 1>Justice Alito for example. Why I can't describe how painful

0:39:24.377 --> 0:39:26.137
<v Speaker 1>it is to be here now in a place where

0:39:26.177 --> 0:39:29.297
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court has the power to erase fifty years

0:39:29.377 --> 0:39:32.737
<v Speaker 1>of constitutional law. Make no mistake, this is not where

0:39:32.737 --> 0:39:35.497
<v Speaker 1>it ends. Conservatives will not rest until they have come

0:39:35.577 --> 0:39:37.857
<v Speaker 1>for all of our rights. Everything we have fought for

0:39:38.017 --> 0:39:40.777
<v Speaker 1>could be lost unless we take it back. It's not

0:39:41.137 --> 0:39:44.417
<v Speaker 1>just about voting in November. It's about doing everything in

0:39:44.497 --> 0:39:47.737
<v Speaker 1>our power to protect and help vulnerable people access abortion

0:39:47.817 --> 0:39:51.017
<v Speaker 1>across state lines. And we have to raise hell in

0:39:51.137 --> 0:39:55.217
<v Speaker 1>our cities. In Washington, in every restaurant, Justice Alito eats

0:39:55.257 --> 0:39:57.977
<v Speaker 1>at for the rest of his life. Because if Republicans

0:39:58.017 --> 0:40:00.777
<v Speaker 1>have made our lives hell, it's time to return the

0:40:00.857 --> 0:40:04.497
<v Speaker 1>favor harass Supreme Court justices. This is what she's saying.

0:40:04.857 --> 0:40:06.297
<v Speaker 1>And I know if she's called out on that. She's

0:40:06.297 --> 0:40:07.937
<v Speaker 1>they're always just kidding. Did she seem like she was

0:40:08.017 --> 0:40:10.497
<v Speaker 1>kidding there and seeing she was getting it all to me?

0:40:10.697 --> 0:40:14.017
<v Speaker 1>But she's classless and unfunny and dumb on top of

0:40:14.097 --> 0:40:16.057
<v Speaker 1>it all, doesn't really know what the hell she's talking about.

0:40:16.097 --> 0:40:19.137
<v Speaker 1>But that's pretty standard these days, where the talking heads,

0:40:19.217 --> 0:40:25.817
<v Speaker 1>the celebrities and various entertainers and influencers who are weighing

0:40:25.897 --> 0:40:28.017
<v Speaker 1>in on constitutional law. Do you think any of them

0:40:28.057 --> 0:40:31.457
<v Speaker 1>have even read the Alito decision that overturned Row. Do

0:40:31.537 --> 0:40:33.577
<v Speaker 1>you think a single one of them even read the

0:40:33.657 --> 0:40:36.777
<v Speaker 1>first page? Now, of course not. They just have emotions

0:40:36.857 --> 0:40:43.537
<v Speaker 1>and feelings, shouting, yelling things, That's what they have. And

0:40:43.577 --> 0:40:45.937
<v Speaker 1>then there are other lives out there who are concerned

0:40:45.977 --> 0:40:50.577
<v Speaker 1>about American flags apparently, and how they can trigger people. Watch.

0:40:51.337 --> 0:40:54.977
<v Speaker 1>On July fourth, me and my family were celebrating and

0:40:55.297 --> 0:40:58.457
<v Speaker 1>shooting all fireworks and a jeep was coming down the streets,

0:40:58.457 --> 0:41:01.017
<v Speaker 1>so we had to get out of the street. And

0:41:02.497 --> 0:41:04.937
<v Speaker 1>as the jeep went by, it had two American flags

0:41:05.017 --> 0:41:08.977
<v Speaker 1>flying high, and in the South that typically means trumplicants

0:41:09.057 --> 0:41:15.217
<v Speaker 1>and supporters and all that wonderful. But I looked at

0:41:15.257 --> 0:41:17.977
<v Speaker 1>my neighbor, and I asked her if she got a

0:41:18.137 --> 0:41:20.897
<v Speaker 1>knot in her stomach when she saw the flag now,

0:41:21.177 --> 0:41:25.457
<v Speaker 1>and she said, yes, she did. And I just attribute

0:41:25.497 --> 0:41:29.417
<v Speaker 1>that to the insurrection. I attribute that to all the

0:41:30.057 --> 0:41:36.017
<v Speaker 1>proud boy and white supremacist waving the flag high and

0:41:36.977 --> 0:41:43.497
<v Speaker 1>just the Trump cards' Oh you just see her, You're like,

0:41:43.577 --> 0:41:46.737
<v Speaker 1>she's just such a miserable cat lady. It's so obvious,

0:41:46.937 --> 0:41:52.097
<v Speaker 1>you know, just so empty inside. I feel badly for her,

0:41:52.177 --> 0:41:55.657
<v Speaker 1>while it is also amusing see somebody who is scared

0:41:55.737 --> 0:41:59.457
<v Speaker 1>of the American flag in lotto more far left wing

0:41:59.537 --> 0:42:02.617
<v Speaker 1>number of Congress, of the so called squad. As well,

0:42:03.297 --> 0:42:05.897
<v Speaker 1>she didn't get the reception she was expecting at a

0:42:05.937 --> 0:42:25.937
<v Speaker 1>concert in Minnesota over the weekend. Watch this one evening. Okay,

0:42:42.137 --> 0:42:45.617
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know why they are buoying her, but

0:42:47.617 --> 0:42:53.017
<v Speaker 1>somebody whose political positions deserve getting booed, so I guess

0:42:53.057 --> 0:42:54.697
<v Speaker 1>it's something love about doing. Do we even know why

0:42:54.737 --> 0:42:56.217
<v Speaker 1>were they booing her? Guys, I don't even know what

0:42:56.337 --> 0:42:58.857
<v Speaker 1>was that was that all about? Just oh, because she's

0:42:58.897 --> 0:43:01.217
<v Speaker 1>just awful? Oh okay, well, you know, in that case,

0:43:01.297 --> 0:43:04.097
<v Speaker 1>looks like Minnesota's waking up because she is awful, there

0:43:04.177 --> 0:43:06.737
<v Speaker 1>you go. Oh good job Minnesota. Maybe stop electing so

0:43:06.777 --> 0:43:09.457
<v Speaker 1>many Democrats that ruin everything for everybody. Just an idea

0:43:10.097 --> 0:43:12.137
<v Speaker 1>that's ever Tonight told the line the no Spinoos with

0:43:12.337 --> 0:43:13.977
<v Speaker 1>Bill O'Reilly is next. She'll tie