WEBVTT - Top Performers From Comeback Win vs. Rams, Previewing Week 10 vs. Seahawks | Bucs Insider

0:00:05.559 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in two Bucks Insider Live Casey Phillips. Here was

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>senior writer and editor Scott Smith. We are coming to

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:12.639
<v Speaker 1>you a little bit sooner this week than normal because

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>we are flying to Deutschland tomorrow and there's a hurricane coming.

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:20.799
<v Speaker 1>Casual week in buccaneer world. Nothing to see here, so

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>as always, we're gonna get you prepared for everything you

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>need to know. But the upcoming game, this past game

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>talk about everything Buck and You're related, And if you

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>have any questions for us, you can put them underneath

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>a live video in the comments section on our Facebook.

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:34.879
<v Speaker 1>So for now, let's start with our news of the day.

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>One Camarta got a got a heck of an award.

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Tell us what happened, I would say, it's expected news.

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I would have been pretty mad if he did not

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 1>win NFC Special Teams Player of the Week. Of course,

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 1>it's all about me and how it makes it. No,

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean he was and I was thinking about this yesterday.

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>It's not often that you get to witness the best

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>game for your franchise ever played by a person of

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>specific position, like I think back to the day when

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>when Doug Martin had two fifty one yards and four touchdowns.

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:07.759
<v Speaker 1>That was the best day ever for a Buccaneers running

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:10.040
<v Speaker 1>back Jimmy Giles had four touchdowns against Miami and the

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>game that was the best day ever for a Buckaners Titan.

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not arguable this was the best game that a

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Buckaners punter has ever had. And it's not just statistical,

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>because his ability to win the field position battle for

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>a game that was just a grind the whole time

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and had fifteen punts and like fifteen combined three and outs,

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:31.680
<v Speaker 1>field position mattered, and he made it happen. And he

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:34.320
<v Speaker 1>had three of the eight longest punts in team history

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:38.039
<v Speaker 1>in one game, including the seventy four yard that tied

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to record by Seawan Landetta in the longest punt the

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:43.839
<v Speaker 1>Bucks I've ever had. And it wasn't just a number,

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 1>because it was it was a critical juncture. The Buccaneers

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 1>had come out in the in the in the second half,

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>got the ball first, went three and out, disappointingly, did

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>manage to force upoint, got the ball went three and

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>out again, disappointing, and then while trying to get the

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>punt off, committed to penalties and so you're on we're

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>just backing up. Yeah, and but I'll tell you this much.

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>He hit a fifty seven yard punt, but we committed

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>a penalty on the punt. The Rams at that point

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>could either tack on ten yards at the end of

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the return and take the ball and go, or back

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>us up ten yards and make us punt again. That

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>they regret that decision. They made the wrong decision. They did,

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:20.679
<v Speaker 1>you know. And I thought about how incredible his leg

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>strength and power is, not just for the distance he's getting,

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>but how many times he was asked to kick in

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 1>general in that game, because technically it had six points,

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>but if we think about it, he really had eight

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>because he punted eight times in terms of those penalties

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>having to redo at each time and they didn't count,

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>but in terms of what his legs asked kicked off. Yeah,

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>So this guy had to kick so much and was

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>still getting that kind of power behind his kicks with

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 1>his leg getting a lot of usage. By the way,

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>he made two of the four special teams tackles as well.

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I was incredible. I was a little concerned from on

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>that first one. I was like, oh God, But then

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>he's a heck of an athlete, so you know, um

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and also shameless plug. We had him and Bryant Suck

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>on the radio show this week. They are great, So definitely.

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he had the one blocked, but that's not

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>his fault. Bobby Wagner jumped over the line, but he

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>made a fifty yard and those three or four, Yeah,

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:10.919
<v Speaker 1>pretty incredible, all right. So um. Also, I know that

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>there were so many milestones we were talking about going

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>into that game, but one we hadn't even addressed was

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>this streak of consecutive passes without an interception for Brady.

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>There's a little bit of a you know, superstitious factor exactly.

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>And this is why I figured we'd tell everybody that, yeah,

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>we don't talk about these before, but now that it's happened,

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>we can talk about it and tell everybody this today.

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 1>And it's also been It's been put in notes, has

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>been put in stories. We're not the ones breaking the

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>seal here. Okay. So Tom Brady hasn't thrown an interception

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>since the fourth quarter of the Week one game against Dallas,

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and that is a streak of three seventy three passes. Now,

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>think about Tom Brady's career. This is his longest streak

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>of passes without an interception. Now, twenty three seasons into

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the best career ever four quarterback, and he's really he's

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>getting close. Hopefully he'll make that mark. He's passed his

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>own best and is what is at So he needs

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty more to uh to have the longest drink in

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>NFL history. Wow, and we're not Jake said, if folks,

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>it's already out there and we've already talked about it.

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>We just thought we'd let you hafens. Don't blame us,

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>not our fault. It really is incredible, and I think

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 1>just overall that the turnover and lack of turnover thing

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>has been so interesting. It's very bizarre. Now, what is it,

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:23.799
<v Speaker 1>five games the defense has not produced a turnover game minutes.

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's it's never happened before the first time

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 1>in team history it's ever happened. But then I will

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:30.720
<v Speaker 1>say that if you're going to have that statistic, at

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>least you are not turning it over. On the other

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>side of the we have one turnover as the Buccaneers

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:37.919
<v Speaker 1>do during that same span, and it was actually on

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>special teams. So the offense has also not turned the

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 1>ball over in five straight games. Yeah, it's incredible. And

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 1>of course, as we've been talking about Brady and the

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>things that he's very good at, uh, last last minute drives,

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the guy knows a thing or two about that. And

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>just explain a little bit about how incredible this end

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>of the game was, what they were able to do

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and produce. There are we're talking about the win probability. Yes,

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:01.039
<v Speaker 1>so if you don't have you seen win probably win

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 1>probability charts. Yes. I love them, especially after the game

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>ends where they show a team was like you had

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>every Yeah, they're like these horizontal charts. Okay, I'll explain

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>this first. Um, according to with the win probability chart,

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>after the Bucks, you know that fourth down on our

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:20.600
<v Speaker 1>pen ultimate drive was incomplete. That gave us a They

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 1>gave us a five percent chance to win. This is

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>based on thousands of historical occurrences, and you know what

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>has happened with them. Um, it went up to the

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 1>Bucks had to get a stop on defense or they

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>would have run out of the the clock. So you know,

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>we get the ball back in the forty it's ten

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>point two percent and then Tom Brady starts making plays

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and you can see it just go up. Kate Doton's

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>even as big of a play as Kate Doton's twenty

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>yard catch, it only put the win probably probability up

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 1>by about five. But then Scotty Miller makes his two

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:49.160
<v Speaker 1>catches and now all of a sudden, we're at thirty

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>two point two percent. And then the penalty on Darian

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Kendrick against Mike Evans and the end zone makes the

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 1>first and goal at the one, and now it looks

0:05:56.920 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 1>like we have a two thirds chance of winning. And

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:00.840
<v Speaker 1>after we score, it's not at a hundred because there

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 1>was nine seconds left. But it was pretty amazing. Those

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:07.839
<v Speaker 1>charts are very interesting because they you know, they got

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the line down the middle and they have one team

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 1>on top of one on the bottom, and the line

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:15.280
<v Speaker 1>goes up and down and you know something, Okay, they

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 1>have a sixty chance. Okay, now they have a sixty.

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>This whole thing was like this and then went whoop

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>all the way up to the rams and then down

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>in just seconds. That's so ridiculous. And so what were

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:29.839
<v Speaker 1>some of the big takeaways for you offensively for the

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:33.039
<v Speaker 1>team this last Sunday and the things that you knew

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 1>that they've already been talking about and working on, and

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:37.599
<v Speaker 1>how many of those did we see improvement? Where do

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>we feel like they're still working? Kind of as you

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>take a look at that game, as all of course,

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>winds feel like they cure everything, but it doesn't mean

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that everything necessary. No. One good thing that was better

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>was third downs. The Buccaneers were something forty two ncent,

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 1>which still isn't as good as they were last year,

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:55.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's a big improvement over been what's been happening. Um,

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:58.239
<v Speaker 1>So that was a big improvement. Otherwise than the overall

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>numbers on offense weren't great. But what I take away

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:02.479
<v Speaker 1>from that, and especially at the end of the game,

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:08.040
<v Speaker 1>was when they were taking away Mike Evanson and Chris Godwin,

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Scotty Miller, Kay Doton, a couple of guys became reliable

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>targets that Tom Brady could count on. And you have

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>to have that and and think about the fact that

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>through a lot of this the last two years of

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable offensive success, we've generally had a third guy and

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 1>even a fourth guy that Tom Brady could count on

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and was comfortable going to Rob Gronkowski for a long time,

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Brown. It's sort of been by committee this year,

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and there's been a shuffling of the of the lineup

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>do some due to injuries, but you saw in this game,

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I would think that would make Tom Brady more comfortable

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and confident going to guys like Kay Doton and Scotty

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Miller when the defense is putting all their resources on

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>stopping are two big guys, right, No, that makes complete sense.

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>And how about defensively, I know that one thing we've

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>really talked about is the need for a complete game

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>both sides of the ball. And um, I mean, as

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>we we saw that win probably ability chart that they

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>did not give us a lot of odds, even the

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>idea of the defense having to get that stop that

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>was so critical of Ucial to get the ball backs.

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>And we know that they made some huge place to

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>just keep the team in this game. UM. So yeah,

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>just in your mind, what is the big takeaway defensively

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of especially after these last few games where there's been

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>some critique, and in criticism, I'm gonna sound repetitive, but

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm i'm gonna say third downs and this is that

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 1>was an issue last week, um when talking about the

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 1>problems that the Buck Bucks for having sustaining success going

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>into the second half, especially on defense, um uh, Todd

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Bull said third downs, and we really were doing poorly

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:45.439
<v Speaker 1>on both. But if you look at this game, they

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:47.319
<v Speaker 1>only gave up two in six yards. They only give

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:51.079
<v Speaker 1>up nine first downs. This is much better than the

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Buccaneers having. I remember the numbers were pretty good through

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:57.199
<v Speaker 1>three games. So the last five games there haven't been

0:08:57.200 --> 0:09:00.559
<v Speaker 1>particularly before this one haven't been particularly good. But look

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 1>at this, I mean, half as many first downs as

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>they had allowed on average, the third down percentage way down,

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>more than a hundred yards less. Overall, the rushing defense

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 1>was much better. I know, I know the Rams have

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a terrible running attack. I get it yards per carry,

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>completion percentage. I mean that's a big one because uh

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 1>less than you don't see that a whole lot. You'll

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:21.560
<v Speaker 1>see that too many times. And average game for play

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 1>three point seven is a really low number for a

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 1>team to get on offense throughout an entire game. So

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:28.439
<v Speaker 1>just improvement across the board. But I think the most

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 1>important thing there is third downs. And so for you

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 1>looking at this next week, it's so interesting is we

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 1>always talk about the schedule when it comes out at

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the year, and we start picking what

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>we think are wins and what we think our losses,

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 1>and this has just been such a weird year across

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the league and even specifically the Buck schedule. I think

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:46.679
<v Speaker 1>if we'd said, you know what, they're going to beat

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys, are going to beat the Saints, They're going

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to beat the Rams, and we just said that, you

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>would think their record would be very different than it

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 1>is now. And then you would have looked at the

0:09:56.400 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Seattle game before the season started, the ro They've got

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Wagner like, this is a team that's in rebuild and

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>this is an easy, easy w going into this point,

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>and that is absolutely not the case for this game.

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 1>So what do you think we should know about the

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks and what this matchup could look like, particularly compared

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>to what we would have thought earlier. Yeah, the thing

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 1>we need to know is the Seahawks are good. They're good,

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and especially on offense. And Gino Smith is one of

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the biggest stories of the entire NFL this season. He

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>has performed amazingly well. He's got a one or seven

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:30.439
<v Speaker 1>point two passer writing it's like third in the entire league,

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's deserved. This isn't flukey. He's doing it again

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:36.439
<v Speaker 1>and again. He also moves well, but he's been very,

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 1>very accurate. He can still hit the deep ball, which

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 1>was the big thing in the Russell Wilson era, but

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 1>he he also works the intermediate area, probably better than Rusted.

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 1>For most of his time there, that just wasn't his thing.

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's a tough offense to defend. You know, he's

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>they still they used to have Russell Wilson throwing to

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>d K Medcalf and Tyler Lockett. Well, they still have

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Metcalf and Lockett, and then those guys are fast. That

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.560
<v Speaker 1>kind is not only fast, but he's huge. It's a

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>tough challenge. They have three tight ends. They use a lot.

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:08.319
<v Speaker 1>They drest. Not only did did they get rid of

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Wilson and Wagner, they let both of their starting offensive

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>tackles walk in free agency and then just drafted two

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>guys and stuck them in there, Charles Cross and Abraham Lucas,

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and they're doing great. So it's it's a challenge now. Defensively,

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>they started out the season really really badly, probably gave

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 1>up the most points for the first three or four weeks,

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>But the last four weeks they've clamped down and they

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 1>they have one of the best scoring defenses in the league.

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Rookie quarterback Treek Woolen has been awesome. So they're just

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 1>getting a ton out of their young guys and it's

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>really working out well for him. All right, Well, that

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 1>is going to do it for us on this edition

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of Bucks Insider Live. Thank you so much for being

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>with us, and again we are flying out with the

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>team to Germany on tomorrow and so definitely stay tuned

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 1>for all the coverage going on in Germany of the game,

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the post game. We've got a lot of fun things

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>that we're trying to do out there in Germany, some

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>some fun videos, some fun events, and of course all

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>of our normal practice coverage, press conferences, all of that

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>s stay tuned to Buccaneers to come and we'll see

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you next time. Mm hmmmm. Thanks