WEBVTT - Goldman's Jeff Currie on the Silver Squeeze and the Coming Boom in Commodities

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:19.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisnal and I'm Tracy all Away. Tracy, So,

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 1>obviously markets have been really fun and wild and crazy lately.

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>You know. I think that, um, when we started talking

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>about some of the stuff with game Stop and everything

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 1>and a liquid small small stocks being pushed on message boards,

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>we didn't expect it to move to a major commodity market, no,

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>And I have to say, I'm reminded of the post

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>you wrote a week or two ago about how it

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>can always get crazier, and I think what we're seeing

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>right now is proof that it can indeed always get crazier.

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 1>But what started with a relatively small single stock game

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Stock migrated to a bunch of other stocks like AMC

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and Nokia, and then it seemed to go to the

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:09.680
<v Speaker 1>silver market. And I think silver future has jumped quite

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>a bit, although as we're recording this, uh, let's see,

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 1>it is February second, and they are starting to come

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:19.759
<v Speaker 1>back down a bit. But the notion that retail money

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>would go after a market as large as silver is

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty intense. Like that is a big market, certainly multiples

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>of game Stop. Now it should be noted that there

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>is some ambiguity about where this silver trade emanated from.

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:40.320
<v Speaker 1>There are people on the subrettit Wall Street bets to say, hey,

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>this isn't us. We never said anything about silver. That's

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>not clear. What is clear is that something happened and

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>in a span of just a few days, starting at

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the end of the last week, maybe Thursday, Friday through

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the weekend, basically every retail silver coin site was just

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>instantly out of inventory, some of them saying, um that

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>they got as many sales in two days as they

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>would expect to get for an entire month. So something happened.

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>They just sent silver demand both through physical demand and

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>also plays on the e t F and then into

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:18.519
<v Speaker 1>the future of market. Absolutely wild. Yeah, this is why

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I find some of the reddit or Wall Street bets

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:24.519
<v Speaker 1>pushed back on this really weird. Like they're all saying

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>that it's hedge funds buying silver and its bots trying

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 1>to push the price of silver up on the subreddit.

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>But the fact that all the coin stores are sold

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>out of American eagles kind of makes me think that

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 1>there is a retail component here. And I'm sure you know,

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Ken Griffin isn't going down to his local coin store

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to load up on Philharmonic coins or something like that. Now, Tracy,

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get to our guests in a second, But

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>have you um posted a video yet of you stacking silver?

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 1>You promise you were going to do that. I did,

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 1>but then I got really a side tracked and um

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>tired by the podcast recording schedule. I will do it.

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I will try it this week. I promise again. Maybe

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe you could, maybe you could time the release of

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the video for this episode. So, unfortunately, we're not interviewing

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 1>your dad because we've been talking about that forever. We

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>know your dad is a big silver bug, but we're

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>not getting him. But I'm extremely excited about our guests.

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>In fact, we booked him before all the silver mania

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>happened because there is actually so much more to talk

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>about in the broader world of commodities, and it was

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>originally we're going to talk about all that. So there's

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>so much going in commodities, silver, oil, the broader macro picture,

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 1>industrial commodities, copper, etcetera. All wild stuff this year. So

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>we have the perfect guest for it. We're going to

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>be speaking with Jeff Curry. He has the Global Head

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of Commodities Research at Goldman Sex or role he's occupied

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the two thousand and six longtime veteran at Goldman Sex,

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>been there for twenty five years and really just sort

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>of knows more about the commodities world than almost anyone

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>you'll speak to. So the perfect guest today, So um,

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Curry, thank you so much for joining us. Great

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me. Jeff. I don't want to get

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you in trouble or have you say anything bad about

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>people who buy commodities, But honestly, what is the deal

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>with people who go who buy silver? Because I will

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:23.119
<v Speaker 1>say that in my career following markets for the last

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>ten or so years, there's something about silver people. They're

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 1>just like wired a little bit different silver people, And

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll just leave it at that, silver bug, silver people.

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>What is the deal with silver? And why does stuff

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>like this happen? Well, you know, you know the piece

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:41.839
<v Speaker 1>we put out this this morning was silver is remains

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the Populist medal, And you go back in history for

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:50.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, hundreds of years. Silver has always been associated

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>with populist movements, and so the market today is focused

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>on the Hunt brothers cornering at the silver market as

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the his oracle analog. We think the appropriate historical analog

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 1>is actually William Jennings Bryan's Cross of Gold speech, where

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>essentially he argues that the government in the banks, um,

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>we're suppressing inflation and economic potential, which is similar to

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the rhetoric that the you know, the Wall Street veterate

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 1>hedit Um group was advocating. And the key here is that,

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, take somebody like Brian. He was advocating silver

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>coinage as a way of getting around this, and so

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 1>it has that historical populist element to it, and I

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 1>think that's really what it's at play here, and the

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>way we view the Wall Street Vets group is this

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>is just a continuation of the rise of populism or

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>it's just you know crescendo occurring um, you know, week

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>after week. That's representing I think this need for governments

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to address some these issues around income inequality and other

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 1>social needs. So we alluded to this in the intro.

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>But trying to force a squeeze in a commodity market

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.159
<v Speaker 1>is very very different to trying to force a squeeze

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 1>in a single stock with high short interest. How how

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:23.280
<v Speaker 1>effective do you think retail could be. And again we

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>should just repeat the Wall Street butts is refuting the

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 1>idea that they're behind all of this. But how effective

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>do you think retail could be in moving the price

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>of silver? At this point, again going back to the

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Hunt Brothers, there was significant regulatory changes in these markets,

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>in particular position limits that makes it almost nearly impossible

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>to be able to squeeze these markets on the same

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:51.599
<v Speaker 1>scale that we saw forty one years ago. Um, you know,

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:55.479
<v Speaker 1>and also in terms of thinking about the magnitude the

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:59.919
<v Speaker 1>size of these macro markets versus let's say game stock.

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, the size of the silver market in terms

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>of what's being produced and all out there is you know,

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>somewhere around three hundred billion US dollars. You know, it's

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>three hundred times the size of the original market cap

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of games. And so when we and by the way,

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a in our world, silver is one of the

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>smallest markets we deal with. You put something like gold,

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, in term you include everything in the central banks,

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>it's just like a seven trillion dollar market. But I

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>think you know, the key point here is that if

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>you take the what five million Wall Street Bets subscribers,

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>they would imply that each one of them would have

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>to own somewhere around forty two hundred ounces of silver

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to be able to replicate what the Hunt brothers did.

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Then the ability for them to do it, given position limits,

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>means that you would have to split the position fifty

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>three ways, with each position representing two hundred and seventeen

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 1>million dollars um, and they would all need to be coordinated. So,

0:07:56.760 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>in other words, it's nearly impossible to do in the

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>current environment, and that's one of the smaller commodities. I

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>think Wall Street Cuts is now seven or eight million subscribers,

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 1>so the number keeps going up. But point taken about

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the amount of firepower that would be needed, yeah, it

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>still seems very unlikely that they're going to do what

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 1>would be needed to really corner this market. Jeff, you know,

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>there's this persistent myth or this thing that people say,

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>and I don't really understand it, but I guess it

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>gets back, you know, to some of the William Jennings

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Bryan populism. There's this persistent myth out there that the

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street banks and in particular JP Morgan for some reason,

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and I never understood why, what the what the story

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>is they're like, oh, they're sitting on this huge naked

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 1>short position, and if we just jack up the price

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of silver enough, they're gonna have to cover and then

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that's the way we're going to take down the bankers

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and get them back and all that stuff. Do you know,

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>like what do what? Can you walk us through the

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:57.959
<v Speaker 1>origin of this notion that for some reason banks Like

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>where did they get this idea that banks are sitting

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>on these huge unhedged short silver positions. If you look

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>at the c TC positioning reports, what you see is

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>that the U, the swap dealers, the banks are have

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:22.200
<v Speaker 1>very large short positions in um precious metals. Now, the

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 1>thing that's forgotten is that these are typically hedges to

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the physical positions and like the E T s And

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 1>that's the one thing that makes commodity markets very different

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>from financial markets or the long only markets is that

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>there's zero sum, meaning that for every long is a short,

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think people forget that. And also, you know,

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>it goes to a broader point about the ability for

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>um speculators to impact these markets. Uh, when you have

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a speculator coming and buy the share of a company,

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the only way you create more supply of those shares

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:59.839
<v Speaker 1>is through the SEC approval and then you issue new shares,

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:02.840
<v Speaker 1>so if the speculator buys those shares, they can drive

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:05.559
<v Speaker 1>up the price. Now, when you think about a commodity

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:09.079
<v Speaker 1>market like let's say, you know oil or something like that,

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>where you have the the you know every long there

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 1>is a short, you're adding more loans means you're adding

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the short. Now, what separates silver and gold from all

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:21.079
<v Speaker 1>the other commodity markets is that E t F is

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 1>physically backed. And so to answer your question, what they're

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 1>observed is the fact that the lights of the entities

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that are supporting those e t F s are using

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the comac silver market as a hedge mechanism. And hint,

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>that's why you see the shorts in that market. But

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I actually always want to quickly go to a point

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>about the physical aspect of those e t F gold

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and silver is if you take the the the current

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 1>size of the of the gold et F, you know

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>it's somewhere around a hundred and fifty billion dollars of gold.

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>You could put the hundred and fifty billion dollars into

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>your office. It may break the floor, it's so heavy

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>it falls through. But the key point is that you

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>don't need a lot of space to store it. Now,

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>in contrast, if you take the oil et F, which

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>is all paper, not physical, and you look at the

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>total amount in there, it's something like a hundred and

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>eighty million barrels. By the way, don't quote me on

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>these numbers I made. They changing quickly. But the point

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to illustrate here is that if you take

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and eighty million barrels, one BLCC carries two

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>million barrels. So think about this, A hundred and eighty

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>million barrels is ninety blccs. Now, why don't you even

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>envision in your head parking ninety b LCCs in the

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>East River, New York or the Thames here in London.

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>It becomes incredibly difficult. Now, in contrast, you take that

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred eighty million barrels at fifty dollars a barrel, that's

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>nine billion dollars parked out on the Thames River. And

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>if you can think about the gold et F, I've

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>just stored a hundred and fifty billion dollar dollars in

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>my office. I'm gonna get you need to concrete floor

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to be able to store. But the key message here

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>is you can do it, you can't do it in oil.

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Hence why you have physical e t s in both

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>gold and silver. Yeah, don't take physical delivery of oil,

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>something I learned from first hand experience. So so what's

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:23.840
<v Speaker 1>your what's your take on why the price of silver

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>actually moved this week? If if we're saying that retail

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>probably doesn't have enough firepower to do it by themselves,

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:33.839
<v Speaker 1>what's going on here? Well, I mean in terms of

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>looking at you know, near term volatility. Absolutely, they can

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 1>create volatility by moving uh, you know, in and out

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>of the market and creating velocity and changes in open interest,

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 1>which they are doing because you know, we're down again

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 1>today similar to this we were up. But in terms

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of thinking about a long term structural shift, you need

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>to have physical demand for those coins and real physical silver.

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>It's increased. What but is they going to create a

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 1>squeeze or anything of that, Megan to The answer is no.

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>And I so I don't want to dismiss the inability

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 1>to move markets, because clearly they did. Yesterday's silver was

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 1>up eight percent. But the question is are they going

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 1>to stay in this market and maintain those positions. That

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:21.200
<v Speaker 1>becomes a much more difficult task because the one thing

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>about commodities that separates them from again from financial markets

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 1>is not only are they long short, but also there's

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>an expiration that they mean the financial market expires into

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the physical, which means at some point they have to

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>roll these positions back out onto the financial market to

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:41.439
<v Speaker 1>avoid taking delivery like our example with oil, and because

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>of that need to roll, they prefer, you know, these

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 1>financial instruments like the E t F, which is where

0:13:47.640 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>most of the retailer activity remains. So regardless of where

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the uh the idea to go crazy to buy silver originated,

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>it did happen. Obviously we saw the buying and the

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 1>s l V E t F. I mentioned that the

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the coin dealers all had to put out put up

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 1>signs saying we can't sell coins right now because we're

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 1>out of inventory. As an analyst, now now that you've

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>seen this happen in the silver market, how do you

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 1>think about it going forward? Because maybe okay, this is

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna die down and maybe silver in a week or

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>two weeks we'll be back to where it was. But

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>now that this can happen and we're aware that they

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of like flash mob buying can happen in a

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 1>physical commodity. How does that make you think about sort

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>of like volatility in the space going forward, the risk

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 1>of it happening um again and sort of changing the

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>ability for the market to get at least short term

0:14:57.080 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>disrupted so quickly, so fast us all these markets, the

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 1>volatility has started to rise substantially, and this represents a

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>significant departure from you know, let's say two to three

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>years ago. UM. And I think it, you know, has

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>to do with the fact that you have these markets

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 1>running at much lower inventory levels, which goes into this

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 1>more structural story, you know, because you know, I think,

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>as you you're aware, we're advocating we're entering a new supercycle.

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 1>And the evidence that we're you know, in you know,

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>this transition between a tactical bowl market and structural bowl

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>market is that every single one of these markets, with

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the exception of zinc and coco, is in a deficit

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>right now. That's a very rare dinam, which means that, um,

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 1>when you have volatility of positions going in and out

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 1>of a market that has tight physical fundamentals is going

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to manifest itself in greater volatility. You know, we like

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 1>to say that the biggest shortage facing silver today is

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the ability to give the physical to the exchanges, whether

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 1>if it's the Leemy or the COMAX. And that's the

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>type of volatility that's being generated. Because if you have

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>more than adequate inventory everywhere, getting into an exchange is

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty easy. When you're short, it becomes much more difficult

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and creates, you know, much more volatility. On that note,

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>walk us through your structural both thesis, because I think

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of people, many people are going to

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 1>still be thinking about and we have this big hit

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to economic growth. We saw oil prices collapse, and a

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are thinking also that we're getting the

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 1>screen energy revolution, which might be bad for oil. So

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the notion that we're entering a long term up cycle

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>in commodities might be counterintuitive to some what's your line

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of thinking here, Well, we think about oil itself, it

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>actually benefits from the green stimulus in the very near term,

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>long before the energy transition begins to hurt its demand.

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 1>And let's say, and so when we put oil into

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 1>the mix we're talking about over the next let's say,

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, three to five years, we would see that

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 1>that tipping point is somewhere around four. But let's talk

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:22.160
<v Speaker 1>about what we think is creating that the structural bull market.

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>And we like to emphasize that while the vaccine represents

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 1>tactical upside, the pandemic itself creates the structural catalyst for

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 1>a supercycle type of bull market. And we would use

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:41.439
<v Speaker 1>analogy more like the seventies in the two thousand's, but

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:44.680
<v Speaker 1>it is back to see a bull market along those

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:47.680
<v Speaker 1>lines of either like the nineteen seventies or two thousand's.

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 1>And there's three themes that we're focused on. One is

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>structural under investment in supply, and historically we've termed that

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the revenge of the old economy, meaning that the new

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:02.399
<v Speaker 1>economy has capital away from the old economy because they

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:05.639
<v Speaker 1>have much better returns starved the old economy of the

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>building the ability to grow out the production capacity. That

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:11.679
<v Speaker 1>then creates a problem once we see a recovery and

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 1>demand as we're witnessing today and why nearly every single

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>one of these markets is in a deficit, and then

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:20.440
<v Speaker 1>we overlay E s G concerns on top of that,

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, you see a very tight supply picture going forward,

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>particularly in oil second big theme that we're focused on

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>is policy driven demand and we like to call that

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 1>revving commodity demand r E D. And what is the

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:43.360
<v Speaker 1>r E V and for redistributional policies environmental policies as

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:46.400
<v Speaker 1>well as versatility and supply chains. And you can think

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 1>about comparing this to seventies. Redigital redistributional policies are like

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the War on poverty in the night late sixties. In seventies,

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the environmental policies again like the seventies, are like the

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:02.679
<v Speaker 1>war are on acid rain where he took all the

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 1>sulfur out of out of the fuels. And then the

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>versatility and supply chains would be like the Cold War

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 1>with the Soviets. This time we have a Cold War

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>with the Chinese. And by the way, that Cold War

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:19.200
<v Speaker 1>type dynamic immediate play today. The Chinese are buying grains

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>at a very torrid pace right now. One of the

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 1>key reasons they want to create security and supply, just

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 1>like the Americans and Europeans did back in the late

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>sixties and seventies against the Cold War with the Soviets,

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>build up these strategic stockpiles at these critical commodities. So

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>again that's why we kind of like in the current

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>environment more being more like the seventies is fascinating. I mean,

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 1>talks us a little bit more about the under investment

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:48.359
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in commodities. I mean in the post grade

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:52.120
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis era. I think like in the immediate way

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:55.879
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine we saw this pretty big oil spike and

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 1>jump in other commodities, but basically it was just all

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 1>down downhill in a lot of industrial commodities, in particular

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 1>for the last decade. Talk to us about what that did,

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that long decade long bear market in commodities did to

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>um investment, how much under investment created and really what

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about when we talk about various industrial commodities

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:24.880
<v Speaker 1>being indeficit. Yeah, I think the bottom line is that

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the companies in these industries had very poor returns, and

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 1>those poor returns um you know, basically we're you know,

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 1>reached a peak or you know, they capitulated when we

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>reached negative oil prices in April of last year. And

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:47.679
<v Speaker 1>so when we look at the willingness of investors to

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 1>come into this space, you know it's gonna take a

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>significant track record before they show any interests. And you

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 1>know the reason why we termed it the revenge of

0:20:57.160 --> 0:21:01.439
<v Speaker 1>the Old economy. Goes back to the dot com boom

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 1>in the late nineties and early two thousand's a period

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:08.360
<v Speaker 1>in which you know, the tech sector was attracting all

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the capital because of you know, the much better prospects

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 1>and outlook. And essentially what occurred over that time period

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:18.679
<v Speaker 1>is investors abandoned the space. That's when you created the

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Exxon mobils, the vps, the shells because they had to

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>reduce costs to survive in an environment with very poor returns.

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:28.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if they come back this time because

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 1>you have the e S G overlay, Because you got

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to ask yourself, even if we went to a hundred

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:35.360
<v Speaker 1>dollar barrel hall, are you interested investing in oil when

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>you know it's only a to three year, maybe five

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 1>year proposition at best. I want to go back to that,

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the notion that there's a sort of arms race in

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:52.200
<v Speaker 1>commodities and in securing things like food and oil. One

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 1>thing I've never quite understood is I understand why you

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>would want to build a stock pile of something like

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>grains in the short term, but I'm trying to think

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>how to phrase this. This is kind of a stupid question,

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 1>But how long would that stockpile actually last? Like if

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you're buying a boatload of grains because you're worried about

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 1>food security way out in the future, Like, how useful

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 1>is that to you? What exactly is the strategy here?

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:22.639
<v Speaker 1>Is it about actually accumulating physical commodities in case you

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 1>run out? Or is it about building relationships and securing

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 1>supply lines with suppliers and countries and partners for the future.

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:36.360
<v Speaker 1>To answer that question, you just go back to biblical

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 1>times and you ask where does that seven year number

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:41.120
<v Speaker 1>come from? That you hear over and over. But when

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 1>we think about the strategic reserves in oil and the

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:46.880
<v Speaker 1>US has you know, six hundred seven hundred million barrels

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:51.400
<v Speaker 1>of oil that was built up during those nineteen seventies. Um,

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:53.879
<v Speaker 1>the oil lasts a lot longer, and they they recycle

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 1>it in and out and they make sure that it

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>is you know, up to par in terms of being

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 1>able to create products. Um. But I think you know,

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>going to to your your broader question here is that

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:06.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you look at China, there's a lot

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>of different motivations here, and we talk about versatility and

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>supply chains. You know, we're talking about duplicate five G

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:17.440
<v Speaker 1>networks responding to the trade war with you know, manufacturing

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 1>UM supply lines. You've heard Biden talk about made in America.

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>That's part of this dynamic that we're talking about. It means,

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, if if Biden wants to go out and

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 1>promote evs that are made in America and using unionized labor,

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 1>it means you need to build different supply chains in

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>America and that's going to take time and require more commodities.

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 1>So that's what we mean by this versatility and supply chains,

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 1>is this need to create your own secure domestic supply

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>chains to deal with you know, host of different issues,

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 1>whether if it were concerns around COVID, you know, people

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>realize supply chains were vulnerable, concerns around climate change, you know,

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 1>do you have enough firefighting capabilities in places like California?

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 1>UM And so I think you get the point here

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:04.200
<v Speaker 1>is it's a more of a broader type of comment

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 1>here than it is specific like it was like it

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:09.119
<v Speaker 1>was in the nineteen seventies. But it's kind of that

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 1>same dynamic. And when you look at capex, you look

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:16.880
<v Speaker 1>at global capex cycles since the nineteen fifties. We've seen

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:20.120
<v Speaker 1>two big capex cycles, one that started in the late

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>sixties and ended somewhere around sight and then another one

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that started around two thousand and one and ended around

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eleven. And both of those corresponded to big

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 1>bullmarkets and commodities, because commodities ultimary reflection of a capex cycle.

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:41.399
<v Speaker 1>So I love this idea that you know, the Biden

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 1>administration could be great for oil because obviously it's kind

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:48.120
<v Speaker 1>of intuitive, but the way you describe it is fairly Uh,

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:50.400
<v Speaker 1>it does make a lot of sense, and it's interesting.

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you have to sort of figure the Trump

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 1>administration was pretty oil friendly with its policies, but that

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:03.159
<v Speaker 1>was a brutal for years for oil stocks, Uh, the companies,

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the whole industry. How much of an effect um does

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>this have? Like you know, say, okay, like the Biden

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>administration is going to have a less generous approach to

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>new permitting, drilling and so forth. What does that mean

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>for sort of domestic the domestic industry and then therefore

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the upward pressure that that puts on prices. Well, you know,

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 1>first of all, the one thing about the policy here

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 1>is that it wants to use a carrot more than

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:33.919
<v Speaker 1>a stick. Um. You know, you look at Europe and

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:37.200
<v Speaker 1>now the blueprint and China, it looks more to using

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 1>a stick get rid of the dirty technologies and replace

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 1>them with the um the following defined technologies. At least

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a ministration here is using more of a carrot and

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:51.360
<v Speaker 1>incentive approach. Now, when we think about, you know, raising

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:53.919
<v Speaker 1>the cost of oil, um, the way I like to

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:57.119
<v Speaker 1>think about it is on the Federal lands, which represents

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, nearly three million barrels per day a production,

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:04.919
<v Speaker 1>they can actually create an implied well head carbon tax

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 1>there that raised the marginal cost of producing the barrel

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:11.400
<v Speaker 1>of oil. And because that shale barrel and these barrels

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 1>in the US are the marginal barrel that sets the

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:16.879
<v Speaker 1>price to the rest of the world, it effectively creates

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a carbon tax that is imposed on the rest of

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the world. UM. So you can, if you think about

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 1>it in that context, and that he has a unilateral

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:29.160
<v Speaker 1>capability to do it, takeaway drilling credits, tax credits, raise

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:31.919
<v Speaker 1>royalty rates and so forth of that nature. So it

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 1>is a way to get at this which then in

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>turn and sentivises investment in other types of clean energy.

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's say, like you know, he's proposing you know, doubling

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 1>capacity offshore. He can do that through you know, unilateral

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:49.719
<v Speaker 1>credits on the tax side, as well as you know,

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 1>improving learning standards for for that type of investment. So

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 1>so I do think that the one thing that's different

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 1>about this approach is it's focusing on the carrot as

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 1>opposed to the stick. Because one of the problems historically

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 1>with the US is if you use the stick, you're

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 1>going don't make these investments in these technologies. It gets

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 1>tied up in the courts. And if it's tied up

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>in the courts, um, you know, you can see Obama's

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>clean air policy is still tied up in the courts today.

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:18.639
<v Speaker 1>I would feel very remiss if we talked about oil

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and didn't mention OPEX. So when we talk about oil

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:26.400
<v Speaker 1>getting structurally more incentive through um, what's the word I'm

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>thinking of a inadvertent carbon tax? I guess, um, Sorry,

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 1>it's late and my vocabulary isn't as good as it

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 1>really is. But how how would we expect OPEC to

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:42.679
<v Speaker 1>respond to that? Why wouldn't they like it? Because ultimately

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>you're raising the price of oil? Um, And they're the

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:48.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, so you're basically they're the two bookends. In fact,

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the ability to grow supply, is

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>that the only short cycle production that can be brought

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:58.359
<v Speaker 1>on in the world if we see a big spike

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and price sometime in the next of months, it's the

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Middle East in the United States, and there are the

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 1>two bookends on. Middle East is the lowest cost, in

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the US is the highest cost. Everything else in between

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>is unlikely to be invested in. In fact, actually, when

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you look at part of the reason why Saudi is

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 1>willing to do a unilateral cut is that Nigeria Angola

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 1>can't even produce at their quota right now because production

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:26.000
<v Speaker 1>is dropping due to a lack of investment. In decline

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 1>rate sitting in Mexico another example of declining production. So

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 1>when we look at non opact production there, even some

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 1>of the non golf OPAC producers, they're struggling to be

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>able to maintain production where it is in the face

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>of a lack of investment. Goes back to that theme

0:28:43.280 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 1>of under investment. You know. Another thing that you said

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 1>in terms of like identifying the big pillars of the

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 1>structural bull market in commodities, redistributionist policies, and it seems

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 1>like the new administration is definitely going to you know,

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>something in the air. More people are into it, the

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 1>idea of actually, uh redistributing wealth downward, giving more households

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 1>buying power, and you liken that to the seventies. Talk

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to us a little bit more about how that plays

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 1>into your broader thesis. Absolutely critical and it's it's and

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to distinguish between the redistributional policies and the

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 1>environmental policies because you know, to use a term from

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the UK green leveling, using green capex to level income

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 1>is you know, a policy initiative. So the two begin

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to blend in with with one another. Now in terms

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 1>of thinking about how this differs from the previous ten

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to fifteen years is following the financial crisis. Policy was

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 1>focused on financial stability and as a result, it went

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 1>into banks that systematically created a decline in interest rates,

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 1>which mechanically raised equity valuations and created a wealth effect.

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>So stimulus work through the wealth channel. Who owns financial assets?

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 1>The higher income households, now they have a very low

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 1>marginal propency to consume, you give them a dollar, they're

0:30:28.040 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>going to save it. They only spend three cents on

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 1>each dollar. In contrast, today we look at most of

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the stimulus goes directly into the hands of the lower

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>income households who have a marginal propensity to consume of

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 1>meaning you give them a dollar, they'll consume one pennies

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 1>of it versus the higher income household that will consume three.

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 1>That is significant because what that tells you is that

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:55.719
<v Speaker 1>going forward, and you already see it in the postcode

0:30:55.800 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 1>level data in the US, is that you're seeing a

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 1>mechanical words shifting consumption. So that's point one. Point two

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>is that the consumption is more commodity intensive. High income guy,

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 1>he can he drives a tesla, his house is well insulated,

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and he eats fish. The lower income guy drives a

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a SUV with poor gas mileage, a poorly insulated house,

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and he most likely eats beef. The beef consumes four

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 1>times or excuse me, eight times more grains in the fish.

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 1>And then there's more consumption going into the SUVs and

0:31:29.800 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 1>into the houses. And you put this together and then

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, you look at the at the margin, the

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 1>lower income households, you give them a dollar, fifty cents

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 1>of it goes to commodities. In contrast, the lower income households,

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 1>you give them a dollar, thirty five cents of it

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:46.920
<v Speaker 1>goes to commodities. So not only do you get the

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>upwards shift in commodity or in overall consumption, it's more

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 1>commodity intensitive. And then one last point, you look at

0:31:54.960 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the colation between UM these transfer payments in commodity prices

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>going back to the sixties, they're very highly correlated. You know.

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I go back to the point about Milton Freeman made

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:11.719
<v Speaker 1>the point that, you know, inflation is a monetary phenomena.

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I think he needed a close to it. Now we've

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 1>learned after oh eight oh nine, provided that the money

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:19.959
<v Speaker 1>gets into the hands of the people who will spend it.

0:32:20.760 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I love the idea of measuring direct payments in terms

0:32:25.560 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 1>of impact on commodities. UM. So you mentioned inflation at

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the very end of that, and I wanted to get

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 1>into this because the dollar also factors into your structural

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 1>boal case. Can you walk us through how you're seeing

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the dollar and what it means for commodities and also

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:49.920
<v Speaker 1>how that would feed into inflation. Let's start with the

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:54.120
<v Speaker 1>reflation feedback loop. How does it work? It is the

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:57.400
<v Speaker 1>call it petro dollar recycling story, or whatever you want

0:32:57.400 --> 0:33:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to call it is. Let's take you know, US spends

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 1>money that weekends the dollar um similar to what we

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 1>saw on the second half of last year. A week

0:33:08.400 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 1>er dollar mechanically raises the cost of produce oil and commodities.

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Take copper and chili. The cost of producing copper is

0:33:17.160 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 1>denominated in local currency like wages for the truck drivers UM.

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 1>So a decline in the dollar and increase in the

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Chilean pay so it just pushes up the dollar price

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 1>of copper. So then we get to higher commodity prices.

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Higher commodity prices then in term increase the terms of

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 1>trade for those different countries and they now start building

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 1>global liquidity. Hence they're even Saudi Arabian. The month of

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 1>November December saw a rise in their liquidity because prices

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:49.959
<v Speaker 1>we got into that fifty five dollar range, and so

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the global liquidity then in turns gets lent out creates

0:33:54.880 --> 0:34:00.040
<v Speaker 1>more dollars, which does two things. Weekends the dollar of

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:03.840
<v Speaker 1>further increases the demand for commodities, and then you cycle

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 1>back over again. So that's how you get that reflation

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:09.000
<v Speaker 1>feedback loop. But I want to go into tying this

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:12.239
<v Speaker 1>into kind of the bigger theme here and got back

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:17.279
<v Speaker 1>to the redistributional policies. If we look at you know,

0:34:17.320 --> 0:34:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the current issues, you know, the populism and so forth,

0:34:20.800 --> 0:34:23.439
<v Speaker 1>I would argue they're mostly tied to this whole idea

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 1>of income inequality. And I challenge you to take a

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:29.120
<v Speaker 1>picture and look at income inequality over the last hundred years,

0:34:29.520 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 1>and when we look at when it's at its lowest

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:35.359
<v Speaker 1>point or when the world was the most equal in

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 1>terms of wealth and income, it was in nineteen seventy

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 1>nine nineteen eighty, a period in which we had the

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:48.279
<v Speaker 1>highest real commodity prices and you know, substantial inflation. And

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the reason why I bring this in with the discussion

0:34:50.440 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 1>of the dollar is that you take you know, July four,

0:34:54.000 --> 0:34:57.719
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight, we reached peak oil prices of

0:34:57.760 --> 0:35:00.360
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and forty seven dollars. It was also the

0:35:00.400 --> 0:35:04.400
<v Speaker 1>weakest dollar ever observed, one point six one against the euro,

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the exact same hour that that oil spiked to those

0:35:07.680 --> 0:35:10.759
<v Speaker 1>higher or higher prices. So when you see that dynamic

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:14.760
<v Speaker 1>between commodity prices in the dollar, it really does feed

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 1>on itself. But we now I go back to that

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 1>whole point about redistribution. If the policy aim here is

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to try to solve income inequality over a longer period

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:27.400
<v Speaker 1>of time, um, you're probably going to end up with

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 1>higher commodity prices as being a call it a collateral

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 1>damage of it because ultimately get more consumption. You know,

0:35:34.840 --> 0:35:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I really didn't expect this conversation to go there, but

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting because it's such a recurring theme on this

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 1>podcast of the conversations that Tracy and I have, which is,

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:50.319
<v Speaker 1>are we essentially at the end of the vulgar era?

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 1>And so if you think about the early eighties and

0:35:52.600 --> 0:35:55.399
<v Speaker 1>when the war on inflation really started to take off,

0:35:55.440 --> 0:35:58.360
<v Speaker 1>of this monetary policy dominance and the sort of forty

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:01.480
<v Speaker 1>year cycle, and we always sort of come back to

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:05.360
<v Speaker 1>this in different ways of is this the turn or

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:07.960
<v Speaker 1>are we coming to the end of this idea? It's

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:12.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of really interesting to hear you put that in

0:36:12.120 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the commodity context, but when you say that, uh, you know,

0:36:15.200 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 1>makes it makes a ton of sense. Yeah, I just

0:36:18.640 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 1>like to emphasize that when you think about these dynamics there,

0:36:22.080 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 1>they're really these longer terms that you're talking about, they're

0:36:24.600 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 1>really political choices. And the political choice back in the

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the late nineteen sixties is very similar to the one

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:37.040
<v Speaker 1>we have today now. Social unrest was high, racial tensions

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:41.040
<v Speaker 1>were running high, and you had the War on poverty.

0:36:41.440 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 1>You had, you know, at that point, you had you know,

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the environmental situation was terrible. You had smog, and so

0:36:48.160 --> 0:36:50.359
<v Speaker 1>you had to have that War on acid rain. By

0:36:50.360 --> 0:36:52.919
<v Speaker 1>the way, on that War on acid rain, taking the

0:36:52.960 --> 0:36:55.359
<v Speaker 1>sulfur out of the out of the fuels, and out

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:57.880
<v Speaker 1>of the sky to get rid of the smog actually

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:01.200
<v Speaker 1>accelerated the carbon problem. And he did the atmosphere because

0:37:01.520 --> 0:37:06.319
<v Speaker 1>sulfur is a coolant. Suit is heats the atmosphere. Um.

0:37:06.400 --> 0:37:08.160
<v Speaker 1>But I think the key point is we had all

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:11.680
<v Speaker 1>those similar type of social dynamics at play in the

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:14.640
<v Speaker 1>sixties and we had to solve them. And as we

0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:17.759
<v Speaker 1>chose to solve them, one of the implications of that

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 1>were higher commodity prices. Joe, I'm waiting for you to

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:23.760
<v Speaker 1>bring up M M T and ask what it means. No.

0:37:24.920 --> 0:37:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Tracy always always told me with that, but I didn't.

0:37:27.440 --> 0:37:30.279
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't gonna I wasn't gonna go there. I have

0:37:30.400 --> 0:37:33.440
<v Speaker 1>to sort of lightning round question type, and then I'll

0:37:33.480 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 1>let you go first. I'm just curious, what were you

0:37:36.640 --> 0:37:40.239
<v Speaker 1>doing when the price of oil hit negative forty list

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you you guys don't want to know. I

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:49.040
<v Speaker 1>was on CNBC UM talking about oil price. Okay, yeah,

0:37:49.040 --> 0:37:51.239
<v Speaker 1>we know that's fine, all right, No, actually I do

0:37:51.280 --> 0:37:52.880
<v Speaker 1>have a lot. But this is and this relates to

0:37:53.080 --> 0:37:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the silver question, the precious metals angle, and this is

0:37:56.080 --> 0:37:58.520
<v Speaker 1>something I'm curious about. We don't need to go too

0:37:58.600 --> 0:38:02.120
<v Speaker 1>into it, but there is this meme out there that

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:05.919
<v Speaker 1>somehow the rise of crypto is um eating into some

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:08.839
<v Speaker 1>demand from the very rich who might otherwise have been

0:38:08.840 --> 0:38:12.720
<v Speaker 1>putting their money into gold and silver as a store

0:38:12.719 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 1>of wealth. Is that something that you observe at all

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 1>from your perch? Very small at the margin. And the

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:25.000
<v Speaker 1>reason why I say that is right now, you look

0:38:25.000 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 1>at let's say the cryptome or bitcoin. You know, the

0:38:27.600 --> 0:38:31.080
<v Speaker 1>overall crypto market is roughly a trillion dollar market, bitcoin

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:37.480
<v Speaker 1>around six hundred billion. The institutional involvement in there is

0:38:37.520 --> 0:38:41.239
<v Speaker 1>somewhere around seven to ten billion dollars. It's still relatively

0:38:41.320 --> 0:38:45.879
<v Speaker 1>small magnitude of about one percent. So what's left over

0:38:46.280 --> 0:38:51.440
<v Speaker 1>are the specult retail investors, and they behave um in

0:38:51.520 --> 0:38:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a very risk on fashion. They're not treating bitcoin and

0:38:55.440 --> 0:38:59.759
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrency as a defensive asset like gold. Instead knit like

0:38:59.840 --> 0:39:04.080
<v Speaker 1>a turbo charged risk on asset that trades very much

0:39:04.120 --> 0:39:08.040
<v Speaker 1>like copper or iron ore, which trades off of positive

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:11.399
<v Speaker 1>growth news. And so if the current environment means do

0:39:11.480 --> 0:39:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to own crypto as a defensive asset, the

0:39:14.960 --> 0:39:18.760
<v Speaker 1>answer is not really no. And then there's also the

0:39:18.880 --> 0:39:23.759
<v Speaker 1>inherent transparency issues. Do big institutional players in you know,

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:28.280
<v Speaker 1>high net worth individuals want to own crypto? Given those issues,

0:39:28.560 --> 0:39:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the answer is probably unlikely. They're still gonna have to

0:39:32.000 --> 0:39:35.359
<v Speaker 1>use a custodial bank to purchase this stuff. And then

0:39:35.360 --> 0:39:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the custodio bank actually owns the crypto. So why do

0:39:38.920 --> 0:39:40.800
<v Speaker 1>we have crypto? And I like to go to the point,

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:44.120
<v Speaker 1>what are the physical properties of bitcoin that make it

0:39:44.239 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a commodity? It's the very first time in the history

0:39:47.560 --> 0:39:50.040
<v Speaker 1>of digital money. You can take it off the grid.

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:52.680
<v Speaker 1>You can put fort Knox onto the key fob, put

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:55.120
<v Speaker 1>it in your pocket and walk away. Why do you

0:39:55.160 --> 0:39:58.480
<v Speaker 1>want to take it off the grid? Maybe they should

0:39:58.480 --> 0:40:01.280
<v Speaker 1>find James stop Stock is a store of value instead

0:40:03.080 --> 0:40:05.759
<v Speaker 1>it's true. Oh, thank you. Thank you for clarifying that

0:40:05.800 --> 0:40:10.399
<v Speaker 1>as a joke. Jeff. This was so great. Jeff, this

0:40:10.480 --> 0:40:13.320
<v Speaker 1>was so great, Uh to chat with you. Um, I

0:40:13.440 --> 0:40:18.000
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate you coming on. Super fascinating, love the big

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:21.600
<v Speaker 1>big picture thoughts as well as the specific mechanics. Thanks

0:40:21.600 --> 0:40:24.160
<v Speaker 1>for coming on the show. Great. Thanks for having me

0:40:24.320 --> 0:40:45.080
<v Speaker 1>about that was really great, Jeff. Thank you, Tracy. I

0:40:45.480 --> 0:40:48.759
<v Speaker 1>really did not expect this conversation, as I mentioned, to

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:50.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of like fit in so well with some of

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 1>our like other broader macro conversations. But just the way

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:58.120
<v Speaker 1>like Jeff rounded that out that was so good. I

0:40:58.120 --> 0:41:00.319
<v Speaker 1>could He's another one. I could listen to him for

0:41:00.560 --> 0:41:03.319
<v Speaker 1>very long time. Yeah, for sure. And I gotta say

0:41:03.360 --> 0:41:08.959
<v Speaker 1>his point about the redistributive effects of direct payments being

0:41:09.000 --> 0:41:12.359
<v Speaker 1>different to quantitative easing like we saw after the two

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:15.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand eight financial crisis. I thought that was really interesting

0:41:15.200 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and something that I hadn't considered before. The idea of

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you're putting money directly into people's pockets, they're probably going

0:41:22.200 --> 0:41:25.799
<v Speaker 1>to go out and spend it on things that use

0:41:25.920 --> 0:41:31.479
<v Speaker 1>a lot of commodities to come into being. That was interesting. Yeah,

0:41:31.560 --> 0:41:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and just this whole idea of like the sort of

0:41:34.160 --> 0:41:39.280
<v Speaker 1>backloaded or front loaded effects on commodities from green spending.

0:41:39.360 --> 0:41:43.000
<v Speaker 1>So at some point the internal combustion engine may come

0:41:43.000 --> 0:41:47.040
<v Speaker 1>to an end and we really might have structurally lower

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:50.840
<v Speaker 1>oil prices forever. But in the meantime that is a

0:41:50.880 --> 0:41:54.279
<v Speaker 1>lot of capex spending right now and all kinds of

0:41:54.320 --> 0:41:58.520
<v Speaker 1>things and more money in people's hands that then increases

0:41:58.600 --> 0:42:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the demand. And then if you at on top of that,

0:42:01.560 --> 0:42:04.440
<v Speaker 1>it's like, okay, well, like who is going to invest

0:42:04.600 --> 0:42:09.960
<v Speaker 1>in expanding oil supply when in the long term oil

0:42:10.040 --> 0:42:13.240
<v Speaker 1>demand really will collapse due to everyone having an electric vehicle.

0:42:13.880 --> 0:42:16.000
<v Speaker 1>You could see how you could have the real makings

0:42:16.160 --> 0:42:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of a sustained spike. It may not last forever, but

0:42:19.280 --> 0:42:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you could see how you could have several years of

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:25.360
<v Speaker 1>extremely elevated prices. It makes a lot of sense. I

0:42:25.360 --> 0:42:27.400
<v Speaker 1>think the thing that comes through really clear here is

0:42:27.440 --> 0:42:30.399
<v Speaker 1>the idea that we're in a transition phase from some

0:42:30.440 --> 0:42:34.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of old economy to some sort of new economy.

0:42:34.600 --> 0:42:37.200
<v Speaker 1>So you know, call it whatever you want, Like the

0:42:37.239 --> 0:42:40.640
<v Speaker 1>baby boomer economy that was focused on returns and financial

0:42:40.680 --> 0:42:44.080
<v Speaker 1>assets and didn't really care about things like the environment

0:42:44.560 --> 0:42:49.000
<v Speaker 1>or fairness, or equitable distribution of wealth, and then maybe

0:42:49.000 --> 0:42:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the new economy starts to look a little bit different,

0:42:52.120 --> 0:42:57.040
<v Speaker 1>tech heavy, very E s G focused, looking at fuzzy

0:42:57.080 --> 0:43:01.480
<v Speaker 1>concepts like fairness and things like that. And the transition

0:43:01.520 --> 0:43:06.040
<v Speaker 1>period is going to be volatile to Jeff's point, but

0:43:06.120 --> 0:43:09.520
<v Speaker 1>you can see how it might throw up weird oddities

0:43:09.560 --> 0:43:13.800
<v Speaker 1>like commodities prices, the oil price getting higher in the interim,

0:43:13.880 --> 0:43:16.640
<v Speaker 1>even though the place we're eventually going to is a

0:43:16.680 --> 0:43:20.959
<v Speaker 1>place where oil is used much much less. No, it's weird,

0:43:21.040 --> 0:43:22.600
<v Speaker 1>but it makes sense. And again, you know, I go

0:43:22.680 --> 0:43:25.440
<v Speaker 1>back to the last four years. It's like literally the

0:43:25.480 --> 0:43:29.200
<v Speaker 1>opposite of the Trump administration, which was super oil friendly

0:43:29.280 --> 0:43:32.560
<v Speaker 1>but in the end terrible for oil given look if

0:43:32.560 --> 0:43:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you just look at oil prices, in the price of

0:43:35.280 --> 0:43:38.040
<v Speaker 1>oil company stocks, and so you can see how this

0:43:38.200 --> 0:43:40.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of like a very big irony, the ultimate irony

0:43:40.600 --> 0:43:43.120
<v Speaker 1>of how like E. S G and redistribution of wealth

0:43:43.200 --> 0:43:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and all this stuff could lead to. Also, that was

0:43:47.239 --> 0:43:50.719
<v Speaker 1>super interesting. I did not realize and he described it again,

0:43:50.840 --> 0:43:54.080
<v Speaker 1>so well, what Biden can do unilaterally by placing that

0:43:54.840 --> 0:43:59.080
<v Speaker 1>essentially the de facto carbon tax. Super interesting, clients, So

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:04.120
<v Speaker 1>thank you. That was the word I was looking for. Um, yeah, no,

0:44:04.280 --> 0:44:06.919
<v Speaker 1>that was really interesting. The idea that Biden could sort

0:44:06.920 --> 0:44:12.160
<v Speaker 1>of lead a global defacto virtue of the US being

0:44:12.239 --> 0:44:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the sort of pricing benchmark for oil. That's a big change,

0:44:15.880 --> 0:44:18.360
<v Speaker 1>so much that I learned a ton in just in

0:44:18.440 --> 0:44:21.120
<v Speaker 1>that period of conversation with Jeff. That was great. Yeah,

0:44:21.400 --> 0:44:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Jeff's good. All right, Um, should we leave it there?

0:44:24.600 --> 0:44:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's see it there. This has been another episode of

0:44:27.600 --> 0:44:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the All Thoughts podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow

0:44:30.520 --> 0:44:34.360
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter at Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe Wisntal.

0:44:34.440 --> 0:44:37.360
<v Speaker 1>You can follow me on Twitter at the Stalwart. Follow

0:44:37.400 --> 0:44:41.839
<v Speaker 1>our producer Laura Carlson. She's at Laura M. Carlson. Follow

0:44:41.920 --> 0:44:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg head of podcast, Francesco Levi at Francesca Today,

0:44:45.680 --> 0:44:48.399
<v Speaker 1>and check out all of our podcast at Bloomberg under

0:44:48.440 --> 0:45:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the handle add Podcasts. Thanks for listening to