WEBVTT - How to Catch a Time Traveler

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking. Hey there everyone, and welcomed up Forward Thinking,

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the podcast that looks at the future and says it's astounding,

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>time is fleeting. I'm Jonathan's Stricklin and I'm Joe McCormick.

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>And you know what, Jonathan, I give you a hard

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>time about a lot of your lyrics, but I think

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>that one was highly appropriate and enjoyable. Yeah. I think

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 1>so too, because today we're gonna be talking about a

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 1>really specific aspect of time travel that I wanted to

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>do an episode about for a while. Okay, and why

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>is that, Joe? How do you catch a time traveler? Well,

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:47.639
<v Speaker 1>I guess you have to be really careful. I mean

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:50.239
<v Speaker 1>someone's going to be able to stop time, or or

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>change times, or or zip through time, and would make

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>it pretty tricky. Do you mean, like like physically catch

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a time traveler just just figure out that a time

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>traveler was around. I mean you'd have to have some

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of very clever bait, like, uh, I don't know

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 1>what to time travelers eat? Oreos? You can catch me

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>using oreos. I think if you had a sonic screwdriver,

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>that'd be a good a good start. I thought at

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>least one of you was going to make some kind

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>of poke ball joke, like you got to catch them

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>all chrono poke ball. You severely under thread old. I

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:26.199
<v Speaker 1>am okay, No, I don't mean physically catching time travelers

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>like in a big bear hug or a net. I

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:32.960
<v Speaker 1>mean finding evidence of time travelers because okay, So we've

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>talked on the podcast in in previous Adventures through the

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Mind space about whether or not time travel is a

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>technological possibility, and basically the answer has always been maybe,

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>we don't know, like like like a very thin maybe

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>sure uh, or more specifically, the question of what kinds

0:01:55.480 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 1>of time travel are technically possible for humans, because, for example, well,

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>we know based on the theory of relativity that you

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>can travel into the future. All you have to do

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to do that is go really really fast, or or

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>you can just wait right. Yes, we are all time

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>travelers can travel into the future faster than the other people.

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>If you get into spaceship going the speed of light

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>ship a long loop journey, and then come back, you

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 1>will have traveled into the future. Time time will have

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>passed more slowly for you relative to the people who

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>stayed behind, But traveling into the past, we don't have

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>any laws of physics that seem to indicate that that's possible. Well,

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's sort of all these scenarios you can

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 1>construct based based on relativity. You can come up with

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the way that, well, if this were possible, we could

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 1>go into the past. We just don't know if it's possible, right, Like,

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>for example, if we were able to travel faster than

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the speed of light, we would technically be traveling back

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>in time, right, Or if you could create a wormhole

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>or create these closed time like curves, you could theoretically

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>travel into the past. We just don't know if we

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>can do that. But there's one way that we in

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the present here could look for evidence of whether or

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>not traveling into the past will ever be possible. And

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that method is, drumroll bela look for people from the future. Okay, gotcha. So,

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:23.799
<v Speaker 1>in other words, look for evidence that people have done this,

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:26.960
<v Speaker 1>people from the future have come back, and if we

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>find that evidence, then that suggests that in fact, time

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:33.919
<v Speaker 1>travel is possible. Yeah, totally. So there there could be

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>time travelers from the future walking amongst us today. But

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>if they're there, how do we find them. That's the

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>question that we're gonna ask today. Okay, And I'd say

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the first place we should start, because it's the most obvious,

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>is that maybe we won't have to find them. Maybe

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>they will just identify themselves willingly, for example, publicly on

0:03:54.560 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>internet forum. Yeah, this is in person. Yeah, well you know,

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you've got stuff to do. Uh. So there's

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a famous story of a character I guess it is

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the best way of putting it, named John Tetoor or

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>John Tighter, depending on how you want to pronounce the name.

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I always said, Yeah, I've heard it both ways. This

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>was a persona that was let's say invented. I'm gonna

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>go that far, because I think the evidence pretty much

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>points to hoax. He was an internet storyteller. Yeah, before

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>we closed the book, let's tell the story briefly and

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:36.280
<v Speaker 1>then and then say what our conclusion. Sure, alright, So

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the story is that this person traveled back in time

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>from the year two thousand and thirties six to warn people,

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>well really not even to warn people, but he did

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>warn people to harold. He happened to post on the

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Internet while he was taking care of some business. Yeah,

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>that business was that he said that in two thousand

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty six the world was on the verge of of

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>a collapse because of a legitimate problem, that is in

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the Unix operating system, that being a date problem. Now,

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:09.719
<v Speaker 1>you guys remember the whole y two K debaccle, right, yeah, yeah,

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 1>the idea that programmers had set a two digit year

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of programming languages, which works fine until

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you hit the year two thousand, because suddenly nine changes

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to zero zero, and all of a sudden, everyone's banking

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 1>is very confused, right, right, All the computer systems are

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>working as if the clock has reset, kind of like

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 1>if you've ever played an old style pinball game and

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the the score turns, so it goes back to zero

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and suddenly it doesn't know that you made a high

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>score anymore. Think of that except for worldwide consequences. Sure,

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and they two K bugs specifically was not the only

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>computer glitch that this sort of system was involved with, right, No, Generally,

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 1>there was this idea that Unix based systems would have

0:05:55.600 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a similar problem in the year. Right. And so here's

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:03.719
<v Speaker 1>where the story gets really funny to me. So the

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>story is that it's twenty six in his time, in

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>two years, everything's going to really fall apart. And their

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>big problem is that they don't have any technology that

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>interfaces with this Unix system anymore. It's Unix. Yeah, So

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>what they need to do is build a time machine

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to go back into time and get an IBM computer

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that can interface with these Unix systems, and with that,

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess, single computer fix everything so that catastrophe is averted.

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 1>And so he was sent back to nineteen to get

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>one of these machines, then did a quick stop over

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand in order to just you know, mess

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:46.599
<v Speaker 1>around a bit, uh, specifically to go and visit his

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>three year old self in two thousand. Uh. Now, the

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>first first indication of this time traveler at all was

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:57.160
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't even know this until we were researching

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>this recently. I did a full podcast about John titor

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:04.160
<v Speaker 1>On on a sister podcast, Tech Stuff, many years ago.

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>But Art bell received a facts and Art Bells was

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a radio host of Coast to Coast a m and

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the show was famous for let's say fringe topics. If

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>it's three AM and you want to tell a story

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>about how you saw a UFO land and werewolves got

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>out of it and probed holes in your body, you

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>call art Bell. Yeah, so the the facts is to

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>art Bell, were essentially stating that it was a time

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>traveler from the future and Y two K had caused

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>worldwide devastation and uh and so this was when the

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>facts has arrived, all right, by two thousand, when the

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>forum stuff was happening. By the way, there are a

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of people who suggest that the facts has sent

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>art Bell and the forum person were two different people,

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>but both working from the same general idea. Um. Now,

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>clearly by two else and we knew the Y two

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>K bug didn't cause worldwide devastation because hey, we were

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>still here. Yeah yeah, we spent you know, millions upon

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>millions of dollars and lots of man hours and woman

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>hours in order to fix the problem. So yeah, So

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>in this case, the the new person who originally went

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>under the handle time Travel underscore zero, I like it,

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>wrote wrote in a Time Travel Institute forum about how

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry I have to interrupt you because I love

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the idea that a genuine time traveler tried to register

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the account time travel, but it was already taken and

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>so underscore zero obviously didn't register in time enough I

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>don't see a problem with that. With time travel, that's

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>totally true. He could have traveled back to before the

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 1>user name was taken. Look, we all know from dr

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:57.320
<v Speaker 1>here that some events are inescapable the fixed points in

0:08:57.320 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 1>our timeline, and perhaps the creation of that particular user

0:08:59.880 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 1>hadle in that particular for him. So you know, there's

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:04.679
<v Speaker 1>just a weeping angel somewhere just typing and laughing. Ha

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 1>ha ha. I'm sorry I interrupted you. So he made

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>some predictions, Yeah, so, well he didn't. There weren't predictions.

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>He was talking about history, not predictions, right, So, first

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:18.719
<v Speaker 1>of all, he did say this was his get out

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>of jail free card. He said that the time travel

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:24.559
<v Speaker 1>machine actually did not take one back to one's own time,

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 1>but rather a parallel time that would be within one

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>to two percent in uh, in agreement, Yeah, in agreement

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>with their own So there'd be one or two percent

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:40.839
<v Speaker 1>deviation from the timeline, so certain things would be changed. Yeah,

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and also had kind of said that, you know, by

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:48.079
<v Speaker 1>going back and altering things, you could actually change the future. However, uh,

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>there were some things that suggested that he suggested what

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 1>we're going to happen, or said we're going to happen. Uh.

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:58.199
<v Speaker 1>Teacher also said that that the Olympics in two thousand four,

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that's the last one two thousand would be canceled, and

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>then there was a little, uh you know, civil war

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>in the United States by two thousand. He claimed that

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>he had served in it. He said he was like

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a shotgun soldier or something something influenced at any rate. Uh. Yeah,

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that by two thousand thirteen there's a civil war happening

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. Obviously that has not happened either. Uh.

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:27.199
<v Speaker 1>He then said that by two thousand fifteen, I believe

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>there was going to be a attack by the Russians

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, but seeing how's how the other

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>ones haven't panned out, I wouldn't worry too much about that.

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Um So, yeah, he he was making these statements and

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>was also really uh taking a pretty firm stance on

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 1>things about, you know, the stuff that people shouldn't do,

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>like they shouldn't eat beef because in the future mad

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 1>cow disease was a real big problem, and that they

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>needed to get off of that reliance upon beef now

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>rather than than you know, court disaster in the future.

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Um So. The thing was that, you know, the predictions

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:05.199
<v Speaker 1>that's made so far have not panned out at all.

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>It does look like it was pretty much a hoax.

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:11.839
<v Speaker 1>He also, uh, there was a John Tetor Foundation, a

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 1>for profit limited liability company that was formed in Florida.

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 1>The person who formed that is a lawyer, um, and

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:24.680
<v Speaker 1>his brother is a computer scientist. And yeah, I think

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I heard about this, didn't they. Like somebody hired a

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>private investigator to look into this and found out that,

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:33.679
<v Speaker 1>like the guy thought it was this computer scientist, there

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:36.439
<v Speaker 1>are quite a few people who and at least through

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the circumstantial evidence suggests that the uh, the brother is

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>in fact the the the brains behind John Tetar and

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the lawyer is the is the person trying to make

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 1>money from it. Um. But I mean again, that's what

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>we can say is there is a lawyer in Florida

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>who does have a company, the John Teeter Foundation, that

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:02.079
<v Speaker 1>he formed, and he has a brother who's a computer scientist.

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>That's all we can say definitively. However, based upon the predictions,

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't seem like this was a legitimate time traveler

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>who came back and um, you know, used a car

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that had been outfitted with a time travel device on

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 1>it so that he could um seamlessly fit into nineteen

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 1>seventy five. You know, there's this. It was a pretty

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 1>silly story, and of course his his point was that

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Teeter's point was that he could go back to nineteen

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:37.679
<v Speaker 1>seventy five, retrieve the computer, and then spend as much

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:39.959
<v Speaker 1>time as he wanted to in the past, because when

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 1>he returns to the present, Yeah, it would just be

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>a couple of seconds. So he said, oh, I came

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to two thousand, My mission is done. I'm done with

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:50.959
<v Speaker 1>my mission. What if he like died in two thousand

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and then never got to take the computer back. John

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Teeter clearly wasn't thinking this through. He was one of

0:12:57.440 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 1>supposedly one of like eight people on a mission, but

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 1>everyone had different parameters to their missions, and his was

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:06.079
<v Speaker 1>that he had to go back and get this IBM computer.

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>So was he so this car of his that created

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>singularities that took him through time? Did he also just

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>drive this around take it through the Taco Bell? Yeah? Essentially,

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was supposed to be like the I

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 1>remember that the requirements were that the car had to

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>have a really good suspension because it was a gravity

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:27.959
<v Speaker 1>drive that was the time travel device. Yeah, I'm I'm

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 1>telling you what the stuff that came out of this.

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 1>The other thing to remember is that even if this

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>were all possible, let's assume somehow that they were able

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to create a time travel like device, it would also

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>have to travel through space because the Earth would not

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:45.080
<v Speaker 1>be in the position that it was in when he left.

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>And then that's not the way cars travel through space, right,

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 1>but not not through space, Okay, I would have this

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 1>car just appear in the middle of of nothing. Okay, Well,

0:13:57.640 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe we can close the book on John

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 1>heat Or it sounds to me like I maybe jump

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 1>into conclusions here, but I think he wasn't a real

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 1>time traveler. I'm gonna pretty much say I think that's

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>that's skepticism. Yeah, okay, so of course he's not the

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 1>only person who's ever claimed to be a time traveler

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>from the future. But I guess we talked about him

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>because he's the most famous. He's the one everybody's heard of,

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>or at least he's he's one that we have lots

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>of documentation for because it all I'll played out on

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>internet forums, right, but all the stories are pretty much

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>like his or less interesting. They make predictions that are

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>either too vague and too far in the future to

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 1>be verified, or they turn out not to be true.

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>But that's not the only way to look for time

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>travelers or to find one. Rather, if they just like

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>come out and say, hey, I'm a time traveler, guys, yeah, yeah,

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>if we we can, we can have other methods to

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>find someone besides just hoping that they are going they

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 1>announce themselves. Yeah, then their ego demands they that the

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>world know them as time travelers. Right. Well, the other

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>thing we could do is int them to show up somewhere,

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, we've done that lots of times. Well

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 1>we haven't. Yeah, I've done episodes on time travel for

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 1>text Stuff back in the day, and I said, listen,

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing. This podcast is going out. It will

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 1>remain out there for quite some time. Here's an open

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 1>invitation for a time traveler to go through and and

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 1>visit how Stuff Works dot Com on this day. In fact,

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>we're recording this on October twenty, two thousand fourteen, at

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 1>around three forty five in the afternoon. If they want

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to come by, you have my permission to walk right

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>into the studio right now uh nothing, but see that's

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 1>just me doing it. I said five, they did, They've

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 1>got the time so I haven't seen the five flip.

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh there just went Okay, Okay, so time travel it's

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>never gonna happen, right, or at least completely. We can

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>at least suggest that if it does happen, either anyone

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>who does time travel doesn't listen to this podcast, which

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>is a possibility, or or that there's some other reason

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>why they wouldn't reveal themselves, or maybe they've got other

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff to do, like go to the m I T.

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Time Traveler convention. Right, I want to talk about this one. Okay,

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>two thousand five May seven. If you're a time traveler,

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 1>what are you doing? You're going to m I T

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Campus for an awesome, awesome party or what will be

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>an awesome party because or what would have been an

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>awesome party? I guess what will be then? What what

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 1>wasn't an awesome party but could be an awesome party

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 1>in the futures past. Okay, Okay, cut it out, cut

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 1>it out. Don't get into the timmey wymy jokes. We're

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 1>going down the road here, all right. Students at m

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I T and may have two thousand five, led by

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>an electrical engineering and computer science grad student named Amal Dorai,

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 1>held an official convention for time travelers. And I think

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 1>this is just an awesome idea. A little side note,

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the original website for this event still exists. It is

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 1>delightful and fully worth checking out. I think you should

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>go look it up. But according to Dry, any real

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:09.639
<v Speaker 1>lifetime traveler was welcome to show up at the event

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:13.119
<v Speaker 1>without rs V ping. All non time traveling attendees had

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to rs VP, but the time traveler had to bring

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>proof that he or she was from the future. He said,

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:22.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, anything that really seals the case will do,

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>but we would prefer proof that's also of practical use,

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>like a cure for AIDS, or a solution to world

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:32.400
<v Speaker 1>poverty or a cold fusion reactors. That's very deep thinking

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of him. I like that. Yeah. Uh so, in what

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:39.199
<v Speaker 1>I think was a very smart move, Dery and the

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 1>people involved with the conference focused heavily on press, on

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 1>getting the word out. This was a case where sort

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:50.639
<v Speaker 1>of shamelessly hounding media attention was not just understandable, but

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 1>it was a vital part of the experiment. Right. Well,

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, because the website wasn't going to stick around forever. Hypothetically,

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:01.920
<v Speaker 1>that's what he said, but has uh so far. But

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:03.359
<v Speaker 1>but they did in no way of knowing that at

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the times right. I just want to read directly from

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 1>their sort of frequently ask questions on the official website,

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 1>because I think this is hilarious. So the question is,

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:15.680
<v Speaker 1>why do you need my help? They said, we need

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 1>you to help publicize the events so that future time

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 1>travelers will know about the convention and attend. This web

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>page is insufficient. In less than a year, it will

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 1>be taken down when I graduate, and furthermore, the World

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:32.159
<v Speaker 1>Wide Web is unlikely to remain in its present form permanently.

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 1>We need volunteers to publish the details of the convention

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:39.439
<v Speaker 1>in enduring forms so the time travelers of the future

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>millennial will be aware of the convention. This convention can

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:46.159
<v Speaker 1>never be forgotten. We need publicity and major outlets, not

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>just Internet news think New York Times, Washington Post, books,

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing. If you have any strings, please

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:56.440
<v Speaker 1>pull them. I love this plea because there's the there

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>was the sphere. I guess that I don't know the

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Internet at the time. The Web is just this transient

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 1>thing keep in mind, this was after the dot Com

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:09.919
<v Speaker 1>bubble burst, and so there was there was already a

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:12.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, granted this was five years after that, but

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:15.880
<v Speaker 1>this was already a time where people had first saw

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the Internet as this this promised land, this this wild

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 1>West where you could build anything. The dot Com bubble burst,

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and then suddenly we all began to be a little

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:28.919
<v Speaker 1>more cautious about it. So and of course we were

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:32.159
<v Speaker 1>also talking about what is the next iteration of the

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Worldwide Web, which were still kind of waiting for, whether

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that's the semantic Web or Back in two thousand five,

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>we were still even thinking about the possibility of like

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:43.359
<v Speaker 1>a virtual web where we would have more of a

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a an experience where you're navigating like in the movies

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 1>where suddenly you're you're using a head a head mounted

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>display and you're your physically moving past things. And ultimately

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 1>we all said, you know that that sounds stupid, but

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 1>at the time that was really one of those things

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 1>we were thinking about. It's it's definitely more cinematic than

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:07.880
<v Speaker 1>scrolling and clicking on a web page, but in anywhere

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>at any rate. I love those nineties hacker movies where

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the hackers used game controllers and then that you encounter

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>a skull and crossbones and that's that's the security firewall

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:22.119
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, yeah, yeah. Anyway, so the dery and the

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:25.360
<v Speaker 1>people organizing the conference asked people to try to create

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 1>a big name for this conference so that it would

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>be remembered into the future, and to leave records in

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:36.160
<v Speaker 1>obscure places like physical lasting records. Right, so write down

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the details about the party and then just hide them

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>in library books all over the place, or or carve

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:46.359
<v Speaker 1>them into clay tablets or right or or or you know,

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:49.920
<v Speaker 1>put a new face on Rushmore that says party at

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 1>my place and time travelers. Yeah. So they eventually did

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:56.640
<v Speaker 1>get plenty of coverage in the press, including a subsequent

0:20:56.760 --> 0:21:00.919
<v Speaker 1>rite up in Nature News called Time Travelers Snow Conference.

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh well, I mean, you know, that's obviously we all

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 1>failed in our attempt to publicize this, and the time

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 1>travelers of the future just didn't know about it. That's

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>one way of interpreting it. Obviously, you can tell yes

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>from the title nobody no time travelers showed up. But

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>from what I hear, it was a great party. Yeah.

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Another party that happened was put on by Stephen Hawking.

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:29.199
<v Speaker 1>This was this was the best way of going about this.

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I think Hawking's affair to remember, and I think he

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:36.360
<v Speaker 1>added a really clever twist to this. So on June nine,

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Hawking held a party in Cambridge. All existing time

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 1>travelers were invited, so he must have had a lot

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of food and drink on hand. I hope. I don't

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 1>know how many time travelers you expect to be. You

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 1>gotta cast a wide net. Yeah, it's really hard to

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 1>tell the caterers. I mean, just like any Facebook event,

0:21:57.240 --> 0:22:00.040
<v Speaker 1>you invite you know, three times more people than and

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>actually fit into the venue because you know, not a

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are gonna hit maybe and that means

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:06.920
<v Speaker 1>they're not showing up. Right. Okay, so all the time

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>travelers were invited, but the catch was Hawking didn't issue

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the invitation for the party until after the party was

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 1>scheduled to take place, which is well after until after

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the party actually happened, right, Because that's the that's the

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>best thing, you know, is the idea that well, with

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:25.879
<v Speaker 1>time travel it doesn't matter when you announced the party,

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>as long as you make it clear enough that the

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 1>party was going to happen. And uh and the time

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 1>travelers would be able to travel back in time to

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>when the party was actually happening and arrived there. So

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>theoretically of time travel is possible, and if people were

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 1>to hear of it and they were wanting to go

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:44.440
<v Speaker 1>to this party, they could go to it even though

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the invitation happened after the event actually occurred. Right. He

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>was also focused on trying to get the word out

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:53.119
<v Speaker 1>and make sure that he left some kind of impression

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that would be accessible to the future. So he had

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>an invitation flyer made up. It said you are cordially

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:03.360
<v Speaker 1>invited to a reception for time Travelers hosted by Professor

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Hawking, to be held at University of Cambridge, Gonville

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and Caius College, Trinity Street, Cambridge. And then I love this.

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 1>It gave the exact global positioning co ordinance of the party,

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 1>So that's pretty awesome. That's good, That's that's important. Champagne

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>was served, though it can't have been all that rowdy

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 1>of a party because it was held at twelve noon.

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I've been to Cambridge. I think that

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>that's have you have you met the Have you met

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the footlights? Because trust me, they could tie one on

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean twelve noons, just when they get started in Cambridge,

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>might be when they woke up from the previous one.

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if maybe Hawking just didn't wait long enough

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>for the fashionably late time travelers to arrive. I I

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:49.199
<v Speaker 1>don't doubt. And maybe they kind of peaked in the

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:51.880
<v Speaker 1>windows and they realized that he'd already drank all the champagne,

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and they were like, well, would you be more fashionably

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:58.359
<v Speaker 1>late than like anyway? Right? So he He later publicized

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the party in the press and on the web, and

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:03.479
<v Speaker 1>had a very elegantly designed version of the flyer printed up,

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:05.359
<v Speaker 1>which you can actually still buy a copy of. I

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 1>thought about buying one because I thought that'd be a

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:10.200
<v Speaker 1>cool thing to have, he said about it. I'm hoping

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 1>copies of the flyer in one form or another, will

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 1>survive for many thousands of years. Maybe one day someone

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:18.359
<v Speaker 1>living in the future will find the information and use

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:20.959
<v Speaker 1>a wormhole time machine to come back to my party,

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>proving that time travel will one day be possible. So

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 1>who showed up to the reception Hawking? Nobody, nobody except

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:33.359
<v Speaker 1>talking Well, I don't know. He might have some other friends.

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:36.399
<v Speaker 1>No time traveler, No time traveler showed up. He later

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:40.159
<v Speaker 1>said during an interview at the Seattle Science Festival, quote,

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I have experimental evidence that time travel is not possible.

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I gave a party for time travelers, but I didn't

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>send out the invitations until after the party. I sat

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>there a long time, but no one came, which is

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:55.680
<v Speaker 1>so sad. He sounds like he's kind of like it

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of hurt his feelings. Well, I mean, you know,

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you might be sad for multiple since One you're sad

0:25:01.160 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>because no one came to your party. Too, You're sad

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>because apparently time travel is not possible. Three, you're sad

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 1>because you drink all of this champagne. And so you're

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:11.879
<v Speaker 1>extra sad about those first two things. Right, So I

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:14.400
<v Speaker 1>he maybe just sat there and watched all the excellent

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:19.119
<v Speaker 1>champagne go flat. Yeah. So, but this is this is

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:22.879
<v Speaker 1>obviously one of those things that we've seen demonstrated repeatedly.

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 1>It's not these are not the only two times as

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 1>has happened. I remember taking some of the most fabulous Yeah.

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I have taken classes in physics where the physics professor

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 1>would say, all right, everyone this class, remember this day.

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Write it down. Uh if this if time travel is possible.

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 1>I want a time traveler to come to the class

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:43.159
<v Speaker 1>this day. Of course, that depends upon everyone in the class,

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:46.120
<v Speaker 1>or at least someone in the class remembering that passing

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>it along so that that information ultimately gets to a

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 1>time traveler. These other examples we've mentioned had a better

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 1>chance because they were more widely publicized, although again you

0:25:56.040 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 1>could argue that uh, these, these uh events were publicized

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:05.199
<v Speaker 1>and then quickly forgotten about. Right, That's always a possibility

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 1>to Oh sure, sure, especially in the grand scheme of

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:12.679
<v Speaker 1>of human life. You know, these might not last more

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:16.199
<v Speaker 1>than a few centuries, so we might need to find

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:19.440
<v Speaker 1>other ways to look for time travelers that doesn't involve

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the time traveler standing up and being like, oh, hi,

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm here, I'm here. You invited me here, I am right,

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 1>which is where the use of big data comes in,

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>of course, always yeah, and I So, I want to

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:34.399
<v Speaker 1>talk about a paper that came out in January of

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 1>this year. It was January UM. It was called Searching

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the Internet for Evidence of Time Travelers by Robert J.

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Nimrov and Teresa Wilson of the physics department at Michigan

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Technological University, and I love their idea. I think it's

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 1>really cool. So the paper, uh, it's a fun read.

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 1>If you actually want to check it out yourself, it's there.

0:26:56.119 --> 0:27:00.439
<v Speaker 1>Their approach was, on one hand funny, but on the

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:04.400
<v Speaker 1>other hand, I mean actually probably the most scientific approach

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:07.439
<v Speaker 1>to this question that's ever been undertaken so far. Alright,

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>So what was this incredible scientific approach I want to know. Well,

0:27:10.800 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 1>they attempted to find evidence of time travelers by sifting

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>huge amounts of Internet data looking for quote prescient knowledge,

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:23.960
<v Speaker 1>which would be verbal patterns indicating that someone had knowledge

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:28.399
<v Speaker 1>of the future. And they had three methods. So first

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>was to look back at the web for terms that

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have made sense at the time they were published,

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 1>but which now refer to something meaningful now that we

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>have knowledge taking place later in time. So the two

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 1>examples given were search terms related to quote comet is

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:49.360
<v Speaker 1>on which was not discovered until September twenty one, two

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:53.959
<v Speaker 1>thousand twelve, and quote Pope Francis, who was formerly just

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:57.919
<v Speaker 1>a cardinal not named frances He was Joge Bergoglio, and

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:01.360
<v Speaker 1>he chose the pope name Francis and mar and there

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:04.439
<v Speaker 1>was previously no pope named Francis. He is the first.

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:09.159
<v Speaker 1>So they searched both web and social media. On the

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>social media, they looked at Facebook, though they explained that

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 1>a search of Facebook has limited value since results are

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of attenuated in terms of time, and you can

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:21.520
<v Speaker 1>back date posts. Well only that, but you know, you

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:25.639
<v Speaker 1>have a limited view of what's been posted based upon uh,

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:30.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, your security. But more usefully, they searched Twitter

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:35.879
<v Speaker 1>also for instances of key terms associated with these phrases

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 1>appearing basically before they should have in time. Then the

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 1>second thing they looked for, and I thought this was

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 1>really clever, was looking for prescient terms, not as published

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 1>on the web, but in search records, right, just just

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 1>in case of time traveler was you know, again trying

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe not to out themselves and so therefore wasn't posting

0:28:57.080 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 1>about their time traveling adventures all over the Internet, but

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 1>rather might have been looking something up before they really

0:29:02.560 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 1>should have been. This sounds like the worst history student

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 1>in the world. Like, it's a student who's been assigned

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 1>to write a paper about a specific point in history,

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and it would have to be a point in which

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 1>we have already created the Internet. They go back before

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>that event, even happens, because that's how bad a history

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 1>student they are. Then they happen to our limited internet,

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 1>which would look primitive by any futuristic standards, and search

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 1>for terms for things that haven't happened yet. That's exactly

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:35.720
<v Speaker 1>what what it would have been. I bet somebody from

0:29:35.760 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 1>a kid from the hundred has to write a report

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 1>on Pope Francis time travels back to two thousands. Like,

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 1>that's about right. Google's Pope Francis gets nothing, goes backusts Now.

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I will say this, based upon the search habits I

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 1>have seen high school students use, this is not that

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 1>unrealistic a scenario if time travel is in fact possible. Yeah,

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 1>so I think this is a really good approach because

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>even if time travelers are sort of being on their

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 1>best behavior and not publishing blog posts about future popes

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and comments, they might privately search for these terms. So yeah.

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 1>The Google trends unfortunately did not turn up anything interesting,

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 1>but the authors pointed out that Google may not remember

0:30:22.800 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 1>searches that have occurred at insufficient volume. So maybe if

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 1>somebody's only searched for something one time, ever, it doesn't

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 1>even show up in Google, right because you're looking at

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 1>your looking at such an enormous number of search terms

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 1>used like at any given time, that would be really

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 1>really tricky unless you have, you know, a a a

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 1>continent worth of students who all came back at the

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 1>same time. One of the studies authors, Nimrof, happened to

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 1>also have access to the back end of NASA's Astronomy

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Picture of the Day site and he he took advantage

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 1>of this to check to see if anybody had searched

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:04.720
<v Speaker 1>for images of comet ice on before it was discovered

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:09.720
<v Speaker 1>and named uh. Didn't turn up anything interesting, unfortunately. So

0:31:09.840 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the third method they used after looking for published things

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 1>in search terms was they invited future people to travel

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 1>into the past and to tweet at them or email

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 1>them with one of two hashtags. And I love this.

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 1>One of them is hashtag I can change the past

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 1>two numeral too UH. And this would be if we

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 1>discover that time travel occurs in a plastic history set

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 1>of conditions where the past timeline is changeable UH. And

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:40.520
<v Speaker 1>then the other option they did, which I thought was

0:31:40.600 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 1>really smart, was hashtag I cannot change the past too

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 1>numeral too. This would be if we discover that time

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 1>travel occurs in a fixed history scenario. In other words,

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 1>time travel is possible, but we would already have observed

0:31:55.160 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 1>its effects. This is consistent with something known as the

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Novikov's self consistency principle. It's the sort of theoretical way

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of thinking about the effects of traveling back in time

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:11.400
<v Speaker 1>that says that whatever whatever effects are caused by time

0:32:11.400 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 1>travelers have already been observed. Okay. So, in other words,

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the I cannot change the past two, which you could

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 1>argue actually changes the past by introducing not necessarily because

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:28.880
<v Speaker 1>they were careful not to search for the hashtag I

0:32:28.960 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 1>cannot change the past two until after they had placed

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the advertisement asking people in the future to go back

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 1>and place it got you. But even so, then you

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 1>know that time travel is possible, that in order for

0:32:42.640 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the time travel to have happened, that event must have

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 1>happened in order to precipitate the time travel that happens

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 1>in the future. And we're getting time Oh no, sure, sure,

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 1>now that makes perfect sense. I'm glad that they set

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:54.720
<v Speaker 1>it up as an experiment not only to find out

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:58.760
<v Speaker 1>whether time travel exists, but what model of the universe

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 1>of time travel we are operating under. That's that's good,

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, adding the extra layer. Yeah, so I

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 1>thought this was really clever and a lot of fun.

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 1>But unfortunately they say in the conclusions of the paper

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that they really didn't turn up anything interesting, Like, I mean,

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 1>we learned something interesting from the paper, but they they

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:20.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't find any results that really seemed to indicate time travel.

0:33:20.960 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 1>So we've tried all these ways so far of looking

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 1>for time travelers, but we haven't found any. And I

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:32.640
<v Speaker 1>want to transition to the question of why. In one way,

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 1>we could sort of look at this as a time

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 1>based version of the Fermi paradox. The Fermi paradox says, look,

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 1>there are all these planets out there, you know, they

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 1>could feasibly be holding alien life. So why aren't we

0:33:45.080 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 1>hearing any transmissions? Where is everybody really far away? Is

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:52.480
<v Speaker 1>my answer? But that could be yeah, yeah, yeah, but there, Yeah,

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a bunch of reasons why we might not have

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 1>found anyone. Well, sure, one of them is just the

0:33:56.600 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 1>fact that we have already mentioned the idea that people

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 1>in the future may legitimately have not heard these various invitations.

0:34:03.600 --> 0:34:06.239
<v Speaker 1>And it's not that they're being rude, it's just that

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:09.400
<v Speaker 1>they didn't know about it. Yeah. Another explanation would be

0:34:09.480 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 1>simply that time travel into the past is impossible, at

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 1>least for humans. Or maybe it's not impossible but simply

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:18.840
<v Speaker 1>never achieved. We will just never figure Maybe we would

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 1>have figured out time travel, but the day before we

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:24.320
<v Speaker 1>would have figured it out, we managed to kill everybody,

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 1>everybody on the whole planet. Yeah, like humanity. Yeah that's cheerful. Well, no,

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 1>there there are plenty of scenarios. Have you not heard

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 1>about these? About the doomsday? Various doomsday scenarios where that

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:38.120
<v Speaker 1>could also be swallowed by a catfish made of bubble gum.

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying it's one of the that's my favorite abilities.

0:34:42.320 --> 0:34:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Catfish made bubble bubble apocalypse. Another one is the idea

0:34:46.840 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 1>that that time travel might be possible, but we can

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:52.600
<v Speaker 1>only go back so far, right that so the time

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:56.920
<v Speaker 1>travel sort of you'd have to create a checkpoint. It's

0:34:56.920 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 1>your safe point in a video game. So you could

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 1>only and this has been suggested by thinkers smarter than

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:07.239
<v Speaker 1>us before, that it's possible to create perhaps some sort

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:10.239
<v Speaker 1>of wormhole based time machine that would only take you

0:35:10.320 --> 0:35:13.280
<v Speaker 1>back to the point at which the pathway you created

0:35:13.480 --> 0:35:16.880
<v Speaker 1>was created. So, in other words, any time before the

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:20.840
<v Speaker 1>time machine was built is inaccessible to us. Another is

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the causality branching idea. Right, that's the term I used.

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:26.920
<v Speaker 1>There's maybe a better way to explain this. But the

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 1>idea is that when somebody travels into the past, they

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 1>actually travel into one of an infinite number of parallel

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:36.359
<v Speaker 1>universe is what te Tours was saying. Yeah, so your

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:40.759
<v Speaker 1>chances of meeting one in your universe are fairly low. Right,

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 1>So in other words, you are not really traveling back

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 1>into your own time, uh timeline, you're trailing slipping dimensions. Yeah,

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and it maybe that it has a one to two

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:54.239
<v Speaker 1>percent deviation from your own home dimensions was talking or

0:35:54.239 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe donuts righting from the guy? Yeah or yeah, exactly

0:35:58.719 --> 0:36:03.520
<v Speaker 1>into that Simpson's treating the hard Exactly. You kill that

0:36:03.600 --> 0:36:07.800
<v Speaker 1>one mosquito and suddenly everything goes haywire. Another one, another

0:36:07.840 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 1>idea that I've seen in science fiction is the idea

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that if you were to travel back to your own timeline,

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 1>it would automatically create a copy of your timeline. So

0:36:17.640 --> 0:36:20.000
<v Speaker 1>let's say that I go back in time to visit

0:36:20.040 --> 0:36:23.359
<v Speaker 1>my younger self. Um, when I travel back as soon

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:25.840
<v Speaker 1>as I arrive at that point in time, it's a

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:29.880
<v Speaker 1>duplicate of our timeline. So everything up to that moment

0:36:29.920 --> 0:36:32.920
<v Speaker 1>in time is identical. But from the moment when I

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:36.120
<v Speaker 1>come in forward, it's a new timeline. It's it's a

0:36:36.160 --> 0:36:39.560
<v Speaker 1>branch almost. Yeah yeah, so I can. I can change

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that timeline without affecting myself because young you and your

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:47.120
<v Speaker 1>own timeline grows up and becomes you. Yeah yeah, But

0:36:47.239 --> 0:36:51.319
<v Speaker 1>the the me I'm looking at in in the time

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I travel back to is not the me because now

0:36:54.160 --> 0:36:56.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a branch to me. So I could kill me

0:36:57.400 --> 0:37:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and I'd still be okay, because the me my timeline

0:37:00.840 --> 0:37:02.960
<v Speaker 1>still grew up to become the me that traveled back

0:37:02.960 --> 0:37:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and was homicidomaniac. It's another version of parallel universes. Basically,

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm on a lot of cold medicine makes me violent.

0:37:12.120 --> 0:37:14.480
<v Speaker 1>That's really good to know, being that we're all trapped

0:37:14.520 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 1>with you in this very small st just intellectually violent.

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm too tired to be physically violent. Okay, shut up.

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about another intellectual possibility, which is

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:28.080
<v Speaker 1>that it's this is entirely possible. Time travelers from the

0:37:28.120 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 1>future are amongst us, but they're intentionally hiding, and so

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:35.279
<v Speaker 1>far they have been successful. This this one, to me

0:37:35.360 --> 0:37:38.480
<v Speaker 1>seems the least likely, actually, okay, most mostly because I

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:42.040
<v Speaker 1>know people and people make mistakes. Well, yes, people do

0:37:42.120 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 1>make mistakes, and they're not very good at keeping secrets.

0:37:45.600 --> 0:37:49.319
<v Speaker 1>But the question is how many time travelers are there? Well,

0:37:49.360 --> 0:37:51.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean if you're talking about if you're talking about

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:54.319
<v Speaker 1>an infinite amount of time, then there's an infinite number

0:37:54.360 --> 0:37:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of time travelers, likely because I'm pretty sure someone else

0:37:58.520 --> 0:38:00.759
<v Speaker 1>will figure it out, not just one person, unless that

0:38:00.760 --> 0:38:03.600
<v Speaker 1>one person figures it out and then eliminates everybody else.

0:38:04.040 --> 0:38:07.160
<v Speaker 1>To go back to my violence, but I would imagine

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:11.279
<v Speaker 1>that this would be incredibly difficult to hide over any

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:15.240
<v Speaker 1>length of time. Uh, anyone coming back making a mistake

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:17.759
<v Speaker 1>would obviously start to raise some eyebrows. Now you could

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:20.000
<v Speaker 1>argue that maybe other people in the future say, well,

0:38:20.040 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 1>let's go back and fix that. Yeah. Yeah, I like

0:38:21.680 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to think that there's like a time travel janitorial crew

0:38:24.640 --> 0:38:27.720
<v Speaker 1>that go out, but that just becomes a domino effect.

0:38:27.719 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 1>There was some movie I saw a trailer for within

0:38:30.560 --> 0:38:32.359
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of years that had a premise kind

0:38:32.360 --> 0:38:34.880
<v Speaker 1>of like that, didn't they I don't know. I've me

0:38:34.960 --> 0:38:40.280
<v Speaker 1>thinking about Looper. Ben Boland would say, you're thinking about Looper. Okay, Okay,

0:38:40.320 --> 0:38:44.360
<v Speaker 1>So what you're saying basically is that even the really

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:47.400
<v Speaker 1>smart time traveler from the future eventually is just gonna

0:38:47.400 --> 0:38:50.799
<v Speaker 1>be a total nano rod because we all are sometimes

0:38:51.239 --> 0:38:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and he's gonna make a mistake, She's gonna she's gonna,

0:38:54.200 --> 0:38:56.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, post a blog post that says something about

0:38:56.440 --> 0:38:58.799
<v Speaker 1>the future. I find it less likely that there would

0:38:58.840 --> 0:39:01.759
<v Speaker 1>be only one time traveler. That's the I would think.

0:39:01.800 --> 0:39:04.960
<v Speaker 1>If time travel is possible, I would expect there would

0:39:04.960 --> 0:39:09.840
<v Speaker 1>be multiple instances of it, and I can't be convinced

0:39:09.880 --> 0:39:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that through those multiple instances everyone does it perfectly all

0:39:14.040 --> 0:39:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the time. I would think the more frequently it happens,

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:20.799
<v Speaker 1>the more likely some trace evidence of that travel would

0:39:20.840 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 1>become noticeable. So that brings us to the question of

0:39:25.440 --> 0:39:28.719
<v Speaker 1>how can we go about ferreting out any of these

0:39:28.719 --> 0:39:32.120
<v Speaker 1>time travelers that are poking around making mistakes? Right? What

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:35.160
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been tried so far? So the Michigan study is

0:39:35.200 --> 0:39:37.839
<v Speaker 1>really fun and interesting, and kudos to them, But as

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:40.919
<v Speaker 1>the authors point out, it was very limited. I mean,

0:39:41.160 --> 0:39:43.799
<v Speaker 1>even if it is the most exhaustive search so far

0:39:44.640 --> 0:39:47.000
<v Speaker 1>it had, you know, it was kind of modest, pretty

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:50.000
<v Speaker 1>small in scope. Yeah, so what else could we do

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to use the data in the world around us to

0:39:53.160 --> 0:39:56.479
<v Speaker 1>look for time travelers evidence of time travelers? At least

0:39:57.400 --> 0:40:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I thought one thing would be simply to exp band

0:40:00.440 --> 0:40:04.320
<v Speaker 1>on what they already tried, because I mean, how often

0:40:04.360 --> 0:40:06.720
<v Speaker 1>are people from the future really going to be talking

0:40:06.719 --> 0:40:09.480
<v Speaker 1>about commt is On and Pope Francis. If you found that,

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that'd be really interesting evidence, But you wouldn't necessarily think

0:40:13.640 --> 0:40:16.799
<v Speaker 1>time travelers would be leaving data about those things on

0:40:16.800 --> 0:40:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the web. Yeah, so you'd really need to be looking

0:40:19.040 --> 0:40:22.640
<v Speaker 1>for anything that really caught the world by surprise, something

0:40:22.880 --> 0:40:26.040
<v Speaker 1>something that was huge news that there wasn't a lot

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:29.360
<v Speaker 1>of lead up to a combination of words specifically that

0:40:29.440 --> 0:40:33.200
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have made any sense before. Yeah, maybe the name

0:40:33.200 --> 0:40:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of an earthquaker disaster or a world leader, or a

0:40:37.800 --> 0:40:40.080
<v Speaker 1>disease that we only really found out about in the

0:40:40.080 --> 0:40:42.480
<v Speaker 1>past couple of decades. Right, And then you know, you

0:40:42.480 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 1>would want to try and make sure you limit that,

0:40:44.680 --> 0:40:48.320
<v Speaker 1>like anything that had a human cause would be somewhat

0:40:48.320 --> 0:40:52.480
<v Speaker 1>problematic because there's a possibility that the humans who caused,

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:56.000
<v Speaker 1>it might have had some activity that could change the results.

0:40:56.000 --> 0:40:58.719
<v Speaker 1>So that's why you would try to kind of avoid that.

0:40:58.880 --> 0:41:02.759
<v Speaker 1>Anything that was a plot, for example, there you might

0:41:02.800 --> 0:41:04.799
<v Speaker 1>find evidence of it, but and the evidence you find

0:41:04.840 --> 0:41:07.440
<v Speaker 1>was actually the formation of the plot, as opposed to

0:41:07.480 --> 0:41:10.080
<v Speaker 1>someone going back and studying something that in their past

0:41:10.120 --> 0:41:13.680
<v Speaker 1>had already happened. So you know, it's a little more

0:41:13.719 --> 0:41:15.759
<v Speaker 1>tricky if it's a human caused event. But if it's

0:41:15.800 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 1>anything that was not caused specific specifically by humans, like

0:41:19.160 --> 0:41:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a scientific discovery that was unexpected, would be a good one.

0:41:23.800 --> 0:41:26.160
<v Speaker 1>But again that's a little tricky because there's probably people

0:41:26.160 --> 0:41:29.399
<v Speaker 1>who are actually actively looking into that kind of thing. So, right,

0:41:29.520 --> 0:41:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and there's another problem with scientific discoveries, which is, I mean,

0:41:33.719 --> 0:41:37.440
<v Speaker 1>how much does the average person actually talk about scientific

0:41:37.480 --> 0:41:39.719
<v Speaker 1>discoveries by name? Well, I mean, if you're talking about

0:41:39.719 --> 0:41:42.160
<v Speaker 1>a time traveler, you expect that they would be coming

0:41:42.200 --> 0:41:46.359
<v Speaker 1>back for some significant purpose, right, Maybe I don't know.

0:41:46.480 --> 0:41:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, So to remedy this, I thought of another option,

0:41:49.520 --> 0:41:52.799
<v Speaker 1>which would be to look for older hypertext containing a

0:41:52.840 --> 0:41:57.080
<v Speaker 1>relatively high density of recently coined words that are part

0:41:57.080 --> 0:42:00.359
<v Speaker 1>of common use language. So, for example, like a person

0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:03.879
<v Speaker 1>from the future, unless they are like a Vatican astronomer,

0:42:04.200 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 1>probably wouldn't have much reason to talk about Pope Francis

0:42:07.040 --> 0:42:11.399
<v Speaker 1>and comment ice on. But you might see people, say,

0:42:11.440 --> 0:42:14.799
<v Speaker 1>posting online in the year two thousands saying words like

0:42:15.120 --> 0:42:19.560
<v Speaker 1>unfriend and selfie and sexting. Yeah, if someone's talking about

0:42:19.640 --> 0:42:23.440
<v Speaker 1>lull cats and twerking like too early in the internet timeline,

0:42:23.520 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's a dead giveaway. It's also something of

0:42:27.120 --> 0:42:33.160
<v Speaker 1>an unusual um example, simply because you're assuming that such

0:42:33.239 --> 0:42:38.000
<v Speaker 1>words would have longevity and not fatal. We don't know,

0:42:38.120 --> 0:42:41.760
<v Speaker 1>but we can try it. I'm just thinking about slang

0:42:41.840 --> 0:42:44.440
<v Speaker 1>and how quickly it changes, and how quickly we abandon

0:42:44.600 --> 0:42:47.000
<v Speaker 1>lots of it. I'm sure people will still be saying

0:42:47.040 --> 0:42:51.480
<v Speaker 1>selfie and sexting in a hundred years. I think we'll

0:42:51.480 --> 0:42:54.600
<v Speaker 1>probably have evolved to a different form of terrible harassment

0:42:54.640 --> 0:42:57.480
<v Speaker 1>than sexting. But but all cats will be around forever,

0:42:57.840 --> 0:42:59.799
<v Speaker 1>that's true, and they truly live in our hearts. They

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:02.719
<v Speaker 1>then at the internet, too, so they did. I tried

0:43:02.760 --> 0:43:05.520
<v Speaker 1>another version of this. I was gonna say, actually, I

0:43:05.560 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 1>thought this was brilliant at first, but I just a

0:43:08.200 --> 0:43:10.480
<v Speaker 1>quick experiment blew it out of the water. I was

0:43:10.480 --> 0:43:12.440
<v Speaker 1>going to say, we should look for uses of the

0:43:12.480 --> 0:43:16.200
<v Speaker 1>word muggle appearing before the publication of the first Harry

0:43:16.200 --> 0:43:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Potter book. In it seems good on the surface, Yeah,

0:43:19.719 --> 0:43:22.120
<v Speaker 1>but I did a Google Ingraham search for the term,

0:43:22.280 --> 0:43:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and either the word has other uses throughout history, or

0:43:26.360 --> 0:43:29.439
<v Speaker 1>I just discovered evidence of future Harry Potter fans going

0:43:29.480 --> 0:43:32.440
<v Speaker 1>back in time and publishing books in the eighteen sixties

0:43:32.480 --> 0:43:35.399
<v Speaker 1>and nineteen o eight in a bunch of other years, right,

0:43:35.640 --> 0:43:38.360
<v Speaker 1>A lot lots of fan fit activity in the eighteen

0:43:38.400 --> 0:43:43.160
<v Speaker 1>six I mean there's another there's another possible explanation, which

0:43:43.200 --> 0:43:46.799
<v Speaker 1>is that perhaps not everything and the book was original,

0:43:47.000 --> 0:43:50.080
<v Speaker 1>but you know, well a lot of the terminology, specifically

0:43:50.120 --> 0:43:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the J. K. Rowling used was very much based on

0:43:52.719 --> 0:43:56.920
<v Speaker 1>already existing um slang. Sure, and there was a lot

0:43:56.960 --> 0:43:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of of course faux Latin in there too, right, so

0:43:59.680 --> 0:44:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, I could have probably looked it up. I

0:44:01.640 --> 0:44:04.839
<v Speaker 1>don't know what muggle actually meant before Harry Potter. Maybe

0:44:04.880 --> 0:44:06.840
<v Speaker 1>it was someone who got mugged. I'm sure it was

0:44:06.880 --> 0:44:10.960
<v Speaker 1>something magical, all right. Well, what about other evidence besides

0:44:11.040 --> 0:44:13.759
<v Speaker 1>things like the traces people have left behind on maybe

0:44:13.800 --> 0:44:17.640
<v Speaker 1>online searches, what about actual physical sightings, because we've had

0:44:17.640 --> 0:44:20.640
<v Speaker 1>a few, a few examples of people who at least

0:44:21.480 --> 0:44:25.120
<v Speaker 1>jokingly have suggested that we've got evidence of time travelers

0:44:25.160 --> 0:44:28.960
<v Speaker 1>amongst us because of things we've captured on film, yeah,

0:44:29.080 --> 0:44:32.319
<v Speaker 1>or or audio or in photographs. Because right, we've been

0:44:32.360 --> 0:44:35.960
<v Speaker 1>talking entirely about text up until now. Really, so so

0:44:36.360 --> 0:44:41.160
<v Speaker 1>what about documentation of people using non contemporary language or

0:44:41.320 --> 0:44:45.040
<v Speaker 1>dialect or you know, clothing technology, other objects like that.

0:44:45.480 --> 0:44:51.359
<v Speaker 1>So you're thinking specifically of the Charlie Chaplin film Premier Spectacular. Yes,

0:44:51.520 --> 0:44:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I thought you were referring to the Nicolas Cage vampire

0:44:54.080 --> 0:45:00.319
<v Speaker 1>from The nore Uncanny. Yeah, we're talking about the s Kuss.

0:45:00.640 --> 0:45:03.400
<v Speaker 1>So there's a video online, you can find it on

0:45:03.440 --> 0:45:07.600
<v Speaker 1>YouTube that shows some footage from I think it's actually

0:45:07.600 --> 0:45:09.319
<v Speaker 1>the film premiere of The Circus, but maybe it's from

0:45:09.360 --> 0:45:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the movie itself, but anyway, it shows a person walking

0:45:12.800 --> 0:45:18.160
<v Speaker 1>along a sidewalk and appears to be holding a cell

0:45:18.200 --> 0:45:21.880
<v Speaker 1>phone or other type of mobile device up to her face.

0:45:22.640 --> 0:45:25.360
<v Speaker 1>For all the world, I mean this was from and

0:45:25.400 --> 0:45:29.000
<v Speaker 1>this looks exactly like what you would expect someone walking

0:45:29.040 --> 0:45:30.759
<v Speaker 1>and talking on a cell phone to look like. Right,

0:45:30.880 --> 0:45:32.600
<v Speaker 1>And and maybe a few years ago, we would have

0:45:32.640 --> 0:45:36.040
<v Speaker 1>been suspicious because it's such a large device. But now

0:45:36.080 --> 0:45:39.439
<v Speaker 1>that we're now seeing the iPhone six plus and other

0:45:39.840 --> 0:45:45.560
<v Speaker 1>enormous fablets coming out, I think it's back to being realistic. Um,

0:45:45.719 --> 0:45:48.719
<v Speaker 1>but you know, not to burst everyone's bubble. But it

0:45:48.760 --> 0:45:52.239
<v Speaker 1>appears upon really close examination that this may have been

0:45:52.320 --> 0:45:57.239
<v Speaker 1>a hearing aid like device. Yeah, the first kind of

0:45:57.320 --> 0:46:01.040
<v Speaker 1>new fangled electric hearing aids were starting to be patented

0:46:01.080 --> 0:46:04.359
<v Speaker 1>in the early nineteen twenties. I think that's the first

0:46:04.360 --> 0:46:06.719
<v Speaker 1>one that I saw. Siemens had a model that was

0:46:06.920 --> 0:46:10.440
<v Speaker 1>very much like what was seen in that. Yeah, I mean,

0:46:10.560 --> 0:46:12.440
<v Speaker 1>or the person might have just had an earache, or

0:46:12.560 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we don't know. It could have been any

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:16.080
<v Speaker 1>number of reasons why they kind of had their hand

0:46:16.600 --> 0:46:18.759
<v Speaker 1>and and an object up to their face while they

0:46:18.800 --> 0:46:23.040
<v Speaker 1>were walking along. Now I like that there's the second hoax. Hoax,

0:46:23.080 --> 0:46:26.600
<v Speaker 1>but second example because I know exactly the photograph you're

0:46:26.640 --> 0:46:28.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about. Yeah, yeah, it's great. There's this very internet

0:46:28.800 --> 0:46:31.840
<v Speaker 1>famous photo you guys might have seen it called the

0:46:31.880 --> 0:46:35.440
<v Speaker 1>time Traveling Hipster, and it's it's an image of a

0:46:35.440 --> 0:46:38.919
<v Speaker 1>man and in large sunglasses and what appears at first

0:46:38.920 --> 0:46:41.280
<v Speaker 1>glance to be a T shirt and a hoodie standing

0:46:41.400 --> 0:46:46.680
<v Speaker 1>in a crowd shot in UM. Upon examination, you realize

0:46:46.680 --> 0:46:50.200
<v Speaker 1>that the glasses actually were contemporary. Okay, that the level

0:46:50.520 --> 0:46:55.920
<v Speaker 1>are before. I think he's got kind of an eraser

0:46:56.000 --> 0:46:58.440
<v Speaker 1>head haircut. Yeah yeah, I sort of like I stepped

0:46:58.520 --> 0:47:01.640
<v Speaker 1>right out of Bonaroo And now, yeah, I mean he's cute,

0:47:01.680 --> 0:47:04.279
<v Speaker 1>like I'd say hi to him. Um. But but but

0:47:04.560 --> 0:47:07.440
<v Speaker 1>his glasses, it turns out, actually were contemporary, although the

0:47:07.719 --> 0:47:09.960
<v Speaker 1>leather side guards on them were a little bit antiquated

0:47:09.960 --> 0:47:11.560
<v Speaker 1>at the time, So maybe he really was a hipster

0:47:11.640 --> 0:47:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of the UM. And his clothing does bear out for

0:47:15.600 --> 0:47:19.160
<v Speaker 1>for common like sweater and cardigan layering that the the

0:47:19.200 --> 0:47:22.080
<v Speaker 1>day's youth would have been wearing. UM. Specifically, the sweaters

0:47:22.440 --> 0:47:25.440
<v Speaker 1>NIT logo was one for a local hockey team UM

0:47:25.480 --> 0:47:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that like players or rink staff would have would have

0:47:27.680 --> 0:47:30.320
<v Speaker 1>been wearing. Yeah, and he also this was a photograph

0:47:30.360 --> 0:47:33.560
<v Speaker 1>that was taken at the opening the reopening of a bridge,

0:47:33.800 --> 0:47:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and one questions while at time traveler would go to

0:47:37.239 --> 0:47:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the opening, I can't miss this. Why would a non

0:47:41.239 --> 0:47:49.799
<v Speaker 1>time traveler go to the opening? Yeah, like like hey, no, no,

0:47:49.920 --> 0:47:52.719
<v Speaker 1>I see he stranded there and he's incredibly bored, his

0:47:52.800 --> 0:47:56.280
<v Speaker 1>time machine stopped working, and he's got to wait until

0:47:56.320 --> 0:47:58.960
<v Speaker 1>they invent something in the nineteen sixties before we can

0:47:59.000 --> 0:48:01.080
<v Speaker 1>go back to his time. It does, it does look

0:48:01.120 --> 0:48:02.879
<v Speaker 1>like in the image that he's that he's holding one

0:48:02.880 --> 0:48:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of the um like early nineteen forties box cameras. UM.

0:48:07.200 --> 0:48:09.360
<v Speaker 1>And and so maybe, you know, maybe he was making

0:48:09.400 --> 0:48:12.360
<v Speaker 1>his own memories to send forward to the future. Perhaps

0:48:12.360 --> 0:48:15.719
<v Speaker 1>he was a photographer for a local publication and the

0:48:15.800 --> 0:48:18.320
<v Speaker 1>reason why he was there was to capture this magic

0:48:18.400 --> 0:48:21.959
<v Speaker 1>moment for all of posterity. At any rate. Um. There

0:48:22.000 --> 0:48:25.040
<v Speaker 1>there are many, many, many other examples that get passed

0:48:25.040 --> 0:48:28.440
<v Speaker 1>around UM and you know, but but like these, they

0:48:28.480 --> 0:48:33.280
<v Speaker 1>can really be debunked without even a whole lot of research. Um.

0:48:33.320 --> 0:48:34.919
<v Speaker 1>Of course, that's a that's a whole lot of work

0:48:35.000 --> 0:48:37.680
<v Speaker 1>for for any given human to sit down and and

0:48:37.680 --> 0:48:39.640
<v Speaker 1>file through. So I was thinking that maybe if we

0:48:39.680 --> 0:48:42.239
<v Speaker 1>want to to really search for time travelers, we could,

0:48:42.960 --> 0:48:46.920
<v Speaker 1>especially as like like AI visual recognition algorithms start improving,

0:48:46.960 --> 0:48:49.320
<v Speaker 1>we could set some robots to the task of searching

0:48:49.360 --> 0:48:52.960
<v Speaker 1>for these extemporaneous visual cues. Yeah. And then of course,

0:48:53.040 --> 0:48:55.400
<v Speaker 1>obviously anything that would be flagged would have to be

0:48:55.440 --> 0:48:58.480
<v Speaker 1>reviewed by humanized to make sure that no then actually

0:48:58.719 --> 0:49:03.800
<v Speaker 1>is a whatever contemporary, contemporary piece of technology or whatever

0:49:04.040 --> 0:49:06.600
<v Speaker 1>happens to be. You know, this is a promotional image

0:49:06.600 --> 0:49:09.319
<v Speaker 1>from a science fiction movie of the time. Yeah, yeah,

0:49:09.440 --> 0:49:12.080
<v Speaker 1>this was. This was a movie that was specifically made

0:49:12.120 --> 0:49:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to look like it came from that era, but was

0:49:14.440 --> 0:49:18.280
<v Speaker 1>in fact made in The funny thing is you would

0:49:18.280 --> 0:49:20.560
<v Speaker 1>never mistake one of those old sci fi movies for

0:49:20.600 --> 0:49:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the present. No no, no, no, no. Um. And I

0:49:24.239 --> 0:49:25.520
<v Speaker 1>was trying to think of how we might do the

0:49:25.520 --> 0:49:27.600
<v Speaker 1>same thing for for audio recordings, and I think it

0:49:27.680 --> 0:49:29.560
<v Speaker 1>might be actually a lot harder. I mean, I know

0:49:29.600 --> 0:49:31.560
<v Speaker 1>that just on this show we've probably done some vocal

0:49:31.600 --> 0:49:37.520
<v Speaker 1>flubs that might sound like something some word from the future. Yeah,

0:49:38.040 --> 0:49:40.920
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, you know. The other day, I I we

0:49:41.239 --> 0:49:43.320
<v Speaker 1>edited it out, but I was trying to say the

0:49:43.360 --> 0:49:46.920
<v Speaker 1>word focusing, but I said folking, and I was just like,

0:49:47.040 --> 0:49:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I know, folking is going to mean something within twenty years.

0:49:50.320 --> 0:49:52.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not a word now, but it's coming. It's going

0:49:52.719 --> 0:49:55.719
<v Speaker 1>to be big. Whereas everyone's going to watch my brain

0:49:55.800 --> 0:49:58.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff video about the old timey voice and assume that

0:49:58.640 --> 0:50:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm from the past. And if someonew managed to land

0:50:01.840 --> 0:50:04.040
<v Speaker 1>in the present. I think both of your time travelers

0:50:04.080 --> 0:50:06.719
<v Speaker 1>to be frank. Like I said, I do travel their time.

0:50:06.760 --> 0:50:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I just do it at a very steady rate. Okay,

0:50:08.840 --> 0:50:12.680
<v Speaker 1>So one last question. If we assume that there are

0:50:12.680 --> 0:50:16.879
<v Speaker 1>time travelers amongst us, but they are good at hiding themselves,

0:50:18.000 --> 0:50:21.719
<v Speaker 1>what could draw them out? I mean, assuming maybe that

0:50:21.800 --> 0:50:25.160
<v Speaker 1>they would have to willingly reveal themselves for us to

0:50:25.239 --> 0:50:28.600
<v Speaker 1>find them. What what could get them to step into

0:50:28.640 --> 0:50:30.799
<v Speaker 1>the into the light that there was a question I

0:50:30.880 --> 0:50:34.920
<v Speaker 1>was thinking when we were looking at Stephen Hawking's party.

0:50:35.400 --> 0:50:39.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is the allure of champagne and hanging out

0:50:39.280 --> 0:50:42.200
<v Speaker 1>with Stephen Hawking enough to make somebody from the future

0:50:42.719 --> 0:50:46.359
<v Speaker 1>break radio silence and show up? Well beyond that, I mean,

0:50:46.840 --> 0:50:50.640
<v Speaker 1>how do you how do you make a serious offer

0:50:51.440 --> 0:50:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that someone from the future would actually find tempting? Keeping

0:50:55.080 --> 0:50:57.560
<v Speaker 1>in mind that you have to assume that the future

0:50:57.760 --> 0:51:01.479
<v Speaker 1>is either going to be super awesome where they've got

0:51:01.520 --> 0:51:03.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty much everything they need anyway, I mean, by the

0:51:03.440 --> 0:51:05.840
<v Speaker 1>time you get to a time machine, you probably have

0:51:05.920 --> 0:51:10.399
<v Speaker 1>managed to cover all the regular bases um or it's

0:51:10.440 --> 0:51:13.879
<v Speaker 1>going to be really, you know, just incomprehensible to us.

0:51:13.880 --> 0:51:15.640
<v Speaker 1>So how can we predict what they would want in

0:51:15.680 --> 0:51:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the first place, you know, And how do you provide

0:51:18.120 --> 0:51:21.080
<v Speaker 1>incentives to somebody who might live in a post scarcity world?

0:51:21.200 --> 0:51:23.839
<v Speaker 1>And how would you do that in a way that

0:51:23.880 --> 0:51:26.800
<v Speaker 1>you could back it up without it just coming across

0:51:26.800 --> 0:51:29.800
<v Speaker 1>as a joke. Right, Like, if I end up making

0:51:29.840 --> 0:51:33.600
<v Speaker 1>an advertisement and I offer something that either I clearly

0:51:33.920 --> 0:51:37.480
<v Speaker 1>cannot actually grant, or if I were to do it,

0:51:37.480 --> 0:51:41.080
<v Speaker 1>it would really cause some serious problems. It might be

0:51:41.120 --> 0:51:44.160
<v Speaker 1>big enough to attempt somebody, but everyone would say, well,

0:51:44.160 --> 0:51:47.520
<v Speaker 1>he can't realistically give me that. So here's my offer

0:51:47.560 --> 0:51:50.680
<v Speaker 1>to you future time travelers. I mean, obviously coming in

0:51:50.719 --> 0:51:53.880
<v Speaker 1>at three wasn't good enough. You weren't you weren't gonna

0:51:53.920 --> 0:51:56.960
<v Speaker 1>do that, And it's after four o'clock now, so um,

0:51:57.160 --> 0:51:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have to up the anti Uh. If you

0:51:59.520 --> 0:52:02.640
<v Speaker 1>come through that door in our studio, you get a

0:52:02.640 --> 0:52:05.680
<v Speaker 1>coupon for a free backrup. Now. These are fantastic. My

0:52:05.719 --> 0:52:09.560
<v Speaker 1>wife loves them. I don't give her any other presents

0:52:09.560 --> 0:52:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and she smiles every year when I give these to her. Uh,

0:52:12.680 --> 0:52:15.000
<v Speaker 1>they don't have an expiration date, so you just have

0:52:15.080 --> 0:52:17.160
<v Speaker 1>to come in and tell me. We can set up

0:52:17.160 --> 0:52:21.879
<v Speaker 1>the time and place. I got a better one. Whoa, whoa, whoa, Joe,

0:52:22.000 --> 0:52:27.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm sitting right now. You may not be able to

0:52:27.280 --> 0:52:29.960
<v Speaker 1>make a material appeal to these people. You may not

0:52:30.080 --> 0:52:33.000
<v Speaker 1>even be able to appeal to their sense of I

0:52:33.000 --> 0:52:36.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know, social desire, because maybe in the future they're

0:52:36.719 --> 0:52:42.719
<v Speaker 1>just too cool. But you can appeal to their schadenfreude. So,

0:52:43.600 --> 0:52:47.520
<v Speaker 1>people from the future, if you show up at four

0:52:48.960 --> 0:52:54.320
<v Speaker 1>on what is this October, Jonathan Strickland will do something

0:52:54.400 --> 0:52:57.759
<v Speaker 1>really humiliating. I don't I don't know what it's gonna be,

0:52:57.840 --> 0:53:00.239
<v Speaker 1>but trust Lauren and I to dream up so thing

0:53:00.320 --> 0:53:03.239
<v Speaker 1>really good. Yeah, and I promise I'll do it. The

0:53:03.280 --> 0:53:05.839
<v Speaker 1>minute already flipped. Well, I you know the other one

0:53:05.880 --> 0:53:08.440
<v Speaker 1>we could say, we could appeal to a sense of vanity.

0:53:08.640 --> 0:53:13.840
<v Speaker 1>You could be the time traveler to break world news

0:53:13.960 --> 0:53:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and be in the history books on forward thinking. Yeah,

0:53:17.960 --> 0:53:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the famous audio podcast. You know, we we are right

0:53:21.760 --> 0:53:26.160
<v Speaker 1>up there with like this American life and or the

0:53:26.239 --> 0:53:28.080
<v Speaker 1>very least we know people who are right up there

0:53:28.120 --> 0:53:33.080
<v Speaker 1>with American life. We've listened to this American Life, so

0:53:33.960 --> 0:53:35.719
<v Speaker 1>obviously we're having a lot of fun with this. But

0:53:35.840 --> 0:53:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean you kind of have to because we don't

0:53:38.960 --> 0:53:42.080
<v Speaker 1>have any evidence, so they're ever working, right, So I

0:53:42.080 --> 0:53:44.960
<v Speaker 1>mean we are dead serious, y'all, like like future time travelers,

0:53:45.000 --> 0:53:47.239
<v Speaker 1>we will follow through on these promises. I mean, you know,

0:53:47.239 --> 0:53:49.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe we need to get more more rad people like

0:53:49.480 --> 0:53:51.879
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Hawking on this game plan, have like Elon musk

0:53:51.960 --> 0:53:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Er or I don't know, um, maybe Scarlett Johansson or whoever,

0:53:58.320 --> 0:54:01.640
<v Speaker 1>whoever people in the future want to hang out Bill Murray,

0:54:01.719 --> 0:54:04.759
<v Speaker 1>that would be Bill Murray would totally hang out with

0:54:04.800 --> 0:54:07.759
<v Speaker 1>you if you traveled back in time to see what

0:54:07.760 --> 0:54:10.040
<v Speaker 1>what this tells me? But he wouldn't tell anyone about it.

0:54:11.000 --> 0:54:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Our our listeners clearly didn't spread this audio podcast far enough,

0:54:16.400 --> 0:54:21.080
<v Speaker 1>So I blame you get to work. Yes, let's blame

0:54:21.080 --> 0:54:24.080
<v Speaker 1>our listeners. It's a great way to build an audience. No,

0:54:24.239 --> 0:54:26.960
<v Speaker 1>obviously we're all again having fun. But this is this,

0:54:27.400 --> 0:54:28.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is one of those things where we

0:54:28.760 --> 0:54:31.960
<v Speaker 1>say this kind of a strike against at least unbridled

0:54:32.120 --> 0:54:35.360
<v Speaker 1>time travel, and maybe maybe that time travel itself is

0:54:35.400 --> 0:54:37.600
<v Speaker 1>in fact possible, but it has one of those limitations

0:54:37.640 --> 0:54:41.160
<v Speaker 1>we talked about earlier. So this was really fun to

0:54:41.160 --> 0:54:43.839
<v Speaker 1>talk about. And uh, we've got we've got a lot

0:54:43.880 --> 0:54:46.719
<v Speaker 1>of other fun topics in mind, some of which have

0:54:46.840 --> 0:54:49.920
<v Speaker 1>been suggested by you guys, our listeners. So if you

0:54:49.960 --> 0:54:52.960
<v Speaker 1>want to suggest any other kind of fun future oriented

0:54:53.000 --> 0:54:55.520
<v Speaker 1>topics let us know. Send us an email all right

0:54:55.520 --> 0:54:59.520
<v Speaker 1>addresses FW thinking at how Stuff Works dot com, or

0:54:59.640 --> 0:55:02.359
<v Speaker 1>drop us a line on Twitter or Google Plus. Our

0:55:02.400 --> 0:55:04.840
<v Speaker 1>handle at both of those is FW thinking. Search for

0:55:04.920 --> 0:55:07.080
<v Speaker 1>us on Facebook. Put f W thinking in that search

0:55:07.120 --> 0:55:08.759
<v Speaker 1>bar will pop right up. Let us know what you

0:55:08.760 --> 0:55:10.680
<v Speaker 1>want to hear, and we will tackle it and we'll

0:55:10.719 --> 0:55:18.759
<v Speaker 1>talk to you again really soon. For more on this

0:55:18.840 --> 0:55:32.040
<v Speaker 1>topic in the future of technology, visit forward thinking dot com,

0:55:32.200 --> 0:55:35.000
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by Toyota. Let's Go Places,