WEBVTT - The Business of Cannabis: Chatting about the highs and lows, with Jackson Tilley

0:00:00.880 --> 0:00:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bethany McLain. This is making a killing in this show.

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I cut through the hype and handwringing to reframe the

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:12.240
<v Speaker 1>stories you thought you understood and uncover the ones you

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't know were important. Literally every day, a marijuana related

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:21.239
<v Speaker 1>pitch pops into my inbox, whether it's to profile a

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.959
<v Speaker 1>cannabis entrepreneur, to check out pot infused bath bombs and

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>facial creams, or to look at the launch of an

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>organic CBD infused sparkling water. That last one is a

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>direct quote, and it's not just me. A Shark Tank

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:37.520
<v Speaker 1>episode featuring a doctor who had launched a CBD oil

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>was the most watched episode in Shark Tank history. The

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 1>craze is on investors, of course, love the eye popping

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>predictions for growth in the cannabis industry. Global spending on

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:52.480
<v Speaker 1>legal cannabis is projected to grow two hundred and thirty

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 1>percent to thirty one point three billion in twenty twenty two.

0:00:56.400 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>According to one market researcher, pot is now leak for

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>medical use in thirty three states, but it's still illegal

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>at the federal level. Strange, and hence author Jackson Tilly's

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:11.399
<v Speaker 1>use of the delightful word legal ish. In his new

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>book subtitle Billion Dollar Dimebag, An Insider's account of America's

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 1>legal ish cannabis industry. A self professed true believer, Jackson

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>calls cannabis the next great American industry. Is he right? Well,

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>there are some serious issues. From a financial point of view.

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:34.119
<v Speaker 1>The short history of cannabis stocks is well highs and lows. Sorry,

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't resist the opportunities to make and lose fortunes.

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Of course, sound like any new industry, but is pot

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:44.559
<v Speaker 1>just like any other new industry. There's a fierce debate

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 1>about whether we'll regret the rush to legalization. There's still

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot about cannabis that we just don't know, including

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>its harms and benefits. Proponents think we're going to learn

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>good things. Detractors argue that THHC, the active compound in cannabis,

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>is strongly linked to psych kosis, schizophrenia, and violence. So

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>today I get to chat with Jackson Tilly, who, as

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I've mentioned, is a total believer. His first job out

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of college was it a cannabis company now called Organic Brands,

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:14.639
<v Speaker 1>and he never left. In addition to being an author,

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>he's now the vice president of strategic partnerships and communications.

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 1>As for me, I'm interested in learning why it is

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>that Jackson believes so strongly in this industry. So I

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>want to start in a slightly odd place. One of

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the fascinating things I learned from your book is this

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>idea that to those of you in the industry, marijuana

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>is actually a pejorative word. Tell us the history of

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>how it came to be. You might want to call

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>it the War on drugs. One point now in the

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>very first generation of cannabis being treated like something horrible.

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>So you have Anslinger who was trying to stoke fears

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>about anti immigrant sentiments in the United States. And this

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>is back in the nineteen thirties, right when pott became

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>illegal exactly. This was probably a year and a half

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>after it was first getting to carry with it a

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:04.080
<v Speaker 1>criminal punishment. So you have Anslinger who's decided that the

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:07.519
<v Speaker 1>best way to do this is to attach cannabis use

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 1>to anti immigrant sentiments. And so marijuana, I guess at

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the time people felt like had some connotation with Mexico,

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and so it sort of just took off from there

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and it was spelled with the H then instead of

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the jay. That you see more commonly now, So it's

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 1>funny to look back at it. It's sort of like

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 1>transparent and kind of unbelievable that that was ever a

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>thought that somebody had, but it worked at the time,

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and I mean not dissimilar to what we're going through now.

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, we have a huge debate about immigration happening,

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think some of the worst parts of politics

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>stoke those fears and people and try to leverage that anger.

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting everything old is new again. I was thinking

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that when I read it, But I thought this was

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>also stunning from your book, that a lot of us

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>don't remember that cannabis was once actually legal, and you

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>write that before nineteen thirty seven, you could walk into

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>a pharmacy and purchase of file was called marijuana tincture

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>from behind the counter, and that it was prescribed as

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>a remedy for a malady known as female hysteria. Yeah,

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>so you have to get women stone don't let us vote, right, right,

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, And I think like whether or not that

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>was actually the impetus for any of that, who knows.

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>But it's just wild to think about the sort of

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>dramatic change back and forth and again it's not dissimilar

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to alcohol prohibition legal before, made illegal, and then made

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>legal once again. Do you have any sense if the

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:33.160
<v Speaker 1>alcohol industry had something to do with marijuana becoming illegal

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>back in the nineteen thirties, You know, I haven't read

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 1>anything to that effect. I wouldn't be totally surprised, but

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I think largely the big push for it was hemp production.

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 1>That people did not want to see hemp as a

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>commodity used in the production of paper pulp, and so

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>that was like a huge driver for this sort of

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>anti cannabis sentiment. Oh, that's interesting, since they wanted the

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>hemp to be used in paper, so they didn't want

0:04:56.560 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>it being used elsewhere exactly. Well, that's fascinating. Okay, So

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.160
<v Speaker 1>again your book with these quotes from three presidents, which

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:03.479
<v Speaker 1>I think is great, and I'm just going to read

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>them because I think it sets the stage to talk

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>about how much attitudes are changing. Now again, you've got

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Bill Clinton saying I experimented with marijuana time or two

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't like it, and I didn't inhale and

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:17.359
<v Speaker 1>I never tried again. And then you've got Barack Obama saying,

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:19.919
<v Speaker 1>when I was a kid, I inhaled frequently. That was

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the point. So talk about the changing attitudes toward cannabis.

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:27.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think it's a lot like any big

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 1>social movement where the big piece that's always missing is

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>just time. And I think you could like in it

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit to gay marriage, almost in the same

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 1>sense that it was something that was forever enormously taboo yep.

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 1>And it was not until things like social media and

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 1>easier access to information at a broad scale that you

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:53.839
<v Speaker 1>saw the conversations start to tilt. So I think it's

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 1>very similar with cannabis that people are just exposed to

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>it to a greater extent now than they were previously.

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think the big piece is that you see

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>more and more people who are both successful and consume cannabis.

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>And for a long time those things were mutually exclusive, right,

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>So you're breaking that historic association of the loser on

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 1>his mother's coach with the right. And for as volatile

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:23.280
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned the stock market surrounding cannabis is, it's

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:25.280
<v Speaker 1>also the first time that it's being taken seriously as

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 1>a real business. I mean, for its faults, it really

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:30.039
<v Speaker 1>is and I want to come back to that, but

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:31.720
<v Speaker 1>one other thing you write in your book that I

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>knew but had forgotten is that John Bayner, and the

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:36.600
<v Speaker 1>former House Speaker right is now serving on the board

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>of a cannabis company. He is. You know, you can

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>type in cannabis investments into Google and you'll be served

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>an ad for America's Bigcashcrop dot Com. What John Bayner

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 1>has to say. That's just amazing, and it's part of this.

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>You note that the number of Americans supporting legalization is growing, right, Yeah, absolutely,

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:57.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's the same thing. I think it's twofold. Really,

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 1>people are frustrated with the prison industrial complex the United

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>States that huge numbers, particularly people of color, are either

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 1>charged or jailed for cannabis or petty drug charges. And

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 1>then I also think people are just interested in new

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>forms of income and new additives to the American economic system.

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>So hence the push toward legalization. So tell us about Colorado,

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:24.239
<v Speaker 1>because Colorado is obviously the first date to legalize pot entirely,

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>not just for medical use, but for recreational use as well.

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 1>What's the picture there. I think it's largely positive, certainly

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>if you compare it to places where there's a black

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 1>market that's still thriving look anywhere in the South and

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>see exactly what's happening. In contrast to Colorado, where just

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 1>like a typical day, if I were to walk off

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the plane in Colorado, I could head to a dispensary.

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>In Denver, if I'm over the age of twenty one,

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll walk in, they'll scan my driver's license, and I

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>can buy something from behind the counter as if it

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>were a liquor store. And in turn, the state has

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>taken a huge portion of what you've just purchased as

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>tax revenue, and a great deal of it has been

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>earmarked toward public schools. So in Colorado, I hadn't lived

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>there in a long time, and then I recently moved back,

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's sort of amazing to see this city is

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Denver in particular, it's spotlessly clean, there's new buildings going

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>up everywhere, and it's consistently ranked as like one of

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the best cities to live in the United States. And

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of that is probably due in

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>fact to this like move toward personal freedoms that people

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>want to be in Colorado and have access interesting correlation.

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go with correlation rather than causation. On

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that point. But I'll give you a possible correlation, And

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you haven't seen the explosion of violence in Colorado that

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:40.599
<v Speaker 1>some of marijuana's detractors. And I'm sorry, I can't help it.

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to keep using the word marijuana. I just fine,

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>bad word or not. I say it too. It's totally fine. Okay,

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>you haven't seen that explosion of violence that people expected, right, No,

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>absolutely not. And as a matter of fact, violence has

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:55.679
<v Speaker 1>largely gone down in Colorado. There was like a brief

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 1>spike three years ago, but still far below the national

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>average and significan currently below what the projected national average

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>was when they did a study of future violence in

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:07.839
<v Speaker 1>the United States as a whole. So I think that

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:11.320
<v Speaker 1>that has largely been debunked. And I make this point

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>in the book that the sky just has not fallen

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>in Colorado. There are certainly issues, as there are with

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>any developing market, but these fears about children having easy

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>access to cannabis, the opposite has proven to be true.

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:28.079
<v Speaker 1>And as far as crime, I think probably the biggest

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>crime that you see is robbery as it relates to

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the transportation of cash in Colorado. Because there's no banking

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>system that will the banking system won't won't take cannabis money,

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>right exactly, So people are forced to use these private

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>armed car services and bank at credit unions instead of

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>just being able to conduct business like anybody. So it's

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 1>crime as a result of messed up regulations rather than Yeah,

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the point you made is, while an obvious one,

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:57.680
<v Speaker 1>it's one I often forget, which is that the black

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>market will exist. We're not talking about pot or right,

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:03.439
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about legal pot or illegal pot. But it's

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:05.199
<v Speaker 1>going to be one or the other, which I think

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 1>is an interesting point. So tell tell us about your

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>personal story, because you're an advocate for this industry and

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 1>yet you don't use it yourself. I don't, and I

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>did at one point in my life, but I got

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>sober in the midst of working in this industry actually,

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and you know, my drug of choice was always prescription pills,

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 1>like I think many people in the United States, and

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>so for me it was sort of an awakening about

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>what's the root of this issue in the United States,

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Like why are prescription drugs so prevalent and so easy

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>to get in cannabis, which carries far less of the

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>same dangers, Almost impossible in so much of the country,

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>And so that's like in one bucket, and then the

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 1>other piece is just And I've hit on this all

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the time in the book, and I say it all

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the time in real life too. But for me, it's

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>just a personal freedom's issue. It's like, I don't know

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:57.839
<v Speaker 1>that it's harming anyone, and in fact probably has a

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:01.319
<v Speaker 1>net positive effect. So the of the day, if you're

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:03.439
<v Speaker 1>not hurting anybody, and we can make the rest of

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the world safer by making it legal, why wouldn't you

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>advocate for that. We're going to come back to that,

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>but but I want to pause on your point about

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>prescription drugs because I thought that was a really interesting

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 1>point that opioids available legally prescription drugs kill people and

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 1>marijuana does not, and that there is some hypocrisy around

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>complaints about making pot legal when you compare it to

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>what is legally available and dispensed crazily in the pharmaceutical system. Right. Yeah,

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and for me, I was an eighteen year

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>old fresh out of high school, dropped off at college,

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and was getting a prescription for exorbitant amounts of xanax

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>from a doctor who just didn't think to question why

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 1>an eighteen year old needs to be taking six or

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>seven zanex a day. And wow, And that case isn't

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 1>unique to me. That's a widespread problem of over prescription

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>in this country. So when it comes to cannabis, I

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>just think it just doesn't carry the same risks. And

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:58.839
<v Speaker 1>I hate to say that because I know they're detractors

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 1>who say that it's certainly does carry risks, and I'm

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>not saying it's risk free, but I think if you

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>look at the two and a vacuum, it's evident which

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>one carries a higher risk. I hadn't actually realized that

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't kill yourself by overdosing on marijuana. I'm naive

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>about the industry and marijuana itself, I have to contest.

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a study that they did said you'd

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>need to eat thirty six pounds of cannabis in order

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to be able to overdose. And it wouldn't even be

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>from the THHC content. It would be from your stomach

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>expanding too rapidly from all of the plant materials. So

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a high bar. Okay, that is a really disgusting image. Okay,

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>So let's start with some of the basics, just for

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>people who are listening who may know. What's the difference

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>between CBD and THHC. Sure, so it's most simple level.

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>THC is the psychoactive part of the cannabis plant, and

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>CBD is the non psychoactive. So CBD offers, according to some,

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the same benefits as THHC, but without

0:12:57.280 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 1>feeling high essentially, And do you believe that these claims

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 1>about CBD are pretty astonishing? This Shark Tank episode with

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 1>this doctor that became this most watched episode in Shark

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:09.079
<v Speaker 1>Tank history, is that it's been clinically proven to help

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 1>dozens of ailments including I just have to do the list,

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 1>chronic pain, arthrit a, stress, depression, anxiety, heart healthy diabetes,

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 1>improve cognition until hey, the onset of horrible conditions like dimension. Also,

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:20.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, seriously, you might be able to moonlight as

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a narrator for prescription commercials on television. That was very quick.

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't know, and I think most people

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know whether it's actually true or not. And a

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>huge piece of that is that there's no situation in

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:36.959
<v Speaker 1>which you could do a controlled clinical study on the

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>effects of CBD because there's no regulatory body to oversee that.

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>So that's one issue, yep. And then beyond that, anecdotally,

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>most people believe in this thing called the entourage effect,

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>which is where you have to have multiple cannabinoids in

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:55.439
<v Speaker 1>order for them to all vire at full power, if

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 1>you want to think of it that way. So CBD

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 1>works in its most effective way if it's paired with

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>some type of THHC or other cannabinoids that are present

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>in the plant, and there's hundreds of them. So taking

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>like a straight up CBD seltzer water for example, I

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know that that necessarily does anything. However, there might

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>be a placebo effect and if that makes people feel great,

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 1>then more power to them. Why not, right? And it

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 1>sounds good. So we are really you mentioned that these

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of strains in the cannabis plant, we're really at

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the nascent stages of research about this, right, because the

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>research that was going on in the twenties and thirties

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>into the medical benefits of cannabis just went caput when

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>it became illegal exactly. And it's a huge issue. I mean,

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot that the plant can do

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>more than we probably understand right now, and The only

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 1>way that we're ever going to figure it out is

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>if there's federal legalization, because until then, who can really

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 1>say no, one is equipped to be running those types

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of studies. So where are we in understanding how useful

0:14:56.360 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>marijuana can be in treating various diseases, not just DBD,

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>but but thhc are we you hear these reports of

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>miracles of people seizures being cured, of cancer patients being

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 1>able to eat and tolerate their medication. Is this the

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>first inning? Is at the ninth inning? Where are we

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>in our understanding level? This is probably the third inning.

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Baseball is not my strong suit. It's like the first

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty minutes of the Academy Awards. Okay, that's that's a

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>concept I'm familiar with. We're waiting to see large scale

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>studies that happen, and I think, again, I hit on

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>this all the time, but it's until there's better legalization.

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 1>It's tough. However, anecdotally you can see it firsthand. There

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>tons and tons of people who move to places like

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Colorado and California who have chronic health issues that rely

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 1>on cannabis. And I think, at the end of the day,

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>whether it's for pain, or for seizures, or for nausea, whatever.

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>If people are finding relief through something that is largely

0:15:57.360 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>free of many of the downsides of prescription pain medication,

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 1>our prescription alternatives, I would advocate for that one hundred

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>times over. So in the interim, I think people should

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>just continue to try products in a responsible manner and

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>see what works for them. There's powerful anecdotal evidence, I

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>will give you that, if no systematic scientific study. What

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>are you seeing in terms of the money coming into

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the industry. I saw statistic earlier this year. I think

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>that a company got one hundred and twenty five million

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars of venture capital money. Are you seeing the amounts

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>of money begin to skyrocket on the whole? I think

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>it's begun to level out a little bit. But in

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the last two years, yes, an exorbitant amount of money

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>has been pumped into the cannabis industry. Our own company

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 1>as well, want public at the beginning of the year.

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>And in Canada, right because in Canada pot is legal,

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>so therefore yeah, okay, actually our friendly neighbors to the north,

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>so it's the way of just avoiding the patchwork of

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>US laws. Yeah, exactly, And there are other ways to

0:16:56.800 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>do it in the United States, but it's more complex.

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>So you write in the book that despite the seeming

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:05.160
<v Speaker 1>popularity of the cannabis industry in the United States, there's

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 1>never been a worse time to get started. And all

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>of the companies here is included, I think lose money.

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Why is that? Why is it so hard to make money?

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 1>People ask all the time, they say, should we get

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>involved in cannabis? And the answer I always say is

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 1>five years ago was the best time. And we actually

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:23.479
<v Speaker 1>just at our quarterlies a couple of days ago bottom

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>line profits for something that's very exciting. But yeah, I

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 1>mean it's an incredibly expensive industry. Number one, talent retention

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>is super difficult. Payroll as a high expense across the

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>cannabis industry. If we're talking about big CpG geared cannabis

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 1>companies like Hours and like Cannapy Grow, what do you

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 1>mean by CPGA geared that it's a consumer package essentially? Yeah,

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>so it's that. And then just raw materials are incredibly

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 1>expensive though they've been compressed significantly or over year. The

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 1>cost of the actual cannabis flower that's being turned into

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>other goods, it is it volatile it's not. It's actually

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 1>consistently gone down that because more and more people are

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:04.119
<v Speaker 1>growing as they see it becoming more legal. Right, okay,

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and what about part of the problem with making money

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:10.880
<v Speaker 1>are these quite contrary regulations. You talk about one section

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 1>to ade explain what that is. To ad, e is

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the bane of every cannabis entrepreneurs existence, strong language. Indeed,

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>it's the section of the US tax code that excludes

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>any businesses that function in an illegal fashion from claiming

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 1>any expenses on their tax reports, any normal business expenses.

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>So when we talk about the incredible cost of running

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 1>a cannabis business in the United States, none of its

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:41.479
<v Speaker 1>tax deductible exactly. So it's a realized tax rate of

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 1>eighty percent for some people. So it's incredible. Wow. And

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:48.879
<v Speaker 1>then on top of that, you've got this complexity of

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:52.920
<v Speaker 1>state law, right, no overarching federal law, and the state

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 1>law is really complicated in patchwork, absolutely, and I think

0:18:56.800 --> 0:19:00.159
<v Speaker 1>that also contributes to the high costs of operating in

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the industry. If you were to work at McDonald's, all

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:06.679
<v Speaker 1>of your supplies, all of the goods that you use

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 1>in your restaurant are coming from one or two or

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>three central warehouses. So that's all been brought into one place.

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 1>And in the cannabis industry, it's not the It's not

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the case if I run an operation in Colorado and

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I also have one in California. I'm creating those products

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 1>in a vacuum, separate from one another. And you can't ship, say,

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:26.159
<v Speaker 1>raw material grown in California and use it in your

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>product in Colorado, right, and nothing has to stay within

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the state. Wow. Yeah, Wow, it's a big logistical nightmare

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I can imagine. So what do you think the picture

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 1>looks like for federal legalization. You seem mixed on it.

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I'd say, yeah, I think it's farther away than a

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of people would like to believe. That said, our

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 1>current political climate is extremely unpredictable. Interesting may you live

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 1>in interesting times? Right? Isn't that the old Chinese proverb?

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 1>So I wouldn't say it's out of the realm of

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 1>possibility that it happens in the next two years. But

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:06.679
<v Speaker 1>it may. But you know, I think we're on the

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:09.920
<v Speaker 1>right path, and I think eventually we hit this tipping

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>point where enough states have legalized that it's just a

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>no brainer to happen at the federal level, and I

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:20.439
<v Speaker 1>think largely to infect us to the banking issues that

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>we spoke about. I think that's probably the thing that

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:25.439
<v Speaker 1>will tip the scales in order to allow banks to

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>take money from cannabis entrepreneurs, right, so you don't have

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>this almost black market system of banking running in parallel

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to the legal ish cannabis industry. Right is part of

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the push for legalization. Will the move toward criminal justice

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>also help, do you think? I think so. I think

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 1>people are really frustrated by the amount of resources that

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 1>are spent on jailing people for petty drug offenses, especially

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 1>when we've seen there are better ways to rehabilitate people

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>than throwing them in jail. Like if people are being

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 1>arrested for drug charges because they have a drug problem,

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 1>going to jail is not the solution to that, not

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 1>going to do much. Right, So, how prior to legalization,

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 1>assuming it ever happens, how is a consumer do you

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 1>navigate all these different brands. I walked into a medman

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 1>when I was in Venice recently, and it's just it's

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:15.719
<v Speaker 1>really hard to know what you're buying, what something is,

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>whether there's any consistency between products. Is that part of

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the issue too, and how as a consumer do you

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 1>navigate that there's a couple pieces to it. Number one

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>companies like ours and we're certainly not the only one

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:29.239
<v Speaker 1>to do this, but are called multi state operators, So

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>we have products and multiple states in the United States.

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 1>For US it's twelve, so you see some consistency among

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:38.120
<v Speaker 1>those products. And then you obviously have state mandated testing

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that you know, there's a label on the back of

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>every product that at its most basic level tells you,

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:45.639
<v Speaker 1>here's how much THC is in it, here's how much

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:48.400
<v Speaker 1>CBD is in it. It's cleared all of its besticide testing,

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>so you can get a general sense based on that

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 1>of what it's going to do to you. But it

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 1>would be there would be more consistency if we had legalization,

0:21:57.560 --> 0:21:59.879
<v Speaker 1>right absolutely, because you would probably walk into a Walgreen

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and be able to buy it and it would all

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>be ABNBEV brand. You make pretty big claims for legalization,

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 1>both in terms of jobs. You think it might save

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>us from the next recession and not because we'll be

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:13.120
<v Speaker 1>too stone to notice that there's a recession going on,

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and also and also tax revenue. Right, those are those

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:18.480
<v Speaker 1>in my right in thinking those are your two of

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:21.919
<v Speaker 1>the big arguments you have for legalization. Yeah. Absolutely, And

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the job creation we've seen it be the case.

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:27.680
<v Speaker 1>In Colorado. We have one of the lowest unemployment rates

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:29.640
<v Speaker 1>in the country. And whether you want to say that's

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:32.719
<v Speaker 1>from cannabis or something else, that's I will leave up

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:36.359
<v Speaker 1>to people to decide. We'll go for correlation again. And

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 1>then tax revenue, it's the same thing. It's we crossed

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the billion dollar freshold and tax revenue in Colorado I

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>think a year and a half ago, two years ago.

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:47.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so the money is coming in and on

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:49.399
<v Speaker 1>a federal level it would be at an even greater scale.

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>But if you legalize federally, doesn't doesn't having it available

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 1>all over the country, then start to no pun intended

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 1>cannibalize from other from other areas. So do you really

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>get the tax benefit? You think maybe to a certain extent,

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 1>but I think I would have to pull the numbers up.

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>But in Colorado, I think it's something like only twenty

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 1>percent of people that come into dispensaries are out of

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 1>state visitors like it. Really it's mostly people who live

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 1>in Colorado. There's a ton of tourists in some cities. Yeah,

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>but you know, if you look on most small towns

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 1>outside of Denver and Boulder, people are going to dispensaries

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>that live in Colorado. So back to this idea that

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:24.639
<v Speaker 1>these companies don't make money, I think the security is

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:26.879
<v Speaker 1>an Exchange Commission even issued a warning about a year

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 1>ago warning investors about fraud in the pot industry. Because

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>if so many of the companies are traded on the

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>over the counter market there they're or they're based in,

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:37.679
<v Speaker 1>they're traded on a Canadian exchange, and there's there's just

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot people people don't know. What would you look

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 1>out for. What's a warning sign to you, as someone

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>who's now a veteran of this industry, what makes you

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>say this company is not one of us. It's tough

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to say. And I think it's like with making an

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 1>investment in any novel industry. The onus is on both

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>sides for a retail investor to scrutinize what they're investing

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 1>in in the first place, and then I think to

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>a pretty significant extent, most people are not successful in listing.

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Even if it is OTC, most people are not successful

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>in doing so. If it's an illegitimate business. Now, that's

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 1>not to say there's not plenty of hot air in

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the pot stock market at the moment, but by and large,

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:22.399
<v Speaker 1>there's about ten companies that you consistently see in business

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>media that are the real deal. Nason Stage company. So

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of risk, like with Canopy Brands, which

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:30.880
<v Speaker 1>has a multi billion dollar backing from its parent Constellation

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>right but still went through a shakeup this year with

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>its CEO being ousted, And it's this we talked about,

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 1>harder to make money than they expected. I think so,

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think I can't speak for anybody from Constellation

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>or Canopy, but I think my read is that they

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 1>probably didn't make their money back as quickly as they

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:50.159
<v Speaker 1>wanted to. And it's a long term play, and that

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 1>has long been you forget. I forget because I've worked

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 1>in this industry for so long that all of that

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 1>stuff isn't immediately apparent to people from the outside. But

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>for me, when I got into it five and a

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:02.680
<v Speaker 1>half years ago, it's thinking, Oh, this is a long

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:04.879
<v Speaker 1>term play. Fifteen years from now, this is going to

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 1>be a fantastic business to be a part of. Wow,

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>that's actually interesting that you were thinking that far in advance,

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably giving myself more credit than I deserved as

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a fresh from college kid. But you know, pretty quickly

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 1>on you can realize that like, okay, it's great now,

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:20.919
<v Speaker 1>but it's going to be even better in the future.

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:22.879
<v Speaker 1>And so if you use your crystal mirror and you

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>think about five ten years, do you think there's going

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:29.719
<v Speaker 1>to be a constant flood of new companies offering I

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 1>don't know, gold whatever, whatever's or do you think the

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:35.359
<v Speaker 1>industry is going to consolidate into a couple of big companies.

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I think we're headed toward large scale consolidation. I think

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you'll always have your sort of boutique, bespoke cannabis products

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and brands, but I think those will make up a tiny,

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:49.920
<v Speaker 1>tiny portion of what's sold on the market. I think

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:52.239
<v Speaker 1>we'll see it become a lot like alcohol, where it's

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>three or four big companies that own everything. It's interesting.

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I've read a history of the automobile industry this summer,

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and I hadn't known that they're with that of little

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 1>auto companies in the late eighteen hundreds and early nineteen hundreds,

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and of course we ended up with three, right, So

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe that will be the history here too, So talk

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:10.919
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about the culture inside the industry. One

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>of the things that I thought was fascinating you had.

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 1>You had this observation about the culture that's quite ironic

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 1>that marijuana does have these really deep anti establishment and

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 1>anti capitalist routs, and yet now people in the industry

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:29.200
<v Speaker 1>are rooting for government regulation and capitalism. So how does

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 1>that sort of contradiction in terms play out. It's funny.

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I think we're in a growth stage right now where

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:39.119
<v Speaker 1>people are sort of reckoning with this notion that they

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 1>got into the industry to fight back against the man

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 1>ten years ago, and now they're very much the man themselves, right,

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>So I think we're seeing a lot of that play

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:51.439
<v Speaker 1>out in I think a lot of these IPOs speak

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:53.919
<v Speaker 1>to that that people are ready to be taken seriously

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 1>as business leaders in the space. So I think from

0:26:57.240 --> 0:26:59.959
<v Speaker 1>the top down that influences a lot of the culture

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:03.159
<v Speaker 1>where people have had to sort of pull themselves up

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:06.679
<v Speaker 1>and like get everything done at the highest possible degree

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 1>because the stakes are just higher now than they were previously.

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:12.880
<v Speaker 1>So it's certainly, you know, I wouldn't say it's as

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:15.680
<v Speaker 1>bad as being on a trading floor. But it's certainly

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:19.119
<v Speaker 1>high stress, high pressure because there's just so much at

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:22.199
<v Speaker 1>stake right now. That's a huge cultural shift within the

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Speaker 1>industry that would be fascinating to live through. So what

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:28.639
<v Speaker 1>was the industry's reaction. It's just one of many critiques.

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>But my journalist named Alex Berenson published a book I

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>think earlier this year called Tell Your Children, basically arguing

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:39.760
<v Speaker 1>that marijuana is the THC, is linked to psychosis, schizophrenia,

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 1>other really really terrible things. And his major point was

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:46.359
<v Speaker 1>that this fresh to legalization is very premature, and you

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 1>hear that from other groups as well. What's the industry

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>reaction to that? I mean to his book in particular,

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not just the industry who has pushed back against

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think there was an open letter from one

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:00.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred different clinicians and psychologists who said that he had

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>cherry picked the data in his book and was drawing

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 1>conclusions that just aren't rooted in science. And that's certainly

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 1>my belief as well as far as schizophrenia and cannabis,

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:12.679
<v Speaker 1>that's an argument that's been made over and over again,

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:16.199
<v Speaker 1>and the science for either side of the argument is

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:20.639
<v Speaker 1>just not there. There certainly can be a relationship between

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the two, but it's like a chicken and egg. Argument

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 1>is that that people had psychosis first, and as many

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:29.879
<v Speaker 1>people with mental health issues do or self medicating with cannabis,

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>or were they using cannabis and it triggered the psychosis.

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I tend to think that it's probably that the psychosis

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>was underlying first. But those cases are also exceedingly rare,

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 1>more rare than I think his book would lead you

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to believe. Yeah, it's that correlation causation issue again. Right,

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 1>what do you in the industry do to push back

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 1>because it's not just his book, there's plenty of this

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 1>criticism everywhere. No, absolutely not. I mean, and it's funny

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about this a lot lately because of

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 1>even just issues with companies like Jewel where vaping is

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 1>becoming like a larger and larger issue among children, whether

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 1>intentionally or unintentionally. Right, but they have certainly found themselves

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 1>on the wrong side of the regulatory apparatus. Yeah, I

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:13.719
<v Speaker 1>would not want to be sitting over there at the moment.

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 1>A big piece of it is, as with everything else

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 1>in the industry, that we're fervent believers in regulation and

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that We're happy to comply with the law because it's

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 1>both in our best interest and in the best interests

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 1>of the consumer. Products are safer, they're difficult for children

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 1>to get, and at the end of the day, like

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 1>that benefits all of us. I'm hesitant to even say it,

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 1>But no marketer is going out and thinking like, oh,

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to think of a way to market cannabis

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to kids, because at the end of the day, they're

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 1>not our consumers and they can't come into a dispensary.

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 1>So do you think some of the pushback is coming

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 1>from the alcohol industry or the tobacco industry, and that

0:29:51.680 --> 0:29:55.719
<v Speaker 1>there's some threat to them if pot becomes illegal substitute? Right?

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Isn't there some line you had in your book about

0:29:57.880 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 1>getting rid of beer bellies, I mean, which maybe they

0:30:01.360 --> 0:30:04.080
<v Speaker 1>might be replaced by munchy bellies. I don't know. That's

0:30:04.120 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 1>such a trite thing. I'll get yelled at for having

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 1>even said that. You know, I think I think largely

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the alcohol industry is in favor of it, and as

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 1>you've seen with Canopy Growth Corporation, Constellation made a four

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar investment in them. So I think the tides

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:22.480
<v Speaker 1>are turning to a certain extent, and I think people

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 1>are choosing different intoxicants aside from alcohol now, and I

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 1>think alcohol companies are wise and now that if that's

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the way that history is going to play out, then

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be involved in it, not fight back

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 1>against it. If indeed the legalization trend does continue, it

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:39.720
<v Speaker 1>will be interesting to see how that plays out. I

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 1>think you might be a little bit optimistic on that front,

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 1>or perhaps naive about the competitive forces at work. Absolutely,

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>but whatever, maintain some happy naive to take if you can.

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 1>A last question for you, do you think this industry

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to look like any other industry in ten

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>or fifteen years If you put back on your your

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 1>future hat and say, what is it going to be like?

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Is this justin industry like alcohol? I think it'll always

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 1>have a certain cultural cache to it that makes it

0:31:06.960 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 1>seem like the outsider industry. But you know, fifteen years

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 1>from now, I think it'll be federally legal. I think

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 1>we'll have seen huge consolidation, so it's just a few companies,

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:20.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe even alcohol companies that have acquired and absorbed them.

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Who knows, But I really do think there's this huge

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 1>push and especially at a company like ours, to really

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 1>move towards this CpG model, focusing on the highest value

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 1>portions of the consumer package goods. For those who have

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 1>forgotten the agronive, there's this increased focus on the highest

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 1>value portion of the supply chain. And so I think,

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:45.640
<v Speaker 1>while there's always going to be this cool factor to

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 1>cannabis and to working in cannabis, I don't think it'll

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 1>be dissimilar to anything else that you walk in and

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 1>buy off the shelf in the store. And maybe it'll

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:55.240
<v Speaker 1>take longer than fifteen years to get there, but we're

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 1>certainly headed there right now. It's going to be fascinating

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to see if your predictions pan out. So before I

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>read Jackson's book and talk to him, I think I

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 1>would have been anti legalization. Why take the risk? Isn't

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the safer route to just say no? But he makes

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 1>some compelling arguments, whether it be the inevitable existence of

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the black market or the hypocrisy of allowing ads for say, alcohol,

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 1>to run freely on billboards across America. His most powerful argument,

0:32:24.600 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I thought, was the comparison between pot and prescription opioids,

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:31.120
<v Speaker 1>a topic we've covered here on making a killing he

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 1>writes for the skeptics, I beg you to look at

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 1>these two drugs side by side and tell me which

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 1>one has the highest likelihood of causing harm. Even so,

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to bet that Jackson might be just a

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:45.600
<v Speaker 1>tadbit optimistic about the future of this industry. I'd think

0:32:45.640 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to be some big scandals and some

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:51.120
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar losses. But then again, isn't that just like

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 1>any other industry. I'm Bethany McLean, host of Making a Killing.

0:32:56.680 --> 0:32:58.520
<v Speaker 1>We're taking a short break. We'll be back in a

0:32:58.560 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks and I'll talk to Kyle Pope, the

0:33:00.880 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 1>executive editor of the Columbia Journalism Review, about how journalism

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 1>is changing looking forward to it. Making a Killing is

0:33:10.440 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the co production of Pushkin Industries and Chalk and Blade.

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 1>It's produced by Ruth Barnes and Rosie Stouffer. My executive

0:33:18.240 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 1>producers are Alison McClain no relation in Making Casey. The

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 1>executive producer at Pushkin is Mia Loebell. Engineering by Jason

0:33:27.000 --> 0:33:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Gambrell and Jason Rostkowski. Our music is by Jed Flood.

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Special thanks to Jacob Weisberg at Pushkin and everyone on

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the show. I'm Bethany McClain, thank you so much for listening.

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 1>You can find me on Twitter at Bethany mac twelve

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and let me know which episodes you've most enjoyed.