Speaker 1: We've got some breaking news. We get to start the
Speaker 1: show with Donald Trump is now calling off attacks. We're
Speaker 1: now being told on Iran. Now, this is breaking, as
Speaker 1: I am recording President Trump backing off a plan to
Speaker 1: launch powerful news strikes against Iran, saying late this weekend
Speaker 1: that it was asked by several Middle Eastern countries to
Speaker 1: hold off as they reached the quote perimeters of a
Speaker 1: new deal quote unquote. It was reported on Friday that
Speaker 1: the US and Israel militaries were striking as early as
Speaker 1: this weekend, targeting Iranian energy infrastructure, but Trump late on
Speaker 1: Saturday said, quote, we have just been asked by Iran
Speaker 1: and other Middle Eastern countries to hold off any attacks
Speaker 1: in the perimeter, in the perimeters of a deal that
Speaker 1: has begun to get agreed too now quote This would
Speaker 1: include the immediate, complete and total opening of the Hormuz
Speaker 1: Strait and an end to Iran's nuclear threat. Trump wrote
Speaker 1: on True Social Then he said, based on this request,
Speaker 1: I have agreed, for the future benefit of the world
Speaker 1: and likewise the survival of a successful and prosperous Iran,
Speaker 1: to cancel the attack, subject to being able to rapidly
Speaker 1: make a deal. Quote unquote, Trump, who did not disclose
Speaker 1: the details of the agreement, has several times before claimed
Speaker 1: to be mirroring a deal with Iran. Unfortunately, the IRGC
Speaker 1: ruins it every time. We also know that Iranian sources
Speaker 1: denied the present statement on Sunday, saying the claim that
Speaker 1: a deal was nearly in place was quote unquote completely baseless. Now,
Speaker 1: why do I read that for you? It's actually pretty clear.
Speaker 1: You have a civil war that is happening in Iran.
Speaker 1: It is not really clear who's in charge of the country.
Speaker 1: We know the de facto leadership of the country is
Speaker 1: the URGC, and that is a terrorist organization. They do
Speaker 1: not want to give it and have a normal nation.
Speaker 1: That is obvious. Now the Farce news agency they have
Speaker 1: come out saying this, the Islamic Republic of Iran has
Speaker 1: reached no agreement regarding the reopening of the Strait of
Speaker 1: Hormus and the reports published and in this regard our false.
Speaker 1: That is what a quote military source in Tehran told
Speaker 1: the country's semi official Farce news agency. The source added quote,
Speaker 1: as long as the United States continues its hostile actions
Speaker 1: and acts of aggression, the Strait of Hormus will remain closed.
Speaker 1: Trump's announcement came hours after he received a call that
Speaker 1: he says from the Crown Prince Mohammad Ben Salmon, known
Speaker 1: as NBS, the de facto ruler of Saudi Arabia. The
Speaker 1: Crown Prince quote expressed concern and asked for clarity about
Speaker 1: the plan of action. Again, this was for Donald Trump
Speaker 1: to go after their energy infhatsy structure. That could include
Speaker 1: their power plants, It could include their water plants. It
Speaker 1: could certainly include their ole and gas infrastructure, which is
Speaker 1: how Iran makes any money at all.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: On Sunday, the state run Saudi pres agency said that
Speaker 1: their defective leader NBS stressed the need to quote prioritize
Speaker 1: dialogue to reduce escalation and the importance of making every
Speaker 1: possible effort to achieve calm that paves the way for
Speaker 1: diplomatic solutions. Now you look at all this and I
Speaker 1: think there's a couple of things here at one. I
Speaker 1: don't think it's crazy to say that we've been here before.
Speaker 1: I do think the President showing a lot of strength
Speaker 1: and as well as Israel showing a lot of strength,
Speaker 1: and the attacks have been pretty damaging that the President's
Speaker 1: done and then stating what he was going to do
Speaker 1: next has clearly had a major impact on the President's
Speaker 1: decision here. All right, so all right, let me rephrase
Speaker 1: that on Iran's decision to maybe come back to the table. Now,
Speaker 1: they could be pausing just to buy time, because when
Speaker 1: you're dealing with terrorists, that makes sense, but you do
Speaker 1: have the civil war that is taking place within Iran
Speaker 1: and their power structure. Now there's also interesting indications. And
Speaker 1: you've got to go back and look at the oil
Speaker 1: markets so that you understand there is what the President's saying,
Speaker 1: there's what Iran is saying, and then some say there's
Speaker 1: truth in the middle of what reality may look like.
Speaker 1: And where do you find what the middle is You
Speaker 1: look at oil prices. Here is what has happened since
Speaker 1: these announcements and the back and forth have come out.
Speaker 1: Oil prices have dropped. I'm say it again. Oil prices
Speaker 1: have dropped after Trump orders US forces to hold off
Speaker 1: on new strikes against Iran. And the oil prices didn't
Speaker 1: fall just a little bit, they fell sharply. When Donald
Speaker 1: Trump said he would quote order US forces to hold
Speaker 1: off on any new strikes. This is coming from the
Speaker 1: ap Oil prices fell sharply Sunday after President Trump said
Speaker 1: he would order US forces to hold off on new
Speaker 1: strikes against i Ran, claiming that a deal to end
Speaker 1: the fighting in the Middle East was near. A resolution
Speaker 1: to the conflict, which has lasted more than five months,
Speaker 1: could give oil shippers the ability to send vessels out
Speaker 1: of the Persian golf, where tankers of oil and other
Speaker 1: prices have been trapped during the fighting. The price of
Speaker 1: US crewed fell five percent to eighty dollars and seventy
Speaker 1: nine cents per barrel Sunday night. The price of brint crude,
Speaker 1: the international standard, fell five percent as well, to eighty
Speaker 1: three eighty seven per barrel. Oil prices have been swinging
Speaker 1: widely since the US and Israel launched the attacks on
Speaker 1: Iran in late February, pushing past one hundred dollars a
Speaker 1: barrel multiple times during the spring. Now, as the conflict continues,
Speaker 1: high oil prices seeped into the cost of gasoline, jet fuel,
Speaker 1: and many other products that are delivered using diesel. Motorists
Speaker 1: have paid more at the pump, and customers shelled out
Speaker 1: more for airfare do the higher jet cost prices in
Speaker 1: some countries that fuel supplies ran low, leading the to
Speaker 1: rationing and sporadic closures of schools and government offices. Now
Speaker 1: again this is coming from the AP. Then they went
Speaker 1: on to say this Meanwhile, oil and gas companies amassed
Speaker 1: huge profits in the spring, doe to the high oil prices,
Speaker 1: gasoline and diesel prices that resulted when petroleum shippers couldn't
Speaker 1: get through the critical suit of her moves the narrow
Speaker 1: waterway that borders Iran due the fighting, prices for US
Speaker 1: crew to oil on Sunday night remained about twenty percent
Speaker 1: higher than before the conflict began. So down five percent overall,
Speaker 1: still up twenty percent. And look, the president knows that
Speaker 1: the midterms are coming, he knows or less than a
Speaker 1: hundred days away. Is that on his mind? I'm going
Speaker 1: to answer that question, of course it is. Is it
Speaker 1: everything to him?
Speaker 2: No?
Speaker 1: Is he gonna let a rand use it for leverage?
Speaker 1: I think it's very clear there's the answer that as hell. No,
Speaker 1: the President sees this as a national security issue. The
Speaker 1: President's committed to it from a national security issue, which
Speaker 1: means that the midterms are in essence second, the politics
Speaker 1: are second to national security. The interesting part is Iran
Speaker 1: tried to use the midterms as a way to get
Speaker 1: out of a real agreement with the US that had
Speaker 1: real teeth. They thought, because of politics, that Donald Trump
Speaker 1: would flinch first, that he would take do a bad deal. Now,
Speaker 1: there was a deal that was given the President and
Speaker 1: it was a bad deal. I've said this before, I
Speaker 1: says on TV. I think the first big deal that
Speaker 1: was blown up, no pun intended, was not a great
Speaker 1: deal that was given to the President by the Vice
Speaker 1: President Jady Vance. I think it was a weak deal.
Speaker 1: I think it was a bad deal. I think it
Speaker 1: was a soft deal, and I think the President also
Speaker 1: has learned from that. So now this second go round
Speaker 1: with this deal, I think you're looking at something that
Speaker 1: could be very very different based on what I've been
Speaker 1: told internally from those in around this deal at the
Speaker 1: White House and outside of it as well. The second
Speaker 1: part of this equation, and it's an important one, is
Speaker 1: that the present understands that, look, if I can get
Speaker 1: a deal done because I am doing putting maximum military
Speaker 1: pressure on them and that gets it done quickly, great,
Speaker 1: because that's where we are. The talking doesn't work. You
Speaker 1: pound them in submission, then you wait, you see, if
Speaker 1: they want to get a deal done, and that seems
Speaker 1: to be where we are now, I am cautiously optimistic.
Speaker 1: Migrant K through twelve enrollment has actually fallen in Massachusetts
Speaker 1: with Trump's migration enforcement. Yeah, the number of migrant students
Speaker 1: enrolled in high schools across Massachusetts tumbled more than twenty
Speaker 1: percent with President Donald Trump's enforcement of the nation's immigration laws.
Speaker 1: The numbers come from a study conducted by Round Universities
Speaker 1: and Burg Institute, which curunts the numbers from the two
Speaker 1: thousand and seven two thousand and eight school year up
Speaker 1: to the twenty twenty four to twenty five school years. Now,
Speaker 1: what they saw was well staggering. According to the study,
Speaker 1: migrant student high school enrollment went from a high of
Speaker 1: more than six thousand, four hundred students in twenty twenty
Speaker 1: four to five thousand, three hundred last year. Now that
Speaker 1: is a massive decrease amid the following enrollment. By the way,
Speaker 1: the numbers also show the Massachusetts schools are still graduating
Speaker 1: many migrant students who were not and are not I
Speaker 1: should say, proficient in the English language. Now, how do
Speaker 1: you graduate from high school if you're not proficient? In English.
Speaker 1: That's a question everyone should be asking. Quote, the landscape
Speaker 1: is one that changes really rapidly. Districts are constantly feeling
Speaker 1: like they are on the back foot in terms of
Speaker 1: responding to immigrant student needs. That's what Anne Mattil, the
Speaker 1: reports author and research scientists at the Amberg set according
Speaker 1: to The Boston Globe. Now, the Globe reported that only
Speaker 1: a tiny six percent of high school newcomers who arrive
Speaker 1: in the US with low English skills graduated with proficiency
Speaker 1: in English. Let me say that again. This is again
Speaker 1: the Globe saying this, six percent of high school newcomers
Speaker 1: who arrive in the US with low English skills graduated
Speaker 1: with proficiency in English almost in the I mean, let
Speaker 1: me just pause there and say this. If a kid
Speaker 1: arrives in the state schools without being conversant in English
Speaker 1: all right and able to read it, what they are
Speaker 1: doing is basically going to daycare because they are graduating
Speaker 1: without having gained those skills. That's a massive problem. We
Speaker 1: also know that it holds back the rest of the
Speaker 1: class because those that are trying to learn are having
Speaker 1: to wait because you're having to babysit people that aren't
Speaker 1: proficient in English who are trying to learn in English.
Speaker 1: You understand the domino effect here. Now, high scores are
Speaker 1: not the only ones lagging in English skills. According to
Speaker 1: Boston Herald, about half of the state's middle school students
Speaker 1: are not meeting Gray level literacy expectations. This is across
Speaker 1: the board, not just migrant students. The paper notes that
Speaker 1: a report by ed Trust found that nearly one hundred
Speaker 1: and fifty thousand of the students statewide fell well behind
Speaker 1: Gray level benchmarks. Again, this refers to all students, not
Speaker 1: just migrant children. Still, there's a sharp difference in literacy
Speaker 1: between wide and agent students on the one hand, with
Speaker 1: higher percentage of literacy and other ethnic groups on the other. Now, quote,
Speaker 1: the gaps are greatest for multi lingual learners, with between
Speaker 1: sixty five and seventy five percent of multi lingual learners
Speaker 1: in grades six through eight and ten not yet meeting expectations.
Speaker 1: The report also found You take that into consideration for
Speaker 1: a second. You have schools that have been overrun with thousands,
Speaker 1: not hundreds, but thousands of illegal immigrant students. We absorb
Speaker 1: them to the system, regardless of any foundation in the
Speaker 1: English language. We then allow them to be in our classroom.
Speaker 1: And it's not just one student in the back. It's
Speaker 1: thousands of students throughout the school system in Boston, for example,
Speaker 1: more than six seven thousand at this point, right who
Speaker 1: then the teachers are ordered to teach them, ordered to
Speaker 1: teach them. The teachers are saying they don't know anything,
Speaker 1: right like, they don't They can't keep up. Not only
Speaker 1: can they not keep up, but they're holding the rest
Speaker 1: of students back. So what is Donald Trump? Doney said, Look,
Speaker 1: you don't get to invade this country and then we
Speaker 1: try to educate you, which is holding our American kids back,
Speaker 1: and so we're going to crack down. Now, here's what's interesting.
Speaker 1: With fewer migrant students enrolling, it seems like the desperate
Speaker 1: numbers may level off as quote, fewer non English speaking
Speaker 1: students enroll in the state schools that you're paying for.
Speaker 1: Education budgets will also likely find cuts looming in the
Speaker 1: near future if the number of migrants continue to climb
Speaker 1: and fewer dollars will we need to serve the migrant students,
Speaker 1: which explains why so many schools are okay with the
Speaker 1: illegal immigrants coming in, because for every pupil, you get
Speaker 1: you then get a bigger check from the government. So
Speaker 1: there is an incentive to turn our education systems into
Speaker 1: daycare systems because if you're a school system, you get
Speaker 1: money regardless of if they can speak English or not
Speaker 1: for your school. The teachers' unions only care about money.
Speaker 1: The teachers' unions only care about cash, and they only
Speaker 1: care about how many kids show up. If you get
Speaker 1: paid per customer, do you care if they speak English
Speaker 1: or not? This article says that the educators are those
Speaker 1: running the schools. They don't mind the non English speaking
Speaker 1: students because they get more money, which means they have
Speaker 1: more cash for them and their coffers. Now here's also thing.
Speaker 1: It's interesting after Joe Biden and his administration flooded the
Speaker 1: country with mi millions of uneducated migrants, forcing so many
Speaker 1: school systems to hide education budgets until they had to
Speaker 1: hike them. Why do they do that because they had
Speaker 1: to meet the demand caused by Biden's open border policies
Speaker 1: and then democratic controlled cities. By the way, we're thrilled
Speaker 1: to find reasons to pump more tax dollars into failing
Speaker 1: schools because then it went back to them and their coffers,
Speaker 1: and they're like, great, bring us all students. We don't
Speaker 1: care for babysitting them. We don't care for a daycare.
Speaker 1: We don't care if it's holding our other students back.
Speaker 1: We don't care for graduating kids, making these diplomas literally meaningless.
Speaker 1: We are socially promoting them. Now, what happened is you're
Speaker 1: giving more your tax money than ever before the legal immigrants.
Speaker 1: That is not going to give your kids, American kids,
Speaker 1: kids that are in this country legally the best education possible.
Speaker 1: What they're also doing, we're learning now is they had
Speaker 1: to dumb down the curriculum to try to make it
Speaker 1: not look so bad for the kids that didn't understand
Speaker 1: the words coming out of the mouths the teachers who
Speaker 1: are speaking English, teaching in English, and books that are
Speaker 1: written in English. This is another reason, by the way,
Speaker 1: why I'm in favor of school choice. This is another
Speaker 1: reason why Americans should be angry at what the socialists
Speaker 1: and communist and Marxis are doing in this country. They
Speaker 1: are destroying our children's futures by caring more about illegal
Speaker 1: immigrants and the numbers they can get in this country
Speaker 1: they do about educating America's kids. When you have and
Speaker 1: I go back to the stat when you go back
Speaker 1: to just six percent of high school newcomers who arrive
Speaker 1: in the US with low English skills graduate with proficiency
Speaker 1: in English, that tells you the entire school system is dead.
Speaker 1: It is broken. It is a daycare system. It's a
Speaker 1: daycare system for parents who drop their kids off and
Speaker 1: not have to be involved in their kids' lives. It
Speaker 1: is a daycare system for illegal immigrants who come this country.
Speaker 1: It's a reward system for illegal immigrants that are coming
Speaker 1: into this country. And what happens to our kids. They're
Speaker 1: not proficient in anything anymore because the illegal immigrants are
Speaker 1: holding back the kids in school because they have to,
Speaker 1: they have no choice, because the educators are letting them in.
Speaker 1: There is a civil war that is getting bigger and bigger.
Speaker 1: And this is a war that well many did not
Speaker 1: see actually happening. It's in the Democratic Party. Now. I
Speaker 1: have been involved in the political world for thirty plus years.
Speaker 1: I have seen civil wars within the GOP. I saw
Speaker 1: when Republican establishment rhinos tried to destroy anyone who was
Speaker 1: connected or helping build or advocating for the Tea Party movement.
Speaker 1: I saw people that lied and acted like they were
Speaker 1: Tea Party. Individuals for example, who actually hated the Tea Party,
Speaker 1: but they were trying to figure out what to do.
Speaker 1: I watched Republicans live and get elected claiming they were
Speaker 1: in the Tea Party, and then when they got to Washington,
Speaker 1: they were the rhinos that many of us believe they
Speaker 1: always were going to be before. Now, I've watched civil wars.
Speaker 1: I worked with the Bush administration two thousand and four,
Speaker 1: was on his reelect campaign in two thousand and four,
Speaker 1: and I witnessed the losing of power in two thousand
Speaker 1: and six and the civil war that erupted within the
Speaker 1: Republican Party. I saw the civil War and the Republican
Speaker 1: Party when it was John McCain, for example, as the
Speaker 1: nominee against Barack Obama. I saw the next civil war
Speaker 1: when there's a guy who not even a Republican, Mitt Romney,
Speaker 1: who acted like he was got the nomination, and well
Speaker 1: we know the rest of that story. Now. During all
Speaker 1: of that, what didn't happen was Democrats not being united.
Speaker 1: I have said this for a long time. Republicans are
Speaker 1: pros at gaining power and then screwing it all up
Speaker 1: because we have so many infighting, civil wars within the
Speaker 1: party in Washington, d C. And what I've said for
Speaker 1: decades is that Democrats are better. I want to say
Speaker 1: that again. Democrats historically are much better that when they
Speaker 1: get power, everyone seems to get in line and they
Speaker 1: get things done. Now I believe most of what they
Speaker 1: get done actually hurts this country. But regardless, they get
Speaker 1: things done. They understand exactly what's at stake when you
Speaker 1: get power. They understand how to put people in line,
Speaker 1: they understand how to ice people out, they understand how
Speaker 1: to run a party. And I've said for years I
Speaker 1: wish Republicans were better at that. We're not, and so
Speaker 1: lots of times we get power. Great example is Donald
Speaker 1: Trump twenty sixteen, and there were many Republicans that were
Speaker 1: undermining President Trump the entire time he was in office.
Speaker 1: The first time. Hell, there was even Republicans that were
Speaker 1: advocating for impeachment. If you remember guys like Adam Kinsinger
Speaker 1: that claim they were a Republican right Liz Cheney, Cheney's daughter,
Speaker 1: another example of that. Now, we have seen civil wars
Speaker 1: that have strengthened the conservative movement. And the winning of
Speaker 1: Donald Trump is an example of that. And those that
Speaker 1: are around Donald Trump. We've also seen the excommunication of Rhinos
Speaker 1: who Donald Trump has helped get rid of. And that's
Speaker 1: good for the country. But ahead of the midterms, I
Speaker 1: was still incredibly worried about the Republicans yet again screwing
Speaker 1: it all up. Look at how we can't even get
Speaker 1: these Save Act passed because there's Rhino Republicans that Trump
Speaker 1: to help get rid of, that hate Donald Trump more
Speaker 1: than they love this country, and they refuse to do
Speaker 1: what the American people want, which is the Save Act.
Speaker 1: I say all that to then tell you the next
Speaker 1: part of this story. There is act actually now, and
Speaker 1: this is legitimate. There is right now in the Democratic
Speaker 1: Party a civil war that is happening between the socialists,
Speaker 1: Marxists and communists, the Democratic Socialists of America, which are
Speaker 1: in fact communists who are angry that the Democratic Party
Speaker 1: has not gone socialist Marxist communists enough for them. Now.
Speaker 1: I've never seen the Democratic Party be out of control
Speaker 1: like it is right now, and the leaders of the
Speaker 1: Democratic Party, they're just showing the cracks in their armor
Speaker 1: to the point where no one can deny this one
Speaker 1: example of that is just pure data on the Democratic
Speaker 1: National Committee. There is a very interesting story that came
Speaker 1: out and it was a story about how broke is
Speaker 1: the Democratic National Committee. Usually the party that is not
Speaker 1: in power is the party that's able to raise money. Well,
Speaker 1: guess what the Democratic National Committee Its finances are under
Speaker 1: quote significant pressure compared with the Republican National Committee. As
Speaker 1: of the latest campaign finance reports, the DNC ended June
Speaker 1: with about sixteen point three million in cash on hand.
Speaker 1: It also reported, and this is the number that really matters,
Speaker 1: eighteen point five million in debt, meaning it had more
Speaker 1: debt than cash, roughly a two point two million dollar
Speaker 1: net deficit. Where does that stand Again, it's the party
Speaker 1: that's out of power. It's us easier to get money
Speaker 1: and have people that give you cash when you're out
Speaker 1: of power, because you want to get your power back,
Speaker 1: and that's what inspires you. And you're not asleep at
Speaker 1: the wheel. You're angry. Right, Democrats should be able to
Speaker 1: raise tons of money against Donald Trump because well we
Speaker 1: know about Trump derangement syndrome. Well, let's compare the two
Speaker 1: point two million dollar deficit for the Democrat National Committee.
Speaker 1: Comparing it to the Republican National Committee. Well, the RNC
Speaker 1: has about twenty eight point five million, I'm gonna say
Speaker 1: that number again, twenty eight point five million in cash
Speaker 1: on hand and no debt, giving Republicans a very large
Speaker 1: financial advantage heading into the twenty twenty six midterms. Recent
Speaker 1: reporting also indicates some of the Democratic Party's largest donors
Speaker 1: have held back contributions after the twenty twenty four election disaster,
Speaker 1: the Joe Biden disaster, the Kamala Harris disaster, citing quote
Speaker 1: concerns about leadership, about strategy, and then also about spending.
Speaker 1: The Democratic National Committee has face internal tourmal as well.
Speaker 1: And this is all for reporting, including massive criticism of
Speaker 1: the chairman, Ken Martin's fundraising performance and then quote questions
Speaker 1: about the committee's financial management or mismanagement. Now, it's also
Speaker 1: worth noting that the DNC's finances are not the same
Speaker 1: thing as the Democratic parties overall cash and their financial position.
Speaker 1: But there are other groups like the Democratic Candidates and
Speaker 1: Congressional campaign committees known as the d trible C. There's
Speaker 1: outside packs, there's state parties, and they're trying to raise
Speaker 1: substantial sums of money. But it's very clear that they've
Speaker 1: got a fundraising problem right now. But that's not even
Speaker 1: the big civil war. I wanted you to understand the
Speaker 1: groundwork of just how bad it is before I got
Speaker 1: to the punchline, and that is this the Democratic Socialists
Speaker 1: of America. They have basically taken over the power that
Speaker 1: the Democratic National Committee used to have. Bill Maher, Yes,
Speaker 1: the same radical leftist Bill Maher who said recently that
Speaker 1: his vote was up for grabs went on vacation. And
Speaker 1: when he said this during an interview and it went viral, well,
Speaker 1: then of course the socialist, communists and Marxists lost their mind.
Speaker 1: The Democratic Party lost their mind, and they all turned
Speaker 1: on Bill Maher, which is exactly what Democrats do and
Speaker 1: socialist and communists do when you step out of line
Speaker 1: with them. I want you to listen to what Bill
Speaker 1: Maher said on his show talking about the Democratic Party
Speaker 1: and comparing it, by the way, to Donald Trump and
Speaker 1: what Donald Trump has said. Listen carefully, as told one
Speaker 1: brilliant lies.
Speaker 2: But when he says the Democratic Socialists of America are
Speaker 2: actually communist, that's not one of them. And it's not
Speaker 2: hard to prove it just by quoting the DSSA and
Speaker 2: their candidates. Dat E Vance was on the show and
Speaker 2: I told him that if the Democratic Party keeps going
Speaker 2: in the direction of the dssay my vote was in
Speaker 2: play and all I heard all vacation was oh my god,
Speaker 2: you're a Republican. Now. No, that's not what I said.
Speaker 2: I said in play. And here's why, because not a
Speaker 2: week goes by where I don't read about some newly chosen, exciting,
Speaker 2: new face in the Democratic Party, and then when that
Speaker 2: face opens its mouth, the Communist Manifesto or some other
Speaker 2: crazy comes out. Again. Let's just read the quotes. The
Speaker 2: DSA platform says your work, you work as much as
Speaker 2: you are able, and no more than needed. If that
Speaker 2: was any closer to Karl Marx's dictum from each according
Speaker 2: to his abilities, to each to his needs, they'd be
Speaker 2: sued for plagiarism. New York Mayor Mandani once tweeted Karl
Speaker 2: Marx's words exactly. They're not trying to hide it. Their
Speaker 2: most popular influencer, Hassan Piker, thinks communism is so groovy.
Speaker 2: He laments the fall of the two of the most
Speaker 2: murderous regimes in history, the Soviet Union and chairman Maos China.
Speaker 2: Mendami's aid, his top aid, Sea Weaver said, if you
Speaker 2: don't believe in the government's sacred right to seize property,
Speaker 2: it's over and impoverish the white middle class. What's a
Speaker 2: that's a goal. You know, you're supposed to scare people
Speaker 2: into voting for you.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: One of the new soon to be Democratic Congress people,
Speaker 2: Darlezia Chabalier, supports seizing all properties from landlords and said
Speaker 2: seize the means of production. Mendami has said the end
Speaker 2: goal is the means of production. I think they want
Speaker 2: to seize the means of production. Now maybe you missed
Speaker 2: that in school, or missed school altogether, but that's communism. Now.
Speaker 2: The coalition within the DSAY called the Marxist Unity Group
Speaker 2: is in ascendance and I must take them at their word.
Speaker 2: When their words include our commitment is to the long
Speaker 2: term struggle for a fully liberated, classless society in a word, communism.
Speaker 2: What do they have to do tweet out elect more communists?
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, seeah, Weaver did that. Yes, good, I'm glad
Speaker 2: you're shot. People got to realize this is going on.
Speaker 1: People got to realize this is going on. There was
Speaker 1: a woman in the crowd there that gas when he
Speaker 1: read the tweet and communists elect more communists. Yes, that
Speaker 1: actually came from Mandanni's person. This is the Democratic Party,
Speaker 1: believe them. I hope you'll take all the audio that
Speaker 1: I just played for you. Please share our podcast wherever
Speaker 1: you are on social media to help us grow, and
Speaker 1: I will see you back here tomorrow