WEBVTT - Single Best Idea with Tom Keene: Michelle Meyer & Amanda Rebello

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. A single ust idea

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to start a really interesting week. I'm exhausted by the politics.

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you were over the weekend of the United

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Kingdom of France. Thank you Francine Lacroix coming to first

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>with Avenue Marceaux with the Eiffel Tower in the background,

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>straddle between the eighth and sixteenth Arrondi smamp. Francie Lacuix

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 1>reporting early this morning on the shocking French election, all

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that's going on in the United States. Looked at Joe

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Matthew and Kayley Lines for balance of Power. That story

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>will change by the time we get this out on

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>ample podcasts, but we're trying to do conventional work with

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>inflation reports late in the week and JP Morgan and

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>City Group on Friday, really getting the earnings going, and

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of course stay cool in this brutal heat and humidity

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>that we're having really across the nation. Michelle Meyer was

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 1>definitive at Bank of America working with Ethan Harris on

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the Consumer master Card. Was so impressed they brought her

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>over as their chief economists and she's been brilliant as

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>a wonderful prism. What she's really good at is telling me,

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what I'm talking about. Michelle Meyer here

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 1>on the polarity of the consumer.

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:30.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that's an accurate assessment. I think that

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 2>there's as we talked before, there's not a uniform story.

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 2>But I don't think you can just break it into

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 2>those two categories, because think about again, look at the

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 2>labor market. Consider the fact that we've had job gains

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:46.319
<v Speaker 2>that have been impressive across many different categories, which span

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 2>many different income levels. Wage growth was actually the fastest

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 2>coming out of the pandemic for the lower income, lower

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 2>skilled part of the population a way that we hadn't

0:01:56.640 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 2>seen in prior cycles. A lot of folks had really

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 2>been supported by the fact that the stimulus was extremely

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 2>beneficial and supportive.

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Michelle Meyer there on the American consumer, and I'll tell you,

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 1>listen to the entire interview, very valuable. She is just

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>heeded of this being the great mist call out of

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic on the strength the broad strength of the

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 1>American consumer. And I think she said both on and

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>off the mic, that MasterCard continues to see data of

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:34.239
<v Speaker 1>a consumer that is spending what a wonderful day Terry

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Haynes on short notice on Washington as well with Pangaea.

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 1>He was just absolutely brilliant on the need to see

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>poles and he said, most of those polls will be

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:47.640
<v Speaker 1>coming up. And hey, it's July, folks. There's a convention

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 1>in Milwaukee, the Republican Convention, and you know, I'm sorry

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of upon us here and we'll continue to

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>follow that of course, all in France and England as well,

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:04.080
<v Speaker 1>but we do have to look at what we see

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>in the markets. And with a brilliant note from DWS

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>of London was Amanda Rebello and this is on ETFs

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and what to do, and it's a very surgical note

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 1>as well. I should point out we talked to her

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>though about the difference in education in Europe and in

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the broader United Kingdom. In her mathematics which she took

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:33.799
<v Speaker 1>at Oxford, she is just absolutely first rate. Here's Amanda

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Rebello on the mathiness of our teachers.

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 3>One thing that's in the way in which math has

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 3>taught and actually my sister is a high school teacher

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 3>in the UK for mathematics. That issue is that it's

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 3>very procedural, I think as well a lot of teachers

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 3>don't have the passion. So yeah, we really need to

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 3>get passionate people to teach. I'm one of them. I

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:00.040
<v Speaker 3>sold out and I went into finance.

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Right she sold out to DWS. I'm sure the DWS

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>marketing people love that statement. Her work is brilliant at

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 1>DWS and the allocation of what to do. There's like

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>six hundred ETFs out there and you say, okay, what's

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:18.159
<v Speaker 1>the most efficacious way to take a belief? And that's

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 1>what Amanda Rebello leads at it DWS off the London

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 1>desk as well. To look forward to this week again

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>CPI and PPI, those will be key reports and then

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>we go into the earning season. I've been saying for weeks,

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>if not months, I have been saying that all of

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, the fed chat is less weighted by me

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and the earnings chat, the cash flow chat is way

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>more rating weighted. It'll be fascinating to see Brian Belski

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>with us at Demo Capital Markets today and he's absolutely

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>heated that the generation of free cash flow will be there,

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>although he's hoping, and I mean being was the word

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:03.600
<v Speaker 1>for a correction? Of course? I asked him, what's a

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>correction And the joke now is it's three percent. The

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:12.160
<v Speaker 1>historical correction is ten percent, and Brian Belski suggesting the

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>joy of a five to six seven percent correction would

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>be more appropriate. We will see as we stagger through July.

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:25.600
<v Speaker 1>We're out on YouTube again. Go to Google search YouTube

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Podcasts and you can subscribe there on YouTube to

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg podcast page. All the value add of what

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>we do on radio. And there's Apple car Play and

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto as well on Apple podcasts. This is single

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>best idea