WEBVTT - Broadcom to Buy VMware for $61 Billion

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world of business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one and twenty countries. You can

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. But it was just this

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:34.959
<v Speaker 1>past weekend that the news broke that Broadcom was said

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to be and talked about vm Ware. Well, it became

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>official this morning. Dina bas is Seattle bureau chief for

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News. Dina joins us now on the phone from Seattle.

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:44.880
<v Speaker 1>We got some more details, thanks to you and to

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Leanna Baker Dinah, sixty one billion dollars. It's a record

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>tech deal. There's a ghost shop provision here. What else

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>do does our investor audience need to know? Uh? You know, so,

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Broadcom was basically saying that vm Ware is going to

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>become the new name for its off for a business,

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to become the focus of a software business

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>that they've been building for the last couple of years. Uh.

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:08.400
<v Speaker 1>There is also a go shop provision in here, though,

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:10.680
<v Speaker 1>so vm Ware can for a limited period of time

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:14.119
<v Speaker 1>try to find other bidders. So we'll we'll see if

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>that creates additional late, late breaking drama in this deal. Boy,

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>it's good to be vm Ware, right, I guess at

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:21.040
<v Speaker 1>this point, I mean who else wants it? Or who

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>should want vm ware? Dina. You know, vm Ware has

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>partnerships with all of the major cloud companies, so and

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the closest one is with Amazon's cloud business, So we're

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>talking Amazon, Microsoft, Google. The problem is that in the

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.759
<v Speaker 1>current regulatory environment, it's going to be difficult for any

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>of those companies to to put together a deal potentially.

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh that that's going to be a little hard with

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the scrutiny that regulators are putting on on large tech. UH.

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Intel another chip maker. Obviously Intel CEO used to be

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of vm Ware. UH. Cisco is another name

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>that's been been mentioned, But we don't know what's going

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to happen from here on out. All right, So we

0:01:57.560 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>have a very smart audience, I know that. But if

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>they're not familiar with Broadcommon, vm Ware, what is it

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>about these companies, what do they do and what is

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>it about them that maybe makes a good combination. Well,

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>you have to look back at broadcomms M and a

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:14.239
<v Speaker 1>strategy over the past couple of years. They're a hardware company,

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a chip maker, but in order to reduce their exposure

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to the cyclicality of the chip industry, they've been buying

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>up software companies. They bought a big part of Semantic,

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>they bought ci A technologies and part of what they

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 1>do UM. When they do that, it's almost a private

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>equity like strategy. They look at these companies that are

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more mature, but have solid, successful product

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>lines that they can you know, continue running and bring

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>in money and and ring costs out of At the

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>same time, software tends to be a more regular flow

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:48.359
<v Speaker 1>of revenue than than hardware and chips in particular, which

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:51.079
<v Speaker 1>are as I mentioned, very cyclical. So when you look

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>at vm ware, you have a company that pioneered a

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:58.399
<v Speaker 1>type of software called virtualization software, and UM, even though

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>that technology is being surpa asked by the sorts of

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>things people are using more frequently in the cloud. They

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>still have a very strong position. They're still very deeply

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>embedded in a very large number of corporate networks and

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 1>their software basically helps you reduce the number of servers

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:14.919
<v Speaker 1>that you have to use and cut costs. Well, I

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 1>think about where we were yesterday Informatica in Vegas, right,

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:19.919
<v Speaker 1>and this was yes cloud, but it was also about

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>taking data, making it intelligent, doing lots of different things

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:25.799
<v Speaker 1>with it. Like it's just this. I feel like there's

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of crossover happening within the tech INDs right

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>with so much data is how do you make it

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>valuable to different customers? So Sodina, what what does Broadcom

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>end up doing with vm where? Now? How why are

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>these companies better off together than they would be by themselves. Well,

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>vm Ware has been in a tough spot for the

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years. There's been a lot of financial

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>engineering going on around the company. So if you if

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you go back historically, vm Ware was a very successful startup,

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>was bought by e MC and probably the most valuable

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>tech deal you know in the history in terms of

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>what e MC paid for it and what it ended

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>up making them in money. But then e MC gets

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>bought by Dell. Vm ware has been you know, spun

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>awesome doll back into you know, it's been there's been

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of backports about where what's gone on with

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>them and all that's going on. They've been trying to

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>come up with a strategy to deal with this uh

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>legacy product line that I talked about before, this virtualization software.

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:19.600
<v Speaker 1>How do they modernize, how do they regain the leadership

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>role they once had in a market that's bypassed them,

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>And so they've been investing in a lot of different

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>areas and security, mobile device management, networking, but still the

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>vast majority of the revenue is coming from this older software.

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>So he've been struggling to figure out what the strategy

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>is as a standalone company in terms of how they're

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>going to continue growing. Their revenue growth has ticked down

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>into the single digits where two years ago, three years

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 1>ago was in the double digits. That's been challenging. Being

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>owned by Broadcom freeze them from having to worry about that. Broadcom.

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:51.479
<v Speaker 1>You know, I spoke to Broadcom Software president Tom Croft

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>this morning and he said, look, you know, yes, they're

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:55.839
<v Speaker 1>single digit revenue business. But that's the type of business

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>we run very well. Um and so VM work gets

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>to be you outside of the stock market scrutiny of

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>around its growth rates, and Broadcom will will try again

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>to squeeze costs out of it and and focus on

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>profit of you know, this aging product line. Heyda. What's

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>going on just more broadly in the tech industry, especially

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:16.119
<v Speaker 1>as we're seeing kind of the big tech really under fire.

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 1>If you look at certainly the performance in the equity

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>markets this year so far. But there's been a lot

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 1>of tech deals, right, and some big ones this year. Sure,

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously you know there's Microsoft Activision at sixty nine billion,

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:28.720
<v Speaker 1>he said earlier. This one is the biggest tech deal.

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:31.119
<v Speaker 1>But that's only if you consider Microsoft activision of gaming

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:34.840
<v Speaker 1>or entertainment deal. I suppose what we're seeing right now

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:38.279
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a confluence of different, potentially conflicting factors.

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:41.839
<v Speaker 1>So companies valuations are going down because the market is

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 1>going down, So acquiring a company becomes potentially cheaper. That said,

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:48.599
<v Speaker 1>the company doing the acquisition, if they are doing it

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>by stock, well, their stock is going down to so

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:53.720
<v Speaker 1>you have to weigh that and We talked at the

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 1>top of this conversation about the increasingly difficult regulatory environment

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>around large deals. So you have a cup of different

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:03.480
<v Speaker 1>forces pulling on things, but valuations are going down and

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that that may enable some more opportunistic buying for those

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>buyers that that can get their deals approved by regulators

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and have the cash or the stock to do it.

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Kind of fascinating just to see what's going on and

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:17.840
<v Speaker 1>what is so far, I feel like a very crazy

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>financial market year, Dina explained, so much. Thank you so much,

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Tina basked, she Seattle bureau chief that Bloomberg News joining

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone from Seattle. So again, right, we

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>heard about the deal just not even a week ago,

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and here you have it. Yeah, but you know, in

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>just a few minutes, we're gonna talk about Stays big take,

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 1>which is about you know, the troubles brewing in tech. Yeah, exactly.

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:41.720
<v Speaker 1>This will get you thinking in a big way. This

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio.

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:55.720
<v Speaker 1>So more Americans died of drug overdoses in then any

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>previous year to mention these numbers, more than a hundred

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand Americans, that's up fift from the previous year. More

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 1>than eighty thousand died using opioids. And just yesterday we

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:07.600
<v Speaker 1>got where that Teva will pay ten million to settle

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>opioid related claims that just in West Virginia. And remember

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>earlier this year, tim there was news that for the

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>largest U S corporations have agreed to pay roughly twenty

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>six billion to settle a tsunami of lawsuits linked to

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>claims that their business practices help you the deadly opioid crisis. Well,

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>we've got an expert voice with stalk all things when

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the opioid epidemic here in the United States,

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Dr Caleb Alexander, as Professor of Epidemiology at the Johns

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Dr Alexander is we

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>should know it has been an expert for plaintiffs in

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>opioid litigation. Dr Alexander, how are you fine? Thanks for

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>having me, Well, you've been working on something. You've been developing,

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the Opioid Industry Document Archive. It's launched by Johns Hopkins

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>University and u c SF. We should know that JOHNS.

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health that is supported by

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Michael R. Bloomberg, founder of Bloomberg LP and Bloomberg Philanthropies.

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>What is the Opioid Industry Document Archive? The Archives is

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>an effort to shine the bright light of day on

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>millions of documents that have been generated through ongoing opioid litigation.

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>It provides an opportunity for members of the public breath

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to have lost a loved one, researchers, historians, legal scholars,

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and others to be able to examine the corporate practices

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that has contributed to the worst drug epidemic in our

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>country's history. You know what's what's fascinating to me, Dr

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Alexander and I think about this When any of the

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>drug companies seem to um come to a settlement to

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 1>settle those opioid related claims, they usually say, what we

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>did nothing wrong. When you look at this archive and

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>you are able to see these documents, is that not

0:08:56.040 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>fair event to say that? Well? It him. It's an

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:03.439
<v Speaker 1>excellent question, and I should start by saying that it's

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 1>unusual that out of litigation we get this opportunity to

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 1>actually put these sorts of documents in the public domain

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>all too often, unfortunately, uh these documents remain field and

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:21.439
<v Speaker 1>and the public never has an opportunity to actually see,

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>uh see these types of internal corporate communications, emails, presentations,

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 1>sales reports, budgets and the like. And you know, I

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>don't think we would be seeing settlements of billions and

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars. You just pointed out the one for

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty six billion with four of the country's largest corporations.

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:45.079
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we would be seeing settlements of that

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 1>magnitude if there wasn't longdoing that had taken place, Dr Alexander.

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 1>We we are getting, you know, thanks to the Opioid

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Industry Document Archive, to some really great work by a

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>journalists who've dug into this over the last few years,

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>we are getting a good understanding of what some companies

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:03.559
<v Speaker 1>have done with regards to their marketing of these pharmaceuticals.

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>The cat, though, is out of the bag and the

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>proof is in the pudding. As Carol mentioned, more than

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>a hundred thousand overdose deaths here in the United States

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>just last year. What now does the United States do?

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>What can we do to start preventing these deaths and

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>to get these numbers to come down. Well, there are

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>many abatement activities that are underway in cities and counties

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>around the country. And we know, for example, that there

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>are highly safe, highly effective FDA approved treatments for opioid addiction,

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and we need to scale these up massively. But but

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the real focus of the Archives is really to allow

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 1>for us to learn what took place within these corporations

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>so as to prevent these sorts of activities from occurring again.

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 1>And we have a president which is tobacco. The Opioid

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Archives sits upon a fire or kind of tobacco industry

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>documents that's been used for decades to reveal industry strategies,

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>to question science, hast doubt about the health harms of

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 1>its products, and delayed public health regulation. And and you

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>think the most documents there have been very important policies

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 1>put in place regarding tobacco, such as state and local

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>ordinances mandating smoke free public spaces and workplaces. Well, we

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:29.080
<v Speaker 1>certainly could talk for a long time on this, and

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>hopefully we can talk again in the future because we've

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately run out of time. But interesting and important work

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:36.200
<v Speaker 1>that you guys are doing, and as you said, It's

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>not often that we get people have access public access

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to all of the documents involved in in cases like this.

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Dr Caleb Alexander's, professor of Epidemiology at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:49.680
<v Speaker 1>School of Public Health, joining us on the phone from Baltimore.

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Of course, the school is supported by Michael Bloomberg, founder,

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:56.319
<v Speaker 1>Bloombergalpy and Bloomberg Philanthropies, and Dr Alexander's we said served

0:11:56.320 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 1>as an expert for plaintiffs and opioid litigation. This is

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:08.599
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Well the cover of the

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:11.080
<v Speaker 1>new issue of Bloomberg Business Week. It's also Today's Bloomberg

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Big Take. It's how the tech route isn't just cyclical,

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>it is well earned and it is overdue. The story

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:20.080
<v Speaker 1>by Bradstone and Lazette Chapman. It's this week's cover story,

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>as Carol mentioned, is available on newsstands, on the Bloomberg

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and at Bloomberg dot com. Slash business Week with us

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Now to tell us all about it is Jeff Muscus,

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Senior Features editor for Bloomberg Business Seek. He's with us

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:34.559
<v Speaker 1>in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio along with Joel Webber,

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the editor of Bloomberg Business Week, who's with us as well. Joel. So, so,

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:42.199
<v Speaker 1>all good things must come to an end, and it's

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>certainly seeming like that's happening in Silicon Valley. Yeah, we

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of called the bottom and now it's coming out,

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:49.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, to Nazac two days, it's creeping back out

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:54.559
<v Speaker 1>since we kind of put the finishing touches, said, uh,

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 1>it'll regress tomorrow. I'm sure. Um, But basically, you know,

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>we do a tech you every year, and what we

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>really wanted to talk about here, and I think it

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>just became impeccably unfortunate timing because every it's like the

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 1>world caught up to the ideas that we had in

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:14.839
<v Speaker 1>this package is everything has started to change. The VC

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>backed funny money, when money was free, led to a

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of uh, you know, exorbitant ideas and investments and

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:28.439
<v Speaker 1>SPACs and crypto and we're seeing an aggression to the norm.

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I think, or and what Jeff really set out to

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>do and as the architect of this package and brad

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Stone and was that, like you mentioned, wrote the cover story,

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:39.319
<v Speaker 1>which I think is the the in the Today's big Take,

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>which really sets the table. But there's a lot of

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>other things in this package that helped kind of amplify

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>this idea. So Jeff being the guiding hand that put

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 1>all of these stories together, Like, what were you what

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>were you setting out to accomplish? Sure? Well, like you said, Joel,

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>we sort of started out from the position of okay,

0:13:56.520 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>well you know here we are sort of um returning

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 1>to very degrees of a new version of normal as

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 1>people returned to their offices and that sort of thing.

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>And so for the first time really in in two years,

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 1>we're taking a sustained and marginally less COVID inflicted look

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 1>at where is the tech industry now? Where are all

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>these you know, big name companies that you know, a

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>lot many of us haven't. I haven't been looking that

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 1>squarely act for the past couple of years. And what

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>does the tech world look like now? And where's it going?

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>And with that in mind, you know a lot of

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 1>our best writers and reporters here at Bloomberg News and

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>on the Tech team, uh took a look at some

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:39.359
<v Speaker 1>of our our biggest, bold faced name targets from Instagram

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and TikTok uh, to Google and all the way down.

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh and then you know, sort of looking forward to

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>where is the tech world going. We have a bunch

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of interesting looks both that things like prediction markets that

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 1>are sort of on the bubble of regulation and biotech

0:14:57.280 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>stories like this, look at h what they're called better

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>odds babies, the science of pologenic risk scoring that might

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>well just be the next big thing. So one of

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the things that I loved about the package was like,

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 1>they're serious stuff. But then there's like the perfect encapitulation

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>of everything that Jeff talking about is just remember the

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 1>scooter craze. Want to start to feel a little bit

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 1>like a segue now, Uh, it survived the pandemic mostly, Jeff,

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>But why why why was it like such a perfect

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 1>story to include in this context. Well, like you're saying

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>a minute ago, Joel, that you know, right before the pandemic,

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the bottom started to drop out of this uh wave

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 1>basically decade long cash burning as a means of not

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>just survival, but as the main strategy for a huge

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>part of the venture backed tech industry. And uh so

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the scooter craze was well suited for that moment where

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the whole deal was Okay, well, you know this or

0:15:56.680 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that mega fund is going to give you guys nine

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>figure checks on the regular to go out and build

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>an exploicit monopoly. Now go do it um and coming

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>out of the pandemic for for a variety of reasons,

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>or you know, as people start to to need things

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>like scooters again, we come back to find these companies

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of clinging to life to varying degrees and without

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the easy access to capital that everybody got used to. Hey, Jeff,

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I feel like one of the things that I feel

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 1>like with every guest, and you often hear like pets

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>dot com, pets dot com, Like, are we likning exactly?

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Are we lining like this tech route that we're seeing.

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Is it similar to what we saw in two thousand?

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, are those comparisons fair or is it different?

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we're still ways off the sort of industry

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>wide carnage that we saw at the end of the

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>dot com bubble, But Brad and Lazett are smart to

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>draw the comparison, at least in terms of the hype

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 1>machine between you know, the sort of infamous pets dot

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Com super Bowl ads and the Super Bowl ads we

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 1>saw this year. With all those crypto celebrities. Yeah, the

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 1>crypt the crypto pets comparison. My favorite was the Larry

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>David one because I'm just a big Larry David. There's

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 1>some other ones that are pretty good too. But so,

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:16.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, what does VC actually had to say about this,

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>because that figures into Brandon was that story to bring

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:22.960
<v Speaker 1>it back to today's big take, right, like because they're

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 1>undaunted really right? Yeah, for what it's worth, most of

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the sort of mainline VC types that you would want

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to talk to you and that Brandon Lizette went out

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to for for this kind of piece, you know, kind

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 1>of said, well, the next next thing is coming, like

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 1>this is going to expose the businesses that aren't ready

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 1>for the next moment for what they are, and the

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 1>people who have done the work to prepare for a

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>storm like this are gonna be just fine. Well, and

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:53.120
<v Speaker 1>more new money keeps coming in, right, Like we talked

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:55.360
<v Speaker 1>about all these these these startup companies that are able

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:58.199
<v Speaker 1>to stay private for what ten years and right, and

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>they don't have to tap the public. Just straight Carol

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Andrees and Horowitz announced directly four point five billion dollar

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 1>fund for crypto, just for crypto, top or. I mean,

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>it could have been a long time in the process

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 1>or chasing the next big thing and and trying to

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 1>figure out where it kind of goes from here. And

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>so I think just again to bring it back to

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:21.199
<v Speaker 1>to to brad Stone and like why we wanted to

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 1>do this on the cover, it was like there is

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a controlled burn every once in a while that hits,

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and like that's kind of what it feels like right now,

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 1>where it's like, let's suppress some of the funny money,

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 1>let's go back to basics. And while that's happening, you

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:38.239
<v Speaker 1>know what. I think We talked about this yesterday with

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:41.199
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Fryer on on this show. It's like even the

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:43.639
<v Speaker 1>Metas of the world have to look themselves in the

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:45.959
<v Speaker 1>mirror and realize that, you know, TikTok is eating their

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:48.879
<v Speaker 1>lunch and they have to basically take their business model

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 1>and and basically come up with a way of fighting back, right,

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 1>And like even even Meta has to deal with this stuff,

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:59.440
<v Speaker 1>right the biggest companies in the world, so text obviously

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:02.680
<v Speaker 1>ever changing. It's why it makes it so much fun

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:07.439
<v Speaker 1>to talk about. But even the Sacred Cows, you know,

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 1>there comes the moment that everything is cyclical. Yeah, it's

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:13.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty remarkable. Right, it's the big tech that are having

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to kind of do some soul searching, that's right. Whereas

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, the last couple of times we we sort

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 1>of talked about something like this, as as Brandon's point

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:23.479
<v Speaker 1>out in the piece, you know, it was something that

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the industry could more or less look

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>at or call out as an outlier, a pharaonis or

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:31.640
<v Speaker 1>even though we work the damage here, as you were saying,

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a moment ago is too broad based to just sort

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 1>of ignore as cost doing business, great timing, you know,

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>we just we just do it every week. Remember Joe

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 1>called the bottom, Remember this day, Remember pressure Joe Webber.

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 1>He's the editor of Bloomberg Business Week and Jeff Muskus

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 1>is senior features editor at Bloomberg Business Week, both in studio.

0:19:56.640 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 1>This is the cover story now on newsstands, on and

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg This is Bloomberg Radio. I'm a journal Yeah,

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 1>but you let me drive. Oh no, no, no, no,

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>all right, please, I'll do the right gravels. I want

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to drive. It's a good question. Good drive. This is

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the drive to the clothes. Well don on Bloomberg Radio.

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, we are just about ten a half minutes

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:36.959
<v Speaker 1>left in today's trading session. It is time to drive

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to the clothes and we've got a good guest who's

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 1>gonna give us some specific names that he's interested in.

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Max Washerman is the founder and a senior portfolio manager

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 1>at Miramark Capital. Max joining us this afternoon on the

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 1>phone from Northbrook, Illinois. Max, how are you. I'm doing well?

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank you well. Before we get to some of the

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:53.919
<v Speaker 1>picks that you have, I just want to get your

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:56.400
<v Speaker 1>take on on the markets and what we're seeing right now.

0:20:56.880 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Two days in a row of gains for the Indusseas.

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Are we out of the woods? I don't think necessary

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 1>we're out of the woods, but I think we're trying

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>to find a bottom. And with the Federal Reserve released

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 1>some notes the other day and basically didn't surprise anyone

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 1>on the downside, meaning they're not giving any shockers, so

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that helped. And also I think with some of the

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>retail numbers that came out Donald the General Dollar Store

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:22.640
<v Speaker 1>basically coming out and saying that the consumer is not dead.

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 1>With an over sold market, I think you're getting some life.

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 1>So you think it's over, you think it's over sold.

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I think the market is a little over sold right now.

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 1>The negativity is so pervasive that when you have any

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 1>negative news come out and the market starts to rally,

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:38.399
<v Speaker 1>that's usually a good sign that we're trying to find

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 1>a bottom. And I think we're I think we're like

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>in the seventh bending, if you would baseball analogy. But

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Max, you sound really optimistic. Well, I think

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 1>when you know what the problem is, that's a big

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 1>step in the right direction. Where before the Federal Reserve

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a where the problem was. They thought, you know,

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:05.639
<v Speaker 1>inflation was transitory. They felt that they could take a

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 1>lack of days approach on raising interest rates, supply chains,

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>all these issues we really know about. It's just addressing

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:15.920
<v Speaker 1>them and working through it. So I think, yeah, I'm

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>optimistic in the long term. It doesn't mean, like Harol mentioned,

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:21.400
<v Speaker 1>you could get it more downside, and we could see

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>another five to seven percent on the downside. But we

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 1>think we're through the majority of the problem. And it's

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:28.920
<v Speaker 1>been a bad market. I mean, nas deck was down

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty and the SMP was close to down twenty. It

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:34.679
<v Speaker 1>could still go further, but we're not We're not bailing

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>on this market, all right. At this point, I'm just

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 1>going to another sports. I'm talking about football. Have you

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 1>ever seen Tom Brady pull out a game in the

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 1>last quarter or the last few minutes. It's pretty remarkable.

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:45.440
<v Speaker 1>So much can happen, Uh, in so many different ways.

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Volume is something, And I can't remember that it it was

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Randy Watts or another guest who brought in that. What

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>we tend to see though, is not the volume confiction

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 1>behind an update. Uh, it's not there. And I'm looking

0:22:57.119 --> 0:22:58.880
<v Speaker 1>at one of the metrics on the Bloomberg in terms

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of volume on the New York Stock Exchange, and it

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:03.439
<v Speaker 1>looks like we're down again, so that there's not necessarily

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 1>even though it's a broad based felt rally, it's not

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of investors are jumping in on this. No,

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they are. In fact, when you come

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 1>into a holiday weekend, you're gonna have even less volume activity.

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 1>But I think what you're starting to see though, if

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to find the retailers find a bottom. I

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 1>mean whether you take a Target of Walmart or even

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a Costco, and you're trying to find out where the

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>bottom is, and you're starting to see that you can

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:29.440
<v Speaker 1>still go lower. I mean, we all know emotions can

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:32.120
<v Speaker 1>take you. We know the FED could surprise at some

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:34.639
<v Speaker 1>point in raise interest rate seventy five to a hundred

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 1>basis points where somebody's not expecting it. That being said

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to be super negative at this particular juncture, I'm not

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 1>sure it serves the purpose because we know the interest

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 1>rates are going up. We know inflations here. We know

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>we have supply constraints, but they're being addressed. I think

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 1>we just have to work through this excess in the market,

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think we're doing that. Okay, let's talk about

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:59.160
<v Speaker 1>some of the individual stock picks that you have, because

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you've got some really interesting ones. I want to start

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>with UPS. Why are you bullish on UPS? I think

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:07.200
<v Speaker 1>we like we're divid in growth UM. We like a

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:10.439
<v Speaker 1>lot of companies are paying above average dividend growing it

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 1>UM good multiple. So UPS has been able to make

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 1>our return on capital about and they've been really able

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 1>to profit in the last mile of delivery. You take

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:23.399
<v Speaker 1>that along with the fact that UM trailing earnings are

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:27.160
<v Speaker 1>about fourteen times forward earnings about fifteen times right now,

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>paying a three point four percent dividends they increased the

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 1>dividend in the past year, and they increased the buy

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 1>back by up to two billion in stock, so it

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 1>has all the fun amounts. We think it's in the

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 1>right place, and when people are shopping, they're still using ups,

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:45.119
<v Speaker 1>max backs, backs, macs. Fundamentals, though, is it really fundamentals

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 1>when we're talking about buy backs and dividend growth versus

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:51.639
<v Speaker 1>maybe investing in the business or hiring you know what

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying. Sure, I hear what you're saying. And what's

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting is we've had a lot of guests coming on

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 1>who are looking at stocks that are that are paying dividends,

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:01.399
<v Speaker 1>and to me, at is a little bit more of

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 1>a safer play that you know you're gonna get that

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 1>dividend no matter what the share price doesnt, no matter

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>what the environment does. Well, you know, we've been a

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>consistent diviend grower. It's not like lately we've been doing

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the firm. But look at the fact that they were

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>able to raise the dividend. That's the big thing. That's

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.400
<v Speaker 1>a cash flow. They have a new CEO and she's

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 1>been able to really focus on profitability, so they're handling package.

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 1>They've increased prices by about ten percent, so they being

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 1>able to handle some of the inflation. That doesn't mean

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 1>there's not problems in the fundamentals facing the whole industry.

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>But again, we're looking long term on these stocks. And

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 1>when I look at the risk reward of a stock

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:41.440
<v Speaker 1>of this caliber paying the dividend the way they did,

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 1>increasing it having to return on capital about thirty, I

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 1>don't mind holding a company like this when it's a

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>blow market multiple and paying such a strong dividend. So yes,

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a while. But these are the type

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:56.360
<v Speaker 1>of companies when the economy gets better, they really benefit.

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 1>And it has some defensive capabilities and the fact that

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 1>it's training below the market and it's giving you a

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:04.680
<v Speaker 1>lot more annal so we like that part. But and

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 1>they're very profitable so to Thus it's a tough market,

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:09.399
<v Speaker 1>but this is the type of company we want to

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 1>hold out in. Okay, what about VF Corps. Uh, this

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>is a company that makes the north Face Vans Timberland Supreme.

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Why are you optimistic on VF Corps? Well, we're optimistic

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:24.480
<v Speaker 1>more now. I mean the stock was about eighty five

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 1>dollars on a twelve months basis and now it's down

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:29.239
<v Speaker 1>to like in the mid forties. Right, it's forty eight

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 1>today it's up three. It's paying you about a four

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 1>point two percent dividend. It's a dividend aristocrat. And their

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:38.400
<v Speaker 1>business has been growing very strong. It's just in China

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:40.640
<v Speaker 1>where they've been having some weakness in the van's line.

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:43.159
<v Speaker 1>If you look at it from their perspective, they've been

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>able to get rid of the inventory pretty much of

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:49.119
<v Speaker 1>full price, which is really good. And the gross margins

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 1>they just reported they only had to decrease in the

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 1>operating margins by like fifty basis points. So here's another

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>company's trainer at thirteen times earnings. It's in the apparel

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 1>outdoor way are which is a five billion dollar industry.

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:05.880
<v Speaker 1>They owned two percent of it, like eleven billion in revenue,

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and we think they have the potential as everybody starts

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to travel and they go out and they spend more.

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>So the fact that we're recommending the stock, it's been

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:17.119
<v Speaker 1>already hammered from the eighties down, So we think the

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 1>risk reward at this price again here is asymmetrical. We

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:23.680
<v Speaker 1>think we could see a lot more upside as the

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:27.159
<v Speaker 1>economy and people start traveling and buying. We know they

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>have problems, but it just came out and reiterated the

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:32.639
<v Speaker 1>cash flow, and they just reiterated the earnings. So at

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:36.399
<v Speaker 1>this time a downside, we think it's there, all right.

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Get around, Hey, Max, Thank you so much. Max Wasserman,

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 1>He's founder and senior portfolio manager at the independent private

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 1>registered investment advisory for A Miramar Capital, training us on

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the phone from Northbrook, Illinois. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 1>Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 1>dot com, and you can also listen to our radio

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:56.880
<v Speaker 1>show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or watch

0:27:57.000 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 1>us on YouTube. Sara to Bloomberg Global News