WEBVTT - This Is What All Great Stock Market Bubbles And Crashes Have in Common

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the ad Thoughts Podcast.

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:17.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe wisent. Joe. I am very,

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 1>very excited about this episode because we are about to

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>embark on our second series here at Odd Lots. Our

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>first series was about financial crime and financial Shenanigan's right. Yeah,

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:34.319
<v Speaker 1>it was great. You must remember it wasn't that long ago.

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>No no, no, no no, I no, I'm playing. Don't I

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>do remember it? It It was very fun um and I'm

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>excited about our new series. Yeah. So, in our grand

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 1>tradition I guess of dealing in the worst of human character,

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>we are going to be all about fear and greed

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>in our next series. We're gonna be talking about bubbles.

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>This is gonna be a great I'm really excited. Let's

0:00:57.440 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>just be honest. Bubbles are when markets are at the

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>most fun. I mean, there may be markets at their worst,

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:07.040
<v Speaker 1>but when markets are just trading on pure emotion, fear

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and greed, totally divorced from fundamentals. Panic, everyone wanted to

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:15.319
<v Speaker 1>get rich. It's hard to argue that that isn't when

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 1>markets are there at their most interesting. No, I totally agree,

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>and you hit the nail on the head, because if

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:24.319
<v Speaker 1>you think markets are reflection of human emotions and human nature,

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 1>then the extremes are probably the most interesting facets of that.

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, I have to say the other thing

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>about bubbles, and I think the real reason that everyone

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>is always perpetually fascinated with them is that you can

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>get rich during the bubble if you can time it

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>perfectly right. And who doesn't want to get rich? So

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>what bubble are we starting with? Are we starting with today?

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>All right? We're going to start out with the quintessential bubble,

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, um, and that has to be the

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of nineteen twenties stock bubble and the subsequent crash.

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>And we're also going to be discussed saying some other

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>stock market bubbles that happened along the way, including of

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>course seven and we might even get to two thousand seven,

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>two eight. I can't wait. I mean, obviously there's bubbles

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>in many things, in many things. We've had some episodes

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>in fact about bubbles, including beanie babies and catfish and

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>probably some others. But I do think that when people

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>think bubble, they probably first think stock market bubbles. So

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, the sort of some of the

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 1>history of the big ones in the United States is

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>a great way to start. We're starting out very very classical, alright.

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>So here with us to talk about various stock bubbles

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 1>is Scott Nations. Uh. He is the author of a

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>book called A History of the United States in five crashes,

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 1>stock market meltdowns that defined a nation. I actually know

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>him from his other job, which is president of Nations Shares.

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 1>It's a company that's been building a lot of indexes,

0:02:56.760 --> 0:03:00.919
<v Speaker 1>including some interesting volatility indexes, so we might even ask

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 1>him about those later in the show as well. Scott,

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for coming on. It's great to be here.

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 1>So Scott, you know your book I think is probably

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the perfect one for us to begin this series. But

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>just to set the scene for us, I want to

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 1>start with crash. If you could pinpoint one thing that

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of sparked the euphoria that led to that initial

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>nine twenties stock bubble, what would it be. It would

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>have to be a friendship. And I know that sounds goofy,

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>but it was a friendship between the head of the

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve Bank in New York and the governor of

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bank of England, and these two wonderful guys, Montague

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Norman and Benjamin Strong had a wonderful friendship, and they

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:00.040
<v Speaker 1>were trying to help each other, and in doing so,

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Benjamin Strong kept interest rates in the United States ridiculously low.

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not the first time the Fed has done that,

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>but he kept interest rates in the United States ridiculously low,

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>even lower than they had been during the emergency level

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 1>of World War One. And that is really what fed

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the bubble that became the nineteen twenties and then ultimately

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen nine crash. And it's it's easy to think

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>about these crashes in numbers, but their dramas. Each of

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>them is a drama. Each one of them is a

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:35.720
<v Speaker 1>fascinating drama. And in nine it's a little bit like

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the story of the Titanic. We know how it ends,

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and it ends badly, but it's a fascinating story. I

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>don't want to skip ahead to another bubble, so I'm

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>not going to. But in when when I've read about

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen twenties, something that struck me was, you know,

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>analogies to the late nineties bubble, because in addition to

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the good financial conditions you characterized, there were a lot

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:03.719
<v Speaker 1>of genuine, the genuine reasons to be excited about things.

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>It was peace, There was the increasing wide spreadness of

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the automobile, the radio, the new communications technology was taking off.

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>But there was just a all kinds of non financial

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>reasons for people to start start to get excited. Absolutely

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>all of Europe had been devastated by World War One.

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 1>The American industrial base had been untouched. People were buying automobiles.

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>There was another invention, relatively new invention that everybody had

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 1>to have. It was the radio. Our ci a Radio

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:39.239
<v Speaker 1>Corporation of America started the decade as a two dollar

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:42.919
<v Speaker 1>stock and after splits it into the decade while almost

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>into the decade at about five seventy dollars, So you're

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>absolutely right. Everybody felt great about America and America's place

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 1>in the world. Interest rates were low. The Treasury had

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>also made the country a country of investors by selling

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:02.799
<v Speaker 1>them war bonds, and that bled into them buying stocks

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:05.679
<v Speaker 1>once the war was over. So you have this mix

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of low interest rates, relatively positive economic growth, a lot

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>of optimism about the future of fairly steady geopolitical landscape.

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 1>When did the wheels start to come off and what

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:24.039
<v Speaker 1>were the signs that trouble was potentially ahead. Unfortunately, in

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>nine we really didn't get any clues until very late

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>in the game. There were certainly some people that were worried,

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 1>but it wasn't really until September of nineteen nine that

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:40.280
<v Speaker 1>people started to worry and and and talk about their

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:43.919
<v Speaker 1>worry out loud. The striking thing about each of the

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>five crashes that I talked about is that each has

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a catalyst that has very little to do often very

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:54.359
<v Speaker 1>little or nothing to do with finance. And it had

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>a little to do with finance. There was a fraud

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>ster in London by the name of Clarence Hatchery who

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 1>uh simply started counterfeiting stock certificates and in a day

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>when everything was on paper, he managed to completely undermine

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the stock market. And he wasn't found out until September

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 1>of nine, and that's when the wheels tracing your in

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>your phrase really started coming off. One thing I like

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>about crashes is it really is, I think impossible to

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 1>pinpoint what caused the crash because you can point to

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a million things. I know one of the is so minor,

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>but I think, uh, one of the things people point

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to was some regulator in Massachusetts preventing a utility company

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>stock from splitting, the most minor thing in the world.

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>But it freaked out utility investors, pointing to if this

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>one minor regulatory body in Massachusetts can freak out investors,

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>how fragile the whole edifice. Because you make a great point.

0:07:54.320 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Until then, this financial regulator had allowed any any utility

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>that wanted to split its stock. They had allowed them

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to do so. Uh. They were essentially a rubber stamp.

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>But then a utility in Massachusetts came to home and said,

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>we'd like to split our stock for for one their

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>reason was because it's the fashion of the day. No

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>more reason than that, it's the fashion of the day.

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>And finally the regulator had had enough and they said, nope,

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>your stock is already trading much higher than any intrinsic value.

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 1>If we allow you to split, it will get even worse.

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 1>And this is our line in the sand. And was

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:34.839
<v Speaker 1>finally somebody who had said, somebody, an authority who had

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>said this is not right and this needs to stop.

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I love the idea that maybe a regulator in Massachusetts

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>of utility companies could possibly be responsible for the stock

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:49.319
<v Speaker 1>market crash on the subsequent create depression. Well, they they

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 1>certainly helped. They certainly helped things on their way. Okay,

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 1>so you get these sort of idiosyncratic things happening and

0:08:56.679 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 1>people start to get a little bit nervous and stocks, uh,

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess they really start coming down on Black Tuesday, right,

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I always got it mixed up with Black Thursday. But

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Black Tuesday was the first big drop, is that right? Well,

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>there were two, there were two nearly identical drops. They

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and the twenty nine that it actually started just after

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Labor Day, that was the day after Labor Day was

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the peak of the market. But you're right, the twenty

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:27.559
<v Speaker 1>ninth of October when the market both of those days,

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the market was down about twelve and a half or

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that's when it that's when it really really really got bad.

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 1>So how do people how are people reacting in that

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 1>time period, because whenever we see stocks drop nowadays, you know,

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 1>we always get the chorus of people talking about how

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 1>this is a healthy correction, to use the cliche. I

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>wonder if the same thing happened in I don't think

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>people understood, well, certainly people didn't recognize what the nineteen

0:09:57.720 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 1>thirties were gonna look like and there's no way they

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 1>could a I think what they were doing was they

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:04.080
<v Speaker 1>were looking back to what had happened in nineteen o seven.

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>The panic of nineteen o seven is the first crash

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I talked about, and that was a panic, and each

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>of the each of the crashes have heroes and villains.

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>The hero in nineteen o seven was undeniably JP Morgan,

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and I mean the man, not the bank, because he

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>nearly single handedly stopped the crash. Well. In nineteen there

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>were a bunch of financiers who thought that they could

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 1>be the modern day JP Morgan, and they tried to

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>do that. They tried to step in, raise some capital,

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 1>buy some stocks, and so I think that for most

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 1>of October of nine, I think most people thought this

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:42.559
<v Speaker 1>is bad, but it will stop and then we'll go

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>back up and it will be like every other break

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that we've had in the market. They didn't realize that

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>they were going to end up making things worse than

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 1>it was going to get. As bad as it did,

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we could actually probably just do the

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>whole episode one because it's so rich and we should

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>move on to and one other right nugget I really

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>like from it I remember during the two thousand and

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:06.839
<v Speaker 1>eight crash. You know, there was that famous um Warren

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Buffett up ed in the New York Times. I think

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>he's like, buy stocks. I know I am. And there

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>was something similar. John Rockefeller had did a similar thing.

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>He sort of came out of seclusion. He's like, I'm

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 1>buying American shares. It's a good it's a good deal.

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Like all these attempts by the sort of business legends

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to just instill confidence with their words alone. Well, John D.

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Rockefeller in nine said my son and I are buying stocks.

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>And he at the time he mentioned some outlandish number

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:37.959
<v Speaker 1>he had spent, a number that only Jape that that

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Rockefeller could spend. But for the most part, people weren't

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 1>really afraid in a way that that Rockefeller could could calm.

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean they were, they were They ultimately were really afraid.

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>They were afraid that they were gonna lose everything. Yeah,

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>And it's funny we still see that happening. I mean

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 1>all the way up to two thousand and eight, when

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Warren Buffett came in and invested in Goldman Sack Shares,

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>a right in the middle of the banking crisis. I

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 1>have a feeling that Joe wants to move on to

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>a later stock market bubble and crash, and that would

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 1>be the events of night seven. That sounds good, Let's

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>talk about eight seven. Um, you know, uh, Well, it's

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>interesting because we hear so much about quants these days,

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 1>and people are sort of nervous that the quant machine

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>are going to malfunction. We're gonna get this like wave

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of uncontrollable selling from computers and everything's gonna melt down.

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Seven was kind of a precursor to these fears. It's

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>interesting there. The five crashes that I discussed pan more.

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 1>They span more than a century, but each one is

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:50.439
<v Speaker 1>abetted by some sort of I call and financial contraption

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:54.839
<v Speaker 1>that is new, it's novel, it's poorly understood, and it's

0:12:54.920 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>untested under stress. And in seven, probably the prototypical contract

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>option was portfolio insurance. It seemed like a like an

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:08.079
<v Speaker 1>ingenious invention by a couple of academics at cal Berkeley,

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>and it was a way they way they expressed it

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>as a way for investors, institutional investors to make certain

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 1>that their stock portfolio never fell below a certain value.

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>It required regular regimented selling of stocks as they fell.

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 1>The problem is that we and we know now we

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>should have known then that when we demand liquidity is

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 1>when it evaporates. And that's what happened. It was the typical, prototypical,

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:40.319
<v Speaker 1>really financial contraption. The interesting thing is that in the

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 1>worst of the crash, of the guys that had created

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 1>this Leland, O'Brien and Rubinstein were running a business that

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>would sell futures to affect this insurance, and their trader,

0:13:55.760 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 1>at one point on October seven, refused to sell anymore futures.

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>His quote was, if I sell all the futures that

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm supposed to, I'm certain I will drive the market

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to zero. Wow. So did he save the world. Well,

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sorry he saved the world, but he he

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 1>helped stop the bleeding. If somebody saved the world, it

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>might it might have been Alan Greenspan the next morning

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 1>with a wonderfully terse um comment that consistent with its

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>position is the Central Bank, the FED is ready to

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>essentially give anybody anything they want. And then the Federal

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Reserve got on the line with banks and said we'll

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>give you anything you want. Now I don't I'm worried

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>we're cheating a little bit here because we talked about

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the crash of but this is the bubble series. Was

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>their exuberance? What was the pre October seven vibe in

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the market where people are just thinking that things would

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>just go straight up? Exuberance doesn't even begin to cover it.

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 1>The first thirteen days, the doll did something it had

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 1>never done before and it has never done since. It

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>gained thirteen straight days in a row. At the market's

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>top in August, it was up forty three for the year.

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that would have made it the sixth or

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the eighth best year ever if it could have just

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>held onto that. So exuberance doesn't even begin to describe it.

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Much of it was a function of corporate raiders who

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>had started to recognize the unrecognized value previously unrecognized value

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of stocks, and they were buying them up.

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 1>And so we gotten into a situation where everybody felt

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>like they could buy a stock confident that some raider

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>would come along and bid it even higher. Yeah. Really,

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the era of greed is good. To Joe's earlier point,

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering, you know, nowadays we talk a lot about

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the potential for quant funds or systematic funds or risk

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>parity funds to spark a broad sell off in the

0:15:54.160 --> 0:16:00.040
<v Speaker 1>style of portfolio insurance in the eighties. Was anyone talking

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>about the risks of portfolio insurance or you know, the

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>downsides of black shoals before it actually happened. Even the

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 1>inventors of portfolio insurance realized that it had some limitations

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>when they go into when they went into sales meetings,

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>they would say that this will work until something like

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>in the analogy they used was the Soviets invade Iran.

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>There were some other people who were talking about it,

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>but you really had to be pretty geeky in order

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to have gotten that message. It was actually precisely a

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>week before the crash that an article appeared in the

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Journal by Beatrice Garcia that really introduced people

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>to the fear of portfolio insurance. Alright, I want to

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>uh skip ahead to actually what I think is. I

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it's my favorite crash, but it's the

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>one that I feel like I know the best because

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I sort of came of age during it, and that

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>is the late nineties bubble. As a student in high school.

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I got really tessed with the market then and I

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>think it is a good chance that due to that

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:06.920
<v Speaker 1>timing is the reason I'm in financial media today because

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I just found the whole thing, uh fascinating. What in

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 1>your when did that bubble start? In your view, that's

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 1>a great question. Once I don't talk about what happened

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand, two thousand, two thousand and two in

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>my book. I don't consider that quite a crash. It

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 1>took place over actually several years. It had several down legs,

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 1>first of all, starting in March up two thousand and

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>then with nine eleven. Uh. But when did when did

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the bubble of of the es start? I think it

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 1>would have to I look at it as something that

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>started with the the Apple Super Bowl ad that ran

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:49.360
<v Speaker 1>one time, because that really started to put the personal

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:53.719
<v Speaker 1>computer and personal technology front and center in people's thinking.

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's I think when that market really started taking off.

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I've conceptual question, which is, uh, you know, after bubbles burst,

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>we always talk about the pricing is having been irrational,

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:13.440
<v Speaker 1>But the run up to all these bubbles actually often

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>has a rational explanation. There's usually a narrative to accompany it, right, Oh, yeah,

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 1>there's always an explanation. Unfortunately, So in terms of those explanations,

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what is it about human nature that we

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:32.360
<v Speaker 1>always buy into those explanations and we're never more skeptical

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>of the story that we're hearing. It's a phrase that

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>we've used before, and the phrases it's different this time.

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>It is so easy to convince ourselves that it is

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>different this time in we had not really seen we've

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>seen a single modern stock market crash in nine seven.

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:59.119
<v Speaker 1>In seven, it had been so long since we've had

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a crash fifty years that I think people just forgot

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>that they could happen, and they thought we are much

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:09.919
<v Speaker 1>more sophisticated, much smarter now than we were then. I

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 1>think it's just the hubrists of humankind where we just

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:16.639
<v Speaker 1>think we're smarter and it's different this time. I have

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:21.120
<v Speaker 1>another human nature question, and it concerns the post crisis period,

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>because since two thousand and nine, we've essentially been in

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 1>this NonStop bowl market. Uh, there's been a few blips

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 1>along the way. That being said, throughout this rally, numerous

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>people have been talking about bubbles or the crash is

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 1>going to come back anytime soon, and so in a way,

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 1>rather than this period being characterized as care freeness are

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:46.160
<v Speaker 1>buying into a new story. There's been this underlying deep

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 1>pessimism that's prevented a lot of people from actually participating

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:52.440
<v Speaker 1>in this rally, and this belief that the next two

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:55.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight could happen any minute from now. Well,

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:57.479
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of those people have something that they

0:19:57.600 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 1>want to sell, and they want to sell you a

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:01.919
<v Speaker 1>news utter. They think that you should be buying gold

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:04.440
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. But I think you make a great point,

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and that is, if there's so much skepticism, it's hard

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to think that we're going to have a crash. Now

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>we know the market can pull back substantially. Nobody is

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 1>saying that it can't. But with interest rates as low

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:18.800
<v Speaker 1>as they are, if interest rates would go substantially higher

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:21.639
<v Speaker 1>over the next couple of years, uh, in, the market

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>could very well be in trouble. But I I just

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>think that you're absolutely right. There's so much skepticism that

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:28.120
<v Speaker 1>it's tough to think we're really going to get say,

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 1>bubble shous. There's skepticism. But on the other hand, uh,

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I really like the way city analysts once

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:38.119
<v Speaker 1>phrased or once characterized a bubble. They said it was

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 1>something that I get fired for not owning. And in

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:44.239
<v Speaker 1>that sense, you can complain about valuations as much as

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:46.680
<v Speaker 1>you want, but if you have to invest money, well,

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 1>then you have to put it somewhere other than cash.

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 1>And so it's either going into stocks or credit. Um.

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 1>But Scott to uh, to Joe's point, if there was

0:20:56.560 --> 0:21:01.199
<v Speaker 1>one thing that you could pinpoint as a suspicious sign

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to identifying a true bubble, what would

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 1>it be? That's a great question. I in my experience,

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 1>in my in my book, I talked about several similarities

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>that each of the crashes share. UM. There is there's

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>always some new financial contraption. I think that if we

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>can see something that is starting to um capture too much,

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>too many assets, uh, then that would be a problem.

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Uh it interest rates too low for too long are

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the reason. And then two thousand and eight happened. So

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>if you want to look now and say, boy, interest

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>rates have been too low for too long, and the

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve seems just terrified of raising Fed funds rate

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 1>past one or of starting to shrink the balance sheet,

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>that might be the thing that would scare people right now.

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 1>And as Tracey you mentioned in the beginning. One of

0:21:57.400 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the really well, let's be honest, one of the cool

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:02.439
<v Speaker 1>things about bubbles is that you could get rich in

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 1>a really short period of time. And the only thing

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>you have to do to get rich during a bubble

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 1>is to sell before everybody else sells. As long as

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 1>you could do that, that bubbles are great. So when

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 1>you look at these crashes and you know, your book

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>is a history of the United States and five crashes,

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 1>are there any common themes out there that sort of

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>foretell the imminent collapse so that people know to uh,

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:30.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, get out the door before everybody else does. Well.

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 1>The problem, it's a it's a fascinating question. The problem

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 1>is that and I mentioned these catalysts, and there's always

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 1>a catalyst. The problem is that the time between the

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 1>catalysts and the crash is collapsing. It was a year

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:45.199
<v Speaker 1>between the catalysts for the nineteen o seven panic and

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the actual panic. Um it was a year. Uh. In nine,

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>it was about a month between hatchery and the crash.

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 1>In seven, it seemed the friday before the crash seemed

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 1>like we'd finally gone to war with a ran. So

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:01.879
<v Speaker 1>that was a weekend and we haven't talked about two

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>thousand and tend the flash crash, but the catalyst for

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.160
<v Speaker 1>that happened the day before the crash. So we've gone

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:09.919
<v Speaker 1>from waiting a year and then a month, and then

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 1>a weekend, and now a day. The problem is as

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the time between the catalysts and the crash collapses, then

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 1>there's less opportunity for people to do what you're suggesting.

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Real quickly, Well, you mentioned the catalyst for flash crash.

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 1>What do you identify that as? Oh? I think it

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>was clearly the rioting, arson and murder in the streets

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 1>of Athens on May five, two and ten. It seemed

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>just absolutely obvious that that all of the Greeks, all

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 1>of Greek society, was going to come apart, and that

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:45.679
<v Speaker 1>as a result of the Eurozone was going to come apart.

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>It seemed absolutely certain A million people were in the

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 1>streets of Athens, a bank had been firebombed, three people

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>had been killed, um not just killed, murdered, three young

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:59.959
<v Speaker 1>people who would come back to Athens to continue their

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>careers when they didn't need to come back to Athens.

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 1>And that and the fact that on the on the

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>seventh we were going to get a non farm payroll number,

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the writing in Athens, which is obviously the catalyst for

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:17.720
<v Speaker 1>what happened. Scott Nations, the author of a history of

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:21.199
<v Speaker 1>the United States in five crashes stock market meltdowns that

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:24.360
<v Speaker 1>defined a nation. Thank you so much for joining us.

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Fascinating conversation. I'd love to have you back one day.

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Did you just like talk more about because we could

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 1>do like two hours on it. But that was great

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and a great start to our bubble series. Thanks so much.

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>It's been tremendous fund to be here, Joe. I thought,

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>as you said, that was a fantastic start to our series. Um,

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 1>I love drawing analogies between previous bubbles, and I have

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 1>to say, the idea that the window that you have

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:01.439
<v Speaker 1>to get out first from a bubble ahead of an

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:05.119
<v Speaker 1>imminent crash, the idea that that is shrinking rapidly, that

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:08.680
<v Speaker 1>really resonates, especially when we think about the way markets

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:12.679
<v Speaker 1>are more computerized nowadays, but also just the way information

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 1>gets disseminated so quickly nowadays. Yeah. I hadn't even thought

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 1>about that, but that is a great a great point,

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:23.359
<v Speaker 1>I thought, and it was one that hadn't clicked to

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>me at all. But it seems easy to say on

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the way up, and it was like, Yeah, I know,

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of a rational it's a bubble, but I'll

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:34.199
<v Speaker 1>just be prudent. But if the you know, the crash

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 1>can happen that fast, probably there are a lot of

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>people who imagine they'll be prudent and not actually be

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:43.399
<v Speaker 1>able to act on it. Yeah, exactly, all right, Um,

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 1>should we tease some of the other bubbles that we're

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be discussing during this series. Wait, I just

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 1>want to make one more point too that I really

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 1>from Scott and that is the sort of what is

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:58.639
<v Speaker 1>he characterized that the new financial contraption at any given moment,

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>because I think it's you know, and I think we

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>look at you could sort of tell that you need. Obviously,

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 1>there's the financial conditions puzzle, often characterized by low interest rates.

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>There's the sort of optimism part of the puzzle, the

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>idea that some new technology like the internet or the

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 1>radio is going to get people excited. But this other

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 1>thing that there's some new tool for investing, whether it's

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the c d O or the online broker and the

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 1>nineties or whatever it is, or the mutual funds in

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the twenties, that there has and of course now you know,

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 1>people are very concerned about e t f s and

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 1>other things like that we don't know exactly. Seems like

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>a very important point I had I'd never really like

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 1>put together before. Yeah, it's interesting that those new creations

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>often come from I don't want to say like a

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 1>good place. But if you think about the Investment Trust

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:52.679
<v Speaker 1>of the nineteen twenties, that was really supposed to uh

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:56.199
<v Speaker 1>democratize finance and make it easier to invest in the

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>same thing for e t f s now right, you

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:00.119
<v Speaker 1>know you're supposed to be able to get easy and

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 1>cheap access to stocks. Uh. You could even argue the

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 1>housing bubble um going into two thousand eight. You know,

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the government was trying to increase home ownership. Um anyway, Alright,

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>but I think there's a quote about the road to

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:17.120
<v Speaker 1>good intentions or something like that, or the road to hell,

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 1>but I applies here. So let's real quickly. Uh. Yeah,

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned tease ahead to some of our future episodes,

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:27.159
<v Speaker 1>what are you excited to talk about? Well, you know,

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:32.399
<v Speaker 1>I said was the quintessential bubble and crash, but there's

0:27:32.480 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 1>one that is even more classic, and that has to

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 1>be the Tulip Bubble. I'm very excited to talk about

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 1>that one, although I've I am very much too. I

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>know there's a lot of debate about that one, about

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 1>how much of it was real and how much it

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:49.160
<v Speaker 1>was a myth, but it is the number one thing

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>that when people think bubble, it's tulips again, and so

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I can't wait to really dive into that.

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Also because I'm super into U the twenties, I'm excited

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna talk about the nine twenties Florida real estate bubble,

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 1>which is sort of a precursor to the overall crash,

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and there are just some fabulous stories that came out

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of that. So I am very excited about continuing this series. Yeah, alright,

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>so everyone should keep on listening because those episodes and

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 1>many more will be coming out in the coming weeks.

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>But that is it for the first edition of our

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Bubbles series. I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Tracy Alloway, and I'm Joe wi isn't All.

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:34.399
<v Speaker 1>You can follow me on Twitter at the Stalwart, and

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 1>you can follow Scott on Twitter at Scott Nations. And

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>our producer, Sarah Patterson Sarah pat with two teas. This

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>has been another episode of the Odd Lots podcast. Thanks

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 1>for listening.