WEBVTT - Benny vs The Penny, Round 4

0:00:01.240 --> 0:00:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome players, You're welcome. Are it's time now, Penny Penny,

0:00:11.880 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>that it is. We are back at it, trying to

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>make you money and trying not to embarrass ourselves picking

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:20.040
<v Speaker 1>NFL games as we head into week four and now

0:00:20.079 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>we already had the Thursday night game. You know the

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>outcome there, We had the Eagles. Uh, that was the

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the pick. We picked the Eagles on the game. So

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll we'll we'll get into the rest of the weekend.

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Now we will not be talking about the Jets. They

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:36.480
<v Speaker 1>are not playing, will not be talking about the forty Niners.

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Jets are oh in three forty Niners or three and oh,

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>but those are the teams we've started the bye weeks.

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>And there's only two teams that are by on the

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>bye week this week, so we're gonna talk about them.

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>But guess God is with me on this now. Guest Gone,

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:51.599
<v Speaker 1>you are the keeper of the stats. Before we look forward,

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>we must look back and see how we did here

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>as we try to buck the odds and pick winners

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and and all that in the NFL. And so the

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:05.839
<v Speaker 1>question here Gascon is how did we do pressing our luck?

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Pressing our luck a week ago? Man? It was a

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 1>bounce back week for you versus the Penny, and it

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>was a dynamite Week number three you are twelve up

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and just four down. And week number three, that's a

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>job that this is three. By the way, this is

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>tried too and tested. Week week one you were thirteen

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and three and then week number three twelve and four.

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>So that is lights out for two to three weeks.

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 1>We will forget Week two. I was my week too, right,

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 1>it was like six, six and ten. Yeah, so I

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>was four under five hundred then, but I'm way over

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>five hundred on the year, like if you bet every game,

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>which you shouldn't do. Yeah, And I think the biggest

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>thing for you is that you finally got away after

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>two weeks. You finally got away from the Miami Dolphins,

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>finally divorced yourself from that. Yeah. I learned a valuable,

0:01:57.080 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>valuable lesson there. And for those that are new to

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>this podcast, many versus the Penny. We did this on

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>radio probably for fifteen years or so, we did many

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>versus the Penny, but I feel like it works better

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>here on the podcast because I would I'm obsessive with

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:15.799
<v Speaker 1>these notes, right, I I try to absorb all this material,

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 1>So I wouldn't I would put a lot of time

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:21.080
<v Speaker 1>handicapping these dopey games, and I wouldn't be able to

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>get it all out there because we because on the radio,

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 1>we have time restraints that we don't have on the

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>podcast and all that. So my advice has always been

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>people email me from time to time they say, well,

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>what's this all about? Should I just bet every game? No,

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you should not bet every game. Your money management is

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the key to gambling. It's becoming more popular. But money

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:42.079
<v Speaker 1>management is important here. But it's also the way I

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>look at this is that you you. I will give

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:46.679
<v Speaker 1>you my opinion on the game. Now, if my opinion

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:49.239
<v Speaker 1>aligns with your opinion, that's a game you should probably

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>been on because we agree. But and and sometimes we

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:54.359
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'll be able to twist your mind around doing

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:58.080
<v Speaker 1>mind mind hack and be able to twist you around

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>and do a different way. But so so that's how

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>you should do betty versus Penny. But let's get right

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>into it. We I did bring back some questions. I

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:06.679
<v Speaker 1>got some complaints of people, Hey, you didn't put any

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>dopey questions in. So we'll get trivial, which is a

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:12.799
<v Speaker 1>word uni Loony used to say to me when I

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>would do the instant trivia and all that, and so again.

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 1>The goal this year that we're pressing our luck. Big money.

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>We want big money. No wammies, no wammies. All right,

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>all right, here we go Carolina at Houston one in

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>two versus two and one. It's on Fox with Kenny

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Albert and Ronde Barber. The Texans opened a four point favorite.

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>There a four and a half point favorite. The pick

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>is in. I'm gonna take the Carolina Panthers here. Now

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a couple of reasons why I know people are not

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>buying what Kyle Allen is selling. He only played one

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>game here this year, but he pitched a gem in

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Arizona last week. This is a much more difficult test.

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I believe the value is on the side of Carolina.

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>The pa there's played a complete game last week. They

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>will look to use that obviously, is a catalyst there

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to chest springboard their season back to after losing back

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to back home games. How do you make up for

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a home loss win a game on the road. That's

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>how how you do it? Uh. And then secondly, when

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you bet on the Texas, you're dependent on Deshaun Watson,

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:22.720
<v Speaker 1>which Deshaun Watson will show up. Watson has been like

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the volatile stock, right up and down and all the round. Uh.

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>For example, he played like flatulence against Jacksonville a couple

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 1>of weeks back, and then was dominant Deshaun Watson against

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers in l A this past week. But that

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>lack of consistency is disturbing as a gambler, and the

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:46.599
<v Speaker 1>Panthers have an above average pass rush. We know the

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>offensive line for the Texas has much maligned and whatnot.

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I expect this to be a fifty fifty game, which

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>means gonna be a tight game, even though it's not

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>a divisional game, it's an interconference game. But I'm really

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>banking on the act that I'm right that Kyle Allen

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>is a at least a slightly above average quarterback, that

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:08.359
<v Speaker 1>he's somehow got the cheek code here and teams haven't

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 1>figured him out yet. And if I'm right about that

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and everything was better because of Kyle allen better quarterback play,

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>then Carolina will be in the winner circles. I think

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:19.160
<v Speaker 1>they win the game out right. I don't need the points.

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll take two points. Carolina Houston. Unlike you, the Penny

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>likes to Shan Watson will take the Houston Texans. Be

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>sure to catch live editions of The Ben Miller Show

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at two a m. Eastern eleven pm Pacific on

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Fox Sports Radio and the I Heart Radio app. All right,

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>let's get trivial. Baker Mayfield. Baker Mayfield five interceptions in

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter through the first three weeks of the season.

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:52.039
<v Speaker 1>That is tied with Blank for the most by any

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>quarterback over his team's first three games of a season

0:05:55.200 --> 0:06:00.160
<v Speaker 1>in the last twenty five years. Again, Baker Mayfield five

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>interceptions in the fourth quarter this year, tied with Blank,

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the most by any qb over the first three games

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:08.720
<v Speaker 1>of the season in the past twenty five years. I'll

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>fill in the blank in a couple of minutes. So

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>if you have the answer, just hold onto it. Just

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>hold on to it. Next up, Cleveland at Baltimore. It's

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>on CUBAZ with Greg Gumbel and Trent Green. The Ravens

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>opened up a five point favorite. They are a seven

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 1>point favorite at home in Maryland. Give me Sonny and

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 1>eighties six degrees at kickoff at M ANDT Bank Stadium.

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking the Brownies in this game, I'm gonna take Cleveland.

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:39.279
<v Speaker 1>I know that's not the popular pick by popular people,

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 1>but I'll tell you why. First of all, Cleveland, they're

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>in the eye of the storm right now. This offseason

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 1>makeover has not paid dividends, obviously, yet they're under five hundred.

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:51.280
<v Speaker 1>They had some embarrassing losses to start the year. Here

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>this would be the perfect time to turn the ship around.

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Here with Baker Mayfield, who has been a total bust

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>of an abject failure at quarterback. He'ste and bad throws

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. I'm surprised he's not higher than that.

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>But it's not like the receivers have dropped that many passes.

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>They dropped six passes, but that that number wouldn't go

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>up that much. Baker Mayfield's completing fifty six point nine

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 1>percent of his passes. That is worst among quarterbacks who

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>have started three games. There's no one worse than Baker

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Mayfield as far as accuracy. His quarterback rating of seventy

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>is also dead last in the NFL garbage So why

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>am I taking the Cleveland Browns? Why would I do that?

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Because I don't believe in the Ravens defense and any

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a scenario where Mayfield can have a breakoud game.

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>The Ravens defense is a soft spot there. Twenty seven

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and past defense ahead of the Dolphins by three yards.

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, they're barely ahead of the Dolphins. This is

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity for Odell Beckham and Jarvis Landry to abuse

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that secondary. But Mayfield's gotta get him the ball. There's

0:07:57.000 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna be open receivers here. There's gonna be chunk plays, big,

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>big yardage place here for the Browns this week. They

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>gotta take advantage now. The second thing and you know,

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the end of the yang here is Lamar Jackson. Uh.

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>The story is the first two weeks, Lamar Jackson has

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>has come come of age. He's evolved. He's he's now

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a legit passing quarterback. Well, based on last week, that

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>looks like smoking mirrors against He put up those great

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>numbers against horseship teams, the Dolphins and the Cardinals, and

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>then he got smashed around by the Vanilla Kansas City

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs defense. He was atrocious. Not only was the quarterback,

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>he was a trocy hadn't uh you know, no touchdowns

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 1>last week, no touchdown passes average barely six yards per attempt,

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>barely fifty completion percentage, and had a passer rating of seventy.

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's that's the old Lamar Jackson from last year.

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>That kind of performance that you expected, and and and

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the other thing. You're the reason like the Browns. Browns

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>have a pretty good defense, pretty good even the tenth

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>best past the fence in the NFL. Cleveland. You look

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>at this here, they really they the two games they

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>lost here, they had some issues. They played well against

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the Jets, a bad team. Obviously the Ravens a better team.

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 1>But if the if the Browns can win this game.

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 1>The last time they get off to a two start

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>on the road was all right, n uh. In this rivalry,

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the road team has covered twelve of the last eight team.

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>But as we say every week, one of the mantras

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:31.719
<v Speaker 1>of our show Benny versus the penny. Anytime you get

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>over seven points in a divisional game. Divisional games are

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:38.079
<v Speaker 1>usually closer. You don't ask questions, you take two points,

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>You put a smile on your face. Browns will win

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>this game out right, Browns twenty four Ravens twenty penny

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 1>is telling you here and going with the Cleveland Browns.

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Be sure to catch live editions of The Ben Meller

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Show weekdays at two a m. Eastern eleven pm Pacific.

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's pay off the Let's get trivial question. Baker Mayfield

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>five in or exceptions in the fourth quarter, tied with

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>blank for the most by any quarterback over the first

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:08.079
<v Speaker 1>three games of the season in the past twenty five years.

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>What's your answer, guest? Normally I think you'd go with

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>a Manning here, but I will go deeper into the

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:15.719
<v Speaker 1>pocket and I'll say Brett Farve. Yeah, Brett far is

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:18.840
<v Speaker 1>not a bad option. He would be at the tail

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>end of that last twenty five year run. Actually not

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the tail and the second half of his career. That's

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 1>that's not it. Uh. It is Ryan fitzpatro Yan Fitzpatrick.

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>And it was only a couple of years ago. Uh boy,

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to I think he was in Buffalo. He's

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 1>changes teams every year. He changes teams like Floyd maywe

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 1>their changes underwear. It's a daily experience, al right. Next up,

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>keep the train moving. Gascon wants to go quick. He

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:49.679
<v Speaker 1>wants to get the hell out of here. Washington, oh

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and three at the New York Giants one and two.

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>It's on Fox. You Better wash. Tom Brennan and Chris

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Spielman on the call. Here. The Giants opened a three

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>point favorite, actually a two point favorite. There a three

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 1>point favorite. The weather mild whether seventies seven agrees, mostly

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>sunny in Jersey at MetLife Stadium, scheduled for kickoff. I've

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>gone back and forth in this game, but ultimately i

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 1>decided that I'm gonna take the Giants. I don't like

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 1>this per se because I'm going with the public. Uh

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>And and there's an obsession with Danny dimes mania here

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jones, who gave the Giants franchise a shot of

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:32.840
<v Speaker 1>adrenaline for a team that was in disarray. But remember,

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:35.839
<v Speaker 1>the perception would be much different here. If Tampa May

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 1>makes that field goal, You'll be like, well, he played well,

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>but they didn't win the game. Right. He would have

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>eaten an l in his maiden voyage as a quarterback.

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>But Jones, he was he was the only bugaboos. He

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>He fumbled a couple of times, and and you fumble,

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 1>you know that's a fifty fifty thing when you fumble

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and all that. But I read a stat that Pro

0:11:56.200 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Football Focus had that since they've been around doun. Daniel

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:05.319
<v Speaker 1>Jones is the first quarterback ever pressured at least twelve

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:08.960
<v Speaker 1>times that had a perfect passer rating. So he was

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>cool under pressure. Who is a cucumber as the old

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 1>cliche goes, And he was pressured one percent of his

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>snaps last week, So I bring that up. You know,

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the Redskins do not have a great defense. They're trying

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 1>to redeem themselves here. That's the second thing embarrassed on

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>National TV. They're down twenty eight to nothing to the

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:30.959
<v Speaker 1>Chicago Bears. Uh and so it's great that they want

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to bounce back, but can they Like Washington is a

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>team that is a hot mess. They play hard for

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Jay Gruden. They have some grit, they have some pesky players,

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>but you gotta have talent and they are lacking in

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>that department. If one player sums up the Redskins, it's

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Landon Collins. Landing Collins is the guy that the Redskins

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>just made the highest paid safety in NFL history give

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>at eighty four million dollar contract. So far this season,

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the highest is paid safety in NFL history has zero interceptions,

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>zero fumbles, force, zero sacks, zero passes defended, and he's

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 1>also missed a bunch of tackles. You talk about a

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>return on investment for for the Redskins from landing Collins

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:22.559
<v Speaker 1>and in the Washington secondary has been been embarrassing. I

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 1>believe that Daniel Jones will play very well in this game.

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>He'll put up his numbers, he will turn the ball

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>over a couple of times. It'll be a back and forth,

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>high scoring game. Redskins will put up some points against

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the soft cheese Giants defense. But in the end, Giants

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty four, Redskins thirty penny, who's going with the g man.

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Fox Sports Radio has the best sports talk lineup in

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the nation. Catch all of our shows at Fox sports

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Radio dot com and within the I Heart Radio app

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>search f s R to listen live. All right. Next

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 1>up the LA Chargers at the Miami Dolphins. It's on CBS.

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Tom Carthy and Jay Feely will have a lot of

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>garbage time here. Dolphins owing three charges, one and two

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 1>line on this game open at sixteen. It's anywhere from

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 1>sixteen to sixteen and a half. The line I have

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:14.239
<v Speaker 1>says sixteen, so we'll use that. Uh and I am

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna take the charges here. I'm gonna take the charges.

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't love this pick per se, but the Chargers

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>because they've been malingering. They have, they've been in games,

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 1>they've lost here, but they've made some some stupid place

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers in particularly late in games, the old war horse,

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers, the old veteran. The Chargers ranked fifth in

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the NFL in total yards, but there are twenty one

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>in points per game, so there's a lack of execution

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>in the red zone. And Philip Rivers has been great

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>for three quarters. He can't put that fourth quarter uh

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>stigma behind the first three quarters, Rivers is completing over

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>seventy of his passes no interception, but in the fourth

0:14:56.320 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 1>quarter he's completing barely fifty of his path no touchdowns,

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 1>two interceptions. In the first three games of the year,

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>he's been back. Now the Miami game is usually an

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 1>extra bye week here, but you still have to show up.

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Dating back the week seventeen of last season, the Dolphins, congratulations,

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>they have become the first team to lose four consecutive

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>games by at least twenty five points. You gotta go

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 1>back to the Boston Patriots in in the nineteen nineteen

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>sixty nine seasons, the last time that happens. So congratulations

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>to the Dolphins franchise. You've done a wonderful job. I

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>did find a positive. The Dolphins of their passes have

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>traveled over twenty yards down field, alright, twenty yards down here.

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>That's the highest in the NFL. Of course, most of

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:54.359
<v Speaker 1>those passes dropped incomplete. And you've got Josh Rosen, who

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I love how bad the Dolphins are that people are saying, well,

0:15:57.040 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Josh Rosen was a breath of fresh air. He had

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>a passer rating of seventy three and completed fifty of

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 1>his passes and is considered and no touchdowns at halftime,

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and people say, oh, I'm very impressive, and all I mean,

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>it's ridiculous. Now. Typically I would say take the points,

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>take the points, don't bet the game, take the points.

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>But the Dolphins aren't trying. They are not trying. The

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Charges will be the desperate team here. They don't want

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>to start out one and three. One and three is

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a bad situation. Two and two is acceptable. Chargers thirty

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>seven Dolphins seventy penny agrees with you. Going with the

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 1>bolts all right. Next up, it's Penning versus the Penny

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 1>will keep the train moving. Oakland one and two at Indianapolis.

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>This game is on CBS and it's a game with

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Harlan and Rich Gannon. They will call the game.

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>The Colts open a six point favorite. They are favored

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 1>by seven. The weather in this situation four degrees, not

0:16:57.400 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 1>that it matters. It's in the dome, will be partly

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 1>sunny if you're in Indianapolis. The pick is in on

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders and the Colts. I've gone back and forth

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:10.640
<v Speaker 1>on this game, but ultimately I've I've landed on taking

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders, and I'm gonna take the Raiders on the points,

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and I understand any strategy here. They're gonna ride the

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Marlon Mack Express train and they're gonna play close to

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the vest with Jacobe Brissette, power running game and all

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. UH and any should jump out to an

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>early lead. The Colts have been very good at home.

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 1>They won their last seven home games going back to

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 1>last year, back when Andrew Luck was there, and they

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:35.639
<v Speaker 1>have not won eight consecutive games since the Peyton Manning

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>years back in the first decade of the two thousand's.

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 1>Here and so we'll see that the Raiders traditionally have

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:46.880
<v Speaker 1>been terrible against the Colts in any they haven't won there.

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:48.400
<v Speaker 1>They don't play that often, but they haven't won there

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>since and that was when our former Fox Sports Radio colleague,

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 1>Jim Mora I was coaching and Rich Gannon was the

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Raiders quarterback the last time they won in Indianapolis. But

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the reason that I the many reason I bet against

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:07.359
<v Speaker 1>the Colts is the public is laying the lumber. This

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>is one of the most lopsided games this weekend. Over

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 1>sevent of the bets have been on the Colts. I

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 1>love to be a contrarian. I love to be against

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the public and be on the side of the sharp guys.

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>So getting a touchdown with a team that is still

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:26.679
<v Speaker 1>trying to win. Unlike the Dolphins, I figured the Raiders

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 1>haven't completely given up hope. They're not a hopeless bunch yet,

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:32.879
<v Speaker 1>even though they look like a Pop Warner team against

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings last week, I expect a better effort, a

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>more competitive game. You don't really get blown out back

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 1>to back games. So and also the Colts could be

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>looking ahead. I believe they play the Chiefs in Week five.

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:47.399
<v Speaker 1>Indianapolis will win the game, but they won't cover the spread.

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Colts twenty eight, Raiders twenty three. Not this time for

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the penny. They like the Indianapolis Colts. All right, we'll

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>keep it going. Next up Kansas City three and oh

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>at Detroit to oh and one. It's on Fox. You

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:06.679
<v Speaker 1>better watch Kevin Burkhardt and Charles Davis and the Fox

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:09.639
<v Speaker 1>box that Rocks calling the game. The Chiefs opened to

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>six point favorite. They are currently a six and a

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 1>half point favorite. I'm told this is the first game

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that Patrick Mahomes has played indoors as an NFL player.

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 1>He used to dominate when he was a Texas Tech

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>in dome environments, but this is the first time as

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:28.120
<v Speaker 1>an NFL quarterback. The pick is in and I am

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 1>taking the Lions. I'm gonna take the Lions here to

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>cover the spread. And this is the ultimate contrarian pick here.

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:40.159
<v Speaker 1>It is uh. This is another acid test for Destroit.

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>The Lions defense. I feel like they have overachieved that

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 1>some of the numbers are skewed because they gave up

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of points in the fourth quarter to tie

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals. But now they go into the lab against

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs where Kansas City has scored twenty five or

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>more points in twenty five consecutive games. That's a long

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 1>his street in NFL history. But I actually like the

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Lions defense to hold their own here Trey Flowers and

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>snacks Harrelson. When I say hold their own, I'm saying

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 1>that the Chiefs aren't gonna score fifty in this particular game.

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>But you also have about a fifty percent chance to

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>win a bet when you take around seven points. Through

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the first three games of the season, all right, forty

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:31.399
<v Speaker 1>seven point nine percent of NFL games have been decided

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 1>by six points or less. And uh, and so you've

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:38.879
<v Speaker 1>got that working for you as well. And is this

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>a letdown spot for Kansas City? Why would it be

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>a letdown spot? The Chiefs just won a big game

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 1>against the Ravens last week, a game that many people

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:49.920
<v Speaker 1>had circled on the schedule earlier in the year. See

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 1>how they would do against Lamar Jackson. Now they play

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 1>an NFC opponent, a team nobody gets up to play

0:20:56.440 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 1>the Lions. And then you have another showcase game next

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:03.880
<v Speaker 1>week against the Colts, which is a bigger game for

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City. Uh, She's still win the game. But I

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:10.400
<v Speaker 1>believe they'll give up some puts. The Chiefs defense will

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 1>will regress here, and I'm not buying there. The real

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 1>McCoy Chiefs thirty four, Lions twenty eight. No chance in

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:22.359
<v Speaker 1>hell of pennies following in this one. They're going with

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City. You can have knocked yourself out with Kansas City,

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and the Chiefs should win the game by ten fifteen

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:36.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand points. But this Lions team, I like the way

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>they're playing right now. They're off the grid. Uh so

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm going with it. All right, let's get trivial again here.

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>It's penny versus the penny. As you know from the podcast,

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Frank Gore was the leading rusher for either team in

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:53.159
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo's win over Cincinnati last week. Right, he led the

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 1>game in rushing yards. At age thirty six, he is

0:21:55.640 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the oldest player to be leading rusher in an NFL

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:04.919
<v Speaker 1>game since Blank. All right, since Blank. Frank Gore, at

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>age thirty six, the oldest player to lead an NFL

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>game in rushing yards since Blank. Will give me the

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>answer in a couple of minutes. Next up New England

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>three and oh at Buffalo three and oh it's on CBS.

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I an Eagle and Dan Fouts will be an Orchard Park,

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:22.680
<v Speaker 1>New York's gonna be a a nice day in in

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>in Orchard Part, New York, sixty five degrees, mostly sunny.

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:29.159
<v Speaker 1>Patriots open a six point favorite. They are a seven

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:31.719
<v Speaker 1>point favorite. Now. I went back and forth on this

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:36.160
<v Speaker 1>game also, but I settled on taking I'm gonna cover

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:38.919
<v Speaker 1>my my eyes here and I'm gonna hold my nose,

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:42.160
<v Speaker 1>which apparently is running. I'm gonna take the Buffalo Bills.

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I And this is a great Patriots team. They're off

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:47.679
<v Speaker 1>to the greatest start in this last twenty years of

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>dynasty for Bill Belichick. They appear to be the cream

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of the crop. They've they've gone scorched earth against the

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>weaklings of the NFL, and the Bills haven't really played

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>anybody of No, they played the Bangals and the two

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>teams in who are claiming to be from New York,

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the Giants and the Jets even like playing New Jersey.

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>This is not great competition. And this is the degree

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>of difficulty goes up a lot for Buffalo, but it

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>also goes up a lot for the Patriots. The Steelers

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 1>appear to be a bad a bad team judging by

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 1>their record, and they didn't show up for that game

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>in New England. And then they played the Dolphins and

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>they played the Jets. So the Patriots haven't played anybody

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>yet either. So that to me, that's equal. Uh. And

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:28.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, I feel like, you know, it's a little

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>insane to the membrane here because New England's point differential

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>is thirty six points higher than any other team. The

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys are number two, thirty six points better than the

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 1>numbers are skewed. And now then the thing that scares

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>me about Buffalo, and you gotta factor this in Josh

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Allen is he's a compass rose. He doesn't know where

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the ball is going and could go north, southeast, west,

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 1>you name it. And he turns the ball over a

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:56.400
<v Speaker 1>lot in his young career, and that will kill you.

0:23:56.640 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 1>That will that will make this a thirty ford a

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 1>nothing type of game if he plays a game like that.

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:04.959
<v Speaker 1>But I believe Buffalo and they're not gonna win the game.

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I'm crazy. I'm not that crazy. Like

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a ship out a shifout rats rat, as they say,

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 1>is that the phrase guest ship house house rat to

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:19.119
<v Speaker 1>pick pick Buffalo to win this game. Uh, However, they

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:21.919
<v Speaker 1>have more than a putcher's chance. They can hang in there.

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 1>It's a divisional game. Remember the bed rock. We talked

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 1>about it, Benny versus the penny. When the wise guys

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 1>give you seven points and more in the divisional game,

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you take the points. Even in a Bill's Patriots game,

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 1>this is a much bigger game for the Buffalo Bills.

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>This is an acid test game to show that there's

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:40.639
<v Speaker 1>some legitimacy that this team is not a fraud. And

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:43.160
<v Speaker 1>so they're at home a lot of enthusiasm there. People

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 1>will be throwing dildos on the field that Tom Brady.

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, it's a big statement game. It's not as

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:50.360
<v Speaker 1>big a statement game for the Patriots. I mean they've

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 1>been they put they're like every every years they wait

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:56.360
<v Speaker 1>till the playoffs for their statement games. Patriots will win

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the game, but the Bills will keep it close. Low

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>scoring game. Patriots twenty Bills sixteen. Penny likes you. They're

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:10.719
<v Speaker 1>going with the Bills and the mafia. All right. Next up,

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>let's pay off the trivia. Let's get trivia. The question

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 1>was Frank gored at age thirty six, with the leading

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>rusher in the Bills Bengals game leading rusher there, and

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:24.399
<v Speaker 1>he's the oldest player to lead the NFL an NFL

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>game and rushing since blank. Alright, gascot, you like old

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 1>guys who are older than me. What's your answer. I'm

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna go with Curtis Martin on this one. It's not

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:39.919
<v Speaker 1>a bad guess, but it's not right the correct answer,

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and you should kick yourself because this guy is a devil.

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Bronco Mike Anderson, No, John Elway. John Elway, believe it

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>or not. At age thirty eight and what I believe

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:57.439
<v Speaker 1>was his final season in a December game, he was

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the leading rusher, the quarterback, the leading rusher, uh in

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 1>in that game at age thirty. So that's that's the

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 1>record to break. And that seems like a record that

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 1>will last long. I don't how many running actually played

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to the forty. Maybe Frank Gore will be that guy.

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 1>All right? Next up, I say, you said running back

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't thinking quarterback, but I said leading rusher. Yeah. Sorry,

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:25.200
<v Speaker 1>that's a good question, thank you. Uh. Next up, Tennessee

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:27.400
<v Speaker 1>at Atlanta. A couple of one in two teams. It's

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 1>on CBS. Former Laker and Nicks played by play guy

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Spiro Adidas and Adam Archiletta, who's claimed to famous working

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 1>with me at the NBC Sports Network. Uh Falcons opened

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>up a three and a half point favorite. They're currently

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>favored by four. I'm all in on the Tennessee Titans,

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 1>which sounds crazy the way they played against Jacksonville, but

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons are teetering on the brink. Actually, both these

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:51.640
<v Speaker 1>teams are. Dan Quinn is barely hanging on to his job.

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:55.159
<v Speaker 1>He's living in that fish bowl in Atlanta and outside

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of a turnaround, he's dead man coaching here. Atlanta has

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>been by and large a second division outfit. The Falcons

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 1>have a feeble run defense, and that's the main reason

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I expect Derrick Henry to have a big bounce back

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:16.160
<v Speaker 1>boomerang game here for Tennessee, the entire team out of Nashville.

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 1>We'll find out what kind of pride they have at

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 1>being embarrassed on National TV last week. They've had a

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 1>lectra time, lectra time to get ready to play the

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night game last week. Plus Marcus Mariota, who you

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>don't want to bet on Mariota. He had a backwards

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>performance there. It's almost like he needs to get a

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 1>GPS to find the end zone. It's Brotal, the guy

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 1>leads the NFL with seventeen sacks has generally been either

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 1>bad or average every game. Uh that said, this is

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 1>a much better Titans team that will show up this

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 1>week and again trying to avoid the one in three start.

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>This This is a team that has matched up the

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years very well against the the week

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 1>lenks of the end fell that the soft serve the

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 1>non physical teams. Atlanta is in that category. Uh so.

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:09.159
<v Speaker 1>And also, I am I am told by some of

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:11.399
<v Speaker 1>my moles here that the big the big whales, the

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 1>big gamblers. Uh, they are all over the Titans. I'm

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna take there, all over the Titans. I'm on their side.

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:26.199
<v Speaker 1>Titans twenty four Falcons. One man, this is scary for

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the Penny too. She has gone with the Titans. Alright,

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 1>so we agree on that game. Next up, let's get

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to the Lake games. All right. We're in the late

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:35.880
<v Speaker 1>games here, as we keep the ship moving on Benny

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 1>versus the Penny, Tampa Bay one and two at the

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 1>L A. Rra Ams on Fox. It's on Fox. Chris

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Myers and Darryl Johnson. I want you to know, guest

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>on that I I might actually go to this game

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 1>because I got a message from a former colleague of

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 1>mine at Fox Sports Radio, the great t J Reeves,

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 1>who I followed him on the weekends, and he is

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the radio sideline reporter for the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, and

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be intended. He asked me if I was

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the Game's like, well, I'm not planning on

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 1>going to the game, and then he told me he

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>was gonna be there. So I said, okay, I'll see

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>if I can get in there at the last minute,

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and then I can I can choose. It's kind of good.

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 1>We haven't I haven't taught to him a long time.

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 1>He's he's down in Tampa. He's a regular down There

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 1>was a weekend host here, all right, Fox Sports Radio.

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 1>So that'll be great you get to Yeah, I love

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I love t J. And we had some fun with

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>him back in the day, and so it's always good.

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 1>He's part of the Fox Sports Radio Alumni Association, Guest,

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 1>which you will soon be part of once they hear

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:34.800
<v Speaker 1>this podcast. But most of those people go up and

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:37.960
<v Speaker 1>up right, they they go to climb onto higher stages.

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Is that accurate? Uh? Not everyone? Uh, We've got guys

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 1>making French fries, not everyone, you know. All Right, Well,

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I hope, so, I hope, I'm I hope. I'm a

0:29:48.160 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 1>part of that upper echelon. You're just as likely to

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:53.240
<v Speaker 1>be the face of the NFL network like andrews Ceciliano

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 1>or make make cheeseburgers and push shopping carts, so that

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 1>those are good jobs people need. But anyway, alright, so

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay and the Rams. The Rams open a nine

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 1>point favorite, They're a ten point favorites, gonna be seventy

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 1>five degrees that kick off at the Colisseum in Los Angeles.

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take the Buccaneers here, even though I love

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the Rams Tampa Bay, their defense is is not horrific.

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Their fourteenth and yards, they're actually better this year than

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys statistically. And I love how Shaq Barrett, the

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 1>guy that got away from Denver, has played. He's the

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 1>new QB Killer for the Tambay Buccaneers, bringing back memories

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 1>of war and Sap and some of those great uh

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Brooks and some of those great defensive players back in

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the day. As he's off to a record setting start

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 1>for sacks the first three weeks of the year. The Rams.

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 1>The main reason not to take the Rams is because

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 1>they have no dimensions to their offense. They're a grinded

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 1>out team right now. Jared Golf has yet to have

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a dominant performance. Todd Gurley is half the man he

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 1>used to be in the backfield. Uh. And so I

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 1>know the Ms are somehow three, you know, but they're

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 1>doing it with ugly, grind out wins. They're not getting

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of style points. You said, well, Tampa Bay

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:08.720
<v Speaker 1>is a bad team. They should blow the doors. Yeah,

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 1>they should. But Jamis Winston, who's played very well in

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the first half of games, he's been a mistake prone

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 1>mess in the second half. I saw a stat his

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 1>passer rating is a hundred eleven before halftime. In the

0:31:22.000 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 1>second half it's below sixty. And the Rams mob squad,

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 1>that defense is too legit to quit. They have a

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 1>very good defense. There's some of these veterans they brought

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>in so far have found the fountain of youth. But again,

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the main reason that I'm gonna bet against the Rams

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:42.479
<v Speaker 1>to cover is Jared Goff. He's like a lost puppy

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 1>dog and you're gonna have to keep scoring poth Now.

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 1>The thing that could change this if if Famous Jamis

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:50.719
<v Speaker 1>throws three interceptions and a couple of pick six is.

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Obviously the Rams will win this game forty to ten.

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 1>But I say that doesn't happen. Buccaneers old hang around

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:00.240
<v Speaker 1>ten points is too many and in the Rams also

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 1>have I believe they played the Thursday game next week.

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I think they played the Seahawks next week, so they

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 1>have a short short week peek ahead NFC West rival

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Rams thirty one bucks, three penny going with the Rams

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 1>all night? Damn right, can ram it all day? You

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 1>can ram it all right? All right? Seattle two and one,

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Arizona O two and one, It's on Fox, and get

0:32:28.960 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 1>another Dick Stockton game for the Arizona Cardinals. I feel

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 1>like Dick Stockton is the personal broadcaster for the Arizona Cardinals. Uh.

0:32:39.000 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I think this is. And it's at least the second,

0:32:40.800 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 1>if not the third, Cardinals game. Mr Stockton has done.

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Dick Stockton and Mark schlay Rith on the call on

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 1>this game. The Seahawks opened at three point favorite. They're

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 1>favorite by five, and I am all over Seattle in

0:32:54.400 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 1>this game. I don't no gonna like road favorites. That's

0:32:56.320 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 1>a bad formula. But I'm gonna take the Sea Seahawks.

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Here a couple of reasons why number one Russell Wilson

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 1>is licking his chops. The Cardinals are missing both starting

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 1>defensive backs. You could not ask for a better opportunity

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 1>to go blitz Creek if you're Seattle. I guesst a

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>divisional opponent. I sometimes I say, well, watch out for

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the wounded bear, but don't watch out for the wounded Cardinal.

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I again, I typically don't like road favorites, but this

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 1>is an exception of the rule. I also love the

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 1>fact Seattle lost last week, so you have the zig

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 1>zag theory in play here, a little more pep in

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 1>their step. Russell Wilson has been great coming off a loss.

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I think sixteen and eight the number against the spread

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:45.240
<v Speaker 1>over over the years here in that situation recent years,

0:33:45.760 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 1>well not that recent, but but anyway. Secondly, uh, you

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:52.200
<v Speaker 1>know who has the most bad throws in the NFL?

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:55.479
<v Speaker 1>Which quarterback has the most bad throws? Ding Ning? Nick

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Nick Ning? This guy has been overmatched by the NFL.

0:33:58.480 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not his fault. She have been the number one

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 1>pick Anyone with half a brain knows that uh Murray

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 1>is pacing the NFL and bad throws. He leads the

0:34:06.840 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 1>NFL and pass attempts, but he's not even in the

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:12.319
<v Speaker 1>top ten in yards because he's averaging six point one

0:34:12.360 --> 0:34:16.280
<v Speaker 1>yards per a tempt That is thirty in the NFL.

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Only Mitch Trabiskie has been worse among quarterbacks. We have

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:24.279
<v Speaker 1>started three games, so it's a hard sell. Cardinals have

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 1>been a terrible home team going back to last year.

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:29.319
<v Speaker 1>There one eight and one and they're the worst in

0:34:29.320 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. They ranked last in the NFL and points

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 1>per game and yards per game at home in that span.

0:34:35.480 --> 0:34:42.759
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks thirty, Cardinals twenty. Penny likes you to going with

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks four more more. Alright, Next up Minnesota at Chicago,

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 1>too and one versus two and one. It's on CBS.

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Jim Nance and Tony Romo. Bears open a three point favorite.

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:55.480
<v Speaker 1>There are two and a half point favorite now mild

0:34:55.520 --> 0:34:59.400
<v Speaker 1>weather at Soldier Field seventy seven degrees. I'm going with

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the public, which is not a good thing, but I'm

0:35:01.680 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 1>taking the Vikings here. Minnesota is gonna have to ride

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that Dalvin Cook train. Cook leads the NFL and rushing

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:11.080
<v Speaker 1>he's off to an Adrian Peterson type start, and Mike

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Zimmer he's running the hide the quarterback offense, trying to

0:35:14.160 --> 0:35:17.279
<v Speaker 1>hide Kirk Cousins. Vikings are second in the NFL and

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards per game. Olio Ravens have been better in Minnesota.

0:35:21.600 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 1>They average the second fewest passing yards per game. That

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:27.480
<v Speaker 1>actually will help the Vikings win this game because the

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Bears are a very opportunistic defense, a h picking off

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:33.719
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks and whatnot, So the Micings will play close to

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the vest. Does Bears have a great defense, They had

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:40.480
<v Speaker 1>a dominant performance there against Chicago, or a gainst Washington

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:44.440
<v Speaker 1>and Chicago. But I don't trust Rubisky not only a quarterback,

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:48.719
<v Speaker 1>he's terrible, twenty seventh ranked quarterback in the NFL. This

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:51.640
<v Speaker 1>game will be tight. Vikings will pull the upset Minnesota

0:35:51.719 --> 0:35:59.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty four the Bears twenty three. Think with Minnesota all

0:35:59.520 --> 0:36:03.160
<v Speaker 1>right next to Jacksonville at Denver, it's on CBS. Andrew

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Catalan and James Lofton have the call. It'll be sunny eighties,

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 1>six degrees that the stadium may now call empower field

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:13.279
<v Speaker 1>at Mile High. I don't know if I like that

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:15.920
<v Speaker 1>or not. I know, but they didn't ask me. I

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:18.799
<v Speaker 1>didn't cut a check. Uh. I'm gonna take now the

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:22.120
<v Speaker 1>line Broncos a three point favorite. I'm gonna take Jacksonville.

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 1>And I'm also going with the public on this. To me,

0:36:25.160 --> 0:36:29.279
<v Speaker 1>this matchup favorite Jacksonville. Everyone's waiting for Gardner midshow to

0:36:29.360 --> 0:36:32.279
<v Speaker 1>suck and have a bad game. The guy seems unfazed

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 1>by all this. He's unencumbered by the level of competition.

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I expect more good stuff. He's accurate. When you're accurate,

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:41.719
<v Speaker 1>you don't have many bad games when you're accurate. I'm

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:45.640
<v Speaker 1>in on the Minshoe mania. So far in twenty nineteen,

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Denver has a total of three quarterback hits, no sacks,

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and no turnovers. They stink el stink aru And as

0:36:53.480 --> 0:36:56.719
<v Speaker 1>Emmanuel Sanders said after the game last week against the Packers,

0:36:56.920 --> 0:36:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos are living in a world of suck. Denver's

0:36:59.840 --> 0:37:03.360
<v Speaker 1>law seven straight games while scoring fewer than seventeen points

0:37:04.200 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 1>per game. I know that includes last year, obviously, but

0:37:07.440 --> 0:37:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the trend has continued. The main reason I like Jacksonville.

0:37:11.160 --> 0:37:14.400
<v Speaker 1>What is their moniker? What are they known as Sacksonville?

0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Right Joe Flacco has been in the pressure cooker all season.

0:37:18.600 --> 0:37:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Entering this week, jump ball Joe has been hurried twenty

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 1>two times, most in the NFL. And you look at Jacksonville. Now,

0:37:25.680 --> 0:37:27.840
<v Speaker 1>they had nine sacks last week, but they're tied for

0:37:27.880 --> 0:37:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the NFL leading with thirteen sacks. They will be all

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:36.200
<v Speaker 1>over Joe Flacco's junk. I'm taking Jacksonville to win the

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:43.840
<v Speaker 1>game out right, Go Jags go to seventeen penning On

0:37:43.880 --> 0:37:46.719
<v Speaker 1>the opposite way with the Denver Broncos. You want a

0:37:46.760 --> 0:37:48.400
<v Speaker 1>quick fun fact that I was gonna do a trivial

0:37:48.400 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 1>but let's give you the fun factor, uh this weekend

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:54.719
<v Speaker 1>in Denver. Gardner Minshew might have used this on the

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Overnight Show last night, but Gardner Minshew can join Blank

0:37:58.280 --> 0:38:01.040
<v Speaker 1>as the only player in NFL history with a ninety

0:38:01.080 --> 0:38:04.720
<v Speaker 1>five or better quarterback rating in each of their first

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:07.920
<v Speaker 1>four games. The answer, who do you think get? Is

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:13.320
<v Speaker 1>real quick? It's Aaron Brooks. Aaron Brooks Now, it's Mark Ripping.

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:18.920
<v Speaker 1>How obscure? I love when the answer is obscure? How

0:38:18.960 --> 0:38:24.640
<v Speaker 1>obscure is that most people super Bowl quarterback? Though? Mark Alright?

0:38:24.640 --> 0:38:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Sunday Night Football, Dallas three and Oh at New Orleans

0:38:27.320 --> 0:38:30.680
<v Speaker 1>two and one. It's on NBC without Michaels and Chris Collinsworth,

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the Little Sunday Night Action. Cowboys are two and a

0:38:33.120 --> 0:38:34.799
<v Speaker 1>half point favor They opened it one and a half.

0:38:35.040 --> 0:38:39.440
<v Speaker 1>The pick I'm taking the Cowboys, I'm taking again. The

0:38:39.520 --> 0:38:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Saints were essentially handed the game last week by the Seahawks.

0:38:43.160 --> 0:38:46.640
<v Speaker 1>They played football follies. They lost the statuet New Orleans,

0:38:46.719 --> 0:38:49.800
<v Speaker 1>they won the game. That is not a sustainable formula.

0:38:50.080 --> 0:38:53.759
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans average just five point three yards per play.

0:38:53.920 --> 0:38:56.920
<v Speaker 1>They had only two hundred sixty total yards. Seattle averaged

0:38:56.960 --> 0:39:00.800
<v Speaker 1>almost seven yards per play. They had five fifteen yards

0:39:01.600 --> 0:39:04.920
<v Speaker 1>fifteen yards, and they lost the game. In other words,

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:08.359
<v Speaker 1>it's unsustainable. As we said, Teddy Bridgewater is gonna have

0:39:08.440 --> 0:39:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to get better. The Cowboys have a pretty good defense.

0:39:11.080 --> 0:39:14.480
<v Speaker 1>The Saints need more chunk plays. He's averaged less than

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:17.799
<v Speaker 1>seven yards per attempt Bridgewater, and I know why he's

0:39:17.840 --> 0:39:20.000
<v Speaker 1>doing that. They're playing it close to the vest Minnesota

0:39:20.040 --> 0:39:23.520
<v Speaker 1>conservative dumb down offense. But you gotta gotta give me more.

0:39:23.640 --> 0:39:26.080
<v Speaker 1>You gotta give me more. The Cowboys with a win

0:39:26.560 --> 0:39:29.560
<v Speaker 1>would be off to their best start in twelve years

0:39:29.800 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 1>since seven when they started out five and oh, Dallas.

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:35.839
<v Speaker 1>Dallas has the Packers next week, all right, so they

0:39:35.880 --> 0:39:39.480
<v Speaker 1>have the package next week? Will they be caught in

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that spot looking at I say no. It's a national

0:39:42.400 --> 0:39:46.400
<v Speaker 1>televised game. Uh, you don't get extra credit for beating

0:39:46.480 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Drew Brees and the Saints. But this is a golden

0:39:49.560 --> 0:39:54.839
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to win in a hostile environment. Cowboys will pull

0:39:54.840 --> 0:40:01.120
<v Speaker 1>it out. Dallas one. New Orleans is twenty three penny

0:40:01.120 --> 0:40:04.200
<v Speaker 1>tailing your hair going to Cowboys. Last one, all right?

0:40:04.280 --> 0:40:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Last one? Monday Night Football, Cincinnati, oh in three, Pittsburgh,

0:40:07.520 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 1>oh and three. It's on ESPN, Joe Testa Tour and

0:40:10.200 --> 0:40:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Booger Booger McFarland. The Steelers opened a three and a

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:17.360
<v Speaker 1>half point favorite. They are currently favorite by four. The

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:23.000
<v Speaker 1>pick is in Oh, p you what stinks? I'm taking

0:40:23.000 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals. Uh. The reason why Cincinnati actually has more playmakers.

0:40:27.040 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 1>It seems odd to say that in a Bengal Steelers

0:40:29.520 --> 0:40:32.400
<v Speaker 1>game because normally that's the other way. But the Bengals

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:35.000
<v Speaker 1>have more playmakers here. This should be a field goal game.

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:37.399
<v Speaker 1>This should be anybody's game. You're getting over a field goal.

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I like taking the points in games like that, Andy

0:40:40.320 --> 0:40:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Dalton is a better quarterback than Mason Rudolph. Very rarely

0:40:43.360 --> 0:40:46.320
<v Speaker 1>is Andy Dalton the better quarterback in the matchup the Bengals,

0:40:46.320 --> 0:40:49.480
<v Speaker 1>As I said, they have more weaponry. The Steelers are

0:40:49.560 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the second worst team in third down defense in the NFL,

0:40:52.680 --> 0:40:55.040
<v Speaker 1>so there's an opportunity for the Bengals to keep the

0:40:55.080 --> 0:40:58.799
<v Speaker 1>change moving. Only the Redskins have been worse. And my

0:40:58.880 --> 0:41:02.440
<v Speaker 1>favorite stat is some up the lazy river of mediocrity

0:41:02.480 --> 0:41:06.839
<v Speaker 1>of Pittsburgh is Mason Rudolph in his first start with

0:41:06.880 --> 0:41:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers against the forty niners. You know many passes

0:41:09.800 --> 0:41:11.840
<v Speaker 1>he completed. We used this on the Overnight Show, but

0:41:11.880 --> 0:41:14.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe you missed it. How many passes he completed that

0:41:14.200 --> 0:41:18.640
<v Speaker 1>traveled more than one yard downfield? The answer is too

0:41:19.200 --> 0:41:21.759
<v Speaker 1>that it not happens. It's a guy named Tim Tebow

0:41:22.560 --> 0:41:26.840
<v Speaker 1>in his heyday. So I realized I'm going against the

0:41:26.880 --> 0:41:30.840
<v Speaker 1>trend here. Over the years, Pittsburgh has been pure cash,

0:41:31.200 --> 0:41:35.280
<v Speaker 1>straight cash hoby in primetime games. They're ten and five

0:41:35.320 --> 0:41:39.680
<v Speaker 1>against the spread the last fifteen Monday Night Football games

0:41:39.880 --> 0:41:43.799
<v Speaker 1>previous fifteen instances. But this is a bad team and it's,

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, be a close game you like the points

0:41:46.120 --> 0:41:53.919
<v Speaker 1>divisional game Bengals twenty Steelers nineteen paying agreement here going

0:41:53.920 --> 0:41:57.120
<v Speaker 1>with the Bungles. All right, that'll put the baby to bed.

0:41:57.200 --> 0:42:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Gag on Gascony and email us a Real

0:42:02.200 --> 0:42:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Fifth Hour with F I F T H Real Fifth

0:42:05.560 --> 0:42:08.319
<v Speaker 1>Hour at Ben mallor follow us on Twitter at Ben

0:42:08.400 --> 0:42:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Mallory whatever your Twitter account is, Guests, David J. Gascon Yes,

0:42:11.560 --> 0:42:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you can follow me there of course. All right, have

0:42:13.120 --> 0:42:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a great weekend. We'll see how we did. We'll have

0:42:15.280 --> 0:42:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the next radio show Sunday night in the Monday, and

0:42:18.560 --> 0:42:21.719
<v Speaker 1>we will have the the reaction to how we did

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:23.960
<v Speaker 1>on Benny versus Penny. Have a great weekend. Thank you

0:42:24.000 --> 0:42:24.680
<v Speaker 1>for downloading