WEBVTT - CPI, Auto Prices, Crypto, and ESG (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.759
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Let's check in with

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Ira Jersey. He actually thinks about this stuff all day

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>when he's not thinking about soccer. Uh. That's because he's

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>a US interest rate strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence, so we

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 1>pay him to think about this stuff. So, Ira, you

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>looked at the data this morning, and I'm gonna ask

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 1>you to put your little FED chairman hat on. What

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>are you taken away from today's data? Uh? Really not

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 1>very much. I mean I think this is more or

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:47.160
<v Speaker 1>less what the Fed was thinking. Um. You know, Matt

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>just mentioned a second ago that you know, inflation is

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>not coming down very quickly. That's you know, very true.

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that's always been the risk and

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the danger is that, um, you know, the market was

0:00:57.200 --> 0:01:00.080
<v Speaker 1>pricing for inflation to come down much faster than it

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>was ever likely to come down, and that's one of

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the reasons why what you're seeing today and and the

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>reason why two year yields are are off so much,

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:11.039
<v Speaker 1>is that we're now pricing out some potential cuts later

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in the year. And I think that that's probably the

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>right move. I do think that the FED is going

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 1>to do what it says and hike two or three

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>more times at twenty five basis points each then basically

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>do nothing for the better part of the year. And

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and the market is starting to come around to that

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>way of thinking, which you know, Paul, I've told the

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>stock market due the last six weeks, not the stock market.

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:34.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we rallied yesterday into this inflation print. Today

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:37.960
<v Speaker 1>we got it and it was at expectations are higher

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:42.039
<v Speaker 1>than expected, and were continue to see prices rise. I

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>just can't work it out. What what's the disconnect between

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>stocks and bonds? Uh, well, I can't. I can't really

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>speak about equity valuations, but I think maybe, um, you know,

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe part of it is the idea that there still

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>is some some pricing power for certainly for some goods

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and services, um you know. But I can tell you

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that that from the rates perspective, you know, the reason

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>why you're seeing this deeper inversion of the yield curve

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:08.799
<v Speaker 1>where now the deepest inverted that we've been in decades UM,

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:11.360
<v Speaker 1>and we're at the and and we're likely to see

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>more um. You know, we have fair value on the

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>two year yield assuming that the Fed does what we

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>think it will do at around four so we still

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>have another five basis points to go here in in

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the two year yield. And you know, we're looking for

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>ten year yield maybe to get up towards three ninety,

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>but not break four percent. So that's an interesting you know,

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I think a really interesting dynamic where you can see

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>very inverted yield curves. You wind up with in an

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>environment where um, where that that probably persists for most

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:41.839
<v Speaker 1>of the year UM and people are gonna be saying like, hey,

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>that that's a signal that we're going to be in

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>a recession blah blah blah, and and you know, maybe so,

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>but it's going to take a long time for that

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:50.359
<v Speaker 1>to filter through to the to the rest of the market.

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:53.799
<v Speaker 1>And maybe that's what the equity markets uh really thinking here,

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>is that we're not going to be in a recession,

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>that there's not going to be a very hard landing.

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you look at the ursion, it's crazy

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>that this is the most inversion we've been as far

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>as I can see since what the seventies, because you

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:12.360
<v Speaker 1>had so the early eighties, which means that you know,

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the bursting of the Internet bubble was nothing on this.

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, nationwide housing bust, well, global housing bust uh

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:23.799
<v Speaker 1>in the two thou eight global financial crisis didn't hold

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>a candle to this, right, It's it's only this recession

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>that gets us back to like the blow up of

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Breton Woods. Well, I think though, Matt, you know, what

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:34.360
<v Speaker 1>we have to appreciate is that this is also the

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>first time since the early eighties that we've had inflation

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>like this, right, and and it's coming down so uh

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>so slowly that the market is trying to adjust to

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>what is the near term outlook for both inflation and

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, policy rates, which is that they're going to

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>it's going to remain a little bit higher for longer

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>than the market was initially thinking versus where are we

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be in four years? Um So, in four

0:03:57.320 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 1>years we might be in a deflationary environment and you know,

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>we're not there yet, and hopefully we won't get there,

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>but but you can you can see an environment where

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>we go back more to like es level of interest

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>rates and of of an economy where you know, a

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>five or six percent mortgage is just normal. Look, I

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>keep on bringing this up. My first mortgage that I

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>got in the late nineties was seven and I thought

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:22.720
<v Speaker 1>that was a decent rate. You know, so so, but

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>but what we've gotten accustomed to very low interest rates, right,

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>so we have to get readjusted to a higher interest

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 1>rate environment, which especially considering the prices paid. You know, uh,

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 1>who was it iceman Um from the Big Short Steve

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Eisman was. I keep bringing this up, but on the

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Odd Lots podcast he said, I do the back of

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:46.599
<v Speaker 1>the napkin math from three percent rates to the seven

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>percent rate mortgage that we're looking at now, housing prices

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 1>have to drop thirty in order to make up for that.

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 1>People don't maybe realize what a big jump that is. Well,

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:00.159
<v Speaker 1>but in fairness too, you have to also look the

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>income side of the equation, right, because if you look

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>at something like housing affordability. And Erica Heidelberg, who's our

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:07.479
<v Speaker 1>mortgage strategist, who reports to me she's been doing some

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>great work on this. Um. You have to appreciate that

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:13.279
<v Speaker 1>affordability is certainly lower because of the higher interest rates,

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>but you also have have wages that are growing at

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>six percent a year, right, So if you think about

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>it from an affordability perspective, it doesn't necessarily have to drop.

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Does it have to drop you know, some level you know,

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>five and fiftent? Yeah? Maybe, but we also rallied yea,

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, but but houseprace has also went up massively

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:30.919
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of years as well, so you

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>would expect potentially some type of adjustment. And quite frankly,

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:36.040
<v Speaker 1>that's what the FET is trying to engineer right there,

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:37.479
<v Speaker 1>trying to get some of the froth out of the

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>real economy. Um. That hasn't necessarily translated as directly to

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:44.719
<v Speaker 1>the financial economy, right, That's one reason why the equity

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:47.159
<v Speaker 1>market is maybe where it is at the moment um.

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>But the but but we're still much lower, right, We're

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>still very far off the highs, and in terms of

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:55.119
<v Speaker 1>of equity markets, we haven't we're not making new highs

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>yet and um, and an environment where we're not going

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:01.280
<v Speaker 1>to fall into recession, than then try waters probably not

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 1>can't be completely unexpected. All right, so, Ira, super bowls

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:08.839
<v Speaker 1>over pitchers and catchers not yet, so I can actually

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>focus a little bit in European soccer or any soccer.

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:14.280
<v Speaker 1>What am I? What am I watching this coming weekend? Um?

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>You know I haven't looked at the fixtures for this weekend,

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:19.159
<v Speaker 1>but I know after this past weekend that the battle

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:20.920
<v Speaker 1>at the top of the Premier League is heating up

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>where you don't have Manchester City up there at the moment,

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 1>you have Arsenal and Manchester United currently one and two

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>in the in the table. So he's gotta keep mean.

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>John Farrow is pretty happy, I think an Arsenal guy.

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>He's a Chelsea guy, but um Arsenal because Manchester UH

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 1>United about to be bought by Dubai, right, and don't know,

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the little Easterner has already owned Manchester City a lot.

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>So all right, Ira, thanks so much for joining us,

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>our Jersey chief US interest rate strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>uh breaking down some of the inflation data and what

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>how the FED might interpret that data going forward and

0:06:56.720 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>next upcoming meetings, well more coming up. This is Bloomber.

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I am in a bit of a tough spot, right,

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>now I'm looking for a couple of cars that you

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>have a couple of cars I have to have. Well,

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>there's there's certain first, especially the Dodge Challenger. I have

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to get um not really uh before they are done

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>making them. So this is the last year for the

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>six point four Leader hemmy, and I must have that's

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>what I hear. A Challenger scat pack wide body. Tough

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to find allocations for that, and the prices are off

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the charts. I also want a Bronco, but I was

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>at the Ford dealership the other day and they said,

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>look forwards, putting a stop to the good combinations with

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the big sasquatchas package you know. Um, they're just giving

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 1>out the little ones right now. So that's that's hard.

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>And that's not even getting into electric car territory. Because

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>if I wanted a Lightning right now, or if I

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>wanted to order a Silver to e V, I mean,

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I would be paying probably a hundred grand. It's crazy.

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Prices are off the charts right now. I want to

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>bring in David Welch, who wrote our Big Take story

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>today about this pricing situation. Car prices hit record highs

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>as automaker's limit output UM and we're seeing it really

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:22.679
<v Speaker 1>across the industry. But evs play a big, big piece

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>into this right now. David joined us out of Detroit,

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the motor city obviously, So David, what are you finding

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:32.439
<v Speaker 1>Because we've been in this situation for a couple of

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>years now, our prices are just ramping up and it

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem like there's any end in sight. Yeah, they've

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>they've been going nuts since really the pandemic started. A

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of it is production related, but going forward and

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>even to a circumstance right now, car companies want to

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:55.959
<v Speaker 1>keep productions somewhat constrained because they've learned that making fewer

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>vehicles and selling them a big prices is just a

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>way better business than atting deal or loss with a

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 1>bunch of production and hoping it will sell and when

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't, inevitably putting four or five dollars in rebates

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>out there to make it move. Um, But that's how

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>they've always done it. There's no way they're going to

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>maintain this discipline, are they. Well, we'll see, but let's

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:23.959
<v Speaker 1>look at a few numbers first. So Too and General

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Motors say that the industry probably has enough semi conductor

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>chips this year in the US, let's start with to

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>make fifteen million vehicles, which is two to two and

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:36.680
<v Speaker 1>a half million fewer than they usually make, you know,

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>years with pretty strong economies and low unemployment like this one, Um,

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's been the case for the past couple of years.

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>In fact, they only sold about thirteen million last year.

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot of pent up demand out there,

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 1>people looking for cars, people like you, who either couldn't

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>find what they wanted because it didn't exist, or they

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:56.079
<v Speaker 1>didn't find what they wanted but a dealer was charging

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:57.719
<v Speaker 1>two thousands over stick er and they walked, and for

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:00.439
<v Speaker 1>that they just keep driving their card wait until prices

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>came back. What I would give two that would be

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>a dream come true. I'm hearing, David, I'm hearing on

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the Challenger, Um, I'm hearing the best deal I've heard

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 1>so far as five thousand over sticker. And good friends

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>of mine whom I've grown up with since elementary school

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>are saying ten to twenty k over. I mean, look,

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:26.599
<v Speaker 1>there's there are some crazy galaging. Those are the exceptions.

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>And I was searching for a key for my daughter,

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:32.319
<v Speaker 1>helping her find a car, and you know, she ended

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:36.559
<v Speaker 1>up having to buy some stupid thing where you basically

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>scotch guard the seats for four d over sticker and

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>that was it. And you know some are one or

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 1>two thousand over sticker. A lot of that has actually

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>gone away. So prisons are sockening up a little. But

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>there's just there's not enough production out there and still

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>enough pent up demand where these high prices are probably

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:56.559
<v Speaker 1>gonna last this year and maybe into and that's when

0:10:56.720 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll kind of figure out do they really have disciplined Yeah,

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of production. I mean, I'm just looking at

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, you have the Big Take story today out

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:07.319
<v Speaker 1>on this topic. So you can find that at bloomber

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>dot com, Slash Big Take or ni space Big Take

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>go on the Bloomberg terminal, and it is a deeply

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>reported story here. But it just comes down to, I

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 1>think back to the Henry Ford. I mean, that's the

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:23.680
<v Speaker 1>business model. Crank out, seventeen millions are and you move them.

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>But I mean I understand that this is a better

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>economic model. David. I will tell you that Paul has

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:31.079
<v Speaker 1>been pushing for automakers to get back to peak start

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of years now, so it's one of

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>this is along with working from home. This is one

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 1>of his pet peeves. And and there's no shortages of

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:41.560
<v Speaker 1>chips and stuff, right, I mean so there still are,

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>right David, there's still Yeah, there's still It's like the

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>chip shortage. It is not binary. We don't go from

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>having nuns having as many as you possibly wanted things

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>all over by the roadside like that. We we're like

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I said, we're going to go from having a dearth

0:11:57.360 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>of chips to being able to make about fifteen million

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>US this year. That's not near peak ins fact, that's

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 1>twelve fifty percent Bulle peak. So if you have if

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>you're still twelve to fifty Bullie peak in terms of

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>what you canm produce this year, and there's still a

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of consumers out there, like you guys who want

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a car, then it's still a sellers market. And I'll

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>throw one more thing at you. This year and next

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have about five or six hundred thousand fewer

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>vehicles coming off lease because automakers and fevers were not

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>leasing as much. So people can the cars they purchased,

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 1>they can hold longer than at least least you gotta

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>you gotta buy the car, get something new. It's just

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>what's the contract siss. So the used market, even though

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>that has been softening up a bit, is still not

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 1>going to come roaring back as a source for cars

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>because you don't have as many coming off least. I'm

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>not saying prices won't weaken this year for new and

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:49.560
<v Speaker 1>used cars. I think they will. But in order for

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>to get really affordable, which is the whole point of

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the big take, for middle class buyers to be able

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>to afford this and get a payment from the current

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 1>rate of seven seventy bucks a month down to more

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 1>affordable four month, prices will need to soften the world

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:04.199
<v Speaker 1>this year. They need to collapse. They're not, they're not,

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 1>but we do see some softening. You put up point

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:10.199
<v Speaker 1>out in the story, and I remember, um, Paul and

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I spoke with Keith Notton when he when he when

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>he had talked just talked to Ford about cutting prices

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:19.960
<v Speaker 1>on the Mockee that and they told him in response

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>this question, why, um, well, we got to do it

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>because Tesla just cut prices. So you're starting to see

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 1>little cracks, right, And the question is can uh you know,

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>if if Jim Farley and Elon Musk are already um

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, are already falling falling out of rank um

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>can Mary Barra and Mark Royce and the rest of

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:47.679
<v Speaker 1>the industry. You know, hold hold hold the line for

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the moment. I think the EV market and the internal

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>combustion vehicle market are kind of two different markets. Uh.

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>And also after after Chess of cut prices, they went

0:13:56.760 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>back and it's not increase um. There are some other

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 1>dynamics going on there. Some of the price decreases we

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 1>saw from Forward and Tessa were so they can get

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>their sticker prices under the thresholds where their customers can

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>get federal tax credits. So you drop your the price

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:14.079
<v Speaker 1>of your car by three thousand, you get under a

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 1>certain threshold, and the government gives that from swing under

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>seventy bucks or bucks whatever, you know, whatever it comes

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 1>out to for that vehicle, and it's an even bigger

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>bonus and they'll sell more thanks to Uncle Sam. So

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 1>there was some of that going on, and I do

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 1>think Look, Test was in a funky position right now.

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>They have a ton of production capacity coming online that's

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty new, and and the plant now some types hasn't

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>even really begun to get close to full production. So

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Ellen saw his sales goals being missed. He wanted to

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 1>grow sales. He only grew up by forty still great

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>by anyone else's standards, but that was it um and

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>he didn't like that. He has a ton of production

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 1>coming online. All of his vehicles, particularly the models and

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the modeloques haven't been redesigned in almost a decade. The

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>model as almost told enough to shave. So he's got

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and look at his cars. People love them. They're good products,

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>but they all go like so the like tests with

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>vehicles are different sizes and shapes of the same sauceage.

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I think he's got three things going on.

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>He does have new competition coming in from Foard, GM,

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Volkswagen out uh BMW Mercendies had vehicles out the Koreans

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Hunt i KA have some very good products out there,

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 1>so that he has competition, He has a ton of

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>compassion becoming online, and he has I'm fresh in any

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>of his vehicles. All of that, all of that is

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 1>any other vehicle market, any of the vehicles segment says

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 1>you gotta cut prices, and I think that David Real

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Real quickly thirty seconds. What are consumers doing today? Are they?

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Are they paying a hundred thousand dollars for a pickup trend?

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Some of them are. Yeah, So like there are a

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>variety of things going on. People are buying expensive vehicles,

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>but that's your wealthy or more fooling consumers. A lot

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of your middle class consumers are either writing or vehicle

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 1>for another year or two and just putting money into repairs,

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 1>or they're buying like eight nine year old vehicles in

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the youth markets because that's where you can really get affordably.

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Right now, all right, amazing stuff. I mean, I'll be

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>it's fascinating to see if this industry can maintain its discipline. Uh,

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 1>but we'll see. David Watch, Detroit Bureau Chief or Bloomberg News.

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's talk crypto and there's a million ways

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>we can go here, but I want to go crypto regulation.

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is this a space that's going to be regulated?

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Needs to be regulated? For all that stuff? We turn

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>to Nathan Dean, He's a senior policy analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence. Nathan,

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 1>you're the smart guy in the room. BS and management

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>from Purdue Heckla Hoops team. This year. Where did that

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>come from? And then an NBA from Chicago, So you

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>are over educated to that to the max. What do

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>you make of all this crypto space in terms of regulation?

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, it sounds like there's a massive crackdown coming.

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>And I mean just putting it in Purdue terms, it's

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 1>like if produced you know, playing the uh you know,

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the smallest teams out there. It's just one

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:00.080
<v Speaker 1>of those things where you know, we've seen over the

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>past year the SEC c come in and register, come

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and talk to us. In the industry largely has not,

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and just within the last few months we've started to

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 1>see the SEC start to crack the whip. One of

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the things that they've done is they've sent out what

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 1>are known as wells notices out to many different crypto players.

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:19.160
<v Speaker 1>In fact, packs so's announced that they had received one. Essentially,

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 1>what this is is the SEC has decided we're going

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:23.879
<v Speaker 1>to take an enforcement action against you, but we're just

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 1>giving you a heads up so that you can give

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>us a written response of why we shouldn't do this.

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:31.479
<v Speaker 1>It's not going to stop the SEC, but we are

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>going to see a lot more enforcement actions between now

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 1>and the next few months. And that's really going to

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 1>issue a further chill to the industry. I get how

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:43.200
<v Speaker 1>staking could be considered a security, certainly staking as a service,

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 1>um in the cracking case. It's harder for me to

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:51.359
<v Speaker 1>grasp how stable coin is a security because you're not

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>expecting any return from a stable coin. No. So, actually,

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>sec each chairman Gary Ginsler gave a speech last year

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>where you essentially insinuated a stable coins of money mark

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>good funds and money market funds has its own, you know,

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:07.119
<v Speaker 1>regulatory regime, and in the sec S eyes, you know

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 1>potentially they should be following that money market reform. Now,

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:12.439
<v Speaker 1>if you assume that they're not a security, well then

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 1>they could be considered a deposit. And if they are

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:17.880
<v Speaker 1>a deposit, then there are other types of banking regulations

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:20.440
<v Speaker 1>that need to apply here. And so I think when

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you move forward with stable coins, the idea here is

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:25.160
<v Speaker 1>is that there's got to be some type of regulation.

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:27.959
<v Speaker 1>You can't have nothing. But the question is what does

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 1>it look like now. I still believe that Congress will

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>eventually move forward on a stable coin regulation. In fact,

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 1>as we speak right now, the Senate Banking Committee is

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:39.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about this. But you know, outside of stable coins.

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:42.959
<v Speaker 1>For the rest of the crypto industry, it's really not

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>looking good right now in terms of new regulations. Is

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 1>this to what extent? Is this maybe increased regulatory attention

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 1>a function of FTX going bust and Sam Bankman freedom

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>all that mess. Oh? Absolutely, I mean this gave it

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>was like given the politicians a piece of andy and

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 1>making them all excited because it gave them a talking point.

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:06.119
<v Speaker 1>You know, they can understand the failure of a company.

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>They understand that there are over nine million creditors out

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:12.399
<v Speaker 1>there who potentially may not get their funds back. And

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 1>this is essentially giving politicians the ability to say, we

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>need new regulation, we need customer protections, we need anti

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:22.439
<v Speaker 1>money launching. The problem is that there are multiple different

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 1>ideas out there right now. Senator Brown is talking about

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>doing this. Senator Tim Scott, the ranking member for the

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Senate Banking Committee, was talking about putting in new customer protections.

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Senator Elizabeth Warren is actually building a coalition including some

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>conservative Republicans, to come up with her own crypto bill,

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:41.439
<v Speaker 1>and this is where it's going to play out over

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the next six months. The problem for the crypto industry, though,

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:48.360
<v Speaker 1>is that they've always said they want clarity. The problem

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 1>is is that the clarity is coming, or it could

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>be coming, and it may not be exactly what they want.

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 1>It may be very very onerous, very restrictive, and it's

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna cost a lot of money to comply with it.

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:00.919
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get onto it. Well. First of all,

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 1>let me plug my show, uh Bloomberg Bloomberg Crypto one

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 1>pm this afternoon. We are focused on this issue for

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>a full thirty minutes. Nice, which is I guarantee the

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:14.920
<v Speaker 1>most you want to hear about it? Okay, is the

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>upper limit? You don't want to hear anymore about token? Yeah, no,

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 1>it's doing great. Um. I want to talk though, while

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 1>we have you, Nathan, about some of the other things.

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:25.719
<v Speaker 1>First of all, whatever happened to this guy is falling

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 1>dead ceiling? People? Are they still like warning about how

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:31.639
<v Speaker 1>horrible this is and what a problem we face. Yeah,

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:33.440
<v Speaker 1>but now that the State of the Union is over,

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Congress is actually turning back to other topics.

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:39.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean the dead ceiling. The problem with the dead ceiling.

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 1>It was a good thing that the politicians began to

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:44.640
<v Speaker 1>look at it on an earlier earlier in the year.

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I honestly didn't think they were going to do that. Um,

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:50.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, but they've gotten their initial talking points through

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:52.639
<v Speaker 1>out there in the public, and now they've turned to

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:54.919
<v Speaker 1>other issues. The problem with it is is that with

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Treasury setting this June fifth date, in our own rate

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 1>strategist Irish Jersey saying, potentially even September October is the

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:03.680
<v Speaker 1>X date, Congress has a lot of time to sit

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 1>around and do nothing, and so it's more likely going

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to be one of those situations where they'll start talking

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 1>about it again. But until the market and until New

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>York comes down and says, folks, you need to start

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>looking at this. We're getting worried, that's when they'll actually

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 1>start negotiating. So I think you'll see some more negotiations,

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>probably in April or May uh, and then certainly more

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>information if that June d gets pushed back out to

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 1>September October. All right, then the two things that I

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 1>always need to keep abreast of, okay, uh, safe banking

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:35.879
<v Speaker 1>so that weed companies can can expand and grow, and

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>then um, the salt tax deduction. What do we know, Nathan,

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>You know I'm not giving you good hopes on either

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of them. I mean when it comes to safe banking. Uh,

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, there was a real opportunity to get it

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:49.199
<v Speaker 1>done last year in the lame duck. Uh. You know,

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna see a catalyst around April twenty if that's

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 1>when the Senate Democrats especially like to yeah exactly that

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:57.680
<v Speaker 1>you'll see a lot of catalysts and a lot of

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:00.400
<v Speaker 1>movement around April twenty. But we just don't it. I mean,

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the one thing for the marijuana industry going right now

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:05.440
<v Speaker 1>is that President Biden has directed his agencies to look

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 1>at reschedulizing, uh every declassifying marijuana. But that's a multi

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 1>Schedule one drug? Is it still a Schedule one drug?

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:17.879
<v Speaker 1>Still a Schedule one drug? And yeah, and you know

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:20.399
<v Speaker 1>it does give the industry hope that a change is coming,

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>but it's a multi year process, and you know, regulations

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>never moved fast. And then on the salt deduction, you know,

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:30.360
<v Speaker 1>we saw the Salt Coalition, the lawmakers from New York

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>and New Jersey give a speech last week outside the

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Capitol Hill and I'm just sorry again for the folks

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 1>in New York and New Jersey. It's just not something

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 1>that I think is gonna happen anytime soon, alright, as

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>long as they don't extend it past Oh that's when

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 1>a sunset, that's when the Trump uh tax thing wears off. Yeah,

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:51.199
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds. Think what will they get done in the

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:54.640
<v Speaker 1>next couple of years? So, you know, I think you're

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to see anti China. You know, anti being

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:01.360
<v Speaker 1>anti China is really popular big tech. You know, there's

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:03.199
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ideas floating around there in terms of

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:06.479
<v Speaker 1>technology right now. That's gonna take some time. But you've

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 1>got to look at these months past pieces of legislation,

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 1>so like the dead stealing the government funding bills and

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 1>so forth. That's when the lobbyists are going to try

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and attach things like the salt deduction uh and potentially

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>try and you know, get government to pass it that way.

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not saying things can't get done. It's just

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not gonna be these gradioseconomic stimulus bills. All right.

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>That's called gridlock, I think is kind of what we Yeah,

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>that's why we give him thirty seconds to tell us

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 1>what Congress is gonna get done exactly, all right, Nathan,

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:33.360
<v Speaker 1>good stuff. If they if they do get anything done,

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 1>give us a ring, and we'll certainly chat about it.

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Nathan Dean, senior policy annals for US and Latin America

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Intelligence. That's right. I mean, I'll tell you

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:45.119
<v Speaker 1>almost nobody on Wall Street has policy annals like we do,

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 1>covered all different parts of the government and where policy

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:51.919
<v Speaker 1>can impact industries and companies. So nobody knows it like

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 1>our Nathans. Nobody knows that like our Nathan's. We're gonna

0:23:54.280 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 1>more coming up. This is Bloomberg. All right. Let's talk

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>about a big, big picture topic here. We're talking E

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:08.120
<v Speaker 1>s G. We're talking diversity um maybe in the technology space,

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>because there's been some some news coming out of Silicon

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:13.399
<v Speaker 1>Valley on that front. And there was a recent op

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 1>ed in Newsweek entitled why Elon Musk and Peter Thiel

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 1>are wrong on E S G Investing? And the person

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:22.159
<v Speaker 1>who wrote that op ed piece isn't Bloomberg in her

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:26.160
<v Speaker 1>active broker studio. Help me out with the pronunciation here, Anniellason.

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 1>She's a founder of Edge and Power. She's based in Zurich,

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:33.399
<v Speaker 1>but she's here in our Bloomberg in actor broker studio today.

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 1>How good is that? Aniella? Thanks so much for joining us.

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:39.119
<v Speaker 1>Here talk to us about why you wrote this OpEd

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:40.919
<v Speaker 1>and what are some of the key takeaways from your

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 1>operator as you think about diversity inequality. Thank you for

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>having me so. One of the main reasons why we

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 1>wrote that opened is that, of course, with all the

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:54.440
<v Speaker 1>layoffs that are going on in the tech sector right now,

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the big question is why should companies continue their investments

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>in diversity equita susan. Are these investments only making sense

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 1>when things are going well and times are good, and

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 1>it is this disposable investment in that times. And there

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 1>are three reasons why we believe that companies should continue

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 1>their dn I investments also in tougher times, in times

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of dayoffs. First and foremost, it's because study after study

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>shows positive correlation between profitability and diversity. The most recent

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 1>one published in January by the World Economic Forum shows

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:42.119
<v Speaker 1>that ethnically diverse and gender diverse companies outperformed their industry

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 1>peers in terms of profitability by thirty six percent and

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty five per cent. That is fascinating because I would

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 1>expect and our performance in terms of revenue growth. Right

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>if you want to sell more stuff to more people,

0:25:57.440 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>you need to get more people to sell that stuff

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:04.120
<v Speaker 1>right um in a sense, But profitability is an even

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:06.440
<v Speaker 1>more interesting metric. Why why do you think that is?

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that profitability is also related to the capacity

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 1>of the organization to show agility, to adapt to changing

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>market conditions, to show resilience, and to show an increased

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 1>capacity to innovate. And all these are positively correlated with

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:26.159
<v Speaker 1>a more diverse workforce. So just looking at your that

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 1>was only one three oh three, gore you just jump

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 1>in all the time. What's reason number two? Why we

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:34.879
<v Speaker 1>should care about reason number two is that we should

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:38.200
<v Speaker 1>really care about people who stay in the workforce, So

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>we should really give them some good news and positive

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>vibes and showing them that we need them to stay

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:48.640
<v Speaker 1>engaged as opposed to quiet equitters, as opposed to quiet quitters.

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>And very interestingly, a Gallop study show that in the

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 1>US right now, the number one reason for diverse talent,

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>women and other historically underrepresented groups to join or to

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:09.639
<v Speaker 1>stay a company is how well they feel respected, what

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:12.399
<v Speaker 1>is their work life balance, and what is their personal

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:15.360
<v Speaker 1>well being taken care of in the workplace. So these

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 1>are key ingredients for engagement. Alongside it's a good motivator

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>is basically what you're saying exactly. What's number three. Number

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 1>three is that, of course we need to take a

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 1>long term view of diversity, equity and inclusion. We cannot

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:32.479
<v Speaker 1>continue considering it as a layer on top of an

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:36.360
<v Speaker 1>organizational core purpose. It's fundamental to it because it's investment

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 1>in people. So there has been. Number three is a

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 1>little softer than I think. Number three is a little

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 1>bit wishier, washier than number I mean, number one. I

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:47.160
<v Speaker 1>get it, you're driving the bottom line. Number two, okay,

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 1>you're motivating your soldiers. Number three, we should because we should,

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>well not exactly. In the last three months, one in

0:27:56.040 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 1>four American employees where truth it whether they were looking

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 1>actively for an opportunity or not, and thirty nine percent

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of those decline a job offer because the company could

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 1>not demonstrate their commitments to diversity, equity inclusion. Now, in

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:18.159
<v Speaker 1>a market where there is a lot of competing demand

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 1>for talent, being able to demonstrate long term commitment to

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:25.720
<v Speaker 1>that gives you an edge in terms of attracting, retaining,

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and motivating the best talent. Okay, sorry, now go ahead, Sorry,

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:32.679
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to get through those I know. Let

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 1>me take the other side. Of the coins. Some influential

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 1>folks out there, Elon Musk, the pushing back on this stuff.

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk recently called E s G the devil. Peter

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Teel's out there and some others, Bill Actman and so

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 1>on and so forth. What is there? And we've had

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 1>effect Ramaswani come in here and say he's telling companies

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>just focused on profits, don't worry about social stuff. He

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>would like reason number one, He might even like reason

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 1>number two. He might. Yeah, So what's the pushback that

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 1>that you in the s G community are seeing from

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 1>some of these folks. Yes, So I think that that

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the main pushback is related exactly to what you said. E.

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>S G is perceived as wishy washy. And why is

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 1>E s G perceived as wishy washy Because we do

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 1>not feel that we can measure some of the aspects

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>behind the s G, especially behind the S and behind

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the G taxonomy just isn't there in objective ways. We

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 1>cannot agree how material some of those topics are, and

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 1>we cannot agree to some standards of excellence when it

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 1>comes to the s G. So because we cannot make

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 1>that link, which is undoubtedly there, we tend to think

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 1>that E s G it is an afterthought and it's

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 1>destroying shareholder value, while e s G is about creating

0:29:46.120 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 1>sustainable shareholder value and keeping the company competitive long term. Well,

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 1>see the argument the background a Swami would make if

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you were here. Actually I can't speak for him, no,

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 1>but I would guess he would say, Look, my number

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 1>one motivation is profit, and if I need to put

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 1>uh some environmental or social concerns aside for that, I'm

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 1>going to do it. Yes, I think that you will

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 1>always have investors. You might think that's short sided. Well,

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's his opinion and he's entitled to

0:30:18.920 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 1>have it. I think that the beauty of guessing that's

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 1>his opinion. I can't. We haven't have both of you

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 1>on together. That would be a very good conversation. I

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 1>think that the idea of it is to go beyond

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 1>this very polarized view. I think that there will always

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 1>be companies and investors that will take that view. Our

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 1>focus is profit, profit only short term, and there will

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>be companies who will take a longer term view of

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 1>how they create value for their stakeholders, and the two

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 1>can coexist. We just have to make sure that we

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 1>there are very clear signs because they will always be

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:55.960
<v Speaker 1>people who want to work for one company or to

0:30:56.080 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the or or the other, or who would want to

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 1>invest in one rather than the other. Well, in this

0:31:00.720 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 1>E s G also seems to me in a sense

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:08.479
<v Speaker 1>like um the crypto industry, in that it's nascent, right,

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:14.160
<v Speaker 1>it's still growing up and getting into its adolescence. We

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 1>just started talking about this really a decade ago, and

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 1>we haven't developed the classifications, we haven't developed the metrics,

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 1>standard metrics that we all agree on yet, but we're

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 1>doing that. For example, you help Bloomberg work on the

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 1>gender Equality Index, don't you so? And as we get

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 1>more metrics like that, and you can show investors, hey,

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 1>look this chart goes up and to the right, then

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna get on board. Yes, And I think that,

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, coming from Europe, I think that Europe is

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit further ahead when it comes to creating

0:31:47.920 --> 0:31:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that taxonomy and creating that clarity around the debate. Because

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that I still believe needs to

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:57.840
<v Speaker 1>be clarified is that E s G and E s

0:31:57.920 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 1>G investments do not necessarily imply a focus on having

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:07.880
<v Speaker 1>a positive E s G related impact E s G

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 1>investment can be simply considering the E s G related

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 1>risks as part of a certain number of risks in

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:22.360
<v Speaker 1>evaluating the risk of the portfolio. Or it can be

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:26.719
<v Speaker 1>considering E s G risks as being the main risks.

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Or it can be impact investment, which is making investments

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>with the intent to have a positive E s G impact.

0:32:36.040 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a big broad bucket, it is, and I think

0:32:38.520 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 1>that there is confusion between the outcome and the process

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 1>in some of these conversations, right yea. Or just just

0:32:45.920 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to let you know how seriously Bloomberg the terminal takes

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 1>E s G. If you go to one of the

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 1>most widely used functions for financial analysis on the Bloomber terminal,

0:32:53.960 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 1>f A, go for any ticker right up there with

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the income statement, the balance sheet, the cash low statement,

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a tab for E s G M the clip

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 1>on that tab you'll see all the E s G

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 1>metrics on a historical basis that Bloomberg captures for these companies.

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 1>So uh, it's you know, just from the Bloomberg perspective.

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 1>In terms of the efficacy of the data, we value

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 1>it as we would income statement data, balance sheet data.

0:33:17.920 --> 0:33:20.719
<v Speaker 1>Think things like we're trying to build that function exactly right,

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and I would imagine we're working with people I cannela

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to do it. Yeah. So, and I think that you know,

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 1>another way to look at the s G E s

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:34.720
<v Speaker 1>G is being good ancestors, right, it's behaving respectfully knowing

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that we live in a world with limited resources and

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 1>thinking what kind of a planet, what kind of economy,

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 1>what kind of the social fabric we leave to the

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 1>seventh generation down the line? Ye great stuff, An Godson,

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 1>founder of Edge Empower based in Geneva. I believe right,

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:58.480
<v Speaker 1>zurch Geneva, zur Okay, good stuff. Join the University of Geneva,

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 1>NBA from university and even why didn't I think of

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:03.240
<v Speaker 1>that Duke was fun, but Geneva would have been maybe

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:05.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better. Joining us here in a blubern

0:34:05.120 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Actor broker studio. We're breaking down talking all the E.

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 1>S G stuff. It continues to be get big issue

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 1>for investors. Market sharply lower here this morning. I got

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 1>that print of inflation um kind of suggesting maybe some

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 1>folks are saying, maybe this friend is gonna stay a

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:24.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit higher for longer. Uh, let's check in with

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:29.200
<v Speaker 1>two Sharma founder and investment manager of Alpha Structure l

0:34:29.400 --> 0:34:33.280
<v Speaker 1>l C. Two. We had that big inflation print this morning.

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 1>What do you've had, you know, a few hours here

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:39.279
<v Speaker 1>to die digested? What do you make of it? Hi,

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 1>thank you for having me. Uh. Clearly we're seeing, um,

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 1>some metrics of inflation come down, but we're seeing others increase. Overall,

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the inflation dynamics remains uh, unprereddictable. I think it's hard

0:34:55.760 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 1>to say, um, how the numbers are going to pan

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 1>out over the next few months, but I think we

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 1>can clearly say that inflation is not coming down at

0:35:07.360 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the rate that Fred would like to see. Um, we are.

0:35:12.640 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 1>It's possible last year we've seen goods inflation come down,

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:22.480
<v Speaker 1>but services remain higher. And it's possible that some of

0:35:22.600 --> 0:35:25.400
<v Speaker 1>that consumer spending last year, which was more driven by

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:28.920
<v Speaker 1>travel and leisures, some of may come back to goods

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 1>again this year. So I think um, UM, I think

0:35:34.719 --> 0:35:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the Fed is um. It's I think the Freed is

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:42.719
<v Speaker 1>likely to say, uh in that inflation control mode and

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:45.880
<v Speaker 1>they want to keep the interest rates higher for longer.

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:51.239
<v Speaker 1>So I mean we rallied into this number yesterday. Um.

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, equities really have been on a tear since

0:35:54.680 --> 0:36:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the October lows. We're trading at four thousand, one hundred basically,

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:05.920
<v Speaker 1>which is in line with strategists expectations for the year end.

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:10.400
<v Speaker 1>So in that case, I mean, aren't we too highly

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:14.919
<v Speaker 1>valued here at you know, eighteen times earnings? I think

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I actually agree with you. I think equity valuations are

0:36:19.160 --> 0:36:21.719
<v Speaker 1>are very high, and it is It's a bit of

0:36:21.760 --> 0:36:25.440
<v Speaker 1>a surprise to me also given the disconnect between the

0:36:25.520 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 1>bond market and the equity markets, because we've seen yields

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:32.400
<v Speaker 1>rise across the short end and the long end in

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:35.920
<v Speaker 1>light of some of this recent data, we've seen the

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 1>economic data being very strong and the risk of a

0:36:38.680 --> 0:36:44.120
<v Speaker 1>recession getting uh pushed back. UM. The labor market is

0:36:44.239 --> 0:36:47.719
<v Speaker 1>remains very strong, so there is no reason for the

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Fed to come around and cut right right now. They

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:54.839
<v Speaker 1>can focus on this inflation dynamic because the unemployment data

0:36:54.920 --> 0:36:59.880
<v Speaker 1>remains UH very strong. And so to see the equity

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:04.400
<v Speaker 1>markets rally like they have given all this uh, you know,

0:37:04.560 --> 0:37:09.239
<v Speaker 1>the the underlying interest rate environment remaining UM in a

0:37:09.400 --> 0:37:14.719
<v Speaker 1>tightening space is surprising and and I think partly it

0:37:14.880 --> 0:37:17.439
<v Speaker 1>is driven by the fact that, yes, we have seen

0:37:17.680 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the econ me stronger the corporate turnings for not as

0:37:21.960 --> 0:37:26.080
<v Speaker 1>weak as sphere, So there's some positive around that. But

0:37:26.320 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 1>partly I think it has a lot of It has

0:37:28.760 --> 0:37:32.279
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of positioning. The biggest positioning that we

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:36.239
<v Speaker 1>had in the last year. Uh, that's playing right now.

0:37:36.760 --> 0:37:38.799
<v Speaker 1>Now let's put this in. Let's put this key too

0:37:38.880 --> 0:37:43.440
<v Speaker 1>into perspective. So listeners understand, before you founded Alpha's future, um,

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:46.719
<v Speaker 1>and after you graduated long in business school, you went

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:50.359
<v Speaker 1>on to really have a broad career. You worked at

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:54.080
<v Speaker 1>an insurance company, you were a credit ratings analyst, you

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:56.719
<v Speaker 1>were in equities at Credit Suite, and then picked Ted

0:37:56.760 --> 0:38:00.920
<v Speaker 1>asset Management. So you've you've been across as sets and

0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:04.160
<v Speaker 1>in regions around the world. What what are we heading

0:38:04.239 --> 0:38:06.200
<v Speaker 1>for right now? What does it look like to you?

0:38:06.360 --> 0:38:12.480
<v Speaker 1>This you know, recession that's so widely forecast globally. Thank

0:38:12.520 --> 0:38:17.319
<v Speaker 1>you for the uh you know, sharing my background. Uh yeah,

0:38:17.480 --> 0:38:21.120
<v Speaker 1>it has been UM. I mean, I think the the

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 1>diversity of perspective I have really helped me look at

0:38:25.160 --> 0:38:29.600
<v Speaker 1>markets from different angles. And uh, what we're seeing right

0:38:29.680 --> 0:38:32.880
<v Speaker 1>now is that your base rates based interest rates, the

0:38:33.040 --> 0:38:36.799
<v Speaker 1>risk free rates are going up. The real rates are high,

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:42.000
<v Speaker 1>but the equity the premium, which is the excess reward

0:38:42.360 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you you want for taking equity equity risk that is

0:38:46.120 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 1>coming down and UM and that is a disconnect given that, uh,

0:38:52.560 --> 0:38:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, ultimately we've we've seen peak economy and UM

0:38:56.880 --> 0:39:01.239
<v Speaker 1>an inflation outlook is still very high. So UM, I

0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:04.320
<v Speaker 1>think from our valuation standpoint, we really have to be

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:07.399
<v Speaker 1>careful about what we buy right now. We don't want

0:39:07.480 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to indiscriminately change this market rally. We should at least

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 1>from our perspective, what we're recommending to our investors is

0:39:15.600 --> 0:39:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to focus on companies that have quality, that can that

0:39:20.480 --> 0:39:25.040
<v Speaker 1>have frightened power, that have valuation support uh, rather than

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:29.480
<v Speaker 1>those which are interest rate sensitive and therefore uh you know,

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:34.200
<v Speaker 1>may suffer from just reduction and valuation multiples. So what

0:39:34.280 --> 0:39:36.360
<v Speaker 1>are some of the examples that fit into the bucket

0:39:36.400 --> 0:39:38.480
<v Speaker 1>that you feel like are higher quality, perhaps a little

0:39:38.520 --> 0:39:42.759
<v Speaker 1>bit bit safer in this uncertain time. So we are

0:39:42.840 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 1>looking at value opportunities and industrials, healthcare, also technology. UH.

0:39:48.880 --> 0:39:52.920
<v Speaker 1>The companies that have uh you know, have some structural

0:39:53.040 --> 0:39:58.280
<v Speaker 1>mega trends and can grow with the with the economy. Also,

0:39:58.840 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, at a global level, companies that can grow

0:40:01.120 --> 0:40:05.959
<v Speaker 1>with the China reopening story and Europe recovering from last

0:40:06.080 --> 0:40:12.480
<v Speaker 1>year's kind of energy crisis. Um. And also quality defenses

0:40:12.640 --> 0:40:15.239
<v Speaker 1>that can that have pur chasing power and can you

0:40:15.280 --> 0:40:20.600
<v Speaker 1>know pass on cost inflation that have pricing powers. Um. Yeah,

0:40:21.160 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 1>it's more it's less about selecting sectors, but more about

0:40:26.360 --> 0:40:31.600
<v Speaker 1>looking at companies within sectors that can sustain um, the

0:40:31.760 --> 0:40:35.520
<v Speaker 1>growth environment and the inflation environment and higher interest rates

0:40:35.560 --> 0:40:39.799
<v Speaker 1>from evaluation standpoint, versus those that might be at risk.

0:40:40.560 --> 0:40:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Thank you too. I'm not sure how much you guys

0:40:43.040 --> 0:40:45.440
<v Speaker 1>traffic in the energy space, but the energy stocks are

0:40:45.520 --> 0:40:47.719
<v Speaker 1>just such a great year last year, and I'm looking

0:40:47.760 --> 0:40:52.440
<v Speaker 1>at bring fruit it barrel. Did I miss that trade

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:58.120
<v Speaker 1>or do you think they're still room to go in energy? Um? See? Energy,

0:40:58.200 --> 0:41:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I think is a hard one to forecast. We don't

0:41:01.719 --> 0:41:05.320
<v Speaker 1>do We don't do commodity forecasting, so uh, and we

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:07.719
<v Speaker 1>don't play in the energy space because we have a

0:41:07.800 --> 0:41:13.320
<v Speaker 1>focus on sustainability. UM. But I think UM, I mean clearly,

0:41:13.360 --> 0:41:16.359
<v Speaker 1>if if we do see commodity prices go up, both

0:41:16.640 --> 0:41:20.879
<v Speaker 1>energy and other commodities, uh, I mean one, it would

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:25.360
<v Speaker 1>be a sign of global economies doing well. Um. But

0:41:25.600 --> 0:41:29.640
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, I think more widely. It can

0:41:29.760 --> 0:41:35.960
<v Speaker 1>have a negative impact on global equities from my inflation standpoint. Alright,

0:41:36.000 --> 0:41:38.440
<v Speaker 1>great stuff. I really appreciate getting a few minutes of

0:41:38.480 --> 0:41:42.040
<v Speaker 1>your time. That is to Sharma Founder, an investment manager

0:41:42.160 --> 0:41:45.239
<v Speaker 1>for Alpha's Futures ll C. A little bit of an

0:41:45.280 --> 0:41:48.640
<v Speaker 1>e s G bed there, Matt kind of sustainability, another

0:41:48.719 --> 0:41:52.759
<v Speaker 1>investor incorporating that into their investment framework. We're hearing more

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:54.719
<v Speaker 1>and more of that. Yeah, yeah, we are. I mean,

0:41:54.800 --> 0:41:56.800
<v Speaker 1>it's an interesting debate that's that's going on. But it

0:41:56.880 --> 0:41:59.040
<v Speaker 1>looks like, um, you can see where the road is

0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 1>going at this point. It doesn't look like we're gonna

0:42:01.719 --> 0:42:04.279
<v Speaker 1>turn back, so it makes a lot of sense. All right, good,

0:42:04.320 --> 0:42:06.240
<v Speaker 1>So I forgot more coming up. We've got the equity

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:09.200
<v Speaker 1>market selling off today. We'll break it down for you

0:42:09.320 --> 0:42:17.520
<v Speaker 1>going forward. This is Bloomberg. Good morning. Thanks for listening

0:42:17.560 --> 0:42:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen

0:42:21.080 --> 0:42:25.319
<v Speaker 1>to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:42:25.760 --> 0:42:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller. P

0:42:30.360 --> 0:42:32.919
<v Speaker 1>On fall Sweeney I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before

0:42:32.960 --> 0:42:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg

0:42:35.880 --> 0:42:36.080
<v Speaker 1>radio