WEBVTT - A Top Antitrust Lawyer on How Increased Competition Could Fight Inflation

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of The Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:18.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe Wasn't Joe? Have I

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>ever told you my favorite conspiracy theory? Uh? No, but

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not surprised you have a favorite conspiracy theory. I

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know what it is. However, I'll try not to

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>take that personally. Um, but my favorite conspiracy theory is

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>a favorite and has something to do with a silver

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:40.880
<v Speaker 1>price suppression. Well, now, wait a second, that conspiracy theory

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:44.879
<v Speaker 1>actually turned out to be true. But anyway, Okay, we're

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>going to go on a really long tangent if we

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>keep heading in that direction. No, my favorite conspiracy theory

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>is well, it has to do with inflation, um, and

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>eggs and cholesterol. And yeah, this is a good one.

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Not many people know this, but in the nineteen sixties

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>when there was high inflation and uh, the president was

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>very worried about it. This is Lyndon B. Johnson. Back then,

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:11.120
<v Speaker 1>he was trying to come up with all these different

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:15.319
<v Speaker 1>ways to maybe get prices to start coming down, and

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the things he did was target eggs and

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>he basically told the Surgeon General to issue alerts um

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 1>all about the risk of cholesterol in eggs to try

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>to get people to buy fewer of them. And you know,

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 1>even to this day, people still think there's lots of

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>cholesterol in eggs and that they're unhealthy. And a lot

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>of that traces back to Lyndon Johnson trying to fight

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 1>inflation fifty years ago or sixty years ago. I should say, So,

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>you said this is a conspiracy theory, But is it true,

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Like did this actually happen or is it just people

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>think this was the sequence of events? No? No, no,

0:01:55.680 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>this actually happened. But basically there was a conspiracy to

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>tell the public that eggs were terribly unhealthy when in

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 1>fact they aren't. That's crazy. So the reason I'm bringing

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:13.119
<v Speaker 1>it up is because there are clearly concerns about inflation

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>right now. I think um CPI is at something like

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>six point eight percent, and when people think about inflation,

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the first thing their minds turned to is

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>interest rates and monetary policy. Inflation is high, so maybe

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the Fed should start raising rates, But of course there

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>are these different ways to actually try to bring prices down. Right.

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>This is really the key thing, which is that you know, obviously,

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, people think of inflation is the purview of

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the FED and monetary policy and monetary aggregate Milton Friedman,

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Inflation is always an everywhere monetary phenomenon. But like we

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>see it this year, if we had if we had

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>had to say, like more used cars or more semiconductors

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 1>to make cars or etcetera, we know that headline inflation

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 1>would be lower, and that's just a fact. And so

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>like we clearly see the existence, especially right now, what

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I would say is non monetary inflation. And maybe some

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:15.799
<v Speaker 1>economists would get annoyed by that or they would disagree

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, but like we could point to maybe overall

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:21.639
<v Speaker 1>it's not just about bottlenecks or whatever, but we could

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly point to at times the existence of forces that

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>are not clearly related to the faith that push up

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:32.519
<v Speaker 1>the aggregates of price and disease without question. And you know,

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:35.119
<v Speaker 1>in other areas like medical care, like and I don't

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>think like the high cost of medical care is something

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that like obviously is attributable to monetary policy, no um.

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 1>And we are starting to see politicians pay more attention

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to these specific issues. So we've been talking a lot

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 1>about attempts to ease supply chain congestion, and I have

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to say one of the more interesting efforts that is

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>currently going on has to do with antitrust legislation, which

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>is not necessarily something that you would think of when

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>you think of supply chain problems. Yeah, no, I think

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>that's like really interesting. And you know, obviously these are

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of like slow moving things and they're probably a

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>limit to what you could do in the next few months.

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>But the idea that a few companies have incredible amount

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>of buying power because of concentration, because of lack of competition,

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>it seems like a very interesting avenue and one that

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:33.839
<v Speaker 1>even at least in the medium to longer term, if

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:36.840
<v Speaker 1>not right away in the next few months, could increase

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the sort of like productive capacity overall if we have

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 1>more competitive markets exactly. So we are going to be

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:47.480
<v Speaker 1>digging into that question of whether or not you can

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>use antitrust enforcement to try to bring down inflation and

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>ease some of these supply constraints bring down things like

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>food prices. And we do have the perfect guest to

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about. We're going to be speaking with Craig Sebald.

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>He's a partner at Vincent and Alkins and an expert

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 1>in anti trust. So, Craig, welcome to the show. Well,

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Tracy and Joe, it's my pleasure to be with you,

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:14.039
<v Speaker 1>and I'm excited to talk to you about some of

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>my favorite subjects, anti trust, politics, and a little history. Great,

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I had a question for you too. I really I

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:22.600
<v Speaker 1>worked on this because it's hard to combine a joke

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 1>that includes anti trust and supply chain. But here it goes,

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:28.919
<v Speaker 1>how many anti trust lawyers does it take to change

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>a light bulb? How many? None? The light bulbs are

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 1>late and not shipping. So that was pretty good. I

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>like it. I like it. It's solid, it's tough materially

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>anti trust. That's the best I can do. Well, I mean,

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>on that note, maybe you could just to begin with

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you could start by defining what antitrust actually is and

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>how it could relate to supply chain problems. Yeah, let

0:05:56.880 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>me just give you a quick overview. In the United

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the States, we have three basic antitrust laws, and well,

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, high prices in ament themselves are

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>not in any trust violation. We do worry and the

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>greatest sin for the any trust area is actions that

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 1>were that cause higher prices. So we have three laws

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>as always saying. One is the Sherman Act, and the

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>German Act goes back to have Sherman Act Section one,

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>which regulates agreements and restraint and trade, and we're looking

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:34.480
<v Speaker 1>at price fixing, bid rigging, those type of agreements between

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>competitors that raise prices. Those are illegal. The second major

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>antitrust law we have is Section two of the Sherman Act,

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>which regulates monopolies. This is getting a lot of press

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>these days because the government's challenges to Google, to facebooks,

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:55.040
<v Speaker 1>those are all under Section two. What's interesting under our law,

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not illegal in the United States to be a monopolist,

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:02.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's illegal to engage in monopolization. And what do

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean by that. It means it's okay to be

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>big in the United States, but it's not okay to

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>be big and do bad things. And one of the

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>bad things could be taking actions to raise prices. And

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>so one of the things that we worry about with

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the big tech companies is what actions they're doing to

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>make markets less competitive. And then finally, we have our

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>merger control laws, which go back to the Clayton Next

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>section seven, which regulate anti competitive mergers. And when we

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 1>review mergers, and we have a whole regime here in

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the United States. Um and actually we have a unique

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>system in the United States because we have to antitrust agencies.

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>One wasn't apparently not good enough for the United States.

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>We have the Justice Department Antitrust Division and the Federal

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Trade Commission, both with authority to investigate matters under the

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>intrust draws challenged mergers. And the greatest sin with mergers

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>is a merger that increases concentration and raises prices. So

0:07:57.240 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>increased prices through bad actions are something that the antitrust

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>laws are good at going after. So let me ask

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>you a question about anti trust as applied. Because there

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>is our antitrust regulation, there is an impression and that

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>in recent years that by and large anti trust on

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>any of the avenues that you identified has not been

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 1>pursued particularly vigorously. That in the past our anti trust

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>laws were taken more seriously, that regulator has had a

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>greater appetite to enforce them, whatever they are, and that

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 1>by and large these days there's not a lot of

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:35.319
<v Speaker 1>regulatory activity, or there hasn't been up until recently. Is

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:38.080
<v Speaker 1>that a fair characterization or is that just sort of

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 1>like a medium meth, you know, I would say it's

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a mixed record. Over the last few years, we are clearly,

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I think, poise for much more antitrust enforcement. The Biden

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 1>administration any trust regulators are very aggressive and has signaled

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to be aggressive in the market. There's

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:59.679
<v Speaker 1>almost an attitude of what's happened before didn't work, We're

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna change things and do more. When I say it's

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:05.839
<v Speaker 1>a mixed record, when we look at enforcement, we've been

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>fairly strong in terms of our criminal enforcement, and that's

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:11.320
<v Speaker 1>an important point. The anti trust laws in the United

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 1>States are prosecuted both criminally, so people go to jail

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>for anti trust crimes and civilly, and so the criminal

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 1>enforcement program has been very active. In the last twenty years.

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 1>There's been a lot of cases involving international cartels, and

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>both Republican and Democratic administrations have gone after them. There's

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>been a fairly rigorous merger enforcement, although I think there's

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>questions about whether we've let too many mergers go through,

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and we'll talk about that as we talk about shipping.

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>The one area there hasn't been many cases, and I

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:45.439
<v Speaker 1>do signal a change in this is the monopolization cases

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you look at, you know, just a couple of years ago,

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>we were bringing zero monopoly cases and uh, that started

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>to change at the end of the Trump administration with

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the high tech suits, and so I think they're looking

0:09:57.160 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to reinvigorate the monopolization cases that they're they're looking at

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 1>these days. So you sort of tease this a few

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>minutes ago when you when you mentioned that we're going

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:11.679
<v Speaker 1>to get into some history. But one of the interesting

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>things when it comes to supply chains and antitrust is

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 1>that there's actually a carve out for shipping companies. So

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>there's an antitrust exemption. Could you maybe walk us through

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:29.559
<v Speaker 1>what that is and how that came to be. So

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>in the antitrust general, there are exemptions to the antitrust rules.

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>The courts have been very consistent in saying anti trust

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>exemption should be applied very carefully and they should construed

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 1>very nearly. One of the most famous antitrust exemptions that

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:49.679
<v Speaker 1>exist is Major League Baseball. There is an exemption from

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Major League Baseball. They are not challenged. What's interesting, They

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 1>get the benefit of that. But other professional sports football,

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the n c a, A, golf, others words don't have

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the benefit of that. So that's a very famous one.

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>And actually there was some concern the summer over even

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that exemption, because when Baseball decided not to have its

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:13.079
<v Speaker 1>um All Star Game in Georgia this summer, there was

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>some talk about getting read of that exemption. Putting that

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:19.560
<v Speaker 1>side talking about the shipping exemption. So it goes back

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to this notion that shipping used to be a highly

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 1>regulated area, and so because of the highly regulatory nature

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 1>of it, that there was felt that the shippers would

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 1>need to be able to work together to organize how

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 1>they ship freight, to maximize storage capacity, to work together

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>on rates, and so because of this regulatory structure, there

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>was given an antitrust exemption, and the exemption allowed that

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that the shippers could agree on rates tariffs they charge

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 1>so long as those were filed with the Federal Maritime

0:11:56.679 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Commission and approved by the Federal Maritime Commission. So you

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>can have a classic cartel, but so long as under

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>this exemption they were filed with the Federal Maritime Commission,

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>it was allowed. That's kind of evolved over the years

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>as we've had deregulation in the shipping industry, so that

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>there is still then exemption, but it's fairly limited. You

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 1>can still technically file tariffs, but people don't do that.

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>All the shipping contracts are private contracts these days, so

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 1>those are those are not any trust exempt. Where the

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:36.439
<v Speaker 1>exemption really lies is that you can have what they

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:39.200
<v Speaker 1>call conferences, and I think that's just a light way

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 1>to talk about competitor meetings where you can have competitor

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:46.199
<v Speaker 1>meetings where they can talk about rates, but they can't

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>agree upon the rates. Now they have to if they

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>have if they talk about them. Again, it's this filing notion. Uh,

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>they still have to file what they're talking about with

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:58.319
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Maritime Commission, but they can't agree on it.

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>So it's a little odd, I have to admit, because

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a pretty fine line to be able to say, oh,

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:08.080
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna talk about rates and have a general agreement

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that we may or may not agree to. So it's

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a pretty fine line and it causes I think a

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of issues in the shipping industry. And as you say,

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:19.839
<v Speaker 1>it's not just one of the shipping industry. We see

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>this in some other industries as well. So, first of all,

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to shipping, and you know, this is

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 1>this is an area we've talked about a fair amount.

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Most of these companies are US based, and I'm just

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>curious or the big ones anyway that we talked about.

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm just curious about the extent to which US regulators

0:13:56.480 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 1>have reached into this space versus you know, how much

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:04.080
<v Speaker 1>does that further challenge the ability of US regulators, even

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>in any legal regime, to do anything on shipping competitiveness

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the US Any trust laws, I would say, are not

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>unlimited in their jurisdiction, but very fulsome in their jurisdictions.

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 1>So any action caused by a foreign company that has

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>a direct enforeseeable effect on US commerce is subject to

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>challenge by the Justice Department. So you could have a conspiracy.

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>We see this all the time in the cases I

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 1>work on, where two companies to business people of real

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>prices in some foreign country. They're even in the United States,

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, the US government can go challenge them and

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>challenge the conduct in US sports. So a couple of

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>years ago, there's this coalition of the shipping companies. They

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 1>get together and talk about race, talking about something that

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 1>we're just talking about under the exemption, and they came

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 1>to San Francisco for their meeting. You knew who visited

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>their meeting. Anti trust lawyers and the FBI. They came

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>in and rated this meeting and they handed out subpoenas

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to everybody in the room. So I can you imagine

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you're in this hotel room with all these your it's, it's, it's,

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a group of shipping executives, and it's all

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the CEOs, all the top guys. So they all come

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to San Francisco for this meeting to talk about these

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>things that they're allowed to talk about under the exemption,

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and who bust in is the FBI and the entrut

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Division handing out subpoenas like their candy. Clearly they did

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 1>this investigation was interesting. They did an investigation of the

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>shipping industry. I think they were worried about the alliances

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>and some of the other things. Ultimately there were no

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>action brought, so uh, you know, I think the exemptions

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 1>did take a bit of a part of that and

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>why the Justice Department didn't move forward on that. But

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>it just shows you that the view that here you

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>had thirteen fourteen four and executives all getting subpoenas, so

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>that the jurisdiction is very broad from the Justice Department's perspective,

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Why don't we get into um like specific actions that

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the US government the antitrust authorities could take in order

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to remedy supply chain issues, because we already mentioned shipping,

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that's one aspect of it. But of course another thing

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 1>they could do is try to go after large monopoly

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>players in consumer goods and try to bring down prices

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>that way. So could you maybe get into some specifics

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 1>of what could happen here, what sort of enforcement actions

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>are realistic. So there are several actually that are ongoing

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. The Federal Train Commission just announced that

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>they're doing an investigation of the supply chain issues. They

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>sent out inquiries to a number of US companies. These

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 1>are the big companies like Amazon, Broger, Procter, and Gambill Tysons,

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>those that are trying to bring products in the United

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 1>States to try to understand what the problems are. So

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the first step. They're doing an investigation. Now, this

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 1>is under a rule at the FTC that allows the

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>FTC to investigate industry wide practices that may have any

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 1>trust problems. So this is really a first step This

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>is to say, is there an any trust competitive problem?

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>What that could lead to if they say, gee, they're

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 1>do soon to be any trust problems are investigations. The

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Justice Department or the FTC could open up civil The

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:26.159
<v Speaker 1>Justice Department could open a civil or criminal investigation of

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>thinks that there are any trust problems. One of the

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>problems about any trust though, is it is very very slow.

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 1>So while we have these problems now, you know, investigation

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 1>can take a year, two years. All any trust cases

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 1>are driven by documents and evidence. It takes a long time,

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 1>especially if you're getting them from foreign companies. It's it's

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 1>can be troubling. There's issues about getting them from foreign companies.

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Quite frankly, foreign companies like China have blocking statutes which

0:17:58.000 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>don't allow foreign companies to reduced documents to the U.

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>S Government without the Chinese governments signing off on it.

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:07.120
<v Speaker 1>And so these investigations can get bogged down. And then

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:10.400
<v Speaker 1>even if they bring a case, anti trust cases are

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 1>super slow, and so you could have a case filed

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and not even have a court date for four or five, six,

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:22.160
<v Speaker 1>seven years. So we could be on three different supply

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:25.200
<v Speaker 1>chain events past where we are today, before we start

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:28.640
<v Speaker 1>having any trust case about what's happening right now. So

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>any trust can be helpful, but it's certainly not an

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:37.399
<v Speaker 1>immediate solution to the problems we're having today. So this

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>actually leads me right into my next question. And you know,

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 1>we sort of said in the intro it's like, oh, right,

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:44.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, well, we're talking about inflation right now. Anti

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>trust isn't going to do anything in the next few months.

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>But one of the themes that we come back to

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:52.479
<v Speaker 1>a lot on this show is that a lot of

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:55.159
<v Speaker 1>what we've run into now is this sort of like

0:18:55.280 --> 0:19:00.119
<v Speaker 1>compounding price that we pay for diminished markets or at

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>your feed markets. And we had this long period after

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:06.399
<v Speaker 1>the Great Financial Crisis in which many industries, maybe due

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to you know, usually talk about mediocre growth or mediocre

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and demand simply did not invest particularly much in capacity,

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and we pay the price. Now, maybe we don't pay

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the price during periods of low demand, but as soon

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 1>as GDP grows rapidly, we pay the price of atrophied capacity.

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 1>And I'm curious, like, okay, long term, like yeah, or

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 1>we accepted in the short term anti trust can't do much,

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>but what about in the medium or longer term, like

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:35.200
<v Speaker 1>is the idea that if we had more robust anti

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>trust and we had more competitive markets as the norm,

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:44.159
<v Speaker 1>that perhaps productive economic capacity overall in any cycle would

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:48.159
<v Speaker 1>be greater than it is today. I think that's true.

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you'll see it, especially in merger enforcement. When

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I was in law school, I had a professor that

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>talked about the fact that we see every forty years

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of the antitrust pendulums wing. When I was going

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:04.880
<v Speaker 1>to law school was right after the Regaan administration. Regulation

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>was disfavored, let the markets do their own thing, let

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>not have very big government enforcement. And I think you're

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>starting to see this movement towards more regulation towards more enforcement.

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I think there is a realization by some of our lawmakers,

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>by some of our regulators that maybe they let things

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 1>go too far. So if you look, for instance, I'm

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>involved in the case right now against some of the

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:35.439
<v Speaker 1>railroad companies for some logistics issues for some fees that

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:38.439
<v Speaker 1>they put in place almost twenty years ago at this point.

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 1>But you're like a railroad industry. We used to have

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 1>a very vibrant railroad industry with lots of competitors. It

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 1>was highly regulated then we had this movement and make

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:50.440
<v Speaker 1>it not regulated, and now we're down to four major

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 1>railroads which control almost of all the all the railroad

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>traffic in the United States. And the same as was shipping,

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:02.680
<v Speaker 1>you had a American competitors, you have foreign competitors. From

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 1>I understand, now you're down to basically nine shippers of

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 1>control almost all of the export products in the United States.

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 1>There are no US producers. And on top of it,

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you have these three alliances. And so I think you're

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:19.360
<v Speaker 1>starting to see people say, did we go too far

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and letting some of these mergers go through? And so

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I think you're seeing this reflected in that we need

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to take a harder look at some of the mergers

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>going on now to make sure it doesn't go any further. So,

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>just on that note, does it feel like attitudes towards

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 1>antitrust enforcement are starting to change? And I guess another

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:42.120
<v Speaker 1>way of saying that is, does it feel like there's

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 1>bipartisan support for more antitrust legislation? Inflation being one of

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:51.439
<v Speaker 1>the few things I think that both parties agree um

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>is actually bad and so doing something or anything about

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 1>it might be a good thing. I used to not

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:02.160
<v Speaker 1>worry about antitrust letters insolation, because I just never thought

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:05.679
<v Speaker 1>it had much of a chance to pass, because you

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 1>always had the setup where the Democrats were more pro enforcement,

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 1>more willing to think about new legislation, and then the

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:17.199
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party at least ten twenty thirty years ago, was

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 1>the party of country club, Republicans chamber of commerce and

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to have it. That has changed dramatically in

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the last year or two, as you see the Republican

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Party move away from big business to become more populist.

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 1>And so now you're seeing this merging of kind of

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the left, which has traditionally wanted anti trust enforcement in

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 1>the right. Now that's more anti business. The summer I

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 1>was struck. I was reading pulling from the Gallop organization

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>that talked about confidence in big business, and they asked

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Republicans and Democrats whether they had a great deal or

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>quite a lot of confidence in business. And just from

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 1>this year to last year, Republicans confidence in big business

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>declined by twelve point. Only only of Republicans have confidence

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 1>in big business. And they track kind of the net

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>confidence in each so the percentage, so that compares the

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:22.880
<v Speaker 1>percentage expressing high confidence in business minus those expressing little

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:25.160
<v Speaker 1>or no confidence. And so in the past, the Republican

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Party over years, I mean over decades was kind of

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:31.399
<v Speaker 1>plus ten, twelve, fifteen percent in favor of big business,

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you know where it was last year negative. That's incredible,

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:39.959
<v Speaker 1>it's incredible. So the Republican Party is no longer and

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:42.199
<v Speaker 1>it's really in line worth where the Democratic Party is.

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>And so bringing it back to shipping, there was this

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of out of nowhere there was this new anti

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:50.919
<v Speaker 1>trust bill called Ocean Shipping Reform Act, and it was

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to kind of consistent when we're talking about give the

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Federal Maritime Commission more regulatory powers, more oversight powers, more

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 1>teeth to worry about some of the things we've been

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:05.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about. The thing that amazes me this bill new

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:08.440
<v Speaker 1>any trust legislation passed in the House of Representatives. And

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about the House of Revery just divided and everything.

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:14.679
<v Speaker 1>This passed three sixty four to sixty. I mean, that

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>is about as one side as you can't have in this.

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:20.119
<v Speaker 1>And here's here's the thing. You think, Joe and Tracy

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 1>think about this. This is the lineup of people who

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 1>voted for this. You had people like on the right list, Cheney,

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Devin Newness, Kevin McCarthy vote for this well, also Madison Cathorne,

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 1>So some of the new guys coming in. But then

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>you also had ok Ceo Cortez Omar the Democrats. So

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>can you imagine a bill where you would have Kevin

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy and AOC both supporting it. But that's what we're

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 1>seeing any trust, Sorry, what's the name of this bill?

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I had totally missed this. What what's the name of

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 1>this bill? Because now I'm definitely gonna have to like go. Yeah.

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>So it's called the Ocean Shipping Reform Act, and it

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>was just passed by the House in December. The Senate

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:04.199
<v Speaker 1>seems very receptive to it. The Biden administration has indicated

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 1>that they would approve it. It It was a bipartisan bill.

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:09.959
<v Speaker 1>One of the congressman was a Republican congressman from South Dakota,

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:11.680
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of funny that South Dakota will be

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>worried about shipping, but they are because they would have products.

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>He has a been consisient that needs to get Lactose

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:21.400
<v Speaker 1>to New Zealand and a Democratic sponsor as well. So

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>it just didn't have a lot of hearings that didn't

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>have a lot. It's just kind of popped up on

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the radar and got improved. And so I think the

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Senden's going to improve it, and I think the Biden

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 1>administration is gonna prove it. And what it does, if

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you're interested, is gives the as I said, the Federal

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Maritime Commission more powers. One of the things that's really

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 1>focused on is some of these fees, these demerged fees

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that people are incurring. Apparently people are paying incredible fees

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:49.640
<v Speaker 1>as their product is sitting in a port and not

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:52.920
<v Speaker 1>being shipped, and there are people throughout the country, shippers

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 1>that are very upset about it. So it puts upon

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the shippers and the dock honders that they have to

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>show that the fees are reasonable. The burden is on

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:08.360
<v Speaker 1>them to prove it's reasonable. There's reporting requirements. It authorizes

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:12.639
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Maritime Commission to have investigations related to fees

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and charges. It prevents ocean carriers from declining opportunities for

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 1>US exports. So there was apparently an issue that was

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 1>a great concern where products would come to the United

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:25.640
<v Speaker 1>States and then empty containers would leave without being anything

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 1>in it, uh, and so they want to stop that.

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:30.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's a pretty comprehensive bill in the shipping area

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be targets. So it's right on point

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:37.159
<v Speaker 1>with what we're talking about. Wow, Yeah, Joe, this is

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that when we spoke to John Porcari,

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the White House's envoy to the Ports, we actually asked

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>him about this, but he kind of didn't answer the question,

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:52.680
<v Speaker 1>which is one reason why we're having this follow up conversations. Yeah,

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:55.479
<v Speaker 1>right right, I I remember that now, and I remember

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 1>this sort of like the lack of substance or the

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:01.720
<v Speaker 1>lack of a very clear response about where this was going.

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Something that I'm sort of interested in is what I

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 1>guess I would say is the other side of the

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 1>coin whenever. So you mentioned, okay, shipping and rail and

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:14.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, we could talk about with the optimal number

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:17.400
<v Speaker 1>of competitors of the space or so forth. But another

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 1>area that we've talked about a lot on the show

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 1>is trucking, which seems like it has it's a hundred

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:26.639
<v Speaker 1>degrees different the barriers to entry into the space or

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>essentially non existent huge boom and bus cycles even in

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:35.120
<v Speaker 1>boom times right now, companies regularly go out of business

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>due to lack of pricing power. Do you see industries

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 1>in which essentially would benefit from, you know, some sort

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:46.679
<v Speaker 1>of greater barriers to entry, in which the supply of goods,

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the supply, the stableness of prices, might benefit from some

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of like you know where where maybe make it

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:57.439
<v Speaker 1>a little bit harder to enter and exit the exit

0:27:57.440 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the industry. Well, that's a dangerous question for an anti

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 1>trust lawyer, but you know, I think that, you know,

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the answer might be more government regulation. You know,

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 1>back in the early seventies eighties, there used to be

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 1>tons of regulation who could drive trucks and which is

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of a backdoor way of it's a kind of

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a backdoor anti trust on some level. So maybe you

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:24.359
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily cap the competitors or whatever, but but you

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 1>like make it a little the bar a little bit higher,

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and believe or not there is a ton of any

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>trust activity in this area because there's another calling sessions

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and the intrust laws, but it's really granted in constitutional rights.

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Competitors and get together in the lobby the government to

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 1>do legislative things that may have a adverse competitive effect.

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 1>But because you're lobbying, because you're structing your First Amendment right,

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you get pushed for legislation that I wouldn't have the

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>effect of recent barriers that would make it part of

0:28:56.480 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>competitors in that all exempt from challenge under the ins

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>because it's part of your right dempetition. I want to

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 1>go back to the what we were talking about with

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of and the Federal Maritime

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Commissioned the of m C, because I guess my question

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 1>is how well suited is the Commission to actually take

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 1>on antitrust issues because my understanding is this is not

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 1>something that they've been doing historically because of that antitrust

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 1>exemption that you just described, So presumably this would be

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 1>a pretty big shift for them. It would be I mean,

0:29:56.920 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 1>let's start out with one fundamental problem of the fantasy

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 1>is a really small organization. I looked at up yesterday.

0:30:05.960 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 1>They're only a hundred thirty employees at the FMC. There's

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>five commissioners, and they only have a budget of thirty

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 1>million dollars or so. Hoping that we'll see Congress fund

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 1>them more. One thing that it's happened, so this summer,

0:30:21.360 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the big things that happened in any Trust

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>in one was that President Biden and issued this Executive

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Order on any Trust right around July fourth, and he

0:30:31.440 --> 0:30:34.720
<v Speaker 1>has asked all the agencies to work to just look

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and try to solve lots of antitrust problems. He'd used

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the world that there's been too much consolidation, too many

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:44.160
<v Speaker 1>any trust things have let slide, and so he's really

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 1>invigorated the government to look for warning trust issues. And

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 1>so one of the things he's worried about his shipping

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and coming out of that. Just in a couple of

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 1>days after the Justice Department in a trust division and

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the FMC has signed an MU pledging to work more

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 1>close together. So I don't think it's gonna be the

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 1>FMC by itself, but I think also working with the

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Justice Department. Now, the slip side of this is the

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Justice Department in the ANEC have more resources, but there's

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 1>still also resource constrain in the middle of a major

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 1>merger wave and they are overwhelmed with the number of

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 1>mergers that they have to review. They're taking on big tax,

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:28.640
<v Speaker 1>they're doing lots of investigations. So yeah, they'll be interesting

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:31.120
<v Speaker 1>going after shipping, But when you put their list of

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 1>priorities in the top ten, but it's not probably at

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the very top. So we're dealing with two agencies, the

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>FMC and the antitrust agencies, who are going to be

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>fairly resourced constrained. Can you just talk a little bit

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 1>more about math and numbers of the short staffing or

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the capacity constraints, because you know, you have this idea

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 1>is like, oh, no private entity could ever match the government,

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 1>but realistically, of course they can. And these institutions only

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 1>have so many lawyers at any given time, I'm and

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 1>only so much budget. What does it often look like

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the amount you know, in terms of

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the legal firepower for some of these mergers versus on

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the private side versus the public side. Some of the

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:14.880
<v Speaker 1>agencies have a number of attorneys and economists that are

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 1>staffed up to look at these but you know, you're

0:32:17.400 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 1>dealing with companies that are very sophisticated that have outside council.

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I work for Vinca, Milicans and we are a big

0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 1>law firm in the United States, but we have only

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 1>we have a set and twenty attorneys. Uh, there's law

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 1>firms have three thousand and two thousand attorneys. So you're

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 1>dealing with situation where you know, companies can afford a

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:39.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of attorneys, and you come to meetings and the

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:43.240
<v Speaker 1>attorney the merchant parties may have twenty three attorneys and

0:32:43.320 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the araman may have five or attorneys in the ECONO,

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 1>so it is an issue. So we're talking about obviously

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:53.280
<v Speaker 1>supply chains and logistics, and I want to like just

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 1>go back to something again on the sort of market structure.

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:58.800
<v Speaker 1>And you mentioned the number of competitors are un rail

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and obviously the number of competitors that are in shipping,

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and one of the aspects of both of those industries

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:07.200
<v Speaker 1>is there is a sort of like I guess I

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 1>would say, very limited constrained public infrastructure. There's only so

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 1>many ports that are available and they're sort of like

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 1>quasi public or quasi private, and there's only so many

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:20.840
<v Speaker 1>rail tracks available, and it's sort of, you know, on

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 1>rail is sort of reminiscence of the cable up companies

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 1>where there's always been challenges with shipping. How much are

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>these industries inherently constrained in terms of what the government

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 1>can do by simply like the lack of like public

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure basically to support new competitors. I think you're seeing

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 1>it with the new legislation we were just talking about.

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the one thing they could do is step

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 1>in and try to regulate more. The notion that you're

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 1>going to have the Federal Maritime Commission regulate rates and

0:33:52.400 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 1>think about what's reasonable, I think is something that we

0:33:56.640 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 1>may see more of. That's probably as much as they

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 1>can do. I mean, we're a capitalist society, and we

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 1>can't start doing industrial planning. I don't think so. I

0:34:06.920 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 1>think we'll just see probably more legis more regulation. So

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe just to summit all up, what what's your sort

0:34:14.719 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 1>of gut sense about the degree to which antitrust enforcement

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:25.799
<v Speaker 1>or legislation would actually bring down inflation and ease some

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:28.400
<v Speaker 1>of these supply chain pressures that we've been talking about.

0:34:29.640 --> 0:34:32.799
<v Speaker 1>I think it will be a useful tool, but it's

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 1>not going to be the cure all. As I said,

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:37.759
<v Speaker 1>some of these cases just last for a long time.

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm involved in two cases right now that involves supply

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 1>chain management. Mentioned when earlier. We're litigating against the railroads

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:48.480
<v Speaker 1>related to fuel searcharges that were imposed in two thousand three.

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Uh So we're dealing with that and I am involved

0:34:54.760 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 1>in another case where we're dealing with supply shortages from

0:34:57.719 --> 0:35:00.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of the two thousand fifteen two thousand sixteen era.

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 1>So antitrust is generally retrospective, obviously looking at problems in

0:35:05.719 --> 0:35:08.879
<v Speaker 1>the past. What it can be helpful though, is as

0:35:08.920 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 1>these cases get decided, the case laws established, and you know,

0:35:13.239 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it will have an impact on how people

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:18.800
<v Speaker 1>do business. I also think one of the things coming

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:22.400
<v Speaker 1>out of this is that compliance of big companies is

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:24.839
<v Speaker 1>going to be very important. If you know that there's

0:35:24.840 --> 0:35:28.319
<v Speaker 1>gonna be an increased regulatory environment. And we've just been

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about the United States, it's the European Commission, and

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:35.760
<v Speaker 1>it's Australians, it's it's the Chinese, it's everybody is becoming

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:40.280
<v Speaker 1>more antitrust focused and uh focus. So if you're a company,

0:35:40.360 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna be more important to have very

0:35:42.960 --> 0:35:46.879
<v Speaker 1>strong compliance programs. In fact, the Justice Department has a

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:49.239
<v Speaker 1>program that if you can come in and show that

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 1>you had an extremely good compliance program, even though you

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:55.279
<v Speaker 1>have some antitrust problems, you can get some benefits and

0:35:55.440 --> 0:35:58.680
<v Speaker 1>some leniency from the Justice Department as a result of that.

0:35:59.200 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Um So, I think that's going to be important, and

0:36:01.040 --> 0:36:03.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe stepping up the compliance will have some impact. But

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:06.719
<v Speaker 1>so I think it's kind of where the secondary effects

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:09.359
<v Speaker 1>of any trust cases. I will say one thing that

0:36:09.440 --> 0:36:12.719
<v Speaker 1>has a mediate effect is if the Justice Department sends

0:36:12.760 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you a grand jury criminal subpoena in your company, gets

0:36:16.160 --> 0:36:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the attention of the CEO and the general counsel and

0:36:18.680 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other folks in the company, and so

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 1>that can sometimes have a interrom effect at change behavior

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:29.080
<v Speaker 1>if it's illegal, but it's just a slow it's it's

0:36:29.080 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 1>a useful tool, but it's a slow moving tool. Well, Craig,

0:36:34.719 --> 0:36:37.319
<v Speaker 1>that was That was really fascinating, and I'm glad you

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 1>could walk us through one of the more interesting ways

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of fighting inflation. Thank you so much, My pleasure, enjoy

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:46.319
<v Speaker 1>talking to you. That was fascinating. Thank you so much.

0:36:46.360 --> 0:37:05.279
<v Speaker 1>I really appreciate it. So, Joe, obviously, I thought that

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:07.960
<v Speaker 1>was really interesting and one of the things that keeps

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:12.400
<v Speaker 1>coming out of these conversations, and you know, Jene Siroka

0:37:12.520 --> 0:37:15.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of talked about it to the executive director of

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the Port of Los Angeles, is this idea of Okay,

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:26.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe antitrust enforcement isn't going to actually do what it's

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:29.640
<v Speaker 1>supposed to do or what it's explicitly written to do

0:37:29.920 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 1>for a very long time because it's tough to push

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:37.240
<v Speaker 1>those enforcement actions through. But maybe the threat of future

0:37:37.440 --> 0:37:41.320
<v Speaker 1>enforcement action is enough to start some sort of change

0:37:41.320 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of behavior within the shipping industry itself. And this again

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:48.720
<v Speaker 1>seems to be a recurring theme, Like just the idea

0:37:48.840 --> 0:37:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of getting people involved in the supply chain to actually

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:58.280
<v Speaker 1>change habits that have been ingrained for decades at this point,

0:37:58.480 --> 0:38:01.120
<v Speaker 1>that that seems to be something that people are really

0:38:01.120 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to do right now. Yeah, no, absolutely, this idea

0:38:04.600 --> 0:38:08.040
<v Speaker 1>of like okay, and he made that point about compliance

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:11.440
<v Speaker 1>departments and the changing norms. I do think like ultimately,

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:16.440
<v Speaker 1>like okay, anti competitive behavior, part of the competitive behavior

0:38:16.520 --> 0:38:20.000
<v Speaker 1>is actually competing and investing and trying to win and

0:38:20.120 --> 0:38:23.239
<v Speaker 1>market share and offering something better. And I do think

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:26.279
<v Speaker 1>that like one of the problems I have with this

0:38:26.320 --> 0:38:29.000
<v Speaker 1>in general or is like okay, but what is going

0:38:29.040 --> 0:38:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to actually get people to invest and increase capacity? And

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I still feel like, you know, obviously the legal aspect

0:38:36.360 --> 0:38:38.120
<v Speaker 1>is a big part of it, and maybe a very

0:38:38.120 --> 0:38:40.680
<v Speaker 1>big part of it, but I'm still like trying to

0:38:40.680 --> 0:38:42.719
<v Speaker 1>wrap my head or as like yeah, well, Okay, you

0:38:42.719 --> 0:38:46.760
<v Speaker 1>can change norms around pricing or fees or penalties or whatever,

0:38:47.160 --> 0:38:50.239
<v Speaker 1>But what is going to like increase competition in like

0:38:50.280 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the sort of like pure capitalist sense, right, But conversely,

0:38:54.200 --> 0:38:58.400
<v Speaker 1>you could argue that anti competitive behavior right now leads

0:38:58.440 --> 0:39:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to higher shipping prices and so people have very very

0:39:01.600 --> 0:39:05.279
<v Speaker 1>little incentive to actually increase capacity because they're already making

0:39:05.280 --> 0:39:08.360
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars. And I think I didn't didn't Marisk

0:39:08.680 --> 0:39:13.719
<v Speaker 1>like unveil quarterly profit recently that was like its highest

0:39:13.880 --> 0:39:18.480
<v Speaker 1>in over a century something like that, And it seems

0:39:18.520 --> 0:39:20.600
<v Speaker 1>like this is like the type of thing which is

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:23.600
<v Speaker 1>like the goal is hopefully to like I guess I

0:39:23.600 --> 0:39:27.640
<v Speaker 1>would say, like reach new equilibrium or like change overall

0:39:27.680 --> 0:39:32.160
<v Speaker 1>like norms throughout multiple cycles going forward, rather than something

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:33.759
<v Speaker 1>that we hope is going to solve the problem now,

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 1>but you know, maybe at the margins there will be

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:40.520
<v Speaker 1>some uh, some potential solution. Now. Yeah. The other interesting

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:43.000
<v Speaker 1>thing I mean on that note is this idea of

0:39:43.120 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 1>deregulation cycles and the idea that this actually has a

0:39:47.680 --> 0:39:51.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of bipartisan support. So maybe we are starting to

0:39:51.840 --> 0:39:55.719
<v Speaker 1>enter a new cycle where people are more interested, where

0:39:56.160 --> 0:39:59.840
<v Speaker 1>where Washington is more interested in actually bringing down some

0:39:59.880 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of the monopolies. And again Craig was talking about this,

0:40:03.080 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 1>but we've already seen that in tech. But it is

0:40:05.560 --> 0:40:10.520
<v Speaker 1>really striking this sort of spectrum of interest that this

0:40:10.600 --> 0:40:13.360
<v Speaker 1>is attracting from both the left and the right. Yeah. No,

0:40:13.520 --> 0:40:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was probably one of the most interesting.

0:40:15.960 --> 0:40:18.120
<v Speaker 1>And it's like sort of like tropism and the sort

0:40:18.160 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of like disdain for anyone in power. I guess I've

0:40:21.200 --> 0:40:24.920
<v Speaker 1>always been like, it's a little bit skeptical at this

0:40:24.960 --> 0:40:27.719
<v Speaker 1>idea that, Okay, are we actually ever going to pass legislation?

0:40:27.960 --> 0:40:30.120
<v Speaker 1>But you know, he pointed out a pretty big bills

0:40:30.160 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 1>passed the House, and maybe this changing political environment will

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 1>have some real downstream legislative effects. Maybe have been too

0:40:37.520 --> 0:40:41.760
<v Speaker 1>skeptical of this sort of like changing public mood actually

0:40:41.800 --> 0:40:46.960
<v Speaker 1>changing and changing public law. You've underestimated people's hatred of

0:40:47.239 --> 0:40:50.279
<v Speaker 1>big business. I guess, yeah, maybe I have, and now

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I have to really sort of change some of my

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:55.320
<v Speaker 1>my priors that they speak. No, I haven't really underestimated

0:40:55.320 --> 0:41:01.200
<v Speaker 1>people's hatred, underestimated whether that hatred will change laws, and

0:41:01.320 --> 0:41:04.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe it will. Yeah, Okay, that's fair. Yeah, um, okay, Well,

0:41:04.680 --> 0:41:07.440
<v Speaker 1>shall we leave it there let's leave it there, all right.

0:41:07.640 --> 0:41:10.560
<v Speaker 1>This has been another episode of the All Thoughts podcast.

0:41:10.640 --> 0:41:13.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on Twitter at

0:41:13.400 --> 0:41:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe Wasn't All. You can follow

0:41:16.680 --> 0:41:20.040
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter at the Stalwart. Follow our producer on Twitter,

0:41:20.120 --> 0:41:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Laura Carlson. She's at Laura M. Carlson. Followed the Bloomberg

0:41:23.800 --> 0:41:27.560
<v Speaker 1>head of podcast, Francesca Levi at Francesca Today and check

0:41:27.560 --> 0:41:30.280
<v Speaker 1>out all of our podcasts at Bloomberg under the handle

0:41:30.640 --> 0:42:00.920
<v Speaker 1>at podcasts. Thanks for listening, O