WEBVTT - 2018 Masters: Paulie’s Picks

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I miss the green. For example, I'm already upset. When

0:00:02.880 --> 0:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:06.320
<v Speaker 1>And when I find my ball.

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:09.000
<v Speaker 2>In a fried egg Frida egg, the dreaded Friday Egg,

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:11.959
<v Speaker 2>Frida Egg, Frida egg, fried Egg, Frida egg, bride egg Lie,

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm about ready to run off the golf course.

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 3>Arnold Palmer is the Master's friend of nineteen. He has

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 3>buddy the last two holes to catch, and that bove

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 3>ahead of catch that Jory?

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:32.519
<v Speaker 1>What are then say? That? Money? Ways golf? I mean,

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 1>have anybody you haven't ever seen that? An't play up

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:40.839
<v Speaker 1>the hell you ever like that?

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:47.319
<v Speaker 3>And I think that's one of the greatest funny I've

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 3>ever seen in Friday Night.

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe yes, sir, there it is.

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:07.959
<v Speaker 3>You believe it? Heckw no, there it is a.

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:24.319
<v Speaker 1>Win for the ages? Is it his time here? It comes?

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 3>Oh my goodness, oh wow?

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>In your life? Have you seen anything like that?

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 3>Hello? Friends, I'm jim NANTZ is my great pleasure to

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 3>welcome you to the Master's Tournament.

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I've heard it said before. It's a tradition unlike any other.

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 3>Ladies and gentlemen, welcome back to another edition of the

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 3>Fried Egg podcast. It is Masters week, so we have

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 3>Paulli from Polly's Picks coming on to help us all

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:32.799
<v Speaker 3>with our Master's pools, DraftKings one and Done leagues. You know,

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 3>this is the week where everybody has a chance to

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:38.799
<v Speaker 3>win a million dollars on DraftKings. So Pollie, welcome on.

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Hei. What's up Andy?

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 3>Not much, man, just busy week and ready to I'm

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 3>excited for it. And you know, it's crazy this year

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 3>with how many you know, people are peaking going into

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 3>the tournament, and it makes picking for one and done

0:02:57.400 --> 0:02:59.079
<v Speaker 3>and all these things really tough.

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, definitely.

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:02.799
<v Speaker 2>It's one of those like a perfect storm scenario where

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:07.360
<v Speaker 2>you couldn't imagine having this many people playing good coming

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 2>into Augusta and this many good storylines. It's literally like

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 2>a script out of a movie.

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:14.519
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, what do you think legitimate winners like you know,

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 3>in term, I think there's probably about twenty guys where

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 3>if you told me, hey, Tommy Fleetwood won, I wouldn't

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:26.359
<v Speaker 3>be surprised. What do you think where do you think

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 3>it goes down to.

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think there's about fifteen to twenty that would win.

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 2>But I think this is one of the unique years

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 2>to where there's about eight or ten guys that you

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 2>could tell me win by four or five shots.

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 1>And I wouldn't be deprised.

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 3>Mm hmm.

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, just because when the guys are on fire, like

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 2>when Justin Thomas gets on on fire, or when DJ

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 2>gets on fire, or you know, or Jason Day right,

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 2>when those guys are the top of their game, they

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 2>can win an event by four or five especially.

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>In a major.

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 3>I agree. I think if we will be treated to

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 3>an unbelievable Sunday, if we could get two or three

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 3>of those guys playing at the top end of their

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 3>game and see a real shootout, it'll be really a

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 3>fascinating masters to watch.

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>So with.

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 3>All eyes on golf for you know, the biggest week

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 3>of the year, tons of people are playing pools, and

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:20.840
<v Speaker 3>I think the pools really mirror DraftKings pretty well in

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 3>the sense of, you know a lot of people like

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 3>to pick the same guys. So what's your strategy going

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 3>into DraftKings or say big office pulls or big friend pools.

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So if I'm trying to, you know, win a

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 2>big pool, whether it's on you know, winning a millionaire

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 2>maker on DraftKings or winning a pool where there's let's

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 2>say maybe one hundred entries. I'm gonna try to figure

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 2>out who I think everyone is gonna pick, and then

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 2>maybe I'll take a slightly like low roun guy. So,

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 2>for example, like if you think Jordan Speed's gonna be,

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, the highest elected player in your office pool,

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 2>you may want to pick you know, somebody else in

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 2>that tier just because you're gonna have a better chance

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 2>to win, most likely if you're not playing Speed at

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 2>that point, Do.

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 3>You expect Speed to be the highest owned player or

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 3>do you think it's gonna be.

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>What he did today in Houston? I would think so yes.

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 2>With him finishing third there and putting miserably, I think

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 2>he's going to be the highest owned guy in most

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 2>of the pools and possibly even on draftings this week.

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 3>I feel like the third place finish for Speak there

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 3>was like the ideal finish. You don't want to win

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 3>that week because it's so hard to win back to

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 3>back tournaments and nobody's ever won in Houston and then

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:34.839
<v Speaker 3>won in at Augusta. But a third place ideal, right, yeah, definitely.

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 2>And then the way that Speed did it too, I

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 2>mean he lost three shots on the greens this week

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 2>in Houston and finished third.

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 3>Are you worried at all given that you know he

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 3>entered the week I think one hundred and seventy second

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 3>in strokes game putting.

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:48.480
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, based on some of the interviews he's had

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:53.160
<v Speaker 2>in the past regarding Augusta, he just is able to

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 2>see the lines very well in those greens and just

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 2>feels comfortable. And if he just has a marginal putting week,

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 2>he's going to be in the contention and the back

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 2>nine on Sunday.

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 3>Mm hm. So, so, Spith, you're expecting going to be

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 3>the highest down player, who would you say, kind of

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:14.719
<v Speaker 3>if if you're looking at we'll say Rory Tiger, Speth,

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 3>Justin Thomas, dj as kind of this this upper echelon,

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:22.040
<v Speaker 3>I guess you could throw Jason Day in there. I

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 3>feel like Justin Rose could be in that section. How

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 3>would you rank those those top tier options if you

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:30.919
<v Speaker 3>were picking a you're talking.

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>In regards to draft kings or for like office.

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 3>Pools, let's say we'll say each Okay, So if we're.

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 2>Looking at DraftKings where it's you know, a salary based

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:43.159
<v Speaker 2>approach where you have Dustin Johnson is the highest priced guy.

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>By a good amount. He's at eleven four hundred.

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 2>I think he's not going to get picked a lot

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 2>because people are going to go down and play Jordan

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 2>Speed at ten thousand, four hundred, or they'll even play

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 2>Tiger at ten thousand or even you know, similar priced

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 2>players of Rory or Jason Day. So I think DJ

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 2>goes a little a little bit under owned up there,

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 2>maybe only owned by ten or fifteen percent of people.

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 2>And DJ is a heck of a player and can

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 2>make a lot of birdies and eagles, which is good

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:09.239
<v Speaker 2>for draftings scoring.

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, that's true. I mean a thousand bucks and

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 3>the field is small, so I you can make it

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 3>up on the back end with some good low priced players, right, definitely.

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 3>So so you like DJ of this top tier and say, say,

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, I know a lot of people will put

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 3>one hundred bucks in and do five of these entries.

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 3>How would you how do you strategize with going with

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 3>like when you do multiple entries for these things, do

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 3>you try and do you have a core group of

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 3>guys or do you try and checker a couple, you know,

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 3>different lineups together.

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Sure, I can kind of talk about the strategy I

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 2>do for the for the large events like this. So

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 2>this week we have the Millionaire Make Around DraftKings, which

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 2>it's a twenty dollars entry, million dollar first place prize,

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 2>and I think second place is like one hundred and

0:07:57.120 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 2>ftwy thousands, So you're pretty much putting twenty dollars in

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 2>trying to hit the jackpot for a million dollars. And

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 2>with that thought in mind, you want to have a

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 2>unique lineup because there's over two hundred thousand entries in

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 2>this so with only you know, eighty something guys in

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 2>the field, you're gonna have a lot of lineups that

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 2>are duplicated to where you may put a lineup in

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 2>with a bunch of guys that are very popular, and

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 2>eighty other people had the exact same lineup, And I

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 2>think that's a problem you can run into.

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Andreo ju agree.

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. You know, a couple of years ago, I was like,

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:33.599
<v Speaker 3>when Speeth had that horrible, disastrous quadruple, I was in

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 3>like seventh place in this thing, but I was another

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 3>guy had the exact same lineup as I did, and

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:43.199
<v Speaker 3>I was watching myself go up there and I was like,

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:45.719
<v Speaker 3>oh man, somebody else has the same lineup. They made

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:48.719
<v Speaker 3>a seven, which made it completely moot, but you know,

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 3>you could see it when you get up there, it's like, yeah,

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 3>there's there's some I mean, one player makes all the

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:58.560
<v Speaker 3>difference between first and what fiftieth sometimes exactly.

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 2>And so one of the strategies I'll do this week

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 2>is we have a fifty thousand dollar budget on DraftKings,

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 2>and the pricing is pretty soft in terms of, you know,

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:08.599
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of guys down that are valuable with

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 2>the lower end that you can you can play or

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 2>even in the middle range to where I'm not going

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 2>to use all fifty thousand because a lot of people

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 2>will fill out a lineup and they get to their

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 2>last guy and say, hey, I got eight guys eighty

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:21.319
<v Speaker 2>eight hundred. He's gonna spend that eighty eight hundred on

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 2>a player that's pretty close to that price range, whereas

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:27.959
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna probably go down and leave myself five six,

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:31.439
<v Speaker 2>seven hundred dollars and choose somebody, you know, around eight thousand,

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 2>just because it's going to provide me a unique lineup

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 2>to where you know, I may have the same five

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 2>players as somebody else, but I'm not gonna be duplicating

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 2>their lineup because of that, and you can have some

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 2>players that maybe a difference between choosing let's say, instead

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 2>of taking Paul Casey, you take Adam Scott, which in

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 2>reality is a big difference between the players.

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:53.559
<v Speaker 3>That's a great point. I mean, it's hard when you

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:56.199
<v Speaker 3>got money to not spend it, and in this case,

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:59.439
<v Speaker 3>you're saying, don't spend all your money because it'll give

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 3>you more chance of being unique.

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Exactly.

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 2>So I mean you could end up having winning the

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Millionaire Maker and having fifty people tie you, and maybe

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 2>you end up getting like thirty thousand dollars.

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:11.559
<v Speaker 1>What do you think you would have won a million?

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 3>That would be an ultimate buzz kill exactly. Yeah, So

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 3>getting into kind of some players you like, So, as

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:26.679
<v Speaker 3>we talked about earlier, there's say fifteen guys that fifteen

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 3>to twenty guys that could legitimately win this thing. And

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 3>then with DraftKings, which are the of the top tier,

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 3>say eighty three hundred guys or eight thousand above, who

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 3>are the guys you like?

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 1>So the guys that like.

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 2>There, I think one guy that'll fly under the radar

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 2>a little bit is Hadeki Manciyama. So Manziama's down at

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 2>eighty four hundred, and I think a lot of people

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 2>won't play him because the last time they kind of

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 2>saw him or heard from him, he was injured withdrew

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 2>from the Waste Management Phoenix. But since then he's come

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 2>back played. He played twice at Bay Hill and WGC

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 2>and from all reports I've heard, he's back healthy and

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 2>he tends to play pretty good here at Augusta, with

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 2>a lot of high finishes and has that high towering

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, iron game, which is perfect for a lot

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 2>of the approaches into the greens.

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think one of the things I look for

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:23.959
<v Speaker 3>with Augusta picks in general is iron play. So I

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 3>think the best iron players play the best at Augusta

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 3>because of the way the course is set up, where

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 3>the approach shots have, you know, very little room for ara.

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 3>You know, they ask you to hit these great approach shots,

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 3>and you know, typically what you see is the guys

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 3>that regularly have success at Augusta are some of the

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 3>best iron players. So you look at Paul Casey, three

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 3>straight top sixes, He's one of the best iron players

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 3>in the world. Justin Rose one of the best iron

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 3>players in the world. Phil Mickelson best, one of the

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:53.679
<v Speaker 3>best iron players in the world, Tiger Woods, you know,

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 3>so on and so forth, and Hideki Matsuyama is one

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 3>of the best iron players in the world. So I

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 3>definitely like Matsi exactly.

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't agree more because it's not necessarily about hitting

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 2>it close with the irons. That's hitting in the correct

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 2>area on the greens. And so when the guys are

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:10.599
<v Speaker 2>miss hit that aren't good with the irons are missing it.

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 2>They're missing it in spots to where they can't get

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 2>up and down, and that's where the bogies creep in.

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 2>If you look at guys that have won in the past,

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:20.320
<v Speaker 2>it's by eliminating bogies, not by making twenty five birdies.

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think one of the things with that too

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 3>is that a guess that has a lot of uneven lies.

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 3>So what you get with those uneven lies is it

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 3>it just it makes it harder hit the right number.

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:36.839
<v Speaker 3>So the the great iron players separate themselves even more

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 3>because it's just you know, they're they're more talented and

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 3>it's a tougher situation. So I think like a couple

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 3>of places that mirror that are Kapalua Pebble has some

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 3>pretty uneven fairways. Memorial even John Deere and Barracuda are

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 3>a couple other ones that are some of the most

0:12:57.280 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 3>undulating pharaways on tour.

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 3>So then if you're looking at like your office pool,

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 3>obviously it's a little bit different and you're dealing with

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 3>like a different kind of subset. Where where where could

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 3>you I I generally think my strategy and you tell

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 3>me if this is right or wrong. You're you know,

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 3>I think that when I'm in my friend's pools, no

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:24.599
<v Speaker 3>offense to any friends listening or in office pools. What

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:27.079
<v Speaker 3>happens is there's a lot of people that don't know

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 3>what they're doing, so they go after the big names,

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 3>and if you pick some guys that are playing well

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 3>that are a little bit lesser known names, you usually

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:36.320
<v Speaker 3>have a lot of success.

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 2>I think the big advantage on the office pools isn't

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:42.199
<v Speaker 2>necessarily with like your top pick, because a lot of

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:44.559
<v Speaker 2>times you're just put in little pods, so they'll see

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 2>the top like ten guys in one pod. It's about

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 2>differentiating in other pods to where you may pick somebody

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 2>like example, like a Tommy Fleetwood, to where you know

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 2>a person that watches a lot of golf is going

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:58.679
<v Speaker 2>to know them. But a casual golfan that just watches

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 2>the majors isn't going to know that much about Fleetwood.

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:05.079
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So with DraftKings and starting to bounce back to this,

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:10.679
<v Speaker 3>anybody you like outside of DJ and Matts Yama, I

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 3>know you mentioned Adam Scott before in this eight thousand

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:15.679
<v Speaker 3>and above range.

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think one other guy there is Paul Casey.

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 2>I think he's going to be one of the higher

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 2>owned guys of the week as well, probably in the

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 2>top four or five highest zwed. His iron game is

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 2>just too good. As you mentioned earlier, He's got three

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 2>straight top six is here. It's been playing good all year.

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 2>His last ten events on tour, he's gatined thirty nine

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 2>shots on approach, which is just stupid to to stick there.

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 2>And if he's able to have, you know, a halfway

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 2>decent putter, he's going to be another top five or

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 2>top ten finishes this week.

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Again.

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 3>You know, Paul Casey's number one in the Sagarin rankings,

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 3>which is like you know, they do head to head

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 3>against every golfer every week. He's number one in the world.

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, mister consistency.

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so we got to ask what about Phil and

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 3>Phil and Tiger? Where are you? Where are you standing

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 3>on these two?

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 2>So I'd rather have Phil than Tiger this week just

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 2>because Phil's hitting his irons really good over his last

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, he didn't play great in Houston this week,

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 2>but prior to that four you know, stroke play events,

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 2>I think he gained fifteen shots on approach and finished

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 2>from the top six in each of those events, and

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 2>then obviously one the WGC in Mexico. So I'd take

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 2>that over Tiger any day.

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So now we're down into the eight thousand and

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean it's always funny. I feel like when you

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 3>look at these this range of players for the Masters,

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 3>because eight thousand and below and you see these names

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 3>that a lot of times are some of the highest

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 3>priced guys at your regular tour stop. So say seventy

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 3>nine and starts at seventy nine hundred, starts with Louis,

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 3>then it goes to Henrik Stenson, who I horrible form.

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 3>But then let's let's knock this down to seven thousand.

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 3>What are the names that kind of jump out in here?

0:15:59.280 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Sure?

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 2>I think that jumps out and if you're looking like

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 2>for consistency and most lucky to you know, get you

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 2>a nice high top ten finish is gonna be Matt Coucher.

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 2>Coucher played good here in Houston as well, and his

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 2>track record at August is very solid, where he's had

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 2>top eight finishes in for the last six years. And

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 2>he's just a guy that's just gonna plot around, not

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 2>make a lot of mistakes, keep it in play, missing

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 2>the correct side of the greens, and you know, he's

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 2>not gonna run away with anything, but he'll he'll.

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Be there come the weekend.

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, I was. I was looking at stats

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 3>and trying to dive into this. I couldn't sleep on

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 3>Sunday nine, and I was thinking about, you know, why

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 3>people play well at the Masters, and I started thinking

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 3>about Matt Coucher, and I started to realize that one

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 3>of the more underrated skills that guys have that do

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 3>well is the short games, because everybody misses and puts

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 3>themselves in bad positions. And I think, you know, Jordan

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 3>Speith and and Coucher are two great examples of that,

0:16:57.120 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 3>is that they miss smart, but then they also have

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 3>just unbelievable short games that allow them to keep their

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:05.439
<v Speaker 3>momentum going. But with those power saves.

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I think the one other thing that helps

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:10.879
<v Speaker 2>Coucher Augusta he's very good with distance control, and so

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:13.400
<v Speaker 2>you don't want to be missing any of your shots

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 2>long on any of these greens, and he tends to

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 2>if his misses are going to be left and right

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:18.919
<v Speaker 2>on iron shots, which is.

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:19.920
<v Speaker 1>A lot easily eat up and down.

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:23.879
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah, So you know, Berger is a guy that

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:28.360
<v Speaker 3>I've you know, top top twenty seven and his two

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:31.159
<v Speaker 3>starts there really good iron player. What do you think

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:32.199
<v Speaker 3>about Burger?

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:34.679
<v Speaker 2>He's a guy that has a lot of a lot

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 2>of upside. I would say to where you know, you

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:38.919
<v Speaker 2>tell me he finishes, you know, in the top ten.

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 2>I can definitely believe it. I'm not sure if he

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 2>can possibly win here, but he's a guy that when

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 2>he's playing well, makes a lot of birdies, which is

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 2>going to be good if you're playing him on draftings

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 2>At seventy.

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 3>Five hundred this week, who else kind of jumps in here?

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 2>I probably dropped down a little lower to Charlie Hoffman

0:17:57.160 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 2>at seventy one. Okay, he was the leader after the

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 2>first round here last year, so last three years, he's

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:07.680
<v Speaker 2>gone twenty ninth and ninth here and he's gained strokes

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:10.399
<v Speaker 2>on approach in every event so far in twenty eighteen.

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, everybody was expecting him to fade away. He kind

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 3>of hung around all the way through till Sunday. And

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he's a guy that gets better every year, seemingly,

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 3>and he hasn't had a breakout performance this year, but

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:27.439
<v Speaker 3>he's been solid.

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 2>And I think the one thing of Hoffmann well is

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he's scared of the big moment. I

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:34.879
<v Speaker 2>think he actually relishes, you know, being in contention and

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, needing to play aggressively. He's not going to

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 2>let off the gas pedal if he's in there, you know,

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 2>on Saturday and Sunday.

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 3>What about your boy of Russell Henley. I feel like

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 3>you always love Henley everywhere.

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 2>I like Henley because for some reason, he plays well

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 2>on courses that he has good history. And that same

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 2>thing happened this week at Houston m Yeah, and I

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of expect from the same thing this week, where

0:18:58.440 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, he's a pretty good driver of the golf

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 2>ball and then is a pretty good short game and

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 2>that tend to add.

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Up pretty well here at Augusta. Yeah, yeah, it makes

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:06.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of birdies.

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:10.120
<v Speaker 3>Any players in here that you don't like, any anybody

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:11.120
<v Speaker 3>you're fading.

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.160
<v Speaker 2>If we're looking on the DraftKings side when it comes tournaments,

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:17.919
<v Speaker 2>I tend to fade guys that don't make a lot

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 2>of birdies. So that'll be you know, your guys like

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 2>maybe a Brendan Grace or possibly even maybe at Charles Schwartzel,

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 2>just because the upside isn't that great for them to

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 2>where they could finish tenth and it could be the

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:36.120
<v Speaker 2>same amount of points DraftKings wise, the guy that finishes thirtieth,

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 2>that makes a lot of birdies.

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 3>So what about Cantley. He hasn't missed a cut since

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 3>coming back from injury, and he was a low am

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 3>here the only other time he's played. Kind of fits

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 3>what we've been talking about too.

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's hard for me to go with Cauntless week

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 2>week to have, you know, to be in full contention,

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 2>I think he probably makes the cut and finishes, you know,

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 2>around twentieth. But I tend to go for guys that

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 2>have that have played the Masters multiple times just because

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 2>of the experience of where to hit it on the greens,

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 2>knowing all the pin locations and just being comfortable in

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:13.399
<v Speaker 2>that atmosphere. And you know, Can'tly hasn't played here in

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 2>what six years, and that was as an amateur, so

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna be a little tough.

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 3>I like can't Still. I think he's a big game hunter.

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 3>Haga's dad came on the pod. He was saying he

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 3>thinks Can'tly might win, which is crazy, but who knows

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 3>crazier That's why they play.

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:31.639
<v Speaker 1>The game right, exactly right. Anybody can win.

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 3>So anybody else in the seven thousand to you know,

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:38.920
<v Speaker 3>seventy nine hundred tier that you really like before we

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 3>drop down into the bargain basement, I think one guy.

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:46.160
<v Speaker 2>That maygo under owned to you know the general population

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:47.959
<v Speaker 2>is going to be Cure deck off the barn Rot.

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:52.400
<v Speaker 2>So he's played the Masters once in twenty sixteen, finished fifteenth,

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:56.159
<v Speaker 2>and he's played pretty solid this year, you know, with

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 2>with three top tens in his last four starts worldwide.

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:01.680
<v Speaker 2>I believe so, well, yeah, he can, you know, and

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:05.120
<v Speaker 2>he's a guy that is afraid moment and likes play

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 2>aggressive and he also hits drivery hole and it's it

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 2>pretty straight. So he hits it long too, and it's

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:12.439
<v Speaker 2>a long yeah, so he can rack up a lot

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:14.959
<v Speaker 2>of birdies for a guy that's you know, seventy one

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 2>hundred is pretty pretty good value there.

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 3>M hm. So sixty nine hundred, there are some really

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 3>good names right at you know, the sixty eight sixty

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 3>nine hundred as well. So you got Pat Perez, Martin Kaimer,

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 3>Kevin Chappel, Brendan Steele, Bryson, Jimmy Walker, Duffner, Stanley will It,

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't. I don't think that's a good one. And

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:46.360
<v Speaker 3>then and then burned Weisberger. I think Weisburger's mad made

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:48.359
<v Speaker 3>the cut every year at the Masters he's played.

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'd be more likely to pick Weisburger in a

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 2>like office pool to where birdies don't matter, because he's

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 2>a guy that kind of plods around and doesn't make

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 2>a ton of birdies, whereas you know, for DraftKings, he

0:21:59.520 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 2>may not be the.

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Best choice for that.

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 3>Okay, what about either any of those guy other guys?

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I definitely like Pat Perez this week. He's kind

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 2>of got the you know, the good attitude coming in

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 2>to where he's going to be attacking the golf course,

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 2>but when he gets going, he has the ability to

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:20.639
<v Speaker 2>you know, he's not afraid of going up against the

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 2>Justin Thomas or DJ in contention, where whereas some of

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:26.400
<v Speaker 2>these other guys haven't necessarily proven themselves as much. Where

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 2>I think Pat Perez could actually get it done if

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:31.639
<v Speaker 2>he was on, you know, in the final pairing on Sunday.

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm all in on the Scientist this week.

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm actually, I believe it or not, a big Bryson

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 2>fan this week as well.

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he was really really great at bay Hill.

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:45.639
<v Speaker 3>He was really awesome his first appearance at the Masters,

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 3>and he wanted deer run of course, with a lot

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 3>of side slopes and uneven lies and fairway.

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that.

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 2>I think picking the correct one or two players down

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 2>here is going to be what differentiates, you know, a

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 2>winning lineup on dry can just weak twenty million dollars.

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 2>Is picking the one or two guys down here that

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:06.359
<v Speaker 2>finish top six, top seven, that's what's gonna win for you.

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 3>Jimmy Walker's actually been playing pretty well lately and obviously

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 3>has had a really good track record at Augusta. What

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 3>do you think about him?

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I definitely him has another option on DraftKings, even

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:24.160
<v Speaker 2>in pool formats, because based on how he's playing, he's

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 2>going to be pretty far down in some of the

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 2>pools that are you know, putting like, you know, pods

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 2>of ten players. He may be in your fifth or

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 2>sixth pod and maybe a pretty good option down there.

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 3>Mm hm. Anybody else you know below there? Do you

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 3>like any any of these guys to take a flyer

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:43.160
<v Speaker 3>on any of the ams or anything.

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 2>I tend to stay away from the ams and some

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 2>of the senior guys just because there's really not that

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 2>much upside. I'd rather have somebody else take them. And

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, I'm not saying it's dead money, but I'd rather,

0:23:55.160 --> 0:23:57.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, have them choose them for at a couple

0:23:57.440 --> 0:23:59.919
<v Speaker 2>percent on DraftKings and hopefully they don't play that well

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 2>and just knocks out one more nch I don't have

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 2>to go up against Yeah.

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:09.919
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Neeman is very talented, but it's such a crapshoot.

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:13.880
<v Speaker 2>And then the one thing with all the young amateurs

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 2>playing here is the fact that it's most of them

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 2>it's their first time playing here, which even if it

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 2>was a pro, I'm most likely not playing a guy

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 2>if it's his first time here.

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 3>So uh, let's move on to one and done. You're

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 3>in the one and done. What are you looking for

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 3>this week?

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Is it?

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 3>Is it based off of where you're at in the standings?

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:36.119
<v Speaker 3>And I know it's kind of early in the season still,

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 3>but is it? Are you looking at it based off

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 3>of where you're at in the standings?

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that's a pretty good way to approach it.

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 2>And i'd also want to probably chart out what you're

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 2>going to do for the rest of your majors the

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 2>rest of the season, and you know, figure out, you know, roughly,

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:53.239
<v Speaker 2>what are your options going forward to where let's say

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 2>you don't want to blow dustin Johnson this week if

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 2>you're going totend to use them for the US Open

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 2>or another major, Right m hm.

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:04.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm not one for organization, So what do you do?

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:05.440
<v Speaker 3>If you're me?

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 2>I would just take a look and think, you know,

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 2>give yourself a couple options, and you know, if you're

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 2>near the topier standings, you may want to go somebody

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:17.160
<v Speaker 2>more chalkier, such as if you have Jordan's speed's available,

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:19.399
<v Speaker 2>he's probably gonna be the highest owned guy in your

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 2>league this week, and you'd probably want to play me

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 2>if you're near the top, if you're a little bit

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 2>lower the standings, maybe you go with a guy like

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 2>Phil Mickelson who won't be as high owned, or maybe

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 2>even you know Justin Rose, who you know pretty much

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:35.680
<v Speaker 2>has made it his mission to win it Augusta this

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:37.399
<v Speaker 2>year after losing last year. He's kind of, you know,

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:40.680
<v Speaker 2>put his schedule made around winning the Masters this year.

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:43.919
<v Speaker 2>Finished you know, in the last seven times at august

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 2>he finished out in the top fourteen only once. He

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 2>played didn't play great this week in Houston, which I

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 2>think is going to get some people off of them

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 2>for one and done purposes, which makes it even better

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:55.399
<v Speaker 2>if you're gonna choose him.

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think going into this week he'd finished in

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:01.880
<v Speaker 3>the top ten thirteen of his last fifteen stars, which

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 3>is unbelievable. Yeah, so yeah, I like that. What do

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 3>you I guy I really like is Justin Thomas. Do

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:12.480
<v Speaker 3>you think he's gonna be I owned across the board?

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Uh, He's probably gonna be I think in the top

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:19.400
<v Speaker 2>five in terms of ownership. I'm thinking on DraftKings, maybe

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 2>around twenty percent. But in terms of like one and done,

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:26.640
<v Speaker 2>he'll probably be fourth or fifth in terms of ownership,

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 2>I would think Speeth would be one. I'm actually thinking

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people are gonna pick Tiger this week

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:34.159
<v Speaker 2>and one and done just because of the history and

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:37.120
<v Speaker 2>the fact that you know Tiger's back, He's coming to Augusta.

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 1>He owns a guy.

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 2>I'd rather save Tiger if he's truly back to play

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 2>maybe at the Bridge jone later.

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>In the year.

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:46.160
<v Speaker 3>You got anybody that if you wanted to go really

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:48.879
<v Speaker 3>kind of off the wall, say you're near the bottom

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:50.880
<v Speaker 3>of your one and done and you want a chance

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 3>to really make up some ground.

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he goes a guy like Tommy Fleetwood.

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 2>He's probably not gonna be picked much in your league,

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 2>and he's pretty much the best iron player on the

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:04.879
<v Speaker 2>European Tour. So to me, he reminds you of kind

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:07.159
<v Speaker 2>of a young Justin Rose, where he's may not have

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 2>to be the best putter, but his driver's pretty good,

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:12.120
<v Speaker 2>and then he's just really really good with his irons.

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think he's he's he's like the golf nerd

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:20.400
<v Speaker 3>pick of the week, I feel like, but there aren't

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:24.120
<v Speaker 3>a ton of golf nerds out there, so but uh yeah,

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 3>and it's so hard to pass on some of these

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:29.479
<v Speaker 3>top guys. So what else you got for us?

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:35.440
<v Speaker 2>Uh, there's not that much out yet because we haven't

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 2>had much of the odds place out there out yet.

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 2>They for the odds to win being put out there,

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 2>but not much in terms of any other matchups or

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 2>any other prop bets for for the Masters. So if

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 2>you want, you can follow me along on Twitter during

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:49.880
<v Speaker 2>the week and I'll have updates on there at frieda

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:51.160
<v Speaker 2>Egg Polly Any.

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's always a good follow Any good long shots

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 3>you like this week?

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh, there's when it.

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Comes to the Masters, I tend not to play many

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 2>long shots just because you have so many of the

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 2>top tier players in good form that one or two

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 2>of them are going to play good. And I don't

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 2>see a guy from outside the top fifteen or twenty

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 2>in the world winning.

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 3>This week, not even Kyle's play of Louis.

0:28:17.000 --> 0:28:18.720
<v Speaker 1>If there was a guy that would be the guy.

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 3>Probably Any do you ever do like top ten bet

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 3>from Yeah, I do.

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 2>Top ten, top twenty, and there's all kinds of other

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 2>bets as well. Masters is pretty much the best week

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 2>of the year in terms of bets. There's literally every

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:39.240
<v Speaker 2>possible bet out there there's you know, over unders on

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 2>everybody's finishing positions in the field too or out there.

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 2>So it's a pretty fun week to be looking at

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 2>the Masters.

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so follow Frida egg Polly on Twitter at Frida

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 3>egg Polly and you'll get updates on that and we'll

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 3>be looking for a good week here. So gun to

0:28:57.120 --> 0:29:00.040
<v Speaker 3>your head. Who wins the twenty eighteen Master.

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Justin Rose?

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 3>All right, this always happens to me. I don't know

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm taking Justin Thomas, but I'll probably switch the day of.

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 1>And then Justin Thomas will win.

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly. This happened to me a couple of times

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 3>this year. It happened to me with Day when he

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 3>w d'd from that damn Yeah. And then it happened

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:28.960
<v Speaker 3>with me with Phil. I'm in another league where you

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 3>have to pick an Illinois golfers with all my college buddies,

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:34.719
<v Speaker 3>and my buddies started talking about how that you had

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 3>to pick the Illinois and I'd forgotten about the rule,

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 3>and I had Phil in Mexico, and I then sure

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 3>enough I switch it to Peters and Phil went, I'm

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 3>like this week, I'm going with JT. I've been saying

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 3>it all week so I'm going with JT.

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Well, good luck all right man.

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 3>Well we'll get a we'll do our draft also later

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 3>this week, so that'll be in in today's newsletter. Sign

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 3>up for the newsletter, and good luck to everybody in

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 3>their contests.