WEBVTT - Warner Bros. Rejects Latest Paramount Bid, Favoring Netflix 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple Coarclay, and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:23.080
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 2>All Right, the media MN a trade that just won't

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 2>go away. Warner Brothers Discovery says an amended takeover offer

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 2>from Paramounts Guidance is inferior to its deal with Netflix

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:37.639
<v Speaker 2>and urges shareholders not to tender their shares. I don't

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 2>know what's going on here, people, but our next guest

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 2>does Keith wrong, Anathan. She is the media analyst for

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence here. Actually, Keith, I thought we'd have something

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 2>done by now. I mean, these offers are pretty clear.

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 2>The value seemed kind of similar to me.

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 3>What do you think's going on here?

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 5>So this time what Warner Brothers is saying, in addition

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 5>to the fact that the offer is actually inadequate, this

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 5>is what they said the very first time when they

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 5>rejected this thirty dollars bid from paramount You know, they

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 5>obviously wanted the personal guarantee from Larry Ellison, which they got.

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 5>They wanted, you know, paramount to raise its termination fee

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 5>to five point eight billion to match Netflix that also

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:21.919
<v Speaker 5>they got. But now they're saying that they actually really

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:25.679
<v Speaker 5>do need, you know, a sweetened bid, So they cite

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 5>a number there. They say that if they had to

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 5>terminate their agreement with Netflix, they will also incur you know,

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 5>obviously they have to pay the termination fee, plus there's

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 5>going to be significant financing costs, so all of that

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 5>comes out about one dollars one dollar and eighty cents,

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 5>close to one seventy nine or one eighty a share,

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 5>So they obviously need to be compensated for that. So

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 5>basically I think, you know, they do need a sweetened offer.

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 5>And the big thing that they highlight this time around

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 5>is the amount of debt, so they actually call this

0:01:56.160 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 5>a leveraged buyout, probably the biggest one in the history

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 5>of M and A, and so say that, you know,

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 5>it just presents too many risks and too many uncertainties

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 5>and is definitely inferior to the Netflix offer.

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 6>Right, the conclusion that it has drawn and what it's

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 6>recommending to shareholders remains the same, which is go with Netflix's.

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 6>The Netflix bid having said that, what does it mean

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 6>that Warner Brothers Discovery wrote this letter to shareholders? Do

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 6>we get the sense that shareholders are tendering shares to

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 6>the paramount?

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 5>Not so from what we've heard. You know, when it

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 5>was last reported Scarlett, about five hundred thousand shares were

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 5>tendered at that thirty dollars price. Remember we have about

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 5>two point six billion, so we're really very very long

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 5>ways off. So you know, I think shareholders definitely expect

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 5>the price to go up. They do, you know, think

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 5>that there is going to be a bidding war. The

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:55.959
<v Speaker 5>number out there on the street is that David Zaslav

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 5>is looking for thirty four dollars, as you know, the

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:02.800
<v Speaker 5>final offer which he will sign this his company away

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 5>to Paramount. I'm not sure whether you know Paramount is

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 5>actually going to raise their offer, but that that is

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 5>really the number that he's looking for. And we know him.

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:14.239
<v Speaker 5>He's he's really a master craftsman when it comes to

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 5>to getting the best deal for his company. So again

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 5>it's it's a way and watch.

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 2>We used to call that the final final offer. This

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 2>is our final final We're not we're not getting any.

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:24.799
<v Speaker 6>So final that we need to say twice.

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, Githy.

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 7>We have not heard really too much from Netflix, have we.

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 5>So all on Netflix said today Paul was after you know,

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 5>Warner Brothers Discovery put out that letter, was you know,

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 5>they said, yes, we continue to you know, work with

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 5>Warner Brothers. We filed, we're working with the anti trust authorities,

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 5>you know, we're working with the regulators, and we hope

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 5>to get you know, the deal down. So everything kind

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 5>of proceeding as expected from from the Netflix management team.

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 6>You mentioned thirty four dollars a share is what David

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 6>Zaslov is really eyeing. Is there any reason to think

0:03:57.160 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 6>Netflix will raise its offer.

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 5>Netflix needs to raise its offer, Scarlett, only if Paramount

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 5>comes back with a sweetened bid, And we do think

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 5>that they actually will raise their offer. They really believe

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 5>even though the you know, the market price reaction obviously

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:16.160
<v Speaker 5>has been very negative to this whole Netflix deal, just

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 5>kind of given that it really kind of complicates a

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 5>very clean narrative. I think Netflix really believes that they're

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 5>doing this, you know, in the long in the long

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 5>they're playing the long game here. You know, this is

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 5>a great collection of assets. Again, it's not just the

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 5>cost of doing the deal. It's the cost of not

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 5>doing the deal, and they obviously do not want to

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:35.599
<v Speaker 5>strengthen their competitors. They believe this is a great collection

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 5>of assets that gives them, you know, tremendous value over many,

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 5>many years to come. So I absolutely think they will

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:43.279
<v Speaker 5>raise the price, but the first move has to be

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 5>from Paramount.

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 2>GITHA part of the Warner Brothers discovery plan before this

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 2>offer was it was to spin out their cable networks.

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 2>And that's exactly what Compcast did several days ago, spinning

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 2>out its cable networks. The company new companies called Versant

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Media vs NT. That thing is traded off about twenty

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 2>just in the last few days. Man, what does that

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:06.160
<v Speaker 2>tell you about the cable network business and maybe how

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 2>it might affect these bids.

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:12.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's it's really bleak. And so this actually strengthens

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 5>the case for Paramount. This is exactly what they were saying.

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 5>They were saying, let's buy this whole thing, because you

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 5>don't know where this, you know, the global networks business

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:22.359
<v Speaker 5>and the TV networks is going to actually trade and

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 5>here we go. Versun is actually just proving their point.

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 5>So does not really bode well for Warner Brothers. But

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 5>again I think still Warner Brothers will continue to have

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 5>to have the upper hand because again they can argue

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 5>that their cable networks, again a slightly different business, much

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 5>larger in scale compared to the version properties, has an

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 5>international footprint. But again the writing is on the wall, Paula.

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 5>As you've said many times, I mean that the TV

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 5>network business is bleeding, not a slow death anymore. This

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 5>is really happening fast and furious.

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:03.919
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever you

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:13.600
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Nvidia CEO Jensen Wang says the artificial intelligence industry always

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 2>needs more energy. On the sidelines of the annual Consumer

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Tech Events, cees Jensen Wang and Siemens CEO roll On

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:31.839
<v Speaker 2>Bush spoke exclusively with Bloomberg's Ed Ludlow on their AI partnership.

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 4>From Hopper to Blackwell, we increased energy efficiency by tenx.

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:43.040
<v Speaker 4>From Blackwell to Reuben, we increased energy efficiency again by tenx.

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 4>And that translates directly to our customers revenues because in

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 4>the case of ANAI factory, whatever factory size you have,

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 4>you're limited by the power.

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 7>All Right.

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:57.159
<v Speaker 3>That was Jensen Wang.

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 2>He is head of Nvidia and Siemens COO role On Bush,

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:03.280
<v Speaker 2>speaking exclusively with Bloomberg's ed La Low of the AI

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:06.919
<v Speaker 2>Partnership AD at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas.

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 2>Let's get the latest reporting from Vegas. Caroline Hydroids is

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 2>she's out there. She's the b Tech co anchor for

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 2>a Bloomberg News. Caroline, it just seems like, you know,

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 2>you're listening to mister Wog, mister Bush. The need for

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 2>AI and the spending on AI shows no real signs

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 2>of slowing yet.

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 3>Is that the vibe you're getting out there?

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 8>That is very much the vibe we're getting. We heard

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:35.119
<v Speaker 8>from Lisa Su yesterday as well, CEO of AMD, saying

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 8>in the next few years, you're going to have to

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 8>one hundred x the amount of compute that we currently have.

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 8>Has stock still falling today, I might add, and so

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 8>many people may be factoring in this extraordinary scale, which

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 8>we'd likely to see the compute needs still ramp up.

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 8>And it's having a marked effect on certain companies stocks

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 8>like I'm sure you were covering yesterday and into today

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 8>sand Disc. It is up one thousand percent from its

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 8>lows back in April, but it's almost fifty in the

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 8>first few trading days of the year. This is all

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 8>about a shortage in memory, memory storage. We are seeing

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:09.239
<v Speaker 8>still the fact that we're worrying about energy, as Jentsen says,

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 8>we're worrying about memory as you're seeing, impacting.

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 4>Some Sung stock as well.

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 8>We had a Somesung executive on the network yesterday saying, Nook,

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 8>we're going to have to see a high con prices

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 8>because supply is just so tight. And yet still people

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 8>question whether we're in some sort of bubble. But all

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 8>I'm hearing is the infrastructure just needs to get ever

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 8>bigger and we kind of need to get on board

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 8>with that.

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, speaking of memory chip makers, Micron the biggest US

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 6>memory chip maker, jumping two hundred and forty percent last

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:37.959
<v Speaker 6>year and up about ten percent yesterday. So interesting example

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:40.839
<v Speaker 6>of that. So Caroline the Consumer Electronics show, Paul and

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 6>I were reminiscing how once upon a time it met

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 6>big screen TVs and other gadgets that you know, companies

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:48.559
<v Speaker 6>dreamt up but consumers may or may not want to

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 6>sign on for. Is that still what's happening at the

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 6>cees or has it turned into a high level discussion

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 6>on chips and AI.

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 8>I think they're managing to walk both sides. We're still

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 8>seeing those big unveils and discussions coming from in video

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 8>CEO from AMDCO, from Quilcom CEO. They're talking about what's

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 8>inside these electronics or what's inside the compute that is

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 8>needed to foster these electronics. But then you have Samsung,

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 8>which is very much on the AI train with its chips,

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 8>but also unveiling the latest, greatest Samsung frame or the

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 8>latest TV that has you can see all around the

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 8>curvature of it, or the fact that they are still

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 8>trying to think about how your home is going to

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 8>be connected, how your television is discussing, discussing with your

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 8>oven as to whether or not the food is cooked,

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 8>and you get in between messaging between the two. I

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 8>mean there are companies that still continue to unveil. They're

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 8>also the ludicrous. I mean there's lollipops that play music

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 8>as you eat them, There's little toys, everything that seems

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 8>to be about AI and about companionship is something that

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 8>just seems to involve some sort of cuddly toy that

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:55.719
<v Speaker 8>talks to you. But apparently cute is the way in

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 8>which we're going to go forward. But there are the

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 8>vacuum cleaners, there's the massoles chairs. It's still very much

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 8>has this idea of pushing the innovation forward. And the

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 8>main thing, guys, I cannot walk without seeing a humanoid

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 8>robot or some sort. So we're gonna have some big

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 8>interviews a little bit later. We got Boston Robotics, for example,

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 8>coming on the show, and that's really Boston Dynamics in fact,

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 8>which has a huge new unveil of its latest humanoid.

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up.

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 7>Are for this.

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:31.679
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am. He's done on Apple, Cocklay and

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 6>Well, there have been lots of big games in the

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 6>lead up to the Super Bowl, and of course there

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 6>will continue to be as we head in that direction.

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 6>So let's bring in Brian Eggers. He covers everything for us,

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 6>from the gaming companies to the lodging companies to the

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 6>cruise ship companies. See your gaming and lodging analysts here

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 6>at Bloomberg Intelligence. And Brian, you and your team have

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 6>done some work and how Draft Kings is positioning itself

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 6>for the NFL playoffs.

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so, DraftKings and Fandel, among other things, recently rolled

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 9>out these prediction market apps which are separate from their

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 9>sports books.

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 7>And this is really to.

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 9>Coldpeep our head on against call She and Robinhood and

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 9>other of these financial firms that offer these event contracts

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 9>in a number of states.

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 7>How big is it?

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm hearing more and more about this prediction market market.

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:24.559
<v Speaker 3>How big is this that?

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 7>I mean, this is potentially really large.

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 9>I don't have numbers in front of me, But the

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:30.319
<v Speaker 9>key thing is that call She and Robin Hood are

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 9>trying to do this in all fifty states. They're about

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:36.560
<v Speaker 9>a dozen states that either hold them cease and desist

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 9>because they effectively are engaging in illegal sports betting according

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 9>to the states, or a couple of states have warned DraftKings,

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:44.200
<v Speaker 9>fandled don't do the same thing.

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 7>If you've got a sports book license.

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 9>So what DraftKings and Fandal did is try to go

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 9>into states with this product where they don't.

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 7>Operate sports books.

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:56.079
<v Speaker 9>They can do prediction markets on politics or entertainment events

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 9>in any state, but the real issue is with respective sports.

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 7>That's where they limit themselves.

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 6>Let me ask you dumb question, and maybe we don't

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 6>know the answer to this yet. Who is the target

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 6>audience for a sports prediction market versus a sports contract

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 6>and in production market setting versus you know, just a

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 6>regular parlay or simple bet.

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 9>In recourse, the type of person in terms of the

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 9>type of area or territory. Think about the fact that

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 9>you've got mobile sports books in almost thirty states, with

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 9>thirty some odd states Draftings, Fandel and twenty five of

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 9>them other states, big states like Texas and California that

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 9>don't have legal sports books in sports betting, that's a

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 9>logical market for call She and Robin the do go

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 9>in there and say you can do these prediction markets

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 9>and engage in that even though sports betting isn't active

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 9>and legal in the state.

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 7>That's really the big.

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 3>So what would Texas and a Florida say about that?

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:51.319
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 7>So, without going through every state.

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 9>There about a dozen states that either specifically told call

0:12:56.679 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 9>she and poly Market or Robinhood ye see and assist

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 9>on do this. A few others have issued Wetter's warning

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:07.320
<v Speaker 9>Draftings of Fandel do not offer a sports prediction market

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:09.199
<v Speaker 9>in a state where you've got a sports bet license.

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 9>So what Fandom and Draftings did is you know, seventeen

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 9>states for Draftings five or Fandel. They're offering this product

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 9>in states where they don't have sports books, and we're

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 9>sports betting isn't quote legal.

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:23.959
<v Speaker 6>Who regulates the sports markets, So it's confused.

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:27.079
<v Speaker 9>It's very confusing because the sports books are regulated by

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:30.679
<v Speaker 9>state gaming regulatory authorities. The prediction markets are regulated by

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 9>the CFTC, so it's state versus federal. And that's been

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 9>the argument of Kolchi that you know, we're a financial

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 9>futures contract, we're not sports betting. We are federally regulated.

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 9>The states have pushed back and said no, this is

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 9>a form of effectively on licened sports betting, and ultimately

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 9>I think this heads to the Supreme Court. That's certainly

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 9>in the view of Eliott Stein or litigation analyst.

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 2>So what are the casino companies say these days? What

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:58.199
<v Speaker 2>do they say, does that impact their sports book and

0:13:58.240 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 2>their sports betting?

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 9>And on the margin, to the extent that MGM and

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 9>Caesars have mobile products, it's very possible to look into

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 9>this type of product as well. Again in those states

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 9>where sports beinning isn't legal, so.

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 7>Everyone's going to be think about it.

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 9>And the real other other wrinkle is Texas and California

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 9>once they realize we may not have sports betting. What

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 9>we have effectively sports betters. If you believe that's what

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 9>prediction markets are, we might as well legalize it. And

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 9>so there's a whole bunch of ramifications to this.

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 6>What about Native American tribes in states like California in Connecticut,

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 6>where do they fit it?

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 9>I mean in California, although sports betting isn't legal in California,

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 9>the tribes have themselves challenged and through legally the Whites

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 9>of KAlSi and Robin Hood I don't remember which one.

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 9>So you know to the extent that tribes have opportunities

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 9>to operate sports books, which effectively Florida has the Seminal

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:56.359
<v Speaker 9>Tribe operating operating hard rock betting site even though draftings

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 9>and or are not involved. So the tribes very much,

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 9>will care to the extent that this is effectively a

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 9>competing product as consumers might perceive it.

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 3>So is betting just going crazy the total dollar not.

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 2>I see kids, high school kids having conversations in detail

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 2>showing a level of expertise which really blows me away.

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Kids high school kids, and I don't know, it just

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 2>doesn't feel it's surprising.

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 9>And it also gets very problematic when you have college

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 9>kids college games.

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 7>Yeh, college players.

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 9>So but yeah, there's a big national draw to that

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 9>draw to this, and I think the real I don't

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 9>think draftings of fand will get as affected as some

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 9>might fear in states where they've got a sports book,

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 9>but in states where they can't operate a sports book.

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 9>But Kyll she and Robinhood and Polymarket others are offering

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 9>prediction markets. That's where I think they see risk as

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 9>well as opportunity.

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 6>Brian, what about the sports leagues, the NFL, the NBA,

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 6>the NHL, the MLB. How do they fit into all this?

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 6>I mean, are they're going all in with the prediction markets?

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think so.

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 9>They're watching obviously with interests. I mean, the major principles

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 9>in terms of where there's heads are state regulators versus

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 9>federal regulators. State's issuing in some cases seas and desist orders.

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 4>It.

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 9>Ultimately, because there's a lot of ongoing court cases, many

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 9>on appeal, the Supreme Court is the logical destination for

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 9>the legality of this.

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 7>But I mean that's the good reason. Maybe years away,

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 7>depends on the urgency.

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 9>I know Elliott Stein believes that could happen potentially as

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 9>early as twenty twenty six, that there's a decision, but

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 9>we don't know. But ultimately, I think this it needs

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 9>to be qualified and resolved as to who has jurisdiction here.

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 3>It is crazy the amount.

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean just a few years ago, I mean, you

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't even have thought this, But now you get sports

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 2>teams in Vegas.

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean, yeah, so they I think my way

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 9>to start this is the leading up to the presidential election.

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 9>There was a lot of activity on one and polymarket

0:16:57.480 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 9>about who we win the election, and that kind of

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 9>kicked off awful water popular interest in this, which means

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:05.959
<v Speaker 9>that's when they became involved in sports prediction markets actively

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:06.640
<v Speaker 9>a year ago.

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:21.679
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 3>We'll get a story here today.

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:34.919
<v Speaker 2>Alaska Airline ordering Boeing Company aircraft including one hundred and

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:38.680
<v Speaker 2>five narrow body seven thirty seven Max ten models and

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 2>five Trip seven eighty seven wide body aircraft. So good

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:43.920
<v Speaker 2>day for Boeing. This stocks up about eight tens to

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:46.879
<v Speaker 2>one percent. Stocks up about thirty four percent over the

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 2>trailing twelve months. George Ferguson joins us here senior Aerospace,

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 2>defense and airlines analyts for Bloomberg Intelligence. George A, is

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 2>this this seems like a nice day, a good order

0:17:58.400 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 2>for Boeing.

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:00.920
<v Speaker 3>How are they doing out in the marketplace?

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:03.400
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I think it's a It was a nice kickoff

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:07.160
<v Speaker 10>to the year. As far as orders look through, we've

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 10>tracked them through November of last year. We get to

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:14.439
<v Speaker 10>see December order and deliveries from Boeing or Airbus. But

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 10>through November of last year, Boeing was beating Airbus in

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:21.399
<v Speaker 10>the order game for the year, and so you know,

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:24.439
<v Speaker 10>we had sort of expected this or there were some

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:26.879
<v Speaker 10>core customers. I think that we're probably sitting on the

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 10>sideline watching the sea if Boeing was going to get

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:33.679
<v Speaker 10>its troubles behind it before it placed orders, and so

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 10>we saw a bit of a bounce back last year

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 10>in twenty twenty five. Is Boeing sort of pulled in

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 10>a bunch of those orders. I think if you're an airline,

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 10>you know, and you're sort of fleet planning, when you

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 10>have backlogs that are ten years large for the for

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 10>the most important airplanes, for the narrow bodies, you kind

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:53.680
<v Speaker 10>of got to be sort of in the order mode,

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:57.199
<v Speaker 10>you know, every year or so many years, sort of

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 10>tapping up orders to make sure that you have airplane

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 10>is coming regularly as either you're expanding or things leaving

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 10>your fleet. So good to see Alaska do it again.

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 10>We think Boeing a lot of Boeing customers caught up

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:12.119
<v Speaker 10>last year. This year probably a decent order year as

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 10>well as that catchup continues for Boeing. And this was

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 10>a core customer for Boeing. Alaska has been a core

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 10>Boeing flyer. They recently bought Hawaiian that added a bunch

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:25.119
<v Speaker 10>of Airbus aircraft to its fleet, not a lot, but

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 10>a bunch of them, a handful of them, actually more

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 10>than a handful of twenties or thirties. And I think

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 10>another indicator that they've kept this Alaska have kept the

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 10>Alaska Airlines as a core customer, and I would see

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 10>them kind of going to a more pure Boeing fleet

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 10>in the future as they ease out some of those

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:43.920
<v Speaker 10>Airbus aircraft.

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:46.399
<v Speaker 2>It seems like a big order for Alaska. Is this

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 2>signal any change in strategy or what's going on there?

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think it's pretty interesting, right Alaska they're seven

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 10>eighty seven dash. They think DASH tens altering when they

0:19:57.000 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 10>buy them. With the biggest seven eighty seven, they've got

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 10>an order for fi of them. Alaska traditionally had been

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:05.639
<v Speaker 10>just a narrow body kind of US but really West

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 10>Coast focused airline. Since they bought Hawaiian, they've added international routes.

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 10>Clearly they added Hawaii Hawaii Hawaiian had routes into Asia

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:17.400
<v Speaker 10>where there's a fair amount of demand for Hawaii. Alaska

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 10>looks to be trying to grow into a global airline.

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 10>They've got European service now too, So this is I

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:29.919
<v Speaker 10>think a continuation of that push by Alaska to be

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:31.679
<v Speaker 10>what it wants to be when it grows up. I

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 10>guess which is going to be maybe another one of

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:37.160
<v Speaker 10>the big, big US full service carricers.

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Is there room, George, do you think for another US

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:41.959
<v Speaker 2>full service carrier?

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 10>I think if you do it well, there probably is, right.

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:47.399
<v Speaker 10>I think, look, got you got Southwest coming as well.

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 10>Southwest is adding premium seating. They're already pretty.

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:51.640
<v Speaker 7>Large in the US.

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 10>They don't have much international, but Southwest is definitely a

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 10>force to be reckoned with. But they're leaving the old

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:01.679
<v Speaker 10>world where they were very much a pure fleet and

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:05.199
<v Speaker 10>they could control costs well, going again into the you know,

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 10>sort of premium and making their operations more complex. Alaska

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 10>kind of come in the other way. They already have

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:16.120
<v Speaker 10>premium now trying to go global. I mean, I think

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:18.679
<v Speaker 10>going back to Alaska, they've got to figure out what

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:21.159
<v Speaker 10>they want to be when they grow up, because I

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 10>don't think they can survive just as a largely West

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:28.399
<v Speaker 10>coast airline. I think Hawaiian was the beginning of that

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 10>expansion strategy, which included long all this, uh, these following

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 10>orders I think reinforced to me that's the direction they're going.

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 10>They're going for a global airline.

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 7>You know it's going to.

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 10>Take a while to get there, but that's what they're

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:41.160
<v Speaker 10>going for.

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 2>Would regulators ever allow, you know, the combination of all

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Alaskan Southwest for example.

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:52.640
<v Speaker 10>You know, that's to me, I think anytime you get

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 10>some of the big carriers involved in buying somebody, I

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 10>think it gets difficult.

0:21:58.320 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 7>I think it's gonna I think it would be hard.

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:00.639
<v Speaker 7>I think it would be hard.

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:02.399
<v Speaker 10>I think Alaska I had to look at something maybe

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 10>smaller or you know, Southwest. I think would be difficult

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:08.679
<v Speaker 10>to do an acquisition, maybe a very small acquisition. But

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:11.479
<v Speaker 10>if Alaska's getting together with somebody, I think it's kind

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:12.640
<v Speaker 10>of jet blue and down.

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 2>What do you think here of just in twenty twenty

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:17.400
<v Speaker 2>six air traffic?

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 3>Air travel? How do you think that's going to shape

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 3>up this year?

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, So we see a lot of additions to premium

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:27.400
<v Speaker 10>to premium carriers, and we see carriers adding premium seats

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 10>that weren't traditionally premium carriers. So to us, it feels

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 10>like premium could be under a bit of pressure as

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:36.359
<v Speaker 10>we get into the into the new year or twenty

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 10>twenty six here because it looks like a lot of

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:40.879
<v Speaker 10>people go in that direction. That's where that's where the

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 10>earnings have been driven lately. Loyalty programs super important. Basic economy.

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 10>World looks like it's starting to right size. Things could

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:51.400
<v Speaker 10>get better, but it will take a little time.

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 4>I think.

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:58.200
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:01.880
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcast. Listen live each

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:05.680
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:12.680
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal