WEBVTT - How Déjà Vu Works

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera.

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you welcome to Stuff you Should Know

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:11.159
<v Speaker 1>from house Stuff Works dot com and be sure to

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>check out the new Stuff you Should Know blog now

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>on the house Stuff Works homepage. This podcast is brought

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>to you by Audible dot com, the Internet's leading provider

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of spoken word entertainment. Get a free audio book download

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>of your choice when you sign up today. Blog onto

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>audible podcast dot com slash stuff today for details. Hey,

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark. With me

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:40.159
<v Speaker 1>is Charles W. Chuck Bryant. Uh. And you put the

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>two of us together, you know that you have stuff

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you should know? Right? That's right, Josh, as you're doing there, Chuff,

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 1>I know you're laughing because I am doing a little thing.

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:50.199
<v Speaker 1>I have punk in my ear and I could use

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a cute tip if you have one. Hey, fun fact.

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Did you know that cute tips originally called baby gaze?

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Baby Gaze? I don't think I knew that, but it

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>sounds familiar. True story story. Very cool. I like starting

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>off with a fact that has nothing to do with

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>our show. Sure, right, So, Chuck, speaking of having nothing

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to do with our show. Um, let's talk about deja vu?

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 1>You ever had it? I have? And uh, let me

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 1>add this as a listener suggestion. Yeah. Dedicated to one

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 1>Peter Harrison of Pittman, New Jersey, Keeping It Real and

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey in the Garden State. He actually had deja

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 1>vu when he was listening to I Believe our Exorcism podcast.

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:32.399
<v Speaker 1>So weird the thought of it unsettling one to have

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 1>deja vu over I would think. It turns out we

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>had a great article on it, so away we go. Yeah,

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 1>let's do this, Chuck. You know, are you part of

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:45.399
<v Speaker 1>the thirty percent who has reported never having all? I

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>guess just hasn't reported having deja vu? Are you part

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>of the sixty to seventy seventy It definitely have had

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>deja many, many times. I was actually surprised to find

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that number was as low as it was. I thought

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>it'd be hovering in the nineties, you know, and then

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the other people were just too late. Say you'd ever say, yeah,

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I've had deja vu. It seems like something everybody would have, right, right,

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>or nothing familiar has ever happened to me exactly like

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't pay attention to anything at all. Right, I

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>just watched you know, Dancing with the Stars all the time.

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:15.959
<v Speaker 1>So um, alright, chuck, Well, let's let's start with the

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>nuts and bolts, shall we. Deja vu French four French

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 1>four already seen and I believe it was named by

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:26.679
<v Speaker 1>Emil Borak, who was a French scientist, first guy to

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.360
<v Speaker 1>ever study it, so he take it its name in

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>his eighteen seventy six book Leveneer decien Ces Physiques. Wow,

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>thank you three years under my belt, pal, I feel

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 1>like you just channeled Peppy le Pew. So deja vu,

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>as everyone knows is uh is a feeling that you've

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 1>seen or experienced something before when you know that you

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>have not. Yeah. Yeah, it's a sense of familiarity, unplaced familiarity. Right.

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 1>For instance, I walk into a store I've never been

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>in and uh see a person I've never seen. I think, wow,

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>this is feel eerily familiar. Yeah. What usually happens to me,

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm part of the sixties to self reported, Um, and uh,

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:11.079
<v Speaker 1>what happens to me usually is there's about three different

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:14.920
<v Speaker 1>things that are going on in conjunction with one another, Like, um,

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, a fish jumps in a lake, and a

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>woman walks by with a baby stroller and then like

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>as a cloud passes in front of the sun, it'll

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>that's how my deja vu is. And I'm like, wow,

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I've been standing in the same spot watching these the

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>same group of things happen, and then it just kind

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>of passes. Interesting. I'm like, WHOA, I don't know if

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I could categorize mine that specifically, but well done, thanks,

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much. That's my deja vu. Um. But yeah,

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>so essentially, um, what was the guy's named war Rock? He? Uh,

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>he mentioned deja vu, but he didn't really go into

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>detail about it. The first really respected I guess scientist

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>to really take up the mantle was Freud, right, and

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>he basically created the theory that that was the driving

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>explanation behind deja vu throughout the twentieth century. Um, and

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that was that he uh, he believed it were that

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>deja vu was the result of repressed memories. He said

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that about everything everything. If it wasn't about the penis

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:20.840
<v Speaker 1>or the vagina, it was about repressed memories and possibly

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>mother's teet. Yeah, I went to the Freud house. Did

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:26.479
<v Speaker 1>you have a nice photo in front of it? That's

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>that's great side. Yeah, what what city is that? Vienna?

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I am almost positive it was Vienna. We'll find out,

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:37.840
<v Speaker 1>won't we. Yes, Yeah, trapsed around though, and all those

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:43.480
<v Speaker 1>memories aren't firmly rooted. So there's a deja vu joke

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>in there somewhere. I just can't find it right now,

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>so we'll just keep going. Huh, sure, we'll edit in later.

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>All right. So, at some point, as we said, Freud,

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, he deja vu explained. And then once Freud

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:57.919
<v Speaker 1>basically was found out to be a m basically a fraud. Okay,

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>well U co addicted um postulator rather than maybe a

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>real scientist. In my opinion, I'm more of a young

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:09.919
<v Speaker 1>Gian than than the Freudian. Of course, Um, I'm a doctor,

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 1>phil guy, are you? You can't go wrong with that guy. Um. Eventually,

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 1>at some point in time, the deja vu was attached

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to the paranormal. I'm not entirely certain when this happened,

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>but you know, you you've heard that kind of thing

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>like it had to do with precognition. Yeah, and and

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:30.160
<v Speaker 1>real scientists wouldn't They kind of just brushed it aside. Well, actually,

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>one one um does explain deja vu through precognitive dreams.

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>But we'll get to that later, right, that's right. Um,

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:39.800
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, that that anytime you put the stank of

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>paranormal onto something that's arguably real, people science just turns

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 1>her back on it. They can't stand things that they

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>can't apply the scientific method to whether it's real or not. Right,

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>So everybody just kind of dropped, at least the scientific

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>community kind of dropped deja vu until our great friend,

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the functional m r I was invented a k a.

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 1>The Wonder Machine, and it sparked this renewed interest in

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>research into into deja vu. Right. Well, yeah, because now

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 1>you can actually look at the brain function and try

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and figure out the science behind it instead of just

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 1>doing the Freudian thing which just makes stuff up. Right. Um,

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>So this is really really really new research. I mean

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 1>just last several years. Right, So the jury is still

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:26.279
<v Speaker 1>definitely out, which is good for us and our listeners

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 1>because we get to talk about a bunch of competing

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:30.720
<v Speaker 1>theories that are super cool, and there's a lot of them.

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I think they're the articles. It's like over forty theories

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:36.840
<v Speaker 1>of what actually is and I think we shouldn't go

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>into all four this would be a four hour podcast.

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>But they they've basically split deja vu into two two

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>broad categories. Right, there's associative and biological. And which one

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>is associative. Well, that's the one that most people out

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>there probably are more familiar with. And that's when you

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>your senses are reacting and you see here, smell something

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:05.159
<v Speaker 1>that stirs up a feeling inside you, and uh it's

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's memory based, and it's very fleeting, like

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>ten to twenty seconds and shorter than that. Actually, yeah,

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I would say less than ten. Usually is there a

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>baby carriage involved? Um? These this is this is a

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>deja vu among generally healthy people. Right, so we're not

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>we're not really attaching any real meaning to it. It's

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>more like a WHOA, that was cool deja vu kind

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>of thing. Right. The other one, biological is actually the

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>result of like some sort of structural impairment to the brain. Um, say, epilepsy, yeah, um,

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>possibly schizophrenia. Uh. And these are these episodes are much

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>more vivid um deja vu than than associative deja vu.

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>And uh, the people who experience biological deja vu have

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>much more of a tendency to attach real meaning to

0:07:56.480 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>it and really believe like they they're experiencing something to wise, right,

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not like a fleeting feeling. And if you're an

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>epileptic and you have a case of vivid deja vu,

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>prepare for a seizure. Oh, it's it's right before the seizure,

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>right before. Yeah. And apparently they also smell flowers, sometimes

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>two or oranges, that's what I've heard. Interesting, I agree.

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>So those are the two broad categories. Right. Still, it

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really explain anything right now, it doesn't um with

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>with the biology. It seems like researchers have the biological

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>explanation of deja vu down a little more pat it's

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:34.840
<v Speaker 1>a little more medically based. Yeah, it's like a temporal

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>lobe malfunction possibly. Um. And actually it seems like the temple,

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the temporal lobe has everything to do with deja vu,

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 1>whether it's structural or you know, associative, right, because that's

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>where our conscious memory is is happening basically, which would

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>be a pretty appropriate place for deja vu to take place, rightly, Um, So, basically, Uh,

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 1>there's this part called the there's a part there's a

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 1>temporal lobe region called the medial temporal lobe and um, that's,

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 1>like you said, the part that's responsible for processing conscious memory.

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:14.839
<v Speaker 1>And there's this guy named Robert Efron, and he's a neurologist.

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I take it of some stripe and he did some

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:22.200
<v Speaker 1>investigation into the temporal lobe and he found that it

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:29.080
<v Speaker 1>receives information the same sensory input twice in Yeah, and

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:31.199
<v Speaker 1>it's still held up his valid It makes a lot

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>of sense. Okay, So what what Effron postulated was that

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 1>if we're getting the same information twice, ones direct to

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the temporal lobe, which which process of sensory information. The

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>other one is slightly indirect. It gets routed through the

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>right hemisphere of the brain and then shoots over to

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the to the left hemisphere of the temporal lobe within milliseconds.

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>But there is a delay. There's a lag. And so

0:09:55.640 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>what Efron said was if this delay is longer than normal,

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 1>extended by even a couple of milliseconds, the brain has

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the potential to confuse you know what what, I guess

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of time stamper, you know what situation or context

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>that this this um this century input was taken in

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>UM and maybe a sign uh an incorrect category Hence

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>we get the feeling that we've been there before, we've

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>experienced this before because we're we're confused, and that's what

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>deja vu is, which makes tons of sense. Pretty cool. Yeah,

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 1>that's certainly not the only uh theory of what deja

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>vu is, No, uh, cell phone theory, So we talk

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>about that. Yes, this Dr Alan Brown is a guy

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>who's don't on our research in this area as well,

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and he did studies at Duke University and SMU Southern

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:48.839
<v Speaker 1>Methodist with Elizabeth Marsh it's a lady's name. And what

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>they did was they worked with subliminal suggestion, which is

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:54.719
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite things. I think it's really cool

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and interesting. Uh. They showed photographs of different locations to

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>students and they're gonna you know, the plan was to

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>ask them which ones were familiar, but before they did this,

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 1>they showed the same photos at subliminal speeds so like

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>ten of twenty milliseconds. And what happened was the brain

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>of course registered it and unconsciously, right unconsciously, and that

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>they found familiarity with these slides of locations that they've

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 1>never been to. Like they showed the people the same

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>picture uh once in a split second, and then later

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 1>on they thought that they hadn't seen it before, but

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the brain had already unconsciously a process there, right, And

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you got it, buddy, so and and there was an

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:39.319
<v Speaker 1>increase in deja vu among those people. Yeah, and um,

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I saw a thing on YouTube and this isn't exactly

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:43.679
<v Speaker 1>deja vu, but this is a really cool thing. There

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 1>was a guy in England named Darren Brown. He's a

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 1>magician and mentalist, which I think is a great title. Uh,

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 1>And he did this, if you look up on YouTube

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Darren Brown and subliminal advertising. He did the school deal

0:11:56.080 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 1>where he brought in these two advertising guys and said, hey,

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I want you to come up with an advertising plan

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:06.319
<v Speaker 1>for me based on taxidermy. And that's all he told him.

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>And then he sat down an envelope and said this

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>is my plan and don't look at it or anything

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>like that sealed. These guys came up with a little

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, sketch and a logo and a and a tagline.

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>He came back in ten minutes later or however long

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 1>it was, and opened up his envelope and the logo,

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the tagline, everything was really really really similar. And these guys.

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>These ad guys were just blown away. And then it

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 1>showed a replay of their trip to the studio where

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:37.559
<v Speaker 1>they did this, and he had placed these little subliminal

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>suggestions everywhere. One is a little sticker on the inside

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 1>of their cab. One was on a road sign that

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:44.559
<v Speaker 1>they passed. One was a group of students that were

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>wearing a T shirt with a logo that passed in

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>front of the car. And their brains picked all this

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 1>stuff up. It was again Darren Brown. Okay, what was

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the name of the clip? Do you remember, Darren Brown?

0:12:56.400 --> 0:13:01.199
<v Speaker 1>Subliminal advertising, very direct and appropriate it yes, So what

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 1>are you doing there, Chuck? You okay? Well, yeah, my

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 1>ear is uh got some gunk in it? Oh yeah, yeah,

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I could use a qute tip. Actually, hey, Chuck, did

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you know that qute tips originally called baby gaze gay

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>as in g A y S. I didn't know that,

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>but that sounds familiar back in. That's what it's interesting.

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Another aside. Sorry, So okay, Chuck, that cell phone theory, right,

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>that's what it was called. That was Alan Brown. Yeah,

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 1>so it um it applies to deja vu in that

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess Dr Brown is saying that we are when

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 1>we're not really paying attention, when we're distracted, UM, we're

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>still processing sensory information unconsciously. So then let's say you

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>walk into a room and you're not really paying attention

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to you're talking to somebody. Um, when you do turn

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>your attention to your surroundings and you start taking that

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>sensory and putting consciously, that's where potentially where deja vu

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 1>comes in. Because we're comparing this new conscious sensory and

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>put into something or brain is already familiar with him.

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 1>We're like, whoa, I've been here before. And they found

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>that some people that are stressed and have anxiety are

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>more prone to it. They also found that people who

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>are refreshed and rested are more prone to it. So yeah,

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 1>we're still getting a handle on deja vu. Right. Yeah,

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>one study says one thing and the other says the

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>exact opposite. I love those. I've got another study, beautiful,

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>let's hear it. It's called the hologram study. Good one. Okay,

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>So this guy's name is Hermann's no s no no W,

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and he's Dutch, and um, he basically has the theory

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>that UM memory memories are like a hologram, right, like

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 1>a three D construct, and they are if you take it,

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>just a small piece of it, you can reconstruct a

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>memory from it. But if you take a very very

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>small fragment, the memory is not going to be completely

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>accurate or true. Right. So Dr Snow's theory actually I

0:14:56.000 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>think he's a philosopher. Maybe his theory is that, uh,

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>we have little snippets of memory brought back, we recall

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 1>them that are triggered by something familiar, but then we

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 1>reconstruct those memories incorrectly too, and we use that immediate

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>um experience. Uh say, getting into a car, we have

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>a memory that we've forgotten about a similar car um so,

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>but we still recall a little bit of it, but

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>we reconstructed around the car that we're in right now,

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 1>and we feel like we've been there before. He's a psychiatrist,

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>by the way, thank you for that. Thank you, no

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>listener mail on that one. Fact checking as we go. Yeah,

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 1>you're quick, chuck, thank you you got any more? Uh? Well,

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I know you probably wanted to hit um the precognitive

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 1>dream thing. Yeah, and I don't remember who came up

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>with this one, do you. Yeah. Swiss scientist Arthur funk Houser. Okay,

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 1>so funk Houser with the coolest name on the planet.

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>He he believed that we actually have dreams that pretend

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the future, if essentially very cool, um, and that it's

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>generally mundane stuff that we easily forget. And he actually

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 1>conducted a study I think back in nine of a

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>bunch of kids at Oxford and found that something somewhere

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>around like twelve point seven percent of their dreams eventually

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 1>bore a striking similarity to future events. And he said,

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>it's as simple as that we we have somehow have

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 1>an ability to see what's coming down the road. Uh,

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>And that's where deja vu comes from. Well, I did,

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>like you said, it was usually more mundane things. What

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>he theorized, and this makes sense too, is that if

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 1>if it wasn't mundane, were more likely to remember it

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>in our you know, just waking conscious right, and these

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>are the ones that slipped between the cracks, right, and

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>since it was Monday, since we can forget it. That

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 1>would explain that kind of hazy quality that um that

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>deja vu always has. You know, it's nothing's quite right

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, it's pretty cool, yeah, uh. And

0:16:56.880 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and actually, interestingly, his theory was backed up by another

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>study from I found similar results, except that it was

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:07.959
<v Speaker 1>more in the ten percent of you know, dreams pretend

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:10.199
<v Speaker 1>the future. I think it's actually ten percent of the

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:13.639
<v Speaker 1>people have dreams that could not ten percent of dreams.

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Are you sure? I would say ten to twelve percent

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 1>of my dreams come true. It's happening right now. You

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:23.440
<v Speaker 1>dreamed of having a podcast with me one day check.

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Should we talk about jen vu? Yes? Please? Jean vu

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>is the opposite of day. I know a lot of

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 1>people say day, but that's just kind of a funny

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:38.159
<v Speaker 1>way to say. It is actually a real term. I

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I passed over this part in the article. Fuck, I'm

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 1>not kidding. This is brand new to me. It was

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:45.199
<v Speaker 1>not in the article. My friend, It's called supplemental research.

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>You should try it sometimes. No, jan vu is is

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>a real thing. It means never seen and uh. It's

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:56.119
<v Speaker 1>when a familiar situation is not recognized. It's like face blindness.

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Not really, Okay, it was worth the shot, Chuck right. Actually, Like,

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 1>have you ever had the situation where you've said a

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:06.240
<v Speaker 1>word like over and over in your head and then

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the word starts to sound funny or that happens to

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:12.880
<v Speaker 1>me when I see it spelled right exactly. That's John

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:16.439
<v Speaker 1>avou And basically what's happening there is um. The word

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:19.399
<v Speaker 1>is just existing in its form, so the function of

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>meaning is lost. So weird. You're not applying the function

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 1>of meaning. So you say, um, eggs benedict fifteen times

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and by the end of it, or if you write

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>it out fifteen times, you're gonna be thinking eggs benedict?

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>What are eggs and benedict? And what is hollandaise sauce?

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>This this word looks so weird. That's one example of

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 1>John don't don't forget the Canadian bacon. Chuck, who can Yeah,

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Our Canadian friends, we love your bacon.

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:48.159
<v Speaker 1>They just call it bacon up there. Well we call

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>it ham. That's true. So um, so wow, Chuck, you

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:55.159
<v Speaker 1>just you dazzled me just now. Good. Yeah, I'd like

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:57.959
<v Speaker 1>to do that. Yeah from time to time. Well that's uh,

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that's sto, I guess for now, until you know, somebody

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:03.439
<v Speaker 1>finally cements down exactly what's going on. And again, I

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>think the Wonder Machine is going to be the the

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>utility that does it for us. Je vu all over again,

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 1>as uh Yogi Barrow went said, great man, Um and Chuck,

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's time to say hey to the people

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>at audible. Audible dot com are one of our beloved sponsors.

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Even better than that, let's tell everybody that the people

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:27.119
<v Speaker 1>at Audible are trying to say hey, it's all of

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:31.400
<v Speaker 1>our listeners. If they go right now, UM to audible

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 1>podcast dot com slash stuff and sign up, they'll get

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 1>one free download. And this is actually kind of big.

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>They have fifty tho plus titles on the site. You

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>can get a book if you want. Yeah, you can

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>get stand up and actually, um, I was looking on

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the site and they have a bunch of George Carlin

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:53.159
<v Speaker 1>and specifically a Place for My Stuff are arguably his

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 1>greatest work ever. Um it's my personal favorite. Um. So yeah,

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 1>there's all sorts of it's not just audiobooks, yeah Carlin.

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:03.200
<v Speaker 1>And speaking of which, this is an audiobook either and

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm surprised you didn't pick this one. It's your your plug.

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 1>But maybe the Gonzo Tapes the Life and Work of

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Dr Hunter S. Thompson. These were just recently released and

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 1>these are just it's a long series, I believe that's

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>an abridge version on audible dot com about but you

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:23.640
<v Speaker 1>get about six hours worth of famous author extraordinary Hunter

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>S Thompson uh speaking into a tape recorder. Over the

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 1>years he did this and they've gathered all these tapes

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's really really awesome. I have found my one

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:35.160
<v Speaker 1>free download. So what I will be doing is going

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to audible podcast dot com slash stuff in signing up. So, Chuck,

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I know you love plugging the blog. You want to

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:49.159
<v Speaker 1>you want to take the opportunity. Sure, I would like

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>to direct everyone to our new blog, which is a

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:58.399
<v Speaker 1>Internet term for blogged, and Josh and I write on

0:20:58.480 --> 0:20:59.879
<v Speaker 1>this sing a couple of times a day and we

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about cool stuff. And basically the idea here was

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:05.359
<v Speaker 1>to get the stuff you should Know Nation involved with

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 1>each other and leading comments and talking to each other

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and reading about cool stuff that they should know, uh,

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 1>instead of just listening to us say it. And also,

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:16.640
<v Speaker 1>don't forget to join these stuff you should Know Nation.

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:20.199
<v Speaker 1>We are actually buying a plot of land right um.

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 1>We'll be sending details out via our blog ironically enough,

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:26.399
<v Speaker 1>and you can access it through the homepage on how

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com. Oh yeah, and it's called stuff

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 1>you should know. Yeah, yeah, appropriately enough and you can

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 1>see lovely photo of Josh who looks cute as a

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>dang button and chunking his black cap. That's right, so

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 1>looking good. It's good stuff. So now, yeah, there's a

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 1>blog plug. Let's do listener man, right, you ready for this? Josh?

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:51.399
<v Speaker 1>I was born ready, Chuck. I have a couple of

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:56.959
<v Speaker 1>stuff we should know, which our new nicer name for corrections. Um,

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 1>christ I thought it was stuff we should have known. Sure,

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 1>it sounds good. Christine Lee of Toronto, Ontario. And as

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>a quick side note, I can't remember his name, but

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:07.919
<v Speaker 1>we had a Canadian friend right in and say it

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:11.160
<v Speaker 1>really bugs when we say like Montreal, Canada. He said

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:14.959
<v Speaker 1>they'd be like saying Atlanta, United States. So we need

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>to start saying the prob So Christine Lee is of

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:22.639
<v Speaker 1>Korean descent, and she said in the Friday thirteenth podcast,

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 1>we talked about unlucky numbers in China and Japan and

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 1>again and can people die a fright? We talked about

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the same thing and it's actually true in Korea as well,

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and she feels like Koreans are often slighted uh to

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>their Chinese and Japanese friends, so we need to start

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:45.680
<v Speaker 1>looking into other Asian countries. Basically, yes, apparently four is

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:47.879
<v Speaker 1>an unlucky number in Korea, and thank you Christine Lee

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>for that. Sorry Christine and Chris from Pennsylvania. This is

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:54.159
<v Speaker 1>what you're gonna love this one. Uh, he said he

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:58.120
<v Speaker 1>listened to the Comas podcast. I'm surprised that between Josh's

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Magnum p I knowledge and Ucks movie knowledge that you

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 1>guys never brought up the connection between Magnum in the

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>nine movie Coma. Tom Selleck was actually in that movie,

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and I haven't seen it in years, but I remember

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 1>him being one of the Comma patients that was suspended

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:16.399
<v Speaker 1>on wires, and that is indeed true. I don't remember

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Tom Selleck in now when my earliest memory of Tom

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Sellek in a movie was a Looker. No, he wasn't

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>in it. Okay, what was the other one with the

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>robots in? Right? You're thinking of Runaway? Very nice? Yeah?

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Are you sure he wasn't in Looker? Yeah? That was

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Albert Finney. That was a great movie though for an

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 1>eighties sci fi. I agree. Susan Day's in it too. Yeah.

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:40.959
<v Speaker 1>All right, well we should probably get out of here

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 1>before Chuck and I say something to embarrass ourselves right further. Yeah, um,

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:48.679
<v Speaker 1>so thanks for listening. Uh. I would advise everybody to

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 1>go onto the site and um check out how deja

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 1>vu works by an article written by our colleague leanne Opringer.

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 1>There's a nice little easter egg hidden in the article

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:02.880
<v Speaker 1>that may induce deja vu in you. You can find

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>that by typing in how deja vu works in our

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 1>handy search bar how stuff works dot com And if

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 1>you want to send Chuck in I a message via

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 1>electronic mail, a non haiku related message, Yes Chuck, yes,

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 1>non haiku. You can alert us at stuff podcast at

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 1>how stuff works dot com for more on this and

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 1>thousands of other topics. Is it how stuff works dot

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 1>com h brought to you by the reinvented two thousand

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:38.480
<v Speaker 1>twelve camera. It's ready, are you