WEBVTT - Deliveroo’s Debut Shunned by Investors Over Labor Practices

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanibek. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:11.959
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world of business and finances, technology, politics, economics,

0:00:12.000 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>all harnessing the power of Business Week reporters and editors,

0:00:15.120 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>not to mention our journalists and analyst in more than

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>one twenty countries. You can download Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 1>or Bloomberg dot Com. You can also listen to our

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>radio show at two pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>or watch us on YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. During

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>a White House COVID nine Team Response Team briefing earlier today,

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 1>CDC Director Rochelle will Lyndsky explained why Americans need to

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:43.199
<v Speaker 1>remain vigilant in fighting the virus check it out. This

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>is a critical moment in our fight against the pandemic.

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:50.239
<v Speaker 1>As we see increases in cases, we can't afford to

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>let our guard down. We are so close, so very

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>close to getting back to the everyday activities we all

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>miss so much. And that, of course, was ADC Director

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Rochelle will Lanski earlier today. This as there's many virus

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and vaccine headlines again, and we just had one just

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>a few minutes ago, crossing the Bloomberg France starting a

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>four week nationwide lockdown on Saturday. That is coming from

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>their leader at Emmanuel mccrowna. And of course just a

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 1>reminder that there's parts of the world that are still

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>seeing um the numbers really troubling. Yeah, despite the progress

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 1>that we've made here in the United States, much of

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:26.319
<v Speaker 1>the world remains unvaccinated. Dr Ian LUs Bader is clinical

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Associate Professor of medicine at n y U Lanego in

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>a medical center, joining us now on the phone from

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>New York City. Dr LUs Bader, it it's always great

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>when you join us. Thank you so much for taking

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 1>the time. Let's get right into it and talk about

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>what's happening in Europe, as we just learned from Carol

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 1>France starting a four week nationwide lockdown on Saturday. The

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:45.959
<v Speaker 1>big question I have is is this the direction that

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>that we're going in here, considering we're starting to see

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 1>cases creep up as well? I don't think so. And

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Happy Wednesday, Tim and call hopeball as well. Definitely, there's

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a number of countries around the world that are seeing

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>a rise. Fortunately we're not seeing a big rise in

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the United States, but and we've done fairly well. A

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>lot further to go in terms of vaccinations, but frances

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:11.799
<v Speaker 1>uh in a bit of trouble, Poland, part of the UK,

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:16.799
<v Speaker 1>and certainly other countries like Brazil, even Mexico. So we're

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:19.119
<v Speaker 1>seeing a number of areas and I think they will

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>relate to probably one of three or four different reasons.

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:26.640
<v Speaker 1>One is vaccine availability. We've been fairly fortunate here that

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 1>we've purchased a large number of different vaccines. They're all

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>fairly effective, and I think the availability now is even greater.

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 1>So I think we've had that many countries in Europe

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>have been either hesitant to take vaccines, and some of

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 1>them relate to I'll take this vaccine, but not that

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, another vaccine there is suspicious about astra Zeneca

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 1>or gsk or or fiser has a preference. So um

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>part of it is um, the availability of it is

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 1>vaccine hesitancy. Part of it as a lifestyle if there

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>are more social country and they're not really following barriers

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>six ft and so forth, if they're more social. But

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>also some new strains that be one one, seven has

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>a higher transmissibility. So if you're dealing with um a

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 1>population that has not had a lot of vaccine, and

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:24.919
<v Speaker 1>you've got a variant that is more transmissible, in other words,

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>one person can infect instead of two or three, potentially

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>four or five or six people, then you're going to

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>have many more problems. So mm hmmm, are we likely

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to have a fourth wave because of people who might

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>not be taking the vaccine, are putting it off, and

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>because we're seeing a COVID nineteen strain that as it mutates,

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>are very As we see the variants and they're higher,

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>as you said, a higher transmissibility, are we likely then

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>to have a fourth wave? Well, I think that's what

0:03:57.000 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the authorities are worried about, and I we could do

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>a better job at addressing people's vaccine hesitancy. There are

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>people who who are concerned about taking it. There are

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of rumors unfortunately on social media and on

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the internet that are really misinforming people. And I don't

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's enough to say we have to keep our

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>guard up and we have to you know, get everyone vaccinated.

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I think we need to directly address some of the

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:30.039
<v Speaker 1>concerns in terms of safety. Uh, and in terms, we

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>just had FISER data that showed very high efficacy in

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 1>kids twelve to fifteen. I think we need to broaden

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>our availability and really kind of address populations that are concerned,

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 1>why they're concerned, and can we have the experts UH

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 1>from the CDC or other infectious disease specialists kind of

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:55.359
<v Speaker 1>really spell out what people are worried about and why

0:04:55.520 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>those concerns really are not so valid? Dr Spader? Are

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>we still seeing people change their thoughts around getting the

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>vaccine in the sense of what we saw early on

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>December January, especially with with with healthcare workers. Maybe they

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>were hesitant, but then people inside their social circles insteade,

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:17.279
<v Speaker 1>their families started getting the vaccine their friends, and then

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:19.280
<v Speaker 1>that sort of change the way that they thought about it.

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Is that still happening very much so when I think

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 1>you've hit on a very important point, which is people

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>need to share with others that they've had the vaccine,

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:31.920
<v Speaker 1>that they did well with it. There are always some

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:34.719
<v Speaker 1>mild side effects. I think some people are concerned about,

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, potentially longer term UH side effects which were

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>really not seeing um or this report about clots and

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>so forth, which really didn't pan out either. And I

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>think the best way to reduce vaccine hesitancy is to

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:51.559
<v Speaker 1>have people in a peer group socioeconomic group, your friends

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 1>basically say hey, I did fine, you should get it

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.479
<v Speaker 1>as well. Uh, And we're not seeing that as much

0:05:57.480 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>as we should. We talked about the Fiser vaccine it

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 1>protection for kids ages twelve to fifteen. That was in

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 1>a study that the company released the data for early

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>this morning. Dr LUs better. It doesn't get any better

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>than right, yes, really encouraging data and in order to

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>really reach herd immunity, which unfortunately is the only reasonable

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 1>way we're going to end the pandemic. I know many

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:26.559
<v Speaker 1>people talk about therapeutics and so forth, but really having

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to have people get the infection and then treat them

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>is is a very cumbersome way. So vaccines really are

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the key. And having a efficacy in this young population

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that is certainly exposed to in social settings and so forth,

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 1>um and can harbor the virus who have a little

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:51.600
<v Speaker 1>less symptoms. Sometimes this really is key data and hopefully

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll reassure people in terms of safety, certainly efficacy, and

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we need to ramp this up and and

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>ultimately distry rebut it that's really the key thing is

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:06.280
<v Speaker 1>getting the vaccine eligibility for really more people and ultimately

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>younger people is the way to to move forward. Hey

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>speaking a key data research also, I think it was

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>out just this week to uh, there's a study. It's

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of a growing part of evidence suggesting that the vaccines,

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>these are the vaccines by maderna advisor, not only reduce

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the risk of getting seriously ill with covedanteam, but can

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 1>prevent catching the virus in the first place. In other words,

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I we can't be hosts even if we're vaccinated. That's

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>also key. I agree with you completely. You know, many

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>people are concerned or one of the excuses for vaccine

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 1>hesitancy is saying, look, even if I get the vaccine,

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I could still harbored in my nasal firings and transmitted

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 1>And that never really made much sense to me, because

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>once you have antibodies, it's much less likely. Of course,

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you've got blood flow in antibodies in your in your

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>nose and nas of fairings. So you know, there's probably

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:00.120
<v Speaker 1>a few people who may have that, you know with

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>studies where they swab you after a vaccine. But the

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>evidence to me is building greater and greater that the

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 1>vaccines will really make a big difference also in decreasing

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>transmission and acquisition of getting it. But yet, for example,

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>we have about twenty five hundred people in the US

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that have had a vaccine about we're growing about thirty

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>three out of a hundred in the UK, but only

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:25.679
<v Speaker 1>about eight out of a hundred, only about eight percent

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, which I think is why we're seeing this

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>rise in cases. Well, we're seeing the rising cases here.

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>We have to address that. Well, I want to talk

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 1>about that a little bit because in the United Kingdom,

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>where the vaccination campaign is a few weeks even a

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>month ahead of where we are in the United States, um,

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Israel significantly ahead of the United States as well, cases

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and deaths have really really dropped. When does that happen here? Like,

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 1>what do we know about the inflection point that happened

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>in those countries and when that starts to happen in

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the US. Well, the numbers in Israel are are certainly encouraging,

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>are closer to like seventy percent of the population or

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>seventy eight out of a hundred. So that's really when

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>you have heard immunity, and and and the numbers show

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that it's hard to know here because part of her

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 1>immunity are people who have already had the virus, and

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>we think those antibodies do stay around for a while.

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think our numbers, I think our herd immunity

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>is higher than the I'm guessing we're probably closer to fifty.

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:33.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that number is close to the

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 1>sixty or seventy that we really need in order to

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of break viral transmission. So I think we're close,

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>But I think, as the CDC says, we're not there yet.

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Um hopefully in the next few months and well before

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the summer, hopefully we will reach those numbers where we

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 1>will not have to have the same restrictions. But and

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 1>do we know how long we stay protected from bodies

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>vaccine means? Is it months? Is it a year? We

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>don't And I think that's a really good question, And

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>people ask me that question too, They say, well, why

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>should I even take the vaccine? I don't know how

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 1>long it's protective. We do have studies out certainly six

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>to now going on maybe twelve months that do suggest

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 1>there is protection and people may need a booster. We

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 1>don't really know, uh, And certainly if there are more variants,

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>is possible you may need a new strain booster. But

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't really worry about that at this point because

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to measure T cells. And we do think

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that immunity may be longer even than than antibodies, but

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the antibody levels are high and they do last for

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 1>many months at least. Look, I gotta say, I'm not

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>so concerned about the idea of getting a booster. It's

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>it's what I do each year for a flu shot,

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:51.559
<v Speaker 1>So why not just throw the flu shot in with

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>a booster for the COVID shot. It's and look, I

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 1>know that not everybody gets a flu shot, but perhaps

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>that will change. Do we get T cells out of

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 1>these vaccines just quickly? We think we do, yes, absolutely,

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and that probably provides much longer lasting immunity than the

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>actual tighter of the inner bodies. But with all the studies,

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the antibody tigers are high, higher than the natural infection

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and last even longer. So I think there's a lot

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 1>of good data and we need to address that. Well.

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Always good fun, let's talk about the lab lee listen

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>always good information for me. I was thinking, I can't

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 1>wait to where we're in a world where we can

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 1>just go wherever we want with Dr LUs Bader, because

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>we discover so many different Maybe do it in the studio,

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and do it in the studio, all right, Dr Ian

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 1>LUs Bader, Stay safe, Be well, Clinical Associate Professor Medicine

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:40.680
<v Speaker 1>at n y U Landgoing Medical Center. On the phone

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>in New York City. This is Bloomberg Business Week with

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovich from Bloomberg Radio.

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 1>So we are hyper focused on President Biden's tune, a

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>quarter twillion dollar US infrastructure plan. He is expected to

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:57.680
<v Speaker 1>announce it in about I think ninety minutes from now,

0:11:57.800 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and reporting for Bloomberg Business Week is national course by

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 1>that Josh Green, He wrote and notes that the infrastructure

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 1>boon risks adding to the President's immigration woes. It's another

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>side of the story that we hadn't thought about. Yeah,

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and like everything else, it is much more nuanced than

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:15.439
<v Speaker 1>meets the eye. Joel Weber is editor at Bloomberg Business Week,

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>joining us on the remote from Brooklyn. Amanda Colson Hurley

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>as Politics editor for Bloomberg Business week Joel Josh makes

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>a great point in this piece, makes a lot of

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:26.959
<v Speaker 1>great points that the focus really has been on on

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:29.079
<v Speaker 1>on one thing, this idea of a surge at the border.

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>But there's a reason why people are coming across the

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:35.439
<v Speaker 1>United States border with Mexico. And at the same time,

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not necessarily as many children as people think. Yeah,

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I thought what Josh did that was really interesting when

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 1>in this was just like take it sort of two

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>steps further than than at least my brain was was

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:50.719
<v Speaker 1>already going, which was, you know, this infrastructure bill that

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>we expect Biden to announce big money. It will mean

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:56.679
<v Speaker 1>that there will be a big boost to the economy.

0:12:57.080 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>It also means that the humanitarian crisis, immigration uh struggles

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen on the border could only get amplified

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 1>because of that. So so Amanda's bring you in. Um,

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:13.080
<v Speaker 1>how how is Josh able to connect those dots? Yeah,

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean the way that Josh connects them is really

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>looking at um the you know, economic prospects in both

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the US and in Mexico. UM. One of the Yeah,

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:29.079
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that's kind of been missed or

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>overlooked in some of the coverage of what's going on

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 1>at the border is that although there's been this um

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>quite pronounced increase in uh families seeking asylum, there's also

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>been a steady increase since last year in the number

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>of uh, you know, just kind of soul soul adults

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 1>not traveling with families, not seeking asylum, just crossing the

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 1>border for for you know, economic opportunity, um. And a

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of those adults traveling alone are are also Mexican.

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 1>And so what you know, what Josh says is that, um,

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot of these migrants are drawn to uh,

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, opportunities in the US as the US recovers

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>from the pandemic. Uh, you know, with vaccination going pretty

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>well here, with jobs coming back, it's it's an attractive prospect.

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>And Mexico, you know, on the other hand, has been

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>hit very hard by COVID, as has the US, but uh,

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, vaccination is not nearly so far along. Uh.

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>And also the Mexican government has not provided uh, you know,

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>a generous relief at all. Uh. It's taken more of

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a kind of austerity approach. So those kind of factors,

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I think, for for some perspective, migrants would would tip

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the balance to uh, you know, maybe maybe trying to

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 1>go to the US. This is one of those stories,

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>as you said at the top, Tim, it's like just

0:14:57.760 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the facts and that this whole idea of this data.

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Two of those apprehended recently are single adults crossing the

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>border from Mexico into the US Mexicans. The thing that's

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting about this, Amanda to first of all, is getting

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>those statistics and kind of understanding exactly what's going on, UM,

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>but also understanding that adults are looking for jobs they

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>don't require maybe you know, as much handling as obviously

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>kids would who are crossing the border from Mexico into

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the United States. Oh, that's right. And uh, you know,

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that the Josh Green notes in

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>this in the story, uh is that obviously, you know,

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>higher numbers of people making that crossing, uh, you know,

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 1>would be a logistical and potentially political you know, a

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 1>headache for the Biden administration, but not the same way

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>as UM, you know, unaccompanied miners or or families. In

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 1>terms of UM, these are not people fleeing persecution you know,

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>back home. If if they end up being deported, it's uh,

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's not a humanitarian crisis of sending them

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>back into danger. So um, some of those logistical and

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>complications and political risks are not, uh do not rise

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>to the level that they would um with the family

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 1>asylum seekers. So given that, we expect the economy to

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>start to do and continue to do pretty well here

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. Unclear how the economy in Mexico

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>will do, but as Josh points out, there significantly behind

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the United States when it comes to inoculating the population. Well.

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, I'm wondering about potential tools that

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the White House actually has for fixing this crisis. What

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>are those, Amanda, Um, Yeah, I mean if there are

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>certain policies you know that it could try to pursue, um,

0:16:55.640 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Trump administration had suspended temporary work these

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>is um, it could bring those back, um, you know

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and kind of generally open up some of those legal

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 1>paths immigration that have been have been blocked for a while.

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm part of what, uh, what we're seeing with the

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 1>increase in unauthorized immigration is um kind of overflow from

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 1>what you know otherwise might have happened in legal channels. UM,

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:28.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, divide administration could even kind of offer assistance

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to Mexico with vaccination. You know it could um write uh,

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, when we have a surplus of vaccine, I

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:39.120
<v Speaker 1>guess we already do, you know, divert some of that

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to Mexico and that would help revive revive the Mexican

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>economy in terms, so then people would have more opportunities

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:48.639
<v Speaker 1>at home, right. Something we talked to Nobel Lauri h

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Joseph Stiglets about recently about how the developed world has

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to help out the developing nations on a couple different levels,

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>but you know, first and foremost helping them get COVID

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:00.239
<v Speaker 1>under control and sharing those vaccines. Folks, thank you how much.

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week editor Joe Webber with us along with

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week Politics editor Amanda Coulson Hurley. This is

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stinovich from Bloomberg Radio. So among our most read

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 1>stories in the Bloomberg includes this next one, uh, not

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:19.200
<v Speaker 1>delivering in its first day of trading as a public company.

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about Delivery holdings collapsing, Tim and its London

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>public debut. Investors abandoning the food delivery startup and that's

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>because of its labor practices, among other things. Yeah, really

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:33.160
<v Speaker 1>interesting story happening, and it's not one that's necessarily playing

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:35.160
<v Speaker 1>out in the United States. And that's what's so interesting

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to me about this because investors here don't really seem

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:40.359
<v Speaker 1>to care about those But it's trending high. It is.

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:42.919
<v Speaker 1>It is, Oh, it is. What I mean, those investors

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:45.360
<v Speaker 1>don't care about it with American companies, Yeah, exactly, that's

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:47.920
<v Speaker 1>what I mean. That it doesn't transfer, Yeah, it doesn't transfer.

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Diana Gomes is consumer staples analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence, joining

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:53.399
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone from London. Diana, help us make

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:55.120
<v Speaker 1>sense of this because what I'm what I'm getting at

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 1>here is that E s G is something that investors

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:00.400
<v Speaker 1>talk a lot about here, it's something that banks talk

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot about, but at the end of the day,

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not part of earnings, and investors look at earnings.

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 1>That's what moves the company stock. And it seems like

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 1>from what I've read and from what I understand about

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:13.959
<v Speaker 1>the delivery story, there are some big investors that are

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 1>unwilling to actually buy the company's stock because of the

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:22.920
<v Speaker 1>company's labor practices. Yes, Hi, thank you for having me UM.

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>That's uh, that's part to it true. That's uh, yes,

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you doesn't quite transfer to earnings UM. So it's some

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest UK asset managers came out over the

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:39.640
<v Speaker 1>last week saying this is not aligned with with our

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:44.119
<v Speaker 1>investment practice. And yes, part of it has to do

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>with the statues of the writers. So Deliver is a

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 1>logistics focused trying to serve on demand food delivery from

0:19:56.160 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 1>restaurants and also grocery stores. So it needs this big

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>foot of writers that can um really serve the demand

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 1>for for these UH goods, especially at the time where

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 1>we are spending so so much time at home with

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>lockdowns and restrictions. So there is some concern as some

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>of the writers may be earning much WEST and the

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 1>minimum wage and and that really depends how we count

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the hours. But the other point is uh, this is

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>a profit loss in company, so it has been burning

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 1>cash UH and the possible regulation changes, especially in many

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:45.360
<v Speaker 1>of the European markets where Deliver competes with the other

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 1>very aggressive competitors, the regulation is changing and that will

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>mean higher costs because it could mean UH a minimum wage,

0:20:56.600 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>it can mean insurance UM eight holi days we've um

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and all that will then transfer into the learning. So

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>it is a big risk and it's a risk that

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>we were reflected in their perspectives as well. Diane, I

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 1>got a couple of questions, but how how likely is

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>this too that just these types of companies which have

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:22.360
<v Speaker 1>been pandemic plays in the past year are just kind

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>of falling out of favor with investors. We see that,

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and you point this out in your story. I mean

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 1>door Dash is down twenty this month. Uh, you see

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 1>others like that, um also just takeaway European rival, uh

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:38.199
<v Speaker 1>delivery Hero. They have fallen this year. Is it just

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:41.120
<v Speaker 1>a case of like not so interested in these kinds

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:45.639
<v Speaker 1>of companies right now? Yes, So the story is really

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:49.880
<v Speaker 1>turning as we see the vaccinations rolling out, even if

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:54.399
<v Speaker 1>quite slowing in some countries. But the story is turning

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 1>into yes, the consumer will want to do things outside

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>house and we'll want to go dying at their favorite

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:06.680
<v Speaker 1>restaurants and with friends and all that. So this companies

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 1>rely on delivering meals from Russians at home, and that's

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 1>not the demand will not be at the same level

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 1>as it's right. I have to say, Tim and I

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 1>had a conversation off air, and we're just like so

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:23.159
<v Speaker 1>tired of take out, Like just like we're talking about cooking.

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:25.439
<v Speaker 1>It's hard when you're working and all that stuff, right him.

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:26.879
<v Speaker 1>But we were just saying, I'm done kind of a

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>taking Yeah, but the hard I mean, look, it's it's

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:31.640
<v Speaker 1>a tough it's a tough thing to be thinking about

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 1>because in one sense it has absolutely saved people during

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:37.880
<v Speaker 1>during the pandemic when it was like difficult to get

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 1>other types of food, people who were really concerned about

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 1>going outside and just thinking about the people who were

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 1>the essential workers who were delivering this food, right, And

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 1>that's a big part of the conversation here in the

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 1>United States. But I go back to some companies restaurants

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:51.919
<v Speaker 1>exactly and helping out restaurants. But a big part of

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the conversation is it's it's just not necessarily on the

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>radar of investors the same way that it's on the

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 1>radar of investors in the UK when they're thinking about

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 1>out the regulatory risks. I think and and and perhaps

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 1>this is some sort of harbinger of things to come

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:07.239
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. What do you think, Diana, I mean,

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 1>do you think there's a chance that some of the

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:12.680
<v Speaker 1>regulatory risk could come to US companies. Yes, I think

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the regulatory risk is smaller in the US, especially with

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the California Act. It was agreed on quite recently. That's

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>that's required some minimum benefits to be paid, but it

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 1>was quite limited so there, and it was limited to

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:39.440
<v Speaker 1>California as well. So I think the sentiment and the

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the perspectives are different. And that probably hurts Deliver as

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 1>well because they had the choice of wing in London

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 1>instead of New York. And and well that's what I

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:53.440
<v Speaker 1>wondered to about what it ultimately does for the London

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>IPO market. Diana, thank you so much for breaking it down.

0:23:56.640 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 1>Diana goes consider Staples analyst Pepperleinberg intelligent with us on

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:07.719
<v Speaker 1>the phone in London. I'm bro Macro a journal now.

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>But you let me drive. Oh no no, no, drive home, honey, please,

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll do the riding drivel let me. I want to drive,

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Just drive, baby, it's the questions trying. This is the

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 1>drive to the Globe Commune. Thanks, we'll drying us down

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. All right, just about ten and a

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 1>half minutes left in today's trading session. Let's get to

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 1>it with Walter Todd, chief investment Officer, Greenwood Capital Associates,

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>back with us and on the phone from Greenwood, South Carolina. Walter,

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 1>how are you doing good, Carol? Thanks for having me

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>on today. Thank you well, it's good to have you

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:55.399
<v Speaker 1>back with us. How do you feel like where we

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 1>are in terms of out of COVID into a recovery

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 1>into blank for the markets? Yeah, it's really it's really

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 1>amazing to reflect back on twelve months ago. I was

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>just looking at S and P cloes four that day

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and we're pushing four thousand here this afternoon. So one

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest questions I get from people is how

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 1>do you explain this disconnect between what's happened in the

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:24.159
<v Speaker 1>markets over the past twelve months and what's happened in

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the economy. And that's it's very difficult to explain until

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>you look at the federalers are a balance sheet, and

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:31.879
<v Speaker 1>the and the US deficit, and then you can you

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:34.919
<v Speaker 1>can make some sense of it. But looking forward, you know,

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 1>I feel very good about where we are kind of

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>on the vaccine front here in the US and the

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 1>outlook for the economy for the rest of the year.

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:46.160
<v Speaker 1>But ironically the market may struggle a little bit more

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>as we reopen than it did when you know, things

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 1>seem the worst. So you kind of get that the

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:56.639
<v Speaker 1>market looking ahead anticipating the reopening, and then the challenge

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 1>as you actually get very good economic numbers for the

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>rest of this year. So a lot of optimism already

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>priced into markets, is what you're saying, right, Yeah, I

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:07.200
<v Speaker 1>think you know that. I think there is a as

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the saying goes, the easy money has been made, and

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the money moving forward, or the games moving

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 1>forward are going to be more challenging, going to be

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:17.120
<v Speaker 1>more nuance. There's gonna be a lot of chop, which

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 1>we've seen over the past you know, a month or

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:21.639
<v Speaker 1>so in terms of the rotation in the market. And

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 1>then we've got the risks out there, you know from Europe.

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, France just announced today they're going back into

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:29.399
<v Speaker 1>lockdown for four weeks. So we've got other parts of

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:31.639
<v Speaker 1>the globe that are not nearly as good shape as

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the US is. Does that make you a little nervous

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:37.120
<v Speaker 1>when you see what's going on over in Europe? Yeah, definitely.

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:39.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean that, you know, Europe as a block is

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:43.240
<v Speaker 1>a bigger you know, economic um influence on the world

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>economy than the US, so it's very important. Um, they're

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 1>clearly lagging behind from a vaccine standpoint, and I think

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that is one of the bigger risks out there that

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:53.679
<v Speaker 1>they don't kind of get a move and start to

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 1>emerge from this as we have. Of course, they don't

0:26:56.040 --> 0:27:00.200
<v Speaker 1>have the benefit of a tracks going into bank accom out,

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 1>so that's that's a little bit of a challenge as well.

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I have to say, you know, you pull up the

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:05.399
<v Speaker 1>S and P five hundred. I'm just doing that on

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg and obviously it doesn't work for radio. But

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, we were kind of building off of the

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 1>New Year, uh, and then you definitely saw I'm going

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 1>back to pre pandemic, so we built up and then

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 1>of course there was a big drop down into um,

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:24.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, March, and then we've had quite a rally

0:27:24.280 --> 0:27:27.639
<v Speaker 1>and we have recovered not only what we lost um

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 1>because of the pandemic, but we've lost a certain amount

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:33.359
<v Speaker 1>then and that's where you start to say, Walter, if

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:35.159
<v Speaker 1>you look at a chart like that, you're thinking, Okay,

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:37.439
<v Speaker 1>how much are we getting ahead of ourselves? Because I

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:40.680
<v Speaker 1>do wonder where the economy would have been today if

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:43.399
<v Speaker 1>we hadn't dealt with the pandemic. Would we be in

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:46.439
<v Speaker 1>a higher rate environment? What kind of growth? You know,

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:49.239
<v Speaker 1>would the labor market continue to be stressed? I mean,

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I just wonder, Yeah, I mean, I think, um, when

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you kind of look at that assessment over the past year,

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I think clearly the moves at the Central Bank made

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and that the government made in terms of the stimulus

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and the support that they provided, provided that downside support

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:10.360
<v Speaker 1>for the market. But we still have all these issues.

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>We have, you know, ten million fewer jobs than we

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>did a year ago. We still got close to nineteen

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:18.920
<v Speaker 1>million people collecting some form of unemployment insurance. So there's

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:21.920
<v Speaker 1>still a lot of work to be done. But clearly

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the support that you know, the Central Bank and the

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 1>government you know, put out there was was a big

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 1>tail win for financial markets. I'm wondering what happens when

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 1>it comes to taxes because part of the infrastructure plan,

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna hear from the President in a little

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 1>over a half hour. That's when a little a little

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 1>around a half hour, it's when he's scheduled to talk

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 1>at for twenty Eastern time today. Uh and unveil more

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 1>details about his infrastructure plan. Some of those details include

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 1>hike on corporate taxes to from markets not moving negatively

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>on that news. It doesn't seem like investors are concerned

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 1>about a corporate tax hike. Why do you think that is? Yeah,

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 1>that's a great point to him. I mean, I think,

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, the corporate tax height was broadly anticipated. The

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 1>rate that's being proposed. I think the expectation that's gonna

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 1>be walked back down to twenty five. So go from

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 1>one to twenty five. It's it's not in significant, but

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not, you know, a huge move. I think investors

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe missing the fact that this is just part one

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 1>of this plan in terms of the spending and the taxes.

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 1>So there's gonna be a second part of this plan

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 1>that's going to include additional taxes that may bite a

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit more. They may include capital gains UH taxes,

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 1>They may include higher individual taxes as well. So I

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 1>think that's total tax bill that's going to be proposed

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 1>is probably gonna be you know, pushed three trillion dollars,

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and when it fully comes out, that may be a

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 1>bit of a shock to investors. Even though we do

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:51.719
<v Speaker 1>have spending on the other side of it. But remember

0:29:51.800 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 1>taxes hit immediately to spending. The spending is going out

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>over eight to ten years, So there's gonna be a

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 1>drag when we head into two. Because hey, Walter Todd,

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:04.800
<v Speaker 1>as an equity investor or someone who is investing in

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the equity market, just got about thirty seconds here. What's

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 1>more problematic capital gains taxes or a corporate tax hike

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 1>for publicly hell companies in particular, Just quickly, Yeah, I

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 1>think I think from an investor perspective of the capital

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 1>gains hike would be more significant in the main. One

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>of the main reasons for that is there's there's the

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 1>prospect that may become effective upun enactment. In other words,

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 1>if it happens and they passed in September, if it

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:32.480
<v Speaker 1>could become effective this year, and that would be problematic

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 1>for investors. I think. All right, I was good to

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:37.080
<v Speaker 1>check in with you. Walter Todd, President and Chief Investment

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Officer of at Greenwood Capital Associates, on the phone from Greenwood,

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 1>South Carolina. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com, and

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 1>you can also listen to our radio show at two

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, or watch us on YouTube.

0:30:53.960 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Star to Bloomberg Global News