WEBVTT - Listener Mail XXII: Visions

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to Saber Protection of iHeartRadio. I'm any

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Reo and.

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm Lauren Bolblabaum, and today we have an episode of

0:00:15.120 --> 0:00:16.079
<v Speaker 2>listener Mail for you.

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 1>Yes, you know we love these. Yes, Oh, y'all are

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:26.759
<v Speaker 1>so delightful you are, and we love that you take

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the time to write in and you share these stories

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>with us, and we love how you interact with each

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>other after hearing from each other. It's the best. It's wonderful.

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:40.520
<v Speaker 1>It's been a minute since we've done one of these.

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>And I counted on you, Lauren, because I was just like,

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what number. This is, no idea.

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 2>I did have to look it up. This is number

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 2>twenty two, just my favorite numbers.

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh it is okay, great, cool, Yes, but yeah, thanks

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>as always to everyone for writing in. We've got some

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>really good ones today.

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, some real meaty ones. Yeah. Truly truly a

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:14.279
<v Speaker 2>spot of joy in a really heck and weird world

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 2>that we're living in right now. So so thank you

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 2>all so much. But yeah, you want to dive in, yes,

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 2>I will start.

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>And I do have to say I have loved how

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>many people have written about pasta Sality, especially after Lauren's

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:39.119
<v Speaker 1>pretty Uh. I won't to say not intense, but just like.

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Slightly slightly harsh.

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:46.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know that's okay. Yeah, but that didn't stop

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>you all?

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 2>No as well?

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 1>It should shunt. Yeah, no, it shouldn't. So we've got

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>some pasta sality emails here. Kelsey wrote, when Savor's latest

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>episodes started in my cueue this afternoon, I was prepping supper,

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>specifically pasta salad. I had not glanced at the title

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>or synopsis before listening. It was very fun listening to

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>you talk about pasta salad while I made some. When

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I make pasta salad, it is usually because it is

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>hot out and I am trying to avoid cooking late

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 1>in the day. It is always a what have I

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>got and how can I use it?

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:23.959
<v Speaker 2>For centure.

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Occasionally I crave a lemony garlicky feta and olive strewn taboule,

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>but no one else in my house really wants that,

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 1>so it's just for me. Tonight's pasta salad is fusilli

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>with grated parmesan dice, tomato dice, bell pepper, corn, and

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>chopped pickled chilis. The dressing is salsa, canola oil and

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a bit of mayo, a squirt of ketchup with cumin, coriander, paprika,

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and regano all run through the food processor to smooth

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and emulsify. It'll be served alongside grilled Smoky's and a

0:02:56.880 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>green salad. I have to say all of your sometimes

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm so envious of your dinner situations listeners when I

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>hear what you do and how you have these go

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:19.639
<v Speaker 1>to recipes. My mom, she was a big to boulet.

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh she loved it, but similarly, my brothers and dad

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't really like it, so it was just for her also.

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean that sounds that sounds delightful. That

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>sounds like the tabulet one sounds like exactly what I

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>would like to eat. That other one if you left

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>out the pasta, I would be great with it. But uh, yeah,

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>it's just a personal thing that I'm going to have

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>to continue working through, you know or not?

0:03:57.280 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, sure, lean in.

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, But I also appreciate like it's a like a summertime.

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a fun time. I can make this. I have

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>to say, this is something I have to work through.

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>If I see like I have to put something in

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>a food processor.

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh oh man, we need to get you like one

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 2>of those little immersion blenders.

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:23.160
<v Speaker 1>That you just have.

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:27.719
<v Speaker 2>Oh it's so easy, Annie, I know.

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>E'sye. I know, I need to work through it. Okay,

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>we both have things. Maybe we'll think about more.

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 2>There you go. There, that's always always room for self consideration. Sure, yes, uh,

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 2>Cale wrote, Hi Annie and Lauren, your recent episode on

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:51.359
<v Speaker 2>You Guessed It? Pasta Salad had me considering whether or

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 2>not it is a dish I actually enjoy. I loved

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 2>the butt when you say how it's never really the

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 2>main event, but more of a side option at potlucks

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 2>and barbecues. This is eventually what I decided as well,

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 2>and ultimately it's a side I most often try to

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 2>avoid due to my sensory issues with certain food textures.

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Lo and behold. A few days later, my partner lovingly

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 2>made pasta salad as a main dish for dinner. I

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 2>took this as a sign from the universe that maybe

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:19.599
<v Speaker 2>it was time for me to give it another chance,

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:22.600
<v Speaker 2>especially because the dish was a childhood favorite of my partners,

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 2>as her mother would make it on hot days because

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 2>of its simplicity and well general coldness. The verdict, I

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:31.479
<v Speaker 2>can now say I am a big fan of my

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 2>partner's pasta salad. It is still up for debate whether

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 2>I enjoy all pasta salads or just this one. But

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:39.919
<v Speaker 2>I do think any dish made with love is a

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 2>dish worth trying, regardless of past experiences. While my partner's

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 2>mom passed away some years ago and I never had

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:48.719
<v Speaker 2>the pleasure of meeting her, I feel so lucky I

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 2>get to meet her in all the wonderful qualities and

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 2>traditions my partner shares with me. Thanks so much for

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 2>continuing to be a bright spot in my week and

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 2>for allowing me the opportunity to cry about pasta salad.

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh always, absolutely, we support crying about food. Oh but yeah,

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 2>that is so lovely. That's really cool.

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:20.239
<v Speaker 1>That is that is and there is something special about

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>someone sharing something that is important to them, that has

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>this history, maybe to their family or something. And so

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>there's something about that that I do think adds an

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>extra like, okay, I can taste how much you love this? Almost?

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Yeah? And of course any personal dietary restrictions notwithstanding.

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, if if someone makes a dish with love,

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, even if you're even if you think you

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 2>might not like it. Try it, Try it, you might

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 2>be so pleasantly surprised. Yeah, yeah, when you can. When

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 2>it's when it's safe too, you know, yeah, have fun

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 2>out there.

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, yeah, don't make yourself miserable. But no, Generally,

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>when people make something, I think they want to share it,

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and they're happy to share it, and so if you're

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>open to it, I say, go for it.

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely no.

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Bass the salad. Okay, Now we have a note from

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Ric about a couple different things. Ark wrote, Dorito's are

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>an interesting snack. I can't recall anyone coming close to

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>making a similar slash clone of the chip. They are

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>a chip I enjoy, but it is also a chip

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that I need to be in the mood for. They

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>do hit the spot when in the mood. If I'm

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>going to have a walking taco, I will take Dorito's

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>over Frito's. While Frito's are the original, I think Dorito's

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>make a better walking taco. I've also used them in

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a taco salad instead of regular tortilla chips to give

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a twist. They do have a variety

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>of flavors, but there is something about the original nacho

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and cool ranch flavors. I've tried a couple of different

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>flavors over the years, but nothing really struck me. If

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I go overseas at some point again, I'll have to

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>look and see what is there and even compare their

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>base nacho to what we have here. Oo Oh, pasta salad.

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I know you are definitely going to hear a lot

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>of strong video here. While I don't mind pasta salad,

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I think there are very few that are done really

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>well to the point that I want to have more.

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>During the summer or at potluck type gatherings, I'll grab

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>a small bite to try. I think a large majority

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>fall into the It's fine, but nothing really special or

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>memorable going on. The dressing really makes a difference on it.

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I generally encountered it either being overdressed or underdressed, and

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>when overdressed it seems like it will be an oil

0:08:56.280 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>bomb or a Mayo bomb. Yes, with the dressing, I

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 1>think an oil based one works better for the most part.

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>While I like a good Mayo for the most part,

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I think mayo and pasta don't really go together. Well.

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Maybe someone can change her mind, but I haven't found

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>one I liked yet. Seems like it is more common

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 1>with elbow macaroni for some reason, and oil and vinegar

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>with the appropriate herbs works better. As Lauren mentioned, she

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 1>might like an orizo based pasta salad more. Those are

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 1>generally simpler and not overdone. Just cook up some orizo ads,

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>some good chopped olives, dice cucumber, some sliced cherry or

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>grape tomatoes, a little finely diced red onion or shallot,

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and a little asiago. Then at a dressing of your choice,

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a simple herb red wine vinaigrette would go well. I

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>don't have a recipe handy, but I do remember having

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>one like this that was definitely one of the better ones.

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Also a wild thought, maybe if we take a sosa

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>pasta salad add some doritos to it. Finally, I can't

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>remember if you've done an episode on lentils. I've been

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>cooking with them a lot more recently. They are so versatile.

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:18.560
<v Speaker 2>We we have a November of twenty twenty two, the

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 2>sentimental lentil episode. Yes, classic title. Hats off to Annie

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 2>for those titles all the time.

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I have to say, I'm loving this sort of Madman esque.

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's just add doritos to it.

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it does. Why let's go Yeah, walking taco withas

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 2>I do think that sounds really good. That sounds slightly

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 2>overwhelming to me, Like Dorito's are already kind of like

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 2>a heightened flavor experience, and so I'm like, would I

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 2>be able to handle a walking taco dorito situation?

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Only one way to find.

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Out, right, And yeah, like why not put some cool

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 2>ranch Dorito's into your nice orzo pasta salad? I don't

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 2>see where we could possibly go wrong?

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>No, I mean at least the experiment will give more knowledge,

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:26.319
<v Speaker 1>more data, and you can go from there.

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Which is always worth having.

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it is, And I really hope more listeners continue

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to write in about pasta salads and perhaps experiments with Dorito's.

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that would be great. Love that.

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 2>I love that other people have strong opinions about this.

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 2>That's I mean, I shouldn't be surprised. We have strong

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 2>opinions about just about every.

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Food out there. But yeah, here we are. Yes, it's fantastic.

0:11:57.280 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, we do have a bunch more listener mail for you,

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 2>but first we've got a quick break for award from

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 2>our sponsor and we're back. Thank you sponsored, Yes, thank you,

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 2>and uh Okay, Nova wrote first, let me thank you

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 2>for doing an episode on cultured meats. I was very

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 2>sad to hear that bistro and vitro was never a

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 2>real thing. I'll have to wait a bit longer to

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 2>sample some lab meat, though apparently not in my home

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 2>state of Florida. To make it more relevant, I've been

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 2>waiting for a Saber Classics episode to come up on

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 2>chocolate chip cookies to write you this email, but decided

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 2>to throw caution into the wind and send it anyways.

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Based on your cultural references, I deduce that both of

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 2>you are in my age group or thereabouts, so you

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 2>probably remember the days of the chain email. You may

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 2>have even seen this one come through your inbox at

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 2>some point in time, because it's been around for a

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 2>long time. I received it in two thousand and nine.

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 2>It was possibly a chain letter even before or email

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 2>was commonly used. I always had my doubts as to

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 2>its authenticity, but either way, I have made these cookies

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 2>several times and they are yummy. Indeed, it's a bit

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 2>long winded, so feel free to paraphrase Okay and then

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Nova pastes in this chain email. That is a thing

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 2>that exists, so okay, let's go into it a little background.

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Nieman Marcus, if you don't know already, is a very

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 2>expensive store. They sell your typical eight dollars shirt for

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 2>fifty dollars. Let's let them have it. This is a

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:39.320
<v Speaker 2>true story. Good mark of any actual true story on

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 2>the internet.

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 2>My daughter and I had just finished a salad at

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Anemen Marcus cafe in Dallas, and we decided to have

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 2>a small dessert. Because both of us are such cookie lovers,

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 2>we decided to try the Nemen Marcus cookie. It was

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 2>so excellent that I asked if they would give me

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 2>the recipe, and the waitress said, with a small frown,

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm afraid not, but you can buy the recipe.

0:13:57.000 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Well.

0:13:57.240 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 2>I asked how much, and she responded, only two fifty

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 2>it's a great deal. I agreed to that and told

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 2>her to just add it to my tab. Thirty days later,

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:07.560
<v Speaker 2>I received my visa statement and the Nieman Marcus charge

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 2>was two hundred and eighty five dollars. I looked again

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 2>and I remembered I had only spent like nine to

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 2>ninety five for two salads and about twenty dollars for

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 2>a scarf. As I glanced at the bottom of the statement,

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 2>it said cookie recipe two hundred and fifty dollars. This

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 2>was outrageous. I called Neeman's accounting department and told them

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 2>the waitress said it was two fifty, which clearly does

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 2>not mean two hundred and fifty dollars by any reasonable interpretation.

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 2>Nieman Marcus refused to budge. They wouldn't refund my money because,

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 2>according to them, what the waitress told you is not

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 2>our problem. You've already seen the recipe. We absolutely will

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 2>not refund your money. I explained the accounting department lady

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 2>the criminal statutes that governed fraud in the state of Texas.

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 2>I threatened to report them to the Better Business Bureau

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 2>and the Texas Attorney General's Office for engaging in fraud.

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 2>And I was basically told, do what you want, don't

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 2>bother thinking of how you can get even, and don't

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 2>bother trying to get any of your money back. I

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 2>just said, okay, you folks got my two hundred and

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 2>fifty bucks, and now I'm going to have two hundred

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 2>and fifty dollars worth of fun. I told her that

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 2>I was going to see to it that every cookie

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 2>lover in the United States with an email account has

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 2>a two hundred and fifty dollars cookie recipe from Nieman

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Marcus for free. She replied, I wish you wouldn't do this,

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 2>and I said, well, perhaps you should have thought of

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 2>that before you ripped me off and slammed down the phone.

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 2>So here it is. Please, please, please pass it on

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 2>to everyone you can possibly think of. I paid two

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 2>hundred and fifty bucks for this, and I don't want

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 2>Nimon Marcus to ever make another penny off of this recipe.

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 2>And then the recipe follows, I'm not going to read

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 2>it out right now, but you can absolutely Google. You

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 2>can email as or Google if you want the purported recipe.

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Nova finishes the email. If you are planning a new

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 2>cookie esque episode, may I suggest Stroopwaffle. Growing up, we

0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 2>would visit my family in the Netherlands every few years,

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 2>and these guys were a special treat for us. But

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 2>more recently they have been popping up at restaurants all

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 2>over the US. Okay, several things. First of all, yes,

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 2>for some reason, I was just thinking about streep Waffles

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 2>the other day and how we have not we've been

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 2>remiss and not talking about them.

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Indeed very important. Yeah.

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Second of all, you're correct about us being of an age.

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm like a couple years older than Annie, but certainly

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 2>I remember chain emails and physical chain letters. I even

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 2>remember the Ya horror books by Christopher Pike from the

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 2>late eighties or early nineties called Chainletter and Chainletter too,

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 2>the Ancient Evil. Yeah.

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, it'd be like, if you don't send this

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>to ten people, that's the end.

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 2>For you, right, yeah, yeah, And this one functions on

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 2>like a slightly. It's not a threat to you, but

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 2>like you're sticking it to the man if you continued

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 2>the email, which which is a great way to motivate

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 2>people to send along an email. That is an urban myth.

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:18.639
<v Speaker 2>It has indeed been debunked. One weird detail that proliferates

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 2>within the myth is that the writer found the charge

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:25.680
<v Speaker 2>on her visa statement, but Nieman Marcus only accepted American

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Express until nineteen ninety nine, which is years after the

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 2>story began circulating. This is one of our points of evidence.

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:38.159
<v Speaker 2>I had to look into this, so okay, Niam and

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Marcus maintains that they have never charged customers for recipes. Furthermore,

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:44.680
<v Speaker 2>they didn't even have a company recipe for chocolate chip

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:48.159
<v Speaker 2>cookies in the mid nineties, but apparently people believed this

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:52.119
<v Speaker 2>story and were writing into them, like absolutely incensed, to

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 2>the point that by nineteen ninety seven they were so

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 2>fed up with this rumor that they had their executive

0:17:56.880 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 2>chef create a chocolate chip cookie recipe and they posted

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 2>it online for free, with like explicit notice that anyone

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:07.439
<v Speaker 2>was free to distribute or print it as they wished.

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh my goodness, this.

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:14.719
<v Speaker 2>Was in nineteen ninety seven. You can still find that

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 2>recipe on their website. It is different than the one

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 2>in the chain letter. The chain letter version uses powdered

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 2>oatmeal and like a grated chocolate bar. The company version

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 2>uses instant espresso. They both sound pretty good anyway. As

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 2>of twenty sixteen, which is when Facebook had an iteration

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:42.639
<v Speaker 2>of this tale circulating, Nieman Marcus's VP of communications told

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 2>Eater that she had not received an angry email about

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:50.919
<v Speaker 2>the whole thing in six or seven years, and you know,

0:18:51.320 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 2>good for her. Wow, not done yet. So this is

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:06.479
<v Speaker 2>not the first urban myth about a customer being like

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 2>sneakily overcharged for a recipe by some kind of uppity

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 2>retailer and then taking revenge by distributing said recipe. Snopes

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:17.360
<v Speaker 2>found iterations of this going back to nineteen forty eight,

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:22.440
<v Speaker 2>when this cookbook titled Massachusetts Cooking Rules Old and New

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 2>printed a recipe called twenty five dollars fudge Cake along

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 2>with this story about a woman who enjoyed a slice

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 2>of cake on a train, asking the chef for the recipe,

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 2>and being billed twenty five dollars for it, which at

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 2>the time was a lot more outrageous. In the nineteen sixties,

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 2>the villain was the Waldorf Astoria Hotel and it was

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 2>a three hundred and fifty dollars red velvet cake recipe.

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 2>In the seventies, it was Missus Fields and a two

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:51.640
<v Speaker 2>hundred and fifty dollars chocolate chip cookie recipe. Some versions

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 2>of that story shifted the blame to Marshall Fields the

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 2>department store, and Snopes thinks that that is probably where

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 2>it to Nieman Marcus the department store.

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Fascinating. That is so interesting to me.

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 2>It's really wonderful in a kind of sick way.

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Wow, because I feel like every chain letter I got

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:28.880
<v Speaker 1>what the end wanted, some action from you. This one

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:33.639
<v Speaker 1>I guess spreading this recipe. Yeah, but if it's not

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>really their recipe, I don't know that's interesting to me.

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's a part in my use of an

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 2>industry phrase. But it's a great way to go viral.

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess they clearly did. I can't believe that me

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:51.639
<v Speaker 1>and Marcus is still like, please.

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 2>Leave us alone about the heck and cookies.

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>The recipe is all for free.

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 2>We didn't even have one, but we made one for you.

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 2>Please leave us alone. Wow, this poor VP of Communications,

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:11.919
<v Speaker 2>this woman who made it up through the chain of

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:17.640
<v Speaker 2>command at name and Marcus and has been plagued by

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:23.440
<v Speaker 2>accusations oh god decades.

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, wow, whole thing. So thank you for sharing that.

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:36.919
<v Speaker 1>Yes, thank you for putting that on our radar.

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 2>We got to look into it. How wonderful.

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:45.679
<v Speaker 1>Wow. I had no idea. That's now I want to

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to go in all further deep dive.

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Right like urban legends about I'm sure that others are

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:55.199
<v Speaker 2>out there now now, I'm like, these can't be the

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 2>only ones.

0:21:57.000 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, well listeners right in if you've got any more, Yeah, okay,

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 1>but in the meantime, do you have more listener mail?

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:14.440
<v Speaker 1>For you. Yeah, Janet wrote one of your episodes, asked

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to send you my interesting cooking projects. I feel like

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:21.400
<v Speaker 1>many concepts and food differ only by tradition. For example,

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 1>every culture has a version of things like bread, fried dough,

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and dumplings. To test how different or similar food concepts are,

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I like to make hybrid monstrosities a midway point in

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 1>between two disparate food ideas. This one is Lamington pizza.

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:43.959
<v Speaker 1>I took the idea of a baked dough circle topped

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 1>in cheese, sauce, various herbs, especially basil and other vegetables

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:51.439
<v Speaker 1>or meats. I combined it with the idea of a

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>square of sponge cake dipped in chocolate sauce and coated

0:22:55.760 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 1>in desiccated coconut or sometimes other nuts, oftenandwich with cream

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:04.719
<v Speaker 1>and jam. This resulted in me making a marscapone and

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:09.440
<v Speaker 1>sliced pineapple jam filled square bakedo dipped in tomato, chili

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:13.119
<v Speaker 1>and chocolate sauce and covered in sliced roast almonds and

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:18.159
<v Speaker 1>fresh basil. Thus it is a completely new abomination because

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the pineapple is inside the pizza. It was generously filled,

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:26.159
<v Speaker 1>so it was a rich dessert. Both soft and crunchy,

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>with the brightness of the basil counterpointing the sweet sour

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 1>of the jam, the richness of the marscapone, and bitter

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:36.439
<v Speaker 1>umame of the chocolate sauce. It was so much better

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 1>than it had any right to me. If I made

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 1>it again, I would definitely coat it in desiccated coconut

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 1>to pair with the pineapple. Please find picture attached and

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 1>picture wells attached.

0:23:50.720 --> 0:24:00.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would absolutely try that. It does look slightly

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:07.199
<v Speaker 2>like an abomination. It looks a little aggressive. That's a

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:10.200
<v Speaker 2>good word for it. Yeah, threatening, Aura, Yeah.

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a little menacing. But I adore that you're doing these.

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:18.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like, why not?

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely you might. I mean you could discover something. Maybe

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>this will become a whole thing we don't know, or

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>it could be the stepping stone to something.

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Else, right, And really you never know until you try.

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 1>You never know until you try. I do love I

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:39.959
<v Speaker 1>know that's what it is. But I love your continued

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:42.120
<v Speaker 1>usage of desiccated coconut.

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 2>Uh oh does that make you feel like like like

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:46.920
<v Speaker 2>mummies are about?

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:52.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Okay, it just adds another layer of like monstrosity.

0:24:54.520 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>It's said with fondness. This is great. Please write in

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>any other experiments.

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:10.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I need to know more about more of these.

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:15.920
<v Speaker 2>That took a number of turns I did. But again,

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm really really curious. Huh, I am.

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Too, I am too. Yeah, keep the listeners. We always

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:27.920
<v Speaker 1>want to hear about your food experiments.

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, well we do have a little bit more

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 2>for you here today, but first we've got one more

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:39.399
<v Speaker 2>quick break for a word from our sponsors.

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>And we're back.

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Thank you sponsors, Yes, thank you, Cecilia wrote your podcast

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 2>topics are always interesting and enlightening and sometimes amazingly pertinent

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 2>for me. On April fourth, you put out an episode

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 2>about Turkish Delight. I was in France at the time,

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 2>but made sure to listen as I was headed to

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 2>Turkey in a few weeks. Once we got to Turkey,

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 2>I started looking out for Turkish delight or Lookum, as

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 2>you said it was called. That is the name used

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:13.400
<v Speaker 2>in Turkey, but because they want to appeal to tourists,

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 2>the shops there also call it Turkish Delight. I did

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 2>get some on our second day there. The shop had

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 2>lots of varieties, but I wanted to try the plain ones.

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:24.119
<v Speaker 2>I bought a box of three flavors. They had rose,

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 2>honey and mint. They were delicious. Later I bought another

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 2>box to take to my son and his wife. That

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 2>box was from a rest stop on a highway and

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:35.200
<v Speaker 2>it contained rose and lemon. I like those even better.

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 2>All attach a photo of a shop in the town

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 2>of Saffron Bola, which is named after Saffron. After Turkey.

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 2>We went to Cambridge, England to visit our son, daughter

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 2>in law and grandson. They lived next door to a

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 2>Sri Lankan family and mentioned that the family had cooked

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 2>a delicious dish for them that included leaves from the

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 2>curry tree. I tried to correct them to say that

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:58.360
<v Speaker 2>curry wasn't a plant, but a mix of spices. They

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:01.199
<v Speaker 2>insisted the neighborhood said that there was a curry tree.

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 2>That night, I looked at your podcast feed and saw

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 2>an episode on the curry Tree that I had just missed.

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 2>It is hard for me to keep up with podcasts

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 2>when I'm traveling, so I listened to that episode and

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:17.000
<v Speaker 2>admitted my misunderstanding. The next day and now camembert ah

0:27:17.080 --> 0:27:19.359
<v Speaker 2>cam and Beert. As I said at the top, we

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:22.159
<v Speaker 2>were in France, Normandy. Actually for the month of April.

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 2>We have a house there in a small village. We

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:26.639
<v Speaker 2>spent the month getting the house ready for the market.

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 2>So if you know anyone looking for a small house

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 2>in a small village in Normandy, let us know. We're

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 2>asking ninety five thousand euros. It's a charming village and

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 2>we love the Normandy area, but with a grandson in England,

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 2>we need to spend more time in England. We'll still

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 2>vacation in France, though we've been spending time in Normandy

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 2>every year except twenty twenty since twenty ten. One year

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:49.879
<v Speaker 2>we visited Camembert. There's a museum there devoted to the cheese,

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 2>but it was a disappointment. It consisted of some wallboards

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:55.479
<v Speaker 2>with pictures. I don't even know if there's a factory

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:58.200
<v Speaker 2>there producing cam and Beert. We did see the statue

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:00.880
<v Speaker 2>of Marie Harel in the town center. It was interesting

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 2>to learn more about the statue through your podcast.

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:07.680
<v Speaker 1>So we're moving to Normandy, Lauren.

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah, I'm not doing it next week.

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's go put our funds together. Cecilia continues. The Prisidon

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Factory has a larger and more interesting museum that we

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 1>visited in Laval last year. That one takes you through

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the entire history of cheese in that area, with lots

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 1>of pieces of equipment on display. They describe and detailed

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the production of the cheese, but they don't let you

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:36.680
<v Speaker 1>visit the actual factory. I suppose her reasons of safety

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and cleanliness. In contrast, we did visit the factory in

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Lone l'abier. On that visit, we were right on the

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 1>floor where the biscuits were being made. They were making

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>chocolate cookies at the time. They have a gift shop,

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 1>of course, but our guide told us we couldn't buy

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the biscuits we saw them making because those were made

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 1>to ship to America. They are sold here under the

0:28:57.800 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 1>name Pierre Biscuity. But we were discussing camm bear. Our

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 1>house in Normandy is not far from the President factory

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>in Don, France, which claims to be the largest manufacturer

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of cam and beer's in the world. We often see

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the President trucks go by the house with the morning's milk.

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Whenever we go out walking or driving in Normandy, we

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 1>see cows in the fields and orchards. Most of the

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 1>herds we see are small, twelve to forty cows. I'll

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 1>attach a picture of some normand cows. We see other

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 1>varieties as well. I have some Camembert in the fridge

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>at all times when I'm in Normandy and most of

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the time here in North Carolina. There are many brands

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 1>available in the grocery store in Normandy. I've tried several

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 1>of them. Most are made from pasteoroid's milk, but I

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>did find one made from raw milk. I didn't notice

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a difference in taste, but maybe I'm just not sophisticated

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>enough to taste the difference. I often buy the President brand,

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>but I've tried others as well. The cheeses in the

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>supermarket in France are fresher than the ones I buy.

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Hear there's one variety I've bought called Les Rustique. This

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 1>one is creamier. When my sister in law was visiting,

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 1>she said that that one was the best, but it

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 1>is still made from Pastchoi's milk. And finally, you asked

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 1>for recipes. I loved baked bree or Camembert. And if

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>you are having people over or have a large family,

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 1>that's a wonderful way to serve the cheese. But if

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>you are just one person in the household eating it.

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Baking a whole cheese at once is not a good idea,

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 1>so I have found out a way to enjoy baked

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 1>caman beert one serving at a time. You need a

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 1>five inch wheel of cammbert, a five inch round pocket peda.

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I buy Joseph's which are low carb, a pop up toaster,

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and a wire cheese cutter. I hope everyone who enjoys

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 1>cheese has a wire cutter. It is the best way

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to cut soft cheese. Take your wheel of cheese and

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:06.000
<v Speaker 1>cut it first in half so you have two semi circles.

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Do the same with the peda. Then stand one semi

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 1>circle of cheese on the cut side in the wire

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 1>cutter and use a knife. Score the outside rind parallel

0:31:16.480 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to the cutting wire, about one eighth inch in from

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the edge. You need to score the front part where

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the wire enters the cheese and the top, but once

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the wire is in the cheese, it will continue to

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 1>cut through the rest of the rind. This trims off

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the outside rind. It's fine to use this as the

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 1>first slice, but if you prefer not to eat that

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 1>much rind, you can just leave that part off. Next,

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:46.719
<v Speaker 1>score the cheese twice more and cut two semicircular pieces

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 1>of cheese, put each one in the peda pockets and

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 1>drop them in a pop up toaster toast on a

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 1>medium setting until the cheese melts. The peda will keep

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 1>it from leaking into the toaster. I've been doing this

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 1>for years, never had a problem with leaking. That's it.

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy your low carb sandwich. Well, I just have to

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 1>let you know how much I enjoy your podcast and

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 1>how often it relates directly to something in my life.

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 1>And lovely pictures were attached, by the way, Yeah, so

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 1>sad sometimes where we're.

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Like, yeah, there were there were pictures. They were images.

0:32:26.080 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 2>We're not in an image medium, no, but yeah, oh

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 2>I love it when y'all write in and these like

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 2>weird coincidences. I promised that we're not surveilling you.

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 1>No, no, but people write in about that kind of frequently.

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah right right, yes, also a cheese peta.

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh right. I'm kind of mad at myself for never

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 2>having thought to do this.

0:32:58.800 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, it sounds like so.

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 2>So obvious, like you have that you have the technology,

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 2>Like why wouldn't you.

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Just put the cheese in Theah?

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:15.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, delicious, so cool and oh my goodness. Thank you

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:22.760
<v Speaker 2>for all of the information about Camembert and various cookies.

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes, always, we love that you go on such

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 1>You always sound so well traveled. You go on all

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 1>these journeys, Cecilia.

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 2>And a lot of y'all.

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a lot of you do, and we love that

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you share that with us and we get to live

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 1>somewhat vicuriously through you. Yes. Well, this brings us to

0:33:48.520 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the end of this listener mail episode, but we do

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 1>love so much hearing from all of you.

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, thank you. Thank you to everyone who wrote in.

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you to everyone who wrote in, and please keep

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:08.799
<v Speaker 1>those letters coming. We'll be here for twenty three and

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:12.440
<v Speaker 1>if you would like to message us, you can. You

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 1>can email us at Hello, atsavorpod dot com.

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:18.840
<v Speaker 2>We're also hypothetically on social media. We are on blue

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:22.439
<v Speaker 2>Sky and Instagram at saver pod, and we do hope

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 2>to hear from you. Save is a production of iHeartRadio.

0:34:25.680 --> 0:34:27.919
<v Speaker 2>For more podcasts from my Heart Radio, you can visit

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:31.200
<v Speaker 2>the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:34.240
<v Speaker 2>your favorite shows. Thanks as always to our super producers

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 2>Dylan Fagan and Andrew Howard. Thanks to you for listening

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 2>and we hope that lots more good things are coming

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 2>your way.