1 00:00:02,720 --> 00:00:10,640 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News. Hello and welcome to 2 00:00:10,640 --> 00:00:13,760 Speaker 1: The Money Stuff Podcast. You're a weekly podcast. Are you 3 00:00:13,840 --> 00:00:17,959 Speaker 1: talking about stuff related to money? I'm Matt Levine and 4 00:00:18,040 --> 00:00:21,200 Speaker 1: I write The Money Stuff com Bloomberg Opinion, and. 5 00:00:21,160 --> 00:00:23,760 Speaker 2: I'm Katie Greifeld, a reporter for Bloomberg News and an 6 00:00:23,760 --> 00:00:29,240 Speaker 2: anchor for Bloomberg Television. And today it's a nail back. 7 00:00:30,600 --> 00:00:33,120 Speaker 2: Dear listeners just keep on sending in questions, and it 8 00:00:33,120 --> 00:00:36,400 Speaker 2: feels like it's about time. It also helps that I'm 9 00:00:36,440 --> 00:00:40,360 Speaker 2: on vacation right now. We're recording this in the future. 10 00:00:40,479 --> 00:00:41,919 Speaker 2: In the past, I don't know. 11 00:00:42,120 --> 00:00:42,839 Speaker 1: I'm the Sloops. 12 00:00:42,960 --> 00:00:52,760 Speaker 2: Yeah, definitely, I am actively skiing right now. Remember we 13 00:00:52,800 --> 00:00:55,240 Speaker 2: did an episode about cocoa futures. 14 00:00:56,160 --> 00:00:56,920 Speaker 1: How could I forget? 15 00:00:57,360 --> 00:00:59,800 Speaker 2: I forgot a little bit, but I was so tickled 16 00:01:00,240 --> 00:01:05,240 Speaker 2: by this question. Yeah, we did. We talked about Hersheyr. 17 00:01:05,680 --> 00:01:08,600 Speaker 1: Can I forget? Coming back to me, Matt. 18 00:01:09,360 --> 00:01:12,200 Speaker 2: We have a question from Patrick, who says, thanks to 19 00:01:12,280 --> 00:01:16,200 Speaker 2: your podcast, I'm now obsessed with chocolate futures contracts. I 20 00:01:16,240 --> 00:01:18,720 Speaker 2: have a question about these chocolate warehouses that I just 21 00:01:18,959 --> 00:01:22,279 Speaker 2: can't understand. Maybe you can help me if they exist 22 00:01:22,319 --> 00:01:25,240 Speaker 2: to facilitate futures contracts. Why is the quality of the 23 00:01:25,319 --> 00:01:29,240 Speaker 2: chocolate often bad? I thought futures contracts specified the quality 24 00:01:29,280 --> 00:01:32,600 Speaker 2: of the chocolate in advance, in terms of origin and grade. 25 00:01:33,000 --> 00:01:35,240 Speaker 2: Is it not a flaw in the system that worst 26 00:01:35,280 --> 00:01:39,920 Speaker 2: chocolate is being put in these warehouses? Thanks? I love 27 00:01:39,959 --> 00:01:47,160 Speaker 2: that questions, good question. I did some Reportingeah, I I 28 00:01:47,200 --> 00:01:50,240 Speaker 2: went to Bloomberg Intelligence. When I have like a niche 29 00:01:50,320 --> 00:01:53,480 Speaker 2: question about a topic I know very little about. I'm 30 00:01:53,480 --> 00:01:56,000 Speaker 2: going to read this out loud. Sure, I got this 31 00:01:56,080 --> 00:01:58,840 Speaker 2: email and I read it really quickly, so I haven't 32 00:01:58,880 --> 00:02:03,400 Speaker 2: thought deeply about this. So hello, You're completely right. Contracts 33 00:02:03,400 --> 00:02:06,280 Speaker 2: would specify the quality and origin of cocoa beans, and 34 00:02:06,320 --> 00:02:08,639 Speaker 2: this is the reason why cocoa really doesn't have one 35 00:02:08,680 --> 00:02:12,320 Speaker 2: single price, but several that reflect these differences. So to 36 00:02:12,400 --> 00:02:15,760 Speaker 2: illustrate this from a higher level perspective, at the end 37 00:02:15,800 --> 00:02:19,600 Speaker 2: of last year, the ic COO published a report noting 38 00:02:19,639 --> 00:02:22,560 Speaker 2: that the price difference between London futures and NY was 39 00:02:22,639 --> 00:02:26,160 Speaker 2: due to London having more beans from Cameroon, which are 40 00:02:26,280 --> 00:02:29,520 Speaker 2: perceived to be of lower quality. Now, because cocoa is 41 00:02:29,560 --> 00:02:32,600 Speaker 2: a soft maybe there is some scope for exchanges to 42 00:02:32,639 --> 00:02:36,840 Speaker 2: hold lower quality or just mismanaged inventories. Don't really know 43 00:02:36,919 --> 00:02:39,239 Speaker 2: to what extent this is happening. Now, I'll leave a 44 00:02:39,280 --> 00:02:43,600 Speaker 2: quote quite popular among cocoa market participants. Quote when there 45 00:02:43,680 --> 00:02:46,200 Speaker 2: is a lot of cocoa, all cocoa is crap. When 46 00:02:46,200 --> 00:02:49,440 Speaker 2: there is no cocoa, all crap is cocoa. Oh dear, 47 00:02:50,680 --> 00:02:56,280 Speaker 2: I hadn't read that first. That's really funny. It's all 48 00:02:56,360 --> 00:03:01,880 Speaker 2: crap is coco. That is so interesting. I guess I 49 00:03:01,880 --> 00:03:03,560 Speaker 2: haven't really thought about it before that. When you take 50 00:03:03,560 --> 00:03:06,520 Speaker 2: a look at commodities such as this and you think 51 00:03:06,560 --> 00:03:08,800 Speaker 2: about the different prices on the different exchanges, I have 52 00:03:08,840 --> 00:03:11,600 Speaker 2: never thought that maybe the quality in this case of 53 00:03:11,639 --> 00:03:16,280 Speaker 2: cocoa explains the difference. Yeah, because with oil, I mean, 54 00:03:16,720 --> 00:03:18,760 Speaker 2: I don't really think about the quality of oil, but 55 00:03:18,800 --> 00:03:21,839 Speaker 2: it makes sense that there's I don't because I don't 56 00:03:21,880 --> 00:03:27,880 Speaker 2: think about that, but it makes sense. Yes, true, Yeah, 57 00:03:28,440 --> 00:03:28,720 Speaker 2: I mean I. 58 00:03:28,720 --> 00:03:31,519 Speaker 1: Read about this a lot. Like if you're a chocolate maker, 59 00:03:32,560 --> 00:03:35,240 Speaker 1: you want cocoa to put into chocolate, and like if 60 00:03:35,280 --> 00:03:37,680 Speaker 1: your a chocolate bars tastes bad, that's bad for you. 61 00:03:38,800 --> 00:03:42,640 Speaker 1: If you're a commodity's futures warehouse, you need cocoa to 62 00:03:42,760 --> 00:03:46,280 Speaker 1: like be the underlying deliverable for the commodity future since 63 00:03:46,320 --> 00:03:49,400 Speaker 1: you put that in the warehouse, but you don't expect 64 00:03:49,400 --> 00:03:51,960 Speaker 1: that most people trading the futures will take delivery of 65 00:03:52,000 --> 00:03:53,680 Speaker 1: the cocoa, and so there's like a little bit more 66 00:03:53,720 --> 00:03:56,240 Speaker 1: of a disconnect, like you have to use pct vigrate 67 00:03:56,320 --> 00:03:58,480 Speaker 1: and everything, but like it's a little bit less important 68 00:03:58,560 --> 00:04:01,480 Speaker 1: that the cocoa taste good if it's mostly being used 69 00:04:01,760 --> 00:04:04,600 Speaker 1: as a substrate for commodities futures contracts, then if you're 70 00:04:04,600 --> 00:04:06,920 Speaker 1: actually just putting it directly into chocolate bars. And so 71 00:04:07,360 --> 00:04:11,240 Speaker 1: there are a couple of like examples of this from 72 00:04:11,280 --> 00:04:15,000 Speaker 1: the not chocolate market, which my very favorite is that 73 00:04:15,760 --> 00:04:19,599 Speaker 1: in the nickel market, Yes there's a warehouse, put nickel 74 00:04:19,640 --> 00:04:22,800 Speaker 1: in it. You trade futures on the nickel. Nickel is 75 00:04:22,880 --> 00:04:25,520 Speaker 1: kind of non perishable and so like you never really 76 00:04:25,520 --> 00:04:27,039 Speaker 1: have to say the nickel out of the warehouse, and 77 00:04:27,080 --> 00:04:29,440 Speaker 1: so it just sits in the warehouse for years. And 78 00:04:29,640 --> 00:04:32,120 Speaker 1: at some point someone discovered that some nickel that JP 79 00:04:32,240 --> 00:04:34,800 Speaker 1: Morgan owned not because it was like JP Morgan nickel, 80 00:04:34,839 --> 00:04:36,400 Speaker 1: because like they you know, happen to take the liver 81 00:04:36,440 --> 00:04:38,720 Speaker 1: around the futures contract. The nickel in this warehouse that 82 00:04:38,760 --> 00:04:41,560 Speaker 1: JP Morgan owned was actually a bag of rocks, and 83 00:04:41,600 --> 00:04:43,920 Speaker 1: like it was fine, Like who cares. They never took 84 00:04:43,960 --> 00:04:45,440 Speaker 1: it out, They never like made anything with it. Was 85 00:04:45,440 --> 00:04:46,760 Speaker 1: just a bag of rocks and the thing. But like, 86 00:04:47,000 --> 00:04:49,200 Speaker 1: once you discover it's a bag of rocks, you can 87 00:04:49,200 --> 00:04:51,359 Speaker 1: no longer use it to trade nickel futures. But until 88 00:04:51,360 --> 00:04:54,720 Speaker 1: then it doesn't matter. You're not like building anything. The 89 00:04:54,760 --> 00:04:58,560 Speaker 1: other great example is coffee futures. Yeah, in the coffee market, 90 00:04:58,960 --> 00:05:03,240 Speaker 1: coffee is like cocoa, perishable, and so there are rules 91 00:05:03,279 --> 00:05:05,400 Speaker 1: about like quality of the coffee that goes into the 92 00:05:05,400 --> 00:05:07,440 Speaker 1: coffee warehouses. One of the rules like you can't leave 93 00:05:07,440 --> 00:05:10,800 Speaker 1: it there forever, right because it's perishable, and so there's 94 00:05:10,960 --> 00:05:13,440 Speaker 1: an age penalty where like you get paid less if 95 00:05:13,440 --> 00:05:16,279 Speaker 1: you deliver old coffee. But it used to be that 96 00:05:16,320 --> 00:05:18,960 Speaker 1: you could take your older beans off the exchange and 97 00:05:19,000 --> 00:05:21,400 Speaker 1: then resubmit them for a new round of certification and 98 00:05:21,400 --> 00:05:23,600 Speaker 1: get rid of the age penalty. So the beans are 99 00:05:23,640 --> 00:05:27,159 Speaker 1: so like abstracted that like taking them out and putting 100 00:05:27,160 --> 00:05:29,800 Speaker 1: them back in makes them fresh new beans again, which 101 00:05:29,800 --> 00:05:32,000 Speaker 1: is not how like actual coffee brewing works. But for 102 00:05:32,040 --> 00:05:34,520 Speaker 1: commodities futures. It's fine, it's good enough, and they change 103 00:05:34,520 --> 00:05:36,680 Speaker 1: that rule, so like now you have to the fresher coffee. 104 00:05:36,720 --> 00:05:38,919 Speaker 2: That would be a disgusting cup of coffee. 105 00:05:39,240 --> 00:05:42,480 Speaker 1: I mean yes, like I think coffee. Probably you could go, I. 106 00:05:42,480 --> 00:05:44,640 Speaker 2: Don't know, pretty high standards. 107 00:05:44,720 --> 00:05:48,120 Speaker 1: Yeah, okay, fun you would not drink no commodities futures 108 00:05:48,120 --> 00:05:50,960 Speaker 1: exchange coffee. I probably would just for rust. 109 00:05:51,279 --> 00:05:56,200 Speaker 2: I mean, if I was dying, that would be kind 110 00:05:56,240 --> 00:05:56,560 Speaker 2: of fun. 111 00:05:56,920 --> 00:05:59,320 Speaker 1: I think you should do it. So different commodities have 112 00:05:59,320 --> 00:06:01,720 Speaker 1: different rules, but like in general, like the need to 113 00:06:01,800 --> 00:06:04,640 Speaker 1: have like the freshest possible commodity, Like you want that 114 00:06:04,680 --> 00:06:06,560 Speaker 1: for your industrial uses, not for your putting in an 115 00:06:06,560 --> 00:06:07,120 Speaker 1: a warehouse. 116 00:06:07,240 --> 00:06:10,160 Speaker 2: Yeah, great question, Patrick, that was That was a lot 117 00:06:10,160 --> 00:06:16,320 Speaker 2: of fun. Mail bag, mail bag. This question comes from 118 00:06:16,440 --> 00:06:20,479 Speaker 2: justin straight after my own heart. With the advent of 119 00:06:20,480 --> 00:06:24,000 Speaker 2: a private credit ETF is an adverse selection and inherent issue. 120 00:06:24,279 --> 00:06:26,560 Speaker 2: What is to protect the retail investor and prevent the 121 00:06:26,560 --> 00:06:29,120 Speaker 2: ETF manager from stuffing the fun with the loans it 122 00:06:29,160 --> 00:06:32,479 Speaker 2: expects to underperform with respect to similar loans from a 123 00:06:32,480 --> 00:06:36,320 Speaker 2: particular vintage. That is, like the most pessimistic fear here 124 00:06:36,880 --> 00:06:39,719 Speaker 2: a very reasonable fear, I know, but you would hope 125 00:06:39,720 --> 00:06:42,599 Speaker 2: that Apollo isn't trying to like use retail as exit 126 00:06:42,600 --> 00:06:43,599 Speaker 2: liquidity or whatever. 127 00:06:44,240 --> 00:06:47,760 Speaker 1: I mean, you would hope you hope that all the 128 00:06:47,800 --> 00:06:50,560 Speaker 1: loans are good. Yeah, And like as an asset manager, 129 00:06:50,600 --> 00:06:53,560 Speaker 1: you have fiducial idities to all of your clients and 130 00:06:53,600 --> 00:06:56,240 Speaker 1: you try to make only the best loans. It is weird, 131 00:06:56,320 --> 00:06:58,159 Speaker 1: you know, Like, you know, you look at Apollo, like 132 00:06:59,080 --> 00:07:01,200 Speaker 1: much of their capital is their balance sheet, right, I 133 00:07:01,200 --> 00:07:03,720 Speaker 1: mean they run a big retirement services company, right, so yeah, 134 00:07:03,760 --> 00:07:05,240 Speaker 1: a lot of it is their balance sheet. A lot 135 00:07:05,279 --> 00:07:09,200 Speaker 1: of it is client money that pays stereotypically two and twenty, right, 136 00:07:09,200 --> 00:07:10,760 Speaker 1: It's probably not really two and twenty, but like you know, 137 00:07:10,800 --> 00:07:14,200 Speaker 1: people who pay kind of like alternative manager fees, and 138 00:07:14,280 --> 00:07:16,600 Speaker 1: some of it is like ETF money who pay let 139 00:07:16,600 --> 00:07:19,480 Speaker 1: our fees. So where do you put the best loans? 140 00:07:19,960 --> 00:07:23,640 Speaker 1: Your insurance company, your balance sheet? Very smart people run that, 141 00:07:23,960 --> 00:07:27,680 Speaker 1: your limited partners and your institutional prior credit funds, smart 142 00:07:27,720 --> 00:07:33,440 Speaker 1: repeat player allocators, your retail ETF clients. Who knows? Well? 143 00:07:33,800 --> 00:07:37,240 Speaker 2: I actually did reporting for this question as well. I 144 00:07:37,280 --> 00:07:40,680 Speaker 2: sat down with Annopoglia from State Street Global Advisors on 145 00:07:40,880 --> 00:07:44,760 Speaker 2: March thirteenth on Bloomberg Television and I asked her this question, 146 00:07:45,000 --> 00:07:49,600 Speaker 2: does State Street have the in house expertise to sort 147 00:07:49,600 --> 00:07:52,480 Speaker 2: of evaluate what Apollo is putting in the ETF? And 148 00:07:52,600 --> 00:07:53,440 Speaker 2: this was her answer. 149 00:07:53,560 --> 00:07:56,240 Speaker 3: She said, we do have the expertise in house, but 150 00:07:56,280 --> 00:07:58,560 Speaker 3: we also made the new hire set to make sure 151 00:07:58,600 --> 00:08:02,120 Speaker 3: that we had the right in seed SSGA is the 152 00:08:02,160 --> 00:08:05,440 Speaker 3: advisor by design. We wanted us to be in a 153 00:08:05,600 --> 00:08:09,760 Speaker 3: position to make selections and have investment discretion on what 154 00:08:09,880 --> 00:08:12,720 Speaker 3: task sets to take or not to take from Apollo. 155 00:08:13,280 --> 00:08:14,920 Speaker 1: That's the sounds a blance right, is like, yeah, the 156 00:08:14,920 --> 00:08:18,800 Speaker 1: ETF manager has a fiducial abbligation to the ETF clients 157 00:08:19,160 --> 00:08:21,880 Speaker 1: and they have their own independent ability to make sure 158 00:08:21,880 --> 00:08:24,160 Speaker 1: they're not getting stuffed with like Apollo's worse loans. But 159 00:08:24,240 --> 00:08:25,800 Speaker 1: it's like Apollo, it's like not in the business of 160 00:08:25,920 --> 00:08:27,440 Speaker 1: like trying to make the worst loans, right, so like 161 00:08:28,320 --> 00:08:32,400 Speaker 1: they're trying to also make good loans. If you think 162 00:08:32,400 --> 00:08:36,320 Speaker 1: about like a bond ETF, like you have the same 163 00:08:36,400 --> 00:08:39,720 Speaker 1: risk there. And the reason people don't think about it 164 00:08:39,840 --> 00:08:41,560 Speaker 1: very much like they do a little bit right because 165 00:08:41,559 --> 00:08:44,199 Speaker 1: like there are sometimes like worries about chart picking But 166 00:08:44,240 --> 00:08:45,960 Speaker 1: the reason people don't think about it that much is because, 167 00:08:45,960 --> 00:08:47,720 Speaker 1: like you know, a bond fund has like a track record. 168 00:08:48,160 --> 00:08:50,800 Speaker 1: There's an incentive for like PIMCO to not do a 169 00:08:50,840 --> 00:08:54,000 Speaker 1: bad job managing its public bond funds because then people 170 00:08:54,040 --> 00:08:57,360 Speaker 1: won't put money into them. Yeah, the prior CREDITTF stuff 171 00:08:57,400 --> 00:09:00,400 Speaker 1: is new, and so there's no like through the cycle 172 00:09:00,480 --> 00:09:03,400 Speaker 1: performance data where you can tell whether a fund is 173 00:09:03,440 --> 00:09:05,840 Speaker 1: good or not right, and so you have to worry 174 00:09:05,840 --> 00:09:07,760 Speaker 1: about this stuff. In the long run, you sort of 175 00:09:07,760 --> 00:09:10,360 Speaker 1: assume that, like people will try to manage funds well 176 00:09:10,400 --> 00:09:11,800 Speaker 1: because that's how they raise money. 177 00:09:12,080 --> 00:09:13,880 Speaker 2: Yeah, it doesn't have a track re heard, And I 178 00:09:13,880 --> 00:09:15,640 Speaker 2: think that's an important point because there are a lot 179 00:09:15,640 --> 00:09:19,040 Speaker 2: of very pessimistic concerns about the CTF. But it just 180 00:09:19,280 --> 00:09:20,880 Speaker 2: hasn't been alive for very long. 181 00:09:21,000 --> 00:09:23,040 Speaker 1: Right, Like you could like sort of tell a story 182 00:09:23,040 --> 00:09:25,680 Speaker 1: of like private credit has had this like massive boom 183 00:09:26,120 --> 00:09:29,440 Speaker 1: and the market might be turning a little bit and 184 00:09:30,600 --> 00:09:32,280 Speaker 1: that was the perfect time to stuff retail with it. 185 00:09:32,400 --> 00:09:33,360 Speaker 1: But yeah, that's like. 186 00:09:33,320 --> 00:09:36,240 Speaker 2: A kind of a I mean, we're recording this in 187 00:09:36,280 --> 00:09:39,040 Speaker 2: the future, so who knows what it looks like. Yeah, 188 00:09:39,120 --> 00:09:41,960 Speaker 2: maybe things will be totally better by the time this 189 00:09:42,000 --> 00:10:05,080 Speaker 2: episode comes out. But great question, mail bag, mail Bag, 190 00:10:05,640 --> 00:10:07,800 Speaker 2: we have another question. I don't have a name to 191 00:10:07,840 --> 00:10:10,679 Speaker 2: attach to this one, but the question is fun. As 192 00:10:10,720 --> 00:10:14,040 Speaker 2: we accelerate slash descend into the scenario where Elon Musk 193 00:10:14,120 --> 00:10:16,400 Speaker 2: is God King and the answer to every question is 194 00:10:16,679 --> 00:10:20,040 Speaker 2: because that's what Elon wants. What's the point of digging 195 00:10:20,080 --> 00:10:26,120 Speaker 2: into anything, Matt, take us into this existential spiral, right. 196 00:10:26,720 --> 00:10:28,560 Speaker 1: I used to think of my job as like trying 197 00:10:28,600 --> 00:10:34,480 Speaker 1: to understand and explain complex structural financial topics, and then 198 00:10:34,559 --> 00:10:38,760 Speaker 1: like memestocks hit and I found myself writing a lot 199 00:10:38,800 --> 00:10:43,120 Speaker 1: of very dumb stuff and like coining the Elon market hypothesis, 200 00:10:43,200 --> 00:10:46,719 Speaker 1: which is, yeah, financial assets are valuable not because of 201 00:10:46,760 --> 00:10:49,320 Speaker 1: their cash flows, but because of their proximity to Elon Musk. 202 00:10:49,360 --> 00:10:51,000 Speaker 1: Because like there was a time and it's kind of 203 00:10:51,120 --> 00:10:53,720 Speaker 1: continuing where like Elon would like tweet about a thing 204 00:10:53,760 --> 00:10:54,959 Speaker 1: and like the thing would go up, and it's like 205 00:10:55,000 --> 00:10:57,520 Speaker 1: doage cooin, or like there's a story about Signal where 206 00:10:57,520 --> 00:10:59,960 Speaker 1: he tweeted Signal and like an unrelated company with Signal 207 00:11:00,080 --> 00:11:02,679 Speaker 1: his name went up. Like just anything like he turned 208 00:11:02,679 --> 00:11:06,200 Speaker 1: his attention to would go up. And if you sort 209 00:11:06,200 --> 00:11:09,640 Speaker 1: of like looked at that and thought, well, the present 210 00:11:09,720 --> 00:11:11,920 Speaker 1: value of the expected future cashlows of this company has 211 00:11:11,960 --> 00:11:15,840 Speaker 1: gone up because Elon tweeted about it, Then you would 212 00:11:15,840 --> 00:11:18,559 Speaker 1: be missing the point. And like what was actually happening 213 00:11:18,679 --> 00:11:20,280 Speaker 1: was just like yeah, people like Elan Musk and the 214 00:11:20,280 --> 00:11:22,839 Speaker 1: stock goes up right, And then like Memestock's kind of 215 00:11:22,840 --> 00:11:24,920 Speaker 1: crystallized that, like a lot of mental energy went into 216 00:11:24,960 --> 00:11:27,560 Speaker 1: like understanding the technicalities of a game stop where it's like, oh, 217 00:11:27,679 --> 00:11:29,280 Speaker 1: you know, like you could have a thesis about the 218 00:11:29,280 --> 00:11:31,720 Speaker 1: company's turnound, or you can be like, oh, like there's 219 00:11:31,760 --> 00:11:33,800 Speaker 1: a gamma squeeze and a short squeeze. There's all this 220 00:11:33,880 --> 00:11:36,680 Speaker 1: like technical stuff that you can understand. But like mostly 221 00:11:36,720 --> 00:11:38,280 Speaker 1: it was like people online liked it and this so 222 00:11:38,360 --> 00:11:40,760 Speaker 1: they bought it and went up. Right, everything got kind 223 00:11:40,760 --> 00:11:47,080 Speaker 1: of dumber, and our current political environment has expanded that dramatically. 224 00:11:47,080 --> 00:11:50,800 Speaker 1: You know, I wrote, let's say last week now about 225 00:11:51,120 --> 00:11:54,679 Speaker 1: the US Consumer Financial Protection BEEAU. The CFPP right like, 226 00:11:54,920 --> 00:11:58,040 Speaker 1: has written some rules about how financial companies are supposed 227 00:11:58,040 --> 00:12:02,120 Speaker 1: to interact with consumer customers, and those rules have been 228 00:12:02,200 --> 00:12:06,080 Speaker 1: sort of suspended by everyone of the FB being told 229 00:12:06,080 --> 00:12:09,040 Speaker 1: to go home. But like they're still there. Yeah, and 230 00:12:09,080 --> 00:12:10,959 Speaker 1: so there's only like stuff you can look at and 231 00:12:10,960 --> 00:12:12,520 Speaker 1: me like, oh, like the rules say this or like 232 00:12:12,559 --> 00:12:14,720 Speaker 1: this is like how you're supposed to do stuff, but 233 00:12:14,800 --> 00:12:16,400 Speaker 1: like it's not clear that how you're supposed to do 234 00:12:16,400 --> 00:12:19,760 Speaker 1: stuff matters anymore, that the rules are enforceable, And so 235 00:12:19,840 --> 00:12:21,599 Speaker 1: we're in this sort of weird gray area where like 236 00:12:21,640 --> 00:12:24,920 Speaker 1: if you try too hard to understand what is allowed 237 00:12:25,040 --> 00:12:28,640 Speaker 1: or how things work, you will be making mistakes because 238 00:12:28,679 --> 00:12:30,720 Speaker 1: like things don't work the way they're supposed to work, 239 00:12:31,080 --> 00:12:35,319 Speaker 1: and the rules don't necessarily apply anymore. And that's a 240 00:12:35,360 --> 00:12:37,319 Speaker 1: frustrating position to be in if you're in the business 241 00:12:37,360 --> 00:12:38,520 Speaker 1: of trying to understand things. 242 00:12:38,640 --> 00:12:40,480 Speaker 2: How does it make you feel as a person who 243 00:12:40,480 --> 00:12:43,040 Speaker 2: writes a newsletter though, because it seems like you had 244 00:12:43,080 --> 00:12:44,400 Speaker 2: fun with the GameStop era. 245 00:12:44,640 --> 00:12:46,360 Speaker 1: I define fund with the GameStop era, but it ate 246 00:12:46,400 --> 00:12:48,280 Speaker 1: at me because I was like, I wish I had 247 00:12:48,360 --> 00:12:50,360 Speaker 1: insight to off or have elite jokes. 248 00:12:51,840 --> 00:12:55,400 Speaker 2: Well, when all else fails, at least we can laugh. Yeah, 249 00:12:55,679 --> 00:12:56,360 Speaker 2: we still have our. 250 00:12:56,360 --> 00:13:02,320 Speaker 1: Loster sort of like yeah, I don't know. I mean, like, 251 00:13:02,600 --> 00:13:04,640 Speaker 1: as a person who has a newsletter, like there are 252 00:13:04,640 --> 00:13:08,320 Speaker 1: always events, but they are not interesting events. 253 00:13:08,400 --> 00:13:10,920 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean there's a parallel to be drawn with 254 00:13:11,360 --> 00:13:15,679 Speaker 2: my life on TV. News is always happening. I anchor 255 00:13:15,720 --> 00:13:17,960 Speaker 2: from nine to eleven, and there's just so many tape 256 00:13:17,960 --> 00:13:21,520 Speaker 2: bombs coming across all the time. But you know you 257 00:13:21,559 --> 00:13:22,880 Speaker 2: have to wonder at the end of the day, like 258 00:13:24,200 --> 00:13:25,160 Speaker 2: did I add value? 259 00:13:26,760 --> 00:13:27,559 Speaker 1: I wonder every day. 260 00:13:27,640 --> 00:13:30,520 Speaker 2: I cannot. I can't answer this question on this podcast. 261 00:13:31,000 --> 00:13:37,240 Speaker 2: Cool great question, mail Bag, mail Bag. I like this one. 262 00:13:37,600 --> 00:13:39,560 Speaker 2: This question comes from Bruce. It's a little bit of 263 00:13:39,559 --> 00:13:43,120 Speaker 2: a long one, so tuck in. Bruce says, I'm intrigued 264 00:13:43,120 --> 00:13:47,560 Speaker 2: by your recent coverage, so stick with us, all right, Bruce. 265 00:13:47,720 --> 00:13:50,520 Speaker 2: Bruce says, I'm intrigued by your recent coverage of super 266 00:13:50,520 --> 00:13:54,440 Speaker 2: performing private investment funds sefed heavily with techies. For my 267 00:13:54,520 --> 00:13:57,600 Speaker 2: spy novel, I invented a tech heavy hedge fund whose 268 00:13:57,640 --> 00:14:01,320 Speaker 2: principles are former CIA contractors who go from stealing Oligarch 269 00:14:01,400 --> 00:14:05,040 Speaker 2: secrets to stealing Oligarch cash, which they then launder through 270 00:14:05,040 --> 00:14:07,520 Speaker 2: a private fund whose operations are a black box to 271 00:14:07,559 --> 00:14:11,200 Speaker 2: the outside world. My villains reverse engineer capital market data 272 00:14:11,240 --> 00:14:15,200 Speaker 2: to fake trade reports for their tame auditor that explained 273 00:14:15,200 --> 00:14:19,280 Speaker 2: the funds quote unquote returns. I'm not accusing the funds 274 00:14:19,280 --> 00:14:22,560 Speaker 2: you wrote about of anything nefarious. I'm just struck by 275 00:14:22,600 --> 00:14:25,800 Speaker 2: how much they resemble the fictional high tech high return 276 00:14:25,960 --> 00:14:28,240 Speaker 2: mcguffin in my book. Is that crazy? 277 00:14:31,280 --> 00:14:31,640 Speaker 1: Is there? 278 00:14:31,680 --> 00:14:35,320 Speaker 2: For a recent A real world operator with bad intentions 279 00:14:35,360 --> 00:14:38,960 Speaker 2: couldn't take say, the cash from his cocaine business and 280 00:14:39,040 --> 00:14:42,600 Speaker 2: report it as fictional market returns from a proprietary model 281 00:14:42,640 --> 00:14:46,160 Speaker 2: investment fund, pay some tax, and then have untraceable money 282 00:14:46,160 --> 00:14:50,120 Speaker 2: to spend. Just asking the question, and not for legal advice, Bruce, 283 00:14:50,560 --> 00:14:54,480 Speaker 2: don't give away this gold material. As someone who's also 284 00:14:54,560 --> 00:14:57,640 Speaker 2: working on a kooky novel, you know, you can't say 285 00:14:57,640 --> 00:14:58,120 Speaker 2: too much. 286 00:14:58,680 --> 00:15:00,720 Speaker 1: Have you not described your entire navel on this podcast? 287 00:15:02,240 --> 00:15:03,400 Speaker 2: Off Mike? For sure. 288 00:15:03,960 --> 00:15:06,400 Speaker 1: It's a little bit like Bernie made Off right, Like, yeah, 289 00:15:06,440 --> 00:15:09,360 Speaker 1: it's a little different. But like Bernie Madoff pretended to 290 00:15:09,440 --> 00:15:14,640 Speaker 1: have investing returns and in fact had you know, Ponzi returns, 291 00:15:15,120 --> 00:15:21,440 Speaker 1: and people who are knowledgeable noticed that and said he 292 00:15:21,480 --> 00:15:23,720 Speaker 1: can't really have these investment returns. Someone is just like 293 00:15:24,240 --> 00:15:27,200 Speaker 1: he like, was doing more pretend volume than there was 294 00:15:27,280 --> 00:15:29,400 Speaker 1: volume in the stocks he was pretending to trade, right, 295 00:15:29,960 --> 00:15:31,360 Speaker 1: And so you have a little of that here. If 296 00:15:31,400 --> 00:15:35,000 Speaker 1: you were in the business of like selling drugs, yeah, 297 00:15:35,160 --> 00:15:38,320 Speaker 1: and then taking the money and pretending the money was 298 00:15:38,360 --> 00:15:41,400 Speaker 1: returns from your hedge fund, you would be reporting to 299 00:15:41,440 --> 00:15:44,520 Speaker 1: a regulator something about your trades, and the regular would 300 00:15:44,560 --> 00:15:47,480 Speaker 1: be like, but you don't have a custodian, you don't 301 00:15:47,520 --> 00:15:49,960 Speaker 1: have audited financial and like maybe like you grab your 302 00:15:50,000 --> 00:15:52,880 Speaker 1: auditor and maybe like the SEC is fooled, as they 303 00:15:52,920 --> 00:15:55,520 Speaker 1: kind of were with Bernie made Off. But it seems 304 00:15:55,560 --> 00:15:58,520 Speaker 1: like a lot of effort to go through in a 305 00:15:58,520 --> 00:16:01,960 Speaker 1: lot of like surface area for regulatory exposure. Yeah, and 306 00:16:02,000 --> 00:16:05,520 Speaker 1: you'd probably rather run like a coin opp laundromat or something, right, Yeah, 307 00:16:05,560 --> 00:16:07,760 Speaker 1: There's a lot of ways to launder money that don't 308 00:16:07,800 --> 00:16:10,000 Speaker 1: involve like entering a regulated industry. 309 00:16:10,320 --> 00:16:12,160 Speaker 2: So, Bruce, I do want you to keep in touch 310 00:16:12,200 --> 00:16:15,120 Speaker 2: though you know where this, Yes, did you get further 311 00:16:15,160 --> 00:16:17,320 Speaker 2: along with the novel? Love to know the title? 312 00:16:17,760 --> 00:16:19,840 Speaker 1: He's not like the only person who's ever thought this. 313 00:16:20,240 --> 00:16:23,400 Speaker 1: A while back, there is like a kerfuffle when uh oh, 314 00:16:23,440 --> 00:16:27,360 Speaker 1: when someone speculated that Bridgewater might be a Ponzi scheme 315 00:16:27,400 --> 00:16:29,920 Speaker 1: because they like were trading with like someone who they 316 00:16:29,960 --> 00:16:32,040 Speaker 1: expected them to be trading with the people had this 317 00:16:32,280 --> 00:16:34,800 Speaker 1: tether too, where they're like, who trades with tether? Whoere 318 00:16:34,800 --> 00:16:37,280 Speaker 1: do they get all their stuff from? But those things 319 00:16:37,320 --> 00:16:38,200 Speaker 1: seem to be wrong. 320 00:16:39,040 --> 00:16:41,240 Speaker 2: Yeah, I don't think Bridgewater is a Ponzi scheme. 321 00:16:41,840 --> 00:16:44,360 Speaker 1: No, I don't either. Okay, there was a minute where 322 00:16:44,360 --> 00:16:46,000 Speaker 1: people were like, oh, that's interesting. 323 00:16:46,960 --> 00:16:49,480 Speaker 2: I feel like some of those tether questions are still 324 00:16:49,480 --> 00:16:52,920 Speaker 2: out there. Yeah, great question, Bruce, Good luck with the novel. 325 00:16:53,000 --> 00:16:55,120 Speaker 2: Maybe people have had this thought before, but turns out 326 00:16:55,200 --> 00:16:59,600 Speaker 2: it's really hard to actually write a novel. So I 327 00:16:59,640 --> 00:17:00,720 Speaker 2: respect very hard. 328 00:17:01,480 --> 00:17:24,000 Speaker 1: That's making money and contrary. 329 00:17:21,520 --> 00:17:26,320 Speaker 2: Mail bag mail Bag one more from Andy, Let's bring 330 00:17:26,359 --> 00:17:30,240 Speaker 2: it home, Andy says. Matt's newsletter today mentioned how financial 331 00:17:30,280 --> 00:17:34,359 Speaker 2: advice was traditionally bundled, where the overpriced stock picking paid 332 00:17:34,400 --> 00:17:37,200 Speaker 2: for the useful advice. This reminded me of a dumb 333 00:17:37,280 --> 00:17:41,080 Speaker 2: question I've had for years. Why doesn't anyone offer unbundled 334 00:17:41,160 --> 00:17:44,160 Speaker 2: financial advice on a fee for service basis? I want 335 00:17:44,160 --> 00:17:46,240 Speaker 2: to pay someone a fixed fee to chat with me 336 00:17:46,359 --> 00:17:50,439 Speaker 2: once per quarter about my goals, asset allocation, tax considerations, 337 00:17:50,680 --> 00:17:53,240 Speaker 2: when I can retire, et cetera. But as far as 338 00:17:53,240 --> 00:17:55,600 Speaker 2: I can tell and I've looked. No one offers these 339 00:17:55,600 --> 00:17:59,080 Speaker 2: services without bundling them with money management services where the 340 00:17:59,119 --> 00:18:02,320 Speaker 2: fee structure is a percent of AUM, and then they 341 00:18:02,440 --> 00:18:05,120 Speaker 2: charge like one percent of AUM, which feels like a lot. 342 00:18:05,280 --> 00:18:07,399 Speaker 2: It sounds like Vanguard is offering a cheaper version of 343 00:18:07,400 --> 00:18:10,879 Speaker 2: this for like twenty basis points of AUM in improvement. 344 00:18:11,200 --> 00:18:13,840 Speaker 2: But if I have like five million dollars to invest, 345 00:18:13,840 --> 00:18:16,840 Speaker 2: that works out to two thy five hundred per quarterly 346 00:18:17,000 --> 00:18:21,280 Speaker 2: zoom call or whatever. Seems like a bit expensive. Anyway, 347 00:18:21,320 --> 00:18:23,159 Speaker 2: Does unbundled financial advice exist? 348 00:18:24,080 --> 00:18:26,400 Speaker 1: I feel like it must a little bit, but like, right, 349 00:18:26,760 --> 00:18:30,720 Speaker 1: there's not a lot. And you see why. It's like 350 00:18:31,080 --> 00:18:33,640 Speaker 1: the opposite of his problem, right, Like, if you're offering 351 00:18:33,920 --> 00:18:36,399 Speaker 1: zoom calls to people to talk about their hopes and 352 00:18:36,480 --> 00:18:40,600 Speaker 1: dreams and portfolio allocations, yeah, and you do you four 353 00:18:40,680 --> 00:18:42,760 Speaker 1: zoom calls a year with that person. You have to 354 00:18:42,800 --> 00:18:46,440 Speaker 1: like market yourself. You have to find hundreds of clients 355 00:18:46,800 --> 00:18:50,200 Speaker 1: and you have to amortize the cost of that over 356 00:18:50,200 --> 00:18:52,560 Speaker 1: the zoom calls. You do have to charge them hundreds 357 00:18:52,640 --> 00:18:55,120 Speaker 1: or thousands of dollars for the zoom call because that's 358 00:18:55,119 --> 00:18:56,560 Speaker 1: just your time on the zoom call. It's your time 359 00:18:56,600 --> 00:18:58,960 Speaker 1: like marketing and like, you know, building the business, and 360 00:18:58,960 --> 00:19:00,920 Speaker 1: then like who wants to pit dollars for a zoom 361 00:19:00,920 --> 00:19:03,240 Speaker 1: call when you put it like that, right, if you 362 00:19:03,280 --> 00:19:05,919 Speaker 1: put it as like, I'll provide you holistic services in 363 00:19:05,960 --> 00:19:10,320 Speaker 1: exchange for a small percentage of your assets, then people like, yeah, sure, 364 00:19:10,359 --> 00:19:12,119 Speaker 1: And if the small percentage one percently works out to 365 00:19:12,200 --> 00:19:15,280 Speaker 1: thousands of dollars, but I don't know, like you don't 366 00:19:15,280 --> 00:19:18,000 Speaker 1: get into the financial services industry to like build a 367 00:19:18,040 --> 00:19:20,920 Speaker 1: captive out for your hours, like you want the ability 368 00:19:20,960 --> 00:19:23,520 Speaker 1: to scale. And it's also it's like a natural form 369 00:19:23,560 --> 00:19:27,199 Speaker 1: of price discrimination, where like if you get a small client, 370 00:19:27,320 --> 00:19:29,720 Speaker 1: you can charge them a small amount of money because 371 00:19:29,880 --> 00:19:32,960 Speaker 1: you're charging them a fixed percentage of assets under management, 372 00:19:33,240 --> 00:19:35,000 Speaker 1: And if they then grow into a large client, you 373 00:19:35,040 --> 00:19:37,440 Speaker 1: charge them a large amount of money and they don't 374 00:19:37,440 --> 00:19:40,439 Speaker 1: notice because it's the same percentage of assets under management. 375 00:19:41,080 --> 00:19:43,639 Speaker 1: And it's just like a better business model for someone 376 00:19:43,640 --> 00:19:45,600 Speaker 1: who is, like you know, kind of largely in the 377 00:19:45,640 --> 00:19:48,800 Speaker 1: business of marketing and funding clients. That just seems like 378 00:19:48,840 --> 00:19:51,119 Speaker 1: the answer, right, Like, it seems like a bad business 379 00:19:51,119 --> 00:19:52,720 Speaker 1: model for someone to be in to be like I'll 380 00:19:52,720 --> 00:19:55,800 Speaker 1: give you some financial advice for an hour for one 381 00:19:55,880 --> 00:19:57,679 Speaker 1: hundred bucks, Like, I just don't think you can make 382 00:19:57,680 --> 00:20:00,880 Speaker 1: a living doing that. I will say that Andy found 383 00:20:00,880 --> 00:20:03,639 Speaker 1: a solution, so he continues, I think I found a workaround. 384 00:20:03,720 --> 00:20:06,119 Speaker 1: I signed up for a wirehouse financial advisor. He charges 385 00:20:06,160 --> 00:20:08,239 Speaker 1: like one percent of AUM, but I only pay him 386 00:20:08,240 --> 00:20:09,719 Speaker 1: for the accounts I keep with him, which I keep 387 00:20:09,760 --> 00:20:13,200 Speaker 1: around the minimum he'll tolerate. And he's not the only 388 00:20:13,240 --> 00:20:16,840 Speaker 1: person who has done this. Like, you know, you find 389 00:20:16,840 --> 00:20:19,440 Speaker 1: a financial advisor, You're like, how much do I need 390 00:20:19,520 --> 00:20:23,399 Speaker 1: to put with you? He tells you five hundred thousand dollars. 391 00:20:23,520 --> 00:20:25,520 Speaker 1: You put five hundred thousand dollars with him for the 392 00:20:25,520 --> 00:20:27,919 Speaker 1: rest of the money and index funds, you know, and 393 00:20:28,000 --> 00:20:30,119 Speaker 1: like your self directed Vanguard account, and then you call 394 00:20:30,160 --> 00:20:32,639 Speaker 1: your financial advisor. I record it for advice. Right, you 395 00:20:32,720 --> 00:20:34,800 Speaker 1: get like a lot of the tax advice and whatever 396 00:20:34,920 --> 00:20:36,679 Speaker 1: that you get from the bundled fee, But you're not 397 00:20:36,720 --> 00:20:38,719 Speaker 1: paying him one percent of all of your ass as. 398 00:20:38,720 --> 00:20:41,280 Speaker 1: You're paying one percent of the minimum amount of assets 399 00:20:41,280 --> 00:20:42,199 Speaker 1: to get him on the phone. 400 00:20:42,359 --> 00:20:45,760 Speaker 2: Does that feel a little mean to the financial advisors? Like, Hey, 401 00:20:45,800 --> 00:20:47,919 Speaker 2: I have this sum with you, but I have like 402 00:20:47,920 --> 00:20:51,280 Speaker 2: two million dollars in my Vanguard account, give me advice 403 00:20:51,320 --> 00:20:52,679 Speaker 2: based on my holistic. 404 00:20:53,400 --> 00:20:56,119 Speaker 1: I don't think the financial advisor would like give you 405 00:20:56,160 --> 00:20:58,919 Speaker 1: advice basically. I don't think the sial adviser would be like, oh, 406 00:20:58,920 --> 00:21:01,160 Speaker 1: here's what you should do with your Vanguard account, right, Yeah, Well, 407 00:21:01,800 --> 00:21:03,760 Speaker 1: what you're looking for from the financial advisor is not 408 00:21:04,040 --> 00:21:07,280 Speaker 1: only like what should my asset allocation be? Yeah, you'd 409 00:21:07,359 --> 00:21:11,000 Speaker 1: rather he'll give you that. I hate to like undermine 410 00:21:11,000 --> 00:21:14,080 Speaker 1: financial advisor. Will they give you a thing being like 411 00:21:14,080 --> 00:21:15,760 Speaker 1: this is how much you have in stocks or bonds? Right, 412 00:21:15,800 --> 00:21:18,800 Speaker 1: and you can believe that or not right, because like 413 00:21:18,840 --> 00:21:20,720 Speaker 1: the financial advisor knows that and you don't, right, But 414 00:21:20,800 --> 00:21:21,920 Speaker 1: like whatever, they're. 415 00:21:21,640 --> 00:21:24,040 Speaker 2: Probably buying a model portfolio from Black Rocks, so. 416 00:21:24,160 --> 00:21:28,080 Speaker 1: Sure they've got some professional deciding how much you should 417 00:21:28,080 --> 00:21:30,320 Speaker 1: have in stocks and bonds or whatever, and like they'll 418 00:21:30,320 --> 00:21:32,560 Speaker 1: tell you that, and they'll do that with the portfolio 419 00:21:32,640 --> 00:21:34,719 Speaker 1: they manage, and then you're gonna mirror that with your 420 00:21:34,800 --> 00:21:36,720 Speaker 1: Vanguard account, right, you know, kind of more or less. 421 00:21:36,760 --> 00:21:38,000 Speaker 2: I just feel though. 422 00:21:38,320 --> 00:21:40,440 Speaker 1: The rude to mirror it exactly. It's rude. 423 00:21:40,440 --> 00:21:42,560 Speaker 2: But also I feel like maybe you'd invest differently if 424 00:21:42,560 --> 00:21:47,480 Speaker 2: you have more money rather than less, If that makes sense. 425 00:21:47,600 --> 00:21:51,439 Speaker 2: Maybe I think that the only way to really know is, 426 00:21:51,680 --> 00:21:53,520 Speaker 2: you know, if Andy would let us listen to one 427 00:21:53,560 --> 00:21:56,040 Speaker 2: of these phone calls that he has with his financial advisor. 428 00:21:56,200 --> 00:21:57,919 Speaker 1: The other thing is they say is like, you're not 429 00:21:58,160 --> 00:22:01,880 Speaker 1: mainly looking for advice about how to invest. Yeah, you're 430 00:22:01,880 --> 00:22:06,879 Speaker 1: looking for advice about tax harvesting. You're looking for advice 431 00:22:06,920 --> 00:22:09,240 Speaker 1: about like what the gift tex limits are on putting 432 00:22:09,280 --> 00:22:11,240 Speaker 1: money into a five twenty nine. You're looking for advice 433 00:22:11,240 --> 00:22:12,560 Speaker 1: about like how much money you need to say for 434 00:22:12,640 --> 00:22:14,760 Speaker 1: a time, Like you've all this like stuff that a 435 00:22:14,800 --> 00:22:18,639 Speaker 1: financial advisor does. Yeah, that is useful for you. That 436 00:22:18,720 --> 00:22:20,760 Speaker 1: is not like here's how much you should have in stocked. 437 00:22:20,800 --> 00:22:21,880 Speaker 2: I know, but I'm saying it's. 438 00:22:21,760 --> 00:22:23,840 Speaker 1: The least useful part. Yeah, like no one knows. 439 00:22:24,320 --> 00:22:26,879 Speaker 2: But like retirement planning, for example, Like it would probably 440 00:22:26,920 --> 00:22:30,000 Speaker 2: be useful if the financial advisor had a holistic view 441 00:22:30,240 --> 00:22:33,760 Speaker 2: at all of your portfolios. That's right, Yeah, that's right. 442 00:22:34,240 --> 00:22:36,840 Speaker 1: And some financial advisors will consider all of your money 443 00:22:36,840 --> 00:22:38,879 Speaker 1: and providing you that advice, even though not all of 444 00:22:38,880 --> 00:22:41,159 Speaker 1: it is with them, because like you know, there's like 445 00:22:41,960 --> 00:22:44,719 Speaker 1: and he's not the only person who like has money elsewhere? Right, 446 00:22:44,720 --> 00:22:46,320 Speaker 1: and the financial advisor like tries to give you a 447 00:22:46,359 --> 00:22:48,080 Speaker 1: host of picture and like they'll be mad if like 448 00:22:48,119 --> 00:22:50,000 Speaker 1: most of your money has elsewhere and they're you're calling 449 00:22:50,040 --> 00:22:52,240 Speaker 1: them every day, but like it's not like all or 450 00:22:52,280 --> 00:22:55,560 Speaker 1: nothing true. So I don't know that's the way to 451 00:22:55,600 --> 00:22:55,880 Speaker 1: do it. 452 00:22:56,040 --> 00:22:58,480 Speaker 2: Good question, Andy, Good good question. 453 00:22:58,280 --> 00:23:02,399 Speaker 1: And good answer. Yeah, all the conundrum right now, Like 454 00:23:02,400 --> 00:23:05,119 Speaker 1: I mean, like there's some minimum that the financial advisor charges, 455 00:23:05,160 --> 00:23:07,199 Speaker 1: and if you have that minimum with them, you're paying 456 00:23:08,160 --> 00:23:10,359 Speaker 1: a certain number of thousands of dollars a year for 457 00:23:10,960 --> 00:23:13,200 Speaker 1: your quarterly zoom call with them. And that's the going 458 00:23:13,280 --> 00:23:16,560 Speaker 1: rate for financial advice. And if you have one hundred 459 00:23:16,600 --> 00:23:18,640 Speaker 1: times the minimum with them, then you're paying more. And 460 00:23:18,760 --> 00:23:21,199 Speaker 1: you could put ninety nine percent of that money into 461 00:23:21,240 --> 00:23:23,280 Speaker 1: a Vanguard self tractored account and pay less, but like 462 00:23:23,320 --> 00:23:25,560 Speaker 1: you don't want that, and you're paying for service. 463 00:23:25,800 --> 00:23:31,840 Speaker 2: Yeah, all right, all right, Well that was our meal 464 00:23:31,880 --> 00:23:35,399 Speaker 2: pad episode, and what a good reminder it is to 465 00:23:35,600 --> 00:23:37,399 Speaker 2: always send us questions. We love questions. 466 00:23:37,440 --> 00:23:45,560 Speaker 1: We send us questions. And that was the Money Stuff podcast. 467 00:23:45,720 --> 00:23:47,920 Speaker 2: I'm Matt Levian and I'm Katie Greifeld. 468 00:23:48,080 --> 00:23:50,120 Speaker 1: You can find my work by subscribing to The Money 469 00:23:50,119 --> 00:23:52,440 Speaker 1: Stuff newsletter on Bloomberg dot com. 470 00:23:52,160 --> 00:23:54,640 Speaker 2: And you can find me on Bloomberg TV every day 471 00:23:54,680 --> 00:23:57,760 Speaker 2: on Open Interest between nine to eleven am Eastern. 472 00:23:58,160 --> 00:23:59,760 Speaker 1: We'd love to hear from you. You can send an 473 00:23:59,760 --> 00:24:03,040 Speaker 1: email to you Moneypod at Bloomberg dot net, ask us 474 00:24:03,040 --> 00:24:04,560 Speaker 1: a question and we might answer it on air. 475 00:24:05,000 --> 00:24:07,160 Speaker 2: You can also subscribe to our show wherever you're listening 476 00:24:07,240 --> 00:24:09,239 Speaker 2: right now and leave us a review. It helps more 477 00:24:09,280 --> 00:24:10,160 Speaker 2: people find the show. 478 00:24:10,920 --> 00:24:13,720 Speaker 1: The Money Stuff Podcast is produced by Anna Maserakus and 479 00:24:13,760 --> 00:24:14,200 Speaker 1: Moses on. 480 00:24:14,960 --> 00:24:17,120 Speaker 2: Our theme music was composed by Blake Maples. 481 00:24:17,160 --> 00:24:18,640 Speaker 1: Brendan Francis Neudhim is our. 482 00:24:18,560 --> 00:24:21,960 Speaker 2: Executive producer, and Stage Bauman is Bloomberg's head of Podcasts. 483 00:24:22,040 --> 00:24:24,359 Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to The Money Stuff Podcast. We'll be 484 00:24:24,480 --> 00:24:25,919 Speaker 1: back next week with more stuff