WEBVTT - Facebook Reinstates Trump, Senate Takes on TikTok

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm Caroline Hide of Bloomberg's San Francisco Viuro and Imed Ludlow.

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:24.120
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Technology Earnings, Earnings, Earnings, TESLA IBM layoffs.

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:26.279
<v Speaker 1>We know the stories. They come thick and fast they do,

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that we had such volatile day of

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:30.479
<v Speaker 1>trading and managed to push off those lows. Microsoft didn't

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:32.519
<v Speaker 1>manage to hold us down. But we've got to get

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>to some of these earnings that still come after the bell.

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Tesla one of them accelerating cost reduction plans as profit

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 1>it tops analysts estimates class The Senate takes up a

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>bill to band TikTok nationwide after dozens of universities take

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>action to block the Chinese owned app, and the space

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>company rocket Lab lifts off from the Virginia Space Area

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>as its first US lawn. Could has become a SpaceX,

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a small payloads earnings continuous, and Tesla as the one

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:07.040
<v Speaker 1>we've been waiting for, partly because there are so many

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>headlines all the time, but partly because this is a

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:13.040
<v Speaker 1>global company with global vision of what's happening with the consumer.

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:16.199
<v Speaker 1>Tests up a lot of emphasis that it's China plants

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 1>where a lot of the problems were yet comes straight

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>to after ours reaction, we bounced around and market wasn't

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:23.399
<v Speaker 1>really sure what to make of it. Top and bottom

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>line be I go straight to fourth quarter adjusted EPs

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>a dollar nineteen cents to share because slightly above expectations.

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:34.319
<v Speaker 1>The big takeaway, I suppose beyond that is Tesla committing

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>to this compounded annual growth rate of fifty saying they'll

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>do around one point eight million units in production. Three.

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's get straight to Bloomberg. Shawn o'caine over in Austin, Texas,

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Sean give us the main takeaways from this earnings print. Well,

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the big things is that we

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>realize there's maybe a little bit of it hit to

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the margins, but I think not as much as people

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>are expecting. You know, it's obviously not a kind of

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>margin growth that Tesla has been working with over the

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>last couple of quarters. But we have to remember that

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>their biggest cuts that they've made to their bracing game

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>after a Q four. So I think there's going to

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>be a lot more of the margin story to be

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>told when we get to the next earnings call. So

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>from this one, I think one of the big things

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:19.800
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at, is is really just you know, how

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:22.639
<v Speaker 1>how much inventory they left the year with sixteen days

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:26.679
<v Speaker 1>of inventory, the most that they've had since exiting a year.

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>And and yeah, those troubles that they had in China,

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:32.919
<v Speaker 1>Shanna came, thank you for the breakdown. We've just got

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 1>some breaking news coming from another key technology platform, you'll

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:39.119
<v Speaker 1>know it Meta Platforms making its decision ending the suspension

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:43.079
<v Speaker 1>of Trump's accounts. Well, we understand they were stand reinstating

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Trump's Facebook and Instagram and accounts after two years of

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>course of being banned from the platforms says it's ending

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the suspension of Trump's accounts across Instagram and indeed across Facebook, following,

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>of course, what happened on January six and Capitol Hill

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:02.359
<v Speaker 1>back into twenty one. We'll have more of that a

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit later in the show. And indeed Digital World

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that position shares are falling three postmarket in reaction to that.

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:09.639
<v Speaker 1>But let's get back to the story of the day.

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:11.919
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to Tesla and of course the numbers

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>that we got out from the company and profit meeting Tashchini,

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>we please to say Art director of Investment Analysis and

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Institutional Strategies, is with us, and of course your bullish,

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:22.640
<v Speaker 1>your bullish on Tesla in the long term, in the

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:26.360
<v Speaker 1>hair and the now, the production focus is there the

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>demand to meet it? Well, you're absolutely right, you know,

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 1>our our focus is over the five year forecast. UM.

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, Telsa's our top position in our r k

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>q E t f UM. But so in terms of

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>you know this this production goal, UM, you know they

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>did mention. I think if you go back to they

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>they're still on track over you know, a number of

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>years to meet their compound and your growth rate. I

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 1>think that the fears of UM, you know, margin and

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>demand troubles are pretty overblown. You know our research we've

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>used right slat of forecast UM Tesla's gross margins over

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>time and basically for every cumult of doubling in production,

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>you get a corresponding reduction in price. We also know

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>that they're unveiling a new vehicle platform which is should

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>be roughly half the cost of the Model three and Y.

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that could be a custom built autonomous vehicle

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna help margins. It's gonna give a huge bump

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>to margins in the long term, because I think autonomous

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>platforms could have really attractive margin structures and recurring revenue

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 1>associated with them. Um. And then you know the last

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>thing all hat is like the main story here is

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that evs are growing. Right, So evs as a category

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>grew sixty percent year every year, while gas powered cars

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 1>were down like seven percent. So that's where Tesla is.

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I'd i'd be worried about traditional autos if anything. Are

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you're worried in any way about the impact of Elon

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Musk himself on demand for test is going forward? Is

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:53.360
<v Speaker 1>in any way that being shown up in the demand erosion? Yeah.

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk has always been a pretty controversial figure. Um.

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'd say, at a minimum, what what do

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>we have to to go buy? Its really Tesla's results, Um,

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:03.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, against the Tesla alone in the fourth quarter,

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>we know, groove sales by every year, while in that

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>same quarter global auto sales were down roughly eight So

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 1>that's what we have to go off of. Um. You know,

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 1>he's a he's a cult figure. I think he's really

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the person to drive the company towards reaching that full

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>self driving goal, um, where you can actually launch an

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>autonomous ride hill platform. Um. You know, so we're happy

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:30.279
<v Speaker 1>that he's committed to Tesla and sticking on for that. TSH.

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring some some more information, I suppose

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 1>to our audience about what you were talking about in

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the shareholder deck. Tesla's talking about its next generation vehicle

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>platform under development, additional details to be shared at the

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>invested day March the first three I think that's what

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:48.479
<v Speaker 1>you were saying about your You suspect that that is

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>some form of fully autonomous vehicle for the future. I

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 1>wanted being it back to the here and now again

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:58.479
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of what Tesla hinted at was the

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>problems of or were largely China related. It basically talked

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 1>about the production issues largely being centered on the Shanghai plant.

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>You look at margins where they came in, you look

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>around the narrative on a SPS average selling price. We

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 1>went to our audience, okay, and we said, did those

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 1>price cuts in North America, Europe, China push you to

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>consider buying a Tesla? These are the results pretty clear,

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:25.720
<v Speaker 1>although I would point out they changed over the course

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:28.160
<v Speaker 1>of the day, you know, with with a good number

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:32.719
<v Speaker 1>of ballots casts. I suppose yes, testers global price cuts

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>have tempted at least our audience to buy affordability. Is

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Tesla too expensive right now for a consumer? You know?

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I think so, first of all, and I'm glad you

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 1>showed that chart. One of the things that we learned

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>is that since the price cuts, um, you know, lead

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>times have actually extended a bit, so we do not

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:55.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're already getting sort of initial indications of

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 1>demand here. We also know that the price cuts made

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>more vehicles eligible tax credits. Of course, we don't actually

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 1>model text credits in our analysis. We think evs are

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the solution longer term compared to gas powered cars, regardless

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>of regulation. UM. So you know, I again, I think

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>really that that's the picture here, Um that electric vehicles

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>are taking share, Tesla's the market leader. Um, they're just

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>invested in in additional capacity. Um. You know, they're at

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a single digit low percentage points of total auto sales.

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's still Tesla is um and evs

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>against still single digit percentage of total auto sales as well.

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>So I think you know that there's room to grow

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>on both of those. We've got a lot of questions

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter for you from our audience as well, most

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 1>of them related to testas energy business. What did we

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>learn about the energy business going forward? Will it be

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 1>more of a star? Yeah, so they did highlight the

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>energy business recently and again with that UM factory expansion.

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>They talked how you know they've they've they've seen some

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>good growth in that business overall. All, like our our

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>model is mostly focused on vehicles, we think that they

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>should UM. Well, you know, Tesla Energy does offer a

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>really interesting proposition to consumers, and actually we've done some

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>work to show that energy storage combined with bitcoin mining

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 1>can offer a great proposition to even use um make

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>more use of renewable sources. But you know that aside,

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>what should you focus on for Tesla UM? In our opinion,

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>it's electric vehicles and autonomy. Those are the two main

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 1>stories here that I'd watch over the next five years. Yeah,

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>it's really quickly. Gen month Sor of Loot points out

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.959
<v Speaker 1>that they guided to around one point eight million vehicles

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>four twenty three, which, if you track a fifty percent

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>compound annual growth rate, doesn't make any sense based on

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 1>last year's number. Do you see what I'm saying? Yeah,

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:53.439
<v Speaker 1>so last year, um, you know, year over year, yet

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>it does fall short of that fifty But if you

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>go back to UM, you'd still be coming in over

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that a few year period, uh, with the growth rate.

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:06.199
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's what they meant in their press release.

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Of course, I'm sure a lot of people will harp

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 1>on that figure. UM, But again, I think longer term,

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the story is electric vehicles are here to stay, and

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I'd be really worried if I was Forward or the

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>other traditional auto manufacturers were the majority of their installed

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 1>based in the vehicles that they sell or gas powered cars,

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 1>which we see declining. UM, that's not going away. And

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 1>by the way, they don't have a great autonomous solution either.

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>They killed that project. So I think that's where the

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 1>concern should be focused here on the traditional auto market. Actually,

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the other question from our audience for you is what

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>does Zelon Musk have to say on March the first,

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the invested day to convince us of that future that

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:50.559
<v Speaker 1>goes beyond Tesla just being a car company. Well, like

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I said, I mean, I'm excited to hear more about

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the autonomous vehicle. They had said that they would mass

0:09:56.080 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>produce a purpose stilt autonomous car in war UM. We

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.960
<v Speaker 1>think that this could totally change Tesla's business model. You know,

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>our price target for six split adjusted is around fift

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>dollars per share. I think over sixty of Tesla's enterprise value,

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:18.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, could be attributable to that autonomous ride hill platform.

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 1>I think it'll have attractive software like margins. It will

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.560
<v Speaker 1>become a recurring revenue stream as opposed to you know,

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>one off vehicle sales that we see today. It's gonna

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>totally change the game and their way ahead. And we

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 1>see that they have nearly a billion miles driven in

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>full self driving data. They have millions of cars on

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the road collecting data. Um, that's much more than competitors.

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Director of Investment Analysis and Institutional Strategies Tasha KINI very

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 1>good to catch up. Thank you for your quick reactions.

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 1>That tests the print. Meanwhile, another big story that's just broken,

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>IBM has announced job coups. The company will lay off

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>about one point five percent of its worldwide workforce, which

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>amounts to roughly four thousand jobs. You see the share

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:04.559
<v Speaker 1>reaction in after hours their IBM also released earnings, delivering

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 1>an upbeat forecast in the wake of its restructuring plans.

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Carrect interesting, We're going to talk about restructuring a certain

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>businesses a little bit more now because more earnings from

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 1>more slim down. A T and T CEO John Stanky

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be joining us for peace to say from

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco Bloomberg, We're going to talk earnings a little

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 1>bit more because A T and t s reaction to

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 1>them positive over the trading day, and this is as

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 1>they add customers, even though perhaps three cash flow forecast

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>miss some anest expectations. Want to dig into what is

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>a slimmer perhaps lean a mina A T and T

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>with none other than it's CEO John Stanky. We're joyfully

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:53.319
<v Speaker 1>welcoming him to the show. Six and a half percent

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 1>higher on the day. John, just talk to us about

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 1>what you think the investor base heard and liked. Is

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>it the fact that you're adding these customers. Is it

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that you're able to share some of the costs going forward. Well,

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me in, and I think what we're

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:10.839
<v Speaker 1>seeing maybe today is kind of a continued story and

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 1>accumulation of the last several quarters. Obviously to your opening,

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 1>we've been focusing the business to be much more adept

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 1>in the communications space, and we started that work in

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>earnest about two and a half years ago, two years ago,

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and completed the Warner Media transaction early part of last year,

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think investors were stepping back and asking is

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>this the right place to go and are they going

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to be able to execute around it? And I think

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 1>what you've seen over the last couple of quarters, in

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 1>particular in the third and fourth quarter, where we continue

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to grow the business, we continue to pick up the

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:48.720
<v Speaker 1>customer base, and now we're seeing the profitability and cash

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:52.319
<v Speaker 1>accretion back into the business as we've made those investments

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and managed to run the business better. I think they're

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 1>starting to gain confidence in that and rightly so. And

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:00.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, we intend to kind of stay focused on

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that and keep moving forward with that strategy. Invest is confident.

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>What about consumers at the moment? John, You've got a

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 1>great bird's eye perspective on how much consumers want to

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 1>be spending? Can you pass on costs? What does the

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>macro get like? Well, you know, we do have a

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>we have a broad scale of consumers at every end

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 1>of the socioeconomic stream, and I think there's probably you know,

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a couple of different stories in this. Clearly the low

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>end of the consumer basis stressed a bit more. Um

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 1>we tend to see that exhibit in them taking a

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit more time to pay their bill, or to

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>call in and ask for arrangements to pay their bill,

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 1>or possibly recharge a little less frequently if they're a

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>prepaid subscriber. But it's not that they aren't buying the service,

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's not that they aren't paying. They're trying to

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>manage it within an overall stressed environment where I think

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>they're making other choices on more discretionary items that they're

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 1>moving out and just trying to balance their overall their

0:13:56.640 --> 0:14:01.560
<v Speaker 1>overall obligations. At the top to the market, it's still

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:03.719
<v Speaker 1>really strong. Um you know, we're coming off a good

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>volume year. I think it will temper a little bit

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 1>as we move into this year, but it's still going

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to be pretty healthy. And it's just indicative of how

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 1>ingrained in life I think the products and service as

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>we sell our Hey, John, I want to jump on that.

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, the cell side reaction or that conclusion seems

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to be your prioritizing financial growth over subscribe a grave

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Yet in the fourth quarter you added what six d

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 1>and fifty six thousand new phone subscribe as strong growth

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>in the fiber optic business. They right, Is it a

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>case of financial growth? Subscribe a grateful Can you achieve both?

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>It's it's both, and um, I actually probably would not

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>agree with that conclusion. And we will share a creative

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>this year in the industry and both wireless and in

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>our fixed broad dawn business, and so um you know,

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>we are growing not only share, but we're growing profitability

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's coming from getting the right customers the right way.

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>And we think we've done a really good job of

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>tuning our offers into the right segments where we've been

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 1>under penetrated to be able to gain that share. And

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>we've been working really hard on restructuring our business and

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>our constructure, and we can do both at the same time,

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think as a result of that, we can

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>drive profitability growth at the same time that we're able

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to grow the business at the top one. Hey, John,

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 1>we're a technology show. We pride ourselves and talking about technology.

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>But I gotta I gotta put the hard questions to

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>you as well. So I ask it like this, how

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>much visibility have you really got through the end of

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the year. Is it that five G continues to drive

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 1>this growth? People buying new handsets, is the consumer strong

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 1>or actually you being a bit conservative here because you

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know what's going to happen. Well, you know, Visibility

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>in general, I would say over the last two years

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>has probably been a bit more challenge given the environment

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>we're in. But I'd take it at two levels. There's

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the visibility on the geopolitical side, which I'm not going

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to sit here and tell you that I'm better than

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>people who do that every day for a living. I mean,

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know when somebody who leads a large country

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 1>somewhere around the globe is going to do something really

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>silly or stupid that could have a big impact not

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 1>only on a T and T but literally every for

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>profit enterprise around the globe that I have no visibility

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>to or any better visibility than anybody else. But the

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 1>visibility on how the economy is performing, I think we

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>have reasonable visibility. I think we've been pretty conservative in

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 1>our assumptions. Moving into three, I would point back to

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 1>our performance in two is a point Inflation clearly peaked

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 1>last year. We were hit by that. Um we were

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>able to navigate through that through a lot of good

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>management techniques, combination of managing our cost structure as well

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>as and sure we were driving the right value into

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>our consumer base. UM, I don't think we're going to

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>see an environment that's probably more dynamic than what we

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>saw last year. We'll have new challenges to work through,

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 1>but this is a management team that's shown itself to

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>be pretty adaptable and pretty agile and being able to

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>adjust to those things. And I feel our assumptions on

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:06.160
<v Speaker 1>our guidance or are consistent with what we can do there.

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 1>It feels like you're getting creative to John. Of course,

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 1>you're focused on the good things the investors want to see, dividends,

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>debt payment, of course, after what had been a lot

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>of building up of debt over M and A and

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>now the unwinding of that. I'm interested in how you're

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>doing joint ventures. I was interested, for example, in the

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 1>black Rock Giggle Power deal. And the way that you're

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be offering fiber. Is this about ensuring that

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you're spreading the risk as you still continue to invest

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>in the fiber plan. It's a combination of things. Certainly,

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:36.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a dynamic of taking a new investment thesis that

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:39.679
<v Speaker 1>frankly is probably not well proven in the market today,

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:42.399
<v Speaker 1>and sharing some of that risk as we prove it

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 1>in and I'm trying to be responsive to share owners

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:48.679
<v Speaker 1>and ensure that as we consume capital and invested, that

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 1>they can gain confidence that we can do that wisely.

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think we've done a really good job of

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>that in our traditional lines of business over the last

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. Since this is a new approach um,

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 1>what I've told the street and what I want to

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:03.639
<v Speaker 1>do here is make sure that as we put the

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:05.640
<v Speaker 1>first tranche of investment and that we can come back

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and show them that we can do this right and

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>earn a very competitive return with it. And to the

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 1>extent that we do that, and when we do that,

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:15.639
<v Speaker 1>will of course put our foot on the accelerator and

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>go a little bit faster and do a little bit more.

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:20.479
<v Speaker 1>And this allows us to do it with a partner.

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:22.720
<v Speaker 1>It allows us to offload some of the risks during

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 1>that proven period, so that I think it keeps everybody

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:29.880
<v Speaker 1>comfortable on the continue income production capabilities of the existing

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>business while trying to find a new vector for growth.

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:36.159
<v Speaker 1>A new vector for growth. Everyone said five G is

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>it the way we're all going to have connected devices?

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:40.639
<v Speaker 1>Where industry is going to connect is it here in

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 1>here and now, John, Well, it's not here, and it's

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:46.359
<v Speaker 1>full maturity. And I think what I would first say

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:49.440
<v Speaker 1>is we shouldn't underestimate what I will call the meat

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and potatoes aspect of investing in the new five G spectrum,

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>in the new five G equipment, which allowed for more

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:59.400
<v Speaker 1>capacity on wireless networks, and what wireless operators have done

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 1>with that compath City is have have individuals move into

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 1>new devices and buy up on more robust plans with

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>higher value, and that's driven our poos up. And without

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:14.439
<v Speaker 1>that capacity and without that increased performance, that wouldn't have

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>taken place. But that's not the be all end all

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 1>the five G. The beyond all the five G is

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the capabilities that brings in to enable what you were

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about before I came on the show, which is

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:29.119
<v Speaker 1>things like autonomous vehicles, so that if Tesla decides to

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 1>bring a vehicle to market and they need to have persistent,

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:36.640
<v Speaker 1>high quality connectivity everywhere that vehicle goes, that's when five

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>G is really going to shine. And the networks are

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>just getting now to the point where they're more ubiquitous

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and scaled enough to do those types of things. And

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I do believe that will open up new revenue streams,

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>all right, A T and T C I, John Stanky,

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you've been watching the show in that coverage

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>of Test. It will get you on in another ninety

0:19:53.840 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>days time and see how you're doing. It's finally come out.

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Meta has indeed announced its decision to reinstate former President Trump.

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 1>On course, Instagram and Facebook most cut WADNA joined us

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 1>now to discuss and we knew it's what Trump wanted,

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:17.239
<v Speaker 1>that's right, Yeah, And we kind of expected. I think

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:19.439
<v Speaker 1>this is what Facebook was going to do too, because

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>what we said and what they had said was they

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:25.119
<v Speaker 1>needed to basically figure out is there still a heightened

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>risk of you know, violence in this case, right, That's

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 1>why he was suspended on after January six, and you

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:33.440
<v Speaker 1>know it's been two years, right, so I think they

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:35.119
<v Speaker 1>it would have been hard for them to come up

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>with a good reason to keep him off. Instead, they're

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:39.679
<v Speaker 1>bringing him back and saying if he has more violations,

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 1>he'll be suspended again quite quickly. Right. And they also

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:44.199
<v Speaker 1>said it will end in the coming weeks, extends to

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and Instagram. You know, I thought we knew this

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 1>was coming, right, Yeah, it's it's not unexpected, especially with

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:52.639
<v Speaker 1>what we saw from Twitter. Right, He's been back on

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Twitter or could be back on Twitter for the last

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:56.680
<v Speaker 1>couple of months. He has not yet tweeted, So I

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>think the big question now is when will we actually

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 1>hear from him? Right? Facebook was very helpful for him

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:03.719
<v Speaker 1>during the election. He has a huge base there. I

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:05.440
<v Speaker 1>imagine he'll be back on Facebook and I don't know

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 1>how quickly. Yeah. Interesting, and of course the digital world

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>acquisition shares we're falling on the back of businesses, obviously

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:14.919
<v Speaker 1>a new social media for Aye that they've been making himself. Ultimately,

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:19.199
<v Speaker 1>will we see better criticized, of course, but they're going

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to be criticized either direction. All Right, Tesla is making

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:35.120
<v Speaker 1>more cars than they can sell. They're doing whatever they

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:40.120
<v Speaker 1>can to sell cars, and customers haven't responded that enthusiastically yet.

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Tesla is running into kind of a buzz saw of issues,

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>many of which have nothing to do with Elon Musk.

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>You've got interest rates going up, which makes its cars

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 1>more expensive. You have problems in China, which is one

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 1>of its biggest markets, and you have competition from rival automakers.

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:01.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, Ford is bringing out these cars that weren't

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 1>around a few years ago that are really competitive. Customers

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:06.400
<v Speaker 1>are starting to take a second look at other brands.

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:11.439
<v Speaker 1>But really, there's this other problem. Musk desperately wants to

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>be considered funny. And it is this desire, which we

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 1>see play out every day on Musk's Twitter account, that

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 1>may be starting to hurt Musk's most important asset, his

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:25.639
<v Speaker 1>own reputation. At the end of the last quarter in December,

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the company started frantically cutting prices, and you might think

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe they would have, you know, an epic quarter as

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 1>must predicted. In fact, they did not meet expectations that

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>sent the stock down further, kind of creating a sense

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:42.919
<v Speaker 1>of failure and disarray. You're starting to see investors, analysts,

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:45.679
<v Speaker 1>even some people who are big fans of Tesla and

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>big fans of Musk say something that would have almost

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 1>been unthinkable a couple of years ago, which is that

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Musk needs to step back. He needs to either find

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:56.479
<v Speaker 1>a way to spend less time on Twitter, or, if

0:22:56.480 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>he's committed to Twitter, to spend less time with Tesla.

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 1>And it was absolutely fascinating read that Max Chafkin and

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Dana Hall had on the Blue Business Week Today front

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:13.199
<v Speaker 1>cover basically just brutal and analysis of how he's not

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>that funny ultimately, but his decision to try and get

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 1>these laughs has almost eroded some value of Elon Musk.

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Interesting Tasha Kearney, of course from ARCS saying at the

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>moment that isn't an issue for Tesla going forward, things

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:28.119
<v Speaker 1>that ultimately the CEO is still a benefit rather than

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:29.880
<v Speaker 1>a hindrance. But I thought it was a great quote

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 1>in this story that just basically said, look, you're not

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.440
<v Speaker 1>going to boast about you buying a Tesla anymore. And

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>they're saying somewhere between basic and cringe if we're going

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to be saying that you're about the other side of

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the argument is that this is all part of Musk's

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>master plan, you know, the focus all on him, free advertising,

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>free discussion around although he bought Twitter fort four billion dollars.

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>But you know what I mean, and you look at

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:51.879
<v Speaker 1>the regularly true fightings and Tesla say it's time and

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>time again Elon Musk is central central to our future success.

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:57.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, we talk about key Man risk, they're intertwined

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Tesla and Elon Musk story. Now, speaking of Twitter, a

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:05.960
<v Speaker 1>new Twitter whistle blower has told Congress that the company

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:11.399
<v Speaker 1>continued to violate privacy and data security protections even after

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Musks takeover. Bloomberg's Emily burn Baum is in d C.

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Give us the details of what this whistle blower is claiming. Yeah,

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for having me. Um. So, this new

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 1>twittle Twitter whistle blower um, A lot of his allegations

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 1>focus on this program internally, a Twitter called god Mode,

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 1>which allowed any Twitter employee to access any Twitter users account,

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 1>either to delete tweets or to access or to tweet themselves.

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Um And essentially, the whistleblower says, the FTC should really

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 1>look into this because the company is flagrantly violating its

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>consent to cry. Indeed, your story says a companie was

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>shared with the Justice Department, the Federal Trade Commission, the

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:56.880
<v Speaker 1>FTC is, say our members of Congress. Ultimately, where does

0:24:56.880 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>this get taken? Emily? So? The FTC already opened an

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 1>inquiry into Twitter's privacy practices last year after a different

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Twitter whistleblower came forward. So that was Peter zako Um

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:13.680
<v Speaker 1>also known as Mudge and the hacking community. UM. He

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:18.119
<v Speaker 1>was Twitter's head of privacy and he came out. You know,

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:22.160
<v Speaker 1>there was a congressional hearing. He said there are horrible

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 1>security and privacy violations across this platform. So the FTC

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>had already opened that investigation um and they have just

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 1>broadened it UM and this is probably going to be

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the next thing that investigators are looking at as they

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:40.640
<v Speaker 1>seek to UM find the company. The question still goes

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 1>on about regulation across the board. Emily urn bound there

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:45.400
<v Speaker 1>on all focused on Twitter, But let's turn our attention

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 1>to the other key social media player that has taken

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>markets chef from a lot of these players and edits TikTok.

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>And we get again focused from Congress on whether or

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 1>not they want to ban TikTok outright. Liver of course

0:25:56.680 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 1>been a Republican senator, Joshally tweeting that he will present

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:03.879
<v Speaker 1>a bill to ban the popular app nationwide. Now, of

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:06.119
<v Speaker 1>course we're already getting little tick bits, aren't we, in

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 1>terms of what the Texas University is driving ensure that

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 1>they confront run any sort of federal action here, but

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 1>it really is building it's specific action of how well

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:18.399
<v Speaker 1>in this case that the Texas governor statewide is trying

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 1>to remove access to TikTok I've got a question when

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>we get into it about actually who's really under pressure

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:27.359
<v Speaker 1>here because state level, right, what we're all waiting on

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 1>is a federal level response to this story. Yeah, let's

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 1>get to it. Let's ask some more questions. Let's get

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:34.919
<v Speaker 1>Alex Bronco, who of course covers this company. So in

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 1>debt Alex, I guess slightly unsurprising that the bagging of

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the drum keeps on coming. It keeps coming in Josh

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Holly has been one of the loudest bangers of that drum.

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:47.920
<v Speaker 1>This newest bill is actually one of two that are

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>now starting to flot around in Congress, with Josh Holly

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>tweeting that he believes that TikTok, because it's own by

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:58.959
<v Speaker 1>Chinese company, is a quote back door into American lives.

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>He's worried about potential data sharing to the Chinese government,

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>so he is putting this bill through. Now, you talked

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:09.640
<v Speaker 1>about pressure. There's obviously pressure here on TikTok, but there's

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:13.160
<v Speaker 1>also pressure on this kind of national security review that's

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 1>been going on for years under the Biden administration. You'll

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:20.440
<v Speaker 1>note whether it's the Texas governor or Josh Holly, the

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Senator there are a lot of Republicans were being very

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:25.959
<v Speaker 1>loud about TikTok. It does seem like the Democrats are

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 1>being a little bit quier, perhaps because Biden's Biden's administration

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 1>is the one who is kind of doing this in

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 1>depth national security review of TikTok. It seems that they

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 1>are kind of waiting and deferring to that process to

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:41.639
<v Speaker 1>come to a conclusion before they pile on or speak

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 1>really publicly about what they think should happen with TikTok

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 1>at large. Well, in TikTok's response was to say, okay,

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 1>we reach a deal with Oracle where we have us

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:54.400
<v Speaker 1>use a day to house the hon Oracle servers, which

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:57.920
<v Speaker 1>are domiciled in the United States. So access to use

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the data was the worry. It seems like that's even

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:03.679
<v Speaker 1>the concern anymore. It goes deeper than that, And this

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 1>conversation shifted and we started talking about it um on

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:11.199
<v Speaker 1>this show before it shifted in Congress. Tiktop speed is

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 1>basically decided by an algorithm. Everybody's feed is different. It's personalized.

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:19.159
<v Speaker 1>That concerned that there could be some influence on that

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 1>feed or influence on the most influential creators on TikTok

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:26.400
<v Speaker 1>that that could actually be um the the idea that's

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:29.119
<v Speaker 1>coming front and center. You'll remember the last time we

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>talked really big about influence on social media when it

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:34.440
<v Speaker 1>had a big impact in the political sphere. Uh, the

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 1>very first time. It was kind of in sixteen around

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the election. I know, were eighteen months out from the

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 1>next to gust presidential election. But as you know, Congress

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 1>gets its feed on the ground, this new Congress gets

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>feed on the ground. I'm sure they are thinking about

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 1>how a bad actor, or if they see China as

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 1>a bad actor, how they might be able to influence

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the feed of an app that's becoming stickier and stickier

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 1>with folks spending more time on it in American particular,

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 1>alex It's an interesting global story as well, isn't it?

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not sure how much you can speak to it.

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:08.719
<v Speaker 1>But of course India took its first step spanned it Europe.

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 1>It's interestingly considering the amount of European regulation the front

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>runs the US, they really haven't been as focused on

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 1>TikTok as the United States has. From this perspective, when

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 1>we do have division among Democrats Republicans, are they going

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to come together over this. Do you think whether they

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 1>come together formally, It seems like at least their voices

0:29:29.640 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 1>are coming together. In the past few weeks, Europe did

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 1>start to turn an eye to TikTok. You saw the

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 1>European regulators who are talking a lot about the new

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:43.479
<v Speaker 1>data security acts that's coming it down this year in Europe,

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 1>basically going to TikTok CEO saying, look, we're not happy

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:50.720
<v Speaker 1>with your content moderation as it stands today. If if

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 1>if these new acts came in place today and not

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>in September, the company might be in a little bit

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of hot water when it comes to EU data security laws.

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:03.040
<v Speaker 1>So it seems like whether or not they formally come

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:06.240
<v Speaker 1>together and follow India's lead and banning it, or if

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>it just seems to be kind of a really heated

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 1>moment where folks are taking notice of TikTok, the voices

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 1>are getting louder. You tend to be has tended to

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>be a bit stricter with its data privacy laws. We

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>know that Congress could be a little bit of a

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 1>tough place to navigate when it comes to bill so

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 1>perhaps the US will be a step behind, But it

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 1>does seem like across the globe, TikTok has eyes on

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 1>it from all of kind of the right people for

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 1>consumer protection and some of the wrong people. If you're

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 1>in the seat of the company, Bloomberg's Atles Brink are

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 1>just terrific reporting on all things TikTok, not just today,

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 1>but over the course of course of a week. Tomorrow

0:30:44.640 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 1>timely FCC Commissioner Brendan car will join us here on

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Technology Live to talk all things TikTok in an

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 1>exclusive interview. One Caroline that we've been waiting a little

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 1>while for now I can't wait for that. Meanwhile, let's

0:30:57.960 --> 0:31:00.239
<v Speaker 1>turn our attention to crypto for a moment, because well,

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the bancrupt lender Genesis is working to get some money

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 1>back from the man that is known as Bitcoin Jesus.

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Now overall, Genesis says rogervert owes them more than a

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty million dollars, alleging that he failed to settle options

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 1>transactions that expired in December. There on early Backer, of course,

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 1>a bitcoin said on Twitter that he has the funds

0:31:19.680 --> 0:31:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to pay Gensis, but this is a breach of their agreement.

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Now coming up, should we go to space a major

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 1>rocket launch in the United States and it wasn't SpaceX,

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg salesforce. You might have seen a sprinkling

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 1>of celebrity around this company. Maybe it's Matthew McConaughey and

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 1>an ad maybe it's Will I Am performing a drill force.

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 1>They're big marketing event. What about giving actual corporate advice?

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 1>That's for some of the reporting. Is that them, him

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and the many of the CEO of this massive software

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 1>company depending on celebrities for some pretty high level corporate

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 1>discussions have a question for many an activist investor now,

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 1>and there's three involved in the stock re member, is

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 1>is the CEO distracted and is he really being focused

0:32:17.160 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 1>on profit where he should be? And of course this

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:24.120
<v Speaker 1>is some reporting coming out of the Financial Times. No

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 1>one they were what they call him celeb schmoozing CEO.

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 1>But it is interesting that at least one or two

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 1>people they spoke to have been really caught off guard

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 1>by them coming out of the celebrities coming out of

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 1>quite high level conversations. So mart Benioff has lost two

0:32:40.200 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 1>co CEOs in the last few years. We're talking about

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 1>two pretty well known celebrities having major influence in the company.

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Can I take you back now that you're here in

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco to two thousand and sixteen, when that Salesforce

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Towers first built, and at the time, bear with me,

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 1>there was stories and reports in the media about a

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 1>a zen Master living with Mark Benioff in his house,

0:33:04.200 --> 0:33:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Master Hahn, Vietnamese Buddhist monk, and when he was building

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Salesforce Tower, apparently he took under advisement what these Buddist

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 1>monks had to say about building the ultimate space for

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:18.160
<v Speaker 1>employee relaxation. It's all I'm saying is he has a

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 1>track record of seeking guidance from those not normally associated

0:33:22.680 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 1>with the world of tech. Well said. And maybe I

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 1>think there was a lot of coverage at the time

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 1>about all the Salesforce Tower actually sinking, rather than sayings

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:35.240
<v Speaker 1>that was all the narratives blaming that exactly. But what's

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 1>so interesting is that these activists that come on boarders

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 1>like questioning this behavior. Ultimately, I thought it was interesting,

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 1>real questioning his philanthropy. I've never heard many and investor

0:33:44.560 --> 0:33:49.480
<v Speaker 1>really questioned the deep phil agendas of his voice association

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 1>with this city in particular. Yeah, exactly, I can understand

0:33:53.120 --> 0:33:56.840
<v Speaker 1>worries about a distraction by bringing in the wrong celebrity

0:33:57.040 --> 0:33:59.880
<v Speaker 1>for technological advice. Whill I am. I know he has

0:33:59.920 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a gadgetal too, but I don't know how much he

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:04.520
<v Speaker 1>knows about Sorry sales, But ultimately I do think it's

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 1>notable that I wouldn't want to see him being distracted

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:09.279
<v Speaker 1>from philanthropy personally for the focus on profitable But you know,

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 1>we talked this week about dream Force, the expense of

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 1>dream Force and what it is. You know, it's a CRM, right,

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 1>but salesforces this brand that everyone knows and clearly there's

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:21.319
<v Speaker 1>been a benefit for it for that now investing guy,

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 1>isn't he right? But investors now saying Okay, get this

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 1>under control. Yeah, profits first. Maybe it's a I don't

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's a Budhist mantra, writes a mantra coming from activists.

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Unionization in tech is a global discussion, and Amazon workers

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 1>in Coventry in the UK took part in a part

0:34:46.520 --> 0:34:49.320
<v Speaker 1>of a historic strike, disrupting the e commerce chance operations

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 1>for the first time in that nation. Zzie Burden has

0:34:52.080 --> 0:34:55.280
<v Speaker 1>more from that. We're in Coventry in the English Midlands,

0:34:55.360 --> 0:34:58.880
<v Speaker 1>where Amazon workers are striking for the first time in

0:34:58.920 --> 0:35:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the UK. You can see the GMB union behind me

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:04.799
<v Speaker 1>has set up camp at the entrance to the warehouse

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's stopping workers on their way in asking if

0:35:08.040 --> 0:35:11.399
<v Speaker 1>they want to join the strike join the union. So

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 1>far about three hundred workers are expected to have joined

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:19.719
<v Speaker 1>at least and it's all about pay. They're asking for

0:35:19.760 --> 0:35:24.359
<v Speaker 1>a fifty percent raise five zero to fifteen pounds an hour.

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 1>This roise isn't going to impact how Amazon Amazon does business.

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:30.920
<v Speaker 1>What it will do is actually start to bring some

0:35:31.000 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of that money that Amazon generates back into the economy. Now,

0:35:34.040 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Amazon has its own problems. It's having to deal with

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:41.440
<v Speaker 1>people adjusting back to their pre pandemic spending habits. It's

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 1>already said that it's going to cut about eighteen thousand

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:49.719
<v Speaker 1>jobs across its branches around the world. That's about one

0:35:49.760 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 1>percent of its total workforce, the biggest call in it's

0:35:53.080 --> 0:35:56.080
<v Speaker 1>near thirty year history. And here in the UK it's

0:35:56.120 --> 0:36:00.839
<v Speaker 1>closing three warehouses, opening two more. But it's adding to discontent.

0:36:01.160 --> 0:36:05.840
<v Speaker 1>This is a company that is hostile to unions. This

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:08.960
<v Speaker 1>is a company that doesn't take health and safety seriously,

0:36:09.000 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and this is a company that simply as something its

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:14.480
<v Speaker 1>workers in our Now, what's also significant about this strike

0:36:14.840 --> 0:36:17.920
<v Speaker 1>is it shows that the discontent has spread beyond the

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:21.719
<v Speaker 1>public sector to the private sector. No longer is it

0:36:21.840 --> 0:36:26.720
<v Speaker 1>just the chaos across travel, healthcare, teaching, the civil service.

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Now it's the private sector to It gives new meaning

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 1>to the warnings about a wage price spiral, because if

0:36:33.560 --> 0:36:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Amazon were to high its prices in response to covering

0:36:37.800 --> 0:36:40.880
<v Speaker 1>this bigger wage bill, it would add surely to the

0:36:40.920 --> 0:36:44.760
<v Speaker 1>inflation problems that the UK is facing. Bimbos Lozzie Burden

0:36:44.800 --> 0:36:47.640
<v Speaker 1>there now from down on Earth to up in space.

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Rocket Lab had its first US launch last night. You

0:36:51.560 --> 0:36:53.320
<v Speaker 1>can see it there on your screen and I'm delighted

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to say. The CEO of the company, Pezebec, joins us

0:36:56.120 --> 0:36:59.240
<v Speaker 1>now on the phone. He's on the move. One question

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:01.640
<v Speaker 1>from our Alreudien for you. How many launches are going

0:37:01.680 --> 0:37:04.719
<v Speaker 1>to come from the United States this year, Peter here,

0:37:04.800 --> 0:37:07.399
<v Speaker 1>So thanks very much for somewhere between four and six,

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and we're probably about fifteen launches in total between our

0:37:11.200 --> 0:37:14.799
<v Speaker 1>global launch sites. There was a moment where we see

0:37:14.800 --> 0:37:19.440
<v Speaker 1>on our screens launched successful. We're waiting. It's tense, it's scary.

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Are the satellite is going to deploy Peter, and they deployed.

0:37:22.960 --> 0:37:26.840
<v Speaker 1>How traumatic was that for you in the moment, Well,

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I knew what was going on. For not very traumatic

0:37:28.800 --> 0:37:32.880
<v Speaker 1>at all. We have ground stations placed around the world UM,

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:35.319
<v Speaker 1>and one of the ground stations went offline, as they

0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:38.240
<v Speaker 1>do occasionally, was one in Australia, so there was probably

0:37:38.239 --> 0:37:40.560
<v Speaker 1>a snake called around it and tied it up or

0:37:40.560 --> 0:37:43.439
<v Speaker 1>something like that. But twenty minutes later we had another

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 1>part of another ground station UM and we had contact

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:49.840
<v Speaker 1>with the vehicle over Africa. So we're all. We're all happy.

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:55.520
<v Speaker 1>But for those watching you probably wondering what was going on,

0:37:55.640 --> 0:38:01.360
<v Speaker 1>but you all successful and happy to see uh hundred

0:38:01.360 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and cooky purpose customer on all. But it's a quite

0:38:03.520 --> 0:38:05.759
<v Speaker 1>an emotional right for an investor as well, because the

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:08.400
<v Speaker 1>stock soared and he was pointing it out pre market.

0:38:08.600 --> 0:38:10.240
<v Speaker 1>It was up, up, up and away and then seems

0:38:10.239 --> 0:38:11.880
<v Speaker 1>to sort of crash back down to Earth. I'm interested

0:38:11.920 --> 0:38:15.600
<v Speaker 1>as to what you think happened to the stock market reaction. Look,

0:38:15.640 --> 0:38:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean with within the space fictor especially, but I

0:38:18.040 --> 0:38:24.760
<v Speaker 1>mean in general, there's very little correlation, frustratingly between a bench.

0:38:25.160 --> 0:38:27.359
<v Speaker 1>So you know, we went to the moon, last year

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:31.279
<v Speaker 1>Vanessa and a varioustoric mission and in you know, the

0:38:31.280 --> 0:38:34.920
<v Speaker 1>stock didn't really change either. So I think in this

0:38:35.239 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the current market, there's very very kind of little or

0:38:39.120 --> 0:38:43.960
<v Speaker 1>or oblique influences on the stock price. But you know,

0:38:44.040 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 1>we just continued to execute and in ultimately, you know,

0:38:48.000 --> 0:38:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the market will catch up. Hey, Peter, how tight is

0:38:50.440 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 1>capacity right now? Industry wide related demark to demand? If

0:38:54.239 --> 0:38:56.799
<v Speaker 1>you did more launches, would you be able to fill

0:38:56.800 --> 0:39:00.839
<v Speaker 1>the three hundred kilogram payload quota? Yeah? Look, I mean

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 1>were the dominant force in the small dedicated launch globally

0:39:05.719 --> 0:39:07.839
<v Speaker 1>right now? And um, you know, I think I think

0:39:07.880 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 1>we we we fly the vast majority of everything there.

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:14.680
<v Speaker 1>We're the you know, the real capacity crunch is around

0:39:14.719 --> 0:39:18.279
<v Speaker 1>about in the five twenty seven time frame, where they're

0:39:18.280 --> 0:39:21.840
<v Speaker 1>about on medium size launch and that's why we're developing

0:39:22.000 --> 0:39:26.759
<v Speaker 1>the Neutron launch vehicle, which of the significantly larger launch.

0:39:27.000 --> 0:39:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Good to meet them, Peter on that. I've got a

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of questions on Twitter when they found out you

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 1>were coming on when is Neutron going to be ready?

0:39:33.960 --> 0:39:37.719
<v Speaker 1>And does it just render Electron obsolete? You know, So

0:39:38.200 --> 0:39:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Neutron will be on the pad in four and Noah doesn't.

0:39:41.880 --> 0:39:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Electron service are a very important small satellite dedicated market,

0:39:45.680 --> 0:39:48.760
<v Speaker 1>so it certainly doesn't make an obsolute rocket lad founder

0:39:48.840 --> 0:39:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and CEO Peter bag just an astonishing achievement, you know,

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:55.920
<v Speaker 1>bearing in mind how dominant spaces in this industry Carrow,

0:39:56.040 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 1>and they did it their first US launch. What about

0:39:58.200 --> 0:40:00.560
<v Speaker 1>this net? You were telling me all of so helicopter

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:03.399
<v Speaker 1>with nets that sometimes catch another time, but they want

0:40:03.400 --> 0:40:05.960
<v Speaker 1>it to be reusable. They're going to catch the booster

0:40:06.040 --> 0:40:08.959
<v Speaker 1>with a helicopter midair. They haven't quite got there yet.

0:40:09.320 --> 0:40:11.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll get him back on to talk about it. Let's

0:40:11.080 --> 0:40:13.239
<v Speaker 1>do that meanwhile. Of course that does it for this

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:16.120
<v Speaker 1>edition a Bloomberg Technology. But you have got to stay

0:40:16.120 --> 0:40:20.840
<v Speaker 1>tuned for tomorrow Thursday. Commissioner Brendan Carr, don't forget a

0:40:20.880 --> 0:40:23.319
<v Speaker 1>lot to recaps and check out our podcast wherever you

0:40:23.400 --> 0:40:28.160
<v Speaker 1>get your podcast, I Heeart Radio, Spotify, Apple. It's been

0:40:28.239 --> 0:40:32.200
<v Speaker 1>a busy week. Layoffs continue, earnings continue, and we will

0:40:32.200 --> 0:40:35.600
<v Speaker 1>be across everything out of the technology sector. This is

0:40:35.600 --> 0:40:36.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg