WEBVTT - Daybreak Weekend: Jobs Preview, Poland Election, Trump Tariffs

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:13.040
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our global look at

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>the top stories in the coming week from our Daybreak

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 2>anchors all around the world. Straight Ahead on the program,

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 2>a look ahead to the November jobs report here in

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:23.960
<v Speaker 2>the US how that may impact FED policy moving forward.

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Plus a look at where oil prices may be heading

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 2>in an upcoming Trump administration. I'm Tom Busby in New York.

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm Caroline Hepge here in London, where we're shining a

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:37.159
<v Speaker 1>spotlight on Poland ahead of the country's presidential election in

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:38.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five.

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm Derek Prisner, looking at President elect Trump's announcement of

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 3>new tariffs on Chinese goods.

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:47.479
<v Speaker 4>That's all It's truly had on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg eleven Trio, New York, Bloomberg ninety nine to one, Washington, DC,

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg ninety two nine, Boston, DAB Digital Radio, London, Sirius

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 4>XM one twenty one, and around the world Bloomberg Radio,

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 4>dot Com and the Bloomberg Business Act.

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 2>The Day to You, I'm Tom Busby. We begin today's

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:14.199
<v Speaker 2>program with the November Jobs Report, Non farm payroll numbers

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:17.759
<v Speaker 2>out this coming Friday, eight thirty am Wall Street Time

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 2>for more on what to expect and what that data

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 2>could mean for the FED, we're joined by Michael McKee,

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg International Economics and Policy correspondent. Well, Michael, let's begin

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 2>with a look back back at October's dismal jobs report

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 2>and the reasons behind that. Before we look at November.

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 5>Well, twelve thousand jobs according to the Bureau of Labor

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 5>Statistics during the month of November, and that was largely

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 5>influenced by what we saw in terms of the potential

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 5>port strike, the Boeing strike, and the hurricanes that hit

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 5>during the month, and so largely dismissed by most people.

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 5>What we'll have to see is whether we get the

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 5>rebound that one might expect, and if so, how strong

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:08.959
<v Speaker 5>that is, because at the same time that we saw

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 5>this extraordinarily low number, we've been in the middle of

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 5>a decline in the number of jobs created each month,

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 5>simply because the economy is sort of plateauing at this point.

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 5>Strong growth, but most of the job gains have been made,

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 5>but it.

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Is shaping up to be a very different number for

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:31.520
<v Speaker 2>job creation in November. I mean we have had some

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 2>good news some mixed news. Jobless claims, initial claims low,

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 2>but continuing claims a sign of long term unemployment. That's

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 2>in a two year high, So a little troublesome there.

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we'll have to watch that. It isn't clear why

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 5>that is. It would suggest that people are having a

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 5>harder time finding a job, but that may also be

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:54.079
<v Speaker 5>hurricane related. The people who initially filed claims have done so,

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 5>so we don't see the initial claims keep going up.

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 5>But the people who lost their jobs because their jobs

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 5>sort of disappeared, they have had a hard time finding

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 5>jobs because so many jobs disappeared in those hurricane areas.

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 5>We're just going to have to wait and see.

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Now, the unemployment rate still just four point one percent.

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:15.959
<v Speaker 2>You know, you talked about strike settles and that's good news.

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 2>But we've also had retailers gearing up for the big holidays, right.

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Travel still strong coming into Thanksgiving, consumer spending still up,

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 2>So there is good news pointing to November's numbers.

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 5>I was traveling at the beginning of the month and

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 5>a lot of people were traveling the our beginning of

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 5>the week last week and a lot of people traveling

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 5>airports and everything kind of crowded, and that just suggests

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 5>that people still have money and they're still willing to

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 5>go out and spend it on things that are not necessities.

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 5>And so if that's the case, we're likely to see

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 5>continued strength in growth and that will continue to incent

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 5>companies who need people to hire people. The hard part

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 5>is when you get to a point in the economy now,

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 5>is projecting what growth is going to be like and

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 5>whether you're going to need more people. It seems fairly

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 5>obvious that we're going to need more help part time

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 5>help for the Christmas season, and we're going to probably

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 5>need more help in the leisure and hospitality space. So

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:22.799
<v Speaker 5>at least those two areas are someplace we can look

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 5>for some kind of gains.

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 2>So the big questions and what right now is Bloomberg

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 2>expecting to see in the November numbers and what'll it

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:35.160
<v Speaker 2>all mean when the Fed meets again for the last

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:37.239
<v Speaker 2>time this year December seventeenth and eighteenth.

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 5>Well, the forecast is for around two hundred thousand, which

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:43.599
<v Speaker 5>would be a significant snap back and stronger than we

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 5>had seen in previous months. The general feeling is that

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:50.599
<v Speaker 5>the risk is even to the upside on that. The

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 5>question is does the data between now and Friday continue

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 5>to support that. The ism numbers we're going to get,

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 5>the jobless aims numbers, we're going to get it, and

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:05.919
<v Speaker 5>the ADP numbers, if those are also strong, we'll maybe

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:10.720
<v Speaker 5>see that even revised up. The biggest question is at

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:14.359
<v Speaker 5>this point what happens with unemployment. The forecast is for

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 5>a four point two percent rate, up from four point one.

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 5>The FED is watching that more closely because that isn't

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 5>affected by the same things that the headline numbers are.

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 5>The strikes and the hurricanes don't really impact that, and

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 5>so if that goes up, then it pushes the FED

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 5>to maybe stay on hold. Right now, the general feeling

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 5>is that the FED knows what's happening with inflation, and

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:42.159
<v Speaker 5>they have a pretty good idea of what's happening with jobs,

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 5>and if that's confirmed by the payrolls report on Friday,

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 5>then they will probably go ahead and cut once more.

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:52.280
<v Speaker 5>And then, of course, with the new administration coming in,

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 5>all bets are off for twenty twenty five.

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'll say well. Also, Powell has said in the

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 2>last couple of weeks he's in no rush it's all

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:05.039
<v Speaker 2>as always data driven, but he's in no rush to

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 2>cut again right away. So kind of playing it both

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 2>ways or is it really just data dependent.

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:13.719
<v Speaker 5>It's data dependent, but he is playing it both ways.

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:17.719
<v Speaker 5>What he wants is the option to have the markets

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:22.480
<v Speaker 5>price in a given at the moment until the FED

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 5>sees the data that they have to work with. If

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 5>the markets were to price in a cut and believe

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:31.280
<v Speaker 5>that they are going to continue that and you get

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 5>this whip saw this volatility in the markets that the

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 5>Fed doesn't want to see. They would prefer that everybody

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:41.359
<v Speaker 5>stays sort of half and half until all the data

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 5>are in, until they're ready to look at it and

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 5>make a decision.

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:47.479
<v Speaker 2>Well, the November jobs report from the Bureau of Labor

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 2>Statistics out this coming Friday, our thanks to Michael McKee,

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg International Economics and Policy Correspondent. We move next to

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 2>the energy market and what plans from the incoming Trump administration.

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 2>Lower demand out of China and continued geopolitical tensions may

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 2>need for oil prices in the New Yar term and

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 2>in the year ahead. It's a lot to consider and

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 2>for more. We're joined by Alex Longley Bloomberg Oil trading

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 2>reporter Alex thank you for joining us. I want to

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 2>start with you where oil prices are right now?

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 6>Well, and it's a good question in the context of

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 6>when people normally hear about oil prices right and the pandemic.

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 6>In twenty twenty, the main thing you'd have heard, if

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 6>you're not in a day to day follower of the

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 6>oil market, is negative prices. Then in twenty twenty two,

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 6>the next thing you hear is one hundred and forty

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 6>dollars a barrel. You've gone from being paid to take

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 6>oil to pay one hundred and forty dollars a barrel.

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 6>The last few months have been a remarkably stable period.

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 6>In fact, most of twenty twenty four has been a

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 6>remarkably stable period for oil prices. We find ourselves now

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 6>sort of somewhere in the kind of seventy to seventy

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:49.679
<v Speaker 6>five region, and that's where oil prices have been trading

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 6>pretty much since the middle of October. And if you

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 6>exclude the period where we sort of heightened volatility with

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 6>Iran firing missiles it Israel. Actually oil has been trading

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 6>kind of in there's seventy to seventy five or sixty

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 6>five to seventy range, depending on what benchmark you look at.

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 6>Since pretty much the end of September, that's a remarkably

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 6>stable period for what is one of the most volatile

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 6>commodity markets in the world.

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 2>And here in the US we are certainly reaping the benefits.

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 2>Gasoline averaging three zero five a gallon a year ago

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 2>it was three twenty six a gallon. So this stability

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 2>is exactly what everyone here was hoping to see.

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 6>Yes, exactly. I think we've already heard that sort of

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 6>Prior to the holiday period, the Department for Transportation was

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 6>expecting a record travel season. I think one of the

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 6>interesting things more broadly about demand is that in the

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 6>oil market, it has generally surprised to the upside. People

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 6>have been consuming more oil than generally was expected to

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 6>be the case.

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 6>Obviously, so far this year, global economic slowdown has hindered

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 6>demand growth to a degree. But the point is oil

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 6>demand is still growing, and as much as we invest

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 6>in the energy transition, the fact of the matter is

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 6>in various parts of the oil market, demand is here

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:03.839
<v Speaker 6>to stay. Another thing that's hugely important when we look

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:06.439
<v Speaker 6>at the price of gasoline price at the pump, particularly

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 6>in the US, but actually across the world is there's

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 6>been a transformation in the number of plants that are

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 6>converting crude into refined products, and that includes gasoline and diesel,

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 6>the fuels that keep the world ticking along. And that

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty two period I mentioned before, when prices were

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:26.439
<v Speaker 6>exceptionally high, the world didn't have enough oil refineries really

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 6>to produce the fuel that needed and that's why you

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 6>saw crazy high gasoline prices, crazy high diesel and heating

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 6>oil prices. And what we've seen over the last twelve

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 6>to eighteen months is a series of giant new plants

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 6>come online in other parts of the world, and that

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:42.680
<v Speaker 6>means lower prices for everyone because there's more ability to

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 6>produce gasoline in the global system.

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:48.559
<v Speaker 2>And we've also seen more countries come back online like Libya,

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, i Ran, I know has had you know,

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 2>pretty much a back and forth there. But also you

0:09:55.880 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 2>know with the Opek plus countries, you know they've increased production,

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 2>they've rolled back production, so a lot of volatility there,

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 2>but bottom line, there's no demand destruction.

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 6>We are flush with oil, yes, exactly. And this comes

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 6>against the backdrop of the OPEC plus countries already kind

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:17.199
<v Speaker 6>of having for several months delayed their production increases that

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 6>they were planning because they want to bring barrels back

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:22.079
<v Speaker 6>to the market for precisely the reasons you say, lots

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 6>of countries outside the grouping have been lifting their output.

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 6>That includes the US, where production is that are close

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:31.959
<v Speaker 6>to a record, but also a handful of others Canada, Brazil, Guyana,

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 6>and lots of these countries have been able to lift

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 6>output because oil prices have been so relatively high for

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 6>several years now that's incentivized higher volumes of production. You

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 6>reference to Iran. That's another country where, particularly under the

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 6>Biden administration, we've seen a perhaps looser approach to the

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 6>enforcement of sanctions and that's meant more Iranian oil flowing

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 6>to the markets. That's kept the markets well supplied. You

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 6>could make a similar argument about Venezuela over recent years

0:10:56.400 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 6>as well. That combination of what we would call non

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 6>OPEC supplier supply from outside the groups that are the

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:05.560
<v Speaker 6>countries that are signed up to the output cuts is

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 6>partly what has helped depress prices relatively in recent years.

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 6>And then the final thing is within OPEC itself, yes,

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 6>that producer group has been reducing output, but not everyone

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 6>has been at the same pace. And there are a

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 6>handful of cheetahs within that producer group which have been

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 6>promising to return their cuts to where they should be.

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:26.319
<v Speaker 6>But that sort of holistic picture is why there's so

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 6>much supply on global markets at the moment.

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 2>And OPEK has another decision later in December right on

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 2>whether to gradually increase output.

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 6>Again, yes, exactly, we're expecting that decision. We'll see what

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 6>comes of that. They have already begun, we've reported discussing

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:46.839
<v Speaker 6>another plan to extend to the delay to resuming output increases.

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 6>I think what the market has been looking for in

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:52.960
<v Speaker 6>advance of that decision has been any suggestion that those

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:55.959
<v Speaker 6>curbs will be delayed for several months. And this comes

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 6>back to a view from the International Energy Agency, which

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 6>pretty much everyone in the market is talking about, which

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 6>is that twenty twenty five is going to be a

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 6>story of lots of oil on the market. And again

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 6>that's not because demand growth is particularly slow, but it's

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 6>because supply growth is so high. Again, we come back

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 6>to Brazil, Guyana, the US, the IEA say lots of

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 6>barrels are going to come onto the market, and that's

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:18.959
<v Speaker 6>giving Opek a slight headache. I think the real question

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 6>for next year is how big that oversupply will be.

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, a lot to look forward to, boy our

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 2>thanks to Alex Longley, Bloomberg Oil Trading Reporter, and coming

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 2>up on Bloomberg day Break weekend, we'll shine a spotlight

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 2>on Poland ahead of that country's presidential election next year.

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:49.079
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Busby, and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 2>day Break Weekend, our global look ahead at the top

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 2>stories for investors in the coming week. I'm Tom Busby

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 2>in New York. Up later in our program, we'll look

0:12:56.920 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 2>at how Donald Trump is already making good on campaign

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:03.439
<v Speaker 2>val to slap punishing tariffs on goods coming into the US.

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 2>But first a closer look at Poland. Its thriving IT

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 2>sector has made it quote the new Silicon Valley of

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:14.679
<v Speaker 2>Eastern Europe, but it's grappling with questions about its political future.

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Its ruling party has chosen Warsaw's mayor to run for

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:21.200
<v Speaker 2>president the next year's election, an ally to Prime Minister

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 2>Donald Tusk and his current legislative agenda, and it comes

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:28.319
<v Speaker 2>as Poland prepares to take over the EU's rotating presidency.

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 2>So what lies ahead for more, Let's go to London

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 2>and bring in Bloomberg Daybreak Europe anchor Caroline hepgar Tom.

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister Donald Tusk has begun his government's bid to

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>secure the Polish presidency in Ernest. Rafal Schaskowsky is a

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>former member of the European Parliament and has been mayor

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of Warsaw since twenty eighteen. He's won the approval of

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 1>seventy five percent of the centrist coalition the Civic Platform

0:13:56.559 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>to become the party's presidential nominee, beating out opponent Foreign

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Minister Radasla Sikorski in the process. Now, winning the presidency

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:11.439
<v Speaker 1>with responsibility for foreign affairs is crucially important for Tusk's administration,

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:14.560
<v Speaker 1>which has vowed to restore the rule of law and

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 1>bring Poland back towards the European mainstream. Incumbent President Andre

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Duda is an ally of the former nationalist Law and

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Justice administration and has clashed with Tusk in his first

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>year in office. The Law and Justice Party have nominated

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Karl Novrodsky, the president of the Institute of National Remembrance,

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>a head of the ballot, which is expected in May

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 1>next year. Current President Duda's second and final term ends

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>in August, but he has cultivated close ties with President

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>eelect Donald Trump and visited him in New York in April.

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Trump's return to the White House raises many considerations for

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>European leaders, particularly when it comes to ongoing support for

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine in the conflict, where the Russia, Poland and NATO

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>member is a staunch back of neighboring Ukraine. So what

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 1>lies ahead for Poland as the country seeks to determine

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 1>its next political chapter, and will the country's decision bring

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>it closer or further away from an alliance with Trump's

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>United States is something I've been discussing with Bloomberg's Warsaw

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Bureau chief Pyotr Skolimowski Hi.

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 7>Indeed, so the role of the president in Poland is

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 7>very often or has been very often underestimated. It's generally

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 7>believed it's just ceremonial. But as we've seen over the

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 7>past few years, and especially since Donald Tusk and his

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 7>party took over after winning the election last year, we've

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 7>seen that the president plays a very important role. He

0:15:52.840 --> 0:16:00.120
<v Speaker 7>can veto legislation, he can appoint judges. He also sits

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 7>on or represents Poland at NATO meetings in relations with

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 7>the UN, for example. So what we've seen over the

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 7>past year is that whenever Donald Tusk tried to introduce

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 7>his legislative agenda, which was basically to reverse some of

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 7>the changes in the judiciary that previous government has has introduced,

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 7>the current the current president, who is very close to

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 7>the opposition, wielded his veto power and that was the

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 7>issue where could not really introduce his legislative agenda. And

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 7>obviously he's now trying to get someone in place who

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 7>could help him win.

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>That case, and that might be Warsaw's mayor, who himself

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 1>was a European politician previously in the EU. How lightly

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 1>is it that Raphael Chalskowski is going to win? Does

0:16:55.840 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the ruling party normally manage to retain the presidency?

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 7>Normally they do. Obviously, it all depends when, when, when

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:10.439
<v Speaker 7>the when the the elections are scheduled. But in this

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 7>case Rafl Saskowski is already an experienced campaigner. We have

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:19.679
<v Speaker 7>to remember that a few years ago he also he

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 7>already ran for the president and he lost very marginally

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 7>to the incumbent Andre Duda, the current president, who comes

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 7>from the Nationalist launch Justice opposition. Shaskowski is very experienced. Obviously,

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 7>some say he may not be as experienced as necessary

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 7>when it comes to security policy, defense policy or international relations.

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 7>We have to remember that he's a mayor of war

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 7>So and he's been running the city for for a

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 7>very long time now. But at the same time he's

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:52.679
<v Speaker 7>also a previous you minister into his government in the

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:57.400
<v Speaker 7>previous one. He also is used to be a lawmaker

0:17:57.400 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 7>at the European Parliament, so he definitely has a lot

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 7>of experience in this respect and the polls show that

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 7>he is definitely in a popposition to to actually make

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 7>it this time around.

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:11.919
<v Speaker 1>In terms of Donald Tusk and his policy agenda, he

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:16.640
<v Speaker 1>wants to bring Poland closer to the European mainstream. Obviously

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the Law and Justice opposition would disagree with that. What

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>is what is the thrust of what Tusk wants to do?

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:27.880
<v Speaker 7>So over the last eight years, when when the Law

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 7>and Justice was in power, Poland was in constant conflict

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 7>with the EU. The main the main accusations they were

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 7>leveled at Poland. That's time was that it's trying, it's

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 7>it's it's started. We are seeing certain democratic backsliding, meaning

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 7>there are changes in the judiciary that are being introduced

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 7>by the by the previous ruling party that that sort

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 7>of remove certain checks and balances on on how the

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 7>nation is or how the administration is run. Now, Tusca's

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:02.439
<v Speaker 7>promised to to reverse those changes to make Poland again

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 7>the place where rolla law is being respected, and obviously

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 7>he needs the president to do that. I mean that

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 7>the changes have have gone so far under the previous

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 7>administration that he really needs the president to sign off

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 7>on reversal of those changes. There are also issues that

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 7>he has also promised. These are, for example, changes in

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 7>Poland's very strict abortion laws. He also wants his government,

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:31.360
<v Speaker 7>his coalition that he runs, to make changes there and

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 7>to loosen up those laws. And the current president, who

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 7>is very conservative, is definitely against that.

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and that caused a lot of protests at the

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>time in Poland. In terms of Poland's economy, why I

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 1>mentioned this is becoming an attractive destination for investors. Why

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>is that and what's the economic backdrop to this?

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:56.639
<v Speaker 7>So, so Polish economy has been growing very very fast,

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 7>and apart from the the period of the pandemic which

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 7>hit all the economies across the world, it's been expanding

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 7>very very quickly. We're seeing a lot of investment coming

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:11.200
<v Speaker 7>in from from across the board, but it also has

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:16.199
<v Speaker 7>a very well established and home grown sec it sector

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:19.879
<v Speaker 7>here and it also attracted a lot of investment from

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 7>abroad from big corporations, it corporations that set up their

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 7>backroom operations. This has been a sector that's been growing

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 7>here in Poland. Poland is also has been a very

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 7>attractive destination when it comes to batteries. It also attracted

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 7>investor investors from for example, South Korea from the US.

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 7>It's also building a nuclear power plant quite or starting

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:47.680
<v Speaker 7>to build it. It has a lot of spending when

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:50.640
<v Speaker 7>it comes to defense that are being planned. It's now

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:54.439
<v Speaker 7>the biggest spender as part of as a share of

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 7>GDP on defense, which is also again another place where

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 7>the economy could grow and where a lot of the

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 7>destment are coming in for example from South Korea from

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:11.239
<v Speaker 7>the US. So there's a lot of pentap demanders. The

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:16.120
<v Speaker 7>society is still catching up with with Western standards, so

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 7>it's a very attractive investment, destination and and economy is

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 7>growing very very fast.

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:26.679
<v Speaker 1>In terms of the EU rotating presidency, what might that

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>mean for Poland? I mean, you know, it's only six months,

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>but often the country that holds that does get some

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>sway perhaps over the over the EU policy agenda. What

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 1>do you think Poland might bring to that role.

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 7>Yes, so indeed the country that holds rotating presidency sets

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 7>the agenda or helps to set the agenda.

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 4>For the EU.

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 7>Obviously it's going to be an important element time. At

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 7>this point, we have Hunger, which is which is the

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 7>rotating president of the of the EU, and it hasn't

0:21:56.560 --> 0:21:59.360
<v Speaker 7>gone very well to to to say the least. Now

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:02.919
<v Speaker 7>Poland wants to change that. It wants to sort of

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:09.919
<v Speaker 7>present that as an opportunity to showcase it's it's its strength. Obviously,

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 7>it will be a time when President Trump is going

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:15.399
<v Speaker 7>to come in, so it will need to to build

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 7>relations there. There are certain certain areas where Poland needs

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:21.640
<v Speaker 7>to wants to focus. He wants Poland wants more focused

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 7>on defense and security, so it wants to make some

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:28.640
<v Speaker 7>headways in terms of where EU spends more on defense

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:31.919
<v Speaker 7>and tries to pull more of the resources to to

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:35.639
<v Speaker 7>to for investments there. It also wants to move ahead

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 7>with with enlargement. So Poland has been a huge supporter

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 7>of Ukraine. And we've already heard with from one of

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:44.919
<v Speaker 7>the ministers except one of the priorities for our presidency

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 7>is actually to open negotiating chapters with those countries don't

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:52.399
<v Speaker 7>want to join in, which are Ukraine and Moldova. So

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 7>quite a packed agenda, but you know, sort of hovering

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 7>over all of this is a US presidency of Donald

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:02.199
<v Speaker 7>Trump and that will be probably a key focus.

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Absolutely, And just in terms of thinking about the

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 1>presidential candidate for election next year, there's still a process,

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>isn't there. I mean, Donald Tusk and his Civic coalition

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:19.400
<v Speaker 1>have held their primary for their candidate, but then Law

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:22.159
<v Speaker 1>and Justice will have a candidate. To just what's the

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>next process in terms of picking the presidential candidate and

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 1>then the vote and so on.

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 7>Indeed, so at this point it seems like we over

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:36.159
<v Speaker 7>the last weekend the campaign effectively started. So we know

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:40.119
<v Speaker 7>the Law the Civic Platforms candidate, and we know the

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:45.439
<v Speaker 7>laun Justice candidate. So the laund Justice picked a fairly

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:51.359
<v Speaker 7>unknown figure Carolin Navrewski, who's a historian and he was

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:57.200
<v Speaker 7>previously or he's currently the head of National Remembrance Institute.

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:00.439
<v Speaker 7>And the next steps at this point are obviously campaign

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 7>will kick off. We're going to see a lot of campaigning,

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:06.440
<v Speaker 7>and it's quite a long campaign by published standards, because

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:13.399
<v Speaker 7>the elections are not expected until May. And obviously the

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 7>key question is whether it's going to be resolved in

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 7>the first round. For that, the main candidate will have

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 7>to gather at least fifty percent of the vote probably unlikely,

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:27.880
<v Speaker 7>but then we're going to go into second round. At

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 7>this point, these are the two main candidates on Narreotsky,

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 7>the Lawn Justice candidate and Shoskovsky, but there's also sort

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 7>of a dark horse of the whole campaign, the current

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 7>Parliamentary speaker, who is also very keen together the vote.

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 7>So it's going to get excited definitely.

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>My thanks to Bloomberg's also bureau chief Pyoto Skolimowski. So

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 1>where Next for Poland will be following that story as

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the country considers who to pick as its next president

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty five. I'm Caroline hepget here in London.

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 1>You can catch us every weekday morning for Bloomberg Daybreak.

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Europe beginning at six am in London. That's one am

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street.

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Tom, Thanks Caroline, and coming up on Bloomberg day Break weekend,

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:16.160
<v Speaker 2>we'll look at how campaign threats by Donald Trump over

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 2>tariffs may soon become a reality. I'm Tom Busby, and

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 2>this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 2>global look ahead at the top stories for investors in

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:40.160
<v Speaker 2>the coming week. I'm Tom Busby in New York. Donald

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 2>Trump's inauguration nearly two months away, but he's already making

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 2>good on his vow of tariffs on goods being imported

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 2>into the US. We turned out at Doug Prisner, host

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 2>of the Daybreak Asia podcast, for more on what it

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:55.680
<v Speaker 2>could mean for big exporting economies.

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 3>Tom. In the past week, President electromp announced a new

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:03.640
<v Speaker 3>additional tarraff of ten percent on Chinese goods, beyond what's

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:06.240
<v Speaker 3>already been put in place, and Trump went on to

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 3>say that his administration would impose a new twenty five

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 3>percent tariff on goods from Canada and Mexico. Now, many

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:16.160
<v Speaker 3>market watchers have been of the view that any proposed

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 3>tariffs were simply a part of a negotiating strategy joining

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 3>US now for a closer look as John Leu, Bloomberg

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:25.680
<v Speaker 3>News Executive Editor for Greater China, John joins us from

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 3>our studios in Beijing. John, thank you so much. It's

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 3>always a pleasure. I appreciate you taking time. The announcement

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:35.399
<v Speaker 3>of these tariffs came very soon after Trump selected Scott

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 3>Bessant as US Treasury Secretary. Now Bessent, we know has

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 3>called for a gradual approach when it comes to implementation

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 3>of trade restrictions, and he also appears to be open

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:50.160
<v Speaker 3>to the process of negotiation. How are these new tariffs

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 3>being read right now in Beijing.

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 8>We don't have a clear sense at the moment, but

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 8>all of the expectations that we've heard from analysis are

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:04.120
<v Speaker 8>the bees will be very careful and measured in how

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:08.439
<v Speaker 8>they respond to this tweet that we've gotten this post

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 8>on truth social again. President Trump has yet to take office,

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 8>and so he's not able to actually enact these tariffs,

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 8>and so I think in the meantime, the Chinese government

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 8>will be trying to communicate with his administration, with officials

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 8>around him, trying to find what a negotiating room there

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 8>may be, and looking not to overreact and make things worse.

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:32.679
<v Speaker 3>One of the things that was a part of that

0:27:32.840 --> 0:27:37.880
<v Speaker 3>post Trump's concern about the transmission of illegal drugs out

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:42.160
<v Speaker 3>of China entering the US. He cited fentanyl in particular.

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 3>So it looks as though we're in a realm now

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 3>that's almost separate from economic issues, right.

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:52.920
<v Speaker 8>It's true. I think tariffs are a tool that President

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 8>Trump will use to achieve various differing objectives. Fentanyl has

0:27:58.320 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 8>been an issue that's he's been very focused on. He

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 8>was in his first administration. This was an issue that

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 8>he brought up with Hijing Ping Again, President Biden has

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:14.679
<v Speaker 8>brought this up with the Chinese government as well, and

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 8>so it's not surprising that President and Trump would be

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 8>harping on this now that he's getting ready to get

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:21.520
<v Speaker 8>back into office.

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 3>So if we look at the idea of negotiation, as

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 3>you understand what leverage does China have over the US

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 3>at this point.

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 8>Well, the trade relationship is one that gives the US

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 8>the more powerful hand as it was because China is

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 8>by far exporting much much more to the United States

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 8>than it is importing from the US. Well, one thing

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 8>that we've seen Beijing do is take measures that would

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 8>it seems allow the government to put restrictions on the

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 8>export of some strategic medals to the US, to Europe,

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:00.719
<v Speaker 8>to other countries, and so that potentially could be one

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 8>lever that Beijing pulls to try to gain some leverage

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 8>in that negotiation.

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 3>Now, you and I in the past have talked about

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:11.480
<v Speaker 3>the vulnerability of the Chinese economy right now, given how

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 3>weak it is, and you just mentioned that the US

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 3>essentially has the upper hand. Should Beijing be particularly concerned

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:21.720
<v Speaker 3>given the set of given circumstances that we're talking about.

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 8>I think Beijing is very concerned, given how much reliance

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 8>the economy has on exports and how big of an

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 8>end market the United States is. I think that Beijing

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 8>actually probably has a little bit more time than it

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 8>might first seem that's because before President Trump takes office,

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:43.480
<v Speaker 8>I think we're going to see a lot of frontloading

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 8>of imports from buyers in the United States trying to

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 8>get their goods out of China before those Trump tariffs

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 8>come into effect. And so I think in the last

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 8>couple of months of twenty twenty four you might see

0:29:55.960 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 8>a real jump in Chinese exports, in turn a lot

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 8>of for the economy. In the last quarter.

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Is there a way that companies based in China can

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 3>create a bit of a work around maybe loopholes that

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 3>some of these tariffs inadvertently create. Maybe you do a

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:15.520
<v Speaker 3>percentage of production on the mainland, but then transfer to

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 3>a country to finish the production process that may not

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 3>be in the crosshairs of some of these tariffs.

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 8>So this is what makes the twenty five percent tariff

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 8>that President Trump announced on Mexico very interesting, because we

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 8>have seen quite a number of Chinese companies setting up

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 8>operations in Mexico doing what you said, essentially doing some

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 8>last bit of the manufacturing process in Mexico and then

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 8>exporting that good into the United States, thereby avoiding the

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 8>tariffs that are in place on Chinese products. We've seen

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 8>factories set up in Southeast Asia and other countries to

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 8>take advantage of the same loophole in the tariffs. And

0:30:54.360 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 8>so it would not surprise me if we see President

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 8>Trump going after these difer channels by which Chinese exports

0:31:02.840 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 8>have been getting into the US.

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 3>John, you and I have talked about the export controls

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 3>imposed by the Bided administration on certain parts of the

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 3>Chinese economy, especially where high technology was concerned. When you

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 3>look at the choices that the incoming administration has export

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 3>controls versus tariffs, let's say, how do they compare.

0:31:23.440 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 8>I think tariffs are a very blunt instrument because they

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:30.719
<v Speaker 8>have the ability to impact lots and lots of different

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 8>products all at once, especially in the way that President

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 8>Trump has talked about imposing them sixty percent tariffs on

0:31:36.880 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 8>all Chinese goods. That would hit everything all at once.

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 8>I think the difference the question is how much priority

0:31:45.440 --> 0:31:51.600
<v Speaker 8>does President Trump put on denying Chinese access to advanced technology.

0:31:52.160 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 8>That is something that was front and center for the

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 8>Biden administration. President Trump during the campaign at talked more

0:31:58.040 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 8>about shrinking the trade deficit that he did talk about

0:32:03.560 --> 0:32:06.960
<v Speaker 8>limiting Chinese access to chips, for example. So then when

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 8>there is ultimately a negotiation, I think we will find

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 8>out then how much value President Trump places on denying

0:32:13.480 --> 0:32:14.880
<v Speaker 8>Chinese access to technology.

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 3>So obviously this is Trump's second term. He has somewhat

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 3>of a relationship already formed with Chinese President Chi Jinping.

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 3>Is that a good thing or a bad thing?

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 8>I think President Trump feels like those personal relationships are

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 8>going to help him get a better deal, and the

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:36.400
<v Speaker 8>way that he speaks about President Xi Jinping in very

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 8>respectful terms, talking about their friendship. It would seem that

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 8>he wants to have a personal relationship that he can

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 8>rely on to try and get a deal through. Whether

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:51.960
<v Speaker 8>or not that actually is fact in case on the ground,

0:32:52.240 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 8>I think we have to wait and find out.

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 3>And this is just the beginning of the process. John,

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 3>thanks for joining us. John lou There, Bloomberg News Executive

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 3>Editor for Greater China, joining us from our studios in Beijing.

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 3>We moved next to crypto recently. As I'm sure you're

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:09.560
<v Speaker 3>well aware, Bitcoin reached all time highs as the market

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:13.960
<v Speaker 3>embraced the support for crypto from the incoming Trump administration. Now,

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 3>the overall value of the digital asset market has surged

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 3>by about a trillion dollars since the election on November fifth.

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 3>A closer look now at the crypto landscape with our

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:28.400
<v Speaker 3>guest Peter Chung. He is head of research at Presto Research.

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 3>He joins us from Hong Kong. Peter, thanks for making

0:33:31.480 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 3>time to chat with us. Let me get your reaction

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 3>to the fundamentals that have been driving the price action

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 3>in a bitcoin lately. Give me your assessment on what's

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 3>driving this rally?

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:44.560
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I think this rally has been happening in two parts.

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:48.360
<v Speaker 9>First is you know, right after the election, when bitcoin

0:33:48.480 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 9>was at around sixty seven sixty seven thousand dollars, it

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:57.480
<v Speaker 9>was in reaction to the election result, and it is

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 9>part of a broad macro reflation trade, so that raised

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 9>the big coeen price from sixty seven thousand to around

0:34:05.560 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 9>ninety thousand. And the second part is also related to Trump,

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 9>but more crypto specific. I think the market is becoming

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 9>more confident on Trump delivering on his pre crypto campaign

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:22.920
<v Speaker 9>promises based on the chatters around the key cabinet nominations,

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 9>so I think they gave the market a confidence that

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:31.160
<v Speaker 9>the Trump has every intention to deliver on his campaign promises.

0:34:31.280 --> 0:34:33.560
<v Speaker 3>There seems to be two parts to that story. One

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 3>the idea of friendlier regulation, and the other seems to

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:40.360
<v Speaker 3>be this pledge to set up a national bitcoin stockpile.

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 3>Which do you think is having a greater influence.

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:47.360
<v Speaker 9>I think more lately it's the idea of bigcoin strategic

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:52.840
<v Speaker 9>reservoir stockpile. I think the recent cabinet nominations and especially

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 9>the Scott Besson who just got nominated, I think he

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:58.880
<v Speaker 9>mentioned that everything is on the table with regard to

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:03.520
<v Speaker 9>big coin strategic reserve or stockpile. So the market is

0:35:03.800 --> 0:35:07.800
<v Speaker 9>increasingly more confident that it could happen. I think the

0:35:07.840 --> 0:35:11.160
<v Speaker 9>Polly market is assigning something like a sixty percent probability

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:11.360
<v Speaker 9>to that.

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:35:12.040 --> 0:35:14.360
<v Speaker 3>The other thing that we're hearing is that the transition

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 3>team has been talking about the possibility of creating the

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:23.239
<v Speaker 3>first ever White House post dedicated to digital asset policy.

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of stunning. You were talking about everything that's

0:35:25.719 --> 0:35:28.279
<v Speaker 3>happened since the election. I think that a lot of

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 3>the US ETFs that invest directly in bitcoin have amassed

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:36.440
<v Speaker 3>about more than one hundred billion dollars in assets since

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 3>launching back in January. Is this a trend that you

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:40.399
<v Speaker 3>expect to continue now?

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:43.960
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean I think so. I think with the ETF,

0:35:44.280 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 9>it basically has paved a way much easier access for

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 9>the institutional investors to come in and make a long

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 9>term investment. I mean, big COUNTF has been around for

0:35:58.719 --> 0:36:02.480
<v Speaker 9>actually two years, but before it was a futures based ETF,

0:36:02.920 --> 0:36:05.840
<v Speaker 9>which isn't really included for the long term investors. With

0:36:05.880 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 9>the introduction of a spot ETF at the beginning of

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:11.719
<v Speaker 9>the year, which is far more efficient in terms of

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:16.719
<v Speaker 9>attracking the underlying asset. You know, that removes a lot

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:19.040
<v Speaker 9>of kind of entry barriers for many of the long

0:36:19.080 --> 0:36:22.680
<v Speaker 9>term institutional investors. And now that you know the new

0:36:22.760 --> 0:36:27.280
<v Speaker 9>president elect is giving far more credits to this asset

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:30.799
<v Speaker 9>class with his pro crypto policies, I think many of

0:36:30.800 --> 0:36:34.279
<v Speaker 9>the long term institutional investors who were a bit heads

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 9>stunted prior to this event, I think is more willing

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:39.760
<v Speaker 9>to take a look at this new emerging asset class.

0:36:39.800 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 3>So pro crypto policies in the US, maybe we understand

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:46.400
<v Speaker 3>that to mean less regulation. Is that what is happening

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 3>where you are in the Asia Pacific? I'm thinking, whether

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 3>it's Hong Kong or Singapore, are you seeing a move

0:36:52.160 --> 0:36:54.799
<v Speaker 3>to deregulate the crypto market A bit?

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:58.040
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I'm a little heads stunted in using the word

0:36:58.239 --> 0:37:01.719
<v Speaker 9>deregulation to describe what's happening right now. It's more I

0:37:01.719 --> 0:37:05.320
<v Speaker 9>think the more accurate way of describing is a regulatory clarity,

0:37:06.280 --> 0:37:09.759
<v Speaker 9>because I think previously what was happening was it was

0:37:09.840 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 9>more policy driven approached by the SEC through enforcement actions,

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:18.960
<v Speaker 9>and some of them were you know, Ukraargia was not

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 9>very lawful and also very vague guidance from the regulatory agency.

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:27.960
<v Speaker 9>Going forward, you know, I think there's going to be

0:37:28.000 --> 0:37:31.400
<v Speaker 9>more clear rulemaking by these regulatory bodies in the US,

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 9>and I think that's going to have an impact on

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:36.480
<v Speaker 9>the jurisdictions in Asia as well. I think many of

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 9>the governments in Asia has been kind of looking at

0:37:39.080 --> 0:37:41.399
<v Speaker 9>the US and using that as a benchmark for their

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:45.560
<v Speaker 9>own regulatory framework. And now that the US is more

0:37:45.719 --> 0:37:49.360
<v Speaker 9>in a position where they are willing to provide further

0:37:49.480 --> 0:37:54.759
<v Speaker 9>regulatory clarity through legislative process as well as, you know,

0:37:54.840 --> 0:37:57.279
<v Speaker 9>by having SEC who's more willing to work with the

0:37:57.320 --> 0:38:00.480
<v Speaker 9>crypto industry, I think that's going to have an impact

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 9>on the many of the governments in this part of

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 9>the world.

0:38:03.160 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 3>That's Peter Chung, head of research at Presto Research, and

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm Doug Krisner. You can catch us weekdays here for

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:13.200
<v Speaker 3>the Daybreak Asia podcast. It's available on Apple, Spotify, or

0:38:13.239 --> 0:38:15.520
<v Speaker 3>wherever you get your podcast. Tom.

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:18.399
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Doug, and that does it for this edition

0:38:18.440 --> 0:38:21.160
<v Speaker 2>of Bloomberg day Break Weekend. Join us again Monday morning

0:38:21.200 --> 0:38:23.440
<v Speaker 2>at five am Wall Street Time for the latest on

0:38:23.560 --> 0:38:26.279
<v Speaker 2>markets overseas and the news you need to start your day.

0:38:26.840 --> 0:38:30.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Buzzby. Stay with us. Top stories and global

0:38:30.040 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 2>business headlines are coming up right now