WEBVTT - When Musk-Twitter Deal Will Close, Google's Pixel 7

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:05.520
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power colli

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:10.879
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Emily jay I remember checking San Francisco, and this is

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:30.639
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Technology coming up in the next hour. A new

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>court filing says Musk's buyout deal expected to close by October,

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>but not a done deal by any means. We're gonna

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>tell you what the hold ups are now. Plus, Google

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>shows off its new collection of gadgets, including new phones

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>and a watch, even teasing a new tablet. How does

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:50.559
<v Speaker 1>it all stack up to Apple? Will take you to

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the Maid by Google event? And a car that drives

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>itself was supposed to be the future, but the reality

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>for self driving cars seems to be getting further away.

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Will they even exist in our lifetime? Is this industry

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a one billion dollar bust? We'll discuss. Let's get into this.

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Musque Twitter and the latest back and forth. The deal

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>could potentially close at the end of the month, but

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 1>Twitter saying not necessarily so fast. Bloomer Zone. Uh, Kurt

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Wagner has been going back and forth now for months, Kurt,

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:26.400
<v Speaker 1>you know what's the hold up now? Why can't they

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>just say let's do it. Yeah, well, there's a huge

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 1>distrust factor, Emily. You have to keep that in mind

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:34.559
<v Speaker 1>as we're talking about this, right, because a few days ago,

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Ellen said hey, let's do the original deal at the

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>original price, and Twitter didn't jump on that immediately, which

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of tells you something, right, because it seemed like

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the two were kind of meeting where they had originally

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>thought they were going to in April, and today we

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>learned that, you know, there's been a hang up around

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>some of the language in uh, you know, what Elan

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>ultimately said was that there would be a debt contingency

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>right that that that wasn't in the original agreement. And

0:01:57.520 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>now he's saying, hey, um, you know I have the debt.

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>It's there, and Twitter is basically saying, prove it, show us,

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>because we're not going to sign anything until we have,

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, a legal document here. And so in the

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:11.520
<v Speaker 1>last hour or so, the Musque team has said, hey,

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>we want to stay this trial, we want to we

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:15.519
<v Speaker 1>want to pause this thing, and the Twitter team just

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>responded not all that long ago, maybe ten fifteen minutes ago,

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>to say, um, we don't want to do that. And

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 1>now it's up to the judge as to whether or

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>not they're gonna, you know, put this thing on pause

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>or or continue. What's the likelihood the debt contingency would

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>actually become an issue. That's a great question. And as

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 1>far as we can tell, a lot of the commitments

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that Elon got with, you know, these debt commitments from

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the banks back in April, and may you know those

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>are as far as we know, still still good. And

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>so Ellen has been saying, well, hey, you know, Twitter

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>is essentially dragging their feet, like there there's no reason

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>that this debt isn't going to come through. Um, but

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, again, if your Twitter, all you've seen is

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>this guy kind of play games with you and change

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:58.239
<v Speaker 1>his mind and flip flop. And so that's where I

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>think this trust thing comes in, right, is even if

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it there is a high likelihood the debt is indeed there, Um,

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:09.799
<v Speaker 1>clearly Twitter is very nervous or uncomfortable with accepting that

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>and moving forward. Now, it also came out that Must

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.679
<v Speaker 1>tried to negotiate a lower price for the deal, and

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>this was, as I understand it, weeks ago. Twitter said no,

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:25.079
<v Speaker 1>not surprisingly, but he actually did come back to them

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>earlier than we saw and said, Hey, maybe I I

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>actually want to do this. Yeah, they're his lawyer. Um

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>actually issued a public statement today that said that Um,

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the two sides had talked about lowering that

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that deal price, which again is fifty four and twenty

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>cents per share, and that Twitter had actually offered a

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>slightly lower deal. He said that that cut billions of

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>dollars off the price, and that Ellen ultimately said no

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>because there were other kind of requirements or stipulations with

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>with that price reduction. Now we're kind of at that stage, Emily,

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>both sides and both lawyers are really kind of throwing

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>everything they can at one another in public here and

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and so it's a little bit, uh, you know, we're

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>still trying to figure out exactly how that negotiation may

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>have played out. But again on the record from meon

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>must employer basically saying Twitter tried to lower this by billions.

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Must have said no because he didn't like whatever stipulations

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>were included with that. All right, Well, it seems to

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:22.599
<v Speaker 1>be an hour by hour, letter by letter, tweet by

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>tweet situation. Ulris Kurt Wagner, thank you for continuing to

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>follow it all for us For the fourth time this year,

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Peloton is laying off a significant number of employees. CEO

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Barry McCarthy told staff today it's part of the effort

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to save the struggling fitness maker. Roughly five hundred Peloton

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>workers being let go now. This is about twelve of

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the workforce. In the span of a year, met as

0:04:57.080 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a market cap has plunged from over a trillion dollar

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:02.480
<v Speaker 1>is to just a few hundred million shares of the

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>social media giant, collapsing some sixty percent over the last

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>year meeting. The Facebook parent now accounts for less than

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>one percent of the SMP five dred the lowest sin.

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 1>What is its signal about the company's future? Let's ask

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>our next guest, Chris Kelly. He is Facebook's former chief

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>privacy officer, it's first general counsel and head of global

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:26.360
<v Speaker 1>public Policy. Chris, thank you so much for joining us. So,

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>of course, market cap isn't everything, but it's astounding to

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>look at those numbers. Do you think we're seeing a

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:37.040
<v Speaker 1>changing of the guard happened before our very eyes, whereby

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Meta's influence and power will be significantly diminished relative I

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 1>think there's obviously a lot of market concern about the

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:50.160
<v Speaker 1>direction um that the company's going that the move to

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the meta versus a focus, the name change, all of

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>these different things that have gone into you know, what

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the what the streets assessment of the business prospects of

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the company are are in the long term, and so

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that has obviously weighed on the stock quite extensively. Um

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:07.720
<v Speaker 1>in the long run that companies will position and I

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>think in general, but needs to to figure out what

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 1>it's going to emphasize in terms of how they're going

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>to continue to make, you know, great profits and how

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:19.599
<v Speaker 1>to you know, lead this transition into the metaverse, which

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 1>is one of the things that they've articulated as the

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 1>as the you know, the main goal of the company

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:27.039
<v Speaker 1>by changing the name. Um. You know, in the meantime,

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 1>they have a whole bunch of these different businesses that

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>operate extraordinarily well, and they're gonna need to make the

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:35.479
<v Speaker 1>case um more to the street about about how those

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 1>have growth prospects and and ultimately that should result in

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a recovering the market cap over time. But you know,

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>this is the way that the marks major companies these days.

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>It's always it's always a challenge. Meantime, you've got the

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court taking a look at Section to thirty. How

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>big a blow could that be for META if the

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:57.720
<v Speaker 1>power of that law is eroded or erased. Yeah, I

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:00.919
<v Speaker 1>Section two thirty has has had a great deal of power,

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I think in protecting UM the reasonable business decisions of

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>all companies in the space, not just you know, Facebook

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Meta UM. And and the threats to that are very

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>real right now. UM. The upholding of the Texas law

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 1>by the Fifth Circuit, the upholding of the Florida law

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>in the in the eleven circuits so far. UM, there's

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>just a whole bunch of kind of wacky stuff from

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>traditional first amateurs prudence going on right now in the

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>courts because of the way that they've been packed UM.

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>And from there, you know, the companies have to be

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 1>very focused on this. UM. I think that there's been

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of good commentary that says that that the

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>companies might end up engaging in kind of more UM

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>takedowns of of improper behavior, even more takedowns of improper

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>behavior if there were to be some sort of repeal

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of Section to thirty or or or limitation of it

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>by the interpretation of these statutes, which pretty clearly both

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>conflict with Section two thirty UM and and the first

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Amendment in a lot of these cases is too So

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's a it's an ongoing work for

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the companies that they're watching it very closely. But you know,

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and Facebook, Meta Google in their you know, in

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>their YouTube division, UM, all sorts of the different companies

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>that are offering media UM and and also content um

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, user generated content have been adapting their policies

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to to get to some sort of stasis, which is

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I think okay right now, UM. But they might have

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to change it pretty radically if their protections are repeated. Meantime,

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:36.559
<v Speaker 1>you've got federal regulation you know that could potentially come

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:40.080
<v Speaker 1>with this clobusch Are Grassley law. But there's this market

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:42.679
<v Speaker 1>cap provision as I understand it, and Facebook wouldn't even

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>qualify because you know, in terms of its market size

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 1>it's too small. You've got leader culture the ftc UM

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.839
<v Speaker 1>scrutinizing Facebook from another direction, and you know, some of

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the you know, let's say Facebook uh defenders would say

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Facebook is getting an undue amount of scrutiny for the

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>size UM at least if you look at the market

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 1>size of the company today. What do you think about that.

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:09.439
<v Speaker 1>The idea that Facebook is a you know, is a

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>monopolist exercising you know, unjust unallowable monopoly power to either

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 1>maintain a monopoly or to gain a monopoly has always

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>been a pretty far fetched vision. A whole bunch of

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>people who just didn't like some decisions that the company

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>was making. Um, you know, the antitrust law is supposed

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to to protect competition, not competitors, and Facebook has had

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:35.319
<v Speaker 1>some competitors who are who are complaining over time, and

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 1>some smaller companies who would like to get into the field.

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>But the the idea that that that they're exercising the

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of bottleneck control that's the historic worry of antitrust

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>law has just always been incredibly difficult, which is why

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Judge Bosberg you know, dismissed the suit in the first

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>instance that the FDCs you know, you know, pleadings were

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of conclusory on that front. He came back and

0:09:57.080 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>he let the lawsuit pursue with the regard to the

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>federal gover the states, you know, lawsuit was dismissed and

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>its entirety they're on appeal right now. But I don't

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:08.079
<v Speaker 1>think that appeal will be successful, um ultimately, and so

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a it's a and if you look at

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:12.559
<v Speaker 1>the things that they wanted to go after Facebook for

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the acquisition of Instagram, the acquisition of WhatsApp, UM, there's

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>a real read of those is more defensive against other

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 1>big players in the industry like Apple and Google who

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>controlled the mobile operating systems UM at the time. And

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.599
<v Speaker 1>so it's it's one of those things where from a

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 1>traditional antitrust law perspective, it was always a pretty far

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>fetched case and um, you know, it's proceeding now, but

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>after you know, some significant um, you know, kind of

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>hand slapping by a fairly good and you know, principle

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>of traditional antitrust judge in in d C. That said,

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Facebook still has a massive cultural and societal impact. We

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>were just speaking with Francis Hogan, the you know now

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>famous uh Facebook with whistleblower, and she expressed her concern that,

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, especially with Cheryl Sandberg leaving that Mark zucker

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>still only really has Mark Zuckerberg to hold him accountable.

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Take a listen to what she had to say. You know,

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Marcus surrounded himself with people who tell him the same

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>kinds of stories over and over again. You know, Facebook,

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 1>it's just a mirror. It doesn't have responsibility. All these

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>things that we're complaining about have always been present. We're

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>just showing them to people who don't. We don't play

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:21.079
<v Speaker 1>any role in this. We have no power. What do

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:24.079
<v Speaker 1>you think? I mean? I do think that there's a

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 1>degree to which, um, you know, Facebook as a gatherer

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:33.719
<v Speaker 1>of um of of cultural expression is merely reflecting what

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:36.599
<v Speaker 1>what is going on in reality. But the idea that

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>it shapes it instead is something that the company has

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>has embraced in its research internally, as as a lot

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>of the documents that Francis Haggan put out showed that that,

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:47.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, I do think that the company should be

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:49.959
<v Speaker 1>more transparent about that research and that they should be

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>engaged in a dialogue saying, look, we understand that that

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>there are challenges um to the change that social media presents,

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:03.839
<v Speaker 1>UH to the way that people traditionally experienced media, and

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and we're trying to lead them and and and now

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:09.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, moving into the metaverse. We want to make

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>sure that that safety and you know, and and sort

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 1>of mental health as people experience these platforms is part

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>of the mission UM and doing that in a good

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 1>way is part of the mission. You know, I think

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I've seen some pretty good action on that front from

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the company in the essay as the metaverse pivot has

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 1>continued to happen UM on that front, and I think

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:32.839
<v Speaker 1>that that, you know, the fact that a lot of

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 1>these documents have come out and have revealed internal research

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>um UH in the company has been mostly a cleansing

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:44.319
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for the company to to talk about these things

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>more openly. That Francis point seems to be that the

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 1>company shouldn't be hiding these and I think that that's

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>mostly right. I kind of ask your thoughts about Elon

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Musk and Twitter. I'm curious what you think the risks are.

0:12:57.080 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Does Twitter and Twitter under Elon Musk attract or Facebook

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>like problems because it's run by a soul and very

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:09.199
<v Speaker 1>public billionaire. You know his commentary about how simple this

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 1>could be, and you just, you know, reinstate some of

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>these figures you just allow, you know, we we want

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to go to the limits to free speech in in

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>law and America where we're gonna try to step back

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 1>seem a lot more like what you know, people like

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:26.839
<v Speaker 1>Francis Huggan or accusing Mark Zuckerberg of than what has

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>actually happened at Facebook and Meta and there's a real danger.

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 1>And Ellen's commentary on this has been simplistic and um

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and and and ill informed in most cases, um, almost

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:40.079
<v Speaker 1>as zill informed as some of the stuff that he

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>put out recently about you know, it was effectively Russian

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>propaganda about Ukraine. A lot of these commentary there are

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>areas where he just doesn't have a lot of expertise.

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 1>And look, I I drive a Tesla, I was an

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>investor in space accent. I mostly believe in Eila Musk

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>and in his ability in certain areas. But the way

0:13:56.600 --> 0:14:00.839
<v Speaker 1>that he is you know, roundly dismissed, you know, years

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 1>of research and thoughtfulness in Twitter's content policies and in

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 1>terms of ways to approach these difficult matters, Um doesn't

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>bode well for Nilon must brunch Twitter, and so I

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 1>mean if it if it ends up descending into four chan, Um,

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not something that's ever going to be as valuable

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>as he needs it to be. All Right, Well, that's

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>quite a you know put comparison there. Uh, certainly much

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>remains to be seeing Chris Kelly, Facebook former chief privacy officer,

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>are gonna have you back here on the show, Chris,

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>uh and hearing away and thank you all right. Coming

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>up the myth of the driverless car, we're gonna talk

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>about why a future where you can relax behind the

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>wheel is still pretty far out. That's our big take.

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Next this is Bloomberg Investors have been a hundred billion

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>dollars on the self driving car industry, but how close

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>are we really to truly seeing them? On the oade Well,

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 1>driverless car engineer and Pronto CEO Anthony Lewandowski says this

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>future is years, if not decades away work. Max Chafkin

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 1>spoke to him and joins us now for more details

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 1>on what that means exactly and if that name sounds

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>familiar Max, of course. Anthony Lewandowski, I feel like we

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>have to say at the start was indicted for charges

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>of theft and stealing trade secrets from Google. Uh. He

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>served a few months in prison. Um, what's he up

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>to now? So yeah, Lewandowski is a very well known

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>figure in this field and as he said, extremely controversial.

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>So he is kind of the guy who kicked the

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>whole thing off. He created the prototype that became Google's

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 1>driverless car. Then, as he said, when he went to Uber,

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 1>he uh was in the middle of this very messy

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>two billion dollar lawsuit that ended, um, you know, with

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>money being paid and also this this indictment, and then

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 1>he was pardoned by foreign President Trump. Uh, he's back

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>and he has kind of turned critic, which is very

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>interesting because he was probably you know, one of the

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>most outspoken boosters in the industry, particularly one of the

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>people you know, pushing towards commercialization of these robotaxis. And

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>what are you saying now, basically is that when you

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>look at the progress that the industry has made, when

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 1>you look at what Weymo and Crews and some of

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 1>these smaller companies that have raised huge amounts of money

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 1>have done, you know, it isn't a whole lot. It's

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a handful of cars and a handful of cities. They're

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>still extremely restricted, and you're still getting you know, all

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of these sort of videos on YouTube and else where

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>on social media of driverless cars behaving badly or weird

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. And and so there are a lot of reasons,

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 1>uh to to have skepticism about the industry, and it's

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and and yet another one is you know this pioneer,

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>this booster, turning critic. So the headline of your story

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>is self driving cars are starting to look like a

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion dollar bust. You talk about weymo car is

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 1>getting confused by things as simple as traffic cones. What's

0:16:56.920 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the real outlook? When are they When are they going

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to be hitting the roads or or are they ever? Well,

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you know what we've heard from the kind of industry, Waymo,

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Cruise and so on, it is basically it's been two

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:10.439
<v Speaker 1>years out uh for like the last ten years. I mean,

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, even going all the way back to like

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:19.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty when Google at the time was unveiling these cars.

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 1>They were saying, oh, we can handle any road. And

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>then we saw Chris Urmson, who was running the program

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:25.920
<v Speaker 1>for a while, say that his child was eleven, was

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna have um, you know, his drivers was never gonna

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 1>have a driver's license. And we're kind of still in

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that place where where it's this kind of near term

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:36.680
<v Speaker 1>uh thing, but it's all very vague. And what what

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 1>would Lewandowski is saying, and what what you hear if

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 1>you talk to people who are outside of the of

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the sort of core of this industry is that we're

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 1>talking decades, We're not talking years. Now. This isn't to

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 1>say that there aren't advances, There are an important technology

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 1>happening that some of this stuff won't in fact change

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:56.399
<v Speaker 1>the world. It's just that the full blown you know,

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:59.159
<v Speaker 1>level four, level five autonomy, this is the idea that

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you get in a car with out of steering wheel

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 1>that is looking increasingly shaky. And I think one of

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 1>the reasons you see, really the only two companies who

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 1>are who are putting huge amounts of money into this,

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Weymo and Cruise both have you know, big corporate backing

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:15.639
<v Speaker 1>Weymo in the case of Google Alphabet and Cruise of

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:18.679
<v Speaker 1>course is GM quickly Max. Our kids are still going

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>to get driver's licenses, right, yeah, I think unfortunately that's

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the case. Um. Now again, there are huge improvements, and

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I think on the kind of advanced driver assistance technology,

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 1>our kids will maybe driving much safer cars. Um we're

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:36.119
<v Speaker 1>seeing that, you know, Tesla's autopilot, even though they market

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that as self driving, but but it's really a really

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 1>great driver assistance technology as well as GM, Super Cruise

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and others. So cars are definitely getting safer. There are

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 1>technological advances, but this kind of crazy steering wheel free

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:54.160
<v Speaker 1>future um looks increasingly shaky. All right, take note parents everywhere.

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Max Chafkin excellent story by You can check it out

0:18:57.080 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 1>in Bloomberg Business Seek Thanks back, Welcome back to Bloomberg

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Technology and Emily Chang in San Francisco. We're gonna get

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:16.440
<v Speaker 1>back to September payrolls coming out Friday. But jobs news

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:19.400
<v Speaker 1>has been moving markets for months as the FED works

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>to cut inflation. Thursday, no exception. Tech again in the headlines.

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Are at bood Log back with the top tech stories,

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, believe it not. There was news in the

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 1>last twenty four hours that had nothing to do with

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:35.239
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk, and it was very focused on jobs. As

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>you say, you see Amazon softed by half of the cent.

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>They're adding a hundred and fifty thousand workers for the

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 1>holiday period, same as they added one temporary workers to

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>handle that demand. But what's interesting is it to assign

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:52.159
<v Speaker 1>the demands there. Bloomberg scoop General Electric cutting hundreds of jobs,

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 1>according to sources, in its manufacturing unit that's responsible for

0:19:56.160 --> 0:20:00.719
<v Speaker 1>making wind turbines for wind energy because the demand has

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 1>gone and of course Peloton we've been speaking about during

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the show. I find Amazon really interesting. Right We're all

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 1>braced for payrolls data on Friday. There's mixed signals about

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 1>what the jobs market is like right now in the

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>United States. But it's a big vote of confidence in

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 1>consumer demand that Amazon is bringing in the same reinforcement

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 1>for this holiday shopping period that it did in one,

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>even at a time where sellers and merchants and the

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Amazon dot Com platform are worried they're bracing for a

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 1>slowdown in consumer spending due to inflation and perhaps and

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>pulled forward if that spending to earlier in the year.

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 1>You see the details of what Amazon's doing behind me.

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>But you know, remember between March and June of this year,

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 1>largely through attrition, they reduced headcount by around a hundred

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:45.879
<v Speaker 1>thousand to undo the investment of the pandemic era. Then

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>this Peloton. Another five hundred jobs to be cut from Peloton,

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and make that around forty six hundred so far this year.

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Is this the final step in Baron McCarthy's plan to

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:58.679
<v Speaker 1>turn around Peloton's fortunes. Of course, we've all gone back

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>to the gym, some of us, some of us back

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:03.440
<v Speaker 1>to the office using our pelotons less. But they've had

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 1>to reduce head count in a period where growth has

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 1>gone and they're pivoting to a more asset light model.

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 1>So really interesting to see what text doing in this climate,

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>particularly when it comes to the jobs front. All right,

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to thank you. Meantime, Google announced a suite

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of new products at the annual Made by Google event.

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Along with the Pixel seven and Pixel Watch, Google teased

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 1>an upcoming Pixel tablet to take on Apple's iPad and

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Amazon's Echo devices. Let's bring in Rick Osterlowe, Google Senior

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:33.440
<v Speaker 1>vice president of Devices and Services. Rit great to have

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>you back with us. So new phones and features, uh

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and you know, well, we're in a very difficult economic

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 1>time where consumers are under pressure paying more for everything

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 1>from gas to groceries. What's your argument to customers about

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 1>why they should upgrade their smartphones now? Well, first of all,

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having the Emily, and secondly, we're really excited

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>about our announcements today. UM for a variety of reasons,

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 1>but we we believe that personal computing technology like phones, watches,

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:09.959
<v Speaker 1>UH and earphones UM and tablets are just absolutely essential

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 1>computing capabilities. So well, I know that right now a

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of people might be concerned with all the economic uncertainty.

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:21.399
<v Speaker 1>I think it's really critical that that these products are

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>in marketing in the hands of users. UM were are

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:28.159
<v Speaker 1>also offering uh some new phone capabilities with our Pixel

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>seven and seven Pro that I think people find just

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>a terrific value. We have our Pixel seven products we

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 1>introduced today at five, nine, and nine and a Pixel

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:39.160
<v Speaker 1>seven Pro with some awesome capabilities for eight ninety nine,

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>which is significantly less than other options in the market.

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>So we wanted to make sure that people had some

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>great options to choose from in today's economic uncertainty. So

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:50.400
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about some of the new tech you brought

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>back face unlock after you actually removed it a few

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 1>years back. Why is that, UM, Well, you know, we

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>have a variety of ways to unlock your phone. We

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:00.680
<v Speaker 1>wanted to make sure that we had a really convenient

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:03.160
<v Speaker 1>way for people to unlock their phone. The primary way

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:05.919
<v Speaker 1>is through a fingerprint sensor, which is right on the display,

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:08.160
<v Speaker 1>makes it really easy to unlock your phone. But also

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 1>for convenience, we've added the ability just using the front

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>facing camera and a lot of our AI technology to

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:16.480
<v Speaker 1>be able to unlock the phone using your face as well,

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 1>So that added element makes it much easier to do

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 1>something that you probably do a hundred times a day.

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:24.239
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk that about your projections. There's this report from

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 1>nik that you're hoping to double Pixel sales compared Is

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that the goal and given these economic times, what makes

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:33.679
<v Speaker 1>you think that's realistic? Well, I mean, I think our

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:36.439
<v Speaker 1>products just keep getting better and better, and so our

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>aim is certainly to continue to grow our business. Here

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have a comment on exact projections, but

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly we have been growing and our intention is to

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 1>continue to do so, and we're doing that through innovations

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 1>in AI, making sure that our products are more and

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>more helpful for our users using our underlying AI technology,

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 1>and then also by expanning our portfolio. We now have

0:23:57.160 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 1>three terrific phone products with six A, seven and seven

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Pro hitting the market, and then we introduced the pixel

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Watch for the first time UM and we also have

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Pixel Buds Pro earphones, and this combination of technology we

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 1>think is what people are looking for right now. So

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 1>hang on, Rick, we're getting some breaking news out of

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the Elon Musk Twitter saga. The judge in Delaware has

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:23.640
<v Speaker 1>said the deal must close by five pm on October

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:27.399
<v Speaker 1>has paused the court case until October. Remember we were

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 1>expecting to go to trial on October sev the judge

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 1>saying if a deal isn't closed by October, they will

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>set a trial date of November. We're gonna get a

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 1>little more context in a moment, Rick, Let's talk a

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:45.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit about what you see as the long term

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 1>viability of the hardware business. How much runway do you

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:52.160
<v Speaker 1>think you have given you know, all this company I mentioned,

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned Apple, I mentioned Amazon, given all this competition

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:57.919
<v Speaker 1>out there. Oh well, I mean this is a very

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 1>long term investment for the company, and the market we're

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:05.639
<v Speaker 1>pursuing is absolutely enormous UM. But probably most importantly, this

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 1>space of delivering personal technology to our users is absolutely

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:14.439
<v Speaker 1>critical for end users UM and we see it as

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a great way for people to experience the very best

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>technology that Google has to offer. We literally take our

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 1>latest AI research and machine learning models and bring that

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:26.200
<v Speaker 1>right to our users with Pixel and so this we see,

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:29.920
<v Speaker 1>this is absolutely essential alright, Google Senior vice president of

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:32.959
<v Speaker 1>Devices and Services, Rick Australo with all the news from

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 1>the Made by Google event, thank you Rick for joining us.

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 1>I want to get back to that Twitter news. Uh.

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>The judge halting the court case until October twenty saying

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:45.439
<v Speaker 1>the deal must close by five pm. So ed, if

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you're going to Delaware, it's not going to be until

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 1>October twenty eight. Uh, potentially at least talk to us

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:53.440
<v Speaker 1>about the latest headlines. What are we hearing? Yes, so

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the deal has until five pm October two close, as

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:58.919
<v Speaker 1>you say. If the deal does not close by that period,

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Kathleene st Je the call make. The chancery judge in

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Delaware overseeing this m and A case this dispute says

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:09.119
<v Speaker 1>that she will go to trial in November, so you know,

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:11.719
<v Speaker 1>the door is still open to kind of any outcome here.

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:13.919
<v Speaker 1>You see Twitter shares rising in after hours, were up

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 1>about one point two percent right now, we were as

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 1>higher as as high as three percent. And remember with

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:21.959
<v Speaker 1>that share pushing higher, it's kind of an indication from

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street that they see the chances of this deal

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>now happening. Twitter indicating their court filing earlier on Thursday

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 1>that they wanted this to happen much sooner. They said

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:34.879
<v Speaker 1>that MUSK could close as soon as next week. By

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the tent date was the one that was originally put

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>out by the Musque team in their court filing where

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>they requested that the stay of proceedings happened that this

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 1>trial be paused. Remember, Twitter opposed that in a court

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 1>filing later in the day. Thursday has said we do

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 1>not want to pause these proceedings. But Kafine and St

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Jude McCormick, the Chance re judge, appears to have sided

0:26:56.840 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>with Team Musk at this time, the judge saying, so

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>set a date for November for a trial. If the

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 1>deal doesn't close by October, there's still this contingency of

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the debt financing. Are we to understand by this that um,

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 1>that's not going to be an issue or do we

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 1>believe that's basically the main issue that remains. Yes. So,

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 1>in the first court filing Thursday, Musk's team said that Twitter,

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:28.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, wouldn't say yes to the deal, that they

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:31.200
<v Speaker 1>were hung up on this idea of the debt not

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 1>being there, which Musk team kind of indicated was not

0:27:35.080 --> 0:27:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a problem. In the filing that Twitter's team gave us later,

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>they said that Musk could not even discuss closing the

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 1>deal with the banks, you know, The concern is that

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Musk has this twelve point five billion dollars of debt

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 1>split between a six point five billion dollar loan, three

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 1>billion of un secured, three billion of secured bonds. There's

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 1>also revolving credit line in there as well. Times have

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 1>changed since that deal and that package was agreed in

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 1>April um and so I guess the concern in the

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 1>background is is the viability of that debt. You know,

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 1>here at Bloomberg, our expert analysts are are beat reporters

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 1>have dug into this issue, and it's kind of unthinkable

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:17.520
<v Speaker 1>that the banks would walk away from giving Musk a

0:28:17.720 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Musk team the money or the proceeds from that debt.

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, it would be a big hit to their

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 1>credibility for one, but the banks do then need to

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:28.920
<v Speaker 1>go to Wall Street and sell the debt to institutional investors.

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 1>So clearly, Twitter, if they don't have concerns about the debt,

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I think they still have concerns about what Musk's true

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 1>intentions are. That much we can gather from the court

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 1>filings Thursday. So what's your hunch are you going to do?

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 1>You're asking me if we're going to Delaware that's the question.

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, we're not going to Delaware on October seventeen.

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Certainly Twitter employees I've spoken to this week, many of

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 1>them outlined early they thought this was a play for

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 1>time by Musks to go back to the original offer.

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 1>We don't know. We don't know what the psychology around

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>this is from Elon must but Kathleen st Judy McCormick

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 1>has made a very fast decision. I don't think anyone

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 1>expected her to take both court filings one us to

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>stay one didn't, and then decide this quick. That's where

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>we stand. We do not know, except that it's still

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 1>not a done deal. Okay, thank you for the play

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 1>by play. As always, what we do know about the

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 1>executive who withdrew millions before Celsius's bankruptcy. Another scandal unfolding.

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 1>That's next. This is Bloomberg time now for our crypto report,

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and remember Celsius. Well, we're now learning the former CEO

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of the bankrupt crypto lender withdrew millions just before stopping

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 1>customer withdrawals. Bloom Worth Katie Greifeld here to explain, Katie,

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>what do we know? Well, just to reach out the

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 1>timeline a little bit like you said we had the

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 1>former CEO withdrawal about ten million dollars in May. He

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 1>wasn't allow. You also had co founder Dan Leon and

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 1>chief technology officer Nuke Goldstein also withdraw millions. That was

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 1>in May, and if we remember, in June, Celsius halted

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 1>customer withdrawals and then ultimately filed for bankruptcy in July.

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 1>So the timing here obviously a bit of a question

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>mark as we work through this bankruptcy and we'll see

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 1>how this shakes out. And just to remind the audience,

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Celsius was one of the highest flying lenders, obviously promising returns,

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to take on actual traditional banks by saying you

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 1>can investor coins, received interest on them. Obviously that came

0:30:45.480 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 1>crashing down in a pretty spectacular way. And this slow

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 1>drip of news has been just fascinating to watch as

0:30:52.560 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 1>we get closer and deeper into this bankruptcy. So it's

0:30:56.080 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 1>hard to believe anything could be more exciting or volatile

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 1>in terms of news than crypt show markets. But elon

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Musk and Twitter, I've given us just that. That said,

0:31:03.520 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 1>there is still action in crypto markets. I know you've

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:09.720
<v Speaker 1>been watching bitcoin and how uh it's been related to

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the market rally or not. What trends are you pulling out?

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 1>It is pretty amusing that crypto is sort of the

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>ho hull market right now. But a trend that I

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 1>have noticed is that actually it's the crypto equities that

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>have been outperforming this week. You have Bitcoin holding up

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 1>relatively well amid all the volatility that we've seen in

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the stock market. Bitcoin is about four percent higher over

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the past four days or so. But if you look

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>at micro Strategy micro Strategy coin based Marathon, they're all

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 1>up by double digits, which is pretty amazing to me.

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Part of the reason could just be that they fell

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 1>much more dramatically than Bitcoin itself. For example, if you

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 1>look at bitcoin, it's down about fifty seven percent year

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 1>to date. If you look at coin based that number

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:55.720
<v Speaker 1>is seventy one percent. So it could be a function

0:31:55.840 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of the fact that they fell further they have more

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 1>room to rise. But it's definitely a trend to keep

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 1>an eye on amid this mild resilience, I would almost

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 1>call it in the crypto market. So what are you

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna be watching in the in the US overnight? Can

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I shamelessly plug something? Of course, that I'm gonna go

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:16.720
<v Speaker 1>ahead and do that. So Crypto I RA all. It's

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 1>show that I host with Tim Stanovic. It's gonna be

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 1>on Quick Take at eight thirty pm Eastern tonight a

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:27.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty pm Eastern on Friday night. We're gonna dig into

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 1>after this amazing draw down that we've seen Bitcoin down

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 1>fifty seven percent this year alone, who's going to lead

0:32:36.120 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the rebuild, who's going to be the winner, who's going

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to be the loser, and whether that's going to be

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of the crypto native companies or whether we're going

0:32:43.320 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to see traditional finance come in here. All right, So

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:48.440
<v Speaker 1>my bad is that's not going to be home at all.

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Excited to see it. Katie Greifeld Crypto I r L

0:32:53.600 --> 0:33:05.560
<v Speaker 1>take a watch. Thank you, Katie. There's another sign that

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 1>labor demand in the US may be starting to moderate.

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Unemployment applications rose more than expected last week by twenty

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 1>nine thousand. This after the Labor Department said that the

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:19.880
<v Speaker 1>number of available jobs in August decreased by a million.

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 1>This as the return to the office is waning or ebbing,

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 1>let's say nationwide. Last week was the second straight week

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 1>or office occupancy barely budged after shooting up right after

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Labor Day. For more on the labor market in the

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 1>future of work, I want to bring in Fran Katsua,

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Cisco Executive Vice president in chief, People Policy and Purpose Officer. Fran,

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:44.720
<v Speaker 1>it's great to have you back with us. So it's

0:33:44.760 --> 0:33:48.400
<v Speaker 1>been called the Great Resignation. Now we're hearing the great realignment.

0:33:48.520 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 1>We're hearing about quiet quitting, what in your view is

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 1>actually happening within the workforce. Thank you, Emily, I'm so

0:33:55.920 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 1>glad to be with you. I think what we're talking

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 1>about is an amazing opportunity to to really think about work.

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I think sometimes when we talk about this phase, we're

0:34:05.360 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 1>so focused on whether people are working from home or

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 1>from the office that we don't look at this opportunity

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 1>from a future of work perspective. As you know, at Cisco,

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:18.719
<v Speaker 1>we have worked hybrid actually before the pandemic, we've had

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of flexibility, and what we see at this

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 1>moment is that one of the most critical elements about

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 1>work is inclusion and flexibility and really understanding there isn't

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:32.279
<v Speaker 1>a one size fits all to the amazing work that

0:34:32.360 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 1>we have to do, and if we're able to intersect

0:34:35.120 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 1>flexibility with the work and innovation and connection that we're building,

0:34:41.080 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 1>it can be an amazing opportunity and not something to dread.

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:47.240
<v Speaker 1>So give me some specifics about how Cisco is changing

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:51.480
<v Speaker 1>its strategy now. Um, you know we're you know, we're

0:34:51.520 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 1>coming out of of the pandemic, but it's hard to

0:34:57.400 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 1>know where new normal is really going to be. Yeah,

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:02.640
<v Speaker 1>So the first thing that I would say is, I

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 1>think all companies are still learning and evolving, and the

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 1>way that we're handling this at Cisco is in a

0:35:09.120 --> 0:35:12.759
<v Speaker 1>very decentralized way. We've asked every leader at Cisco to

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:15.279
<v Speaker 1>really work with their team to figure out against the

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:18.239
<v Speaker 1>backdrop of the work and how people are at their

0:35:18.360 --> 0:35:21.400
<v Speaker 1>best to make arrangements. And for some people Emily, that

0:35:21.480 --> 0:35:23.719
<v Speaker 1>means that maybe they're coming in once or twice a week.

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it's a little bit more. But because from a

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:29.799
<v Speaker 1>Cisco perspective, we have been doing this for for so long,

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:33.680
<v Speaker 1>what we can see is there's amazing opportunities. We see

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:36.759
<v Speaker 1>that career trajectory for people, regardless of where they're working,

0:35:36.960 --> 0:35:40.400
<v Speaker 1>can be equal. And we also see another opportunity from

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:42.799
<v Speaker 1>a Cisco perspective, which is really all about the tech.

0:35:43.400 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 1>What we see from our customers is they want to

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 1>have an experience for their people that is similar whether

0:35:49.120 --> 0:35:51.759
<v Speaker 1>they're sitting in the office or sitting at home. And

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the other interesting thing right now is that

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:58.399
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing inclusion really intersect technology in a very different way,

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:01.279
<v Speaker 1>where the tech is working harder to make sure that

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:05.640
<v Speaker 1>every person is pulled into a meeting, innovation, a brainstorming

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:07.799
<v Speaker 1>session on a white board, and I think that's going

0:36:07.840 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to be critical for all companies moving forward. Well, that's

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:14.440
<v Speaker 1>certainly an opportunity for Cisco's WebEx. I'm curious for your

0:36:14.480 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 1>take on San Francisco's downtown, which still hasn't recovered from

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:20.879
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic and it seems to be coming back much

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:25.440
<v Speaker 1>more slowly than other US cities. Do you think it

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:28.359
<v Speaker 1>ever will be the same and what does that mean

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:30.920
<v Speaker 1>for for tech culture. I don't think it will be

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the same, and I think that's part of the problem.

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that a lot of companies are stepping into

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 1>this wanting to go back, and what we're realizing at

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Cisco is that we have to invite our people back

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:44.560
<v Speaker 1>into the office. Right now, Emily, we're talking about our

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:47.680
<v Speaker 1>leaders as having a new role, which is these event

0:36:47.920 --> 0:36:51.200
<v Speaker 1>managers that are really thinking about that connection. I think

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the amazing things that all companies want the connection. They

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:57.879
<v Speaker 1>want to have the culture. But asking people to come

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:00.719
<v Speaker 1>in and sit on their own while they do their

0:37:00.840 --> 0:37:04.239
<v Speaker 1>video calls or their emails just doesn't make sense to

0:37:04.320 --> 0:37:06.080
<v Speaker 1>our people. And so I think it's going to be

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:11.880
<v Speaker 1>really the focus on, uh, the anniversary celebration, the brainstorming session,

0:37:12.040 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe the community give back that will bring our people

0:37:15.160 --> 0:37:16.680
<v Speaker 1>to the office in a different way. And I think

0:37:16.719 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 1>we just have to lean into that trend and try

0:37:19.239 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 1>new things until we find what works. So as the

0:37:21.520 --> 0:37:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley kind of standard of you know, office gyms

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:30.239
<v Speaker 1>and catered food and on site laundry is not era over,

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh goodness, that's a really tough question. I will tell

0:37:33.680 --> 0:37:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you that at the moment, I don't think those perks

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:39.600
<v Speaker 1>are as valuable as they once were. What we're hearing

0:37:39.680 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 1>from our people is they want to work in an

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:44.960
<v Speaker 1>environment where they can contribute, where they can have impact,

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 1>where they can decide on a week to week basis

0:37:48.320 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 1>whether or not they're coming in. And so I do

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:53.680
<v Speaker 1>think there's going to be a new set of benefits

0:37:53.800 --> 0:37:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and perks that are more meaningful to our people. It's interesting, Emily,

0:37:57.840 --> 0:38:00.759
<v Speaker 1>because when I talk to my peers a US industries

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:03.359
<v Speaker 1>and for those companies that are mandating that their people

0:38:03.480 --> 0:38:06.239
<v Speaker 1>come back, they're sharing that their people are still not

0:38:06.400 --> 0:38:09.160
<v Speaker 1>coming back. And so it's it's not these perks that

0:38:09.239 --> 0:38:10.719
<v Speaker 1>will bring them back. I think it's going to be

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:13.560
<v Speaker 1>one another. It's going to be teams and really having

0:38:13.600 --> 0:38:16.879
<v Speaker 1>a career that fits your goals. All right, Francot Suit,

0:38:16.960 --> 0:38:19.920
<v Speaker 1>us executive vice president of Cisco fran good to have

0:38:20.040 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 1>you back with us. Thank you for sharing your thoughts

0:38:22.719 --> 0:38:25.920
<v Speaker 1>on the changing lay of the land that does it.

0:38:26.000 --> 0:38:28.759
<v Speaker 1>For this edition of Bloomberg Technology, We've got a great

0:38:28.760 --> 0:38:31.920
<v Speaker 1>show coming up Friday. Sarah couldn't of Cleo. We'll be

0:38:32.000 --> 0:38:34.400
<v Speaker 1>joining us to talk about tech sentiment in response to

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:37.359
<v Speaker 1>the US jobs report. And don't forget to check out

0:38:37.400 --> 0:38:40.080
<v Speaker 1>our podcast wherever you get your podcasts. I'm Emily Changing,

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:42.280
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. This is Bloomberg