WEBVTT - 2025 U.S. Open Preview with Geoff Ogilvy

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I miss a green, for example, I'm already upset.

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:04.920
<v Speaker 2>When I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:05.880
<v Speaker 2>And when I find my.

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Ball in a fried egg Friday Egg, the dreaded Frida

0:00:08.720 --> 0:00:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Egg Friday, Frida Egg, Brian Egg, fridagg Bride Egg Lie,

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm about ready to run off of the hump course.

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:40.279
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to the Friday Egg Golf Podcast. I am

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>your host, Andy Johnson, and we are here. We are

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 1>at the US Open week. It will be the one

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:50.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty fifth US Open at Oakmond. It's the

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and twenty fifth US Open, not the one

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty fifth at Oakmont. This is I think

0:00:57.080 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the more probably probably the most anticipated event

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 1>in golf post Masters win by Rory, which we didn't

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>know he was going to win the Masters, So I

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>would say this was the one you kind of circled

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:15.680
<v Speaker 1>on the calendar as they tossed around. The quintessential US

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Open course. I like the term that Garrett Morrison came

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>up with that for the phrase. Oakmont created his own

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 1>genre and it remains the only example of that type

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of golf course. So we've got a big week ahead

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>today I'm I'm excited to be joined by Jeff Ogilvie,

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the six US Open champion. We're going to preview the

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:45.039
<v Speaker 1>championship ahead. You know, obviously Jeff won at wingfoot. He

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>was actually in the seven US Open at Oakmont as

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the defending champion, so unique perspective, and he was a

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>part of our Oakmont video that if you haven't watched,

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>go check it out on YouTube. It's one of the

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>best things that we've ever made. Big thanks to our

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>team that put that together. Cameron heard us, Matt Rush's

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:09.519
<v Speaker 1>really put a lot of work into that. Go check

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that out. Week of for anybody in the area. I

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>will I am Brendan Poorath the Shotgun start. PJ. Clark

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>will be at Local Remedy as well as some other

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>members of our team. Joseph Lamania will be there. We

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>will be at Local Remedy Brewing, which is right down

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:32.359
<v Speaker 1>the road from Oakmont. We will be doing things on Wednesday, Thursday,

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and Friday and Saturday of the US Open, So if

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>you're in, if you're going, if you're in the neighborhood,

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 1>feel free to swing by. Those will mostly be nighttime

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:46.359
<v Speaker 1>after play. I think Wednesday night We're doing just a

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 1>very casual thing, so come check us out, come meet,

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>come meet there if you're in the neighborhood. But before

0:02:56.520 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>we get to Jeff and the US Open, big thanks

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>to our partner for the week of the US Open.

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 1>They're sponsoring kind of the whole, the whole shebang of

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>us of the US Open. It is Echo golf shoes,

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>known for combining premium materials with comfort, durability, and performance.

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>The brand is committed to innovative shoe technology and sustainable craftsmanship.

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Echo was established in Denmark in nineteen sixty three and

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>is now a global family of shoemakers. From drawing the

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>first sketches to presenting our finished shoes at in Echo

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>stores around the world, we apply the utmost attention to

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>detail and quality. Echo owns their own factories and leather tanneries,

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>which allows for full control over quality and craftsmanship. The

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>show shoe is so comfortable, I think that you know,

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I always go back. I tell this story a lot.

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>But when I played us AM's those thirty six whole days,

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>which they sadly have gone away from. But those thirty

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>six whole days are the last of a state. AM

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>always Echo days because the shoes are so comfortable, ideal

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>for long rounds and walking golf courses. They have the

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>best technology in it, whether it's the waterproof technology or

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the comfort, the way they approach the heels. These are great,

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 1>great shoes. These are the shoes that I'm gonna be

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>wearing around Oakmont. On top of that, they have some

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>top global ambassadors including Lydia Coe, Hendrik Stenson, Eric Van Ryan,

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>and Thomas Bjorn. That was the first player they actually signed.

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, big thanks to Echo. If you're interested in Echo,

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 1>visit their website at Echo Ecco dot com. That's Echo

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Ecco dot com. I would look through their wide range

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 1>of shoes. It's not just golf shoes as well as

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 1>a tidbit, I'm gonna be wearing one of their just

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of casual shoes around Oakmont, So check it out

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>at Echo dot com. Big thanks to Echo, and let's

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:06.919
<v Speaker 1>get to Jeff Ogilvie. All right for the one hundred

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and twenty fifth US Open. I'm delighted to bring back

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the six US Open champ. Jeff Ogilvie. Uh, you played

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the seven Oakmont. I wasn't didn't even put this together

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>when we when when I reached out, But you were

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the defending champion at the seven Oakmont US Open. What uh,

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 1>what's it like being a defending champion? This is an

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>hunter that you know I will never feel. What's it

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>like being the defending champion at a major?

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 2>It feels pretty good. I mean, obviously it's a little

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:43.159
<v Speaker 2>bit different than defending a normal tournament.

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 3>I think.

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:48.279
<v Speaker 2>Because it's such a big deal. It's just amplified. It's

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 2>it's a big deal. And what made it better, I

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:53.919
<v Speaker 2>guess was better or more memorable as I played with

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Tiger first two rounds because he I think it was

0:05:57.440 --> 0:06:01.799
<v Speaker 2>he'd won Hoylake six Open, and we played with Richie

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Ramsey who was the US Amateur champ, so it was

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 2>it was a cool group. Any time you played with

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 2>Tiger was memorable. I mean I remember all of those times.

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 1>So one of my favorite things was, you know, before

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 1>you guys did the or the Medina Project, the Redal,

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 1>I was like, what do you remember of Medana And

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>you're like, well, I couldn't really see the chorus because

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:28.599
<v Speaker 1>I played with Phil and Tiger, and it's pretty much

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 1>when you're playing with them, it's the worst way to

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 1>see the golf course.

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 2>That was so many people. Yeah, that was a memorable

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 2>one too. Like that was there was three hundred people

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 2>inside the ropes at that one. Whenever you played with Tiger,

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:44.280
<v Speaker 2>there were so many people inside the ropes because it's

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 2>the only time anyone in the media center actually left

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:48.719
<v Speaker 2>the buffet and went out and actually watched golf, and

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:51.600
<v Speaker 2>they walked inside the ropes with Tiger. I felt bad

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 2>for the fans because they could never see past all

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 2>these photographers and writers and stuff who were watching on

0:06:57.040 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 2>the inside.

0:06:59.000 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 3>Memorable.

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 2>That was great play with talking, I mean like just

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 2>a good I was. I was the right age to

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 2>play with a guy like that in times like that

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 2>at a place like Goakmont. It was fun and I

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:12.679
<v Speaker 2>don't think either of us played great, but I think

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 2>he probably ended up finishing better than me, but we

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 2>were both finished on.

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>A second or third. He was like sneaky in the mix,

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>but wasn't really in the mix.

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we were kind of doing okay. After the thirty

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 2>six solls we played together. I was probably thirtieth or

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 2>something and he was tenth or something like that.

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the uh, the the O seven, you know, besides

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Zelpato was the coming out party of Bubba Watson. That's

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the thing that I forgot. We did rewatch a few

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>years ago and I was like, oh my god, this

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>is like the this is Bubba Watson's like opening act

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>where and it's funny because he played you know, it's

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>this first major. They played really well, and then he

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>never played well in the US Open after that. It's

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>like and it made me actually think, like, you know,

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Okama gets this. I had this narrative of like, it's

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>so hard after being there, and I wonder what you

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>think about this. It feels like it's actually it's hard,

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>but it does require some level of creativity.

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh absolutely. I mean it's probably the hardest course if

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 2>all the weather is neutral, if everyone has seventy if

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 2>it's seventy degrees, then there's no wind. Oakland's the hardest

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 2>course that we ever play in the US Hope. I mean,

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:35.839
<v Speaker 2>Wingfoot's close, but Wingfoot's more of about the greens. I

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 2>think you can get out of Fairway bunkers a little

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 2>bit at wing Foot. It feels I don't know, Winfot's

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 2>really hard to but just on a just a basic

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:50.199
<v Speaker 2>like normal day, Oakmont is really hard, but it takes

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 2>creativity because every hole is different.

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 3>Most courses have a theme.

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, wing foot is if you hit it to

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 2>the front edge of the green all day, you're going

0:08:57.440 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 2>to do okay because you're always under the hole. But

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't work because six or seven other greens go

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 2>the other way. It's it takes all the shots. And

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I guess it makes sense that Bubba would

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 2>play well there. You wouldn't think at first that he

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:11.959
<v Speaker 2>would play well there because would think it would be

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 2>awful for Bubba. But he was a really elite ball striker.

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Really even though he got the ball to the spot

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 2>in a different way to everyone else, he was a

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 2>great driver of the ball because he could hit that

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 2>little chip cut three hundred yards and it was a

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 2>very safe shot. Yeah, it's it's just you have to

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 2>be creative because you see shots at Oakmont that you

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 2>don't see anywhere else. You know, you get especially around

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 2>the greens, you just get faced with stuff that you

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 2>just don't see anywhere else, and so you kind of

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 2>have to have that ability to adapt, you know, and

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:46.959
<v Speaker 2>that you if you sum up Bubba Watson, it's adaptability,

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 2>you know.

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Also, like the the ability to hit chaps can

0:09:55.320 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 1>counter some of the movement. The severity sure.

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean like if you think of a green like

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 2>ten or a whole like twelve, twelve is sort of

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 2>a right hand as nightmare, if you like, because it's

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 2>all falling away to the right, like for six hundred

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 2>yards and you have to sort of hug it up

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 2>the left hand side the fairway and hopes it hangs

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 2>on bubble. Can hit that big right to left slice

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 2>if you like, and it's gonna bounce straight. You know,

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of tilt sideways tilt at Oakmont, and

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 2>I guess shape He's shaped it more than anyone else,

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 2>and when it lands on the green, it spins and

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:32.079
<v Speaker 2>so on ten. He's hitting a big drawer in there

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 2>with a wedge and it's spinning against the hill and

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 2>it probably helps it stop going over the back.

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about just getting if I was getting

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:45.680
<v Speaker 1>ready for Oakmart and the stuff I would be thinking

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>about in practice rounds. And I feel like if you

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>go to like a tour stop, often you know, majors,

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>even they somebody hits a bad drive, you don't see

0:10:55.800 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>guys like hit approach shots into greens from broth right,

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 1>like they pull it into the fairway or but to me,

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>like I was thinking about, it's like maybe like the

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>most important shot to practice is like the hitting into

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>one green from the rough, just to see how a

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 1>ball like scoots in there? Where approximately do I need

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to even land this because it's such a unique shot.

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 2>It's funny you say that because most of the caddies.

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 2>I always felt like my caddy, especially Squirrel, for the

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:29.959
<v Speaker 2>longest time through those majors. He's like what I'd always

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 2>drive on in the rough and then just flick it

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 2>out the fairway and hit it because I just wanted

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 2>to hit it off the fairway because it's more fun.

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 2>And he used to be mad because I wouldn't try

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 2>any of these shots out of the raft. And I

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 2>think there's some players who do hit shots out of

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 2>the rough, but most of us just flip it out

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 2>with the fairway and hit it. And you're right, you're

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 2>not to wear yourself out and hurt yourself. I think

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 2>it was O seven seven that Phil hurt his wrist.

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 1>He said it was unsafe. The ruff was unsafe.

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 2>The ruff was unsafe. Always won for a bold statement,

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:02.679
<v Speaker 2>but it was very long and falling over, falling over itself.

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 3>But you should.

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 2>You've definitely got to in a US, especially the US Open,

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 2>hit some that you hit out of the raff like

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 2>that you hit into the roff, to work out what

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 2>you can and can't achieve out of the raf, because

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:20.199
<v Speaker 2>sometimes ruff looks tough, but you can actually move it

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 2>a long way. Sometimes ruff doesn't look that bad and

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:27.199
<v Speaker 2>you can't move it. You've got to have a sense

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 2>for what you can get away with and how much

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 2>you can take it on. But like you said, the

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 2>first hole, if you're coming out of the rough, you

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 2>can't hit.

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:35.439
<v Speaker 3>The green, can you? I don't know. I mean maybe

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 3>if you're.

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 2>In the left rouff, maybe and you sort of have

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 2>one tumbling up the right ruff.

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 3>And it dribbles on the front of the green.

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 2>Maybe, But you definitely should sort of assess how aggressive

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 2>or conservative you should be out of the rough, because

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 2>the number one thing is to just get it out

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 2>of the rough. You don't want to be you don't

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 2>want to drive it in the rough and then have

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:56.959
<v Speaker 2>your next one in the rouff. You know.

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 1>It is one of the things that I think that

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>particularly in US opens, that the adage of if you

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>hit a poor drive, the next shot has to be

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>like it's a different calculus in golf typically, especially at

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>one at Oakmont, where you're you're kind of thinking about

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>getting the ball back into a position to possibly make

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 1>par as opposed to you know, this week in Canada,

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:29.080
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be like, oh, a hit and the rough,

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Like can I still make birdie? Possibly? Can I still

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:34.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, can I still hit it? Hit the green

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and have a putt at birdie? And when you get

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>in this type of golf, it does feel like it

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:44.839
<v Speaker 1>becomes like a you know, it's like a decision tree,

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>where like if this happens, then this becomes like and

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and so much of it is taking medicine and getting

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:56.079
<v Speaker 1>into back into a position where you can take a

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>big number out of play.

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think more than anything at a place like Gokmont,

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 2>you've got to play every single shot on its merits

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 2>and not have like a score that you're supposed to

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 2>make in your head, Like you say on too, you

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 2>just hit it as far as we can basically and

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:17.079
<v Speaker 2>work it out as we go, And like this is

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 2>a birdie hole. Even if you're in the rough, you

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 2>can make birdies. But if you drive in the ruff

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 2>at Oakmont, you've got to all of a sudden you're

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 2>sort of looking at the Okay, now it's I want

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 2>to average four and a half from here, as opposed.

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 3>To you know, you don't want to make six. You know,

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 3>you drive it the first raff.

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 2>It's like the rouff on the first the decision is, okay,

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 2>I just have to make sure I don't make six.

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 2>So how do I make my decision from there? That Okay,

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 2>I want to make four. But let's take sick, Let's

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 2>take double bog out of the equation. And that's the

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 2>same on every shot at Oakmont. I mean putting. You're

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 2>going to have some parts, some long parts and some

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 2>really not long parts on some holes where Okay, I

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 2>want to make this, But how do I hit this

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 2>pot to make sure if I don't make it, I

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 2>make the next one.

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, it is like you know, the analytics say

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>like there they get to and you obviously have worked

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 1>with analytics with your experience with the President's Cup, and

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>they make these defiant statements about you should hit driver

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 1>every time here, or it is better to be closer

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and above the hole than the below the hole. But

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I think when you get to a golf course as

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>severely punishing as Oakmont, analytics and the severity on the greens,

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>for example, like that five footer downhill is not better

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>than the eight footer uphill, even though the analytics say

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 1>is better everywhere else, like because of the way you

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>just can't confidently stroke the putt. One thing I was

0:15:56.200 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>thinking about off the team, particular at Oakmont is if

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>they say driver but it just doesn't look right. You

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 1>have to approach every shot at Oakmont with like a

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>very aggressively confident swing. Otherwise that's when it can go

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>off the reels and then it can go off the

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 1>reels quick. So there's like almost a strokes gained of

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 1>comfort and ability to play with some aggression that bucks

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the a lot of the modern analytical trends in my mind.

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I totally agree. I think analytics they

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 2>would disagree with me, but you've got to throw it

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 2>out at Oakmont. I think it is definitely more about

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 2>a headspace than a freedom. I mean, Augusta does the

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 2>same thing to you. It makes you hit shots that

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 2>you don't want to hit. But the only way you

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 2>can hit it well is if you're swinging it with freedom.

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, like Oakmont's going to have some shots that

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 2>you would never normally take on in a seventy two hole,

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 2>but you have to take it on. Is If you

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 2>don't take it on, the alternative is worse. So you

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 2>have to be confident doing something you don't want to do.

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 2>And that's probably why it's such a great tournament course.

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you could analyze. I don't think you

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:14.400
<v Speaker 2>could use I mean all these guys will have analytics

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 2>from O seven, they'll have analytics from sixteen where players

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 2>had success from around the course. Do you want to

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:22.679
<v Speaker 2>be back left edge on the first? You want to

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 2>be the front edge on the second? You where to

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:27.880
<v Speaker 2>miss it and where not to miss it? That's over

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 2>a hole, But the analytics takes in every player in

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 2>the field over seventy two holes, and it's just sort

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 2>of giving you an insight into where players had the

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:41.360
<v Speaker 2>success from on the course and where the bad spots were.

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 2>That doesn't mean that's true for you, because everybody puts

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 2>different and it hits different shots. And some guys might

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 2>like fifty yard pitch shots when they lay it up.

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 2>If they drive it, they're rough on the first they

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:54.639
<v Speaker 2>might be better to lay it up. Then they added

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:56.719
<v Speaker 2>to hit it over the back and try to get

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 2>it up and down. But like over a collective one

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 2>hundred and fifty people, then maybe over the backs better,

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 2>but over what for one individual case, it might be

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 2>better to lay it up.

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 3>So I think you're right, Hope.

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Month's about trying to find yourself, get yourself comfortable on

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 2>a very uncomfortable golf course.

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 1>That's that's what I felt, you know, my one time

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 1>playing it was like, I do feel like the thing

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:22.959
<v Speaker 1>that makes it makes it great and not gimmicky, is

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:25.200
<v Speaker 1>that I do feel like if you like get going,

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 1>you can go like there's no you don't like, there's

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>no reason you can't make birdies there because if you

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:34.679
<v Speaker 1>hit it into the right spots, you're like, okay, And

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:37.679
<v Speaker 1>there's now with the expansions on some of these holes,

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:40.359
<v Speaker 1>like there's enough space to like, oh, if I hit

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a good T shot here, I can you know, but

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the second that you get off is very bad. So

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>it's where that calm, aggressive swing really works out there.

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 2>Sounds like you're describing Scott Scheffler a little bit. At

0:18:55.160 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 2>the moment. It it definitely doable I think that's why

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 2>it gets away with it somehow. It Most courses this

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:09.159
<v Speaker 2>hard are just players don't want to go back and

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 2>play again. But Oakmont somehow because you know that the

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:15.199
<v Speaker 2>good score is there. I'm sure we won't see it.

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 2>We might see another sixty three or something like that.

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 2>But if you can hit most fairways and most greens

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:26.359
<v Speaker 2>at Oakmont, if you hit every shot great, and you

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 2>can leave yourself puts straight up the hill and every hole,

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:30.439
<v Speaker 2>you know, and if you do that like you can

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:32.719
<v Speaker 2>be pretty aggressive. We've seen some low scores around Oakmont

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:35.679
<v Speaker 2>over the years. But if you miss one shot in

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 2>the wrong spot, like it's it's just carnage, you know.

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 2>And that's sort of the pressure it puts on you

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 2>all days. And there's no let up really, every even

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 2>the simple holes can go really wrong with a bad shot.

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:52.679
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about this about let up like where,

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think this is like so many people are

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:58.200
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about the eighth being three hundred plus

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>yards in a way, it's maybe the most docile surrounds.

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that might actually be like the hole that

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>you take a deep breath and you say, okay, you know,

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen it it's actually like the hole with

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the least amount of variability in it. It's you kind

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 1>of stand on the tee and you know, if I

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:20.160
<v Speaker 1>hit a good shot, it'll probably going to make a three.

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 1>If I had a bad shot and probably gonna make

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:25.439
<v Speaker 1>a four. In a way, playing it, did it feel

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>like actually one of the more compared to the other

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>par threes where I think like there's a lot of

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 1>chaos potential where you could make a big number. Does

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:38.439
<v Speaker 1>that feel like a place you could take a deep breath?

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, for sure.

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:42.439
<v Speaker 2>I mean I think when we talked about it a

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 2>few like a few weeks ago, I thought eight was

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 2>a letup hole if I run through them in my head.

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:50.199
<v Speaker 2>I mean, four is a little bit of a let up,

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 2>but it's only a let up if you hit the fairway,

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 2>Like eight is a relaxed hole. I mean then not.

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 3>Oh seven.

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:58.880
<v Speaker 2>They had the three hundred tea, but they only played

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 2>at once. Maybe so we probably played two fifty a

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 2>couple of times. Maybe you're two to twenty and a

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:11.400
<v Speaker 2>three hundred eight is like you say, it's a three

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 2>or four. I mean, maybe you make a two with

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 2>an amazing shot, but you're not really like focused on

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 2>a two, but yeah, it's a three or four.

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 3>If you miss the.

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Green, you hit it out, you're going to have a

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 2>reasonable chance to make it, and if you miss, you

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:24.880
<v Speaker 2>just tap it in. Like there's not many other lead

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:28.119
<v Speaker 2>up holes out there. And it's funny that it's the

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 2>three hundred yard path three that might seem to seem

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 2>that way. I mean, they might play at three hundred

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 2>every time. Three hundreds are long part three. I mean,

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 2>I think they'll probably go on the next one up

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 2>a couple of times. But yeah, it is. There's no

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 2>other letups. Really, seventeen kind of feels like a let

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 2>up maybe, but the job is seventeen is it's a

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 2>narrow iron shot to hit the fairway and that's one

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:52.200
<v Speaker 2>of the scariest wedges in the world with no water.

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:56.360
<v Speaker 2>That wed shot into seventeen. So you can go really

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 2>wrong on seventeen. You can make seven or eight on

0:21:58.680 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 2>seventeen if you get it wrong.

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>You know that's to my own herd. But I just

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 1>drove the green. You know, it's easy. You hit it

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 1>on the green, then you two pot and you get

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:07.640
<v Speaker 1>out of there.

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 3>You know, simple way to let the scorecard. As USG

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 3>I written on the top of it.

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll never go back, just so I can hold on

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to that up easy, easiest you know hole though out there,

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>what were the scariest What did you feel like? We're

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the you know, one to three scariest shots out there,

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>like the particular nitty gritty this shot I still think about.

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, the first green, the second shot of the first

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:44.360
<v Speaker 2>is a little I was. It's not scary because it's

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 2>not that long a shot, but it's just how am

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 2>I going to make this? How am I going to

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 2>hit this green? Because it's just so severe sort of

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 2>front right to back left, How am I going to

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 2>do this? It wasn't that scary because if you just

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:58.200
<v Speaker 2>miss it over the back, you've you've got some You

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 2>can chip it reasonably close as you're coming back up

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 2>the hill. The third I found a very scary hole

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 2>in I think there's rough over the back of the

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 2>green this year, but when in seven, definitely it was

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:13.239
<v Speaker 2>shaved all the way down on the back. So it

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:17.119
<v Speaker 2>was either it felt like you're either short and running

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:19.200
<v Speaker 2>off the front or long and running over the back.

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 2>Like it didn't you didn't see a whole lot of

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 2>green there. You can't see a lot of that green

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 2>from the fairway anyway, it's.

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Kind of a shinnercock shot.

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's very repellent, it's very sort of pinehursty. Yeah,

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 2>it's a shinnecock hole exactly.

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 1>You're just playing straight up from a noun even lie

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:41.399
<v Speaker 1>to something that just sheds in all directions, right. I

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:45.119
<v Speaker 1>feel like that's shinnakock in that middle stretch of halls.

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 2>And it felt like it feels like you don't You

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 2>can land it and hit it on the green, but

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:52.400
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't feel like you've got a very big area

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 2>to have it end up in a good spot, and

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 2>if you missed that spot, it's going to be in

0:23:55.119 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 2>a really really bad spot. Four or five, seven, eight, nine.

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Nine's a pretty scary tea shot. I think totally blind,

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:11.360
<v Speaker 2>you can't see anything, and you want to go left

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 2>because you don't want to be in.

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 3>The fairy bunkers.

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 2>But left has got one of those ditches that's just

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 2>you might never get out of and you're never really

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 2>sure or even though you've got your lines in your

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 2>book and you kind of know. I found nine are

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:24.400
<v Speaker 2>really scary te shot.

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>The ditches are such a unique aspect because I feel

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:32.159
<v Speaker 1>like they're in. They're always in the places that you

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of want to bail a side, and then you're like, oh, wait,

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that's actually worse than the bunker.

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:40.679
<v Speaker 2>Well it could be. It's definitely worse than a bunker.

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean you could you could have ten swings, you

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 2>could hurt your risk getting out of that.

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:46.160
<v Speaker 3>Stuff could be unsafe for rough in there.

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:52.879
<v Speaker 2>Nine. I think sixteens are really tough shot. Sixteens are

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 2>really scary. Part three. It's even longer this time than

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:57.919
<v Speaker 2>when I played it. I think it's back to two

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:00.159
<v Speaker 2>fifty or something now, which is these past three? Is

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:04.159
<v Speaker 2>it getting pretty long? Insane? Yeah, Aan's a scary TA

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:06.160
<v Speaker 2>shot to atane is a tough TAA shot.

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would echo those. Those are like it's kind

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>of where you it comes and go, like you feel

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>like you kind of have to take advantage of, like

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 1>in that like four or five six area of the

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 1>golf course. Then seven, eight, nine is really hard, and

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 1>then you kind of go on the back and it's

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:27.439
<v Speaker 1>like can I get something going early or at the

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:29.399
<v Speaker 1>end of the back nine? Can I get a sneak

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>one at seventeen? It's a it's it kind of comes

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:33.919
<v Speaker 1>and goes in waves.

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Like.

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>One of the things I like about the golf course,

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and we'll get somewhere else other than the golf course soon,

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:43.679
<v Speaker 1>is that it does have like it's really hard, but

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:47.119
<v Speaker 1>there are they have the scorable there's a lot of

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:50.880
<v Speaker 1>short par fours, like sub four hundred. When you start

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>to add them up.

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 2>It's very doable. I mean, like I said, I think

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 2>that's why somehow, somehow we all we tolerate it, because

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:03.400
<v Speaker 2>it's very doable. Like there's birdies everywhere in Oakmont. It's

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:06.439
<v Speaker 2>just the fear is the carnage if you get it wrong,

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 2>I think. I mean, there's a lot of hard holes

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 2>that are just really hard to make in the world

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 2>of golf, that are just really hard to make a

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 2>birdie or a par. But if you don't, you just

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:16.399
<v Speaker 2>make a five and you're bogie or something, and you

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 2>just go on Oakmont. You could be there all day

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 2>on some of those greens. If you get it wrong

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 2>and you get the wrong spot, I mean, you're just

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 2>across the other side and now you're in rough on

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 2>the other side, and now you could like it can

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 2>be your mistakes are magnified so much that that's the

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 2>fear like you say, I mean two two is a

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 2>pretty straightforward four iron pitch, but if you get it

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:42.720
<v Speaker 2>wrong on that green, like you could be there for

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:45.399
<v Speaker 2>a while. You know, Like four is a pretty easy

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 2>part five if you drive it on the fairway. But

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:50.120
<v Speaker 2>if you drive it in the church pews. Now you're

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 2>third shots from three thirty, you know, because you've got

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 2>to go sideways and then you're going to go for

0:26:56.400 --> 0:26:57.640
<v Speaker 2>it too much and you're going to hit. You could

0:26:57.680 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 2>hit it in one of the ditches or like it's

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 2>it's the miss. It's the penalty when you miss at Ogmont,

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 2>that's the hard part. If you hit great shots, you

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 2>can bury every hale. Probably I would.

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:12.919
<v Speaker 1>Say that, you know, it's like even like what you're saying.

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>When I played twelve, I hit a great drive and

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I had a hybrid in and I hit like I thought,

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, you look at everything is just screaming left

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:25.959
<v Speaker 1>to right, and I'm just like, okay, just get this,

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 1>like just land it short left. It's gonna hum down there.

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 1>And I just pulled it five yards and then I'm

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 1>in this like thick ruff and the green. I'm looking

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:38.399
<v Speaker 1>at this green, I'm like, I don't think I can

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:40.439
<v Speaker 1>hold the green, Like, I'm not going to hit it

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 1>in two. I just hit two really good shots, and

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to hit the green in regulation on

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:48.440
<v Speaker 1>this par five because I'm in the worst spot possible.

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Because to hit the good shot, to hit the great shot,

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the might yield and eagle, I also have to contend

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:58.439
<v Speaker 1>the line is so narrow. It's your adage of like

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 1>would tennis be interesting if you just hit the ball

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>down the middle? Like one of the things about Oakbant

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Lake tennis is like where you need to get to

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>on certain holes to really have a chance to score

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 1>is on the line. And like twelve is a perfect example.

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 1>You have to deal with that left rough on the

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 1>second shot in order to get the reward of an

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 1>eagle put on it. And then if you get hung

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:26.360
<v Speaker 1>up in the left rough, you're like, Okay, I don't

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>know if I can hold this green.

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean twelve is the best example.

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 2>Like you to make eagle, you have to land it

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 2>in the left edge of the fairway, very short of

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 2>the green. Yes, to hope it hangs on in a

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 2>good spot. But if you like you say, you miss

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:44.239
<v Speaker 2>it two yards to the left. Now you can't get

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 2>your third shot on the green, and now you start thinking, well,

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 2>how do I get my third shot to a place

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 2>where I can hopefully make PA. So you've gone from

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 2>pulling at a yard or two maybe making an eagle,

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:00.680
<v Speaker 2>to like, how do I make PA? That's just that

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 2>sums up Okemond, Like that's like you said you went

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 2>to the seventeenth green. You go for the seventeenth green.

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 2>That's great if you pull it too through or three yards.

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 2>Now it's hard to get it on the green from

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 2>ten yards away because the rough is so long and thick,

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 2>and it's the opportunities are there, but the only way.

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 2>And it's so that's why it's so interesting. I guess,

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I guess it's sort of it hallmarks to

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 2>like the great courses. Is that the great lines like

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 2>third end at the Masters. It's like you've just got

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 2>to hug the creek to really maximize your chance to

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 2>do it. You've got to hug the trouble, like you've

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 2>got to take on the risk to get the reward.

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 3>But if you fail, like you just get annihilated.

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 1>What do you I think a big topic of the

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the week is going to be score, and

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it's so conditioned dependent. I looked at the

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 1>weather today. I didn't like what I saw I saw.

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I saw a decent amount of rain in the forecast.

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I think as of yesterday there wasn't a lot of

0:29:57.160 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 1>rain in the forecast. So these things change. What would

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you say if we get it? We'll say a soft

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Oakmont versus a firm Oakmont? What would be your your

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 1>just general gas un score?

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 3>So O seven was what five over? Sixteen was? Under right?

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean DJ was? I think six under right with

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 1>a penalty with which I don't know.

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, look, i'd probably say soft. A few under,

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, single digits, single digits under. I think soft.

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 2>It's still crazy hard, but you can fly it on greens.

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 2>You can fly it on the first and hold it.

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 2>You can fly it on ten and hold it. Like

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 2>shots into the third are going to be easier because

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 2>you're going to be able to hold it. It's not

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 2>going to get crazy soft Oakmond. I mean those greens

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 2>are pretty firm. It's gonna take a lot of rain

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 2>to make them soft. But if it's firm, way over

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 2>par I would say, I mean, it's just too hard

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 2>to hit it. On greens when it's firm, because you

0:30:57.360 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 2>have to be landing them short. And then the firmer

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 2>it is, the more the slope, the whole general pitch

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:06.480
<v Speaker 2>of the place comes into play, and like gravity just wins.

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, you can't beat it. When it's firm out there,

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:10.719
<v Speaker 2>you can't hit some of the greens. You just can't hit.

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 1>That's I got a message from a couple players who

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 1>played it recently, and they I sat on a podcast,

0:31:21.560 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I thought, like the new par for US opens is

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 1>four under, and it's like, that's the level par. It's

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 1>four under. And they said that I was crazy and

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 1>that it's going to be over par if it plays

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the way it's been playing recently. But I also believe

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that they all don't realize how good they are, you know.

0:31:42.200 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you never know, people follow the leader to

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 2>a little bit. Like I think sometimes in these tournaments

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 2>if the leaderboard, if someone gets off to a good

0:31:51.280 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 2>start makes a few birdies, it makes everybody else think

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 2>they can do the same thing, and everyone kind of follows,

0:31:56.640 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 2>you know. I think sometimes the score under par is

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:04.400
<v Speaker 2>almost a reflection of like the best players in the field,

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 2>and people just follow a little bit you know, like

0:32:07.040 --> 0:32:09.760
<v Speaker 2>if Thursday morning, if everyone's watching who's playing in the

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 2>afternoon and it's carnage and not everybody's over par and

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 2>there's triples and doubles, everyone gets scared going out there.

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 2>They play the course differently than if someone's going out

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 2>and shot six under, you know, Like so it's the

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 2>most impossible. It's a fun game to pick to play,

0:32:26.080 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 2>like who's going to what the score is going to be,

0:32:27.840 --> 0:32:28.880
<v Speaker 2>but you can never get it right.

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 1>The other thing that happens is like if a player

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 1>goes out and they get deep, there's like then like

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 1>a restrict plate that goes on you. Whether it's like

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 1>there's like a mental thing, you know, you can't just

0:32:40.800 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 1>keep going. Uh, It's like you get kind of stuck

0:32:44.880 --> 0:32:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and then people catch up to you. You know, it

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 1>becomes more about like not losing the lead then continuing

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to add to the lead. And it's like one of

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 1>those weird things with golf where it's just like really

0:32:56.160 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 1>hard to stay in the moment and keep going.

0:32:58.720 --> 0:33:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Absolutely, I mean that's it's also unique about Tiger

0:33:01.240 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 2>and guys who go and win by fifteen shots. It's

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 2>like he's not the rest of the field he isn't relevant,

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, he's just scoring the score that he would

0:33:08.400 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 2>shoot whether anyone was there or not. You definitely get

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 2>influenced by what other people are doing, you know, Like

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, even just in your own group. If the

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 2>guy you're playing with lands a ball where you wanted

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 2>to land and it bounces over into a bunker that

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 2>looks dead, you're going to hit a different shot.

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, you just are.

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 2>You know. So maybe you end up scoring better because

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:30.680
<v Speaker 2>the go in front of you showed you that you

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 2>can't do that, you know, But maybe you go worse

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 2>because now you're scared and now you put it a

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 2>bad swing on it. Mean, I don't know. Everything gets

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 2>affected by everything else. Right, It's look, if it's firm,

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:43.760
<v Speaker 2>I can't see anyone breaking part. But if it's soft,

0:33:43.840 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 2>someone will. I would say, these guys that like you say,

0:33:46.200 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 2>they're really good.

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 1>It's funny you bring this up. I never thought about that.

0:33:50.040 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 1>With golf, is like the idea of like what other

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:56.520
<v Speaker 1>people do in your group, your fellow competitors, how they influence,

0:33:56.720 --> 0:34:00.240
<v Speaker 1>like how you make decisions, like even like club time

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:03.480
<v Speaker 1>par threes, Right, it's like, oh, he hit that and

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 1>it went over but it's like you could be thinking

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 1>of a completely different shot in your head and then

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you go down a club and then you end up short.

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:09.640
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:34:10.320 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean it all like you play with better

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:15.319
<v Speaker 2>players and you end up hitting better shots because you

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 2>see a shot that maybe you didn't see, you know,

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 2>and you can definitely get dragged down like we've seen it.

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:21.720
<v Speaker 2>You see it forever.

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Like bad vibe groups.

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:25.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you get bad vibe groups and everyone gets dragged down.

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean you see the match plays the most obvious.

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:29.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, match plays a different sort of game, but

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:32.960
<v Speaker 2>the scores that people shoot relative to power match players

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:35.919
<v Speaker 2>just outrageous. I mean people go nine, ten, eleven, twelve under.

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:39.319
<v Speaker 2>They chip in from everywhere because they have to. You know,

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 2>the guy they're playing against just birdying the hole. I

0:34:41.640 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 2>just have to find a way to make a burdie.

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:48.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, people definitely get affected by everyone else, and

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:50.239
<v Speaker 2>they're going to be affected at Oakmont just by the

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 2>history of it. They're all going to be scared before

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 2>they start. The practice rounds are going to beat them up.

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 2>They're all going to be on the first two going,

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:56.800
<v Speaker 2>how am I going to get round here for four rounds?

0:34:56.880 --> 0:34:58.440
<v Speaker 2>Like it's.

0:34:59.800 --> 0:35:01.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you get affected by everything.

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:05.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a that's a great point you brought up. And

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 1>it's like the Masters. There is an extra weight when

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you make the turn on Sunday or you have t

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 1>off on Thursday. There's an extra weight of winning the

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Masters because of the history of Masters. When you look

0:35:19.520 --> 0:35:22.239
<v Speaker 1>at when you look at Oakmont and people that have

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:27.480
<v Speaker 1>won championships there, Jean Saraz and Bobby Jones, Ben Hogan,

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Jack Nicholas, Johnny Miller, Ernie Els. You know, DJ, winning

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a winning a US Open at Oakmont is a different

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 1>pelt than winning a US Open at a lot of

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 1>other places, you know, in a lot of great places.

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:46.120
<v Speaker 1>You could, you know, compare it to I'm a huge

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:48.799
<v Speaker 1>LA c C fan, but like winning a US Open

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:51.840
<v Speaker 1>at Oakmont is not winning a US Open at L

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:54.040
<v Speaker 1>A c C or even Pineer's number two at this

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:55.880
<v Speaker 1>point for sure.

0:35:56.120 --> 0:35:59.839
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's a bit like Mialfield in the Open Road.

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:03.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean that's just produced like number one in Nicholas

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:05.359
<v Speaker 2>and number one in the world Ernie Els and Nick

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:08.640
<v Speaker 2>Faldo and I just you're right. I mean, it's it

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't be US Open to US Open. I mean, luckily

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:16.560
<v Speaker 2>wingfoot is places. I got a pretty good one. You

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:21.240
<v Speaker 2>didn't get cheam Er Spey, No, you take any us open.

0:36:21.520 --> 0:36:22.120
<v Speaker 3>But you're right.

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:26.319
<v Speaker 2>It looks different, and it's different because you feel the history,

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:28.319
<v Speaker 2>especially at Okenmand. I'm sure you went in the locker room.

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's a pretty amazing clubhouse and it's a

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:33.239
<v Speaker 2>cool locker room, one of those original locker rooms with

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:37.560
<v Speaker 2>spike marks on the seats, and you feel it when

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:39.440
<v Speaker 2>you're at a place like that. It definitely adds to it.

0:36:39.800 --> 0:36:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Did you see in the lockers how they have the

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:47.680
<v Speaker 1>little booze compartment from the prohibition where there's like a

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:50.240
<v Speaker 1>little compartment that you can fit two bottles of booze

0:36:50.280 --> 0:36:52.200
<v Speaker 1>in the lockers and when they build new ones they

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:55.040
<v Speaker 1>build it into it.

0:36:55.200 --> 0:36:57.239
<v Speaker 2>Like the more you learn about this prohibition is that

0:36:57.239 --> 0:37:00.920
<v Speaker 2>booze was banned, but everyone still was drinking, right like

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 2>in the golf court with little stash, a little stash

0:37:04.040 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 2>in your luck at a KP. Bow's like no, that

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 2>sort of stuff's s amizing.

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:14.600
<v Speaker 1>This tournament, I think is the dominant headline beyond the

0:37:14.719 --> 0:37:18.160
<v Speaker 1>course is going to be the big players in golf.

0:37:18.239 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a it's an interesting time. Obviously, we

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:24.279
<v Speaker 1>always have like our big whatever number, and this is

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 1>always the story. But it feels like we've got like

0:37:27.040 --> 0:37:29.360
<v Speaker 1>a class a player that's starting to separate itself with

0:37:29.480 --> 0:37:32.439
<v Speaker 1>Scotty obviously, who's playing some of the best golf we've

0:37:32.480 --> 0:37:38.520
<v Speaker 1>ever seen, Rory McElroy, Xanderschoffley Bryson, and John Rahm in

0:37:38.600 --> 0:37:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the last kind of two years of major championships. What

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:45.719
<v Speaker 1>I think is actually fascinating is you start to look

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 1>at it and there's like a question of who's the

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:52.880
<v Speaker 1>best US Open player of this era. So you have Bryson,

0:37:52.920 --> 0:37:55.040
<v Speaker 1>who has two wins, but outside of his two wins,

0:37:55.080 --> 0:37:57.560
<v Speaker 1>he has no top tens. Outside of those two wins,

0:37:58.239 --> 0:38:02.279
<v Speaker 1>you have Scotty, who you know, obviously since he's term

0:38:02.400 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 1>pro when he's been in his like formative three years,

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 1>he's got he's got a second, a third, and a seventh,

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and then last year's US Opening wasn't very good. Rory

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:14.920
<v Speaker 1>has one US Open win, but since twenty nineteen he's

0:38:14.960 --> 0:38:18.280
<v Speaker 1>gone T nine, T eight, T seven, T five, second second.

0:38:19.160 --> 0:38:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Xander has three top fives, seven top tens, and eight starts.

0:38:24.440 --> 0:38:28.520
<v Speaker 1>His worst finish is fourteenth, which is absolutely mind boggling

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:33.800
<v Speaker 1>eight US Opens and you finished no worth worse than fourteenth.

0:38:33.880 --> 0:38:37.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a crazy stat. And then you've got You've got

0:38:37.520 --> 0:38:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Brooks with his two wins. It's an amazing run. And

0:38:39.920 --> 0:38:42.759
<v Speaker 1>the question is is it over? Are we passed it?

0:38:43.880 --> 0:38:46.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, we like to, we like to, you like

0:38:46.440 --> 0:38:48.759
<v Speaker 1>to go early on putting forks in people here. But

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and then you got rom first of Tory, t third

0:38:54.000 --> 0:38:56.560
<v Speaker 1>third at Pebble, t ten at LA no worse than

0:38:56.600 --> 0:38:59.799
<v Speaker 1>twenty third place finished since twenty nineteen. So it's like

0:38:59.840 --> 0:39:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the guys like they are the best players in the world.

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:06.560
<v Speaker 1>And it feels like in the last five years of

0:39:06.600 --> 0:39:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the u US Open, these have these are the guys

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:11.719
<v Speaker 1>that have been the main actors and that's pretty much it.

0:39:13.480 --> 0:39:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well those stats are pretty telling. I mean, what

0:39:18.520 --> 0:39:20.800
<v Speaker 2>do you say, They're just good players, like you're right,

0:39:20.840 --> 0:39:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Like we you the Targer era, we had Targer and

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:26.960
<v Speaker 2>there was a few others, you know, feel out he's

0:39:27.000 --> 0:39:29.719
<v Speaker 2>run and he had his run. A few others would

0:39:29.760 --> 0:39:32.080
<v Speaker 2>pop up here and there. But there does seem to

0:39:32.080 --> 0:39:37.160
<v Speaker 2>be five or six that seem to be that always

0:39:37.239 --> 0:39:40.320
<v Speaker 2>show up in these big tournaments. I mean, Xander always

0:39:40.320 --> 0:39:41.960
<v Speaker 2>shows up I mean, I mean, I don't know what

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Marco's US Open record is, but like he's sort of

0:39:45.120 --> 0:39:48.360
<v Speaker 2>he's had an amazing major record the last couple of years.

0:39:48.560 --> 0:39:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the one other player that you could

0:39:50.640 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 1>put into this group that like you could be like, okay,

0:39:54.080 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 1>that's that's another player in this group. But it's interesting.

0:39:58.040 --> 0:40:00.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, he has one to ternament in three years,

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:01.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, basically.

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Which is interesting. Yeah, I mean, I think j T

0:40:05.960 --> 0:40:08.879
<v Speaker 2>will probably do well too. But like, these guys are

0:40:08.920 --> 0:40:11.000
<v Speaker 2>just good. I mean, the level that Chefler's playing is

0:40:11.000 --> 0:40:14.240
<v Speaker 2>a level almost that we haven't seen. I mean, Tiger

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:17.239
<v Speaker 2>was Tiger, and it's a they're a different sort of

0:40:17.320 --> 0:40:22.920
<v Speaker 2>great player. But Shecheffler just it's so peaceful and calm

0:40:23.000 --> 0:40:25.839
<v Speaker 2>and stress free. How he wins tournaments. It's like even

0:40:25.880 --> 0:40:28.239
<v Speaker 2>Tigers seemed to be there was more drama. That doesn't

0:40:28.280 --> 0:40:33.600
<v Speaker 2>seem to be drama when Chefler plays. You know, his

0:40:33.760 --> 0:40:38.759
<v Speaker 2>ball striking is just beyond deleite, and his headspace is

0:40:38.800 --> 0:40:39.960
<v Speaker 2>like I've never seen anything like.

0:40:39.960 --> 0:40:40.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, maybe Jack.

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:42.280
<v Speaker 2>I never saw Jack in his prime, but it seems

0:40:42.360 --> 0:40:45.319
<v Speaker 2>like very Jack, like very workman like not getting carried away,

0:40:45.480 --> 0:40:47.480
<v Speaker 2>just hitting good shots and just wearing the field out,

0:40:47.600 --> 0:40:49.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, and then all of a sudden on Saturday,

0:40:49.800 --> 0:40:51.480
<v Speaker 2>whether Chefler's been on the leader board or not, all

0:40:51.480 --> 0:40:53.200
<v Speaker 2>of a sudden Saturday afternoon, all of a sudden, there

0:40:53.200 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 2>he is.

0:40:53.640 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, Xander.

0:40:57.160 --> 0:40:59.480
<v Speaker 2>We haven't seen Xander play this year like he did

0:40:59.560 --> 0:41:02.600
<v Speaker 2>last year, but it can't be far away, you know,

0:41:02.719 --> 0:41:07.919
<v Speaker 2>like it's he's just that one one roundaway, almost from saying,

0:41:07.920 --> 0:41:10.160
<v Speaker 2>oh okay, I remember, this is it.

0:41:10.280 --> 0:41:14.359
<v Speaker 3>You know it's going to take. It's going to take.

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:18.239
<v Speaker 2>You would expect out of that list, you would would

0:41:18.280 --> 0:41:19.560
<v Speaker 2>you take the field or that list?

0:41:19.920 --> 0:41:23.160
<v Speaker 1>And this is where I feel like I've started to

0:41:23.160 --> 0:41:26.880
<v Speaker 1>get and I felt this way at at the PGA,

0:41:27.960 --> 0:41:30.080
<v Speaker 1>is that I've started to get to the point where

0:41:30.080 --> 0:41:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't look at the leader board. I look to

0:41:32.680 --> 0:41:35.279
<v Speaker 1>see where one of those names is at after round

0:41:35.320 --> 0:41:38.280
<v Speaker 1>one and the first one I hit, I'm like that

0:41:38.280 --> 0:41:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that's the leader in the golf tournament right now. And

0:41:41.160 --> 0:41:44.839
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a wild I hadn't. I don't think we've

0:41:44.880 --> 0:41:48.960
<v Speaker 1>been at this type of place in golf where it

0:41:48.960 --> 0:41:51.600
<v Speaker 1>feels like one of those names is going to win.

0:41:52.560 --> 0:41:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I would be almost shocked if if it doesn't come

0:41:55.600 --> 0:41:58.760
<v Speaker 1>from one of those names, So I would take those names.

0:41:59.000 --> 0:42:01.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Kyile Hollowe very like that one.

0:42:01.600 --> 0:42:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Like that.

0:42:02.200 --> 0:42:04.920
<v Speaker 2>The lady board didn't really it was kind of a

0:42:04.960 --> 0:42:07.279
<v Speaker 2>bit odd, and we didn't it didn't take shape, and

0:42:07.280 --> 0:42:09.840
<v Speaker 2>then all of a sudden, Scottie berties what for the

0:42:09.880 --> 0:42:11.799
<v Speaker 2>last five on Saturday and it's like, okay, this later

0:42:11.800 --> 0:42:14.200
<v Speaker 2>would makes sense now, you know. But it took until

0:42:14.200 --> 0:42:15.759
<v Speaker 2>the end of the day Saturday for it to look

0:42:15.880 --> 0:42:19.080
<v Speaker 2>like what it was going to look like.

0:42:19.520 --> 0:42:23.359
<v Speaker 1>And the only other person on Saturday and Sunday that

0:42:23.440 --> 0:42:25.759
<v Speaker 1>you felt like we're going to win was like You're like, oh,

0:42:25.800 --> 0:42:28.839
<v Speaker 1>Bryson might win. And then on Sunday it was like, oh,

0:42:28.960 --> 0:42:32.360
<v Speaker 1>John Rom's gonna steal in this tournament. And it's like,

0:42:32.920 --> 0:42:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that's the kind of weird situation. And after round one

0:42:38.400 --> 0:42:41.439
<v Speaker 1>on our other podcast, I said, Sky Scheffler's leading at too.

0:42:41.800 --> 0:42:44.880
<v Speaker 1>That's the leader of the golf tournament right now. And

0:42:44.920 --> 0:42:47.799
<v Speaker 1>it's become this like leaderboard where you look at the

0:42:47.880 --> 0:42:51.759
<v Speaker 1>leaderboard and you kind of find the functional leader, not

0:42:51.960 --> 0:42:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the one that's actually at the top of the board.

0:42:56.360 --> 0:42:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, look, these hot these tournaments are really hard.

0:42:59.360 --> 0:43:01.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's more of a belief thing, and I

0:43:01.200 --> 0:43:04.879
<v Speaker 2>mean you look, it's a it's a headspace belief thing

0:43:05.000 --> 0:43:06.680
<v Speaker 2>that they know they're going to be there at the

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:11.560
<v Speaker 2>end because they always do it. They just it's almost

0:43:11.560 --> 0:43:13.480
<v Speaker 2>an expectation. It's like, well, I'll be top ten this

0:43:13.520 --> 0:43:15.600
<v Speaker 2>week because that's what I do when I play a major,

0:43:15.719 --> 0:43:17.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, so it almost doesn't matter how it's like

0:43:17.480 --> 0:43:20.880
<v Speaker 2>Rory how much how often does Rory not be in

0:43:20.920 --> 0:43:22.200
<v Speaker 2>a major? And then at the end you look and

0:43:22.239 --> 0:43:25.080
<v Speaker 2>he was fourth, you know, like it's he does it

0:43:25.080 --> 0:43:26.680
<v Speaker 2>all the time because it's just in his head. Well,

0:43:26.680 --> 0:43:28.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm a guy who finishes top five in majors, like

0:43:29.719 --> 0:43:33.000
<v Speaker 2>it's a at some point, I mean, look, windhom Clark

0:43:33.040 --> 0:43:37.200
<v Speaker 2>wins like people win for the first time, you know,

0:43:37.280 --> 0:43:39.319
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Xander was that guy and then he hadn't won,

0:43:39.400 --> 0:43:40.880
<v Speaker 2>and now he's won two and all of a sudden

0:43:40.960 --> 0:43:43.360
<v Speaker 2>he's like, well, for sure, Xander can win. But before

0:43:43.360 --> 0:43:45.080
<v Speaker 2>that we were thinking, was Anda cant when someone's going

0:43:45.120 --> 0:43:46.080
<v Speaker 2>to win for the first time?

0:43:46.600 --> 0:43:49.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, maybe at Oakmont. But you're right, it's a very.

0:43:51.600 --> 0:43:58.879
<v Speaker 2>Sunday the Sunday, the finishing results feel very predictable at

0:43:58.880 --> 0:44:02.400
<v Speaker 2>the moment necessarily exact winner. But like you say, like

0:44:02.440 --> 0:44:04.040
<v Speaker 2>six of the top ten seems to be like, well

0:44:04.239 --> 0:44:05.960
<v Speaker 2>they were always six, those six are always in the

0:44:05.960 --> 0:44:08.359
<v Speaker 2>top ten. Like it does seem like that a lot

0:44:08.440 --> 0:44:10.520
<v Speaker 2>the last couple of years, And.

0:44:10.600 --> 0:44:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what it is. I think I think

0:44:13.239 --> 0:44:18.640
<v Speaker 1>it might be just like how all around talented these

0:44:18.680 --> 0:44:22.960
<v Speaker 1>players are. Where you start to look at like, I

0:44:23.000 --> 0:44:25.600
<v Speaker 1>mean you just at this point with Scotty, it's like

0:44:26.120 --> 0:44:28.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're playing against Scotty, it's like I think you

0:44:28.560 --> 0:44:32.560
<v Speaker 1>have to like pray for poor putting, pray that he

0:44:32.760 --> 0:44:36.080
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't make putts in a day because everything else

0:44:36.160 --> 0:44:39.040
<v Speaker 1>is such a high level, you know, Rory, it's I

0:44:39.040 --> 0:44:41.040
<v Speaker 1>hope he doesn't have his a game with his driver,

0:44:41.840 --> 0:44:44.040
<v Speaker 1>you know. But like you start to look at the

0:44:44.080 --> 0:44:46.600
<v Speaker 1>well roundedness as Xander last year when he was cooking

0:44:46.719 --> 0:44:50.400
<v Speaker 1>was effectively same recipe as Scotty. Exceptional at everything in

0:44:50.440 --> 0:44:53.279
<v Speaker 1>the game. You know, rom when he's going, he's exceptional

0:44:53.640 --> 0:44:57.120
<v Speaker 1>at everything. And it's when you think about, like how

0:44:57.160 --> 0:45:01.040
<v Speaker 1>does someone else win, It's, well, he has an above

0:45:01.120 --> 0:45:06.440
<v Speaker 1>average week with one of his slightly deficient clubs, and

0:45:06.520 --> 0:45:10.719
<v Speaker 1>everything else is cooking, you know, where these guys, they're

0:45:10.760 --> 0:45:14.160
<v Speaker 1>so good at everything that they can have slightly below

0:45:14.200 --> 0:45:16.680
<v Speaker 1>average weeks and still be in the mix and have

0:45:16.760 --> 0:45:17.600
<v Speaker 1>a good week and win.

0:45:19.239 --> 0:45:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Oh yeah. I mean, I don't know, Like you

0:45:23.880 --> 0:45:26.080
<v Speaker 2>just it comes down to belief, I think, more than

0:45:26.120 --> 0:45:29.200
<v Speaker 2>anything else, and you've got to kind of do it

0:45:29.560 --> 0:45:31.640
<v Speaker 2>to get the belief. But it's a leap of faith

0:45:31.719 --> 0:45:34.640
<v Speaker 2>there between where you're at and the result, where you've

0:45:34.640 --> 0:45:38.480
<v Speaker 2>got to sort of think I can do it. I

0:45:38.520 --> 0:45:41.680
<v Speaker 2>don't know. These torments are hard, they're very mentally challenging,

0:45:41.719 --> 0:45:44.000
<v Speaker 2>these tournaments from the first two onwards, not just the

0:45:44.000 --> 0:45:48.160
<v Speaker 2>physical test, but mentally. A lot of people can't see

0:45:48.160 --> 0:45:50.800
<v Speaker 2>their name on the top of a on a major

0:45:50.840 --> 0:45:52.359
<v Speaker 2>trophy before they've got it there.

0:45:52.440 --> 0:45:56.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, what's it like when you think back to

0:45:56.920 --> 0:45:59.719
<v Speaker 1>like coming down the stretch when you haven't done it,

0:46:01.160 --> 0:46:03.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to get it done in a meter.

0:46:03.640 --> 0:46:05.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, mine was kind of weird. Mine was kind of

0:46:05.880 --> 0:46:10.360
<v Speaker 2>weird the way it finished. There was lots of guys

0:46:10.400 --> 0:46:12.719
<v Speaker 2>with a chance, and I just ended up. I ended

0:46:12.760 --> 0:46:20.160
<v Speaker 2>up the good one in the end. But I just

0:46:20.280 --> 0:46:22.279
<v Speaker 2>I think it's I mean, I don't know, I don't know.

0:46:22.480 --> 0:46:26.640
<v Speaker 2>It's a headspace It's one of those intangibles that you

0:46:26.680 --> 0:46:30.000
<v Speaker 2>can tell when you the first time I ever played

0:46:30.000 --> 0:46:32.320
<v Speaker 2>with Brooks, I don't know, first year on tour or

0:46:32.360 --> 0:46:34.960
<v Speaker 2>something back in somewhere or wherever we were, are you

0:46:35.120 --> 0:46:36.839
<v Speaker 2>just like, yeah, this guy knows he can do it.

0:46:36.960 --> 0:46:40.040
<v Speaker 2>You could just tell whatever that is. You know, first

0:46:40.080 --> 0:46:41.960
<v Speaker 2>time you play with Speeth, it's like, yeah, there's something

0:46:41.960 --> 0:46:45.000
<v Speaker 2>about this kid, like he knows, you know, Whereas there's

0:46:45.040 --> 0:46:48.799
<v Speaker 2>others who don't miss a shot. Lots of others who

0:46:48.800 --> 0:46:50.360
<v Speaker 2>don't miss a shot and do everything really well, and

0:46:50.400 --> 0:46:51.799
<v Speaker 2>you just look at them and go, yeah, you don't

0:46:51.800 --> 0:46:53.759
<v Speaker 2>really believe, do you. I don't know what it is,

0:46:53.920 --> 0:46:56.200
<v Speaker 2>and I don't know where it comes from, and I

0:46:56.200 --> 0:46:58.600
<v Speaker 2>don't know whether you can can you get it if

0:46:58.600 --> 0:47:02.080
<v Speaker 2>you don't have it, I don't know. Maybe it's winning

0:47:02.080 --> 0:47:04.880
<v Speaker 2>a lot when you're a kid, you know. Maybe it's

0:47:06.040 --> 0:47:08.160
<v Speaker 2>getting thrown into the right group, you know, having the

0:47:08.200 --> 0:47:09.920
<v Speaker 2>right week and getting to play with Tiger at the

0:47:10.000 --> 0:47:12.040
<v Speaker 2>right time, or playing with Chefler at the right time,

0:47:12.239 --> 0:47:16.759
<v Speaker 2>or remember, like Mike, we're at Madonna in ninety nine,

0:47:16.800 --> 0:47:19.160
<v Speaker 2>played with Tiger and went for a lot on Sunday

0:47:19.239 --> 0:47:21.000
<v Speaker 2>and then a couple of years later, he wins the Masters,

0:47:21.040 --> 0:47:22.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, because he gets belief out he didn't have

0:47:22.680 --> 0:47:24.080
<v Speaker 2>very good day, but he gets belief out of that.

0:47:24.080 --> 0:47:27.440
<v Speaker 2>We've seen that story a lot, Like maybe you can

0:47:27.520 --> 0:47:29.400
<v Speaker 2>learn it, or maybe it's just what these guys have

0:47:30.080 --> 0:47:32.319
<v Speaker 2>sort of cultivated over their junior career. I know, you

0:47:32.320 --> 0:47:33.880
<v Speaker 2>play with j T. The first time you play with

0:47:33.920 --> 0:47:35.759
<v Speaker 2>JT's like j or this guy knows he can do it,

0:47:36.000 --> 0:47:38.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, Like, I don't know, it's just it's in

0:47:38.640 --> 0:47:40.200
<v Speaker 2>some guys and it's not in other guys, and I

0:47:40.200 --> 0:47:41.680
<v Speaker 2>don't I don't know what that is. It's a bit

0:47:41.719 --> 0:47:42.480
<v Speaker 2>of an intangible.

0:47:43.360 --> 0:47:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I felt that way with you know, unfortunately, like

0:47:47.440 --> 0:47:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the back's been a huge problem. But Zella Taurus was

0:47:49.880 --> 0:47:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that like you you know, and when you listen to

0:47:52.880 --> 0:47:54.919
<v Speaker 1>him talk, it was like, Oh, this guy thinks he's

0:47:54.920 --> 0:47:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the best of everyone, you know, And I think that's

0:47:58.440 --> 0:48:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a good I think that idea looking at like who's

0:48:01.080 --> 0:48:04.680
<v Speaker 1>won a lot, because if you finish, if you finish

0:48:04.760 --> 0:48:06.799
<v Speaker 1>tenth a lot, there's a reason you finished tenth a lot,

0:48:06.880 --> 0:48:07.799
<v Speaker 1>but not you know.

0:48:09.040 --> 0:48:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And it's also there's like, I mean, Brooks is

0:48:11.600 --> 0:48:14.360
<v Speaker 2>the interest Like you mentioned Brooks Brooks and Ram especially,

0:48:14.440 --> 0:48:18.560
<v Speaker 2>they win against great fields. It's almost like they need

0:48:18.600 --> 0:48:21.520
<v Speaker 2>that rise. They need what Okay, now all the studs

0:48:21.520 --> 0:48:23.640
<v Speaker 2>are here. Now I'm going to show you that I'm

0:48:23.680 --> 0:48:26.520
<v Speaker 2>the alpha, you know. Like It's whereas if it's just

0:48:26.600 --> 0:48:30.680
<v Speaker 2>in a middling tournament in the middle of the year,

0:48:30.760 --> 0:48:32.480
<v Speaker 2>they're just a normal golfer. But you get into the

0:48:32.560 --> 0:48:33.920
<v Speaker 2>US Open, and all of a sudden, they're the best

0:48:33.960 --> 0:48:34.640
<v Speaker 2>golf from the field.

0:48:34.640 --> 0:48:37.400
<v Speaker 3>Like I think, and Tiger just won everything. He just

0:48:37.440 --> 0:48:38.760
<v Speaker 3>wanted to win absolutely everything.

0:48:38.800 --> 0:48:42.640
<v Speaker 2>I think everybody's got a different competitive sort of fuel,

0:48:42.880 --> 0:48:45.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, and some guys need need it to be

0:48:45.960 --> 0:48:48.040
<v Speaker 2>the US Open, you know. I think this group that

0:48:48.080 --> 0:48:51.360
<v Speaker 2>you're talking about, Sheffler seems to be able to do

0:48:51.400 --> 0:48:52.120
<v Speaker 2>it every single week.

0:48:52.160 --> 0:48:53.160
<v Speaker 3>But this group you're talking.

0:48:52.960 --> 0:48:55.280
<v Speaker 2>About, the bigger the field and the bigger the event,

0:48:56.160 --> 0:48:59.040
<v Speaker 2>the more they feel like I'm the one who's going

0:48:59.120 --> 0:48:59.960
<v Speaker 2>to be up there at the end.

0:49:00.760 --> 0:49:05.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, how would you rank those their six names,

0:49:05.040 --> 0:49:11.080
<v Speaker 1>so it's it's it's Scottie Bryson, Rory Xander, Ram, Brooks.

0:49:13.000 --> 0:49:16.239
<v Speaker 2>How would you Scotty's got to be number one at

0:49:16.280 --> 0:49:17.239
<v Speaker 2>the moment, right Like.

0:49:18.080 --> 0:49:20.640
<v Speaker 1>In terms of this coming this week for the Oakmart

0:49:20.719 --> 0:49:21.120
<v Speaker 1>So for.

0:49:21.520 --> 0:49:23.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Scotty, for sure one.

0:49:23.920 --> 0:49:28.480
<v Speaker 2>Rory is hard to rank because his best is probably

0:49:28.520 --> 0:49:30.879
<v Speaker 2>the best. His best is probably better than Jeffler's best,

0:49:31.160 --> 0:49:36.640
<v Speaker 2>But Chefler's the same every week, like he's just nuts

0:49:36.680 --> 0:49:39.920
<v Speaker 2>every week. Rory kind of gives us some sort of

0:49:39.960 --> 0:49:43.239
<v Speaker 2>strange ones. So I don't know, Xander, I'd probably have

0:49:43.280 --> 0:49:50.640
<v Speaker 2>to put Bryson two, Rory three, Xander four. Who we

0:49:50.680 --> 0:49:51.480
<v Speaker 2>got left?

0:49:51.800 --> 0:49:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Ram and Brooks?

0:49:54.040 --> 0:49:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Ram and then Brooks probably Now like the I think

0:49:57.920 --> 0:50:01.040
<v Speaker 2>it's is it what we think they're going to play

0:50:01.200 --> 0:50:03.880
<v Speaker 2>or their ceiling? I mean, because I think rams ceiling

0:50:04.080 --> 0:50:09.160
<v Speaker 2>is clearly really high. I think it's higher than most.

0:50:09.440 --> 0:50:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Brooks a ceiling is clearly higher than most, but we

0:50:12.200 --> 0:50:15.279
<v Speaker 2>haven't seen that for four or five years, so you

0:50:15.280 --> 0:50:17.280
<v Speaker 2>can probably almost Brooks has to be down the bottom

0:50:17.280 --> 0:50:17.680
<v Speaker 2>of that list.

0:50:17.800 --> 0:50:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, but if.

0:50:19.360 --> 0:50:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Every one of them, if every one of them plays

0:50:21.320 --> 0:50:23.480
<v Speaker 2>their best, who wins? You know?

0:50:24.160 --> 0:50:28.719
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's like it's interesting, It's like the

0:50:28.760 --> 0:50:33.000
<v Speaker 1>most fascinated question in golf. I think Rory's probably got

0:50:33.000 --> 0:50:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the most, Like he's got an explosiveness about him that

0:50:38.520 --> 0:50:41.400
<v Speaker 1>but like the thing that Scotty does is he just

0:50:41.520 --> 0:50:46.360
<v Speaker 1>he's relentless. I couldn't imagine playing Scotty Shuffler in a

0:50:46.400 --> 0:50:51.520
<v Speaker 1>match in like a match play situation, like just dealing

0:50:51.600 --> 0:50:55.239
<v Speaker 1>with the constant stress that he inflicts on you hall

0:50:55.320 --> 0:50:58.879
<v Speaker 1>after hall, where it feels like you probably can never

0:50:59.000 --> 0:51:02.000
<v Speaker 1>hit a shot that's better than his, you know.

0:51:02.840 --> 0:51:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, and he just won Quail Hollow playing decidedly average

0:51:06.960 --> 0:51:10.000
<v Speaker 2>for him, you know, like it was a long way

0:51:10.040 --> 0:51:13.240
<v Speaker 2>below his best. He played an amazing last five holes

0:51:13.239 --> 0:51:16.960
<v Speaker 2>on Saturday, and that was kind of it, you know,

0:51:17.080 --> 0:51:20.279
<v Speaker 2>like that's that won him the tournament. Like I don't

0:51:20.360 --> 0:51:22.760
<v Speaker 2>think any of that other list could do that, could

0:51:22.800 --> 0:51:26.239
<v Speaker 2>play below the level and still win a major by

0:51:26.280 --> 0:51:29.000
<v Speaker 2>four shots. I just don't Rory wins a major by

0:51:29.000 --> 0:51:31.400
<v Speaker 2>four shots if he plays to his level, you know,

0:51:31.440 --> 0:51:32.480
<v Speaker 2>and so does Xander and.

0:51:33.920 --> 0:51:39.479
<v Speaker 3>Brooks and Rahm. But Scotty found a way.

0:51:39.520 --> 0:51:43.239
<v Speaker 2>It was a Nicholas like performance, like he just made

0:51:43.320 --> 0:51:46.120
<v Speaker 2>him got himself into the right position with twenty five

0:51:46.200 --> 0:51:48.440
<v Speaker 2>or twenty four holes to play, and then just said, okay,

0:51:48.480 --> 0:51:50.239
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to win this now, you know. And then

0:51:50.239 --> 0:51:54.040
<v Speaker 2>he played awful on the front nine. Really on Sunday.

0:51:54.480 --> 0:51:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Awful is relative term, but relative to how he normally.

0:51:58.320 --> 0:52:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Plays, it was like categorically awful.

0:52:02.200 --> 0:52:04.359
<v Speaker 2>If any of those other if the five other guys

0:52:04.360 --> 0:52:06.279
<v Speaker 2>played a front nine like that, then they probably don't

0:52:06.280 --> 0:52:06.960
<v Speaker 2>win the tournament.

0:52:07.040 --> 0:52:07.239
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:52:07.400 --> 0:52:10.080
<v Speaker 2>So you kind of have to say Cheff is going

0:52:10.160 --> 0:52:11.759
<v Speaker 2>to win because it just feels like he's going to

0:52:11.840 --> 0:52:14.239
<v Speaker 2>have one less than all of the others, you know,

0:52:14.360 --> 0:52:16.000
<v Speaker 2>like it doesn't matter what they shoot, He's going to

0:52:16.040 --> 0:52:17.680
<v Speaker 2>find a way to have one less because he's gone

0:52:17.719 --> 0:52:20.239
<v Speaker 2>really low, like we saw him at Dallas. He's clearly

0:52:20.280 --> 0:52:23.960
<v Speaker 2>happy to go crazy low. It feels like he just

0:52:24.200 --> 0:52:26.200
<v Speaker 2>does what he needs to do to win. Just tell

0:52:26.200 --> 0:52:27.680
<v Speaker 2>me where I have to shoot to win, and I'll

0:52:27.719 --> 0:52:30.160
<v Speaker 2>just work out how to do that. You know, it's crazy.

0:52:31.040 --> 0:52:36.480
<v Speaker 1>The ram piece I think is, you know, he got

0:52:36.800 --> 0:52:40.000
<v Speaker 1>he got a taste of something he hasn't had in

0:52:40.080 --> 0:52:45.240
<v Speaker 1>a while with the PGA, and I saw that. Brandle

0:52:45.520 --> 0:52:47.759
<v Speaker 1>afterwards was like, this is what happens when you go

0:52:47.800 --> 0:52:50.480
<v Speaker 1>to a non competitive league. And I don't know if

0:52:50.520 --> 0:52:56.439
<v Speaker 1>there's truth to that, you know, where like he got

0:52:56.480 --> 0:52:58.560
<v Speaker 1>into a situation he hasn't bet end. But I think

0:52:58.600 --> 0:53:02.120
<v Speaker 1>this is just general golf, Like golf is, like you

0:53:02.160 --> 0:53:04.399
<v Speaker 1>put yourself into these positions and you get a little

0:53:04.440 --> 0:53:08.040
<v Speaker 1>uncomfortable and then your your level of play just tweaks

0:53:08.080 --> 0:53:10.719
<v Speaker 1>down just to touch right because you're not in that

0:53:10.800 --> 0:53:14.120
<v Speaker 1>same calm space. And Rom, like all of a sudden

0:53:14.239 --> 0:53:16.480
<v Speaker 1>is the leader, and all of a sudden it kind

0:53:16.480 --> 0:53:18.640
<v Speaker 1>of fell apart and he hit a pot that should

0:53:18.680 --> 0:53:20.640
<v Speaker 1>have probably gone in. And if that putt goes in,

0:53:21.440 --> 0:53:23.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, everything could be differently. And we're talking about

0:53:23.840 --> 0:53:27.120
<v Speaker 1>John Rom winning the PGA. The other aspect of Rom

0:53:27.160 --> 0:53:30.959
<v Speaker 1>I think is worth pointing out is that when John

0:53:31.040 --> 0:53:34.919
<v Speaker 1>Ram made the leap to Live, Scotty had a great year.

0:53:35.400 --> 0:53:37.799
<v Speaker 1>Rom had a great year, and those were like the

0:53:37.880 --> 0:53:41.960
<v Speaker 1>two guys going back and forth, trading blows with wins.

0:53:42.360 --> 0:53:44.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, like if you think about the lead up

0:53:44.440 --> 0:53:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to that Masters, it was like these guys won everything.

0:53:50.360 --> 0:53:56.319
<v Speaker 1>I I think John rom the decision to go to

0:53:56.360 --> 0:53:59.399
<v Speaker 1>Live took him out completely out. It has made him

0:53:59.520 --> 0:54:02.760
<v Speaker 1>fairly irrelevant outside of four weeks of the year. And

0:54:03.080 --> 0:54:06.359
<v Speaker 1>the simple fact is that he's very undervalued in terms

0:54:06.440 --> 0:54:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of like we're not very far removed from him being

0:54:10.280 --> 0:54:12.560
<v Speaker 1>what everybody said was the best player in the world

0:54:12.800 --> 0:54:16.640
<v Speaker 1>without a doubt, you know, and I do think John

0:54:16.719 --> 0:54:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Rahm coming off of the PGA, I think he's maybe

0:54:20.840 --> 0:54:24.959
<v Speaker 1>the most intriguing of these names, where it's like, yeah,

0:54:24.960 --> 0:54:29.040
<v Speaker 1>that guy is is I think he you know, I

0:54:29.040 --> 0:54:31.319
<v Speaker 1>think the thing with all these guys is that they

0:54:31.440 --> 0:54:34.120
<v Speaker 1>think they're better than everyone, as you said, and I

0:54:34.120 --> 0:54:36.239
<v Speaker 1>think John Rahm thinks he's the best player in the

0:54:36.239 --> 0:54:37.200
<v Speaker 1>world still.

0:54:39.320 --> 0:54:39.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, true.

0:54:39.880 --> 0:54:41.879
<v Speaker 2>I mean I look, I see him in Scott style

0:54:41.920 --> 0:54:44.080
<v Speaker 2>all the time. He plays a lot like he's very

0:54:44.120 --> 0:54:48.799
<v Speaker 2>good at golf, like he is next next level better

0:54:48.840 --> 0:54:51.120
<v Speaker 2>than everyone else here, like and there's some good players

0:54:51.120 --> 0:54:54.920
<v Speaker 2>hanging around in Scot style, he is amazing and still

0:54:54.920 --> 0:54:58.040
<v Speaker 2>wants it, you know, he definitely wants it, and the

0:54:58.040 --> 0:55:00.760
<v Speaker 2>majores are he's outlet. I mean, maybe he is outlet

0:55:00.800 --> 0:55:02.520
<v Speaker 2>to sort of that's what he wants. I mean, he

0:55:02.560 --> 0:55:05.000
<v Speaker 2>wants to be the alpha in the room and you

0:55:05.040 --> 0:55:07.239
<v Speaker 2>can only really do that now, like you say, four

0:55:07.239 --> 0:55:10.279
<v Speaker 2>times for him coming off the PGA, where he got

0:55:10.280 --> 0:55:12.360
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a taste, like it might be a

0:55:12.360 --> 0:55:14.560
<v Speaker 2>bit of a sign. You very often see the next

0:55:14.600 --> 0:55:17.600
<v Speaker 2>major when somebody has a good one, pop up at

0:55:17.600 --> 0:55:22.280
<v Speaker 2>the next one, So he might be the second best

0:55:22.320 --> 0:55:26.920
<v Speaker 2>of that list, like to challenge Scotty. But look, they're

0:55:26.960 --> 0:55:33.480
<v Speaker 2>all so good. I just the way Scheffler gets it done.

0:55:34.160 --> 0:55:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Like he's not going to win every major for the

0:55:35.719 --> 0:55:38.000
<v Speaker 2>next that he's not going to win every tournament. I mean,

0:55:38.200 --> 0:55:41.520
<v Speaker 2>as many times as he's winning, he's still losing sixty

0:55:41.600 --> 0:55:43.520
<v Speaker 2>seventy percent of them, you know, like he's not winning

0:55:43.560 --> 0:55:46.560
<v Speaker 2>every week. But as far as favorite, he has to

0:55:46.600 --> 0:55:48.920
<v Speaker 2>be beyond favorite Scheffler because he just finds a way

0:55:48.960 --> 0:55:51.440
<v Speaker 2>to get it around. I mean, but at an Oakmont

0:55:51.800 --> 0:55:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Rahm he's got some weapons and his short game is

0:55:56.280 --> 0:55:58.040
<v Speaker 2>miraki and you're going to need to come up with

0:55:58.480 --> 0:56:02.040
<v Speaker 2>a few redicular shots around the greens. You're just going

0:56:02.080 --> 0:56:05.520
<v Speaker 2>to have to because and shots that not everybody has.

0:56:05.600 --> 0:56:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Ram has those shots. Scheffler might not have to because

0:56:09.640 --> 0:56:14.720
<v Speaker 2>he might just hit every green. But Ram has got

0:56:14.800 --> 0:56:18.279
<v Speaker 2>that and it's called it an extra gear. He's got

0:56:18.280 --> 0:56:22.719
<v Speaker 2>that flare, that sort of the incredible stuff around the

0:56:22.719 --> 0:56:25.719
<v Speaker 2>greens that will come in handy at Oakmon. If it

0:56:25.760 --> 0:56:28.480
<v Speaker 2>starts going a bit wrong, the patients will be tested

0:56:28.520 --> 0:56:31.600
<v Speaker 2>though for Ram it's a patients testing course if it's

0:56:31.600 --> 0:56:34.439
<v Speaker 2>if it's anything, you know, and I don't know if

0:56:35.000 --> 0:56:38.160
<v Speaker 2>historically he's been a bit up and down on that respect.

0:56:38.680 --> 0:56:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I was going to ask if outside of just like

0:56:42.360 --> 0:56:46.000
<v Speaker 1>outside of a flusher, you know, just a pure great

0:56:46.200 --> 0:56:49.760
<v Speaker 1>ball striker, what's the other skill set at that Oakmont

0:56:49.800 --> 0:56:53.640
<v Speaker 1>can really reward? Is it the guy the short game.

0:56:54.440 --> 0:56:55.320
<v Speaker 3>Short game and putting.

0:56:55.320 --> 0:56:57.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, clearly puttings are important because that's one of

0:56:57.480 --> 0:57:00.480
<v Speaker 2>the hardest places to partner the world. But it's very

0:57:00.480 --> 0:57:05.759
<v Speaker 2>dependent on where you're putting from. And it's more of

0:57:05.800 --> 0:57:08.880
<v Speaker 2>a like you were talking about angles on twelve before,

0:57:08.960 --> 0:57:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Like it's angles, it's where you miss it. Like you

0:57:12.719 --> 0:57:14.520
<v Speaker 2>know you're going to miss some greens and maybe you're

0:57:14.560 --> 0:57:15.719
<v Speaker 2>in a spot where you can't really hit it on

0:57:15.800 --> 0:57:18.960
<v Speaker 2>the green. It's having the ball striking to miss it

0:57:18.960 --> 0:57:20.560
<v Speaker 2>in a spot where you can get it up and down,

0:57:20.600 --> 0:57:22.360
<v Speaker 2>because there's just spots that open you just can't get

0:57:22.400 --> 0:57:24.400
<v Speaker 2>it up and down. You just can't. It's like Augusta.

0:57:24.440 --> 0:57:25.520
<v Speaker 3>If you're in the wrong spot.

0:57:25.320 --> 0:57:31.920
<v Speaker 2>You just can't. It's the whole package, Like everything is

0:57:31.960 --> 0:57:39.760
<v Speaker 2>rewarded pretty like proportionately. I think the better you ball

0:57:39.800 --> 0:57:41.640
<v Speaker 2>strike it, even though you're going to miss greens, you're

0:57:41.640 --> 0:57:43.240
<v Speaker 2>going to miss it in spots where you can get

0:57:43.240 --> 0:57:44.720
<v Speaker 2>it up and down, and you can have some pretty

0:57:44.720 --> 0:57:46.600
<v Speaker 2>simple up and downs. But if you get off track

0:57:46.640 --> 0:57:48.520
<v Speaker 2>a little bit, which you will over seventy two holes,

0:57:48.520 --> 0:57:50.680
<v Speaker 2>you're going to get off track. You have to have

0:57:50.760 --> 0:57:52.880
<v Speaker 2>a pretty crazy short game. You have to be good

0:57:52.880 --> 0:57:55.240
<v Speaker 2>out of long rough and good out of bunkers around

0:57:55.280 --> 0:58:00.240
<v Speaker 2>the greens, and all of those guys really are m

0:58:00.320 --> 0:58:02.600
<v Speaker 2>might be the best of that group. I would say, you.

0:58:02.560 --> 0:58:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Know, I think Bryson's probably the one.

0:58:08.920 --> 0:58:11.480
<v Speaker 2>He's pretty crazy around the greens two these days with

0:58:11.560 --> 0:58:13.280
<v Speaker 2>a thirty eight degree wage. I don't know how he

0:58:13.320 --> 0:58:17.080
<v Speaker 2>does it, but a thirty eight inch long or whatever

0:58:17.120 --> 0:58:19.240
<v Speaker 2>it is, seven one long sixty, I don't know how.

0:58:19.280 --> 0:58:20.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how he does it, but he's amazing.

0:58:21.040 --> 0:58:24.960
<v Speaker 1>He's gotten so good around the greens. It's, you know,

0:58:25.000 --> 0:58:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the what's fending the irons have been the thing that

0:58:28.200 --> 0:58:30.240
<v Speaker 1>has let him down in the last two Majors, and

0:58:30.440 --> 0:58:33.600
<v Speaker 1>he's on I mean, he's on maybe the best run

0:58:33.600 --> 0:58:36.640
<v Speaker 1>in Majors of all these guys. Obviously he missed the

0:58:36.640 --> 0:58:39.800
<v Speaker 1>cut at the at the the Open last year, but

0:58:39.800 --> 0:58:41.919
<v Speaker 1>he's finished in the top ten of every other one,

0:58:42.280 --> 0:58:47.400
<v Speaker 1>like really in the mix in every other one. Him

0:58:47.880 --> 0:58:52.760
<v Speaker 1>sneaky of all these guys, has the best course history too.

0:58:53.600 --> 0:58:56.640
<v Speaker 1>He was he had a chance to win on Sunday

0:58:56.800 --> 0:59:00.240
<v Speaker 1>at the last US Opening. I used under part going

0:59:00.280 --> 0:59:01.160
<v Speaker 1>into the final round.

0:59:02.120 --> 0:59:05.960
<v Speaker 2>So all right, yeah, I mean, look, I think if

0:59:06.000 --> 0:59:08.720
<v Speaker 2>you can play Augusta, you can play this place. I

0:59:08.760 --> 0:59:11.520
<v Speaker 2>think it's similar test around the greens and a similar

0:59:11.520 --> 0:59:14.920
<v Speaker 2>sort of philosophy of like under the hole is premium

0:59:14.960 --> 0:59:17.400
<v Speaker 2>and you've got to have flight control and move the

0:59:17.400 --> 0:59:20.320
<v Speaker 2>ball both ways. And if he can do it there,

0:59:20.360 --> 0:59:22.080
<v Speaker 2>which he clearly can. He hasn't won there, but he's

0:59:22.120 --> 0:59:24.120
<v Speaker 2>clearly plays really well there, I think he can do

0:59:24.160 --> 0:59:26.760
<v Speaker 2>it at Hope Pont he can. Also he has that

0:59:26.800 --> 0:59:28.680
<v Speaker 2>advantage of how long he is. He can iron off

0:59:28.720 --> 0:59:31.160
<v Speaker 2>some t's that other guys maybe can't, which I think

0:59:31.200 --> 0:59:33.360
<v Speaker 2>is an advantage. I think that's where length is going

0:59:33.400 --> 0:59:36.080
<v Speaker 2>to come in, where you can prioritize fairway with an

0:59:36.120 --> 0:59:39.560
<v Speaker 2>iron or a three wood or something. And it's going

0:59:39.600 --> 0:59:43.200
<v Speaker 2>to challenge his It's the scientist in him is going

0:59:43.240 --> 0:59:49.160
<v Speaker 2>to be pretty intrigued because it's an amazing test and

0:59:49.200 --> 0:59:53.320
<v Speaker 2>his analysis and plan because he loves coming up with

0:59:53.360 --> 0:59:55.280
<v Speaker 2>a plan. Whatever plan he comes up with. It's going

0:59:55.320 --> 0:59:57.880
<v Speaker 2>to be interesting to watch because it's it's a place

0:59:57.920 --> 1:00:00.320
<v Speaker 2>where I don't know what sort of plan you would

1:00:00.320 --> 1:00:02.800
<v Speaker 2>come up with, but he's gonna come up with one,

1:00:02.840 --> 1:00:06.400
<v Speaker 2>and it would it'll it'll engage his interest level on

1:00:06.400 --> 1:00:08.720
<v Speaker 2>that front, I think because it's such a unique test.

1:00:10.040 --> 1:00:13.400
<v Speaker 1>He seemed enamorated with it in in his YouTube video

1:00:13.440 --> 1:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>he just put up, so you know, if you want

1:00:16.000 --> 1:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>to glean from from his YouTube content, he seems he

1:00:19.600 --> 1:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>seemed very into it, by the way, putting a nod

1:00:23.080 --> 1:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>on a more kwa good good record as you imagine,

1:00:28.320 --> 1:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>because he's very good at golf T four, T five

1:00:31.320 --> 1:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>and then T fourteen the last two years. So last

1:00:34.440 --> 1:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>four open opens no worse than fourteenth, which pretty uh

1:00:39.160 --> 1:00:41.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty stout. There are a lot of you know, obviously

1:00:41.840 --> 1:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>we've seen this week at Canada we have three college

1:00:45.760 --> 1:00:48.920
<v Speaker 1>kids that are are have their full PGA Tour cards

1:00:49.280 --> 1:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>making their first start. This is the first major of

1:00:54.160 --> 1:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>two of four that is actually open to you know,

1:00:59.080 --> 1:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>potentially some of the better players in the game that

1:01:01.760 --> 1:01:05.200
<v Speaker 1>aren't professionals being in it. We've seen a lot of

1:01:05.320 --> 1:01:09.120
<v Speaker 1>youth success, uh in the in the in the game

1:01:09.160 --> 1:01:14.680
<v Speaker 1>of golf. Do you think we could get like because

1:01:14.720 --> 1:01:19.680
<v Speaker 1>of the just general trends in in pro golf, a

1:01:19.680 --> 1:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>an amateur late or is Oakmont just not the place

1:01:22.680 --> 1:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>for it? An amateur winning late just contending?

1:01:27.600 --> 1:01:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Eh, maybe. I mean they'd have to be really good.

1:01:32.520 --> 1:01:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Like there's some good good like they got Jackson in.

1:01:36.840 --> 1:01:39.640
<v Speaker 3>A like just the very pony end of good.

1:01:40.120 --> 1:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>So you got like Jackson Coven who has his card

1:01:44.320 --> 1:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>as a sophomore, has his card, is going back to

1:01:46.520 --> 1:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>school for a junior year, has AARA earned it. You've

1:01:49.120 --> 1:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>got Ben James, the Virginia kid that's that's competed, contended.

1:01:54.640 --> 1:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I think in in a in a PGA Tour event

1:01:56.920 --> 1:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>or two. You've got some some very good amateur names.

1:02:00.800 --> 1:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>But we haven't had like anybody, you know, like I

1:02:03.360 --> 1:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>think a perfect example is Scotti shot I think sixty

1:02:06.280 --> 1:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>eight as a as an amateur in twenty sixteen and

1:02:10.080 --> 1:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>then kind of bombed out at Oakmand over the period

1:02:14.200 --> 1:02:14.520
<v Speaker 1>of time.

1:02:15.960 --> 1:02:18.680
<v Speaker 2>I think, look, physically, they clearly would have the skill.

1:02:19.080 --> 1:02:20.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there's no shot that oak One's going to

1:02:20.920 --> 1:02:24.720
<v Speaker 2>ask that those kids can't hit. I just think there's

1:02:24.760 --> 1:02:28.240
<v Speaker 2>an experience, if any course that we ever play in

1:02:28.240 --> 1:02:32.280
<v Speaker 2>a major maybe outside of Augusta. But even so, even

1:02:32.320 --> 1:02:38.440
<v Speaker 2>including that, that experience is like a fifteenth club. It's Oakmond,

1:02:38.760 --> 1:02:41.640
<v Speaker 2>I would say. I mean, it's look at like you said,

1:02:41.680 --> 1:02:44.040
<v Speaker 2>you the list of winners and Nicholas and Hogan and

1:02:44.120 --> 1:02:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Jones and Miller and Ernie El's. I mean, these are

1:02:46.680 --> 1:02:52.280
<v Speaker 2>pretty well seasoned, traveled around the world experience. Guys, You're

1:02:52.280 --> 1:02:54.040
<v Speaker 2>just going to come across things at Oakmont that you

1:02:54.120 --> 1:02:58.840
<v Speaker 2>haven't seen before. If you've only played college golf and

1:02:58.840 --> 1:03:01.320
<v Speaker 2>a smattering of two events, you know, you just don't.

1:03:02.280 --> 1:03:03.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you played there a few weeks ago. You

1:03:03.800 --> 1:03:06.480
<v Speaker 2>just don't see stuff like that anywhere else. And I

1:03:06.520 --> 1:03:09.680
<v Speaker 2>think the more golf you've got under your belt, the

1:03:09.680 --> 1:03:11.680
<v Speaker 2>more chance you've got at Oakmont. I mean, I'm not

1:03:11.680 --> 1:03:13.080
<v Speaker 2>saying they can't do it because they can hit all

1:03:13.120 --> 1:03:16.479
<v Speaker 2>the shots. I mean they're so good these kids. There's

1:03:16.480 --> 1:03:17.840
<v Speaker 2>no shot that they're going to be asked that they

1:03:17.840 --> 1:03:22.720
<v Speaker 2>can't hit. But the experienced level of understanding that, right,

1:03:22.760 --> 1:03:24.400
<v Speaker 2>as soon as you've hit your t shot in the RAF, right,

1:03:24.440 --> 1:03:27.280
<v Speaker 2>I've made bogey. Now let's just make bogie, you know,

1:03:27.440 --> 1:03:28.960
<v Speaker 2>not try to take on the shot. I know, I

1:03:29.000 --> 1:03:32.520
<v Speaker 2>can hit, but take on, let's play this whole sensibly

1:03:32.600 --> 1:03:34.480
<v Speaker 2>and like Bogey doesn't cust me with you as open

1:03:34.520 --> 1:03:36.960
<v Speaker 2>here and all those little decisions that scottis Cheffler will

1:03:37.000 --> 1:03:39.160
<v Speaker 2>be making and Xander will be making and Rory will

1:03:39.200 --> 1:03:42.080
<v Speaker 2>be making. That's hard to do when you're twenty one

1:03:42.200 --> 1:03:44.520
<v Speaker 2>twenty two years old. It's just hard to do because

1:03:44.560 --> 1:03:46.560
<v Speaker 2>you think you can do everything, which is why they're

1:03:46.600 --> 1:03:50.880
<v Speaker 2>so good. And I remember being like that. But I

1:03:50.920 --> 1:03:55.000
<v Speaker 2>think Oakmont will reward experience, so it would be hard

1:03:55.000 --> 1:03:58.600
<v Speaker 2>to see. But they're better now than we ever were

1:03:58.640 --> 1:04:01.320
<v Speaker 2>at that age or anyone any era. We haven't seen

1:04:02.040 --> 1:04:06.600
<v Speaker 2>the number of young kids be this good before, so maybe,

1:04:06.680 --> 1:04:09.600
<v Speaker 2>but what's a tough place for it to happen?

1:04:10.160 --> 1:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I think like it's one of the biggest things. Probably

1:04:14.600 --> 1:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>advantage of experience is the ability to get over stuff.

1:04:21.760 --> 1:04:23.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah for sure. Absolutely.

1:04:23.360 --> 1:04:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:04:23.800 --> 1:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>When you feel like you hit two good shots and

1:04:25.560 --> 1:04:28.280
<v Speaker 1>you make a bogie or you three put you go

1:04:28.320 --> 1:04:31.480
<v Speaker 1>to the next tee and like seemingly always it is

1:04:31.640 --> 1:04:35.280
<v Speaker 1>like a bad t shot next. And that's where Oakmont

1:04:35.440 --> 1:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>just gets you more than anywhere else, is like you

1:04:39.000 --> 1:04:42.840
<v Speaker 1>feel like you can't hit consecutive shots poorly, and what

1:04:43.000 --> 1:04:46.840
<v Speaker 1>happens is often you have that like four whole stretch

1:04:47.560 --> 1:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of bad golf, and at a course that doesn't punish

1:04:51.040 --> 1:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>bad that much, you might get through it even par

1:04:54.800 --> 1:04:58.360
<v Speaker 1>or one over and be fine. But you can't afford

1:04:58.440 --> 1:05:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to let things dwell there because that will lead you

1:05:04.320 --> 1:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>doubles and triples.

1:05:05.480 --> 1:05:07.520
<v Speaker 2>You can't compound your errors here because it's just going

1:05:07.600 --> 1:05:11.000
<v Speaker 2>to get worse. I mean the morning I when either

1:05:11.240 --> 1:05:14.640
<v Speaker 2>the morning I woke up or I was going out

1:05:14.680 --> 1:05:16.800
<v Speaker 2>to the golf course for Wingfoot for my last round.

1:05:16.920 --> 1:05:19.560
<v Speaker 2>Judy Rankin, who's a family friend, put a little note

1:05:19.520 --> 1:05:21.160
<v Speaker 2>in my locker or sent me a text or so.

1:05:21.200 --> 1:05:25.000
<v Speaker 2>I can't remember how it was, but she said, everyone

1:05:25.040 --> 1:05:27.560
<v Speaker 2>always opens the paper on Monday morning after the US

1:05:27.640 --> 1:05:30.560
<v Speaker 2>Open is surprised at how high the winning score was,

1:05:30.880 --> 1:05:32.760
<v Speaker 2>So just hang in there. You never know. And it

1:05:32.840 --> 1:05:34.840
<v Speaker 2>turned out to be very prophetic because I thought I

1:05:34.880 --> 1:05:36.360
<v Speaker 2>was gone with four holes to play, and I just

1:05:36.360 --> 1:05:37.560
<v Speaker 2>part of the last four holes in one.

1:05:37.880 --> 1:05:39.600
<v Speaker 3>That's a hard headspace.

1:05:40.960 --> 1:05:42.680
<v Speaker 2>If you've never if you haven't played a bunch of

1:05:42.760 --> 1:05:46.240
<v Speaker 2>US Opens to get like, if you're yeah, like you say,

1:05:46.280 --> 1:05:48.040
<v Speaker 2>you have a bad couple of holes, and you're three

1:05:48.120 --> 1:05:50.680
<v Speaker 2>over after five on Thursday. You kind of any other

1:05:50.720 --> 1:05:53.440
<v Speaker 2>week that's a disaster. But I mean the guy who

1:05:53.480 --> 1:05:55.439
<v Speaker 2>wins the tournament might very well be three over after

1:05:55.440 --> 1:05:59.240
<v Speaker 2>five on Thursday, you know, and having that sort of

1:06:00.120 --> 1:06:02.960
<v Speaker 2>experience level to realize that this is not that bad,

1:06:03.520 --> 1:06:05.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, like I don't have to get these three

1:06:05.560 --> 1:06:08.480
<v Speaker 2>shots back. Now, I've got sixty holes to get these

1:06:08.480 --> 1:06:10.600
<v Speaker 2>sixty seventy holes to get these shots back.

1:06:10.680 --> 1:06:11.880
<v Speaker 3>I can do this like.

1:06:13.320 --> 1:06:16.200
<v Speaker 2>That. I don't think can be taught. That has to

1:06:16.240 --> 1:06:19.280
<v Speaker 2>be learned, you know. I Mean we've seen some amazingly

1:06:19.560 --> 1:06:25.000
<v Speaker 2>mature young kids along the way, but even Jordan had

1:06:25.000 --> 1:06:27.120
<v Speaker 2>that the US Open that they're sorry the masters that

1:06:27.120 --> 1:06:29.120
<v Speaker 2>first one was in contention and didn't win, and any

1:06:29.120 --> 1:06:31.360
<v Speaker 2>won the next one. Like there's just experience to be

1:06:31.520 --> 1:06:33.760
<v Speaker 2>had and lessons to be learned, and I think the

1:06:33.840 --> 1:06:38.080
<v Speaker 2>US Open lessons can only be learned in US Opens.

1:06:39.720 --> 1:06:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Rory Is I think he was talking recently about how

1:06:44.320 --> 1:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>he's like mentality shift to being a great US Open player,

1:06:48.120 --> 1:06:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and he was talking about how it's so hard to

1:06:51.640 --> 1:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>get to the state, but like where he's gotten to

1:06:54.240 --> 1:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>is I'm playing seventy two holes and I'm playing every

1:06:58.640 --> 1:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>hole and I'm not worried about where i am, but

1:07:01.560 --> 1:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm just playing. I'm playing the same through seventy two holes,

1:07:05.560 --> 1:07:08.040
<v Speaker 1>like the idea of like I'm just going to keep

1:07:08.200 --> 1:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>trying and not like allow what's happening to disrupt, like

1:07:13.640 --> 1:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>my next shot in the seventy two hole sequence of

1:07:16.440 --> 1:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>me playing seventy two holes, like not thinking about like

1:07:20.480 --> 1:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>hole by hole like it's it's it's what makes golf

1:07:25.760 --> 1:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>such a challenging game. It's like that mental gymnastics of it.

1:07:30.080 --> 1:07:33.200
<v Speaker 2>And you can't in the US Open, you cannot use

1:07:33.240 --> 1:07:35.840
<v Speaker 2>your score as a barometer to how you're playing.

1:07:36.120 --> 1:07:36.760
<v Speaker 3>You just can't.

1:07:37.360 --> 1:07:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Like every other tournament, you get a pretty good feel

1:07:39.920 --> 1:07:42.200
<v Speaker 2>after halfway through Thursday morning, all right, this is going

1:07:42.280 --> 1:07:44.160
<v Speaker 2>to be four hundred day is gonna be good, sixty.

1:07:44.000 --> 1:07:46.720
<v Speaker 3>Nine is gonna win the toll. You never know in years,

1:07:46.800 --> 1:07:48.120
<v Speaker 3>you have no idea how you're playing.

1:07:48.160 --> 1:07:49.920
<v Speaker 2>You can be playing well and be whyever power you

1:07:49.920 --> 1:07:54.960
<v Speaker 2>can be playing it. It's it's it's an unusable sort

1:07:54.960 --> 1:07:58.720
<v Speaker 2>of metric how you're scoring. You just have to that

1:07:58.840 --> 1:08:01.600
<v Speaker 2>seventy two whole mindset that Rory says is exactly is

1:08:01.640 --> 1:08:03.560
<v Speaker 2>the only way. You just hit every single shot on

1:08:03.600 --> 1:08:05.480
<v Speaker 2>its merits. Every shot is so hard and there's a

1:08:05.520 --> 1:08:07.400
<v Speaker 2>train wreck after every shot of you hit it poorly.

1:08:08.240 --> 1:08:10.960
<v Speaker 2>It's just every shot of its merits, and make decisions

1:08:11.040 --> 1:08:14.200
<v Speaker 2>based on I want to be at the lowest I

1:08:14.280 --> 1:08:17.160
<v Speaker 2>can be on Sunday night. It's not about shooting a

1:08:17.160 --> 1:08:18.960
<v Speaker 2>good score today. It's not about having a good score

1:08:19.000 --> 1:08:21.200
<v Speaker 2>on this hole. It's about how do I get to

1:08:21.360 --> 1:08:23.840
<v Speaker 2>Sunday night in a decent spot? And every decision has

1:08:23.880 --> 1:08:25.720
<v Speaker 2>to be framed like that. And we never play like that.

1:08:26.280 --> 1:08:28.160
<v Speaker 2>We play like just I want to have a good

1:08:28.200 --> 1:08:31.080
<v Speaker 2>score on this hole. You know, it's a different way

1:08:31.120 --> 1:08:31.479
<v Speaker 2>to think.

1:08:31.840 --> 1:08:33.599
<v Speaker 1>Do you think golf would be easier if there were

1:08:33.640 --> 1:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>no scoreboards for players? Do you think the scores would

1:08:36.960 --> 1:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>go down?

1:08:40.040 --> 1:08:41.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, Like we kind of hinted on that before,

1:08:41.960 --> 1:08:43.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I think they'd go up or down.

1:08:43.280 --> 1:08:44.920
<v Speaker 2>Do you think they would shoot thirty seven under par

1:08:45.040 --> 1:08:46.640
<v Speaker 2>or whatever they do at Capellura if they didn't know

1:08:46.640 --> 1:08:48.640
<v Speaker 2>everyone else was doing it? Or do you think they

1:08:48.720 --> 1:08:50.639
<v Speaker 2>go lower because they know everyone else is doing it?

1:08:51.640 --> 1:08:55.559
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. It's an interesting that's an interesting question.

1:08:55.880 --> 1:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I think for different people, it would be different. Yeah,

1:08:58.200 --> 1:09:02.439
<v Speaker 1>results do you have any We've just talked about big names.

1:09:02.479 --> 1:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Are there any other names that you particularly are might

1:09:06.160 --> 1:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>be keen on that type of player rising up?

1:09:11.240 --> 1:09:14.000
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned JT. I think JT is playing well this year.

1:09:14.120 --> 1:09:20.640
<v Speaker 2>I think he loves this occasion. I think he'd be

1:09:20.760 --> 1:09:26.160
<v Speaker 2>very interesting, you know. I think what the Rasmus. I

1:09:26.280 --> 1:09:30.880
<v Speaker 2>like Rasmus Hoyguard's game. I think he's long and he

1:09:30.960 --> 1:09:34.080
<v Speaker 2>seems to have something special about Hi. Nikolai too obviously,

1:09:34.160 --> 1:09:36.439
<v Speaker 2>but Rasmus is on a better run this year and

1:09:36.520 --> 1:09:39.720
<v Speaker 2>he sort of got himself sort of in the on

1:09:39.720 --> 1:09:41.680
<v Speaker 2>the fringes of the mix at kail Alo for a

1:09:41.680 --> 1:09:42.280
<v Speaker 2>little bit there.

1:09:42.760 --> 1:09:45.879
<v Speaker 1>Rasmus, how do you feel about Corey Conners?

1:09:47.000 --> 1:09:48.719
<v Speaker 2>Look, I think Corey Connors will have a good week.

1:09:48.840 --> 1:09:52.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he has a lot of good weeks. If

1:09:52.800 --> 1:09:55.120
<v Speaker 2>he has a weakness, and I'm sure he'd be happy

1:09:55.120 --> 1:09:57.160
<v Speaker 2>to admit this too, would be his putting.

1:09:58.080 --> 1:10:02.360
<v Speaker 3>And I think Oakmont, You're.

1:10:01.840 --> 1:10:05.120
<v Speaker 2>Gonna have to be really brave to hold a lot

1:10:05.120 --> 1:10:07.639
<v Speaker 2>of pots at Oakmont because they why outside the whole

1:10:07.680 --> 1:10:09.880
<v Speaker 2>pots and how we saw him on the weekend of

1:10:09.920 --> 1:10:13.760
<v Speaker 2>the Masters, He's going to have to improve on that

1:10:13.960 --> 1:10:17.160
<v Speaker 2>performance on the grains at least. But he's he's certainly

1:10:17.200 --> 1:10:18.800
<v Speaker 2>got the ball striking chops.

1:10:18.640 --> 1:10:21.639
<v Speaker 1>That's what I just think he could just be around

1:10:21.800 --> 1:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>because like when you think about I, he's it's kind

1:10:26.720 --> 1:10:29.639
<v Speaker 1>of like the way Scotty drives the ball is where

1:10:30.400 --> 1:10:33.519
<v Speaker 1>it's not flashy, but the accuracy is at such a

1:10:33.600 --> 1:10:37.879
<v Speaker 1>high level with enough distance, and Scotty's pretty plus distance,

1:10:38.200 --> 1:10:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, He's. Scotty's like a souped up Corey Connor's

1:10:41.160 --> 1:10:46.200
<v Speaker 1>with with with a better short game and better better putting. Yeah,

1:10:46.240 --> 1:10:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, but like Corey Connor's like kind of machine

1:10:49.160 --> 1:10:50.599
<v Speaker 1>like te degree you know.

1:10:51.439 --> 1:10:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean he's going to bull struck it.

1:10:53.160 --> 1:10:54.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean he hits it so well and that's sort

1:10:54.880 --> 1:10:56.559
<v Speaker 2>of one hundred and fifty to two hundred and twenty

1:10:56.640 --> 1:11:00.320
<v Speaker 2>yard sort of id on through four and I mean

1:11:00.360 --> 1:11:02.400
<v Speaker 2>he's as good as anyone, you know, Corey, and he

1:11:02.439 --> 1:11:04.920
<v Speaker 2>does it every week, you know, so you'd think.

1:11:04.840 --> 1:11:06.120
<v Speaker 3>He's going to be in the mix. I don't know.

1:11:06.120 --> 1:11:07.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I loved his I'd love.

1:11:07.240 --> 1:11:07.760
<v Speaker 2>To see Corey.

1:11:07.800 --> 1:11:09.320
<v Speaker 3>He's a he's a great guy and.

1:11:10.800 --> 1:11:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Presence of our team. Yeah, like.

1:11:15.000 --> 1:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>You should just pick all Presidents, International Presidence.

1:11:18.160 --> 1:11:26.559
<v Speaker 2>International Presidence Cup players. Look, I mean Sung Jay at

1:11:26.600 --> 1:11:28.840
<v Speaker 2>some point surely is going to get there in the

1:11:28.880 --> 1:11:30.320
<v Speaker 2>mix at the end of one of these things. He's

1:11:30.680 --> 1:11:33.040
<v Speaker 2>talk about machines, I mean he is. He's been a

1:11:33.080 --> 1:11:37.400
<v Speaker 2>little bit off for his standard, but he's so good,

1:11:37.439 --> 1:11:41.880
<v Speaker 2>Sung Jim. It's incredible. He has every shot, there's nothing

1:11:41.880 --> 1:11:42.439
<v Speaker 2>he's missing.

1:11:45.400 --> 1:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I've floated this crazy theory. I'm curious your your thoughts

1:11:49.280 --> 1:11:52.519
<v Speaker 1>on this. Uh. One of my colleagues ask me why

1:11:52.560 --> 1:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that Patrick Cantley hasn't played well at major

1:11:55.439 --> 1:12:01.519
<v Speaker 1>championships and I this was just off the top. I

1:12:01.760 --> 1:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>just got me thinking. I was curious. He's so efficient

1:12:05.479 --> 1:12:09.639
<v Speaker 1>with his golf swing where he doesn't have a high

1:12:09.800 --> 1:12:15.759
<v Speaker 1>end swing speed, but he produces like very great distance results.

1:12:16.120 --> 1:12:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it's a thing where when when the

1:12:18.800 --> 1:12:22.960
<v Speaker 1>rough just gets a little bit ticked up, that the speed,

1:12:23.520 --> 1:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>this lack of speed hurts him hitting shots out of

1:12:27.240 --> 1:12:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the rough And that's just the marginal difference.

1:12:34.439 --> 1:12:41.280
<v Speaker 2>You don't have rough in every major, maybe specifically to

1:12:41.479 --> 1:12:43.880
<v Speaker 2>US Open. You would think he's like he's been built

1:12:43.920 --> 1:12:46.559
<v Speaker 2>in a lab to play US Open. You would Patrick Kenley,

1:12:46.560 --> 1:12:51.240
<v Speaker 2>you would the US Open player. Yeah, I don't know.

1:12:52.800 --> 1:12:54.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. Maybe he tries too hard, Like it's

1:12:54.840 --> 1:12:58.600
<v Speaker 2>a very big it's a very regular thing that we

1:12:58.600 --> 1:13:02.200
<v Speaker 2>we I say we now, but like golfers can try

1:13:02.280 --> 1:13:08.280
<v Speaker 2>too hard in these things, you know, or you know,

1:13:08.360 --> 1:13:10.000
<v Speaker 2>all of a sudden, the swing coaches out and like

1:13:10.040 --> 1:13:12.160
<v Speaker 2>you're trying different things, and you're practicing differently, and you're

1:13:12.160 --> 1:13:15.280
<v Speaker 2>preparing differently, and you're playing more, you know, your whole

1:13:15.280 --> 1:13:18.200
<v Speaker 2>families in town, and I don't I don't know. He's

1:13:18.200 --> 1:13:20.639
<v Speaker 2>an enigma. Like I couldn't come up with a reason.

1:13:20.640 --> 1:13:22.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't think there's a lack of speed thing. I mean,

1:13:23.080 --> 1:13:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Salatoris doesn't have the speed that probably doesn't have the

1:13:25.840 --> 1:13:29.000
<v Speaker 2>rough ability that the big guys do, and he was

1:13:29.000 --> 1:13:30.880
<v Speaker 2>producing it in the majors, like you said, not injured,

1:13:30.920 --> 1:13:36.519
<v Speaker 2>you would think he's one of the favorites. Yeah, I

1:13:36.520 --> 1:13:39.200
<v Speaker 2>don't know. I don't think. So he's got enough speed,

1:13:39.360 --> 1:13:40.040
<v Speaker 2>is it fair enough?

1:13:41.680 --> 1:13:43.960
<v Speaker 1>One of the one of the other things I love

1:13:44.160 --> 1:13:48.679
<v Speaker 1>about the group that we just talked about, the big names,

1:13:48.800 --> 1:13:53.840
<v Speaker 1>is there you don't see like swing coaches lingering around

1:13:53.880 --> 1:13:58.639
<v Speaker 1>a ton, you know, like they're pretty self reliant players.

1:13:59.200 --> 1:14:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, that would be my h I think that's

1:14:05.120 --> 1:14:06.560
<v Speaker 2>a better way to approach it. I mean, at the

1:14:06.600 --> 1:14:08.120
<v Speaker 2>end of the day, you have to hit the shots,

1:14:09.160 --> 1:14:14.679
<v Speaker 2>and golf fundamentally isn't a game that you can teach someone.

1:14:14.720 --> 1:14:17.040
<v Speaker 2>It's a game that the player has to learn themselves, right.

1:14:17.080 --> 1:14:21.080
<v Speaker 2>Coaches are just great at like helping players learn. I

1:14:21.200 --> 1:14:24.240
<v Speaker 2>never loved having a coach there at a at a major,

1:14:24.320 --> 1:14:26.240
<v Speaker 2>like great, maybe a month before if you want to

1:14:26.520 --> 1:14:28.200
<v Speaker 2>have a few things, but like you can come to

1:14:28.200 --> 1:14:30.120
<v Speaker 2>the Major and stand on the range, but don't tell

1:14:30.120 --> 1:14:33.599
<v Speaker 2>me anything, which is clearly what Randy does, you know, And.

1:14:34.200 --> 1:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>They only work it seems like they only work on

1:14:36.360 --> 1:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>like three things. Just set up, set.

1:14:39.800 --> 1:14:42.760
<v Speaker 2>Up, swing play, Yeah, whatever it is, alignment or whatever.

1:14:42.760 --> 1:14:47.920
<v Speaker 2>It's just aim further right or whatever it was. I

1:14:47.920 --> 1:14:49.759
<v Speaker 2>think that's especially in the big tournaments.

1:14:49.960 --> 1:14:50.479
<v Speaker 3>You've got to.

1:14:51.960 --> 1:14:53.920
<v Speaker 2>You've got a sort of dance with the girl that

1:14:53.920 --> 1:14:56.320
<v Speaker 2>you brought with you. You can't find it on the range

1:14:56.600 --> 1:14:58.760
<v Speaker 2>on Wednesday afternoon at the US Open, you know. I

1:14:58.800 --> 1:15:03.599
<v Speaker 2>mean maybe like maybe it's like happened, but really your

1:15:03.640 --> 1:15:05.720
<v Speaker 2>game is at the level that it's at, or it's

1:15:05.760 --> 1:15:07.479
<v Speaker 2>in the state that it's in, and it's always it's

1:15:07.520 --> 1:15:13.600
<v Speaker 2>an up and down situation. Just work out how to

1:15:13.640 --> 1:15:15.400
<v Speaker 2>get the best score out of what you bring to

1:15:15.439 --> 1:15:17.160
<v Speaker 2>the tournament. And I don't think that's a coach thing.

1:15:17.160 --> 1:15:19.479
<v Speaker 2>I think sometimes that's just a you thing, you know.

1:15:19.600 --> 1:15:25.240
<v Speaker 2>So I like how that the gurus are less prevalent.

1:15:25.280 --> 1:15:27.519
<v Speaker 2>It's quite a probably a lesson for the guys who

1:15:27.520 --> 1:15:30.400
<v Speaker 2>are down further downalys struggling to break into this group.

1:15:30.640 --> 1:15:32.639
<v Speaker 2>If they've always got their coach there at a major,

1:15:32.760 --> 1:15:35.200
<v Speaker 2>like well, doing a lot of stuff. Maybe the best

1:15:35.200 --> 1:15:38.120
<v Speaker 2>players aren't doing that. Maybe you should look at it.

1:15:37.960 --> 1:15:40.479
<v Speaker 1>It feels like it's almost like the final thing to

1:15:40.600 --> 1:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>unlock is like you work with someone to get to

1:15:45.000 --> 1:15:47.680
<v Speaker 1>that top level, and then at the top level it

1:15:47.720 --> 1:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>becomes about your ability because that's when things are going

1:15:52.200 --> 1:15:54.519
<v Speaker 1>sideways on the golf course. The only way you're getting

1:15:54.560 --> 1:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>out of it.

1:15:57.520 --> 1:16:01.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, look, you can't probably do it without

1:16:02.160 --> 1:16:07.120
<v Speaker 2>help along the way. You know, you need wisdom and teaching.

1:16:07.400 --> 1:16:09.599
<v Speaker 2>It's just the week of a major is it should

1:16:09.640 --> 1:16:12.160
<v Speaker 2>be done. That's not the week for it, you know.

1:16:14.040 --> 1:16:20.479
<v Speaker 2>And ultimately it's about adjusting along the way golf, you know,

1:16:20.560 --> 1:16:25.120
<v Speaker 2>it's just every shot is different forever. Like I mean,

1:16:25.200 --> 1:16:28.000
<v Speaker 2>like you make a swing off the first it feels

1:16:28.000 --> 1:16:29.800
<v Speaker 2>a little bit funny. You can't just like go over

1:16:29.840 --> 1:16:31.400
<v Speaker 2>to the ropes and say, hey, what did I do there?

1:16:31.400 --> 1:16:32.760
<v Speaker 2>What should I do on the next one. You've got

1:16:32.760 --> 1:16:34.080
<v Speaker 2>to kind of work out how to get the next

1:16:34.080 --> 1:16:35.360
<v Speaker 2>one going where you want it to go on the

1:16:35.360 --> 1:16:38.040
<v Speaker 2>next one go. It's a never ending work in progress.

1:16:38.080 --> 1:16:40.160
<v Speaker 2>And I think when you're doing that yourself, you learn

1:16:40.200 --> 1:16:45.040
<v Speaker 2>your swing better, You'll know your little fixes. You know

1:16:45.120 --> 1:16:47.280
<v Speaker 2>you how to do it. I mean Jack used to

1:16:47.280 --> 1:16:48.560
<v Speaker 2>talk about, hey, what do he went and getting to

1:16:48.560 --> 1:16:51.120
<v Speaker 2>sew Jack grout like in January, like once or twice

1:16:51.160 --> 1:16:52.640
<v Speaker 2>a year, and that was it, Like I'll see you

1:16:52.680 --> 1:16:56.080
<v Speaker 2>in twelve months. You know that is probably the model.

1:16:56.520 --> 1:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, Yeah, I mean he's see somebody long enough.

1:17:01.080 --> 1:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>You're just working on the same things too, over and

1:17:03.439 --> 1:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>over again.

1:17:04.320 --> 1:17:05.519
<v Speaker 3>You have to know your own game.

1:17:05.640 --> 1:17:07.479
<v Speaker 2>You have to know how to fix your game on

1:17:07.520 --> 1:17:11.559
<v Speaker 2>the fly because any given day you're going to wake

1:17:11.640 --> 1:17:13.479
<v Speaker 2>up and it's going to feel different. You've got to

1:17:13.520 --> 1:17:14.680
<v Speaker 2>know how to fix.

1:17:14.439 --> 1:17:18.080
<v Speaker 3>It for you, you know, which is probably hard for someone

1:17:18.080 --> 1:17:18.680
<v Speaker 3>else to do.

1:17:20.680 --> 1:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, who's are you taking? Scartia I assume.

1:17:25.960 --> 1:17:27.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I know that's the boring answer, but I

1:17:27.800 --> 1:17:30.639
<v Speaker 2>have to. I think, like, how do you not take him?

1:17:30.760 --> 1:17:38.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think he's a hyper competitive He's not

1:17:38.840 --> 1:17:39.960
<v Speaker 2>a list like.

1:17:40.000 --> 1:17:43.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't think he's a lifetime list guy, like goal list.

1:17:42.840 --> 1:17:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Like a Tiger. But he's such a hyper competitive guy.

1:17:44.960 --> 1:17:47.040
<v Speaker 2>He just wants to win so bad. And I think

1:17:47.280 --> 1:17:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Rory winning the Career Grand Slam probably added a little

1:17:50.920 --> 1:17:53.479
<v Speaker 2>bit of fuel to that. You know, like, I know

1:17:53.600 --> 1:17:56.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm actually the guy, So I think he's on a

1:17:57.000 --> 1:17:59.640
<v Speaker 2>I think he's on a run of motivation and competitiveness

1:17:59.680 --> 1:18:00.960
<v Speaker 2>at the moment, and it's gonna be hard to go

1:18:01.040 --> 1:18:01.519
<v Speaker 2>past him.

1:18:01.800 --> 1:18:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Where would you put if you were gonna put career majors?

1:18:06.680 --> 1:18:10.200
<v Speaker 1>What do you think is like if you just threw

1:18:10.240 --> 1:18:12.839
<v Speaker 1>a number out for suffer?

1:18:13.240 --> 1:18:15.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what's he got? Three?

1:18:15.360 --> 1:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>He's got three?

1:18:16.479 --> 1:18:20.439
<v Speaker 2>Seven? Like something always happens, right Like at the moment

1:18:20.479 --> 1:18:22.400
<v Speaker 2>he would think he's going to win seventeen, but like

1:18:24.200 --> 1:18:26.080
<v Speaker 2>there's always something that happens. You know, we didn't have

1:18:26.439 --> 1:18:30.679
<v Speaker 2>like they're hard to win, you know, and look at Rory.

1:18:30.720 --> 1:18:32.639
<v Speaker 2>When Rory a decade ago, it was like this guy's

1:18:32.680 --> 1:18:38.640
<v Speaker 2>gonna win twelve. You know, seven, I think he's. I

1:18:38.640 --> 1:18:40.640
<v Speaker 2>think he's and seven is would be like in the

1:18:40.680 --> 1:18:42.760
<v Speaker 2>elite of the elite of the elite. You know, that's

1:18:42.760 --> 1:18:47.240
<v Speaker 2>an unbelievable amount of majors and this day and age, the.

1:18:48.640 --> 1:18:54.240
<v Speaker 1>That Sunday turnaround, because I think like that career just

1:18:54.280 --> 1:19:01.000
<v Speaker 1>like he's now like still like scar tissue free. If

1:19:01.000 --> 1:19:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that Sunday he hadn't won, I think, like, you know,

1:19:05.000 --> 1:19:10.280
<v Speaker 1>there's like real damage that can do mentally. But the

1:19:10.320 --> 1:19:13.000
<v Speaker 1>fact that he played so bad and then just one

1:19:13.680 --> 1:19:18.120
<v Speaker 1>by like skating down the last three holes like stress free,

1:19:18.840 --> 1:19:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that almost helped him. It's like the complete

1:19:25.200 --> 1:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy, like how that tournament goes opposite ways. It

1:19:30.760 --> 1:19:34.360
<v Speaker 1>could have like a a completely different such a different

1:19:34.520 --> 1:19:39.439
<v Speaker 1>impact on where his career trajectory goes. That's the thing

1:19:39.520 --> 1:19:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that to me, you know it it's like one of

1:19:45.240 --> 1:19:48.680
<v Speaker 1>those like sometimes like you it's like a couple of

1:19:48.720 --> 1:19:52.479
<v Speaker 1>good breaks and and nobody and then John Rahm just

1:19:52.560 --> 1:19:56.160
<v Speaker 1>like that lipout being lipout and not making birdie on

1:19:56.200 --> 1:19:58.639
<v Speaker 1>the next two holes. It's like that's the difference in

1:19:58.760 --> 1:20:01.640
<v Speaker 1>him having like a heartbreak loss and then all of

1:20:01.640 --> 1:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>a sudden it's now like, oh, like could he do?

1:20:04.840 --> 1:20:07.640
<v Speaker 1>He got away with like very poor plane won a

1:20:07.680 --> 1:20:09.160
<v Speaker 1>major by a lot of shots.

1:20:09.400 --> 1:20:12.280
<v Speaker 3>You know, I don't know where do you have him?

1:20:12.320 --> 1:20:13.479
<v Speaker 3>I mean, look, it's just hot.

1:20:13.800 --> 1:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think the appropriate over under his six

1:20:16.080 --> 1:20:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and a half. I saw that there was a line

1:20:18.160 --> 1:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that was like nine point five. I think it was

1:20:21.160 --> 1:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>no laying up called fan duel, and they said it

1:20:23.560 --> 1:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>would be nine point five, which I think is like

1:20:25.840 --> 1:20:28.559
<v Speaker 1>crazy because, like you said, stuff happens.

1:20:29.720 --> 1:20:32.559
<v Speaker 2>I think that happens, and other golfers come along, like yes,

1:20:33.080 --> 1:20:36.120
<v Speaker 2>look at Jordan. I mean he was winning him for fun.

1:20:36.520 --> 1:20:39.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, Rory was winning him for fun at the start,

1:20:39.600 --> 1:20:42.160
<v Speaker 2>Like life happens. You know, he's had a kid. Now

1:20:42.240 --> 1:20:42.800
<v Speaker 2>he might have.

1:20:42.920 --> 1:20:45.320
<v Speaker 3>More like school drop offs.

1:20:45.360 --> 1:20:47.439
<v Speaker 2>Maybe doesn't it ball, I don't know, like just life

1:20:47.560 --> 1:20:50.960
<v Speaker 2>just comes along, you know, and then you Luke Clinton's

1:20:51.040 --> 1:20:53.360
<v Speaker 2>and all these sort of kids come along and they

1:20:53.400 --> 1:20:55.439
<v Speaker 2>might even be better again, you know, like the level

1:20:55.479 --> 1:20:59.719
<v Speaker 2>keeps going up. I mean, who would have thought Greg Norman.

1:20:59.760 --> 1:21:01.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we're going way out of the thing. But

1:21:01.120 --> 1:21:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Greg nominal only won too. I mean, if Bob Twy

1:21:03.040 --> 1:21:04.760
<v Speaker 2>had to hold that bunker shot, Larry Miies having to

1:21:04.800 --> 1:21:06.439
<v Speaker 2>hold that chip shot nor than one of one ten.

1:21:06.680 --> 1:21:07.479
<v Speaker 2>You know, things happen.

1:21:07.680 --> 1:21:12.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's it's it's very very rare for a

1:21:12.960 --> 1:21:16.599
<v Speaker 1>player to sustain like elite elite player play for more

1:21:16.640 --> 1:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>than ten years and he still.

1:21:19.040 --> 1:21:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Has to do it against Bryce and Rory, Xander Marikaua,

1:21:23.600 --> 1:21:25.160
<v Speaker 2>like he still has to beat these guys, and these

1:21:25.160 --> 1:21:28.080
<v Speaker 2>guys that group's only going to get better, you know,

1:21:28.240 --> 1:21:30.920
<v Speaker 2>not specifically those names, but the five, six, seven, eight,

1:21:30.960 --> 1:21:32.519
<v Speaker 2>the top ten in the world, the level they're going

1:21:32.600 --> 1:21:34.360
<v Speaker 2>to play is just going to get better and better

1:21:34.400 --> 1:21:36.840
<v Speaker 2>and better. So it's going to be harder and harder

1:21:36.920 --> 1:21:39.280
<v Speaker 2>to keep winning them.

1:21:38.400 --> 1:21:41.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm fascinated to see if we could get you know,

1:21:41.760 --> 1:21:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Xander had two majors last year, which I mean like

1:21:45.240 --> 1:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>winning multiple majors in the years is the crazy stuff.

1:21:49.960 --> 1:21:52.400
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like that's a separator of like all

1:21:52.439 --> 1:21:55.559
<v Speaker 1>time greats is like they usually get to a couple

1:21:55.600 --> 1:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>of years of two majors, you know, like three Big

1:21:59.360 --> 1:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Tiger had four or five years of two majors. You know,

1:22:04.200 --> 1:22:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Rory obviously had one, Speith had one, Like will Scheffler

1:22:09.280 --> 1:22:12.160
<v Speaker 1>get a is this the year he gets two majors

1:22:12.160 --> 1:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>in a year, and because when you start doing the

1:22:14.840 --> 1:22:18.519
<v Speaker 1>multiples of years, that's how you go up really quick. Yeah,

1:22:19.040 --> 1:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to pick one off per year because then

1:22:21.800 --> 1:22:23.960
<v Speaker 1>you have years where you know, you got a bad

1:22:24.000 --> 1:22:26.479
<v Speaker 1>bounce here, or you know, somebody gets hot and finishes

1:22:26.520 --> 1:22:31.160
<v Speaker 1>with three birdies there, and you know, so I'm taking

1:22:31.840 --> 1:22:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm gonna take Bryson.

1:22:36.080 --> 1:22:36.760
<v Speaker 3>Defending her.

1:22:38.040 --> 1:22:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I just I didn't even think about that. It probably

1:22:42.360 --> 1:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>makes it harder. But uh, he's been rattling around so

1:22:46.400 --> 1:22:49.599
<v Speaker 1>much people will say, oh, he's not getting it done.

1:22:50.439 --> 1:22:52.599
<v Speaker 1>Does he have a closing I saw somebody ask if

1:22:52.600 --> 1:22:57.160
<v Speaker 1>he has a closing tournament problem? Well, like people, you

1:22:57.160 --> 1:23:01.360
<v Speaker 1>you make up that storyline because somebody's available and has

1:23:01.400 --> 1:23:05.479
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity to win a lot, and I do. I

1:23:05.520 --> 1:23:08.840
<v Speaker 1>think this golf course fits him really well in terms

1:23:08.840 --> 1:23:10.800
<v Speaker 1>of like if he's if he hits in the rough,

1:23:10.880 --> 1:23:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, I would put him and Rory

1:23:13.400 --> 1:23:15.599
<v Speaker 1>is probably the two best rough players in the world,

1:23:16.400 --> 1:23:18.920
<v Speaker 1>just because of how far up they're playing from and

1:23:18.960 --> 1:23:26.200
<v Speaker 1>their sheer speed, and uh, yeah, I think it. The

1:23:26.240 --> 1:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>guy's built to play really well everywhere, I feel like

1:23:29.680 --> 1:23:31.800
<v Speaker 1>except for the Open right now.

1:23:33.000 --> 1:23:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it'll be a challenge. Yeah, I mean I think, yeah,

1:23:36.040 --> 1:23:38.880
<v Speaker 2>that's a pretty good goal. Rom's got to get an honorable.

1:23:38.520 --> 1:23:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Mention though, I think, yeah, I think I'm saving Rom

1:23:41.840 --> 1:23:44.360
<v Speaker 1>for the Open. I'm doing my I'm I one and done.

1:23:44.400 --> 1:23:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I got to stick with my You know, I can

1:23:46.439 --> 1:23:50.400
<v Speaker 1>only pick somebody one time, so you know, I'm interested

1:23:50.439 --> 1:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to see what Rory does the most. I think he's

1:23:52.360 --> 1:23:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the most intriguing player because obviously Quail Hollow was such

1:23:55.400 --> 1:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a disappointing finish and it's like, you know, can he

1:24:00.120 --> 1:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>get back up there because him and Scottie or you know,

1:24:03.160 --> 1:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>they're both having like sensational years and it's you know,

1:24:06.320 --> 1:24:09.439
<v Speaker 1>there's half the Major year left to determine who was

1:24:09.479 --> 1:24:10.519
<v Speaker 1>the best player this year.

1:24:10.960 --> 1:24:12.559
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean you got that, you got the hangover

1:24:12.600 --> 1:24:14.320
<v Speaker 2>out of the way, if you like. The next Major

1:24:14.439 --> 1:24:15.840
<v Speaker 2>was always going to be on the one or the

1:24:15.840 --> 1:24:18.680
<v Speaker 2>other for Rory one after Augusta. So maybe you got

1:24:18.680 --> 1:24:20.680
<v Speaker 2>it out of the way. Maybe he's free now, you know,

1:24:20.960 --> 1:24:23.800
<v Speaker 2>expectations are go on, everyone's talking about someone else.

1:24:24.840 --> 1:24:29.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, thank you for coming on and chatting about this.

1:24:30.000 --> 1:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for being a part of that US Open video.

1:24:33.360 --> 1:24:36.599
<v Speaker 1>You were great in that. Uh and Uh, congrats. We

1:24:36.600 --> 1:24:39.160
<v Speaker 1>we haven't talked about well, have to talk President's Cup

1:24:39.200 --> 1:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>another time. Congrats on your appointment than you. You know,

1:24:43.360 --> 1:24:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm very invested in the Chicago President's Cup as a

1:24:46.680 --> 1:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Chicagoan and uh, I'm excited to uh for that tournament

1:24:52.040 --> 1:24:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and glad that you're going to be running the show.

1:24:54.439 --> 1:24:57.400
<v Speaker 1>And of course you, uh, you helped renovating and I

1:24:57.439 --> 1:25:01.120
<v Speaker 1>think brought back a lot of the uh. You know,

1:25:01.200 --> 1:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a championship course that Chicago is going

1:25:04.040 --> 1:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to be very proud of. So I'm excited about that tournament.

1:25:07.120 --> 1:25:10.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, you just have to rally all your international fans

1:25:10.880 --> 1:25:12.280
<v Speaker 2>and get more to go out of the tournament.

1:25:12.680 --> 1:25:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I got I should I should have wore my my internet,

1:25:18.400 --> 1:25:19.719
<v Speaker 1>I got the international gear.

1:25:19.800 --> 1:25:20.040
<v Speaker 4>I am.

1:25:20.160 --> 1:25:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm a I'm an international team guy.

1:25:22.520 --> 1:25:24.400
<v Speaker 3>You'll be in trouble in your town. But like we

1:25:24.520 --> 1:25:24.840
<v Speaker 3>lock it.

1:25:25.520 --> 1:25:27.599
<v Speaker 1>Well. You know, the last time I was at Medina

1:25:27.720 --> 1:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>for a team competition, I was I was watching the

1:25:30.080 --> 1:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Ryder Cup, which you know, at the time I was

1:25:33.120 --> 1:25:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I was an American fan through and through, and you know,

1:25:36.439 --> 1:25:40.000
<v Speaker 1>since I've kind of I've departed my American roots in

1:25:40.000 --> 1:25:42.400
<v Speaker 1>in the golf space. So I'm more of an international

1:25:42.400 --> 1:25:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and European team.

1:25:43.680 --> 1:25:47.679
<v Speaker 3>If you need any more gear, just ask.

1:25:49.439 --> 1:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Some more geary. You know, I like busting it out

1:25:52.320 --> 1:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>every once in a while. I think I wore I

1:25:55.080 --> 1:25:57.479
<v Speaker 1>wore one of my hoodies with with the Davis Love.

1:25:57.560 --> 1:26:00.240
<v Speaker 1>He was disappointed to see that if this was a

1:26:00.280 --> 1:26:02.680
<v Speaker 1>president it was just a stock President's cup now that

1:26:02.680 --> 1:26:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking of that, but uh, but yeah, we'll be Uh,

1:26:06.280 --> 1:26:08.839
<v Speaker 1>we'll be in touch. And thanks so much for for covenant.

1:26:09.120 --> 1:26:21.320
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, thank you for.

1:26:21.360 --> 1:26:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Listening to another edition of the Frida Egg Podcast. Big

1:26:25.800 --> 1:26:28.800
<v Speaker 1>thanks to p J Clark for editing and producing. If

1:26:28.800 --> 1:26:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you haven't yet, check out our our pro shop. We

1:26:32.479 --> 1:26:35.639
<v Speaker 1>cooked up some really neat merch We've got a lot

1:26:35.640 --> 1:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>of kind of limited edition Oakmont themed merchandise, really creative

1:26:42.280 --> 1:26:45.400
<v Speaker 1>T shirts and hats. I would go check that out

1:26:45.400 --> 1:26:48.160
<v Speaker 1>at proshop dot Thefridagg dot com. As a reminder, if

1:26:48.200 --> 1:26:51.240
<v Speaker 1>you're a Fridagg Golf Club member, you do get a discount,

1:26:51.520 --> 1:26:53.880
<v Speaker 1>just check your email you'll have a discount code in there.

1:26:54.920 --> 1:26:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to everybody for listening. We'll look forward to breaking

1:26:58.200 --> 1:27:02.200
<v Speaker 1>down the US Open with Trevor Immelman on Monday or

1:27:02.240 --> 1:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday after they'll be out midweek next week, so hopefully

1:27:06.000 --> 1:27:09.960
<v Speaker 1>we got a great tournament. Can't wait. Thanks for listening

1:27:10.000 --> 1:27:10.360
<v Speaker 1>to the pod.