WEBVTT - Tech News: Tech Crooks and Cybercrime Stats

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:20.079
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of all things tech. And this is

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 1>the tech news for Tuesday, December twenty one, twenty twenty one.

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Before we get into it, the rest of the episodes

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>this week will be classic episodes in order for us

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>to take some time off for the holidays. I hope

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you guys enjoy that we will have a couple of

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>new episodes next week. My hope is to have some

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>episodes that are the wrap up for the year in

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>tech one. Those are gonna be some doozies. I'm sure

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be more than one episode, but I have

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:50.880
<v Speaker 1>not actually written them yet, so we'll see. But let's

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>get to the news for today. The trial of Elizabeth Holmes,

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the founder of the company Theronos, is now in the

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>hands of the jury. They will meet for a second

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>day of deliberations today to determine a verdict for Holmes,

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>who is facing eleven charges of wire fraud and conspiracy

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>to commit wire fraud. Now, in case you managed to

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 1>miss out on the Tharonis story. Over the last decade,

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Holmes founded a medical startup company with the goal of

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>producing a device that could run a battery of tests

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>on a single micro drop of blood. Holmes has said

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 1>that her fear of needles and a desire to democratize

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>medicine drove her to found Theoris, and if the deck

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>had worked, it could have truly revolutionized medicine, potentially to

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the point where a household would have its own Theoris device,

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:45.480
<v Speaker 1>almost like a desktop printer, and they could use it

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to run tests and share that information with a physician.

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>But unfortunately, as was slowly revealed in a series of

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 1>expose s and documentaries and testimonials, the tech just could

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>not live up to that promise. But didn't stop sarin

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Us from raising nearly one billion dollars in investments over

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the years. And that's kind of the nub of the case.

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Did Holmes knowingly misrepresent what her technology could do and

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>how it performed in order to get investors and partnerships

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>with healthcare companies? Did she intend to mislead them? That's

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>what the jury has to determine. She certainly adopted a

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>lavish and eccentric lifestyle and there are records of her

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>interactions with employees who brought up concerns with her. It

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>seemed to indicate that she was not keen on accepting

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the possibility that the whole endeavor was fruitless. But her

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>lawyers have argued, essentially that she was just as bought

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>in to the hype as her investors were, which would

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:53.359
<v Speaker 1>mean she did not purposefully lie to anyone. Honestly, it's

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>a pretty tough call from a legal standpoint, though, I

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>think it goes without saying that what the company did

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>was wrong and an enormous amount of money was wasted

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 1>on this. Not only that, but for people who are

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:10.119
<v Speaker 1>depending upon blood tests to come back from Tharaos, that's

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:13.119
<v Speaker 1>another matter entirely, right, Like, that's the level of criminality

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that goes beyond just fraud. There are people who you know,

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>whose health is at stake here. Anyway, We may have

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>a verdict later this week, but as I record this episode,

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>we're still in the deliberation phase. And now to transition

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>into the cyber crime part of this episode, buckledown, folks,

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot to cover first up, According to a

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>company called Group or eighty Group a I T e.

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how you say the name, but nearly

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>half of all Americans were victims of some form of

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>financial identity theft in twenty That is a really crazy statistic. Now,

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>if I were being flippant, I would suggest that it's

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the other half of all Americans who stole the identities

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>of the first half. So if you're not in one group,

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>you're in the other. But that's obviously not true. That's

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>just a bad joke. Losses from those incidents amounted to

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>more than seven hundred billion dollars, according to this research firm,

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>which published its findings in a paper titled US Identity

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Theft The Stark Reality. A big slice of that crime

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>pie goes to folks who committed some form of unemployment

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>identity theft, using false information to claim unemployment benefits. So,

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>just to be clear, the folks who were abusing unemployment

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>weren't necessarily people who didn't want to work. That was

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:37.160
<v Speaker 1>like the common narrative you would hear from certain circles, right, like,

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 1>you can't you can't boost unemployment, it will just encourage

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 1>people not to work. No, it turns out the people

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>who were really abusing the system were thieves who are

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:52.720
<v Speaker 1>victimizing other people and stealing from the system in order

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to fund themselves. They weren't like layabouts, they were actually

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 1>actively victimizing oaks who deserved unemployment benefits. By the way,

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:08.239
<v Speaker 1>if you're between the ages of thirty five and forty four, well, congratulations,

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>you are in the prime target zone for those kinds

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>of attacks, because that age group represented the highest percentage

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>of consumers who found themselves victimized in twenty twenty. The

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:23.840
<v Speaker 1>report also found that Kansas, Rhode Island, Illinois, Nevada, and

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:26.799
<v Speaker 1>Washington were the states with the highest number of identity

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>theft reports. Now, when it comes to fraud, the states

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the top that list were Nevada again, Delaware, Florida, Maryland,

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and my home state of Georgia. The number one state,

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:42.160
<v Speaker 1>as in the state with the highest number of reported

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:47.280
<v Speaker 1>cyber crimes was Kansas, with one thousand, four hundred eighty

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>three reports per one hundred thousand people. The safest state

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>was South Dakota, which had just seventy two reports per

0:05:55.800 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>one hundred thousand people. However, we take territories into account,

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the real prize goes to Puerto Rico, which only had

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty two reports per one thousand people. But wait, it

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>keeps getting worse. The report points out that there have

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>been some big data breaches and cases of companies failing

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to secure data over the last year, from a case

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>where more than two million records from Microsoft customers was

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:24.479
<v Speaker 1>found on the web unprotected to the ransomware attack on

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Colonial pipeline that interfered with fuel transportation and distribution earlier

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 1>this year. So yeah, bad news. Meanwhile, there are the

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>robo calls, another branch of scams and crimes. T Mobile

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:40.600
<v Speaker 1>released an end of the year report on scam calls

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:43.479
<v Speaker 1>and robo calls, saying that the number of calls more

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>than doubled over the course of so that in January

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>there were around one point one billion scam call attempts

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and in November there were two point five billion, and

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>people wonder why I never pick up my phone anymore?

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>And way. T Mobile says it already blocked more than

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 1>twenty one billion scam calls this year through its scam

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Shield service. Even so, scammers were able to siphon away

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>nearly thirty billion dollars from targets. Now. According to T Mobile,

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:18.239
<v Speaker 1>more than half of those calls came in the form

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>of a scam vehicle warranty message, and I could say

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I've actually received some of those. Uh, the few times

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>that a scammer actually bothered to leave a voicemail that

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>is because I don't pick up the phone. And you know,

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 1>that's actually pretty rich, because there's no car in my name.

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a car in my name, so I

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't know what I'd be warranteeing in the first place.

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>But following up on that are calls that claim to

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>be from the Social Security Office, which suggests a focus

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>on older targets, and the Federal Communications Commission or FCC,

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>has really been going after robocall operations in the United States,

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>levying hefty fines for companies found to engage in the

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 1>practice and pushing for tell calm companies to institute systems

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>that would eliminate stuff like spoofing. Spoofing is when a

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>scammer uses a bit of software to make it seem

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>as though the call is coming from a different phone number,

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 1>often one that appears to be local to whatever the

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>targets phone number is, in an effort to commence them

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>to pick up. Like you're more likely to pick up

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>a phone if the phone number looks somewhat familiar. That's

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the thought process. The UK's National Crime Agency and National

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Cyber Crime Unit found a database containing two hundred twenty

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 1>five million stolen login credentials for various services and websites.

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>The agencies handed this cash of data over to a

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>service called Have I Been Poned? That's a have I

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:50.559
<v Speaker 1>Been pw in e ed. That service gives folks the

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>chance to search their own email information to see if

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>any of the accounts that email is part of have

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 1>been compromised in the past, and if their passwords have

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>been exposed. And so it's really a way for people

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to to kind of take action and see if their

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>loggin credentials are still safe. This is also a good

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>time to remind you all that it is important to

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>set strong passwords. Do not use the same password for

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>multiple accounts. I know you all know this, but I'm

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:26.959
<v Speaker 1>gonna say it anyway. Also, I find that password vault

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>programs really help with this because that way you don't

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>have to remember two hundred unique strong passwords. I totally

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 1>get that that's not really feasible. So password vault's a

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 1>good password vault is invaluable. And finally, if a service

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>that you subscribe to offers two factor authentication, Definitely activate that,

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>choose that option. It will really cut back on the

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>chance that someone will compromise one of your accounts. We

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>have some more stories to cover in this episode, but

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>before we get to that, let's tay a quick break. Okay,

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:12.719
<v Speaker 1>we're back and we're still talking about cybersecurity. You might

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 1>remember that I did a recent episode in which I

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:20.319
<v Speaker 1>talked about a zero day vulnerability in apaches logging library

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>service log for J. Tons of companies, tons of systems

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and services all rely on log for J, and as

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the name suggests, log for J logs data. It essentially

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>is about keeping a record of what's going on within

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>a system anyway. This particular vulnerability would allow someone like

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>a hacker to gain access to a system running log

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>for J and potentially get control where they can execute

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 1>whatever code they want and thus execute code that would

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>give them full control of that remote server just by

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, using this vulnerability in this logging service. Apache

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>issued a patch to fix the vulnerability, but you have

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to install patches right Just because the patches there doesn't

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>magically solve the issue and cure all these systems that

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>have logged for J on them, you have to actually

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 1>install that patch, and the problem is that not everyone

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:26.680
<v Speaker 1>is super responsive. Not everyone jumps on that right away.

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:30.679
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it's not necessarily the fault of the company, maybe

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>that their system is so huge and diverse that rolling

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>out a patch actually takes a lot of time. That

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>means that while there are technically fixes to this problem,

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 1>not everyone is actually incorporating them, not to the same

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 1>degree in the same speed. So some systems, perhaps tens

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>of thousands of them, remain vulnerable, and likely some of

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:56.680
<v Speaker 1>them will remain vulnerable for years to come. Meanwhile, a

0:11:56.720 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>hacker group called CONTI, known primarily for in someware attacks,

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>has developed an attack chain that leverages the log for

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 1>J vulnerability. CONTI is a prolific ransomware hacker gang. They're

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>based out of Russia. They're potentially state sponsored or at

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>least state sanctioned, meaning the Russian authorities have shown very

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:23.559
<v Speaker 1>little interest in shutting down this hacker group, and security

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>experts at at a dv INTEL say Conte's scale is

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:32.679
<v Speaker 1>really large, it's a big operation, and that their methods

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 1>are very sophisticated, which makes them particularly dangerous and it

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:39.719
<v Speaker 1>sounds to me like two, where's is going to be

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 1>another big year of of big ransomware attacks. It really

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>drives home that organizations will need to spend a lot

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>of time and resources to patch vulnerable systems, which again

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>is a process that's laborious and time consuming. So you know,

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a big mess. It's absolutely critical, and it's

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 1>also not easy to do a fun combination. Over in Belgium,

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the Ministry of Defense recently announced that the department was

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the target of cyber attacks and that yes, the attackers

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>exploited that log for J vulnerability I was just talking about.

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:20.119
<v Speaker 1>According to the department quote, some of the Ministry's activities

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>were paralyzed for several days end quote. Now, it sounds

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 1>as though staff detected the attack fairly early on, and

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 1>they were able to sequester the infected systems and thus

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>compartmentalize their computer systems so that the ministry could mostly

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>continue doing what it does while simultaneously containing the threat

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to the affected systems. Now, as I record this, no

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>one has yet to identify the attackers, so we don't

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>know who was responsible. It is a pretty scary story, right,

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and countries defense ministry being effectively targeted by hackers. It's

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:00.440
<v Speaker 1>not out of the ordinary. I mean, we know that

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 1>cyber warfare is raging all the time, we just don't

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>necessarily know about it most of the time. But to

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:12.559
<v Speaker 1>see something like that UH is incredibly sobering because obviously

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>you could have hostile countries really disabling the functionality of

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>massive and critical infrastructure in other countries. Very scary stuff.

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>But while I'm talking about Belgium, I should also mention

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>that back in June, the government of Belgium proposed a

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>law that would require companies that run encrypted messaging services

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 1>like WhatsApp and Signal to include a tool that would

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>decrypt communications upon request by authorities in the course of

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>criminal investigations. Of course, doing that would completely invalidate encryption

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. I mean, the whole point of

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the system is that no one other than the parties

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>involved in that communication are able to decrypt the messages,

0:14:59.840 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>not not even the service provider. Like that's that's got

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>to be key to an encrypted messaging service, that the

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>service itself cannot decrypt the messages. To incorporate a work

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>around would negate all of that. It would also require

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>an entirely different approach to providing the service, but that's

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>another matter anyway. Once the public learned of this this

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>part of the law, criticism followed. Many rightly pointed out

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 1>that creating a back door in a secure system means

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>that you've just removed any security from that system. A backdoor,

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>when you really break it down, is a vulnerability, and

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>people can learn about and exploit vulnerabilities. So generally speaking,

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>you want to identify and eliminate vulnerabilities, not introduce new ones.

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>What analogy I was used is that you can have

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 1>like a bank vault and you have like one of

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 1>those big, massive vault doors that totally locks in place

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and has time locks and all this stuff, and it's

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 1>really hard to break through. But if you install a

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>screen door in the back of the vault so that

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you could just you know, come in and out more easily,

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>then you've just invalidated that that giant door. Right, it

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter, same sort of thing when we talk about

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 1>back doors and secure systems. It is a terrible idea. Fortunately,

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the Belgian government listened to the criticism and has subsequently

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>removed the decryption requirement from that law. Now it's time

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of Bitcoin stories. Bitcoin the choice for

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>money launderers around the world. So an employee of Sony's

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>life insurance company allegedly embezzled around a hundred fifty four

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>million dollars during a financial transfer transaction between two Sony

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>company accounts. So essentially the job was to move money

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>from one Sony account to another Sony account. It's just

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that along the way, a measly hundred fifty four million

0:16:55.800 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>dollars worth of Sony's resources found their way into the

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:04.959
<v Speaker 1>personal account of this particular Sony employee. That is a

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 1>heck of a dip into the corporate piggy bank. Then

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:13.160
<v Speaker 1>that employee allegedly converted all of that money into bitcoin,

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:17.679
<v Speaker 1>around three thousand, eight hundred seventy nine bitcoin, and the

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>FBI got on the case and seized the bitcoin in question.

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>And today that bitcoin amount is worth around a hundred

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:30.879
<v Speaker 1>eighty million dollars. That's not not bad amount of interest,

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 1>right It started off with a hundred fifty four million,

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Now you're at a hundred eighty million, like cow. So

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the Sony employee, now former employee, is under arrest in Japan.

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>No big surprise there. I'm not sure if this means

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:48.199
<v Speaker 1>Sony will actually end up with more money than what

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.399
<v Speaker 1>was stolen from it, thanks to the appreciation and value

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>of bitcoin between May, when the theft happened and when

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the FBI was able to seize the bitcoin. That's a

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 1>question I can't answer. Pretty curious stuff, But yeah, bitcoin

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>continues to be associated with people who are doing some

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty shady stuff. Again, like I've said, with a lot

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:12.680
<v Speaker 1>of other technologies, there's nothing about bitcoin that inherently makes

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 1>it bad. It's just that a lot of bitcoins features

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>are ones that also become really useful if you want

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>to do shady things, So the tool itself not necessarily bad,

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:30.400
<v Speaker 1>although I have other very obvious feelings about bitcoin. But yeah,

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>you see a lot of folks running some unethical operations

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:39.439
<v Speaker 1>relying on bitcoin. Speaking of bitcoin, and a report that

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 1>probably didn't surprise that many people, the Wall Street Journal

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:46.439
<v Speaker 1>says that the top ten thousand bitcoin accounts hold five

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>million bitcoins. That's equal to more than two hundred thirty

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:54.919
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. That would be about ten thousand out of

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 1>around a hundred fourteen million people, and the Wall Street

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Journal points out this means the top point zero one

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>percent of bitcoin holders control nearly of all bitcoin in circulation,

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 1>so this would be the tippy tippy top of a

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 1>pyramid if you were to compare bitcoin to a pyramid scheme.

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 1>Some folks have tried to do that, although I think

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 1>it's more of a speculation engine than a pyramid scheme.

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>This is a greater disparity than we see in the

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:28.879
<v Speaker 1>United States in general, where the top one percent of

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the wealthiest people control around a third of all wealth

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 1>in the US. But one percent is a whole lot

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>more than point zero one. Anyway, in the crypto community,

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the accounts that control a lot of bitcoin are referred

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 1>to as whales, and I'm not sure if the researchers

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:49.119
<v Speaker 1>who looked into this differentiated between accounts that belong to, say,

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>a single individual, and those that belong to crypto pools

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:58.159
<v Speaker 1>or exchanges and that kind of thing. Moving on, let's

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about Amazon on because there are a couple of

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>big stories. They're One is that Reuter's reports that Amazon

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:10.439
<v Speaker 1>scrubbed negative reviews of Chi Jinping's book The Governance of China.

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Chi Jinping is the president of China. Now, apparently Amazon

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 1>was told to strike any review that wasn't five stars

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:22.879
<v Speaker 1>from its Chinese operated sites like the sites that operate

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 1>within China, and the company subsequently removed and disabled reviews

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 1>for that book. This happened about two years ago, and

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the report drives home how big tech companies will often

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 1>enable authoritarian regimes if it means getting access to their

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:42.400
<v Speaker 1>very huge markets. China has more than one point four

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>billion people in it, and so big companies naturally really

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>want access to the money those people may or may

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>not have. And if that means the company has to

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 1>engage in a little censorship or perhaps enable a propaganda

0:20:57.240 --> 0:21:00.880
<v Speaker 1>arm of authoritarian regime, well in many cases that's kind

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 1>of waved away as the price of doing business. It's

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>never framed that way, by the way, no one would

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:08.159
<v Speaker 1>ever frame it that way, because that would just be

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 1>a pr nightmare to it to say the quiet part

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:13.720
<v Speaker 1>out loud. They always frame it in a way where

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 1>they claim that they're giving access to more information. But

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 1>if it's information that only goes through a government filter

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>before it gets to people, I don't really buy that

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>argument anyway. Considering China's record on stuff like human rights violations,

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>this is pretty darn insidious, but it's also not surprising,

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>which is incredibly sad. All Right, we have several more

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 1>stories that we need to finish out before we close

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>this episode. But before we do that, let's take another

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>quick break. Boeing and Airbus have issued warnings that five

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 1>G technology rollouts could create problems for the aviation industry.

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>The warning says that five G radio waves could interfere

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:07.160
<v Speaker 1>with aircraft electronics like radio altimeters. This follows awarding from

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:10.879
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Aviation Ministration or f a A that also

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 1>said five G interference could cause flight diversions, which obviously

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:18.159
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty serious problem. Companies like A, T and

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:21.359
<v Speaker 1>T and Verizon have delayed their activation of five G

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:25.880
<v Speaker 1>networks while working on this issue, looking to adopt precautionary

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>measures to limit five G interference, but Boeing and Airbus

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 1>claim that these proposals don't go far enough, and they

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 1>want to see a commitment to limiting five G so

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>that it doesn't operate within range of like forty of

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the world's major airports. The US wireless industry is pushing

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 1>back against this, saying that the aviation industry is distorting

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the truth that they are essentially saying that this problem

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>is way worse than any actual problem that might exist,

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and they argue that delays in five G rollouts cause

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>harm to the companies and consumers alike. I may have

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:02.959
<v Speaker 1>to do a full episode about this in the future

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and really look into what's going on at a technical level,

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>because I honestly don't know what argument here is. The

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 1>most realistic musician Brian Eno has a pretty skeptical perspective

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:17.639
<v Speaker 1>on n f T s, which means he and I

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 1>share that in common. Also, I used to record in

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a podcasting studio named after him. All our podcasting studios

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 1>at the office are named after musicians like Eno, Bowie, Prince,

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:33.159
<v Speaker 1>and York. Anyway, Eno says he feels n f T

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:35.879
<v Speaker 1>s are being peddled by the equivalent of snake oil

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:40.120
<v Speaker 1>salespeople and marketed to suckers, hucksters and suckers I think

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:42.119
<v Speaker 1>is how he put it, which sounds like p T.

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:45.159
<v Speaker 1>Barnum would be all over the n f T market

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 1>if you are alive today. I happen to agree with

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 1>Eno on this. Should we actually build a metaverse and

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you can listen to yesterday's episode to hear my thoughts

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 1>about that, then n f T S could arguably be

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>is full if you wanted to port digital goods from

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 1>one environment into another, though that process would also require

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:09.719
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of other pieces fall into place, and

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 1>it's by no means a guarantee that it would actually happen.

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 1>But right now, n f t s are really just

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>a digital record of a transaction, and you don't actually

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:21.919
<v Speaker 1>end up owning anything tangible, at least not in the

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 1>sense that we typically think of. I've often said it's

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:27.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of like buying a star. If you've ever seen

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>one of those commercials, you don't really actually own anything,

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:33.639
<v Speaker 1>and there's no way to say, hey, that's my star,

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>so no one else can buy it, Like there's nothing

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>stopping some other companies saying, well, we're selling stars, and

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 1>that same star is owned by like eight different people.

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:45.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, not that anyone would really care or do

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 1>anything about it. It's just it's it's meaningless, is what

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying. Anyway, One thing n f T s can

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 1>do is allow fans of an artist or creator a

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:57.200
<v Speaker 1>chance to support that person's work and show their enthusiasm

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 1>for it. So if an artist works primary le in

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:03.920
<v Speaker 1>web based media, it can be difficult to monetize that work.

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>You might create a Patreon account or something like that,

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>But there are fundamental differences between an artist who works

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>in the digital realm versus someone who works in a

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 1>physical form of media. N f T s can be

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>one way to financially support artists, but that's not really

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 1>how n f t s are marketed. They're pushed more

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>as a status symbol or speculative investments, and I feel

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that that's pretty harmful and that that was mostly what

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Eno was getting at. You can read up on what

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 1>he has to say at the Crypto Syllabus website and

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 1>it's under the article Brian Eno on n f T

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>s and automaticism. Finally, New Scientists has published an article

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>titled human brain cells in a dish learned to play

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:51.919
<v Speaker 1>Pong faster than an Ai, which is all sorts of

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>clickbait for yours. Truly, the headline appears to have been

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 1>engineered in such a way that there's no way I

0:25:56.960 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 1>could avoid clicking on it. It brings to mind something

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 1>like a Frankenstein film in which a doctor has a

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit of brain matter and a dish, and he's

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>watching a screen and sees a paddle hit a ball

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 1>on the screen and then proclaim it's alive a love

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:15.120
<v Speaker 1>But what is actually going on here? All right? Well,

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 1>so some scientists at Cortical Labs took living brain cells,

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>incorporated them into a processor, and connected that to a

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote virtual game world. A large discipline within AI

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and machine learning is the creation of what are called

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:35.879
<v Speaker 1>artificial neural networks. Well, this is kind of similar, except

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>it's using actual neural tissue to serve as neural nodes.

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I would love to tell you more about this, but

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:48.879
<v Speaker 1>the article is distressingly short on details, and Cortical Labs

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:51.920
<v Speaker 1>their website gets a bit loosey goosey with their own language.

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 1>For example, from a blog post that was posted just

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 1>a couple of days ago called what does it mean

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 1>to Grow a Mind? The Cortical Lab blog reads up,

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:04.719
<v Speaker 1>we don't know what we're making because nothing like this

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 1>has ever existed before, an entirely new mode of being,

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:11.959
<v Speaker 1>a fusion of silicon and neuron, a native to the

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 1>digital world, lit with the Promethean fire of the human mind.

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:24.160
<v Speaker 1>So they don't really know what they're making. Well, nothing

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:28.640
<v Speaker 1>could go wrong there, you know. Um, I'll set aside

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>my pessimism and skepticism and need to know more and

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:36.640
<v Speaker 1>just say that bio circuits are fascinating and they come

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 1>complete with their own set of ethical issues to consider,

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 1>but they might also end up being the backbone of

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 1>a new branch of machine learning and AI. And that's

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 1>it for this episode of the Tech News Tech Stuff.

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>When we come back later this week, like I said,

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have some reruns of classic episodes, but

0:27:56.160 --> 0:27:58.879
<v Speaker 1>we'll be back next week with some new ones. And

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I hope every and out there is having a safe,

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:06.439
<v Speaker 1>healthy and happy holiday season. I know that is incredibly

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:13.439
<v Speaker 1>challenging considering the the way things work today, but I

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:16.159
<v Speaker 1>still hope you're all well, and I look forward to

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:24.240
<v Speaker 1>talking to you again and really soon. Text Stuff is

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:27.439
<v Speaker 1>an I Heart Radio production. For more podcasts from I

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio, visit the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.