WEBVTT - A Global Perspective

0:00:04.600 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>So the big question is this, how do investors like

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:11.800
<v Speaker 1>us get access to the ideas, information, and most importantly,

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the right people that give us the tools and information

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>we need to make conformed and educated decisions to have success.

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:22.319
<v Speaker 1>That is the question, and this podcast will give us

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the answers. This is Mark Moss, your host. Let's get

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>this started. Hey everyone, welcome back to another episode of

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the Market Disruptors podcast. This week we are joined by

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 1>cats Ya from Peer to Peer Capital. She has an

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>amazing story. She's lived in Russia, Switzerland and now the US.

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 1>An amazing story of how she's gone from investing in

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>different asset classes and into cryptocurrencies and why, and we

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:48.959
<v Speaker 1>talk about her fund, her thesis, um, how they look

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:51.160
<v Speaker 1>at the market, how they're investing, how they look at risk,

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 1>and so many other fascinating things. There's a lot of

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>really good stuff to get out of this episode. Can't

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>wait to jump into it. So let's go. All right, guys,

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>welcome to another episode of Art Constructors podcast. I have

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Catia from Peer to Peer Capital on today, and she

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>has a really unique insight into some sectors of the

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:09.680
<v Speaker 1>market that a lot of people have been looking at,

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>specifically about protocols. She wrote a paper on protocols which

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>really caught my eye and I led some really interesting

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>conversations and so let's just jump right in. So Katia, welcome, Hi,

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>good to be here. So um for for those that

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>probably haven't read your paper, no much about you, just

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>give us a quick um intro on your background and

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>how you got here into the blockchain space, right now? Sure? Sure?

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:39.399
<v Speaker 1>So I was born and raised in Russia and moved

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 1>to Switzerland in my early twenties and started my career

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>in well. I had education and finance and financial managements

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and investments. I wrote my diploma and investment climate, and

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess after writing the Diploma of Investment Climent, I

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>realized that investment climate in Russia was not that good.

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>So I moved to Switzerland and then started working in

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>power management and magists after mainly, and that's where I've

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>built my career mostly for the ten years, and always

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>been in finance part of it. And also I've been

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>into startups, very interesting crazy startups and energy storage, battery

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>grid management, so those kind of things. And in early

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>two thousands sixteen, i've through actually my family business. I've

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:30.360
<v Speaker 1>met a team who are doing um watching investments since

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 1>two thousands fourteen, so they've been in the market for

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years. And since my family was in

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the real estate and we were looking how to uh

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that's actually a separate story, but we're looking at how

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>to talken eyes real estate investments. But we didn't know

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the word talking I yet. We were just looking at

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the way of making it more easy and accessible and

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>liquid to the market. And then friends said, well, you

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>should look at this blotching thing, and so we started

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>working with like with the teams who can help us

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>with and then when we realized the potential of it,

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and when I saw what it was this, I was like, Okay,

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not interested in real estate anymore. I'm not interested

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:10.359
<v Speaker 1>in whatever I was doing in corporate finance in my

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:15.079
<v Speaker 1>corporate career in big multinationals, and I was diving in

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>it had had first since two thousand sixteen. So I

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 1>joined the group of private investors and at the time

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>they were running the fund which is called SATUCI Fund,

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and then we rebranded to ptop Capital last year, but

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>it was mainly just changing the structure of the fund.

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>But their investment thesis has been pretty stable let's say

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>since the beginning, so since it's a thousand fourteen, the

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 1>team has discovered that there can be alternative assets to bitcoin,

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and they wrote a thesis around it that bitcoin is

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>a store of value, and we realized the potential of it,

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>but they can be other interesting use cases that can

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 1>have a huge potential, And of course even now we

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>still cannot see what the potential is, but it was

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>clear that as that it's going to be interesting. So

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>it started investing like very early projects from Ethereum, like

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the Genesis, Walck, Criterium, bit Shears made Safe all Us

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>like the starting projects, and then I joined and then

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 1>we started diving into protocols and smart contract platforms. So

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious, Um. You know, you have a very diverse background,

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>living in Russia, living in Switzerland, um, and then obviously

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:26.280
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. So those are three different countries,

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think, um, growing up in those are, living

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 1>in those areas, gives you different ideologies which play into

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that we'll get into. But I'm curious, Um, And you

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>said in twenty sixteen you were looking at tokenizing real estate.

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>You found out about blockchain and said, whoa forget real estate? Right,

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm all in. Um. Was there one thing in particular

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:45.720
<v Speaker 1>that kind of got your eye, um, that really made

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you want to just go all in into this kind

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>of blockchain technology movement? Oh yes, I think these are

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>um two things, mainly from again the personal perspective. One

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>is that living in three countries so into I moved

0:04:58.080 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to the US into thousand and fifteen, so I was

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:03.600
<v Speaker 1>already in the in the States, and just moving my

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 1>fun personal funds around three countries was such a pain.

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>It was so difficult, and you can imagine what it

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 1>is to transfer from Swiss Bank too, I don't know,

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:17.919
<v Speaker 1>Russian bank, and then to the US bank. It took

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:21.600
<v Speaker 1>me months and weeks and sometimes over a year just

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>to like manage this accounts. And these were like the

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>perfectly legitimate money that I earned for all of my

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 1>years working in like perfectly legit corporations. So it was

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>just how inefficient the system was. There was one thing,

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:37.119
<v Speaker 1>and then when I discovered bitcoin, I was like, okay,

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 1>so I just click and that's it. So was it?

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>So was it. It was kind of the ability to

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:45.359
<v Speaker 1>have instead of you you dealt with the problems, the

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>complexity of having three different countries and three different sets

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>of policies and trying to move and then bitcoin kind

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of being that own sovereign money that really doesn't need

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>a country. I guess is that kind of what you

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>absolutely absolutely And within the US, I've changed three states,

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and even within one country, moving from state to state,

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>some bank is not present in this state. So when

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I moved from New York, for example, to North Carolina,

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the bank that I used in New York that was

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:14.279
<v Speaker 1>in the next three to me, there was no branch

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>of this bank in North Carolina, so and certain transactions

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:20.600
<v Speaker 1>they couldn't confirm without me going physically in the branch location.

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>So it can you imagine to do a transaction, I

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:25.480
<v Speaker 1>had to fly back to New York and it was

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>like those things were totally ridiculous to me. And then

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 1>another pivoting point was when we're starting looking at the

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 1>real estate, the potential of managing our family's real estate

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>through to organization, just the whole process how it works

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>in the US, I guess you know it better than

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I do. With the title search and all the documents

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that you have to do, and just realizing the potential

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that you can have having this records on the blockchain,

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I still think it's too early. I don't think it's

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen anytime, So not in thousand sixteen, not in

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the thousand nineteen. But when it happens, it's going to

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>bring enormous efficiencies and you can only see it. I

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>guess when you were going yourself this Spain and you

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>just realize how quickly you can manage this if this

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>was ever on the blockchain. Yeah, you know. Um, I

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>think kind of the same thing that caught your eye

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>was the same thing that caught my eye in where

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at setting up like offshore corporations and

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>bank accounts, just I didn't want to have all my

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>money tied up in one thing. I thought, Hey, it's

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>all digital money anyway, why not be in Singapore and Panama?

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>And then I learned about bitcoin and I was like, oh, perfect,

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>That's what caught my eye. As I learned more about it,

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I was like, all in kind of like you, I'm curious.

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>So I love that. And so for me, a lot

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>of my content I like to talk about why why bitcoin,

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>not like what is it? But why? And these are

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the things we talked about, right, I'm curious. Um, Coming

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>from Russia, and Switzerland, because those are those very interesting

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>places for me. So when I think of Russia, I

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>think about like, I mean, I'm young, I'm old enough

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 1>to remember before the fall, right, so I kind of

0:07:57.320 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>just grew I grew up in this Cold War era.

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I remember like this oppressive regime, which I would imagine

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>it's probably pretty hard to get money out of, maybe

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>even today. And then I think of Switzerland as like

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the place where people go park their money for privacy.

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 1>So you have like this country where it's hard to

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:14.120
<v Speaker 1>get money out of, and then you lived in a

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>country where maybe people think about it as like good

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>sound money, good banks and privacy. Um is it like that?

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>And did those do those visions kind of like did

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:28.119
<v Speaker 1>that draw you into bitcoin bits and pieces? Um? It's yeah,

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>It's not so much about the ideology and whatever, like

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the regime was. It's more about practicality and the bureaucracy

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that you have to deal with in Russia and in

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Switzerland to be fair, just to move your money in

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and out being absolutely legit investor. This is what surprises me,

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Like how much, how how much time a person has

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to spend just to have his own funds moving in

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 1>his own accounts, you know, and like these things. It's

0:08:57.720 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>not like in Russia. I didn't have any problems were

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>like the regime or whatever. It's again, it's more about

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the bureaucracy. It's more about how many papers you have

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to feel how many times you have to prove why

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>you're moving like funds outside of the country. Oh, because

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:12.559
<v Speaker 1>you don't live here anymore, like this kind of thing.

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 1>So I didn't face any like oppressive measures or whatever.

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>But it's just like it's just the inefficiencies and the

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>fact that the country is don't like their systems, don't

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>talk to each other. I think they're changing it slowly.

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:29.559
<v Speaker 1>I think they're bringing more transparency. There was this I

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.559
<v Speaker 1>remember when it was enacted, the law that they share

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the information between the tax authorities between the fact fact

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>that that was I think maybe around twenties. It's it

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:46.319
<v Speaker 1>was very recent. That wasn't necessarily a good thing, and

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of opinions, but of course I like to

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>comply with that. But you know, it's, uh, that's gonna

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 1>be interesting and we'll see how that plays out. But

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, the governments are always going to

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 1>want to try to control that and and so that

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 1>bureaucracy is part of that, um, so and so. But

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>you also, yeah, like people don't want to share this

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 1>information between countries for the simple reasons because they don't

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>want to pay their taxes. And I always remind when

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 1>people say, well, it's like it's oppressive that the country's

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 1>required the questless information from Switzerland. I was remind to

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:22.560
<v Speaker 1>my US friends that the income tax and Russia, at

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>least when I was living there was thirteen percent. Is

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>how is it compared to the US? I was like,

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>come on, you can paytent right, It's it's like we're here.

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>It's for some people it's almost half of what they earned,

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>so it's it's very different. Yeah, and those are those

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 1>are much bigger issues which I would love to talk

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to you about, especially in your background. But we won't

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>dive too much into those today. We'll save those for

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>another time. But but I get super interested in that

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 1>stuff as well. But so then you're all in sixteen

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 1>you started working with this fund so totially fund now,

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 1>which is peer to peer capital, which is a really

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>cool name. Obviously the technology is that appear to peer, right,

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and so, um tell us a little bit about the

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the investing thesis and and how you guys are like

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at the market and approaching the market. Yeah. Sure.

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 1>So we have invested mainly in the productal layer in

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 1>layer one basically since the beginning because we believe that

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 1>this is where the value creul is going to happen mainly.

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:23.839
<v Speaker 1>And so just to give a little bit overview of

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>our work in UM investment portfolios, so started from Ethereum,

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 1>from the genesis look of Ethereum. We invested in other

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>platforms like Diffinity, like to those like interoperability platforms like

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Cosmos and Polka dot Um and also in um more

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:44.839
<v Speaker 1>experimental platforms like Definity or Salona. I'm gonna talk about

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:47.559
<v Speaker 1>this a little bit later in more details, but this

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>is like the layer one thesis that we outline, and

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:53.959
<v Speaker 1>the idea is that UM we believe in poly chain

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>world it's not going to be one chain that's going

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 1>to rule at all, but that same time, it's not

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be thousands of that so we belief it's

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be skewed around certain use cases because the

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 1>actually blockchain, the network doesn't need like hundred use cases.

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>One to strong use cases is enough for it to

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:17.200
<v Speaker 1>approve value for example, Bitcoin, it's I think that the

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 1>consensus is around it being it's digital gold and ultimate

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>store of value. So even this one use case is enough.

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>But if it if it also grows around the medium

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>of exchange, it's going to be help it. It's going

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 1>to help it coin too. But having one or two

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 1>strong use cases enough, Ethereum now shapes as a general

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>trust layer for all the web free stack. This is

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 1>how we see Ethereum. But it doesn't mean that there

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>is no place for other change, because they will find

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>other use cases. And I think what's also important is

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that we don't look at all the changes competitors to

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Etherium because we don't we should not look at them

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 1>as we know all the use cases, and that's what

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 1>they're fighting for. I haven't it exhausted the list of

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the use cases. We just like peeked into it, and

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:05.079
<v Speaker 1>now we're already saying, oh, all this change are fighting

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:08.439
<v Speaker 1>for de fight. Well, we just discovered defied year ago. Wait,

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>we're going to discover something else. We're gonna discover more

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>use case cases with the change as they grow, as

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>they uncover their potential. Yeah, well we're talking about protocols.

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious to get your take, because um, really, I

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>think most of seen was kind of dominated by what

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>they call the fat protocol thesis right where the Internet.

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 1>To explain it to everybody listening on the Internet, it

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>was the applications that really accrued the value, not the protocol,

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>because the protocols were open source I know, T C, P, I,

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 1>p UM, and that in this thesis was that the

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>protocols would actually accrue the value, not the applications, UM,

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 1>so the ethereums and whatnot. However, now that narrative seems

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to have changed and a lot of people think that

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that was a fallacy and that's not the case. But

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 1>you guys still believe the protocols will accrue the value,

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 1>or some of them will. I guess yeah. I think

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>it's just that we're going through over simplification of the

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 1>market to actually understanding how complex it is. So fat

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>protocol thesis was I think in the general sense it

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:11.719
<v Speaker 1>was right. It was just oversimplified because it's not just

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 1>because the protocol exists and their network effects that the

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>token is going to accrude value. And I think that's

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>where it was the disconnect. And then with all the

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>years to come, we saw that if the token economy

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>is not built on the right way, the network effects

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>will not make the token accrou value. So there will

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>we see we saw it was a lot of networks

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>which are now have like less than ten million dollars

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>market caps that the protocol didn' accrouve value even though

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 1>there was valuable code built on top of it. And

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the reason for it is that we see

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that the fat protocols are only going to become fat

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>if they're underlying economics for the token to accrouve value.

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>And by this I mean, first of all, if the

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 1>token can gain certain um store failure components. For example,

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>either will not compete in store failure for bitcoin, but

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>it will gain a store value component, and at least

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>for sure when it's going to be based on proof

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>of steak and proof of stake is an interesting UM

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>is interesting value chrome mechanism, at least for the short

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>term term because it provides liquidity stings, and if you

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>don't have these liquidit testings with taking or bonding or

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>baking whatever, then it's very hard to approve value for

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the token because of the high velocity that it has.

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>And the second is what's the usage of the token

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>if you can, if there's a certain usage, like you

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>see for some layer two tokens, for example, I can

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>devil in this a little bit later. How the tokens

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 1>accroup value on layer two, because we believe they do

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>as well, but only for certain tokens that have the

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>tap talking mechanics, the token economics, the correct tokn economics

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>behind it. So for certain layer two tokens, if there's

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:48.880
<v Speaker 1>a usage where you can build the discounted cash flow

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>models on, like for example, for Life Beer for their

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>LPT token which is used to stake to perform transcoding services,

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>then there are underlying reasons for it to approve value.

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:04.479
<v Speaker 1>And and also yeah, if if some of this um

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>if some of the reasons combined in one token, then

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>it even strengthens it. For example, if it's store value

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>components plus taking and plus certain usage. But only if

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>there's only if this metrics combined, then they will see

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that protocol value. The producal tokens accrue value, not just

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>because the prodocol is going to have networks networks effect.

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 1>That's what I think. That's where the flat protocol these

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>has got at not wrong, but maybe too early. Well,

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I think people thought that just because the token will

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>become the most used token, that it would accrue value.

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>But velocity doesn't cause it to accrue value, right, So

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 1>there has to be some sort of mechanism built in

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that key wants people to hoard it, right, somebody has

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>to store it in order to get that supply demand

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 1>to be kind of activated. I guess, um, it's kind

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>of what you're saying exactly. UM you talked about you

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>talked about many protocols, not just one. Um. You know

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>we see in the Internet. I know that when we're

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about an technology here, and I believe this new

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:04.120
<v Speaker 1>technology is going to be I I kind of look

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 1>at it like we've had like five technological revolutions, um,

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Industrial Revolution, you know, steam engines, electricity, automobiles, and the

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 1>was this telecommunications where we got the first microprocessor and

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of built this whole all the way to the

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Internet age. But I look at this as like the

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:24.439
<v Speaker 1>next it's fifty they happen every fifty years, is like

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the next revolution. So it's it's bigger than the Internet.

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:29.959
<v Speaker 1>And sometimes we try to use something we know to

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 1>compare it, and then it boxes it in too much.

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>But with the with with what we have. Right, when

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you look at the Internet, we do have multiple protocols, right,

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>one is used for email, one is used for security,

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 1>one is used right for different things. And so maybe

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:46.159
<v Speaker 1>you're talking like that where we have different protocols and

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and they're used for different applications. Yeah, exactly. Specifization is

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the aspects of coward thesis. So we believe

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 1>that it's not going to be just one protocol layer.

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not going to be just one smart contract platform.

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's put it this way. But there's not gonna be

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of said, so they will they will find their

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>niches where they're what they're best at. For example, Tissos

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>is best ats on chain governance, and we're gonna see

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>governance is a separate topic because I'm still like, I

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:19.159
<v Speaker 1>cannot shape our opinion if governance is fundamentally valuable. But

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 1>at least we're going to see this experiment with Tessos.

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Uh than if the developers and the community finds it

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally valuable, then tsos got gets a niche because it's

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>so far as the only platform. And we've seen this

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>with their recent Athens that yeah, Athens uprate that it

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 1>works so far it works, so they are finding their

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>valuable niche in this. Then if we look at um

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>platforms like like Tessa's part of our portfolio, but I

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 1>also I try to speak about different platforms sometimes even

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>if they're not part of our portfolio, so it doesn't

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>sound like I'm only talking our books. So if we

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 1>are like if we look at Cardono, their value proposition

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:03.360
<v Speaker 1>is deep academic your review and their fundamental value proposition

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 1>as as I understand it again, is that the other

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 1>chains are too experimental and not validated academically as strongly

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 1>as Cardano is. So in the long term, they're all

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>going to fail because of the technological reasons, and Cardan

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna stand, and it's gonna if there are any

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:22.879
<v Speaker 1>other like useful features, not the networks, they're gonna pbsorb.

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 1>But again we're gonna see if the market is gonna

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:27.119
<v Speaker 1>take it and if they're gonna be interesting for the market.

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>If we look at eos Um, eos is like, I

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:33.679
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I don't even understand why people compared so

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 1>much to Etherium because I think they're totally different platforms.

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:40.679
<v Speaker 1>Us is not competing for being a general trust layer

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:43.879
<v Speaker 1>for the web three as Ethereum is just because of

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 1>its obvious centralization properties. But at the same time, first

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>of all, it's backed by block one, which has huge

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>exposure to media industry and gaming, and they are supporting

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of projects that are building on it, something

0:19:57.000 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that Ethereum doesn't have. And then it has it's looking

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:04.440
<v Speaker 1>into gaming industry, and this is not something I'm very

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>familiar with, so I cannot again judge how promising this is.

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:11.120
<v Speaker 1>But again, looking at what they're doing, they're finding their

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 1>niche and it might well be that they're gonna find it,

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>especially with the billion dollars that they have in the

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>world chest to support all the projects that are building

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>at it. So this is how we look at the

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>market and um. So generally our portfolio is split between

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:32.440
<v Speaker 1>like certain store of value coins like bitcoin and its rim.

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 1>We kind of put in this category because we believe

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>it from all the other tokens that's the most proven.

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Then the tokens that go into the new trend which

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 1>is taking which we believe also going to be of

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the market excluding Bitcoin, will be in proof of steak networks,

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and so in this bucket with wait so you you

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 1>say bitcoin will move into a proof of steak Oh no, no, no,

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:57.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean except from bitcoin if we take bitcoin, because

0:20:57.280 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't compare any of these assets with Bitcoin, because

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I believe they're fundamentally different. So whatever I say seven

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of the market, I'm talking about the market except bit

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>got it? Got it? Okay? So yeah, so I believe

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 1>this fift of the market will be in proof of

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 1>stake networks. And this is also like one of the

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>largest buckets in our portfolio, which is whereas like Cosmos,

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Polkad Tisso's our grand new cipher as well. And then

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 1>also one like the last bucket is experimental platforms. This

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 1>is like Salona and difinity. It's very hard to shape

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:31.639
<v Speaker 1>the theefs and where these platforms are going to be

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:33.920
<v Speaker 1>best at because they're so new and they're so different

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:37.160
<v Speaker 1>and their positions themselves so differently from the other than

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>we just put it like, we think it's very interesting

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 1>technology and we believe it's experimental. So this is kind

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:45.360
<v Speaker 1>of the third bucket where we don't know how it's

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:47.360
<v Speaker 1>going to turn out about it's different, interesting to look

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>at it. Yeah. Now, a lot of funds um you know,

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>especially the ones that are more connected VC funds, and

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:55.640
<v Speaker 1>we see in Silicon Valley and whatnot are really trying

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:59.160
<v Speaker 1>to get more into like equity. It seems like these days, Um,

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 1>do you guys always try to see if you can

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 1>get in like seed round equity or do you guys

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:07.919
<v Speaker 1>also play open market tokens? We do all of it.

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:10.360
<v Speaker 1>So the way we structure, yeah, the way we structure

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>our business. And again we're private investment firms, so there's

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of information I can disclose, but I

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 1>could speak about the general structure. How how we do it?

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 1>So um yeah, sure, um so um. It's about half

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:25.680
<v Speaker 1>of the portfolio is like a tradable portfolio, and this

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 1>is we always adjust our positions on the market based

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:30.879
<v Speaker 1>on trends, so we're not actively trading. What do we

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:34.159
<v Speaker 1>do like when fundamental shift and we see the fundamental shift,

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>we we do portfolio rebalancing. And then the rest of

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 1>it is split between the liquid tokens. This means the

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 1>tokens that are invested or bonded which are not immediately tradeable,

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and and a venture investing, which is about twenty of

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the portfolio depending on the time. And yeah, in venture investing,

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>we UM. We started with doing only tokens back in

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and sixteen, and now we do both tokens

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 1>and equity. But of course the idea is to sometimes

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>we get in equity for the reasons that the project

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:09.160
<v Speaker 1>is in the very early stage and they're talking economy

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 1>is not fairly yet, and actually it's preferential then investing

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 1>in the seed stage when the project has the white

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 1>paper outlining the exact mechanics of all it's talken, because

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:22.199
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it's too unrealistic to predict how exactly it's going

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 1>to work, and it's better to get into in equity.

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 1>But it's important to have the exposure to the underlying

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 1>asset because if UM and by that I mean having

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:34.199
<v Speaker 1>convertible equity or any other like talking options. There are

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 1>different types of arrangements you can have, but we usually

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:40.119
<v Speaker 1>don't do pure equity because most of the projects, I

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 1>guess all of the projects were investing. They have the

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>underlying assets, they have the underlying talking and we want

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 1>to have exposure to it. But we also want to

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:49.639
<v Speaker 1>have the product, want to give the project time to

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>figure out the talking economy, and we actually don't only

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 1>give them time. We work very closely. Well, our portfolio

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>companies on this to help them structure talking economy and

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 1>then gain exposure to the underlying said. So that's that's

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:04.119
<v Speaker 1>pretty much how we co over. So since you believe

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>in your your view is kind of that multiple chains

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 1>will be you know, all kind of coexisting in the future. UM,

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I take it. Maybe you believe that bitcoin is probably

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 1>has the best chance of survival and being there in

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the future, but maybe some of these other chains maybe

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>present better investment opportunities, meaning over the next you know,

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>five years, they'll probably increase faster than Bitcoin. Well, so

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe bitcoin is a safer play, but the other ones

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:34.640
<v Speaker 1>are more explosive. Uh, it could be. But still bitcoin

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>is our larger, largest bit on the portfolio. And um,

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:41.879
<v Speaker 1>I think that bitcoin bitcoin has not reached its explosive

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:45.160
<v Speaker 1>growth either. So it's just to me, it's like even

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:47.679
<v Speaker 1>if you look at your traditional portfolio, you keep some

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 1>of your funds and equities, someone bonds and someone gold.

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:53.400
<v Speaker 1>It's just very different as and some you might be

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>investing in some hedge funds or vcs. If you are

0:24:56.640 --> 0:24:58.399
<v Speaker 1>in the credit that investor and you have exposure to it,

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I view it the same. Wait, so I think, yes, yeah,

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about that harbor. Yeah, it's a safe harbor,

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>but it hasn't reached it school potential yet. Sure, yeah,

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and I agree. I mean I I see it much

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 1>much higher than it is today. I'm just thinking some

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:18.159
<v Speaker 1>of these, you know, other projects might go up faster,

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 1>right because they still have they're still we don't know

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>where that's going to go. But curious kind of what

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 1>you just said. UM So, I believe in acid allocation

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I talked about all the time, right, Like, nobody should

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>be getting wrecked in this market. You shouldn't put all

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>your money into it. Um So, you should only be

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 1>putting a you know, a portion of your assets into

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>this and whatever that percentage is for you. But within

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that allocation that someone puts into crypto, UM, do you

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:43.919
<v Speaker 1>really think there's a way to diversify that or is

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 1>it really just all lumped in crypto um or how

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 1>do you guys look at that? Well, crypto market is

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:54.400
<v Speaker 1>still very correlated, even though we've seen them this this

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:59.400
<v Speaker 1>year that bitcoin got separated more from the other assets

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>as we've seen in the recent kind of bull market. UM,

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 1>we've seen that bitcoin has really separated itself from all

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the market. But I still think it's

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>very correlated. And why because the main use case is

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 1>still speculation until we get to use it. Until we

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 1>get these tokens uh used as they were intended to

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:22.400
<v Speaker 1>instead of being speculated on, then we're going to see

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the uncorrelated market. Then we're going to see that you

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:29.639
<v Speaker 1>can really diversify for now. Yeah, I think diversification is

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:32.120
<v Speaker 1>a big word for crypto because it's still it's still

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>mainly about speculation, and I think it's not there's nothing

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 1>wrong with it. This is how markets evolve. They start

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 1>with speculation, they start with trading. But until we see

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>most of these tokens being used and being traded and

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 1>purchased for their intended value, we're going to see them

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>being highly correlated. And that's why I think that's a

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>poor diversification strategy. If you're diversifying in different market platform tokens,

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that's put it this way. Yeah, so I agree with you.

0:26:57.640 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Right where we're at right now, we're in a spect

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 1>reulation phase and it just is what it is. Um

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>So I guess what you're saying is then you know,

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 1>only take a percentage and allocate towards crypto, but then

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:09.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not really diversified. It's just it's just kind of

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 1>in crypto. Maybe you know, maybe some is more into

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>like bitcoin etherium, which is a little bit safer, and

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:17.239
<v Speaker 1>then some is into more like moonshots or whatever. But

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, it's still pretty correlated. So it's

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 1>all kind of not very diversified. Yeah, it depends. It

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 1>depends on whom you're talking to. If you're a professional

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 1>crypto investor, of course you look at it differently. And

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>that's like if we're talking about professional crypto investors like

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 1>like Austin, like yourself too, then it's very different because

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you're diving into the details. But most most investors, as

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:40.879
<v Speaker 1>you see them, and like as I talked to that

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 1>like more in the traditional investing business, they see cryptos

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 1>one a st class, and that's how I usually tell

0:27:46.640 --> 0:27:48.679
<v Speaker 1>them to look at it. Like I usually don't have

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 1>an advice to get anything beyond bitcoin and etherium, because

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>otherwise you have to form an investment these that's around it,

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and you have to like you cannot just buy tokens

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:00.080
<v Speaker 1>just to diversify. You have to perform an invest some

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:02.439
<v Speaker 1>pieces are you investing in smart contract platforms. Are you

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>investing in identity LA you're are you investing in defy?

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:10.119
<v Speaker 1>Are you investing in decentralized computing? They are already different

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 1>these that's forming around this asset class. And yes, of

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:17.040
<v Speaker 1>course in this sense there is a lot of diversification opportunities.

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 1>But again, if you're a professional crypto investor, not if

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:23.159
<v Speaker 1>you're an outside investor looking to diversify your portfolio, then

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's point and ether are the best bets.

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:27.639
<v Speaker 1>I think even the way we talk about it shows

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 1>how early we are. Right For example, right we're calling

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 1>it an asset class and talking about investing in the crypto.

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 1>You wouldn't say, like, I invest in the Internet right now.

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 1>In you would in ninety nine you would say that

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm investing on the Internet. Um, I was young, and

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:47.479
<v Speaker 1>my roommate and I we thought we were day traders

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, and we're playing these Internet stocks,

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and so we did. But today you would never go, oh,

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I invest in the Internet. Just that that doesn't work.

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that just shows how early we are.

0:28:56.440 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 1>We Yeah, we we look at cryptos and asset class,

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 1>but really it shouldn't and that just shows how early

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 1>we are. UM. Yeah, so it's interesting. UM, but I

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 1>agree with you, right, it can be dangerous and so

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>just practice asset allocation if anything else. What do you

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 1>think about I think we both agree on like how

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:19.600
<v Speaker 1>early we are we talked about, Um, really it's speculation

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 1>right now. UM. I see people talking about bitcoin, even

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin being you know, one of the longest running chains,

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and trying to still call it a money, a medium

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 1>of exchange, or even a store of value, which I

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>think is all too early. UM. What do you think

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 1>about some of the maybe use cases that we're starting

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 1>to see. Do you think we're gaining any traction or

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 1>do you think we're just still maybe a year or

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 1>two away from seeing anything really start to take hold. Um.

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the main mistake, but maybe misunderstanding of the

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:57.360
<v Speaker 1>market that most investments have me included, UM, is that

0:29:57.640 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I think we get the general trends right, we get

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the timing wrong, and like looking at the market at

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the thousand sixteen, I remember what we're talking about, Oh,

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 1>this is this is going to happen in two or

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 1>three years. Well, two or three years have passed and

0:30:09.760 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 1>very little has happened. So I think like, as you said,

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 1>when you were looking at the Internet, you should look

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 1>in ten fifteen years ri since if you're looking into

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:21.719
<v Speaker 1>like real shifts in the use cases. So yeah, like

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't like now, I don't even say, oh, in

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 1>two or three years, X, Y and Z just gonna happen,

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 1>because it's probably not. And it's to some extent it's

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 1>disappointing that it's moving so slowly, but I understand that

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that that's how it's probably gonna work, and that's how

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>it works for most technologies. So I think also, it's

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:42.960
<v Speaker 1>like we're like watching paint dry, Like we're sitting there

0:30:43.000 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 1>watching it every day. But if you really step back

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and look what's happened in the last two years, for example,

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 1>it's it's kind of moving pretty fast. It is if

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>you're inside this industry. It is if you're if you're

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 1>an insider, you're like, oh my god, there are hundreds

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 1>things of happening. Look defiled, look make dolls, CDPs. But

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 1>we can do so many things. But if you talk

0:31:03.120 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to an outsider and say, and the person will tell, well,

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 1>how can I use it, You're like, um, well, look,

0:31:08.880 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 1>this is making down. This is like you cannot open

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the CDP. It's still it's super exciting if you're inside

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 1>this industry and you're playing with this, and I agree

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 1>with this, like all the defied movement excites me. If

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you're asking about the trends, I think this is one

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 1>of the most interesting trends. Then. Um, of course, the

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:27.240
<v Speaker 1>staking and the governance and how all this proof of

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 1>state network is gonna launch and play out. This is

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 1>super interesting to watch. We just had Cosmos launched, we

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 1>had Tasos launched last year, and we're gonna have Palka

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Dot launched this year. So I'm very excited to see

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:42.160
<v Speaker 1>how this is gonna play out. Again, all the games,

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 1>theory and all of this is going to evolve in

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 1>years time when the network is going to grow in value,

0:31:46.920 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 1>when there's the security budget, let's say, the network is

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be much higher, and it's going to be

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 1>much more interesting to watch this all unfold. What else

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm very excited that about is Interiorum two point zero,

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of course, because they have such an um crazy ambitious roadmap,

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and again where now only talking about the roadmap in

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and you know how software development goes, it's never going

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to be completed in two any twenty one. So it's

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 1>like it's going to be completed later, and then after

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be completed, it's going to be a

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 1>period of adaptation of people moving to the new change.

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 1>So if we're gonna see all this new trends taken

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 1>on but slowly, and in terms of bitcoin, I think

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of maybe it's a little bit controversial, but

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of them. Um, A lot of

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:36.479
<v Speaker 1>the projects around bitcoin spending, bitcoin paying and whole foods,

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I think there are a little bit of distraction. They're

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 1>good marketing effort. It's nice. It's nice to see it

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 1>in the news. Oh now you can pay for your

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 1>groceries with bitcoin, But honestly, I don't want to pay

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 1>with my groceries with with bitcoin. And yeah, I think

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 1>this is not a primarily used case. Um so yeah,

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 1>like if talking about the advantage of bitcoin, I'm more

0:32:57.120 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 1>interested about privacy about it's the like the improvements in

0:33:03.080 --> 0:33:05.960
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin that the core development wasn't working on. But this

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 1>like little marketing thing. So I think I good for

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the general public to see the US like, oh, this

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:13.479
<v Speaker 1>big chain accepts bitcoin, but I think it's more like

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 1>noise over signal. I I would agree with you. I

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:20.120
<v Speaker 1>think there's definitely pros and cons to that. Um. I

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 1>think it's nice because I guess it does increase awareness,

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 1>but it pushes the wrong narrative. And really, I think

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:28.960
<v Speaker 1>we have to understand that there's this evolution, right, and

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:32.239
<v Speaker 1>and we're kind of going from like a collectible and

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll eventually get to this store of value stage. Bitcoin

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 1>is not even a good store of value. It's too

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 1>volatible right now, but it's getting there, and it will

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:40.320
<v Speaker 1>get there, and then after we get to the store value,

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:43.680
<v Speaker 1>then eventually we'll get to that medium of exchange. Right. Um.

0:33:43.800 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>But uh, but to try and push it as that today,

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean I look back because I started in two

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:51.320
<v Speaker 1>thousand and fifteen and and I was I bought a

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of bitcoin. They're cheap back then, and through like

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the tweventeen run, I started just spending bitcoins like they

0:33:57.840 --> 0:34:00.240
<v Speaker 1>were just chicklets, like oh yeah, bitcoin, bitcoin, bit pin,

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and then all of a sudden, you know, it hit

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 1>wherever it's tied. I'm like, what did I do with

0:34:04.480 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 1>all these big Why did I spend them? You know, Uh,

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to be the big point pizza guy, right, No, yeah,

0:34:10.719 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to be the bitcoin pizza guy and

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 1>you spend it. You spend an inflationary currency, you don't

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 1>spend a deflationary currency, right right, Yeah, you know it's

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:23.799
<v Speaker 1>good for adoption, it's good or good for awareness, but

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:26.600
<v Speaker 1>definitely too really for a for adoption for sure. So

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:29.880
<v Speaker 1>but the DeFi space is one that I like, I like,

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I like that, As you said, I think that's kind

0:34:31.920 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of exciting. Are you guys looking at that at all?

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:36.879
<v Speaker 1>Or just really more in the protocols, because there are

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 1>some defied protocols that we're starting to see, Oh yes,

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:43.799
<v Speaker 1>for sure, and most of them are built on ethereum.

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 1>So again back to our thesis, we believe that if

0:34:47.200 --> 0:34:51.600
<v Speaker 1>this protocols became valuable, etherium becomes valuable and our underlying

0:34:51.640 --> 0:34:56.759
<v Speaker 1>investments become valuable. So there's some layer two or reason

0:34:56.880 --> 0:34:59.759
<v Speaker 1>I heard the term security layer and execution layer and

0:34:59.880 --> 0:35:01.920
<v Speaker 1>like it even more than layer were one on layer

0:35:01.960 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 1>two because it's different. But so some of these protocols

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 1>on layer two will be able to capture value separately

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:11.880
<v Speaker 1>from ethereum, and we do invest in some of them,

0:35:12.000 --> 0:35:15.719
<v Speaker 1>like for example, life beer is one of those um

0:35:15.880 --> 0:35:20.359
<v Speaker 1>or the reacts. Uh, it's they're they're improving ethereum, they're

0:35:20.360 --> 0:35:25.440
<v Speaker 1>improving the ecosystem, but they're also separate layer two networks

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that can also gain value and prove value because they're

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:31.040
<v Speaker 1>holding some valuable states in it. So I think it's

0:35:31.040 --> 0:35:33.680
<v Speaker 1>important to see defy. It's a very interesting trend, but

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I think each it's important to look at each platform

0:35:37.040 --> 0:35:40.360
<v Speaker 1>and see if the underlying asset is going to improve

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 1>value because the platform itself and the software itself may

0:35:43.600 --> 0:35:47.160
<v Speaker 1>be extremely interesting, but the valuable still still complete ethereum.

0:35:47.760 --> 0:35:50.440
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, so I think we look at it separately.

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:53.279
<v Speaker 1>We think all of these protocols like DOHRMA, like d I,

0:35:53.360 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 1>d X, Maker die. Of course we use it extensively.

0:35:56.480 --> 0:35:58.919
<v Speaker 1>We use make a dial and that's what I'm excited about.

0:35:58.960 --> 0:36:02.760
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the few blockchain tools that you actually

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 1>use for its intended purpose, not like not the speculation,

0:36:06.040 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and very excited about this use cases. So we've been

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 1>using Maker Doubt for a while. We've been using their

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:14.719
<v Speaker 1>CDPs and looking for the multichollateral dye to come on

0:36:14.960 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to come on boards so we can use like for example,

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 1>digits tokens like goldback tokens to CDPs. So this is

0:36:22.160 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 1>very interesting. But again we'll look at it separately as

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:27.240
<v Speaker 1>a use case or as an investment. As a use case,

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:30.600
<v Speaker 1>they're all extremely exciting. As an investment, you have to

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:34.000
<v Speaker 1>see like we're we don't own, for example, maker tokens,

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:38.759
<v Speaker 1>but we do use maker dow extensively. So that's the difference. Okay. Um.

0:36:38.800 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 1>One last topical that dip into just a little bit

0:36:41.400 --> 0:36:46.000
<v Speaker 1>is UH is risk and and and risk management. Um.

0:36:46.040 --> 0:36:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I think obviously every single project is going to have

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:52.200
<v Speaker 1>its own set of risks, right, um. Whatever that may

0:36:52.239 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 1>be risk from the team, risk from other competing. But

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:58.120
<v Speaker 1>then I think we have maybe we have a risk

0:36:58.200 --> 0:37:00.799
<v Speaker 1>over kind of the asset class from like regulations and

0:37:00.800 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that, Like where do you see risk and

0:37:03.160 --> 0:37:05.959
<v Speaker 1>how do you guys, um kind of plan that out

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:09.840
<v Speaker 1>in your investing thesis. Oh, I don't like this topic.

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm kidding because there's just so many risks in crypto now.

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 1>It's just like full of risks. But to be serious, um,

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:22.719
<v Speaker 1>the different buckets of risks. One is the inherent risks

0:37:22.760 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 1>of the token economy being not thought through. And this

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:27.920
<v Speaker 1>is the very obvious one, and this is what we

0:37:28.040 --> 0:37:30.040
<v Speaker 1>look at the first place. It's like the on the

0:37:30.080 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 1>micro level. UM. If you look at the project, the

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:34.560
<v Speaker 1>risk is that the token is not going to prove value.

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:37.719
<v Speaker 1>And we can draw models as long as we can,

0:37:38.280 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 1>but until you invest, if you invest in the token

0:37:41.600 --> 0:37:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that's not treated yet and not used for its intended purpose,

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you have no idea if the token economy that's been

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 1>drawn on the white board is actually going to work

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:52.520
<v Speaker 1>in practice. That's why we do invest a lot in

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the tokens that traded on the market. And we talk

0:37:56.160 --> 0:37:58.360
<v Speaker 1>to projects sometimes and we love the project and we

0:37:58.440 --> 0:38:00.799
<v Speaker 1>love the token, and we say, guy, we're gonna invest

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:03.600
<v Speaker 1>in it at the higher price, but we want to

0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:05.920
<v Speaker 1>do risk. We want to do risk your token economy.

0:38:05.960 --> 0:38:08.920
<v Speaker 1>We want to do risk, your um, your mechanics, who

0:38:08.920 --> 0:38:11.319
<v Speaker 1>want to see how it works, And that's what we do.

0:38:11.480 --> 0:38:13.880
<v Speaker 1>We do a lot of market investing were by tokens

0:38:13.880 --> 0:38:15.840
<v Speaker 1>on the open market too, So we don't only do

0:38:15.960 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 1>venture deals for the specific reason, because sometimes we believe

0:38:19.320 --> 0:38:22.400
<v Speaker 1>if it's all very theoretical and bettery, new is just

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:25.719
<v Speaker 1>too risky. UM. So this is one of the office risks.

0:38:25.880 --> 0:38:28.600
<v Speaker 1>But of course the regulatory risk that you're talking about

0:38:28.680 --> 0:38:32.800
<v Speaker 1>is another big one because we're based in the US

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:34.360
<v Speaker 1>and you're based in the US two and you know

0:38:34.680 --> 0:38:38.919
<v Speaker 1>how unpredictable it can be. But also at the same time,

0:38:39.160 --> 0:38:43.240
<v Speaker 1>it's unpredicable, but it's predictable. If you are issuing a token.

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Most of the projects have to think that they have

0:38:47.239 --> 0:38:49.759
<v Speaker 1>highly like likelihood of being deemed the security at some

0:38:49.800 --> 0:38:51.399
<v Speaker 1>point in time, and they should start I guess they're

0:38:51.440 --> 0:38:54.480
<v Speaker 1>thinking from this point of view because we heard so

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 1>many projects that they're saying, oh, we're utility token that

0:38:58.480 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 1>this is why kind of like, well, you haven't got

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:03.480
<v Speaker 1>any approval from the legislature for being a YouTube. It's

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a token. It's what we have invented, like the industry

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:11.600
<v Speaker 1>have invented instead of itself. And some lawyers had said

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:15.239
<v Speaker 1>that yeah, that works, I mean yes and no. Right, So,

0:39:15.320 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 1>like you take like a storage application, like a file

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:20.239
<v Speaker 1>coin or storage coin or whatever. Right, so I could

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:23.440
<v Speaker 1>have like decentralized storage I could store instead of using Dropbox,

0:39:23.440 --> 0:39:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I could store my files decentralized. In order to use that,

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I have to use their credits or their tokens um.

0:39:31.520 --> 0:39:34.719
<v Speaker 1>But like if I use in the traditional sense, I

0:39:34.840 --> 0:39:37.560
<v Speaker 1>use let's say I use a shutter stock for stock

0:39:37.600 --> 0:39:41.080
<v Speaker 1>photography or video block for stock videography, And to use

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:44.040
<v Speaker 1>those platforms, I have to buy credits and then I

0:39:44.080 --> 0:39:47.160
<v Speaker 1>redeem their credits for those photos. I redeem those credits

0:39:47.239 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 1>for That's how it works. And those credits I buy

0:39:50.200 --> 0:39:52.919
<v Speaker 1>are not securities, and those credits are not attacked. So

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 1>if I buy a token to use on video or

0:39:55.719 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 1>file coin, they're treating that as a as a security,

0:39:59.080 --> 0:40:01.160
<v Speaker 1>of treating that as a as a as an ASCID,

0:40:01.200 --> 0:40:04.240
<v Speaker 1>as a taxable event. So we we have like real

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:06.239
<v Speaker 1>world This is where I lose it. It's like we

0:40:06.320 --> 0:40:10.360
<v Speaker 1>have this real world example. I get reward points at target.

0:40:10.480 --> 0:40:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Those aren't taxable, right, but all of a sudden, because

0:40:13.680 --> 0:40:16.440
<v Speaker 1>it's now a token, it is. So what do you

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 1>think about that? Well, I totally agree with you. But

0:40:19.840 --> 0:40:23.360
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying is that's what we think the legislators

0:40:23.360 --> 0:40:26.080
<v Speaker 1>are gonna say, and that's where the risks are. So

0:40:26.120 --> 0:40:30.280
<v Speaker 1>it totally makes sense. But then because it hasn't proven itself.

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:34.000
<v Speaker 1>And now actually with the skin Kick case, you've seen

0:40:34.000 --> 0:40:36.560
<v Speaker 1>it yesterday, the SEC decided to see you. I mean

0:40:36.760 --> 0:40:38.839
<v Speaker 1>it's it's kind of was expected that they will see

0:40:38.960 --> 0:40:42.359
<v Speaker 1>them but at least it's gonna show some clarity because

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:46.360
<v Speaker 1>for now it's more what the industry inside of itself thinks,

0:40:46.520 --> 0:40:48.960
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen and what makes sense, and that's

0:40:48.960 --> 0:40:51.640
<v Speaker 1>what we hope is going to happen, because yeah, most

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of these tokens are intended for its intended purpose. But

0:40:54.760 --> 0:40:56.960
<v Speaker 1>you can see the the kin token, for example, it

0:40:57.040 --> 0:41:00.799
<v Speaker 1>also has an intended purpose. But I have no idea

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:02.279
<v Speaker 1>how it's going to turn out because there have been

0:41:02.280 --> 0:41:04.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot of gray areas how it's been sold, how

0:41:04.840 --> 0:41:08.719
<v Speaker 1>it's been marketed, what the team members have advertised, what

0:41:08.760 --> 0:41:13.319
<v Speaker 1>they've said. So until we have one, two, three, ten

0:41:13.440 --> 0:41:15.719
<v Speaker 1>cases like this which are public and open and give

0:41:15.719 --> 0:41:18.759
<v Speaker 1>a public precedent, I think there's still high risk. Even

0:41:18.760 --> 0:41:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that the recent fence and guidance that was issued a

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:23.359
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago, it had a lot of new

0:41:23.440 --> 0:41:26.920
<v Speaker 1>points that were not mentioned before because before I remember,

0:41:27.000 --> 0:41:29.520
<v Speaker 1>there was only the main concept was that if your

0:41:29.560 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 1>network is fully functional at the moment of sale of talking,

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:35.799
<v Speaker 1>it shouldn't be considered a security. That was kind of

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the general understanding, but now they have added many more

0:41:39.680 --> 0:41:42.200
<v Speaker 1>points to it. They were like, it's it's not supposed

0:41:42.239 --> 0:41:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to be traded for example, remember they were they were saying,

0:41:45.680 --> 0:41:49.400
<v Speaker 1>like nobo, what what the exact term was, But it

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:52.240
<v Speaker 1>was not supposed to be openly traded on the market,

0:41:52.520 --> 0:41:55.400
<v Speaker 1>only through like your designated app or something. But that

0:41:56.000 --> 0:41:59.959
<v Speaker 1>so that's where the regulators are gonna that's the threat

0:42:00.000 --> 0:42:04.800
<v Speaker 1>at I see, because um, I see this token economy

0:42:04.880 --> 0:42:08.440
<v Speaker 1>where it unlocks value. So right now I have value

0:42:08.560 --> 0:42:12.320
<v Speaker 1>stuck in my airline rewards points, and I have value

0:42:12.480 --> 0:42:15.560
<v Speaker 1>stuck in my whatever target reward points, and I have

0:42:15.680 --> 0:42:18.400
<v Speaker 1>value stuck in all these silos and it's stuck. But

0:42:18.440 --> 0:42:21.000
<v Speaker 1>if we can tokenize that, then all that value can

0:42:21.040 --> 0:42:25.160
<v Speaker 1>freely exchange. But what what that Fincent as you're pointing

0:42:25.160 --> 0:42:30.160
<v Speaker 1>out specifically says is you cannot you can't exchange that.

0:42:30.280 --> 0:42:33.000
<v Speaker 1>And it's like, well, and so all this we're talking

0:42:33.000 --> 0:42:34.600
<v Speaker 1>about like n f T s and video games. So

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:37.680
<v Speaker 1>now I could earn this skin from my video game

0:42:37.719 --> 0:42:39.239
<v Speaker 1>and I should be able to freely exchange that. But

0:42:39.320 --> 0:42:42.439
<v Speaker 1>what that regulation says is no value has to stay

0:42:42.440 --> 0:42:45.000
<v Speaker 1>in a silo. And so that's very scary. So we'll

0:42:45.000 --> 0:42:48.319
<v Speaker 1>see how that how that we're just in the beginning, Yeah,

0:42:48.440 --> 0:42:50.520
<v Speaker 1>because it's to the guidance, then this is not a

0:42:50.560 --> 0:42:52.960
<v Speaker 1>court key. And this is also important, and that's I

0:42:53.000 --> 0:42:55.280
<v Speaker 1>think what they said themselves, like, this is a guidance,

0:42:55.320 --> 0:42:57.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a framework, but until it's been tested and coured,

0:42:57.960 --> 0:42:59.360
<v Speaker 1>we cannot say that this is a rule said and

0:42:59.400 --> 0:43:03.799
<v Speaker 1>still so yeah, we have. At a recent conference I

0:43:03.840 --> 0:43:06.000
<v Speaker 1>was at, there was someone from the SEC talking and

0:43:06.320 --> 0:43:08.319
<v Speaker 1>they said, look, you guys are all waiting for us

0:43:08.320 --> 0:43:10.160
<v Speaker 1>to come out and tell you what you can do.

0:43:10.520 --> 0:43:13.080
<v Speaker 1>That's never gonna happen. We don't tell you what you

0:43:13.200 --> 0:43:15.680
<v Speaker 1>can do. You're allowed to do whatever you do. We'll

0:43:15.719 --> 0:43:19.239
<v Speaker 1>only tell you when you can't. And so, as you said, right,

0:43:19.280 --> 0:43:22.240
<v Speaker 1>we'll have to see it playing out over court cases,

0:43:22.239 --> 0:43:25.319
<v Speaker 1>and it's just going to be a slow, slow role

0:43:25.320 --> 0:43:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Out's going to be interesting to watch exactly. But we

0:43:28.160 --> 0:43:30.560
<v Speaker 1>should also shouldn't forget about the rest of the world.

0:43:30.840 --> 0:43:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's very said when the projects have

0:43:33.200 --> 0:43:35.439
<v Speaker 1>to exclude the US because of this regulation, but there's

0:43:35.440 --> 0:43:38.040
<v Speaker 1>still a big white world there and some countries I

0:43:38.080 --> 0:43:42.080
<v Speaker 1>believe will be pioneering very open legislation. It's going to

0:43:42.120 --> 0:43:44.680
<v Speaker 1>be very interesting to watch. And I'm not only talked

0:43:44.680 --> 0:43:48.880
<v Speaker 1>about like Malta but also I think maybe we're going

0:43:48.920 --> 0:43:53.280
<v Speaker 1>to see more innovation coming from Singapore Hong Kong because

0:43:53.520 --> 0:43:56.879
<v Speaker 1>their legislators are going to move faster than the US legislators.

0:43:57.200 --> 0:43:59.400
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, it's it's also interesting to watch what's going

0:43:59.400 --> 0:44:01.839
<v Speaker 1>to happen on this side of the world. Yeah, as Ah,

0:44:02.080 --> 0:44:04.719
<v Speaker 1>you're you're more of an international citizen, having lived in

0:44:04.719 --> 0:44:08.240
<v Speaker 1>three countries. Um, I think a lot of Americans, uh don't.

0:44:08.400 --> 0:44:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Seems like a lot of Americans don't really travel that

0:44:10.200 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 1>much and they just kind of stay focused and so um,

0:44:12.520 --> 0:44:15.520
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely gonna be a lot scarier for them. I'm

0:44:15.520 --> 0:44:18.799
<v Speaker 1>not thinking globally, But great stuff, gotcha. I I really

0:44:18.840 --> 0:44:22.080
<v Speaker 1>appreciate this. It's been been a fascinating conversation. Um, there's

0:44:22.120 --> 0:44:24.280
<v Speaker 1>so many areas that I'd love to dive in deeper

0:44:24.320 --> 0:44:25.879
<v Speaker 1>with you. So hopefully we'll get together and be able

0:44:25.920 --> 0:44:27.759
<v Speaker 1>to talk about that. But I don't want to. I

0:44:27.760 --> 0:44:29.439
<v Speaker 1>don't want to keep keep you too long. We've already

0:44:29.480 --> 0:44:32.880
<v Speaker 1>gone over past what I told you. So anyway, it

0:44:32.960 --> 0:44:37.239
<v Speaker 1>was it was great. Uh nice talking to you. Yeah,

0:44:37.239 --> 0:44:39.040
<v Speaker 1>it was super nice and thanks for having it was

0:44:39.080 --> 0:44:43.160
<v Speaker 1>a great discussion. Yeah, I'm happy to talk again. Yeah,

0:44:43.200 --> 0:44:45.239
<v Speaker 1>we'll have you back on soon. All right, thank you,

0:44:45.800 --> 0:44:49.040
<v Speaker 1>all right, thank you. All right. Hey, if you like

0:44:49.200 --> 0:44:52.799
<v Speaker 1>this episode of the Market Disruptors Podcast, please help us

0:44:52.840 --> 0:44:55.319
<v Speaker 1>take this to the top of the podcast charts. Just

0:44:55.360 --> 0:44:58.400
<v Speaker 1>please do me a favor and rate, review and subscribe.

0:44:58.640 --> 0:45:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Taking fifteen seconds to leave a quick review goes a

0:45:01.600 --> 0:45:04.280
<v Speaker 1>long way in helping us reach more people and disrupt

0:45:04.280 --> 0:45:07.160
<v Speaker 1>more markets. I really appreciate you listening, and I'll see

0:45:07.200 --> 0:45:09.360
<v Speaker 1>you next time on the Market Instructors podcast.