WEBVTT - What's Happening to the Retail Industry?

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:32.199
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Well,

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>let's turn our attention out to an area of the

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:38.239
<v Speaker 1>economy which has not necessarily, let's say, been illuminated by

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump's presidency, and that is the retail sector. And

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 1>here to tell us more as Chris Fulkei is the

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>chief executive Store Capital Chris, thanks very much for being here.

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Now I just want to read you one note. This

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>comes actually from a Credit Suite report, and this has

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>to do with the deterioration in real estate investment trust

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>but specifically in the mall A segment. It says this

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>has to do with the associated mortgage backed securities and

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>CDs right swaps. Barely a quarter into seventeen, year to

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:15.479
<v Speaker 1>day retail store closings have already surpassed those of two

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:20.759
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight. Is that scary? It is scary? There

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>are probably close to nine thousand stores slated to be

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>closed potentially this year. UM. Now, the good news for

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 1>us is that we're into service space and manufacturing, so

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>we have give or take exposure to retail, and of that,

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 1>very few of our locations are anywhere close to any

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:42.039
<v Speaker 1>of the chains that are suffering the big closures. Well,

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>so let's talk about your firm, your chief executive officers

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>officer of store Capital, which is a middle market real

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>estate capital solutions firm. Are you going into some of

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 1>these mid tier retailers and these mid tier malls and

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to help them structure their debts and their businesses

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>that they can emerge from this uh, this deterioration and

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>credit worthiness that we've seen on a broad based level

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and retail. Uh No. So, so store is stands for

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>single tenant operational real estate. So we focus on profit

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 1>center properties. So we do business mostly in the service space.

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 1>So think about health clubs and fitness or early childhood education,

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>movie theaters, uh, you know, veterinary clinics, that kind of thing.

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 1>So we do lots of lots of things in the

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>service space. We do about in the retail space. And

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:37.399
<v Speaker 1>we started the company in two thousand and eleven, which

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>meant we had a little bit of foresight to know that, hey,

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the Internet is here. We know that you have to

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>be an experiential retailer. And clearly there are retailers that

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>are expanding in today's economy. But uh, the the assets

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that we're owning would be let's say, in the furniture space, hunting, fishing,

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>um uh, you know, home improvement, things like that hobby

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>space uh and which is just a different kind of space,

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:03.359
<v Speaker 1>and and things that you would not typically buy over

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the internet, things you'd like to try out. Can you

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:08.639
<v Speaker 1>put numbers to just how different the fates of these

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 1>experiential stores are to their retail they're like physical retail brethren. Well,

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I would say that our average retailer is probably growing

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>year to year about eight percent top line in sales,

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>so uh, and some of that same store sales growth,

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:30.119
<v Speaker 1>and some of that's adding new locations. Um So, these

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>are vibrant retail companies. And again it's only about fift

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>of what we do, but it's um uh. Typically people

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>for example, want to try an mattress or they want

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>to try a sofa there, and they have a hard

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>time returning things if they're if they're delivered to them,

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and so on. So uh so these are the types

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>of things that we think long term, uh will do well.

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>We don't think that people will just stay in there

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>on their sofa and order everything that they can. So

0:03:56.880 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>would it be okay to classify you as an expert

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>in credit? Uh? You know a little bit about it

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>right well? And the reason because I'm wondering if you

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>could just walk us through the credit landscape right now

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and give us your thoughts not just as a as

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>an investor, but as someone that is a practitioner about

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the consent deals you're seeing and the kinds of investors

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that are being courted because yields are as still historically low. Well,

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I've I've always thought in our space the

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:27.919
<v Speaker 1>credits miss priced. People have a tendency to think that

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a strong credit equates to an investment grade contracts. So

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>otherwise I have an investment grade tenant, I must have

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>an investment grade contract. Um Uh. If I have a

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:39.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty piece of real estate, it must be a good investment.

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these are things that are not necessarily true.

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Good credit does not equate to a good contract. A

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty piece of real estate does not equate to a

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>good investment. Just to give maybe given example so people

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:51.480
<v Speaker 1>understand how that works. Well, Uh, you could have a

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>company that's an investment grade credit, but you could pay

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:55.679
<v Speaker 1>twice what the real estate would cost to build for

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:59.600
<v Speaker 1>for for example, you may not have proper allianments of interest,

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>so leases allow the tenant to go dark. Anytime. You

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>don't have master leases, you have no financial reporting. If

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 1>you look at our company today, we get financial reporting

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>from about nine percent of our talents, which is just

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>staggering at the store level, not just the corporate level,

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the corporate level, but the store level. So that's just unbelievable.

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Where are the companies that you invest in the stores?

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Are they in a level malls sea level malls? Are

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>they not in malls? I would say most of them

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>are not in malls. Um, So let's if I if

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:35.919
<v Speaker 1>I have three of our properties that are within a

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 1>quarter of a mile roughly of Macy's, a Kmart, a Pennies,

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>a Sears. That tells you that we're not really in malls.

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Where in strip center is more or less in front

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>of Walmart's, in front of targets. Uh. Sometimes if it's

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>a if it's a restaurant, or if it's another retail store,

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>we might be adjacent to one of those kinds of properties. Well,

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess I I What I'm trying to get at

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>is we've heard a lot of hedge fund managers say

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>that shorting mall related debt is the next big short,

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen a lot of big investors who are

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 1>very respected go in and try to do this via

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 1>derivative wagers, among others. Do you think that they're onto

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>something based on what you have seen in your personal

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>investing experience. I think if you could find a pure

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 1>way to short more related debt, it might be an

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting investment. Uh, it's it's far moved from what I

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:26.799
<v Speaker 1>do for a living, but it might be interesting investment.

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>But what I've seen is that things that people are

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 1>shorting tend to be somewhat blunt instruments, so they're not

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:34.480
<v Speaker 1>exactly pure more related debt. There is no pure thing

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>to short in CDs as there was in residential real

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>estate prior to the Great Recession. Some of your customers

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>might be restaurants, for example, right, like for Burger King Right.

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:47.480
<v Speaker 1>If you need some financing or some help with the franchise,

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:50.160
<v Speaker 1>then you're going to lend your expertise to that. You're

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:53.480
<v Speaker 1>in Scottsdale, Arizona. When I thought when I saw that,

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:55.719
<v Speaker 1>and I remembered, of course, what you have to live

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>through it to be in Scottsdale, Arizona. Let's say, back

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and eight, if you can give us

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>a little perspective as to why this cycle appears the

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>way it does, and not to confuse it with what

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>happened in two thousand and eight, right, well, to put

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>it in perspective. We've been in this business for about

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty five years UM, and this is our third public company,

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>so this is not my first rodeo. And every company

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>we've run is outperformed the benchmark. So it didn't matter

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>whether a ten year treasury with six fifty four fifty.

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Today we're a two thirty, So we've always out performed

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the benchmarks. Um Our Stores, the assets that we own

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>are today in forty eight states, UH, the biggest state

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>being Texas, at no other states north of ten UM,

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>so we're all over the country and we're providing UH

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>financial real estate net least solutions to middle market and

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>larger companies and for them we're providing a financial solution

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>for our investors, were providing them with the opportunity to

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>own some really good quality real estate investments. How many

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>competitors do you have if you noticed that the field

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>has gotten more crowded as an investment firms to look

0:07:56.880 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>for new opportunities so far, I would say no, um

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>uh and and I we sold our first public company

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand one to GE Capital. Uh. Today my

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>office is actually in UH space that used to be

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>occupied by the successor company to the first company were created.

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>G must have bought ten people in our space, so

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>they almost like the oxygen out of the room, buying

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>people and growing it in. Today G Capital has has

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>ceased to exist, So I would say that there it's

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>very very hard to create an institutional player in the space.

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Most of the people that are competitors of ours are

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>small to medium sized landlords. They're privately held. They're very

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:38.559
<v Speaker 1>few of you know, good quality public you know landlords.

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>And in the marketplace. By the way, that our our

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:42.559
<v Speaker 1>market alone is about two and a half treeion dollars

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>in size, so uh and and here we are with

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:49.319
<v Speaker 1>an equity capitalization that's just north of four bayon acquisitions,

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>what are you looking for? Well, our guidance this year

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:55.080
<v Speaker 1>so far is to do nine million dollars net of sales,

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>so we'll sell properties from time to time. Last year

0:08:57.440 --> 0:08:59.839
<v Speaker 1>we did about a b in one fifty uh so

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the year before that we did about the same. We've

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:05.719
<v Speaker 1>been in general doing somewhere around a hunter million hours

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:08.559
<v Speaker 1>a month worth of business. We've been doing thirty to

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>forty transactions every quarter. We've been adding to our customer base,

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and about a third of the business we do is

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>repeat business with existing tenants. What do you think will

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 1>be the hallmark to look for to indicate that the

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>retail armageddon iss some people have been calling it with

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the incredible rush of stores that have been closed, that

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:31.680
<v Speaker 1>this that this retail blood bath is reaching a crescendo.

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think that the retail blood bath that

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about is mostly going to affect malls where

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you're dealing with large anchors that are having issues, which

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:46.680
<v Speaker 1>can cause a lot of smaller retailers to also close

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 1>down their shops. And some of those smaller retailers are

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:51.719
<v Speaker 1>also closing down their shops on their own. Um, if

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you look at strip malls, for example, most of those

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 1>malls are filled with you know, a Walmart, and then

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>lots of service providers could be taxed for fighters, could

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>be yoga studios, um. And I think that a lot

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:06.680
<v Speaker 1>of those malls are doing great. So but a lot

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>of people say that we're not in the ninth inning,

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:10.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to use a baseball analogy, We're not

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>necessarily nearing the end of the pain that we've seen

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 1>in the retail industry. I mean, would you agree, I

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>do agree. I think that you know, we're going to

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 1>see the demise of some very old and um storied

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>names and retail over time. Thank you so much, truly

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to speak with you, and thank you so much

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>for coming to the studios. Chris Volki is chief executive

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>officer of Store Capital, talking about middle market investing in

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:58.679
<v Speaker 1>retail spaces but really focusing on experiences, not just selling stuff. Well, yesterday,

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Home Capital Group, which is Canada's biggest alternative mortgage lender,

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 1>plunged more than sixty percent after disclosing that it needed

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>emergency financing that was done and secured at very un

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:16.959
<v Speaker 1>uh financially unpleasant terms. Let's just say now the stock

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 1>is rebounding rebounding a bit, but I really want to

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>get a sense of how much this company serves as

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 1>a harbinger for the broader Canadian mortgage market which has

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>been on fire. Doug Alexander, please join us and make

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>sense of this. Doug Alexander is a Canadian financial service

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>services reporter with Bloomberg and he comes to us from Toronto. Doug,

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 1>can you just put this into broader context? I mean,

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:44.680
<v Speaker 1>is Home Capital Group considered UH sort of a red

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 1>flag a Canary uh that sort of signifies some deeper,

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>broader pain in the mortgage market in Canada. Yes, good morning, UM,

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Home Capital H. A short answer would be uh no, Um.

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>They are actually, UH, as you point out, the largest

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:06.079
<v Speaker 1>alternative lender UH in Canada. They do. They've been around

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>for like thirty one years, um. And what they really

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 1>do is they do specialize in a certain kind of mortgage.

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:13.839
<v Speaker 1>It's not necessarily like the subprime that you'd see in

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the US that has what caused so many problems during

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the financial crisis, but they do provide loans to people

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>that may have a bit more difficulty UH getting qualifications

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>through the major Canadian banks, whether it be because they

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>have more complicated UM income streams, or they could be

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 1>foreigners that have just moved into the country. But the

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:39.599
<v Speaker 1>bottom line, home capital has about twenty billion dollars or

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 1>less than twenty billion dollars of loans UM mortgage loans,

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and the Canadian UH mortgage market essentially is about one

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 1>point one trillion in Canadian Hey, hey, Doug, you know,

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if you could just step back into and

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 1>explain a little bit about the real estate market, the

0:12:55.920 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>residential real estate market in Canada, because, uh, the government

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>has I believed already proposed a tax on foreign purchases. Also,

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>you've seen explosive increases in real estate values in cities

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 1>like Vancouver and also in Toronto. You got a lot

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 1>of speculators. What if you could just kind of pull

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 1>it all together for Yeah, it's a very interesting market.

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>So when it comes to real estate in Canada, UM

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and really, as you point out, there has been a

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 1>huge price appreciation as of late. It's really am It's

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>really a market that is very, very lumpy. There are

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>two areas in the country where you could argue that

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>there's an overheated housing market, which is UH Toronto currently

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>UM and Vancouver Vancouver is UM kind of eased off

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, but as you point out, in UM

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Vancouver last year, there were UH measures taken to curb

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 1>UH some of that demand UM by targeting UH foreign

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:59.680
<v Speaker 1>investors with a with a tax UM that's been in

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 1>pos is now in to cover the Toronto market as well.

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:06.559
<v Speaker 1>But either very two very specific markets in the country.

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>If you look across the country and that there are

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>other markets that are are UH seeing a slowdown UM

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>for whatever UM economic reasons, Calary being one of them.

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>UM and other major cities like Much we all that

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>really just haven't seen that UM that that same level

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>of appreciation. So it's really a a country that has

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>two overheated housing markets. And let's be clear that's actually

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>concerned policymakers UM and you know those in the financial

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>services industry and UH and UH you know politicians at

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the local level as well well. I just want to

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>bring this back to Home Capital Group because this UH

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 1>is this company is based in Toronto, which is one

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>of the overheated markets that you point to, and they

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 1>have been the subject of a regulatory probe basically looking

0:14:56.160 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>into whether their lending standards were overly lax. Another words,

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 1>they were letting me perhaps money to people who couldn't

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>afford to pay it back. I mean, I guess that

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>from that perspective, you have to wonder, is this a problem.

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Are we seeing a repeat, perhaps on a smaller scale,

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 1>of what we saw leading up to two thousand and

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>eight in the US? Yeah, I don't think that's what's

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>what the you know, the analysts and UH and other

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>observers in the industry industry are looking at. They're looking at.

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Home Capital is really a very company specific issue, and

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I think to understand the current context that we're in

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 1>with home Capital, we have to kind of go back

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years and really what their problem is

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>is a problem of disclosure. UM. A couple of years ago, UH,

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:45.479
<v Speaker 1>they they had issues with some mortgages from outside brokers

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>UH that UH that turned out to be approved by

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 1>because some of the information on their income was falsified. Now,

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>as far as we've been told since, there's been really

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 1>no problems with those mortgages. But a time in two

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>thousand and fifteen, UH, the company cuts hies with about

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>forty brokers. The problem is that initially they kind of

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 1>downplayed that, they kind of hid that information UH in

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 1>their UM quarterly results and when they were asked about

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>it during the conference calls with the Analyston investor community,

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>they really kind of um sidestepped it. That brought concerns

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>with the Canadian regulator, Ontario's regulator, and that's where their

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 1>problems have surfaced as of late. Um Doug Alexander, I

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>wish we could continue because it's a fascinating story. We're

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to leave it there. Doug Alexander is Canada's

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>financial services reporter for Bloomberg. Coming to us from Toronto.

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>We want to take a moment to let you know

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>about something new from Bloomberg. Starting right now, you can

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>use our iOS app or our new Google Chrome extension

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to scan any news story on any website, instantly revealing

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:06.879
<v Speaker 1>relevant news and market data from Bloomberg and other sources

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:10.440
<v Speaker 1>related to companies and people you're reading about. So no

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 1>matter where you're reading the news, you can bring the

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 1>power of Bloomberg's news and data with you. It's pretty amazing.

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Download our io s app or search for the Bloomberg

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 1>extension on the Chrome Store to try it out. Learn

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:32.159
<v Speaker 1>more at Bloomberg dot com. Slash lens Board is quote,

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 1>having one foot in today and one foot in tomorrow.

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 1>That's according to Chief executive officer Mark Fields. Today after

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Ford Motor Company reported earnings that underwhelmed UH certainly traders,

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the shares are down more than a percentage point based

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:50.919
<v Speaker 1>on the idea that the company is spending more on

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 1>driver list technology now uh cost cutting more costs, and

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 1>trying to prepare for the future. To sort of explain

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the road ahead, I am very pleased bringing Bob Shanks,

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 1>executive vice president and chief financial officer of Ford Motor Company,

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>coming to us from Dearborn, Michigan. Bob, thank you so

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. First, I just wanted to gauge

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the mood inside Ford headquarters. I mean, do people feel

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 1>like it's kind of not fair that Ford is now

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 1>pouring money into too uh driver list technology and uh

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:25.120
<v Speaker 1>more electric cars and investors are not impressed. Whereas Tesla,

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 1>all they have to do is say, you know, energy

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and everybody cheers. Well, I can tell you you know

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 1>how I feel untrustrated frankly, because um, while we're creating

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:40.919
<v Speaker 1>value in terms of the core business today, uh and

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>certainly our dividend is strong and it's sustainable even through

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>a downturn. UM. We we have laid out a plan

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to participate in what's what's going to be a transformation

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of the industry that will pay off as it will

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:57.159
<v Speaker 1>for others that are working on similar technologies UM in

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the future. There doesn't seem to be a much of

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:02.479
<v Speaker 1>our recognition of that because I think deeper focused more

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:05.439
<v Speaker 1>on the nearer term. I would just say, we're not pouring, uh,

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, resources into that. The vast majority of the

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 1>investments we're making are in the core business. But we

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 1>we are investing appropriately imprudently in autonomy, electrification, mobility and

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:18.159
<v Speaker 1>so forth. That's that's true. But you know, we're going

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:20.119
<v Speaker 1>to continue to do what we're doing because we know

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>it's right, and we know where the industry is heading

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and we have to be prepared for that, and we

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>we plan to participate that and to create value by

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 1>doing so. Bob, I want to talk a little bit

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 1>about the here and now with you and just get

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts on Lincoln and the Lincoln Navigator and the

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:38.199
<v Speaker 1>refresh that's going on. Yeah, that is, uh, that's a

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:40.879
<v Speaker 1>really big opportunity for us, the Navigator as well as

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 1>the Ford Expedition We just revealed those products of the

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Lincoln at the New York Auto Show expedition to a

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 1>bit earlier. This is the first complete ground up redesign

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:54.440
<v Speaker 1>in a long time. It's gonna They're both going to

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 1>take aluminum bodies. They're going to be on the same

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of platforms as the F one fifty, which has

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>been usually successful and the re action to that product

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>has been phenomenal. They'll be coming out. I think the

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:07.119
<v Speaker 1>launches are in the third quarter, probably hit the market

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 1>in the fourth and they're very high margin products, so

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a big opportunity for us. Just quickly where they

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 1>made are they say, in the same Kansas they're made

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the F as the F series. They're made at Kentucky

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Truck which is where we make the Super Duty. But

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:21.880
<v Speaker 1>they have their own body shop and their own paint shop,

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, Bob, I do want to just a touch

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:28.719
<v Speaker 1>on used car prices and that Ford did say today

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:32.160
<v Speaker 1>that they see use car prices falling six percent this year.

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Can you put that into perspective whether use car values

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>are falling faster than you've been expecting and the road

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 1>ahead for the rest of the year. That's a good question.

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I would say, they're not falling faster than what we

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 1>have been expecting over the last number of months. What

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:50.199
<v Speaker 1>happened about a year ago actually this time, is that

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:54.199
<v Speaker 1>we started to talk about and guide to decline in

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:57.919
<v Speaker 1>use car values related to the fact that the industry

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>has been leasing at the levels of you know, we've

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>never seen before over the last number of years, and

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a rising industry and been you know, a lot of

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 1>those vehicles. Now we're starting to come back off lease.

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>So we we expected a decline. We adjusted our view

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>of that decline in November last year, and everything that

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:16.920
<v Speaker 1>we see today suggests that everything's happening and unfolding as

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:19.919
<v Speaker 1>we had expected. So we have seen a year over

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>year decline of seven percent at Ford. That's in align

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>with what's happened overall across the industry. And what I

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:28.200
<v Speaker 1>mentioned in the call today is that we expect on average,

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>used car values to decline about six percent over the

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 1>full year. But what about the charge offs in Ford's

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>credit unit. Have you seen delinquencies and write downs increase

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 1>at a faster pace than you've been expecting. Well, they've

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 1>been increasing from where they had been and they but

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:48.120
<v Speaker 1>they've been at historical lows. So when we look at

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the all the metrics around delinquencies, the frequency of defaults,

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:57.919
<v Speaker 1>the severity of those defaults, they're only approaching what you know,

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>we would consider to be historical norms. So they were

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:03.200
<v Speaker 1>extremely low when we came out of the downturn for

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:05.439
<v Speaker 1>a number of years, or just approaching what you know,

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 1>we would call normal. Uh. And in fact, in recent

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>periods we've seen you know, some slow down if you will,

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the pace of that change. So we

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 1>feel that we've captured that appropriately in the outlook for

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Ford Credit for the full year. Bob, just taking a

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>look at the shares of Ford, I mean, they're down

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 1>about five percent so far this year, but you're paying

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>a five and a quarter percent dividend. And if you

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>are talking directly to and I'm sure you are in

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>a way speaking directly to shareholders who may be bought

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 1>into the Ford idea, let's say to three years ago

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:42.159
<v Speaker 1>after the financial debacle, what would you say to them today? Well, clearly,

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>we've delivered seven years of very very strong performance right

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 1>across the board. This is a different company than it

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 1>was going into the downturn. We've done a lot of restructuring,

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:55.879
<v Speaker 1>it's a much fitter company. It's ready for another downturn. Uh.

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 1>And in particular relatives to the dividend, you know, we

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 1>have staked very strong position that we intend and plan

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and believe we have the capability of paying that regular

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 1>dividend at the level that it's at when we go

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>into the downturn throughout that downturn. So, you know, for

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>those interested in a good return, because as you said,

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:16.399
<v Speaker 1>five percent and you're paying what fifteen fifteen cents to

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>share exactly. Uh. And in addition to that, over the

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:24.199
<v Speaker 1>last two years, we've paid a supplement dividend UH. And

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that opportunity still exists as as we move forward, because

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:30.400
<v Speaker 1>we don't see any signs that the recession that ultimately

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>will happen is on the horizon. So we think we've

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:34.879
<v Speaker 1>got a great story to tell for those that are

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>particularly interested in in dividend a great return. Thanks very

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:40.399
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. As always, Bob Shanks is the

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 1>executive vice president and the chief financial officer of the

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 1>Ford Motor Company based in Dearborn, Michigan. Thanks for listening

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg pm L podcast. You can subscribe and

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:57.360
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:04.440
<v Speaker 1>pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 1>before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide on

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Bluebirg Radio