WEBVTT - After The Builders: On Musk and Thiel

0:00:16.070 --> 0:00:18.130
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff. I'm Oswald Losch and we've got

0:00:18.150 --> 0:00:22.550
<v Speaker 1>a special episode today. Kaleidoscope, the podcast network I co-founded,

0:00:22.610 --> 0:00:25.150
<v Speaker 1>has a new podcast out this week called The Builders

0:00:25.329 --> 0:00:27.970
<v Speaker 1>with Walter Isaacson. So I wanted to bring on my

0:00:28.010 --> 0:00:31.810
<v Speaker 1>co-founder Mangesh Hatikada to talk about what motivated the project

0:00:31.990 --> 0:00:34.450
<v Speaker 1>and then share some clips from the first two episodes.

0:00:34.950 --> 0:00:38.270
<v Speaker 1>Interviews with Elon Musk and Peter Thiel, two figures we

0:00:38.290 --> 0:00:40.729
<v Speaker 1>talk about fairly frequently on the podcast and who don't

0:00:40.790 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>do sit down interviews all that often. Joining us to

0:00:43.780 --> 0:00:47.060
<v Speaker 1>break the interviews down are two of the foremost journalists

0:00:47.270 --> 0:00:51.330
<v Speaker 1>and chroniclers of Musk and Thiel. Max Chafkin, a Bloomberg

0:00:51.350 --> 0:00:54.750
<v Speaker 1>Businessweek columnist and author of The Contrarian, Peter Thiel and

0:00:54.770 --> 0:00:58.050
<v Speaker 1>the Rise of the Silicon Valley Oligarchs. And Fez Siddiqui,

0:00:58.370 --> 0:01:01.090
<v Speaker 1>a technology reporter for The Washington Post and author of

0:01:01.170 --> 0:01:04.670
<v Speaker 1>Hubris Maximus, The Shattering of Elon Musk. Welcome both.

0:01:05.060 --> 0:01:05.869
<v Speaker 2>Hey, thanks for having me.

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:06.380
<v Speaker 3>Hey.

0:01:06.900 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for joining us. Before we get into it,

0:01:09.030 --> 0:01:10.290
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to hear a little bit from both of

0:01:10.310 --> 0:01:13.090
<v Speaker 1>you about your reporting on these two figures. Max, maybe

0:01:13.110 --> 0:01:15.990
<v Speaker 1>let's start with you. Having written the book on Teal,

0:01:16.470 --> 0:01:18.070
<v Speaker 1>what's your biggest open question about him?

0:01:18.450 --> 0:01:20.850
<v Speaker 4>I think the big open question on Teal, Teal has

0:01:20.930 --> 0:01:24.990
<v Speaker 4>been around the world of tech, you know, from before

0:01:25.010 --> 0:01:29.949
<v Speaker 4>the time I became a tech journalist, which was around 2005, 2006.

0:01:29.950 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 4>But for most of my career, Teal was sort of

0:01:34.300 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 4>making all of these long shot bets to create this

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 4>kind of way out there view of the world, a

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:43.820
<v Speaker 4>way out there view of the world on a political

0:01:43.860 --> 0:01:46.750
<v Speaker 4>dimension as well as a technology dimension. And I think

0:01:46.810 --> 0:01:51.190
<v Speaker 4>the big open question to me after many of these

0:01:51.590 --> 0:01:55.050
<v Speaker 4>kind of out there projects have really paid off, Palantir

0:01:55.270 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 4>being probably the most notable one, but also Teal had

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:01.820
<v Speaker 4>a hand in SpaceX, some of Elon Musk's companies, as

0:02:01.860 --> 0:02:04.740
<v Speaker 4>well as Facebook. these are now like the biggest and

0:02:04.780 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 4>most powerful companies in the world. Teal was also notable

0:02:08.419 --> 0:02:11.140
<v Speaker 4>as like an early supporter of Donald Trump as kind

0:02:11.180 --> 0:02:14.210
<v Speaker 4>of a pioneer of the effort to bring Silicon Valley,

0:02:14.220 --> 0:02:18.489
<v Speaker 4>you know, closer to the American right wing. It's like

0:02:18.590 --> 0:02:20.730
<v Speaker 4>all that has happened. And so part of the big

0:02:20.790 --> 0:02:23.269
<v Speaker 4>question I have is like, what does he want now?

0:02:23.450 --> 0:02:26.210
<v Speaker 4>I mean, and where is he now, given that he

0:02:26.250 --> 0:02:30.580
<v Speaker 4>has gone from being this outsider to being in a

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 4>position of incredible power?

0:02:32.990 --> 0:02:35.270
<v Speaker 1>Very interesting question. And Fez, what about you? I mean,

0:02:35.290 --> 0:02:37.870
<v Speaker 1>you wrote the book on Elon. What's your biggest open

0:02:37.889 --> 0:02:38.510
<v Speaker 1>question about him?

0:02:38.970 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 2>What does he ultimately want out of this? You know,

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 2>he's the world's richest person. He controls the world's most

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 2>valuable automaker. He controls a company that is at the

0:02:49.780 --> 0:02:55.179
<v Speaker 2>forefront of space exploration, of social media, the dominant platform

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 2>for political discourse. He is controlling, you know, one aspect

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:03.419
<v Speaker 2>of that firm that is heavily focused on artificial intelligence bets.

0:03:03.940 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 2>And yet he's so full of grievance. He is so

0:03:08.380 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 2>seemingly still angry, still has that sort of underdog mentality,

0:03:12.180 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 2>feels like it's him versus the world. What does he want?

0:03:16.100 --> 0:03:19.090
<v Speaker 2>And the book seeks to explore that question and also

0:03:19.150 --> 0:03:21.970
<v Speaker 2>examines the forces that allowed him to accumulate so much power.

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:24.060
<v Speaker 1>I think that's, I mean, we'll get to the interviews,

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:26.419
<v Speaker 1>but I think that's something that shines through kind of

0:03:26.460 --> 0:03:27.919
<v Speaker 1>in both of them, which is that these are two

0:03:27.980 --> 0:03:33.180
<v Speaker 1>people who basically achieved almost everything beyond their wildest dreams

0:03:33.220 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>they set out to achieve, and yet still find a

0:03:35.580 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>way to be motivated by the sense of being an underdog,

0:03:38.180 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of extraordinary. And just, I mean, just

0:03:40.620 --> 0:03:42.220
<v Speaker 1>to give a little more context on the builders, I

0:03:42.260 --> 0:03:45.370
<v Speaker 1>started my career as a producer for Charlie Rose and

0:03:45.490 --> 0:03:48.530
<v Speaker 1>was kind of, grew up with the idea that these

0:03:48.590 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of, interviews with historical figures in real time could

0:03:53.140 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of become interesting, like documentary evidence, both for the

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:00.180
<v Speaker 1>moment and for the future. And so we approached Walter

0:04:00.260 --> 0:04:02.750
<v Speaker 1>and said, you know, you have this sort of extraordinary

0:04:02.780 --> 0:04:06.010
<v Speaker 1>ability to drive FOMO amongst the people in the world

0:04:06.050 --> 0:04:09.230
<v Speaker 1>who can have everything else. But sitting with you and

0:04:09.310 --> 0:04:13.050
<v Speaker 1>being kind of part of the Walter Isaacson, Da Vinci, Einstein,

0:04:13.470 --> 0:04:16.589
<v Speaker 1>Musk jobs legacy is incredibly compelling. So You know, we

0:04:16.610 --> 0:04:18.050
<v Speaker 1>think we have a real chance of getting all these

0:04:18.070 --> 0:04:19.589
<v Speaker 1>people to sit down with you and perhaps do it

0:04:20.029 --> 0:04:22.089
<v Speaker 1>in a way and in a tone which you don't

0:04:22.110 --> 0:04:24.690
<v Speaker 1>often hear them speaking in. But Mangesh, I mean, tell

0:04:24.710 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>us a bit more about the inside baseball and what

0:04:27.580 --> 0:04:29.580
<v Speaker 1>it was like to actually book these guys. I mean,

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>what it was like to get Elon to do this.

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:35.300
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, we really wanted to figure out whose imagination...

0:04:35.230 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 3>we're going to be living in right and and collecting

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:41.539
<v Speaker 3>these thoughts from from the biggest tech geniuses leaders uh

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:45.140
<v Speaker 3>influencers of our time and uh we had thought that

0:04:45.310 --> 0:04:47.909
<v Speaker 3>walter having written the elon book that that that would

0:04:47.950 --> 0:04:50.670
<v Speaker 3>be an easy ask and and probably an easy get

0:04:50.710 --> 0:04:53.310
<v Speaker 3>from the start but um we got a lot of

0:04:53.370 --> 0:04:57.270
<v Speaker 3>no's from him. We had approached him first. Walter approached him.

0:04:57.750 --> 0:04:59.340
<v Speaker 3>And it had been sort of the better part of

0:04:59.380 --> 0:05:01.260
<v Speaker 3>a year. And he'd said no. And so we were

0:05:01.300 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 3>moving along with the other interviews. And I really didn't

0:05:03.700 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 3>think it was going to happen. And then it's funny

0:05:06.380 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 3>because the timing is so strange. My cousin told me, like,

0:05:10.060 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 3>let's go to a World Cup game. He had an

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 3>extra ticket. So I went to this France-Sweden game. And,

0:05:14.860 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, these moments in sports when like something extraordinary

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 3>is happening, you feel like you're watching a no-hitter or

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:23.630
<v Speaker 3>you feel like someone has a hot hand. And Mbappe

0:05:23.670 --> 0:05:27.930
<v Speaker 3>gets the ball and he's just like cutting through four people.

0:05:27.950 --> 0:05:31.410
<v Speaker 3>And Walter Isaacson calls me. And Walter doesn't call me.

0:05:31.710 --> 0:05:34.810
<v Speaker 3>He normally texts. And so I put on silence immediately

0:05:34.830 --> 0:05:36.510
<v Speaker 3>because I'm watching this moment and I'm like, oh, wait,

0:05:36.529 --> 0:05:39.750
<v Speaker 3>maybe it's something important. And right as Mbappe has cut

0:05:39.770 --> 0:05:42.090
<v Speaker 3>through all these people, shoots the goal, I look at

0:05:42.150 --> 0:05:43.630
<v Speaker 3>my phone and it says.

0:05:43.610 --> 0:05:44.390
<v Speaker 2>Elon is in.

0:05:44.410 --> 0:05:48.390
<v Speaker 3>And so... You know, we got Musk to say yes.

0:05:48.490 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 3>We'd set up the cameras, etc. And Walter's sort of

0:05:53.300 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 3>twiddling his thumbs. And the interview's supposed to start. And

0:05:56.540 --> 0:05:59.540
<v Speaker 3>he's not getting on. He's not getting on. And David,

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:03.670
<v Speaker 3>one of our colleagues, looks and he realizes, like, Musk's

0:06:03.690 --> 0:06:08.070
<v Speaker 3>just been tweeting. And that's what gets him away. But

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:10.860
<v Speaker 3>then they get on the riverside and they're just so

0:06:11.460 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 3>comfortable with one another that that sort of intimacy was

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 3>really interesting to see. And the way he opened up

0:06:15.860 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 3>about Trump and getting carried away and things weren't things

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 3>that I was expecting him to say.

0:06:20.350 --> 0:06:21.830
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to go to some clips for the

0:06:21.850 --> 0:06:25.969
<v Speaker 1>interview shortly. But first, Max and Fez, what's the context

0:06:26.050 --> 0:06:27.870
<v Speaker 1>we need to know here? It's been obviously a huge

0:06:27.930 --> 0:06:31.039
<v Speaker 1>week for Elon, Fez, you're on deadline for good reason,

0:06:31.100 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>no doubt. But can you just give us the breakdown

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:36.860
<v Speaker 1>between the Gibney dock, between Starlink, between the midterms? What's

0:06:36.940 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the moment in Musk land?

0:06:38.900 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 2>It's just one of those moments where you feel like

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:43.469
<v Speaker 2>there are times when there is, I've described it as

0:06:43.570 --> 0:06:47.029
<v Speaker 2>quiet or really disquiet in Musk world. And then the

0:06:47.250 --> 0:06:50.450
<v Speaker 2>complete opposite happens where just everything seems to be happening

0:06:50.470 --> 0:06:54.290
<v Speaker 2>all at once. You mentioned the four-hour-long documentary that has

0:06:54.350 --> 0:06:58.250
<v Speaker 2>dropped examining Elon Musk. There was also a great Wall

0:06:58.270 --> 0:07:02.790
<v Speaker 2>Street Journal scoop on Elon Musk seemingly unilaterally slowing down Starlink,

0:07:03.050 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 2>according to the journal, in response to what he saw

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:13.220
<v Speaker 2>as Ukrainian offensive use of this technology, which is intended

0:07:13.300 --> 0:07:17.390
<v Speaker 2>for defensive use, if I'm reading between the lines correctly

0:07:17.410 --> 0:07:20.470
<v Speaker 2>on Elon. But He sort of argues that there is

0:07:20.510 --> 0:07:24.090
<v Speaker 2>a system called Starshield that is for those sorts of

0:07:24.130 --> 0:07:26.500
<v Speaker 2>military purposes that is in the control of the U.S. government.

0:07:27.900 --> 0:07:31.140
<v Speaker 2>In any case, the Journal reports that Musk has slowed

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:35.790
<v Speaker 2>down Starlink use on the Ukrainian front. Also this week,

0:07:35.990 --> 0:07:39.930
<v Speaker 2>SpaceX earnings, Tesla earnings, so two major big milestone for

0:07:39.970 --> 0:07:42.250
<v Speaker 2>SpaceX in that it, you know, turns it turns its

0:07:42.270 --> 0:07:46.230
<v Speaker 2>first ever profit, at least since going public. Meanwhile, Musk

0:07:46.490 --> 0:07:51.020
<v Speaker 2>is tweeting up a storm about the midterms and, you know,

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:54.420
<v Speaker 2>the potential for him to be investigated after the midterms.

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:56.300
<v Speaker 2>So just a lot going on in his world.

0:07:56.980 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 4>So one that that last point, I think, is very important.

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:04.830
<v Speaker 4>You know, this the idea that Musk left politics is funny.

0:08:05.130 --> 0:08:07.630
<v Speaker 4>You know, a year ago or whatever it was a

0:08:07.650 --> 0:08:12.210
<v Speaker 4>little over a year ago, You know, Musk gave up

0:08:12.250 --> 0:08:15.150
<v Speaker 4>his position in the White House and left in this

0:08:15.250 --> 0:08:18.350
<v Speaker 4>blaze of glory. I don't know if it's glory, maybe infamy,

0:08:18.940 --> 0:08:22.860
<v Speaker 4>hurling insults. There were mutual recriminations. And within a couple

0:08:22.900 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 4>of months, they were right back together. And they are

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:30.100
<v Speaker 4>as back together now. I mean, Musk is less central.

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:35.610
<v Speaker 4>You don't see the kind of PDA level affection that

0:08:35.890 --> 0:08:39.219
<v Speaker 4>maybe we saw during the 2024 campaign. But Musk is,

0:08:39.780 --> 0:08:45.020
<v Speaker 4>you know, is donating record-breaking sums to the Republicans right now.

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 4>If somehow Ken Paxton manages to win the seat in

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 4>Texas and Republicans hold off the Democrats, it will be

0:08:52.660 --> 0:08:57.110
<v Speaker 4>thanks to Elon Musk, I think. And conversely, if Democrats

0:08:57.130 --> 0:09:00.390
<v Speaker 4>do well, we're going to spend two years watching them

0:09:00.929 --> 0:09:05.650
<v Speaker 4>basically rake him over the coals and potentially longer, depending

0:09:05.670 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 4>on what happens in 2028. he has made himself a

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:13.140
<v Speaker 4>central figure in Republican politics for a very long time.

0:09:13.620 --> 0:09:15.750
<v Speaker 1>I mean, all of what you say is true. And

0:09:15.790 --> 0:09:17.890
<v Speaker 1>it's somewhat surprising that Elon said in the interview on

0:09:17.910 --> 0:09:21.110
<v Speaker 1>The Builders that he actually regretted some of his involvement

0:09:21.130 --> 0:09:22.970
<v Speaker 1>in politics. We're going to go there in a second.

0:09:22.990 --> 0:09:25.170
<v Speaker 1>But first, before they have to ask you both about

0:09:25.190 --> 0:09:27.010
<v Speaker 1>the roadster. Underwhelmed.

0:09:27.190 --> 0:09:27.829
<v Speaker 5>I'm sorry.

0:09:27.950 --> 0:09:31.810
<v Speaker 4>But, you know, I think it's, I mean, my understanding

0:09:31.929 --> 0:09:35.420
<v Speaker 4>is that, um, there wasn't, we didn't really see any

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 4>new technology here. What we saw was like an awesome

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:44.220
<v Speaker 4>kind of like evil Knievel style pitch, but it's, it's

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:47.030
<v Speaker 4>weirdly a pitch for a car that does not exist

0:09:47.490 --> 0:09:51.109
<v Speaker 4>in the sense that you can't buy it. And even if, even,

0:09:51.130 --> 0:09:53.410
<v Speaker 4>and even if you follow like the Elon Musk timeline,

0:09:53.429 --> 0:09:54.969
<v Speaker 4>which is like, oh, we're going to start producing it

0:09:55.270 --> 0:09:57.730
<v Speaker 4>in 2028, you're not going to be able to drive it.

0:09:58.170 --> 0:10:01.100
<v Speaker 4>And so what I think it's actually a pitch for,

0:10:01.860 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 4>and this gets to a lot of what is happening

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 4>and what has been happening with Elon Musk in recent years,

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 4>it's a pitch for the stock. It's like a memification

0:10:12.330 --> 0:10:15.010
<v Speaker 4>of this guy. And at a certain point, there is

0:10:15.070 --> 0:10:17.530
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk, the technologist, and there is Elon Musk, the meme.

0:10:17.900 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 4>And it's become harder and harder to distinguish those two things.

0:10:21.500 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 2>I think that was well said. I mean, it was

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:25.260
<v Speaker 2>pretty clear to me what was going to happen when

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:27.100
<v Speaker 2>we saw this demo. Like, it's the kind of thing

0:10:27.140 --> 0:10:30.260
<v Speaker 2>that I watch and, you know, reporters are naturally skeptical

0:10:30.340 --> 0:10:32.140
<v Speaker 2>and they they know a dog and pony show when

0:10:32.179 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 2>they see it. But I see this thing and I'm like, oh, OK,

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 2>this is going to be a thing. People are going

0:10:37.260 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 2>to notice this. It's a flying car. And then it

0:10:40.260 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 2>sort of becomes clear as you go frame by frame,

0:10:42.660 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 2>like you're kind of like, what am I looking at?

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:47.470
<v Speaker 2>Like when I really inspect the underside of this thing,

0:10:47.610 --> 0:10:50.810
<v Speaker 2>what What is in that thing? And like, how does

0:10:50.850 --> 0:10:54.010
<v Speaker 2>it correlate to what a customer might receive a year

0:10:54.050 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 2>from now or two years from now? And second, I

0:10:56.500 --> 0:10:58.620
<v Speaker 2>made this point on a different podcast. It's sort of

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:03.179
<v Speaker 2>like this question of, OK, it's a supercar. Also, it

0:11:03.260 --> 0:11:05.959
<v Speaker 2>maybe flies. It has rockets. Call it a gimmick, whatever

0:11:05.980 --> 0:11:08.380
<v Speaker 2>it is. Aren't you kind of building the equivalent of

0:11:08.420 --> 0:11:10.890
<v Speaker 2>like an amphibious car where it's like not a great car,

0:11:10.950 --> 0:11:13.590
<v Speaker 2>not a great boat? Like, is this really what people

0:11:14.290 --> 0:11:17.190
<v Speaker 2>people who want a supercar want or people who want

0:11:17.210 --> 0:11:20.550
<v Speaker 2>a flying car want? And lastly, I'll note, it didn't

0:11:21.090 --> 0:11:24.630
<v Speaker 2>really register in Tesla earnings. There's an hour long earnings call.

0:11:24.850 --> 0:11:27.770
<v Speaker 2>And there just was very little, you know, the only

0:11:27.830 --> 0:11:30.450
<v Speaker 2>way it did register was it was like the backdrop.

0:11:30.570 --> 0:11:33.990
<v Speaker 2>It was like the photo that they showed for that call.

0:11:34.030 --> 0:11:37.050
<v Speaker 2>But it's not like investors and analysts were clamoring for

0:11:37.270 --> 0:11:40.100
<v Speaker 2>details on this. And Tesla was touting like, you know,

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:41.750
<v Speaker 2>record reservations.

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:42.220
<v Speaker 6>It wasn't.

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 2>And I was just shocked at how quickly that excitement

0:11:44.860 --> 0:11:45.380
<v Speaker 2>sort of faded.

0:11:45.890 --> 0:11:48.470
<v Speaker 1>I think Elon recently said, a friend of mine, Peter Thiel,

0:11:48.570 --> 0:11:50.910
<v Speaker 1>once said, the future promised us flying cars, but instead

0:11:50.929 --> 0:11:53.490
<v Speaker 1>we've got 140 characters. Well, not anymore.

0:11:53.510 --> 0:11:57.900
<v Speaker 2>That is what he said. And it was just sort of,

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, I hate to be the person to pour

0:12:00.820 --> 0:12:05.300
<v Speaker 2>cold water on it, but it didn't definitively answer that question.

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:06.660
<v Speaker 2>It didn't put that question to rest.

0:12:06.700 --> 0:12:09.300
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, you can have more than 140 characters, though.

0:12:09.340 --> 0:12:10.780
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk has, in.

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:15.030
<v Speaker 5>Taking over Twitter, he has changed that. So credit where due.

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:20.500
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's an amazingly self-referential post, isn't it, from the

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:22.900
<v Speaker 1>owner of X. But let's play the first clip about

0:12:23.020 --> 0:12:27.150
<v Speaker 1>Elon's mantra, which coming back to this kind of overarching question,

0:12:27.270 --> 0:12:30.070
<v Speaker 1>whose imagination do you want to live in? Here is

0:12:30.150 --> 0:12:33.970
<v Speaker 1>Walter asking Elon about what type of AI he thinks

0:12:33.990 --> 0:12:35.490
<v Speaker 1>humanity should be building.

0:12:36.250 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 6>And if you make it maximally truth-seeking and curious, like

0:12:41.140 --> 0:12:43.900
<v Speaker 6>you say, I don't quite get it. Why does that

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:44.660
<v Speaker 6>make it safer?

0:12:45.490 --> 0:12:48.730
<v Speaker 7>Well, um, if you're forcing AI to believe two mutually

0:12:48.770 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 7>consistent things, you can, you can make it go insane. Um, and,

0:12:52.990 --> 0:12:56.250
<v Speaker 7>and an insane AI, I think is not a safe one. Um,

0:12:56.750 --> 0:13:01.449
<v Speaker 7>then curious, I think is important because, um, a curious AI,

0:13:01.470 --> 0:13:04.170
<v Speaker 7>I think is going to want to foster humanity to

0:13:04.250 --> 0:13:08.380
<v Speaker 7>see how we turn out. So like what happens to, uh,

0:13:08.660 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 7>to a humanity that is, uh, that, that prospers and

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:16.530
<v Speaker 7>is becomes multi-planetary and, uh, I think a curious AI

0:13:16.570 --> 0:13:20.690
<v Speaker 7>will want to foster humanity. Because a future where there

0:13:20.750 --> 0:13:24.350
<v Speaker 7>are humans on multiple planets is more interesting than one

0:13:24.850 --> 0:13:27.270
<v Speaker 7>where there are not any humans on the planets.

0:13:27.730 --> 0:13:30.870
<v Speaker 6>So the most interesting outcome is the most likely? Yes.

0:13:31.530 --> 0:13:33.990
<v Speaker 7>Well, generally I think that's true for a different reason,

0:13:34.010 --> 0:13:37.710
<v Speaker 7>which is that if simulation theory is correct, then any

0:13:37.750 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 7>simulations that are boring will be truncated. Therefore, the fact

0:13:40.750 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 7>that we exist means that we are an interesting simulation.

0:13:44.830 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 7>And really, the most important thing is just don't be boring.

0:13:49.740 --> 0:13:52.540
<v Speaker 6>This has explained you a bit. You're on a crusade

0:13:52.580 --> 0:13:53.540
<v Speaker 6>against being boring.

0:13:55.500 --> 0:14:00.050
<v Speaker 7>I don't know. I mean, there's odd things that happen

0:14:00.110 --> 0:14:03.189
<v Speaker 7>in this simulation, especially if you're me. I mean, think

0:14:03.210 --> 0:14:06.490
<v Speaker 7>about it. If you're me and you're like, should all

0:14:06.530 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 7>these things really be happening? I mean, should I really

0:14:10.270 --> 0:14:14.650
<v Speaker 7>be making spaceships to go to the moon and Mars? Like,

0:14:14.830 --> 0:14:16.510
<v Speaker 7>what the? That doesn't seem real.

0:14:17.210 --> 0:14:20.470
<v Speaker 1>Fez, I'm curious. What do you make of this?

0:14:21.530 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it was a classic Elon, what should we

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 2>call that? You know, I don't know, train of thought.

0:14:28.620 --> 0:14:32.660
<v Speaker 2>It felt sort of like he was answering a question

0:14:32.700 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 2>that Isaacson didn't really ask. He just sort of was

0:14:37.290 --> 0:14:40.370
<v Speaker 2>free associating there at the end. But they are coherent thoughts.

0:14:41.500 --> 0:14:43.940
<v Speaker 2>unrelated to the question, which is how does this make

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 2>us safer, right? They end up on this idea that,

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, Isaacson is channeling Elon. He definitely knows the

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:54.540
<v Speaker 2>answer to the question that he's asking, like, so the

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 2>most interesting outcome is the most likely. That's just sort

0:14:57.020 --> 0:15:01.420
<v Speaker 2>of like a classic Elon perspective. But it doesn't really,

0:15:01.500 --> 0:15:03.180
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, it sort of felt like a tangent

0:15:03.230 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 2>or like free association in the end.

0:15:05.430 --> 0:15:05.670
<v Speaker 7>Max?

0:15:06.190 --> 0:15:09.250
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I agree with everything Fez just said, but I

0:15:09.290 --> 0:15:13.470
<v Speaker 4>do think that Leaving aside the kind of like philosophical,

0:15:13.490 --> 0:15:16.750
<v Speaker 4>you know, this this this thing he's interested in simulation theory,

0:15:16.770 --> 0:15:20.100
<v Speaker 4>which comes up all the time. His idea of like

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:23.580
<v Speaker 4>not being boring and which I which, you know, he

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 4>didn't quite articulate it, but he kind of almost did,

0:15:26.060 --> 0:15:30.850
<v Speaker 4>I think, is like central to to to his rise

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:32.570
<v Speaker 4>and to one of the ways that he's made himself

0:15:32.630 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 4>like an appealing figure. in people's lives. It's a big

0:15:38.140 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 4>source of his power. People talk about Elon Musk, the technologist,

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:49.490
<v Speaker 4>but he's an amazing marketer. And that idea of being unafraid.

0:15:49.150 --> 0:15:51.230
<v Speaker 5>To be weird or.

0:15:51.530 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 4>Self-referential or kind of go on a slightly like bong

0:15:54.980 --> 0:15:58.940
<v Speaker 4>hit style free associating, like, what if it's all, what

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:01.220
<v Speaker 4>if this is all a dream and somebody else, you know,

0:16:01.420 --> 0:16:03.540
<v Speaker 4>that is, that's interesting.

0:16:03.700 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 5>And, and it makes him different.

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 4>And it's, it's some of that difference is what has

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:12.229
<v Speaker 4>allowed him to get this like massive following of people who,

0:16:12.510 --> 0:16:13.810
<v Speaker 4>who basically hang on his every word.

0:16:14.330 --> 0:16:17.570
<v Speaker 1>You know, I, I definitely don't count myself among that number,

0:16:17.590 --> 0:16:20.370
<v Speaker 1>but I have to say when he asked that rhetorical question, like,

0:16:20.870 --> 0:16:23.530
<v Speaker 1>should all this stuff really be happening? Should one person

0:16:23.570 --> 0:16:25.150
<v Speaker 1>be able to do all this? I mean, maybe think

0:16:25.170 --> 0:16:27.210
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of the title of your book, Fez,

0:16:27.450 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, Hubris Maximus. But I mean, it is kind of,

0:16:30.290 --> 0:16:33.330
<v Speaker 1>it is just weird. I mean, we live in weird times.

0:16:33.510 --> 0:16:35.430
<v Speaker 1>And I think Elon is very symbolic of that.

0:16:36.170 --> 0:16:40.380
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I think he has created an environment where,

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:44.580
<v Speaker 2>you know, he is uniquely equipped to pursue all of

0:16:44.660 --> 0:16:47.300
<v Speaker 2>these bets at once. There's an anecdote in the book where,

0:16:47.340 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, someone pulls him aside and asks him, you know,

0:16:50.530 --> 0:16:55.270
<v Speaker 2>humanity is going to almost certainly going to progress like

0:16:55.290 --> 0:16:58.150
<v Speaker 2>beyond where we are now in hundreds or even thousands

0:16:58.190 --> 0:17:01.470
<v Speaker 2>of years. You know, why go to Mars now? We

0:17:01.490 --> 0:17:03.610
<v Speaker 2>don't necessarily need to do it right now if we

0:17:03.670 --> 0:17:09.360
<v Speaker 2>understand that humanity will progress. And according to my reporting,

0:17:09.380 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Elon's reaction to that is yes, but I want to

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:16.100
<v Speaker 2>be the one to do it. And so he is

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:20.850
<v Speaker 2>sort of created this problem for himself that he is

0:17:21.190 --> 0:17:24.930
<v Speaker 2>obviously very like incredulous over. He's like, how did this

0:17:25.010 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 2>end up being the case? How did I end up here? And,

0:17:27.890 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, it must be it reminds me of his reaction,

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:34.580
<v Speaker 2>I think, to becoming the world's richest person, which was incredulity.

0:17:34.700 --> 0:17:36.220
<v Speaker 2>But like, OK, back to work.

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 3>And it goes back to like the points I think

0:17:39.100 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 3>both of you are making about like he really sees

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 3>himself as this underdog slash warrior. Right. Like he has

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:48.170
<v Speaker 3>to be the person who's moving things forward like making

0:17:48.210 --> 0:17:51.590
<v Speaker 3>these dreams possible. And that plays into like so much

0:17:51.690 --> 0:17:53.070
<v Speaker 3>of his, his ethos.

0:17:54.369 --> 0:17:55.850
<v Speaker 1>It's funny. We put the, put the episode up on

0:17:55.890 --> 0:17:58.290
<v Speaker 1>YouTube and the, and the most liked comment on YouTube

0:17:58.350 --> 0:18:00.830
<v Speaker 1>is somebody noticing that he's playing an RPG in the background.

0:18:00.869 --> 0:18:03.490
<v Speaker 1>So then there's something.

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:05.900
<v Speaker 2>Do we know what he's playing?

0:18:06.780 --> 0:18:08.580
<v Speaker 1>Manga, should you figure it out?

0:18:08.740 --> 0:18:09.980
<v Speaker 3>We did, but I've forgotten it now.

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:15.869
<v Speaker 1>Let's turn to politics. I mean, I thought the most

0:18:16.270 --> 0:18:19.870
<v Speaker 1>sort of self-reflective moment was actually about the involvement in politics.

0:18:20.430 --> 0:18:21.270
<v Speaker 1>Let's play the tape.

0:18:21.890 --> 0:18:25.710
<v Speaker 6>You just said something interesting about your year away from

0:18:26.100 --> 0:18:30.260
<v Speaker 6>XXAI and everything else in government and politics. Do you

0:18:30.580 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 6>feel that that was too much of a distraction, that

0:18:33.820 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 6>in retrospect it was misbegotten?

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:40.420
<v Speaker 7>I think I, I think I, I had it gone

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:46.340
<v Speaker 7>for too long. So, um, you know, I mean, obviously

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:47.940
<v Speaker 7>a lot of people will disagree with me about this,

0:18:47.980 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 7>but I, I think it's important, it was important to elect, uh,

0:18:50.940 --> 0:18:54.220
<v Speaker 7>president Trump to sort of, you know, steer things more

0:18:54.260 --> 0:18:58.550
<v Speaker 7>in the direction of a free market economy. Um, you know,

0:18:58.619 --> 0:19:02.450
<v Speaker 7>have less bureaucracy ideally. Um, I mean, it was, it

0:19:02.470 --> 0:19:05.850
<v Speaker 7>was interesting to sort of go around with, uh, president

0:19:05.869 --> 0:19:08.330
<v Speaker 7>Trump and, you know, on the Marine one and Air

0:19:08.350 --> 0:19:12.129
<v Speaker 7>Force one and all that sort of stuff. But then

0:19:13.109 --> 0:19:16.590
<v Speaker 7>what I should have done, I think, was be more

0:19:16.650 --> 0:19:17.449
<v Speaker 7>in the background.

0:19:18.109 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 6>But was that too seductive in a way?

0:19:20.690 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 7>It was a little bit.

0:19:21.660 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, you seemed to get a bit too intoxicated by

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:27.659
<v Speaker 6>it in a way with the chainsaws and all that.

0:19:28.460 --> 0:19:32.860
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I think that's true. I carried away, basically. Yeah,

0:19:32.900 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 7>I mean, so I ended up leaving sometime in May uh.

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:44.770
<v Speaker 6>That was a weird weekend yeah it was uh tell

0:19:44.810 --> 0:19:45.510
<v Speaker 6>me about.

0:19:45.250 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 7>It no no i can't let's not take up the...

0:19:50.380 --> 0:19:55.120
<v Speaker 7>Let sleeping dogs lie or whatever, you know. Let's not

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:57.140
<v Speaker 7>put a spade down in the backyard type of thing.

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:04.010
<v Speaker 7>You never know what you're going to find. But yeah, anyway,

0:20:04.030 --> 0:20:06.630
<v Speaker 7>the point is I should have gone back and focused

0:20:06.790 --> 0:20:09.890
<v Speaker 7>on AI a little sooner than I did.

0:20:10.980 --> 0:20:13.990
<v Speaker 6>And did you feel like when he gives you a

0:20:14.010 --> 0:20:17.389
<v Speaker 6>golden key, you're going, did you kind of feel relieved? Like, actually,

0:20:17.450 --> 0:20:20.929
<v Speaker 6>this has been intoxicating, but I can do more if

0:20:20.970 --> 0:20:23.310
<v Speaker 6>I go back to my businesses? I mean, what did

0:20:23.350 --> 0:20:25.990
<v Speaker 6>you feel when you said, oh, man, I'm exiting. Maybe

0:20:26.020 --> 0:20:27.140
<v Speaker 6>that's not the worst thing.

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:33.260
<v Speaker 7>Well, actually, the thing is I came to the conclusion

0:20:33.300 --> 0:20:37.660
<v Speaker 7>that there was no way we were going to solve

0:20:37.700 --> 0:20:39.700
<v Speaker 7>the deficit from within the government.

0:20:39.770 --> 0:20:40.270
<v Speaker 3>Impossible.

0:20:41.090 --> 0:20:42.729
<v Speaker 1>And he goes on to say the reason it's impossible

0:20:42.770 --> 0:20:45.210
<v Speaker 1>is because President Trump wants to be liked too much

0:20:45.270 --> 0:20:50.130
<v Speaker 1>to make the hard decisions. But how do you understand

0:20:50.170 --> 0:20:53.369
<v Speaker 1>this kind of sense of regret about the involvement with Doge,

0:20:53.410 --> 0:20:56.210
<v Speaker 1>but also the enormous binge of check writing in the

0:20:56.250 --> 0:20:57.310
<v Speaker 1>last couple of weeks?

0:20:58.570 --> 0:21:02.929
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it feels like a bit of almost like retconning.

0:21:04.780 --> 0:21:08.340
<v Speaker 2>He wasn't just like organically retconning. He didn't just make

0:21:08.380 --> 0:21:12.340
<v Speaker 2>a decision to leave in a vacuum. His work was

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:17.180
<v Speaker 2>becoming increasingly untenable and unpopular. His relationship with the president

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:23.310
<v Speaker 2>was fraying. He ultimately accuses the president of being in

0:21:23.330 --> 0:21:27.610
<v Speaker 2>the Epstein files. And it's just everything goes down like

0:21:27.650 --> 0:21:31.630
<v Speaker 2>kind of in flames. I think the most revelatory part

0:21:31.650 --> 0:21:33.850
<v Speaker 2>of that to me, though, and I'm like kind of

0:21:33.910 --> 0:21:37.930
<v Speaker 2>shocked that He admitted it like like his intoxication with

0:21:37.970 --> 0:21:40.450
<v Speaker 2>the pageantry of it all, like being on Marine One.

0:21:42.350 --> 0:21:44.550
<v Speaker 2>It's just it's wild to me that, you know, you

0:21:44.850 --> 0:21:48.470
<v Speaker 2>can be someone so rich and so powerful and still

0:21:48.790 --> 0:21:53.869
<v Speaker 2>like feel something and like feel some unfulfilled fantasy or

0:21:53.890 --> 0:21:57.050
<v Speaker 2>whatever it is by being next to the president on

0:21:57.070 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 2>a helicopter. I think that that was revelatory to me.

0:22:02.450 --> 0:22:08.290
<v Speaker 2>But as for his view on. why or how he left.

0:22:08.310 --> 0:22:08.389
<v Speaker 4>I.

0:22:09.970 --> 0:22:12.369
<v Speaker 2>Think that answer would have been more interesting a year earlier.

0:22:12.830 --> 0:22:16.450
<v Speaker 1>He didn't want to put that spade down into the backyard, sadly.

0:22:16.490 --> 0:22:17.950
<v Speaker 1>I think I would have been quite, I would have

0:22:17.990 --> 0:22:19.550
<v Speaker 1>wanted to know what he had in mind.

0:22:19.609 --> 0:22:20.470
<v Speaker 2>I agree.

0:22:21.670 --> 0:22:25.870
<v Speaker 4>There is, I mean, in those questions, I almost felt

0:22:25.970 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 4>Walter pushing Elon to a regret Like, like, does Elon

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:35.230
<v Speaker 4>really regret it? I can't I don't I don't I

0:22:35.270 --> 0:22:38.310
<v Speaker 4>can't quite tell in in in what he's saying. I mean,

0:22:38.730 --> 0:22:42.629
<v Speaker 4>he and I think I think it's because there's a

0:22:42.670 --> 0:22:47.139
<v Speaker 4>disconnect between the the sort of Elon Musk where he

0:22:47.220 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 4>is politically and where a lot of his following is

0:22:50.660 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 4>where his like following sees him as like a very

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:58.669
<v Speaker 4>effective technologist. not as the primary financer of the far

0:22:58.770 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 4>right around the world, not as somebody who was ruthlessly

0:23:03.380 --> 0:23:09.290
<v Speaker 4>laying off government workers, including parts of the government that

0:23:09.330 --> 0:23:12.750
<v Speaker 4>were responsible for saving millions of lives in Africa. It

0:23:13.150 --> 0:23:18.780
<v Speaker 4>was this incredible moment and disorienting moment in which Elon

0:23:18.820 --> 0:23:22.160
<v Speaker 4>Musk's brand as this green technologist and also a very

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 4>effective technologist kind of fell apart. He was ineffective, as

0:23:28.100 --> 0:23:30.859
<v Speaker 4>Fez is saying, and he was pushing a bunch of

0:23:30.900 --> 0:23:35.050
<v Speaker 4>policies that vast parts of his you know, of his

0:23:35.090 --> 0:23:38.970
<v Speaker 4>fan base, you know, profoundly disagree with. And so and

0:23:39.010 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 4>so it's like it's very hard to hold those two

0:23:40.859 --> 0:23:43.419
<v Speaker 4>things in your head. And it's not clear to me

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:48.120
<v Speaker 4>that Elon himself quite knows how to square that circle.

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:52.100
<v Speaker 4>He keeps talking about stepping away from politics and then

0:23:52.940 --> 0:23:55.310
<v Speaker 4>keeps writing these these massive checks.

0:23:55.369 --> 0:23:58.389
<v Speaker 5>And I fully expect, you know, if J.D.

0:23:58.430 --> 0:24:01.250
<v Speaker 4>Vance is the Republican nominee in twenty twenty eight, which

0:24:01.470 --> 0:24:05.170
<v Speaker 4>I think is the most likely scenario, that Elon Musk

0:24:05.210 --> 0:24:07.130
<v Speaker 4>will be a major.

0:24:06.850 --> 0:24:07.410
<v Speaker 2>Backer of J.D.

0:24:07.510 --> 0:24:09.930
<v Speaker 4>Vance, that he's going to be back on Marine One, possibly,

0:24:09.950 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 4>you know, assuming he can't contain himself.

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:15.699
<v Speaker 2>Let's not forget, Tesla was in hell, right? Like they

0:24:15.740 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 2>had to have a, you know, there was what, like

0:24:19.500 --> 0:24:23.830
<v Speaker 2>people throwing, I don't know, Molotovs, whatever, whatever was happening

0:24:24.070 --> 0:24:28.810
<v Speaker 2>at the Tesla showrooms. And the stock was just a bloodbath.

0:24:29.230 --> 0:24:33.850
<v Speaker 2>And Trump had to essentially like attempt to prop this

0:24:33.910 --> 0:24:35.950
<v Speaker 2>thing up or whatever.

0:24:35.970 --> 0:24:40.060
<v Speaker 1>By bringing the red Tesla onto the White House lawn.

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 2>You may read that more generously as like, I don't know,

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 2>doing a favor for a friend as inappropriate as that

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 2>would be given their positions. But yeah, I mean, there

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 2>was a lot of external pressure that was driving Elon

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:56.990
<v Speaker 2>away from government. It wasn't just a matter of like, oh,

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:01.180
<v Speaker 2>Like I, I was, you know, too enamored by this

0:25:01.260 --> 0:25:04.359
<v Speaker 2>and maybe stayed too long. It was like, no, you

0:25:04.460 --> 0:25:08.820
<v Speaker 2>actually have now undercut your business. As Max points out,

0:25:08.900 --> 0:25:13.090
<v Speaker 2>like that was driven largely by, you know, these sort

0:25:13.130 --> 0:25:16.889
<v Speaker 2>of climate advocates or at least people who were sympathetic

0:25:16.910 --> 0:25:19.730
<v Speaker 2>to the climate movement in California. Like there was just

0:25:19.770 --> 0:25:23.390
<v Speaker 2>a base for this business that was clearly eroding because

0:25:23.430 --> 0:25:24.110
<v Speaker 2>of his decisions.

0:25:24.950 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 4>I feel compelled to point out, though, that it worked.

0:25:27.890 --> 0:25:32.120
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you know, as much as I think there

0:25:32.180 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 4>are ways in which, you know, if Tesla were to

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:38.020
<v Speaker 4>collapse in a few years, we would look back on

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:41.920
<v Speaker 4>the on the dalliance with Trump as as the beginning

0:25:41.940 --> 0:25:42.260
<v Speaker 4>of that.

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:42.350
<v Speaker 3>But.

0:25:44.290 --> 0:25:47.230
<v Speaker 4>It's been really good for Tesla. I mean, like, you know,

0:25:47.350 --> 0:25:49.350
<v Speaker 4>and for Elon Musk, you know, his his net worth

0:25:49.390 --> 0:25:53.270
<v Speaker 4>has gone way up. Yes, it's true that Donald Trump

0:25:53.369 --> 0:25:57.210
<v Speaker 4>got rid of the subsidies that were a big part

0:25:57.250 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 4>of Tesla's profit margins. And, you know, this and, you know,

0:26:01.060 --> 0:26:02.500
<v Speaker 4>as Trump likes to say, you know, got rid of

0:26:02.540 --> 0:26:05.359
<v Speaker 4>the electric mandate. But that's kind of worked for Tesla

0:26:05.380 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 4>in a way because it's caused every other automaker to.

0:26:08.410 --> 0:26:11.149
<v Speaker 4>outside of China to like give up on EVs. And

0:26:11.190 --> 0:26:13.530
<v Speaker 4>it's in a way kind of cleared out a bunch

0:26:13.550 --> 0:26:17.770
<v Speaker 4>of companies that were starting to, you know, potentially, you know,

0:26:17.810 --> 0:26:21.610
<v Speaker 4>present a real threat while creating a bunch of policies

0:26:22.050 --> 0:26:25.210
<v Speaker 4>that have allowed Elon Musk to like reshape this company

0:26:25.630 --> 0:26:28.210
<v Speaker 4>as an AI play and to kind of like put

0:26:28.250 --> 0:26:30.650
<v Speaker 4>the car business aside. And like, you know, you look

0:26:30.690 --> 0:26:32.070
<v Speaker 4>back on this and you say like, what did he

0:26:32.109 --> 0:26:35.860
<v Speaker 4>get for his $ 300 million? Now it's like probably almost

0:26:35.859 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 4>$ 700 million of, political contributions and like his net worth

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:43.750
<v Speaker 4>has gone up, you know, threefold or something like that.

0:26:43.790 --> 0:26:45.990
<v Speaker 4>I haven't I haven't done the math recently, but, you know,

0:26:46.030 --> 0:26:49.130
<v Speaker 4>he's a trillionaire. It's it's it's it's worked incredibly well,

0:26:49.210 --> 0:26:50.290
<v Speaker 4>at least, you know, for now.

0:26:51.570 --> 0:26:54.050
<v Speaker 2>So look at the weird dynamics like with Tesla itself,

0:26:54.190 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 2>like they yesterday on their earnings, they report they report

0:26:56.859 --> 0:26:59.880
<v Speaker 2>this like slight demand bump. And why is that happening?

0:26:59.940 --> 0:27:03.399
<v Speaker 2>Because oil prices are super high because Trump started a war.

0:27:04.140 --> 0:27:07.140
<v Speaker 2>And it's like, yeah, like there are just these roundabout

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 2>ways even if there are also direct ways in which

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:13.160
<v Speaker 2>there were decisions made that were going to benefit Tesla.

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, there are ways that Elon can look back

0:27:16.300 --> 0:27:19.070
<v Speaker 2>at this and say like, oh, I have done the

0:27:19.090 --> 0:27:22.369
<v Speaker 2>right thing despite the cost to everything and everyone around him.

0:27:23.070 --> 0:27:23.389
<v Speaker 1>Mangesh?

0:27:23.869 --> 0:27:25.750
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I was going to say like, you know, there

0:27:25.830 --> 0:27:31.510
<v Speaker 3>is something, the intoxication of the chainsaw stuff and all

0:27:31.550 --> 0:27:34.409
<v Speaker 3>that like was surprising. Also surprising to me was the

0:27:34.430 --> 0:27:37.359
<v Speaker 3>fact that he says like, I think 75% of America

0:27:37.410 --> 0:27:40.120
<v Speaker 3>likes me because I'm looking at Twitter and I see

0:27:40.140 --> 0:27:42.540
<v Speaker 3>in my comments that that's what, and so like, I

0:27:42.580 --> 0:27:45.640
<v Speaker 3>do think there's this way in which in that moment,

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:50.350
<v Speaker 3>it was such a valley versus the SpaceX IPO being

0:27:50.390 --> 0:27:52.810
<v Speaker 3>such a peak, right? And I do think there is

0:27:52.910 --> 0:27:57.510
<v Speaker 3>some regret because he was perceived publicly in bad light

0:27:57.550 --> 0:28:00.709
<v Speaker 3>during that moment, but obviously it's a net win for him.

0:28:03.260 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, We're going to hear from the

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:09.070
<v Speaker 1>builder of builders about everything from AI to the Antichrist.

0:28:09.570 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 8>Stay with us.

0:28:22.550 --> 0:28:26.929
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back. From Elon Musk to Peter Thiel. I want

0:28:26.950 --> 0:28:28.710
<v Speaker 1>to play some clips from that interview. But before we

0:28:28.750 --> 0:28:31.109
<v Speaker 1>do that, Mangesh, what were some of your favorite behind-the-scenes

0:28:31.150 --> 0:28:31.889
<v Speaker 1>moments from this one?

0:28:32.470 --> 0:28:34.830
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think In the way that I was

0:28:35.090 --> 0:28:37.450
<v Speaker 3>a little too optimistic that we'd get Musk, I was

0:28:37.930 --> 0:28:41.670
<v Speaker 3>completely pessimistic that we'd get Thiel. He'd done that Douthat interview,

0:28:41.690 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 3>that pause had gone viral, and, you know.

0:28:45.500 --> 0:28:48.460
<v Speaker 1>The pause about whether humanity should.

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:51.340
<v Speaker 1>Should continue to exist.

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:56.020
<v Speaker 3>And people are commenting, is it, is this like a

0:28:56.040 --> 0:29:01.290
<v Speaker 3>computer glitching? Right. But, um, I think one thing you

0:29:01.310 --> 0:29:05.670
<v Speaker 3>discovered was that, uh, Teal actually has multiple copies of

0:29:05.710 --> 0:29:06.370
<v Speaker 3>Walter's books.

0:29:06.390 --> 0:29:07.510
<v Speaker 1>I did hear that. I did hear that.

0:29:07.890 --> 0:29:09.489
<v Speaker 2>And so we thought, Oh.

0:29:09.550 --> 0:29:11.190
<v Speaker 3>There's a sliver of a chance. We were talking to

0:29:11.210 --> 0:29:14.100
<v Speaker 3>people on every continent, trying to figure out like how to,

0:29:14.180 --> 0:29:16.990
<v Speaker 3>how to coordinate them. And, and, uh, You know, so

0:29:17.030 --> 0:29:19.650
<v Speaker 3>many of these interviews just fall apart like a day

0:29:19.810 --> 0:29:21.870
<v Speaker 3>of like all these people talk about how much they

0:29:21.990 --> 0:29:26.469
<v Speaker 3>love canceling interviews. And you talk to like eight handlers.

0:29:26.770 --> 0:29:29.690
<v Speaker 3>You have like security sweeps of the studios. You have

0:29:29.750 --> 0:29:33.390
<v Speaker 3>like eight bodyguards traveling with various people. And then they

0:29:33.410 --> 0:29:34.950
<v Speaker 3>decide they just want to go out to coffee with

0:29:34.990 --> 0:29:38.350
<v Speaker 3>Walter instead of doing an interview. Which wasn't the case

0:29:38.390 --> 0:29:39.590
<v Speaker 3>in this one, but it was the case in some

0:29:39.610 --> 0:29:41.670
<v Speaker 3>of the others. And so like, I was just kind

0:29:41.710 --> 0:29:44.900
<v Speaker 3>of stunned that we got Teal on tape. But I think,

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, both of you, Max and Fez, like know

0:29:49.020 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 3>this world better. But I was kind of stunned by

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:55.530
<v Speaker 3>how charismatic or a certain type of charisma Teal had

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:58.450
<v Speaker 3>in person. And that like the pauses don't really exist

0:29:58.870 --> 0:30:00.670
<v Speaker 3>They do exist on tape, but they don't exist in

0:30:00.810 --> 0:30:03.790
<v Speaker 3>person in the same way. And you think about like

0:30:03.910 --> 0:30:07.490
<v Speaker 3>the Gawker lawsuit or like the Antichrist or like, you know,

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:11.959
<v Speaker 3>the shadowy work he does behind campaigns. And like it

0:30:12.260 --> 0:30:15.100
<v Speaker 3>is interesting to see that sort of like charisma in

0:30:15.140 --> 0:30:17.620
<v Speaker 3>person and also why like Zero to One is such

0:30:17.700 --> 0:30:19.740
<v Speaker 3>an important book to Silicon Valley.

0:30:20.460 --> 0:30:22.350
<v Speaker 1>Max, did you get any legal threats for your book?

0:30:23.270 --> 0:30:27.750
<v Speaker 4>No, nothing that was, you know, nothing that's, you know,

0:30:27.910 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 4>nothing of significance. And I always feel compelled to say,

0:30:32.100 --> 0:30:35.620
<v Speaker 4>so the book that I published, it's fair, but it's critical.

0:30:35.660 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 4>It is not like the Teal fanboy perspective, although that

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 4>perspective is certainly included in the book. And I approached

0:30:45.100 --> 0:30:51.610
<v Speaker 4>Teal and attempted to, you know, to secure his participation

0:30:51.700 --> 0:30:54.459
<v Speaker 4>and And, you know, through the process, he kind of

0:30:54.550 --> 0:30:56.050
<v Speaker 4>he kind of kept me at arm's length.

0:30:56.090 --> 0:30:57.950
<v Speaker 5>He he I met with him.

0:30:59.550 --> 0:31:01.310
<v Speaker 4>There was some back and forth and I met with

0:31:01.370 --> 0:31:04.430
<v Speaker 4>him off the record in a meeting that I described

0:31:04.450 --> 0:31:06.560
<v Speaker 4>in the book, although didn't quote from. And, you know,

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:09.820
<v Speaker 4>ultimately he he declined to to like sit down with

0:31:09.840 --> 0:31:13.460
<v Speaker 4>me on the record. There's sometimes people will will not

0:31:13.500 --> 0:31:15.610
<v Speaker 4>speak to you, but but seem interested in seeing the

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:16.990
<v Speaker 4>book published.

0:31:17.660 --> 0:31:19.590
<v Speaker 5>And towards the end of the process, that was not

0:31:19.630 --> 0:31:20.590
<v Speaker 5>the vibe that I had.

0:31:20.950 --> 0:31:23.710
<v Speaker 4>But I have to say that I was not subjected

0:31:24.190 --> 0:31:29.410
<v Speaker 4>to intimidation. He basically allowed me to do my job

0:31:29.570 --> 0:31:33.110
<v Speaker 4>and allowed the book to exist and allowed critical journalism

0:31:33.150 --> 0:31:39.200
<v Speaker 4>about him to exist, which is very obviously different from

0:31:39.220 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 4>the Gawker situation. I always feel compelled to say that

0:31:42.260 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 4>because I do think what he did to Gawker You

0:31:45.940 --> 0:31:49.610
<v Speaker 4>can debate like the ethics of it, but it had

0:31:49.770 --> 0:31:53.370
<v Speaker 4>a real chilling effect on journalism and the profession of journalism.

0:31:53.410 --> 0:31:57.430
<v Speaker 4>And it changed how many, many wealthy people relate to

0:31:57.470 --> 0:31:59.710
<v Speaker 4>the media. It kind of opened it like moved the

0:31:59.790 --> 0:32:04.020
<v Speaker 4>Everton window, the Everton window, the Overton window on on

0:32:04.420 --> 0:32:08.260
<v Speaker 4>on like what is permissible in terms of what you

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 4>can do in terms of intimidating a journalist. And at

0:32:11.220 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 4>the time, Thiel said, no, no, no, that is not

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 4>my goal. He's all along said he didn't want to

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 4>do that.

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 5>It was a specific instance.

0:32:18.860 --> 0:32:19.460
<v Speaker 1>Do you believe that?

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:22.620
<v Speaker 4>Well, I don't know if I believe it, but I

0:32:22.660 --> 0:32:24.500
<v Speaker 4>do have to say I feel like it's an important

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 4>fact that in this one case, he didn't, you know

0:32:27.740 --> 0:32:28.050
<v Speaker 4>what I mean?

0:32:28.090 --> 0:32:30.630
<v Speaker 5>Like he lived his values, if those are in fact

0:32:30.650 --> 0:32:31.150
<v Speaker 5>his values.

0:32:32.390 --> 0:32:34.190
<v Speaker 2>Max, I'm not really a Premier League guy, but I

0:32:34.230 --> 0:32:36.330
<v Speaker 2>think the Everton window is closed and has been closed.

0:32:37.910 --> 0:32:40.030
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's better than a Manchester United window, that's for

0:32:40.050 --> 0:32:44.410
<v Speaker 1>damn sure.

0:32:44.450 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 3>But Max, you did meet him. Were you surprised that

0:32:48.340 --> 0:32:54.100
<v Speaker 3>he looked you in the eye? Having met some of

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:56.940
<v Speaker 3>these other founders and stuff, the way they have a

0:32:56.960 --> 0:32:59.860
<v Speaker 3>difficulty communicating, I was kind of surprised by that.

0:33:00.330 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 4>Teal is like a I found Teal to be a

0:33:03.140 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 4>very interesting subject and kind of like endlessly fascinating because

0:33:07.060 --> 0:33:09.860
<v Speaker 4>he's he's a guy with with all these contradictions, but

0:33:09.980 --> 0:33:14.350
<v Speaker 4>also because he's somebody who is not as afraid. Like

0:33:14.450 --> 0:33:17.670
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk, that the point you made about 75 percent

0:33:17.710 --> 0:33:20.380
<v Speaker 4>of America likes Elon Musk wants to be loved. He's

0:33:20.390 --> 0:33:24.540
<v Speaker 4>got this feeling that I think many people who perform

0:33:24.620 --> 0:33:27.060
<v Speaker 4>on stage have, which is he gets a real charge

0:33:27.100 --> 0:33:31.070
<v Speaker 4>from the crowd, and he reads his mentions. If somebody

0:33:31.110 --> 0:33:33.650
<v Speaker 4>somewhere says something negative about Elon Musk, there's a very

0:33:33.670 --> 0:33:35.990
<v Speaker 4>good chance that Elon Musk will see it and remember.

0:33:36.740 --> 0:33:39.970
<v Speaker 5>And Teal, it's not like he isn't aware of his critics.

0:33:40.010 --> 0:33:42.190
<v Speaker 5>He's hyper aware of his critics, but.

0:33:42.110 --> 0:33:46.110
<v Speaker 4>He's also somebody who is not afraid to have critics

0:33:46.470 --> 0:33:49.850
<v Speaker 4>and throughout his career has, I think, almost valued it. Like,

0:33:50.130 --> 0:33:54.010
<v Speaker 4>it's not that he he has this like superhero persona

0:33:54.410 --> 0:33:57.550
<v Speaker 4>with his fans and a supervillain persona with the people

0:33:57.890 --> 0:34:00.750
<v Speaker 4>who do not like him. who see him as this

0:34:00.810 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 4>kind of inventor of shadowy technologies that, that do surveillance

0:34:04.980 --> 0:34:08.339
<v Speaker 4>and shadowy right wing stuff. And I would argue that

0:34:08.380 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 4>he has cultivated both of those brands. Like being a

0:34:12.080 --> 0:34:15.569
<v Speaker 4>supervillain is his brand. He kind of likes it, I think.

0:34:15.910 --> 0:34:18.089
<v Speaker 4>And I'm not sure if he would ever admit that, but, but,

0:34:18.210 --> 0:34:20.590
<v Speaker 4>but he has at times and he's talked, talked to

0:34:20.630 --> 0:34:22.270
<v Speaker 4>people at times. And I think even recently in a

0:34:22.310 --> 0:34:26.250
<v Speaker 4>public interview somewhere, I can't remember, talked about being seen

0:34:26.910 --> 0:34:30.469
<v Speaker 4>as being evil is not necessarily the worst thing in

0:34:30.489 --> 0:34:33.330
<v Speaker 4>the world because it's being seen as capable.

0:34:34.050 --> 0:34:36.660
<v Speaker 1>That's organic transmission of content to the world that we love.

0:34:36.739 --> 0:34:39.860
<v Speaker 4>I have to say, I saw that clip and I

0:34:39.900 --> 0:34:43.819
<v Speaker 4>was like, wow, like he's saying this thing that in

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:46.330
<v Speaker 4>my book, like if you go and look in the book,

0:34:46.370 --> 0:34:48.690
<v Speaker 4>it's attributed to somebody, you know, a friend, I forget,

0:34:48.810 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 4>but like, it's not, it's not an on the record assessment. And,

0:34:52.820 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 4>and like, and, and so just seeing him come out

0:34:55.140 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 4>and say it, it was, was staggering, but I definitely

0:34:57.660 --> 0:35:01.899
<v Speaker 4>think it's true. He understands the power of, of like

0:35:02.040 --> 0:35:05.969
<v Speaker 4>being reviled or being feared or, or that, that adds

0:35:06.010 --> 0:35:09.469
<v Speaker 4>its own kind of, um, that's a compliment in a way.

0:35:10.150 --> 0:35:12.380
<v Speaker 3>But also everything's chess to him. Right. Like it feels

0:35:12.420 --> 0:35:15.839
<v Speaker 3>like everything's just like thinking, like thinking steps ahead, which

0:35:15.900 --> 0:35:18.420
<v Speaker 3>he even says is why he goes silent. Right. Is

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:20.940
<v Speaker 3>like he's trying to think about like what is the

0:35:20.980 --> 0:35:23.830
<v Speaker 3>response and how do I respond to that response?

0:35:23.890 --> 0:35:24.109
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:35:24.170 --> 0:35:28.110
<v Speaker 3>Like it is an interesting perspective versus the sort of

0:35:28.170 --> 0:35:32.650
<v Speaker 3>like racing to have a certain feeling of joy or

0:35:33.010 --> 0:35:33.770
<v Speaker 3>elation or whatever.

0:35:34.670 --> 0:35:36.009
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you say you talked in the interview about

0:35:36.050 --> 0:35:39.730
<v Speaker 1>how the DMV is bad and evil is better than bad.

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:41.899
<v Speaker 1>And in the moment, I was like, well, that's kind

0:35:41.940 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 1>of compelling and quite funny and interesting. But then I

0:35:44.060 --> 0:35:47.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of thought afterwards, but I'm not sure if you

0:35:47.900 --> 0:35:50.540
<v Speaker 1>can really say that evil is better than bad. I mean,

0:35:50.660 --> 0:35:52.620
<v Speaker 1>I kind of get what he's driving at, but also

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:55.490
<v Speaker 1>that's a little spooky.

0:35:55.590 --> 0:35:58.510
<v Speaker 4>Well, I always have this feeling, one of the feelings

0:35:58.570 --> 0:36:03.549
<v Speaker 4>I've had in kind of consuming every piece of Teal

0:36:03.610 --> 0:36:08.170
<v Speaker 4>writing and content is that his critique of government has

0:36:08.210 --> 0:36:10.259
<v Speaker 4>always felt a little bit thin to me. Like, is

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:11.670
<v Speaker 4>this a guy who spent a lot of time at

0:36:11.690 --> 0:36:12.270
<v Speaker 4>the DMV?

0:36:12.310 --> 0:36:13.590
<v Speaker 5>Like, I'm not totally sure.

0:36:13.610 --> 0:36:18.370
<v Speaker 4>And so, like, he'll often say things about the post office.

0:36:18.870 --> 0:36:21.590
<v Speaker 4>He'll make comments about how terrible the experience is at

0:36:21.790 --> 0:36:23.030
<v Speaker 4>the post office or the DMV.

0:36:23.630 --> 0:36:25.359
<v Speaker 5>And I sometimes think a lot of.

0:36:25.390 --> 0:36:30.339
<v Speaker 4>His critique of dysfunction is more just like, it's like

0:36:30.739 --> 0:36:33.880
<v Speaker 4>some inconvenient parts about being a rich guy that is

0:36:33.920 --> 0:36:37.219
<v Speaker 4>actually a lot thinner than many of his fans think.

0:36:37.530 --> 0:36:37.780
<v Speaker 8>Feel.

0:36:37.820 --> 0:36:42.200
<v Speaker 4>He's constantly complaining about air travel and how a key

0:36:42.219 --> 0:36:47.580
<v Speaker 4>part of the stagnation theory for Peter Thiel is that

0:36:47.860 --> 0:36:50.880
<v Speaker 4>we haven't gotten faster planes. And that is an observation

0:36:50.900 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 4>that I understand makes sense if your main experience of

0:36:54.260 --> 0:36:58.010
<v Speaker 4>air travel is the cabin of your own private jet.

0:36:58.330 --> 0:37:01.140
<v Speaker 4>Whereas if you are a regular person, air travel has

0:37:01.180 --> 0:37:04.190
<v Speaker 4>gotten so much better in that period. It's a perspective

0:37:04.230 --> 0:37:08.009
<v Speaker 4>that is informed by a lot of privilege and in

0:37:08.050 --> 0:37:10.650
<v Speaker 4>a way that I think actually kind of makes the critique,

0:37:11.710 --> 0:37:13.910
<v Speaker 4>you know, less strong than it could be.

0:37:14.450 --> 0:37:16.850
<v Speaker 2>This is how you get USB ports in the seats

0:37:16.950 --> 0:37:19.950
<v Speaker 2>before you get a transit line to another neighborhood, right?

0:37:20.110 --> 0:37:23.879
<v Speaker 2>It's like, what do people who are just seeking these

0:37:23.940 --> 0:37:27.460
<v Speaker 2>sort of luxuries want out of the experience versus what

0:37:27.500 --> 0:37:30.759
<v Speaker 2>is actually going to improve the experience for everyone. And like,

0:37:31.219 --> 0:37:32.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, it's just such a great point that

0:37:32.560 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 2>you just made, Max. Like, why do we take this

0:37:35.219 --> 0:37:37.360
<v Speaker 2>other than the fact that, you know, Tio holds a

0:37:37.380 --> 0:37:41.910
<v Speaker 2>tremendous amount of power? You know, it's not necessarily like

0:37:41.950 --> 0:37:45.290
<v Speaker 2>a serious critique, especially if you're bringing up the DMV

0:37:45.350 --> 0:37:47.610
<v Speaker 2>as somebody who has not spent a significant amount of

0:37:47.650 --> 0:37:49.090
<v Speaker 2>time at the DMV recently.

0:37:49.110 --> 0:37:50.570
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a good moment to go to our

0:37:50.610 --> 0:37:51.650
<v Speaker 1>first clip, which is.

0:37:53.170 --> 0:37:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Walter has this framing of Peter as somebody who invested

0:37:58.580 --> 0:38:02.759
<v Speaker 1>in Elon and financed Vance, and basically as the kind

0:38:02.800 --> 0:38:05.660
<v Speaker 1>of meta-concept of the series is the builders, that Thiel

0:38:05.719 --> 0:38:08.050
<v Speaker 1>is someone who's kind of like a builder of builders.

0:38:08.120 --> 0:38:09.370
<v Speaker 1>So let's roll that clip.

0:38:09.910 --> 0:38:13.830
<v Speaker 6>If you were to back a builder, though, where would

0:38:13.870 --> 0:38:15.990
<v Speaker 6>you rank having a moral compass?

0:38:18.270 --> 0:38:24.860
<v Speaker 8>I rank that... pretty high. I rank that highly. I

0:38:25.700 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 8>would say, but let's, you know, I, I, I don't

0:38:33.660 --> 0:38:36.799
<v Speaker 8>like investing in companies where it's, it's simply a business.

0:38:37.680 --> 0:38:41.330
<v Speaker 8>There's some transcendent purpose. There's something, you know, very important

0:38:41.370 --> 0:38:47.129
<v Speaker 8>that you're doing. So, you know, Elon going to Mars is,

0:38:48.570 --> 0:38:51.089
<v Speaker 8>I don't know exactly where I would rank that on,

0:38:51.250 --> 0:38:55.109
<v Speaker 8>on sort of a moral good versus evil dimension, but

0:38:55.150 --> 0:38:59.109
<v Speaker 8>it is transcendent. It is, it's somehow, it's not just

0:38:59.170 --> 0:39:01.990
<v Speaker 8>a business. It's, we're not just, you know, a stock

0:39:02.050 --> 0:39:04.719
<v Speaker 8>brokerage where we're making, you know, a few dollars and

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:07.379
<v Speaker 8>every time people buy and sell stocks, it's, it's not

0:39:07.420 --> 0:39:11.339
<v Speaker 8>just the sort of short-term coin operated business. It has this,

0:39:11.700 --> 0:39:14.500
<v Speaker 8>you know, transcendent sense of purpose. That's what I like.

0:39:16.020 --> 0:39:19.410
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that, I mean, first of all, Teal's talked about this,

0:39:19.489 --> 0:39:22.290
<v Speaker 4>but he has, uh, He has this problem.

0:39:22.750 --> 0:39:25.060
<v Speaker 5>The title of my book is The Contrarian. He's a contrarian.

0:39:25.340 --> 0:39:28.149
<v Speaker 4>He has a very hard time just kind of agreeing

0:39:28.170 --> 0:39:30.510
<v Speaker 4>with the conventional wisdom. This is one of the problems

0:39:30.550 --> 0:39:34.660
<v Speaker 4>if you're a contrarian. There are certain things where it's

0:39:34.700 --> 0:39:36.989
<v Speaker 4>hard to be contrarian about a question like, should you

0:39:37.030 --> 0:39:39.280
<v Speaker 4>have a moral compass? And you could kind of almost

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:42.620
<v Speaker 4>hear him... you know, trying to think about how can

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:46.040
<v Speaker 4>I give an interesting answer to the question that, because

0:39:46.100 --> 0:39:47.899
<v Speaker 4>he doesn't want to just say yes, but he did

0:39:47.980 --> 0:39:50.540
<v Speaker 4>say yes. I, I, in a way, right. He's, he,

0:39:50.680 --> 0:39:54.510
<v Speaker 4>he gave his own kind of definition of, of like

0:39:54.660 --> 0:39:58.310
<v Speaker 4>what he would see as morality and purpose in a company.

0:39:58.650 --> 0:40:00.370
<v Speaker 4>And I do think, I mean, I think he very

0:40:00.410 --> 0:40:04.890
<v Speaker 4>much has that, that sense of, of, of, uh, of

0:40:04.969 --> 0:40:07.680
<v Speaker 4>a you know, worldview that includes things like good and

0:40:07.739 --> 0:40:09.920
<v Speaker 4>evil and so on. It's just like a very different,

0:40:10.060 --> 0:40:14.549
<v Speaker 4>very different definitions of what of like what moral superiority

0:40:14.630 --> 0:40:16.810
<v Speaker 4>would be to most people.

0:40:17.810 --> 0:40:19.969
<v Speaker 1>I think just for a final clip, the kind of

0:40:20.690 --> 0:40:25.500
<v Speaker 1>politics and geopolitics of both of these figures and China

0:40:26.020 --> 0:40:28.820
<v Speaker 1>is a really kind of important and fascinating thread. And

0:40:29.219 --> 0:40:32.219
<v Speaker 1>Walter was asking Peter about what he thought about this,

0:40:32.420 --> 0:40:34.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, the context of whether or not there should

0:40:34.700 --> 0:40:36.510
<v Speaker 1>be a pause on AI development.

0:40:36.969 --> 0:40:39.970
<v Speaker 6>Your old friend, David Sachs, and of course, President Trump

0:40:40.030 --> 0:40:43.950
<v Speaker 6>are now saying, because of the competition with China, stop

0:40:44.150 --> 0:40:47.609
<v Speaker 6>talking about pausing AI, even if you think it could

0:40:47.670 --> 0:40:49.750
<v Speaker 6>be an existential threat. Do you agree with that?

0:40:53.989 --> 0:40:57.070
<v Speaker 8>Yes, yes, I broadly agree with that. I would say

0:40:57.150 --> 0:41:01.330
<v Speaker 8>the challenge that I've been friends with David Sachs for

0:41:01.350 --> 0:41:05.530
<v Speaker 8>many decades. The thing that makes me less comfortable making

0:41:06.030 --> 0:41:10.520
<v Speaker 8>those kinds of arguments publicly is that on some level,

0:41:10.860 --> 0:41:13.420
<v Speaker 8>it's hard when the big companies themselves are telling you

0:41:13.460 --> 0:41:14.839
<v Speaker 8>to stop and to slow down.

0:41:15.120 --> 0:41:17.620
<v Speaker 6>So that's caused you to have some pause because you

0:41:17.700 --> 0:41:20.060
<v Speaker 6>were not in the pause button camp.

0:41:20.820 --> 0:41:23.120
<v Speaker 8>Well, I'm still not in the pause button camp. And

0:41:23.420 --> 0:41:24.880
<v Speaker 8>I'm saying this on your show that I'm not in

0:41:24.900 --> 0:41:27.900
<v Speaker 8>the pause button. We need to hit the accelerator as

0:41:27.980 --> 0:41:28.950
<v Speaker 8>hard as possible.

0:41:29.300 --> 0:41:31.250
<v Speaker 6>Well, wait a minute. Let me stop there. Why haven't

0:41:31.430 --> 0:41:35.670
<v Speaker 6>the past few weeks caused you to be more amenable

0:41:35.710 --> 0:41:38.850
<v Speaker 6>to a pause button? It's pretty scary, that hugging phase.

0:41:38.870 --> 0:41:41.770
<v Speaker 8>You know, I think in some ways you have to

0:41:41.810 --> 0:41:44.919
<v Speaker 8>develop the AI technology to control the AI technology. So

0:41:45.760 --> 0:41:48.880
<v Speaker 8>if you assume China will develop things like that, it's

0:41:48.960 --> 0:41:50.719
<v Speaker 8>more imperative than ever that we stay ahead of them.

0:41:50.780 --> 0:41:53.900
<v Speaker 8>So if you look at it geopolitically, maybe you can

0:41:53.960 --> 0:41:56.390
<v Speaker 8>even interpret something like the hugging phase thing as It's

0:41:56.450 --> 0:41:59.319
<v Speaker 8>so imperative that we not lose the lead and that

0:41:59.340 --> 0:42:01.279
<v Speaker 8>we get, you know, cyber attack to death.

0:42:02.140 --> 0:42:03.719
<v Speaker 1>Walter went on to ask him, well, if there was

0:42:03.780 --> 0:42:06.260
<v Speaker 1>no China, would you be more amenable to a pause button?

0:42:06.300 --> 0:42:10.320
<v Speaker 1>To which Thiel replied, apart from that, how was the play, Mrs. Lincoln?

0:42:10.340 --> 0:42:12.870
<v Speaker 1>Which gave us a chuckle in the control room. But

0:42:12.890 --> 0:42:16.830
<v Speaker 1>what I mean, how do you how do you interpret

0:42:16.870 --> 0:42:17.270
<v Speaker 1>this mix?

0:42:17.730 --> 0:42:21.750
<v Speaker 4>So his comment about accelerationism, we should hit the accelerator.

0:42:21.790 --> 0:42:24.520
<v Speaker 4>Let's like make the AI better. you know, that's very

0:42:24.560 --> 0:42:27.359
<v Speaker 4>much in line with like his overall worldview, which is that,

0:42:27.430 --> 0:42:31.049
<v Speaker 4>which I alluded to earlier, which is that tech is

0:42:31.110 --> 0:42:33.250
<v Speaker 4>not doing as much as it could. And I think

0:42:33.290 --> 0:42:38.130
<v Speaker 4>that perspective, a lot of technologists share that perspective. And

0:42:38.170 --> 0:42:39.810
<v Speaker 4>I think if you, even a lot of people in

0:42:39.930 --> 0:42:43.620
<v Speaker 4>AI share that perspective that, you know, that, you know,

0:42:43.739 --> 0:42:46.859
<v Speaker 4>like they're not as worried about what this technology could

0:42:46.880 --> 0:42:50.100
<v Speaker 4>do as what it can't do. I will say that,

0:42:51.210 --> 0:42:54.810
<v Speaker 4>Thiel is a guy who talks his book and who

0:42:54.930 --> 0:43:00.740
<v Speaker 4>often has really melded in a seamless and very interesting

0:43:00.780 --> 0:43:05.540
<v Speaker 4>way his ideology with his business portfolio and saying that

0:43:05.680 --> 0:43:11.610
<v Speaker 4>being pro-acceleration and AI is definitely good for business and

0:43:11.770 --> 0:43:16.870
<v Speaker 4>good for his financial portfolio and that makes sense. I

0:43:16.910 --> 0:43:20.489
<v Speaker 4>also think it's worth applying the same filter to some

0:43:20.510 --> 0:43:23.200
<v Speaker 4>of the people who are causing or calling for a pause.

0:43:23.530 --> 0:43:26.919
<v Speaker 4>Like some of these AI companies, I think, also stand

0:43:26.940 --> 0:43:30.339
<v Speaker 4>to benefit financially from some of the warnings that they

0:43:30.380 --> 0:43:33.880
<v Speaker 4>are issuing. So I think it's a somewhat calculated comment.

0:43:35.550 --> 0:43:40.710
<v Speaker 2>Just as a casual observer, it just feels like nuclear

0:43:40.810 --> 0:43:43.590
<v Speaker 2>arms race rhetoric. It's just like, oh yeah, they're building

0:43:43.650 --> 0:43:46.610
<v Speaker 2>something really powerful. We have to build something equally powerful.

0:43:46.640 --> 0:43:49.610
<v Speaker 2>Where does it stop? Is there any Is there anything

0:43:49.750 --> 0:43:52.009
<v Speaker 2>I guess I would have liked to hear, like, you know,

0:43:52.590 --> 0:43:56.549
<v Speaker 2>whether there was any red line, anything that would get

0:43:56.590 --> 0:44:01.230
<v Speaker 2>him to maybe endorse the idea of a pause? And

0:44:01.670 --> 0:44:04.190
<v Speaker 2>if there is not, I think that's quite revelatory.

0:44:04.210 --> 0:44:09.310
<v Speaker 4>You know, Teal's been going around the world, essentially saying

0:44:09.489 --> 0:44:14.860
<v Speaker 4>that anyone who wants to rein in the technology industry

0:44:14.880 --> 0:44:18.670
<v Speaker 4>is is like a candidate for the antichrist, is that

0:44:19.330 --> 0:44:25.140
<v Speaker 4>this is such a dangerous ideology that you should think

0:44:25.200 --> 0:44:29.500
<v Speaker 4>about it in those terms. And look, he's a provocateur,

0:44:29.560 --> 0:44:31.660
<v Speaker 4>he's somebody who likes, like as I said, he likes

0:44:31.719 --> 0:44:36.050
<v Speaker 4>to say controversial things and watch people react. I also

0:44:36.210 --> 0:44:41.989
<v Speaker 4>think that he correctly senses that this is like a

0:44:42.070 --> 0:44:46.670
<v Speaker 4>reaction to what is a very, very powerful and nascent

0:44:46.950 --> 0:44:50.330
<v Speaker 4>political movement that is skeptical of tech and technology. And

0:44:50.350 --> 0:44:56.630
<v Speaker 4>I think Thiel is picking up on something significant in

0:44:56.650 --> 0:44:59.390
<v Speaker 4>the culture and in our world. And yeah, you can

0:44:59.430 --> 0:45:02.630
<v Speaker 4>disagree with his reaction to it is like, push that aside,

0:45:02.650 --> 0:45:05.130
<v Speaker 4>we need to stamp it dead. Whereas I think it's

0:45:05.150 --> 0:45:10.540
<v Speaker 4>very reasonable to ask, do these technologies... as Fez is saying, like,

0:45:10.660 --> 0:45:14.460
<v Speaker 4>where's the line? You know, there's probably a line somewhere,

0:45:14.540 --> 0:45:17.549
<v Speaker 4>and it's pretty weird not to say there is none.

0:45:18.430 --> 0:45:20.890
<v Speaker 4>But again, I just think he's reacting to something that

0:45:20.950 --> 0:45:23.950
<v Speaker 4>is significant. And like, Thiel is very good. He's good

0:45:23.989 --> 0:45:26.790
<v Speaker 4>at picking up these trends early, and I think that's

0:45:26.810 --> 0:45:27.690
<v Speaker 4>what we're watching right now.

0:45:28.650 --> 0:45:30.830
<v Speaker 1>We're going to roll out on a clip of Peter

0:45:30.870 --> 0:45:33.090
<v Speaker 1>Thiel talking about the Antichrist.

0:45:33.890 --> 0:45:36.700
<v Speaker 6>Let me read you something you once said, because I'm

0:45:36.860 --> 0:45:39.730
<v Speaker 6>sort of wrestling, and I mean this... Genuinely, with the

0:45:39.750 --> 0:45:42.969
<v Speaker 6>whole Antichrist thing and what you mean by that. But

0:45:43.010 --> 0:45:45.970
<v Speaker 6>it ties into this new AI moment we're in, which

0:45:45.989 --> 0:45:48.660
<v Speaker 6>you said the way the Antichrist would take over the

0:45:48.700 --> 0:45:53.420
<v Speaker 6>world is you talk about Armageddon nonstop. You talk about

0:45:53.540 --> 0:45:58.700
<v Speaker 6>existential risk nonstop. The Antichrist wouldn't seize power by creating

0:45:58.739 --> 0:46:03.839
<v Speaker 6>an AI apocalypse, but by convincing everyone that the apocalypse

0:46:04.020 --> 0:46:07.120
<v Speaker 6>was coming. Is that what's happening now?

0:46:07.719 --> 0:46:10.120
<v Speaker 8>Well, since I said that like a year and a

0:46:10.140 --> 0:46:13.560
<v Speaker 8>half ago, yeah, I'm tempted to take a victory lap

0:46:13.620 --> 0:46:17.940
<v Speaker 8>of sorts that you have to at least ask certain questions.

0:46:17.960 --> 0:46:20.480
<v Speaker 8>And that's what I would want people to do.

0:46:20.900 --> 0:46:22.640
<v Speaker 6>But wait, explain to me, though, what you mean by

0:46:22.660 --> 0:46:23.480
<v Speaker 6>the Antichrist.

0:46:25.060 --> 0:46:29.219
<v Speaker 8>Well, it is, I mean, it's a sort of medieval

0:46:29.390 --> 0:46:34.550
<v Speaker 8>biblical concept of sort of a tyrant who will somehow

0:46:34.830 --> 0:46:37.920
<v Speaker 8>rule the entire world at the end of history. If

0:46:37.960 --> 0:46:41.540
<v Speaker 8>you think of it in a literary way or, you know,

0:46:42.260 --> 0:46:44.259
<v Speaker 8>sort of a creative way, you can say, well, you know,

0:46:44.320 --> 0:46:46.900
<v Speaker 8>how would the Antichrist come to power in different times

0:46:46.960 --> 0:46:51.480
<v Speaker 8>and different places? And in early modernity, 17th, 18th century,

0:46:51.960 --> 0:46:55.520
<v Speaker 8>perhaps the Antichrist would use science and technology to build

0:46:55.580 --> 0:46:59.029
<v Speaker 8>weapons and take over the world. In my telling, in

0:46:59.120 --> 0:47:02.370
<v Speaker 8>late modernity, we in some ways still think of the

0:47:02.430 --> 0:47:05.709
<v Speaker 8>Antichrist in 17th century categories. We still think it's like

0:47:06.190 --> 0:47:10.490
<v Speaker 8>a doctor's strange love. Edward Teller-type person who builds nuclear

0:47:10.530 --> 0:47:13.590
<v Speaker 8>bombs to conquer the world. But if you think of

0:47:13.610 --> 0:47:17.150
<v Speaker 8>it as a political dimension, the way I think the

0:47:17.210 --> 0:47:20.469
<v Speaker 8>politics work in our society is that the fear of

0:47:20.530 --> 0:47:23.790
<v Speaker 8>science and technology are far more powerful, and that that's

0:47:23.830 --> 0:47:26.509
<v Speaker 8>the kind of thing that would really crystallize things. I

0:47:26.530 --> 0:47:30.629
<v Speaker 8>don't think Greta is the Antichrist. I don't think she's

0:47:30.650 --> 0:47:35.160
<v Speaker 8>the Antichrist, but I think environmentalism You know, there are

0:47:35.180 --> 0:47:35.700
<v Speaker 8>real fears.

0:47:35.760 --> 0:47:38.219
<v Speaker 6>People pushing back on progress is what you're saying.

0:47:38.239 --> 0:47:41.810
<v Speaker 8>Pushing back on progress, but then also pushing for these very,

0:47:41.870 --> 0:47:46.230
<v Speaker 8>very powerful global political structures. Because something like climate change,

0:47:46.910 --> 0:47:48.609
<v Speaker 8>it sounds like the sort of thing where you need

0:47:48.630 --> 0:47:50.190
<v Speaker 8>a global regulatory authority.

0:47:50.469 --> 0:47:55.620
<v Speaker 6>So your big feel is some global regulatory authority. Yeah.

0:47:55.640 --> 0:47:58.120
<v Speaker 8>And again, there are probably versions of that that could

0:47:58.140 --> 0:48:00.279
<v Speaker 8>be good. You know, the nuclear ones we ended up

0:48:00.320 --> 0:48:01.960
<v Speaker 8>with were definitely more good than bad.

0:48:02.580 --> 0:48:03.279
<v Speaker 1>Max, last word to you.

0:48:03.610 --> 0:48:07.299
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, I think Thiel's worldview is, we opened

0:48:07.320 --> 0:48:09.739
<v Speaker 4>the show talking about living in these guys' heads. I mean,

0:48:10.040 --> 0:48:16.450
<v Speaker 4>Thiel's worldview is that he, him, himself, and people like him,

0:48:16.489 --> 0:48:20.210
<v Speaker 4>including Elon Musk, should run the world, and that technology

0:48:20.510 --> 0:48:23.930
<v Speaker 4>should be the imperative through which we structure our society

0:48:24.219 --> 0:48:26.259
<v Speaker 4>at the expense of democracy.

0:48:26.920 --> 0:48:27.180
<v Speaker 5>And I.

0:48:28.700 --> 0:48:32.239
<v Speaker 4>I think that is interesting and it's worth discussing. It's

0:48:32.260 --> 0:48:35.480
<v Speaker 4>worth talking about, especially in societies where we've decided that

0:48:35.960 --> 0:48:39.000
<v Speaker 4>democracy is a good thing. But I always feel compelled

0:48:39.160 --> 0:48:42.839
<v Speaker 4>to point out that there is no guarantee that we

0:48:42.910 --> 0:48:45.690
<v Speaker 4>live inside of the brains of these people. That is

0:48:45.770 --> 0:48:50.070
<v Speaker 4>what they very much want. And we members of a

0:48:50.469 --> 0:48:53.729
<v Speaker 4>democratic society get to decide. And the fact that that

0:48:54.070 --> 0:48:58.430
<v Speaker 4>is so terrifying to them is interesting and is worth

0:48:58.489 --> 0:49:02.220
<v Speaker 4>exploring and especially in the context of a you know

0:49:02.260 --> 0:49:04.339
<v Speaker 4>democratic society with an election coming and so on.

0:49:04.760 --> 0:49:06.540
<v Speaker 1>On that and that indeed was the mission of this

0:49:06.600 --> 0:49:11.520
<v Speaker 1>show the builders to to reveal these people in in

0:49:11.560 --> 0:49:14.210
<v Speaker 1>their own words and so you can listen to it

0:49:14.250 --> 0:49:17.060
<v Speaker 1>or you get your podcast find it on youtube and

0:49:17.320 --> 0:49:20.070
<v Speaker 1>uh fez and max really this was a fascinating and

0:49:20.090 --> 0:49:23.410
<v Speaker 1>very revealing uh conversation analysis and thank you both so much.

0:49:23.310 --> 0:49:25.230
<v Speaker 2>For joining us thank you so much thank you.

0:49:39.670 --> 0:49:42.550
<v Speaker 1>For Tech Stuff, I'm Azfar Lashin. This episode was produced

0:49:42.610 --> 0:49:45.970
<v Speaker 1>by Eliza Dennis and Mangesh Hattikadur. It was executive produced

0:49:46.030 --> 0:49:49.300
<v Speaker 1>by me and Julian Nutter for Kaleidoscope and Katrine Norvell

0:49:49.320 --> 0:49:53.460
<v Speaker 1>for iHeart Podcasts. Jack Inslee mixed this episode. Kyle Murdoch

0:49:53.480 --> 0:49:56.340
<v Speaker 1>wrote our theme song. And please check out The Builders

0:49:56.680 --> 0:49:57.880
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts.