WEBVTT - Think, Innovate, Organize! 

0:00:02.279 --> 0:00:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George

0:00:06.640 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Show, Katty arm Strong

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and Getty and he.

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty. Hard to believe that a little company

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 2>that started in a warehouse in El Segundo is now UH.

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 3>Is now is not going public for the it was

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 3>with the largest ipo that ever.

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>That was not his best work. Elon was talking about

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:53.200
<v Speaker 1>his ipo, which debut on Friday and searched past two

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars on its debut, and people who got in

0:00:57.280 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and got out at the right time made some money.

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>It was up nighte teen percent from the ipo price

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>later in the day. But you know, these things make

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>such a splash when they happen in the news, These

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 1>big IPOs SpaceX did andthropics going to UH happens chat

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>GPT will be a big one open AI and whether

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:19.119
<v Speaker 1>or not we should get involved in them is always

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>a question to me.

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:22.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think a lot of folks have only a

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 2>vague idea of what happened and what it all means.

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 2>So to answer some of those questions, we turned to

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Stephen Kates, a finance expert with Bankrate Dot com Stephen, welcome,

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:32.679
<v Speaker 2>how are you.

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm doing good, Thanks for having me.

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>That is the question, isn't it what happened and what

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>does it mean?

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 3>Tell us, Well, what happened was SpaceX went public. The

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 3>IPO price was one hundred and thirty five dollars. So

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 3>that's the price that anybody who applied to try to

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 3>get access to those IPO shares, that's the price that

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 3>they got. They would all be, you know, in the

0:01:57.480 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 3>money here. It's currently trading for about a hundred seventy

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 3>five dollars, so we're roughly about thirty percent higher than

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 3>that IPO price. So that's a good thing for anybody

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 3>who did get that for anybody who didn't but wants

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 3>to get in or is thinking about it, you know,

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 3>that's a different calculus because now you're buying again thirty

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:19.920
<v Speaker 3>percent higher than that IPO price, and you have to

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 3>determine do you think it's going higher over what timeline

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 3>and how much do you expect to actually profit?

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>So can anybody invest now? You can jump in now

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:31.519
<v Speaker 1>if you want, anybody can invest.

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 3>You can go out there, you can buy as many

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 3>shares as you can find out on the open market.

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>So I was looking at a chart on Friday because

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's so much talk about this on Friday,

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and it looks like it's pretty all over the place

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>on these really big IPOs when they debut, whether a

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>week later they're up or down or flat.

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:51.920
<v Speaker 3>Right, Yeah, I mean there's a lot of volatility with

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:56.639
<v Speaker 3>IPOs again because you know, these companies coming from private market,

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot less transparency, a lot less reporting on that,

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 3>so you know, people can get into a florri of activity,

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, wanting to get involved, and then some sell.

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>And I I had serious full mo is what I had? Yeah, Uh,

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>just a lot of.

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 2>People get that.

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 3>I think the important thing that people need to understand

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:22.920
<v Speaker 3>is that for especially for large IPOs and SpaceX is

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 3>one of the largest there has ever been, and the

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 3>valuation is extremely high relative to some of the fundamental

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 3>values like revenue and most large IPOs. You can take

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 3>your facebooks, Ali Baba's you know all snap point Base, Robinhood,

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 3>you name it. Uh, there's typically a fifty percent draw

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 3>down in the first twelve months for some of the

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 3>large IPOs. So that's real. That is, you know, the

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 3>the median and average draw down from U takes a trough. Uh,

0:03:57.600 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, within the first twelve months. So that's a reality.

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 3>If you're thinking about wanting to buy this, you need

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 3>to recognize that you either want to have a long

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 3>holding period or you may want to wait for the

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 3>right price.

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Because you're betting against history.

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Joe, Joe's got a real question. I got a dumb

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>guy question. Is this the sort of Are these big

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 1>IPOs like this the sort of stuff that us dumb

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>guys get into and like real investors, smart investors stay

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>away from or not? I would not seems like dumb

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>guy baits. It seems like the sort of thing you

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>lure me in on. Well, I wouldn't say.

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to say that anybody's word into these things.

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 3>I think that the excitement, you know, is contagious. People

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 3>like to be involved in these things. I mean, it's

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 3>fun to be involved in these things. There's nothing wrong

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 3>with that. I think it's a position size in question.

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 3>If you try to put fifty percent of your net

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 3>worth into an IPO, well then you're truly gambling because

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 3>you don't really know what's going on with that company.

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 3>You simply, as an average investor, have no access to

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 3>information on what's really going on in that company. You're

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:03.359
<v Speaker 3>taking the word of the company at face value, and

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 3>you can't always do that. Now, if you drop in

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 3>a couple percentage points of your portfolio into this or

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 3>any other IPO, go for it. That's your prerogative. That's

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:16.799
<v Speaker 3>not an unsafe position size. But you should never put

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:19.160
<v Speaker 3>money into something like this that you can't.

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Afford to lose. So, Stephen, this would probably require thousands

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:25.919
<v Speaker 2>of words to answer completely. But I've been reading a

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 2>lot about how space is truly Captain Kirk the next

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 2>frontier and also vastly yeah for manufacturing and technology and

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 2>all sorts of amazing stuff having you know, you know,

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 2>let's agree on that. To what extent is the skyrocketing

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 2>price and the skyrocketing evaluation of SpaceX unmored to mathematics.

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Is it just excitement? It's a big name of how

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 2>do you read all of that?

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:00.919
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of excitement. Now, I'm not an engineer,

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm not an aerospace engineer. I'm not any kind of

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 3>an engineer. So the capability for a company like SpaceX

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 3>or any other to do the kind of things that

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 3>they've talked about having, you know, space data centers, doing

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:20.679
<v Speaker 3>micro chip manufacturing in space, doing you know, a trip

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 3>to Mars? Is that something that can be done in

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.840
<v Speaker 3>five years or fifty years? I have no idea, but

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:31.279
<v Speaker 3>nobody else does either, and it, you know, to compare

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 3>sort of how dislocated the valuation is.

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 2>I'll put it this way.

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 3>SpaceX is valued like Amazon but earns revenue like Macy's.

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Wow, let's bottom line it. How much did you put

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:51.599
<v Speaker 1>in zero? Okay, in fact in the idea?

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:56.039
<v Speaker 3>So I will tell you that any anybody who's going

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 3>to be owning an index fund of the next year

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:06.840
<v Speaker 3>NASDAK you know specifically very soon will include some SpaceX shares, Yes,

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 3>and P five hundred. It's going to be about twelve

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 3>months from now, but it will likely get included. But

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 3>the rules you know for those things are going to

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 3>allow SpaceX into the indexes earlier than in past ips.

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>So you enjoyed just pointing out, you know, like how

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 1>so unknown. I mean, space is vast, but there's just

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>so much What are they going to be doing when

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>all that sort of stuff that's like a car company

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>compared to these AI companies though? Is that I mean,

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>like a solid we make bricks compared to these AI

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>because who has any idea what these AI companies are

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be worth or making or doing and there

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>with their IPOs are going to be really nuts, aren't they.

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 3>Well it's similar, I mean, space X their financials are

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 3>far more transparent than Anthropic or open AI. We know

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 3>more about SpaceX and and the businesses that that are

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 3>involved in that. You know, they're X formerly Twitter, you know,

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 3>that was very clear what the financials looked like at

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 3>one point for that, the you know, XAI there's more

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 3>known about that, uh, you know, even even the uh,

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, the segment of starlink. There's a lot known

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 3>about those things. And coming into this i PO, people

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 3>could parse those numbers more easily. With open AI and Anthropic,

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 3>it's very opaque. We don't really know much about these

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 3>We know that they're growing fast, we know that they

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 3>are deeply, deeply unprofitable, but a lot of the revenue

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 3>numbers and the performance is muddy. It's annualized run rate

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 3>numbers where they're saying that you know, we're we're doing

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 3>twenty or thirty billion dollars in annualized run rate, which

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:52.319
<v Speaker 3>means that you know, on a high growth rate, that's accelerating,

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 3>which is great, but it means that it kind of

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:58.319
<v Speaker 3>is fuzzy numbers because what they actually earned over the

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 3>last twelve months is going to be significally lower than

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 3>these run rate numbers. You analized run rate, meaning that

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, if you took a single month and you

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 3>multiply it by twelve, you're saying that what we earned

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 3>let's say in December, if we multiply that by twelve,

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 3>look at that was a twelve month representation. That's what

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 3>we might earn over the next twelve months. And so

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 3>you can you can make things look really nice that way.

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 3>You know, if you if I annualized my Christmas stockings

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 3>on an annualized run rate basis based on what I

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:38.199
<v Speaker 3>got in December, well I'm getting twelve stockings per year,

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 3>but I don't. So you know, of open AI or

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 3>Anthropic earned a billion dollars in December, they could say

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:50.079
<v Speaker 3>we have an annualized run rate of twelve billion dollars

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 3>per year even if they earned maybe two billion dollars

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 3>in the past year, because they grew it significantly in December,

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 3>which is great. Growth rate that's high, is amazing, but

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't tell you what they actually earned over the

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:06.959
<v Speaker 3>past couple months. It just tells you what they could

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 3>earn based on a single data point.

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Final question for Stephen Kates of bankrate dot com. Stephen,

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 2>are you using AI agents? Say in your work these days?

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:21.319
<v Speaker 3>I haven't used AI agents, but I do use AI.

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 3>Do use the l l ms to do different analysis,

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:28.839
<v Speaker 3>and you know, sometimes even just bounce arguments off to

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 3>try to make sure that you know those things are solid.

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:36.439
<v Speaker 3>But a lot of what I do is not looking at,

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, publicly available data as much as as it

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 3>is analyzing things as they come out. So I can't

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 3>really get an agent to do any better than I

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:49.679
<v Speaker 3>can to go read the CPI report. I'm looking at

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:52.199
<v Speaker 3>it as it comes out. The AI agent can't really

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 3>do it any faster.

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:57.079
<v Speaker 2>So you're suggesting a strong don't buy when Anthropic has

0:10:57.080 --> 0:10:59.839
<v Speaker 2>their IPO, I get it. Thank you saw through your code.

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 2>I got it, wink No. Stephen katesbankreat dot Com, Stephen,

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 2>good to talk to you. Thank you my pleasure.

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>So what I liked about that is that dealed with

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 1>dealed with dealt with the fomo that I think a

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:17.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of people have he didn't invest a single dollar.

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 1>These things get so much attention leading up to their

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:29.319
<v Speaker 1>announcement and then the day of and everything like that. Apparently,

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>feel free is like you're just being like a grown up,

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, medium risk investor, feel free to just ignore it.

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Sounds like to me, what do you think?

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Right? Yeah, especially because and I was gonna I want

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 2>to confirm this because I'm absolutely not an expert. I'm

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 2>just a guy who's curious about it. How IPOs work

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 2>sometimes is they're not immediately to the public. The underwriters

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 2>and the company you agree on the final offer price

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:07.680
<v Speaker 2>for the shares and allocate them to select investors, and

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 2>the next morning the stock begins trading on the New

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 2>York Stock Exchange or the NASDAC or whatever. And at

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 2>that point, everyday retail investors can buy and sell the

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:19.319
<v Speaker 2>stock on the open market. But there's a layer before

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 2>we even get a shot at it of the well connected, right,

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 2>I'd like to be in that layer, please, But.

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>As I was looking at the charts on Friday, I

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>forget who had that the Wall Street Journal, I guess,

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>showing that it's just as likely to stay flat or

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 1>go down as go up. So I mean there's there's

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>no rhyme or reason really to the last half dozen

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 1>biggest IPOs that have ever been seen because we keep

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>setting records. Yeah, okay, well I'm happy to hear that. That.

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>And if you're listening and you didn't get involved, either,

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you're not an idiot. You didn't you didn't miss your

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>great opportunity or whatever.

0:12:57.120 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 2>Right, No, No, it's all about the long term anyway,

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 2>unless you're a really really good day trader, and we're not.

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>But we should deal with this concept that Elon must

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:11.959
<v Speaker 1>becoming a trillionaire somehow screwed the rest of us.

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:17.079
<v Speaker 2>That's nuts, idiotic, idiotic, terrible And if you think that's true,

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 2>stay tuned. We're going to straighten out before you make

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 2>a bigger fool of yourself.

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that's next.

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:34.559
<v Speaker 4>Those who have been blessed the most, who have disproportionately

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 4>attracted by whatever skill, more and more from the national wealth,

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 4>they're gonna have to share more of that.

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>That is the four term governor of California, two terms

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 1>when he was the youngest governor ever ever of California,

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>then two terms when he is the oldest governor of California,

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>who believes there's a set amount of wealth out there

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>and rich people have disproportion extracted from it.

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 2>That is not only as wrong as wrong can be,

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 2>it is a poisonous, diseased understanding of economics misunderstanding.

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Now, whether or not Jerry Brown actually believed that or

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 1>was just pandering to people, I don't know. I also

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know this for instance. I mean, I was watching

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>this stuff unfold online and including around one tweet that

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I put out there, and people, a lot of you

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 1>getting in arguments on our Twitter feed, which I appreciate.

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>You smart people who stood up for the free market

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>and common sense. I really appreciate that. But here's an example.

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know this woman, but she has several

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand followers and is involved in some organization. She

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>tweeted out the idea that Elon Musk worked harder than

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>every other personal live who has ever lived is very

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>stupid and immature in a fairy tale wake up, he's

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 1>robbing us.

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Wow, speaking of stupid and immature, Yeah, nobody said he

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 2>worked harder. He works very hard, but no, he created

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 2>more value. You see, That's the way it works.

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 1>And so the common refrain from a lot of people

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>was about the They lumped different things together that are

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>completely different things. Tax breaks like around you know, electric

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>cars that Democrats pushed, you know that helped this car company,

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>along with government contracts that the government signed with SpaceX.

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 2>Among other competitive bidding exactly.

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And the government decided to do it because space

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>X could do it cheaper than NASA was doing. You

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>were gonna pay more for it if NASA did for it.

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Did it anyway, Just all of these things being lumped

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 1>together is we gave this money, We taxpayers gave this

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars to Elon, which is.

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Just not right. Yeah, yeah, and just her whole premise

0:15:55.000 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 2>is wrong. The wealthy don't hoard the money and they

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 2>don't spend all of it. They couldn't more than he

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 2>could ever spend a lifetime. Yes, that's correct. So real

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 2>wealth accumulation comes from productive investment. You deploy capital into

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 2>businesses and technologies, ventures of whatever sort you think are

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 2>going to generate returns because they create value for others.

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 2>If they don't give more value than they cost as

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 2>perceived by the buyers, they fail and that money just

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 2>goes to the people who are working to the business

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 2>or whatever. But it's mutually beneficial. You build companies that

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 2>employ people, lower costs for innovation, expand opportunities, and pull

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 2>people out of poverty. You feed clothes, educate, and medicate

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 2>entire families for generations when you build a successful business.

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 2>The idea that at some point you should stop creating

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 2>value in building businesses that do all those things. Because

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm super jealous of how much money you have. On paper,

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 2>You're an idiot. You're an envy ridden I'm sorry, idiot's strong.

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 2>You're a fool. You don't know enough to have an

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 2>intelligent opinion.

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>You're letting envy run your brain. Yes, and that's not good.

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk a little more about this after

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the commercials because I think it's very important. I'm worried

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:19.120
<v Speaker 1>about a revolution over this sort of thinking. It's crazy.

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:20.439
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and getty.

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>People at the Babylon be are really funny. I can

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 1>go to that anytime and scroll through their latest headlines

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and always laugh. But this one time, this one made

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>me laugh today. Schroding's got to get the name right too.

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Schrodinger's neighbor says thought experiment very interesting, but he'd really

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 1>just like a straight answer on where his cat is okay, great,

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:49.400
<v Speaker 1>So where's my cat?

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 2>Have you seen the cat?

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Google it? So the Washington Post actually had a peace out.

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 1>This is about the whole Elon Musk becoming a trillionaire

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>thing that this there should have been a there should

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>be the litmus test, and they should have had everybody

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>go on to a government website or something and put

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>in their vote on Friday. Elon Musk becoming a trillionaire

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>fills you with feelings of, oh, wow, cool, wish I

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>could do that, That's awesome, how impressive, versus that's disgusting.

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm angry, unfeased on.

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:35.439
<v Speaker 2>Something wrong exactly. Yeah.

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>In other words, positive feelings versus negative feelings.

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 2>I can't imagine.

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 1>How I could have any negative feelings about the fact

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 1>that Elon Musk became a trillionaire through inventing all kinds

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>of really really cool stuff. Yeah, how could that possibly

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 1>make me unhappy?

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Anywaying them, developing them, making them available to the masses. Yeah,

0:18:57.240 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 2>that's the thing.

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>So in Bezos was the world richest man for a while,

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and people would complain about that. Tim Sanderfer, who was

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>always big on because he gives people stuff they want

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 1>at a price they like that's how he became the

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:17.919
<v Speaker 1>world's richest man. What's wrong with that? Similar but different

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 1>with Elon Musk anyway, The Washington Post put this out,

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>which is just so incredibly misleading. It's Jeff Bezos's newspaper.

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:27.399
<v Speaker 1>He understands this, he would think he wouldn't want it anyway.

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk companies have received at least thirty eight billion

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 1>dollars in US government contracts, subsidies, loans, and tax credits,

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 1>according to a comprehensive financial investigation they had to do

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>an investigation the Washington Post. I like the way they

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>lump together all those things that are completely different. I mean,

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 1>tax credits, loans, subsidies, and contract government contracts are all

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:54.160
<v Speaker 1>completely different things.

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:57.680
<v Speaker 2>And all of them passed by the legislatures in question.

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Right, and so many of them are things but you

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>on the left love. But one of my litmus tests

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 1>to use that phrase again would be for those of

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:12.440
<v Speaker 1>you or who are complaining on our Twitter feed, because

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I basically tweeted out, you're a moron if you're mad

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:17.919
<v Speaker 1>about Elon becoming a trillionaire and you think it somehow

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 1>takes money from you, Oh yeah, what about this much money?

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Or that much money he got. This much money isn't

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 1>taxax payer money? Oh yeah, you're right about that money.

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 1>All government money is tax payer money. But it's an

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:35.119
<v Speaker 1>investment or. In the case of the uh tes list cars,

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 1>this is the stuff that your crowd wanted anyway to

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>get the electric car industry going. But on the on

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the investing in various things, do you ever here's my

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 1>litmus test. Did you ever get upset when the government

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:54.959
<v Speaker 1>invested billions of dollars in something that amounted to crap,

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't amount to anything, didn't do anybody any good, didn't

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:01.920
<v Speaker 1>create a single job, didn't help climate change, didn't help

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:05.199
<v Speaker 1>homeless people, didn't build a bullet train, didn't whatever. Do

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:08.199
<v Speaker 1>you ever get upset about those? Or only when somebody

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>ends up rich?

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Right? Right? Well, the first one doesn't, right, the first

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 2>one doesn't satisfy their envy, though, it's only the second

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.160
<v Speaker 2>one that really gets some feeling that envy. Because that's

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:19.360
<v Speaker 2>what this is all about.

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Right, And that's what I wanted to get to that.

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to find it the some philosopher from

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:27.160
<v Speaker 1>way back in the day, and I'd never heard anybody

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 1>put it this way before. About how Marxism is. People

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>get it wrong. They think it's because you want to

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:37.400
<v Speaker 1>help the downtrodden. Nope, it's because you want to tear

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>down the successful. That's the motivation. You might, you know,

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:48.120
<v Speaker 1>intellectually claim to yourself that it's to help the downtrodden,

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:52.399
<v Speaker 1>but the real emotional motivation is that guy's got a

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 1>bunch and I want to tear him down, which is sick.

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how you end up that way, but

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>that's what that's what's bothering people. Otherwise, you'd been bothered

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:05.640
<v Speaker 1>by Stacy Abrams getting two billion dollars for her some other,

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>some or other project that never amounted to anything, never

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>created a job, never did anybody any good, but you didn't.

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>That didn't bother you. Elon doing something that has ended

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>up being cheaper products for the government, US the taxpayer,

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:23.400
<v Speaker 1>or creating hundreds of thousands of jobs and all those

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>people pay taxes and blah blah blah. That makes you

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>mad because it made Elon richer. It's just an envy thing, yeah, clear,

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 1>so logic behind it.

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 2>Their entire neighborhoods, even cities where the vast majority of

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 2>people think that way came across this. I love this

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:42.280
<v Speaker 2>reply to somebody who calls themselves proud socialist and says,

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:44.640
<v Speaker 2>I would much rather live in a society where everyone

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 2>has healthcare, housing, and food than a society or one

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 2>trillionaire now owns more wealth than half the country. And

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 2>this person responded, I'd rather live in a society where

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 2>everyone has access to healthcare, housing, and food too. The

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:01.679
<v Speaker 2>real question is what system is most effectivot producing those outcomes.

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Blaming a trillionaire for poverty misunderstands the problem. A trillionaire

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 2>doesn't create government deficits, waste, public funds, mismanaged housing policy,

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:14.639
<v Speaker 2>inflate the currency, or burden businesses with regulations that suppress growth.

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:19.159
<v Speaker 2>Governments do. The entrepreneur builds a trillion dollar enterprises, demonstrating

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 2>how to think, innovate, organize, lead, execute, allocate capital, and

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:27.400
<v Speaker 2>create value at an extraordinary scale. In most cases, their

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 2>wealth is a by byproduct of creating products and services

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:34.640
<v Speaker 2>that millions or billions of people voluntarily choose to use.

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:38.879
<v Speaker 2>And Furthermore, history shows that widespread prosperity was not created

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 2>through wealth redistribution never has been Since the rise of

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 2>market capitalism around eighteen hundred, global living standards have improved dramatically,

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 2>and it goes through the extreme poverty, falling life expectancy, doubling, literacy,

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:57.199
<v Speaker 2>sword infant mortalities collapsed, access to food, medicine, transportation, communication

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 2>technology have skyrocketed. The existent of a wealthy individual is

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:04.159
<v Speaker 2>not why someone else lacks opportunity. Wealth is not a

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 2>fixed pie. The question is not how to divide wealth

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:11.160
<v Speaker 2>more evenly, but how to create more of it. Constantly

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:14.160
<v Speaker 2>putting it successful people as the source of society's problems

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:18.479
<v Speaker 2>encourages a mindset of resentment rather than achievement. Bernie. A

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:24.920
<v Speaker 2>healthier response is to what creates value, study, what builds organizations,

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 2>and what solves problems, and what improves lives. Envy has

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 2>never built a business, created a job, cured a disease,

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 2>or lifted a family out of poverty. Innovation, productivity, discipline,

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:37.879
<v Speaker 2>and leadership have that is brilliant.

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:41.960
<v Speaker 1>That is good And if you weren't listening earlier, NASA

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>was going to do some of this stuff, taking stuff

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 1>up into space that we want to do as a country,

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:49.719
<v Speaker 1>that we've decided to do. Elon came along with SpaceX

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:52.359
<v Speaker 1>is doing it for a fraction of the cost that's

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:55.399
<v Speaker 1>why we have the government contract. So it's cheaper to

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>have Elon do it than to have NASA do it,

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:01.400
<v Speaker 1>but makes a profit and gets rich.

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 2>Why does that bother you?

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:08.360
<v Speaker 1>It's less tax money to get the rocket up there

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and deliver that thing into space with Elon than with NASA.

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 1>But would you rather pay more to NASA as long

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:16.360
<v Speaker 1>as Elon didn't get rich? I think some of you would,

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 1>which is weird.

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 2>It's even worse than that because there were incentives built

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 2>in where if SpaceX could create the technology such that

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 2>the cost would get below a certain point, they got

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 2>to keep that the delta, as they say. But what

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:35.159
<v Speaker 2>that did was incentivize innovation. So now we in the

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:38.679
<v Speaker 2>United States mankind, I hope we use it mostly. But

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 2>now we have access to technologies that were never dreamt

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:43.880
<v Speaker 2>of before and abilities to do things that were never

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 2>dreamt of before in a way that the fat socialist

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 2>government program I shouldn't even have to finish that sentence

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:53.560
<v Speaker 2>could never ever hope to do.

0:25:54.320 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 1>Elon's companies, Tesla, SpaceX X Neuralink injected three hundred and

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:07.160
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight billion dollars directly into the US economy via

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and eleven billion in wages and salaries supporting

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:14.920
<v Speaker 1>two hundred thousand plus employees at competitive pay, Forty six

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in taxes corporate payroll, et cetera. One hundred

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:21.679
<v Speaker 1>and eighty two billion dollars in supplier spending e g.

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Tesla alone spent heavily on US batteries, chip steel. That's

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the points you always make in these companies.

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Then buy stuff and blah blah blah. During his lifetime,

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Bernie Sanders has contributed approximately zero dollars and zero cents

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to the national economy.

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 2>True, How is that better?

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:45.159
<v Speaker 1>This is Elon responding to Elizabeth Warren who called him

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 1>a free loader in twenty twenty one.

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, just unbelievable. The irony is too much.

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Elon said at that point, I'm actually paying the most

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 1>tax that any individual in history has ever paid this

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>year ever, And she doesn't pay taxes basically at all.

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Her salaries paid for by the taxpayer.

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Like me.

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:05.199
<v Speaker 1>If you could die, I'm the taxpayer paying her. If

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 1>you could die by irony, she would be dead.

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:16.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, we have changed as a society. The cultural

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:18.120
<v Speaker 2>norm used to be much more. What we're talking about

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 2>the very successful and the moderately successful were admired, and

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:28.439
<v Speaker 2>kids were told, hey, in America, you could grow up

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 2>to be you know whomever, pick your favorite titan of

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 2>industry or the guy who owns you know, three McDonald's

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 2>or whatever. And that was that was to be sought after.

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 2>It was admired. And now it's a shame. But you

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:45.199
<v Speaker 2>need that if you are in the business of the

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 2>politics of envy, which is socialism, you cannot permit the

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:53.399
<v Speaker 2>flower of that admiration to grow. You've got to stamp

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:56.399
<v Speaker 2>it out. Otherwise your philosophy doesn't work.

0:27:56.800 --> 0:27:59.360
<v Speaker 1>That's a good point. That's a good point. They saw

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:02.359
<v Speaker 1>Friday as a dangerous day that a lot of people

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 1>are gonna look at that and say cool, right, No,

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 1>they gotta gotta get on top of that right away

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:11.479
<v Speaker 1>and try to convince people that it somehow took money

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 1>from you.

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and he I said it earlier, and he is

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:21.640
<v Speaker 2>like a shot of fentanyl. Once it hits you, your

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 2>brain is off. You're just hanging there from your waist,

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 2>gurgling and drooling.

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:30.639
<v Speaker 1>But whose chances do you like better? In terms of

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:34.880
<v Speaker 1>making the argument, the takes a few minutes to explain

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 1>government contracts versus subsidies, versus tax breaks versus all that

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of stuff, or the he's a trillionaire and you're poor,

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 1>let's get him.

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 2>I refuse to answer that question on the advice of

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 2>my counsel. I know that's why it's so insidious.

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Slightly different topic, but uh, elon's involved. Some lady flipped

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 1>me off with tremendous amount of anger the other day

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>because I was in my cyber truck. She was jogging

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>along the road and she saw me, and she was

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 1>just she was screaming something. I wish I'd had the

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 1>window down, red face screaming at me. And I thought

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 1>of all those people that flip me off because I'm

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 1>driving a truck that Eli Musk was involved in creating.

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 1>It's so nuts. I can't even hardly wrap my head

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 1>around it. If they, if they, if they couldn't watch

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 1>somebody hurt me, they would enjoy it. I don't know

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:32.160
<v Speaker 1>if that they would hurt me, but they'd be perfectly

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>okay with somebody physically hurting me.

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, some guy, some big guy beating you down. They

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 2>would cheer it on. Yeah, yeah, And that isn't that troubling.

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 2>It's sick. Yeah, they have a mental problem. These are

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 2>odd times. I don't know.

0:29:48.160 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Would say they are. We will finish strong next.

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 5>Well back at Kroger and Bounty has made some changes.

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 5>Eight equals twenty eight also equals twenty four you know

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:08.800
<v Speaker 5>it else equals twenty four six?

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 1>You know at six also equals twelve? What equals twelve?

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Thirty equals twelve, so that.

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 5>Means thirty equals six, which equals eight.

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 1>You know it also equals eight four unrelated to equals six?

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>What the hell was.

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 2>That, Michael? It meant nothing to anyone.

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 1>What was that?

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 2>I didn't pull it, but I don't know what it

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 2>was exactly. The title is toilet paper Math, Odd Weights

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:41.400
<v Speaker 2>and Measures. Man baffled by Bounty's paper towel math.

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:47.280
<v Speaker 1>That that was entirely visual. I'm thinking there was something

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 1>clever there.

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:51.239
<v Speaker 2>But I h there will be a meeting about this

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 2>after the show. That was a dark moment in show history.

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 2>Executive producer maps the darkest. Yes.

0:30:56.880 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Executive producer Mike Hanson joins.

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 2>This, Yes, I think he's here to defy himself.

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Hanson, what was that? We have to press like eighteen buttons?

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Again? He's here, He's here. Okay, Yeah, of indecipherable clip

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 2>that we were just subjected to.

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 1>It makes perfect sense.

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 6>Clearly, you don't buy the paper towels or toilet paper

0:31:16.920 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 6>in your family. When you look at these containers, it

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 6>will say eight rolls equals thirty rolls, and every package

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 6>has a different comparison. And he's pointing out that none

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 6>of them make any sense whatsoever, none of them nearly

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 6>visual though.

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, okay, you're complaining about the clip, but I'm interested

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 1>in the toilet paper thing.

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I want to sign blame, not solve the problem.

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 2>All right, So toilet paper, paper towel, whatever. Yeah, back

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 2>to the point.

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 1>So what are they trying to claim that you get

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 1>like twelve rolls worth in six or Yeah, say what

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you just said, but with enough.

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Words that we can understand you.

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I do buy the toilet paper and paper towels in

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:03.959
<v Speaker 1>my house because I'm the only adult.

0:32:03.960 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 6>Well, then you should know what we're talking about here, Jack,

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 6>and I'm offended by both of you in your attitudes

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 6>towards this clip, which I admit didn't make any sense

0:32:12.560 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 6>by itself.

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 1>It needed an explanation. Okay, I will pay attention to

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 1>that when I get home today. I will look at

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 1>that because I just buy the biggest thing, so I

0:32:21.440 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 1>know I don't have to buy it again later.

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Now I'm on your team. Now I want to understand.

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 2>So you said the six means the same as twelve?

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 2>What used the words? What are you talking about?

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 1>That's the point. It doesn't make any sense.

0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 6>They sell you a gigantic like a thirty roll container

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 6>of it takes up your whole cart, and then they

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:44.440
<v Speaker 6>say it's double roll so that you're getting more per role.

0:32:44.600 --> 0:32:48.600
<v Speaker 6>And they'll say a roll of this double equals thirteen

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 6>rolls of the regular stuff. But then but then they

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 6>take the same double roll and put it in a

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:58.040
<v Speaker 6>smaller thing, and the proportions change in a way that

0:32:58.080 --> 0:32:59.040
<v Speaker 6>doesn't make any sense.

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 1>And you're like, well, how can I compare these two things?

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Right when you're trying to trick me with.

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Makes sense?

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:09.400
<v Speaker 1>The math doesn't work here, people. They clearly are trying

0:33:09.440 --> 0:33:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to do a weird apples Oranges comparison to try to

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 1>make the numbers works.

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I almost want to. Three minutes later, I understand. Yeah,

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:20.240
<v Speaker 2>go ahead, play again.

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 5>Well back at Kroger and Bounty has made some changes.

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 5>Eight equals twenty eight also equals twenty four. You know

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 5>it else equals twenty four six. You know at six

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 5>also equals twelve, what equals twelve?

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 2>Thirty equals twelve, so that.

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 5>Means thirty equals six, which equals eight. You know it

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 5>also equals eight four unrelated to equals six.

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I can see that. Yeah, you had lots of packages

0:33:47.480 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 1>next to each other, all claiming that that is pretty fun.

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 6>We should take Joe toilet paper shopping and then see

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 6>if he is confounded by this out.

0:33:54.760 --> 0:33:57.600
<v Speaker 2>No, try, don't try to make this sound like it's

0:33:57.640 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 2>about me. That clip was nose.

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Final thoughts were not strong Eddy, You'll get the facts

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:10.360
<v Speaker 1>they're sharp.

0:34:10.800 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Instead, tune in to Moel don't you for Getty?

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:23.400
<v Speaker 4>For more from a strong and Jedny.

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:23.160
<v Speaker 2>I love that.

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Here's your host for final thoughts, Joe getting oh so tuneful.

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 2>Let's get a final thought from everybody on the crew

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:30.840
<v Speaker 2>to wrap things up for the day. There he is,

0:34:30.880 --> 0:34:33.439
<v Speaker 2>pressing the buttons. Mike Langelow, Michael final thought, Jack, don't

0:34:33.440 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 2>miss out on SpaceX.

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Just so you know, I had a choice back in

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:37.359
<v Speaker 1>the day.

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 5>I had Amazon and Apple versus Sears and BlackBerry, and

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:43.919
<v Speaker 5>well I've been here for twenty six years now.

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:47.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah enough, said Jack. Final thought for.

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Us, Yeah that financial guy we had on earlier saying

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:52.279
<v Speaker 1>they were way overvalued. Yeah, that's what people told me

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:57.160
<v Speaker 1>about Tesla about twenty years ago. Graham Plattner, who might

0:34:57.239 --> 0:35:00.239
<v Speaker 1>end up being a US Senator, tweeted out on the

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 1>weekend Elon Musk just became the world's first trillionaire. Let's

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:07.799
<v Speaker 1>make sure he's also the last. So that.

0:35:09.440 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 2>My final thought is, here's a startup that's looking too

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 2>in orbit manufacturing, asteroid mining, extracting lunar ice and helium

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:22.760
<v Speaker 2>three from the moon. Where this all leads just blows

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:28.400
<v Speaker 2>your mind. The exploitation of weightlessness and the cold of

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 2>space and the yeah space. There are smart.

0:35:31.719 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 1>People that think SpaceX could be thirty fifty times its

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 1>current value and not that long if it goes the

0:35:39.000 --> 0:35:42.560
<v Speaker 1>direction they want to. Oh nokes Armstrong in getty wrapping

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 1>up another grueling four hour workdays.

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:46.279
<v Speaker 2>So many people who thinks so a little time go

0:35:46.320 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 2>to armstrong in getty dot com, drop snow mailbag at

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:51.440
<v Speaker 2>armstrong in geddy dot com. If you disagree or agree

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:54.640
<v Speaker 2>with anything, feel free pickups, may and g swags. Begin

0:35:54.719 --> 0:35:56.880
<v Speaker 2>of capitalism and hit the hot links.

0:35:58.160 --> 0:36:01.040
<v Speaker 1>We will see you tomorrow and maybe we'll have some

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:03.359
<v Speaker 1>idea what the Iran deal is. I don't know. See then,

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 1>God bless America.

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:08.359
<v Speaker 2>What's your name?

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm strong and Getty.

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 2>I think it takes two to tango.

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 1>That's great in heaven. I think your Star Spangled ball

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:18.719
<v Speaker 1>show dead, repeat long so dead.

0:36:19.680 --> 0:36:22.399
<v Speaker 6>Let's go with a shout out the trunk for having

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:23.840
<v Speaker 6>the ball to put some on.

0:36:24.480 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 1>And lastly, Mochelle.

0:36:26.840 --> 0:36:33.759
<v Speaker 2>Obama, He's a man? Am I right? America? Or I'm

0:36:33.880 --> 0:36:34.880
<v Speaker 2>Strong and Getty