1 00:00:13,680 --> 00:00:16,720 Speaker 1: Hey everybody, Welcome back to the Betting Pros Podcast, brought 2 00:00:16,720 --> 00:00:18,960 Speaker 1: to you by Bett MGM. I'm your host, Dan Harris. 3 00:00:18,960 --> 00:00:21,040 Speaker 1: Find me on Twitter at Dan Harris eighty. It is 4 00:00:21,079 --> 00:00:23,680 Speaker 1: time to talk about our best bets for Week ten 5 00:00:23,800 --> 00:00:25,840 Speaker 1: of the NFL season. Here with me to do that 6 00:00:26,000 --> 00:00:28,240 Speaker 1: is Ben Stevens, host of the Morning After over on 7 00:00:28,280 --> 00:00:31,760 Speaker 1: Sports Grid. Find him on Twitter at Ben Scott Stevens. Ben, 8 00:00:31,800 --> 00:00:33,920 Speaker 1: thank you for taking time out of your very busy 9 00:00:33,920 --> 00:00:35,480 Speaker 1: schedule to pop on today. 10 00:00:35,520 --> 00:00:37,879 Speaker 2: How you doing I'm doing well, Dan, thank you for 11 00:00:37,880 --> 00:00:40,720 Speaker 2: having me. When Joe Pieceapia comes calling, who is the 12 00:00:40,720 --> 00:00:43,480 Speaker 2: one that introduced us from Fantasy Pros, I often listen, 13 00:00:43,800 --> 00:00:46,040 Speaker 2: and when Joe P asked for something, I like to 14 00:00:46,080 --> 00:00:48,040 Speaker 2: oblige as best I can. So I'm very glad to 15 00:00:48,040 --> 00:00:49,760 Speaker 2: be here and I'm excited to talk to NFL football 16 00:00:49,760 --> 00:00:49,960 Speaker 2: with you. 17 00:00:50,280 --> 00:00:53,479 Speaker 1: Well, your opinion already means less to me than what 18 00:00:53,600 --> 00:00:55,760 Speaker 1: it did before if you are valuing Joey P. But 19 00:00:56,120 --> 00:00:59,200 Speaker 1: I do appreciate Joe's healthier and getting us together. All right, 20 00:00:59,360 --> 00:01:01,280 Speaker 1: let's get into it. But you guys know what the 21 00:01:01,320 --> 00:01:03,560 Speaker 1: show is. We are going to give our three favorite 22 00:01:03,560 --> 00:01:06,399 Speaker 1: bets for this weekend. It can be anything, can be spread, 23 00:01:06,640 --> 00:01:09,080 Speaker 1: can be total, can be moneyline, can be player across, 24 00:01:09,160 --> 00:01:11,400 Speaker 1: whatever we want, and then we will quickly just run 25 00:01:11,400 --> 00:01:14,040 Speaker 1: through the remaining spreads. Just you can get our very 26 00:01:14,160 --> 00:01:16,240 Speaker 1: very brief thoughts on it before we get into it. 27 00:01:16,360 --> 00:01:18,440 Speaker 1: Let me remind you about our latest offer from bet mgm. 28 00:01:18,560 --> 00:01:21,840 Speaker 1: Our sponsor new customers, bet ten dollars and when two 29 00:01:21,880 --> 00:01:23,360 Speaker 1: hundred dollars at the team you bet. 30 00:01:23,200 --> 00:01:24,960 Speaker 3: On scores a touchdown. 31 00:01:25,160 --> 00:01:27,000 Speaker 1: That is all you got to use the code Juice 32 00:01:27,000 --> 00:01:30,000 Speaker 1: one hundred, which is based on our other podcast, The 33 00:01:30,080 --> 00:01:31,559 Speaker 1: Daily Juice hosted by Matt Parut. 34 00:01:31,640 --> 00:01:33,480 Speaker 3: This is available in New Jersey. 35 00:01:33,319 --> 00:01:38,480 Speaker 1: Colorado, Indiana, West Virginia, Tennessee, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Virginia, Iowa, Washington, 36 00:01:38,520 --> 00:01:42,120 Speaker 1: d C, Arizona, and Wyoming. Again just one hundred over 37 00:01:42,160 --> 00:01:44,800 Speaker 1: at bet MGM. For new customers, bet ten dollars when 38 00:01:44,800 --> 00:01:46,800 Speaker 1: two hundred dollars at the team you bet on scores 39 00:01:46,880 --> 00:01:47,640 Speaker 1: a touchdown. 40 00:01:47,920 --> 00:01:48,640 Speaker 3: Quick recapable. 41 00:01:48,720 --> 00:01:50,600 Speaker 1: Last week, our guest Andrew Kayley went two and one. 42 00:01:50,680 --> 00:01:52,720 Speaker 1: He hit on the Chargers, laying two to the Eagles, 43 00:01:52,960 --> 00:01:54,920 Speaker 1: the Bears getting six and a half from the Steelers. 44 00:01:54,920 --> 00:01:58,400 Speaker 1: He missed on the Chiefs, team total over twenty seven 45 00:01:58,440 --> 00:02:00,240 Speaker 1: and a half. I also went to one and I 46 00:02:00,320 --> 00:02:02,560 Speaker 1: hit on the Browns getting two and a half from 47 00:02:02,560 --> 00:02:05,240 Speaker 1: the Bengals, the Vikings, and the Ravens going over fifty. 48 00:02:05,440 --> 00:02:07,440 Speaker 1: But I missed on the forty nine Ers laying one 49 00:02:07,920 --> 00:02:10,679 Speaker 1: to the Cardinals. That puts me at sixteen and eleven 50 00:02:10,760 --> 00:02:13,200 Speaker 1: through nine weeks with our best bets. All right, we're 51 00:02:13,200 --> 00:02:16,080 Speaker 1: going to bettingpros dot com for the aggregate lines. You 52 00:02:16,080 --> 00:02:20,160 Speaker 1: guys know all about that there. Let's start with you, Ben, 53 00:02:20,360 --> 00:02:21,560 Speaker 1: what's your top pick of the weekend? 54 00:02:21,919 --> 00:02:23,200 Speaker 2: Dan, I didn't know there was going to be a 55 00:02:23,240 --> 00:02:26,520 Speaker 2: recap portion for next week's podcast looking back at these picks, 56 00:02:26,520 --> 00:02:28,320 Speaker 2: So now I'm a little bit scared to my future 57 00:02:28,360 --> 00:02:31,280 Speaker 2: self into the future audience out there. Hopefully I did 58 00:02:31,280 --> 00:02:33,400 Speaker 2: not lead you astray. So one of my favorite bets 59 00:02:33,440 --> 00:02:36,640 Speaker 2: this weekend is the New Orleans Saints getting points on 60 00:02:36,720 --> 00:02:38,600 Speaker 2: the road against the Tennessee Titans. Yes, I know that 61 00:02:38,680 --> 00:02:41,680 Speaker 2: sounds like a scary proposition. The Saints lost last week 62 00:02:41,800 --> 00:02:44,680 Speaker 2: in an absolute dud to the Atlanta Falcons. The Tennessee 63 00:02:44,720 --> 00:02:46,680 Speaker 2: Titans might be the hottest team in all of football. 64 00:02:46,840 --> 00:02:49,079 Speaker 2: They have won five straight. They have covered in five 65 00:02:49,120 --> 00:02:52,000 Speaker 2: straight the last four even as an underdog. But there 66 00:02:52,040 --> 00:02:54,280 Speaker 2: is an interesting trend going on in the NFL right 67 00:02:54,280 --> 00:02:56,440 Speaker 2: now that I have liked to capitalize on this year, 68 00:02:56,480 --> 00:02:59,040 Speaker 2: and that's when a team puts out a dud, they 69 00:02:59,080 --> 00:03:01,480 Speaker 2: generally bounce back pretty well the following week. And that 70 00:03:01,600 --> 00:03:03,640 Speaker 2: is the case for the New Orleans Saints right now. 71 00:03:03,880 --> 00:03:06,040 Speaker 2: Following a loss this year, New Orleans is two and 72 00:03:06,120 --> 00:03:08,839 Speaker 2: zero against the number, and they are covering by that 73 00:03:08,960 --> 00:03:11,600 Speaker 2: number of thirteen and a half points per game and 74 00:03:11,639 --> 00:03:14,680 Speaker 2: the two times they have responded after a loss, So 75 00:03:14,960 --> 00:03:17,640 Speaker 2: I like where New Orleans is where it currently stands. 76 00:03:17,680 --> 00:03:20,160 Speaker 2: And New Orleans, even being on the road, getting points 77 00:03:20,160 --> 00:03:22,120 Speaker 2: has been pretty good as an underdog so far this 78 00:03:22,200 --> 00:03:24,840 Speaker 2: year three and zero against the spread as an underdog. 79 00:03:24,880 --> 00:03:27,600 Speaker 2: And I mentioned Tennessee has been so great lately four 80 00:03:27,639 --> 00:03:30,920 Speaker 2: straight covers as a dog themselves as a favorite this 81 00:03:31,000 --> 00:03:33,800 Speaker 2: year just two and two against the spread. So I 82 00:03:33,880 --> 00:03:35,920 Speaker 2: think that the good times have been rolling for the 83 00:03:35,960 --> 00:03:38,560 Speaker 2: Tennessee Titans. They head back to the Music City. Hard 84 00:03:38,560 --> 00:03:41,400 Speaker 2: to pick against them, I think, just at this point, 85 00:03:41,720 --> 00:03:44,680 Speaker 2: maybe things slow down. A response last week after losing 86 00:03:44,680 --> 00:03:46,720 Speaker 2: Derrick Henry not saying this is going to be the 87 00:03:46,760 --> 00:03:49,400 Speaker 2: trend for Tennessee moving forward, just in this one spot 88 00:03:49,440 --> 00:03:51,320 Speaker 2: this week that the winning streak has to come to 89 00:03:51,320 --> 00:03:53,880 Speaker 2: an end sometime, Why not against the New Orleans Saints 90 00:03:53,920 --> 00:03:55,880 Speaker 2: getting two and a half points this upcoming Sunday. 91 00:03:56,280 --> 00:03:58,280 Speaker 1: At some point the magic has to end here, right 92 00:03:58,320 --> 00:04:01,600 Speaker 1: for the Titans, Like no, the reason than just mentally 93 00:04:01,640 --> 00:04:04,600 Speaker 1: and emotionally getting up for these giant games and somehow 94 00:04:04,600 --> 00:04:07,680 Speaker 1: pulling out these these incredible victories. At some point, there's 95 00:04:07,680 --> 00:04:10,000 Speaker 1: going to be a letdown. This would have been my pick. 96 00:04:10,040 --> 00:04:12,840 Speaker 1: I told you I like to ask the guests generally 97 00:04:12,880 --> 00:04:14,840 Speaker 1: to send me his fix. This would have been one 98 00:04:14,840 --> 00:04:17,039 Speaker 1: of mine as well, which is good that we're on 99 00:04:17,080 --> 00:04:18,840 Speaker 1: the same side. And again there are some threes out there. 100 00:04:18,839 --> 00:04:21,200 Speaker 1: I'm looking over it's two and a half or threes 101 00:04:21,240 --> 00:04:23,120 Speaker 1: for me. At DraftKings it's two and a half. And 102 00:04:23,200 --> 00:04:26,160 Speaker 1: at Fendal you know, at bet MGM it's three. At 103 00:04:26,160 --> 00:04:28,080 Speaker 1: points Bet it's three. So you can get some threes 104 00:04:28,120 --> 00:04:30,680 Speaker 1: out there. Yeah, Sean Payton, just generally, man, you know, 105 00:04:30,760 --> 00:04:34,120 Speaker 1: against the spread as an underdog generally pretty good. And 106 00:04:34,160 --> 00:04:36,599 Speaker 1: again you're right, the trendses here at teams, especially coming 107 00:04:36,640 --> 00:04:38,880 Speaker 1: off a loss against the spread versus teams coming off 108 00:04:38,920 --> 00:04:41,560 Speaker 1: a win against the spread. It very much favors the underdog. 109 00:04:41,680 --> 00:04:43,680 Speaker 1: So I do like this one as well. It would 110 00:04:43,680 --> 00:04:46,760 Speaker 1: have been on mine, but I cannot take it. Obviously, 111 00:04:46,800 --> 00:04:48,560 Speaker 1: you take it, but I'm backing you, and hopefully next 112 00:04:48,600 --> 00:04:51,960 Speaker 1: week people look back fondly on that one. I'm gonna 113 00:04:51,960 --> 00:04:55,080 Speaker 1: go here. You know, I argued with this one with 114 00:04:55,200 --> 00:04:58,479 Speaker 1: Joe when we did the look ahead lines on podcasts 115 00:04:58,480 --> 00:05:00,520 Speaker 1: on Tuesday about what we thought he was on the 116 00:05:00,520 --> 00:05:01,240 Speaker 1: other side. 117 00:05:01,480 --> 00:05:03,239 Speaker 3: I said I'd revisit. I did revisit. 118 00:05:03,360 --> 00:05:06,560 Speaker 1: I held my stance. I'm still sticking with the Browns 119 00:05:06,960 --> 00:05:09,719 Speaker 1: getting two and a half against the Patriots in New England. 120 00:05:09,839 --> 00:05:12,680 Speaker 1: So this is really same as last week where I 121 00:05:12,720 --> 00:05:14,760 Speaker 1: sat the Browns getting the points against the Bengals. I 122 00:05:14,839 --> 00:05:17,039 Speaker 1: still think the Browns are a little bit undervalued here 123 00:05:17,120 --> 00:05:18,640 Speaker 1: in the market, and I think the Patriots might be 124 00:05:18,680 --> 00:05:21,280 Speaker 1: a little overvalued. We started with the Patriots. I mean, 125 00:05:21,279 --> 00:05:23,720 Speaker 1: they're five and four before their wins. Two of them 126 00:05:23,760 --> 00:05:26,480 Speaker 1: have come against the Jets, one of them against the Texans, 127 00:05:26,480 --> 00:05:29,240 Speaker 1: and then one of them against the Panthers with pretty 128 00:05:29,240 --> 00:05:31,760 Speaker 1: injured Sam Darnold. They've got injuries at running back right now. 129 00:05:31,960 --> 00:05:35,360 Speaker 1: Neither Damien Harrison Normandro Stephenson has practiced yet this week, 130 00:05:35,400 --> 00:05:38,760 Speaker 1: including today as they recover from head injury potential concussions. 131 00:05:38,760 --> 00:05:41,720 Speaker 1: Mac Jones really just a game manager like most quarterbacks. 132 00:05:41,760 --> 00:05:43,760 Speaker 1: Not great under pressure. That is what Cleveland does. They 133 00:05:43,800 --> 00:05:46,200 Speaker 1: get a ton of pressure, second highest clip in the 134 00:05:46,279 --> 00:05:48,440 Speaker 1: league at a twenty eight point four percent pressure rate. 135 00:05:48,720 --> 00:05:51,159 Speaker 1: And the Browns, I'm just buying the Browns. I think 136 00:05:51,160 --> 00:05:53,960 Speaker 1: they are coming together here after Odell Beckham Junior is out. 137 00:05:53,960 --> 00:05:56,320 Speaker 1: I think Baker Mayfield plays better without Odell Beckham Junior. 138 00:05:56,360 --> 00:05:58,400 Speaker 1: They used to be a joke. Now it's for real. 139 00:05:58,920 --> 00:06:00,960 Speaker 1: Nick Chubb is probably going to be out for this game. 140 00:06:01,000 --> 00:06:03,560 Speaker 1: That of course is worth mentioning. Not definitely yet. I 141 00:06:03,560 --> 00:06:05,960 Speaker 1: haven't seen anything that says that he officially. You know, 142 00:06:06,080 --> 00:06:08,800 Speaker 1: it's very difficult to get the two, you know, negative 143 00:06:08,839 --> 00:06:10,960 Speaker 1: COVID tests in twenty four hours when you test positive 144 00:06:10,960 --> 00:06:13,040 Speaker 1: on the Tuesday, but it is possible. But either way, 145 00:06:13,080 --> 00:06:16,440 Speaker 1: we saw Dean mis Johnson perform well against the Browns 146 00:06:16,480 --> 00:06:19,120 Speaker 1: and the against the Broncos pardon me, and the Pats 147 00:06:19,160 --> 00:06:21,720 Speaker 1: of a great defense, but they're much better against the 148 00:06:21,760 --> 00:06:25,120 Speaker 1: past six and defensive Dvoa against the past, seventeenth against 149 00:06:25,160 --> 00:06:26,719 Speaker 1: the run. They don't get a ton of pressure, just 150 00:06:26,720 --> 00:06:29,080 Speaker 1: eighteen the pressure rates. So the bottom line is, I 151 00:06:29,160 --> 00:06:31,240 Speaker 1: just I think the Browns are better team. There's six 152 00:06:31,360 --> 00:06:35,760 Speaker 1: overall in Dvoa. The Patriots are thirteenth home field. They're 153 00:06:35,800 --> 00:06:37,479 Speaker 1: one and four at home, so it's not like homefield 154 00:06:37,480 --> 00:06:39,200 Speaker 1: advantage is what he used to be with Brady. So 155 00:06:39,600 --> 00:06:41,440 Speaker 1: I don't know, Man, I think the Browns find a 156 00:06:41,480 --> 00:06:43,640 Speaker 1: way to win this game, so I will certainly take 157 00:06:43,880 --> 00:06:45,440 Speaker 1: them getting two and a half here. 158 00:06:45,640 --> 00:06:48,280 Speaker 2: Yeah, Dan, I love that spot honestly for the Cleveland Browns. 159 00:06:48,279 --> 00:06:50,160 Speaker 2: It's something we were monitoring all week on the show. 160 00:06:50,160 --> 00:06:52,080 Speaker 2: I looked at this line on Tuesday. It was at 161 00:06:52,080 --> 00:06:53,960 Speaker 2: two and a half for an opener in favor of 162 00:06:54,000 --> 00:06:55,760 Speaker 2: the Patriots. I saw it come down all the way 163 00:06:55,800 --> 00:06:57,600 Speaker 2: to one. So I thought there was some early sharp 164 00:06:57,640 --> 00:07:00,520 Speaker 2: movement early in the week on the Cleveland Browns, thinking, hey, 165 00:07:00,520 --> 00:07:02,600 Speaker 2: we're getting them as a dog even in this situation. 166 00:07:02,800 --> 00:07:05,200 Speaker 2: And it's not like Juette has been a great home 167 00:07:05,200 --> 00:07:08,040 Speaker 2: field advantage for mac Jones in his rookie season one 168 00:07:08,080 --> 00:07:10,280 Speaker 2: and four straight up, two and three against the spread. 169 00:07:10,600 --> 00:07:12,520 Speaker 2: I kind of like Cleveland in what might be a 170 00:07:12,560 --> 00:07:15,200 Speaker 2: close game, and I think Cleveland getting the points in 171 00:07:15,200 --> 00:07:17,120 Speaker 2: this situation is a really good spot to have the 172 00:07:17,120 --> 00:07:17,880 Speaker 2: Browns this Sunday. 173 00:07:18,200 --> 00:07:19,960 Speaker 1: Yeah, and there is a one and a half. You're right, 174 00:07:20,000 --> 00:07:21,760 Speaker 1: it had moved a little bit fandual by the way, 175 00:07:21,880 --> 00:07:23,320 Speaker 1: still at one and a half. I'm just looking at 176 00:07:23,320 --> 00:07:25,440 Speaker 1: the contensus lines at Benning CROs. There's a two out 177 00:07:25,440 --> 00:07:27,520 Speaker 1: there over at bet MGM, but the bast Man Dirty 178 00:07:27,560 --> 00:07:29,200 Speaker 1: Book still at two and a half, including my book 179 00:07:29,200 --> 00:07:32,000 Speaker 1: again DraftKings here from New Hampshire, so the consensus line 180 00:07:32,040 --> 00:07:33,400 Speaker 1: stays at two and a half. I will take it. 181 00:07:33,440 --> 00:07:35,440 Speaker 1: But yeah, it's not getting a three like that's where 182 00:07:35,480 --> 00:07:37,400 Speaker 1: I thought it was. If anything, it's sort of bouncing 183 00:07:37,440 --> 00:07:39,520 Speaker 1: back down there. So yeah, I do think the Browns 184 00:07:39,560 --> 00:07:42,160 Speaker 1: win this game. I'll back them again as the short 185 00:07:42,440 --> 00:07:44,920 Speaker 1: underdog here as I did last week. Number two pick 186 00:07:44,960 --> 00:07:45,800 Speaker 1: ben go for it. 187 00:07:46,280 --> 00:07:49,040 Speaker 2: I am going to a total that features a team 188 00:07:49,160 --> 00:07:51,000 Speaker 2: called the New York Jets. And I know that might 189 00:07:51,040 --> 00:07:54,440 Speaker 2: sound like a crazy proposition and I understand, but follow 190 00:07:54,560 --> 00:07:57,720 Speaker 2: me here. The New York Jets have played five straight 191 00:07:57,960 --> 00:08:00,840 Speaker 2: games too, and over let us not forget Thursday night 192 00:08:00,920 --> 00:08:03,880 Speaker 2: against the Indianapolis Colts when we had seen six straight 193 00:08:03,960 --> 00:08:07,000 Speaker 2: unders hit on Thursday Night Football. The Jets said enough 194 00:08:07,040 --> 00:08:09,040 Speaker 2: of that, and it was a game where they allowed 195 00:08:09,080 --> 00:08:12,120 Speaker 2: forty five points a week following or two weeks following 196 00:08:12,360 --> 00:08:14,840 Speaker 2: allowing fifty four to the New England Patriots, and the 197 00:08:14,840 --> 00:08:17,720 Speaker 2: Colts and the Jets combine for seventy five points on 198 00:08:17,800 --> 00:08:20,320 Speaker 2: Thursday Night Football. So the Jets have played in five 199 00:08:20,480 --> 00:08:23,280 Speaker 2: straight overs and the over under total that I see 200 00:08:23,280 --> 00:08:25,360 Speaker 2: now for the Buffalo Bills and the New York Jets 201 00:08:25,400 --> 00:08:28,280 Speaker 2: at MetLife on Sunday is forty eight. It opened it 202 00:08:28,360 --> 00:08:30,600 Speaker 2: forty eight, came down by a hook to forty seven 203 00:08:30,600 --> 00:08:32,200 Speaker 2: and a half as I saw it, now back to 204 00:08:32,240 --> 00:08:35,480 Speaker 2: forty eight. I like it there. Although Buffalo has not 205 00:08:35,600 --> 00:08:38,280 Speaker 2: been quite as good offensively the last couple of weeks 206 00:08:38,320 --> 00:08:41,880 Speaker 2: aka the six they scored against the Jacksonville Jaguars, still 207 00:08:41,880 --> 00:08:45,160 Speaker 2: the fourth best scoring offense in the NFL, averaging just 208 00:08:45,240 --> 00:08:48,160 Speaker 2: below thirty points. I think they want to reinstate the 209 00:08:48,200 --> 00:08:50,160 Speaker 2: fact they are one of the best offensive teams and 210 00:08:50,200 --> 00:08:53,360 Speaker 2: can be that explosive, and it's a good opportunity against 211 00:08:53,360 --> 00:08:55,839 Speaker 2: the New York Jets, because again, although the Jets have 212 00:08:55,920 --> 00:08:58,160 Speaker 2: played five straight overs. A lot of that has come 213 00:08:58,400 --> 00:09:00,600 Speaker 2: from New York allowing their opponent to rack up the 214 00:09:00,640 --> 00:09:03,320 Speaker 2: points fifty four to the pass three weeks ago. Last 215 00:09:03,360 --> 00:09:05,640 Speaker 2: week on Thursday night, they gave up forty five to 216 00:09:05,679 --> 00:09:08,599 Speaker 2: the Indianapolis Colts on a short week, even that overtime 217 00:09:08,679 --> 00:09:11,400 Speaker 2: thrilling win or the upset win rather against the Cincinnati 218 00:09:11,400 --> 00:09:14,319 Speaker 2: Bengals that didn't quite reach overtime, they allowed Sincy to 219 00:09:14,360 --> 00:09:16,920 Speaker 2: score thirty one points. I think the Bills can get 220 00:09:16,960 --> 00:09:19,240 Speaker 2: over thirty pretty easily, and I actually think the Jets 221 00:09:19,400 --> 00:09:21,040 Speaker 2: are going to add a little bit to the equation 222 00:09:21,160 --> 00:09:23,760 Speaker 2: as well. So I was thinking about a Buffalo team total, 223 00:09:24,000 --> 00:09:25,840 Speaker 2: but that spurned me in the past a couple of 224 00:09:25,840 --> 00:09:28,480 Speaker 2: weeks ago against the Miami Dolphins. So I decided just 225 00:09:28,559 --> 00:09:31,319 Speaker 2: game total overall. Knowing the trends for the Jets, and 226 00:09:31,320 --> 00:09:33,680 Speaker 2: although Buffalo has played five of the last eight games 227 00:09:33,880 --> 00:09:36,960 Speaker 2: to the under, including two straight unders, I still think 228 00:09:36,960 --> 00:09:39,319 Speaker 2: that Buffalo and New York can combine to score more 229 00:09:39,320 --> 00:09:40,600 Speaker 2: than forty eight points on Sunday. 230 00:09:40,920 --> 00:09:41,560 Speaker 3: Yeah, I like it. 231 00:09:41,840 --> 00:09:43,760 Speaker 1: There are forty seven and a halfs out there still, 232 00:09:43,760 --> 00:09:44,960 Speaker 1: As you mentioned, it's back and forth. 233 00:09:45,000 --> 00:09:45,560 Speaker 3: A lot of books. 234 00:09:45,559 --> 00:09:47,319 Speaker 1: Most books at forty eight, some in forty seven and 235 00:09:47,320 --> 00:09:49,240 Speaker 1: a half again including draftings where. 236 00:09:49,040 --> 00:09:50,560 Speaker 3: I bet, But yeah, I like it. 237 00:09:50,800 --> 00:09:52,599 Speaker 1: I do think this is it has to be a 238 00:09:52,600 --> 00:09:54,600 Speaker 1: get right spot here for the Bills offense. Has it 239 00:09:54,600 --> 00:09:56,760 Speaker 1: sputtered a little bit, as you know we were talking 240 00:09:56,800 --> 00:09:58,800 Speaker 1: about over the last couple of weeks, but this is 241 00:09:58,840 --> 00:10:02,600 Speaker 1: a great spot for them. The Jets secondary, which had 242 00:10:02,679 --> 00:10:07,280 Speaker 1: admirably played pretty decently in the first few weeks, has 243 00:10:07,400 --> 00:10:09,560 Speaker 1: now basically shown what it is, which is a bunch 244 00:10:09,559 --> 00:10:12,240 Speaker 1: of no names and can be easily exploited by really 245 00:10:12,280 --> 00:10:14,640 Speaker 1: any of the Bills wide receivers. And I do think 246 00:10:14,679 --> 00:10:17,800 Speaker 1: that the league sort of hasn't yet figured out Mike White, 247 00:10:17,800 --> 00:10:19,840 Speaker 1: who is going to start in this game, and he 248 00:10:19,880 --> 00:10:22,360 Speaker 1: has played better than expected, so I do still think 249 00:10:22,400 --> 00:10:24,559 Speaker 1: we've got another week or two where he's going to 250 00:10:24,600 --> 00:10:27,040 Speaker 1: be I mean, they might have won that game frankly 251 00:10:27,240 --> 00:10:29,160 Speaker 1: had White not getting injured. I mean, they were given 252 00:10:29,240 --> 00:10:31,120 Speaker 1: up a ton of points, but he drove them down 253 00:10:31,320 --> 00:10:34,080 Speaker 1: pretty well in that drive there before he got injured. 254 00:10:34,120 --> 00:10:35,599 Speaker 1: So I do think he's going to be able to 255 00:10:35,600 --> 00:10:37,959 Speaker 1: put a points even against this very very good defense. 256 00:10:38,000 --> 00:10:41,480 Speaker 1: So I agree with you that the total overall total 257 00:10:41,520 --> 00:10:43,920 Speaker 1: better than even the Buffalo team total. So I'm with 258 00:10:44,000 --> 00:10:46,040 Speaker 1: you on this one as well. I'm going to stick 259 00:10:46,040 --> 00:10:47,760 Speaker 1: in my same game and be kind of boring here, 260 00:10:47,880 --> 00:10:51,280 Speaker 1: just very quickly, because it says, look, it's not that exciting. Sorry, 261 00:10:51,320 --> 00:10:53,079 Speaker 1: But if I'm talking about the bets that I like 262 00:10:53,120 --> 00:10:55,080 Speaker 1: the most, this is one, and that is the Browns 263 00:10:55,080 --> 00:10:57,959 Speaker 1: and the Pats under forty five points here. It kind 264 00:10:58,000 --> 00:11:00,440 Speaker 1: of goes with just what I was saying before. You've 265 00:11:00,440 --> 00:11:04,560 Speaker 1: got two above average defenses. Generally speaking, both teams run 266 00:11:04,640 --> 00:11:06,760 Speaker 1: the ball. The Browns run it forty nine percent of 267 00:11:06,760 --> 00:11:09,240 Speaker 1: the time, that's third most in the NFL. The Pats 268 00:11:09,280 --> 00:11:11,280 Speaker 1: run it forty three percent of the time, that's ninth 269 00:11:11,280 --> 00:11:13,640 Speaker 1: most in the NFL. Obviously, when you run the ball, 270 00:11:13,679 --> 00:11:16,440 Speaker 1: the clock runs with it. That lends itself just generally 271 00:11:16,679 --> 00:11:19,079 Speaker 1: towards an under. Both teams also can stop the run, 272 00:11:19,160 --> 00:11:22,560 Speaker 1: So you know, I don't expect these touchdown drives. I expect, 273 00:11:22,559 --> 00:11:24,199 Speaker 1: you know, a couple plays, blah blah blah, going a 274 00:11:24,240 --> 00:11:27,080 Speaker 1: little bit running the clock before some punts go. Again, 275 00:11:27,120 --> 00:11:29,160 Speaker 1: you've got injuries to running backs on both sides. It's 276 00:11:29,160 --> 00:11:31,600 Speaker 1: going to make it even less effective. This just strikes 277 00:11:31,640 --> 00:11:33,480 Speaker 1: me to me again as a game that's going to 278 00:11:33,559 --> 00:11:35,960 Speaker 1: be close, that both teams are going to just sort 279 00:11:36,000 --> 00:11:38,360 Speaker 1: of look to grind it out defensively, you know a 280 00:11:38,400 --> 00:11:40,880 Speaker 1: little bit like the Pats and the Panthers last week, 281 00:11:41,080 --> 00:11:43,000 Speaker 1: and it's just a game that look betting unders in 282 00:11:43,000 --> 00:11:45,280 Speaker 1: the NFL, then you know, like it's just a terrifying 283 00:11:45,320 --> 00:11:47,240 Speaker 1: proposition just generally speaking. 284 00:11:46,920 --> 00:11:47,760 Speaker 3: Except last week. 285 00:11:48,120 --> 00:11:51,080 Speaker 1: But for me, I do think that this is just 286 00:11:51,080 --> 00:11:52,800 Speaker 1: going to be a game that's going to be kind 287 00:11:52,800 --> 00:11:56,320 Speaker 1: of a defensive battle that eventually the Browns are going 288 00:11:56,400 --> 00:11:58,440 Speaker 1: to be able to sneak out here with a win. 289 00:11:58,520 --> 00:11:59,200 Speaker 3: That's where I'm going. 290 00:11:59,240 --> 00:12:01,959 Speaker 1: But I do think that this strikes me just as 291 00:12:01,960 --> 00:12:04,079 Speaker 1: a game that's going to be like twenty one seventeen 292 00:12:04,160 --> 00:12:06,320 Speaker 1: somewhere around there and coming at the under. 293 00:12:06,360 --> 00:12:06,920 Speaker 3: What do you think? 294 00:12:07,280 --> 00:12:09,040 Speaker 2: Yeah, No, I completely agree with you. The Pats have 295 00:12:09,080 --> 00:12:11,760 Speaker 2: been a very very streaky team as it pertains the 296 00:12:11,760 --> 00:12:14,880 Speaker 2: totals this year. The first four games solidly under and 297 00:12:14,880 --> 00:12:16,760 Speaker 2: then I think the market readjusted, and then the next 298 00:12:16,760 --> 00:12:19,080 Speaker 2: four the Patriots played all to the over, and then 299 00:12:19,160 --> 00:12:21,400 Speaker 2: last week where I thought we were getting a very 300 00:12:21,400 --> 00:12:24,520 Speaker 2: dismal total against the Carolina Panthers. I wanted to work 301 00:12:24,520 --> 00:12:27,440 Speaker 2: in market contradiction of having seen that total drop to 302 00:12:27,440 --> 00:12:29,320 Speaker 2: as low as forty and a half or forty one 303 00:12:29,559 --> 00:12:32,920 Speaker 2: and maybe taken over in that spot Pats cover twenty four. 304 00:12:32,960 --> 00:12:36,160 Speaker 2: But then Sam Darnold and the Carolina Panthers offense didn't 305 00:12:36,160 --> 00:12:38,520 Speaker 2: really hold up their end of the bargain, only scoring six, 306 00:12:38,600 --> 00:12:41,200 Speaker 2: So another under for the New England Patriots and Dan, 307 00:12:41,240 --> 00:12:42,760 Speaker 2: I think you bring up a great point. If the 308 00:12:42,800 --> 00:12:44,720 Speaker 2: Cleveland Browns don't have Nick Chubb and they don't have 309 00:12:44,760 --> 00:12:47,000 Speaker 2: the reliability in that ground game, that is what they 310 00:12:47,040 --> 00:12:48,360 Speaker 2: want to do. They run the ball at one of 311 00:12:48,360 --> 00:12:51,679 Speaker 2: the highest clips in all of the NFL, and if 312 00:12:51,720 --> 00:12:54,720 Speaker 2: you force it into Baker Mayfield's hands, although he might 313 00:12:54,760 --> 00:12:57,560 Speaker 2: be happy without Odell Beckham Junior right now, I think 314 00:12:57,559 --> 00:12:59,520 Speaker 2: that is the advantage to Bill Belichick being able to 315 00:12:59,520 --> 00:13:02,240 Speaker 2: scheme against what might have to be a heavy passing 316 00:13:02,240 --> 00:13:04,560 Speaker 2: attack from the Cleveland brown So I don't think having 317 00:13:04,559 --> 00:13:06,880 Speaker 2: the running backs on either side because, like you mentioned earlier, 318 00:13:06,880 --> 00:13:10,720 Speaker 2: both Damian Harris and Raman J. Stevenson currently in concussion 319 00:13:10,720 --> 00:13:13,839 Speaker 2: protocol in neither practice on Wednesday during that MIDWEK portion, 320 00:13:14,320 --> 00:13:16,479 Speaker 2: I think that kind of takes away what both offenses 321 00:13:16,559 --> 00:13:19,280 Speaker 2: do best, and it makes their quarterbacks play out on 322 00:13:19,320 --> 00:13:22,160 Speaker 2: an island more, which is a more dangerous proposition for 323 00:13:22,240 --> 00:13:24,920 Speaker 2: scoring points in this game. I think if even if 324 00:13:24,920 --> 00:13:27,520 Speaker 2: it does go to Cleveland's way, that they are able 325 00:13:27,559 --> 00:13:29,000 Speaker 2: to win that football game. I think are able to 326 00:13:29,000 --> 00:13:30,640 Speaker 2: grind it out just a little bit more than New England. 327 00:13:30,720 --> 00:13:32,680 Speaker 2: So I think the under is a pretty correlated market 328 00:13:32,760 --> 00:13:33,400 Speaker 2: right there, for sure. 329 00:13:33,760 --> 00:13:36,319 Speaker 1: And by the way, Harris and Steininson also didn't practice 330 00:13:36,360 --> 00:13:38,480 Speaker 1: already today, like I just saw a report that came out, 331 00:13:38,559 --> 00:13:40,839 Speaker 1: so there's a realistic chance that both are going to 332 00:13:40,880 --> 00:13:43,480 Speaker 1: be gone. And I love Brandon Bolden, but I don't 333 00:13:43,480 --> 00:13:45,319 Speaker 1: think you really want to rely on him generally as 334 00:13:45,360 --> 00:13:46,160 Speaker 1: your every down back. 335 00:13:46,160 --> 00:13:48,360 Speaker 3: All right, your third pick here, sir? What do you have? 336 00:13:49,000 --> 00:13:51,000 Speaker 2: I am going with a PROMP and it is not 337 00:13:51,160 --> 00:13:53,280 Speaker 2: out yet a lot of places, because we were recording 338 00:13:53,280 --> 00:13:55,000 Speaker 2: this on a Thursday afternoon and it is for the 339 00:13:55,000 --> 00:13:58,040 Speaker 2: Sunday night football game. I was hoping prime time, the 340 00:13:58,160 --> 00:14:00,640 Speaker 2: Chiefs and the Raiders out in the desert, maybe we'd 341 00:14:00,640 --> 00:14:03,760 Speaker 2: get this early. But I want Derek Carr's passing attempts 342 00:14:03,800 --> 00:14:06,400 Speaker 2: prop Dan The reason I like passing attempts at times 343 00:14:06,520 --> 00:14:08,600 Speaker 2: more than passing yards is because all you need for 344 00:14:08,640 --> 00:14:10,640 Speaker 2: them is to throw the football. It can air mail 345 00:14:10,720 --> 00:14:13,440 Speaker 2: their receiver by fifteen yards down the field still counts 346 00:14:13,440 --> 00:14:15,600 Speaker 2: in our way of getting to and over. And Derek 347 00:14:15,640 --> 00:14:17,680 Speaker 2: Carr and the Las Vegas Raiders have been throwing the 348 00:14:17,679 --> 00:14:20,720 Speaker 2: football a ton this year. Derek Carr, in seven of 349 00:14:20,720 --> 00:14:23,080 Speaker 2: the eight games Vegas has played so far, has had 350 00:14:23,120 --> 00:14:26,680 Speaker 2: at least thirty four passing attempts. Last week against the Giants, 351 00:14:26,720 --> 00:14:29,760 Speaker 2: even in a loss, he had forty six passing attempts. 352 00:14:29,840 --> 00:14:33,960 Speaker 2: He is averaging thirty nine passing attempts per game. So generally, 353 00:14:34,040 --> 00:14:36,280 Speaker 2: in what I have seen throughout the marketplace, even on 354 00:14:36,320 --> 00:14:38,560 Speaker 2: the top end of quarterbacks who throw it a ton, 355 00:14:39,000 --> 00:14:41,960 Speaker 2: the highest passing attempts prop you'll get thirty three and 356 00:14:42,040 --> 00:14:44,560 Speaker 2: a half, thirty four and a half, maybe even a 357 00:14:44,640 --> 00:14:46,840 Speaker 2: thirty five and a hook as long as it doesn't 358 00:14:46,840 --> 00:14:48,960 Speaker 2: eclipse that number, and I think it will probably be 359 00:14:49,040 --> 00:14:51,040 Speaker 2: somewhere around at thirty three and a half thirty four 360 00:14:51,040 --> 00:14:53,400 Speaker 2: and a half. For the primetime affair against Kansas City, 361 00:14:53,600 --> 00:14:56,400 Speaker 2: I would still take in over. As we know, Kansas 362 00:14:56,400 --> 00:14:58,560 Speaker 2: City's defense has a multitude of issues, so you could 363 00:14:58,560 --> 00:15:01,040 Speaker 2: attack him on the ground or through the air. But 364 00:15:01,120 --> 00:15:02,760 Speaker 2: I think the Raiders are going to look to throw 365 00:15:02,800 --> 00:15:05,680 Speaker 2: the football with Derek Carr forty six again last week 366 00:15:05,880 --> 00:15:08,840 Speaker 2: against the New York Giants at least thirty four in 367 00:15:08,960 --> 00:15:11,240 Speaker 2: seven of the eight games the Raiders have played this year. 368 00:15:11,280 --> 00:15:13,720 Speaker 2: If it's around that ballpark of thirty four, thirty four 369 00:15:13,760 --> 00:15:15,600 Speaker 2: and a hook, I would take the over for Derek 370 00:15:15,600 --> 00:15:16,960 Speaker 2: Carr in primetime on Sunday Night. 371 00:15:17,520 --> 00:15:19,280 Speaker 1: What do you think that your line is where you 372 00:15:19,320 --> 00:15:21,640 Speaker 1: would say, Okay, this is at a spot where it's 373 00:15:21,640 --> 00:15:22,080 Speaker 1: too much. 374 00:15:22,280 --> 00:15:24,760 Speaker 3: This scares me a little bit. I'm gonna avoid it entirely. 375 00:15:25,120 --> 00:15:27,040 Speaker 2: Thirty five and a half. I'd get a little bit shaky, 376 00:15:27,080 --> 00:15:28,600 Speaker 2: But then I'd look at the line and I'd say, 377 00:15:28,720 --> 00:15:30,320 Speaker 2: do I want to do it? Yeah? Okay, yeah, no, 378 00:15:30,360 --> 00:15:31,840 Speaker 2: I'm gonna go with it. I'll go thirty five and 379 00:15:31,840 --> 00:15:33,480 Speaker 2: a half because Dan, I'm not sure if you can see, 380 00:15:33,480 --> 00:15:35,840 Speaker 2: that's how we do this year. That is a retro 381 00:15:36,200 --> 00:15:39,720 Speaker 2: photo of nineteen eighties Arrowhead Stadium. Although I grew up 382 00:15:39,720 --> 00:15:41,840 Speaker 2: in Los Angeles, I did not grow up with a 383 00:15:41,840 --> 00:15:44,440 Speaker 2: football team in Los Angeles. So at the tender age 384 00:15:44,440 --> 00:15:46,440 Speaker 2: of six years young, I fell in love with a 385 00:15:46,480 --> 00:15:48,160 Speaker 2: man by the name of Priest Holmes who taught me 386 00:15:48,440 --> 00:15:50,280 Speaker 2: all I needed to know about running the football in 387 00:15:50,320 --> 00:15:52,320 Speaker 2: the NFL. So I've been a Chiefs fan for a 388 00:15:52,400 --> 00:15:55,280 Speaker 2: very long time. My confidence in the Chiefs and backing 389 00:15:55,320 --> 00:15:57,880 Speaker 2: them as a road favorite and primetime against the Raiders 390 00:15:58,120 --> 00:16:00,120 Speaker 2: minus two and a half when they have a two 391 00:16:00,200 --> 00:16:02,320 Speaker 2: and seven record against the spread, the second worst mark 392 00:16:02,360 --> 00:16:04,600 Speaker 2: in the NFL. I'm not going to do that. And 393 00:16:04,720 --> 00:16:07,360 Speaker 2: although Derek Carr and looking at him to find some 394 00:16:07,400 --> 00:16:10,160 Speaker 2: profitability in the PROMP market, if he goes over his 395 00:16:10,200 --> 00:16:13,360 Speaker 2: passing attempts, prompt doesn't necessarily mean that I'm hoping the 396 00:16:13,440 --> 00:16:15,880 Speaker 2: Chiefs lose the football games. So that's how I'll have 397 00:16:15,960 --> 00:16:17,360 Speaker 2: some skin in the game for Sunday night. 398 00:16:17,760 --> 00:16:20,080 Speaker 1: I'm still reeling from the fact that I think you 399 00:16:20,120 --> 00:16:23,400 Speaker 1: said you were six and Priest Mahomes is that Priest 400 00:16:23,280 --> 00:16:25,680 Speaker 1: at Home? Sorry not Mahomes, yad there, I am six 401 00:16:25,800 --> 00:16:28,600 Speaker 1: years old than Priest Homes. Okay, that's fine. I'm not 402 00:16:28,640 --> 00:16:31,680 Speaker 1: an old man whatsoever. It's totally fine. Okay, let's go 403 00:16:31,880 --> 00:16:34,760 Speaker 1: to my final pick. I'm actually really interested to hear 404 00:16:34,840 --> 00:16:36,440 Speaker 1: what you think about this one Ben, because I looked 405 00:16:36,440 --> 00:16:38,920 Speaker 1: at this one closely. I was kind of on both sides, 406 00:16:38,920 --> 00:16:40,680 Speaker 1: and then it came down to a very simple like 407 00:16:40,720 --> 00:16:42,600 Speaker 1: there's no trends or anything like that. That came back 408 00:16:42,600 --> 00:16:44,720 Speaker 1: to a very simple sort of way I'm thinking about it. 409 00:16:44,720 --> 00:16:47,600 Speaker 1: It's the Seahawks getting three and a half from the 410 00:16:47,640 --> 00:16:50,240 Speaker 1: Packers and Lambell, So I think this game's gonna be close. 411 00:16:50,320 --> 00:16:52,040 Speaker 1: That's personally how I see it. I won't be surprised 412 00:16:52,040 --> 00:16:54,600 Speaker 1: again at the Seahawks one. Two big things here. The 413 00:16:54,600 --> 00:16:56,960 Speaker 1: first is I don't want to I don't think we 414 00:16:57,000 --> 00:16:59,640 Speaker 1: should underestimate. I think people are going to underestimate how 415 00:16:59,680 --> 00:17:01,760 Speaker 1: big deal it is that Rogers can't even get back 416 00:17:01,800 --> 00:17:05,160 Speaker 1: into the facility until Saturday. Now there's again the small 417 00:17:05,280 --> 00:17:07,120 Speaker 1: chance that he's not going to play in this game, 418 00:17:07,160 --> 00:17:09,000 Speaker 1: So you can factor that in if you want. I'm 419 00:17:09,000 --> 00:17:10,640 Speaker 1: assuming he's going to play, but he can't get back 420 00:17:10,680 --> 00:17:13,320 Speaker 1: till Saturday because that's the first day he can be cleared. 421 00:17:14,160 --> 00:17:15,920 Speaker 1: And I know Russell Wilson has been out. Of course, 422 00:17:15,960 --> 00:17:17,680 Speaker 1: Russell Wilson's going to come back for this. But again, 423 00:17:17,800 --> 00:17:20,359 Speaker 1: he's been able to be there, he's been able to practice, 424 00:17:20,359 --> 00:17:22,920 Speaker 1: he's been able to work with the team getting ready 425 00:17:22,960 --> 00:17:25,840 Speaker 1: for this game. In particular, this is ten straight days 426 00:17:25,880 --> 00:17:28,160 Speaker 1: right now where the Packers offense has had to practice 427 00:17:28,400 --> 00:17:31,320 Speaker 1: with Jordan Love. That is a big deal to me. 428 00:17:31,440 --> 00:17:34,200 Speaker 1: And we've also seen quarterbacks, by the way, struggle a 429 00:17:34,240 --> 00:17:37,280 Speaker 1: little bit when they come back after testing positive from COVID. 430 00:17:37,280 --> 00:17:38,000 Speaker 3: We saw it last year. 431 00:17:38,000 --> 00:17:40,639 Speaker 1: It's possible that you know, Rogers isn't at one hundred 432 00:17:40,720 --> 00:17:43,359 Speaker 1: percent physically just after testing positive. 433 00:17:43,440 --> 00:17:45,800 Speaker 3: So there's that. The second is that these. 434 00:17:45,600 --> 00:17:48,719 Speaker 1: Teams are actually more evenly matched, and I think the 435 00:17:49,040 --> 00:17:51,239 Speaker 1: public is going to give him credit for Seattle has 436 00:17:51,280 --> 00:17:55,560 Speaker 1: actually rated better overall in DVA twelfth in DVA, the 437 00:17:55,560 --> 00:17:59,040 Speaker 1: Packers are fifteenth. This is a monstrous game for the Seahawks. 438 00:17:59,119 --> 00:18:01,280 Speaker 1: They're on the outskirt to the playoff race. They obviously 439 00:18:01,320 --> 00:18:03,680 Speaker 1: fell down a little bit with Geno Smith. They basically 440 00:18:03,800 --> 00:18:06,560 Speaker 1: have to win. The Packers obviously want the number one seed, 441 00:18:06,600 --> 00:18:08,760 Speaker 1: but the division is basically locked up there three and 442 00:18:08,800 --> 00:18:11,000 Speaker 1: a half games ahead. This strikes me as a very 443 00:18:11,119 --> 00:18:13,800 Speaker 1: very close game. I would be shocked if the Packers 444 00:18:14,200 --> 00:18:16,080 Speaker 1: just run with it. I'd be shocked if the Packers 445 00:18:16,119 --> 00:18:18,679 Speaker 1: win this by touchdown or ten points or anything like that. 446 00:18:18,720 --> 00:18:20,520 Speaker 1: I think it's a close game, strikes me as a 447 00:18:20,520 --> 00:18:22,360 Speaker 1: field goal game, So I'm going to take the hook 448 00:18:22,400 --> 00:18:24,040 Speaker 1: here with the Seahawks. 449 00:18:24,040 --> 00:18:25,560 Speaker 3: But I'm very interested to hear what you have to 450 00:18:25,600 --> 00:18:26,160 Speaker 3: say about this. 451 00:18:26,200 --> 00:18:28,120 Speaker 2: Well, Dan, I think it's going to be very interesting 452 00:18:28,119 --> 00:18:31,680 Speaker 2: to monitor this line movement by about Saturday afternoon, Saturday evening, 453 00:18:31,760 --> 00:18:34,679 Speaker 2: when we get some kind of final confirmation on Aaron Rodgers, 454 00:18:34,720 --> 00:18:37,000 Speaker 2: if he's even able to get out of the COVID 455 00:18:37,080 --> 00:18:40,359 Speaker 2: nineteen protocol in time to play this football game, because 456 00:18:40,800 --> 00:18:43,240 Speaker 2: if he is not, this is going to close closer 457 00:18:43,240 --> 00:18:45,320 Speaker 2: to a pick up, maybe one and a half, still 458 00:18:45,520 --> 00:18:47,480 Speaker 2: in green Bay's favor, so we could be getting the 459 00:18:47,480 --> 00:18:49,840 Speaker 2: best of the number. If Aaron Rodgers is back, I 460 00:18:49,880 --> 00:18:52,040 Speaker 2: think it could work more in green Bay's favor, and 461 00:18:52,160 --> 00:18:55,200 Speaker 2: still I would probably lean with Seattle maybe getting four 462 00:18:55,200 --> 00:18:56,840 Speaker 2: and a half or five points, So I don't mind 463 00:18:56,880 --> 00:18:58,359 Speaker 2: where it is right now. And again, I think you 464 00:18:58,400 --> 00:19:01,160 Speaker 2: have the hook in your advantage past that field goal, 465 00:19:01,200 --> 00:19:03,080 Speaker 2: because like you, this is not going to be a 466 00:19:03,080 --> 00:19:05,880 Speaker 2: blowout on either side. Even if Aaron Rodgers is back, 467 00:19:06,080 --> 00:19:07,639 Speaker 2: green Bay could find a way to win. But if 468 00:19:07,640 --> 00:19:09,679 Speaker 2: it's twenty four to twenty one, I would not be 469 00:19:09,760 --> 00:19:12,560 Speaker 2: shocked by any means, and I think adding Russell Wilson back, 470 00:19:12,800 --> 00:19:14,439 Speaker 2: we know what Russ can do. We know what he 471 00:19:14,520 --> 00:19:16,880 Speaker 2: was doing early on this year. Off to a great 472 00:19:16,880 --> 00:19:19,720 Speaker 2: start for the Seahawks. He's seventy two percent completion percentage 473 00:19:19,840 --> 00:19:22,600 Speaker 2: obviously makes that offense go in a way that even 474 00:19:22,640 --> 00:19:26,479 Speaker 2: Geno Smith cannot but credit to Gino Smith because in 475 00:19:26,520 --> 00:19:29,000 Speaker 2: the three games that he started, three and zero against 476 00:19:29,000 --> 00:19:31,080 Speaker 2: the spread for the Seattle Seahawks. So they are three 477 00:19:31,160 --> 00:19:33,640 Speaker 2: and five straight up. But they are a very interesting 478 00:19:33,680 --> 00:19:36,160 Speaker 2: team to me, Dan for how they look moving forward 479 00:19:36,200 --> 00:19:38,359 Speaker 2: in the NFC postseason picture, because if you look at 480 00:19:38,359 --> 00:19:41,200 Speaker 2: any make playoff odds right now the NFC, six of 481 00:19:41,240 --> 00:19:43,280 Speaker 2: the seven spots that we will have for this postseason 482 00:19:43,640 --> 00:19:46,119 Speaker 2: virtually wrapped up based on the odds. You have the Rams, 483 00:19:46,160 --> 00:19:48,240 Speaker 2: who are trailing in the NFC West. You have the 484 00:19:48,240 --> 00:19:50,200 Speaker 2: New Orleans Saints who are trailing in the NFC South, 485 00:19:50,240 --> 00:19:53,800 Speaker 2: but both heavily favored to earn a postseason perth. That 486 00:19:54,000 --> 00:19:56,760 Speaker 2: seventh spot, though, is wide open right now. In the 487 00:19:56,880 --> 00:19:59,399 Speaker 2: NFC wildcard race. You could look at the Vikings. I 488 00:19:59,440 --> 00:20:02,440 Speaker 2: have no comp midence in Minnesota. I think although Seattle 489 00:20:02,520 --> 00:20:05,640 Speaker 2: is coming from behind. Having Russell Wilson back, I think 490 00:20:05,680 --> 00:20:08,600 Speaker 2: the Seahawks become a very very interesting team, and the 491 00:20:08,680 --> 00:20:11,520 Speaker 2: Niners have left everything open in the NFC West, where 492 00:20:11,520 --> 00:20:13,600 Speaker 2: I would look at the Seahawks just a peg behind 493 00:20:13,720 --> 00:20:16,040 Speaker 2: the Rams and the Cardinals. So I think this is 494 00:20:16,080 --> 00:20:19,240 Speaker 2: a great spot for Seattle to get this momentum building 495 00:20:19,240 --> 00:20:21,800 Speaker 2: toward the postseason. I think the Seattle Seahawks are will 496 00:20:21,840 --> 00:20:23,520 Speaker 2: be fascinating here in the second half of the year. 497 00:20:23,880 --> 00:20:24,080 Speaker 3: Yeah. 498 00:20:24,080 --> 00:20:26,360 Speaker 1: I think the Falcons may have the seventh spot right 499 00:20:26,359 --> 00:20:28,440 Speaker 1: now in the NFC. And that's just not a team, right, 500 00:20:28,520 --> 00:20:30,240 Speaker 1: I know, it's nuts. That's not a team that you 501 00:20:30,320 --> 00:20:32,280 Speaker 1: look at is going to run that spot. Yeah, that's open. 502 00:20:32,359 --> 00:20:34,920 Speaker 1: They need this right now. And there is the possibility, 503 00:20:34,960 --> 00:20:37,200 Speaker 1: of course that Wilson, because he's been out for several weeks, 504 00:20:37,240 --> 00:20:39,040 Speaker 1: he's going to be rusty himself as well, But at 505 00:20:39,119 --> 00:20:40,840 Speaker 1: least he has been back and he's been able to 506 00:20:40,840 --> 00:20:42,639 Speaker 1: practice in game plan for this. And you make the 507 00:20:42,720 --> 00:20:44,760 Speaker 1: right point, which is correct, which is if you like 508 00:20:44,800 --> 00:20:47,480 Speaker 1: the Seahawks like you do, you might as well bet 509 00:20:47,520 --> 00:20:52,080 Speaker 1: it now because if Rogers obviously is not cleared five points, 510 00:20:52,119 --> 00:20:54,360 Speaker 1: the other way maybe, like I mean that right, it's 511 00:20:54,400 --> 00:20:56,439 Speaker 1: something you know we saw with Jordan Love, So obviously 512 00:20:56,520 --> 00:20:59,119 Speaker 1: you'll get the best number. But if Rogers is cleared 513 00:20:59,119 --> 00:21:02,000 Speaker 1: and he is going to play, maybe it moves maybe 514 00:21:02,040 --> 00:21:04,560 Speaker 1: a point or something in the Packers. So as long 515 00:21:04,600 --> 00:21:06,399 Speaker 1: as you're over three, but it's not like you're getting 516 00:21:06,400 --> 00:21:08,160 Speaker 1: a seven or anything like that, you might as well better. 517 00:21:08,200 --> 00:21:09,680 Speaker 3: Now, all right, very very good. 518 00:21:09,720 --> 00:21:12,560 Speaker 1: Okay, So that is gonna be our six picks for 519 00:21:12,600 --> 00:21:13,000 Speaker 1: this weekend. 520 00:21:13,080 --> 00:21:14,800 Speaker 3: Let me very quickly recap it. 521 00:21:14,880 --> 00:21:17,160 Speaker 1: You are taking these Saints getting two and a half 522 00:21:17,200 --> 00:21:19,960 Speaker 1: from the Titans, which I also like, the Bills and 523 00:21:20,000 --> 00:21:23,200 Speaker 1: the Jets over forty eight points and Derek Carr overpassed 524 00:21:23,200 --> 00:21:24,200 Speaker 1: attempts and what did we say? 525 00:21:24,240 --> 00:21:25,000 Speaker 3: The top number is. 526 00:21:25,000 --> 00:21:27,119 Speaker 1: Anything above as long as it does it get to 527 00:21:27,119 --> 00:21:28,639 Speaker 1: what thirty five and a half. 528 00:21:28,680 --> 00:21:30,800 Speaker 2: As long as it's not over thirty five and a half, 529 00:21:30,880 --> 00:21:33,120 Speaker 2: Thirty five and a half would be the absolute ceiling, 530 00:21:33,280 --> 00:21:36,800 Speaker 2: and I'd still probably be like, all right, I'm in basically. 531 00:21:36,359 --> 00:21:38,159 Speaker 1: Whatever it is you can take, but certainly if it's 532 00:21:38,200 --> 00:21:39,840 Speaker 1: as long as it's under thirty five and a half, 533 00:21:39,840 --> 00:21:41,720 Speaker 1: you want the over there For me, I'm taking the 534 00:21:41,800 --> 00:21:43,960 Speaker 1: Browns getting two and a half from the Patriots and 535 00:21:44,000 --> 00:21:46,480 Speaker 1: the total in that game under forty five. And I'm 536 00:21:46,520 --> 00:21:49,520 Speaker 1: also taking the Seahawks getting three and a half from 537 00:21:49,560 --> 00:21:52,320 Speaker 1: the Packers. All right, let's go lightning speed here very quickly. 538 00:21:52,520 --> 00:21:55,359 Speaker 1: Your ten cent thoughts on the remaining spreads. The Lions 539 00:21:55,400 --> 00:21:57,879 Speaker 1: are visiting the Steelers. The Steelers are laying eight and 540 00:21:57,920 --> 00:22:02,560 Speaker 1: a half, no pass, just a total path I had 541 00:22:02,600 --> 00:22:04,440 Speaker 1: to If I had to, I probably would have to 542 00:22:04,480 --> 00:22:06,720 Speaker 1: take the lines. I'm not backing Mike Tomlin at home 543 00:22:06,800 --> 00:22:08,720 Speaker 1: as a big favorite any game that they should destroy 544 00:22:08,800 --> 00:22:11,760 Speaker 1: because they'll probably lose out right. How about the spreading 545 00:22:11,760 --> 00:22:13,720 Speaker 1: the Bills and the Jets. Actually, this has come down here. 546 00:22:13,760 --> 00:22:16,000 Speaker 1: It started early in the weekend. I think it might 547 00:22:16,040 --> 00:22:17,960 Speaker 1: have been fourteen and a half per half. I first, 548 00:22:18,000 --> 00:22:20,560 Speaker 1: I got it, it's twelve right now with the consensus line, 549 00:22:20,600 --> 00:22:21,960 Speaker 1: there are some thirteens out there. 550 00:22:22,119 --> 00:22:23,480 Speaker 3: What do you think about it? At twelve? 551 00:22:23,800 --> 00:22:25,920 Speaker 2: Are we about to get our second Mike White game 552 00:22:26,080 --> 00:22:28,879 Speaker 2: in three weeks? Maybe so, But I think the market 553 00:22:28,960 --> 00:22:31,320 Speaker 2: makes sense. And the Bills haven't covered in three straight, 554 00:22:31,359 --> 00:22:34,280 Speaker 2: the last two by nearly a two touchdown favorite, I 555 00:22:34,280 --> 00:22:35,919 Speaker 2: think I'm gonna lean with the Jets. I mean, the 556 00:22:35,920 --> 00:22:38,080 Speaker 2: Bills could still win by double digits, but that's how 557 00:22:38,119 --> 00:22:39,320 Speaker 2: I would lean in this game. 558 00:22:39,520 --> 00:22:41,480 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean you saw just how close the Jets 559 00:22:41,480 --> 00:22:44,480 Speaker 1: were with Johnson and quarterback to backdoor covering that game 560 00:22:44,560 --> 00:22:46,080 Speaker 1: last week with twelve points. 561 00:22:46,320 --> 00:22:46,800 Speaker 2: I agree. 562 00:22:46,840 --> 00:22:49,280 Speaker 1: I'd probably lean that way with Mike White. The Cowboys 563 00:22:49,320 --> 00:22:52,960 Speaker 1: are home against the Falcons, laying nine at the consensus here, 564 00:22:53,480 --> 00:22:53,960 Speaker 1: I would. 565 00:22:53,840 --> 00:22:55,159 Speaker 2: Like the under of this game. It doesn't make a 566 00:22:55,200 --> 00:22:56,800 Speaker 2: lot of sense to me. It's at fifty five. It's 567 00:22:56,800 --> 00:22:58,600 Speaker 2: the highest total of the weekend. I know Dallas has 568 00:22:58,600 --> 00:23:01,760 Speaker 2: a propensity to play over. Atlanta's defense has been a 569 00:23:01,760 --> 00:23:03,840 Speaker 2: little bit better this year, and I think you're getting 570 00:23:03,840 --> 00:23:06,080 Speaker 2: an inflated number on a Dallas team that still needs 571 00:23:06,080 --> 00:23:08,439 Speaker 2: to figure some things out. I would go total first. 572 00:23:08,640 --> 00:23:11,240 Speaker 2: If I'm looking at the spread. I actually think Dallas 573 00:23:11,280 --> 00:23:13,120 Speaker 2: has an opportunity to get right here, and I think 574 00:23:13,119 --> 00:23:14,160 Speaker 2: they hammer the Falcons. 575 00:23:14,359 --> 00:23:14,920 Speaker 3: I do too. 576 00:23:15,119 --> 00:23:17,159 Speaker 1: It was a game actually I considered whether or not 577 00:23:17,240 --> 00:23:18,800 Speaker 1: I wanted to take because I do think that this 578 00:23:18,880 --> 00:23:20,880 Speaker 1: is the bounce back spot right here for the Cowboys. 579 00:23:21,000 --> 00:23:23,520 Speaker 1: Classic Bilos sell high. With the Falcons beating the Saints 580 00:23:23,600 --> 00:23:26,119 Speaker 1: last week, I think the Cowboys might absolutely run with 581 00:23:26,160 --> 00:23:29,320 Speaker 1: this game. But again, non official pick Colts laying ten 582 00:23:29,359 --> 00:23:31,280 Speaker 1: and a half at home against the Jaguars. 583 00:23:31,480 --> 00:23:32,760 Speaker 2: Dan, I don't know if you know this about me. 584 00:23:32,800 --> 00:23:34,520 Speaker 2: I'm a faderban Meyer guy at all costs, so I 585 00:23:34,520 --> 00:23:37,080 Speaker 2: will never pick the Jacksonville Jaguars, even against the spread. 586 00:23:37,080 --> 00:23:39,040 Speaker 2: We are going to take the Indianapolis Colts, who has 587 00:23:39,080 --> 00:23:41,440 Speaker 2: a ten and a half point favorite twice already this year, 588 00:23:41,640 --> 00:23:42,879 Speaker 2: have covered both of those numbers. 589 00:23:43,160 --> 00:23:45,040 Speaker 1: I'm in agreement with you, and I think you joined 590 00:23:45,080 --> 00:23:48,120 Speaker 1: the ninety nine percent of the population in fading Urban Meyer. 591 00:23:48,240 --> 00:23:51,320 Speaker 1: The Washington football team at home with the Bucks. Washington's 592 00:23:51,320 --> 00:23:52,359 Speaker 1: getting nine and a half points. 593 00:23:52,359 --> 00:23:55,760 Speaker 2: What do you think a very interesting opposing trends here? 594 00:23:55,800 --> 00:23:58,879 Speaker 2: The Tampa Bay Buccaneers have yet to win against the 595 00:23:58,920 --> 00:24:01,320 Speaker 2: spread as a row team this year, zero to four 596 00:24:01,359 --> 00:24:04,000 Speaker 2: against the number washingt football team, the worst record against 597 00:24:04,000 --> 00:24:06,520 Speaker 2: the spread in all of the NFL, just one in seven. 598 00:24:06,840 --> 00:24:08,840 Speaker 2: Something's got to give. I think it's the Bucks covering 599 00:24:08,880 --> 00:24:09,639 Speaker 2: by nine and a half. 600 00:24:09,960 --> 00:24:12,200 Speaker 1: I think Washington might be able to keep this one close. 601 00:24:12,200 --> 00:24:14,840 Speaker 1: I have no idea I'll staying away from it entirely, obviously. 602 00:24:14,920 --> 00:24:17,480 Speaker 1: Chris Godwin has mispracticed this week. There's not gonna be Kronk. 603 00:24:17,640 --> 00:24:19,359 Speaker 1: There's probably not gonna be Antonio Brown. 604 00:24:19,720 --> 00:24:20,320 Speaker 3: I don't know, man. 605 00:24:20,359 --> 00:24:22,439 Speaker 1: It just strikes me as something where Washington might be 606 00:24:22,520 --> 00:24:24,960 Speaker 1: able to keep this again. I'd love it at ten, 607 00:24:25,000 --> 00:24:26,760 Speaker 1: but it's not going to get there. How About we 608 00:24:26,760 --> 00:24:28,880 Speaker 1: already talked about that one. How about the Chargers laying 609 00:24:28,920 --> 00:24:30,120 Speaker 1: three at home to the Vikings. 610 00:24:30,440 --> 00:24:32,480 Speaker 2: I have no trust in the Minnesota Vikings. I like 611 00:24:32,520 --> 00:24:34,879 Speaker 2: the Los Angeles Chargers. They have played in two straight 612 00:24:34,920 --> 00:24:37,200 Speaker 2: three point games. I loved it at two and a half. 613 00:24:37,240 --> 00:24:38,920 Speaker 2: Now it's up to three, but I'd still take the 614 00:24:38,960 --> 00:24:39,800 Speaker 2: Chargers in the points. 615 00:24:40,080 --> 00:24:42,000 Speaker 1: I'm just running away from it entirely. I don't want 616 00:24:42,000 --> 00:24:43,880 Speaker 1: to go anywhere near it. How About the Cardinals lank 617 00:24:43,960 --> 00:24:45,840 Speaker 1: ten and a half to the Panthers. I assume, by 618 00:24:45,840 --> 00:24:47,480 Speaker 1: the way, it's still gona be PJ Walker, right, There's 619 00:24:47,520 --> 00:24:49,680 Speaker 1: no way Cam is ready to go yet in this one, Okay, 620 00:24:49,840 --> 00:24:51,080 Speaker 1: Cardinals like ten and a half. 621 00:24:51,359 --> 00:24:53,359 Speaker 2: If it was, that'd be crazy because he had not 622 00:24:53,480 --> 00:24:55,800 Speaker 2: played under Matt rules, so that would be absolutely nuts. 623 00:24:55,840 --> 00:24:58,240 Speaker 2: If he was ready with the offensive scheme. I kind 624 00:24:58,240 --> 00:25:00,280 Speaker 2: of want to see PJ Walker. I think it's the 625 00:25:00,359 --> 00:25:03,000 Speaker 2: XFL brain of me that thinks there's some hope left 626 00:25:03,000 --> 00:25:05,280 Speaker 2: in the way that quarterbacking can be played in the NFL. 627 00:25:05,520 --> 00:25:07,199 Speaker 2: But no, if I was looking at this, the Cardinals 628 00:25:07,240 --> 00:25:09,520 Speaker 2: have the best cover margin in the NFL at over 629 00:25:09,600 --> 00:25:11,760 Speaker 2: ten points. Maybe they can cover ten and a half. 630 00:25:12,240 --> 00:25:14,320 Speaker 1: How about the Broncos at home lank two and a 631 00:25:14,359 --> 00:25:16,119 Speaker 1: half to the Eagles. This was at three earlier in 632 00:25:16,160 --> 00:25:17,560 Speaker 1: the week when we looked at it, so it's moved 633 00:25:17,560 --> 00:25:18,160 Speaker 1: a little bit here. 634 00:25:18,280 --> 00:25:21,120 Speaker 2: Two and a half just disgusting football. I don't really 635 00:25:21,160 --> 00:25:23,080 Speaker 2: want any part of the Eagles and Broncos. I thought 636 00:25:23,080 --> 00:25:25,480 Speaker 2: about putting this in our rundown for our show tomorrow 637 00:25:25,600 --> 00:25:28,040 Speaker 2: on our Football Friday, and I was like, nobody cares 638 00:25:28,040 --> 00:25:29,560 Speaker 2: about this. I'm staying away from it. 639 00:25:30,240 --> 00:25:32,159 Speaker 3: That is fair. We talked about it. 640 00:25:32,200 --> 00:25:34,720 Speaker 1: You don't want any part right of the Chiefs visiting 641 00:25:34,760 --> 00:25:36,359 Speaker 1: the Raiders and laying two and a half points on 642 00:25:36,400 --> 00:25:37,080 Speaker 1: either side of it. 643 00:25:37,720 --> 00:25:40,960 Speaker 2: I mean the idea, as my father taught me from 644 00:25:40,960 --> 00:25:44,240 Speaker 2: a young age, hometown dog in a primetime game. I'm 645 00:25:44,240 --> 00:25:46,360 Speaker 2: not sure the metrics backed that up so much. I'm 646 00:25:46,400 --> 00:25:48,720 Speaker 2: still a believer, and maybe that is the fan in 647 00:25:48,760 --> 00:25:51,040 Speaker 2: me of the Kansas City Chiefs that only two and 648 00:25:51,080 --> 00:25:55,280 Speaker 2: a half against this Raiders team like something somehow, some way, 649 00:25:55,760 --> 00:25:57,399 Speaker 2: But no, I can't really touch that number. 650 00:25:57,720 --> 00:25:58,240 Speaker 3: That's the thing. 651 00:25:58,280 --> 00:26:00,359 Speaker 1: I'm like, I want it to be the chief and 652 00:26:00,400 --> 00:26:01,840 Speaker 1: i feel like it should be the Chiefs, and I've 653 00:26:01,840 --> 00:26:04,640 Speaker 1: got absolutely no way to justify it being the chief 654 00:26:04,720 --> 00:26:07,080 Speaker 1: So I'm staying away. Last one Monday Night football, the 655 00:26:07,160 --> 00:26:08,720 Speaker 1: Rams are visiting the forty nine ers. 656 00:26:09,040 --> 00:26:11,000 Speaker 3: Forty nine Ers are getting four points here. 657 00:26:11,200 --> 00:26:13,520 Speaker 2: Completely agree with the market movement in the Rams favor 658 00:26:13,560 --> 00:26:15,760 Speaker 2: early on for this Monday night game. I am not 659 00:26:16,000 --> 00:26:17,840 Speaker 2: pleased with what I'm seeing out of the San Francisco 660 00:26:17,840 --> 00:26:19,800 Speaker 2: forty nine Ers, who now have the longest odds to 661 00:26:19,800 --> 00:26:22,439 Speaker 2: win the NFC West after being the preseason favorites. I 662 00:26:22,440 --> 00:26:24,720 Speaker 2: think the Rams, who just got owned by the Titans 663 00:26:24,760 --> 00:26:27,400 Speaker 2: in their own home stadium, now go on the road 664 00:26:27,520 --> 00:26:29,800 Speaker 2: up north to northern California. In Santa Clara, I think 665 00:26:29,800 --> 00:26:30,720 Speaker 2: the Rams can cover that. 666 00:26:31,440 --> 00:26:31,800 Speaker 3: Ben. 667 00:26:32,119 --> 00:26:33,919 Speaker 1: It was great having you on. I'm glad we were 668 00:26:33,960 --> 00:26:35,520 Speaker 1: finally able to do it. I guess thank you to 669 00:26:35,640 --> 00:26:38,159 Speaker 1: Joe for making sure that this could happen. Mind everybody 670 00:26:38,160 --> 00:26:39,880 Speaker 1: where they can check you out and your work. 671 00:26:40,320 --> 00:26:42,800 Speaker 2: At Ben Scott Stevens on Twitter, and then, as Dan 672 00:26:42,840 --> 00:26:44,240 Speaker 2: mentioned at the start of the show, I host The 673 00:26:44,280 --> 00:26:47,080 Speaker 2: Morning After on sports Grid every weekday morning, nine am 674 00:26:47,200 --> 00:26:49,200 Speaker 2: to noon Eastern, where we do what we did here, 675 00:26:49,600 --> 00:26:51,720 Speaker 2: try to educate you on how to become a better 676 00:26:51,760 --> 00:26:53,520 Speaker 2: sports better having a little bit of fun along the 677 00:26:53,520 --> 00:26:56,280 Speaker 2: way in an engaging, in informative format. So that's at 678 00:26:56,320 --> 00:26:58,719 Speaker 2: sports Creed at Serious XM channel one to fifty nine, 679 00:26:58,760 --> 00:27:01,600 Speaker 2: on sports Grid Radio all across the place. There's people 680 00:27:01,880 --> 00:27:03,479 Speaker 2: Dan that reach out to me from places like, Hey, 681 00:27:03,520 --> 00:27:05,320 Speaker 2: I'm watching you in Glenwood, Iowa. I'm like, I didn't 682 00:27:05,320 --> 00:27:07,399 Speaker 2: even know we were affiliated out there, but sounds great. 683 00:27:07,440 --> 00:27:09,480 Speaker 2: So it's places I don't even know. But we do 684 00:27:09,520 --> 00:27:11,639 Speaker 2: have a YouTube TV channel now, so maybe that's the 685 00:27:11,640 --> 00:27:12,400 Speaker 2: easiest format. 686 00:27:12,800 --> 00:27:15,320 Speaker 1: Awesome, he's been Stevens. I'm Dan Harris. You can find 687 00:27:15,359 --> 00:27:18,080 Speaker 1: us again on Monday with our early reaction to the 688 00:27:18,119 --> 00:27:20,639 Speaker 1: week eleven lines. Enjoy your weekend of football, everybody. I'll 689 00:27:20,680 --> 00:27:21,440 Speaker 1: talk to you next week.