WEBVTT - Surveillance: Italy's Possible Eurozone Exit

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Who you put your trust in matters. Investors have put

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:07.640
<v Speaker 1>their trust in independent registered investment advisors to the tune

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:12.240
<v Speaker 1>of four trillion dollars. Why learn more and find your

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>independent advisor dot com. Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast.

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:32.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Keene with David Gura. Daily we bring you

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Find Bloomberg Surveillance on iTunes, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com, and

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>of course, on the Bloomberg. It is always a good

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>time to speak with David blanche Flower of Dartmouth College.

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>He is someone we can talk to our austerity on

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the FED. We can talk to him about the mysteries

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>of economic growth. What we can really talk to him

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>about is the labor economics of Italy is classic. The

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>wage curve from a good twenty years ago was controversial

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 1>with us Ian Shepherdson as well. This morning from Pantheon

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 1>macro Economics, Professor Blanche Flower, I would suggest the wage

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>curve for Italy is destroyed. Here's the chart we showed

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:26.680
<v Speaker 1>earlier under twenty five year old unemployment. His balloon from

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 1>to thirty seven percent. Danny Blanche Flowers labor economics doesn't

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 1>work in Italy, doesn't. No, not really in a sense

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:39.479
<v Speaker 1>that to put it technically, there are long flatbits. What

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 1>we mean by that is when unemployments really high, labor

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:45.760
<v Speaker 1>markets kind of stopped working. So think about when the

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>unemployment rates and it moves to a team doesn't change

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>things very much. So so this is a labor market

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that hasn't been working, isn't working um and obviously that

0:01:57.320 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>has implications. I mean the big thing you see actually

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>if you look at in Britain as an awful lot

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>of Italian academics, they come out of the Italian labor

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>market moved to the UK. Young Italians do the same.

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>But this is clearly a labor market in crisis. Well,

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a labor market in crisis. What are the incentives

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>to the people that the Italian government must initiate. Not

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>macroeconomic mumbo jumbo, but how do you incentivize these people

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:33.919
<v Speaker 1>under to go get a job? Well, obviously there's two

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 1>parts to it. You obviously want to make sure on

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the supply side that they have the skills, but the

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>reality is on the demand side, you've actually got to

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:46.799
<v Speaker 1>offer adequate numbers of jobs and you said, talked to

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Blanche Flower about wages and growth and austerity, and blanch

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Flower would obviously come back and say, fiscal policies overly

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>tight as it's been throughout the European Union, um, and

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 1>we have very little incentive on the part of Italian

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>employers to hire young Italians. And so that's the problem.

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:09.839
<v Speaker 1>Firms are not moving to Italy. But that's exactly where

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to go. Tom bring up your chart right,

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:14.799
<v Speaker 1>when you look at youth unemployment in Italy, it's huge.

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>When you look at Spain, look after that forty two percent.

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's just think about this. Forty people between twenty five

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and thirty five are unemployed in Spain. Danny, My question

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>to you is, how do you do Do you do

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 1>reforms that actually make employers want to hire but also

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>fire a lot of the people in it They are

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>holding back from hiring because then you're stuck with someone

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>for twenty years. Right, So the obvious thing, you've got

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>to raise the level of aggregate demand. Give firms incentives

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to hire young people. You can do it through the

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>tax code. You give firms incentives. You say, if you

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>hire a young person, will give you this this tax credit.

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>We're not seeing any credible government in Italy focused on

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>those kinds of issues. That one thing you would actually say,

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the surprise is actually these young people have been pretty compliant.

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>You would have thought they'd have been on the streets.

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>High levels of youth unemployment like that generally generates social disorder.

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:16.479
<v Speaker 1>They haven't, and so that's obviously a big puzzle. But

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>you need to break this youth unemployment problem. What we

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>know that the famous line is a youth unemployment actually

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>generates a permanent scar rather than a temporary blemish on people.

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:31.839
<v Speaker 1>So it's not just an individual problem. It's down the road.

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 1>The society is going to be heard by the fact

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>that these people haven't got into the label. Fritz, you

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>don't want to jump in. This is so critical. This

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>is the history recess that Olivier Blanchard and wren Somers

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:45.919
<v Speaker 1>talks about. This is like, absolutely it is. But you

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 1>know what, talking to your point, let's start talking mumbo jumbo, Danny,

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>what needs to happen, because actually Materrancy was empowered. He's

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:55.480
<v Speaker 1>forty one years old and he's in and the focus

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>was meant to get people back into jobs, and he's

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>been unable to do that. Well, I don't know about

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>mumbo jumbo. I mean there's a reality is that this

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 1>labor market has been in trouble for two or three decades.

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>The government doesn't seem to have any kind of ability

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 1>to do that. The fiscal framework is too tight. You

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>need to give firms incentives to hire, You need to

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.919
<v Speaker 1>give incentives for mobility. You need to get the labor

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:22.279
<v Speaker 1>market working, the capital market working, the housing market working,

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:24.839
<v Speaker 1>and you need to loosen the levels of aggregate demaut

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>and give incentives for employers to hire the young. And

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>that's not what's been happening. Okay, we got Ian Shepherdson

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and David Blanchelire where this this is what surveillance is

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:36.479
<v Speaker 1>all about. Bring up the chart. This is from fokars Landau,

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:40.279
<v Speaker 1>which is the idea here of they need a Lira.

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not speaking for David fokars land off Deutsche Bank,

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>but Beppy Greenlow France been clearly says he wants an

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:51.840
<v Speaker 1>independent Lira. Ian Shepherdson, what would happen two days or

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:56.040
<v Speaker 1>two weeks after an independent Lira other than wealth destruction

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>for the elites of Italy that there would be gigantic

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 1>wealth destruction and extended period of total chaos at the breakup.

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:05.160
<v Speaker 1>You couldn't have Italy leaving the Eurozone without the rest

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:07.039
<v Speaker 1>of the Eurozone falling apart. So it's kind of the

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>end of the world event where things would lie six months,

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>one to three years down the line. That's a different question,

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and it may well be that after a period of

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary extended pain that actually a much weaker sovereign Italian

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 1>currency would would be would put it really into into

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a better position. But I've got to say the transition

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:26.600
<v Speaker 1>from where we are now to that would be horrendous

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and it would be short term things would be much

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:31.160
<v Speaker 1>worse without a doubt, right And Danny, so Tom keeps sudden,

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, talking about the switch to Lira. I mean

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:36.159
<v Speaker 1>this is extremely unlikely, right to Danny blanch when you

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 1>when you look at even Beppy Grille, I mean he

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really have the best craft of economic so you

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>don't see how this would work. Do we just need

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>to have a prime minister with more power that has

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>a much more aggressive mandating reforms? Well, what what you want?

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>A credible market driven reforms where firms feel that there's

0:06:56.360 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>some certainty going forward that they can invest and higher.

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what you and Tom have been talking about

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:05.799
<v Speaker 1>is a country in chaos. I mean, we've seen similar

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>problems in the UK with Brexit. Has calm um. If

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:11.679
<v Speaker 1>you can't form a government, you can't get a policy.

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>You you know, we don't know where this country is going.

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Why would firms go in and hire young Italians? So

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>you've got to break that first. There's this great chicken

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>an egg, and if you're an employer, you'd say, well,

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I think I'll go to Germany. Actually, but David, I

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>want to get this on the record. Professor Blanche or Is,

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>you're one of our true international authorities. What would be

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the pain of an individual separate Lira? I mean, bring

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>up the chart here, Jose and the idea here. Ian

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Shepherdson says there would be massive instability. Is lira depreciated?

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you agree? Well, I mean he's completely right that

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>if suddenly you say we're going to go to the lira,

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that would cause the collapse of the euro Zone. That

0:07:57.040 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>would have huge cataclysts, make effects for for quite some time.

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:04.679
<v Speaker 1>But he's also right in that what you have here

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>is a currency that is overvalued for the Italian The

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>point of saying you would go to a lira would

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>be at least that would make the country competitive, and

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 1>so that is that is in some way attractive. So

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>it is completely right, um that a lower valued currency

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>could help. It's hard to see how you get to

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the benefits of that lower currency without the cut this

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>terrible collapse that he's talked about. It's hard to know

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>where you go from here. But this does threaten us

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the whole being of the euro Zone, right and tom

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:42.320
<v Speaker 1>there are people out there saying that the market is

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit too complacent ahead of that referendum

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>to do the leap from the referendum to actually getting

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the lira bag is you know, it's humongous a lot.

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, very few people are doing that leap at

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the moment. Also, compared to Brexit, you can't constitution that

0:08:56.960 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you can't put a referendum on whether to leave the

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Eurozone or not to the at in So absolutely, December

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>four is a referendum in Italy, one that will be

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:19.679
<v Speaker 1>closely watched in Italy, in Europe, indeed around the world.

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Swatter Thing is a senior economist at T. S. Lombard,

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a research and she joins us now by phone. We've

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 1>been told here that there's a continuum between the Brexit referendum,

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the presidential election here in the US, and now this

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>referendum in Italy. And what you urge some caution there?

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>You say this is likely just to be a side show. Um. Yes, absolutely, Hi,

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>good morning there. So we think the you know, investors

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>are excessively focused on the referendum of thember of the vote. UM.

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>But I guess it's just it will just be a

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 1>side show in the largest game of things. Things will

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>not dramatically change after the referendum. In fact, they will

0:09:56.760 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the trigger points for this sort of political days in in, in, in,

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, last summer else. UM. Italy nonetheless remains a

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 1>key threat to a key medium term threat to UH

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:13.439
<v Speaker 1>your area stability. But a no vote in the referendum,

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>while it will intensify near term volatility, it does not

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 1>spell doom. UM. And in the same way, yes vote

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:25.679
<v Speaker 1>does not guarantee a recovery or reforms or recapitalization. UM.

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess what I'm trying to say is that the

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Italian problems are are very much supply side related, UH,

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:36.439
<v Speaker 1>and they're deeply ingrained. UM. Vote on the referendum does

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 1>not change the story. Um. In fact, where the twelve

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 1>month horizon ECB policies and trumponomics, so to speak, a

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>strong dollar truth trumponomics I will actually provide a temporary

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>tailwind to two Italians. For me? Is it is Italy

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>an emerging market? Um? Well, if you look at the

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>performance of the the spreads every time there was a

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>political tremor, you might be tempted to believe it. I

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>believe so, UM, But I guess it depends how you

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>define emoting market. Um. The one of the ways I

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 1>try to define the MS is the the you know,

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the correlation between stocks and heels that does not hold

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 1>so well in Italian In Italian case, well, you may

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 1>argue it's because of e c D policies. Um. But

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:29.439
<v Speaker 1>it shows a lot of characteristics. But well, not not

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>yet animoting market. Not yet anyway, you know. I We've

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:36.079
<v Speaker 1>talked an awful lot here about the banking sector, and

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I wonder what you see is the path forward there

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:41.439
<v Speaker 1>through in a sixty billion euros in non performing loans

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>there on the books, tremendously over banked country exclusive of

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 1>this referendum, how does that begin to get fixed? Right?

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Um Um. Now, the Italian banking problem, UH, it's it's

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a lot more difficult to rectify it because

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:02.559
<v Speaker 1>of three important critiquy reasons. The first is the the

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>dominant share of these bad loans or sorry, the dominant

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 1>share of bank debt is held by retail investors um

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 1>as compared to in in other in other countries, So

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 1>one third of senior debt is held by retail investors,

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 1>while half of the junior debt is held by uh

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 1>A retail investors. And it's junior debt that will be

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>used if the banks have if if banks have to

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:32.679
<v Speaker 1>be recapitalized. The second important reason is that the the

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 1>government itself, policymakers themselves have been have played a role

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 1>in in sort of selling this these bad potentially bad

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:44.720
<v Speaker 1>assets to to the household sector. And third, it's the

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:48.439
<v Speaker 1>the timing of the the eu Blian rules which came

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 1>in affect earlier this year, which prohibit or make it

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>very punitive to to for state aid uh to recap

0:12:56.800 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the banking sector. So it's the culmination of these three

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 1>problems that's really making matters worse. Um. There was a

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 1>way out the advance uptil Solvent. Well, if you exclude

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 1>monted Departe, that is, there was a way out. They

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>can they can use the precautionary clause. They can uh

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>compensate the retail investors for miss selling. Um. Well, but

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 1>but but you have to you need political will to

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 1>go through that. That's lacking in Italy's case, and there's

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>always a reason before their friends they did not want

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:33.839
<v Speaker 1>to disappoint policymakers or a retail investors. After the referendum,

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:38.439
<v Speaker 1>attention will shift to the elections. Sing with us with

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the definitive report and Italy from her Lombard Street Research.

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Your report Shadow which I need to recover the cover

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>all twenty eight pages, shows that incentives are critical to Italy.

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 1>When you and Charles Duma sit around a cup of

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 1>coffee with Jonathan Fenby, what's the key incentive that big

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>ins to nudge Italy towards a modern economy? Um, the

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>key incenter would probably have to be, you know, um,

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:15.080
<v Speaker 1>directing capital uh and and and labor, all the productive

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>resources towards the right area. We've seen as a massive

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 1>increase in this allocation in the manufacturing sector and it

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>has continued to increase, of course dramatically since the you're

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>since that joined the Euro and after the global financial crisis. UM.

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess there are a lot of rigidities within the

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>economy itself, whether you look at the product market, whether

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 1>you look at the the label sector, labor segments, the

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the capital segments. And I guess one of the key problems,

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>UH is is the there's a dominance of state of

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>small and medium enterprises. In Italy. Almost eighty five percent

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 1>of employment comes from the small and medium medium uh

0:14:56.920 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 1>small industries, and that sort of restricts the gains you

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>could enjoy from economy of scale. UH. You know, when

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>you speak to a various small businesses, they say they

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>did they preferred turban small because the the tax code

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's so intense. UM. And then you you have

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 1>various restrictions in terms of how many farms we can

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 1>have within a certain area. And it also extends to

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>various other retail segments. Did the mark up on the

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the on the retail prices is significantly higher in Italy

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 1>than in any any European economy. As you were saying earlier,

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>it's it's an overbanked country. And I guess The reflection

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>of all these weaknesses is the fact that the activity

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>growth has been stagnant for almost a decade. And how

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 1>sure you you in that very lucid report right about

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the small window of opportunity Italy has here to to

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>write its economic and financial malaise. How small a window

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>were we talking about here? And I wonder if that

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>is going to happen under Matteo Rensey's leadership. The window

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of opportunity is is getting smaller because uh, you know

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 1>as all because at least for the next twelve months

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you have support from ECB, Dewy and UH and a

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>strong dollar thanks to h tromponomics so to speak. Um.

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>But you know, very gradually we will see uh, well

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>will see strengthening in the euro Uh. The ECB will

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>have to start tapering its asset purchases and that means

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>we will be even more exposed to a higher global

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 1>youth and there will be increase in political uncertainty across Europe.

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>We have elections in the Netherlands, um in in in

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>France and in Germany. So it's it's a combination of

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>all these factors. Not to forget it really might be

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>heading towards another towards its own general elections. So I

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 1>guess the visitor really is narrowing, especially if you look

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>at the banking sector. Um. Uh So at this point

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 1>in time, what is helping the sector survive is whatever

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>literally nominal GDP broad that they have and and and

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a chief actor driving back to the weaker Euro. So

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>once these things take to roy it will it will

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 1>be quite a nasty scenario. Okay, you just hit on

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:16.879
<v Speaker 1>the discussion point. They've got to get away from the

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>over value euro. Do they do that within the euro

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>model or do you just presume some form of depreciation

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>towards a renewed Italian lira. Um. I guess, but I

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:39.120
<v Speaker 1>think stands it will have to you know, the the

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:42.440
<v Speaker 1>need to suppose at this at least at this point

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>in time, it's coming from the c D two. But

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:48.159
<v Speaker 1>gradually want the your stars to strength, and thanks to

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 1>strength in the German economy for example, uh, improving corny

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:56.119
<v Speaker 1>concerts in your in your area, I guess the the

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>burden of balancing will will fall back on on Themandi

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>station Uh. And that's really quite a punitive way to

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>address the problem. Uh. Notwithstanding the very very high non

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:11.639
<v Speaker 1>performing loan version of the banking sector. I would struck

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 1>in your report. Uh, the degree to which so much

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 1>of of the Italian economy's troubles right now you attribute

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to what happened with the w t O and China

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:22.680
<v Speaker 1>signed onto the w t O. Why would that happen?

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Was Italy hit so profoundly hard? Um? Yeah, So we

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>call it three strikes and you're out. So the first

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>strike was the information and communications technology, which Italian of

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 1>businesses quite well, we're quite a lagged in terms of

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>adopting those technologies. And again the reasons are, you know,

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>this this sort of relationship based U based businesses where

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>where people are not really and managerial incentives are not

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:56.679
<v Speaker 1>really inclined towards profit for example. The second time was

0:18:56.680 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>was Italy joining the euro and that meant that ment

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the the policy tool that was that it's Italian authority

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:07.160
<v Speaker 1>is so frequently used that the devaluation was no longer

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:10.919
<v Speaker 1>an option to them. And the third strike was was

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:14.879
<v Speaker 1>Italy joining sorry, was China joining the w and and

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the reason why this this hurt Italian economy a lot

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:21.479
<v Speaker 1>more than it did the other European economies is that

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Italian exports are very similar to Chinese exports. They're concentrated

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 1>at the lower value added seconds um and and the

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>d the rigidity on the product product labor, and there

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>is other institutional weaknesses. Thanked that really was more exposed

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to these three forces external forces than many other economy

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 1>within the area. We continue to see that. Try to

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:51.880
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, saying with Lombard Street Research this

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>morning and Italy, who you put your trust in matters.

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Investors have put their trust in independent registered investment advisors

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to the tune of four trillion dollars. Why they see

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 1>their role is to serve, not sell. That's why Charles

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Schwab is committed to the success of over seven thousand

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 1>independent financial advisors who passionately dedicate themselves to helping people

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>achieve their financial goals. Learn more and find your independent

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 1>advisor dot com we go now at. Stephen Shork, editor

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 1>of the eponymous Short Report out of Philadelphia, spoke with

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:41.640
<v Speaker 1>him yesterday. He expressed some skepticism that OPEC delegates would

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:43.919
<v Speaker 1>be able to come to an agreement on a production freeze. Indeed,

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News reporting this morning according to two delegates they

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:50.400
<v Speaker 1>have agreed to a freeze here on this the first

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>day of that OPEC meeting in Vienna at Stephen Shork.

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Great to have you with us here is that it

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>all said and done. We haven't a great It's really

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>this simple, right. So I was on bloomberg yest today

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:08.719
<v Speaker 1>expressed my skepticism that we would get it. I'm on

0:21:08.760 --> 0:21:13.399
<v Speaker 1>today and the premise of that my skepticism still holds

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:17.359
<v Speaker 1>that I based it on the fact that without a

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:21.680
<v Speaker 1>material concession by Iran, I couldn't see how Saudi Arabia

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:23.680
<v Speaker 1>could ever sign off on this deal, and hence why

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:25.920
<v Speaker 1>they've been at loggerheads now for the past two years.

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 1>So with the preliminary data coming out, what I'm reading

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:32.880
<v Speaker 1>off of my Bloomberg here is that OPEC has agreed

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and let's let's let's mind you this isn't official. It

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 1>is coming from an anonymous source, but OPEC has agreed

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:43.400
<v Speaker 1>to cut production by one point two million barrels a day. Now.

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Interestingly enough, Iran is going to be able to up

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>its production to three point nine million barrels a day,

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>So at three point seven currently with Iran, that means

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>i Ran adds two hundred thousand barrels to the market,

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 1>which means now other OPEC members have to cut one

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>point four million arles a day. So of course that's

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be meaning that Saudi Arabia and Iraq are

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:08.880
<v Speaker 1>going to have to bury the brunt of this. And

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:13.119
<v Speaker 1>and once again, guys, I'm extremely skeptical of this report.

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:15.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't see how Saudi Arabia signs off on it.

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:18.160
<v Speaker 1>But in the here and the now, that's the headline

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and the markets rage respect. I don't know if you've

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 1>seen it. I put it on Twitter, Stephen Short because

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>my good morning. There is a spectacular Bloomberg gad Fly

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>article for Liam Dunning and right co writing and it

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:38.679
<v Speaker 1>focuses on demand. Gus what you see for oil demand?

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Gad Fly says it's gonna vapor away. China is at

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the margin. But what is oil demand in the United States?

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Steve that you own, I mean, what what does demand

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:54.359
<v Speaker 1>like in Kansas or Florida or Washington State? Well, in

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the here, in the miror And this is the premise

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>why I think OPEC should and would want to keep

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 1>oil prices as low as possible because demand here in

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:04.959
<v Speaker 1>the United States, we just came out of last summer

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 1>with the greatest demand for gasoline that we've ever seen.

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:11.199
<v Speaker 1>And why was that. It's because of a losticity of demand.

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:13.679
<v Speaker 1>Two dollars a gallon, you get a lot more people

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>on the road, driving bigger, larger, longer distances. Uh. And

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:20.880
<v Speaker 1>so demand was very strong. And this is what OPEC

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 1>essentially needs to have to happen, because what I also

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:28.159
<v Speaker 1>spoke about on Bloomer yesterday is the Tesla effect. You

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:30.879
<v Speaker 1>remember ten years ago we're all talking about. Well, I

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>wasn't because I always thought it was a fallacy. But

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 1>peak oil supply today, because of alternative fuels, we are

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about peak oil demand. And so each dollar you

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 1>raised the barrel of oil is a marginal decrease in

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the entry barrier for alternative fuels. So even driving into

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:52.359
<v Speaker 1>the studio yesterday into Philadelphia on the school goal, I

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 1>saw four teslas. This is Philadelphia, for crying out live

0:23:56.200 --> 0:24:00.040
<v Speaker 1>driving Tesla's in Philadelphia. That means this is really a

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:02.920
<v Speaker 1>harding to take off. And so we're looking into we're

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about the long term relevancy of OPEC and if

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>they succeed in driving oil prices to a level where

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:13.399
<v Speaker 1>we start to see gasoline prices well above three dollars. Well,

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that is only going to eat into demand longer term out.

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 1>So this is a long this is a long term

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>existential threat to back in all oil producers in here

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and they now, uh right now because me in the future.

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Right now, what we have is this is great news

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>help for US producer. Yes, Steven, We've been talking a

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 1>lot about the role that Moscow is playing here, the

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:37.680
<v Speaker 1>role of Russia here, and I wonder what that says

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 1>about the the the medium term future, the future of

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>OPEC that so much emphasis was placed on Russia. An

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 1>opaque member. Yeah, and I trust, I mean, I trust

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the crimblin, don't you I'm putin seems like a pretty

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 1>stand up guy. And and why why wouldn't we believe

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>anything that comes out of Russia nowadays? Uh So, that said,

0:24:56.800 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>if we look about if we go back to April,

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 1>this is when US production hit a modern day record.

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Since April two, US producers have taken off the market

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:11.680
<v Speaker 1>one point one million bars a day. At that same time,

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:15.160
<v Speaker 1>OPEC has added two point six million barrels a day.

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Russia has added in additional six barrels a day, So essentially,

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>for everyone, barrel the U S producer took off Opec

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:26.879
<v Speaker 1>in Russia added back three barrels. So now we're talking

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>about trying to take some of that added oil back

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to the market. Um, to take that oil back off

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the market from Opec in Russia. Him again, highly skeptical.

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe a thing that comes out of if

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>put put it this way. Putin's lips are moving. He's lying,

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:46.120
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know why. But again, markets up three

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars and fifty cents. But this is great news to

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the Canadian producer and the US because they're gonna start

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to add out a lot barrel and one minute left,

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>one minute left. What is the dynamics of price on

0:25:57.320 --> 0:26:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the downside if we get a Steve short break, Yes,

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 1>forty a big resistance or could we revisit twenty nine

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars a barrel? Oh? I think we can. Yeah, if

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 1>this all turns out to be smoking mirrors, and if

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>they come out with their official statement and they and

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 1>they punt and um, then this obviously this is going

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:20.880
<v Speaker 1>to um evaporate. So yes we can. Forty is nothing

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 1>but a psychological moment. There's nothing magical about that. But

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 1>certainly with stagnant demand growth. And that's not me, that's

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the I e. A. Saying stagnant demand growth through next year.

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:32.920
<v Speaker 1>We could certainly see sub thirty dollars oil if if

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>this deal turns out to be a far but in

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:38.200
<v Speaker 1>here and the now, stay away from it. We're headed

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 1>back to over fifty dollars if this, if they do

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>make good on the deal. Stephen Shark, thank you so much.

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:46.919
<v Speaker 1>A Shark report on oil and gas and valves and

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 1>pipelines and all things energy. I mean, you know, Francy

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:55.120
<v Speaker 1>mentioned it brilliantly today. David Girl, We in America don't

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:58.680
<v Speaker 1>understand the frenzy of an opaqu com meeting. You're saying,

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:00.920
<v Speaker 1>so you wish you could cover one with you. I've

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:04.119
<v Speaker 1>never been, but Francine says, it's bizarre. It's all these

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>informal little chit chats with reporters and a handline will

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:16.639
<v Speaker 1>come out stopping doors stopping. Yeah, they're stopping exactly, and

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:19.640
<v Speaker 1>there's like a single headline comes out in granted, Bloomberg

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>is the fastest and best, and headlines are heard and

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the oil price moves and then here's a new one.

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:28.479
<v Speaker 1>Just kneel hum out on Twitter and it's a Bloomberg headline.

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:32.120
<v Speaker 1>OPEC ministers still debating details of oil. I'll put cut

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 1>proposal for some countries. I have no idea what I'm reading,

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:38.200
<v Speaker 1>but there is there are more informal breakfast to be had.

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Any way to run a cartel exactly well said, I mean,

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:46.640
<v Speaker 1>how do you run the microeconomics of a cartel? By

0:27:46.720 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 1>scrum Francine is a pro at this Yes, thanks to

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 1>Javier bloss In our oil team, they are there. Stewart

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Wallace leading our we do. Stewart Wallace leads a coverage

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:59.679
<v Speaker 1>in London. Stewart Wallace was with John Rockefeller at the

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>first oil oil Derek east of Cleveland. I mean he

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>goes Stuart Wallace goes back that far. Our next because

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:26.720
<v Speaker 1>David Girl is going to bring in our next guess.

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:29.959
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Scaramuchi. You may not know the name. Mr Trump

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 1>knows his name because he was out early and often

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 1>for Donald Trump when any and all doubted. Mr Scaramuchi

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:41.959
<v Speaker 1>is an interesting guy, toughs economics, Harvard Law School. And

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 1>what is great, uh David about Mr Scaramucci is there

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 1>is an there's like a Mike Piazza energy there like

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 1>day one let's like, let's go. And what's great about

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 1>this is he bought Mike Piazza's jersey years ago, which

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 1>one is wonderful. Game after September eleventh, David, why don't

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you help us? Uh? Maybe is can he make a

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Can he make an announcement right now? Can he transit? If?

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Following Anthony scar A, co founder of Skybridge Capital, executive

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 1>comittee for the Trump transition team. And that's where I

0:29:16.000 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 1>want to start. Anthony, you had a front row seat

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 1>for the parade as it passed through Bedminster and along

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Fifth Avenue. Donald Trump looking at many people for this

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:26.800
<v Speaker 1>job of Treasury Secretary? Why did he settle on Stephen Nuchin?

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I first want to say, if I had Tom's height,

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 1>anything could have been possible for me. Gave it. But

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>on on on the topic of the of the transition

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and Treasury, Stephen Manuchin is a perfect pick for many

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 1>reasons that I'm gonna give you the top three. Number

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 1>one twenty plus year relationship with Donald Trump and with

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Wilbur Ross, the new Income and Commerce Secretary. Number two.

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 1>He is a phenomenal guy and a number of different businesses.

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>He's worked in Hollywood, He's worked on Wall Street. And

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 1>he also built from scratch the finance operation which power

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 1>us through to the presidency. And he was critical in

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the policy piece of our website UH and building the

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 1>tax plan, in all the white papers around the economic

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and trade policy for the Trump campaign. So I know

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 1>this is UH something that it will carry through with

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>him into the administration. And I've had the opportunities know

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Steve now for a quarter century, Anthony. A lot of

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>people here saying we know the background, we know about Goldman, Sachs,

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 1>we know about Hollywood. They want clarity about how Stephen

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Manutin is going to run the Treasury Department. Give us

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 1>some sense of that. Well, listen, he's a very organized guy.

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 1>He's super meticulous. My my, My guess is he's going

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 1>to start with the first order of shop is the

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 1>tax policy and the implementation of the tax policy. UH.

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:49.440
<v Speaker 1>He's already going through the U S. Trade representative list

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 1>with our transition team this morning, Deputy and Under Secretaries

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of Treasury. But the first order of action is going

0:30:56.920 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to be on taxes and getting the Trump tax plan

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 1>into the Congress immediately within the first for days. The

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 1>second big piece of this is working in coordination with

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the President, Secretary of Commerce, and the US trade representatives

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to focus on fair deals and right siding these trade deals.

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 1>As you guys both know, our economic history in the

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>United States is that we've uneven these trade deals to

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>benefit the emerging economies, as we believe that economic interdependence

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:31.479
<v Speaker 1>would lead to less violence around the world. That has

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 1>been very, very successful. But the side product of the

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 1>side that is that hurt the middle class families and

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the working class families in the United States. And so

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:44.959
<v Speaker 1>these guys they understand the Trump trade philosophy better than anybody,

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and they're gonna go back through these deals and you

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 1>saw what happened to Carrier last night, and go back

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 1>through these deals and re fashion them for the American

0:31:52.160 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 1>worker and for the American middle class. So that's how

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna run things. Anthony helped me understand Trump trade policy.

0:31:58.080 --> 0:32:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Every economist I talked to says, when he or she

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 1>is forecasting for the next year, the biggest X factor

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 1>here is what's going to happen with trade. They're worried

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 1>about tariffs. They're worried what that could mean for the

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 1>economy defined for us, what the trade policy is under

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Donald J. Trump. Really, I really feel that people that

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 1>are worried about tariffs are not really understanding the trade policy.

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:20.360
<v Speaker 1>He talked about it, they talked about him on the

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 1>campaign trail. Well, well, no, we're taking a very superficial view.

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 1>What do you what do you have said about tariffs

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 1>on the view is that he had, I mean, you

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 1>know on the campaign trail is that he would use

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 1>them as a bargaining chip if people did not want

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to go through the formal review process and even up

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 1>these trade deals. And so you know that we've had

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>back channel discussions with many many nations at this point. Uh.

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 1>And my guess is is that we are in the

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 1>United States, the largest economy, twenty three point six percent

0:32:51.120 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 1>of the global GDP our trading partners are going to

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 1>want to deal with us, and I think Mr Trump

0:32:57.080 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 1>is sending them a message same way he did to

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Carrier over the weekend, Uh, that we want the things

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to be fair, and want the things to be fair

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 1>for the American worker. The tariffs are a last resort

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 1>proposition if people are making a decision that they don't

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 1>want to treat us fairly. And that's really all there

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 1>is to it. And so This is a free fair

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 1>trade proposition by the Trump administration. And I can't think

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 1>of any two better people in the United States the

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:26.880
<v Speaker 1>prosecute this than Stephen Manuchin and Wilber Ross Anthon. We

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:29.719
<v Speaker 1>got about thirty seconds left here. Donald Trump tweeting this

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 1>morning that he is going to give a press conference

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:34.840
<v Speaker 1>on the fifte December talking about leaving his business. What

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 1>does the Trump organization look like come December fift and

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:40.720
<v Speaker 1>is this in response to criticism of those back channel

0:33:40.760 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 1>deals you're talking about with foreign governments, worries about conflicts

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 1>of interest? Well, listen, you know we're working super hard

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 1>on this. Someone that not not really mentioned it, Don McGann,

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the White Asse Council. You're going to see Mr Trump

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 1>completely removed from the Trump organization. He's leaving that to

0:33:56.280 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 1>his children are going to stay in the organization, and

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 1>it will be a very thick wall between the two.

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 1>In fact that what do you mean to say a wall?

0:34:04.040 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 1>They're not even gonna be talking to each other. As

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:10.719
<v Speaker 1>as it's a phenomenal trophy business. And my guests is

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:12.719
<v Speaker 1>the children are gonna do a really good job on

0:34:12.760 --> 0:34:14.799
<v Speaker 1>that business without the dad, and he's going to be

0:34:14.800 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 1>extremely focused on the American pief All right, Anthony Scaramuchi.

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Remember if Donald Trump's transition team's executive committee, This is Bloomberg.

0:34:29.040 --> 0:34:33.399
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and

0:34:33.480 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews on iTunes, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm out on Twitter at Tom Keene. David

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Gura is at David Gura. Before the podcast, you can

0:34:46.080 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio. Who you put

0:35:02.520 --> 0:35:06.439
<v Speaker 1>your trust in matters. Investors have put their trust in

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:10.719
<v Speaker 1>independent registered investment advisors to the tune of four trillion dollars.

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:17.799
<v Speaker 1>Why learn more and find your independent advisor dot com