WEBVTT - 2% Inflation is a Ceiling Not a Target, Kashkari Says

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Brought you by Bank of America, Mary Lynch. Investing in

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 1>local communities, economies and a sustainable future. That's the power

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of global connections. Mary Lynch, Pierce Fenner and Smith Incorporated

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Member s I p C. Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast.

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Keene with David Gura. Daily we bring you

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Find Bloomberg Surveillance on iTunes, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot Com, and

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of course on the Bloomberg. Now joining us is someone

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that was way out front. In fact, maybe President Trump

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>read his book The Price of Civilization. Jeffrey Sachs is

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>at Columbia University. He is a guide to world liberal

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>He is someone who does not agree with the president,

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>but he has to see how the president applies policy here.

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>You were way out front on the struggles of this

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>nation with your book Price of Civilization. The President struck

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a third rail with the American public, a poorer opulated,

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the different other issues that are out there that are

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>all in your book. I mean you were at what

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:27.959
<v Speaker 1>is the prescription to get this administration to begin a

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:34.319
<v Speaker 1>constructive dialogue with liberals, independence, and Republicans. This administration is

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:38.560
<v Speaker 1>not having a constructive dialogue with anybody right now. What

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:42.039
<v Speaker 1>happened at the G twenty this weekend was alarming. Actually,

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>they couldn't even make a statement opposing protectionism because Steve

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Manuk in the Treasury Secretary, held the ground to say, no,

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to oppose protectionism. We're not going to

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>make a statement about climate change. It's so nineteen to one.

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>The US Trump is absolutely arraying the whole world against

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the U S. You watch it step by step, That's

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:10.799
<v Speaker 1>that's what's happening. Would you suggest and just in one issue,

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the opioid epidemic, Rob Portman, I'm going to suggest doesn't

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>read Jeffrey Sachs. He's a Republican, a moderate from Ohio.

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>He probably is aware of your work, but he doesn't

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>read it word for word. And except right now, you

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and the senator from Ohio have more common ground than

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:31.239
<v Speaker 1>with the president. Can the Democrats co opt a Republican

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>centrist group to oppose this administration? But let me just

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>say a word about what's happening. Our society is falling apart.

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>This has been clear for years. There's a divide between

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 1>those who have a college education, times couldn't be better.

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>And those who have a high school degree. Jobs are falling,

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>wages are falling, mortality rates are rising, opiate addiction rising,

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>suicide rates rising. So along comes the Republican Health Plan.

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>It's to cut the tax at the top and throw

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:10.839
<v Speaker 1>more than twenty million people off of healthcare coverage. Are

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 1>they kidding? Are they kidding? What are they doing? It's

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>dreadful what's going on right now? And we have to

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>say it today. You know you said I'm you introduced

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>me earlier. Is miserable mood because today is supposed to

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>be world It is World Happiness Day and we are

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>releasing the World Happiness Report. The United States is in

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>a free fall right now. Out of the thirty four

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>o C countries, the US Cayman twenty one. We're going

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to come back to that. Yeah. But so, Jeffrey, this

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>is why people voted for Trump, right, He's trying to

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>fix a problem. Now you're saying he's fixing it badly

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and he's focusing on the bad things, or he's going

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>about it the wrong way. How would you deal with

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>this unhappiness or this uneasiness that we clearly saw in

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the American people to give them something better. We would

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>have rich people pay taxes and we would have poor

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>people on healthcare. That's simple. We would say, we tell

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:17.599
<v Speaker 1>the truth in this country that the rich have never

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:21.160
<v Speaker 1>had it better, they've never had more money, they've never

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 1>had more rise of incomes, and they should do something

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 1>for our society. And what he's doing is exactly the opposite.

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:32.600
<v Speaker 1>He's given every single position in this administration to Goldman

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Sacks so that they can cut taxes at the top.

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>It's a but he was but he was voted on

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that platform, right, Yeah, But then it's bait and switch.

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 1>It's complete bait and switch. He said I'm going to

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>fight Wall Street and then he gave every top position

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>in the administration to one company. How much more bait

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and switch can it be? We have to tell the

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>truth about what's happening in this country. It's dramatic, it's

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>a word on the poor. But Jeffrey Sax, do you

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:04.600
<v Speaker 1>actually admit that a lot of people in the US

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 1>voted for President Trump because he was going to deregulate

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and they voted for him. Again, I'm not saying it's

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:13.480
<v Speaker 1>boutter wrong, but this is what people voted for. They

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:16.840
<v Speaker 1>voted for him because he made promises to them and

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>he is lying. I'm sorry, this is the biggest, very

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:23.359
<v Speaker 1>very quickly here did Secretary Clinton loses election because she

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:27.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't go after Midwest Democrats who are more conservative than

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the East Coast liberals like you. She lost the election

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>because she was a lousy candidate and she didn't have

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:37.600
<v Speaker 1>a position that people trusted. And Donald Trump said I'm

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>going to help you, and what he's doing is helping

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 1>his billionaire buddies. It's so clear, it's obvious as long

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:47.119
<v Speaker 1>as we look at what he's really doing. Don't watch

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>what he tweets, watch what he says, watch what he's doing.

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I feel miserable. We're gonna talk happiness to Jeffrey Sachs

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>here in Am. I just had a nightmare thought Jeffrey

0:05:56.560 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Sachs playing golf with Donald Trump floor around. That would

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>be quite around, to say the least. Jeff Sex, thank

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Feel l joining us some p K

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:24.039
<v Speaker 1>burlicer on oil. Phil. We've got your new research note

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and folks, we protect the copyright of our guests. I'm

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:28.919
<v Speaker 1>not going to send it out to you, and you

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>go right to gasoline. Why does a pro like you

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>look at gasoline dynamics, Well something, Gasoline is probably excuse,

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>probably the most important component of petroleum demand, and it's

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>also the one that's most influenced by economic cycles and

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>by expectations. UH. And and this report, UH what I've

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:53.839
<v Speaker 1>been writing about for a while. I've been looking at

0:06:54.560 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the failure, essentially of most following the market to recognized

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the consumers respond in an anticipatory fashion. You know, I

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:10.239
<v Speaker 1>take take my cues from my gold class making good friends.

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Stand Fisher of the FED Monitorists talk about expectations and

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>how consumers adjust ahead of time when they hear news

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>about changes in the FED. Right, consumers have done the

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 1>same thing. In the case of gasoline. We had strong

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>growth and gasoline on a year over year basis every

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>month UH in two thousand and fifteen and two thousand

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and sixteen until OPEC said, oh, Saudi Arabia said we

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>want to raise oil prices. And then consumers heard the

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>news and immediately began changing their consumering pattern. Nothing surprising here.

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 1>The big surprises that those who follow the market, follow

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>oil markets totally ignore this. And gasoline is you know,

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 1>a good portion of petroleum demand. How tight is this

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>market getting right now? How tight is the gas market getting?

0:07:56.680 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Gasolene market is getting a little tighter because people produced

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a less less and because a good deal of gasolene

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>has been exported. Uh. The gasolene was flashing around the

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>East Coast two or three weeks ago to uh maybe

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>a month ago, and large volumes were sent to other

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>parts of the world because the prices just couldn't be

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>held up. But you know, gasoline supply is getting a

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>little tight, but gasolene demands looks to be down relative

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to UH last year by about two three. I know

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>you're paying close attention to that Sarah conference in Houston

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:35.920
<v Speaker 1>a week or two ago, the h s Market conference.

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>And what's the biggest news that came out of there

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 1>is you listen to all those speakers on stage in Houston.

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Um I was. I wasn't there. Uh you know you're

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna and I haven't spoken since uh and the but

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the news that came out to me was the attempt

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>by the oil exporting countries to try to get US

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>producers to cooperate. Uh. They had a dinner, UH, they

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>had the Nigerian delegation. I had had the dinner, and uh,

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:09.479
<v Speaker 1>every anti trust lawyer in the country must have been squirming,

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>because you know, the idea of a group of producers

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>getting together to talk about controlling production any place in

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the world is scary, but doing the United States is

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 1>really dangerous and it shows opex desperation, the producer desperation. Uh.

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>With essentially the change in technology and drilling and finding oil. Uh,

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>they are working. Uh. You know, the U S producers

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 1>are working extremely hard to drive costs down. And and

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>More's law the more from Intel that technology doubles every uh,

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 1>with every new generation or speed doubles applies to oil fracking.

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>So suddenly people are talking about being profitable with twenty barrel.

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 1>So we had a real moment ten days ago. Edward

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:56.719
<v Speaker 1>more Stark on the door the acclaimed oil or theologist

0:09:56.720 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>at City Group and basically said, oils stupid. Maybe it

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:04.559
<v Speaker 1>works higher, but he said, given a longer time frame

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>we go to the land of Phil Verlager, which is

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>cheaper oil, what will be the catalyst if we have stability,

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 1>if we go to somewhat of a higher per barrel,

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>what will be the catalyst to get us to the

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Verlager vision? Well, it'll be it'll be a the same

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of catalyst, the catalysts technology. Uh, the fact that

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>every every time we drill another well, we're finding new things.

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>One of the stateless lumber shades president out there came

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>out with a statement that the amount of data one

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>uses right now for a well, uh, is the amount

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>of constitutes the amount of data on to high definition television,

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>tell of movies. I mean, big data is just beginning

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 1>to arrive into the oil business. And when did it arise.

0:10:56.720 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>We're just going to have an overwhelming falling calos and

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>an overwhelming expansion and opportunity. And it's gonna happen here.

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna happen in Argentina where there's a great opportunity.

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna happen in Russian where there's a great deal

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>of shale. Uh, we're gonna you know, two years ago

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:15.559
<v Speaker 1>or a year and a half ago, Spencer Dale of

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>BT came out with a thing, and I think I

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>came out with about the same simultaneously. But is the

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>oil is no longer a finite resource? Uh, so much

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 1>oil is gonna have to be left in the ground.

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>It's really a race to see who loses. You are

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 1>you very kindly quote and praise our colleagues that Liam

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Denning and Halfier have bloss here of Bloomberg News on

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the issue of technology. And what I find fascinating is

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 1>how the old hands, the oil producers are processing all

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>of this technological change. Talk a bit about that, how

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>they're how they're facing this change. Well, it's not the

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not really the oil producers, it's the companies like

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:54.679
<v Speaker 1>Slumberge and so on. Now I'm a visiting fellow at

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the School of Minds. We've just moved here to Denver,

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>and the School of mind produces some of the best engineers,

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 1>uh in the world. It's been recognized for years. And

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>what what what's happening is all these young engineers are

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:09.839
<v Speaker 1>coming out knowing all these new technologies. So a woman

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I know is working uh for for slumbers j I

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>think down in Texas comes out is totally trained in

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>new technology and everything, and they bring all this technology

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to the to the drilling companies, and then the drilling

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:26.959
<v Speaker 1>companies apply it steadily, uh, to the to the wells

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and and just essentially bring along these the companies who

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 1>are are developing. It's it's in many ways. It's like

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the agricultural business. It's the farmers are the customers for

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the John Deere's and the Monsantos, the Montsando's producers of

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:46.679
<v Speaker 1>the new the new UH seeds, and the farmers by

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the seeds and double the triple their their products. So

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's that sort of relationship. And the universities

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and the companies like Slumber, J. Baker Hughes are just

0:12:56.800 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 1>all developing these technologies and driving costs down. What do

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 1>you do in Golden Colorado? Is this like a big

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>salary and a six pack? Of course, every time it

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>comes out of the faucet. I've moved down their UH.

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Friend of mine who's teaching there, I was supposed to

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 1>teach their back in the early nineties and had a

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 1>medical issue. Um asked me. They have a new research institute,

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the Pain Institute. And what I'm looking for is is

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity to work with some of these younger students

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and and spread the economics and and and as I

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>said when I was talking about the demand here in Gasolene,

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>is the monetary economists have moved ahead with rational expectations.

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>And you just read their material and Stanley's and I've

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>watched therely for years and that this whole economics, the

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>way of thinking about backing out demand for petroleum has

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's come back soil f earliger with this on the

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Colorado school of mind. What have we learned about the

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>role of OPEC now and going forward in light of

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen since that deal was inked a few

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 1>months back. Well, OPEC has been struggling to be relevant

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 1>for several years UM. In the early part of this decade,

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:17.199
<v Speaker 1>we had a series of disruptions of supply in Nigeria, Libya,

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Syria and the tight oil market, and you know, OPEC

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 1>essentially ignored what was going on and produced at full rate,

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>so it was no different than the market for week uh.

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>When the production disruptions essentially passed and the US oil

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>supply came in, the organization looks to try to reorganize

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>and this is the way Cartel's work and cut production

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and the sustained prices, and what they have found is

0:14:52.320 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>that essentially in today's world they are at best a

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 1>very marginal player as an organization. The reason is that

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 1>demand is now a good deal more price sensitive. Who

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>spoke about the consumers responding quickly to news of higher prices.

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Consumers are more astute. And secondly that the supply response

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>is much quicker and the costs again as we were

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 1>talking on the previous segment, are falling much more rapidly.

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 1>So OPEC I think is opex day has passed? And

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>UH the organism attempts by groups of countries such as

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>especially high cost countries producers like Venezuela are waging a

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>regard war that they are not ultimately going to be successful,

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 1>but they may hold prices up a little bit and

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>just provide a much greater incentive for UH lots of

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>small producers, relatively small problem producers such as E G,

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>E O G and others, and UH pioneer just to

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>keep pushing ahead and expand supply. UH. You know, if

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you want to say, put it bluntly, UH, they've been

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>overtaken by technology. I'm still confused here about the metrics

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>that we use to gauge how these countries are upholding

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>their ends of the barn. With Saudi Arabia in particularly,

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 1>they released their own figures. We had figures from the

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>International Organization as well. What do you prize more when

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 1>you're when you're looking for for outputs, say what are

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>you looking at? I very rarely try to do that.

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>What I do is I turned to the market. I

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 1>turned to the futures market. Uh you know. I was

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>when the company called Drexel Burning was around. I was

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 1>helping create this market. And today we have over five

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and almost five and a half billion barrels of oil

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>outstanding in futures contracts. And what you do is you

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>look at the shape of the forward price curve and

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 1>how the companies are responding, and you look at the

0:16:56.160 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>cash prices. It is you know what OPEC says it's

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:04.160
<v Speaker 1>doing is it has become irrelevant. Now I know this

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:06.400
<v Speaker 1>is this is what people have watched for fifty years.

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>And as I'm moving into this new home, we got

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>a hundred boxes of file cabinets and books and you

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:12.880
<v Speaker 1>look at all these old books and so on where

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>people talked about OPEC and how we had to follow

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>production and so on, and and it's all quaint. It's

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:23.120
<v Speaker 1>it's like filing away old train schedules when you used

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to use the train to go across the country. I mean,

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I look still at where we are, and we've gone

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>from a hundred dollar framework down to twenty nine and

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>back up to fifty ish. When you think about it

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 1>every day, what is the thing our audience should watch

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 1>in the oil market? If I were what, you know,

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:48.959
<v Speaker 1>if i'm I thought, I'm an investor, I wouldn't be

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 1>watching so much the oil market because it's it's it's

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:56.239
<v Speaker 1>not going to move dramatically. Uh. What I'm watching is

0:17:56.520 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>uh North Korea. Uh so you go act of political

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>analysis that if somebody does something that takes a lot

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of demand off the market, which is what an attack

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 1>on North Korea would do, or takes a lot of

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 1>supply off the market, you're going to be in a

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:20.880
<v Speaker 1>very different situation. And every commodity market is this way.

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, you look at copper. There's this big strike

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 1>down in Chili that's changed the dynamic copper market. It

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:32.359
<v Speaker 1>is something like that. You know, I picked North Korea

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:35.919
<v Speaker 1>because that's the highest scary thing right now, but it

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 1>is you know, it is not in the oil market

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:43.400
<v Speaker 1>right now. Okay, so we gotta leave it there. Feel

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>really good, Thank you so much, and congratulations on analysis

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 1>of gasoline. Is the dynamic going into the warmer season

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>brought you by Bank of America. Mary Lynch dedicated to

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>bringing our clients insights and solutions to meet the challenges

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of a transforming world. That's the power of global connections.

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Mary Lynch, Pierce Federan Smith Incorporated Member s I p C.

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>On the Spectum Enterprise phone line. Jack Bogo, Mr Bogo,

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>wonderful to speak to you again. What has changed is

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:29.120
<v Speaker 1>not so much the migration of billions of dollars from

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>active to passive, but just in the last six months

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 1>we are now it what appears to be a crisis

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 1>moment for active managers, mergers, mergers, mergers, cutting of costs,

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:46.640
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. Where will active management be in five years, Well,

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 1>it will almost certainly be a smaller proportion of the

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>mutual fund industry and than it is today. And today

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:59.199
<v Speaker 1>passive is around mutual fund equity mutual funds, and you know,

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>it could get it gets very tough to build these numbers,

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:06.120
<v Speaker 1>these share numbers. But I would say probably five years

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>from now it would be maybe maybe over forty five.

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>There's a very strong tide out there, tom as you know,

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 1>and amazingly, I mean the the e t F I'm sorry,

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the Total Index fun business. I was doing a bad

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 1>forty billion last year and this year forty billion a

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>month a month, and this year in the first two

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>months it's something like sixty seven billion. That's a huge

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 1>increase in UM in index fund close. I haven't seen

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:39.400
<v Speaker 1>all the data for active management, but they're still very, very,

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:41.639
<v Speaker 1>very negative. I want to quote a letter here from

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 1>one Warren Buffett of Omaha, Nebraska. Quote. If a statue

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 1>is ever erected to honor the person who's done the

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>most for American investors, the hands down choice should be

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Jack Bogel. What's your relationship like with with Warren Buffett?

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>And how how closely, how in sync or your two

0:20:55.520 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 1>investing strategies. Well, are in many accidentical. And I first

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:04.920
<v Speaker 1>met Warren probably in about five out of the State

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Securities Commissioners meeting and in San Diego, California. We had

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 1>a nice chat and we stayed in touch really a

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Ever since. He's written forwards to my books.

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 1>He's done a great blurb if you will endorsement of

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the tenth anniversary edition of my little Book of Common

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Sense Investing, which will be coming out in the ball

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's right there in the cover of the book

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:31.119
<v Speaker 1>and that book has been He greatly admired that book,

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:34.679
<v Speaker 1>greatly admires it, and every time he speaks about it,

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>up go the sales. He has a lot of a

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:40.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of effect. But you know, it's so close. He

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>he recommends the S and P five just about every

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>regular investor. He's leaving a trust for his wife and

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>he has directed that invested in the Vanguards seven s

0:21:53.640 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and Index fund. You know, decades on he gets a

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:08.439
<v Speaker 1>shameless plug in. There again, you got the plug in

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>for the Vanguard funds. Jack there with Mr Buffet, I

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 1>get there's David continued, I. I can't avoid the plug.

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>He was the one that plug there you go, there

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:20.880
<v Speaker 1>you go. We were talking with Arthur Levin a moment

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 1>ago about the passive versus active debate, and I asked

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>him how close we are to settling it? What's what's

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 1>your sense of that? Well, we've seen something very very

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:33.160
<v Speaker 1>few people have talked about this, but what we've really

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 1>done has moved active to a different section. Exchange traded funds,

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>which are the big driver this year. They haven't always

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>been in recent years, but they are right now. And

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 1>that is people who are doing a lot of trading

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:49.919
<v Speaker 1>a lot of activity in their index fund investing. And

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can buy an index fun and bet

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 1>whether the markets going up or down today and get

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>three times leverage. I'm not sure exactly what sense that makes,

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and I would recommend nobody do it. But there's some

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.479
<v Speaker 1>very aggressive e t s out there. There's a very

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 1>undiversified e t s out there, and there's a lot

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of trading. These e t s are turning over it

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>while the Spider, the most popular stock in the world

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 1>every day, the Standards and Boors five under e t

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 1>F run by State Street has an annualized turnover at

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the moment of two thousand percent a year. Two percent

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:23.679
<v Speaker 1>a year. I mean, I'm the kind of guy Toma

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 1>thinks three percent a year is pushing the envelope. Yeah,

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I I look jack at this debate, and

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 1>again I look at the M and A, and it

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 1>really just comes back to the theory, which you know

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 1>your expert on among others of modern portfolio management. What

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 1>did they get wrong the act of tom Let me

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 1>respectfully disagree with that. You know, I had never heard

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 1>of modern port folio theory. And when I started the

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>first FUN back in back in nineteen seventy five recommend

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:01.919
<v Speaker 1>into the board of directors and got it approved here

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>at Vanguard, the first index fund, And all I did

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>was look at the record. I'm the pragmatic indexer. The

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 1>record shows very clearly, and it showed the same thing

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:14.679
<v Speaker 1>to the great economist Paul Samuelson, that the record shows

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 1>clearly that most managers, if not all managers, cannot consistently

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 1>beat the stock market. And when you think about it, Tom,

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:26.160
<v Speaker 1>how could they. They're all average, They're competing with each other,

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and the market is the average. So if you take

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:30.119
<v Speaker 1>out a little bit every year, you'll do better than

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:31.879
<v Speaker 1>the guys that are taking out the great hunks of

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:36.920
<v Speaker 1>money every every day. Very quickly. Here, I'm just I'm disappointed, sir,

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:40.199
<v Speaker 1>you don't have Princeton the champion of the final four. Gonzaga.

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>What is it about Gonzaga that Jack Bocal likes. Well,

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 1>they're they're little, they were pretty unknown four or five

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:53.120
<v Speaker 1>years ago, and they've gone from being a constant underdog

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to you know, a rising star. And one of these

0:24:57.560 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 1>days that the star will will be aligned with some

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty good things. So that was my guest. That's good,

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Jack Bogel, thank you so much greatly appreciated. Mr Bogel,

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the celebrities that we have within our Bloomberg

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:27.880
<v Speaker 1>brackets today, the aerospace engineer at the Minneapolis Fed, Neil

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 1>at cash carry Um, the president of the Minneapolis Fed.

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:34.680
<v Speaker 1>In a recent UH dissenter, Neil, I want to get

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>away from the four questions you've been asked in the

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:41.199
<v Speaker 1>forty seven interviews you've done sense of descent, and I

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>want to get a little Matthew, as you put in

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:46.119
<v Speaker 1>your wonderful note with a lot of good charts on

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:50.119
<v Speaker 1>why I dissented. You talk about linearity, and you talked

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:54.919
<v Speaker 1>about the vector of inflation in this worry that we

0:25:55.000 --> 0:26:00.040
<v Speaker 1>get convexity or acceleration or a second derivative move in

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:04.680
<v Speaker 1>inflation at some point. Discuss the evidence from your PhDs

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:09.119
<v Speaker 1>that we can get an acceleration of inflation at a

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>certain tipping point. Well, first of all, Tom, I'm good

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>to talk to you, and thanks for having me. Well,

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing I'm pushing our PhD saying, show me

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the evidence of this downlinearity, and there isn't any. I

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 1>mean the question is all of our models work and

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:29.360
<v Speaker 1>are based on the premise of inflation expectations being anchored.

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:33.680
<v Speaker 1>If inflation expectations get unanchored, they break somehow, then all

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>sorts of bad things can happen. We don't know what

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:40.679
<v Speaker 1>causes inflation expectations to break or to become unanchored, but

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 1>all the data right now suggests they are rock solid anchored,

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and investors appropriately really believe the Federal Reserve that we're

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:51.160
<v Speaker 1>committed to not letting inflation take off. And so if

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:54.159
<v Speaker 1>that's the case, then I don't see this big concern

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that inflations all of a sudden going to go above target.

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Help me with horse and cart, David Gara, This is

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 1>an extreme, a complex economic model of the horse before

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the cart. When you showed up at the University of

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Illinois Urban a years ago, Champagne, I thought you were

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:12.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe it came on a horse and a

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 1>cart or something equivalent to it. Can the FED be

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the horse or by definition is the FED the cart?

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:25.360
<v Speaker 1>And must act ex post in light of visible evidence? Well,

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how else to behave and conduct policy

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:32.639
<v Speaker 1>other than the look at the evidence. Otherwise we're just guessing.

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Because for the past five or six years, the Sutter

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Reserve has been consistently guessing the form C participants that

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:42.160
<v Speaker 1>inflation is around the corner, and if they had acted

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 1>based on those guesses, they would have hurt the economy.

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 1>And so I'm saying, we've been guessing wrong for five

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:51.879
<v Speaker 1>or six years. Let's stop guessing. Let's just focus on

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the data and let the data guide us present cast car.

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I look back on the speech that FED your Janet

0:27:57.480 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Yellen gave in Chicago ahead of the last meeting, and

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 1>something that she said a couple of times is the

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:04.160
<v Speaker 1>FED has not fallen behind the curve when it comes

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to inflation, when it comes to the labor market. I

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 1>understand you're very concerned about their being slack. How worried

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 1>are you about the FED falling behind the curve? I'm not.

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I agree with her about that, and not in terms

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 1>of we're not too late, because here's the thing. From

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:22.359
<v Speaker 1>a risk management perspective, we have very powerful tools to

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 1>raise rates to bottle up inflation if it starts to accelerate.

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>We have far fewer tools, as do other central banks

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:32.679
<v Speaker 1>around the world to deal with very low inflation. And

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 1>so from a risk management perspective, that also tells us

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 1>we should be patient, allow inflation to build back towards targets.

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 1>So I agree with her. I don't think we're behind

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the curve, but if we are, we have the tools

0:28:43.600 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 1>to and the will to deal with it. At the

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 1>end of the last statement, it says voting against the

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 1>action with Neil cash Car who preferred at this meeting

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to maintain the existing target range for the federal funds. Right,

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>you go on and write a very extended medium post

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 1>explaining why in fact that you did that incredibly valuable

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to somebody like me or does somebody like Tom. You

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 1>also note that of the medium term inflation forecasts in

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the semi economic projections have been too high. What's wrong

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>with the Fed's ability to forecast right now? And is

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 1>there a way to change the forecasting mechanism? You know,

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 1>people are doing their very best, and we have some

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 1>of the best economists, the best PC's in the world,

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 1>helping us to think through these issues. I think we

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 1>all have this desire to go back to normal, that

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 1>we just think in a couple of years things are

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 1>going to return to normal. And after the financial crisis,

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 1>it has taken the economy a lot longer to return

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 1>to normal. You know, remember over time, the FED is

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 1>really just following what the economy is doing. Over the

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 1>last thirty years, real interest rates have been falling all

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 1>around the world, not because of the FED, not because

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the central banks, because there broader economic forces and we're

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>adjusting around that overall trend. And so uh, I want

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 1>to return to normal to Let's let the data guide us.

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's stop guessing. The other thing I put in that

0:29:57.240 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 1>piece is I think we're behaving as though two per

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 1>sent as a ceiling rather than a target. If we

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 1>really truly believe the two is a target, then we

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 1>should be behaving that way. Within this is a working paper,

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 1>your Minneapolis Fed folks, if you're just joining us, Neils

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 1>carry with this President of the Minneapolis Fed, Amador Bianchi,

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Pacola and Perry about exchange rates and dollar dynamics at

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the zero bound? What's wrong with getting away from the

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:27.959
<v Speaker 1>zero bound? Did share yelling? And can we have a

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 1>few measured rate rises to give us some wiggle room

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 1>if we've got to go back down at some point? Well,

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't find that argument compelling. It's like

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:40.600
<v Speaker 1>saying you're driving down the highway and you think there

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 1>might be a hill coming up so let's let off

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the gas now so that if a hill comes up,

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 1>we can floor it. You know, you're much better off

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:50.200
<v Speaker 1>just maintaining your speed, and then if you reach a hill,

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 1>give it what remaining gas you have left. So this

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 1>preemptive raised hikes just so we can turn around and

0:30:56.760 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 1>cut them. I don't actually think that that makes sense.

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we just need to allow the economy to

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 1>continue to perform, allow inflation to gradually go up to target,

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 1>allow the labor market to continue using up slack, and

0:31:08.200 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 1>then raise rates when the data call for it. You

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the data. What's your preferred set of data when

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 1>it comes to inflation? What are you looking at? What's

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Neil cash Car looking at? You know, there's the number

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 1>one thing that I look at is twelvemonth core PC

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 1>personal consumption expenditures. At the prior f MC meeting, it

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 1>was around one point seven year over year. It's now

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 1>ticked up to one point seven, but it's still well

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 1>below our two percent target. And the reason we focus

0:31:35.400 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 1>on core is because core is the best predictor we

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:42.320
<v Speaker 1>know of of future headline inflation. So we do care

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 1>about headline inflation, but we know that energy and food

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 1>bounce around a lot, so we focus on Core as

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a forward indicating give us an update on too Big

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to Fail? Are you and James Diamond on speaking terms, Well,

0:31:55.200 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I haven't spoken of it quite a while. UM I

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 1>would hope that he would admit it that JP Morgan

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and Goldman Sachs and Bank of America are still too

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 1>big to fail because if they got into trouble today,

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve and the Treasury would have to step

0:32:10.040 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 1>in to stabilize them, not for their own sake, but

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 1>because of the damage they would do to the U.

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 1>S economy. And I think Republicans and Democrats agree we

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 1>need to do something about that. President cash Curry, thank

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Neil cash Cary with a miniapluis fed

0:32:23.320 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 1>uh with with a different view and an important view.

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I can't say enough about their website. All of the

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>FEDS have distinctive websites, and the mini appus FED as

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 1>a terrific Lincoln sure of their district including agriculture, along

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 1>with the independence that's been seen for decades from the

0:32:42.840 --> 0:32:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Minnieapolis uh fed Uh. Neil cash Curry today on the

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Spectrum Enterprise phoneline is what do we learned to David.

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm really glad that he did write this,

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 1>this piece of the medium, and I don't know if

0:32:54.880 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 1>he's going to do that after every meeting, but it

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 1>is certainly insightful. You know, we listen to the speeches,

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:00.960
<v Speaker 1>we look at the trans to the speeches, but to

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 1>have this sort of considered assessment of why he voted

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the way he did, I thought was great. So agree

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 1>and with great charts, which you would expect from engineer

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Cash carrigs Well, a real different take on how to

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 1>do monetary transparency. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast.

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Subscribe and listen to interviews on iTunes, SoundCloud, or whichever

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm out on Twitter at Tom Keene.

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>David Gura is at David Gura. Before the podcast, you

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio, brought you

0:33:57.280 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 1>by Bank of America Mary Lynch. Dedicated to bringing our

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 1>clients insights and solutions to meet the challenges of a

0:34:04.600 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 1>transforming world. That's the power of global connections. Marylynch, Pierce,

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Fenner and Smith Incorporated Member s I p C.