WEBVTT - Daniel Yergin on What Happened to the Energy Transition

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Authoughts podcast.

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:23.119
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:24.079
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Joe Wasenthal.

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 2>Joe, you know what's weird.

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 3>Tell me what's weird.

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot that's weird. Actually, But we seem to

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 2>be living in this extremely high tech world where you

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 2>can get a chat bot to write you an essay

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 2>or create a video. Sure, you could buy a robot

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 2>dog to play with all that stuff, and yet we

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 2>still seem to be struggling somewhat to provide cheap and

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 2>affordable and abundant energy to power all these things. And

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 2>in fact, because all this new technology guzzles so much energy,

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 2>data centers you so much power, it feels like energy

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:05.559
<v Speaker 2>is becoming even more strategically important in many ways.

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 3>It definitely feels like we're in an age of sort

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 3>of people remembering the deep constraints that energy, yeah imposes,

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 3>whether it's data center, all kinds of things. Energy is

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 3>not a solve problem by any stritch, although I would

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:21.679
<v Speaker 3>say that in my limited sort of reading of the

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 3>history of energy, it's never a solved problem. I know,

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:27.400
<v Speaker 3>at the moment we find we're in a period of

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 3>energy surplus, we quickly find something to do with that energy,

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 3>and once again we are in a period of constraint.

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 3>But it does feel like we're in some sort of

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:36.400
<v Speaker 3>period of constraint right now.

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 2>When Caines was doing his whole abundance theory, did he

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:41.399
<v Speaker 2>mention energy at all? What do you say, Well, I'm

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:44.399
<v Speaker 2>just gonna assume that Kaines promised us all abundant energy

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 2>as well as everything else, and it's not here. So

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 2>we're all upset. Okay. So even though we've had all

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 2>these breakthroughs in alternative energy technologies, you know, things like

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 2>solar and wind, we're still using more coal, more oil

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 2>than ever. And in fact, there's sort of some old

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 2>school energy behaviors going on with China stockpiling massive amounts

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 2>of oil.

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, as you said, coal is booming, China stockpiling oil.

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 3>Electricity prices in the US on the rise, maybe perhaps

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 3>due to some of this AI data centered demand. It

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:21.919
<v Speaker 3>feels like I would say pre COVID at least. I

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 3>don't know if people got a little bit naive or

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 3>optimistic or goldilocks, but this view is it's only a

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:28.959
<v Speaker 3>matter of time before energy is solved because we're gonna

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 3>have all this wind and solar is gonna be cheap,

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 3>it's gonna be clean. We see all these cost curves

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 3>coming down with like batteries and wind and so forth.

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 3>It's only a matter of time before we don't need

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 3>the dirty stuff. And right now it doesn't feel we're

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 3>anywhere close to that. And I'm sort of curious what happened.

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, everyone talked about the energy transition, but so

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 2>far it's not really a transition. It's like a compliment

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:50.519
<v Speaker 2>to existing sources. Anyway, we could keep talking, but why

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 2>not go to our guest, who is truly, truly the

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 2>perfect guest. We're gonna be speaking with someone I wanted

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:59.519
<v Speaker 2>to speak with on the podcast for a very long time. Dan,

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:03.359
<v Speaker 2>you're he is, of course, the author of the Pulitzer Prize,

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 2>winning the prize the Epic Quest for Oil, Money and Power.

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 2>He's also vice chairman of SMP Global, and he also

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 2>has a new book out called The New Map, Energy,

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:16.239
<v Speaker 2>Climate and the Clash of Nations. So a lot to

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 2>talk about, Dan, Thank you so much for coming on

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:20.679
<v Speaker 2>all thoughts, It's great to be on with you all.

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 2>So does it feel like energy and security is still

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 2>with us in many forms.

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 4>Yes, it goes through cycles. You know, you mentioned COVID.

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 4>I think during COVID demand went down, prices went down,

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 4>and people kind of forgot about energy, and there was

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 4>a sense in twenty twenty one, International Energy Agency did

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 4>this scenario about getting to basically a renewable world by

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 4>twenty fifty. But now we're in twenty twenty five, going

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 4>into twenty six, energy demand is going up wind and solar,

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 4>but also coal, oil, and natural gas. And this share

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 4>of hydrocarbons and energy has gone from about eighty one

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 4>percent to about eighty point five five percent roughly.

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 3>So it's going to take a while to get down

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 3>to zero in a while.

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 4>You know, though you mentioned energy transition. I think it's

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 4>time to do some rethinking about the energy transition.

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 3>Well good, That's what I was going to ask you about.

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 3>So when people talk about the energy transition, this fantasy

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 3>or you know, maybe fantasy is a little bit scenario

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 3>scenario scenario of Okay, we're going to get to net zero,

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 3>et cetera. Is this just a matter of the timeline

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:27.479
<v Speaker 3>has been pushed back, or is there a fundamental flaw

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 3>with the premise.

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 4>I think certainly the timeline has been pushed back, the

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 4>notion by twenty fifty the closer we get to twenty fifty,

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 4>the farther way, it seems the goal of net zero

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:41.159
<v Speaker 4>by twenty fifty zero. And what Tracy said before energy

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:42.839
<v Speaker 4>transition has been energy addition.

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:44.279
<v Speaker 3>And what happened.

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 4>What happened is I think the reality came back in

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:50.159
<v Speaker 4>that we live in a world that rests on an

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 4>energy foundation, and that you just can't overnight take one

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 4>hundred and fifteen trillion dollar world economy and change it

0:04:57.400 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 4>from one thing to another.

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 2>Are there any scenarios you could see where I guess

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:05.279
<v Speaker 2>new technologies like AI, the data centers that are getting

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 2>built encourage new players to come in and provide capital

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 2>for energy, so you know, Google building their own gas port.

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, exactly what we have now is the tech world

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:19.160
<v Speaker 4>meeting the energy world, and these two worlds have very

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:23.159
<v Speaker 4>different cultures. Tech world, things go happen pretty fast energy.

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 4>You know, in your software engineer come out with new software.

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 4>In the energy world, an engineer takes seven years to

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 4>build something. And these cultures have come together, and I

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:36.040
<v Speaker 4>think one of the reasons that we're seeing kind of

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 4>this called the easy or simple notions and transition pushed

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 4>out is what you've mentioned. It's going to take a

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 4>lot more electricity, and some of that will come from

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 4>windows solar. But what's come back into the picture is

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 4>natural gas is an electric generation. If you wanted to

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 4>go out and buy a gas turbine today, you could

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 4>get it delivered in twenty thirty. If we back go

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 4>back to twenty twenty two. I was talking to one

0:05:57.040 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 4>of the big companies in the field and the guy

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:02.039
<v Speaker 4>said that year, all over the world, exactly one gas

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 4>turbine was sold and it wasn't one of ours. So

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:07.599
<v Speaker 4>we said, our market share that year was zero. Now

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:08.839
<v Speaker 4>they're all sold out.

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 3>Is there an increase in capacity? We talked about this

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 3>recently and this has come up, the shortage of gas turbans.

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:19.280
<v Speaker 3>Is the scarcity being addressed or is there still this

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 3>phenomenon where no one really wants to do the initial

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 3>upfront investment in a say, factory that makes the gas

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 3>turbans because there's still uncertainty about say twenty thirty.

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 4>What I you know, when I talked to the companies,

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 4>those who are around in about two two and a

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 4>half decades ago, remember there was a huge rush turbance

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 4>and then it all collapsed.

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 3>And there were and that was coincidentally or incidentally that

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:46.799
<v Speaker 3>boom was also at a time of massive tech investment

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 3>the late nineties. That was another period of the sort

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 3>of marriage of tech and energy at the time.

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, that's right, and so I think they are expanding capacity,

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:59.159
<v Speaker 4>but they're not doing it helter skelter. Also, like so

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 4>many other companies, the shortage of the talent that you need.

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 4>I mean, these are not simple things to build.

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 2>One of the reasons we wanted to talk to you

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 2>is because you do such a fantastic job of connecting

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 2>the oil space with capital markets, and I've always maintained

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 2>that oil is very much a capital market story. Can

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 2>you talk about the difference between how capital is sourced

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 2>for something like oil or gas versus clean energy, and

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 2>whether attitudes towards the two have changed at all.

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean it was quite different with clean energy,

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 4>and a lot of it, you know, had tax credits

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 4>and ability to you know, to sell tax credits and

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 4>things like that, and a lot of the oil and

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 4>gas development may be funded by financial institutions, but a

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 4>lot of it is funded by the companies themselves.

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 3>What is it like we see these lines on charts

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 3>that show the collapsing price of solar production, or the

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 3>collapsing price of wind production, or the improvements in battery technology.

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 3>All true, all true, and yet there is still so

0:07:57.000 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 3>much public money that goes into these areas, and so

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 3>many tax credits and subsidies, etc. To kind of accelerate

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 3>them along. Why is it that you have these lines

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 3>going down and yet they don't undercut traditional sources in

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 3>the way that maybe the tech mindset.

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 2>We yes so well.

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 4>First, remember the renewables, wind and solar. Really we're not

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 4>competing with oil until you started to have electric cars

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 4>coming onto the scene. But you know, it's interesting. I

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 4>was talking to a company that's developing a big battery

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 4>project in Europe I probably shouldn't say which country, and

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 4>they're very excited about it. It's really big. They said, Oh,

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 4>by the way, they couldn't do it on their own.

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 4>They had to go to the government and get incentive

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 4>subsidies or a partnership with it. So the costs are

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 4>still up there, and I think we're seeing a testing

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 4>now for wind and solar. Everybody's rushing right now to

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 4>get steel into the ground so they can get the

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:53.200
<v Speaker 4>tax credits which will expire in not very long time,

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 4>so the testing will be how competitive will they be?

0:08:56.800 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 4>And I think we'll still see wind and solar, particularly

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 4>solar put in, but it won't be enough. And what

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:05.719
<v Speaker 4>they concern right now is about the reliability of the

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:10.439
<v Speaker 4>electric power system. And you see prognostications about this area

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:13.559
<v Speaker 4>that stretches from Illinois, you know, as far as New Jersey,

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 4>that by the end of this decade, which is not

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 4>so far away now, we'll be looking at very tight

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 4>markets with really great pressure on it. And I'll tell

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 4>you the kind of regulators. The people looking at it

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 4>but are starting to get pretty alarmed. And that's why

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 4>you see a lot of a lot of discussion and

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 4>focus on can we get permitting reform so you can

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:33.439
<v Speaker 4>actually get something built?

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:36.679
<v Speaker 3>Can you just what is the source of alarm? Is

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 3>it about the generation of electrons or is it about

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 3>the transmission and with the grid capacity to balance and

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 3>take in all these things.

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's both, and certainly the transmission is a very

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 4>key part of it. But what we have been doing

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:54.319
<v Speaker 4>has been retiring coal plants. We thought, you know, we

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 4>re mar going to have any more gas and electric generation,

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 4>but that's coming back. And now you see kind of

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:02.840
<v Speaker 4>slow down and closing these coal plants. And also we

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:06.319
<v Speaker 4>see an election coming up in New Jersey where electricity

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:10.319
<v Speaker 4>prices are an issue, and suddenly this whole issue. I

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 4>was looking at our numbers, and electricity prices have been

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 4>going up at twice the rate of inflation in the

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:16.199
<v Speaker 4>United States.

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 2>Why can't clean energy seem to exist without subsidies? Given

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 2>that electricity prices are going up, and we all agree

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 2>that energy is strategically important, why can't it, you know,

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 2>fund itself.

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:32.320
<v Speaker 4>Well, it has to, you know, ultimately, it has to

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 4>be that. But you know, obviously there's a lot of

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 4>debate about what happened in this big beautiful bill where

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 4>they you know, basically are cutting back and then eliminating

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 4>the subsidies. And at least this administration says, well, wait,

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 4>these were put in thirty two years ago for infant

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 4>in industries, and now the prices come down, why are

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 4>we were doing it? So I think these industries are

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:55.079
<v Speaker 4>going to have to stand on their own right now.

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Would they be economical in their current form?

0:10:57.360 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 4>I think, you know, it depends on the circumstances and

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 4>where they're built and whether they have access to transmission,

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 4>because of course you can have solar, but then you

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 4>need you need to connect it to the grid, and

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 4>grid connection becomes a very important issue.

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:13.559
<v Speaker 2>That's the expensive thing. That's why with my solar panels

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 2>on my farm, I mooch off of the entire Connecticut

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 2>system grid.

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:19.199
<v Speaker 4>How is your solar panels working?

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 2>They're fantastic. Our energy bills are like maybe twenty dollars

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 2>a month. Sometimes we get paid so you.

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 4>Put it back in the system. You didn't get any

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:29.679
<v Speaker 4>tax creditors.

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, the house had it when we bought it. Oh,

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 2>but I'm just very happy with the low electricity bill

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 2>and not having to shoulder the costs of the grid.

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:39.439
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and somebody else will take care of it, that's right,

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 4>somebody else's problem.

0:11:57.040 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 3>I want to talk a little bit more about the

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:02.959
<v Speaker 3>return of natural gas or LNG. What do you think

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 3>the prospects are for the US as an LNG export powerhouse?

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 3>Can you continue to grow well at the pace that

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 3>it's been growing, especially given some of the bottlenecks and constraints.

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, obviously you need pipes to get gas to

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 4>the Gulf coast or to tide water in order to

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.679
<v Speaker 4>ship the gas, and that ability to build pipes is

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 4>really difficult, or has been difficult. It's going to get

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 4>easier now unless you're in Texas where you could build

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 4>them anyway. But it's an amazing story. A decade ago,

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 4>the US was not exporting any LNG in fact, and

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 4>now it's the world's largest exporter of LNG. And our

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 4>own numbers say that the next half decade or so,

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 4>global capacity will increase by over fifty percent. Half of

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:49.440
<v Speaker 4>that increase will be in the United States, you know,

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 4>and people don't think about it this way, but we're

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 4>not for USLNG. Putin might well have succeeded using the

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 4>energy weapon cutting off gas to Europe and shouted the

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:05.439
<v Speaker 4>coalition supporting Ukraine. And what prevented him from doing that

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 4>was USLNG, which he hadn't counted on. In the book

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 4>you mentioned the new Map. I have this story about

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 4>where I had this interaction with Putin in twenty thirteen,

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 4>and it was at the Saint Petersburg International Economic Forum,

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:23.599
<v Speaker 4>which was his version of Davos, was before he enexed Crimea,

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 4>and he was up there on the platform with Chancellor Merkel,

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 4>and you could see the ice between them, and they

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:30.679
<v Speaker 4>said to me, oh, you get to ask the first question.

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 4>So I thought I was just asking the question. Yeah, exactly,

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 4>no pressure, the normal question about you know, what are

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 4>you going to do? Your budget is over dependent on

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:43.200
<v Speaker 4>oil and gas. By accident, I mentioned shale and he

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 4>started shouting at me in front of all these people

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:48.599
<v Speaker 4>and said, shale is barbaric, it's terrible, poisoned people. He

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 4>went on and on like that, and I can tell

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 4>you it was very unpleasant being shouted at by Vladimir

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 4>Putin in front of three thousand people.

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 3>But it's a good story.

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but it's a good story, you know exactly it

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 4>did at the time and think it's a good story.

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 4>At the time, I wanted to get out of there,

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 4>But afterwards I thought he was actually precient. He saw

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 4>that shale gas in the form of then LNG would

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 4>augment us influence in the world, which it certainly has,

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 4>and it would compete with his jewels crown jewel gas problem,

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 4>which has also happened because now Russian gas is being

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 4>pushed out of Europe. So I think, you know, people

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 4>don't connect speaking of connecting the dots that the shale

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 4>gas revolution there tied into the ability to support Ukraine

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 4>in this war that's now gone on almost as long

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 4>as World War One.

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 3>It sounds like you're saying, Aubrey McClinton was a great

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 3>hero for the West and democracy and all of this stuff.

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, i'd say a great entrepreneurial. Yes.

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 2>When it comes to old school energy sources, whether it's

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 2>oil or your term old school, is there any low

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 2>hanging fruit left in terms of making the technologies more efficient?

0:14:56.400 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 2>I remember, maybe like almost ten years ago now, there

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 2>was a big standardization push and all these you know,

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 2>drills that used to have custom parts started to standardize

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 2>them and that actually brought down prices quite a bit

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 2>or helped ease some of the pressure at a time

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 2>when oil prices were quite low. Is there anything like

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 2>that on the horizon.

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think you're right. I mean shale. The development

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 4>of shale revolution is to kind of continue your memory,

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:26.239
<v Speaker 4>it really became a manufacturing process. It's a very repetitive

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 4>manufacturing process. And you know, no one back then when

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 4>days of you mentioned Ay mcclennan was one of the

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 4>pioneers could have possibly envisioned the US being the world's

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 4>largest oil producer, the largest natural gas producer. I think

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 4>right now you know about maybe ten percent of the

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 4>oil has recovered from shale. So one thing companies are

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 4>working on, can we increase that output? Can we increase

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 4>it be more efficient? But there is the sense now

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 4>which you wasn't even had a year ago, that maybe

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 4>shale has peaked out, peaked out at a very high number,

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 4>but peaked doubt And people I start to see are

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 4>starting to talk about what's known as exploration, going out

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 4>and finding new oil sources in parts of the world

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 4>where nobody really looked for them.

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Does it make you nervous to use the word peak

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 2>in an oil conversation.

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 4>Now that you mentioned it at times? What should I say? Plateau?

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 4>How's plateau?

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Ok?

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? Peak oil. I remember when when people were talking

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 4>about peak oil back in you know, decade and a

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 4>half ago, and that the world was going to run

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 4>out of oil. I remember I said, I better go

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 4>back and look in the prize and went back and said, oh,

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 4>the world's actually run out of oil five times, and

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 4>every time it's where you pointed before. It's new technologies

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 4>and new geographies, that changed the game.

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 3>Tell us a little bit more about some of those

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 3>times were, so, I guess probably the seventies, when else

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 3>have there been well, right at the air of peak

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 3>oil running out.

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 4>World War One turned out to be a war that

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 4>really sort of elevated oil because it started with people

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 4>on horses and cavalry, it ended up with banks and

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 4>airplanes and trucks and all of that. And there was

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 4>this great fear after World War One that the US

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 4>had what was it, nine years worth supply left, and

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:13.120
<v Speaker 4>so what happened as American companies started to go out

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 4>and it went out to the Middle East and of

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 4>course found lots of oil. So that was a period.

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 4>Then after World War Two there was that concern because

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 4>oil had been so important there had been an oil

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 4>war within the larger war, and then of course the seventies.

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:29.199
<v Speaker 4>But it even happened in the nineteenth century that you know,

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 4>people start ringing the bell saying, you know, it's all over,

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:34.680
<v Speaker 4>and technology keeps expanding the frontier.

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 2>So, speaking of oil supplies and stockpiles, one of the

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:42.679
<v Speaker 2>big stories in energy markets has been China buying enormous

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 2>amounts of oil and stockpiling them for reasons that we

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:50.680
<v Speaker 2>don't know for certain how important has that dynamic been

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 2>to you know, a fairly resilient oil price. Crewd has

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:56.399
<v Speaker 2>come down a little bit, but it's still, you know,

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 2>around sixty dollars a barrel, I think, and why are

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:00.120
<v Speaker 2>they doing it?

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 4>In your rod, that is always the question of why

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:05.880
<v Speaker 4>they're Chinese stockpiling. I've we've been working on minerals too,

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 4>and looking at the stockpile minerals too. It's what they do.

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 4>Is it because they think there may be a conflict?

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 4>Is there a problem? Are they worried about the South

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 4>China Sea which I write about in the new map?

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 4>And they know that during World War Two the US

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 4>cut off the oil line to Japan, and so they

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 4>want to be sure they have supplies. Or is it

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 4>just because it's cheap and they're expecting it to go up.

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 4>We don't know. I'll be there in a couple months

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 4>and I'll ask them again. I'm not sure I'll get

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 4>an answer. But they're doing it. But the role of

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:40.640
<v Speaker 4>China's changed because for two decades the growth in oil

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 4>demand worldwide, half of it was in China. And now

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 4>the view, I won't use the word peak I'll use

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:51.639
<v Speaker 4>the word plateau. That demand in China is plateauing at

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:54.639
<v Speaker 4>a high level. But they're importing seventy five percent of

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 4>their oil and they don't want to continue to do that.

0:18:56.720 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 4>That's why they've been pushing one of the reasons they've

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 4>been pushing electric cars. The other reason is because I

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:05.359
<v Speaker 4>see it as a way to an export market, so

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:07.679
<v Speaker 4>you don't have the growth engine of China. And so

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 4>you know, there's a fair amount of debate today at

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 4>what rate at oil de Man will grow, but is

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 4>it how how much will grow? Will be a million

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:17.920
<v Speaker 4>barrels a day, a million and a half barrels a day,

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 4>And that is a subject within oil circles of a

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 4>great deal of vigorous debate.

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:27.879
<v Speaker 3>We obviously don't know what chision ping strategic plans are,

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:31.119
<v Speaker 3>potential military plans in the future. But for all of

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:35.120
<v Speaker 3>the EVY adoption in China, which has of course been

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 3>huge military conflict, whatever the source, will still be an

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 3>incredibly oil intensive process.

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I think exactly. I mean, that's right. All you're

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 4>not going to have battleships, you know, you know, solar

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 4>power times yeah, yeah, yeah, I mean you do mention,

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:55.159
<v Speaker 4>I mean what is we know some things that are

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 4>ensoes Youping's mind, because he said it, and he does

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 4>talk about the dominating the new indust supply chains, which

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 4>means evs, which means solar panels, which means when and

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 4>of increasingly critical importance batteries, which is another issue that's

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 4>going to actually is percolating up about here. We have

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 4>regulations against batteries that come from foreign entities of concern

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:23.679
<v Speaker 4>and you say, what's a foreign entity of concern? And

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 4>it tends to be mean parentheses China in the energy discussion, could.

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 2>You ever envision a time where where earths are more

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 2>important strategically than oil?

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 4>No, but I can tell you that they're really important,

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 4>and I would say in the last six months there

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 4>has been, if you are here in Washington, a crisis

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 4>mentality about them, because I think that was a shock

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:47.119
<v Speaker 4>when Trump was rolling out all of his tariffs and

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:49.200
<v Speaker 4>the country that they were going to be most aimed at,

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 4>which was China. Suddenly China said, well, you know, to

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:56.199
<v Speaker 4>complay this game. And then that is, of course, in

0:20:56.320 --> 0:21:00.640
<v Speaker 4>recent days is once again come up the Chinese, whether

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 4>for strategic reasons, but again new supply chains. You know,

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 4>they produce process ninety percent of the rarers and they

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 4>know it. And when you hear an automobile maker saying,

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:13.120
<v Speaker 4>you know, we have a week and a half supply,

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 4>you realize how urgent it is, and so you know

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 4>it's really come up and trying to grapple with it.

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 4>It's not something you can solve overnight, because it takes

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:26.119
<v Speaker 4>a long time to open a mind, put up a

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:28.920
<v Speaker 4>processing a thing. And the Chinese are putting not only

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 4>controls on rareers, they put controls on the machinery and

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 4>equipment for processing rarers, and they put controls on the

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 4>people who have to know how that they may not

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 4>be able to have passports anymore.

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about US energy policy. It seems a little

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 3>unfocused to me.

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:51.880
<v Speaker 4>Or we might say variable, okay.

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 3>Go on, Like how would you characterize it? Or like

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:57.919
<v Speaker 3>when you say, let's say it's variable, how would you

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 3>characterize what's going on? I think there was a US

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 3>energy security or energy policy.

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:07.360
<v Speaker 4>And under Biden, of course, it was all about basically renewables,

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:11.919
<v Speaker 4>climate change, the goal that have no gas, natural gas

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 4>or coal and electric generation. By twenty thirty five, half

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:17.399
<v Speaker 4>the new cars in America were to be electric by

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:21.159
<v Speaker 4>twenty thirty. That was then, this is now. It's just

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 4>pretty much in the opposite direction.

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 3>Can the US, you know, I think Trump would like

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 3>powerful dominant US energy industry.

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 4>He uses that word.

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:37.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, is that realistic? Can you get there? I mean,

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:40.679
<v Speaker 3>there's wanting to expand drilling, but with the price of oil,

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:43.120
<v Speaker 3>actually it's a below fifty blow six and now it's

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:47.920
<v Speaker 3>fifteen seventy five today. For like, can these things hang together?

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:51.439
<v Speaker 3>Can we have prices at these levels and booming domestic

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 3>oil coustrut No.

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 4>I think that's one reason we get into not the peaking,

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 4>but the plateauing for that reason. And you know, you

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:01.959
<v Speaker 4>look at the survey from the Dallas Federal Reserve that

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 4>came out, and you know, below sixty, people don't you know,

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 4>they just pull back and they husband capital. And you know,

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:14.200
<v Speaker 4>it certainly seemed that it was possible that we would

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:17.119
<v Speaker 4>see oil prices below sixty in the latter part of

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:19.119
<v Speaker 4>the year. And it's come. Maybe it's come earlier than

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 4>people might have expected, and very much affected by the

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:25.639
<v Speaker 4>trade war between the US and China, among other things.

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 4>But the US is the dominant player right now and

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:34.959
<v Speaker 4>energy you know, the new trade deal the Europe supposed

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 4>to have with the US, They're supposed to buy more

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:39.920
<v Speaker 4>natural gas from US and so forth, and they set

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 4>up something called the National Energy Dominance Council, which is

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 4>you know, kind of the view of the US in

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:50.879
<v Speaker 4>this position. But it is tough to both want to

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 4>have a very vibrant domestic industry and have low prices

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:54.879
<v Speaker 4>at the same time.

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 2>I know you just mentioned that Europe is still going

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 2>to be getting US oil, But do you foresee a

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 2>more I guess autaric energy future for the world, because

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 2>it does feel like, at least with manufacturing goods and

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 2>some strategically important goods, people are stockpiling and people are

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 2>focused on building out their own capacity. Is that going

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 2>to be the case in energy or will it be

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 2>that energy is just so geographically specific and expertise oriented

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:25.399
<v Speaker 2>that not everyone will well do.

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:28.679
<v Speaker 4>We've already seen a partitioning of the global oil market

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 4>in terms of Russian oil not going to its natural

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 4>market Europe, but going to China, which was a market before,

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:39.200
<v Speaker 4>in India, which was not a market before. We see

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:42.639
<v Speaker 4>that in natural gas. So I think call it economic

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 4>nationalism or economic sovereignty. I think that the you, and

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 4>in a sense, that's what all the teriff policies are about.

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:55.119
<v Speaker 4>I think Europe is in a very difficult position because

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 4>they would like to continue to pursue zero as it's called,

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 4>since by twenty fifty, but now they have this other problem,

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 4>which is called being competitive, or rather not being competitive

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 4>and losing industry. And on the other hand, they're now

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:11.359
<v Speaker 4>supposed to spend not one and a half percent, but

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:15.119
<v Speaker 4>five percent of GDP on defense. So I think Europe

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:17.200
<v Speaker 4>is in a very tough position.

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:20.359
<v Speaker 2>And I know you speak to a lot of experts

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 2>in the energy industry, but what's your sense of the

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:26.879
<v Speaker 2>mood on the ground among I guess oil and gas

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 2>workers specifically, because on the one hand, Trump has been

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 2>a friend of oil and gas and has said that

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 2>he wants oil and gas to be dominant. But on

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 2>the other hand, a lot of the policies that he's

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:41.440
<v Speaker 2>actually put in place, you see people in like the

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Dallas Fed survey complaining about them, and the mood seems

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 2>to be kind of bad.

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think it's both. I mean, I remember CEO

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 4>of one Oil Companies saying that he was actually too

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 4>surprise was invited to I don't know if he's joking

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 4>or not to the Biden White House, but he said

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:59.119
<v Speaker 4>he had to go in through the basement door. And now,

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:02.919
<v Speaker 4>of course they're very you know, accepted, and you know,

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 4>in part of the dialogue, you know, I think it's

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 4>a mixed message. They're glad to see a reduction in

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 4>all these new regulations that have been imposed and kind

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 4>of just the general hostility to an important US industry.

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 4>But on the other hand, they at low prices. You've seen,

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:21.679
<v Speaker 4>you know, layoffs in the industry, you see people putting

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 4>down drilling rigs, you know, at this prices, I think

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 4>if they persist, we'll see more of a negative impact.

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 2>So the US is producing massive amounts of oil and gas.

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:51.200
<v Speaker 2>How does this sort of change the geography or the

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 2>energy industry.

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 4>Well, it really has changed it dramatically. It was really

0:26:56.080 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 4>brought home in twenty nineteen when the Iranians attacked the

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:02.960
<v Speaker 4>most important infrastructure in the entire world oil industry in

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:05.200
<v Speaker 4>Saudi Arabia, and the price went up for a day

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 4>or two and then went down. And I think that's

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 4>because of the existence of shale and just as it

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:12.359
<v Speaker 4>kept growing and growing and it gave a sense of

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 4>security that wasn't there before.

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:16.919
<v Speaker 2>I totally forgot about that, but I think I was

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 2>actually in the Middle East when that happened. Does Opek

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 2>matter anymore? U?

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Speaker 4>Yes, Well, it's really OPEK plus that matters right now.

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:28.920
<v Speaker 4>And they took a lot of oil off the market,

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 4>basically giving room market share to the US. They're now

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 4>begun the process of taking back their market share, and

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:38.479
<v Speaker 4>that's partly what's reflected in price.

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 3>One of the things that is a constant theme on

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 3>the podcast, and it comes up in numerous industries, whether

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:47.880
<v Speaker 3>we're talking about housing or lumber or anything else, is that,

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, periods of surplus or periods of slack, you

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 3>end up paying for it at the end. You end

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:54.639
<v Speaker 3>up maybe paying for it five ten years down the

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 3>road because you get this declined in production. The talent

0:27:57.240 --> 0:27:59.959
<v Speaker 3>leaves the industry, the labor moves the industry, the parts run,

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 3>and you can't just take them out of the warehouse,

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 3>et cetera and start drilling or whatever. Again, when you

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 3>look at the declining price of oil today, are we

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 3>going to pay for this?

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 4>I so yeah, I think it's interesting because you know,

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 4>I had to write this new epilogue for the new edition,

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 4>thirtieth edition of the Prize, and I was thinking about

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 4>what are the lessons And one of the lessons to

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 4>me is, among the hundreds of characters in the book,

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 4>there are only two who really matter. One is supply

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 4>and one is demand, and they're always fluctuating between the

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:30.399
<v Speaker 4>two of them. And I could see that today. Let

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:33.399
<v Speaker 4>me give you an exact because there's a natural decline

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 4>that goes on in oil, which is people now saying

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 4>and gas maybe it's five percent a year. So in

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty one you had the International Energy Agency come

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 4>out with a scenario for net zero by twenty fifty

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 4>in terms of emissions, and all these steps to get

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 4>there made it look rather easy. Because the demand was

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 4>down and price was down. They just came out with

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 4>a new study saying the world needs five hundred and

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 4>forty billion dollars of investment every year between now and

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:00.960
<v Speaker 4>twenty fifty just to kind of stay where we are

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 4>with oil. So it is that cycle that people forget.

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 4>There's a whole decline there, and I think if you

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 4>have a period of slack, you pay for it down

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 4>the road in terms of the tight market, because investment

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 4>leaves and I think you made a really important point.

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 4>People leave too, They say, I don't want to be

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 4>in this industry.

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 3>Did some episodes a couple of years ago, like actually,

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 3>when oil is much higher about one of the constraints

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 3>that's been well, a bunch of like the petroleum schools,

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 3>they didn't have the same pipeline of engineering talent because

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 3>in twenty nineteen or whatever those years were, who was

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 3>going into majoring in petroleum engineering?

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 4>Right here exactly Now it's actually looks like it's a

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 4>more attractive industry, but it's.

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 2>A competition from geothermal as well. If you want to

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 2>go drilling some rocks somewhere, you don't have options.

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 4>Well, actually we didn't talk about geothermal, but in fact

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 4>there is now the notion can you apply shale technology

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 4>and drilling to geos?

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 3>Are you optimistic about that?

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 4>I don't go through optimist or pessimism. I'd just say,

0:29:57.360 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 4>but it's promising. Let's see how it plays out.

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 3>I want to talk more about Europe. You mentioned the

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:05.040
<v Speaker 3>industrial economies getting clobbord. I mean German. Let's just talk

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 3>about just Germany. Maybe they were able to substitute LNG

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 3>imported from the US from some of its Russian sources,

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 3>but the price is up and industrial production in Germany

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 3>has been terrible. Do you think at some point European

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 3>leaders will sort of cry on goal or cave on

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 3>the net zero ambition because it feels like the politics

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 3>of that have been running on fumes first.

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, you know, it's interesting because of course they're it's

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:33.720
<v Speaker 4>so entrenched that it's hard for them. I mean, you

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 4>could say, okay, we're for net zero, but maybe not

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 4>by twenty fifty. But Europe continues to you know, it's

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 4>not just energy costs, it's this incredible weight and burden

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 4>of regulations that are designed without any connection to the markets.

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 4>I was talking to one company on Sunday and they

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 4>said they just closed one facillit plant in Europe. They

0:30:56.240 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 4>had another one that was eighty percent built that they've

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 4>decided not to go ahead with. Talking to another company

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 4>that's also closing. I mean, they impose these policies with

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 4>no connection to the marketplace or to technology, saying seventy

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 4>percent of jet fuel has to be so called sustainable

0:31:13.200 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 4>aviation fuel. Well it's less than one percent now, and

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 4>so it's just if you say it, it's going to happen.

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:22.480
<v Speaker 4>So I think maybe in Germany we're starting to see

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 4>some of that easing up, But I think that those

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:29.000
<v Speaker 4>economic realities are weighing down with them and if they

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 4>don't step back, and as I say, it's not just

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 4>climate policies, but it's this whole regulatory straight jacket that

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 4>helps people go invest. In the United States, I.

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 2>Do feel like even before Russia invaded Ukraine, there was

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 2>a sense that I guess ESG in general was kind

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 2>of failing. You know, inflation started to.

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 3>Pick up, er bureau phenomenon.

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, inflation started to pick up, and suddenly there

0:31:56.600 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 2>was what I thought was an inevitable backlash against East

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 2>and targets net zero and things like that. Do you

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 2>think that ever comes back or how would you characterize

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 2>I guess the helpfulness of ESG when it comes to

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 2>building out clean energy, well.

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 4>I think it was clearly that all is a package together.

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 4>I think now really the clean energy argument, the argument

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 4>for solar now is less about that, and it's about

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 4>that you can do it quickly and lay it down

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 4>quickly and get those electrons into the grid. So it's

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 4>more about the economics are working economics rather than virtue

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 4>and ESG clearly is faded away. I can't see it

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 4>coming back with the full force that it did because

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 4>it has a built in backlash, which we're seeing now.

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 4>So I think it means that these things have to

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 4>be more market driven.

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:54.400
<v Speaker 3>Does the boom and energy exports from the US raised

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 3>prices for American households?

0:32:56.160 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 4>That is, of course a very critical question was raised

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 4>at the end of the Biden administration. We did a

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 4>study on that, you know, we being S ANDP and

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 4>the Commodity Insight team there and concluded that we have

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 4>a lot of natural gas so that it's not a

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:15.719
<v Speaker 4>threat in terms of prices. Natural gas is not as

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:16.640
<v Speaker 4>constrained as oil.

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:20.040
<v Speaker 2>What about nuclear? We've gone this entire conversation without talking

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 2>about nuclear, but nuclear, you know, could solve all these

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:23.239
<v Speaker 2>problems well.

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:25.479
<v Speaker 4>And it's also interesting because that circles back to one

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 4>of the points we talked about before, because you say, well,

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 4>what's brought nuclear back? Partly it's you know, just time,

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 4>Partly its need, but I think it's also the entry

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 4>of the tech companies from being just consumers, you know,

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 4>for software, to really worrying about data centers. And you

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:48.120
<v Speaker 4>look at it last time I looked, there's been six

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 4>billion dollars of venture capital infusion. Nobody ever used to

0:33:52.320 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 4>do venture capital in fusion. That was what the government

0:33:54.280 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 4>did because it was fifty years away. And we had

0:33:57.440 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 4>an event at our SERRAH conference in Houston this year

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:03.400
<v Speaker 4>where we had Commonwealth Fusion, which came out of MIT.

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:06.440
<v Speaker 4>The head of the largest, the main utility in Virginia

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:08.879
<v Speaker 4>and the governor of Virginia saying, you know, we think

0:34:08.920 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 4>we're going to have fusion here by twenty thirty two.

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:15.560
<v Speaker 4>So nuclear is definitely back. Small modular reactors are a

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 4>hot topic. I think the first ones will be deployed

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:20.439
<v Speaker 4>around twenty thirty.

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:21.960
<v Speaker 3>So you think they're actually going to happen because this

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 3>seems like another technology that's always five or ten years old.

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:26.759
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think it's going to happen, But I think

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:29.400
<v Speaker 4>the test will be then can you bring down the

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:32.720
<v Speaker 4>cost and is it a more flexible way to add nuclear?

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 4>But it is. I think that it's really the tech

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:38.640
<v Speaker 4>companies who I mean there you had Amazon investing in

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:41.680
<v Speaker 4>one of the SMR companies with the notion that they

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:46.319
<v Speaker 4>will then buy successive reactors with the idea that each

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:48.919
<v Speaker 4>one the cost will come down. Now that will still

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 4>be tested. It still has to go through a regulatory

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:54.239
<v Speaker 4>process at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and all of that,

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 4>but there's certainly you have the sort of entrepreneurial Silicon

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:04.360
<v Speaker 4>Valley spirit now imbued into nuclear, which of course is

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 4>not an overnight thing, but it is back on the agenda,

0:35:07.560 --> 0:35:09.640
<v Speaker 4>and I think history will go back and say, in

0:35:09.719 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 4>Germany Chancellor Mercles one of her two biggest mistakes was

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:17.320
<v Speaker 4>shutting down the nuclear basically in a weekend. Well was

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 4>the other and that was and that was twenty five

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:24.759
<v Speaker 4>percent of her electricityke The other mistake was saying, you know, immigration,

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:25.640
<v Speaker 4>the door is open.

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 2>This might be a dumb question, but you know, if it's.

0:35:29.800 --> 0:35:31.719
<v Speaker 4>Not such any dumb there's not such a thing. I

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:32.680
<v Speaker 4>better watch out now.

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, But if Amazon or someone invests in a small

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:40.399
<v Speaker 2>nuclear reactor or some other type of energy plant, how

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 2>are those agreements actually structured in terms of the off take?

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Because I assume they get priority, and then does whatever

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:50.280
<v Speaker 2>is left over get sent into the grid?

0:35:50.400 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, I guess it depends if it is a reactor

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:56.279
<v Speaker 4>that's owned by a utility, or is it possible that

0:35:56.320 --> 0:35:59.879
<v Speaker 4>these would be like merchant nuclear reactors. You have seen

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:03.399
<v Speaker 4>examples already where some of the I guess we used

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 4>to call them big tech. Now we call them hyperscalers.

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 3>When did that happen? We just all started using that term.

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, exactly. I think it's about a year. Yeah, I

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:15.200
<v Speaker 4>mean for the first time you had to think, what's

0:36:15.200 --> 0:36:18.360
<v Speaker 4>a hyperscale? Is like an elephant, But it's scaling. But

0:36:19.400 --> 0:36:21.719
<v Speaker 4>where they've signed where they will take the entire off

0:36:21.760 --> 0:36:25.520
<v Speaker 4>take of nuclear power plant. So they are very these

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:30.640
<v Speaker 4>companies are very concerned about power because it's so electricity intensive.

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:33.400
<v Speaker 4>The other day there was a story saying that the

0:36:33.440 --> 0:36:39.760
<v Speaker 4>two data centers that that Elon muskis building in Memphis

0:36:39.800 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 4>will use more electricity than all the households. So this

0:36:42.719 --> 0:36:44.719
<v Speaker 4>is a big issue for regulators of what are you

0:36:44.880 --> 0:36:47.399
<v Speaker 4>going back to the question you raised before about who

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 4>pays for this? How do these costs get disaggregated?

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 3>Right now, you mentioned electricity costs having gone up faster

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:57.920
<v Speaker 3>than inflation. Right now, can we draw a line between

0:36:58.080 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 3>these prices and the data enter boom or is this

0:37:03.080 --> 0:37:05.319
<v Speaker 3>two things that happened to be happening. Well, I've seen

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 3>different views on how directly data centers are right now.

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 4>I think it's it's part of it, but it's just

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:16.280
<v Speaker 4>the general increase of demand, including you know, evs, although

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:18.799
<v Speaker 4>not on the scale that had been envisioned, So all

0:37:18.800 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 4>those things and just having I mean, we had gone

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:26.239
<v Speaker 4>for twenty five years with flat demand in electricity the

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:29.400
<v Speaker 4>United States then and now it's just recently that it

0:37:29.480 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 4>started to grow again. And so you have a whole

0:37:31.680 --> 0:37:35.239
<v Speaker 4>generation of utilities who've grown up in flat demand and

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 4>now figuring out how do you get things built, how

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:39.960
<v Speaker 4>do you get into the regulatory process, and even when

0:37:40.000 --> 0:37:42.239
<v Speaker 4>you get it approved and you end up in court

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:43.560
<v Speaker 4>because somebody challenges it.

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Are we ever going to solve the energy problem?

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:48.759
<v Speaker 4>No? I think it will just I mean, it will

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:52.239
<v Speaker 4>always be there as long as industrial society will be

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:56.320
<v Speaker 4>one form or another. Maybe fusion, the dream.

0:37:56.080 --> 0:37:59.320
<v Speaker 2>Of ah fusion. Yes, I used to play some city

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:02.000
<v Speaker 2>and that was all was the ultimate goal. You work

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 2>out from the gas plant to nuclear and then to.

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:08.319
<v Speaker 4>Confusion solves everything. But it's also striking to me what

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 4>I've noticed, you know, having studied the energy for you know,

0:38:12.719 --> 0:38:16.480
<v Speaker 4>some time that you get a consensus about energy and

0:38:16.520 --> 0:38:19.279
<v Speaker 4>it lasts about three years and then something new comes

0:38:19.320 --> 0:38:20.799
<v Speaker 4>along and just changes the view.

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:24.759
<v Speaker 3>Are past periods we actually talked, we talked a little

0:38:24.760 --> 0:38:27.400
<v Speaker 3>bit about the late nineties when there's the gas boom.

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:30.920
<v Speaker 3>Then are there any other past periods that people should

0:38:31.080 --> 0:38:34.560
<v Speaker 3>study right now that might help them form the current environment.

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:38.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think that what we have to remember, which

0:38:38.840 --> 0:38:44.440
<v Speaker 4>to me is absolutely critical, is energy security, and that

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 4>it gets forgotten. And for me, I have this story

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:51.880
<v Speaker 4>and the prize about Winston Churchill converting the Royal Navy

0:38:51.920 --> 0:38:54.680
<v Speaker 4>from coal to oil before the First World War, which

0:38:54.719 --> 0:38:57.719
<v Speaker 4>to me is that is what made oil a strategic commodity,

0:38:57.800 --> 0:38:59.080
<v Speaker 4>that transition.

0:38:59.280 --> 0:38:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Why do you do that?

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:03.800
<v Speaker 4>He did it because he gained speed, flexibility, you didn't

0:39:03.800 --> 0:39:06.760
<v Speaker 4>need to have all these guys shoving coal on board,

0:39:07.000 --> 0:39:09.080
<v Speaker 4>and you gained thirty percent extra cargo space.

0:39:09.520 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 2>That's the very start of the book, right, that's opening exactly.

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:16.200
<v Speaker 4>And I've always thought that phrase. He said safety in oil,

0:39:16.239 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 4>but we could say an energy lies in variety and

0:39:18.239 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 4>rite alone that you don't want to be overdependent on anything.

0:39:21.760 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 4>You want variety, whether in terms of your suppliers, in

0:39:24.760 --> 0:39:25.720
<v Speaker 4>terms of your sources.

0:39:26.000 --> 0:39:28.480
<v Speaker 3>We're never going to bring whale oil back, you know.

0:39:29.120 --> 0:39:31.879
<v Speaker 4>I said there's not a single energy source that has

0:39:32.000 --> 0:39:35.920
<v Speaker 4>not increased, even wood has increased. The only one that

0:39:35.960 --> 0:39:37.880
<v Speaker 4>hasn't increased is whale oil.

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:42.280
<v Speaker 2>All right, joke and dream, I guess Dan Jurgen, author

0:39:42.360 --> 0:39:45.560
<v Speaker 2>of the probably I'm pretty sure, the best book on

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:48.080
<v Speaker 2>the oil market ever, thank you so much for coming

0:39:48.080 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 2>on all thoughts.

0:39:48.800 --> 0:39:49.080
<v Speaker 4>Thank you.

0:39:49.200 --> 0:40:03.680
<v Speaker 2>It's great, Joe, that was so much fun. I'm so

0:40:03.719 --> 0:40:05.200
<v Speaker 2>glad we finally got to take You can't.

0:40:05.080 --> 0:40:07.560
<v Speaker 3>Believe it took us that long to talk to Dan,

0:40:07.600 --> 0:40:08.240
<v Speaker 3>but that was great.

0:40:08.320 --> 0:40:13.000
<v Speaker 2>I know, well, fortuitous meeting in Washington, DC. I gotta

0:40:13.040 --> 0:40:18.520
<v Speaker 2>say his point about the sort of interconnection between energy

0:40:18.600 --> 0:40:22.839
<v Speaker 2>and technology, Definitely, it does seem to be a driving force, right,

0:40:22.920 --> 0:40:26.400
<v Speaker 2>And as soon as you get new advancements in weaponry

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:31.839
<v Speaker 2>or transport or in this case software, you do tend

0:40:31.880 --> 0:40:35.320
<v Speaker 2>to get a sudden like rethinking of what your energy

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:37.400
<v Speaker 2>needs actually are or some sort of transition.

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:39.959
<v Speaker 3>And then on the flip side, like if you ever

0:40:40.040 --> 0:40:43.160
<v Speaker 3>are in an era of energy surplus, you're gonna find

0:40:43.200 --> 0:40:45.279
<v Speaker 3>something to do with it. Yeah, Like you never just

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:47.640
<v Speaker 3>sit around it, like here's a bunch of cheap energy,

0:40:47.719 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 3>let's not do anything.

0:40:49.120 --> 0:40:52.560
<v Speaker 2>With Although China is stockpiling successfully, right.

0:40:52.600 --> 0:40:55.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, they are stockpiling. We don't know for what exactly,

0:40:55.480 --> 0:40:56.000
<v Speaker 3>but yes.

0:40:55.920 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 2>They haven't spent it yet.

0:40:57.200 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 3>They haven't spent it yet, although they're spending I guess

0:41:00.239 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 3>sense to acquire all the oil. It does feel to me,

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:07.080
<v Speaker 3>And it's not like this is that new, but there

0:41:07.160 --> 0:41:10.719
<v Speaker 3>was a phase in probably the US and Europe in

0:41:10.760 --> 0:41:13.400
<v Speaker 3>the late twenty tens, and maybe it extended through twenty

0:41:13.440 --> 0:41:17.719
<v Speaker 3>twenty magical thinking with respect to energy being solved. We're

0:41:18.080 --> 0:41:20.000
<v Speaker 3>you know that there is just like this, like clear

0:41:20.120 --> 0:41:25.239
<v Speaker 3>path towards cheap, clean, abundant energy and some sort of

0:41:25.280 --> 0:41:28.839
<v Speaker 3>realities clearly smacked a lot of policymakers in the face.

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:31.880
<v Speaker 3>And I guess the question is how locked into current

0:41:31.920 --> 0:41:35.239
<v Speaker 3>plans are they? What has to give? It does feel

0:41:35.280 --> 0:41:40.280
<v Speaker 3>like in Europe specifically, the constraints when it comes to industry, energy,

0:41:40.360 --> 0:41:42.759
<v Speaker 3>climate security are pretty real.

0:41:43.200 --> 0:41:45.160
<v Speaker 2>It seems to me like the big problem is the

0:41:45.200 --> 0:41:49.080
<v Speaker 2>cyclicality of the industry, Like you're constantly going through booms

0:41:49.120 --> 0:41:51.280
<v Speaker 2>and bus and as soon as you get a boom

0:41:51.400 --> 0:41:55.319
<v Speaker 2>in oil production, it inevitably leads to a collapse in

0:41:55.360 --> 0:41:58.560
<v Speaker 2>oil prices, and then you struggle to build out capacity

0:41:58.719 --> 0:42:01.560
<v Speaker 2>for years and years, and then there's not enough oil,

0:42:01.680 --> 0:42:03.680
<v Speaker 2>and then prices start to rise and everyone goes back

0:42:03.680 --> 0:42:06.960
<v Speaker 2>in again. If we could find some way to moderate that,

0:42:07.080 --> 0:42:09.279
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how you would do it, but that

0:42:09.400 --> 0:42:10.240
<v Speaker 2>might be a way forward.

0:42:10.400 --> 0:42:14.920
<v Speaker 3>I feel like an underrated element of the Chinese economic

0:42:15.200 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 3>story over the last however many decades has just been

0:42:19.200 --> 0:42:23.799
<v Speaker 3>this like sustained boom without major downturn, et cetera. And

0:42:23.840 --> 0:42:25.759
<v Speaker 3>so then you don't get these like big periods of

0:42:26.120 --> 0:42:29.080
<v Speaker 3>people leaving an industry or whatever that are really hard

0:42:29.120 --> 0:42:31.560
<v Speaker 3>to escape out of. It's like I sort of think

0:42:31.600 --> 0:42:34.280
<v Speaker 3>the cure for the boom bus cycle is just perpetual boom,

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:37.960
<v Speaker 3>Like that's the answer. Just always be booming, always be booming, booming.

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:40.960
<v Speaker 2>I like that, But I also have to say China

0:42:41.080 --> 0:42:43.800
<v Speaker 2>as a source of energy demand. You know, they're buying

0:42:43.840 --> 0:42:46.920
<v Speaker 2>for stockpiles right now, but they're using so many electric

0:42:47.000 --> 0:42:50.239
<v Speaker 2>vehicles that their gas consumption is actually going down. Gasoline

0:42:50.640 --> 0:42:52.680
<v Speaker 2>very impressive. All right, shall we leave it there.

0:42:52.760 --> 0:42:53.439
<v Speaker 3>Let's leave it there.

0:42:53.600 --> 0:42:55.960
<v Speaker 2>This has been another episode of the All Thoughts podcast.

0:42:56.040 --> 0:42:59.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

0:42:58.960 --> 0:43:00.840
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Jill wasn't the Oh. You can follow me

0:43:00.880 --> 0:43:04.440
<v Speaker 3>at the Stalwart, follow our producers Kerman Rodriguez at Kerman

0:43:04.560 --> 0:43:08.080
<v Speaker 3>armand Dshel Bennett at Dashbot and Kilbrooks at Kilbrooks. From

0:43:08.080 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 3>more Oddlots content, go to Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots.

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:13.640
<v Speaker 3>We've a daily newsletter and all of our episodes, and

0:43:13.680 --> 0:43:15.640
<v Speaker 3>you can chat about all of these topics twenty four

0:43:15.760 --> 0:43:19.720
<v Speaker 3>seven in our discord Discord dot gg slash odd Lots.

0:43:19.840 --> 0:43:22.440
<v Speaker 2>And if you enjoy odd Lots, if you like it

0:43:22.480 --> 0:43:25.800
<v Speaker 2>when we talk about the future landscape of the energy industry,

0:43:25.840 --> 0:43:28.440
<v Speaker 2>then please leave us a positive review on your favorite

0:43:28.440 --> 0:43:32.040
<v Speaker 2>podcast platform. And remember, if you are a Bloomberg subscriber,

0:43:32.080 --> 0:43:35.280
<v Speaker 2>you can listen to all of our episodes absolutely ad free.

0:43:35.480 --> 0:43:37.360
<v Speaker 2>All you need to do is find the Bloomberg channel

0:43:37.400 --> 0:43:41.200
<v Speaker 2>on Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening,

0:44:07.000 --> 0:44:07.040
<v Speaker 2>E