WEBVTT - Giving Away Power with Matthew Barzun

0:00:15.396 --> 0:00:23.996
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin from Pushkin Industries. This is a Deep Background, the

0:00:24.036 --> 0:00:27.156
<v Speaker 1>show where we explore the stories behind the stories in

0:00:27.156 --> 0:00:32.356
<v Speaker 1>the news. I'm Noah Feldman. As regular listeners know, this

0:00:32.436 --> 0:00:35.956
<v Speaker 1>year's central theme on Deep Background is power, and we've

0:00:35.996 --> 0:00:40.116
<v Speaker 1>been approaching the question of power from numerous different angles.

0:00:40.956 --> 0:00:43.276
<v Speaker 1>This week, I want to feature a conversation with one

0:00:43.316 --> 0:00:47.636
<v Speaker 1>of my contemporaries, a college classmate actually, who has had

0:00:47.676 --> 0:00:51.556
<v Speaker 1>an intimate understanding of the structure of power long before

0:00:51.756 --> 0:00:55.036
<v Speaker 1>chronologically most of us even had a whiff of getting

0:00:55.196 --> 0:00:58.236
<v Speaker 1>anywhere near any of it in the real world. That

0:00:58.356 --> 0:01:02.796
<v Speaker 1>person is Matthew Barzen, who served as US Ambassador to

0:01:02.916 --> 0:01:05.756
<v Speaker 1>Sweden from two thousand and nine to two and eleven,

0:01:06.036 --> 0:01:09.116
<v Speaker 1>and was then the US Ambassador to the United Kingdom,

0:01:09.316 --> 0:01:12.436
<v Speaker 1>traditionally considered the jewel in the crown of US ambassadorships,

0:01:12.676 --> 0:01:17.436
<v Speaker 1>for another five years thereafter. What's remarkable about his career

0:01:17.676 --> 0:01:20.076
<v Speaker 1>is that he had the opportunity to do these jobs

0:01:20.116 --> 0:01:23.516
<v Speaker 1>starting off when he was still in his thirties, rather

0:01:23.596 --> 0:01:26.876
<v Speaker 1>than as the capstone to a long and distinguished diplomatic

0:01:26.916 --> 0:01:32.036
<v Speaker 1>career the way many many ambassador positions operate. Since doing that,

0:01:32.116 --> 0:01:35.116
<v Speaker 1>Matthew has decided to share some of his ideas around power,

0:01:35.276 --> 0:01:37.836
<v Speaker 1>and he did so in a new book called The

0:01:37.916 --> 0:01:41.716
<v Speaker 1>Power of Giving Away Power, a book that offers a

0:01:41.756 --> 0:01:46.396
<v Speaker 1>different philosophical account of power, viewing the question very much

0:01:46.476 --> 0:01:49.916
<v Speaker 1>more from how elites can broaden the base of power

0:01:50.276 --> 0:01:53.996
<v Speaker 1>than from the countervailing perspective of how elites can constrain

0:01:54.076 --> 0:01:57.796
<v Speaker 1>and control power. And in an era where populism is

0:01:57.836 --> 0:02:01.716
<v Speaker 1>seen by many powerful people as a fundamental threat, Matthew

0:02:01.796 --> 0:02:06.916
<v Speaker 1>instead sees the engagement of broad publics into the possibilities

0:02:06.956 --> 0:02:11.476
<v Speaker 1>of deploying power as a necessary and positive development, even

0:02:11.516 --> 0:02:14.556
<v Speaker 1>as he too worries about the kind of populism that

0:02:14.596 --> 0:02:17.996
<v Speaker 1>comes with bad values or bad beliefs. Having read his book,

0:02:18.076 --> 0:02:21.156
<v Speaker 1>I thought it would provide a wonderful springboard for a

0:02:21.196 --> 0:02:25.076
<v Speaker 1>different kind of conversation about power from somebody who knows

0:02:25.116 --> 0:02:27.996
<v Speaker 1>how to deploy it, but who fundamentally believes that it

0:02:28.036 --> 0:02:35.996
<v Speaker 1>needs to be reshaped. Matthew, thank you so much for

0:02:36.356 --> 0:02:39.876
<v Speaker 1>joining me to talk about many things, among which is

0:02:40.436 --> 0:02:43.396
<v Speaker 1>your terrific new book, The Power of Giving Away Power,

0:02:43.836 --> 0:02:46.916
<v Speaker 1>with the subtitle how the Best Leaders Learn to Let Go,

0:02:47.116 --> 0:02:48.676
<v Speaker 1>And as a lead in I want to ask you

0:02:48.716 --> 0:02:53.956
<v Speaker 1>about your very unusual path to leadership experience at an

0:02:53.956 --> 0:02:56.836
<v Speaker 1>extremely young age. You came out of the business world,

0:02:57.356 --> 0:03:00.356
<v Speaker 1>and then when you were still in your thirties, you

0:03:00.596 --> 0:03:04.116
<v Speaker 1>became an ambassador, first to Sweden and then to the UK.

0:03:04.356 --> 0:03:09.316
<v Speaker 1>So big ambassadorships. How did all that happen? Well, first

0:03:09.316 --> 0:03:11.876
<v Speaker 1>of all, thanks for having me, Noah, I mean, I

0:03:12.156 --> 0:03:14.836
<v Speaker 1>didn't plan it. I was, as you mentioned, right out

0:03:14.876 --> 0:03:17.476
<v Speaker 1>of college. I got involved in what was then the

0:03:17.556 --> 0:03:22.276
<v Speaker 1>very unglamorous world of internet companies. We didn't call them

0:03:22.316 --> 0:03:24.556
<v Speaker 1>dot com companies, it was just the Internet. I did

0:03:24.556 --> 0:03:28.436
<v Speaker 1>that for a while and then a distant cousin of

0:03:28.476 --> 0:03:32.236
<v Speaker 1>mine announced that he was running for president, John Kerry.

0:03:32.276 --> 0:03:35.356
<v Speaker 1>This is two thousand and three, and so I had

0:03:35.396 --> 0:03:38.316
<v Speaker 1>interned for him when I was in college when he

0:03:38.356 --> 0:03:40.876
<v Speaker 1>was a senator, and I said, how can I help?

0:03:40.996 --> 0:03:43.756
<v Speaker 1>And what you and the listeners know is in our system.

0:03:43.796 --> 0:03:47.036
<v Speaker 1>If you ask how you can help, ninety nine times

0:03:47.036 --> 0:03:49.996
<v Speaker 1>out of one hundred, the answers help us raise money.

0:03:50.076 --> 0:03:54.676
<v Speaker 1>And my heart sank. Because I was raised in New England.

0:03:54.956 --> 0:03:57.436
<v Speaker 1>We have that in common, and I was raised to

0:03:57.476 --> 0:04:01.436
<v Speaker 1>never talk about money, politics or religion, and I knew

0:04:01.436 --> 0:04:05.156
<v Speaker 1>that fundraising would require at least two of those and

0:04:05.276 --> 0:04:08.156
<v Speaker 1>probably three and I sucked at it, which is a

0:04:08.156 --> 0:04:11.516
<v Speaker 1>longer story. Then I got better at it, and then

0:04:11.756 --> 0:04:14.236
<v Speaker 1>Senator Obama asked me if I would help out on

0:04:14.316 --> 0:04:16.636
<v Speaker 1>his campaign, and so that's how I got into his world.

0:04:17.036 --> 0:04:20.196
<v Speaker 1>And then when he won, he asked me if I

0:04:20.236 --> 0:04:23.116
<v Speaker 1>would serve as ambassador, and candidly I thought, oh, that's

0:04:23.156 --> 0:04:26.516
<v Speaker 1>what like old people do. It's just like a giant

0:04:26.516 --> 0:04:29.596
<v Speaker 1>cocktail party, like, no thanks. But then I learned more

0:04:29.636 --> 0:04:31.956
<v Speaker 1>about it. There's a great Republican friend of mine who

0:04:32.116 --> 0:04:34.436
<v Speaker 1>knew a lot about it, and I talked to him

0:04:34.476 --> 0:04:38.156
<v Speaker 1>and he described what the role of diplomacy was all about,

0:04:38.236 --> 0:04:42.436
<v Speaker 1>and then I got intrigued and said an enthusiastic yes.

0:04:43.796 --> 0:04:47.636
<v Speaker 1>So power is one of our central themes on Deep Background,

0:04:47.756 --> 0:04:50.756
<v Speaker 1>especially this year, and your book is about power. But

0:04:50.836 --> 0:04:53.116
<v Speaker 1>as you tell that story, it strikes me that you

0:04:53.196 --> 0:04:56.156
<v Speaker 1>got into a position of genuine power to the extent

0:04:56.196 --> 0:04:58.396
<v Speaker 1>ambassadorships are that. And we can talk a little more

0:04:58.636 --> 0:05:01.236
<v Speaker 1>at some point about what kinds of power it's possible

0:05:01.236 --> 0:05:03.156
<v Speaker 1>to wield in those jobs, because I think you did

0:05:03.196 --> 0:05:06.116
<v Speaker 1>that quite interestingly and innovatively. But the way you got

0:05:06.156 --> 0:05:08.476
<v Speaker 1>there was through a different form of power. Which, as

0:05:08.516 --> 0:05:12.196
<v Speaker 1>you said, is the power of fundraising in our system. Yeah.

0:05:12.236 --> 0:05:14.636
<v Speaker 1>So if you started off, as you said, not so

0:05:14.676 --> 0:05:17.956
<v Speaker 1>good at it, not a naturally talented fundraiser, what was

0:05:17.996 --> 0:05:21.356
<v Speaker 1>the trick that is one way of deploying a certain

0:05:21.436 --> 0:05:24.876
<v Speaker 1>kind of power in our system. Yeah. The reason I

0:05:24.956 --> 0:05:28.156
<v Speaker 1>was so bad at it for quite a long time

0:05:29.436 --> 0:05:31.636
<v Speaker 1>was I sort of thought it was about me. So

0:05:31.676 --> 0:05:34.876
<v Speaker 1>I would have these awkward usually emails in my case,

0:05:34.956 --> 0:05:37.916
<v Speaker 1>of like, hey, sorry to bother you, I've set a

0:05:37.956 --> 0:05:40.076
<v Speaker 1>goal of trying to raise X amount of money and

0:05:40.156 --> 0:05:43.596
<v Speaker 1>would you help me? And anyway, that is not a

0:05:43.676 --> 0:05:46.036
<v Speaker 1>very effective way of doing it because it puts yourself

0:05:46.076 --> 0:05:50.676
<v Speaker 1>at the center of the discussion. And I was fortunate

0:05:50.756 --> 0:05:53.756
<v Speaker 1>enough to be seated next to this amazing woman named

0:05:53.836 --> 0:05:56.316
<v Speaker 1>Lynn Twist, and she had just written a book back

0:05:56.316 --> 0:05:59.316
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and three called The Soul of Money,

0:05:59.476 --> 0:06:02.836
<v Speaker 1>and she's a professional fundraiser. And I had raised hundreds

0:06:02.836 --> 0:06:05.436
<v Speaker 1>of millions of dollars. So in desperation, I said, can

0:06:05.476 --> 0:06:07.076
<v Speaker 1>you please, I mean, I will buy your book, I

0:06:07.116 --> 0:06:10.396
<v Speaker 1>will read it, but I need help right now. And

0:06:10.476 --> 0:06:12.276
<v Speaker 1>she said, sure, do you have a pen? And I did,

0:06:12.276 --> 0:06:13.716
<v Speaker 1>so I picked up a pen and I wrote it

0:06:13.716 --> 0:06:15.836
<v Speaker 1>down on a napkin, and it was just three things.

0:06:16.796 --> 0:06:21.556
<v Speaker 1>Number One, money is like water. When it flows, it heals,

0:06:21.876 --> 0:06:27.356
<v Speaker 1>and when it's stagnant, it kills. Number two, Only ask

0:06:27.436 --> 0:06:30.436
<v Speaker 1>people for money who want to use their money for

0:06:30.516 --> 0:06:37.636
<v Speaker 1>something greater than themselves. Number three ask everyone. And of

0:06:37.676 --> 0:06:39.876
<v Speaker 1>course the trick there which I fell for, was, wait

0:06:39.876 --> 0:06:42.276
<v Speaker 1>a minute, how can I ask everyone and only ask

0:06:42.276 --> 0:06:44.356
<v Speaker 1>people who want to use money? And she basically said, look,

0:06:44.676 --> 0:06:47.156
<v Speaker 1>everybody wants to use money for something greater than themselves.

0:06:47.156 --> 0:06:49.196
<v Speaker 1>It may not be politics, or it may not be

0:06:49.236 --> 0:06:52.876
<v Speaker 1>your political party or your candidate, but it's something. And

0:06:52.916 --> 0:06:57.636
<v Speaker 1>so if you ask them to do that, you are

0:06:57.716 --> 0:07:00.676
<v Speaker 1>helping them help their money flow. And so when they

0:07:00.676 --> 0:07:03.356
<v Speaker 1>say no to you, they might say yes to something else,

0:07:03.396 --> 0:07:05.316
<v Speaker 1>and so you're doing them a service. And that, for me,

0:07:05.396 --> 0:07:08.756
<v Speaker 1>really clicked, and I thought, okay, because I got plenty

0:07:08.756 --> 0:07:11.636
<v Speaker 1>of notes, but they didn't hurt, they weren't personally wounding.

0:07:11.756 --> 0:07:15.636
<v Speaker 1>They were just I felt like I was helping the

0:07:15.716 --> 0:07:18.716
<v Speaker 1>money and the energy flow, and that for me, did

0:07:18.716 --> 0:07:21.516
<v Speaker 1>it Does that make any sense? Yeah? It makes a

0:07:21.556 --> 0:07:24.556
<v Speaker 1>lot of sense. It leaves out the sales pitch part,

0:07:24.596 --> 0:07:26.716
<v Speaker 1>and it makes me interested to hear whether in her

0:07:26.796 --> 0:07:29.836
<v Speaker 1>viewer in your own experience, it doesn't matter so much

0:07:29.836 --> 0:07:33.396
<v Speaker 1>whether you're selling John Kerry or selling in Barack Obama.

0:07:33.636 --> 0:07:35.636
<v Speaker 1>As an outsider to fundraising, I would think it would

0:07:35.636 --> 0:07:38.476
<v Speaker 1>make a big difference that one was more effective and

0:07:38.556 --> 0:07:41.076
<v Speaker 1>inspiring than the other, but maybe that's just naive totally.

0:07:41.076 --> 0:07:43.716
<v Speaker 1>And fast forwarding when I started to work on the

0:07:43.956 --> 0:07:47.476
<v Speaker 1>Obama's first campaign, and I was doing well, and we

0:07:47.596 --> 0:07:50.836
<v Speaker 1>sort of pioneered the first low dollar fundraiser, and then

0:07:50.876 --> 0:07:53.276
<v Speaker 1>that caught on and we took that out across the

0:07:53.276 --> 0:07:56.156
<v Speaker 1>country as a model. I was asked with a bunch

0:07:56.196 --> 0:07:59.516
<v Speaker 1>of other volunteers like me to teach fundraising training, which

0:07:59.516 --> 0:08:03.996
<v Speaker 1>we pretentiously called Obama University. Subsequent presidents have given presidential

0:08:04.076 --> 0:08:08.596
<v Speaker 1>name and university a strange name, so this had none

0:08:08.596 --> 0:08:10.636
<v Speaker 1>of that go on. But anyway, so we'd gather I

0:08:10.636 --> 0:08:12.796
<v Speaker 1>think one hundred at a time volunteers from all around

0:08:12.836 --> 0:08:15.516
<v Speaker 1>the country and if you ask them, which we did,

0:08:15.596 --> 0:08:17.036
<v Speaker 1>what do you want to get out of today? Is

0:08:17.076 --> 0:08:18.636
<v Speaker 1>it was an all day session what do you want

0:08:18.636 --> 0:08:21.356
<v Speaker 1>to get out of today? And everyone wanted the exact

0:08:21.396 --> 0:08:24.556
<v Speaker 1>same thing, which is, please arm me with talking points

0:08:24.596 --> 0:08:28.236
<v Speaker 1>to go back to Austin or Boston or wherever and

0:08:28.356 --> 0:08:31.596
<v Speaker 1>win the argument. And the realization that I'd come to

0:08:31.676 --> 0:08:34.756
<v Speaker 1>learn from Lynd Twist and from Obama himself is And

0:08:34.796 --> 0:08:36.356
<v Speaker 1>we did it as a gimmick. We'd say, okay, a

0:08:36.436 --> 0:08:38.356
<v Speaker 1>quick show of hands, how many people here like to

0:08:38.396 --> 0:08:43.436
<v Speaker 1>lose an argument? And nobody ever raises their hand. So

0:08:43.556 --> 0:08:46.676
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we're in the argument winning business. It's

0:08:46.716 --> 0:08:49.036
<v Speaker 1>just sort of bad math. So you don't need to

0:08:49.076 --> 0:08:51.076
<v Speaker 1>win an argument. You don't even have to really make

0:08:51.116 --> 0:08:53.636
<v Speaker 1>a pitch if you just ask people what their hopes

0:08:53.676 --> 0:08:57.676
<v Speaker 1>and fears are, really listen and connect it back to,

0:08:58.556 --> 0:09:01.436
<v Speaker 1>in this case, what Obama also is fearful of and

0:09:01.516 --> 0:09:06.236
<v Speaker 1>hopeful for. That's pretty much just the job that's already

0:09:06.436 --> 0:09:09.676
<v Speaker 1>I think a powerful takeaway to something that is not

0:09:09.716 --> 0:09:12.636
<v Speaker 1>immediately available to the ordinary person who reads the news

0:09:12.636 --> 0:09:15.036
<v Speaker 1>and reads about fundraising. I don't think we think about

0:09:15.076 --> 0:09:17.276
<v Speaker 1>what the back room looks like where people are trying

0:09:17.276 --> 0:09:19.436
<v Speaker 1>to figure out the right way to do it. That's fascinating.

0:09:19.956 --> 0:09:22.356
<v Speaker 1>So Lynch Twist gave you her book in three bullet

0:09:22.356 --> 0:09:24.956
<v Speaker 1>points to put on a napkin. I'm curious to see

0:09:25.036 --> 0:09:28.116
<v Speaker 1>what your napkin worthy. Three bullet points are for your

0:09:28.156 --> 0:09:31.156
<v Speaker 1>own book, the power of giving away power, because it's

0:09:31.196 --> 0:09:33.396
<v Speaker 1>a quirky and fascinating book, and I use quirky in

0:09:33.396 --> 0:09:35.556
<v Speaker 1>the most positive sense at the time. Thank you. What

0:09:35.596 --> 0:09:37.396
<v Speaker 1>would you say if someone said what you know, I'm

0:09:37.436 --> 0:09:38.996
<v Speaker 1>saying next you at a dinner party and I promise

0:09:39.036 --> 0:09:41.476
<v Speaker 1>to buy your book? But what are the bullet points

0:09:41.476 --> 0:09:43.436
<v Speaker 1>that I can write down right here? All right? This

0:09:43.516 --> 0:09:45.836
<v Speaker 1>is fun putting me on the spot. Noah, okay, I

0:09:45.916 --> 0:09:48.676
<v Speaker 1>would This is inspired by another amazing woman who I

0:09:48.676 --> 0:09:51.596
<v Speaker 1>didn't get to meet because she died in nineteen thirty three,

0:09:52.316 --> 0:09:54.756
<v Speaker 1>and she is the matron saint of my book. And

0:09:54.796 --> 0:09:57.836
<v Speaker 1>her name is Mary Parker Follet eighteen sixty eight to

0:09:57.956 --> 0:10:02.076
<v Speaker 1>nineteen thirty three. I encourage listeners to look her up

0:10:02.076 --> 0:10:04.476
<v Speaker 1>on Wikipedia, which is how I found her. I had

0:10:04.516 --> 0:10:06.556
<v Speaker 1>a rule about I'm going to answer your question. I'm

0:10:06.556 --> 0:10:08.796
<v Speaker 1>stalling for time now. You also have a terrific account

0:10:08.796 --> 0:10:11.076
<v Speaker 1>about Wikipedia in the book, so you're read it's all

0:10:11.116 --> 0:10:13.276
<v Speaker 1>the amanicy consistent. Well, but I had a rule in

0:10:13.316 --> 0:10:15.276
<v Speaker 1>the book as I was writing it and rewriting it

0:10:15.276 --> 0:10:18.156
<v Speaker 1>and rewriting it, and I had this little informal rule

0:10:18.236 --> 0:10:20.676
<v Speaker 1>up on my white board of only that could only

0:10:20.756 --> 0:10:24.276
<v Speaker 1>quote three dead white guys per chapter. I loved them.

0:10:24.316 --> 0:10:26.476
<v Speaker 1>I mean, one day I'll be one. But I just

0:10:26.516 --> 0:10:28.236
<v Speaker 1>figured there ought to be a limit. So I had

0:10:28.316 --> 0:10:30.396
<v Speaker 1>hit the limit in this particular chapter, and I wanted

0:10:30.396 --> 0:10:33.236
<v Speaker 1>to quote Peter Drucker, who is I don't know the

0:10:33.236 --> 0:10:36.436
<v Speaker 1>twentieth centuries probably pre eminent sort of the guru's guru

0:10:37.036 --> 0:10:40.716
<v Speaker 1>as it relates to for profit, nonprofit government leadership and management.

0:10:41.236 --> 0:10:43.076
<v Speaker 1>So he had the perfect thing and I wanted to quote,

0:10:43.116 --> 0:10:45.756
<v Speaker 1>but I couldn't. So I start digging around in Wikipedia

0:10:45.836 --> 0:10:48.076
<v Speaker 1>about Peter Drucker, and I learned that lo and behold,

0:10:48.116 --> 0:10:51.396
<v Speaker 1>he had a guru, the guru's guru's guru, if you will,

0:10:51.956 --> 0:10:53.996
<v Speaker 1>And her name was Mary Parker fall It, and she's

0:10:54.036 --> 0:10:58.356
<v Speaker 1>this amazing story and she studied power and she studied leadership,

0:10:59.236 --> 0:11:03.236
<v Speaker 1>and I read everything she wrote and she rocked my world,

0:11:03.596 --> 0:11:07.276
<v Speaker 1>and so inspired by her, I will try to sum

0:11:07.276 --> 0:11:10.636
<v Speaker 1>it up. And she basically said, all of our democracy

0:11:10.836 --> 0:11:13.716
<v Speaker 1>and all of our business, some of our most intractable

0:11:13.756 --> 0:11:15.996
<v Speaker 1>problems can actually are going to be dealt with one

0:11:16.036 --> 0:11:17.996
<v Speaker 1>way or another. With a bunch of people sitting around

0:11:17.996 --> 0:11:20.676
<v Speaker 1>a table with each other, and she said, there are

0:11:20.676 --> 0:11:23.036
<v Speaker 1>four possible outcomes of a meeting, but only one of

0:11:23.076 --> 0:11:27.476
<v Speaker 1>them is worthwhile. Now, Outcome number one is you go

0:11:27.556 --> 0:11:30.036
<v Speaker 1>in the meeting and you try to win. She's like, well,

0:11:30.076 --> 0:11:31.836
<v Speaker 1>that's no good because someone else is going to lose.

0:11:32.596 --> 0:11:35.196
<v Speaker 1>Option number two is you go in and you just acquiesce,

0:11:35.636 --> 0:11:38.236
<v Speaker 1>like Joe is sort of a blowhard, just let him

0:11:38.276 --> 0:11:41.116
<v Speaker 1>have his way. It's easier that way. That's no good

0:11:41.476 --> 0:11:46.156
<v Speaker 1>because you haven't brought your contribution to the meeting. Outcome

0:11:46.236 --> 0:11:49.796
<v Speaker 1>number three also bad, but very tempting, and we're usually

0:11:49.876 --> 0:11:53.676
<v Speaker 1>told it's good is compromise, but her point was, no, look,

0:11:54.436 --> 0:11:58.876
<v Speaker 1>if you compromise, that's just little mini victories and mini defeats.

0:11:59.476 --> 0:12:02.836
<v Speaker 1>It's not something to be sought out. The only reason

0:12:02.916 --> 0:12:04.996
<v Speaker 1>she thought you should get together for a meeting at

0:12:04.996 --> 0:12:07.076
<v Speaker 1>all is if you could do the fourth thing, which

0:12:07.116 --> 0:12:11.196
<v Speaker 1>was the only good outcome, which was creating something with

0:12:11.276 --> 0:12:14.836
<v Speaker 1>your fellow meeting members. And it's a pretty high standard,

0:12:14.876 --> 0:12:17.236
<v Speaker 1>but we all been in those meetings where it really works.

0:12:18.036 --> 0:12:20.036
<v Speaker 1>And she said, the magic that happens if you make

0:12:20.116 --> 0:12:23.796
<v Speaker 1>something together in a meeting, you are fully all of

0:12:23.836 --> 0:12:26.356
<v Speaker 1>you is in that thing. You've made it's in you.

0:12:27.596 --> 0:12:30.316
<v Speaker 1>You're not diminished for it, you're enriched by it, and

0:12:30.396 --> 0:12:36.036
<v Speaker 1>you haven't lost yourself in it. And so if we

0:12:36.716 --> 0:12:39.796
<v Speaker 1>take Mary follows I think very wise points. I would

0:12:39.876 --> 0:12:41.356
<v Speaker 1>if I had to sum up the whole book in

0:12:41.396 --> 0:12:47.036
<v Speaker 1>a napkin worthy three bullet points, it would be expect

0:12:47.236 --> 0:12:52.316
<v Speaker 1>to be needed, expect to need others, and expect to

0:12:52.356 --> 0:12:57.436
<v Speaker 1>be changed. And that final one's important because in today's

0:12:57.516 --> 0:12:59.676
<v Speaker 1>lingo we say, and I think appropriately and I think

0:12:59.676 --> 0:13:02.236
<v Speaker 1>Mary Follot would love that we say it, bring your

0:13:02.276 --> 0:13:06.236
<v Speaker 1>truth to the meeting, absolutely, because no one else can

0:13:06.276 --> 0:13:09.516
<v Speaker 1>bring your truth. So you have a deep obligation to

0:13:09.636 --> 0:13:14.916
<v Speaker 1>bring your truth. But if that's all you do, that's

0:13:14.916 --> 0:13:19.716
<v Speaker 1>not enough. You need to through this process of co creation.

0:13:20.036 --> 0:13:22.596
<v Speaker 1>You ought to leave that meeting a different person than

0:13:22.596 --> 0:13:26.716
<v Speaker 1>you came in. That's the reciprocal obligation. If we take

0:13:26.796 --> 0:13:30.036
<v Speaker 1>Mary follow at her word, that's the expect to be changed. Part.

0:13:32.436 --> 0:13:35.636
<v Speaker 1>That leads me to a question that I myself have

0:13:35.716 --> 0:13:37.476
<v Speaker 1>been struggling with, and I think is in the backdrop

0:13:37.516 --> 0:13:39.596
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of the debates about power that we've

0:13:39.596 --> 0:13:41.636
<v Speaker 1>been having on deep background and also in our society

0:13:41.636 --> 0:13:45.956
<v Speaker 1>and more broadly, it's very appealing to say with Mary

0:13:45.956 --> 0:13:49.196
<v Speaker 1>Parker followed and with you, we should exercise what you

0:13:49.276 --> 0:13:53.436
<v Speaker 1>quote her is calling power with, not power over. And

0:13:53.516 --> 0:13:56.356
<v Speaker 1>we shouldn't go into the meeting, whether it's a fundraising

0:13:56.396 --> 0:13:58.156
<v Speaker 1>meeting or a business meeting or any kind of meeting,

0:13:58.316 --> 0:14:00.196
<v Speaker 1>trying to win, because, as you said, if you win,

0:14:00.276 --> 0:14:02.796
<v Speaker 1>then somebody else loses. Those are very powerful insights. They

0:14:02.836 --> 0:14:06.116
<v Speaker 1>seem right. Then you look at a country like the

0:14:06.196 --> 0:14:11.276
<v Speaker 1>United States today, which is so found lyad divided and polarized,

0:14:11.636 --> 0:14:13.196
<v Speaker 1>and you don't have to claim that it's unpresent. I

0:14:13.196 --> 0:14:16.636
<v Speaker 1>actually don't think it is unprecedented, but it's bad in

0:14:16.836 --> 0:14:21.756
<v Speaker 1>relative terms to the research past. And you say, well,

0:14:22.036 --> 0:14:26.036
<v Speaker 1>you know, leaders of the United States Democratic Party don't

0:14:26.076 --> 0:14:28.236
<v Speaker 1>just try to win by having fifty votes in the

0:14:28.276 --> 0:14:32.356
<v Speaker 1>Senate plus the vice president to break the tie. Work

0:14:32.436 --> 0:14:37.596
<v Speaker 1>with right, let's exercise power with to which miss McConnell says, yeah, no, no,

0:14:37.716 --> 0:14:40.636
<v Speaker 1>thank you. I don't want to exercise power with you.

0:14:40.796 --> 0:14:43.436
<v Speaker 1>I mean Barack Obama tried to do this on occasion.

0:14:43.516 --> 0:14:45.756
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes he got away with it, more often he didn't.

0:14:46.156 --> 0:14:49.156
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I love the idea, and I do think

0:14:49.196 --> 0:14:51.916
<v Speaker 1>that under other circumstances. You know, Joe Biden would have

0:14:51.916 --> 0:14:54.076
<v Speaker 1>been a politician who loved that idea and would have

0:14:54.076 --> 0:14:55.796
<v Speaker 1>said yeah. You know, when he was in the Senate,

0:14:55.796 --> 0:14:58.716
<v Speaker 1>he had a reputation for trying to be a centrist,

0:14:58.836 --> 0:15:01.556
<v Speaker 1>for be friends with people on both sides of the aisle.

0:15:01.796 --> 0:15:05.156
<v Speaker 1>It all sounds almost hopelessly romantic and naive seen from

0:15:05.196 --> 0:15:06.916
<v Speaker 1>a distance of twenty or twenty five years, but that

0:15:06.996 --> 0:15:10.756
<v Speaker 1>is how he operated through much of career. But it's

0:15:10.796 --> 0:15:13.716
<v Speaker 1>just not doesn't seem to be doable now. So I

0:15:13.716 --> 0:15:16.156
<v Speaker 1>guess I'm well in a place of saying philosophically, I

0:15:16.196 --> 0:15:18.836
<v Speaker 1>totally agree with you. I mean, I love this idea.

0:15:18.916 --> 0:15:20.716
<v Speaker 1>I love the idea that you know the key to

0:15:21.316 --> 0:15:23.516
<v Speaker 1>power is to not think that you have all the power.

0:15:23.636 --> 0:15:27.476
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know in practical terms how one can

0:15:27.796 --> 0:15:30.236
<v Speaker 1>I suderstand that. Look, I do think you've picked. I mean,

0:15:30.396 --> 0:15:36.156
<v Speaker 1>our two party system in Washington right now looks pretty

0:15:36.196 --> 0:15:39.196
<v Speaker 1>tough if you come at it through some of the

0:15:39.236 --> 0:15:42.796
<v Speaker 1>other wonderful topics you've covered on this podcast. Take NC

0:15:42.876 --> 0:15:48.756
<v Speaker 1>DOUBLEA athletics. Right We're almost no one involved thinks the

0:15:48.796 --> 0:15:52.596
<v Speaker 1>current system is all that great. Right in Louisville, where

0:15:52.636 --> 0:15:54.076
<v Speaker 1>we live. We don't have a pro team, so we're

0:15:54.116 --> 0:15:58.156
<v Speaker 1>obsessed with University of Kentucky, University of Louisville. We take

0:15:58.196 --> 0:15:59.956
<v Speaker 1>it really seriously. If you've got all the fans in

0:15:59.996 --> 0:16:03.996
<v Speaker 1>a room, they may split red blue cards, cats, but

0:16:04.116 --> 0:16:07.236
<v Speaker 1>not on political terms. They love the games that are

0:16:07.276 --> 0:16:09.516
<v Speaker 1>played and they don't think the current thing is working

0:16:09.556 --> 0:16:12.516
<v Speaker 1>all that well. So you can imagine that group systematically

0:16:12.836 --> 0:16:16.396
<v Speaker 1>trying to work through together finding a better way to

0:16:16.396 --> 0:16:19.236
<v Speaker 1>do that. I mean, would you agree that seems we

0:16:19.276 --> 0:16:23.876
<v Speaker 1>aren't hopelessly in partisan trench warfare as it relates to

0:16:23.996 --> 0:16:28.836
<v Speaker 1>college athletics. Yeah, I think that it's it's definitely plausible

0:16:28.916 --> 0:16:32.436
<v Speaker 1>that reasonable people, without getting super angry at each other,

0:16:32.516 --> 0:16:34.956
<v Speaker 1>could try to work out a better way to do

0:16:35.156 --> 0:16:38.796
<v Speaker 1>NCAA sports. Yeah, I'm willing to accept that. I'll accept

0:16:38.796 --> 0:16:41.236
<v Speaker 1>the preface, thank you well, so then and so the

0:16:41.316 --> 0:16:45.596
<v Speaker 1>act of working through it, I don't think anyone. Very

0:16:45.596 --> 0:16:48.116
<v Speaker 1>many people don't think they have the right answer coming

0:16:48.116 --> 0:16:51.276
<v Speaker 1>into that meeting or series of meetings. They are open

0:16:51.356 --> 0:16:53.556
<v Speaker 1>to and they'll learn about the trade offs and like, oh,

0:16:53.596 --> 0:16:56.276
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize if you just paid everyone, maybe women's

0:16:56.316 --> 0:16:58.276
<v Speaker 1>athletics would lose all their money in three weeks, and

0:16:58.276 --> 0:17:01.116
<v Speaker 1>oh gosh, no, I didn't. That undetended consequence isn't one

0:17:01.156 --> 0:17:03.676
<v Speaker 1>I'm willing to live with. Right, and you start doing

0:17:03.676 --> 0:17:08.036
<v Speaker 1>that kind of work, I think we're get tricky. And

0:17:08.236 --> 0:17:11.196
<v Speaker 1>where I think the point of this book could be

0:17:11.236 --> 0:17:14.916
<v Speaker 1>misunderstood is and I'll stay with sports for a second.

0:17:14.956 --> 0:17:18.356
<v Speaker 1>There's a bathroom somewhere on ninety five between New York

0:17:18.396 --> 0:17:23.596
<v Speaker 1>and Boston where in the bathroom someone had scribbled Yankees suck,

0:17:24.636 --> 0:17:27.156
<v Speaker 1>and then someone scribbled it out and wrote Red Sox suck,

0:17:27.276 --> 0:17:29.316
<v Speaker 1>and then someone wrote Yankee suck. Right, So there's like

0:17:30.276 --> 0:17:34.716
<v Speaker 1>almost like eighteen inches worth of this scribbling back and forth.

0:17:35.236 --> 0:17:37.436
<v Speaker 1>And then sust have been new Avan, Connecticut based on

0:17:37.516 --> 0:17:41.636
<v Speaker 1>many factors, don't you think exactly. So then someone comes

0:17:41.636 --> 0:17:47.116
<v Speaker 1>into the bathroom and circles the whole back and forth,

0:17:47.276 --> 0:17:49.996
<v Speaker 1>and then a big green sharpie writes and we all

0:17:50.076 --> 0:17:56.076
<v Speaker 1>love baseball. Now you're kind of like, oh, like that

0:17:56.116 --> 0:17:59.796
<v Speaker 1>feels good for like a second. But if if the

0:17:59.916 --> 0:18:03.476
<v Speaker 1>people trying to find a way through these intractable problems

0:18:03.556 --> 0:18:06.356
<v Speaker 1>sound like mister green sharpie, and I didn't go back

0:18:06.396 --> 0:18:09.836
<v Speaker 1>by the way but you know there's continued commentary on

0:18:09.876 --> 0:18:13.476
<v Speaker 1>where mister Greensharpie could put his pen. Oh yes, it's

0:18:13.556 --> 0:18:16.596
<v Speaker 1>just annoying. It's this sort of group hug, feel good

0:18:16.636 --> 0:18:18.596
<v Speaker 1>crap that people will just be like, well, that's not

0:18:18.756 --> 0:18:21.636
<v Speaker 1>a real life thing. So what I would say is

0:18:21.636 --> 0:18:25.316
<v Speaker 1>somewhere between Red Sox sock Yankee sock sort of trench

0:18:25.316 --> 0:18:29.196
<v Speaker 1>warfare going nowhere and hey, big group hug, we all

0:18:29.236 --> 0:18:33.156
<v Speaker 1>love baseball, there exists and in between space where I

0:18:33.196 --> 0:18:35.076
<v Speaker 1>think we should put a lot of time and effort,

0:18:35.116 --> 0:18:38.596
<v Speaker 1>and you are on this podcast, which is to stick

0:18:38.596 --> 0:18:42.636
<v Speaker 1>with baseball. Hey, should we eliminate the designated hitter in

0:18:42.676 --> 0:18:46.476
<v Speaker 1>the American League? Now you can imagine Red Sox and

0:18:46.556 --> 0:18:48.996
<v Speaker 1>Yankees fans being super shortsighted and being like, well, we

0:18:48.996 --> 0:18:51.076
<v Speaker 1>have a really good DH now, so that sucks. But

0:18:51.156 --> 0:18:53.476
<v Speaker 1>you could also imagine them being like, I am willing

0:18:53.516 --> 0:18:57.836
<v Speaker 1>to have this discussion about a game we love, but

0:18:57.996 --> 0:19:01.716
<v Speaker 1>bring all your differences in disagreements and argue and haggle

0:19:01.796 --> 0:19:06.596
<v Speaker 1>about a game you love and the habits of doing that.

0:19:08.236 --> 0:19:10.516
<v Speaker 1>I think we've lost and we need to get better

0:19:10.556 --> 0:19:12.996
<v Speaker 1>at and we could get better at them outside of

0:19:13.276 --> 0:19:17.036
<v Speaker 1>high stakes Washington politics, because there's so many other things

0:19:17.036 --> 0:19:19.076
<v Speaker 1>we could get to work at, and if we got

0:19:19.076 --> 0:19:22.156
<v Speaker 1>good at doing those, maybe we could or our children

0:19:22.196 --> 0:19:24.996
<v Speaker 1>maybe could get better at solving some of these other ones.

0:19:25.276 --> 0:19:27.476
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you partly about how we lost

0:19:27.596 --> 0:19:29.476
<v Speaker 1>that capacity, and I want to use as a concrete

0:19:29.476 --> 0:19:31.276
<v Speaker 1>example something you're in a position to know a huge

0:19:31.276 --> 0:19:33.876
<v Speaker 1>amount about, which is the years where you were US

0:19:33.916 --> 0:19:38.156
<v Speaker 1>Ambassador to the United Kingdom were years that the Brexit

0:19:38.276 --> 0:19:42.236
<v Speaker 1>specter gradually went from being a pie in the sky

0:19:42.356 --> 0:19:46.356
<v Speaker 1>idea to something actually plausible, and then, ultimately, to a

0:19:46.356 --> 0:19:48.716
<v Speaker 1>lot of people's shock, it actually happened. And you had

0:19:49.076 --> 0:19:52.076
<v Speaker 1>the front row seat to all of that. So I

0:19:52.116 --> 0:19:55.236
<v Speaker 1>wonder what you would reflect on in observing that whole

0:19:55.276 --> 0:19:57.596
<v Speaker 1>process and in the course of your pretty significant amount

0:19:57.636 --> 0:20:00.276
<v Speaker 1>of time there. I would argue that they that's what

0:20:00.356 --> 0:20:02.156
<v Speaker 1>happened to them. They lost the ability to have the

0:20:02.196 --> 0:20:05.076
<v Speaker 1>green sharpie, and they collapsed into our red Sox versus

0:20:05.156 --> 0:20:09.996
<v Speaker 1>Yankees or remain versus Leave. What do you think happened

0:20:09.996 --> 0:20:13.956
<v Speaker 1>there at a deep cultural level. I think the honest

0:20:13.996 --> 0:20:19.076
<v Speaker 1>and short answer is I don't know what I did learn,

0:20:19.356 --> 0:20:21.196
<v Speaker 1>As you said, being right there in the middle of

0:20:21.196 --> 0:20:24.476
<v Speaker 1>all that, I remember why. I was at some fancy

0:20:24.516 --> 0:20:27.756
<v Speaker 1>black tie dinner in the city of London. I was

0:20:27.796 --> 0:20:29.756
<v Speaker 1>seated next to a gentleman. He was quick to tell

0:20:29.796 --> 0:20:31.636
<v Speaker 1>me early that he had written something like a five

0:20:31.756 --> 0:20:36.316
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand pound check to the Remain campaign, right, so

0:20:36.396 --> 0:20:39.836
<v Speaker 1>this is the group against Brexit, and I thought, okay,

0:20:39.956 --> 0:20:41.636
<v Speaker 1>you know, good to know. And then we chatted about

0:20:41.676 --> 0:20:44.756
<v Speaker 1>other things, and then I'm looking up at the in

0:20:44.796 --> 0:20:48.556
<v Speaker 1>this big vaulted ceiling room. There was some flag I

0:20:48.556 --> 0:20:50.476
<v Speaker 1>didn't really recognize. It may have been like the City

0:20:50.476 --> 0:20:54.076
<v Speaker 1>of London flag or something. Then there was the English cross,

0:20:54.156 --> 0:20:56.516
<v Speaker 1>the English flag, and then there was the Union jack

0:20:56.996 --> 0:20:59.116
<v Speaker 1>and I just said to him offhandedly, I was like, hey,

0:20:59.916 --> 0:21:03.076
<v Speaker 1>you know, twenty years from now, could you picture the

0:21:03.116 --> 0:21:06.436
<v Speaker 1>European flag as a fourth flag up there? And you

0:21:06.476 --> 0:21:09.396
<v Speaker 1>would think I said something incredibly insulting to him. And

0:21:09.396 --> 0:21:11.876
<v Speaker 1>he turned to me and he's like, over my dead body,

0:21:11.996 --> 0:21:15.356
<v Speaker 1>you know, gripping his butter knife. And so here's a

0:21:15.356 --> 0:21:18.916
<v Speaker 1>guy funding Remain and he hates the idea of the

0:21:18.916 --> 0:21:22.196
<v Speaker 1>European Union flag ever showing up in this place that

0:21:22.276 --> 0:21:26.676
<v Speaker 1>he loves. And I thought, oh, okay, that's weird. So

0:21:27.036 --> 0:21:31.516
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't a whole lot of love for the European

0:21:31.596 --> 0:21:34.876
<v Speaker 1>Union by the people who were That's not true of everybody.

0:21:34.956 --> 0:21:37.716
<v Speaker 1>Some people really got into it, but I thought that

0:21:37.796 --> 0:21:41.676
<v Speaker 1>was a window into Hey, that's a tough thing to prevail.

0:21:42.716 --> 0:21:45.476
<v Speaker 1>So in that interpretation, which is a fascinating one, and

0:21:45.516 --> 0:21:47.836
<v Speaker 1>I like stories about how you say something in England

0:21:47.836 --> 0:21:49.516
<v Speaker 1>and then people look at you like you've insulted him,

0:21:49.516 --> 0:21:51.396
<v Speaker 1>because that seemed to be every conversation I had an

0:21:51.556 --> 0:21:53.956
<v Speaker 1>entire time that I lived in English, although to be fair,

0:21:54.076 --> 0:21:55.596
<v Speaker 1>half the time they were also insulting me and they

0:21:55.636 --> 0:21:58.356
<v Speaker 1>didn't know they were doing it. But so I love

0:21:58.396 --> 0:22:01.076
<v Speaker 1>the story. It sounds like in your interpretation, you're suggesting

0:22:01.116 --> 0:22:06.156
<v Speaker 1>that the deep national sentiment that people feel in England

0:22:06.236 --> 0:22:09.836
<v Speaker 1>and maybe in Britain as well more broadly, is just

0:22:09.876 --> 0:22:13.036
<v Speaker 1>so powerful that even people who rationally had an argument

0:22:13.076 --> 0:22:15.636
<v Speaker 1>for remaining in the European Union at some deep level

0:22:15.716 --> 0:22:17.356
<v Speaker 1>didn't care about it as much as the people who

0:22:17.396 --> 0:22:20.916
<v Speaker 1>really wanted out. Well that that still begs the question, yeah,

0:22:20.956 --> 0:22:23.636
<v Speaker 1>could go ahead. So the rough runt of the way

0:22:23.636 --> 0:22:26.076
<v Speaker 1>it was worded was just sort of thumbs up, thumbs

0:22:26.076 --> 0:22:28.836
<v Speaker 1>down in out it was a binary choice. If you

0:22:28.916 --> 0:22:31.356
<v Speaker 1>gave people, you know, when you do HR surveys, it's

0:22:31.396 --> 0:22:36.036
<v Speaker 1>like strongly agree, somewhat agree, neutral, There's a five check

0:22:36.076 --> 0:22:39.636
<v Speaker 1>marks you could do across the spectrum. My sense is

0:22:39.676 --> 0:22:42.076
<v Speaker 1>if you had asked, I have nothing to back this up.

0:22:42.076 --> 0:22:43.716
<v Speaker 1>This is a hunch. Hey, do you want to be

0:22:44.156 --> 0:22:47.276
<v Speaker 1>totally fully in the EU like France and Germany are?

0:22:47.436 --> 0:22:50.836
<v Speaker 1>That's one out of five? Do you want totally out?

0:22:50.916 --> 0:22:52.716
<v Speaker 1>I'd never want anything to do with this thing is

0:22:52.756 --> 0:22:55.836
<v Speaker 1>a five. I think you would have ended up with

0:22:55.876 --> 0:22:57.476
<v Speaker 1>people sort of I don't know in the two and

0:22:57.556 --> 0:22:59.916
<v Speaker 1>a half to three kind of like I want to

0:22:59.916 --> 0:23:01.996
<v Speaker 1>be in, but I don't want to be in their currency,

0:23:01.996 --> 0:23:03.916
<v Speaker 1>and I don't want to have the same customs union. Oh,

0:23:03.956 --> 0:23:07.036
<v Speaker 1>which by the way, is where the UK was as

0:23:07.076 --> 0:23:11.156
<v Speaker 1>it relates to the European Union beforehand. But a lot

0:23:11.196 --> 0:23:15.356
<v Speaker 1>of that subtlety gets lost in out. Yes, no kind

0:23:15.396 --> 0:23:20.596
<v Speaker 1>of world, which this mindset, which I call the pyramid mindset,

0:23:20.796 --> 0:23:22.756
<v Speaker 1>which I think is really I mean, the obvious way

0:23:22.876 --> 0:23:25.396
<v Speaker 1>is sort of a top down view of the world,

0:23:25.596 --> 0:23:27.156
<v Speaker 1>but by the way, a bottom up view of the

0:23:27.156 --> 0:23:29.876
<v Speaker 1>world is the exact same shape, and I would argue no, better.

0:23:30.836 --> 0:23:33.836
<v Speaker 1>It's the same pyramid shape where we get trapped into

0:23:33.916 --> 0:23:37.636
<v Speaker 1>thinking it's wind lose up, down in out, which is

0:23:37.636 --> 0:23:40.916
<v Speaker 1>how that referend of battle played out. And there's an

0:23:41.556 --> 0:23:44.276
<v Speaker 1>alternative way of looking at ourselves in the world around

0:23:44.396 --> 0:23:47.756
<v Speaker 1>us that isn't a pyramid. And these amazing leaders we

0:23:47.876 --> 0:23:49.956
<v Speaker 1>talked about some of them, there are lots of others,

0:23:49.956 --> 0:23:52.196
<v Speaker 1>many of whom we've never heard of, who've built these

0:23:52.276 --> 0:23:57.236
<v Speaker 1>unbelievably consequential organizations and innovations that we benefit from every day.

0:23:57.276 --> 0:23:59.756
<v Speaker 1>They chose to not look at the world like a pyramid,

0:24:00.156 --> 0:24:03.436
<v Speaker 1>and they didn't think, oh, everyone on their own. They

0:24:03.516 --> 0:24:05.116
<v Speaker 1>chose to look at the world in what I call

0:24:05.156 --> 0:24:10.116
<v Speaker 1>a constellation, which is, yes, be yourself. You're a star,

0:24:10.396 --> 0:24:12.396
<v Speaker 1>and you see other people as stars, and you try

0:24:12.396 --> 0:24:14.996
<v Speaker 1>to form new and interesting connections between them to make

0:24:15.076 --> 0:24:18.316
<v Speaker 1>something useful and something you could never do on your own.

0:24:18.996 --> 0:24:21.436
<v Speaker 1>Too often are default setting is looking at the world

0:24:21.436 --> 0:24:25.436
<v Speaker 1>like a pyramid, and we keep getting into those binary traps.

0:24:26.236 --> 0:24:28.116
<v Speaker 1>One of the things I really liked about the book

0:24:28.316 --> 0:24:30.756
<v Speaker 1>is that you didn't fall into the trap that sometimes

0:24:30.836 --> 0:24:33.556
<v Speaker 1>people do in leadership books, where they just give you

0:24:33.596 --> 0:24:37.596
<v Speaker 1>a series of case studies of quote unquote great leaders

0:24:37.636 --> 0:24:40.156
<v Speaker 1>and say do it like this person, And so it

0:24:40.196 --> 0:24:42.756
<v Speaker 1>was a relief that you didn't write it that way.

0:24:43.436 --> 0:24:46.756
<v Speaker 1>That said, I did finish the book wondering who are

0:24:46.876 --> 0:24:50.396
<v Speaker 1>your models of people who you think of as having

0:24:50.556 --> 0:24:55.956
<v Speaker 1>governed either businesses or countries or other kinds of nonprofit

0:24:56.036 --> 0:25:00.956
<v Speaker 1>entities through this model of giving away power or doing

0:25:00.996 --> 0:25:04.036
<v Speaker 1>the power with thing. I mean, it would be great

0:25:04.076 --> 0:25:06.996
<v Speaker 1>to say Barack Obama, whom we both admire tremendously, but

0:25:07.076 --> 0:25:09.876
<v Speaker 1>I sort of think his biggest wins came when he

0:25:09.916 --> 0:25:13.236
<v Speaker 1>didn't do that. You know, Obamacare being a great example

0:25:13.396 --> 0:25:15.956
<v Speaker 1>of not open without complexity. But you know, the real

0:25:16.396 --> 0:25:19.876
<v Speaker 1>transformative piece of legislation, to my mind of his presidency

0:25:20.156 --> 0:25:21.436
<v Speaker 1>not was saying what this or being word did to

0:25:21.516 --> 0:25:25.236
<v Speaker 1>it subsequently and it really was not ultimately a compromise.

0:25:25.436 --> 0:25:28.316
<v Speaker 1>It's a great point. I mean, Anne Marie Slaughter wrote

0:25:28.316 --> 0:25:32.356
<v Speaker 1>this great essay I think in Foreign Policy or Foreign Affairs,

0:25:33.036 --> 0:25:36.756
<v Speaker 1>and I'm paraphrasing here, but she basically starts off because

0:25:36.756 --> 0:25:39.116
<v Speaker 1>I would add the Paris Climate Accord, despite what happened

0:25:39.116 --> 0:25:41.316
<v Speaker 1>to it afterwards, I think it's wonderful she said. As

0:25:41.356 --> 0:25:45.156
<v Speaker 1>an internationally trained lawyer, and this and this. I ought

0:25:45.156 --> 0:25:46.756
<v Speaker 1>to hate the deal, and I ought to hate it

0:25:46.836 --> 0:25:49.516
<v Speaker 1>because it isn't binding. It isn't And she does the

0:25:49.556 --> 0:25:54.316
<v Speaker 1>whole litany of what were the criticisms of it leading

0:25:54.356 --> 0:25:56.716
<v Speaker 1>up to it and after it, and she said, but

0:25:58.196 --> 0:26:00.836
<v Speaker 1>for all those reasons, of all those things, it isn't.

0:26:01.756 --> 0:26:04.436
<v Speaker 1>I think it is wonderful and really helpful because it

0:26:04.556 --> 0:26:07.636
<v Speaker 1>is not binding, it is open ended. It allows people

0:26:07.636 --> 0:26:10.836
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah. And I think that is an interesting

0:26:11.716 --> 0:26:14.676
<v Speaker 1>test case. And I am no expert on climate or

0:26:14.756 --> 0:26:17.996
<v Speaker 1>the Climate Deal, but that we could get out then

0:26:18.076 --> 0:26:20.836
<v Speaker 1>get back in. Other people could step up for us

0:26:20.916 --> 0:26:23.916
<v Speaker 1>when the previous administration didn't want to. All of that

0:26:24.036 --> 0:26:26.836
<v Speaker 1>is a kind of weird in a good sense and

0:26:26.996 --> 0:26:31.996
<v Speaker 1>flexible way of dealing with something that is voluntary. People

0:26:31.996 --> 0:26:34.396
<v Speaker 1>set their own targets and it may go off the rails,

0:26:34.436 --> 0:26:38.916
<v Speaker 1>but it could lead to something really beautiful. I like that.

0:26:39.116 --> 0:26:42.836
<v Speaker 1>So Anne Marie Slaughter, she's someone I admired tremendously. You know,

0:26:42.876 --> 0:26:46.116
<v Speaker 1>she's done things in academia where she was a professor

0:26:46.156 --> 0:26:49.076
<v Speaker 1>in a dean. She's been in government as director of

0:26:49.076 --> 0:26:51.316
<v Speaker 1>Policy Penny in the State Department. Now she runs a

0:26:51.356 --> 0:26:53.036
<v Speaker 1>think tank. I mean, there's sort of no cool thing

0:26:53.396 --> 0:26:56.596
<v Speaker 1>in the world of public life that she hasn't done.

0:26:57.276 --> 0:27:00.436
<v Speaker 1>And she's argued, really in a series of books over

0:27:00.476 --> 0:27:03.796
<v Speaker 1>the course of almost twenty years about the value in

0:27:03.836 --> 0:27:07.836
<v Speaker 1>the international community of networks of people who are often

0:27:07.916 --> 0:27:11.956
<v Speaker 1>like minded, who come from different countries, and cooperation among

0:27:11.996 --> 0:27:15.156
<v Speaker 1>those people. Now, one of the criticisms of her work

0:27:15.316 --> 0:27:17.396
<v Speaker 1>that's come both from the left and from the right,

0:27:18.116 --> 0:27:20.636
<v Speaker 1>and she is nothing if not the mainstream of American

0:27:20.636 --> 0:27:22.556
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy thinking. I think I always think it's good

0:27:22.556 --> 0:27:24.676
<v Speaker 1>if people are criticizing you on both sides. But one

0:27:24.676 --> 0:27:27.436
<v Speaker 1>of the criticisms that her work has encountered is that

0:27:28.116 --> 0:27:31.996
<v Speaker 1>the people who are doing the dance are actually an elite,

0:27:32.756 --> 0:27:35.556
<v Speaker 1>and that they're an elite, they exercises a lot of

0:27:35.556 --> 0:27:39.796
<v Speaker 1>power that because it's not centered in one person, most

0:27:39.796 --> 0:27:43.396
<v Speaker 1>people don't really notice, and which is therefore in some

0:27:43.516 --> 0:27:50.036
<v Speaker 1>sense less responsive to big majorities of people. Yeah, that

0:27:50.076 --> 0:27:51.476
<v Speaker 1>made me want to ask you about the sort of

0:27:51.556 --> 0:27:54.836
<v Speaker 1>overall picture you have of the power of giving away power.

0:27:55.116 --> 0:27:58.996
<v Speaker 1>It's very consistent with Anrie's idea of shared power. As

0:27:58.996 --> 0:28:00.356
<v Speaker 1>you said, a lot of decisions are made by the

0:28:00.396 --> 0:28:02.396
<v Speaker 1>people in the room, and I wonder, how do you

0:28:02.436 --> 0:28:04.636
<v Speaker 1>think about that? I mean, it could be very down

0:28:04.636 --> 0:28:07.916
<v Speaker 1>to the grassroots. But you know, fifty million or three

0:28:07.996 --> 0:28:10.116
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty million people will have trouble all sitting

0:28:10.156 --> 0:28:12.516
<v Speaker 1>in a room together. They're always representatives of that group.

0:28:12.556 --> 0:28:15.836
<v Speaker 1>We're sitting in a room. Yeah. You said two phrases

0:28:15.876 --> 0:28:18.516
<v Speaker 1>that I think often come up in this context that

0:28:18.796 --> 0:28:22.996
<v Speaker 1>are important to clarify and redefine maybe. And one is

0:28:24.036 --> 0:28:26.236
<v Speaker 1>I had this discussion with Anne Marie. She came to

0:28:26.276 --> 0:28:28.476
<v Speaker 1>London and she said, oh, we need more bottoms up.

0:28:28.476 --> 0:28:30.276
<v Speaker 1>And I made the point to her I made earlier,

0:28:30.396 --> 0:28:34.116
<v Speaker 1>like bottoms up is no better. If you think of

0:28:34.156 --> 0:28:37.316
<v Speaker 1>yourself or you think of other people, is at the bottom,

0:28:37.676 --> 0:28:41.756
<v Speaker 1>you are doomed. Nothing good is going to come from

0:28:41.756 --> 0:28:45.396
<v Speaker 1>thinking of people at the bottom. You'll be condescending or

0:28:45.436 --> 0:28:48.716
<v Speaker 1>you'll feel condescended too, depending on where you've put yourself

0:28:48.756 --> 0:28:51.556
<v Speaker 1>in that equation. It's an awful equation, and you do

0:28:51.636 --> 0:28:54.036
<v Speaker 1>not have to look at yourself or others. Is at

0:28:54.076 --> 0:28:56.996
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of a pyramid. You could think of yourself

0:28:57.076 --> 0:29:00.876
<v Speaker 1>as stars in a constellation, for example. The other is

0:29:00.876 --> 0:29:04.876
<v Speaker 1>the word sharing power, which is what you said sounds right.

0:29:05.676 --> 0:29:09.836
<v Speaker 1>It is an exercise in dividing, implicit and sharing powers.

0:29:09.876 --> 0:29:12.476
<v Speaker 1>There's only so much and so we'll divvy it up.

0:29:13.076 --> 0:29:15.716
<v Speaker 1>And it's like no, no, no, you're done once you're

0:29:15.756 --> 0:29:20.756
<v Speaker 1>in that limited mindset. The great leaders, these constellation leaders.

0:29:21.636 --> 0:29:26.236
<v Speaker 1>Power is not something to be obviously lorded over others. Okay,

0:29:26.356 --> 0:29:28.596
<v Speaker 1>we all got that mumbo. It's not something to be

0:29:28.636 --> 0:29:32.276
<v Speaker 1>hoarded to yourself as an isolated individual. It is not

0:29:32.436 --> 0:29:35.036
<v Speaker 1>something to be divvied up and shared. It is something

0:29:35.076 --> 0:29:38.476
<v Speaker 1>to be made with and through other people, made and

0:29:38.556 --> 0:29:41.956
<v Speaker 1>multiplied over and over again. And that's where the magic lives.

0:29:41.956 --> 0:29:44.276
<v Speaker 1>And it's where the phrase grassroots is a real problem

0:29:44.276 --> 0:29:46.556
<v Speaker 1>because it's just kind of code for bottom up. Two.

0:29:48.596 --> 0:30:00.436
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right back. So I like that, and I

0:30:00.516 --> 0:30:02.836
<v Speaker 1>buy it, and I also take it that what you're

0:30:02.876 --> 0:30:05.916
<v Speaker 1>saying is that power needs to be conceptualized as not

0:30:06.156 --> 0:30:08.476
<v Speaker 1>zero sum. It has to be positive sum. You can

0:30:08.516 --> 0:30:11.396
<v Speaker 1>construct power in ways that are inclusive because you're not

0:30:11.436 --> 0:30:13.836
<v Speaker 1>starting with a pie and then dividing up the pie. Yeah,

0:30:13.836 --> 0:30:17.116
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's very very powerful. Do you think

0:30:17.116 --> 0:30:20.836
<v Speaker 1>there are no zones of power though that would genuinely

0:30:20.916 --> 0:30:26.356
<v Speaker 1>truly qualify as zero sum aren't there some situations, Yeah,

0:30:26.396 --> 0:30:28.276
<v Speaker 1>you know. I mean if you think about the amassing

0:30:28.556 --> 0:30:31.996
<v Speaker 1>of troops and resources and the logistics of D Day,

0:30:32.956 --> 0:30:37.236
<v Speaker 1>I bet that was very pyramid like and top down

0:30:37.476 --> 0:30:40.676
<v Speaker 1>and work backwards from a set date, all these sorts

0:30:40.716 --> 0:30:42.756
<v Speaker 1>of things I warn against in the book, like it

0:30:42.836 --> 0:30:46.196
<v Speaker 1>was helpful for that. But what I love is Churchill

0:30:46.596 --> 0:30:49.276
<v Speaker 1>made the point at the time like that is to

0:30:49.436 --> 0:30:51.956
<v Speaker 1>win this victory and then a different kind of hard

0:30:51.956 --> 0:30:55.116
<v Speaker 1>work begins where that mindset isn't at all helpful. And

0:30:55.196 --> 0:30:58.356
<v Speaker 1>that's what he called for the forming of special relationships,

0:30:58.396 --> 0:31:01.356
<v Speaker 1>which sounds really touchy feely except at Winston Churchill saying it,

0:31:01.916 --> 0:31:04.356
<v Speaker 1>and he's like, no, no, millions of them right between

0:31:04.476 --> 0:31:08.996
<v Speaker 1>farmers and farmers, and like that's where the energy and

0:31:09.116 --> 0:31:11.556
<v Speaker 1>this new kind of power can be created and multiplied.

0:31:12.396 --> 0:31:14.236
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if we're allowed to if can I

0:31:14.236 --> 0:31:16.956
<v Speaker 1>ask you a question because this is I didn't write

0:31:16.996 --> 0:31:18.796
<v Speaker 1>this in the book, but I want to. It's what

0:31:18.836 --> 0:31:22.476
<v Speaker 1>I've been struggling with. In the book, I talk about

0:31:22.516 --> 0:31:26.556
<v Speaker 1>the fact that win win is a losing formula because

0:31:26.596 --> 0:31:28.596
<v Speaker 1>it sounds good at first. It's like win win, but

0:31:28.636 --> 0:31:31.436
<v Speaker 1>you can't sort of talk about winning without implying losing.

0:31:31.676 --> 0:31:34.716
<v Speaker 1>And it comes with all these it comes with that

0:31:34.756 --> 0:31:37.476
<v Speaker 1>pyramid mindset that isn't helpful, I think, to a whole

0:31:37.516 --> 0:31:40.396
<v Speaker 1>bunch of intractable problems we're trying to work through together.

0:31:41.476 --> 0:31:44.196
<v Speaker 1>So I went back to that famous Adam Smith quote,

0:31:44.276 --> 0:31:46.036
<v Speaker 1>we do not rely on the benevolence of the butcher,

0:31:46.076 --> 0:31:49.316
<v Speaker 1>the baker, the brewer for our dinner, right, And I think,

0:31:49.356 --> 0:31:52.436
<v Speaker 1>and then you read on a little bit, and he

0:31:52.596 --> 0:31:56.156
<v Speaker 1>is understandably, I think, skeptical of sort of the do

0:31:56.316 --> 0:31:59.316
<v Speaker 1>good or instinct that it is particularly important for progressives

0:31:59.356 --> 0:32:02.676
<v Speaker 1>to listen to that critique of he had seen so

0:32:02.716 --> 0:32:07.156
<v Speaker 1>many things not happen or happen badly relying on benevolence alone.

0:32:08.556 --> 0:32:10.956
<v Speaker 1>My question you, it's like, okay, so it seems like

0:32:10.996 --> 0:32:13.676
<v Speaker 1>we've run with it over since seventeen seventy six till

0:32:13.676 --> 0:32:15.836
<v Speaker 1>now we've sort of run with that. Okay, you don't

0:32:15.836 --> 0:32:17.876
<v Speaker 1>rely on the benevolence, So then you do sort of

0:32:18.076 --> 0:32:21.556
<v Speaker 1>some version of enlightened self interest or whatever. That's what

0:32:21.836 --> 0:32:24.356
<v Speaker 1>is going on between the butcher, the baker, the brewer

0:32:24.476 --> 0:32:28.196
<v Speaker 1>and you, who's an implied other stick figure in Adam

0:32:28.276 --> 0:32:33.076
<v Speaker 1>Smith's rendition, which doesn't seem right either. And I guess

0:32:33.116 --> 0:32:35.756
<v Speaker 1>my questions like, what would you describe as the relationship?

0:32:35.996 --> 0:32:38.396
<v Speaker 1>What does the butcher think of the baker? What does

0:32:38.396 --> 0:32:40.316
<v Speaker 1>the baker think of the brewer? How does the brewer

0:32:40.396 --> 0:32:45.076
<v Speaker 1>think of you? What is going on between all those

0:32:45.076 --> 0:32:47.436
<v Speaker 1>people that begin with B. One of the answers that

0:32:47.476 --> 0:32:52.436
<v Speaker 1>emilily comes into my mind is inspired by the historian M. A.

0:32:52.516 --> 0:32:57.316
<v Speaker 1>Rothschild's writing about Adam Smith and what she I'm going

0:32:57.316 --> 0:33:00.236
<v Speaker 1>to grossly oversimplify this, but one thing that she shows

0:33:00.516 --> 0:33:02.436
<v Speaker 1>is that you know some of this famous for Wealth

0:33:02.436 --> 0:33:05.236
<v Speaker 1>of Nations, which is where the quote you're introducing comes from.

0:33:05.716 --> 0:33:07.916
<v Speaker 1>But he also wrote this incredibly influential at the time

0:33:07.916 --> 0:33:11.116
<v Speaker 1>book called a Theory of Moral Sentiments, and he was

0:33:11.156 --> 0:33:15.476
<v Speaker 1>actually really deeply interested in exactly the question that you're asking.

0:33:15.556 --> 0:33:18.036
<v Speaker 1>What are the we call them affects or sentiments that

0:33:18.156 --> 0:33:22.356
<v Speaker 1>shape the moral life. And now this is me riffing

0:33:22.396 --> 0:33:25.516
<v Speaker 1>on Emma, but I think it's sort of interesting that

0:33:25.716 --> 0:33:29.316
<v Speaker 1>in Smith's world people still believed that being in commerce

0:33:29.356 --> 0:33:33.476
<v Speaker 1>with other people made you like them more, made you

0:33:33.516 --> 0:33:36.836
<v Speaker 1>feel more connected to them, because relative too, I live

0:33:36.876 --> 0:33:41.676
<v Speaker 1>in my little hamlet, I never leave I grow all

0:33:41.756 --> 0:33:45.396
<v Speaker 1>my own food, I make everything that I make for myself,

0:33:46.076 --> 0:33:48.316
<v Speaker 1>and I therefore never meet the people on the other

0:33:48.356 --> 0:33:50.596
<v Speaker 1>side of the hill. And when I meet them, I

0:33:50.636 --> 0:33:52.156
<v Speaker 1>don't like them, because if I meet them, it's probably

0:33:52.156 --> 0:33:54.836
<v Speaker 1>because they're trying to steal something from me. Relative to

0:33:54.876 --> 0:33:57.716
<v Speaker 1>that world, a world where I go over the hill

0:33:57.796 --> 0:34:00.156
<v Speaker 1>with my goods and the people on the other side

0:34:00.156 --> 0:34:01.356
<v Speaker 1>of the hill come up to the top of the

0:34:01.436 --> 0:34:04.156
<v Speaker 1>hill with their goods and we trade, is a world

0:34:04.196 --> 0:34:07.796
<v Speaker 1>where we have more human contact, more engagement. And I

0:34:07.836 --> 0:34:10.916
<v Speaker 1>think in the seventeen hundreds of people believed with Smith

0:34:11.356 --> 0:34:13.036
<v Speaker 1>that the way I would think about those other people

0:34:13.036 --> 0:34:15.116
<v Speaker 1>with whom I was trading on a daily basis is

0:34:15.156 --> 0:34:17.716
<v Speaker 1>that I liked them because I got to know them

0:34:17.756 --> 0:34:20.436
<v Speaker 1>a little. Yeah, there we go. Then we got, you know,

0:34:20.636 --> 0:34:23.676
<v Speaker 1>fifty years later by the time Marx is looking at

0:34:23.676 --> 0:34:27.276
<v Speaker 1>the same economic situation. By then, big time capitalism has

0:34:27.276 --> 0:34:30.196
<v Speaker 1>come into existence, and we've had the Industrial Revolution much

0:34:30.236 --> 0:34:33.476
<v Speaker 1>beyond what Smith could just glimpse the beginnings of. And

0:34:33.516 --> 0:34:36.076
<v Speaker 1>then at that point Marx is starting to say, look,

0:34:36.076 --> 0:34:40.036
<v Speaker 1>economic relationships are alienated. It's no longer the case that

0:34:40.156 --> 0:34:42.316
<v Speaker 1>I like you, and so now we sort of imagine

0:34:42.356 --> 0:34:44.236
<v Speaker 1>that in the small town everyone knew each other and

0:34:44.316 --> 0:34:45.716
<v Speaker 1>liked each other. But once you go to the big

0:34:45.756 --> 0:34:47.356
<v Speaker 1>city and you have to buy and sell in a

0:34:47.676 --> 0:34:50.116
<v Speaker 1>big store, or you work in a factory, you become

0:34:50.156 --> 0:34:53.156
<v Speaker 1>alienated from the other people, alienated from your labor. And

0:34:53.196 --> 0:34:57.236
<v Speaker 1>I guess my own view is that in the perfect world,

0:34:57.596 --> 0:34:59.956
<v Speaker 1>all of our interactions would enable us to feel a

0:34:59.996 --> 0:35:04.276
<v Speaker 1>little more human connection, a little more human contact. And

0:35:04.396 --> 0:35:06.596
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Internet shows you how complicated this is. Right,

0:35:06.636 --> 0:35:10.596
<v Speaker 1>The Internet both had a promise of nanimity and a

0:35:10.716 --> 0:35:14.276
<v Speaker 1>danger of alienation, and especially with the rise of social media,

0:35:14.356 --> 0:35:18.316
<v Speaker 1>it produces at least the perception of intimacy, and you

0:35:18.356 --> 0:35:20.356
<v Speaker 1>can actually get to know people on the Internet whom

0:35:20.356 --> 0:35:22.836
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't know otherwise. I look at my kids world.

0:35:22.876 --> 0:35:24.956
<v Speaker 1>They have a much broader acquaintanceship than I did at

0:35:24.996 --> 0:35:28.076
<v Speaker 1>their age, because I basically knew people whom I had met. Yeah,

0:35:28.156 --> 0:35:30.356
<v Speaker 1>and they know a lot of people well whom they've

0:35:30.356 --> 0:35:32.596
<v Speaker 1>never they've met them, but they haven't met them in person.

0:35:33.196 --> 0:35:36.636
<v Speaker 1>So I guess, to me, this is the sort of

0:35:36.636 --> 0:35:40.036
<v Speaker 1>thing that's it's always both elements are going to be there.

0:35:40.156 --> 0:35:42.556
<v Speaker 1>We're going to have to interact with you with one another,

0:35:42.636 --> 0:35:44.716
<v Speaker 1>knowing that we have something to gain, that there's something

0:35:44.796 --> 0:35:47.156
<v Speaker 1>kind of quote unquote purely economic about it. But we

0:35:47.196 --> 0:35:49.436
<v Speaker 1>also need to have some sense of human connection and

0:35:49.476 --> 0:35:53.636
<v Speaker 1>if we don't, we are screwed. Well, thank you, and

0:35:53.796 --> 0:35:57.356
<v Speaker 1>that is very helpful. As you were saying that, I

0:35:57.436 --> 0:36:00.396
<v Speaker 1>was thinking often I think our debate is the individual

0:36:00.676 --> 0:36:03.356
<v Speaker 1>or like big groups of people, and what I think

0:36:03.396 --> 0:36:06.796
<v Speaker 1>Mary fall it and what we're talking about is small

0:36:06.836 --> 0:36:09.916
<v Speaker 1>groups of people sitting around a table together, something as

0:36:09.956 --> 0:36:13.916
<v Speaker 1>mundane as your staff meeting on Monday. That is certainly

0:36:13.916 --> 0:36:16.316
<v Speaker 1>where Mary Follett said, that's where a lot of this

0:36:16.396 --> 0:36:19.956
<v Speaker 1>work can happen, because in a crowd you can be lost.

0:36:20.356 --> 0:36:22.396
<v Speaker 1>You're not lost in a group. You are more you

0:36:22.716 --> 0:36:26.396
<v Speaker 1>in a group. You can only really know yourself by

0:36:26.436 --> 0:36:30.036
<v Speaker 1>bumping into working through with other people around you and

0:36:30.116 --> 0:36:34.316
<v Speaker 1>figuring out ways to get people around a table, and

0:36:34.436 --> 0:36:38.436
<v Speaker 1>not to say things that like what unites us is

0:36:38.476 --> 0:36:41.636
<v Speaker 1>greater than what divides us, which is another one of

0:36:41.636 --> 0:36:44.036
<v Speaker 1>these things that everyone nodds their head. I certainly do

0:36:44.116 --> 0:36:46.196
<v Speaker 1>when people say it, because you're supposed to nod your

0:36:46.196 --> 0:36:48.996
<v Speaker 1>head to it. But I don't think it's true. And

0:36:49.036 --> 0:36:53.076
<v Speaker 1>I think all the energy lies indifference. That's where the magic,

0:36:53.116 --> 0:36:55.316
<v Speaker 1>That's where all the energy lives. So let's not be

0:36:55.356 --> 0:36:57.356
<v Speaker 1>afraid of it or sweep it under the carpet. Let's

0:36:57.396 --> 0:37:10.556
<v Speaker 1>deal with it. We'll be right back, Matthew. I want

0:37:10.556 --> 0:37:12.796
<v Speaker 1>to thank you for your service to the country, for

0:37:12.876 --> 0:37:16.876
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating and challenging book, and for a really great

0:37:16.916 --> 0:37:20.996
<v Speaker 1>conversation about power and how we can rethink it in

0:37:21.076 --> 0:37:23.956
<v Speaker 1>more productive ways going forward. Thank you so much for

0:37:23.996 --> 0:37:27.476
<v Speaker 1>having me, and thank you for this podcast. And you're

0:37:27.516 --> 0:37:29.476
<v Speaker 1>hitting on crypto we didn't talk about, but all the

0:37:29.516 --> 0:37:31.676
<v Speaker 1>topics you're going through on this podcast are the things

0:37:31.716 --> 0:37:34.796
<v Speaker 1>I'm eager to learn much more about. So I'm a

0:37:34.796 --> 0:37:45.356
<v Speaker 1>big listener and fan too. Thank you. Thanks him. Speaking

0:37:45.396 --> 0:37:48.916
<v Speaker 1>to Matthew about the power of giving away power, I

0:37:48.956 --> 0:37:52.676
<v Speaker 1>was really struck by the paradox that lies at the

0:37:52.716 --> 0:37:55.956
<v Speaker 1>heart of it. On one hand, Matthew is a strong

0:37:56.036 --> 0:38:00.356
<v Speaker 1>advocate of the idea that we need to recognize our

0:38:00.396 --> 0:38:04.276
<v Speaker 1>diversity and our difference in order for power to mean anything,

0:38:04.756 --> 0:38:06.996
<v Speaker 1>and that instinct lies at the heart of his idea

0:38:07.116 --> 0:38:09.916
<v Speaker 1>that we need to diffuse power and spread it out

0:38:09.956 --> 0:38:12.636
<v Speaker 1>to many different people in order for it to function,

0:38:13.076 --> 0:38:15.996
<v Speaker 1>and indeed that doing so will enhance the power and

0:38:16.036 --> 0:38:19.756
<v Speaker 1>authority of the legitimate democratic institutions that do so. That

0:38:19.836 --> 0:38:22.556
<v Speaker 1>insight seems to be correct, and it is, after all,

0:38:22.596 --> 0:38:26.396
<v Speaker 1>the basic insight on which all democracy is built. Democracy is,

0:38:26.436 --> 0:38:29.876
<v Speaker 1>after all, the very idea that collective rules should take

0:38:29.916 --> 0:38:34.356
<v Speaker 1>place collectively rather than from the dominant center. Yet, at

0:38:34.396 --> 0:38:38.276
<v Speaker 1>the same time, as Matthew acknowledges and indeed points out,

0:38:38.796 --> 0:38:41.716
<v Speaker 1>in a world where we are tremendously diverse, and where

0:38:41.756 --> 0:38:45.436
<v Speaker 1>power is sent out to many, many different people, there

0:38:45.556 --> 0:38:48.476
<v Speaker 1>is a real risk that our divisions will become so

0:38:48.476 --> 0:38:51.476
<v Speaker 1>significant that we will no longer be able to make

0:38:51.516 --> 0:38:55.476
<v Speaker 1>collective decisions, and a glance at the US political system

0:38:55.516 --> 0:38:58.196
<v Speaker 1>over the last five or six years suggests that we

0:38:58.276 --> 0:39:02.036
<v Speaker 1>may actually be in such a period. Indeed, in other

0:39:02.076 --> 0:39:06.276
<v Speaker 1>historical moments, political division might have given way to common

0:39:06.276 --> 0:39:09.556
<v Speaker 1>feeling when we face something like the COVID pandemic, But

0:39:09.676 --> 0:39:13.796
<v Speaker 1>in our profoundly politicized era, it seems as though even

0:39:13.836 --> 0:39:17.156
<v Speaker 1>existential threat to our lives is not enough to pull

0:39:17.196 --> 0:39:19.596
<v Speaker 1>us together. As we've come to understand and construe the

0:39:19.636 --> 0:39:23.836
<v Speaker 1>pandemic in politicized terms and in polarized terms, making it

0:39:23.876 --> 0:39:28.316
<v Speaker 1>harder and harder for polarization to go away. In this conversation,

0:39:28.516 --> 0:39:31.996
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that either Matthew or I solved this paradox,

0:39:32.236 --> 0:39:35.476
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps it's a paradox that can't be perfectly solved.

0:39:36.076 --> 0:39:38.236
<v Speaker 1>Like Matthew, I have a lot of faith in our

0:39:38.276 --> 0:39:42.156
<v Speaker 1>capacities to pull together as a country eventually. Yet that said,

0:39:42.356 --> 0:39:45.596
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a simple solution to how we get there,

0:39:45.916 --> 0:39:49.876
<v Speaker 1>other than living through the realities of our divisions and

0:39:49.996 --> 0:39:54.116
<v Speaker 1>trying to slowly and gently make our way back towards

0:39:54.116 --> 0:39:56.996
<v Speaker 1>the middle. I think that's the kind of aspiration that

0:39:57.036 --> 0:40:00.356
<v Speaker 1>Matthew has, and to me, it makes his political vision

0:40:00.676 --> 0:40:04.276
<v Speaker 1>immensely attractive and interesting, and it makes him a person

0:40:04.516 --> 0:40:07.956
<v Speaker 1>who's worth watching going forward, not just for the ways

0:40:07.996 --> 0:40:10.676
<v Speaker 1>he's deployed power in the PAS, but for the takeaways

0:40:10.676 --> 0:40:14.876
<v Speaker 1>and lessons that it's led him to reach. Until the

0:40:14.916 --> 0:40:17.316
<v Speaker 1>next time I speak to you here on Deep Background,

0:40:17.956 --> 0:40:24.476
<v Speaker 1>breathe deep, think deep thoughts, and have some fun. Deep

0:40:24.476 --> 0:40:27.756
<v Speaker 1>Background is brought to you by Pushkin Industries. Our producer

0:40:27.836 --> 0:40:31.076
<v Speaker 1>is Mola Board, our engineer is ben Toalliday, and our

0:40:31.116 --> 0:40:35.916
<v Speaker 1>showrunner is Sophie Crane. Mckibbon. Editorial support from noahm Osband.

0:40:36.396 --> 0:40:39.796
<v Speaker 1>Theme music by Luis Gara at Pushkin, thanks to Mia Lobell,

0:40:39.996 --> 0:40:44.716
<v Speaker 1>Julia Barton, Lydia Jeancott, Heather Faine, Carlie Migliori, Maggie Taylor,

0:40:44.916 --> 0:40:48.516
<v Speaker 1>Eric Sandler, and Jacob Weisberg. You can find me on

0:40:48.516 --> 0:40:51.316
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Noah R. Feldman. I also write a column

0:40:51.316 --> 0:40:54.036
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg Opinion, which you can find at Bloomberg dot

0:40:54.076 --> 0:40:58.356
<v Speaker 1>com Slash Feldman. To discover Bloomberg's original st later podcasts,

0:40:58.556 --> 0:41:01.836
<v Speaker 1>go to Bloomberg dot com slash podcasts, and if you

0:41:01.876 --> 0:41:04.516
<v Speaker 1>like what you heard today, please write a review or

0:41:04.636 --> 0:41:07.556
<v Speaker 1>tell a friend. This is deep background