WEBVTT - Spotlight on Alan Turing

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve Camray.

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you get in touch with technology? With

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:17.760
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff from how stuff works dot com. Hello again, everyone,

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:20.800
<v Speaker 1>welcome to tech Stuff. My name is Chris Pollette and

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I am an editor here at how stuff works dot com.

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:25.959
<v Speaker 1>It's singing across from me as usual, his senior writer,

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. There was what no one at the Mutant

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Hamster Races. We only had one entry into the Madame

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Curie lookalike contest and he was disqualified later, why do

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I even bother? Okay, I have no clue on that one.

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Trust me. We're about to talk about someone who's a

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:48.840
<v Speaker 1>real genius and so, uh it'll come through eventually where

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>that quote comes from. So to start this this podcast off,

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>we actually have a little Facebook feedback you be, and

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>this comes from Brian, and Brian says, you guys should

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 1>definitely devote an entire podcast to Alan Turing at some point. Well, Brian,

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>that point is now, well, who we're gonna do a

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>spotlight on Alan Turing. I first became acquainted with Mr

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Touring's name while reading a novel, actually Neil Stevenson's Cryptonomicon,

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>which is, as you might guess from the title, very

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>heavily oriented around cryptanalysis, cryptography and cryptology, which I find fascinating.

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>That's basically they're all revolving around codes and code breaking exactly.

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>And Touring was known as a very important person in

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the history of code breaking. Although uh, and it's interesting,

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess it depends on which circles you you talked to.

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>You know what Touring was known for. So he's really

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>known as a codebreaker, but he's also known as the

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of the father of computer science. Yes, that's true.

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>That's true. Sort of depends on whom you asked. Very clearly,

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:08.079
<v Speaker 1>he had an extremely important role to play during World

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>War Two, but we'll we'll get into that first. Let's

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:13.239
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about Touring and where he came

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>from and and sort of his background. He's one of

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>those individuals that the more you read about him, the

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 1>more you realize how incredibly remarkable this guy was. I

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>liken him to Ada Lovelace in a way. Ada Lovelace

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>was another person who had this amazing ability to understand

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>mathematics on a level that is is completely foreign to me.

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I I understand basic math. I don't understand

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>mathematics the way Touring did, even at a young age.

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>So Touring was born in nineteen twelve in Paddington, London.

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Both of his parents were from the upper middle class,

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:59.119
<v Speaker 1>which at that time was class was very very important

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>in the UH in England still is to some extent,

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>but not it's I don't think they're quite as class

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>conscious as they used to be. But at anyway, he

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>was born to upper middle class parents who got him

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>into public school UM, and he had a keen interest

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 1>in math and science, physics in particular. Yes, Uh, In fact,

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>he was incredibly gifted in in mathematics. He was reading

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>as a teenager. He was reading UH papers written by

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Einstein and theorizing on um the nature of relativity, and

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and really understanding it in a way that I still

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>struggle with today. So clearly a guy who whose genius

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>far outstrips any intelligence I might possess. I am more

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>than happy to to admit that, because I certainly don't

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>understand it on the level he did. While in school,

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>he happened to meet a student who was a year

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>ahead of him named Christopher more Comb, now whom he

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>referred to as Chris, and Chris was another brilliant young student,

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>someone who really had a very strong grasp on mathematics

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and physics as well. And Chris and Allan found that

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 1>talking together that they could kind of understand mathematics on

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>an even deeper level by sharing their combined perspectives. And

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:37.039
<v Speaker 1>they struck up a very strong friendship. And unfortunately, Chris

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 1>died in nineteen thirty. He was he was not He

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 1>was not a healthy young boy as it turns out,

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 1>So by nineteen Chris dies and that left a huge

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>gap in Touring's life. I'm sorry you're about to say something. No,

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>I was. I was going to say, Uh, Jonathan and

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I took our our source information from a couple of

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>really exhaustive sources. Um. I took a lot of mine

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:10.160
<v Speaker 1>from the from Touring's actual website, which is maintained by

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>one of his biographers, Andrew Hodges. Yes. Yes, Andrew Hodges

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>wrote a book called Alan Touring The Enigma. I highly

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>recommend this book. I've actually I read it ages and

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>ages ago, and I revisited it for this podcast, and

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>it is a very good biography that that really kind

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of dives into not just the the accomplishments that Touring

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>achieved during his lifetime, and not only in the and

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the foundation he laid for computer science, but also his

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>personal life and how that kind of shaped what he

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>did and who he was. Yep, I haven't read it yet.

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:49.839
<v Speaker 1>I want to pick it up. But the other source

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:51.719
<v Speaker 1>that I consulted for this, and I know that Jonathan

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:54.919
<v Speaker 1>did too, was the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, which is

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>an awesome site to have used it for other podcasts.

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>But in doing the research and learning more about Chris

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>more Com, I think that one of the interesting things

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:09.039
<v Speaker 1>that this pulled out for him from touring, based on

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the biographical the Hodges website, was that for some time,

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:18.160
<v Speaker 1>for two or three years afterwards, he spent a lot

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 1>of time thinking about human consciousness and what happens to

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:27.719
<v Speaker 1>that information basically how I I assume from that that

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:30.279
<v Speaker 1>he was thinking about how the brain stores information and

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>where that information goes when somebody dies. Right, Yeah, he

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>became very focused on the subjects of mind and matter. Yes,

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>where where does where does one begin? On the other end,

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 1>are they one and the same? Is the human mind

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>just a you know? Is it just a material construct or?

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:54.479
<v Speaker 1>Is there some other element there that is indefinable really

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>as far as you know we can understand right now. Um,

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>this kind of led him into a study of physics yep.

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think it has a lot to do with

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:08.279
<v Speaker 1>the uh, the genesis of the touring test, whether computers

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>can can think. But these are things where we'll talk

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>about more in a minute. But I think it's interesting

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>that an event like this may have prompted him to

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>consider more serious matters and and take him in different

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>directions of study later in life. Yeah, yeah, it was.

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I would definitely call that a pivotal moment in his life.

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>One wonders what his life would have been like had

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>had more Coum not died. So he graduates from public

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:41.239
<v Speaker 1>school and then goes to attend King's College at Cambridge University. Um,

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>it's here where he really starts to study various kinds

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>of deep mathematics, including probability and um number theory, stuff

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>that goes well beyond my basic understanding. It's also where

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 1>he first begins to come to grips with his sexuality.

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Alan tour ing if you did not know I was

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>a homosexual, and he kind of really started to discover

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>this during college and college was a pretty um open

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>environment compared to his public school. Like public school was

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>a very controlled environment, a very conservative environment, and the

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>college as was almost the opposite. So Touring really experienced

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a complete change in culture by the time he went

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>to college. So I'm sorry I was going to say that.

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>He also during this period started to become involved with

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>some very liberal thinkers of the time, UM, economists like

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 1>like Keynes and Pigou. Um. You know, people have have suggested,

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that he may have been moving in so

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:53.200
<v Speaker 1>far as to be Marxist, but I don't believe he

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>actually ever was formally affiliated with people like that. But

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>he was. He was exposing himself to some very uh,

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>some very liberal people at that point, and in a

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>variety of uh ways of speaking about it. Yeah, there

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>were a lot of anti war intellectuals that he was

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 1>he was friends with, or at least he moved in

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the same circles that they did. Um. He never really

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 1>seemed to express a particularly strong political opinion. No, no,

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>not not from what I've read. Um, this was in

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the in the early nineteen thirties, so we're talking the

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>period between worlds World wars, one and two. Um. And

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of course economics playing a terrific part in terrific I

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>mean very large part in uh, the outbreak of World

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>War two. Um. So you know these are these are

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>things much on the minds of of people in the

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:49.559
<v Speaker 1>very early twentieth century. Certainly right. So in nineteen thirty

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>four he graduates from King's College. In nineteen he's elected

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 1>a fellow to the college, which means he actually draws

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>a stipend. Uh. And in ninety six he's awarded a

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Smith's Prize for his work in probability theory. So during

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>this period he was starting to specialize in quantum mechanics

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 1>and logic as well as probability. And then we get

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:12.559
<v Speaker 1>to nineteen thirty six, which is the year in which

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:17.319
<v Speaker 1>he theorized in a device called the touring machine. Yes,

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>this was purely theoretical, not an actual physical device, but

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 1>he theorized that it would be possible to create a

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>machine that could complete a computational operation the same way

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:34.439
<v Speaker 1>the human mind would. So it simulates what the human

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>mind goes through to perform a very specific operation. Now,

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 1>each each Turing machine could only perform one kind of operation. Yes,

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>so uh, it wasn't like it would be like if

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:51.439
<v Speaker 1>you if you told one person they could only this

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 1>is oversimplifying, but telling one person they could only add numbers,

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and another person they could only multiply numbers, they would

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>not be able to swa oper roles at all. They

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>could only do that one simple operation. You could give

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:05.719
<v Speaker 1>them different numbers, but they could only perform that one

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>operation upon the numbers. Then this led him to then

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>theorize a universal touring machine. Yes, something that could handle

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 1>more than one task, right, it could. It could perform

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 1>all the operations that individual touring machine machines could perform.

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 1>So the universal touring machine was sort of really a

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:31.559
<v Speaker 1>theoretical computer. It was a computer that could perform any

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>operation or algorithm, set of directions, set of instructions that

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the various other like individual theoretical touring machines could could perform.

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:46.599
<v Speaker 1>So again, this is all just the realm of ideas.

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Right now, we'd start at a physical machine. Yet, Yes,

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>apparently um Touring believed that the universal touring machine. UM

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>he probably didn't call it that. I don't know, I

0:11:58.080 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't read that, but that's of course what we call it.

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:04.559
<v Speaker 1>Um He believed that the universal machine would operate according

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>to a table of behavior, which people likened to a

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>computer program. So basically those were the parameters under which

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:15.840
<v Speaker 1>it could perform different kinds of operations. But it's just

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 1>funny that he had his own language. It's funny to me,

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>but it makes all the you know, all the sense

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>in the world when you didn't already have a paradigm.

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, we call them computer programs because everyone else does.

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 1>But he had his own language for this. But once

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you've understand sort of what he's talking about, you kind

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>of go, oh, so that's what you think, right, So

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:36.680
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago by he gets a PhD

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 1>in algebra and number theory, So no slouch there. Um,

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and and then he starts, um, he starts working on

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 1>an interesting project for the British government. Um, so we're

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about eight. There's there's an event going on in Europe. Yeah,

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a small event going on in Europe. There's a

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Germany is uh is becoming a bit of a problem.

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>There's um, a World War two is breaking out at

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>this point. I'm sorry, go ahead, no, as I as

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I previously alluded to, the the German economy has been

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 1>very poor for a very long time for them, and

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 1>so gradually as Adolf Hitler convinced that he could turn

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the country around where he given the opportunity to take

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:29.439
<v Speaker 1>the reins and take power. Um, he basically convinced the

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:32.559
<v Speaker 1>Germans that you know, he would be the leader that

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 1>would lead them to greatness. And in doing so they

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:39.840
<v Speaker 1>militarized of course, and of course Hitler had another agenda

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:42.200
<v Speaker 1>in mind as well. This was brought to you by

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff you missed in history class. Yeah, but no, it's

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 1>but it's interesting to think about that that Touring was

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>involved in. He was interested in things like, you know,

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>economics and things and mathematics. And the Germans had developed

0:13:56.240 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 1>a very uh powerful mechanical code machine, yes, called the

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Enigma machine. Yes, so the German Enigma code machine was

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 1>this device that allowed the Germans to encode um different commands.

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>The Luftwaffa in particular was using it as well as

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the German Navy. Now, the luftwaff version was slightly simpler

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>than the NAVL version, yes, and didn't have all that

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 1>lent on it. Oh sorry wrong, Yeah, it was in

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the air as opposed to underwater anyway, Um, touring began

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>to work on the Enigma codes and he developed a

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>device of his own U actually he developed along with

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 1>some other people. He worked with several other people on

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>this project, but together they developed a device called the

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 1>bomb b O M B e yes and this was

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>a decoding device, and the Luftaffa codes ended up being

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the simplest to decode it. It It took more work to

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>decode the naval ones, which were mainly UH concerning the

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 1>U boats submersible vehicles, which was very important as far

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 1>as the war in the Atlantic was concerned. Without those UH,

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 1>without being able to decode those messages, the war may

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>have gone very differently, at least the naval part of

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the war would have gone very differently. Um. So UH,

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>he starts to break these codes, it's actually having a

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 1>measurable effect on the war. It's saving countless lives on

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the Allied side. Uh. He also, in nineteen forty two,

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>interestingly enough, proposed marriage yes to Joan Clark, and then

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 1>he retracted the proposal. She accepted, then he had to

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>retract it, and he explained to her. I think this

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>was one of those moments where it was probably another

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>defining moment where he told her that he was homosexual

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and that he wouldn't that his therefore he couldn't really

0:15:57.320 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>marry her. And I think that was probably the moment

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>where I mean, this is this is guesswork, but it

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>seems like it's the moment where he decided that he

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>wasn't going to pretend to be something he wasn't, which

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately would lead to tragedy further down the line. Um.

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 1>So in in nineteen four, this is getting close to

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the end of World War two, he actually first started

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about building a brain, an electronic simulation of a brain,

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 1>and what it would take in order to achieve such

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 1>a thing, and this would sort of be an electronic

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>version of his Universal machine. Now, back when he was

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the Universal machine, it would have been mostly

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>a mechanical device, non electronic device. It was only through

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the developments of World War two, the techno technological developments

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of World War two, that electronics started to become more

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>important than mechanical devices. So that's when he starts working

0:16:56.000 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>in computer theory and and even computer software theory. Uh, again,

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 1>this is all theoretical, but he starts to work. In

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:07.440
<v Speaker 1>forty seven, he starts working on the idea of programming

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 1>and neural nets. That's fascinating stuff. Yeah, talking about networks

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>essentially years before we would have computer networks of any size, right,

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and he was he was even thinking about creating some

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:28.239
<v Speaker 1>sort of mechanical network that would have some sort of

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 1>learning capability. Yes, so it's not just that it can

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>carry out instructions, but that it can learn from the

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 1>instructions you give it and build upon that. Yes, so

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>this is essentially artificial intelligence. This is really where he

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>starts to to become interested in the subject of artificial

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 1>intelligence and touring. You know, you could call him the

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 1>father of computer science. You could also call him the

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:56.719
<v Speaker 1>father of artificial intelligence in a way. Yeah, yeah, that's true. Um.

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>One other fascinating thing about him in that era, right

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and imediately post war um apparently part of his frustrations,

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 1>as part of a way to alleviate the frustration he

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:12.160
<v Speaker 1>was feeling with getting his work done. Now, he wasn't

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>really recognized for his wartime work because so much of

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 1>it was top secret, so you know, it's a sort

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>of a way to deal with the stress of that.

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>He took up running and almost qualified for the h

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>British Olympic team as a marathon runner. And it's just

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 1>one of those things where I'd always heard about his

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:37.679
<v Speaker 1>mathematical work and his work with computers. Mean really, you know,

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 1>he sustained an injury, which unfortunately prevented him from being

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:45.640
<v Speaker 1>really considered for that team, but as pretty remarkable. I mean,

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the guy was a phenomenal genius and potentially a world

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:56.399
<v Speaker 1>class athlete. Yes, there are stories about Touring, uh having

0:18:56.440 --> 0:19:01.919
<v Speaker 1>fun by racing people cross the campuses of the various

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>universities he worked at while they took public transportation and

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 1>he would go on foot and beat them there. So

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean there was he definitely had a little bit

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>of a playful side to him. Um So. In nineteen fifty,

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Touring proposes something that plays a really important role in

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence. It's called the Touring test. And this was

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>in a paper called Computing Machinery and Intelligence, which appeared

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>in the journal Mind in nineteen fifty. Yes, and uh,

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>this was this was a really interesting philosophical point. Touring

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>suggested that if you could build a machine that could

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:50.880
<v Speaker 1>imitate a thinking, living creature, um so that it could

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 1>fool someone an interrogator, Uh, seventy percent of the time

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:57.200
<v Speaker 1>that the integator was talking to a human and not

0:19:57.280 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 1>a machine. It would be said to pass the touring test,

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>that would said it would be said that this was

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 1>a machine that could at least simulate intelligence. And Uh

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Hodges has a great section in his website that goes

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 1>into a discussion about Descartes. Uh and Descartes actually theorized

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 1>about something similar to this ages before Touring. Descartes said

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:27.919
<v Speaker 1>that that if we could build a machine that could

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:30.919
<v Speaker 1>imitate a living thing, we would still be able to

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 1>recognize it as a machine because it would lack understanding. Yes,

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 1>so even if we could teach a machine to talk,

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>it would just it would say words, but it wouldn't

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:46.479
<v Speaker 1>be meaningful. It couldn't respond in a meaningful way, so

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 1>it could not be able to demonstrate any sort of

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:54.360
<v Speaker 1>understanding of what it was talking about. Descartes was actually,

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:57.120
<v Speaker 1>in a way, Descartes was really forward thinking in this

0:20:57.240 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>because he was essentially stating that the problem of teaching

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:06.399
<v Speaker 1>a machine two comprehend and respond to stimuli is far

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>more complicated than anyone would imagine. And it turns out

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that's true. It is really really hard to teach a

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>machine too two detect, interpret, and respond to stimuli beyond

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a basic level, like you could teach a machine quote

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>unquote teach a machine to detect temperature and move away

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:33.440
<v Speaker 1>from temperatures that are too hot. But two be able

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>to converse is a much different task, much much higher

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 1>level of thinking required in order to accomplish that task exactly.

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's that maybe why Touring specifically chose conversation as

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the task to test in the Touring test. It makes

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Some people have objected to that, saying that conversation is

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:57.680
<v Speaker 1>not really a test of intelligence, but Touring had various

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:01.360
<v Speaker 1>responses to these objections. In his paper, He said that

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:04.359
<v Speaker 1>this is a quote, I believe that in about fifty

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 1>years time, it will be possible to program computers with

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 1>a storage capacity about ten to the ninth power. Tend

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to the ninth power of what I have no idea

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:14.200
<v Speaker 1>because he didn't specify in this particular quote to make

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 1>them play the imitation game so well that an average

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:20.640
<v Speaker 1>interrogator will not have more than seventy chance of making

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the right identification after five minutes of questioning. So the

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 1>invitation game is kind of what I was alluding to earlier.

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 1>You have an interrogator who is asking questions of two subjects.

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:35.119
<v Speaker 1>One of those two subjects is a computer, right, the

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>other is a human being, and the interrogator doesn't know which. Yeah,

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>it has no way of seeing like the interrogator. It

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 1>does not have a line of sight to the subjects.

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 1>The interrogators essentially asking questions, usually like through a terminal,

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:50.160
<v Speaker 1>so you're typing the man and you're seeing the responses

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 1>on the screen. Um. And after five minutes of questioning,

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>if that interrogator is unable to determine which is the

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:01.440
<v Speaker 1>human which is the computer, then that device may very

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:04.719
<v Speaker 1>well pass the touring test. Now, when we say with chance,

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>that means that over multiple tests, UM, with multiple interrogators,

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that that ends up being chance or better that um,

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the interrogators unable to make that determination. That's when you

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 1>say you've kind of hit this artificial intelligence level as

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:26.640
<v Speaker 1>defined by touring. UM. Now, some people would say that, well,

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:30.200
<v Speaker 1>if you just designed a computer that had a deep

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>enough vocabulary and a basic set of rules that told

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:40.679
<v Speaker 1>it how grammar works, so essentially a syntax telling it

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:45.359
<v Speaker 1>how syntax works, UM, it could possibly fool people, but

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:50.119
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that it's intelligent. Tourings responses, So what to

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 1>your From your perspective, it seems as if the machine

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 1>is intelligent, and isn't that all that matters? Right, because

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 1>you could argue, well, I can talk to the dumbest

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>person on the planet and they're gonna at least be

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 1>able to understand certain things I say, as opposed to

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:08.919
<v Speaker 1>this machine that doesn't really understand it. Durings response to

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 1>that is, how do you know? The only way we

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>know that anything's intelligent is through our own experience. We

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:17.959
<v Speaker 1>don't like, Chris is looking at me, and I'm talking

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to Chris, but Chris doesn't know if I'm intelligent because

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Chris only has his own experience. He knows that he's

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>intelligent in the sense that you know, he's able to

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:31.639
<v Speaker 1>think and process information. I appear to be able to

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:34.959
<v Speaker 1>do that, But that could all just be an incredible simulation.

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 1>There's no way for you to know correct. Same thing

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 1>with the machines. Turing is like, Hey, we can't really

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>know that anyone else is intelligent, therefore it doesn't matter,

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>so the same thing should apply to machines. Shut up

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 1>at your face. I have long suspected that Jonathan Strickland

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:57.879
<v Speaker 1>is in fact a machine. Yeah, I you know, I

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>let me put it this way. I want to be

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>a replicant. I want to be a replican Okay, I

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 1>like that one. Okay, so this is nifty. When he

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 1>proposed the Turing test in nineteen fifty two, we we

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:16.919
<v Speaker 1>reach a really unfortunate time during Touring's life. The British

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 1>government arrests him or for being a homosexual. This is

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 1>again the the UK had very strict laws, conservative laws, UM,

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:30.439
<v Speaker 1>and he rather than going to prison, he elected to

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:36.359
<v Speaker 1>undergo injections which would decrease his libido hormone injections. Yes,

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:39.320
<v Speaker 1>so essentially this is it's chemical castration is what the

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 1>what's technically referred to as UM. He did that for

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>at least a year. UM. But part of that sentence

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:52.640
<v Speaker 1>also meant that he lost all of his clearance security

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 1>clearance that he had as working for various UM projects

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and government uh well government projects as well as as

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:05.440
<v Speaker 1>his university once so he lost all of that. He

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 1>lost his security clearance because UM he could not as

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 1>as a convicted criminal could not retain it. UM. This

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 1>possibly lead to depression. It's hard to say because he

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:21.879
<v Speaker 1>wasn't really communicative. But on June seven, ninety four, he

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:26.680
<v Speaker 1>took his own life. He committed suicide by ingesting cyanide pills. Yes,

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:29.159
<v Speaker 1>they they found him. Actually I believe it was his

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 1>housekeeper who found him, uh with an apple which had

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:39.640
<v Speaker 1>been partially eaten. Um. Apparently the police revealed that they

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:46.359
<v Speaker 1>thought it was a suicide. Although the apparently the his

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 1>mother believed that he might have been doing a science

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:52.399
<v Speaker 1>experiment with cyanide and had some on his hands and

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:56.960
<v Speaker 1>may have accidentally ingested the poison. And I actually saw

0:26:57.080 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 1>somebody and may have even been in the Hodges reference

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>where he They said he may have planned it specifically

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 1>that way, specifically to convince his mother that it was

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:09.639
<v Speaker 1>an accident, to make her feel better about it. She

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:13.919
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be heartbroken that her son committed suicide. Right. So

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>when we say committed suicide, that's the generally held belief

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:21.680
<v Speaker 1>that was established by the police. Um. There are there

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:27.879
<v Speaker 1>is the possible there's the possibility that it was an accident. UM,

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 1>although I can I think that's probably ah not likely,

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>that's true. On September ten, two thousand nine, the British

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 1>government UM the Prime Minister Gordon Brown, issued a formal

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>apology to Touring for the way that the country treated him,

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>considering that he was a war hero really and his

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 1>contributions to computer science were phenomenal. Um. And they said that,

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, treating any human being that way was reprehensible

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 1>and that it was inexcusable, and that they offered a

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:10.719
<v Speaker 1>very profound apology, not just to Touring, but to everyone

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:15.479
<v Speaker 1>who had to undergo this kind of oppression during that

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:19.239
<v Speaker 1>period of British history, and that that was just not

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 1>it was it was inhumane, is what he was essentially saying.

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 1>But that specifically to Touring, someone who gave such huge

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:32.159
<v Speaker 1>contributions to the United Kingdom and the world, it was

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>particularly tragic. Yes, he certainly helped win the war for

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the Allies, or at least shorten it considerably, right, He

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 1>saved countless lives, uh, you know, on on the Allied side.

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>So he really was in every sense of the word

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 1>a hero. Um. So it was you could say the

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 1>cynical thing about, well, this apology comes fifty years too late,

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 1>but ah, another way of looking at it is that

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 1>it was it was a way of it was a

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 1>way of admitting that these policies were we're wrong and

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that was. It was an important step really, yeah, yeah,

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:16.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, to maybe change the mood a little bit,

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 1>since its we're ending on a sort of a down note. Um.

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 1>And when I say sort of, I don't mean sort of. Um.

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that I had never heard before.

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Some people feel that there may be an homage two

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>touring in one of today's tech companies, that being the

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 1>logo of Apple Computer, the Apple with the bite taking. However,

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the original logo for the company, um, which is funny

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 1>if you've ever seen it, and you see today's logo,

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 1>they're completely different. The original logo looks like a woodcut

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 1>of Isaac Newton sitting under the tree, you know, for

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the apocryphal story of the apple clunk and them on

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the head and going, hey, there's gravity. Uh. The Apple

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>did not actually say that, No, it did not. Neither

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 1>did he, but it is an appealing story. Oh, now

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 1>that we've gotten to the core of that. Um, it

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 1>apparently is not true. They were already using the name

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Apple and uh. Um. The different colors on the Apple logo,

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:22.480
<v Speaker 1>UM do not represent tourings homosexuality. Um. In fact, they may.

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 1>They probably had everything to do with Steve jobs, wanting

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 1>to promote the multicolor Apple two UM abilities, and so

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:35.959
<v Speaker 1>they added the colors to the logo for that reason.

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 1>But it is kind of an interesting I mean, when

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you see it, you go, oh, well, you know that

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 1>very well could be. I don't know that Apple has

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 1>ever issued a formal um statement regarding that connection, but

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:53.479
<v Speaker 1>most people that I read on that subject say, you know, well,

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 1>if Newton was the very first reference and they had

0:30:56.080 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 1>already been calling themselves Apple, it's probably not an homage

0:30:59.840 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 1>to Touring, but he certainly did make significant contributions to

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 1>UH computer science. And I was even reading in that

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 1>UM the about the new Jane Smiley book about remember

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 1>when we talked about the very very first computer UM.

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, Touring was working all in the same time

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:22.480
<v Speaker 1>as the Soviet scientists and the folks at Iowa State

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 1>back in the day, and they were all sort of

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 1>working on different methods of getting UM, making mechanical and

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 1>electronic calculations in different ways. UM. But it's it's fascinating that,

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:38.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, these pioneers were completely on their own, working

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 1>independently from one another, and all making these significant contributions.

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 1>It's it's kind of a shame though, that Tourings contributions

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 1>were known so much later because they were classified, and

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 1>so people really didn't realize what an important person he

0:31:54.680 --> 0:31:57.840
<v Speaker 1>was in the field of computer science until so much later. Yeah,

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of his contributions, even the ones that weren't classified,

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:04.080
<v Speaker 1>um ended up being like he would get beaten to

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the punch by someone else, but intended to be people

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:10.440
<v Speaker 1>that he worked with that and and they were building

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 1>on his work, and he was building on theirs. From

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 1>from Hodge's book, I got the I mean, I don't

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 1>know how accurate the sentiment is. My own. My own

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 1>interpretation was that Touring wasn't really he wasn't obsessed with credit.

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:28.920
<v Speaker 1>He wasn't really that wasn't important to him. What was

0:32:28.960 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 1>important to him was making these connections. Uh. We didn't

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 1>mention this, but towards the end of his life he

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Touring had this thing throughout his life where he would

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 1>switch gears and suddenly be really interested in a seemingly

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:48.880
<v Speaker 1>unrelated field of study and yet find ways to connect

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 1>it to things that he was already pretty well schooled in. Ya.

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 1>As a matter of fact, I'm sorry. At the at

0:32:55.880 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the time he died, he was involved in biology and

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 1>physics experiments, which makes all the world of sense. You

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:03.239
<v Speaker 1>might say, cyanide, why would he have sign on in

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:06.640
<v Speaker 1>his hands. He's a you know, mathematician, he's a computer scientist. Now,

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:08.800
<v Speaker 1>he was actually interested in all kinds of science, right,

0:33:08.880 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 1>so by the end of his life he was looking

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:16.719
<v Speaker 1>at biology and and nonlinear uh mathematics that apply to biology.

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:20.240
<v Speaker 1>So he, like I said, he was a really remarkable guy.

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 1>He found connections between things that most of us we

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 1>look at and we just think of as being completely

0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 1>compartmentalized different subjects, right, like there's a hard line between

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 1>this subject and that subject. And Touring was saying, no, no,

0:33:36.160 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 1>they're all the same thing. You just don't see the

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:41.680
<v Speaker 1>numbers like I do. And I'm thinking, Wow, this guy.

0:33:41.760 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 1>And you know, he was reportedly shy and awkward, not

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a very good conversationalist. Um. I think I read somewhere

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:53.360
<v Speaker 1>that his speech was halting. Yeah, he sounds like he's

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:55.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of like one of those guys who was just

0:33:55.280 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 1>perfectly happy to have his close set of friends and

0:33:59.360 --> 0:34:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to be able to work on these these complicated problems

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and that was that was really all he needed. Um.

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 1>And you know he and the fact that he was

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 1>constantly learning was pretty inspirational too. So I guess that

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:14.680
<v Speaker 1>wraps up this discussion about Alan Touring. UM. Like I said,

0:34:14.680 --> 0:34:16.920
<v Speaker 1>he's a very interesting person. You can find plenty of

0:34:17.000 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 1>information on the web about him, and you can also

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 1>pick up that book, the The Alan Touring The Enigma UM.

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 1>That's a it's a good book, and the Stanford Encyclopedia

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 1>has an exhaustive and exhausting entry just on the touring

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:38.080
<v Speaker 1>test alone. There's also an entry about Alan Touring himself. Yeah. Yeah,

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's funny because you think in a philosophy UM

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 1>material that he wouldn't But really, when you get down

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 1>to it, the touring test is it's part computer science,

0:34:47.200 --> 0:34:49.840
<v Speaker 1>part philosophy. Yeah, artificial intelligence definitely has a lot of

0:34:49.840 --> 0:34:52.280
<v Speaker 1>philosophy to it. I should also point out that Touring

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 1>was not really concerned with machines gaining any sort of

0:34:56.719 --> 0:35:00.759
<v Speaker 1>UM self awareness or consciousness. He was talking on intelligence

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and consciousness as two separate things, which, as we've discussed before,

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:08.359
<v Speaker 1>you know that's that's an important thing to to distinguish

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 1>intelligence and consciousness because you know, I'm often conscious, rarely intelligent.

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:17.759
<v Speaker 1>All Right, So if you guys have any comments, questions,

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 1>any suggestions for future topics, especially you do I think

0:35:22.120 --> 0:35:25.040
<v Speaker 1>we should do one on Bletchley Park. Oh okay, yeah,

0:35:25.160 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Bletchley Park. Let us know if you think that that

0:35:27.200 --> 0:35:29.359
<v Speaker 1>would work, If you if you'd like to hear more

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:31.719
<v Speaker 1>on on that. Because the code breakers of World War Two,

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:33.840
<v Speaker 1>it's yeah, it's always fascinating. We can go into the

0:35:33.880 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Navajo codes and things of that nature. One of my

0:35:37.520 --> 0:35:41.560
<v Speaker 1>first big articles was about code breaking. Big articles here

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:43.719
<v Speaker 1>at how stuff works dot com is well if you

0:35:43.960 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 1>If you have any suggestions, you can let us know

0:35:46.640 --> 0:35:49.840
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook or Twitter are handled. There is text stuff

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:52.840
<v Speaker 1>hs W, or you can email us. Our address is

0:35:52.920 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 1>tech stuff at how stuff works dot com and Chris

0:35:55.160 --> 0:36:01.120
<v Speaker 1>and I will taught you again really soon. For more

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 1>on this and thousands of other topics, visit how stuff

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:06.480
<v Speaker 1>works dot com. To learn more about the podcast, click

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:08.840
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast icon in the upper right corner of

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 1>our homepage. The how stuff works dot Com my phone

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:15.400
<v Speaker 1>app is coming soon. Get access to our content in

0:36:15.440 --> 0:36:18.799
<v Speaker 1>a new way, articles, videos, and more all on the go.

0:36:19.400 --> 0:36:22.439
<v Speaker 1>Check out the latest podcast and blog post and see

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:33.480
<v Speaker 1>what we're saying on Facebook and Twitter. Coming soon to iTunes,

0:36:38.400 --> 0:36:40.960
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera.

0:36:41.280 --> 0:36:42.440
<v Speaker 1>It's ready, are you