WEBVTT - The Top Tech Stories of 2018

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Get in touch with technology with tech Stuff from how

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff Works dot com. Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff.

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:16.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with

0:00:16.320 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works and my Heart Radio and I love

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>all things tech. And it is that time of the year,

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the time when I cover the big tech news stories

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>from the previous twelve months and talk about some of

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 1>the most important developments in the tech industry over the

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>course of the year. So we're looking back on and

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>some of the big stories. I am not going month

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>by month. Sometimes I do that. Sometimes I will look

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>over a year and go through it chronologically. Instead, I

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>decided to kind of group things thematically. So this first section,

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to focus on some of the biggest news

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>stories um especially around the big, big companies that we

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>are all familiar you're with, And I can't think of

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>any place more appropriate to start than how Facebook's eighteen unfolded.

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>It was a particularly tumultuous year for Facebook, and then

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I have a feeling that twenty nineteen is not going

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:19.120
<v Speaker 1>to be a whole lot easier. Anyway. I've covered a

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:21.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of the stories about this in episodes of tech

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Stuff over but I want to sum up some of

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:28.119
<v Speaker 1>the things that the company has experienced over these last

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>twelve months, because they've been pretty spectacular. In March, the

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Guardian and The New York Times published pieces that exposed

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the Cambridge Analytica scandal, and that was the scandal in

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:45.120
<v Speaker 1>which it was revealed a political marketing and consulting firm,

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Cambridge Analytica, based in the UK, had apparently taken advantage

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>of a design flaw that had existed in Facebook several

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Is way back in when this design flaw,

0:01:57.040 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>or this this policy, it wasn't even a design flaw

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 1>so much as it was just sort of a lack

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>of accountability was in place back then. If you were

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>creating apps for Facebook, you could build into your app

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>a point where the person installing the app would essentially

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 1>give permission for you to view all sorts of information

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 1>not just about the person who was installing the app,

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>but possibly access to all of their friends. So think

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of it like if you befriend someone on Facebook and

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 1>they're friends with somebody else, but you were not friends

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:35.079
<v Speaker 1>with that third person. You might be able to follow

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the links back and take a look at that third

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 1>person's profile and if they haven't said it to private.

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 1>If they have public information, you can find out a

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>lot about this stranger, this person you only uh, you

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know that one. You just happen to have a

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 1>common friend. Well, the app in question, which was called

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, a Digital Life app that what it was

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>doing the same thing, and Cambridge Analytica was able to

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>harvest data from this app. They leveraged it. It's actually

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>called This is Your Digital Life. That was the name

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>of the app, and it was a survey. And not

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:12.919
<v Speaker 1>only that, but it was a survey where you could

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>be paid for filling up the survey, so people had

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 1>an incentive to participate in it, and it generated this

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>enormous amount of data that originally Facebook assumed was going

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:26.919
<v Speaker 1>to be around fifty million people or so that would

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:29.119
<v Speaker 1>be affected. As it turned out it would be more

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>than eighty seven million people would They would revise this

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>estimation later on, And so that was a pretty ugly scandal,

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>mostly about user privacy and security and also a little

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>bit about election interference, although really it was privacy and

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>security over everything else at that point. The reports prompted

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Trade Commission in the United States to open

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>an investigation into Facebook. Mark Zuckerberg would eventually appear in

0:03:57.240 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>front of Congress a couple of times to answer quest

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>gens about this scandal, and one of the things that

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>came out of those hearings was the possibility that perhaps

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>social platforms like Facebook should fall under some sort of

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>official regulation policy, that the government should be able to

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 1>regulate these sort of things. Also, while this story exploded

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>in I should point out this was not the first

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>time that journalists had discovered evidence of something hinky going on.

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:29.039
<v Speaker 1>There are articles way back in about it, but it

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>wasn't until eighteen that it really got traction. That was

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 1>when a former Cambridge Analytica employee came forward and gave

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:39.679
<v Speaker 1>a lot more information about what was going on inside

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the company, and that's when it really blew the doors

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>open coming into Facebook was already neck deep in scandal

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 1>since before the election. The company has had to deal

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:56.359
<v Speaker 1>with fake accounts that were taking advantage of how Facebook

0:04:56.400 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>works to to post propaganda masquerading is real news. They

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>were they understood how Facebook's algorithm would favor certain types

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 1>of content over others, largely through engagement. If you get

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 1>a post that has a lot of likes, there are

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of comments, a lot of people are sharing it.

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:18.479
<v Speaker 1>That post ends up showing up more frequently in various

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>people's news feeds because Facebook's algorithm assumes, oh, this post

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>must be important because a lot of people are active

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>on it. Therefore, I'm going to show it to more

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>people because I'm sure more people will be interested in it.

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:37.719
<v Speaker 1>This is from a very high level perspective. Well, knowing

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:41.839
<v Speaker 1>that that's how Facebook's algorithm works means that you could

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:46.599
<v Speaker 1>engineer content specifically to try and bring about the situation

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:53.160
<v Speaker 1>that leads to the sort of viral uh uh posts

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, shared across millions of different profiles. And as

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>it turns out, the goal was not just to get shared,

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>but to try and influence the outcome of the election.

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>So Facebook was already dealing with that, and that story

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>continued to unfold throughout. Less scandalous, but still an important

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 1>story is how Facebook would change its algorithms so that

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Facebook pages, that is, the pages that are run by

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>like organizations, businesses, personalities, not not someone's personal page but

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a page representing something are getting less engagement. Now, this

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>is Facebook's attempt to make the experience of using Facebook

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>more centered around your family and friends that you're seeing

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 1>more of their posts and fewer posts from businesses and

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:48.839
<v Speaker 1>organizations that are trying to connect with a community or

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:52.239
<v Speaker 1>a group of customers or whatever. So you can understand

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 1>where Facebook's coming from. However, for any business that was

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>at least partly dependent upon Facebook to create a connection

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>with customers or a community, it became a huge problem.

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:07.039
<v Speaker 1>Suddenly their engagement starts to drop down, their businesses start

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to lose momentum, and they're scrambling to find an alternative.

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Now you could say this is yet another point of

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>evidence that strengthens that argument of don't put all your

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>eggs in one basket. In other words, if you are

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a business, don't count on someone else's platform to be

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>your platform for success, whether that happens to be Facebook

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>or YouTube or anything else. You should build a presence

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>that is independent of those so that when these other

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>platforms change, you are not thrown into the lurch as

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a result because you put it all in on that one.

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 1>But on the other hand, Facebook was still taking money

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>from businesses to promote pages even when the impressions were

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 1>on the decline, so that was a problem. Then there

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>are the properties that Facebook owns, and the story is

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>going around with oos like WhatsApp. WhatsApp is the messaging

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>service that Facebook purchased way back in It was a

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>big story then because of how much money Facebook paid

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>for it, and people in the United States are not

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>terribly familiar with WhatsApp. There are people in the US

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 1>who use it, some of you out there may be

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>using it, and you might be US citizens, particularly people

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>who travel internationally, they tend to use it, but really

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>it's much more popular outside the US than it is

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:34.839
<v Speaker 1>in the US. Anyway, in news broke out that people

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>in Brazil were using WhatsApp to spread misinformation and polarized

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>messaging in the lead up to a contentious election in Brazil,

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:47.079
<v Speaker 1>which sounds pretty familiar. I mean, essentially the same thing

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>was happening in the United States two years previously with

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:54.319
<v Speaker 1>Facebook in general and Twitter and several other social platforms.

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>So that was another terrible story that's still unfolding as

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>we record this podcast. Then there's also the story about

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Instagram and its founders, and Instagram founders Kevin Systrom and

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Mike Kreeger both resigned from Facebook. The reasons were not

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>spelled out plainly, why they decided to leave, but the

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 1>general consensus is that they were becoming exasperated by the

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>way Facebook was interfering with how Instagram was running, and

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 1>they were taking features that Instagram was developing specifically for

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Instagram and then using those to incorporate them into Facebook

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 1>or Facebook Messenger. Now. On Facebook first acquired Instagram, the

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 1>thought was that they were not going to interfere at all.

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 1>They were going to allow Instagram to continue to operate independently,

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and it sounds like that didn't happen. So the founders

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>decided that they wanted to get out. And a lot

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>more happened with Facebook, but those were the really big

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>points I wanted to touch on, and I don't want

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to make this just an episode about what Facebook went

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>through in twenty team, so I'm going to move on

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to some other stories. Um. There were other companies that

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>also had to weather controversy. In Twitter had its share

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and continues to from troll accounts, fake accounts, bought accounts.

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Jack Dorsey would attend a congressional hearing about whether regulation

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:21.199
<v Speaker 1>and moderation of online content was something that needed more attention.

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Topics ranged from the fake accounts to Russian interference in

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>US political events, and whether or not Twitter was suppressing

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 1>conservative voices online. Dorsey would also come under scrutiny in

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>December for personal reasons. He went to Myanmar and he

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>tweeted about it, and he called it a beautiful country. Meanwhile,

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, there is a global uh campaign.

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 1>United Nations is focusing on Myanmar because it's military is

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>carrying out a campaign of genocide against a minority Muslim

0:10:57.559 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>population within the country. So there's Dorsey saying Myanmar, it's

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>a beautiful country. Meanwhile, the rest of the world is

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at Myanmar and these atrocities that are taking place,

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and so people said, at best, Dorsey's tweets were tone deaf.

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 1>His response was that he needed to learn more about Myanmar,

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>probably before posting about it. Meanwhile, Evan Williams, who is

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>a co founder of Twitter, was quietly selling off a

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of his ownership of Twitter throughout the second half

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 1>of ten and it would amount to nearly half of

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>his ownership steak. So essentially, you know, he has all

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 1>these different shares in Twitter, he sells off almost half

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of them by the second half of which has led

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>to some speculation that perhaps Twitter has officially passed its peak,

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's now on the decline, and eventually it will

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:58.719
<v Speaker 1>head towards obsolescence. That's one interpretation. Another is just that

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:02.320
<v Speaker 1>he might want to versify his portfolio, so you could

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:05.320
<v Speaker 1>say financial coverage is even more vague than tech coverage

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 1>HAZA for that. Then there's Google, and that company has

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:12.839
<v Speaker 1>also had its own share of issues to deal with

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 1>throughout It too came under scrutiny and the various congressional hearings.

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Google was invited to participate, but declined to send anyone

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to meet with Congress, while Facebook and Twitter would send

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>their top brass to d C. In December, Google CEO

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Sundar Picha, I did meet with Congress, and this was

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>to talk about political bias and search results. If you

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>followed those hearings, you might have been rolling your eyes

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty hard because it got a little silly. Representatives of

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Congress were asking if Google was shaping the public perception

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>of various topics through search results. In other words, they

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>were maybe guiding search results in order to send a

0:12:56.960 --> 0:13:00.160
<v Speaker 1>specific message to people when they started searching for things.

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Um So, for example, they showed that if you searched

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:08.599
<v Speaker 1>the word idiot, and you did an image search, it

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 1>would bring up pictures of Donald Trump, and they said,

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>is this your commentary? Are you calling the President of

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the United States an idiot? Now? PA's response was said

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that these search results were a reflection of the public discourse.

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 1>This is reflecting what's going on in the world. It's

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>giving people what they're asking for. It is not an

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 1>attempt to guide the discourse, but rather, here's what people

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 1>are saying. So it's not that a person is an idiot,

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 1>it's that people are writing about someone they call that

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:42.440
<v Speaker 1>person an idiot. Then that's what's going to come up

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>in search results, not that Google says that person is

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:50.199
<v Speaker 1>an idiot. And the hearing really punctuated what we really

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 1>already knew. That's the most politicians are totally ignorant of

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>how the Internet in general works and how search in

0:13:57.280 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>particular works. We did get some punctuation about this where

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>at one point a representative said, if you search the

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>news items for a specific person and you get a

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 1>bunch of negative stories, it's because that person has done

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:18.839
<v Speaker 1>things that have been reported on in a negative way.

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>But if you went out and did lots of wonderful

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 1>things that got lots of positive coverage, then the news

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>stories that would pop up would reflect that it's not

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 1>that Google is shaping this message, but rather the people

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 1>themselves are shaping it, and that if you want to

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 1>have less bad news written about you, don't go out

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and do bad things. Seems like a pretty solid idea, assuming,

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of course, that the search engine results are accurate and

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>they're fair and unbiased, and that they're not, say, censoring

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 1>any articles or stories that would otherwise be positive. This

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 1>applies to politicians of all political points of view. By

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the way, I don't mean to say that one political

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>party is guilty of being terrible, terrible, terrible people and

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the other ones a bunch of saints. I don't believe

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>that for a second. There are people who have great

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 1>scruples and they they adhere to their own code of ethics,

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 1>they are not hypocrites, and they should have really great

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>stories written about them and and their their efforts, whether

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 1>they happen to be conservative or liberal. And then there

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>are others, both on the conservative and the liberal side,

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 1>who do dumb things and are hypocrites, and they were

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna have bad stories written about them, and they should.

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 1>So that's kind of what Google was saying is that

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>don't shoot the messenger. We're just giving you what exists.

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>We're not making it, we're just serving it up. Another

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>scandal that Google had to handle in two thousand eighteen.

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Didn't mean for that. The rhyme was Project Maven, and

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I talked about that earlier this year in an their episode.

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>So this was a project with the Pentagon, still is

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>a project. It's still undergoing over and between Google and

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the Pentagon, but to create algorithms that can improve computer

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>vision processes, which ultimately could be used to identify and

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>target individuals. If it were used in a weaponized form,

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the military could choose to go down that path. Now.

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Google insisted that when it signed on to do Project Maven,

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>this was in the understanding that it was a non

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>weaponized program. They were helping with computer vision, but it

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>was not meant to be used in any kind of

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>weaponized way. But people said that's pretty naive because there's

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>nothing stopping anyone from adapting those protocols and using them

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>in something like a personalized missile that specifically is looking

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>for a particular individual and honing in on that person um,

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>whether directly or through satellite coordination or whatever it may be.

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Google eventually was as mount was facing so much pressure

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 1>both from outside the company and within the company itself.

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:08.119
<v Speaker 1>Google employees started to sign petition saying that the company

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>should extract itself from this deal. They said, well, we

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>can't extract ourselves, but we will not renew this contract

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>when it comes up in two thousand nineteen. So the

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:24.120
<v Speaker 1>contract will expire next year and Google executives have said

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:26.679
<v Speaker 1>they are not going to pursue a renewal. There was

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>also a lot of disturbing allegations about sexual harassment and discrimination.

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:36.119
<v Speaker 1>This was true throughout all of tech, but it was

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 1>particularly highlighted over at Google. So in February there was

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a Google programmer named Loretta Lee who filed claims against Google,

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>and our allegations were numerous. There's a lot of things

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 1>that Loretta Lee said had happened at Google that are very,

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>very upsetting. It's it's a terrible account that no one

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 1>should be subjected to. And at the time, Google had

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:09.159
<v Speaker 1>a policy of mandatory arbitration within the company. This is

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 1>something that a lot of tech companies were putting in place.

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:15.919
<v Speaker 1>That meant that all of the conflict had to be

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>handled within the company. This would prevent employees from being

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 1>able to take the matter to the courts. It had

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>to be handled inside of Google, and employees would sign

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:32.399
<v Speaker 1>agreements essentially when they would get employed with Google that

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:35.880
<v Speaker 1>said they were agreeing to this, they would give up

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:40.879
<v Speaker 1>the right to sue in court. They would have to

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>go through this mandatory arbitration process, which could limit the

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>amount of money a victim could get if they were

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>proven to be telling the truth. And not only that,

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 1>but there was this perception that if the company was

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 1>handling it, they were more likely to just kind of

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>smooth things over as best they could and ignore that

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:05.160
<v Speaker 1>it was happening. They wouldn't if someone who was being

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>accused was also thought of as being a high performer,

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>then it would largely go ignored. Which is a terrible thing. Right.

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:17.159
<v Speaker 1>If if there's somebody who's who's sexually harassing people in

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 1>a company, whether it's a man or it's a woman,

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.919
<v Speaker 1>whether the people they are harassing our men or women,

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>whatever it may be, that should not be tolerated. And

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the problem was that using this mandatory arbitraction approach, if

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 1>executives said, well, yeah, I mean it shouldn't be tolerated. However,

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>one Ever, since they've been in charge, that department has

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 1>been performing at an incredible level. Then there seemed to

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>be this at least perceived habit of not paying the

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>appropriate amount of attention and care to those those cases.

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 1>So Google employees began to protest this. There was a walkout.

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 1>All the women employees at Google, or a large majority

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of them agreed to walk out in protest of this

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:11.360
<v Speaker 1>policy and just the general way that Google is handling

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>these sexual harassment cases. Uh. Several men also stood with

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the women in solidarity and saying that they supported this,

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately Google has reversed that policy. There is no

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>longer mandatory arbitration. Arbitration is optional, but employees are allowed

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to pursue these cases in court. It is not retroactive,

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>so any case that's in arbitration remains there for now.

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>But this, this is just another example of a systemic

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 1>problem not just of Google, but in the tech industry

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>that is slowly changing as more scrutiny is applied to

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>these companies and and the the culture is changing to

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 1>say that this is not appropriate and not acceptable. That

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>is changing, uh, but it is a slow process. I mean,

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:11.640
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about a system that's been generations in the making. So, uh,

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>that was the other big story of Google. Now I've

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:17.440
<v Speaker 1>got all those big scandals out of the way. Hopefully

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that means that we're going to be able to move

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>on to happier stories. Spoiler alert, not all of them

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>are happy. But before I get into those, let's take

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>a quick break to thank our sponsor. In two thousand eighteen,

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I also did an episode about the General Data Protection

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Regulation Rules or g d p R those took effect

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>in These are rules that apply to online companies that

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>serve people within the European Union. Whether the company is

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 1>located in the EU or not doesn't matter. It matters

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 1>if the people using the company's services or products are

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 1>in the EU, and the rules are meant to protect

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 1>data and privacy. They call for responsible, transparent, and easily

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:04.719
<v Speaker 1>understandable policies from these online companies, whether it's a store

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 1>or social media platform, whatever it may be. Now, there

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:09.120
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of rules, and I did a full

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>episode on this, so I'm not going to go over them.

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>But the important thing to remember is that the companies

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that are working in the EU, whether they're located there

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>or not have to adhere to these rules or they

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 1>can face penalties. And the scope of the penalties depend

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>upon the severity of the violation, but it can be

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>up to twenty million euros or four of all the

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 1>total sales of a company from the year before, whichever

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>amount is greater. So there's some serious penalties there. So

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:42.280
<v Speaker 1>companies are paying attention. In fact, some companies have even

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:46.120
<v Speaker 1>temporarily at least closed up shop, you know, turned off

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:51.399
<v Speaker 1>those European Union facing websites at least until they can

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and they can, you know, conform to the regulations. And

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:59.439
<v Speaker 1>now here's some big business news elements of tech in

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty team. First, A T and T initially got approval

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>for its eighty five billion dollar acquisition deal for Time Warner.

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to talk a little bit more about that

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 1>in some upcoming episodes of Tech Stuff that I've already

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:15.920
<v Speaker 1>recorded but have not aired. But as I record this episode,

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>that approval is actually under appeal and another court is

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 1>considering whether or not to allow the process to continue.

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 1>If it does continue, it's another consolidation of communications and

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:30.199
<v Speaker 1>entertainment companies. Not everyone thinks that's a great thing, but

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 1>it could be a big benefit to both of those

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>individual companies. We'll have to wait and see. By the

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 1>time you hear this episode, all of that may have

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 1>already been resolved. Disney got approval for its acquisition of

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty first Century Fox, both from the United States government

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and from shareholders, and the company had announced that intent

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>way back in two thousand seventeen. The acquisition will be

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>complete on January one, two thousand nineteen. T Mobile and

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Sprint are looking to merge into a single company that

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 1>got announced in April, and if everything goes as they

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:05.359
<v Speaker 1>expect it to, the process will be complete by April

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:07.719
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nineteen. Not at the time I'm recording this.

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Analysts predict that regulators are probably going to allow this

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:14.440
<v Speaker 1>merger to go forward. They might require that the companies

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>divest themselves of certain businesses in order to prevent the

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:21.640
<v Speaker 1>possibility of having a monopoly, but otherwise they think it's

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>going to happen. And there are a ton of other

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:26.640
<v Speaker 1>stories that fall into this category. IBM announced it would

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>sell off Lotus notes to an Indian firm called hc

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:33.439
<v Speaker 1>L for one point eight billion dollars. Of course, IBM

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:36.360
<v Speaker 1>had purchased Lotus for three point five billion dollars back

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>in IBM also announced a thirty four billion dollar acquisition

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.399
<v Speaker 1>plan for red Hat, which is a software company that

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 1>specializes in enterprise products. It's also the largest software acquisition ever.

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>And this isn't an acquisition, but Dell Computers is currently

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>scheduled to return to the stock market as a publicly

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:59.439
<v Speaker 1>traded company on December. I'm recording this on December twelve,

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>so that's in the future for me. Also saw some

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:07.919
<v Speaker 1>game studios close up shop, so that's sad, not just

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>for gamers, but obviously for the people who worked for

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:13.439
<v Speaker 1>those companies. So here's a list of some of the

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>companies that closed up shop in tween in the video

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:22.160
<v Speaker 1>game industry. Boss Key, which was founded by a Cliff Blazinski.

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>It was the producer of the game Lawbreakers. That One closed,

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Telltale Games That One hurt a lot. It's they're the

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:34.119
<v Speaker 1>creators of the Walking Dead series as well as the

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Wolf among us um. They've done a Game of Thrones game,

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 1>They've done a Minecraft story based game, that done Borderland

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:44.919
<v Speaker 1>story based game. They shut down in September ten. It

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:49.160
<v Speaker 1>was an incredibly messy and ugly process. Employees were let

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:53.440
<v Speaker 1>go without severance or prior warning. Um it was largely

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 1>viewed as being very poorly handled. Carbine Studios closed up

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>as well. They produced only on game. It was a

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:05.120
<v Speaker 1>multi player game called wild Star UM. That one also

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:09.239
<v Speaker 1>shut down in September two eighteen. Also in September two

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>thou eighteen, Man, that was a bad month. Capcom closed

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:17.120
<v Speaker 1>its Capcom Vancouver studio. That team oversaw the Dead Rising

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 1>series of games, and war Gaming Seattle closed in May

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:25.120
<v Speaker 1>two th eighteen. They made Dungeon Siege and Supreme Commander.

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Now that that's terrible news, but it's not to say

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:30.919
<v Speaker 1>that video games as a whole are in trouble. The

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>industry has tripled in size over the last decade. Developing

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:38.959
<v Speaker 1>video games, particularly if you're talking about large prestige titles

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 1>like Red Dead. Redemption to for example, costs millions of dollars,

0:26:44.080 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and it requires hundreds of people, maybe up to a

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:50.400
<v Speaker 1>thousand for some of these big games, and it also

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>can include some really brutal work. Weeksen was also a

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>year in which the world took a closer look at

0:26:56.280 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 1>the working conditions that game developers experience, particular and crunch

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:04.200
<v Speaker 1>time while developing a title, and the industry is slowly

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:07.439
<v Speaker 1>changing in response to some really tough criticisms, things like

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 1>there's gotta be a better work life balance, that people

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:15.200
<v Speaker 1>should not be expected to work a hundred hour weeks,

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff. We don't appear to have reached

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the tipping point quite yet, for the point where a

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 1>triple A title game costs so much to make that

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:30.199
<v Speaker 1>you're never going to recover those costs and sales. We

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 1>haven't reached that point, but it's getting pretty tight. Probably

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>means that I wouldn't be surprised to see game prices

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 1>start to climb again in the near future. We already

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 1>see more expensive ones for like collectors, editions and stuff

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 1>like that, but I think it's going to get more

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>expensive pretty soon. Super Smash Brothers Ultimate was the best

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:54.439
<v Speaker 1>selling game on Amazon in two thousand eighteen, followed by

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 1>Super Mario Party and then Red Dead Redemption too for

0:27:57.720 --> 0:28:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the PS four. Now, to be fair, these facts and figures,

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:05.479
<v Speaker 1>they take into account games by platform, not by title,

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:09.640
<v Speaker 1>because if you look at titles, you would say Red

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Dead Redemption two is in the lead across all platforms

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 1>when you when you add them all up, that's when

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you only look at it um by platform that Super

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Smash Brothers Ultimate becomes the best selling game. There was

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 1>no shortage of games that received critical acclaim in twenty eighteen.

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 1>There were a ton of them, Assassin's Creed Odyssey, the

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:32.919
<v Speaker 1>Tetris Effect, Forts Horizon for God of War. Lots of

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:36.399
<v Speaker 1>them were lauded for their art style, their gameplay, the

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>stories win applicable um. Also, Fortnite's Battle Royal Mode became

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>a huge hit in ten. A lot of people said

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>it was essentially a copy, a complete lift of Player

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Unknowns Battle Grounds game style, although there are differences with Fortnite,

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 1>but they said that you know the game is centially

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 1>lifted the style from from Battlegrounds. To be fair, battle

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Grounds is not the first Battle Royal game that's ever

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 1>come out either, But I see where they accusations come from.

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 1>But the game became so popular that now there are

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>organizations popping up that are supposed to help wean kids

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 1>off of playing the darn thing. Not all games got

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:25.240
<v Speaker 1>universal acclaim, however. Fall Out seventy six, the online multiplayer

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 1>game from the THEESDA and the Fallout series, was greeted

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 1>with at best if you're being super generous A mixed response.

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 1>I would actually say those more of a negative response.

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it was almost overwhelmingly negative. There are a

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of legitimate complaints leveled at that game. There are

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things I cannot just say no that

0:29:46.120 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't exist, No there. That game does have real problems. However,

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I still have fun when I log in now. I

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 1>can't deny the game has major issues though I'm having

0:29:56.480 --> 0:30:01.520
<v Speaker 1>fun because of the setting and the game world. But

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I definitely can completely understand the complaints people have about it.

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I can't deny them. There was another game called Sea

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 1>if Thieves, still as a game called See If Thieves,

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 1>another online game. They got a lot of early enthusiasm.

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a game where you play as a member of

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 1>a crew on a pirate ship. You and some friends

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 1>can join up and grab a ship and go out

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and plunder. But a lot of people felt that there

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 1>was a lack of content that was very repetitive. After

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you've done a few missions, you pretty much have played

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the whole game. It's just doing it over and over again.

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>The game did continue to add more stuff throughout the year,

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 1>whether it was enough to satisfy the typical pirate remained

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>a matter of individual preference. I got a little bit

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 1>more to say about Before I get into that, Let's

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:55.720
<v Speaker 1>take another quick break to thank our sponsor. Back in January,

0:30:55.760 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 1>we learned about vulnerabilities that are baked into modern micro processors.

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>This is another huge story. It's an ongoing problem in

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 1>tech now. Those vulnerabilities that were built in microprocessors weren't

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 1>done so on purpose, and we call them meltdown and specter.

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I think did an episode about this. But generally speaking,

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the vulnerabilities allow a malicious application to spy on other applications.

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 1>The way it does this is different depending upon the

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:31.120
<v Speaker 1>vulnerability it's exploiting, but generally speaking, it's this idea of

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a malicious program sapping information away, largely based on the

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 1>information gathered by other programs. And this can be on

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a computer, it can be on a mobile device. All

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:47.200
<v Speaker 1>of these things are running microprocessors that have architecture that's

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:51.600
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable to this stuff. So conceptually, applications are supposed to

0:31:51.640 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 1>be isolated from each other, supposed to be siloed and protected.

0:31:56.600 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 1>That way, it would prevent people from doing this very thing.

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 1>But these vulnerability would allow programmers to build apps that

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 1>could get around this isolation and gather data from other apps,

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 1>including stuff like passwords and even more critical information than that.

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 1>In some cases. There are a lot of talks about

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 1>patches that might address these vulnerabilities, but some analysts say

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 1>that's not going to be enough. What really needs to

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 1>happen is an entirely new microprocessor design, something that needs

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 1>to happen for different microprocessors in order to address this vulnerability,

0:32:28.640 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty tough to do, might be necessary. However,

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:36.959
<v Speaker 1>Also in January, Tim Cook of Apple apologize for not

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 1>being transparent about Apple's policy to throttle older model phones.

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:44.440
<v Speaker 1>In other words, they would run more slowly than they

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 1>had before. Now. Supposedly this was to increase the use

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 1>time per battery charge on older phones, the idea being

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that later versions of operating systems would put greater demands

0:32:56.840 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 1>on a phone's battery, and so without throttling it, the

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 1>older phones would just drain their batteries super fast. But

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 1>some people said this feels more like it's a tactic

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 1>to convince people to upgrade to a newer phone. Like

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 1>my old phones running slow, I must need to get

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a new one, And the fact that Apple was not

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 1>transparent about this. They weren't even admitting that they were

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 1>doing it at first. That seems to lend credence to

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 1>that second theory, the idea that they were doing this

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 1>in an effort to try and up sell an upgraded phone.

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:35.520
<v Speaker 1>So that's an issue. Um. That was a pretty ugly

0:33:35.600 --> 0:33:39.560
<v Speaker 1>story early on in the year, and I talked about

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 1>this in my suite of episodes about autonomous cars recently.

0:33:42.720 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 1>But back in March two thousand eighteen, that were a

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 1>pair of really bad accidents that brought the whole concept

0:33:49.680 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 1>of autonomous cars back into the headlines. First, there was

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a self driving Uber vehicle that struck and killed a

0:33:55.600 --> 0:34:00.239
<v Speaker 1>pedestrian in Arizona. That accident prompted Uber to curtail all

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 1>autonomous car tests in their various cities, at least temporarily,

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and to completely withdraw from Arizona with their driverless program.

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 1>But also in March, a Tesla Model X was put

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:16.240
<v Speaker 1>in autopilot mode and it crashed at a high speed

0:34:16.280 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 1>with a concrete highway divider. The driver died in the accident.

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Tesla released information stating that the driver was not paying

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 1>attention to the road despite the car providing multiple warnings,

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and this wasn't the first time that a Tesla autopilot

0:34:32.640 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 1>accident that ended in a fatality had happened. But I

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 1>do have to point out, to be fair to Tesla,

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that it's very clear that the autopilot is not meant

0:34:43.000 --> 0:34:47.439
<v Speaker 1>to be a truly driverless type of technology. In fact,

0:34:47.480 --> 0:34:51.359
<v Speaker 1>Tesla requires that drivers read and acknowledge or at least

0:34:51.360 --> 0:34:54.680
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge a warning saying as much, and they're supposed to

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 1>keep their hands on the wheel at all times and

0:34:57.160 --> 0:34:59.840
<v Speaker 1>be paying attention attention to the road even when the

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:04.440
<v Speaker 1>are is in control. So there's at least some truth

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:07.280
<v Speaker 1>to Tesla saying that this is not really our fault

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:12.759
<v Speaker 1>because they're not following the actual policy. Um, it's it's

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:15.280
<v Speaker 1>hard to argue against that, although you could argue, well,

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:20.720
<v Speaker 1>this autonomous technology is obviously not advanced enough to avoid

0:35:20.800 --> 0:35:23.720
<v Speaker 1>these kind of accidents, so that's very worrisome as well.

0:35:24.040 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk got into all sorts of hot water in

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:31.120
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eighteen. Man, that guy, what a year he had.

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 1>For one thing, he tweeted out messages that said he

0:35:33.680 --> 0:35:37.719
<v Speaker 1>intended to take Tesla private, and he was. He had

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:40.200
<v Speaker 1>secured funding and it was at a price of four

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:44.840
<v Speaker 1>dollars per share, which he apparently later said was a

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 1>joke about um, you know and marijuana. Funny joke. Here's

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the problem. It's illegal to share misleading information to shareholders,

0:35:56.440 --> 0:36:00.799
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't clear that funding had been secured, so

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:05.719
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Justice said that's not cool. Then the

0:36:06.040 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 1>SEC announced in September that it was going to sue

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk over this matter, that he was sharing misleading information,

0:36:14.400 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that shareholders could see that and have the wrong idea

0:36:18.640 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 1>about what was about to happen with their investment, and

0:36:21.640 --> 0:36:25.840
<v Speaker 1>that that caused problems. And eventually that lawsuit was settled

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:28.719
<v Speaker 1>out of court. Elon Musk and Tesla agreed to pay

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:32.359
<v Speaker 1>a total of forty million dollars in fines. Musk would

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:35.920
<v Speaker 1>later say that he quote did not respect the SEC

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 1>end quote. I think that was already apparent, but anyway.

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Musk also was the center of some other stories. In

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen, he sat down for an interview with Joe

0:36:45.280 --> 0:36:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Rogan for his show, and while on camera for that show,

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 1>he took a puff off of some marijuana, and folks

0:36:54.239 --> 0:36:57.280
<v Speaker 1>plumb done lost their minds about it. There were questions

0:36:57.280 --> 0:36:59.760
<v Speaker 1>as to whether he might have violated his own company's

0:36:59.760 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 1>cause duct policy. There were discussions about the public perception

0:37:03.680 --> 0:37:07.920
<v Speaker 1>of marijuana use, which is admittedly complicated and weird, has

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:11.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot of historical taboo stuff tied to it. Personally,

0:37:11.520 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I find his marijuana use way less concerning than his

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:18.800
<v Speaker 1>disregard for the legality of spreading misinformation from a position

0:37:18.800 --> 0:37:21.040
<v Speaker 1>of power. I think that's the thing I would worry

0:37:21.040 --> 0:37:24.800
<v Speaker 1>about more. But I also say that, you know, because

0:37:24.880 --> 0:37:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that has the greater capacity to have greater harm. Uh.

0:37:30.280 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 1>And I also say this as someone who's a total square.

0:37:33.560 --> 0:37:37.160
<v Speaker 1>You're not gonna catch me smoking marijuana because I'm boring.

0:37:37.920 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I have no interest in it. But I also don't

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 1>see it as being as big a deal as this

0:37:42.640 --> 0:37:46.800
<v Speaker 1>other issue that tweeting out about the taking Tesla private.

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that one causes the greater harm. He also

0:37:50.000 --> 0:37:53.279
<v Speaker 1>insulted a British cave diver who is helping rescue some

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:55.400
<v Speaker 1>young boys who are trapped in a flooded cave. You

0:37:55.480 --> 0:38:00.920
<v Speaker 1>might remember that story from and Uh. He indicated a

0:38:00.920 --> 0:38:02.880
<v Speaker 1>couple of times during the year that he was working

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:06.319
<v Speaker 1>such long hours and getting so little sleep that he

0:38:06.400 --> 0:38:09.799
<v Speaker 1>was starting to make pretty bad goofs, you know, like

0:38:09.880 --> 0:38:12.440
<v Speaker 1>consulting someone who is risking his own life to try

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and save other people. For example. I also did an

0:38:15.600 --> 0:38:20.120
<v Speaker 1>episode about tunneling machines and must Boring Company and how

0:38:20.160 --> 0:38:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that was in the news as he was trying to

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:24.239
<v Speaker 1>work out plans to create underground tunnels for a new

0:38:24.280 --> 0:38:27.919
<v Speaker 1>method of urban transportation. UM planning on building it out

0:38:28.280 --> 0:38:31.759
<v Speaker 1>under Los Angeles, for example, but he's hit some obstacles

0:38:32.120 --> 0:38:34.839
<v Speaker 1>and the tunneling machines can't just dig through these. This

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:37.719
<v Speaker 1>is obstacles, like government saying we got to work out

0:38:37.760 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 1>some very important details. You have to secure a lot

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:43.640
<v Speaker 1>of permissions before you can dig under any cities. And

0:38:43.680 --> 0:38:48.160
<v Speaker 1>so now while the technological side might be solved, there's

0:38:48.160 --> 0:38:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the red tape to get through. And that red tape

0:38:50.640 --> 0:38:54.360
<v Speaker 1>has good purpose. I don't mean to dismiss it. And

0:38:54.440 --> 0:38:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the Google Io event in the spring of Google's CEO

0:38:58.160 --> 0:39:01.040
<v Speaker 1>showed off a new application called dup Lex, which is

0:39:01.080 --> 0:39:03.839
<v Speaker 1>an AI assistant that can actually make phone calls on

0:39:03.880 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 1>behalf of the user, and it can make arrangements like

0:39:06.560 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 1>reserving a car or a hotel room, and it sounds

0:39:10.040 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 1>eerily human. It even incorporates stuff like ums and us

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:17.160
<v Speaker 1>in the speech, and it left some folks wondering, at

0:39:17.200 --> 0:39:19.920
<v Speaker 1>what point will we be unable to tell if we're

0:39:19.920 --> 0:39:23.360
<v Speaker 1>talking to a robot and not a human. News flash,

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:27.880
<v Speaker 1>We're already there, at least for some limited applications. In October,

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:31.359
<v Speaker 1>we found out that a vulnerability in Google Plus meant

0:39:31.360 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 1>that developers were able to get access to users private data,

0:39:35.719 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and that the vulnerability had likely been present for maybe

0:39:38.640 --> 0:39:41.759
<v Speaker 1>as long as three years. Google found out about this

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:45.719
<v Speaker 1>vulnerability in March, but they kept it quiet until October,

0:39:46.480 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and that made critics concerned about the lack of transparency.

0:39:49.880 --> 0:39:52.040
<v Speaker 1>So Google announced it was going to shut down Google

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Plus in August nineteen. That's when a little end and

0:39:56.480 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 1>then in December of another vulnerability was to scovered similar

0:40:01.080 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 1>to that, exposing the data of fifty million or so people.

0:40:06.120 --> 0:40:09.360
<v Speaker 1>So Google has now moved the sunset date for Google

0:40:09.360 --> 0:40:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Plus to April nineteen. And I remember when that platform launched.

0:40:13.920 --> 0:40:15.840
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of weird to see it from from birth

0:40:15.920 --> 0:40:20.400
<v Speaker 1>to death. Magic Leap, the augmented reality company that had

0:40:20.440 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 1>been operating in secrecy for a couple of years but

0:40:23.600 --> 0:40:27.800
<v Speaker 1>was really driving up anticipation about augmented reality. Finally showed

0:40:27.800 --> 0:40:30.680
<v Speaker 1>off a headset. It's called the Magic Leap one. This

0:40:30.719 --> 0:40:33.400
<v Speaker 1>is a developer kit. It's not met for the average consumer,

0:40:33.719 --> 0:40:35.920
<v Speaker 1>but for people who are going to make applications for it.

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:40.400
<v Speaker 1>It costs two thousand two so definitely not priced in

0:40:40.400 --> 0:40:43.879
<v Speaker 1>the realm of consumer technology. They look like some high

0:40:43.880 --> 0:40:46.560
<v Speaker 1>tech goggles, and some of the reviews I've seen say

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:49.200
<v Speaker 1>it is really impressive, but it still falls short of

0:40:49.239 --> 0:40:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the expectations that were created by Magic Leap itself, as

0:40:53.000 --> 0:40:55.359
<v Speaker 1>well as the media coverage around it that led up

0:40:55.400 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to the release. But still it's pretty encouraging as far

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:01.759
<v Speaker 1>as advances in a argo. Switching over to cryptocurrency for

0:41:01.760 --> 0:41:06.799
<v Speaker 1>a second, Bitcoin's value went into decline throughout seventeen. The

0:41:06.840 --> 0:41:10.200
<v Speaker 1>currency had hit a value of nearly twenty thousand dollars

0:41:10.239 --> 0:41:15.239
<v Speaker 1>per bitcoin at princely some By early January that had

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:18.840
<v Speaker 1>dropped to just shy of fifteen thousand dollars per bitcoin.

0:41:19.360 --> 0:41:22.160
<v Speaker 1>By the time you hear this, they will be very different.

0:41:22.239 --> 0:41:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Right now, as I record this episode, the value is

0:41:25.320 --> 0:41:28.719
<v Speaker 1>down to three thousand, four hundred dollars or so per bitcoin.

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 1>So the question is is it going to continue to

0:41:31.640 --> 0:41:35.319
<v Speaker 1>dip down or is it toward the bottom of its

0:41:35.320 --> 0:41:37.600
<v Speaker 1>trough and now it's going to go through another upswing.

0:41:38.000 --> 0:41:39.480
<v Speaker 1>And I guess I'll have to make a prediction in

0:41:39.520 --> 0:41:44.480
<v Speaker 1>our Predictions episode for twenty nineteen about that for much

0:41:44.480 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of cities in North America waited anxiously to find out

0:41:48.120 --> 0:41:51.319
<v Speaker 1>where Amazon was going to put its second headquarters. And

0:41:51.360 --> 0:41:53.920
<v Speaker 1>it announced that it was going to choose such a

0:41:53.960 --> 0:41:57.480
<v Speaker 1>location in late seen and opened up the opportunity for

0:41:57.560 --> 0:42:00.520
<v Speaker 1>various cities in metropolitan areas to send in a proposal.

0:42:01.080 --> 0:42:04.520
<v Speaker 1>And then, after months of speculation, Amazon announced that it

0:42:04.600 --> 0:42:09.000
<v Speaker 1>was going to select an area in northern Virginia very

0:42:09.000 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 1>close to Washington, d C. And a section of Queens

0:42:12.560 --> 0:42:17.600
<v Speaker 1>in New York City, splitting the second headquarters into two locations,

0:42:17.640 --> 0:42:21.480
<v Speaker 1>which coincidentally happened to be in places where Jeff Bezos

0:42:21.520 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 1>already owns homes. I'm equally convinced the whole thing was

0:42:26.640 --> 0:42:30.319
<v Speaker 1>a sincere attempt to find suitable locations for Amazon's headquarters,

0:42:30.400 --> 0:42:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and not just an enormous manipulative attempt to get the

0:42:34.520 --> 0:42:38.000
<v Speaker 1>sweetest deals at two locations that the company had already

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:43.080
<v Speaker 1>decided upon before making the announcement. But then you guys

0:42:43.440 --> 0:42:45.360
<v Speaker 1>heard me talk about that in the previous episodes, so

0:42:45.360 --> 0:42:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to drop it finally in a story that

0:42:48.040 --> 0:42:52.040
<v Speaker 1>is extremely close to home. I Heart Media, the company

0:42:52.080 --> 0:42:55.960
<v Speaker 1>that was once known as Clear Channel, acquired Stuff Media, LLC,

0:42:56.600 --> 0:43:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the company I work for. The acquisition was complete by

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:02.840
<v Speaker 1>eight fall, and as I record this, I Heart Media

0:43:02.960 --> 0:43:05.840
<v Speaker 1>is preparing to emerge from bankruptcy and there are a

0:43:05.840 --> 0:43:08.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of rumors flying around about what might happen next,

0:43:08.560 --> 0:43:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and I have no idea what it might be now

0:43:11.160 --> 0:43:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and have an inside line to any of that. I

0:43:13.200 --> 0:43:16.320
<v Speaker 1>am excited to find out what happens in twenty nineteen,

0:43:17.400 --> 0:43:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and that wraps up this retrospective look at There are

0:43:21.760 --> 0:43:25.640
<v Speaker 1>tons of stories that didn't cover. Obviously, a lot happened

0:43:25.760 --> 0:43:30.040
<v Speaker 1>in I'm pretty sure that eighteen was four times longer

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:33.480
<v Speaker 1>than any year that came before it. I think somewhere

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:36.400
<v Speaker 1>we added extra months in there because it felt like

0:43:36.400 --> 0:43:39.760
<v Speaker 1>it lasted an eternity. I have no idea what twenty

0:43:39.880 --> 0:43:43.080
<v Speaker 1>nineteen has in store that I'm going to make some guesses. Anyway.

0:43:43.440 --> 0:43:45.600
<v Speaker 1>You'll have to hear about that in my Predictions episode.

0:43:46.600 --> 0:43:49.239
<v Speaker 1>That's it for this time. In our next episode, I

0:43:49.280 --> 0:43:52.200
<v Speaker 1>will go over how my predictions for this past year went.

0:43:53.000 --> 0:43:55.759
<v Speaker 1>Spoiler alert, I did pretty well that you'll hear more

0:43:55.800 --> 0:43:57.239
<v Speaker 1>about that in the next one. If you guys have

0:43:57.280 --> 0:44:00.000
<v Speaker 1>suggestions for future episodes, send me an email. The address

0:44:00.080 --> 0:44:03.200
<v Speaker 1>is tech stuff at how stuff works dot com, or

0:44:03.280 --> 0:44:06.560
<v Speaker 1>drop me a line on Facebook or Twitter. I have

0:44:06.600 --> 0:44:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the handle tech stuff hs W. Go to tech stuff

0:44:09.080 --> 0:44:11.239
<v Speaker 1>podcast dot com. That's our website where you can learn

0:44:11.239 --> 0:44:13.239
<v Speaker 1>more about the show, and you also have a link

0:44:13.280 --> 0:44:15.879
<v Speaker 1>to our merchandise store. Remember every purchase you make there

0:44:16.000 --> 0:44:18.200
<v Speaker 1>goes to help our show, and we greatly appreciate it.

0:44:18.640 --> 0:44:27.359
<v Speaker 1>And I'll talk to you again really soon. For more

0:44:27.400 --> 0:44:29.680
<v Speaker 1>on this and thousands of other topics. Is that how

0:44:29.719 --> 0:44:40.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com.