WEBVTT - CEPSA Sets A New Strategy in ‘Positive Motion’

0:00:00.680 --> 0:00:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Hi, this is Dana Perkins and you're listening to Switched

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>on the BANNIF podcast. At B and EF we talk

0:00:07.000 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot about the energy transition, the pace of change,

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the drivers, what the future of an increasingly complex energy

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>system could look like. And today we have the opportunity

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:21.440
<v Speaker 1>to hear firsthand from Martin Witsellar, the CEO of SEPSA,

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:24.760
<v Speaker 1>regarding what they're changing, what are their targets for decarbonizing,

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:26.439
<v Speaker 1>what are some of the things that they might be

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 1>struggling with, and what could the future of their company

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:32.880
<v Speaker 1>look like now. For background, SEPSA first started over ninety

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:35.560
<v Speaker 1>years ago and they are the first private oil company

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:39.159
<v Speaker 1>in Spain. Today they're across five continents and historically their

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:42.880
<v Speaker 1>business activities have been focused on oil, gas and chemicals,

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:45.880
<v Speaker 1>so this is quite a pivot. With their announcement of

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>their Positive Motion Plan, SEPSA is now investing sixty percent

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of their eight billion investment budget into sustainable business activities.

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>By the end of the current decade, they want to

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>see a fifty five percent emissions reduction when compared to

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen law. So how are they going to pull

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>it off and what is their strategy? Well, BN EF's

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 1>deputy CEO, Albert Chung, spoke with Martin about just that.

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>They discussed topics including international competition between nations within the

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 1>clean energy space, seps's to Gigawat and a Lucian hydrogen

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Valley project, and the new Green Corridor between Spain and

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.839
<v Speaker 1>the Netherlands. And they also talk about transportation and mobility

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 1>customers and how SEPs is adapting to meet their needs,

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and of course SEPs as plans for their upstream business.

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>If you like this podcast, make sure to subscribe to

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>receive updates on future episodes on your device and possibly

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>give us a review on Apple or Spotify. If you

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>want to be alerted on Twitter, subscribe to the handle

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>at podcasts and you'll hear about new episodes that come

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>out of Switched On and also other Bloomberg podcasts. Please

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>note that bn EF does not provide investment or strategy advice,

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and our full disclaimer can be found at the very

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>end of the show. And now let's get to the

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>conversation between Albert and Martin.

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Martin, it's great to have you on the show today.

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:09.079
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for joining us.

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 3>Albert, good morning from Madrid. Delightful to be with you

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:15.359
<v Speaker 3>and discuss some fundamental topics today.

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Martin. I do want to get your thoughts on

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 2>this current energy situation in Europe and the opportunities and

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 2>challenges in the energy transition. But before we dive into

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 2>all of that, I was hoping you could take a

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 2>minute just to tell us a bit about your own

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:28.959
<v Speaker 2>journey and your career and how you came to be

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 2>in the position you're in today. Would you mind telling

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:31.520
<v Speaker 2>us a bit about that.

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 3>So I joined the energy industry almost thirty years ago,

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:38.799
<v Speaker 3>which is a somewhat scary data point. When I joined,

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 3>I thought the people that joined thirty years ago should

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:42.959
<v Speaker 3>go and do something else. But here I am and

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:45.800
<v Speaker 3>still full of ambition and keen to make an impact.

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 3>So joined in nineteen ninety five at Shell, the Anglo

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 3>Dutch nowadays Anglo Major and pursue the career that took

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 3>me through almost all the businesses. So I started in

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 3>the downstream trading business, then in downstream trategy and marketing

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 3>and finance, and moved into upstream and quickly from the

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:08.239
<v Speaker 3>upstream business, cut engaged on the gas business and that's

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 3>where I probably spent the majority of my time in Shell.

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 3>To basically grow consolidate the gas business and particularly the

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:21.119
<v Speaker 3>lerg business, which at the time was still i would

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:24.359
<v Speaker 3>say in the beginning a bit of a niche business. Nowadays,

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 3>of course, is a global business in its own right,

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 3>and certainly in Shehall it's one of the biggest businesses

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 3>that the company has and I was privileged to lead

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 3>that business for nine years, three years as an EVP.

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 3>And then you may recall both BG Group former British Gas,

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 3>who were also a significant energy company. We combined the

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 3>businesses and I moved on to the executive committee of Shell,

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:51.119
<v Speaker 3>where I stayed for six years, running that gas business

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 3>but also picking up the newly formed new energies business.

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 3>In twenty sixteen, Shall switched on a new energies business

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 3>which had before in the two thousands but basically closed

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 3>down in two thousand and eight two thousand and nine,

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 3>started up again in twenty sixteen, and so over the

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 3>last six years, based in then Atherlans, I rent both

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 3>the gas and energy business and the new energies business,

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 3>which took Shell into offshore wind, into solar, but also

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 3>into biofuels, hydrogen batteries, power training, power sales et cetera

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 3>to customers, so setting up an integrated new energies business there,

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 3>and then in the course of twenty twenty one, the

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:33.160
<v Speaker 3>opportunity to lead SEBSAT came along, and eventually I took it,

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:36.159
<v Speaker 3>not just because the amazing city that marid is, with

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 3>its climate and it's the social life, it's position in

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 3>the center of Spain, a bit more over because I

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 3>saw an opportunity to lead a fundamental and very fast

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 3>transformation of a company that has as a starting point

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 3>and we can talk about it later, a quite traditional

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 3>fossil fuel based integrated oil gas chemicals business, to lead

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 3>a transition that would actually before the end of the decade,

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 3>turned that into a leader in in clean energies, clean

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 3>green molecules, and clean mobility or sustainable mobility. And that

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:09.159
<v Speaker 3>opportunity to me was irresistible. So I moved by the

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 3>end of twenty twenty one, and I am now fourteen

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 3>months into that adventure and very pleased with the progress

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 3>and still at the same time quite in all of

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 3>what still needs to be done to get to the endpoint.

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:23.840
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Martin, Thank you for sharing that. It's really interesting

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:25.919
<v Speaker 2>to hear how your own story has in some ways

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 2>mirrored the transition itself in terms of the focus of

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 2>what you've been working on. Now, as you say you've

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 2>been at the Helm of Stepster for a little bit

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 2>over a year, now, could you first maybe tell us

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 2>a bit about the company first of all for those

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 2>of our listeners who are less familiar, and then I'd

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 2>also love to hear what you've learned since joining the company,

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 2>anything that surprised you perhaps over that year, and a

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 2>bit that you've been there now.

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So, SEMSA is a company headquarter in Spain, but

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 3>with a relatively global portfolio in some businesses. So it

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 3>has an extreme business in the Middle East and in

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:58.279
<v Speaker 3>Latin America. It has a chemicals business that really is global.

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 3>It is in all time zones in nine different countries.

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 3>We produce chemicals and we sell them in many more countries.

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 3>And then the size a downstream business that's quite focused

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 3>on the Iberian Peninsula, so in Spain, Portugal, but also

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:15.600
<v Speaker 3>has a presence in Mexico and Morocco. In the downstream,

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 3>the company owns the largest refinery in Spain and another

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:22.159
<v Speaker 3>big one both in the south of Spain and Ondalucia,

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:24.799
<v Speaker 3>and that's relevant when we start to talk about the transition,

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 3>and we are eighteen hundred service stations and are significant

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 3>players in aviation, in bunkering. In all that, let's say,

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 3>the classic B two B and B two C businesses

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:39.239
<v Speaker 3>in the oil industry were less less of a player

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 3>in meatural gas actually, although we do import the products.

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 3>So it's company with between twenty eleven thousand employees last

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 3>year three billion dollars of EBITA to give you a

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 3>sense of the dimensions. And one of the things I've

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:57.160
<v Speaker 3>learned is you, of course when I joined, or before

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 3>I joined, I talked as significantly to be shareholders about

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 3>what they were hoping to achieve with how they saw

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 3>the future, and they very much saw the future or

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 3>were very interested in the future that will be a

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 3>radical transformation into the transition data. Partly because they think

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 3>that's the right thing to do, that the world needs

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 3>an example of that, or multiple examples of that. But

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 3>I would say also partly because attracted by the situation

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 3>in the equity markets where companies with a predominantly fossil

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 3>portfolio at the moment, certainly in Europe, attracked ebe down

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 3>multiples of three and a half to four in evaluation,

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 3>whereas companies that are predominantly sustainable and green attract double

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 3>digit eb down multiples in evaluations. So if you apply

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 3>that to let's say a three billion door EBITA, it's

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:46.679
<v Speaker 3>the difference between a ten billion dollar valuation and thirty

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 3>billion dollar valuation. And since re private equity owned, there's

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 3>an incentive to see can you get from A to

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 3>B and can you do it this decade? So with

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 3>that inside and with the chareholder Wiship, I certainly have

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 3>studied the company ahead of joining and these I thought

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 3>it was possible. But I think the lesson that I've

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 3>learned is that strategy is really an art of making choices,

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 3>and too many companies and I think that was also

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 3>probably the case in thepside before, end up doing a

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 3>bit more of everything. In our sector, companies with such

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 3>a broad portfolio of chemicals, upstream gas, downstream renewables end

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 3>up their strategy ends up being, well, let's grow everything

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 3>a little bit. And what we've come up with is

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 3>a strategy that really makes choices, that decides to ribble down,

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 3>triple down on sustainability businesses. We've announced that we will

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 3>invest more than sixty percent over our eight billion investment

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 3>budget into sustainable businesses the rest of this decade, creating

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 3>a company that's more than fifty percent sustainable income by

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 3>the end of the decade, and therefore, as a result,

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 3>shrink the classic business of fossil based businesses by essentially

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 3>running them for maximum value rather than investing in them.

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:55.199
<v Speaker 3>And I think that having such a clear choice on

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 3>the strategy has been important internally to make to align

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 3>everybody and to give direction to the company. But it's

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 3>also been hugely helpful excellently because it really creates a

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 3>story about where we're going, and a story that is

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:12.680
<v Speaker 3>easier to understand and that can be explained by all

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 3>the other thousand people in the company, but also can

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 3>be easily understood by people who we deal with in government,

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 3>in regulatory agencies, in the press, and in the general public.

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 3>And having a story that is focused and that is exciting.

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 3>I think we're reaping the benefits of that every day,

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 3>even if we're only at the start of executing story.

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:32.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I think that's a really powerful insight on

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 2>strategy being the art of making choices. I really like that.

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 2>And I've always thought that if you say yes to everything,

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 2>then it's not a real strategy. So yeah, half of

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 2>strategy is knowing what to say no to. So I

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 2>think that's a really powerful message. Now, I know you've

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:47.839
<v Speaker 2>already touched on this. Actually, SEPSO has announced a new

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 2>strategy in the last year called Positive Motion, which is

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 2>all about transforming to net zero. You've already started telling

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:55.839
<v Speaker 2>me a bit about that, but cauld ask you maybe

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 2>just to map out some of the main pillars, the

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:00.319
<v Speaker 2>main components of that. What are the main pieces that

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:02.560
<v Speaker 2>make up that overall strategy over the next eight to

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:03.199
<v Speaker 2>ten years.

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 3>At its core, it starts with understanding who our customers

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 3>are and what they need from us, what they most

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 3>need from us this decade. Also on the B to

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 3>B and the B two C side, we want to

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:17.559
<v Speaker 3>retain those customers and in a way attract many new

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 3>customers and offer them decarbonization solutions. The carbon footprint of

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 3>a company like Stebsite is significant, but eighty five percent

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 3>of that carbon footprint if you go scope one, Scope two,

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 3>Scope three, so let's say life cycle carbon impact of

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 3>our product, not just our own emissions but also our

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 3>customer emissions, eighty five percent of the emissions take place

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 3>when the customer use our products when they drive the car,

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 3>and they use the gasoline over the plane flys and

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 3>they use the curacy. So for us to have a

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 3>meaningful and impactful impact on climate change and on the

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 3>energy to tradition, decarbonizing our own facilities doesn't make much of

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 3>a difference because it's only fifteen percent of our carbon footprint.

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 3>We need to do that, of course, and we're doing it.

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 3>But much more importantly is that we help our customers

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 3>decarbonize their energy use, which will then decarbonize the life

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 3>cycleed carbon footprint of our business. But starts with understanding

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 3>what do our customers need to decarbonize, and it's actually

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:21.839
<v Speaker 3>a relatively simple story. We think that there are mobility

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 3>customers which are at the B two C side. That

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:26.679
<v Speaker 3>starts with let's say the cars that fill up at

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:30.199
<v Speaker 3>one of our eighteen hundred stations will need green electrons,

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 3>will need electric vehicle charging solutions because that's where light

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 3>vehicles are going by and large, So on that segment,

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 3>we are raining down all Liberia super fast chargers so

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 3>people can can charge in fifteen twenty minutes to eighteen

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 3>ninety percent of their battery and go on their live

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 3>journey again with their ev charge staff. Of course, we

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 3>continue to offer diesel and gasoline as we go, but

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 3>becoming the leader in super fast charging in Iberia is

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 3>our main B two C strategy. Alongside that strategy comes

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:07.559
<v Speaker 3>a convenience strategy, because, of course those customers will spend

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:09.679
<v Speaker 3>a bit more time in our stations, let's say twenty

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 3>minutes on average, and therefore we want to give them

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 3>options to make the most of those twenty minutes. Whether

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:17.839
<v Speaker 3>that's drinking coffee or doing some e commerce, or picking

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 3>up a meal, or picking up groceries or having a

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 3>meal are many, There are many options. But we will

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 3>treat those stations not so much anymore as places where

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 3>you have to go because you want to fill up

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 3>your garmend casoline, but where you want to go because

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 3>there are convenience locations that are offer many options whow

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 3>you charge your vehicles. So on the B two C side,

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 3>it's super fast charging plus convenience strategy. On the B

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:42.439
<v Speaker 3>to B side, what our customers need most from us

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:46.079
<v Speaker 3>is green molecules. And I mean with that is many

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 3>sectors in the B to B business that we serve

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 3>are very difficult to be electrifying. The ones that can

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 3>electrify will do so because that's the easiest way to

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 3>decarbonize your energy usage. But there are many sectors such

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 3>as aviation, such as maritime trans or such as heavy industry,

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 3>but also such a heavy transport big tracks driving long

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 3>distance for whom it's or the fertilizer sector, the chemical sector,

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 3>for whom it's very difficult to electrify. But they still

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:16.959
<v Speaker 3>need a decarbonization solution and for that they need green molecules.

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 3>And we've elected so again a choice. We could try

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 3>and serve the industry that electrifies, but we actually believe

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 3>that we can be more distinct by developing green molecules.

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 3>We've been in a molecule business for one hundred years.

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:33.440
<v Speaker 3>They've been hydrocarbon molecules. Now we will develop green molecules.

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:37.680
<v Speaker 3>And essentially there's two main families there. There are biofuels

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:41.559
<v Speaker 3>and gases, and there is the green hydrogen family. On biofuels,

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 3>we want to become one of the main suppliers of

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 3>sustainable aviation fuel in Europe and we will start making

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 3>some substantial investments this year. We already produce sustainable aviation

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 3>fuel and on green hydrogen. We will also become one

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 3>of the major suppliers in Europe of green hydrogen and

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 3>its derivatives green ammonia and pretend green methodol, and in

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:04.839
<v Speaker 3>that way we can decarbonize the carbon footprint of our

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:07.440
<v Speaker 3>industrial of our let's say B two B customers who

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 3>need green molecules and our BDC customers that need green electrials.

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 3>So that is broadly, let's say the growth strategy underpinned

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 3>by a significant renewable energy investment, which we will do

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 3>to sell green electrons to customers or so to end customers.

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 3>We will do it for own use. We will do

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 3>about seven gigabatts of renewable solar wind electricity then will

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 3>go to feed the super fast charging for the B

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 3>two C customers and then will be used to make

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 3>to produce the green hydrogen and to produce the biofuels

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 3>and biogases. And so it's an own use strategy. We

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 3>will not significantly compete in the electricity market itself, not

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 3>because we because it's a bad business, but again because

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 3>strategy is about making choices. So that's that's the growth

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 3>part of the agenda. And then we will de emphasize

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 3>our extreme business. As you may have seen, we've recently

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 3>announced the sale of our oil production business Adown. That's

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 3>about half of our extreme and in the rest of

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 3>our exstream positions, we are really not growing apart from

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 3>making the investments in the fields that we already have

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 3>that makes sense. We are running that business for maximum value,

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 3>and you will see the relative weight of our extreme

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 3>business decline in our portfolio as we grow the green

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 3>side and as we run that business form maximum value

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 3>going forward. Our chemicals business does have a green agenda,

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 3>is able to decarbonize and become green at kind of

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 3>the pace that our energy businesses, so we've decided to

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 3>keep that alongside our business for now and go on

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 3>also go on a pretty aggressive green strategy. Our main

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 3>business is to make La b which goes into the

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 3>surfactanins business, which eventually people use to wash their clothes

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 3>or wash their hands, et cetera. And we believe that

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 3>is a sector that will decarbonize early, where our green

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 3>propositions will attract the preview.

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 2>So maybe just to drill into some of the opportunity

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 2>areas there that you see across immobility, across hydrogen and

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 2>bio fuels and sustainably aviation fuels. How are you thinking

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 2>about the relative size of those opportunities between now and

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 2>twenty thirty? Are they different sizes and different values to you?

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Do they carry different risk profiles? How are you thinking

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 2>about the balance of those different opportunities there?

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 3>They are all different and indeed have kind of different

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 3>sizes and risk profiles. If you look at electric vehicle charging,

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 3>it is a business that where there's no question that

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 3>will be there. The European Union will drive adoption of

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 3>EV very very hard in the coming decade, and therefore

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 3>the fleet will change to EV. There's no question. The

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 3>question is a bit how fast you see very big

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 3>differences in Europe Norway, I think eighty five percent of

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 3>the cars are now EV's that are sold. Netherlands and

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 3>Germany it's twenty five growing to thirty, and in Spain

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 3>it's four. And so the big question how fast will

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 3>that four grow to twenty to thirty, to fifty and

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 3>eighty And it's a bit a noble but it certainly

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 3>depends also on the amount of infrastructure available. So we

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 3>want to be part of the solution, will investigate it,

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 3>We will invest ahead of the growth of that EV park,

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:07.640
<v Speaker 3>which hopefully will in itself trigger growth of the EV park,

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 3>because we believe it's a bit of a business of

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 3>a land grap where it's better to be early than

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 3>to than to be laid, and by creating an installed base,

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 3>we can grad a much higher market share in the

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 3>EV charging business, let's say up to twenty five percent

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 3>that we have in the fossil the business, where we

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:25.919
<v Speaker 3>are somewhere somewhere apt to after thirteen percent. It's an

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 3>opportunity for step change in our market share by going

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 3>early on ev charging, but eventually the opportunity is limited

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 3>by the size of the car park in Iberia and

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:40.639
<v Speaker 3>the size of our network, so you cannot grow that forever.

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 3>On biofuels, particularly sustainable aviation fuel, the risk profile is

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 3>an interesting one. It's not so much to demount because

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 3>the aviation sector really has only one credible near to

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:55.919
<v Speaker 3>medium term to decarbonized, which is stainable aviation fuels, and

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 3>again in Europe will be forced by the European Union

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:03.120
<v Speaker 3>to adopt. Many companies want to adopt, but even those

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 3>who don't want to will be forced by regulation to

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:07.920
<v Speaker 3>start buying the stainable aviation fuel. So in a way,

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:10.479
<v Speaker 3>the demand in that sector is kind of de risked.

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 3>It will be there and it will grow. The risk

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:15.680
<v Speaker 3>profile in the biofuel's business much from the supply side.

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 3>Can you find enough second generation feedstock that is genuinely

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 3>sustainable and not food based but waste based. Can you

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 3>find enough speedstock to grow your business? And so we

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 3>are very very strongly focused at being allocating substantial resource

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 3>to find a to originate in feedstock supply into the

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 3>South of Spain so we can be a leader in

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 3>producing biofields of stainable aviation fuel. The main risks on

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 3>the supply the feedstock supply side, on the green hydro

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:44.360
<v Speaker 3>side is the other way around. Feedstock is not a problem.

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 3>You just need water and reheuble electricity and where we

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:49.919
<v Speaker 3>are in the South of Spain is the best place

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 3>in Europe for reneble electricity. We have the best combination

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 3>of sun wind and space. And what I mean by

0:18:56.760 --> 0:19:00.400
<v Speaker 3>space is the opportunity to build world class solar wind

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 3>parks because there's quite a those space in the Midleland

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 3>and South of Spain that that's usable. It's the population

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:08.400
<v Speaker 3>density is quite low. All of a sudden, the winter

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:12.119
<v Speaker 3>you get very two renewable electricity and the other component

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 3>you need is water and you don't need so much

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 3>of it. And actually by reducing our own use in

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 3>the refinery is we can free up enough water to

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 3>grow a very very large hygien business. So there is

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 3>no constraint on the feedstock side on hygien. The constraint

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 3>there at the market is to actually develop customers who

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 3>want to buy hydrogen and that so that's a very

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 3>different risk profile. But the good thing is these three

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 3>businesses all have their own different risk profiles, and so

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 3>by growing all three of them, you can actually you

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 3>get diversification. You don't just depend on one single one

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 3>of them working out. One of them might work out

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 3>better than the others. But by growing all three into

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 3>a leadership position, we're pretty comfortable with the decarbonization drive

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:53.439
<v Speaker 3>that we have in Europe, with the advantage position that

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 3>we have in the South of Spain in terms of

0:19:55.400 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 3>clean power being the cheapest in Europe, we will have

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 3>a strong clean energy portfolio in the course of this decade.

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Maybe just to spend another minute on hydrogen, I noticed

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 2>your very exciting announcement that you've made around this two

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:13.400
<v Speaker 2>gigawats project. I believe it's called the Andalusian Green Hydrogen

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 2>Valley if I recall correctly. We have a coalition of

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 2>partners including Furtive Barrier, the fertilizer company, which clearly will

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 2>have a use for hydrogen. So my question first of

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.440
<v Speaker 2>all is what did it take to get that project

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:27.360
<v Speaker 2>up and running. Clearly having that anchor customer is critical.

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 2>And then where do you then see that hydrogen flowing?

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 2>More broadly, I presume there'll be other applications for that

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 2>hydrogen coming out of this two gigawort project, So where

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 2>do you see it going into? Which industries and which geographies.

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:41.639
<v Speaker 3>It's a very exciting projects. It's ten times the size

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 3>of the largest hydro project in Europe being constructed at

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 3>the moment, which is in Rotterdam built BCHEL Mega. What

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:52.120
<v Speaker 3>is a is a major chef change in the industry,

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 3>and we are we are fortunate we have a number

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 3>of things in place. As I said, very cheap renewable

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:02.640
<v Speaker 3>power and electricity is about eighty percent of the court

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:04.880
<v Speaker 3>of green hydrogen. So when you have the cheapest renewable

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 3>power and you're likely to have the cheapest green hydroen

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:10.639
<v Speaker 3>so that's one key element. But the second key element, indeed,

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 3>is that we have local demands that we can use

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 3>as a way to get going. We have the alliance

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:20.719
<v Speaker 3>with thirty BA. We ourselves, with our two refineries, are

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:24.680
<v Speaker 3>significant hydrogen users and we will consume our own green hydroen.

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:27.880
<v Speaker 3>And then we have a number of other customers more

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 3>in the aluminium and steel side around our energy parks

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:34.680
<v Speaker 3>in the south of Spain that our potential and I

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:38.919
<v Speaker 3>would say likely customers that we are having discussion. So clearly,

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 3>if you're going to build a hydroen valley, the first

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 3>step is to serve local demand, and we have quite

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 3>a bit of local demand. But then the second step

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 3>is to start to serve demand in other areas. And

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 3>for that you need to transport the product. And that's

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 3>totally trivial when it comes to hydroen because it typically

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 3>can't use existing gas by bine systems and although you

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 3>can blend them with a network that it doesn't derive

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:04.120
<v Speaker 3>as hydro with the customer. So there is a plan

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:06.440
<v Speaker 3>in Europe, a very detail plan in Europe that the

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 3>European Union is committed to to build a hydrid pipeline

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 3>system in Europe. That will eventually solve that issue, but

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 3>that's going to take time. The EU says by twenty

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 3>thirty that will be very fast, could be in the

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 3>cause of the thirty so we can't wait for that

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:26.880
<v Speaker 3>to go and so for us to second. After having

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 3>served local demand, we see the best opportunity in turning

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 3>green hydroen into green ammonia, which is easily shippable, and

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:38.119
<v Speaker 3>then we have a number of destinations for that, so

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 3>we will produce green ammonia. We've done a deal with

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:44.440
<v Speaker 3>the port of Rotterdam where we create a green ammoniac

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 3>corridor between a Caceras which is the second part in

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:49.439
<v Speaker 3>Europe and Rotterdam, which is the first port in Europe.

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 3>There's a big ammonia market in Rotterdam for fertilizer for

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 3>other uses that we can supply into from all caesiras

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:00.680
<v Speaker 3>and we are sponsoring the construction of the infrastructure we

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 3>need in Rotterdam to do so. But we are also

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:09.199
<v Speaker 3>developing a business of selling ammonia into ships. The maritime

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:13.119
<v Speaker 3>sector will need to de carbonize and the two available

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 3>pathways are methanol and green ammonia, both made using green hydrogen.

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 3>So over time, we also expect to be selling into

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 3>ships or to sell into other markets. Japan is a

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 3>market that is very keen to bigreen ammonia, and so

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:28.399
<v Speaker 3>that will be the second level of customer that we

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 3>will serve, the shipping industry and the ammonia market globally.

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 3>And then eventually, as we think of scaling that well

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:38.119
<v Speaker 3>beyond the two gigabots, we would start to count on

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 3>the pipeline system to take the hydrogen to the north

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 3>of Europe. So there are a number of layers. The

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:47.159
<v Speaker 3>last layer, I would say is developing a trucking market.

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:50.240
<v Speaker 3>We do see that for a long distance heavy trucking,

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 3>hydroen is the logical alternative, and we have a plan

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 3>to start constructing hygen stations in Spain and then link

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 3>into hydrogen distribution facilities in the rest of Europe to

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 3>start sending HydroD to drugs, which is a also shepherd

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 3>as otherwise very very difficult to decarbodize. So we see

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 3>a large market opportunity in front of us, but we

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 3>need to develop it step by step.

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 2>It's a really interesting concept to start with the local demand,

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 2>but then ultimately to think about transforming Spain's inexpensive green

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 2>electrons into molecules that can then supply the rest of Europe.

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a really exciting, really exciting concept. Maybe

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:27.680
<v Speaker 2>just to zoom out, Martin, just think about the oil

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:30.360
<v Speaker 2>and gas sector and the opportunities in the energy transition

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 2>more broadly. I remember when you were in your previous role.

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:35.360
<v Speaker 2>You were at Shell at the time, and you join

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 2>me on stage at our BNF New York summit. It

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 2>must have been four or five years ago. I remember

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 2>you explaining with quite some conviction that you felt that

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:45.639
<v Speaker 2>oil and gas companies can and must play a leading

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 2>role in the energy transition. Now, I assume and I

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 2>can tell that that's still your conviction. But now that

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 2>you're at SEPSO, which is still quite a large company,

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 2>but somewhat smaller and different in structure, different in focus,

0:24:57.040 --> 0:24:59.159
<v Speaker 2>do you feel that SEPSA has a different set of

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:01.920
<v Speaker 2>advantages or or different challenges than other players in the

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 2>industry and how do you see that playing into your strategy.

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we talk about the size of steps. We always

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 3>say it's it's big enough to matter, but small enough

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:15.920
<v Speaker 3>to change fast. And I think that is that is

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:18.879
<v Speaker 3>very true, But that's not the only distinct position that

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 3>we have. I do absolutely believe that our position in

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 3>the south of Spain and we are the only company

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 3>with energy parks and with logistics assets, et cetera. The

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:31.640
<v Speaker 3>only energy player with a position in the south of Space,

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 3>so it's not that easy to copy. Is an advantage

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 3>that we have and that helps helps us be pioneers

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:40.920
<v Speaker 3>in this area or the early movers. But I think

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 3>there's another issue at play Albert, which is ownership structure.

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:49.400
<v Speaker 3>I have two private equity owners, Mubadla and Carla, who

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 3>are convinced that this is the right strategy for steps

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 3>to follow and put their money and governance behind it

0:25:56.560 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 3>and allow us to execute very fast and quite medical

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 3>transformation of the portfolio and the business. I think what

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 3>we've seen in public equity markets is that they're very

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 3>hard to read, and if anything, they've been going the

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 3>other way. I think the most recent proof point would

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 3>be when VP announced that they were going to reverse

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 3>to some extent their commitment to reduce their oil and

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 3>gas production. Their share price went up by twenty percent,

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:25.919
<v Speaker 3>so the promised to produce more oil and gas than

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 3>plant and their shurprise went up substantially, so I think

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 3>the public equity markets at the moment are a bit

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 3>I would say polarized. There is a large but shrinking

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 3>part of the public acuity market that simply wants oil

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 3>and gas production and oil and gas exposure. And then

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 3>there's an even larger part of the public equity markets

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 3>that wants to invest in EG compliant or related shares.

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 3>The problem that these integrated oil and gas companies have

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:57.160
<v Speaker 3>is that whenever they announced their going let's say, from

0:26:57.200 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 3>five percent renewables to ten percent or five to fifty,

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 3>then the part of the equity market that wants oil

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:07.199
<v Speaker 3>and gas exposure divests because that's not what they are

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 3>looking for. They want oil and gas exposure. They either

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 3>don't want these companies to invest in the energy tradition

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 3>or they don't believe in the energy tradition, but they're

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 3>looking for oil and gas exposurem So they divest or

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:18.399
<v Speaker 3>in these apportion divest But the ESG part of the

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 3>or the equity market, that's a very powerful part of

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 3>the equity market, doesn't yet invest because it only wants

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 3>to invest if these companies achieve forty or fifty percent

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 3>green energy penetration. So it's a very hard journey to make.

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 3>So at the moment, I would say the public equity

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:36.400
<v Speaker 3>markets reward pure place. You're either in oil and gas

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:39.680
<v Speaker 3>and you develop it and then you get share price appreciation,

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 3>or you are a green company and you develop that.

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:45.400
<v Speaker 3>But there are very few public equity investors that want

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 3>to invest in the journey. My private equity investors don't

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 3>want anything else but to invest in the journey. I

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:52.880
<v Speaker 3>think there's a real tension there where for the large

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 3>companies in the industry, it is hard to find the

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:59.639
<v Speaker 3>trajectory to lead in the carbonization if the equity markets

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:01.200
<v Speaker 3>are not willing to buy into that.

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 2>It's a really interesting and insightful point, and I agree

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:07.879
<v Speaker 2>there's something about stability and clarity that's provided by some

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 2>insulation from the public markets. I want to expand the

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 2>lens of this conversation just talk a bit about the

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 2>situation here in Europe, where you and I both live,

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:18.440
<v Speaker 2>and also more broadly about the global decoupling and the

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 2>growth of international competition. But maybe just starting here in

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Europe and the energy crisis. Do you see that the

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 2>worst is now behind us in terms of this energy crisis.

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 2>We now have this oil price cap that seems to

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 2>be doing its job. We have gas stories that seems

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:34.120
<v Speaker 2>like it's at a reasonable level after winter. What's your

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:36.959
<v Speaker 2>thought on kind of the prognosis and do you think

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 2>we've weathered the worst of the storm.

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 3>So a few points, the situation is clearly a lot

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 3>calmer than it was in twenty twenty two after the

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 3>war started, in particularly summer, when things got really quite stress,

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 3>particularly in decasuallytricity markets. I would make a distinction between

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 3>liquids and gas. I think the oil and oil products

0:28:57.040 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 3>markets have settled more or less with the Russian ancients

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 3>in place, the oil and products keep flowing. The logistics

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 3>are a bit more difficult, are all kinds of issues

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 3>with the quality of ships that bring the Russian cruder

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 3>products to their new end customers, et cetera. So so

0:29:10.800 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't say it's it's completely normal, but it's kind

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 3>of settled. And so to me, the liquid markets will

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:21.720
<v Speaker 3>simply going forward again be driven by supplying demand, and

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 3>we do believe supply has been underinvested, so oil prices

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 3>likely to be relatively strong going forward. But that market

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 3>has kind of settled, and I wouldn't expect there to

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 3>be any panic moments left. I think on the gas market,

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 3>Europe has been successful and lucky. It's been successful in

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 3>attracting supply from other sources and in suppressing demand. But

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 3>it's also been very lucky that the winter was one

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 3>of the warmest winters on record, and therefore the heating

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:49.760
<v Speaker 3>demand was so much lower than average, and those two

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 3>factors have led now to quite a calm situation in

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 3>the gas market. I think that it's too early to

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 3>declare victory on that. If we get resurging China demand,

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 3>Asian demand for gas, which was also quite suppressed last

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 3>year because of COVID and other reasons, if it all

0:30:06.080 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 3>comes back into the market and we have a very

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 3>cold twenty three to twenty four winter, and the gas

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 3>situation could still be tied. But we still have to

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 3>get through one or two winters on the gas before

0:30:16.080 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 3>we can really say that that situation is also settled.

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 3>So we'll see how it goes next winter. But I

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 3>think the models now in place to respond to are

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 3>a lot better than nowhere a year ago, so I

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 3>don't think we'll get to the very extremes that we

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 3>saw last year anymore, but could still be tense, but

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 3>one of the important structural points is that Europe will

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 3>never again go back to depending so much on Russia

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to gas, and therefore it will become

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 3>a structural energy importer and that will impact the long term.

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 3>Gas price in Europe will go as a result, because

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 3>energy prices will be higher than the Russian sply used

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 3>to be, and that will have impact on the gas market,

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 3>the electricity market, and the competitiveness of Europe for industry,

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:55.080
<v Speaker 3>et cetera.

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 2>That's really interesting and I think that's not too dissimilar

0:30:58.200 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 2>to the view that our team has over the next year,

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 2>this question of the rebound in Asia and in China

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:04.560
<v Speaker 2>and offset against the potential weather for Europe for the

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:06.560
<v Speaker 2>coming year. It's interesting as well to think about how

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 2>climate change has already impacted that balance by giving us

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 2>a warm winter, which we're thankful for, but also limiting

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 2>hydro output last year, which we're less thankful for.

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 3>And let's not forget that warm summers also mean a

0:31:17.200 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 3>lot of air conditioning demand in many places that burn

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 3>gas repout, So it's not a climate change a way

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 3>a lot of one way.

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Street indeed, right, that's right. And then of course you

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:29.120
<v Speaker 2>know the European response, or one of the elements of

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 2>the European response to this crisis has been to increase

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 2>its ambition and accelerate the energy transition and try to

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 2>remove more of the blockers. How do you see that

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 2>now that we're more than a year into this crisis,

0:31:38.920 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 2>do you think we're starting to see the impact of

0:31:40.920 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 2>that acceleration, that that ambition can be delivered or do

0:31:43.840 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 2>you still see plenty of challenges ahead.

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 3>So I'd say that the rebouwer EU ambitions by and

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:53.720
<v Speaker 3>large are the correct response to the crisis. I think

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 3>it is to me, for anybody who takes energy transitions,

0:31:56.600 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 3>here is obvious that the thing to do is to

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 3>mix out on growing green energy in Europe, both electricity

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 3>and green molecules, and then if that doesn't provide all

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 3>the answer to the energy crisis, then to develop more

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 3>fossil supply into Europe, either energy or pipeline from neighboring countries,

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 3>et cetera, and embedance system in that way. So I

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 3>think the ambition and the targets are the right ones.

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 3>What I haven't seen enough of is turning that into practice.

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 3>I would have wanted and expected more of a wartime

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 3>effort to kickstart the biofuels and green hydrogen industries, to

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 3>already be constructing large projects, to already be breaking ground

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 3>on pipelines, et cetera, to really change the approach and

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 3>remove some of the permitting blockers, but also other blockers

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 3>that stand in the way of you're moving so much

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:52.960
<v Speaker 3>more quickly to that new energy system. All those ideas

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:57.479
<v Speaker 3>exist in results about permitting zones and go to areas

0:32:57.520 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 3>they call them, about moving faster by lines and only

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:03.720
<v Speaker 3>electrolyizers and on biofields, but it's taken quite a lot

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 3>of time for them to be agreed at the European

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 3>level and then for them to find their way down

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 3>to local legislation, et cetera, in order for implementation to

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 3>be able to start. So I think most of the

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:17.400
<v Speaker 3>right ideas, correct ideas, are around, but driving them into

0:33:17.440 --> 0:33:21.960
<v Speaker 3>implementation is slower than necessary in my view, and certainly

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:25.160
<v Speaker 3>slower than what Europe needs, and that still needs work.

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 3>In the meantime, of course, we've had the IRA in

0:33:27.680 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 3>the US, which gives very significant supply incentives to the

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:34.960
<v Speaker 3>market there, and that's certainly a wake up call for

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 3>Europe is trying to respond within its own limits, score

0:33:38.480 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 3>of tools that the European Union has and the countries

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 3>are allowed to have. My sense is that that could

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 3>still end up in the right place because where Europe

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:48.720
<v Speaker 3>at the moment is struggling a bit to copy the

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:52.360
<v Speaker 3>IRA supply site incentives and will need to step up further.

0:33:52.720 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 3>It has very significant demand side incentives, and there's the

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 3>etes the price on carbon in terms of the framework

0:33:59.320 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 3>for adopting sustainable aviation fuel and hopefully maritime is sustainable

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:05.560
<v Speaker 3>maritime fuels, and that's missing in the US. The US

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:08.359
<v Speaker 3>has very significant supply side incentives and l the IRA

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:11.719
<v Speaker 3>is very clear, simple piece of legislation, well done, but

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:14.680
<v Speaker 3>it still needs demand side incentives such as carbon prices

0:34:14.800 --> 0:34:16.920
<v Speaker 3>or other ways to stimulate demand. So I think the

0:34:17.120 --> 0:34:19.839
<v Speaker 3>race is still on between Europe and US internal who

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 3>will actually be the quickest to develop a green energy

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 3>transition industry.

0:34:24.760 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a really fascinating point. And I was

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 2>actually going to ask you that exact question, to what

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 2>extent do you think this narrative around the green investment

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 2>case in Europe being undermined by the US is really true?

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:36.319
<v Speaker 2>But maybe a follow on question to that, I think

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:38.400
<v Speaker 2>one of the observations is that there's now more of

0:34:38.440 --> 0:34:43.320
<v Speaker 2>a race around the green manufacturing jobs, the industrial production

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:46.239
<v Speaker 2>jobs of the technology for the energy transition. So I'd

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:47.920
<v Speaker 2>be curious to know if you have a view on

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 2>how important that piece is versus just getting on with

0:34:51.640 --> 0:34:53.800
<v Speaker 2>deploying projects at the downstream. I don't know if you

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:57.880
<v Speaker 2>ever thought on how important those green manufacturing jobs really are.

0:34:58.280 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it is seem to see how we've

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:05.759
<v Speaker 3>always seen the energy transition and get into one point

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:09.840
<v Speaker 3>five degrees as a collaborative global effort, or an effort

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:12.400
<v Speaker 3>that had to that in order to succeed, had to

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:15.280
<v Speaker 3>be collaborative. What we now see it is actually becoming

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 3>more competitive between the Europe and the US, between China,

0:35:19.239 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 3>Europe and US, the energy tangition is becoming more of

0:35:21.600 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 3>a competition than a collaboration. We hope it's both, but

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 3>I actually think that's probably not a bad thing because

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 3>competition in general has brought many good things to society,

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:34.360
<v Speaker 3>and it can bring progress on energy transition, then then

0:35:34.440 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 3>bring it up. I think the focus on manufacturing jobs

0:35:37.400 --> 0:35:42.760
<v Speaker 3>is if you take a purely ecomomist few is actually

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 3>not so helpful. You want to create those jobs in

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 3>the places where they are most efficient and then globally optimized.

0:35:49.160 --> 0:35:52.480
<v Speaker 3>But politically it is very very important that we keep

0:35:52.760 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 3>the population in Europe and the propulation in the US

0:35:55.160 --> 0:35:58.800
<v Speaker 3>and elsewhere, so keep their support of the energy transition.

0:35:58.960 --> 0:36:01.480
<v Speaker 3>So I think in country that tend to lose a

0:36:01.520 --> 0:36:04.280
<v Speaker 3>lot of jobs because of the energy tangition, where for example,

0:36:04.360 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 3>the car manufacturing industry is a very big employer and

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:09.840
<v Speaker 3>it is in Spain and it isn't in Germany, the

0:36:10.000 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 3>notion that driving that energy transition hart will create a

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 3>lot of unemployment could actually cause political support for anty

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 3>tgition to fall away. And so, from a political point

0:36:18.680 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 3>of view and from a political acceptance point of view,

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 3>being able to sell the energy transition acceleration as something

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:28.840
<v Speaker 3>that will also bring jobs to the local economy and

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 3>there will also be manufacturing activity and prosperity, et cetera,

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 3>it's probably not actually such a bad idea if that

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:38.800
<v Speaker 3>accelerates the energy tangition, and if accelerates popular support for it,

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 3>then I think the economic symp optimization of having manufacturing

0:36:43.320 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 3>jobs in what you might economically call the wrong place

0:36:46.360 --> 0:36:49.760
<v Speaker 3>may actually be worth that acceleration, or worth that public support,

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:52.640
<v Speaker 3>so I'm I'm not too unhappy about it. I think

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:55.320
<v Speaker 3>it is one of the biggest biss to energy tangition

0:36:55.719 --> 0:36:58.640
<v Speaker 3>is if it loses popular support, that people start to

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:00.600
<v Speaker 3>feel that the only thing that does for them is

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:04.800
<v Speaker 3>make energy more expensive and export jobs, and then I

0:37:04.840 --> 0:37:07.480
<v Speaker 3>don't think we'll be able to get it done anywhere

0:37:07.520 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 3>near in time. So I'm actually quite sympathetic to efforts

0:37:11.200 --> 0:37:14.840
<v Speaker 3>to continue to raise popular support for the energy transition,

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:18.520
<v Speaker 3>even if it is economically perhaps not the optimal thing

0:37:18.600 --> 0:37:18.719
<v Speaker 3>to do.

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:20.960
<v Speaker 2>So I'd like to just drill into that point about

0:37:21.040 --> 0:37:24.319
<v Speaker 2>international competition really, because I think we're entering this era,

0:37:24.640 --> 0:37:27.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, first of all, the marginalization of Russia as

0:37:27.160 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 2>an energy exporter, which you talked about, and this broader

0:37:30.120 --> 0:37:32.920
<v Speaker 2>rivalry between China and the US, China and the West,

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:35.640
<v Speaker 2>and concerns about supply chain resilience for the energy transition.

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:38.040
<v Speaker 2>And I think I detected from your earlier remarks actually

0:37:38.040 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 2>a sense of optimism that against that backdrop, we can

0:37:40.560 --> 0:37:43.959
<v Speaker 2>still accelerate the energy transition. Is that how you feel

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:46.520
<v Speaker 2>that even during these complex times, that we can continue

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:48.760
<v Speaker 2>to push and continue to move faster on that journey.

0:37:49.239 --> 0:37:52.920
<v Speaker 3>I think it's absolutely possible. I think my sense, for example,

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:55.839
<v Speaker 3>as the IRA may not have existed and read power

0:37:55.920 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 3>EU may not have existed, is the current conflict in

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:02.160
<v Speaker 3>Ukraine wasn't there, But I think it has sparked and

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:05.919
<v Speaker 3>however totally terrible. That is, it has sparked a number

0:38:05.960 --> 0:38:09.560
<v Speaker 3>of important accelerators for the energy tradition that I think

0:38:09.640 --> 0:38:12.560
<v Speaker 3>could have a very very lasting impact on the speed

0:38:13.080 --> 0:38:15.880
<v Speaker 3>and direction of the energy system. It is. It is

0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 3>not all easy going, of course, because if you if

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:25.120
<v Speaker 3>you summarize Europe's approach as becoming lesser even totally independent

0:38:25.200 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 3>of Russian from an energy perspective, by driving the energy

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:31.440
<v Speaker 3>tradition hard, then then of course you exchange dependence on

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:34.759
<v Speaker 3>let's say, fossil fuels to dependence on materials, because the

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:38.919
<v Speaker 3>energy tradition, the solar panels, the hydrogen plants, et cetera,

0:38:39.080 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 3>to biofuels are all about materials, and these many of

0:38:43.600 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 3>these materials you created dependence on China and other parts

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:48.960
<v Speaker 3>of the world. So if you in a way you

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:51.600
<v Speaker 3>exchange one dependence for the other, and will need to

0:38:51.719 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 3>work through the impacts of that, and so so it

0:38:54.680 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 3>isn't all clear. Sailing but I'm optimistic that the system,

0:38:58.800 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 3>let's say the EU US China system, will will come

0:39:02.719 --> 0:39:06.560
<v Speaker 3>to an equal equilibrium that allows those materials to flow

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:10.760
<v Speaker 3>and it allows that energy tradition acceleration to to take place.

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 3>It has been what has been clear to me is

0:39:14.120 --> 0:39:18.239
<v Speaker 3>that energy security is also in Europe very very political

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:22.080
<v Speaker 3>and sensitivision. It's been quite remarkable last year to see

0:39:22.120 --> 0:39:24.760
<v Speaker 3>that when energy price has got high, Europe was willing

0:39:24.800 --> 0:39:29.480
<v Speaker 3>to spend hundreds of billions subsidizing fossil fuel consumption in

0:39:29.640 --> 0:39:32.400
<v Speaker 3>order to keep its citizens content. And of course the

0:39:33.280 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 3>European argument for a long time has been that nobody

0:39:35.719 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 3>should subsidize fossil fuel consumption. And yet when when the

0:39:38.719 --> 0:39:41.760
<v Speaker 3>going got tough last year, European countries together spend hundreds

0:39:41.800 --> 0:39:43.600
<v Speaker 3>of billions on it, and they also switched some co

0:39:43.760 --> 0:39:46.000
<v Speaker 3>fire power plants. So that to me has been an

0:39:46.040 --> 0:39:48.880
<v Speaker 3>extremely important insight last year. Although we all believe in

0:39:49.000 --> 0:39:52.560
<v Speaker 3>energy tradition, and certainly in Europe and US politicians will

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:55.400
<v Speaker 3>will say that when the going gets tough, energy security

0:39:55.440 --> 0:39:58.840
<v Speaker 3>and affordability quickly come into perhaps or trumpet an agenda,

0:39:58.960 --> 0:40:01.920
<v Speaker 3>but certainly going side with it. And that comes to

0:40:02.360 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 3>the necessity to increase our efforts to make sure that

0:40:06.120 --> 0:40:08.960
<v Speaker 3>there's not just greener energy, but there's also plentyful and

0:40:09.000 --> 0:40:12.040
<v Speaker 3>affordable energy as we drive the energy transition. I don't

0:40:12.040 --> 0:40:14.360
<v Speaker 3>think that was as clearly on the radar screen as before.

0:40:14.960 --> 0:40:17.960
<v Speaker 3>To me, it just emphasizes the need to scale up

0:40:18.480 --> 0:40:20.840
<v Speaker 3>fast than we have been doing, and indeed about the

0:40:21.320 --> 0:40:26.480
<v Speaker 3>wartime approach to creating clean energy in abundance affordability doesn't

0:40:26.800 --> 0:40:28.120
<v Speaker 3>drive us back into the wrong place.

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Martin. I think that's a great place to

0:40:30.680 --> 0:40:32.440
<v Speaker 2>end the conversation, and I agree the challenge we have

0:40:32.520 --> 0:40:34.920
<v Speaker 2>in front of us is to keep accelerating the transition

0:40:35.200 --> 0:40:37.960
<v Speaker 2>but making sure that we're managing and ensuring energy security

0:40:38.000 --> 0:40:40.080
<v Speaker 2>at the same time. Martin, I always learned so much

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:41.480
<v Speaker 2>when I get to talk to you, so thank you

0:40:41.760 --> 0:40:43.600
<v Speaker 2>very much for sharing your thoughts with all of our

0:40:43.640 --> 0:40:45.080
<v Speaker 2>listeners out there, and I hope we'll get to have

0:40:45.200 --> 0:40:47.000
<v Speaker 2>you back on the show or on stage at one

0:40:47.040 --> 0:40:49.799
<v Speaker 2>of us summit's very soon. Thank you, no thanks.

0:40:49.840 --> 0:40:52.120
<v Speaker 3>I'll be keen to report on our promise. We are

0:40:52.440 --> 0:40:56.320
<v Speaker 3>undergoing probably the fastest transformation of any energy company in

0:40:56.400 --> 0:40:58.400
<v Speaker 3>the world, and if we can prove that it can

0:40:58.480 --> 0:41:00.359
<v Speaker 3>be done, as I'm sure we will. I hope many

0:41:00.400 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 3>others will follow, and we can look back over a

0:41:03.239 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 3>decade of progress eventually, rather than a decade of trouble.

0:41:06.239 --> 0:41:08.239
<v Speaker 3>But thanks for your time. Then over there for the

0:41:08.280 --> 0:41:09.239
<v Speaker 3>opportunity to be with you.

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much.

0:41:19.239 --> 0:41:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg n EF is a service provided by Bloomberg Finance

0:41:22.400 --> 0:41:25.839
<v Speaker 1>LP and its affiliates. This recording does not constitute, nor

0:41:25.880 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 1>should it be construed, as investment advice, investment recommendations, or

0:41:30.120 --> 0:41:33.640
<v Speaker 1>a recommendation as to an investment or other strategy. Bloomberg

0:41:33.760 --> 0:41:37.000
<v Speaker 1>n EF should not be considered as information sufficient upon

0:41:37.080 --> 0:41:40.680
<v Speaker 1>which to base an investment decision. Neither Bloomberg Finance LP

0:41:40.920 --> 0:41:44.280
<v Speaker 1>nor any of its affiliates makes any representation or warranty

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:47.320
<v Speaker 1>as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained

0:41:47.360 --> 0:41:50.440
<v Speaker 1>in this recording, and any liability as a result of

0:41:50.480 --> 0:41:52.360
<v Speaker 1>this recording is expressly disclaimed.