WEBVTT -  SpaceX IPOs on the Nasdaq

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. This is Bloomberg Business

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Week Daily reporting from the magazine that helps global leaders

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>stay ahead with insight on the people, companies, and trends

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>shaping today's complex economy, plus global business, finance and tech

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>news as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Masser and Tim Stenebeck on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 2>SpaceX again one hundred and seventy four sixty nine. It's

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 2>moving fast, up almost forty no excuse me, up almost

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:42.199
<v Speaker 2>thirty percent here in the trade. Hey, one thing we

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 2>wanted to point out and we want to continue with

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:46.920
<v Speaker 2>our all team coverage here. Elon Musk earlier this morning

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:49.880
<v Speaker 2>in a live stream on another one of his platforms

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 2>and companies, we are talking about X.

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 3>Here's what he had to say.

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 4>There are always problems on Earth. There are always problems

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 4>on Earth. There always things that we wish to be better,

0:00:58.280 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 4>that we want to solve here.

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 5>On Earth, and we should solve them.

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 4>But they also have to be things that get you

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:07.960
<v Speaker 4>excited about the future, that make you glad to wake

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 4>up in the morning because you can't wait to see

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 4>what happens next. And that's the future that SpaceX wants.

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 6>To bring to you, all right?

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 2>That, of course was Elon Musk and a live stream

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:22.479
<v Speaker 2>on X this morning. Felt kind of spacey there, Tim

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 2>stenteex it did.

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 5>It also felt very familiar if you've read the S

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 5>one for SpaceX. It felt like I was reading that

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 5>all over again. This is the messaging that Elon and

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:34.959
<v Speaker 5>company want to get across that waking up in the morning,

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 5>you can't wait to see what happens next, the future

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:38.479
<v Speaker 5>that SpaceX wants to bring to you.

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:41.039
<v Speaker 2>All right, guys, So let's bring back Billy Lipshealtz and

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:44.399
<v Speaker 2>Ed Ludlove of course, Bloomberg News IPO reporter Blly Lipschultz

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 2>and host of Bloomberg Tech on Bloomberg Television Ed Ludlow,

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, is this all about the future?

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 7>Ed?

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 2>The valuation of this We have talked so much about

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 2>the valuation of the SpaceX company now and is it

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 2>all about future expectations? Which is often what you do

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 2>when you kind of buy into Elon in his story

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 2>and his companies.

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, what investors have had to understand is an already

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:12.919
<v Speaker 8>quite diverse business that has lots of different arms and

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 8>then over a very distant timeline, things happening in a

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 8>different order. So SpaceX still has a sort of guiding

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 8>mission of making humankind a multiplanetary species. One thing I

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 8>would not And you know, again, all we can do

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 8>is go back and read the documents. It's stated in

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 8>black and white. But part of mister Musk's compensation package

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 8>is literally tied to the goal of establishing a human

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:40.959
<v Speaker 8>colony on Mars, and so he doesn't really fully realize

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 8>his stock based comp without achieving that goal. You know,

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 8>let's for a second give some sympathy to the Business

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:49.800
<v Speaker 8>Week listeners somewhere around the world that is hearing that

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 8>for the first time. Yeah, the problem is is that. Okay,

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 8>so SpaceX wants to put human humankind on Mars and

0:02:57.680 --> 0:02:59.519
<v Speaker 8>actually in the interim on the Moon. It's all laid

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 8>out for him estas, but the business in the future

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 8>has nothing to do with that.

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, what I want to ask you and Bailli come

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 2>on in on this when we go to valuation. Let's

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 2>say Elon doesn't do that. But is this is SpaceX

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 2>really largely an AI company going forward? And is it

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 2>about what he does with data centers and space and

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 2>so on and so forth? When it comes to the

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 2>valuation and kind of growing into it.

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think Ed and I were one of the first,

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:24.080
<v Speaker 9>if not the first, to really call out the fact

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:26.920
<v Speaker 9>that SpaceX pitched the twenty six and a half trillion

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 9>dollar AI story. So that's terrestrial data centers, that's orbital

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 9>data centers. That's potentially making grock a real rival to

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 9>Claude and chat GBT pretty pie in the sky ambitions. Again,

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 9>it's really when I talk to some critics, they say, well,

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 9>you can't disprove a twenty six and a half trillion

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 9>dollars TAM because I don't know, you say it's real.

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 9>Everyone else kind of buys into it. But that's the vision.

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 9>I think when you talk to investors and people who

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 9>are must believers Mars, this idea that they're going to

0:03:56.200 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 9>be the union specific of space and comparing Mars to

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 9>California is a big part of that pitch. But the

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 9>actual dollars and cents in the interim will come from

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 9>the ability to provide compute via these orbital data centers.

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 5>One thing I like about California is you can just

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 5>go outside and enjoy it without wearing a space suit.

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 5>But that's neither here nor there. And I'm going to

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:18.359
<v Speaker 5>go back to this over and over again, which is

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 5>what we know about twenty twenty five revenue from SpaceX,

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 5>the segments, the reporting segments, This is what we're going

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 5>to be watching in the future. And remind everybody space

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 5>about twenty two percent of twenty twenty five revenue connectivity,

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 5>which of course includes starlink about sixty one percent, and

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 5>then seventeen percent is AI. In terms of the growth

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 5>opportunities in those three segments, which is the one that

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 5>investors are most bullish on, Yeah, in the immediate term.

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 8>In the immediate term, they are most bullish on something

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 8>that's quite recent, which is space XAI. Remember SpaceX owns.

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 5>XAI as of early twenty twenty six.

0:04:56.320 --> 0:05:00.680
<v Speaker 8>Very quickly pivoting itself to be a neocloud, in other words,

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 8>renting the compute capacity on Earth, the data center that's

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 8>terrestrial in nature to Anthropic and Google. Anthropic agreed to

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 8>pay one point twenty five billion dollars per month.

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:12.159
<v Speaker 5>There's a lot of money Google more.

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 8>Than nine hundred million dollars per month. Musk has made

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 8>a big deal on the socials about these being short term.

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 8>They can pull the plug after ninety days. But you know,

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 8>the investors are like, wow, that's so smart.

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 5>And it's also real money in the very near future.

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:28.280
<v Speaker 3>You make it real accounts receivables.

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 8>Right again, this is so difficult. I think that you know,

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 8>the shares now are at a thirty percent game. I

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:35.600
<v Speaker 8>don't have the ticker in front of me.

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:37.039
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, thirty percent higher.

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 8>You know, people say, okay, right, So you guys are

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 8>telling us that in the future you're going to make

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 8>all this money from data centers in space. And what

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 8>that means in practice is a very very big satellite

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 8>where the solar arrays are just ginormous. But actually in

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 8>the twenty twenty five financials is buried some of the

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 8>answer connectivity, which is the bucket for Starlink, is basically

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 8>cash flow positive. It's a cash generating business. SpaceX has

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 8>thousands of Starlink satellites and deployment around the Earth, and

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 8>so what the existing investors do is extrapolay out and say,

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:10.799
<v Speaker 8>I can see them doing that with data sentens.

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 5>I think it's also something that's really tangible for a

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 5>lot of people who've experienced SpaceX. I mean, I've noticed

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 5>advertising on United flights. United Regional jets now having starlink,

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 5>they're trying to roll it out across the entire fleet.

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:24.279
<v Speaker 5>It's a pretty incredible product that a lot of people

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 5>have had access to, unlike something like actually experiencing a launch.

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I don't own a spot, you know,

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:33.720
<v Speaker 2>a rocket yet, but you do have starlink.

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 10>But I do know.

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:36.479
<v Speaker 2>I do have starlink, and it is a pretty incredible product,

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 2>and we increasingly seeing it. If you jump on an airplane,

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:41.719
<v Speaker 2>you're increasingly seeing it kind of spread out in terms

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:44.280
<v Speaker 2>of kind of more normal should I say usage. You

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 2>know what's interesting is Tom keenan Scarlet Food just had

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 2>Jim Chay You noted Bear noted skeptic talking about among

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 2>the Elon universe, because he's pretty skeptical about most of it,

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 2>it sounds like, but he talked about starlink being a

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 2>real business worth a couple of hundreds of billions of

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 2>so you know, is again, so the bet today is

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 2>on that or like what so just really.

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 8>Quick and I'll keep it really short. You know, it's

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 8>interesting that channels acknowledges the merits of that business. The

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 8>issue is that in this IPO process is that the

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 8>prospectors set out a total addressable market of twenty eight

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 8>point five trillion, and Starlink and the launch business combined

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 8>was only two trillion.

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 9>Of that, And even what ed when we look through

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 9>the notes from the cell side analysts, again not publicly

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 9>published for the most part, circulated with investors. The pitch

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 9>is the fact that they're going to throw off hundreds

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 9>of billions of dollars in revenue from AI. The ability

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 9>potentially to hit a trillion dollars in sales according to

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 9>ever Core ISI just after the end of the decade,

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 9>is predicated on artificial intelligence. And when you think about it,

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 9>starlink is a terrific business. It's a great business. But

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 9>the multiples if you looked at a Verizon or an

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 9>AD and T or a true competitor, are not what

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 9>the AI VISU would be.

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 3>What are they making off of XAI right now?

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 8>Well, there is a big disconnect here which I'm staring

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 8>at my screen. I might be able to answer at

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 8>some point in the next four hours. But if XAI

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 8>is going to sell all of this AI software to

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 8>other companies on planet Earth, why would they rent out

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 8>all the compute capacity that they built to Enthropic and Google.

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 8>Why aren't they using that capacity to train more of

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 8>their own models or is it a signal that people

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 8>aren't using the models they're not being run on the

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 8>inference side. We don't really have an answer from that,

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 8>but that is what the bear would say. They would

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 8>interpret that signal as yes, okay, that's a pretty profitable

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 8>business potentially on paper, but what is it tell us

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:39.680
<v Speaker 8>about how much progress Xai is making with selling its software.

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 8>That's a very near term headache that people go back

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 8>and forth on Bailey.

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 5>Over the next few months. We're going to be sort

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 5>of glued to different analysts who who come out and

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 5>say that they've initiated coverage and what their coverage looks like,

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:56.239
<v Speaker 5>just in terms of chatter on the street among analysts,

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 5>is there a general consensus, a general view? And again,

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 5>every every bank pretty much was involved in this, so

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:05.079
<v Speaker 5>there's sort of a challenge in dissecting what the banks

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:07.559
<v Speaker 5>who were involved with versus what their analysts are saying.

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 5>But is there any consensus there.

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 9>We'll get initiations from the banks that underwrote this deal

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 9>in twenty five calendar days, so that's when we'll get

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 9>the view. When you look at Oppenheimer initiating, I think

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 9>they had one hundred and ninety.

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 5>Dollars price target.

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 9>Again, that's twelve months from now and we're currently trading

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 9>at one seventy one, So take that with a grain

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 9>of salt. I think the big debate when you just

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 9>look at the analyst community is Tesla is the most

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 9>hotly debated stock from the cell side, thirty buys, twenty

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 9>four holds you hold is essentially a cell, let's call

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 9>it what it is, and nine cell ratings, which is

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 9>telling clients actively short this stock. So when you're looking

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:47.319
<v Speaker 9>at an investment community that hasn't bought into the Tesla vision,

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 9>and the parallels are pretty darn stark in that it's

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 9>on Elon AND's bet on futuristic technologies towards the end

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 9>of the decade, if not a decade out, it's going

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 9>to be fascinating to see what the reception is on

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 9>that perspective.

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 5>And maybe it gets us to a discussion point and

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 5>we'll be revisiting this in the next few hours with

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 5>you about a potential Tesla tie up with SpaceX. This

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 5>has been banned about for months at this point.

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 8>So the idea that SpaceX would merge with Tesla has

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 8>been around for some time. People still believe that that

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:20.319
<v Speaker 8>will be the case to different degrees. Some see it

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 8>as being completely imminent, others see it as being something

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 8>that might happen in twenty twenty seven and twenty twenty eight.

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 8>Tesla and SpaceX have never said anything publicly about it, right.

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 8>This is all based on the thesis of some investors

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 8>that have spoken publicly. But also when SpaceX merged with Xai.

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 8>The friday before that was confirmed, we would reported that

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 8>it looked like SpaceX was going to merge with Xai,

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 8>but they had looked at multiple options and one was

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 8>a discussion between SpaceX and Tesla company to company about

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 8>what that merger would look like. And also in that

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 8>some detail that some SpaceX investors basically went to Elon

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 8>those that hadn't access to him, and said, wouldn't it

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 8>be a better idea for SpaceX emerged with Tesla rather

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 8>than Xai.

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 6>Xai had a.

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 8>Lot of debt, it was burning cash. Tesla and SpaceX

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:17.559
<v Speaker 8>are hardware companies. They're more analogous and vertical integration. In

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:20.080
<v Speaker 8>the end, it's academic. You know, SpaceX merged with XAI

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 8>and then it went public and the biggest IPO in history.

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:24.959
<v Speaker 8>But it won't go away that idea. The thing is,

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 8>we just don't know, well I will.

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 9>Do You want to call out that an earlier interview

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:31.319
<v Speaker 9>on CVC when Chawell did say that it would make

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 9>life easier, just reading from the transcript saying, well, there's

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 9>no question that there's synergies between Tesla and SpaceX in

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 9>our futures. Definitely, there's a convergence of kind of what

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 9>we're all trying to accomplish in the future. That's an

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:45.959
<v Speaker 9>acknowledgement that it is a possibility and that it does

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 9>make it.

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 8>It does also exist with terror fab which we can

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 8>get to you later into the hours we have together.

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:52.560
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, synergies, but it's also you've got companies that

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 2>are buying stuff from each other and creates kind of

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:59.319
<v Speaker 2>a demand automatically for various elon probles.

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 9>Even when you think about the fact that a big

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 9>part of the pitch ed greigm if I'm wrong for

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:06.080
<v Speaker 9>Tesla is optimists, and when you talk to people who

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 9>are buying into the twenty forty twenty forty five vision, sure,

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 9>why wouldn't you use robots on Mars to build out

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 9>the infrastructure.

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 8>One more immediate answer rather than getting to Mars, is

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 8>that those satellites in orbit that are data centers, you know,

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 8>they have GPUs on board. When you're running Inferance, you're

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:29.439
<v Speaker 8>running the models excuse me, at the edge actually Optimus

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:33.959
<v Speaker 8>and the Robotaxi business of Tesla. There is localized compute

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 8>in the brain, so to speak, of the humanoid robot.

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 8>There's a chip, but there is still some element of

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 8>cloud computing that's needed when you run an AI model

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 8>at that scale.

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 5>Good.

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 8>That would be a good first customer for Starling, for Starling,

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 8>sorry for SpaceX, but.

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:49.199
<v Speaker 5>But I'm glad you brought up starlink because how are

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 5>these all entities all going to communicate with one another?

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 5>Connectivity exactly?

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 2>And also, one million robots on Mars? Is that hitting

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:56.959
<v Speaker 2>the goal of one million.

0:12:56.720 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 3>People on Mars?

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 5>Daryl, You're opening up a real count. I am, I am,

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 5>they are people.

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 2>Yet score Hey listen, folks, if you're just joining us,

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm Carol Master long At Tim Standavek, Ed Ludlow, Bally Lipsheltz.

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:13.680
<v Speaker 2>We are talking on a historic market day, no doubt

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 2>about it. Shares the SpaceX climbing in their first day

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 2>of trading, company making history with a seventy five billion

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 2>dollar IPO sold for one point fifty and it's opening

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 2>trade right now. The stock it's gone up as much

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:26.679
<v Speaker 2>as thirty percent in this first day of trading. Right now,

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:28.840
<v Speaker 2>we're looking at a share price of one hundred and

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 2>seventy three ninety seven a share that means good for

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 2>a gain of just shy of twenty nine percent in elon,

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 2>go buy dinner for your family because you're a trillionaire.

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 3>Now I'm just gonna put it out.

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:44.719
<v Speaker 2>We continue with all hands on deck, Carol Master, Tim

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 2>standavek Ed Ludlow, Belly Lipsheltz, and this is Bloomberg BusinessWeek Daily,

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:50.959
<v Speaker 2>a special edition the SpaceX ipo.

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 5>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 5>up after this.

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:07.200
<v Speaker 1>us live weekday afternoons from two to five eas during

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Listen on Apple Karplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:14.079
<v Speaker 1>Business app, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Carol Master along with Tim Stanevik and of course Bloomberg

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 2>Tech host ed Ludlow. You Gotta Love it on a

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 2>day when you look at the most read stories on

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg terminal in the past eight hours, and six

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 2>of ten, somehow are either about SpaceX are related to SpaceX.

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 2>There's also a story about Nixon five crashing New York

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 2>City weddings this week. So I'm just giking an idea

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 2>of what everybody's reading on the Bloomberg this far.

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 5>Oh well, i think I'm guiltiest charge for reading a

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 5>lot about SpaceX. Today. Shares, as we heard from Charlie

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 5>just now, twenty eight percent. They were up as much

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 5>as thirty let's say, go ahead and call it thirty

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 5>point eight percent earlier in the session. They did open

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 5>today eleven percent higher than that IPO price yesterday. Looking

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 5>at volume, it is a lot of shares are trading hands.

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 5>I'm at three hundred and thirty six million according to

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 5>the latest instant count on the Bloomberg Terminal.

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's pretty historic and fun to watch, but it

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 2>feels like very orderly and kind of millow. We were

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 2>just saying, hey, we want to get to a trusted

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 2>and thoughtful voice on all things Elon Musk and his

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 2>universe masks Chapkin is with us he's Bloomberg BusinessWeek columnist

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 2>who's host of Everybody's Business podcast here at Bloomberg, author

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 2>of the Contrarian Peter Teel and The Rise of the

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Silicon Valley Oligarchs. He's here in studio along with me

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 2>and Tim and of course the host of Bloomberg Tech

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 2>at Ludlow Max.

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Hey, so, how are you thinking.

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 2>About this that you wrote a story back in April,

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 2>and I think the headline on it was that SpaceX's

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 2>IPO is Elon Musk's most audacious product launch yet.

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 7>I mean when I've been spending some of today thinking

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 7>about the last Elon Musk IPO back in twenty ten,

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 7>and you think about then, the it was at a

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 7>not a super high valuation, the economy was not great,

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 7>there were you know, relative i'd say, low expectations.

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 6>Around that company.

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 7>And also Elon Musk was incredibly popular, right, he didn't

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 7>have this kind of political thing where you have a

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 7>lot of people who are suddenly you know, really mad

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 7>at him, really mad at his company's talent, you mad

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 7>at data centers and so on. So I think in

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 7>a lot of ways SpaceX is going into this market

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 7>that while it's it's very inflated. It's hard to see

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 7>where how much room there is to grow.

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 5>But it does seem like Max that in recent weeks

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 5>and months, the chatter around Elon's political actions over the

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 5>last couple of years, what his relationship with the president,

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 5>that has not really been the focus of the way

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 5>that people are thinking about this, I PO and in fact,

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 5>it doesn't seem like it's come up much in the coverage. Certainly,

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 5>there were some protests outsign the NASDAC today, or I

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 5>should say, some some signage outside the NASDAC today, But

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 5>I don't know, I don't know how else how would

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 5>you describe it was an effigy?

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:06.640
<v Speaker 3>Is that the word?

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:09.919
<v Speaker 7>I think he is still very much involved, you know,

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 7>in the in our politics, he's a when you look

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 7>at the list of donors for twenty twenty six, he's

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:16.679
<v Speaker 7>he's pretty high up there. Uh. He and he and

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 7>Trump of course are are back together. They're the friendship

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 7>is back on. Uh, you know, SpaceX just want a

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 7>couple of big contracts related to.

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 6>The Golden Dome.

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 7>I think what's happened is that the AI story has

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 7>basically swamped everything else. And that's especially true when we're

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 7>talking about the sort of financial side and Wall Street

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 7>and everything. I mean, the bankers who have been pushing

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 7>this are certainly not pitching Elon Musk's connection to the

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 7>Trump administration at least I wouldn't think explicitly.

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:53.160
<v Speaker 6>And and the AI story is is.

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 5>Risk factors right? Political?

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:55.120
<v Speaker 9>Well?

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:58.160
<v Speaker 8>Well, no, I mean the main issue in the risk

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 8>fact is, right, you just I'm just recounting, is that

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:04.719
<v Speaker 8>it also spells out as clear as day that the

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 8>entire success of the plan is dependent on Elon Musk

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:11.639
<v Speaker 8>leading it right, you know, that it says if he

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 8>were to go away, that would be it, and that

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 8>in the last you know, Max.

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:17.360
<v Speaker 6>And Ims was so big.

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:18.880
<v Speaker 5>Risk is so weird.

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 8>I'm like thinking back, was it even twenty twenty four

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:23.400
<v Speaker 8>that we wrote it? Or was twenty twenty.

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 6>Five twenty four?

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 8>I believe everyone's just trying to make sense of, like, Okay,

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 8>what was it that Elon Musk was trying to achieve

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 8>by aligning himself in that political bucket even outside of

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:41.120
<v Speaker 8>the president. You know, people ask me all the time

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 8>at the moment that I mean, literally this week, Well,

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 8>is there anything about SpaceX going public in the President

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:50.360
<v Speaker 8>Trump's term don't know the answer.

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 2>I think I asked you, like, would we be having

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 2>a SpaceX IPO if President Trump not of.

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 7>Two trillion dollars. I mean, I think so much of

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 7>the run up in the in the AI market has

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 7>to do with the White Houses, for better or worse,

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:09.160
<v Speaker 7>the White House's policy on AI, which has essentially been

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 7>let them cook. You know, let's let's take rip out

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 7>all the regulations, let's get data centers going as quickly

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:18.199
<v Speaker 7>as we can, and so on, and so much of

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:21.679
<v Speaker 7>that is you know, is kind of baked into the

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:24.639
<v Speaker 7>SpaceX pitch. I also think, as I said, you know,

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 7>the s one says that US federal contracts are about

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 7>twenty percent of SpaceX's revenue. That's down, it's falling, but

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 7>that's still a significant amount of money. And as I said,

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:40.639
<v Speaker 7>they are getting more contracts as much as this is

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 7>kind of a sideline for SpaceX at this point, because

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 7>the future is starlink. The future is you know, data

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:50.159
<v Speaker 7>centers in space and groc and all that stuff. The

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 7>present very much is is government contracts, and they have

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:57.160
<v Speaker 7>done well during this period. I think we're talking about

0:19:57.160 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 7>Elon Musk being a trillionaire, you know, I'm not sure

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 7>or that he's a trillionaire if he doesn't have that

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:05.640
<v Speaker 7>political adventure that he had, you know, in twenty twenty

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 7>four and twenty twenty five.

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 8>The one thing I would observe right is that we

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:13.880
<v Speaker 8>keep forgetting about what is SpaceX on the hook? For

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:17.880
<v Speaker 8>SpaceX and Starship are a massive part of America's ambition

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 8>to get back to the moon. In fact, they are

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 8>literally now on the hook to make Starship work in

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:27.120
<v Speaker 8>a certain timeframe where they're required to demo that this year.

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:31.120
<v Speaker 8>And that's so fascinating because that isn't codified in the prospectus.

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 8>It's not even discussed.

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 5>How are they doing with respect to Starship.

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 8>Well, they've just done the twelfth test flight and the

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:42.919
<v Speaker 8>twelfth sort of mission I suppose, where it carried no

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:45.719
<v Speaker 8>payload of any significance. It was a dummy, but it

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:48.160
<v Speaker 8>was with a brand new architecture, basically top to tail.

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 8>They re engineered it. And I think what Gwynn shot

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 8>Well the President and COO, has been saying this morning

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 8>is that in the coming weeks they'll do thirteen and fourteen.

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 8>The whole point of it is the economics work, because

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 8>it's reusable so it's very big. You can carry lot

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 8>of stuff into space, but they've never actually successfully landed

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 8>both parts, the booster and the spacecraft back on Earth.

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 8>And that if it's going to carry human beings is

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 8>a test that they should get too soon.

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 5>And they haven't taken anything their orbit yet. I mean,

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:14.920
<v Speaker 5>and that for you know that that's the data center.

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 6>That's going to be an important milestone.

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 7>I mean, it's it's important to say it's right, like

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 7>the Artemis mission is kind of in a bind if

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 7>Starship doesn't come through, but all of SpaceX is in

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:28.120
<v Speaker 7>a bind if Starships doesn't say one thing.

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:31.640
<v Speaker 8>Real quick, So you've got I'm just recounting what's happened.

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:36.919
<v Speaker 8>But in the twelfth test flight they deployed dummy Starlink satellites.

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:39.119
<v Speaker 8>It's like a Pez for you know, for fans of

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:41.400
<v Speaker 8>the Pez candy. You have that in America, right, Yeah,

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:42.640
<v Speaker 8>obviously the du.

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Like it's been around for a while, the Starship space

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 2>for my time even.

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 5>I'm sorry, you can go to the museum in Connecticut

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 5>while you're here.

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:53.159
<v Speaker 6>Okay, dear America, I'm sorry.

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 3>There is probably an elon Pears.

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:56.439
<v Speaker 5>I don't know that there.

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 8>Was definitely a serious point to this. Basically, how the

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:02.159
<v Speaker 8>Starlink satellite to play out of starship. There's a slot,

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 8>they come out the side kind of like and they

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:05.679
<v Speaker 8>get pushed down and down and down lak Pez. But

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 8>they did demo the ability to do it, but it

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 8>was the payload wasn't real. They were dummies. So I'm

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 8>just stating that for the record, does elin.

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:14.400
<v Speaker 3>Have to be worried?

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Jeff Bezos has become rather chummy with the administration,

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:20.120
<v Speaker 2>and do we have to ever worry about Blue Origin

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 2>and his rockets being able to do some of what

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:24.640
<v Speaker 2>we are.

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 5>But they're also an integral part of the Artemist.

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:27.880
<v Speaker 6>Mission, hautely worried.

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 7>Although Blue Origin had a huge setback recently, and so

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:34.120
<v Speaker 7>and that and that is why that because because Blue

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:37.640
<v Speaker 7>Origin and SpaceX are competing for this lunar Lander, uh,

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 7>this lunar Lander part of the mission. And and and

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 7>you know, of course, you know Blue Origin is say

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:46.199
<v Speaker 7>they're they're going to rebuild and everything. But this everyone

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 7>I've talked to in this world says that it's a

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 7>huge setback.

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:52.119
<v Speaker 5>We're speaking with Max Chafkin, Bloomberg business Week columnists. The

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 5>host of the Everybody's Business podcast here at Bloomberg. He's

0:22:54.600 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 5>author of the contrarian uh Max. The Carol mentioned Jeff Bezos.

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:02.440
<v Speaker 5>We're going to talk about Blue Origin a little later

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 5>in the program. Before we do that, You've spent a

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 5>lot of years covering Tesla in the way that Elon

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 5>Musk has led Tesla as a as a public company

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 5>and his relationship with investors. How should investors right now

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 5>look at that over the last decade or so an

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 5>as an idea for how he'll run this company and

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:21.719
<v Speaker 5>maybe even divide his time. It's kind of different thing

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 5>in both.

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 7>Public that I'm not sure how helpful the early years

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 7>of Tesla are to understanding this. I think I think

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 7>SpaceX really looks very similar to the Tesla of the

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:38.639
<v Speaker 7>last couple of years, the post AI pivot, and where

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 7>you have this very good business that is kind of

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:47.199
<v Speaker 7>being pushed to the side for reasons that either have

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 7>to do with muscles. In the case of Tesla, it's

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 7>the auto's business, which which is this very very successful,

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 7>good business. It's the thing that everyone talks about. Elon

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 7>Musk popularized electric cars, you know, in the United States,

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 7>but but for two years or so it's been de emphasized,

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 7>and you look at it, sales have not been growing.

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 7>I mean, it is in certain ways a challenged business.

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:13.680
<v Speaker 7>And then you have this kind of futuristic robots, self

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 7>driving cars piece of the business. Same thing with SpaceX.

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:18.399
<v Speaker 7>But the one thing I'll say is I think the

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 7>legacy part of SpaceX is actually a better business than

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:25.680
<v Speaker 7>the EV business. I mean, the EV business, as dominant

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 7>as it was, never reached any kind of like monopoly status,

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:33.120
<v Speaker 7>whereas SpaceX's launch business, you know, kind of is that

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 7>there are there are competitors, There are there are parts

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:37.919
<v Speaker 7>of the business where they have more competition than others.

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 7>But you know, as we're saying, if SpaceX has a

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:43.399
<v Speaker 7>has a huge problem, NASA has a huge problem, a

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:46.199
<v Speaker 7>bunch of satellite makers have a huge problem. They really

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:49.439
<v Speaker 7>have the market, you know, more or less cornered in

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 7>that in that piece, and then you have this futuristic

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 7>stuff that you know, even Starlink to some extent is futuristic.

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:56.640
<v Speaker 6>But of course the data.

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 7>Center thing, which is just like pure science fiction, so

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 7>Starlink is it's like the Robotaxi. Data centers are like

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 7>the humanoid robots.

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:06.120
<v Speaker 5>No, everybody thinks it's science fiction. Just very quick.

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 8>All the SpaceX investors that phone me over the last week,

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 8>thanks for phoning me. Interesting that SpaceX aren't encouraging you

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 8>to come on Bloomberg Television Radio. They also would make

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:19.639
<v Speaker 8>the case that it's not analogous to Tesla, but they

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 8>would also say that SpaceX should get credit right now

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 8>for being a much more diversified business than we talk about.

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 8>It is more than rockets, and they have a good

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 8>interim before Orbital Data Center.

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Edlla Loos Staying with Us, host of Bloomberg Tech, Max Chafkin,

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much. Bloomberg Business Week columnist, host of

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:36.880
<v Speaker 2>Everybody's Business Podcast.

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 3>Check it out on the weekend.

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:42.640
<v Speaker 5>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 5>up after this.

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:51.440
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 1>us live weekday afternoons from two to five e's during

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Listen on Applecarplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:25:58.480 --> 0:25:59.200
<v Speaker 1>or watch.

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 3>Us live on YouTube.

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:05.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, certainly we're focusing on SpaceX. Get it just we

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 2>were quickly talking before we got going, and you take

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 2>a look at what's going on with Tesla. We've seen

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 2>it up as much as one and a half percent today.

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 2>It's been down three percent in today's session right now, Tim,

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 2>just a game about half a percentage point.

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 5>All right, that's Tesla, but SpaceX certainly only moving in

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 5>one direction. Opening eleven percent higher than that IPO price yesterday,

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 5>up as much as thirty point eight percent. Right now,

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:29.719
<v Speaker 5>up about twenty seven point three percent so far. This

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 5>looks like a pretty successful first day of trading. I

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:35.120
<v Speaker 5>think it's fair to say three hundred and fifty five

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:37.400
<v Speaker 5>million shares as we speak of traded hands.

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 3>It's pretty calm. Carol Masser.

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Tim Stanevek also ed Ludlow, co host of Bloomberg Tech,

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 2>of course, on Bloomberg Television Monday through Friday at eleven am.

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:48.640
<v Speaker 2>Who has been all things? How long do you feel

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 2>like you've been talking about this IPO?

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean goes back to when we break the

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 8>story even the end of last year, that the whole

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:58.199
<v Speaker 8>point of the IPO was, Oh, they needed lots of

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 8>money to buy chips to put in space And as

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 8>I told you a few times this month, people laughed

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 8>at that report at the time, like that's not why

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 8>they would IPO. And then the prospectors hit and here

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 8>we are.

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 3>They need money.

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, they need GPUs in space, but yeah, they need

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 8>money for that.

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:13.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:14.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 5>I want to bring in Anthony Hughes, Bloomberg News US

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 5>equity capital markets reporter. He joins us from the Bloomberg

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 5>News bureau here in New York, just steps away from US. Anthony,

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:27.120
<v Speaker 5>pretty successful out of the gate. I think it's fair

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:29.640
<v Speaker 5>to say NASDAC should be patting itself on the back

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 5>right now.

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 11>Yes, Tim, I think for a IPO of this size,

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 11>a percent gain is a pretty balanced outcome, you know,

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:41.719
<v Speaker 11>from the bank's perspective. You know, obviously you never want

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 11>to see the stock go down, but you don't want

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 11>to see the stock necessarily go through the roof either.

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:49.200
<v Speaker 11>So you know, twenty thirty percent for a high growth

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 11>company too, I mean, you want to see a decent return,

0:27:51.880 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 11>So you know, I think people will go away and

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:57.399
<v Speaker 11>think this is a relatively balanced outcome compared to a

0:27:57.400 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 11>lot of IPOs we've seen in the past.

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's interesting.

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 2>You know, we've been talking with you as well to

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 2>the lead up, Anthony, I don't know what's top of mind.

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 2>What have you been thinking about as you watch the

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 2>trade today and what's important here.

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:12.920
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, well, I think we've been looking at the level

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 11>of volume, and certainly out of the gate they got

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 11>about ten percent of the stock paired up and you

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:22.439
<v Speaker 11>know at the opening print there, So that's sort of

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 11>something you'd like to see to make sure it's an

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 11>orderly outcome. I think the main thing. I mean, it

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 11>can be a little bit of an anti climax in

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 11>some ways the first day of trading for a stock,

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:34.120
<v Speaker 11>because we've said a lot already about this company. We're

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:37.120
<v Speaker 11>just seeing basically the results today. But you know, it's

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 11>fairly orderly. First day of trading started up eleven percent,

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 11>I mean, funnily enough, if you go back to Facebook

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 11>in twenty twelve, it actually went up eleven percent on

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 11>the appening print too, but then finish flat. So it

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 11>doesn't look like it's going to happen here for SpaceX.

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 11>But you know, sometimes you know, these early games can

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 11>evaporate as the day goes on. But you know, it's

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 11>just one day of trading, and there's many, many days ahead,

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 11>and anyone who's been a long term sharehold of Tesla

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 11>knows that there's some tough days and some great days.

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 6>But longer term.

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 11>Tesla did very well, and I guess a lot of

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 11>people are hoping to see something similar here, but on

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 11>a larger scale. And this company's got such a big

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 11>market cap, it's obviously hard to expect that SpaceX will

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:18.440
<v Speaker 11>do something like Tesla in terms of a relative gain.

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 11>But you know, obviously SpaceX got big dreams and sort

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:23.440
<v Speaker 11>of unlimited hopes about what they can do in space.

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 5>I want to I'm glad you brought up Facebook. We

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 5>were talking about that just a few minutes as we

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 5>came live to you before SpaceX up twenty percent ed

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 5>love though. We're gonna get to Nickollis in just a second,

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 5>but before we do, just remind us today who can

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 5>actually sell?

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 5>Sure, this is a really important point because there's been

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 5>a lot of discussion about, Okay, who are the new

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 5>one the new centi millionaires, who are the new millionaires,

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 5>and who are the venture capitalists who have made billions

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 5>on that.

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 8>Just a few rapid five things. There's a big difference

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 8>between economic ownership of this stock and voting power. So

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 8>Elon Musk has eighty four percent voting power, right, and

0:29:54.440 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 8>so he's locked up for three hundred and sixty six days.

0:29:56.880 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 8>But you know, he he's going to be a big seller,

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 8>and he also has a big options packet that he

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 8>can exercise, and then everyone else is kind of tiered.

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 8>So after the Q four twenty six earnings released, twenty

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 8>percent of the existing shares are free of a lock up.

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 8>Who can sell today is basically anyone that participated in

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 8>the offering the seventy five billion. And what was so

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 8>interesting to hear from the buyside today is like begrudgingly

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 8>their participation in the open market as buyers, you know,

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 8>because loads of people didn't get allocations. You know, we

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 8>can we have so much time. We can talk about

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 8>the venture funds later. But you know, even those that

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 8>are subject to lock ups, the venture funds will distribute

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 8>the shares back to their LPs, which are endowments, pension funds.

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 8>They don't just give them cash. Yeah, but those they

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 8>won't sell the stock, you know that at least that's

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 8>what people keep telling me.

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's longer term, right, they're going to stay with it.

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 2>Hey, we're talking, of course, with our low host of

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Tech. We've also got with us Anthony Hughes, Bloomberg

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 2>News ECM reporter joining us here as well, and then

0:30:57.200 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 2>let's roll into the mix. Nick cooll Us just joining

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 2>us here on set, co founder of Data Trek Research.

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Good to have you here. You're an independent financial advisory firm.

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Would you be advising institutional investors retail investors to own

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 2>this one?

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 12>Well, what we do is we try to give people

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 12>a framing to understand their decision. And by that count,

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 12>the simple math obviously doesn't add up. This is a

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 12>very expensive stock relative to any rational measure of value.

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 12>But we're talking about Elon Musk, who has a tremendous

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 12>track record of not just success, but convincing people that

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 12>success is durable. So it's not a calculus based on valuation.

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:37.480
<v Speaker 12>It's a calculus based on faith. And plenty of people

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 12>have a ton of faith and have made billions of

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 12>dollars with Elon Musk in the past, and they're willing

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 12>to give them a pass on this one because they

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 12>think they can happen again.

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 5>I want to talk connectivity a little bit with you,

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 5>and the focus on really telecom starlink when it comes

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 5>to this IPA. It's in twenty twenty five, it was

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 5>sixty one percent of the revenue. As I was mentioning earlier,

0:31:55.120 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 5>I think for a lot of people who you know

0:31:57.360 --> 0:32:00.920
<v Speaker 5>haven't been to a rocket launch, or actually you know,

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 5>are big users of the AI tech that SpaceX has,

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:08.480
<v Speaker 5>maybe Starlink is the most tangible part of this business

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 5>that they've interacted with. In your view, that's a pretty

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 5>good business, right.

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 6>It is a phenomenal business.

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 5>It is a truly I mean, there were so many

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 5>years when we were talking about and Edward was reporting

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 5>on it, the possibility of perhaps that being spun off

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 5>as its own indepact as.

0:32:23.120 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 12>A traded company, and their prediction market contracts on that

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 12>right now, oddly enough, it is a truly disruptive business

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 12>in the classic Clayton Christiansen sense of the word. It's

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:35.720
<v Speaker 12>a new technology that offers a product to an undersherved

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:38.719
<v Speaker 12>community and then builds up from there. So how Amazon

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 12>started with books and then blew up everything, Starlink started

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 12>with rural customers and has blown.

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 5>Up to everything.

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:46.880
<v Speaker 12>It's exactly the playbook investors want to see, and Elon

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 12>as usual, has played it perfectly.

0:32:49.680 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 8>I just you know, I just recap the numbers, you know,

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 8>I find that so interesting that you're saying you can't

0:32:55.040 --> 0:32:57.480
<v Speaker 8>do the math, you kind of can, you know? And

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 8>what a lot of the existing cap tables told me

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 8>for months and months was how do I start to

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 8>model for the orbital data center business? And what they

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:13.480
<v Speaker 8>would say is twenty twenty five not the revenues from starlink,

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:17.400
<v Speaker 8>but connectivity operating income four billion, and the scale of

0:33:17.440 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 8>deployment and rate of deployment, literally the operation of putting

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 8>it into orbit. They just extrapolate out to space based

0:33:23.920 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 8>data center. Can you use faith or hope and do

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 8>the same on behalf of clients?

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 12>Unfortunately you have to. There is no other option. There

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:34.560
<v Speaker 12>are no orbital data centers in space right now right

0:33:34.600 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 12>So you are betting on a brand new technology, and

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 12>which you're betting is the guy who brought you the

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 12>past couple of interesting technologies and then bring you the

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 12>next one. But it is a faith based process. It

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 12>is not based in any math you can rationally model.

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 12>And I was a sales side analyst for a decade.

0:33:47.640 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 12>I covered the udos. I know how to do a

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 12>financial model, oh goodness, you know to a very strong degree.

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 12>And this is not one of those analyses. So people

0:33:55.920 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 12>can do whatever math they want to do the suction

0:33:58.080 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 12>of trade where it wants to trade and the two

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 12>make coalesced that they may.

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:04.160
<v Speaker 8>Not the real quick without betraying confidence. Do you have faith?

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 8>In other words, did you tell clients like, look, this

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:08.680
<v Speaker 8>is a trade based on faith. We have faith make

0:34:08.760 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 8>the trade.

0:34:09.239 --> 0:34:09.479
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:34:10.040 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 12>What I've told clients is if you want to put

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:14.319
<v Speaker 12>in for the stock, I gave you a range and

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:16.360
<v Speaker 12>I just went in through the numbers. The average IPO

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 12>since nineteen eighty up nineteen percent on day one, So

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 12>that's the bogie one sixty one for SpaceX is an

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 12>average IPO one day pop. If you want to look

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:26.320
<v Speaker 12>at twenty twenty five, it was a twenty nine percent pop,

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 12>SO one seventy four, which is right around where I

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 12>think we're trading now.

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 6>Change nowt so boom.

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:35.319
<v Speaker 12>Twenty nine percent is the average twenty IPO pop from

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:37.319
<v Speaker 12>last year. If you want to look at nineteen ninety

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 12>nine just to Go Bananas, that was a seventy one

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:43.759
<v Speaker 12>percent one day pop. I remember, so that was we all. Yes, yes,

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 12>I certainly do as well. I was working for a

0:34:45.600 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 12>Steve Cohen at the time and that was an amazing year.

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 12>That would be a two thirty one close.

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:50.880
<v Speaker 3>Could Steve Cohen be buying this.

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 12>Steve Colin would have gotten an allocation and probably have

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:56.240
<v Speaker 12>sold half of it on the open and be trading

0:34:56.239 --> 0:34:59.439
<v Speaker 12>the other half very intelligently, because that's what he does.

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:00.760
<v Speaker 3>That's really interesting.

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:02.799
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Nickollas is with us, co founder of Data Trek,

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:04.359
<v Speaker 2>research ed Ludlow's with us.

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:05.400
<v Speaker 3>Anthony Hughes.

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:09.319
<v Speaker 2>You've been sitting by patiently here at Bloomberg News. You

0:35:09.400 --> 0:35:12.360
<v Speaker 2>mentioned though Nick mentioned SpaceX. The stock right now is

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:15.400
<v Speaker 2>up almost twenty eight percent here, one seventy two and

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:18.319
<v Speaker 2>change in its first day of trading. Anthony Hughes, You've

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 2>been thinking about the valuation writing about it.

0:35:20.680 --> 0:35:22.360
<v Speaker 3>Got a question for Nick for us.

0:35:22.600 --> 0:35:24.719
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, well, I think one of the interesting questions Nick is,

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 11>you know, we do see it with a lot of

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 11>these hot IPOs that they come pretty you know, they

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:31.960
<v Speaker 11>can come it can rise pretty sharply out of the gate,

0:35:32.000 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 11>and then fall off pretty quickly in the weeks and

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:36.759
<v Speaker 11>months afterwards. I just wanted do you think there's an

0:35:36.840 --> 0:35:39.319
<v Speaker 11>argument with SpaceX that you know, perhaps it could do

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:41.440
<v Speaker 11>something a little bit differently, just because there's such a

0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 11>need for people to buy the stock. The index inclusion

0:35:44.200 --> 0:35:45.759
<v Speaker 11>and stuff like that. Do you think that could have

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 11>a be a factor here in helping to sort of

0:35:48.080 --> 0:35:49.480
<v Speaker 11>put a bit more of a floor out of the stock.

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:51.919
<v Speaker 12>I think that it is a factor for the next

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:54.080
<v Speaker 12>couple of weeks, because we have the Q entry. I

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 12>think on July fifth, if if I recall correctly, fifteen

0:35:57.080 --> 0:36:00.960
<v Speaker 12>days after pricing, so you're going to see some offset

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:02.960
<v Speaker 12>of people who are owning the stock right now selling

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 12>it to the cues when it gets included in the

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:07.400
<v Speaker 12>one hundred past that there seems to be a proaly

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:11.319
<v Speaker 12>even matched. And they actually did earlier lockup expirations for

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:15.719
<v Speaker 12>employees and insiders than usual, So you actually compare the

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 12>additional ad of stock to the cues to the unleashing

0:36:19.680 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 12>of stock from the individual owners that have it right now,

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 12>so it should balance out. But I will make one

0:36:24.680 --> 0:36:29.160
<v Speaker 12>broad macro point very important. Most IPOs don't work. Most

0:36:29.160 --> 0:36:33.320
<v Speaker 12>IPOs underperform in year one, and so to beat that

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:37.880
<v Speaker 12>those odds is relatively hard. Stocks take time to season,

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:40.360
<v Speaker 12>managements take time to season. This is not a company

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 12>that has a lot of prior experience.

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:45.720
<v Speaker 5>But the executives have a lot of prior public market experience.

0:36:45.760 --> 0:36:48.120
<v Speaker 5>Elon Musk for example, I mean when shotwell for years,

0:36:48.120 --> 0:36:51.160
<v Speaker 5>the CEO has been talked about, not talked about as

0:36:51.239 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 5>much anymore, but being like the adult in the room. Yes,

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:57.439
<v Speaker 5>and she is at SpaceX, So I think people could

0:36:57.440 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 5>push back on the experienced part of it.

0:36:59.560 --> 0:37:02.000
<v Speaker 12>That's a little that is fair. The Elon thing cuts

0:37:02.040 --> 0:37:04.879
<v Speaker 12>both ways. At the five year chart on Tesla and

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:06.560
<v Speaker 12>tell me that thing has been evalue created for the

0:37:06.600 --> 0:37:08.239
<v Speaker 12>last three years. It just hasn't.

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 5>So there is is.

0:37:10.040 --> 0:37:12.000
<v Speaker 2>Tesla the model we should be looking at Nick in

0:37:12.080 --> 0:37:14.120
<v Speaker 2>terms of for SpaceX. So that's not fair.

0:37:14.520 --> 0:37:17.080
<v Speaker 12>I think it's entirely fair because both are basically on

0:37:17.120 --> 0:37:19.759
<v Speaker 12>a musk premium and a massive one. Tesla's going to

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:22.600
<v Speaker 12>earn maybe two bucks a share this year stock trades

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 12>what two hundred times that, So you're talking about big

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:28.280
<v Speaker 12>valuations in both names. And I thought it was interesting,

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 12>you know, looking at Tesla at one point five trillion

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:34.240
<v Speaker 12>and this, you know, call it one point nine two.

0:37:34.880 --> 0:37:37.400
<v Speaker 12>You're talking about, you know, two very large companies based

0:37:37.440 --> 0:37:39.880
<v Speaker 12>on one person's vision, but not a lot of cash flow.

0:37:40.560 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 12>That's the common factor. And you can be a season

0:37:42.640 --> 0:37:44.319
<v Speaker 12>management team, but I don't know any of those season

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:46.800
<v Speaker 12>manage team that can hold those together besides Elon's teams.

0:37:49.120 --> 0:37:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Ed, I want you do you have a question

0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 2>for Nick because I know you're gonna bring us after

0:37:53.040 --> 0:37:53.719
<v Speaker 2>this segment, So.

0:37:53.760 --> 0:37:56.319
<v Speaker 8>You know, thet is so interesting and like you know,

0:37:56.480 --> 0:37:59.640
<v Speaker 8>we remind ourselves the over subscription actually, like you know,

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:03.319
<v Speaker 8>what's four x to five xover subscription doesn't even seem

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:05.080
<v Speaker 8>that world to me. Like you look at what's happening

0:38:05.120 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 8>in China market for IPOs like twenty x. Sometimes I digress.

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:12.239
<v Speaker 8>There's a lot of evidence that SpaceX employees wanted to

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:15.359
<v Speaker 8>buy more shares. And the unusual difference with SpaceX is

0:38:15.400 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 8>the secondary's market. They've had regular liquidity windows. Might that

0:38:19.280 --> 0:38:20.680
<v Speaker 8>be a difference this time?

0:38:21.600 --> 0:38:22.680
<v Speaker 6>It certainly could be.

0:38:22.719 --> 0:38:25.120
<v Speaker 12>But everything's a function of price, Right, If this thing

0:38:25.160 --> 0:38:28.440
<v Speaker 12>goes to four hundred, even the most ardent insider might

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:30.600
<v Speaker 12>be tempted to sell. So it's a function of price.

0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:33.879
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to say if the stock tanks a little bit,

0:38:33.920 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 2>it makes it cheaper for SpaceX to buy it and merge.

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:38.040
<v Speaker 5>The company very very quick.

0:38:38.680 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 8>Many times SpaceX was the leader of the secondarase they

0:38:41.680 --> 0:38:44.800
<v Speaker 8>bought back shares from employees and we never really reported

0:38:44.800 --> 0:38:48.240
<v Speaker 8>on it and that was true at the time, So yeah, yeah.

0:38:48.040 --> 0:38:50.080
<v Speaker 2>I just think there's just like so many moving aspects

0:38:50.080 --> 0:38:52.239
<v Speaker 2>of this. Nicholas, thanks for jumping in here. We really

0:38:52.280 --> 0:38:54.880
<v Speaker 2>appreciate it. The perspective in data was really helpful. Co

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:59.240
<v Speaker 2>founder Data Check Research, of course, joining us here in studio.

0:38:59.320 --> 0:39:01.759
<v Speaker 2>We're going to continue with Ed Ludlow, host of Bloomberg

0:39:01.800 --> 0:39:02.759
<v Speaker 2>Tech Are Thanks.

0:39:02.520 --> 0:39:04.600
<v Speaker 3>To to Anthony Hughes, be sure to check out all

0:39:04.600 --> 0:39:04.839
<v Speaker 3>of his.

0:39:04.840 --> 0:39:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Reporting on the Bloomberg and at Bloomberg dot Com, a

0:39:07.680 --> 0:39:10.800
<v Speaker 2>member of our trusted Bloomberg News team.

0:39:11.160 --> 0:39:13.960
<v Speaker 5>Stay with us more from Bloomberg business Week Daily coming

0:39:14.040 --> 0:39:14.920
<v Speaker 5>up after this.

0:39:18.880 --> 0:39:22.759
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch

0:39:22.840 --> 0:39:25.480
<v Speaker 1>us live weekday afternoons from two to five e's during

0:39:25.520 --> 0:39:28.920
<v Speaker 1>this listen on Applecarplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg

0:39:29.000 --> 0:39:31.719
<v Speaker 1>Business app, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:33.880
<v Speaker 2>Let's get to someone who we talk to you a

0:39:33.880 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 2>lot when it comes to all things Elon. He's owned

0:39:36.040 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 2>and sold shows of Tesla, owned several Teslas, including the Cyberchuck.

0:39:40.080 --> 0:39:42.440
<v Speaker 2>He's been a fan and critic of Elon. The person

0:39:42.480 --> 0:39:45.480
<v Speaker 2>back with us, so great to have here on this day.

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Ross Gerber President CEO of Gerbert Kawasaki Wealth and Management

0:39:48.920 --> 0:39:53.360
<v Speaker 2>Investment Management, joining us here in studio.

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 7>Hey, Ross, uh are you I'm a SpaceX owner too?

0:39:58.080 --> 0:39:59.279
<v Speaker 6>You didn't You didn't mention that?

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:01.440
<v Speaker 5>Well, that's yeah, I explained.

0:40:01.040 --> 0:40:03.160
<v Speaker 3>So remind yes, explain away.

0:40:04.000 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 6>Well, explain away. I got involved with this wonderful deal

0:40:07.120 --> 0:40:09.160
<v Speaker 6>that was presented to me four years ago to invest

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 6>in Twitter, and boy, oh boy, did we do great

0:40:11.760 --> 0:40:14.320
<v Speaker 6>with that. Huh. So I had written down that stake

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:17.800
<v Speaker 6>in Twitter to about twenty five percent of its original investment,

0:40:18.320 --> 0:40:21.239
<v Speaker 6>and then somehow Xai came and bought Twitter, and then

0:40:21.560 --> 0:40:26.799
<v Speaker 6>somehow SpaceX XAI and now today you know, I've now

0:40:26.880 --> 0:40:29.720
<v Speaker 6>made like over three times my money investing in Twitter.

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 6>So you know, there is a thing called luck in

0:40:32.680 --> 0:40:34.160
<v Speaker 6>the world, and I'm lucky.

0:40:34.239 --> 0:40:36.400
<v Speaker 5>So you've tripled your money from four years ago and

0:40:36.719 --> 0:40:40.319
<v Speaker 5>investing in the take private of what is now x

0:40:40.360 --> 0:40:43.480
<v Speaker 5>and owned by Xai, which is part of SpaceX. Of course,

0:40:43.840 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 5>what do you do with those with that part of ownership?

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:50.080
<v Speaker 5>Do you hold on Twitter? Do you sell it when

0:40:50.080 --> 0:40:50.319
<v Speaker 5>you can?

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:52.479
<v Speaker 6>Well, I'm building a new pool, but that has nothing

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:55.320
<v Speaker 6>to do with my SpaceX. I want to continue and

0:40:55.360 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 6>employ lots of people because it's fun. But no, I'm

0:40:59.080 --> 0:40:59.960
<v Speaker 6>holding my space.

0:41:00.040 --> 0:41:01.680
<v Speaker 5>Actual tool, an actual pool.

0:41:01.760 --> 0:41:05.040
<v Speaker 6>I was thinking, I'm building an actual physical pool in

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:08.520
<v Speaker 6>the AI era. I'm taking my AI profits and doing

0:41:08.520 --> 0:41:14.000
<v Speaker 6>something really worthwhile employing people to dig holes. But that said,

0:41:14.760 --> 0:41:16.800
<v Speaker 6>you know, SpaceX is one of the most interesting companies

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:19.280
<v Speaker 6>I've ever seen, and we have such a unique viewpoint

0:41:19.320 --> 0:41:22.840
<v Speaker 6>of SpaceX because we work with so many SpaceX clients

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:25.600
<v Speaker 6>and we're getting more all the time, and we've really

0:41:25.600 --> 0:41:28.560
<v Speaker 6>been focusing on helping SpaceX employees because it's down the

0:41:28.560 --> 0:41:31.200
<v Speaker 6>street from us here in Los Angeles, is kind of

0:41:31.200 --> 0:41:34.560
<v Speaker 6>their main one of their main hubs, and so, you know,

0:41:35.200 --> 0:41:38.040
<v Speaker 6>I've met some incredible people over the last several months

0:41:38.080 --> 0:41:43.960
<v Speaker 6>doing incredible things. These are the highest caliber engineers in

0:41:44.000 --> 0:41:46.719
<v Speaker 6>the world that have made our space program because it's

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:52.000
<v Speaker 6>really United States Space program just so amazingly unique and successful.

0:41:52.040 --> 0:41:53.759
<v Speaker 6>So what we have in store for us over the

0:41:53.840 --> 0:41:56.200
<v Speaker 6>next decade is really exciting.

0:41:56.440 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Hey, So, Ross just want to ask you, so you

0:41:59.080 --> 0:42:02.080
<v Speaker 2>own this the stuff you're happy about that, will you

0:42:02.120 --> 0:42:04.040
<v Speaker 2>continue owning it or do you think the.

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:06.719
<v Speaker 6>Valuation That's what I'm saying, I'm not selling it, you know,

0:42:07.040 --> 0:42:08.799
<v Speaker 6>I got my ten year old kids sitting here because

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:11.280
<v Speaker 6>he's out of school, and when I start thinking about

0:42:11.360 --> 0:42:13.080
<v Speaker 6>what his life is going to be like when he's

0:42:13.120 --> 0:42:15.840
<v Speaker 6>only twenty, you know, like ten years from now, like

0:42:15.960 --> 0:42:18.080
<v Speaker 6>space is just going to be something that's like I

0:42:18.160 --> 0:42:20.000
<v Speaker 6>keep making this joke, it's like easier to go to

0:42:20.000 --> 0:42:23.200
<v Speaker 6>space than New Jersey, you know. And so you know,

0:42:23.280 --> 0:42:24.960
<v Speaker 6>the truth is, I think it's harder to go from

0:42:24.960 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 6>New York to New Jersey than it will be in

0:42:26.640 --> 0:42:28.359
<v Speaker 6>space to go to space in ten years.

0:42:28.680 --> 0:42:31.160
<v Speaker 8>And Ross, to be clear, this is you Ross Gerbert

0:42:31.200 --> 0:42:33.520
<v Speaker 8>personally as opposed to Gerba Kawasaki.

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:37.480
<v Speaker 6>That's credit. I personally own the shares in my firm.

0:42:37.880 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 6>In our own firm account owned shares because when the

0:42:41.239 --> 0:42:44.839
<v Speaker 6>Twitter deal came by, you know, Elon really didn't want

0:42:44.840 --> 0:42:47.000
<v Speaker 6>to do the deal. So we didn't actually sell the

0:42:47.000 --> 0:42:49.120
<v Speaker 6>deal to our clients because I was like, I can't

0:42:49.160 --> 0:42:51.160
<v Speaker 6>sell this. The guy doesn't want to do it, you know,

0:42:51.320 --> 0:42:53.440
<v Speaker 6>And so they basically called us the last night and

0:42:53.520 --> 0:42:55.480
<v Speaker 6>was like you still want to invest because we're actually

0:42:55.480 --> 0:42:57.759
<v Speaker 6>doing this, and so I just like wrote a check

0:42:57.840 --> 0:43:01.600
<v Speaker 6>because it was Elon, you know. But but none of

0:43:01.600 --> 0:43:05.200
<v Speaker 6>our clients have been able to participate in this well,

0:43:05.239 --> 0:43:08.160
<v Speaker 6>fortunately and unfortunately because remember you are pretty bad.

0:43:08.280 --> 0:43:11.640
<v Speaker 8>You didn't get an allocation or submit a bid for

0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:14.680
<v Speaker 8>an allocation in the IPO or go into the open

0:43:14.719 --> 0:43:16.960
<v Speaker 8>market today. I'm being mechanical, but I'm just.

0:43:17.640 --> 0:43:20.720
<v Speaker 6>No, we haven't done open market purchases of SpaceX today

0:43:20.760 --> 0:43:23.560
<v Speaker 6>because our firm does not buy IPOs for very good reasons,

0:43:23.719 --> 0:43:26.480
<v Speaker 6>which I'm happy to talk about. Well, and then well,

0:43:26.520 --> 0:43:29.440
<v Speaker 6>can I ask you, well, secondly, we did request IPO

0:43:29.480 --> 0:43:32.680
<v Speaker 6>allocations for clients of ours that are at Fidelity and

0:43:32.719 --> 0:43:34.680
<v Speaker 6>Schwab because we work with both of them, and they

0:43:34.960 --> 0:43:37.439
<v Speaker 6>did provide. So some of our clients did get small

0:43:37.480 --> 0:43:42.920
<v Speaker 6>allocations of SpaceX stock today as well, so the but

0:43:43.000 --> 0:43:46.440
<v Speaker 6>those were unsolicited, you know, like these clients really wanted it.

0:43:46.560 --> 0:43:48.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. Why.

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:50.560
<v Speaker 8>The reason that's insightful is like there are people listening

0:43:50.560 --> 0:43:53.520
<v Speaker 8>to Bloomberg Business Week or watching bloom this Week that

0:43:53.560 --> 0:43:55.440
<v Speaker 8>are in the same boat, right, and they're just thinking, like,

0:43:56.000 --> 0:43:57.320
<v Speaker 8>you know, what, what did I do here? But the

0:43:57.400 --> 0:44:00.600
<v Speaker 8>hypothesis presented to me by loads of people is they

0:44:00.600 --> 0:44:05.480
<v Speaker 8>didn't sell their Tesla shares to get some liquidity to participate,

0:44:06.400 --> 0:44:09.920
<v Speaker 8>in part because they just see that the Tesla SpaceX

0:44:09.960 --> 0:44:13.040
<v Speaker 8>merger happening imminently, and so what would be the point

0:44:13.200 --> 0:44:15.920
<v Speaker 8>I may ask where you stand on that idea today?

0:44:17.160 --> 0:44:19.759
<v Speaker 6>Well, I very I tweeted again this morning. I mean,

0:44:19.960 --> 0:44:22.080
<v Speaker 6>I know, how long does this take till they put

0:44:22.080 --> 0:44:25.320
<v Speaker 6>these companies together? And then even Gwen shotwell today, didn't

0:44:25.440 --> 0:44:27.160
<v Speaker 6>you know pooh pooh the idea when it was brought

0:44:27.200 --> 0:44:30.360
<v Speaker 6>to and actually said it makes sense? So you know,

0:44:30.400 --> 0:44:32.400
<v Speaker 6>we know this is going to happen at some point.

0:44:32.680 --> 0:44:34.120
<v Speaker 6>And I think a lot of that has to do

0:44:34.200 --> 0:44:37.399
<v Speaker 6>with what valuations SpaceX and Tesla really are to make

0:44:37.440 --> 0:44:40.440
<v Speaker 6>this combination work for both sets of shareholders, so that

0:44:40.520 --> 0:44:44.080
<v Speaker 6>doesn't create a lot of you know, lawsuits and other issues.

0:44:44.160 --> 0:44:47.240
<v Speaker 6>So so I think it's it's definitely a foregone conclusion.

0:44:47.239 --> 0:44:50.080
<v Speaker 6>Now I do agree with you that that props up

0:44:50.160 --> 0:44:53.000
<v Speaker 6>Tesla stock because you know, people are like, well I

0:44:53.040 --> 0:44:57.359
<v Speaker 6>did not say that. Well, okay. My feeling is it

0:44:57.400 --> 0:45:00.000
<v Speaker 6>props up Tesla's stock because people don't want to say

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:01.719
<v Speaker 6>their Tesla if it's just going to get bought out

0:45:01.719 --> 0:45:04.319
<v Speaker 6>by SpaceX anyways, you know, And so I do think

0:45:04.360 --> 0:45:07.759
<v Speaker 6>that that helps Tesla, that the perception is that they

0:45:07.800 --> 0:45:09.800
<v Speaker 6>will be acquired by SpaceX or merge.

0:45:09.920 --> 0:45:12.600
<v Speaker 5>So so ross maybe in your view it works for investors,

0:45:12.640 --> 0:45:15.759
<v Speaker 5>Does it work from an actual operations perspective?

0:45:15.920 --> 0:45:20.920
<v Speaker 6>Oh? In fact, well, I would argue that this is

0:45:20.960 --> 0:45:23.960
<v Speaker 6>really unfair to Tesla, and it's one of the real

0:45:24.120 --> 0:45:26.680
<v Speaker 6>gripes I've had over the last several years is the

0:45:26.719 --> 0:45:30.400
<v Speaker 6>way they took you know, Tesla's chips and Tesla's engineers

0:45:30.400 --> 0:45:34.560
<v Speaker 6>and built Xai, which was the brains of Tesla's you know,

0:45:35.200 --> 0:45:38.319
<v Speaker 6>optimist robot and full self driving. And then Elon goes

0:45:38.360 --> 0:45:40.640
<v Speaker 6>on TV and says, this is the entire value of

0:45:40.680 --> 0:45:43.800
<v Speaker 6>the company is based off if we can can succeed

0:45:43.840 --> 0:45:46.359
<v Speaker 6>with full self driving. But yet the brains of full

0:45:46.400 --> 0:45:50.000
<v Speaker 6>self driving isn't known by Tesla. Like that's super wrong.

0:45:50.400 --> 0:45:52.960
<v Speaker 6>It just doesn't make any sense that I have a

0:45:53.000 --> 0:45:55.840
<v Speaker 6>bunch of robots and cars that will not work without

0:45:55.840 --> 0:45:59.880
<v Speaker 6>another company's technology. So Tesla in my mind, is worthless

0:46:00.280 --> 0:46:03.320
<v Speaker 6>if it doesn't merge because it doesn't own the IP

0:46:03.640 --> 0:46:07.200
<v Speaker 6>to the brains to their own products. Like, like, it

0:46:07.320 --> 0:46:08.600
<v Speaker 6>just makes no sense.

0:46:09.800 --> 0:46:13.720
<v Speaker 2>All right, speaking of the brains, the brains behind anything

0:46:13.840 --> 0:46:17.120
<v Speaker 2>with Elon's universe is obviously Elon Musk can we talk

0:46:17.120 --> 0:46:20.920
<v Speaker 2>a lot about risk to the company. We talk about governance,

0:46:20.960 --> 0:46:23.680
<v Speaker 2>but we also just talk about, you know, how much

0:46:23.840 --> 0:46:25.120
<v Speaker 2>what he does, his.

0:46:25.160 --> 0:46:27.600
<v Speaker 3>Brain, his oddness, if you will.

0:46:27.680 --> 0:46:32.960
<v Speaker 2>Some might say, you know, is what makes this company petricity.

0:46:33.280 --> 0:46:37.200
<v Speaker 2>You're much better on this and on the governance and

0:46:37.239 --> 0:46:41.600
<v Speaker 2>stock structure. Nelman Value Edge Advisors Vice chairman, joined the

0:46:41.600 --> 0:46:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Closed team yesterday on Blueberg Television.

0:46:44.200 --> 0:46:46.680
<v Speaker 3>Let's all listen up to what Neil had to say.

0:46:46.719 --> 0:46:47.239
<v Speaker 3>Noill had to.

0:46:47.200 --> 0:46:50.439
<v Speaker 10>Say, all of those protections that you talked about, the

0:46:50.480 --> 0:46:52.840
<v Speaker 10>ability to vote, proxies, the ability to sell the stock,

0:46:52.880 --> 0:46:55.440
<v Speaker 10>the ability to sue, all of those are there to

0:46:55.480 --> 0:46:59.279
<v Speaker 10>reassure investors. Having independent directors on the board, all of

0:46:59.280 --> 0:47:01.560
<v Speaker 10>those are there to re sure investors that their money

0:47:01.640 --> 0:47:04.920
<v Speaker 10>is being taken care of in a principled way for

0:47:05.000 --> 0:47:07.400
<v Speaker 10>their benefit, not for the benefit of the insiders. And

0:47:07.600 --> 0:47:13.120
<v Speaker 10>all of those have been obliterated by this offering. You know,

0:47:14.440 --> 0:47:17.840
<v Speaker 10>Ila Musk has appointed himself CEO for life. He's the

0:47:17.880 --> 0:47:19.879
<v Speaker 10>only one who can remove himself, Not even his board

0:47:19.920 --> 0:47:21.359
<v Speaker 10>of directors can remove him.

0:47:21.400 --> 0:47:22.880
<v Speaker 3>He has all the voting control.

0:47:23.040 --> 0:47:26.840
<v Speaker 10>He has basically built a moat with alligators around himself.

0:47:27.120 --> 0:47:29.360
<v Speaker 3>And that's not good for shareholders.

0:47:30.840 --> 0:47:35.360
<v Speaker 2>Nel Mio Value Edged Advisors Vice chairman on Blueberg Television yesterday.

0:47:36.040 --> 0:47:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Ross my understanding that you were kind of laughing as

0:47:38.400 --> 0:47:39.200
<v Speaker 2>you were listening to that.

0:47:40.360 --> 0:47:43.920
<v Speaker 6>Well, you know, there's no companies that have ever been

0:47:44.000 --> 0:47:48.160
<v Speaker 6>run like Tesla and SpaceX in the history of public companies,

0:47:48.560 --> 0:47:51.760
<v Speaker 6>And so I find her outrage to be humorous because

0:47:51.960 --> 0:47:54.800
<v Speaker 6>that's basically how it's worked for Tesla for the last

0:47:54.840 --> 0:47:58.080
<v Speaker 6>fifteen years. And you know, the board is not independent.

0:47:58.239 --> 0:48:01.640
<v Speaker 6>They do whatever Elon says. The pay packages are approved

0:48:01.640 --> 0:48:05.680
<v Speaker 6>because index funds just push yes to whatever management puts forth.

0:48:05.920 --> 0:48:09.480
<v Speaker 6>So Elon's taken advantage of a system where twenty percent

0:48:09.800 --> 0:48:13.360
<v Speaker 6>of his companies owned by robots that don't make any decisions.

0:48:13.480 --> 0:48:17.160
<v Speaker 6>There's nothing worse than Vanguard for shareholder rights. So if

0:48:17.200 --> 0:48:20.560
<v Speaker 6>she wants to complain, she should be complaining about Vanguard,

0:48:20.840 --> 0:48:23.600
<v Speaker 6>not Tesla. And the fact that Elon takes advantage of

0:48:23.640 --> 0:48:26.600
<v Speaker 6>the fact that you know, there's basically going to be

0:48:26.680 --> 0:48:29.200
<v Speaker 6>nobody but you know somebody like me who goes out

0:48:29.200 --> 0:48:32.520
<v Speaker 6>on TV. But as far as trying to vote change

0:48:32.560 --> 0:48:35.879
<v Speaker 6>into Tesla or SpaceX never going to happen. So does

0:48:35.920 --> 0:48:38.239
<v Speaker 6>he take care of shareholders. Yeah, they've made a lot

0:48:38.280 --> 0:48:41.319
<v Speaker 6>of money, So that's taking care of shareholders any way

0:48:41.360 --> 0:48:44.160
<v Speaker 6>you do the math. Whether I vote proxies or not,

0:48:44.560 --> 0:48:47.279
<v Speaker 6>what matters is whether I'm making money. And I've made

0:48:47.560 --> 0:48:50.279
<v Speaker 6>over one hundred times of my money investing in Tesla,

0:48:50.360 --> 0:48:53.680
<v Speaker 6>and so I just think, you know, when you invest

0:48:53.760 --> 0:48:56.040
<v Speaker 6>with Elon, you have no rights. You get on the bus,

0:48:56.080 --> 0:48:58.279
<v Speaker 6>you don't like the bus, get off the bus, but

0:48:58.560 --> 0:49:01.040
<v Speaker 6>if you want to be on that bus. He has

0:49:01.160 --> 0:49:04.879
<v Speaker 6>rewarded people who has done that, and that's why people

0:49:04.960 --> 0:49:08.640
<v Speaker 6>are giving him such a ridiculously high valuation, is because

0:49:08.960 --> 0:49:11.759
<v Speaker 6>he has rewarded shareholders in the past and in a

0:49:11.760 --> 0:49:15.400
<v Speaker 6>way that very few CEOs have. So you know, I

0:49:15.480 --> 0:49:18.000
<v Speaker 6>get the outrage and all that, then don't buy the stock.

0:49:18.280 --> 0:49:18.800
<v Speaker 5>Russ may I.

0:49:19.400 --> 0:49:22.520
<v Speaker 6>It was very clear in the S one, you know exactly.

0:49:22.120 --> 0:49:24.560
<v Speaker 8>And like I'm just relying on recounting what was in

0:49:24.600 --> 0:49:28.040
<v Speaker 8>the S one, right, the restriction that's paid placed on

0:49:28.160 --> 0:49:31.120
<v Speaker 8>Musk's comp I'm just going to read it out because

0:49:31.239 --> 0:49:34.160
<v Speaker 8>you know, it's the only way the audience will will

0:49:34.480 --> 0:49:36.239
<v Speaker 8>come to have a sense of it. He has a

0:49:36.280 --> 0:49:40.120
<v Speaker 8>one billion restricted cass B shares award. That's contingent a

0:49:40.239 --> 0:49:43.280
<v Speaker 8>on market cat milestones. So if he achieves the market

0:49:43.280 --> 0:49:46.319
<v Speaker 8>cat milestones through shareholders get rewarded. You say, but must

0:49:46.360 --> 0:49:50.600
<v Speaker 8>compensation package is tied to establishing a permanent human colony

0:49:50.640 --> 0:49:55.000
<v Speaker 8>on Mars with at least one million inhabitants. I don't

0:49:55.000 --> 0:49:56.520
<v Speaker 8>want to give a long win a question, but you

0:49:56.560 --> 0:49:59.279
<v Speaker 8>explained to the audience how you came to be a

0:49:59.280 --> 0:50:01.960
<v Speaker 8>SpaceX investor and shareholder.

0:50:03.080 --> 0:50:03.880
<v Speaker 6>That that goal.

0:50:04.160 --> 0:50:05.160
<v Speaker 8>What does it mean to you?

0:50:07.640 --> 0:50:09.399
<v Speaker 6>It means I might have a chance of not having

0:50:09.400 --> 0:50:13.480
<v Speaker 6>to pay him the billion shares, you know, so so

0:50:13.560 --> 0:50:16.399
<v Speaker 6>I kind of like that. You know, I don't think

0:50:16.600 --> 0:50:18.600
<v Speaker 6>we're going to have a million people living on Mars,

0:50:18.680 --> 0:50:22.200
<v Speaker 6>So you know, that's good news if you're a SpaceX

0:50:22.280 --> 0:50:24.680
<v Speaker 6>yere older. And I could give you a lot of

0:50:24.719 --> 0:50:27.200
<v Speaker 6>reasons that Elon might want to argue with me about.

0:50:27.400 --> 0:50:29.879
<v Speaker 6>And I'm a more practical person, but I don't think

0:50:29.880 --> 0:50:33.120
<v Speaker 6>you could talk a million people into going to Mars,

0:50:33.480 --> 0:50:37.440
<v Speaker 6>you know, like, unless Mars looks a lot like Hawaii,

0:50:37.920 --> 0:50:40.640
<v Speaker 6>I don't think people want to go there, and Mars

0:50:40.719 --> 0:50:43.759
<v Speaker 6>doesn't look like Hawaii. So I don't know. I don't

0:50:43.760 --> 0:50:48.520
<v Speaker 6>know who's moving to Marsh by the way, it's far

0:50:48.560 --> 0:50:49.760
<v Speaker 6>away and there's no air.

0:50:49.800 --> 0:50:52.600
<v Speaker 5>Ros Gerbert, president and CEO of Gerber Kawasaki Wealth and

0:50:52.600 --> 0:50:56.480
<v Speaker 5>Investment Management. I did make that that point earlier in

0:50:56.480 --> 0:50:59.680
<v Speaker 5>our last hour about when people compared Mars to potentially

0:50:59.680 --> 0:51:01.879
<v Speaker 5>being then California. I pushed back a little bit better.

0:51:02.360 --> 0:51:07.080
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I'm not moving from here for anything social.

0:51:08.480 --> 0:51:10.840
<v Speaker 2>I still think he's going to put Optimus robots on

0:51:11.040 --> 0:51:11.800
<v Speaker 2>in one million.

0:51:11.960 --> 0:51:14.040
<v Speaker 6>Maybe that's what I think though, that's what I think.

0:51:14.520 --> 0:51:17.040
<v Speaker 6>I think the robots are are the ones doing the

0:51:17.040 --> 0:51:19.320
<v Speaker 6>work in space and going to Mars.

0:51:19.520 --> 0:51:21.600
<v Speaker 5>So so Ross, I want to put aside the question

0:51:21.680 --> 0:51:24.719
<v Speaker 5>of of sort of governance right now and these these

0:51:24.760 --> 0:51:27.880
<v Speaker 5>pay packages and just get back to your view of

0:51:27.880 --> 0:51:32.359
<v Speaker 5>of SpaceX shares right now. You said gerber Kawasaki does

0:51:32.400 --> 0:51:35.080
<v Speaker 5>not buy on the first day of IPOs. What restrictions

0:51:35.080 --> 0:51:37.319
<v Speaker 5>do you have or have you put out? And it's

0:51:37.320 --> 0:51:39.920
<v Speaker 5>sort of a rules based buying when it comes to IPOs.

0:51:39.960 --> 0:51:43.759
<v Speaker 5>And when would you start getting your clients in even

0:51:43.800 --> 0:51:45.399
<v Speaker 5>if they're not, you know, asking for.

0:51:45.360 --> 0:51:48.319
<v Speaker 6>It, No, they're asking for it. There are some of them.

0:51:49.040 --> 0:51:51.400
<v Speaker 5>We've talked to a lot of wealth managers lately who

0:51:51.480 --> 0:51:55.399
<v Speaker 5>have said some people want it badly. Some people want

0:51:55.440 --> 0:51:58.120
<v Speaker 5>nothing to do with it, Like we've had three examples

0:51:58.120 --> 0:51:59.520
<v Speaker 5>of that recently this week on air.

0:52:00.440 --> 0:52:03.360
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, you know, and that's we have so many clients.

0:52:03.360 --> 0:52:07.920
<v Speaker 6>We have all those examples, right, what I think because

0:52:07.960 --> 0:52:09.680
<v Speaker 6>the way my firm works, you know, we don't tell

0:52:09.719 --> 0:52:11.680
<v Speaker 6>people no, you know, like if a client's like, I

0:52:11.719 --> 0:52:13.920
<v Speaker 6>really want to do this, we don't say no. You know.

0:52:13.960 --> 0:52:16.400
<v Speaker 6>It's our job to advise our clients. So we advise

0:52:16.480 --> 0:52:19.120
<v Speaker 6>them of the risks of it, and then we'll execute

0:52:19.320 --> 0:52:22.120
<v Speaker 6>the transactions as unsold if they want to, if they

0:52:22.120 --> 0:52:24.200
<v Speaker 6>really want to do that, and we've you know, would

0:52:24.280 --> 0:52:26.440
<v Speaker 6>do that now we I haven't done that today for

0:52:26.520 --> 0:52:29.560
<v Speaker 6>anybody because I've talked them out of it, you know,

0:52:31.239 --> 0:52:34.200
<v Speaker 6>because they listen to my advice, which is IPOs are

0:52:34.239 --> 0:52:37.120
<v Speaker 6>really difficult, okay. And I've been trading for thirty two

0:52:37.239 --> 0:52:41.560
<v Speaker 6>years and idid dot com and I I trade billions

0:52:41.600 --> 0:52:45.880
<v Speaker 6>of dollars. So just from my experience, it's really really

0:52:46.040 --> 0:52:49.680
<v Speaker 6>hard to make binary decisions. Like I'm putting one hundred

0:52:49.680 --> 0:52:52.680
<v Speaker 6>thousand dollars in my retirement money into SpaceX today and

0:52:52.719 --> 0:52:54.680
<v Speaker 6>that's it, and I will never look at it for

0:52:54.760 --> 0:52:57.400
<v Speaker 6>ten years because that's just not what investors do. So

0:52:57.440 --> 0:52:59.800
<v Speaker 6>if you were able to do that, I would say, Okay,

0:53:00.120 --> 0:53:03.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, buy the ipoy, pay up for it, but

0:53:03.320 --> 0:53:06.200
<v Speaker 6>in ten years you'll be happy. But nobody actually does that.

0:53:06.239 --> 0:53:07.919
<v Speaker 6>What happens is they look at their account in six

0:53:07.960 --> 0:53:10.680
<v Speaker 6>months and it's down thirty percent, and then they panic

0:53:10.680 --> 0:53:12.440
<v Speaker 6>and they sell it right before it goes back up.

0:53:12.800 --> 0:53:18.120
<v Speaker 6>And so investor psychology and behavior makes IPOs extremely difficult

0:53:18.120 --> 0:53:20.840
<v Speaker 6>because of the volatility. So I don't know what the

0:53:20.840 --> 0:53:23.120
<v Speaker 6>market's going to do over the next twelve months, let's say,

0:53:23.400 --> 0:53:25.799
<v Speaker 6>and you know, and then you've got a very high

0:53:25.800 --> 0:53:29.440
<v Speaker 6>priced IPO that has no pe ratio, and then maybe

0:53:29.440 --> 0:53:32.759
<v Speaker 6>markets go down for some reason. Well, SpaceX is going

0:53:32.800 --> 0:53:34.680
<v Speaker 6>to go down more than the market, And if the

0:53:34.719 --> 0:53:37.280
<v Speaker 6>market stays the same or goes up, there's the potential

0:53:37.320 --> 0:53:40.160
<v Speaker 6>that SpaceX stays the same or also goes up. But

0:53:40.239 --> 0:53:43.239
<v Speaker 6>what I say is how much upside can you get

0:53:43.280 --> 0:53:46.600
<v Speaker 6>if you buy the stock today until this company actually

0:53:46.640 --> 0:53:50.600
<v Speaker 6>produces earnings, which might be three to five years from now.

0:53:51.120 --> 0:53:54.400
<v Speaker 6>So you've got plenty of time to get into SpaceX.

0:53:54.440 --> 0:53:56.799
<v Speaker 6>So if you really really want it, what I tell

0:53:56.840 --> 0:53:59.719
<v Speaker 6>people is buy twenty percent of what you want to

0:53:59.760 --> 0:54:02.239
<v Speaker 6>buy today. If it's ten thousand dollars in SpaceX, you

0:54:02.280 --> 0:54:04.799
<v Speaker 6>buy two thousand dollars today, and then you wait a

0:54:04.840 --> 0:54:06.680
<v Speaker 6>month and you buy another two thousand dollars, and you

0:54:06.719 --> 0:54:08.879
<v Speaker 6>wait another month, and you get in over the next

0:54:08.880 --> 0:54:11.560
<v Speaker 6>five months. But what I would really say is wait

0:54:11.920 --> 0:54:15.200
<v Speaker 6>till the lockups expire. Wait. There's a lot of liquidity,

0:54:15.239 --> 0:54:17.600
<v Speaker 6>and a lot of people want to get this liquidity.

0:54:17.719 --> 0:54:20.399
<v Speaker 6>They've worked at SpaceX for a very long time now,

0:54:20.440 --> 0:54:22.080
<v Speaker 6>they're not going to be quitting, and they're not this

0:54:22.160 --> 0:54:23.759
<v Speaker 6>and that, but they want to buy a house in

0:54:23.920 --> 0:54:26.120
<v Speaker 6>LA And a house in LA costs two to three

0:54:26.120 --> 0:54:28.359
<v Speaker 6>million just to get in, and these people are living

0:54:28.400 --> 0:54:31.000
<v Speaker 6>in apartments. You see what I'm saying. So they're going

0:54:31.080 --> 0:54:33.120
<v Speaker 6>to sell some of their stock to buy a house,

0:54:33.400 --> 0:54:35.359
<v Speaker 6>and they're going to sell some of their stock so

0:54:35.400 --> 0:54:38.279
<v Speaker 6>that they have some financial security, which is what we're

0:54:38.280 --> 0:54:41.440
<v Speaker 6>advising them. But many of the employees that SpaceX are

0:54:41.440 --> 0:54:43.960
<v Speaker 6>not selling their stock. And I just want to make

0:54:44.000 --> 0:54:46.640
<v Speaker 6>it very clear. Many of them. These are the people

0:54:46.680 --> 0:54:49.520
<v Speaker 6>who believe in their mission and they're working extremely hard.

0:54:49.560 --> 0:54:52.040
<v Speaker 6>And after meeting many of these people, I believe in

0:54:52.080 --> 0:54:55.120
<v Speaker 6>their mission and Elon gets too much credit. I just

0:54:55.160 --> 0:54:58.239
<v Speaker 6>want to say this, it's not Elon Musk that's made

0:54:58.320 --> 0:55:01.560
<v Speaker 6>SpaceX successful. It's the people there. Elon must is a

0:55:01.600 --> 0:55:03.920
<v Speaker 6>visionary and he guides the company. But the truth of

0:55:03.960 --> 0:55:07.000
<v Speaker 6>the matter is he does not really run SpaceX. Right,

0:55:07.120 --> 0:55:08.920
<v Speaker 6>the people running SpaceX are excellent.

0:55:09.040 --> 0:55:11.840
<v Speaker 2>Ross thirty seconds left, though, we do think about succession,

0:55:12.040 --> 0:55:15.680
<v Speaker 2>so does Elon? Does it become even more important on

0:55:15.719 --> 0:55:18.560
<v Speaker 2>this day where we continue to see the Elon universe

0:55:18.760 --> 0:55:21.799
<v Speaker 2>get bigger and bigger that there is a succession plan

0:55:21.840 --> 0:55:22.280
<v Speaker 2>in place?

0:55:22.440 --> 0:55:25.480
<v Speaker 3>Is there one that you know of just quickly.

0:55:25.360 --> 0:55:28.960
<v Speaker 6>See see at SpaceX. Yes, I think if Elon died tomorrow,

0:55:29.080 --> 0:55:32.759
<v Speaker 6>SpaceX would be fine. Actually, SpaceX has great management and

0:55:32.800 --> 0:55:36.680
<v Speaker 6>they've been very independent for a long time. And many

0:55:36.680 --> 0:55:39.359
<v Speaker 6>of the employees and I'm not gonna, you know, say

0:55:39.400 --> 0:55:43.000
<v Speaker 6>where they were divisions they were. They don't like Elon either, Okay,

0:55:42.719 --> 0:55:46.480
<v Speaker 6>they they you know, having a mission like going to

0:55:46.520 --> 0:55:48.600
<v Speaker 6>Mars or going to the Moon or building a starship

0:55:49.600 --> 0:55:52.919
<v Speaker 6>is what motivates people. A lot of what Elon does

0:55:53.160 --> 0:55:56.799
<v Speaker 6>hurts SpaceX and hurts the company. So so SpaceX has

0:55:56.840 --> 0:56:00.880
<v Speaker 6>have much better management team than Tesla when it to secession,

0:56:01.120 --> 0:56:04.120
<v Speaker 6>and I'm much more confident about his success even if

0:56:04.760 --> 0:56:05.840
<v Speaker 6>Elon isn't involved.

0:56:05.880 --> 0:56:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, some great color and context on all things SpaceX

0:56:08.560 --> 0:56:10.520
<v Speaker 2>and Elon, as he always does.

0:56:10.640 --> 0:56:13.160
<v Speaker 3>Ross, have a great weekend. Thank you so much. Ross Gerber,

0:56:13.440 --> 0:56:15.719
<v Speaker 3>President CEO of Gerbert Kawasaki.

0:56:15.120 --> 0:56:17.920
<v Speaker 2>Wealth and Investment Management, Joining us from Los Angeles.

0:56:18.800 --> 0:56:24.279
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:56:24.400 --> 0:56:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

0:56:28.520 --> 0:56:32.680
<v Speaker 1>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:56:32.800 --> 0:56:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:56:36.800 --> 0:56:39.680
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:56:39.920 --> 0:56:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal