1 00:00:10,240 --> 00:00:14,720 Speaker 1: Hey, that folks, closing arguments are done and the jury 2 00:00:15,240 --> 00:00:19,280 Speaker 1: is deliberating and the so called grief author murder trial 3 00:00:19,400 --> 00:00:24,239 Speaker 1: are also called the poisoned husband murder trial. But jury 4 00:00:24,280 --> 00:00:28,680 Speaker 1: deliberations got underway and it didn't take long before things 5 00:00:28,680 --> 00:00:30,680 Speaker 1: got interesting. And with that, welcome to this episode of 6 00:00:30,680 --> 00:00:34,200 Speaker 1: Amy and TJ. Rose. We expect and always gets interesting 7 00:00:34,200 --> 00:00:36,239 Speaker 1: when you get notes from the jury. Didn't expect one 8 00:00:36,240 --> 00:00:36,680 Speaker 1: this quickly. 9 00:00:36,880 --> 00:00:40,159 Speaker 2: Yeah, this one happened ten twelve minutes into jury deliberations, 10 00:00:40,159 --> 00:00:44,200 Speaker 2: so no time at all and kind of a confusing note, 11 00:00:44,240 --> 00:00:48,400 Speaker 2: but seems like they were able to give them some instructions, 12 00:00:48,400 --> 00:00:50,400 Speaker 2: but they were already asking questions. 13 00:00:50,440 --> 00:00:52,120 Speaker 1: You know what this said to me, they are really 14 00:00:52,159 --> 00:00:54,240 Speaker 1: taking this seriously, because we looked at the note and 15 00:00:54,280 --> 00:00:57,120 Speaker 1: saw what they were asking, Like, what exactly are they asking? 16 00:00:57,600 --> 00:01:00,680 Speaker 1: What does that mean? What did it say again? Factual 17 00:01:00,720 --> 00:01:04,520 Speaker 1: stipulation question mark And that was all it said. They 18 00:01:04,560 --> 00:01:07,120 Speaker 1: sent a note according and again as we record, there's 19 00:01:07,120 --> 00:01:10,160 Speaker 1: the jury only got the case literally minutes ago, and 20 00:01:10,200 --> 00:01:13,160 Speaker 1: they said before they even got into the jury room 21 00:01:13,200 --> 00:01:15,200 Speaker 1: for the most part, they handed a note to a 22 00:01:15,240 --> 00:01:19,400 Speaker 1: bailiff asking a question about a factual stipulation something. They 23 00:01:19,440 --> 00:01:22,960 Speaker 1: expected the judge to give them some instruction and he 24 00:01:23,319 --> 00:01:26,199 Speaker 1: forgot to do so maybe, but I thought it was cool, like, wow, 25 00:01:26,240 --> 00:01:27,160 Speaker 1: they are really. 26 00:01:26,920 --> 00:01:27,759 Speaker 3: They're on top of it. 27 00:01:27,880 --> 00:01:29,000 Speaker 1: Yeah, that's what it said. 28 00:01:29,080 --> 00:01:31,120 Speaker 2: They on top of things, and I think that's probably 29 00:01:31,160 --> 00:01:33,080 Speaker 2: good news for both sides and the fact that you 30 00:01:33,160 --> 00:01:37,840 Speaker 2: want a fully engaged jury that is ready to really 31 00:01:38,360 --> 00:01:41,560 Speaker 2: carefully go through all the testimony. 32 00:01:41,880 --> 00:01:44,360 Speaker 1: So they had to. We had an episode one right 33 00:01:44,400 --> 00:01:48,520 Speaker 1: before this, going through the prosecution's closing argument. They did 34 00:01:48,600 --> 00:01:50,240 Speaker 1: get a rebuttal. We'll get into that a little bit, 35 00:01:50,360 --> 00:01:53,360 Speaker 1: just didn't take as long, but now we'll go through 36 00:01:53,520 --> 00:01:58,760 Speaker 1: what the defense Their theme, I guess was during their 37 00:01:58,800 --> 00:02:02,840 Speaker 1: closing argument and roll it was pretty clear pretty early 38 00:02:03,040 --> 00:02:05,360 Speaker 1: they tried to humanize her and they harped on this 39 00:02:05,440 --> 00:02:10,200 Speaker 1: point reasonable doubt. They are beating that into the ground. 40 00:02:10,680 --> 00:02:14,080 Speaker 1: What is reasonable doubt? And they're trying to put every 41 00:02:14,240 --> 00:02:15,960 Speaker 1: bit of evidence into question. 42 00:02:16,120 --> 00:02:16,520 Speaker 3: That's right. 43 00:02:16,560 --> 00:02:19,000 Speaker 2: In fact, they said, if you think she maybe did it, 44 00:02:19,560 --> 00:02:22,680 Speaker 2: if you think she probably did it, if you think 45 00:02:22,720 --> 00:02:25,640 Speaker 2: it's very likely that she did it, you still have 46 00:02:25,720 --> 00:02:28,440 Speaker 2: to find Corey Ritchin's not guilty. 47 00:02:28,480 --> 00:02:30,160 Speaker 3: I thought that was interesting, which. 48 00:02:30,000 --> 00:02:35,080 Speaker 1: Actually isn't the legal threshold, right, But they kept telling 49 00:02:35,120 --> 00:02:38,680 Speaker 1: the jury everything the lawyer's saying closing is not evidence. 50 00:02:38,760 --> 00:02:40,760 Speaker 1: But the lawyers can say what they want to say. 51 00:02:41,040 --> 00:02:45,119 Speaker 1: And yet Rome they're beating this thing into the ground 52 00:02:45,360 --> 00:02:49,120 Speaker 1: reasonable doubt, reasonable doubt. Did you think it was effective? 53 00:02:49,120 --> 00:02:53,680 Speaker 1: They were essentially saying everything that the prosecution is telling you, 54 00:02:54,360 --> 00:02:59,000 Speaker 1: we have a reasonable explanation on the other side that 55 00:02:59,040 --> 00:02:59,520 Speaker 1: counters it. 56 00:02:59,760 --> 00:02:59,959 Speaker 3: Yeah. 57 00:03:00,040 --> 00:03:03,240 Speaker 2: Yes, And I think they made the point very clear 58 00:03:03,280 --> 00:03:05,440 Speaker 2: that there was no direct evidence. 59 00:03:05,520 --> 00:03:07,120 Speaker 3: This was all circumstantial. 60 00:03:07,600 --> 00:03:12,000 Speaker 2: There is no way that the state or prosecutors could 61 00:03:12,160 --> 00:03:14,720 Speaker 2: actually without. 62 00:03:14,480 --> 00:03:17,520 Speaker 3: Doubt tell jurors how. 63 00:03:18,560 --> 00:03:22,800 Speaker 2: How Eric Richins ingested the lethal dose of fentanyl. And 64 00:03:22,919 --> 00:03:25,639 Speaker 2: that is true. And then I also thought it was interesting. 65 00:03:25,800 --> 00:03:28,560 Speaker 2: It seemed a little hokey. They had some visuals up, 66 00:03:28,600 --> 00:03:32,480 Speaker 2: but the defense started with the state looks at facts 67 00:03:32,520 --> 00:03:35,480 Speaker 2: one way and sees a which but if you look 68 00:03:35,520 --> 00:03:37,240 Speaker 2: at those same facts another. 69 00:03:36,920 --> 00:03:38,880 Speaker 3: Way, you will see a widow. 70 00:03:39,480 --> 00:03:42,240 Speaker 2: And so they were asking the jury not to take 71 00:03:43,160 --> 00:03:46,880 Speaker 2: all of the examples of how she grieved, how she reacted, 72 00:03:47,240 --> 00:03:50,360 Speaker 2: what she said and did in that body cam footage, 73 00:03:50,480 --> 00:03:52,760 Speaker 2: what she sounded like in that nine one one call. 74 00:03:53,680 --> 00:03:55,880 Speaker 3: They were trying to make the point you don't know 75 00:03:56,040 --> 00:03:58,280 Speaker 3: how one person grieves versus another. 76 00:03:58,760 --> 00:04:00,400 Speaker 1: You know, they spend less go to that because they 77 00:04:00,400 --> 00:04:02,560 Speaker 1: spend a lot of time on that, And it makes 78 00:04:02,600 --> 00:04:05,280 Speaker 1: a fair point, does it not? Robes? How are we 79 00:04:05,400 --> 00:04:07,160 Speaker 1: don't send a woman to prison for the rest of 80 00:04:07,160 --> 00:04:09,840 Speaker 1: our life punish her because she's not grieving the way 81 00:04:10,240 --> 00:04:12,680 Speaker 1: you think she should grieve. It's the worst moment of 82 00:04:12,720 --> 00:04:14,840 Speaker 1: her life and you're going to judge her for it. 83 00:04:15,160 --> 00:04:17,479 Speaker 1: That's a fair It's kind of a reasonable point, is 84 00:04:17,520 --> 00:04:17,719 Speaker 1: it not. 85 00:04:18,440 --> 00:04:18,719 Speaker 3: Yes? 86 00:04:19,400 --> 00:04:23,559 Speaker 2: And they had to go there because the prosecution putting 87 00:04:23,720 --> 00:04:28,440 Speaker 2: up that video the next day of shots and laughter 88 00:04:28,760 --> 00:04:31,920 Speaker 2: and celebrations where Corey Richards and her friends say they 89 00:04:31,920 --> 00:04:35,520 Speaker 2: were celebrating Eric Richon's life, but it looks like she's. 90 00:04:35,360 --> 00:04:36,440 Speaker 3: Celebrating his death. 91 00:04:36,440 --> 00:04:39,640 Speaker 2: And that is certainly how prosecutors tried to present it 92 00:04:39,680 --> 00:04:42,719 Speaker 2: to the jury. And it does feel icky watching, but 93 00:04:43,080 --> 00:04:45,320 Speaker 2: that was just another example of how they were saying 94 00:04:45,400 --> 00:04:49,400 Speaker 2: to the jury. The defense was, you, every person grieves differently, 95 00:04:49,480 --> 00:04:51,080 Speaker 2: every person reacts differently. 96 00:04:51,440 --> 00:04:56,560 Speaker 1: And this is where the defense attorney injected herself into this. 97 00:04:56,680 --> 00:05:02,160 Speaker 1: She actually said she lost her a number of years back, 98 00:05:02,240 --> 00:05:06,960 Speaker 1: and she said based on what I have learned in 99 00:05:07,000 --> 00:05:10,159 Speaker 1: this case. I didn't grieve appropriately. She didn't go into details, 100 00:05:10,160 --> 00:05:12,080 Speaker 1: but she put herself into it, and that was a 101 00:05:12,120 --> 00:05:13,680 Speaker 1: moment at least you sit up. And that was a 102 00:05:13,720 --> 00:05:16,840 Speaker 1: personal story there about how one grief. Bro I don't 103 00:05:16,839 --> 00:05:21,080 Speaker 1: know what to do with that. What is one supposed 104 00:05:21,120 --> 00:05:23,880 Speaker 1: to do when they grieve? I can tell you I've 105 00:05:23,880 --> 00:05:26,440 Speaker 1: seen grief. I've seen it up close. I've seen it 106 00:05:27,000 --> 00:05:30,640 Speaker 1: in movies, I've seen it in real life videos. You 107 00:05:30,720 --> 00:05:34,680 Speaker 1: get a general idea of how people behave when they grieve. 108 00:05:34,800 --> 00:05:37,440 Speaker 1: But I don't know. I thought that was a fair point. 109 00:05:37,880 --> 00:05:40,599 Speaker 1: How can I judge her put her in prison the 110 00:05:40,600 --> 00:05:44,320 Speaker 1: rest of her life because I say, how she's supposed 111 00:05:44,360 --> 00:05:46,000 Speaker 1: to react to her husband being dead. 112 00:05:46,200 --> 00:05:48,680 Speaker 2: I thought the defense scored points with that, and I 113 00:05:48,720 --> 00:05:53,240 Speaker 2: do think they scored points by really bringing that home 114 00:05:53,279 --> 00:05:57,200 Speaker 2: that did such an individual experience, and just this they 115 00:05:57,240 --> 00:06:00,760 Speaker 2: were truly trying to humanize her throughout it all, talking 116 00:06:00,800 --> 00:06:06,560 Speaker 2: about how when she left Eric initially this is when 117 00:06:06,600 --> 00:06:08,960 Speaker 2: she claims he died, and she did know it because 118 00:06:08,960 --> 00:06:10,920 Speaker 2: she went to go laid down with her child because 119 00:06:10,960 --> 00:06:14,000 Speaker 2: her child was having nightmares, because her child needed her. 120 00:06:14,200 --> 00:06:17,160 Speaker 2: They were trying to create the mother, the human, not 121 00:06:17,400 --> 00:06:22,040 Speaker 2: this black widow, this premeditated evil woman who was trying 122 00:06:22,080 --> 00:06:24,360 Speaker 2: to kill her her husband for money. 123 00:06:24,720 --> 00:06:27,320 Speaker 1: I thought some of that. There were several times where 124 00:06:27,320 --> 00:06:29,960 Speaker 1: it was obvious where they said she did this just 125 00:06:30,040 --> 00:06:32,720 Speaker 1: like any parent would kind of a thing, and it 126 00:06:33,040 --> 00:06:35,279 Speaker 1: was obviously. I don't know how effective it might have been, 127 00:06:35,760 --> 00:06:42,080 Speaker 1: but this was happening, Robes, this was okay, fine, let's 128 00:06:42,080 --> 00:06:44,880 Speaker 1: do this now and right. She's innocent to proven guilty. 129 00:06:45,480 --> 00:06:47,600 Speaker 1: But a big part of this in the conversation in 130 00:06:47,600 --> 00:06:49,200 Speaker 1: the last couple of days have had to do with 131 00:06:49,279 --> 00:06:53,600 Speaker 1: her reactions, how she has behaved in the courtroom and 132 00:06:53,680 --> 00:06:55,800 Speaker 1: the faces she has made and whatever else. And the 133 00:06:55,800 --> 00:07:00,960 Speaker 1: prosecutor used that in his clothing Robes today it look, 134 00:07:02,360 --> 00:07:04,719 Speaker 1: how do you judge what she was doing? I don't know. 135 00:07:04,960 --> 00:07:11,240 Speaker 1: But what she was doing today was smirking. She was 136 00:07:11,280 --> 00:07:14,920 Speaker 1: reacting sarcastically even in some of her faces and reactions 137 00:07:14,920 --> 00:07:17,120 Speaker 1: to what she was hearing from the prosecution. How that 138 00:07:17,560 --> 00:07:20,960 Speaker 1: plays for a jury, I don't know. But today she 139 00:07:21,200 --> 00:07:26,000 Speaker 1: almost in her reaction Robes kind of countered the sweet 140 00:07:26,160 --> 00:07:28,960 Speaker 1: lady they were trying to create in the narration. 141 00:07:29,360 --> 00:07:32,240 Speaker 2: I agree, So just as we could see her face. 142 00:07:32,280 --> 00:07:34,440 Speaker 2: You know, the jury is looking at her face, and 143 00:07:34,520 --> 00:07:38,360 Speaker 2: while the prosecutor was giving his closing arguments, she was 144 00:07:38,480 --> 00:07:41,880 Speaker 2: rolling her eyes. She had a smug look on her face, 145 00:07:41,960 --> 00:07:44,400 Speaker 2: and look, I imagine I was trying to give her 146 00:07:44,440 --> 00:07:47,680 Speaker 2: some grace and say, Okay, if someone was saying the 147 00:07:47,720 --> 00:07:50,520 Speaker 2: worst possible things about me, I don't have a poker face. 148 00:07:50,560 --> 00:07:53,360 Speaker 2: I likely probably would roll my eyes too, maybe out 149 00:07:53,400 --> 00:07:56,440 Speaker 2: of frustration and annoyance, and just like, are you kidding me? 150 00:07:56,760 --> 00:07:58,880 Speaker 2: That is not what happened, That is not what I did. 151 00:07:58,880 --> 00:08:01,280 Speaker 2: That is not so there could be that, and you 152 00:08:01,280 --> 00:08:03,720 Speaker 2: could give her that. But I have seen Look, there 153 00:08:03,760 --> 00:08:06,720 Speaker 2: are there's rolling commentary in a lot of these feeds, 154 00:08:07,000 --> 00:08:09,520 Speaker 2: and a lot of people watching this just at home, 155 00:08:10,080 --> 00:08:13,160 Speaker 2: just people who like to watch trials. They were all 156 00:08:13,240 --> 00:08:16,760 Speaker 2: commenting on someone needs to wipe that look off her face. 157 00:08:17,120 --> 00:08:20,520 Speaker 3: I don't think it. Definitely wouldn't. It didn't do her 158 00:08:20,560 --> 00:08:21,160 Speaker 3: any good. 159 00:08:21,880 --> 00:08:25,360 Speaker 2: And I guess the only hope would be if you're 160 00:08:25,440 --> 00:08:28,200 Speaker 2: the defense is that you're looking at it saying, well, 161 00:08:28,240 --> 00:08:30,280 Speaker 2: what would that be like if somebody were making up 162 00:08:30,320 --> 00:08:31,520 Speaker 2: lies about me? Yeah? 163 00:08:31,600 --> 00:08:33,320 Speaker 3: That was It didn't look good. 164 00:08:34,640 --> 00:08:36,800 Speaker 1: Oh my god, you know, I've just had a flashback 165 00:08:36,840 --> 00:08:42,439 Speaker 1: to a stand up. How do you react when you're innocent? 166 00:08:43,000 --> 00:08:45,120 Speaker 1: How do you behave when you're innocent and you're being 167 00:08:45,120 --> 00:08:49,640 Speaker 1: accused of something? She doesn't. People can judge it, and 168 00:08:49,640 --> 00:08:51,600 Speaker 1: people are the way you said, but she she's not 169 00:08:51,640 --> 00:08:54,320 Speaker 1: coming off necessarily as an innocent woman. She's coming off 170 00:08:54,400 --> 00:08:57,920 Speaker 1: smug in some of this, and that is the best 171 00:08:57,920 --> 00:09:00,360 Speaker 1: way to put it. She needs to wipe that look 172 00:09:00,360 --> 00:09:00,880 Speaker 1: off her face. 173 00:09:00,960 --> 00:09:03,520 Speaker 2: That's what people were saying, because what it ends up 174 00:09:03,520 --> 00:09:08,160 Speaker 2: looking like you're seeing, you're getting a window into her 175 00:09:08,360 --> 00:09:11,960 Speaker 2: personality that she's used to being right, She's used to 176 00:09:12,000 --> 00:09:15,040 Speaker 2: getting things her way, she's used to not having to 177 00:09:15,920 --> 00:09:19,800 Speaker 2: There's just this like entitlement about her reactions that make 178 00:09:19,840 --> 00:09:20,960 Speaker 2: her not likable. 179 00:09:21,040 --> 00:09:22,280 Speaker 3: And that is what I was saying. 180 00:09:22,360 --> 00:09:26,880 Speaker 1: And the problem is that Robes plays into the storyline 181 00:09:27,559 --> 00:09:30,320 Speaker 1: of the prosecution of who she is. It actually is 182 00:09:30,400 --> 00:09:32,600 Speaker 1: matching up. Let's talk about this video you mentioned a 183 00:09:32,600 --> 00:09:35,839 Speaker 1: second ago. You said during it, like earlier during this drin, 184 00:09:35,920 --> 00:09:38,200 Speaker 1: I might have missed this video, but to see it 185 00:09:38,320 --> 00:09:40,040 Speaker 1: this is the day after or then yeah. 186 00:09:39,960 --> 00:09:42,480 Speaker 3: The day after the day after he died. 187 00:09:42,559 --> 00:09:44,800 Speaker 1: Bro, this is this is what they ended with so 188 00:09:44,840 --> 00:09:51,199 Speaker 1: the the video is of her who took this video, 189 00:09:51,240 --> 00:09:51,520 Speaker 1: By the. 190 00:09:51,440 --> 00:09:53,600 Speaker 3: Way, I think they were just there were some of 191 00:09:53,640 --> 00:09:54,400 Speaker 3: her friends. 192 00:09:54,480 --> 00:09:56,440 Speaker 2: I don't know if there were some of Eric's friends, 193 00:09:56,480 --> 00:10:00,200 Speaker 2: but the couple's friends, the kids, the sons. I I 194 00:10:00,240 --> 00:10:03,000 Speaker 2: remember when I first saw it, thinking, even if that 195 00:10:03,200 --> 00:10:06,160 Speaker 2: is something people do where they celebrate someone's life the 196 00:10:06,200 --> 00:10:10,040 Speaker 2: next day after someone tragically and suddenly dies, it seems 197 00:10:10,080 --> 00:10:14,520 Speaker 2: like a tough emotion to feel that quickly when something 198 00:10:14,559 --> 00:10:17,120 Speaker 2: is so sudden. Like I understand if somebody was slowly 199 00:10:17,200 --> 00:10:19,400 Speaker 2: dying of cancer and you prepared for it, and when 200 00:10:19,400 --> 00:10:21,800 Speaker 2: they passed, you could celebrate, like there'd be a different feeling. 201 00:10:21,800 --> 00:10:22,760 Speaker 3: But this was shocking. 202 00:10:22,800 --> 00:10:25,600 Speaker 2: This was sudden, this was unexpected, and these poor kids 203 00:10:25,640 --> 00:10:29,360 Speaker 2: are reeling. And to see adults taking shots, laughing and 204 00:10:29,400 --> 00:10:34,360 Speaker 2: going to Eric, it just seemed so out of touch 205 00:10:34,559 --> 00:10:39,040 Speaker 2: tonally to even put it mild and it was friends, 206 00:10:39,160 --> 00:10:40,240 Speaker 2: it was her, okay. 207 00:10:40,520 --> 00:10:44,120 Speaker 1: And this is so this after the defense finished with 208 00:10:44,200 --> 00:10:48,199 Speaker 1: their closing, the prosecution gets the last words, so they 209 00:10:48,200 --> 00:10:50,000 Speaker 1: get a rebuttal. They get to come back up and 210 00:10:50,080 --> 00:10:53,360 Speaker 1: kind of close things out and robes this is what 211 00:10:53,480 --> 00:10:57,640 Speaker 1: that video they used. That's one of the last things 212 00:10:57,760 --> 00:11:01,840 Speaker 1: the jury sees before they go into deliberation. That is 213 00:11:01,960 --> 00:11:04,679 Speaker 1: impactful to me because I'm seeing it for the first time. 214 00:11:04,760 --> 00:11:08,560 Speaker 1: Fully today hopes her husband died the day before. You 215 00:11:08,640 --> 00:11:13,800 Speaker 1: see laughter, giddy. This looks celebratory. I've been to funerals 216 00:11:13,800 --> 00:11:16,160 Speaker 1: we call them, yes, celebrations of life, and they are 217 00:11:16,240 --> 00:11:20,080 Speaker 1: parties and they are they have good energy and joy, 218 00:11:21,320 --> 00:11:24,400 Speaker 1: but they don't look like this. This looked like not 219 00:11:24,480 --> 00:11:27,000 Speaker 1: a celebration of his life, but a celebration of his death. 220 00:11:27,440 --> 00:11:31,440 Speaker 1: That's two different things. That's how it comes off. Judged 221 00:11:31,480 --> 00:11:35,440 Speaker 1: for yourselves with robes and I don't know what context 222 00:11:35,480 --> 00:11:37,080 Speaker 1: you put this in for this to make sense. 223 00:11:38,000 --> 00:11:40,600 Speaker 2: That's I think that was a really, really tough visual 224 00:11:40,720 --> 00:11:44,160 Speaker 2: for them to actually be able to fully explain. Now, Look, 225 00:11:44,240 --> 00:11:47,400 Speaker 2: it wasn't just Corey. Her friends were there too. So 226 00:11:48,000 --> 00:11:50,000 Speaker 2: if she were doing it like with her and her 227 00:11:50,160 --> 00:11:52,320 Speaker 2: three or four of love her, but there were several people, 228 00:11:52,360 --> 00:11:55,679 Speaker 2: several adults there, So look, I don't know she was saying. 229 00:11:55,679 --> 00:11:58,040 Speaker 2: I believe the defense attorney was saying, She's Irish and 230 00:11:58,080 --> 00:12:01,120 Speaker 2: they celebrate life and this is part of what so 231 00:12:01,360 --> 00:12:04,360 Speaker 2: you know, culturally speaking, I couldn't I wouldn't. I've never 232 00:12:04,400 --> 00:12:07,280 Speaker 2: seen anything like that, but they say that's part of 233 00:12:07,320 --> 00:12:07,800 Speaker 2: what they do. 234 00:12:08,840 --> 00:12:13,640 Speaker 1: Well, stay here, folks. The defense had answers for everything. 235 00:12:13,720 --> 00:12:17,400 Speaker 1: They really did have a let me explain approach to 236 00:12:17,480 --> 00:12:20,040 Speaker 1: the whole case if you will, we'll explain that. And 237 00:12:20,840 --> 00:12:25,240 Speaker 1: one guy sat in that courtroom today and had his 238 00:12:25,600 --> 00:12:41,480 Speaker 1: entire reputation eviscerated by the defense. Stay here, are continuing 239 00:12:41,520 --> 00:12:43,800 Speaker 1: here on Amy and TJ. That lead investigator had a 240 00:12:44,800 --> 00:12:47,360 Speaker 1: It was tough to sit through that. Today the defense 241 00:12:47,440 --> 00:12:50,800 Speaker 1: giving their closing arguments in the Cory Richion's trial, and 242 00:12:50,960 --> 00:12:53,920 Speaker 1: they went after really, they went after the rich and 243 00:12:54,120 --> 00:12:59,520 Speaker 1: family to some degree, saying that they were responsible for 244 00:12:59,559 --> 00:13:02,160 Speaker 1: putting the police down this wrong path and pushing the 245 00:13:02,200 --> 00:13:05,680 Speaker 1: investigation and making sure it was Corey Richins who was charged. 246 00:13:05,840 --> 00:13:10,520 Speaker 1: But Ropes. She went after the lead investigator and they 247 00:13:10,600 --> 00:13:13,439 Speaker 1: kept doing cutaways of him in the courtroom. This was uncomfortable. 248 00:13:13,559 --> 00:13:14,760 Speaker 3: That was when it got uncomfortable. 249 00:13:14,760 --> 00:13:18,880 Speaker 2: They just stayed on Detective Jeff O'Driscoll's face, who has 250 00:13:18,960 --> 00:13:22,000 Speaker 2: sat I think in court I believe every single day 251 00:13:22,040 --> 00:13:24,600 Speaker 2: through all the testimony. But he got to hear Yes, 252 00:13:24,760 --> 00:13:28,000 Speaker 2: the defense attorney take a tactic that we've seen many, many, 253 00:13:28,080 --> 00:13:31,720 Speaker 2: many defense attorneys take just of course, attack the investigation, 254 00:13:32,200 --> 00:13:36,160 Speaker 2: attack the lead investigator, say that he didn't do his job, 255 00:13:36,240 --> 00:13:39,319 Speaker 2: that he created a theory, that he decided what happened 256 00:13:39,360 --> 00:13:42,280 Speaker 2: and then found evidence to fit his theory. 257 00:13:42,360 --> 00:13:43,600 Speaker 3: We see this all the time. 258 00:13:43,640 --> 00:13:46,200 Speaker 2: And so just go after the investigators, go after the 259 00:13:46,200 --> 00:13:50,040 Speaker 2: police to deflect from any culpability your client may have. 260 00:13:50,200 --> 00:13:53,160 Speaker 1: Does that work? I mean, is that effective? I don't 261 00:13:53,240 --> 00:13:57,040 Speaker 1: know this jury as much as we watched of this case, 262 00:13:57,080 --> 00:13:59,080 Speaker 1: which and I really do believe we saw at these 263 00:13:59,120 --> 00:14:01,680 Speaker 1: ninety percent of all the timemoni in this case, I mean, 264 00:14:02,200 --> 00:14:04,280 Speaker 1: wrote Rose, they were paying attention closer than we are. 265 00:14:04,320 --> 00:14:07,079 Speaker 1: I'm always surprised by jury's I have no idea what 266 00:14:07,160 --> 00:14:07,840 Speaker 1: these folks are under. 267 00:14:07,960 --> 00:14:10,280 Speaker 2: That lead investigator came off to me as a straight shooter, 268 00:14:10,679 --> 00:14:12,400 Speaker 2: like he just came off as a guy. Now he 269 00:14:12,440 --> 00:14:14,640 Speaker 2: got a little testy with the defense. He was definitely 270 00:14:14,679 --> 00:14:18,400 Speaker 2: not willingly helping them in any way. Well, he was defensive, 271 00:14:19,160 --> 00:14:21,760 Speaker 2: he was a little defensive, but he was getting attacked. Sure, 272 00:14:21,840 --> 00:14:25,320 Speaker 2: but yes, he definitely got eviscerated in the closing argument 273 00:14:25,320 --> 00:14:28,480 Speaker 2: today and then in her let me explain moment, I 274 00:14:28,520 --> 00:14:31,400 Speaker 2: actually appreciated some of this, and I thought some of 275 00:14:31,440 --> 00:14:35,120 Speaker 2: this did land, especially when she was explaining why Corey 276 00:14:35,240 --> 00:14:39,120 Speaker 2: deleted messages, why she searched about whether or not police 277 00:14:39,120 --> 00:14:41,840 Speaker 2: could find deleted messages once they took your phone, and 278 00:14:41,880 --> 00:14:44,240 Speaker 2: she said this, she was having an affair. She didn't 279 00:14:44,280 --> 00:14:46,320 Speaker 2: want her husband's family to know that she was having 280 00:14:46,360 --> 00:14:48,200 Speaker 2: an affair. She didn't want police to know she was 281 00:14:48,240 --> 00:14:51,480 Speaker 2: having an affair. So, yeah, she was deleting messages. That 282 00:14:51,760 --> 00:14:55,440 Speaker 2: made sense to me again that I could get that now, 283 00:14:55,560 --> 00:14:56,200 Speaker 2: it also. 284 00:14:56,040 --> 00:14:58,840 Speaker 1: Makes sense she might delete them because the affair gives 285 00:14:58,920 --> 00:15:01,920 Speaker 1: motive for the murder. Just all kinds of stuff. This, 286 00:15:01,920 --> 00:15:03,600 Speaker 1: This is why I don't like circumstances cases. 287 00:15:03,640 --> 00:15:04,200 Speaker 3: This is tough. 288 00:15:04,240 --> 00:15:06,680 Speaker 2: And then in terms of the suspicious searches that they 289 00:15:06,720 --> 00:15:10,200 Speaker 2: said she found, including about expensive female. 290 00:15:09,960 --> 00:15:11,040 Speaker 3: Or sorry, what was it. 291 00:15:11,040 --> 00:15:14,520 Speaker 2: It was jails or prisons, rich for the rich, And 292 00:15:14,640 --> 00:15:17,520 Speaker 2: they were saying, yeah, she was being investigated for murder. 293 00:15:17,600 --> 00:15:20,200 Speaker 2: She was nervous, she was concerned, she started looking at 294 00:15:20,200 --> 00:15:22,840 Speaker 2: what her options. By me, that was a little tougher 295 00:15:22,880 --> 00:15:23,120 Speaker 2: for me. 296 00:15:23,600 --> 00:15:25,560 Speaker 1: Okay, I didn't know where he was a little. 297 00:15:25,440 --> 00:15:26,000 Speaker 3: Tougher for me. 298 00:15:26,800 --> 00:15:29,760 Speaker 2: But then when she said that, Look, we didn't know 299 00:15:29,800 --> 00:15:32,760 Speaker 2: what they were going to say about the housekeeper and 300 00:15:32,960 --> 00:15:35,360 Speaker 2: Carmen Lauber and how they were going to get around 301 00:15:35,560 --> 00:15:40,280 Speaker 2: this testimony that Carmen Lawber said that she got pills, 302 00:15:40,320 --> 00:15:44,600 Speaker 2: she got drugs for Corey Richards. Well, they basically admitted 303 00:15:44,880 --> 00:15:47,520 Speaker 2: that she asked Carmen for pain or if she asked 304 00:15:47,520 --> 00:15:50,440 Speaker 2: Carmen for pain pills, that doesn't mean she asked her 305 00:15:50,440 --> 00:15:52,920 Speaker 2: for fentanyl. And it certainly doesn't mean that she killed 306 00:15:52,920 --> 00:15:56,520 Speaker 2: her husband. That's fair, Okay, that's one of the things. 307 00:15:56,520 --> 00:15:59,400 Speaker 1: They have an answer for everything. Is it reasonable? I 308 00:15:59,440 --> 00:16:03,200 Speaker 1: don't know if this, this collection, this preponderance of evidence, 309 00:16:03,600 --> 00:16:06,880 Speaker 1: all taken together, is circumstantial enough that I am really 310 00:16:06,880 --> 00:16:08,680 Speaker 1: supposed to not use my common sense. 311 00:16:09,520 --> 00:16:10,920 Speaker 3: You're supposed to use your common sense. 312 00:16:10,960 --> 00:16:13,400 Speaker 1: But I don't know. This is why I hate circumstantial cases. 313 00:16:13,480 --> 00:16:17,360 Speaker 2: I was confused too, because when the defense told the 314 00:16:17,480 --> 00:16:20,920 Speaker 2: jury what we said at the beginning, even if you 315 00:16:20,960 --> 00:16:25,680 Speaker 2: think she probably did it, you still cannot convict. 316 00:16:25,840 --> 00:16:28,880 Speaker 1: You can't. That's the whole point. You don't have to 317 00:16:28,880 --> 00:16:31,520 Speaker 1: be convinced one hundred percent. That is the thing. And yes, 318 00:16:31,600 --> 00:16:33,880 Speaker 1: the defense, excuse me, the prosecutor got up, and that 319 00:16:33,960 --> 00:16:36,240 Speaker 1: was the first thing in his rebuttal. He put up 320 00:16:36,280 --> 00:16:39,360 Speaker 1: a graphic, Actually, what reasonable doubt means and what you're 321 00:16:39,360 --> 00:16:42,280 Speaker 1: supposed to consider, and it doesn't mean there there are 322 00:16:42,400 --> 00:16:44,840 Speaker 1: very few things that you know beyond a reasonable doubt 323 00:16:44,880 --> 00:16:48,480 Speaker 1: excuse me, of absolute certainty. There's almost nothing that's not 324 00:16:48,560 --> 00:16:51,160 Speaker 1: the I'm not one hundred percent you're not an alien, right, 325 00:16:51,600 --> 00:16:54,400 Speaker 1: I'm pretty sure. But can I know that one hundred percent? 326 00:16:54,520 --> 00:16:54,720 Speaker 2: No? 327 00:16:55,200 --> 00:16:59,520 Speaker 1: I don't so. No, it's that reasonable doubt thing is 328 00:16:59,560 --> 00:17:04,000 Speaker 1: so fat, it's this slighty. It seems some weird scale. 329 00:17:04,720 --> 00:17:07,119 Speaker 1: I'm just a smoking gun kind of a juror. 330 00:17:07,680 --> 00:17:11,439 Speaker 2: Well, yes, it's wonderful when you can actually have fingerprints, 331 00:17:12,600 --> 00:17:16,120 Speaker 2: forensic evidence that puts you on the scene with motive. 332 00:17:16,440 --> 00:17:20,240 Speaker 1: CSI every single episode, but this case did not have that. 333 00:17:20,560 --> 00:17:24,280 Speaker 2: And I actually really liked I will say, just from 334 00:17:24,400 --> 00:17:28,720 Speaker 2: the effectiveness of it. The way the prosecutor ended his rebuttal, 335 00:17:29,080 --> 00:17:33,119 Speaker 2: this was the final sentence the jurors heard, see through 336 00:17:33,240 --> 00:17:37,800 Speaker 2: her facade, check her ambition, and do not let her 337 00:17:37,800 --> 00:17:39,080 Speaker 2: get away with murder. 338 00:17:40,720 --> 00:17:41,760 Speaker 3: I thought that was effective. 339 00:17:43,600 --> 00:17:45,520 Speaker 1: I don't know, you know it so far what I've 340 00:17:45,520 --> 00:17:49,960 Speaker 1: seen from this jury, they they are taking this job seriously. 341 00:17:50,000 --> 00:17:51,879 Speaker 1: And oh yeah, by the way, and utah, it's a 342 00:17:52,040 --> 00:17:57,520 Speaker 1: jerors eight eight. So they just let four alternates go today. 343 00:17:58,119 --> 00:18:00,760 Speaker 1: So they yes, they had twelve sitting there, but four 344 00:18:00,800 --> 00:18:03,600 Speaker 1: alternates were sent home. They are still supposed to be 345 00:18:03,680 --> 00:18:06,720 Speaker 1: on standby in case somebody gets six but out sick. 346 00:18:06,800 --> 00:18:08,520 Speaker 1: But out there it's only eight. 347 00:18:08,720 --> 00:18:11,360 Speaker 3: That is fascinating. And look the other thing. 348 00:18:11,640 --> 00:18:16,800 Speaker 2: So where we have the prosecution telling the jury don't 349 00:18:16,840 --> 00:18:19,760 Speaker 2: let her get away with murder, you have the defense 350 00:18:19,800 --> 00:18:22,720 Speaker 2: attorney telling the jurors, and she said this more than once, 351 00:18:23,119 --> 00:18:28,920 Speaker 2: to be brave, be courageous, find Corey Richins not guilty. 352 00:18:29,119 --> 00:18:30,920 Speaker 3: And so it was just. 353 00:18:30,960 --> 00:18:35,480 Speaker 2: Fascinating how they were appealing to the jury's emotions. Be brave, 354 00:18:35,680 --> 00:18:40,679 Speaker 2: be courageous, don't send this innocent woman to prison. On 355 00:18:40,680 --> 00:18:44,560 Speaker 2: one hand, and on the other you have quite the opposite. Basically, 356 00:18:45,680 --> 00:18:47,280 Speaker 2: check her ambition, see. 357 00:18:47,000 --> 00:18:47,800 Speaker 3: Through her facade. 358 00:18:47,840 --> 00:18:48,560 Speaker 1: What's your prediction. 359 00:18:50,119 --> 00:18:52,440 Speaker 2: I am going to predict that she is going to 360 00:18:52,480 --> 00:18:55,040 Speaker 2: be found not guilty. I'm sorry, wooh, that was wrong. 361 00:18:55,320 --> 00:18:56,919 Speaker 2: I am going to protict that she is going to 362 00:18:56,920 --> 00:19:02,960 Speaker 2: be found guilty. M look on murder charges. I don't 363 00:19:03,000 --> 00:19:06,080 Speaker 2: know about the attempted murder. I don't know that that 364 00:19:06,280 --> 00:19:08,719 Speaker 2: was as strong in terms of what I saw and 365 00:19:08,800 --> 00:19:13,080 Speaker 2: heard from the testimony, But I feel like once they 366 00:19:13,119 --> 00:19:15,119 Speaker 2: convict her of murder, they're. 367 00:19:14,840 --> 00:19:16,240 Speaker 3: Probably just going to find her guilty. 368 00:19:16,240 --> 00:19:18,919 Speaker 1: Here, Oh yeah, we murder, We forget there's fraud and 369 00:19:18,920 --> 00:19:19,919 Speaker 1: all kinds of other stuff. 370 00:19:19,960 --> 00:19:23,359 Speaker 2: And once she find her guilty of the big charge, 371 00:19:23,400 --> 00:19:26,840 Speaker 2: aggravated murder, it probably the rest will follow. 372 00:19:27,560 --> 00:19:29,480 Speaker 1: I don't know what I would if I was forced 373 00:19:29,520 --> 00:19:32,200 Speaker 1: to put money on it. I would go probably a 374 00:19:32,280 --> 00:19:37,360 Speaker 1: hung jury first after that, not guilty after that guilty. 375 00:19:37,680 --> 00:19:40,000 Speaker 1: I don't know why. There's something about these types of 376 00:19:40,040 --> 00:19:44,840 Speaker 1: cases and these types of defendants sometimes robes. We've seen 377 00:19:45,320 --> 00:19:49,840 Speaker 1: Karen Reid that juries can be very sympathetic. Now she 378 00:19:50,040 --> 00:19:53,520 Speaker 1: is not necessarily a sympathetic character. They didn't say, well, 379 00:19:53,520 --> 00:19:55,600 Speaker 1: she was abused, or he was cheating on her, or 380 00:19:55,640 --> 00:19:57,240 Speaker 1: I mean, even though he was, but she was cheating 381 00:19:57,280 --> 00:19:59,959 Speaker 1: as well. I'm just saying she doesn't. They didn't make 382 00:20:00,119 --> 00:20:02,520 Speaker 1: the case that she is some battered woman kind of 383 00:20:02,520 --> 00:20:05,480 Speaker 1: a thing, so that might play into it, But I 384 00:20:05,880 --> 00:20:08,199 Speaker 1: just circumstantial cases are so hard for me. 385 00:20:08,600 --> 00:20:11,040 Speaker 2: I know I would the media the cases that immediately 386 00:20:11,080 --> 00:20:14,600 Speaker 2: came up Karen Reid and Casey Ans. Those are Casey Anthony. 387 00:20:14,640 --> 00:20:16,800 Speaker 2: Remember that one also surprised me. That was a not 388 00:20:16,840 --> 00:20:20,560 Speaker 2: guilty verdict. That shocked me beyond belief. But you never know, 389 00:20:21,000 --> 00:20:22,720 Speaker 2: No one ever knows what juries are going to do. 390 00:20:23,520 --> 00:20:27,280 Speaker 2: We'll find out that, I guess in a little well, 391 00:20:27,320 --> 00:20:29,200 Speaker 2: we'll jump on, of course if anything were to happen. 392 00:20:29,240 --> 00:20:31,560 Speaker 2: But it looks like most likely the jury will keep 393 00:20:31,560 --> 00:20:34,679 Speaker 2: deliberating until court ends for the day. They are two 394 00:20:34,720 --> 00:20:37,160 Speaker 2: hours behind us here on the East Coast, so likely 395 00:20:37,240 --> 00:20:39,879 Speaker 2: the jury will pick back up with the deliberations tomorrow. 396 00:20:39,880 --> 00:20:40,120 Speaker 3: Warne. 397 00:20:40,119 --> 00:20:41,720 Speaker 1: What didn't he tell them though? What was it? He 398 00:20:41,760 --> 00:20:43,359 Speaker 1: told him that he was giving them so long, going 399 00:20:43,400 --> 00:20:44,120 Speaker 1: to check in with him. 400 00:20:44,359 --> 00:20:45,840 Speaker 2: He was going to check in with them, and the 401 00:20:45,920 --> 00:20:48,360 Speaker 2: timing was it would have been six thirty Eastern time, 402 00:20:48,440 --> 00:20:50,199 Speaker 2: four thirty Mountain time, to see if they wanted to 403 00:20:50,280 --> 00:20:52,679 Speaker 2: keep on deliberating or go home for the night. So 404 00:20:53,280 --> 00:20:55,639 Speaker 2: if anything develops, of course we would jump on. But 405 00:20:55,720 --> 00:20:58,920 Speaker 2: I think it's fairly safe to presume that they will 406 00:20:59,000 --> 00:21:04,120 Speaker 2: likely go home and read every and begin deliberating. 407 00:21:03,560 --> 00:21:05,400 Speaker 3: Again tomorrow morning. So we will, of course. 408 00:21:05,240 --> 00:21:08,240 Speaker 2: Stay on top of this trial for you. As always, 409 00:21:08,520 --> 00:21:10,679 Speaker 2: we appreciate you listening. Thank you so much. I made 410 00:21:10,840 --> 00:21:12,359 Speaker 2: Robock alongside TJ. Holmes. 411 00:21:12,800 --> 00:21:13,720 Speaker 3: We'll talk to you soon.