WEBVTT - How Is 1968's Poor People's Campaign Reviving Today?

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to brain Stuff, a production of I Heart Radio,

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Hey brain Stuff Lauren Vogelbaum. Here, most dogs and cats

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>are never late for a meal. They know exactly where

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:17.440
<v Speaker 1>to be at the same time every day. They also

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:20.759
<v Speaker 1>know their owner's schedules, and, like clockwork, will join you

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:24.080
<v Speaker 1>in or even anticipate your daily movements, like waiting by

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the door when you usually get home from work, or

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>complaining if it's bedtime and you're still up. When you

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>witness this behavior, you might assume that your pet has

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a sophisticated understanding of time, But what is time really

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>like for a dog or cat. To understand how animals

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>perceive time, we first need to understand how humans perceive time. Arguably,

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>each person experiences the passing of time in different ways

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 1>at different times. Albert Einstein once explained the principle of

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>relativity by saying, when a man sits with a pretty

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>girl for an hour, it seems like a minute. But

0:00:56.680 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>let him sit on a hot stove for a minute,

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's longer than any hour. That's relativity. Even though

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the experience of time is relative for every individual, all

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 1>humans probably think about time in similar ways. For instance,

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>our memories are inextricably tied to how we understand the

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>passing of time. Our ability to remember events in a

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>particular order plays a large part in our perception of time.

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>We're also able to predict things not in a psychic way.

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Each of us makes educated assumptions about certain events in

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the future, even as simple as assuming that the sun

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>will come up tomorrow. These abilities have important implications. For instance,

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>memory and prediction allow us to have a sense of

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:40.959
<v Speaker 1>continuity of personal history and self awareness. So do dogs,

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Cats and other animals have the same abilities. If you

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>climbed inside of a dog's mind, would you be presented

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>with the memory of eating a raw hide bone earlier

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>this morning. Research on how dogs and cats in particularly

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>perceived time is limited, but we can learn more about

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>it when we look at the extensive research that's been

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>done with other animals, such as broad birds and primates.

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Animal cognition researcher William Roberts has made some remarkable conclusions

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:10.359
<v Speaker 1>regarding animal memories and anticipation. He says that animals are

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>stuck in time. By this, he means that without the

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated abilities it takes to perceive time, like truly forming memories,

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>animals only live in the present. Roberts thinks animals are

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>stuck in time because they can't mentally time travel backward

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>or forward. Humans can consciously and willfully think back to

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>specific memories and anticipate new events. Animals cannot, too many.

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>This might seem like a faulty theory. After all, can't

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>we train animals and doesn't this training depend on animals

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 1>own memories? Well, not necessarily, at least not in the

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>way we usually think of memories. According to Roberts, animals

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>might be trained to do things in the same way

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>that young children are trained to do things. According to

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>studies with children, by the age of four, kids have

0:02:56.720 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>learned lots of things crawling, walking, but without them toll

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>ability to remember where or how they learned them. In

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 1>other words, they don't have the power of episodic memory,

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>or the ability to remember particular events in the past.

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>A dog can know how to respond to the command

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>sit without having a memory of the specific event in

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>which it learned that command. And that's not all that's

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>at work in a dog or cat's brain to help it,

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>for example, impeccably predict the arrival of its owner. Internal

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:29.080
<v Speaker 1>biological rhythms also play their part. According to Robert's researchers

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:32.359
<v Speaker 1>have discovered from experiments on pigeons that an internal clock

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>allowed the birds to learn where and when food would

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>be available. Similarly, our furry friends might use circadian oscillators,

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>that is, daily fluctuations of hormones, body temperature, and neural

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 1>activity to know when food is likely to hit the

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>bowl or when owners are likely to return home. Instead

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of remembering how much time passes between meals or what

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>time meals are given, dogs and cats react to a

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>biological state that they reach at a particular time of day,

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>and they react the same way at the same time

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 1>every day to the stimulus. So if they can't store

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>memories like humans can, can they plan for the future.

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>In his work, Roberts argues that time is a human

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>construction created to keep track of such things as days

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and significant events. A timekeeping devices from sundials and precise

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>clocks to smartphones have revolutionized how humans perceived time, and

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>animals don't have the advantage of these tools. Human beings

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>have two important abilities to help us understand time. We

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:34.599
<v Speaker 1>are able to remember a sequence of events, and we

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:38.719
<v Speaker 1>are able to anticipate future needs or events. Studies show

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>that animals may have these abilities, but to a lesser extent.

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Scientists have tested animals working memories and reference memories, that is,

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:50.159
<v Speaker 1>their short term and long term memory, respectively. They did

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 1>this to see how well the animals recall sequences of events.

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 1>In working memory tests, for example, pigeons or primates have

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:00.719
<v Speaker 1>been encouraged to remember a sequence well enough to pick

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>or pick it in the right order again to get

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 1>a reward. The animals did fairly well at these tasks,

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:09.720
<v Speaker 1>but their memory faded fast. Roberts thinks that they were

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:13.719
<v Speaker 1>probably learning going from weakest memory to strongest memory, rather

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>than actually learning or remembering a sequence. Other researchers found

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 1>that pigeons and monkeys performed well at reference memory tests,

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>in which they needed to remember a sequence after a

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>delay between learning and testing, but it took extensive training

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>for the animals to learn these sequences, suggesting to Roberts

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>that the ability did not come naturally to them. From

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>these tests, it seems that animals would perceive time differently

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 1>from humans, who have a relatively reliable and sophisticated memory

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 1>of a sequence of events. In addition, animals don't seem

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:46.160
<v Speaker 1>to anticipate future needs and rewards very well, suggesting to

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 1>researchers that they don't have a concept of the future.

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>For instance, when given the choice, pigeons and rats shows

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>a smaller immediate reward over a larger future reward. In

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>one test, researchers presented primates with a choice between one

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>banana and two bananas. Understandably, they chose to bananas consistently. However,

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>as the supply of the two choices got larger, they

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:13.720
<v Speaker 1>started showing less of a preference. They weren't hungry enough

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 1>at that moment to eat ten bananas, so they chose

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>five bananas about half the time. Roberts concludes from these

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:23.799
<v Speaker 1>experiments that these animals sought to satisfy immediate hunger needs

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>and weren't planning for future hunger. This is very unlike humans,

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>who often use reason and forethought to anticipate future needs,

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:33.720
<v Speaker 1>from packing a snack and a drink for later to

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:37.479
<v Speaker 1>investing in a retirement plan. So what about squirrels and

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>other animals that hoard food for the impending winter months.

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 1>That behavior seems to imply that the animals anticipate future needs,

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>but maybe that's not it studies have found that animals

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 1>don't stop hoarding even when their supplies disappear over and

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>over again. This could mean that the animals don't understand

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 1>why they hoard, what it means for their future, or

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>in what the future is. They simply do it out

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of instinct. Humans, on the other hand, understand their preparations

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and will quickly change strategies when their plans go awry.

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>If animals are stuck in time, as Robert suggests, this

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>could mean that understanding time is uniquely and fundamentally human.

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Today's episode was written by Jane McGrath and produced by

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Clang. For more on this a lot of other

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>curious topics, visit how stuff works dot com. Brain Stuff

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>is production of iHeart Radio or more podcasts. My Heart

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Radio visit the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.