WEBVTT - Britain’s Debt Problem, AI’s Local Burden, Poland’s Economic Boom

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Waltree Week. I'm David Weston bringing you stories

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>of capitalism. The data center frenzy is in full bloom,

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>but the neighbors are restless. Is there a way for

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the rest of us to get the benefits from AI

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>without compromising the interests of those who will be living

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:34.199
<v Speaker 1>next door? Plus Earlier we brought you the story of

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:37.199
<v Speaker 1>the brain drain from New Zealand. People and talent are

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>flowing the other way. For Poland, it's one of the

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>fastest growing economies around, driven in part by the best

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and brightest returning home, and we use it for everything

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:52.599
<v Speaker 1>from military equipment to package goods. Aluminum is ubiquitous, and

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>now it's caught in between Trump tariffs and a war

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>in Iran. But we start with the drama that is

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>politics in the United Kingdom, as the fifth Prime minister

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>in eight years is finding to avoid yet another turnover

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>at number ten and the markets are keeping score. How

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>much say does the guilt market have in who gets

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>to run the country? John Authurs is Bloomberg's senior editor

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>for Markets. So John, there's a lot of political upheaval

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>drama playing out in the United Kingdom right now. At

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the same time bonds are selling off guilts. Yes, the

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>yields have gone up. Is there a connection between the two,

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and if.

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:34.040
<v Speaker 2>So, what Yes, there's certainly a connection, which is that

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 2>Britain has even more than where we are here in

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:39.839
<v Speaker 2>the US the rest of the Western world, it has

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 2>a fiscal problem. We don't have much headroom left to

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 2>spend money in the UK. Any sign of concern about

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 2>political instability will in its own right worry bond markets,

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 2>and specifically at the moment, because Kirstama is in a

0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 2>lot of political trouble. Any challenger, even those who you

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 2>could argue are to his political right, will want to

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 2>do something to show they've made a difference once they

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 2>take over from him, and that's going to involve spending

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 2>some more money on something that's going to involve being

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:16.799
<v Speaker 2>more lenient on fiscal policy than labor has been so far.

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 2>So plainly the risks are towards more fiscal spending. That's

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:27.959
<v Speaker 2>plainly something the guilt market dislikes. There's a long history

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:35.959
<v Speaker 2>of friction between a labor government that has its origins

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 2>in socialism and the unions and bond markets.

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Naturally, there is also a more recent history between the

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Conservative government the Bard market. Yes read Ritler's Trust. We

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>remember that. But one of the things you pointed out

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>one of your columns is actually the yields and guilt

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 1>right now are above where they got to unders Trust exactly.

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean that there are to be fair to the

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 2>current labor government. There are reasons for that in the

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:03.239
<v Speaker 2>interests have risen across the world since then. And what

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 2>really can endanger a financial extent is when yields rise

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 2>very fast, which is absolutely what happened under Liz Trust.

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 2>She took the market by surprise and thereby slipped on

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 2>a banana skin, whereas what we've got at the moment

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:22.359
<v Speaker 2>is more of a slow motion car wreck with labor.

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 2>But yes, the ultimate fact is true. The higher the

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 2>yields go, and they are now even higher than when

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 2>they toppled Liz trusts, the less room for maneuver any

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 2>government has. And to some extent this is a systemic

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 2>problem for the UK because as we've just said that

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Liz Trust was and is conservative. This is universal across

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 2>the party is a certain lack of trust and the

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 2>British two party system is breaking down at present, and

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 2>both Greens, who are basically a British Woman of the

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 2>the AOC Bernie Sanders left and the Reform Party of

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 2>the Nigel Farash were obviously very similar to the Donald

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Trump margat Wright. Both of those are on the face

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 2>of it, more inclined to splash money around and do

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 2>things that the bond market really dislikes than the incumbents.

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:23.840
<v Speaker 2>There's a very worrying dynamic about the entire British political situation,

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:27.480
<v Speaker 2>or at least it's very worrying if you're a guilt investor.

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>We know from your calm that you are a student

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:35.239
<v Speaker 1>of popular music. And I don't remember the Ritha Franklin

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>song Who's Zoom and Who?

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 2>So that the nineteen eighty five I remember that that

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 2>was actually my first time in America. But anyway, carry on.

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 1>But if you take the bond market the guilt market

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the one hand, and the political system on the other,

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Who's zoom and Who? I mean you've explained how that

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:51.919
<v Speaker 1>the political turmol can affect the guilt market. Is the

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>guilt market affecting what's going on in politics as well.

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:55.719
<v Speaker 4>At the moment?

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, certainly in the Liszt trust incident, Yes, that

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 2>was very much case that it was the bond market

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 2>that basically said no, you can't do this, and force

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 2>the expulsion of first the Chancellor and then the Prime

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:13.839
<v Speaker 2>Minister itself. This time around, that's less clear. You could

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 2>certainly say that at this point the bond market has

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 2>become a kind of a sheet anchor or a straight

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 2>jacket for whoever is in charge. But it will be

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 2>more uncomfortable for, you know, a party of the left

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 2>that actually has fewer hang ups about spending taxpayers money.

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:37.160
<v Speaker 2>But you know, the overall position is difficult either way.

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 2>And the other thing that's quite interesting compared to history

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 2>is that it used to be the currency market. So

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Harold Wilson have being forced to devalue in the pound

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:52.839
<v Speaker 2>and then going on television to say that the pound

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 2>in your pocket, of course isn't worth any less, which

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 2>absolutely wasn't true, and then Labor government of the seventies

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 2>being forced by a run on the pounds to go

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:07.359
<v Speaker 2>to borrow from the IMF, and John Major's government basically

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:10.840
<v Speaker 2>never recovered from the Black Wednesday attack on sterling by

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 2>George Soros and others. So it used to be the

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:20.280
<v Speaker 2>currency market that's really inflicted pain. And now that currencies

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 2>do tends to float more gradually, more easily, and now

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 2>that we've had many years of being used to extremely

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 2>low bond yields, that cheap money is being treated as

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 2>a fact of light for a birthright. Almost it's the

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 2>bond market that has now taken over as the anchor

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:40.039
<v Speaker 2>the great limitation.

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 1>The UNI Kingdom has a historically high ratio of debt

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>to g gyps, but they're not alone in that. There

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:48.040
<v Speaker 1>may be a little bit more than some of the

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>rest of us, maybe a little less than some as well.

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Is what we're seeing in the UK simply what's going

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>to happen in other parts of the world, including the

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 1>United States, just sooner.

0:06:57.480 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 2>Yes, there's a reason that the UK has more of

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 2>a problem, or more of an instant problem, which you

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 2>can explain easily enough from geography and history. The UK

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 2>is an island which got rich by trading with other people.

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 2>The US is basically a continent that got rich by

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 2>trading with itself. So exports have always been a much

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 2>more important part of the UK equation. When you have

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 2>pressure on the currency, when you have inflation elsewhere, it

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 2>will affect the UK much more swiftly, much more dramatically.

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 2>It is much more dependent on the generosity of others

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 2>than the states. That said, America's share of GDP public

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 2>debt as a share of GDP was in around numbers

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 2>twenty years ago, before the global financial crisis sixty percent.

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Cause are occasioning great alarm. The Simpson bowls if you

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 2>remember that attempts to cut the deficit.

0:07:57.480 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 4>It's now one hundred and twenty.

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 2>And whatever you think of the relative merits of Joe

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:10.679
<v Speaker 2>Biden and Donald Trump, both of them spent money, whether

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 2>through tax cuts or fiscal larges or both, in a

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 2>way that suggested that this just wasn't an issue. It

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 2>will become an issue at a time. The US is

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:28.239
<v Speaker 2>a bigger, more closed economy than the UK. It can,

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 2>and it has the exorbitant privilege of the dollar. It

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 2>doesn't it's not it's not disciplined by potential runs on

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 2>the currency like the UK is. But ultimately, if you're

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 2>borrowing more than you have and can't generate the money

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 2>to repay it, you're either going to get very bad

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 2>inflation or you're going to go bust. You're not going

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 2>to go bust. You're going to get very bad inflation

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 2>and that that is ultimately the risk that afflicts this country.

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:04.319
<v Speaker 1>To you were a young lad, a young boy during

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the Wilson time and the crisis when there was really

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>high inflation in the UK, and as you say, the

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 1>power was devaluing, and I think some would say that

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 1>was a predicate for what happened with Margaret Thatcher and

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 1>a fundamental revision of the economy. Is there any prospect

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 1>that could happen again in the UK. Could we have

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 1>a new Thatcherer?

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 2>We certainly can't see her yet. Although that being said,

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 2>if you think back to seventy five seventy six, Margaret

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 2>Thatcher wins the leadership of the Conservative Party in seventy five,

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 2>doesn't actually get the general election which becomes prime minister

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:45.439
<v Speaker 2>until seventy nine. She certainly didn't seem to be quite

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 2>the radical departure that she would turn out to be

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:51.439
<v Speaker 2>in seventy five. So maybe there is somebody out there

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 2>who is hiding in plain sight already. I think the

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 2>points I would make about the Thatcher regime I was

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:02.560
<v Speaker 2>when she got in twenty four, when she left, my

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 2>generation of Brits still basically think she's running the world.

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 2>And you could also argue there's an analogue to that

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:10.839
<v Speaker 2>in the States, which didn't get into anything like as

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 2>much trouble in the seventies as Britain did, but did

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 2>get into a lot of trouble. Paul Volka is the

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 2>key figure who changes America around. He is appointed by

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Jimmy Carter.

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 1>As was Alfred Kahan as deregulation.

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and would the American economy have boom the way

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:31.320
<v Speaker 2>it did in the eighties if you hadn't then had

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 2>Ronald Reagan, who really believed this stuff, who was a

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:38.680
<v Speaker 2>really enthusiastic advocate for almost certainly not. But it was

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:41.320
<v Speaker 2>much easier for him to do what he did because

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 2>he actually had the building blocks in place. Again, the

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 2>ancien regime had accepted that the game was up and

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 2>shifted before you then had the really exciting free market

0:10:56.600 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 2>politician factor o Reagan to take things for So, I

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 2>think the key moment is when is the game up?

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 2>When does the market that the economy force a change.

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 2>It's conceivable it could happen here that Donald Trump grasps

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 2>that you just need to actually start cutting entitlements and

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 2>cutting back on defense budgets or whatever. But I think

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 2>it's more likely that circumstances force a change from the

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:35.079
<v Speaker 2>ancien regime and that's the critical change, rather than that

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 2>voters elect in the person who will make the.

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Change coming up. The money is pouring in, the construction

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>is underway. Data centers are paving the way for our

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:50.079
<v Speaker 1>AI future. But some communities want to know why they

0:11:50.160 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>have to be in their backyard. This is a story

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 1>about good fences making good neighbors. The promise of artificial

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 1>intelligence has brought a wave of data center building across

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the country, and in success, we hope that AI will

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>benefit the economy, investors, and the vast majority of Americans.

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 5>A trillion dollars is an enormous amount of infrastructure. You

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 5>have to have complete confidence that the trillion dollars you're

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:31.719
<v Speaker 5>putting down would be performant for as long as you

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 5>could see.

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:35.079
<v Speaker 6>If you're building a multi billion dollar data center in

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 6>the US or around the world, and you have a

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 6>fifteen plus year contract with a company with a three

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:43.439
<v Speaker 6>trillion dollar market cap, that feels pretty good.

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:45.199
<v Speaker 4>If we knew how to get a trillion dollars right now.

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 7>If we don't, would we be able to deploy that

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 7>profitably in the next few years and I'm not sure

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 7>about that, but I feel.

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 4>Confident we can make five hundred billion of value back.

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:58.559
<v Speaker 1>But while we all wait for the full benefits of

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>AI to be realized, what does construction of these massive

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 1>AI data centers mean for the people living around them?

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 1>And how much of us, say, do residents have and

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the type of fences keeping things in or out?

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 8>Pushback today to a proposed AI data center. Amazon comes

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 8>to town, starts emailing our town manager and wants to

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 8>build an enormous data center and the citizens did not

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 8>know about this, even though it was going to be

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 8>a five hundred million dollar investment.

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 1>That sort of massive capital investment brings with it the

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>prospect that the data centers being built today will be

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>with us for a long time to.

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 9>Come, ultimately to be paid for the risk that we're taking.

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:47.959
<v Speaker 9>We're looking to get a lease that's somewhere in the

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 9>neighborhood David between thirteen years and seventeen years.

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Mark Genzi is the CEO of Digital Bridge, an alternative

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 1>asset investment firm specializing in data infrastructure. He's among the

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>major players making long term bets for AI, massive bets

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 1>that are being distributed across a wide array of investors.

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 9>So on the equity side, you're seeing the traditional players,

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 9>the big infrastructure players, and so we're seeing today as

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 9>we're seeing the large megafunds, these big, big infrastructure players

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 9>really lean into the AI thematic, and as a part

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 9>of that thematic, when they think about infrastructure, they think

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 9>about putting billions of dollars of equity to work behind

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 9>these large data center platforms and projects. On the debt side,

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 9>it's actually really interesting today. Of course, we see bank syndicates,

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 9>we see construction financing club deals on the bank side,

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 9>and now, David, you're beginning to see the emergence of

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 9>private debt capital. So private debt capital financing projects that

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 9>are a little tougher, perhaps less investment, great exposure, or

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 9>perhaps even more risk.

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>On the power side, projected investments in data centers have

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 1>climbed past three trillion dollars. That's a three trillion dollar

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 1>long term bet on the future, which requires a business

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 1>plan with some pretty attractive returns.

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 9>That is the long term nature of the cashlows, so

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 9>that we go to build that facility, we're getting an

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 9>imputed yield, and today most data center yields are somewhere

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 9>between David on a cash on cash return basis somewhere

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 9>between eight and twelve percent.

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 4>It just depends on who the credit is.

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 9>So if you're dealing with an investment grade tenant like Amazon.

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 4>You're going to be at the low end of that guidance.

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 9>If you're dealing with a brand new startup, or perhaps

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 9>you're dealing with a quantum compute player that's non investment grade,

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 9>you're looking at something more like an eleven to twelve

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 9>cap rate. But you do need to be paid for

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 9>the risk that you're taking, and that risk is measured

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 9>in long durrated cashlows with some form of an escalator.

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 1>But while investors anticipate that future payout over fifteen or

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty years, in the communities where data centers are going

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>up right now, there are immediate potential effects on the

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>people who live near them.

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 10>To say that I have significant concerns is sort of

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 10>an understatement.

0:15:57.280 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Dana Nessel is the Michigan Attorney General, who's job includes

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 1>looking out for the interests of Michigan taxpayers, rate payers,

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and citizens. She is appealing the state's expedited approval of

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>a very large data center set to be built in

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Saline Township, just south of ann Arbor.

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 10>It appears as though the project is underway. The first

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 10>that I learned about it was really on Halloween of

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 10>last year, that this was going to be an enormous project,

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 10>a project bigger than any of its kind we've seen.

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>It's not that Attorney General Nessel denies the potential upside

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>of data centers in Michigan, but she wants to test

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the projections and promises, weighing both the benefits and the

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 1>burdens of things like changing electricity rates, land values, and

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>water needs, that her citizens will face the sorts of

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 1>things that may require some pretty good fences.

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 10>If you talk to Michigan residents, they don't want these

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 10>in their backyard. Nobody knows yet what it's going to

0:16:57.000 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 10>mean for that community. They don't know what it's going

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 10>to mean for their water. They don't know what it's

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 10>going to mean in regard to noise pollution or other

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 10>types of pollutants. Until we have some of those questions

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:12.160
<v Speaker 10>that can be more fully answered and better policies put

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 10>in place at the state level. Most people don't want

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 10>to see these massive data centers continue to be erected.

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 1>Michigan residents aren't the only ones with concerns. Pew Research

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Center found that an overwhelming share of Americans think data

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:32.399
<v Speaker 1>centers are mostly bad for the environment, home energy costs,

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and their overall quality of life. But Ganzhi says he's

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 1>seen a version of this play before and that it

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 1>can be handled in a way that satisfies the need

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:44.680
<v Speaker 1>for growth and the concerns of citizens. Do you need

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to take into account the reaction of the community.

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:48.159
<v Speaker 4>One hundred percent as a factor.

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 9>I've been doing this for thirty two years, building digital infrastructure,

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:54.199
<v Speaker 9>and where I got my sort of humble start with

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 9>building cell towers David in nineteen ninety four. And at

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 9>that point in time, nobody wanted a cell tower in

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:03.679
<v Speaker 9>their backyard, and that was the rise of nimbiism, not

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 9>in my backyard. Well, the sector got organized, we navigated

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 9>through it, we explained the benefits of mobile communications, emergency services,

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 9>and ultimately the fact that most Americans wanted ubiquitous mobile coverage.

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 9>And so that carried through the early two thousands into

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 9>twenty ten, twenty twenty, and today you don't hear a

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 9>lot of skirmishes around cell towers because largely the industry

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 9>has made peace with the local community.

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 1>State leaders like Nessel don't deny that things might work

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.439
<v Speaker 1>out for all concerned, but for that to happen, she

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:37.399
<v Speaker 1>believes we all need to know in advance the scope

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of data center construction, the effects it's likely to have

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 1>on the community, and what commitments the developers and owners

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>are making to address the possible local downsides.

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 10>The request was made before our utility regulator, the Michigan

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 10>Public Service Commission, for this contract that was filed for

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:04.400
<v Speaker 10>an ex party hearing, meaning a hearing that would take

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:07.199
<v Speaker 10>place behind closed doors that we wouldn't be allowed to

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 10>be part of. So the contract that was posted publicly

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 10>was heavily redacted, and that included reactions to some incredibly

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 10>important information, you know, evolving things like exit fees, what

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:26.679
<v Speaker 10>would happen upon the termination of the contract, Even you know,

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:32.400
<v Speaker 10>basic terms and definitions had been redacted, Customer credits, even

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:37.639
<v Speaker 10>the signatories to the contract had been redacted, so that

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 10>we can't even know who signed this contract or what

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:45.119
<v Speaker 10>company they're affiliated with, which is pretty insane when you

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 10>think about it. How are we supposed to know whether

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 10>or not rate payers are getting a fair deal if

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 10>we're not even allowed to see the contract itself.

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 1>All of this comes against the backdrop of a rapidly

0:19:56.880 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>evolving technology that is growing at a rate we've never

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:04.160
<v Speaker 1>seen before, raising questions about what happens if things evolve

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:07.199
<v Speaker 1>in ways that fall short of the best case. As

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>an infrastructure investor, Ganzhi says, they're ready for that. How

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>do you anticipate the further growth as well as the

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:17.400
<v Speaker 1>obsolescence of some of the technology you're putting in.

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think the great part about being the owner

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:24.159
<v Speaker 9>of the railroad is you don't known the actual cars

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 9>that run on the tracks.

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 4>We own the land. We build the power plant.

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 9>Sometimes actually we're building power adjacent to the data center.

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 9>We build the physical real estate structure inside the four walls.

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:37.439
<v Speaker 9>We bring the fiber connectivity, we bring the cooling, we

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 9>bring the back of power. We create the data hall

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:43.639
<v Speaker 9>conditions where the UPC units are in and the cooling

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:46.680
<v Speaker 9>is in and the cable trays. But eventually, David, our

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 9>customers put in the technology. So what makes our business

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 9>great is we are candily we're GPU and TPU agnostic,

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 9>And what I mean by that is we're not involved

0:20:57.320 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 9>in the active compute. That is a bet that we

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 9>don't make it digital bridge. What we are in the

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 9>business of doing is providing that mission critical real estate

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 9>and infrastructure to the top technology providers in the world,

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 9>and we let them make the decision what kind of

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 9>server they're going to buy.

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>That may take care of the investor risk, but what

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>about community risk. In Michigan, abandoned auto plants still dot

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the landscape, a constant reminder of an earlier era of

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>technological promise and the costs that followed. Who will bear

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the cost this time remains uncertain.

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:33.640
<v Speaker 10>In the event that the bubble bursts and something happens

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:38.479
<v Speaker 10>and this hyperscale center in Saline Township is no longer needed,

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 10>somebody is going to have to pay all of the

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 10>extra costs of this new infrastructure. And who's going to

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 10>pay it, Well, it's either going to be borne by

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:53.880
<v Speaker 10>the rate payers in this state, and we already are

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 10>subject to some of the highest rates and the worst

0:21:56.680 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 10>reliability anywhere in the country, or it'll be the taxpayers

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 10>they'll have to bail out the utility companies who are

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:07.639
<v Speaker 10>making these in some instances, is you know, terrible bets

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 10>that AI is going to be around for a long time.

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 10>If you look at these contracts, it's clear that the

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:17.199
<v Speaker 10>cost is supposed to be born out not over the

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 10>course of a few years, but over the course of

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 10>really a few decades, you know, up to something like

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:28.119
<v Speaker 10>eighteen years. But we can't even see the exit fees

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 10>in the next few years. Those that have encouraged these

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:36.120
<v Speaker 10>data centers to come here without any sort of guardrails

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:40.199
<v Speaker 10>at all, I think they've set us up for a

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 10>very difficult future here.

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 1>Which brings us back to those fences neighbors need. Ganzy

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>sees a way to build what's needed in a way

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 1>that accommodates everyone and doesn't stand in the way of progress.

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:55.679
<v Speaker 9>You're seeing Red states and blue states both look at

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:58.640
<v Speaker 9>the data center opportunity and quandary in the same way,

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:02.879
<v Speaker 9>which is, can't hurt consumers. So the industry has to

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 9>get organized and has to explain ultimately the benefits of

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:10.199
<v Speaker 9>why these data centers exist, Why are they creating jobs

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 9>not losing jobs, Why is it going to be good

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 9>for them long term from a property value perspective, and

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 9>why it ultimately isn't going to rise their utility bill

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 9>and take away all their water. We got a pretty big,

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 9>uphill challenge.

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 1>We need data centers to build the technology of tomorrow.

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>The long term promises are big, but so are short

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>term costs that may fall on the shoulders of local communities.

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:36.439
<v Speaker 1>That's why we need to construct some fences carefully to

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 1>protect our neighbors. And to do that, we need to

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>bring everyone to the table up next. Poland has gone

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 1>from a laggard to a European economic leader, in large

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>part by attracting back all those talented polls working abroad.

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 1>This is a story about going home again. The narrative

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of Europe in recent years has too often been about

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:10.440
<v Speaker 1>lack of growth, but there are exceptions. It turns out

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:13.640
<v Speaker 1>that Poland is one of the world's fastest growing economies,

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and although it's now attracting its best and brightest to

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:20.640
<v Speaker 1>come home to build their businesses, tough challenges still lie ahead.

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Born and raised in Warsaw, Alexandra Pedroshevska followed a well

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>trodden path for young, ambitious Poles and went abroad.

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 11>I wanted to study abroad, and I started looking around,

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:41.159
<v Speaker 11>and my objective was getting the best education that I

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 11>can get. So I left in twenty thirteen to study

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:48.159
<v Speaker 11>at Cambridge. I didn't really make a choice after his

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 11>studies about which country I want to live in. It

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 11>was very much driven by the opportunities what kudat are

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:59.119
<v Speaker 11>in different countries, and for me it was natural to

0:24:59.119 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 11>stay in the UK.

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 1>But that was then. Now the well trodden path is

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:09.880
<v Speaker 1>heading in the other direction. Poland is booming. It's economy

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>top one trillion dollars last year and this year it

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>will be invited to the G twenty summit, and it's

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:19.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of citizens living abroad, a figure that was steadily

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:21.680
<v Speaker 1>climbing after I joined the EU in two thousand and four,

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 1>peaked in twenty seventeen and has been dropping ever since,

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>although Poland's National Statistics Agency adjusted its methodology in twenty

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty two. Among those returning is Pedroshevska.

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:37.120
<v Speaker 11>I think a lot has changed, and especially for people

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 11>like me with the backgrounds like I had. I wanted

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:45.680
<v Speaker 11>to work on the edge of new technologies. I really

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 11>wanted to be exposed to the best R and D,

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:52.119
<v Speaker 11>the best teams that are building effectively the future of

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:54.880
<v Speaker 11>what the technology sector is. I don't think that these

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 11>opportunities were as obvious ten years ago and as available

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:00.400
<v Speaker 11>as they are now.

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:05.680
<v Speaker 7>Actually, our performance started in nineteen eighty nine.

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Andre Domanski is Poland's Minister of Finance and Economy.

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 7>And nineteen eighty nine we had GDP of sixty seven

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:23.400
<v Speaker 7>billion US dollars. Last year GDP of Poland reached one trillion.

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:27.920
<v Speaker 7>There was only one country in that period that had

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 7>a higher pace of growth, and it was China.

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:35.160
<v Speaker 1>What were the things that drove that performance over that

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 1>long period of time.

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 7>Well, first of all the reforms of the early nineties,

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 7>strong institutions that were established here at the time. Of course,

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:55.199
<v Speaker 7>the entrepreneurship spirit of Polish people who helped in this process,

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:59.119
<v Speaker 7>and of course, with no doubt, joining European Union in

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:03.159
<v Speaker 7>two thousand and four. And frankly, we are often asked

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 7>what is the most important sector or most important company

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 7>of Polish economy And it's very difficult to say, and

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 7>I perceive it as a strength of Poland because we

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:21.439
<v Speaker 7>are really well diversified. Polish economy is well integrated with

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 7>other European Union economies, we are well integrated with global

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 7>value chains. At the same time, we are quite important

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:36.119
<v Speaker 7>market of thirty seven million people, so we have strong

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 7>domestic markets. So there are many engines of Polish GDP growth.

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Drivers of Poland's economic growth include a range of services

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 1>as well as manufacturing. More recently, the Russian invasion of

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine has led to a sharp uptick in defense spending,

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:57.199
<v Speaker 1>projected to account for almost five percent of GDP and

0:27:57.240 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five, the highest in the EU. Its digital

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 1>industry is also growing fast. McKinsey estimates the current forty

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 1>four billion dollar sector will grow to one hundred twenty

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>three billion dollars in twenty thirty, accounting for nine percent

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>of GDP. That's Petroshevska's domain. She co founded vivid Q,

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a British company developing holographic display technology, in twenty seventeen,

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 1>but on her return to Poland she started vast Point,

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:28.440
<v Speaker 1>a venture capital firm focused on tech startups in Central

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and Eastern Europe.

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 11>The startup seeing is very vibrant. And I think about

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:35.399
<v Speaker 11>this word, I think it really represents what's currently going on.

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 11>I think that this ambition and this certainty that whatever

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 11>is being built from here or by Polish teams has

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 11>this potential of becoming a global solution.

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Yet for all the optimism around Poland, there are some

0:28:50.040 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 1>warning signs ahead. Machi Albanovski is an economist at the

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Institute for Structural Research in Warsaw.

0:28:56.440 --> 0:29:00.959
<v Speaker 12>The short term challenge for POMP is to consolidate public finances.

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 12>Although public debt is still at moderate level of around

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 12>sixty percent of GDP and public debt is safe in

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 12>Polant we are running large deficits. Last year it was

0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 12>around seven percent of GDP, so it is clearly not

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 12>sustainable over the longer term, and we need to come

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 12>up with a way to rationalize public spending, probably raise

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 12>some taxes, and probably we need to face the fact

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 12>that elevated military spending requires some tax hikes. We don't

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 12>want to start consolidating our public finances when we are

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 12>under external pressure, because then it's more painful.

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 7>We spend close to five percent of our GDP on defense.

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 7>This is close to fifty billion euro per year, so

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 7>of course we run high deficit. We take some steps

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:08.760
<v Speaker 7>to lower it gradually, we believe that we are not

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 7>in a position to cut spendings on defense.

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Another challenge lies in demographics. For Poland, as in much

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 1>of the Western world.

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 12>By fifty our labor force will shrink by about twenty percent,

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 12>so this is one large factor. Secondly, the average age

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:34.320
<v Speaker 12>of an employee is increasing and it also matters for

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 12>the productivity. While older workers can certainly work with modern technologies,

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 12>they may need some more support than younger workers. So

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 12>we need to invest more in policies that allow up skilling,

0:30:50.240 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 12>cre skilling, adjusting skills to these new technologies. And currently

0:30:56.640 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 12>we are not doing much in this direction.

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 1>How do you address that economically?

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:07.040
<v Speaker 7>So we are running many programs that are supporting Polish

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 7>families with some additional income. We have also started in

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 7>Vitro program. Already thirteen thousand children were born thanks to

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 7>this program in Poland, and I want to say personally

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 7>that we are really proud that after eight years of

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 7>very right wing government that stopped this program, our government

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 7>reintroduced it and we already have, as I said, thirteen

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 7>thousand young Polish people because of that. But it's not enough.

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 7>We need to create new incentives for people to be

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 7>more willing to work, and our government is doing that.

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Foreign investment is both an opportunity and a challenge for Poland.

0:31:57.080 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Many foreign investors have become more confident in this sstainability

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of the Poland story. But Damonsky says the war in

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine has made some wearing.

0:32:06.240 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 7>We see that some investors, especially from non European investors,

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 7>are a little more reluctant to invest in especially eastern

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 7>parts of Poland recently. That being said, Poland will be

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 7>the biggest, of course, apart from the Ukraine, beneficiary of

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:29.959
<v Speaker 7>peace in Ukraine. So we want just and lasting peace

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 7>for Ukraine first of all. Of course too we need

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:40.360
<v Speaker 7>to end this brutal Russian aggression. It would be also

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 7>very good for Polish economy. Foregdirect investments were absolutely crucial

0:32:46.680 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 7>in building strength of Polish economy. And this is not

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:53.560
<v Speaker 7>it's a matter of facts, it's not an opinion. Because

0:32:53.880 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 7>of the investments from other European countries of US investors,

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:05.560
<v Speaker 7>right now we see more and more interests from Asian

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 7>investors investing in Poland.

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:13.200
<v Speaker 12>We certainly need to invest more in research and development.

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:16.960
<v Speaker 12>We need to invest in our academic sector. We also

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 12>need to refining our educational policies, both aimed at children

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:27.960
<v Speaker 12>and at adults, because this is what more successful Western

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 12>economies are doing. And in Poland so far we relate

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:39.720
<v Speaker 12>much on competitive labor supply, on cheap labor costs, but

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 12>if we want to reach higher level of wages, if

0:33:43.840 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 12>you want to converge to not to fifty percent of

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 12>German wages, but to eighty or ninety percent, we certainly

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:57.600
<v Speaker 12>need to invest more in education, in research and development

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:02.959
<v Speaker 12>and in other programs policies. We are quite satisfied with

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:07.840
<v Speaker 12>our present growth trajectory, so we may not be well

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 12>motivated to invest in research and development, to invest in

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 12>new educational policies, because so far is good, but in

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 12>future current growth model of Polish economy may not be sufficient.

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:25.759
<v Speaker 1>As they say, getting to the tap is one thing,

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:29.840
<v Speaker 1>staying there is another. Poland's growth is a success story,

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 1>but its next test will be sustaining it.

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 11>A lot of the success of Poland's so far has

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 11>been unfortunately playing catch up. I think once you join

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 11>twenty biggest economies in the world, or twenty economies with

0:34:46.440 --> 0:34:52.319
<v Speaker 11>the biggest GDP per capita, it really becomes about what

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:56.880
<v Speaker 11>is the limits of your growth and where do you

0:34:56.960 --> 0:34:59.399
<v Speaker 11>need to seek it if playing catchup is not going

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 11>to work out that well anymore.

0:35:01.840 --> 0:35:04.640
<v Speaker 1>But in the end, for Poland, as it is for

0:35:04.800 --> 0:35:07.720
<v Speaker 1>many countries, the key is making sure that the best,

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the brightest can go home. Again and stay there.

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 11>I could have stayed in London, raise a fund there,

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:16.760
<v Speaker 11>I could have thought about maybe moving to the US

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:21.400
<v Speaker 11>and effectively starting over. But I decided to take a

0:35:21.480 --> 0:35:23.960
<v Speaker 11>step which I don't think is a step back, but

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 11>step into something entirely new, but just in the place

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:29.360
<v Speaker 11>which I used to call home as a child. So

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:31.279
<v Speaker 11>it feels really special to be able to do that.

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 11>It feels also really special because I don't feel like

0:35:33.920 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 11>I have to give up on anything.

0:35:37.320 --> 0:35:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Coming up. It's not just oil and fertilizer. Aluminum is

0:35:41.239 --> 0:35:44.360
<v Speaker 1>another victim of the around war, which is making President

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Trump's plans to strengthen the US industry that much harder.

0:35:57.840 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 1>This is a story about trying to have it both way.

0:36:00.920 --> 0:36:03.759
<v Speaker 1>Since he first became president, Donald Trump has sought to

0:36:03.760 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 1>protect the US aluminum industry through tariffs, but the war

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:10.280
<v Speaker 1>in Iran may be taking us in a very different direction.

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Our colleague Christian Friedland tells us a story of a

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 1>key metal that is caught in the middle.

0:36:17.840 --> 0:36:22.280
<v Speaker 10>Aluminum foil keeps foods from drying out while ceiling in

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 10>all their natural flavor.

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:28.480
<v Speaker 13>When you think about aluminum, the first thing that comes

0:36:28.480 --> 0:36:31.719
<v Speaker 13>to mind might be tinfoil. Or soda cants, but it's

0:36:31.760 --> 0:36:36.000
<v Speaker 13>also an essential component of cars, planes and machinery. It's

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:39.359
<v Speaker 13>the world's most abundant metal. But even that hasn't kept

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:41.719
<v Speaker 13>aluminum safe from the fallow of war.

0:36:42.320 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 14>The supply is now depleted by about half of the

0:36:47.000 --> 0:36:49.840
<v Speaker 14>metal that used to be shipped from the Middle East

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:53.360
<v Speaker 14>because there's been some damage and there's been some curtailments

0:36:53.480 --> 0:36:55.279
<v Speaker 14>to avoid further damage.

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 13>Jean si mart is the President and CEO of the

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 13>Aluminum Association of Canada.

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 14>It's a very significant situation for the aluminum sector worldwide

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 14>because the Middle East produces twenty percent of all the

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:14.440
<v Speaker 14>aluminum outside China, and it ships to Asia, but mostly

0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 14>to the US and to Europe.

0:37:17.480 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 13>Of the top aluminum producing countries in the world, two

0:37:20.680 --> 0:37:23.640
<v Speaker 13>or in the Middle East, and Sima says the impact

0:37:23.719 --> 0:37:26.400
<v Speaker 13>of the war in Iran could be long lasting.

0:37:27.280 --> 0:37:31.160
<v Speaker 14>Starting at the beginning of the crisis, the first curtailment

0:37:31.280 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 14>happened in Qatar because of an energy supply situation, and

0:37:35.600 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 14>then damage was done in Baryn and then to the

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 14>alta wheela smelters in the Emerits. This is very significant

0:37:46.280 --> 0:37:50.239
<v Speaker 14>because it will take a long time to bring it

0:37:50.320 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 14>back smelters are very highly impacted by energy, and to

0:37:58.280 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 14>restart a smelter have to do like if there is

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 14>a supply problem with electricity for your house, you have

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 14>to unplug everything and then replug one at a time,

0:38:09.239 --> 0:38:11.879
<v Speaker 14>so they can only start back two cells a day

0:38:12.000 --> 0:38:14.319
<v Speaker 14>out of hundreds and hundreds of cells.

0:38:14.840 --> 0:38:17.719
<v Speaker 13>Production is just one part of the aluminum supply chain,

0:38:17.800 --> 0:38:21.719
<v Speaker 13>facing disruption distribution is another. Like so many of the

0:38:21.760 --> 0:38:25.640
<v Speaker 13>world's exports, aluminum needs to be shipped, often a long way,

0:38:25.800 --> 0:38:28.600
<v Speaker 13>and shipments are snarled by the blockade of the Strait

0:38:28.600 --> 0:38:29.200
<v Speaker 13>of Hormonies.

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:33.640
<v Speaker 14>The problem is what's in front of us. The last

0:38:33.680 --> 0:38:37.720
<v Speaker 14>ship to leave the Middle East just before the beginning

0:38:37.760 --> 0:38:40.919
<v Speaker 14>of the crisis has made it to the US. There's

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:43.400
<v Speaker 14>no other ship on its way. It took sixty days

0:38:43.440 --> 0:38:46.799
<v Speaker 14>to get there, so the full shock is ahead of us.

0:38:47.360 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 14>I'm not too sure that all downstream transformers, processors, mom

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 14>and pop shops that use aluminium are fully aware of

0:38:55.760 --> 0:38:56.719
<v Speaker 14>what's ahead of them.

0:38:57.200 --> 0:38:59.000
<v Speaker 13>In the first two weeks of the war, the price

0:38:59.040 --> 0:39:01.840
<v Speaker 13>of aluminum on them life London Metal Exchange saw double

0:39:01.880 --> 0:39:05.640
<v Speaker 13>digit gains, shooting to record highs. But while the war

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:08.560
<v Speaker 13>added to rising prices around the world. Some of the

0:39:08.600 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 13>fallout in the US is self inflicted. Last year, President

0:39:12.520 --> 0:39:16.200
<v Speaker 13>Trump hiked tariffs on imports of aluminum to fifty percent

0:39:16.760 --> 0:39:20.120
<v Speaker 13>with the intention of stimulating domestic production. As of twenty

0:39:20.160 --> 0:39:23.200
<v Speaker 13>twenty five, the US was dependent on imports to meet

0:39:23.360 --> 0:39:27.640
<v Speaker 13>some sixty percent of internal aluminum consumption, and that was

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:30.080
<v Speaker 13>something that the Trump administration didn't like.

0:39:30.719 --> 0:39:33.920
<v Speaker 15>The US is a short market on primary aluminium, so

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:36.759
<v Speaker 15>the US need to import a lot of primary aluminium

0:39:37.080 --> 0:39:43.839
<v Speaker 15>to fill demand. So to attract that metal, then US

0:39:44.080 --> 0:39:48.880
<v Speaker 15>consumers or manufacturing using aluminum, in effect, how to pay

0:39:49.320 --> 0:39:51.440
<v Speaker 15>the duthday on aluminum into the US market.

0:39:51.960 --> 0:39:55.440
<v Speaker 13>Tront Olaf Christofferson is the CFO of Norris Kiedro, a

0:39:55.480 --> 0:39:58.880
<v Speaker 13>publicly traded aluminum producer based in Norway. The company is

0:39:58.880 --> 0:40:01.440
<v Speaker 13>also in the unique position of having a production facility

0:40:01.520 --> 0:40:02.160
<v Speaker 13>in couver.

0:40:02.920 --> 0:40:07.759
<v Speaker 15>Our joint venture in Katar Catalom has been impacted by

0:40:07.800 --> 0:40:11.800
<v Speaker 15>the war and is currently operating around sixty percent production

0:40:12.040 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 15>capacity because of the situation, and we continue to operate

0:40:17.719 --> 0:40:21.560
<v Speaker 15>around that level. It is a challenging situation with the

0:40:21.640 --> 0:40:25.439
<v Speaker 15>raw material access and also to get metal out from

0:40:25.480 --> 0:40:29.080
<v Speaker 15>the region, but we are continuing to operate at that.

0:40:29.040 --> 0:40:33.400
<v Speaker 13>Production level, and so is the US now facing more

0:40:33.640 --> 0:40:36.360
<v Speaker 13>of an aluminum crisis than other parts of the world.

0:40:36.760 --> 0:40:40.120
<v Speaker 15>Well, the supply situation, I think is of the situation

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:46.960
<v Speaker 15>in midleast impacts the supply situation in all markets physically.

0:40:46.960 --> 0:40:49.400
<v Speaker 15>When it comes to supply, I think the Asian market

0:40:49.960 --> 0:40:53.440
<v Speaker 15>is worse impacted because quite a lot of the metal

0:40:53.480 --> 0:40:56.120
<v Speaker 15>from the Middle East is normally sold in Asia around

0:40:56.160 --> 0:40:59.480
<v Speaker 15>two and a half million tons, But the price impact

0:40:59.640 --> 0:41:00.440
<v Speaker 15>is global.

0:41:01.160 --> 0:41:03.880
<v Speaker 13>This isn't the first time the United States has imposed

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:07.279
<v Speaker 13>tariffs on Canadian aluminum. In twenty eighteen, when I was

0:41:07.320 --> 0:41:10.880
<v Speaker 13>Foreign Minister, the trade spat between our two countries ended

0:41:11.000 --> 0:41:14.239
<v Speaker 13>with the US backing down. And although the US is

0:41:14.320 --> 0:41:18.319
<v Speaker 13>facing higher aluminum prices today, SamArt says that's not a

0:41:18.440 --> 0:41:22.280
<v Speaker 13>direct effect of the warrant around. That's because the vast

0:41:22.320 --> 0:41:25.960
<v Speaker 13>majority of aluminum the United States imports comes from Canada.

0:41:26.280 --> 0:41:31.400
<v Speaker 14>When the tariffs, the fifty percent tariff were implemented, it

0:41:31.520 --> 0:41:36.560
<v Speaker 14>created a price shock in the market for exporters into

0:41:36.600 --> 0:41:40.480
<v Speaker 14>the US, as Canada is one of them, and basically

0:41:40.560 --> 0:41:45.240
<v Speaker 14>the reaction was to divert shipments to another market, which

0:41:45.960 --> 0:41:50.560
<v Speaker 14>covered the full logistical costs and the whole netback that

0:41:50.640 --> 0:41:54.640
<v Speaker 14>would differentiate this destination from the US. One thing is sure,

0:41:54.719 --> 0:41:57.920
<v Speaker 14>if you want to get all the available supply from Canada,

0:41:59.000 --> 0:42:02.920
<v Speaker 14>you have as a polymaker in the US to do

0:42:03.000 --> 0:42:07.200
<v Speaker 14>a carve out for Canada within the global tariff situation

0:42:07.360 --> 0:42:12.759
<v Speaker 14>right now. If that doesn't happen, Canada will go where

0:42:12.840 --> 0:42:13.799
<v Speaker 14>the market is.

0:42:14.680 --> 0:42:17.600
<v Speaker 13>Among the industries that are most affected by higher aluminum

0:42:17.640 --> 0:42:22.000
<v Speaker 13>prices are packaging and transportation from trains and trucks to

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:25.360
<v Speaker 13>mopeds and bikes, and that's where Brenton Moore comes in.

0:42:25.800 --> 0:42:28.880
<v Speaker 16>Fundamentally, aluminum is one of the primary materials used on

0:42:28.880 --> 0:42:33.160
<v Speaker 16>a bicycle. The reason is it's very light, very strong,

0:42:34.719 --> 0:42:37.400
<v Speaker 16>reasonably priced. You know, it's not a super exotic metal.

0:42:38.160 --> 0:42:41.640
<v Speaker 13>Or's company, Wolf Tooth Components, makes premium bike parts that

0:42:41.680 --> 0:42:45.160
<v Speaker 13>are shipped all over the world. His manufacturing plant in

0:42:45.160 --> 0:42:48.279
<v Speaker 13>the suburbs of Minneapolis is about seven thousand miles from

0:42:48.280 --> 0:42:51.480
<v Speaker 13>the Strait of Hormies. But he's still feeling the consequences

0:42:51.640 --> 0:42:52.480
<v Speaker 13>of the war in Iran.

0:42:53.040 --> 0:42:54.399
<v Speaker 3>We're a small company like us.

0:42:54.560 --> 0:42:56.920
<v Speaker 16>We're not Boeing, so we don't get to say, Kaiser

0:42:56.960 --> 0:43:00.360
<v Speaker 16>send us ten truckloads of aluminum. We buy our luminum

0:43:00.400 --> 0:43:05.480
<v Speaker 16>through suppliers locally, and those suppliers will source that from

0:43:05.640 --> 0:43:07.400
<v Speaker 16>various suppliers around the world.

0:43:07.680 --> 0:43:08.680
<v Speaker 3>We don't get a lot.

0:43:08.520 --> 0:43:10.680
<v Speaker 16>Of choice and where our aluminum comes from, but I

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:13.080
<v Speaker 16>can tell you that it's shifted and we do have

0:43:13.120 --> 0:43:15.399
<v Speaker 16>a preference for US aluminum.

0:43:15.480 --> 0:43:19.000
<v Speaker 13>Eventually, the only solution for a manufacturer like More might

0:43:19.000 --> 0:43:21.799
<v Speaker 13>be to raise prices, but he says it's not so.

0:43:21.840 --> 0:43:23.760
<v Speaker 3>Simple in consumer goods.

0:43:24.000 --> 0:43:25.560
<v Speaker 16>I would say, it's not like when you go to

0:43:25.600 --> 0:43:28.560
<v Speaker 16>the restaurant and there's like lobster pricing and it's like

0:43:28.600 --> 0:43:29.160
<v Speaker 16>market rate.

0:43:29.560 --> 0:43:31.120
<v Speaker 3>That's not how consumer goods work.

0:43:32.200 --> 0:43:35.400
<v Speaker 16>And when prices of aluminum raw material go in, we

0:43:35.480 --> 0:43:40.680
<v Speaker 16>can't necessarily just like raise our prices right away. Raising prices, remember,

0:43:40.719 --> 0:43:45.479
<v Speaker 16>does three really bad things. One it upsets your customers, Two,

0:43:46.400 --> 0:43:50.600
<v Speaker 16>it puts you at a disadvantage to your competition, and

0:43:50.680 --> 0:43:53.799
<v Speaker 16>three it's actually a lot of work. And so when

0:43:53.840 --> 0:43:57.799
<v Speaker 16>aluminum goes up, effectively initially we just eat. It just

0:43:57.800 --> 0:43:59.360
<v Speaker 16>comes right out of our bottom line.

0:44:00.120 --> 0:44:03.280
<v Speaker 13>Has seen peaks and valleys in the price of aluminum before,

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:06.000
<v Speaker 13>but he says this time is different.

0:44:06.160 --> 0:44:09.640
<v Speaker 16>If you look, there was COVID, which aluminum prices started

0:44:09.680 --> 0:44:12.279
<v Speaker 16>going up, but then actually the biggest peak was right

0:44:12.320 --> 0:44:16.600
<v Speaker 16>when the Russian War started, just went crazy high, and

0:44:16.640 --> 0:44:20.160
<v Speaker 16>then tariffs came in and then the.

0:44:20.160 --> 0:44:21.640
<v Speaker 3>Straight of horror moves was closed.

0:44:21.920 --> 0:44:23.960
<v Speaker 16>But the biggest thing people aren't talking about, and you're

0:44:23.960 --> 0:44:27.080
<v Speaker 16>seeing this broadly across commodities, is the AI buildout is

0:44:27.120 --> 0:44:30.600
<v Speaker 16>actually one of the big impacts for aluminum prices going up.

0:44:30.680 --> 0:44:32.719
<v Speaker 16>Right now, those data centers that we all hear so

0:44:32.800 --> 0:44:35.319
<v Speaker 16>much about, they use a ton of raw material and

0:44:35.440 --> 0:44:38.560
<v Speaker 16>a lot of it's aluminum, and so kind of we're

0:44:38.560 --> 0:44:39.720
<v Speaker 16>seeing like a triple whammy.

0:44:39.800 --> 0:44:43.839
<v Speaker 13>Now, if you will, smaller manufacturers like wolf Tooth components

0:44:44.000 --> 0:44:46.600
<v Speaker 13>not only have to contend with higher prices for the

0:44:46.640 --> 0:44:49.880
<v Speaker 13>metal they need, but also have to compete against bigger,

0:44:50.120 --> 0:44:53.640
<v Speaker 13>more powerful players that also use illuminum. The squeeze could

0:44:53.640 --> 0:44:58.080
<v Speaker 13>eventually raise prices across the board for consumers, triggering another

0:44:58.440 --> 0:44:59.040
<v Speaker 13>of inflation.

0:44:59.480 --> 0:45:03.720
<v Speaker 16>There's really no viable alternative to aluminum in our case,

0:45:05.000 --> 0:45:06.600
<v Speaker 16>and you'd hear the same thing if you ask blowing

0:45:06.719 --> 0:45:09.840
<v Speaker 16>like they're still going to use tons of aluminum airplanes

0:45:09.880 --> 0:45:12.239
<v Speaker 16>no matter what the price is, and the price of

0:45:12.239 --> 0:45:14.680
<v Speaker 16>those airplanes will just go up same with our bicycle parts.

0:45:15.280 --> 0:45:17.719
<v Speaker 13>As the war drags on, so did the timeline for

0:45:17.800 --> 0:45:22.080
<v Speaker 13>prices to stabilize. Back in Norway. Christofferson says, the outlook

0:45:22.239 --> 0:45:23.480
<v Speaker 13>is far from certain.

0:45:23.960 --> 0:45:25.880
<v Speaker 15>So in the aluminum market, I think we see a

0:45:25.920 --> 0:45:29.360
<v Speaker 15>bit the same situation as you see in the energy markets,

0:45:29.360 --> 0:45:32.600
<v Speaker 15>where you have quite high prices in the front ten

0:45:33.000 --> 0:45:36.799
<v Speaker 15>meaning metals to be delivered in the coming month, but

0:45:36.880 --> 0:45:40.000
<v Speaker 15>then you have a declining price of backguardation situation in

0:45:40.040 --> 0:45:44.880
<v Speaker 15>the market with lower prices folding down to three thousand dollars.

0:45:44.880 --> 0:45:47.480
<v Speaker 3>But on a couple of years out in time.

0:45:47.680 --> 0:45:51.880
<v Speaker 14>So it will take anywhere between twelve to eighteen months

0:45:52.000 --> 0:45:55.560
<v Speaker 14>for the Middle East supply that's been affected to come

0:45:55.600 --> 0:45:59.320
<v Speaker 14>back into the market, and then you need sixty days

0:45:59.680 --> 0:46:02.480
<v Speaker 14>to sip to North America that you add to this.

0:46:03.080 --> 0:46:07.799
<v Speaker 14>So we're heading for a supply shock as we move

0:46:07.920 --> 0:46:11.840
<v Speaker 14>through the summer period, and this will last most likely

0:46:11.920 --> 0:46:14.960
<v Speaker 14>for about a year a year and a half until

0:46:15.000 --> 0:46:19.360
<v Speaker 14>this supply starts to make its way back into the market.

0:46:20.000 --> 0:46:23.280
<v Speaker 13>For business owners like Brendan Moore, the effects of domestic

0:46:23.320 --> 0:46:27.160
<v Speaker 13>and foreign policy have become an unavoidable hazard of the job.

0:46:27.480 --> 0:46:30.320
<v Speaker 16>We control, the processing, we control our efficiency, We control

0:46:30.360 --> 0:46:32.839
<v Speaker 16>our yields, so we have to just focus on those.

0:46:32.960 --> 0:46:34.840
<v Speaker 16>I think near term we're going to be able to

0:46:34.920 --> 0:46:37.560
<v Speaker 16>mitigate most of the aluminum prices. Longer term, if it

0:46:37.640 --> 0:46:41.720
<v Speaker 16>stays this high, there has to be some sort of increase.

0:46:41.920 --> 0:46:45.359
<v Speaker 16>But a consumer, if aluminum goes up twenty percent again

0:46:45.400 --> 0:46:47.880
<v Speaker 16>this year, our prices of our products aren't going to

0:46:47.880 --> 0:46:48.520
<v Speaker 16>go twenty percent.

0:46:48.560 --> 0:46:51.200
<v Speaker 3>They're going to go up like three or five percent.

0:46:51.680 --> 0:46:52.480
<v Speaker 3>And I like boeing do.

0:46:52.680 --> 0:46:54.200
<v Speaker 16>I mean, I'm trying to poopoo with them at all,

0:46:54.239 --> 0:46:56.439
<v Speaker 16>But like, we don't have the negotiating power that say

0:46:56.440 --> 0:47:00.600
<v Speaker 16>they have or automaker has, And when these prices change

0:47:00.840 --> 0:47:04.680
<v Speaker 16>or tariffs change, I see that almost the same day.

0:47:04.760 --> 0:47:05.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean not joking.

0:47:05.640 --> 0:47:09.080
<v Speaker 16>Sometimes, Well, I didn't start this small business because I

0:47:09.080 --> 0:47:12.320
<v Speaker 16>wanted to learn about tariffs or deal with massive supply

0:47:12.440 --> 0:47:17.919
<v Speaker 16>chain issues, or deal with geopolitics. Those are, in fact

0:47:17.920 --> 0:47:20.560
<v Speaker 16>some of my least favorite things. Bicycles are way more

0:47:20.560 --> 0:47:21.480
<v Speaker 16>fun than that stuff.

0:47:22.000 --> 0:47:24.080
<v Speaker 13>With all the back and forth of tariffs and wars,

0:47:24.440 --> 0:47:27.480
<v Speaker 13>it's hard to see how US policy at the moment

0:47:27.880 --> 0:47:32.520
<v Speaker 13>is helping American manufacturers or American consumers. And this is

0:47:32.640 --> 0:47:35.799
<v Speaker 13>one problem that the marketplace can't fix on its own