WEBVTT - How the Enlightenment Works

0:00:00.920 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to you Stuff you Should Know from House Stuffworks

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark,

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:18.119
<v Speaker 1>There's Charles W. Chuck Bryant, and Jerry Are. So this

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 1>is stuff you should know. The Enlightened Ones exactly, the

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>three of us, no one else, No, we're the Enlightened Ones.

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I am gonna go ahead and preface this what what

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I just said off the air. This is a very

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>tough subject to distill in a thirty to forty five

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:41.239
<v Speaker 1>minute podcast because volumes of books can be written on

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the Age of Enlightenment and have been and have been.

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 1>So this is this is stuff. There is gonna be

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:49.319
<v Speaker 1>a very bird's eye view. Yeah, there's a dude named

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Israel who just came out with I think this

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>third volume of a three volume set on the Enlightenment

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>and he wrote literally several thousand and pages of it

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's considered an obscure text. Yeah, he probably doesn't

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>even think that he covered it in full. No, but

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't, although he's coming right. I think he does

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>have another one coming. So maybe it was a second

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 1>but um he uh that that the idea that um

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't think that it's done, that it's not finished

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>is actually a pretty standard view of the Enlightenment. Like,

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>during research for this, I realized that there are tons

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of intellectual arguments going on right now, like the Bill

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Maher thing. Bill Maher in Islam. He's been accused of

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:46.479
<v Speaker 1>being like a just a complete racist, xenophobic dude um

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>because of his recent statements on Islam. Did you see

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>him and Ben ben uh? Did you see them get

0:01:54.440 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>into it? Okay, that argument is an Enlightenment argument. It's

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>like it provided the Enlightenment was so massive that the

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>ripple effects are still being felt on a daily basis

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 1>because it was such an enormous change in the way

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>humans think that we're still trying to sit there and

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>analyze what the heck happened. And that is one manifestation

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:23.920
<v Speaker 1>of it. Is is like what Bill Maher is saying is, well,

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, Islam is a religion or whatever, and therefore

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>it's um an athetical to progress and culture and like

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>real thought and rationalism, and Ben a Ben yeah, Ben

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Affleck is saying, like, you can't say that about a culture,

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:40.919
<v Speaker 1>Like each culture is its own thing. So what we're

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>seeing there is the idea of moral absolutism arguing with

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>moral relativism, and that is like textbook Enlightenment argument. Pretty interesting. Sure.

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Like researching this article seriously, I tied together probably ten

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>different things that I didn't realize we're connected. Well, yeah,

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I love it when stuff like that. It was the

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 1>start of and you know, the age of Enlightenment quote

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>unquote started and ended, but it was the birth of

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>just a new kind of thought and a new value system, uh, philosophical, scientific, cultural, intellectual,

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>basically saying reason over this previous long held belief that

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>just strict religious dogma is all you need to worry about.

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>You don't question anything, don't try and think about science

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 1>and nature and things like that other than just this

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>is God's creation and what does it mean in terms

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of religion exactly. So, of course it's still going on.

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>But it wasn't. It wasn't just that. It was definitely

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Enlightenment was the If you're an Enlightenment UM fan, you

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 1>would say Enlightenment was the domination of reason over religion

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>or faith. It was a it was a value system basically.

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>But there was another aspect of the Enlightenment, the domination

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of um the will of the people over the monarchy. UM.

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Economic there was economic change, UM, huge economic changes thanks

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to Adam Smith. There were a lot of like huge

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>monumental changes in the way people thought. UM. So much

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>so that modern historians who are trying to unpack the

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Enlightenment still one of the schools of thought is that

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you can't just call it the Enlightenment. It happened in

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>too many different places under different circumstances. Um. And then

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the again, like the the different aspects of it, the

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:38.479
<v Speaker 1>fact that one part of it dealt with governmental change,

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 1>one part of it dealt with religious change, another part

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that with economic change. That they it's been kind of

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 1>distilled into separate compartments. Now, yeah, I mean separate compartments

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 1>somewhere divergent and contradictory. Uh. It occurred nearly simultaneously in

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the eighteenth century in France, Great Britain, Germany and other

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 1>in at least Bain, Portugal, American colonies all over the place. UM.

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:07.599
<v Speaker 1>I like to say, it's the period of time where

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the world started waking up and pulled their heads from

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>their rear ends. Basically, well, the the the question now,

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:22.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you're a religious type, you're probably happy

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>about the fruits of the Enlightenment. Like everybody points at

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the Industrial Revolution is proof positive the Enlightenment was great,

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 1>or the American experiment proof positive the Enlightenment was great.

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:34.839
<v Speaker 1>But you probably don't like the fact that the world

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>completely turned its back on religion or not completely but

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 1>largely did. If you're a pro Enlightenment type, you're probably

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>saying this was for the best, like we were backwards,

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>we emerged from the dark Ages thanks to the Enlightenment. Um,

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>And this is the argument that's still going on today, Like, yes,

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the Enlightenment changed everything, but did it go too far?

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>So that's we'll get into all that. But Conger, who

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:01.039
<v Speaker 1>wrote this article, I think did a very good job

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:05.600
<v Speaker 1>of taking the whole thing back further than the eighteenth

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>century out of the French salons and set the stage

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>for what created the basis for this this change in thinking. Yeah,

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I think Kristen did a great job of distilling a

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>complex topic down to like an eight page article, but

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:22.720
<v Speaker 1>she does take it back to Um, there were a

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 1>couple of things that sort of laid the groundwork. Um, well,

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things, but a couple of them are

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Mr Sir Isaac Newton and the famous story of the

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:36.359
<v Speaker 1>apple falling on his head, which makes a great story.

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>He told a lot of people that I don't know

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:42.719
<v Speaker 1>how uh factually exactly true that is, but it makes

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 1>for a great story. But either way you want to

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:48.839
<v Speaker 1>look at it. Isaac Newton looked at the space at

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>some point between that apple in the ground and said,

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>there's something going on in that empty space that should

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>be explained, because that apple doesn't fall up. Something's keeping

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>us all did here on the ground, and I want

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>to look into that. Although if you were a fan

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of David Humes, you would say, uh, well, actually it

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 1>could consumably fall up, because we've never proven it won't

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>fall up. And him was one of the proponents, well

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>not proponents, but uh he was active in the Age

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 1>of Enlightenment. Another thing that really laid the groundwork was

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the Thirty Years of War from six eighteen to sixty eight,

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>which pretty much paved the way for Protestant Reformation and

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the Roman Catholic Church took a lot of the teeth

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>away from the Roman Catholic Church. Huge first time, Yeah,

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 1>it was. There was a huge change. So what you

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>just described, Chuck, is a the foundation for the intellectual

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>branch of of the Enlightenment thinking usurping the power from

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>theological thinking. And then with the Thirty Year War, the

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>political power was taken away from the church because for

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the first time now the precedent has been set that

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>you was a citizen. Your allegiance is not split between

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>church and state. Your allegiances first and foremost to the state.

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>And we see that still today. Like if somebody uh

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>kills their um, their parents or whatever because it's the

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Seventh Sign and Demi Moore's running around and they it

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>turns out that they were brother and sister, so you

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>kill them because it's the will of God. State says,

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't care if it's the will of God, you

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>can't kill your parents. The state's law is more powerful

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and more important than God's law. That's straight out of

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the Thirty Years War that changed everything. Have you ever

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>seen the Seventh Sign? Man? I saw that, like when

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:43.319
<v Speaker 1>it came out. I don't remember anything about it. I

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:46.559
<v Speaker 1>just remember like one of the characters was this kid

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>with down syndrome and he murdered his parents because he

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>found out that they were brother and sister and he

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>was super religious and they were going to execute him. Yeah,

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 1>when they execute. I think he was like the last martyr. Man,

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll have to check it out again. Yeah more. Uh man,

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>she just keeps getting better looking, don't she. How didn't

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 1>do that? Yeah, like you look at um. Blame it

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 1>on Rio seeing that. Yeah, she's kind of dooey and

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 1>not tubby, but just round. And then she got all chiseled. Man,

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>they remained chiseled. That was Michael Kine. Wasn't it great movie? Yeah?

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>But I mean she was a kid back then. Everyone

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>was Dowie back then when they were kids. Blaming Rio.

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:30.560
<v Speaker 1>It was really good movie. So Conger points out even

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 1>further back about the Dark Ages, sort of laying the groundwork,

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:36.959
<v Speaker 1>which the Dark Ages were dark for many reasons, but

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the big ones was that the Roman Catholic

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Church basically ruled everything. Uh. Latin was the language, the

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>center of life and academia where monasteries and abbeys. You

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 1>weren't encouraged to get educated outside of uh theological uh realms.

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>It was not encouraged. Do you have to actually, I

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 1>want to say, you have to be carefully using the

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>term Dark Ages because uh apparently it is a disparaging

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 1>label that people on the pro Enlightenment side of the argument.

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>The humanists, they say, these are the Dark Ages. That

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>was back when the Church controlled everything, when everybody was

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>just an ignoramus. Once the Enlightenment came along, we emerge

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>from the Dark Ages. Technically, once the Renaissance came along,

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>we emerge from the Dark Ages. So if you're in

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:27.559
<v Speaker 1>a Storian, you call it the Middle Ages. But even

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the Middle Ages are kind of sad because it just

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>says these ay just kind of existed between this important

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>age and this important age. We just call this the

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Middle Ages. But it's better than the Dark Ages. But

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's a um an argument or a label

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 1>that a disparaging label that humanists use unfairly, because there

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 1>were scientists working and laying the groundwork for future science

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>in the Dark Ages, and Congret even mentions them in

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>this article, like Thomas Aquinas came up with scholasticism, Yeah,

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and scholasticism is basically the idea that you can understand

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>God even more and be even more pure and divine

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 1>yourself by studying nature. Yeah. Roger Bacon was another monk

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>who was a proponent of that. And I think um

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 1>that allowed them and I don't think that's the reason

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 1>they did it. But that allowed them to pursue these

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 1>scientific avenues because it was still tied to God. Another

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 1>big change was Uh. Like I said before, in the

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>not so dark Ages, perhaps Latin was the language, and

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have something called the printing press until Johann

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Guttenberg came along in fourty eight and says, you know what,

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 1>everyone should be able to read. Start printing stuff in

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>your native tongue. Uh. And that led directly to people

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>starting to educate themselves. It was the democratization of education

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>right exactly. And all of this didn't happen like out

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 1>of the blue, like Roger Bacon and Thomas Aquinas and

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>a guy named Leonardo Brunei. They didn't necessarily come up

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 1>with their ideas on their own. There was some this

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>really seminal thing that happened back in the mid century

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:13.680
<v Speaker 1>where somebody, I don't know who did, somebody translated um

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:18.319
<v Speaker 1>Aristotle I believe his works into Latin, and all of

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, the Greek rational thinkers of antiquity, their ideas

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>were suddenly available to the West for the first time.

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:32.079
<v Speaker 1>And it just so happened that some people started paying

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>attention to these things. Leonardo Bruni read Petrarch and revived

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:40.839
<v Speaker 1>the idea of humanism, which is a huge sea change

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>because humanism says humans are pretty awesome and the fruit

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:47.560
<v Speaker 1>of our labors, the fruit of our intellect, the fruit

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 1>of everything that we do comes from human ability, not

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 1>God Like, We're not just vessels for God's brilliance to

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>be shown through. If you create something, you come up

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 1>with a work of art because God did that. You

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>did that, but let's figure out how you did it, right.

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>That's humanism. And this is what the Renaissance started to

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 1>revive and was a huge change, Like, maybe we should

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 1>start paying attention to ourselves a little more exactly, let's

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>explore the human condition. Yeah. Um. Aristotle was not a

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>heretic because he tied his geocentric universe ideas to God

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 1>as well. Um. He thought the universe was composed of

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:31.559
<v Speaker 1>ten separate crystal spheres, and beyond the tenth sphere that

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 1>was heaven and God. Uh. Copernicus, Um, she uh pretty

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 1>much said no, that's not true. The universe is infinite. Uh.

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>And he was pretty alone in that thinking. Early on,

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:49.679
<v Speaker 1>I faced a lot of criticism from like every every

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 1>religion Protestants and Catholics. Yep, it was a They thought

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>it was a dangerous way of thinking because he didn't

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>make room for God in the cosmos, And it definitely

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>was a dangerous way of thinking to the church, Like

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the Protestant Reformation was going on, you had the Thirty

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Years War coming down the pike, you had Copernicus um

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>thanks to this revival of interest in astronomy, like yeah,

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 1>starting to to look at the universe around us and

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>finding even like symbolic stuff like um, who was it? Kepler?

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>He was an assistant to Tycho Brahe and Kepler figured

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>out that the planets uh revolve around the Sun in

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>an ellipse. Well, the church, the Holy Roman Church, said

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 1>that the circle was a symbol of perfection. So of

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>course everything revolved around the earth in a circle. Not

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>only did things not revolve around the Earth, revolved around

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the sun. And they didn't even do that in a circle,

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>they did an ellipse. So the church is just losing

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>its mind because all these people are coming forward saying

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>everything that you're saying over here is starting to prove

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>to smell like bs and the church is losing its

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>power left and right. Both politically and intellectually. It's losing

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>its authority. Yeah. Galileo even recanted, uh, because he was

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>accused of heresy for his theory that the Earth rotates

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>on its axis. So he said, I'll take it all back.

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I didn't mean that. Please don't kill me. He's like,

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>but just make sure my manuscripts survive. So we were

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about Bacon. He is the creator of the scientific method,

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 1>and he says, you know what, we should use experiments

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>to actually try and explain things. And so it's six.

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's high time we have a method for

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>doing so. So that was Francis Bacon. Yes, I wonder

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>if he was related to Roger Bacon. I don't know.

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>They were separated by a few centuries, but they could

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>have been fam sure, I think so. Uh. And he

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>was did you ever take philosophy in college? No? Um,

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I think I might have. I didn't get much out

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>of it. If I did, I don't remember. That's like

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>one class we studied descartes um a lot. I've grown

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>to be a little more interest it in it, but

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I like the more I like like existential crisis philosophy,

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>like Nick Bostrom stuff, And I don't know what that is,

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>just basically how the world's gonna end. Okay, this stuff

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>is I think, like de Cartes is interesting, but I'm

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>not like a I'm not. It doesn't light my fire. Yeah,

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>it was right. I think I made an a in

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>that class actually because it interested me at the time.

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>But I never took a follow up class. It just

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 1>took the intro. So it clearly didn't mean that much

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to me. But I get it. Well. Yeah, And what

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 1>they cart was saying is our experience is not It's

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 1>not what you thought. Like mind and matter are two

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>different things, and the human experiences a subjective experience and

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the mind, what the mind produces is different than what

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>is reality and really kind of um that changed things

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>tremendously too. So you got all these people like contributing

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 1>to this. We haven't even reached the eighteenth century yet,

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Like the groundwork is definitely being late and it's still

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:05.399
<v Speaker 1>being laid. Um as far as the like the government goes.

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>John locke Um was one of the people who contributed

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to the idea of the social contract. The social contract

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 1>there was Hobbes Lock and later on Rousso and others

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:21.680
<v Speaker 1>contributed this idea that humans are born with natural rights.

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 1>You're born free. I'm born free, even Jerry's born free,

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>look at her. And to form a society, you give

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:32.920
<v Speaker 1>up some of these natural rights. For example, one one

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 1>thing that you give up is your right to kill

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>in retribution. Uh. Any society typically demands a state monopoly

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:45.680
<v Speaker 1>on violence, which means that if somebody kills your family member,

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:47.879
<v Speaker 1>you don't go kill that person. You go to the

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 1>state and say that guy killed my family member, triumph,

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 1>convict him and kill him on my behalf because there's

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:55.879
<v Speaker 1>a state monopoly on violence. So that's a natural right

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 1>that you give up. I think appropriately so and for

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 1>the better, but as part of the social contract and

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:05.639
<v Speaker 1>so Uh. The idea that that humans had these rights

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and that society in turn had rights because humans gave

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>them rights. Um, that was a big basis of enlightenment thinking.

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:16.679
<v Speaker 1>That would be added to later on too. Yeah. And

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:20.399
<v Speaker 1>Locke also was one of the first champions of what

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>would kind of become nurture over nature. His idea of

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the Tabu larassa that when humans are born, their minds

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:29.440
<v Speaker 1>are a clean slate and they are shaped by experience

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and education and not some preordained thing that you're born

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:36.679
<v Speaker 1>with and uh, this French intellect gobbled that stuff up.

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>His name was Francois Marie Arouette, and he went by

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 1>a name you might know, Voltaire, and he really loved

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 1>this stuff and went back to France with all these

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 1>ideals and said, we gotta get on this and let's uh,

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:52.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, we can't go out in the streets right

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>now and talk about the stuff, but we can meet

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 1>in private and homes like a Tupperware party, and we'll

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>call them salons and we'll we'll talk about these radical

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 1>ideas is in um in this new way of thinking,

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>in the privacy of homes for those that are willing

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to host it. Yeah, and we'll talk more about Voltaire

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and what he did right after this. So, Chuck, Voltaire

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 1>has been lit up. He was in England from seventeen

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:23.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine, living in exile because he was already critical

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:25.680
<v Speaker 1>of the French monarchy. While he was there he ran

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:30.159
<v Speaker 1>into the ideas of lock of apparently Descartes as well.

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>He he basically got turned onto rationalism and he was

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:37.239
<v Speaker 1>primed and ready for it, Like this guy was just

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:40.160
<v Speaker 1>waiting for these ideas to pour into him. And when

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:43.879
<v Speaker 1>they did. He became a lightning rod for what we

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>think of as the Enlightenment. Like Voltaire was the main

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>dude to start from what I understand. Yeah, and um,

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:53.719
<v Speaker 1>like we mentioned the salons, they had to do this

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:58.400
<v Speaker 1>in private because Louis the four Yeah that right, Yeah,

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:03.920
<v Speaker 1>get better at that. He was pretty hard on to try.

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 1>He didn't like that kind of talk. It threatened him

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>for good reason. Uh well, yeah, I mean the reason

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:13.879
<v Speaker 1>why is like the power was taken from the church

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 1>in place more in the monarchy. But in very short order,

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:18.879
<v Speaker 1>people said, you know, we're not really that fond of

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the monarchy either. We think we should rule ourselves or

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:24.479
<v Speaker 1>at least elect people to rule ourselves. To this divine

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>right of kings. Things seems kind of hinky now that

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>we think about it. So the monarchies were threatened as

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:32.439
<v Speaker 1>well by the Enlightenment. So yeah, the monarchy liked the

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:36.200
<v Speaker 1>dumb masses that stayed under their thumb and any kind

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 1>of like radical thought or original thought was super dangerous.

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>It sounds familiar exactly. It is interesting how you talked about.

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I think there are periods of time where things like

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:50.119
<v Speaker 1>the Age of Enlightenment keep popping up that's like the

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:53.199
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixties in the United States, and I think, like

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 1>you said, we're in one right now. I think we're

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 1>in probably more than even the sixties right now. Yeah,

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:00.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think there are periods where that lulls it

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>like maybe the nineteen eighties, the seventies, remember Disco, like

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:08.399
<v Speaker 1>a dumbing down of things. Yeah, just people not caring

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. It's weird and cyclical. I read I read

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:14.879
<v Speaker 1>this article um called things Fall Apart How social media

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:17.679
<v Speaker 1>leads to a less stable world. It was by a

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 1>guy named Curtis Howland h G. H. L Andy and

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 1>it's on Knowledge at Wharton there, like the Wharton Business

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 1>School website, and it was basically saying it wasn't I

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>thought it was condemning social media, and this guy was

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>just basically stating, matter of factly that social media erodes

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the state and that now we have ways to connect

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>with other people in ways that are more important to

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 1>us than, say, our allegiance to the state. So you

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 1>may feel, um, you may feel more connected to somebody

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 1>over Hello Kitty and your fondness for Hello Kitty, more

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:56.480
<v Speaker 1>than you would identify yourself as saying American, and with

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:59.160
<v Speaker 1>social media you're able to connect with other people who

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:01.679
<v Speaker 1>feel the same way, and so you form on social

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:06.440
<v Speaker 1>media basically bodies that supersede the state in your opinion,

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>no boundaries exactly. And as this happens, more and more

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 1>of the states, what's called sovereignty erodes more and more

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and more um and it becomes a less and less

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 1>stable world. The guy's point was that, yes, while it's

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>very unstable and things are much more dangerous during periods

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>like this, it's it's basically just a period of upheaval

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and change, and then eventually things stabilize again. But what

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 1>this guy was saying, using this as an example, is

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that we're in a like right now, possibly on the

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 1>cusp of a period of tremendous fundamental change in the world.

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I see that every day. It's pretty interesting time to

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 1>be alive. Yeah, a little scary to me. Yeah, well,

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's like the guy said, it's it's more

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 1>dangerous than your average time because change frequently comes out

0:22:55.800 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>of spasms of violence or um upheaval, just where nobody's

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:04.400
<v Speaker 1>in charge, because there's a power struggle going on, or

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>our normal structures are being eroded. It's interesting, it's super interesting. Uh.

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 1>So back to the salons. We're back to the age

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:19.680
<v Speaker 1>of enlightenment, the traditional age of enlightenment. Uh, the Salons,

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the members were known. There was a group of people

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 1>known as the philosophics. Uh. We've mentioned a few of them. Rousseau,

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 1>did Hero Voltaire. Um, how do you pronounce that? Is

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that it's not montgue is it Montesquieu Montesquieu? Um. And

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>they were They're kind of skeptics and critics of not

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:45.400
<v Speaker 1>everything but the establishment of government or the way government

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>was at the time, especially the church. Hated the church,

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 1>like Voltaire especially hated the church and the very fact

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that it even existed. And a lot of the enlightened

0:23:56.800 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Uh ones were deists um and daism Basically, I like

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the way Conger put it um in a big picture way.

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 1>They believe in a clockmaker God, which means maybe God

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 1>created everything and set things in motion. But then I

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 1>was like, all right, that's it. I'm out right, I'm

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>not uh getting my fingers and all the pies of everyone.

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's you have free will basically after you're born um,

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:26.640
<v Speaker 1>which again was pretty dangerous to the religious establishment. Yeah,

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 1>so you you've got the basis you've got the foundation

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>of um, the Holy Roman Empire in the West losing

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>tons of power and and um political and intellectually, you've

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 1>got the monarchy now being assaulted by the French salons

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 1>who are planning the seeds of democracy. Like Monascu for example,

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:50.919
<v Speaker 1>Uh wrote in se the Spirit of the Laws, and

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>he basically proposed the idea of a separation of powers.

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:56.239
<v Speaker 1>He's like the first guy to do that. He's the

0:24:56.240 --> 0:24:59.639
<v Speaker 1>French lawyer who was in the salon scene. And um,

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>all the sen it's like separation of power. What are

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 1>you talking about? No, you've got a monarch and what

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the monarch says is right. And as a result of

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>this kind of thinking, the seeds of democracy are planted.

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:13.880
<v Speaker 1>And then a hostility toward religion, um of almost any

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>kind that you still see today, like in the form

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of like Bill Maher or Richard Dawkins are formerly Christopher Hitchens. Um.

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 1>All of this started coming out of the French salons. Yeah,

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 1>all right, after this message, we're going to talk a

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit about how the Age of Enlightenment manifested itself

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:44.640
<v Speaker 1>in different parts of the world. So we've mainly been

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:49.119
<v Speaker 1>in Europe this whole time. UH. In France there was

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:52.719
<v Speaker 1>an emphasis on the arts. UH. In England they had

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 1>a more emphasis on UM science and economics. You mentioned

0:25:56.320 --> 0:26:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Adam Smith at the beginning UH Scottish Man and Night

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>some nineteen seventy six. In seventeen seventy six wrote his

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Wealth of Nations, which basically said the government should not

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:14.120
<v Speaker 1>interfere with UH matters of finance and economics. Yeah, there

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>should be UH, the invisible hand guiding all these principles. Yeah.

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I read this article and by this guy who's explaining

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:24.399
<v Speaker 1>that change and thought, like before that, it was that

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>whole social contract thing, like Russa saying, you know, the

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the it's this is an interplay between citizens and citizens

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:33.639
<v Speaker 1>and citizens and their government, and the government's role is

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to protect UM the rights of people. What Hume said

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>is the government is legitimate and so they're not human.

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:45.399
<v Speaker 1>But Smith, it's the government's legitimate and so far as

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 1>it steps out of people's affairs and let's free trade

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:52.400
<v Speaker 1>take place, which that might sound familiar if you UM

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to republican or conservative or libertarian ideology. You know,

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:00.919
<v Speaker 1>like the whole laz A fair attitude of government is

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 1>what's what legitimizes government, and the government that medals in

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 1>someone's affairs is an illegitimate government as far as classical

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 1>economic thought goes. Yeah, and we talked about that in

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 1>our stuff you should know Guide to the Economy, Yeah,

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:18.400
<v Speaker 1>which we got an email someone bought that the other day. Yeah,

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 1>they thought was seventeen hours long or something. And then

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:24.879
<v Speaker 1>also in Scotland, um was David Hume, who's like my

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:28.400
<v Speaker 1>favorite philosopher of all time, just because he's like he's

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the only when he studied, he's a meeting. Now he's

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a meeting, but he's the only one who's ever really

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 1>spoken to me of the Enlightenment philosophers. And Hume was

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:40.400
<v Speaker 1>this meat and potatoes dude who basically said, like, show

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 1>me the proof. He was a skeptic, he was an empiricist,

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Like he said, you basically can't believe anything that you

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:49.399
<v Speaker 1>can't see with you or not. My belief in his

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:53.120
<v Speaker 1>philosophy has been eroded with the idea that like consciousness

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 1>is a subjective experience, like just totally subjective basically. But

0:27:58.320 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I like his his idea and it was like the

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the cause and effect right, like I think he used

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 1>like Billiards as an example, where you hit a ball

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 1>like you're playing eight ball, and you hit like the

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 1>eight ball with the cue ball, like you can predict

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>where that's gonna go, like where the eight ball is

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:18.679
<v Speaker 1>gonna go based on how you hit it with the

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 1>cue ball. But the Humes point is is you can't

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 1>say for certain that that's what's going to happen. You're

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:30.680
<v Speaker 1>basing that strictly on previous experience rather than proof that

0:28:30.720 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 1>this is what will happen. So we can't prove that

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:37.239
<v Speaker 1>hitting that cue ball will make this eight ball go

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 1>in a certain direction ahead of time. And so therefore

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 1>we've come up with this thing called causing effect, which

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 1>basically serves as a stop gap between what we think

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 1>will happen and the phenomenon we've already observed. Like in

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>other words, you can't say for certain the sun is

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna come up tomorrow just because it's already come up

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 1>so many days before. And the reason why it's because

0:28:57.400 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>we don't have empirical proof. And I liked him for that.

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 1>So you don't think the sun will come up tomorrow necessarily.

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 1>That's it's not the point that I think it won't

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>come up tomorrow It's what human was saying, is we

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 1>we we can't prove that it will. We we you

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>can't prove that it will just based on previous experience. Well,

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Jefferson and John Adams were on board that train

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 1>to a certain degree. Uh. And we mentioned earlier that

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>most of the establishment was pretty threatened by most of

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 1>these ideas and the people in power, but not everybody. Uh.

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Some people wanted to get on the Enlightenment train because

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it was progressive and maybe made them seem

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>um open to ideas and modern perhaps um. Empress of Russia,

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Catherine the Great was one of those who had a

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of dealings with the philosophs, and Frederick the Great

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:54.400
<v Speaker 1>of Prussia even had Voltaire over and said, you know what,

0:29:54.440 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 1>once you come and live here, and he did, yeah,

0:29:57.200 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 1>he said for free, and he said for free. He said, okay,

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm just trying to think of Prussian money, but I

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 1>have no idea. The prawlers the approval that's but way better. Uh.

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>It was also happening in Germany, um all over the

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>world with Emmanuel Kant. He was one of the first

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 1>champions of freedom of the of the press, and his

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 1>motto is one that I love dare to know. And

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 1>again he was just challenging people go out there and

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 1>learn about something and don't just accept, uh what these

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>religious leaders are telling you you have to accept. And actually, um,

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 1>he came up with this idea called the categorical imperative. Basically,

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 1>can't gave the world the idea that there is such

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a thing as moral absolutes right. And I guess he

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't give the world that because the Judeo Christian ethic

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and most religious ethics say that there is such a

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 1>thing as right or wrong. And today you have that

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 1>argument of is there such a thing as moral absolutism

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 1>or is moral or cultural relativism a thing? Right? That's

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the argument. That's that one of the arguments that's playing

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 1>out right now in the intellectual world. Yeah. I just

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 1>think that's fascinating to it totally is Uh So, what

0:31:13.200 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 1>does this all lead to? Eventually, It's gonna lead to war, um,

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 1>because any time there is well not any time, but

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of times when there's a uprising of radical thought,

0:31:24.600 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 1>people are gonna want to take action. And it happened

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 1>in the United States by way of the American Revolution

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and in France by way of the French Revolution, and

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 1>they had different results, to say the least, they were

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 1>both experimentations in this new idea of democracy. Yeah, pretty much, um,

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, the American one worked out pretty well. Some

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>would say the French one not so much, because apparently

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:54.160
<v Speaker 1>robes Pierre, who was the head of the Jacobin party

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 1>that took power during the French Revolution, robes Pierre was

0:31:58.040 --> 0:32:00.960
<v Speaker 1>a follower of Rousseau, I remember, was so contributed to

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the social contract by saying, um, the people will something

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and then it's up to the people in charge to

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 1>carry out that will. And so rose Pierre took that

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to mean that the people stormed the best steal and

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 1>overthrew the monarchy. And so it was his job as

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the head of the joke Coben party, which is now

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:20.719
<v Speaker 1>empowered to kill everybody who wasn't down with the revolution.

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 1>And so thousands and thousands of French people lost their

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 1>lives at the guillotine um as a result during this

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 1>reign of terror. So some people would say, America, uh,

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 1>founded itself based on democratic principles, and um, let's not

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to some of these darker spots over here

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and just pay attention to the democratic experiment and it

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:44.960
<v Speaker 1>worked out great, and then the French one, there's a revolution.

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 1>They tried to install democratic ideals and thousands of people

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 1>had their heads chopped off, so it didn't work quite

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:55.160
<v Speaker 1>as well well. And some people say that effectively killed

0:32:55.160 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the Age of Enlightenment as we know it. The French

0:32:57.200 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Revolution because the chaos and violence erupted was in certain

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 1>circles blamed on the Enlightenment and proof that we can't

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 1>self govern and these are radical ideas and that's why

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 1>we got stomped on. Um. Have you ever heard the

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 1>theory that the French Revolution was due to moldy bread? No? Uh,

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 1>there's one theory that people got ahold of bad bread

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 1>poisoning and basically we're tripping on acid. On July fourteen nine,

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 1>when they decided to storm the Best Deal, that was

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:32.959
<v Speaker 1>one of the explanations for the sale and witchcraft childs crazy.

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't heard that, so they were like, let's it's

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 1>go time, so let's get this party started. But like

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:43.680
<v Speaker 1>I said, some people say that ended the Age of

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Enlightenment as we know it. Uh. Romanticism was soon ushered

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:51.280
<v Speaker 1>in and was way more appealing to the common folk,

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:57.480
<v Speaker 1>um than this weird radical thoughts that we're going on before, well,

0:33:57.520 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 1>it was Romanticism was the first time people questioned the

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 1>idea on a large scale that maybe the rationalism of

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the humanism of the Enlightenment went too far in the

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:15.000
<v Speaker 1>other direction, Like sure, maybe we were way too religious

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:18.319
<v Speaker 1>and the religious organizations had way too much power, but

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 1>we swung way over here, and just rationalism had this

0:34:22.680 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 1>idea too, and it became dogmatic in and of its

0:34:25.000 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 1>own right. And so this is we still never really

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 1>figured out if how to how to fine tune it enough,

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's what we're still figuring out right now. A

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:39.919
<v Speaker 1>lot of people say, um, the Enlightenment the idea that

0:34:41.160 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 1>you're that the course of humanity is always towards civilization

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and rational thought, and that any culture that's not there

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 1>is inferior to a culture that does think rationally. So

0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:58.959
<v Speaker 1>that means that colonialism and imperialism was supported by Enlightenment thought,

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:02.440
<v Speaker 1>which is a huge Like the Enlightenment it's not supposed

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:04.239
<v Speaker 1>to be about that's supposed to be about good things

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and freedom and all that, but it also uh supported colonialism.

0:35:09.719 --> 0:35:12.040
<v Speaker 1>That was a huge that's people are arguing about that

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:14.640
<v Speaker 1>right now too. Yeah, let's go conquer these people and

0:35:14.800 --> 0:35:17.640
<v Speaker 1>make them modern and bring them into today's world exactly.

0:35:18.120 --> 0:35:21.759
<v Speaker 1>So there there's another article I want to recommend. It's

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:24.719
<v Speaker 1>called um the Trouble with the Enlightenment. It's by a

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:28.760
<v Speaker 1>guy named Ali Cussin. It's on Prospect magazine. Awesome, awesome

0:35:28.840 --> 0:35:31.960
<v Speaker 1>article about this that's just he basically reviews a couple

0:35:31.960 --> 0:35:35.719
<v Speaker 1>of books, one one by Jonathan Israel, who I mentioned earlier,

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 1>where he basically says, like, forget the philosophics, you gotta

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:45.279
<v Speaker 1>look at um Baruch Spinoza, who was a Dutch philosopher

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:47.799
<v Speaker 1>from I think the seventeenth century. He was the one

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 1>who came up with the Enlightenment ideas, and had we

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 1>followed his Enlightenment ideas, there wouldn't have been any governments now,

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:57.440
<v Speaker 1>or that there wouldn't be any religion whatsoever. He came

0:35:57.520 --> 0:36:00.840
<v Speaker 1>up with the real revolutionary Enlightenment, and what we got,

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:03.160
<v Speaker 1>what we think of as the Enlightenment, was a watered down,

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:07.320
<v Speaker 1>moderate version that was changed. Sure, there was tons of change,

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 1>but it was still palatable to the elite that the

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:14.759
<v Speaker 1>people could still be governed easily even in these new

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 1>democratic experiments and stuff like that. There's a lot of

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:20.360
<v Speaker 1>people who take issue with his book, but it's um

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty interesting to discuss it Democratic Enlightenment. I think he's

0:36:27.640 --> 0:36:31.239
<v Speaker 1>the one who wrote that several thousand page trilogy. And

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:34.320
<v Speaker 1>then there's another guy in a historian named Anthony Pageant.

0:36:34.680 --> 0:36:37.399
<v Speaker 1>He believes um that the Enlightenment project is still going

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:39.840
<v Speaker 1>on and basically that as long as there's religion in

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the world, the Enlightenment won't be fulfilled entirely, which is

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:49.839
<v Speaker 1>again it's it's like this this idea that rationalism has

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:52.759
<v Speaker 1>become dogmatic, and if you don't, if you're not just

0:36:52.800 --> 0:36:55.359
<v Speaker 1>strictly rational, if you hold any kind of what could

0:36:55.400 --> 0:36:59.440
<v Speaker 1>be considered irrational or superstitious belief, you're acting irrationally. You're

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:02.400
<v Speaker 1>not thinking correctly, and therefore you have to be converted,

0:37:03.080 --> 0:37:08.560
<v Speaker 1>which is just as dogmatic. Yeah, lots going on right now,

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 1>huge time of change. And also go read The Dark

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Age myth and Atheist Reviews God's Philosophers by Tim O'Neil

0:37:16.360 --> 0:37:21.160
<v Speaker 1>on Strange Notions dot com. Tip O'Neil, Tim O'Neal, And uh,

0:37:21.200 --> 0:37:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's about it. Huh, that is it for me?

0:37:23.600 --> 0:37:25.239
<v Speaker 1>If you want to learn more about the Enlightnment, go

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:28.759
<v Speaker 1>check out those three articles, or check out and check

0:37:28.800 --> 0:37:31.719
<v Speaker 1>out how the Enlightenment worked, and by typing that in

0:37:31.760 --> 0:37:34.319
<v Speaker 1>the search part, how stuff works. And now it's time

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:38.720
<v Speaker 1>for listener mail. I'm gonna call this mad Cow theory

0:37:39.400 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 1>from Seattle. Hey, guys, just listen to your podcast on

0:37:42.320 --> 0:37:45.560
<v Speaker 1>fatal familial insomnia. In it, you mentioned the late eighteenth

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 1>century cases in Venice and then wondered about the unrelated

0:37:49.560 --> 0:37:52.640
<v Speaker 1>cases and what they were eating. This made me finally

0:37:52.640 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 1>sit down and write my first email. For years, I've

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:57.400
<v Speaker 1>had a theory about prion disease and matt cow and

0:37:57.480 --> 0:38:01.040
<v Speaker 1>specific years ago, I was watching a program on Egyptian mummies.

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:04.239
<v Speaker 1>They talked about how mummification may have started out with

0:38:04.280 --> 0:38:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the Pharaoh, but the practice eventually made it down to

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 1>uh call it budget mummification. They talked about how in

0:38:12.640 --> 0:38:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the late eighteenth nineteen century crypts of these early mummies

0:38:17.120 --> 0:38:20.319
<v Speaker 1>they would be ground up and sold as fertilizer, specifically

0:38:20.360 --> 0:38:23.120
<v Speaker 1>in England. Sometime later, when I learned about prions and

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:27.400
<v Speaker 1>how nearly indestructible they were, I wondered, could ground up

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:29.960
<v Speaker 1>mummies have been used to fertilize the field. Then a

0:38:30.040 --> 0:38:33.319
<v Speaker 1>cow comes along and eats grass but has been contaminated

0:38:33.360 --> 0:38:36.560
<v Speaker 1>with prions, leading to mad cow disease. The human eats

0:38:36.600 --> 0:38:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the mad cow's brain gets quit spelt yakups. Uh. So

0:38:41.160 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I've always wondered it, could never figure out if you

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:45.080
<v Speaker 1>could prove it or disprove it. If see if j

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:51.120
<v Speaker 1>was a real mummy's curse of desecrated Egyptian corpses, and

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:53.920
<v Speaker 1>that is Darren Gray in Seattle, and man, I just

0:38:54.000 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 1>like that kind of speaking of radical thought. I had

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:02.440
<v Speaker 1>not heard that one. Darren's having it. Well, it's Darren's own. Uh,

0:39:04.360 --> 0:39:09.239
<v Speaker 1>nice going, Darren, Yeah. Uh, if you have anything to

0:39:09.239 --> 0:39:11.839
<v Speaker 1>say about that, anybody else we would like to hear

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:18.160
<v Speaker 1>from you. Can you prove or disprove that Kritchfield yakubs

0:39:18.239 --> 0:39:21.120
<v Speaker 1>disease is a mommy's curse. You can tweet to us

0:39:21.440 --> 0:39:23.600
<v Speaker 1>at s Y s K podcast. You can join us

0:39:23.640 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook dot com slash stuff you Should Know. You

0:39:26.040 --> 0:39:29.400
<v Speaker 1>can send us an email which seems appropriate to stuff

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:32.480
<v Speaker 1>podcast at how Stuff Works dot com and join us

0:39:32.480 --> 0:39:34.520
<v Speaker 1>at at home on the web Stuff you Should Know

0:39:34.680 --> 0:39:42.120
<v Speaker 1>dot com for more on this and thousands of other

0:39:42.200 --> 0:39:51.600
<v Speaker 1>topics Is that how stuff works? Dot com