WEBVTT - Debt ETFs Could Grow to $2 Trillion: BlackRock’s Tucker

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot Com. I'm

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>so pleased to have our next guest, someone who I've

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>been speaking with for years, but who now has a beard,

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>so it's completely different. Matt Tucker, head of I Shares

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:43.480
<v Speaker 1>America's fixed income strategy at black Rock, the first portfolio

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>manager for a fixed income et F How much the

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>world has changed since then? Right? Quite a bit? Good morning, Lisa. Yeah,

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you know. The joke I make is that I was

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the first PM on the first fixed income e t

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>f B. At the time, nobody cared. Right now, Well,

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>but one day I want to ask you about, especially

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 1>as the total a U m asset center management and

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>fixed in comm e TF swells to eight hundred billion dollars,

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>where do we go from here? Are we sort of

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>past peak growth for this industry given the fact that

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>rates are rising, or do you see this a total

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 1>significantly increasing over the next few years, you know. A

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 1>For me, I think the joke is that we're still

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>in the early innings. Right. If you look at the

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>market so global fixed in com ets, as you said,

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>it's over eight hundred billion. The fixed income market is

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>over a hundred trillion dollars, So less than one percent

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of all the bonds and kind of bond exposures in

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the world are in ETFs, but so many of them

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 1>aren't even that liquid. So how much is sort of

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:42.399
<v Speaker 1>ETF a bowl? I think a lot more, um, So

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>give us some projections. So I think in the next

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>five years you could see this will easily cross a

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>trillion and probably approached two trillion globally for fixed in

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>com ETFs. And we're still growing at pretty healthy fift

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>year growth rates um. Things like So, I think I

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>have to look at a couple different trends. So one

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>is you're just seeing more adoption of e t f

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>s as a way to invest in fixt income markets. Right,

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>they do a lot of things that you can do.

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>The one you can do the ETF you can't do

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>with the mutual fund or a bond, right, But at

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the same time, you do have kind of these shorter

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>term periods where you have like rising rates that might

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>cause some pullback and fixed income, but that doesn't diminish

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the overall trend, right, I mean, go back to thirteen,

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the fan went, he had the taper tantrum. Rates went up,

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>people pulled money out of fixed income ETFs. Money came out,

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>but they went back in in fourteen, fifteen, sixteen, seventeen.

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:26.359
<v Speaker 1>So you're gonna have these short term pullbacks, but long term,

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the trend is still. I think you're gonna

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>still see adoption because there's still so many investors discovering

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>bond ETFs. So where's the biggest opportunity, where's the biggest

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:35.639
<v Speaker 1>growth could come from? So I think the biggest growth

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>is this move towards model portfolios that's happening in the

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>wealth space, right, so so many wealth managers smart smart data,

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>well not even a smart data. So to put that aside,

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll I think there is a growth area. But if

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you put that aside and just say kind of bread

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and butter, how investors invest today is changing. So it

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:52.639
<v Speaker 1>used to be that a portfolio manager, say it a

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 1>say called a financial advisor would go buy a couple

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>active funds and say, Okay, that's my bond allocation. Now

0:02:58.200 --> 0:02:59.679
<v Speaker 1>they're saying, you know what, I can use e t

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 1>F to actually build my own exposure at the client level,

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>so every individual investor can have a customized fixed income portfolio.

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:08.640
<v Speaker 1>That trend is still growing. I think it'll be a

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>ton more adoption of body tfs around that trend alright, So,

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>certainly there has been a lot of growth in government bonds.

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Certainly there's been quite a bit of growth in corporate bonds.

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:20.919
<v Speaker 1>But when it comes to the risk of your debt

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>high your bondy ts, for example, the assets have kind

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>of stagnated. It seems like recently there's been sort of

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a leveling off, and even as volumes increase in institutions

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 1>use it more, it kind of has seems to have

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>reach a saturation point. Do you think that that's the case.

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that they're sort of done growing. I'm

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>much sure they're done growing forever. I think at this

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>part of the cycle. Though, if you kind of look

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>at who's using them right now, you have a lot

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>of institutions, as you mentioned, using high O dtfs, the

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>liquidity is very strong. Um there, there's kind of enough

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>float out there to kind of support the liquidity that's

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>out there. I think if you had a period where

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>investors started to allocate more to HIE out as an

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>asset class, you'd see it grow. But honestly, where spreads

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>are right now and we are in the cycle, you're

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>just not seeing a lot of investor to and an

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>appetite for high yield um. Different part of the cycle

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>that changes, I think they grow, but I think at

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>this point it's hard to imagine it would grow, right

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>just like you're not seeing growth in highled mutual funds

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>or other HILD vehicles. So, Matt, what do you think

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>of bitcoin ETFs? We don't have any yet. I mean

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin has got a hold of the problem and that

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:19.280
<v Speaker 1>no one's quite sure if it's a security or not, right,

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and so kind of tell you to fine. If it's

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 1>a security, it's hard to actually put it into something

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>else which is a security. So I think the regulators

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of work to to kind of figure

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 1>that out and figure out how to legally treat bitcoin.

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>But once you actually have it established, the rules are established, sure,

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I can see making its way to do an E

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>T F as long as it was eligible. Well, just

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about that, I'm wondering with some of the derivatives

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that have been used in e t F. Some'm thinking

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of an E t F complex that has credit default

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:46.600
<v Speaker 1>swaps as the backing. It's just sort of a derivative

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:48.599
<v Speaker 1>of a derivative. Does that start to get you nervous

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>or you know, with the right parameters and the right holdings,

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:54.160
<v Speaker 1>it's fine. I think as long as you structure and

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 1>manage the risks appropriately, it can be fine. Right, so

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>as you can imagine AID and all these things. I

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 1>think there are actually in the market credit fault swap

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, back t tps. But as long as those

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>are fully collateralized, there's not a lot of leverage, I

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:06.720
<v Speaker 1>think it can work. I think if you started getting

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>into layers of leverage, I think that's the lesson of

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:12.160
<v Speaker 1>ten years ago, right, that's when you start to create

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 1>these structures that can unwind quickly in a crisis, but

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>fully collateralized, fully back whether you hold a bond or

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 1>a derivative, it shouldn't matter much. Actually, are there bad

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:22.600
<v Speaker 1>actors in the E t F world that are doing

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>things that you think are imprudent? That's always a tough question. Um,

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I like to I like to make your life difficult.

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I think there are more and more actors in this space.

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Right so I sit in a seat to your point

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>where I've been doing this for more than sixteen years now,

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:37.839
<v Speaker 1>right so I take kind of a long lens on

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 1>this where I think there are very good providers who

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>put out very good products where they understand their risks

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and how to list them, like black Rock for example.

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Not to make this commercial, but yeah, so I feel

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 1>like when we've been doing this so long, we understand

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>this and understand how to do it. As you get

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>new players market, you can't name names, but but I

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:55.919
<v Speaker 1>think you could firms that don't really understand the underlying

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>don't understand how to create funds. I think there's risks

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>like any industry, right you get more players in But

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>but what kind of reputational risk is there to you

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 1>and to your firm given the fact that there are

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>more players, some with less perhaps prudent standards. Um, I

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>am something that we definitely think about and talk about,

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>right this This idea that if there was a bad

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 1>actor who made some big mistake, there could be some

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>taint the e t F industry. That's kind of a

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:24.160
<v Speaker 1>tail risk that every industry has, right, But I think

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>that the forces pushing the growth of ETFs are strong

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>enough that the industry would weather any such event. I'm

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:31.479
<v Speaker 1>not really concerned about as a long term risk, but

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 1>as a short term pullback or cause for concern, or

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:36.280
<v Speaker 1>an area where you might have to educate more. Yeah,

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean there could be something. If you look at

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>leverage inverse funds classic example, right, they've gone through some

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>periods that they've had a lot of scrutiny from regulators

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 1>from investors, and when that's happened, we've gone out and

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>done a lot of education to help people understand, like,

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>these are what these securities are, this is how they operate.

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>These are risk you should worry about. And as long

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>as we keep doing that in educating the market, I

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>think we're fine. Matt Tucker, so good to see you,

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>like the beard. Thank you. Matt Tucker is the head

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of I Shares America's for fixed income strategy at black Rock.

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>He was the first portfolio manager for a fixed income

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>et F. He said people didn't really care back then

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>nearly two decades ago, but people certainly care today. When

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 1>there is eight hundred billion dollars in fixed income et fs,

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>and definitely this is an increasing area where people are

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>seeing both liquidity and an ability to invest in debt

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>at relatively low fees. All focused today on marijuana, in

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>particular Till Right, the Canadian cannabis company that has searched

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>four hundred percent in just months and is now more

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>valuable than American Air, Clorox and CBS. So who's hearing coaching?

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps it's Sam Massuchi. He joins us now. He's founder

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and chief executive officer of e t F Managers Group

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>in Summit, New Jersey. Sam, thank you so much for

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>being with us. You have an exchange traded fund that

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>invests in marijuana companies. How has it benefited from the

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>recent popularity of all things marijuana. Well, the fund, which

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>was launched by the way at the end of December

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 1>last year with seven million, is now over six million

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>in assets. We had a thirty million in UH you

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>know since August. UM it's had a record high yesterday

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and we're up mid August. So all of this positive news,

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 1>whether it's related to UH til ray, the recent canopy

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:45.439
<v Speaker 1>growth transaction, UM, you know, growing global acceptance of marijuana

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>is really helping the funds and investors in the funds.

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>How concerned are you about deploying that cash because there's

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of a limited number of candidates here to receive it,

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>certainly in the public market. Yeah, I mean currently the

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>fund has thirty four hold things across the globe. UM.

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>The number of opportunities and target companies I think will

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>continue to grow as again there's more regulatory certainty around

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the space and more companies UH start to enter. So

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the universe of stocks is just going to

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:19.319
<v Speaker 1>keep growing. I mean, how do you define a marijuana

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:23.559
<v Speaker 1>marijuana stock when a company like Coca Cola is thinking

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:26.839
<v Speaker 1>about creating a drink that uses one of the ingredients

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:32.680
<v Speaker 1>in cannabis to provide certain benefits or effects, and when

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the big tobacco companies are behind the scenes trying to

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>lobby for legalization and create throw networks. So what we

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:41.599
<v Speaker 1>do is we UM And by the way, this is

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>an index based fund. The index is produced by Prime

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Indexes and we manage the portfolio to mass the index.

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>But the index is actually split up between pure marijuana

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>plays as well as companies that are becoming very involved.

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>But it's not their core business. I think Scott's Miracle

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>could grow, which is one of our holdings, is a

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:04.960
<v Speaker 1>good example of that. Philip Morris is another. So it

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 1>is unique in that it is a pure play. It

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>does offer access to companies that are not UM only

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>in the cannabis space, as I said, in like a

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Scots or a uh you know, some of these other

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 1>funds Philip Mars. But it does offer this kind of

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>access that benefits from the growth in this space, investor

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>demand and certainty around regulations. So, Sam, you are the

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>first cannabis et F in the US. Are you seeing

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other E t F providers follow on

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and try to get in the game as well recently? Um,

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not. I mean we're the only pure play in

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the US. UM, there is a pure play in Canada. UM.

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:47.199
<v Speaker 1>We have the benefit of having first mover advantage as

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 1>of all of our funds, our first mover UM and

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>so this is a very first mover driven business E

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 1>t F thematic ets in particular. So it's not to

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>say that others might not get in all, but you know,

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>we have that space. How concerned aregue that this is

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 1>just a passing fad? That this sort of is a

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:08.719
<v Speaker 1>rolling ball of money that will roll out of the

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 1>cannabis space as we get more certainty around regulations and

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>get a clear sense of the winners and losers here. Um,

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it is. I think it is an

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>industry and really within its infancy and again around the globe,

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 1>people are learning more about the medicinal properties. It's being

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>used for things like the treatment of children's epileptic seizures,

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>chrone disease, It's weaning people off of opioids. So certainly

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the medicinal side of it will continue to grow as

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 1>we better understand the science and the benefits. One thing

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:40.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand, though, is that's not where the real

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>growth opportunity comes from, right, I mean the real growth

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 1>here could be from recreational use, where it puts the

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>cannabis industry on par with the alcohol industry or the

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>tobacco industry. Correct. Well, well, I I don't know that

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that. I think there's there There are

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 1>is two pronged growth, which is a benefit to investing

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>in this space. Sure, there is a recreational side. There's

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 1>less acceptance of recreational certainly within the US and globally

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 1>than medicinal, but there were very large companies doing some

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:15.239
<v Speaker 1>tremendous work in the medicinal space, all benefiting from marijuana,

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 1>particularly the CBD components of the cannabis plant. So now

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:21.199
<v Speaker 1>I think you're gonna see a lot of growth both

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>in both sections, which benefits the fund either way. Sam,

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:27.839
<v Speaker 1>who are the investors that you're seeing put money into

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:31.680
<v Speaker 1>your fund for the most partment, institutions, individuals, all of

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the above. I mean we literally have hundreds of thousands

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>of investors in the fund. The ticker, by the way,

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>is m j UM. It's a stock that that you

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 1>know today. It's a you know, it's a forty four

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>dollar and thirty cent stock. So I think what it's

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>benefiting from is a lot of people wanted to invest

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>in this space, but they wanted to get away from

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 1>single stock risk. When you buy a portfolio of thirty

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>four thirty six stocks, it's giving you access to the theme,

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>but they're not having to do the research to pick

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the right horse. This is a fund that does that

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 1>for you. Thank you so much for joining us. Really

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>a good time for for mj for your fund, UH

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>in a really compelling time as we watched the shift

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>from illegal to select legality and potentially beyond. Sama Succi,

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>founder and chief executive officer of et F Managers Group

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>in Summit, New Jersey. MJ invests in a range of

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>cannabis focused companies, UH, and it's just interesting to see

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>just how much these stocks have absolutely skyrocketed this year.

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:39.199
<v Speaker 1>M J up nearly thirty seven percent year to date.

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Till Ray, of course, is rocketing past some of the

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred year old companies that are mainstays in the broader

0:13:45.480 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>US equity in disease. We have the chief ex oecative

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:04.720
<v Speaker 1>officer of Auto Nation who started as a mechanic at

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>a mar Cities Benz dealership and has risen through the

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:11.560
<v Speaker 1>ranks steadily to become the CEO, and he joins us

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 1>here in our eleven three studios as well, of course

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>as Craig Trudel, us Auto's team leader based in New York.

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Here for us at Bloomberg News, Mike, thank you so

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>much for being with us. Mike Jackson, UH, executive Chairman

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 1>of Auto Nation. The announcement today that you are going

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>to retire as CEO and help find the next leader,

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 1>was this decession hard for you? To do now. I've

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>been thinking about it for us some years. Uh. The

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>company is in a great position, so there's a good

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 1>window for a transition. And next year I'll be seventy

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>years old and we'll have been CEO then for twenty years,

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>always sort of like breaking the rule of ninety and

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 1>so I think it's uh uh the right moment to

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 1>uh kick off a transition to an exciting new CEO

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and UM the boards taking responsibility for the recruitment and

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>selection of the next CEO. I'm sure it will be

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 1>an outstanding, exciting, vibrant UH leader to join Auto Nation.

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>And my contract has been extended uh through as executive chairman.

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>So I'm excited myself to start an exciting new chapter

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>with the company. So, Mike, before we get into all

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of the succession planning, I'm just wondering going forward, you know,

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>is the used car sales business going forward going to

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 1>look very different from the one that you grew up in. Well,

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>there's no question that's very different, and we've had a

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>part in changing it. We've branded the company Auto Nation

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>uh coast to coast, and we moved to one price

0:15:56.560 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>in all our pre owned operations across the comp ay

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>and our customers absolutely love it. It's how they want

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 1>to buy cars. It's and and our associates love eliminating

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>all the negotiation and haggle and be able to do

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>it much quicker. So if I look at our second

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>quarter for pre owned, uh, we're in that wonderful quadrant

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 1>where we have higher volumes at higher gross margins. Yeah, Greig,

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>come on in here. Yeah. And it's hard to talk

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>about all the change on the used car side without

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>talking as well about all of the changes on I'm sorry,

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm the used car side without changes on the new side. Uh.

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>And maybe the biggest story in that respect for some

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>years now has been Tesla for a lot of people,

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and this idea that can the the automaker sort of

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 1>circumvent the franchise model that we've come to know in

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the US. How is that going for Tesla at this point?

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>In your view? Well, how how's it going for Tesla? Period?

0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean I have to you have to tip your hat.

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>The is is good for a luxury all electric vehicle,

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and they were there first, and they've built a brand

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 1>that almost as a cult following They've never been able

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:16.919
<v Speaker 1>to make money doing that. And their capital structure is

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:23.639
<v Speaker 1>absolutely scary. Uh So the sustainability and viability is very

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 1>much open to question. Now. As far as their distribution model,

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not what I would have chosen, but this is America.

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I believe in free enterprise. If that's how they want

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:39.640
<v Speaker 1>to do it, fine, I would observe that the rest

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:43.440
<v Speaker 1>of us have electric vehicles coming in big numbers over

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the next several years. Um Audi just launched its Etron

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>yesterday in San Francisco. It's absolutely sensational. So these are

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>very compelling electric vehicles and for the first time, on

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 1>top of everything else, Tesla is going to have real

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:03.159
<v Speaker 1>company Titian and Elon Musk said that he was in

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:07.160
<v Speaker 1>production hell last year. He recently said he's in deliveries hell.

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Is that a hell that could have been avoided had

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>he not sort of snubbed his nose at the franchise dealer.

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Greg I said this years ago. I said it for

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>a boutique model. What he's doing is fine. As soon

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 1>as he wants to do value, it's going to be

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>an issue. Well, here we are. We're now at the issue.

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:29.679
<v Speaker 1>It is hell and um you know, all you have

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 1>to do is see these Model three sitting all over California.

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, so, Mike, I do want to get your

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:39.359
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts. The automation shares are down quite a bit

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:41.439
<v Speaker 1>this year, but down about and there's been a lot

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:45.159
<v Speaker 1>of concern raised about how we've reached peak autos and

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:47.680
<v Speaker 1>we've turned to the corner and we're starting to see

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 1>some wobbly sales. What's your view there and do you

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>think that it's going to be a rocky road forward

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>for the entire auto industry? Well, I was always very

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>frank that I think I said it coming out of

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the Auto show in something like that, that uh, auto

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:07.880
<v Speaker 1>new vehicle sales are not going to climb forever, uh,

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and that they're going to level off somewhere in the

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 1>high sixteen million units. And that's exactly what's happened. There's

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>been a very major shift though towards trucks, which I

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 1>think is permanent. In a month of August, the mix

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 1>was as vehicles to find his truck. Do you think

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 1>it's permanent? I think it's permanent, even with the concerns

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 1>about at some point we're gonna talk about gas consumption again,

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:35.639
<v Speaker 1>now we're not, because alright, then, let me tell you

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:39.920
<v Speaker 1>why it's permanent. Uh So, First, it's what the consumer wants.

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 1>They love the high seating position, they love the utility,

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:45.719
<v Speaker 1>and they love the panache that comes with the design.

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:49.119
<v Speaker 1>Step two, the fuel economy of these vehicles compared to

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>ten years ago, has doubled. We have small SUVs that

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>are as more fuel efficient than a sitan. It's absolutely amazing.

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 1>We have pickup trucks that get thirty miles to a

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:04.120
<v Speaker 1>gown on the highway. So, and then you combine the

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>fact that gasoline prices are very reasonable of adjusted for inflation,

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 1>just under three dollars a gallon, and America is producing

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>its own petroleum. Again, We're up to ten million barrels

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 1>a day with fracking and it's sustainable. So what's going

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to happen to get the American consumer out of this rucket?

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Would take five six seven dollars a gallon gasoline to

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 1>to to push them back into Sedan's. I don't see

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 1>it happening. So that means um overall, Yeah, uh, it's

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:38.640
<v Speaker 1>leveled off, but at a very nice place. All right, Craig,

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>just real quick here, I'd love to get your perspective.

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you ever see a world two people you talk

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to see a world in which the ride sharing industry

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:48.439
<v Speaker 1>overtakes the car ownership industry. Is that going to upset

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the model here? I think it's really hard to see

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that in most of America. And I think one of

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the things that Mike I've heard Mike talk about is

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>is that being really a model that is applicable and

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>useful in the cities, but so much of America, so

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 1>much so much of the American car buyers are the

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 1>folks in rural areas where Lift and Uber and the

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:11.399
<v Speaker 1>like just have not scaled and are going to have

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>some real trouble, uh, scaling in any meaningful way. And

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:17.200
<v Speaker 1>we've seen these companies make a lot of noise and

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:19.399
<v Speaker 1>cities and and maybe pick off some buyers on the

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>margin here and there. But uh, you know, we're quite

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a few years into these companies being around and we're

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.360
<v Speaker 1>still selling you know, sixteen seven million. Look at who

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 1>they who They're disrupting taxis, buses, subways, rental cars. So

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 1>so the shared market is being disrupted by a shared business, yes,

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and it really hasn't touched the personally used market. Unfortunately,

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 1>we have to leave it there. Thank you so much

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:48.399
<v Speaker 1>for being here. Congratulations on an amazing tenure, uh rising

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 1>from being a mechanic to the CEO. Mike Jackson, executive

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:55.679
<v Speaker 1>chairman of Automation, also chair at the Atlanta Fed. He

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 1>joins us here in the Leventhreeo Studios. Also our thanks

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to Craig Trudell, us Auto's team leader for Bloomberg News

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>in New York. I want to talk about housing. There's

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of questioning about how strong the US

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>housing market really is. An underlying that angst really is

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the affordability question. Can Americans afford to own homes? Can

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>they afford the American dream? And joining us down to

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about that is Danielle Hale, chief economist for Realtor

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Danielle, thank you so much for being here.

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Definitely some conflicting data this morning. We saw that US

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>housing starts rose more than forecasts, but permits slumped, suggesting

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 1>perhaps a little bit of a struggle there. I'm wondering

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 1>how much of this story is the ability for people

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to actually buy homes right now? Yeah, I think that's

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 1>a great point, lisas so, housing starts were up, but

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:58.439
<v Speaker 1>if you dig down and look at the data, single

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 1>family starts eat out just a really minor gain. Most

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>of the game came from a huge jump and multi

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>family starts. And when we think about the owner occupied

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 1>housing market, it's single family starts that lead to homes

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 1>that people can buy. Most of the multi family construction

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>that is built is built for rent UM. So this

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:17.439
<v Speaker 1>really isn't helping people who are in the market to

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:20.199
<v Speaker 1>buy a home. It's probably good news for renters. They

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:22.680
<v Speaker 1>might see some relief and rent increases on the horizon,

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>but not so much on the on the home ownership side.

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>So can you talk a little bit about affordability because

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 1>a news story study that you guys put out showed

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the only forty one of the US can actually afford

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to own a home. How does that compare to the past. Yeah,

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 1>So what we're looking at in that study is the

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 1>media income family. So the media income family in counties

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:47.399
<v Speaker 1>where forty one percent of the nation's population lives can't

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:50.879
<v Speaker 1>afford to buy the median home listing price UM, and

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>so things are less affordable now than they have been

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>from most of the last seven or eight years UM.

0:23:57.280 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 1>But we're sort of back in line with what a

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 1>longer term picture of affordability is. So in the last

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>seven or eight years, mortgage rs have been incredibly low.

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 1>After the housing crisis, prices were low and have since

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:12.119
<v Speaker 1>recovered um And so that created a huge opportunity for

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:15.200
<v Speaker 1>people to get into the housing market. UM and we're

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:18.440
<v Speaker 1>starting to see that that window is closing, at least

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:21.439
<v Speaker 1>as far as you know, great opportunities. That doesn't mean

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 1>there aren't opportunities. Things are just less affordable now than

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:27.400
<v Speaker 1>they have been in the recent past. I'm wondering what

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>this does with respect to the dynamic and the rental market.

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 1>We've seen a lot of money being raised for funds

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:36.440
<v Speaker 1>managed by the likes of ox if or Blackstone to

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>buy up rental properties. How much does this sort of

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 1>create a puzzle or present possibly a challenge to the

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:47.399
<v Speaker 1>costs that people end up paying if people are forced

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:49.920
<v Speaker 1>into renting more than owning. In other words, can you

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:52.399
<v Speaker 1>just give a sense of what the benefits are on

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:56.440
<v Speaker 1>both sides here? Yeah, So if you're renting, you have flexibility,

0:24:56.840 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>um in the sense that if you need to move,

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you can do so relatively easily. You're not responsible for

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 1>any of the property maintenance, and you don't take any

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:08.360
<v Speaker 1>of the risks of anything breaking that falls on your landlord.

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>So it's great for younger households, and in fact we

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>see younger households are much more likely to rent than

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 1>to own. But for older households that are more established,

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe you have kids in the picture, um it's nice

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to have that stability. Um So, you don't get the flexibility,

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:25.919
<v Speaker 1>but you get the benefit of stability. You get to

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 1>be in the same place, you get to call the

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>shots and make decisions, so you're not facing the question

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:33.440
<v Speaker 1>of what is going to happen to my rent every year.

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>You get to pay a fixed monthly payment if you've

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 1>taken out a thirty year fixed rate mortgage, which is

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:41.199
<v Speaker 1>by far the most common type of mortgage. Um So

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of benefits. And when you're a homeowner,

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:45.360
<v Speaker 1>you're paying down your mortgage every month, and so you're

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 1>building up equity through that forced savings plan of making

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 1>payments on your mortgage. So it's a great way for

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>homeowners to accumulate wealth. And in fact, if you look

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 1>at the data, homeowners tend to have thirty to forty

0:25:57.000 --> 0:26:00.159
<v Speaker 1>times greater net worth and renters. A large part of

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 1>that is because of the value they've built up in

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:03.880
<v Speaker 1>their homes. What do you think of the theory that's

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 1>been postulated that when the baby boomers get old, retired

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:11.199
<v Speaker 1>downsize their homes, there's going to be a flood of

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:14.679
<v Speaker 1>houses that are put up from market valuations are going

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:17.440
<v Speaker 1>to crash. Have you heard this theory? I have heard

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>this theory, um quite a bit. I think that, um,

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the baby boomers own a lot of real

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>estate right now, and they're such a huge generation that

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 1>they have big impacts on the macro economy. I think that, um,

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:34.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, baby boomers are living longer, They're healthier than

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 1>previous generations, so they're staying in their homes longer. I

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:40.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think we're going to see a sudden exodus out

0:26:41.000 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 1>of their homes because I don't think they're moving to

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 1>assisted living type facilities as much as previous generations, and

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 1>they're certainly not moving as early to those types of facilities.

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 1>So I think they're going to stay in their homes

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 1>for a little longer. And I think that's going to

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:57.119
<v Speaker 1>be good because it's going to spread out that wave,

0:26:57.240 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 1>so it's not going to be like a huge surge.

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it will be a gradual increase and that

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 1>will help the market better adjust to absorb it, and

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:09.200
<v Speaker 1>especially as millennials age into those years where they're forming

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 1>households having kids, I think that will help absorb some

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 1>of those homes that are out in the suburb. Danielle,

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>just twenty seconds here. Where do you think we are

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:21.160
<v Speaker 1>in the housing cycle right now? I think prices are high.

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:24.679
<v Speaker 1>I think sales are struggling because affordability is challenging. But

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 1>for households who are looking again, and I still think

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:29.639
<v Speaker 1>there's opportunity in the housing market. Thank you so much

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 1>for being with us, Danielle Hale, chief economists for Realtor

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 1>dot com. And definitely, uh, quite a staggering number that

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 1>only the US can actually afford to own a home.

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 1>But great perspective there that this is not uncommon historically,

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 1>that this sort of is uh the historic average in

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 1>terms of what people could afford. Definitely also telling though,

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 1>as a number of big institutional firms plow into the

0:27:54.440 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 1>rental ownership business try and capitalize on this trend. Thanks

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 1>can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:12.120
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:15.679
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Abramo wits one before the podcast, you can always catch

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio