WEBVTT - BI Weekend: Nvidia Earnings, Paramount Saga

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. This is Bloomberg Intelligence

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>with Alex Steinehl and Paul Sweeney.

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 2>The real app performance has been in US corporate high yield.

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:20.239
<v Speaker 3>Are the companies lean enough? Have they trimmed all the fats?

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:23.959
<v Speaker 2>The semiconductor business is a really cyclical business.

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Breaking market headlines and corporate news from across the globe.

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Do investors like the M and A that we've seen?

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 4>These are two.

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 2>Big time blue chip companies.

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 3>The window between the peak and cut changing super fast.

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence with Alex Steinehl and Paul Sweeney on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 5>I'm Paul Sweeney and I'm Emi Graffeo filling in for

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 5>Alex Steele.

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 2>On today's Bloomberg Intelligence Show. We dig inside the big

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 2>business stories impacting Wall Street and the global markets.

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 5>Each and every week, we provide in depth research and

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 5>data on some of the two thousand companies and one

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 5>hundred and thirty industries our analysts cover worldwide.

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 2>Today, we'll discuss how patients can now get Eli Lilly's

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:05.479
<v Speaker 2>blockbuster weight loss rug at nearly fifty percent discount plus.

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 5>We'll look at a slew of US retail earnings that

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:09.960
<v Speaker 5>are painting a mixed picture of the consumer.

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:12.279
<v Speaker 2>But first we dive into the earning from AI giant

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 2>n Vidia. This week, the chipmaker gave a revenue forecast

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 2>that fell short of some of the most optimistic analyst expectations.

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 5>The outlook threatens to tamp down an AI frenzy that

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 5>has transformed in Vidia into the world's second most valuable company.

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 2>For more, Emily and I were joined by kun John Sobani,

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence senior semiconductor analysts.

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 5>We first asked Koon John for his take on the

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 5>company's results.

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 4>Look, this not enough negatives.

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 6>Fundamentally, they are a victim of their own recent success

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 6>and strength and really unrealistic expectations.

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:45.399
<v Speaker 5>I'm wondering, this is a company where a lot of

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 5>their their customers are highly concentrated. Something like forty percent

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 5>of the customer base is just a few big tech companies.

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 5>What are the risks associated with that?

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 6>I mean, the concentration has been a significant risk. It's

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 6>sort of a double eds. You know, by the function

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 6>of spending. These customers are the ones who really spend

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 6>major I app capex dollars, So you do want them

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 6>to be your biggest customers. Because that's who are really

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 6>creating the market. At the same time, we have seen

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:18.359
<v Speaker 6>signs like over the last two quarters, the cloud players

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:22.079
<v Speaker 6>make up about forty five percent of its data center revenue,

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:24.919
<v Speaker 6>which is down from its peak of mid fifty percent

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 6>over last year, so that's a good sign. Over the

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 6>last few quarters, we have seen enterprises and the consumer

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 6>internet and vertical companies growing faster for NVDA data center

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 6>revenues compared to the cloud revenues for NVDA data center,

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 6>so that's again a good sign. Another third sign that

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 6>shows that ditaversification is happening and that risk is easy

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 6>is what we have seen in front of geographical demand perspective.

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:51.919
<v Speaker 6>So over the last few quarters, we have seen rest

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 6>of the world outside of US continue to sustainably keep

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:58.799
<v Speaker 6>growing sequentially. In fact, this quarter was the first time

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 6>we ever saw US decline slightly quarter work quarter.

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 2>So Kunjan, can those new types, new verticals of customers,

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 2>can they offset what might be slowing demand from the

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:11.919
<v Speaker 2>Amazons of the world, the Googles of the world who

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 2>are developing their own chips.

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 6>So we have not seen signs of slowing demand from

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 6>the Amazons and Googles of the world. You know, when

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 6>you look at quarter to quarter things can look lumpy,

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 6>but from a year and perspective, annual perspective, we are

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 6>not seeing slowing demand. In fact, when we look at

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 6>these earning seasons, all of these customers beat their capex

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 6>estimation and guided for more capex spending, most of it

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 6>going to a Yeah, most of it going to in media. Yes,

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 6>the risk is there of these customers using their own chips,

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 6>but that's more of a out year risk. They still

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 6>do are not slowing down or stopping purchasing in media chips.

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 5>What do investors need to know about the Blackwell processor lineup?

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 5>Ian King of Bloomberg News said this is in Nvidia's

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 5>next big cash cow exactly.

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 6>I mean, from our perspective, the biggest question or the

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 6>risk going into the earnings was what's happening with the

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 6>Blackwell delay? Is it going to ramp? And if so?

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 6>When I think the comment that Jensen made about seven

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 6>billion dollars shipment in their fiscal four Q should put

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 6>a lid on these uncertainty around Blackwell. And yes, Blackwell

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 6>is supposed to be the next growth driver. Specifically, most

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 6>of the twenty twenty five growth is hinged on Blackwell's success.

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Layout for US kind of how the competitive environment looks

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:30.719
<v Speaker 2>at their Kunjan. I'm thinking about advanced micro devices, broad coom,

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 2>maybe to Qualcom to less extent Intel. I guess where

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 2>are all these competitors here? Why can't they do this stuff?

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 6>I mean, and Media has almost more than a decade

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:43.840
<v Speaker 6>of R and D behind them in this arena. Right,

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 6>they are the ones who, for the most part, invented GPUs.

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:50.720
<v Speaker 6>They have been working on GPUs for like I said,

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 6>investing in it more than a decade. These other companies

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:56.919
<v Speaker 6>that we talked about I have not been investing in

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 6>this area. So it's not as easy to come in

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 6>and immediately replace someone who has been ahead of you

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 6>by multi years. Second, there's a lot other entries to barrier.

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 6>It's not just about creating comparable chips, their software, system

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:15.040
<v Speaker 6>their systems. They're not a chip solution provider anymore. They

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 6>are a system solution provider. So you don't need a

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 6>comparable chip. You also need the software, you need the ecosystem,

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 6>you need the vertical integration and the system integration capabilities.

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:27.279
<v Speaker 6>At the same time, they are not just sitting right,

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:29.799
<v Speaker 6>they are running much faster than they have in the past.

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 6>So it's not just about catching up to in Media,

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 6>which is already two plus years ahead of its closest competitor.

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 6>It's also trying to catch up when they are even

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 6>running faster. One example of that is they are now

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 6>launching new products at a cadence of twelve months. This

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:46.919
<v Speaker 6>is unprecedented in the semi conductor world for this complex technology.

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:49.279
<v Speaker 6>Usually you see eighteen to twenty four months of a

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:50.280
<v Speaker 6>product lon cycle.

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 2>How about valuation here again, you know, you look at

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 2>it and it's like seventy times trailing forty five times

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 2>this year, is thirty times next year? Is this a

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 2>stock that real, realistically with a straight face you can

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 2>say to clients is earning its way into its multiple.

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:07.720
<v Speaker 6>Also, we look at forward looking multiples and when you

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 6>still compare it today compared to most of its peers, right,

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 6>it's still growing faster than most of its peers, even

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:17.559
<v Speaker 6>at this large scale, which is very important that people

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 6>forget when you look at other fundamental metrics, the gross margin,

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 6>the earnings growth, the free cashual generation still top of

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 6>the list. So I mean that does demand a certain

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:30.600
<v Speaker 6>premium versus its peers, right, And when you look at

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 6>the other air peers. It doesn't seem that expensive on

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:34.719
<v Speaker 6>a relative basis.

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 5>Give us some final thoughts on is this a market

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 5>that is only going to be powered by in video

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:42.279
<v Speaker 5>or are we going to see more trading days The tech

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 5>trade is kind of you know, in the green without Invidia.

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:46.479
<v Speaker 1>I would say both.

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 6>I mean you have to really separate out right. We

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 6>think if if there is fundamental weakness or concern coming

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 6>out of in media, which did not happen, by the way,

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 6>we think there will be a broader impact to the market.

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 6>But in the absence of that, right, there was no

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 6>real concerns, There was no real flag risks that were

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 6>macro risks outlined here that the demand is slowing, the

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 6>spending is slowing. So I believe until and unless we

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 6>don't see those risks come out, the impact should be

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 6>limited to Invidia. But when, if, and when we do

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 6>see those come out, it could spread across.

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to Kunjhan Sobani, Bloomberg Intelligence senior semiconductor analysts.

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 5>We move now to the media space.

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 2>Pretty sure, David Ellison Skydance Media looks set to become

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 2>the new owner of Paramount Global.

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 5>That's after seacrem air. Edgar Bronform Jr. Dropped his bid

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 5>for Paramount this week. Paramount said it now expects to

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 5>complete a deal with sky Dance in the first half

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 5>of twenty twenty five.

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 2>For More and All This, host Alex Steele and Bailly

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Lipschaltz were joined by Keitha rung Anathan Bloomberg intelligence analyst

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 2>on US media.

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 5>They first asked Etha for her take on the latest news.

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 7>This one's been a tough one, right, It's not over

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 7>until it's over. I think Skydance does seem to be,

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 7>you know, the only bidding party here for Paramount, and

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 7>you know, the Edgar Braffman bid, and you know, we

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 7>were talking about this last week, Alex. It was really

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 7>a little bit of a head scratcher because they made

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 7>that eleventh hour move. He cobbled together something like twenty

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 7>outside investors and then when you know, kind of push

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 7>came to shove, he really couldn't find the equity financing

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 7>required to back his six billion dollar offer.

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 8>Am I reading too much into it to question why

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 8>the eleventh hour offer, Like if if it seemed like

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 8>there wasn't enough time early, enough time, and you're trying

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 8>to find people and get funding. It kind of I.

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 7>Don't know, Yeah, I think, you know, a couple of

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 7>different things. Maybe he had difficulty kind of finding all

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 7>the different parties interested. Obviously he didn't you know, there

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:45.679
<v Speaker 7>was a ghost shop period that was a forty five

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:49.080
<v Speaker 7>day period and he literally submitted it on August twentieth.

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 7>Then August twenty first was the end of that forty

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 7>five day go shop period. One could argue that maybe

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 7>he didn't want to, you know, kind of show his

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:57.960
<v Speaker 7>hand too early so that there, you know, would be

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 7>other parties kind of jumping in. But at the end

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 7>of the day, you know, he obviously does not have

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 7>the financial firepower of the Allison family, and that's something

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 7>I think investors are going to have to come to

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 7>terms with.

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:12.959
<v Speaker 3>So all right, let's just walk it forward. You get Skuidance,

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 3>gets paramount, et cetera. There were some reports that maybe

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 3>some of the TV networks I'm assuming Local would be

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 3>spun off or sold, etc. What are we expecting of

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 3>that sort to unfold?

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:24.559
<v Speaker 7>So they right now have three co CEOs and this

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 7>kind of structure, this temporary structure, is going to continue

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 7>till this Guy Dance deal closes, which might happen sometime

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:35.319
<v Speaker 7>towards the latter half of twenty twenty five. Until then,

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 7>what they're really trying to do is number one is

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 7>make streaming profitable. They already did do that in the

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 7>second quarter. So they're really kind of cutting down on

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 7>marketing spend, they're cutting down on content expenses, They're doing

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 7>everything they can to write the ship. They're also kind

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 7>of trying to undertake cost cuts across the whole enterprise

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 7>and get rid of non core assets. So the news

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 7>that we got about them looking to divest some of

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 7>their low local TV stations exactly kind of goes to

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 7>that strategy. You know, they could potentially end up with

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 7>about five hundred million, I mean about half a billion

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 7>or a billion dollars for those you know, TV stations. Again,

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 7>that's going to help them pay down debt. And debt

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:18.079
<v Speaker 7>has been a huge problem for Paramount. They have almost

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 7>about fourteen and a half billion dollars in debt, and

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 7>that has really kind of complicated the whole story because

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 7>it you know, they have low ebit, low free cash flow,

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:30.079
<v Speaker 7>and then very high debt.

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 8>And what does the path forward look like. I'm just

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 8>looking through your latest note kind of looking at strengthening

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 8>the balance sheet. To your point, more than fourteen a

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:38.960
<v Speaker 8>half billion in debt. Market cap is seven point six

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 8>billion dollars, so you never really want to see numbers

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 8>that stretched. But what does Ellison's d pockets bring to

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:48.719
<v Speaker 8>the table, Like, how does this potentially revamp Paramount if

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 8>at all?

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely, that's that's a great point, Bailey. So I think

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 7>the main reason that Ellison has been chasing after Paramount

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:58.679
<v Speaker 7>for all these months is really his interest in kind

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 7>of getting his hands on the studio. So he does

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 7>have a long history with Paramount. They have, you know,

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 7>the Ellisons have been a co financer on many of

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 7>the Paramount TV and film projects, most notably a lot

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 7>of the Tom Cruise movies. So they do kind of

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 7>know how, you know, that business works. They have a

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 7>lot of expertise, so they are going to kind of

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 7>double down on the Paramount studio business. The theatrical business

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 7>is rebounding nicely, so I think it does make sense

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 7>for them. And historically, if you just look at Paramount,

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 7>this is you know, the studio has always kind of

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 7>been a step child. So it's nice that it's going

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 7>to now come into focus, and then along with that,

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 7>you have almost one thousand person animation team that Skuydance

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 7>is going to bring to Paramount, so really kind of

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 7>doubling down on the animation business. And this is important

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 7>because we see studios kind of going deeper and deeper

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 7>into animation. This is animation is one of the most

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:56.440
<v Speaker 7>profitable genres across the whole movie space, so it makes

0:11:56.480 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 7>a lot of sense for them to get into that

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 7>in a bigger way because they can really kind of

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 7>enhance the profitability of the studio business as a whole.

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:08.599
<v Speaker 2>Our Thanks to Githa Ranganathan, Bloomberg Intelligence analyst on US Media.

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 5>Coming up a conversation with the executive director of the

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 5>Port of Los Angeles on cargo volumes and the shipping industry.

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 2>depth research and data on two thousand companies and one

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Bigo on the terminal.

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 5>I'm Paul Sweeney and I'm Emily Graffeo. This is Bloomberg.

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:35.439
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us Live

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplaying and broud Outo

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:49.440
<v Speaker 5>I'm Paul Sweeney and I'm Emily Graffeo filling in for

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 5>Alex Steele.

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 2>We move now to the biotech space. This week we

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 2>heard the pharmaceutical company Eli Lilly is selling vials of

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 2>its blockbuster weight loss drug to patients at a fifty

0:12:58.360 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 2>percent discount to its shots.

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 5>Patients with a prescription for Zetbound can now purchase a

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 5>month's supply of single use vials through Lily's direct to

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 5>consumer site.

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 2>This is being done to help Eli Lily overcomes supply

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 2>shortages of its widely popular shots. For more, hosts Alex

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Stale and Billy Lipschutz were joined by Michael Shaw, Bloomberg

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence Senior Pharma analyst.

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:21.679
<v Speaker 5>They first asked Michael why it's easier for Eli Lilly

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:24.080
<v Speaker 5>to produce vials than actual shots.

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 4>They're providing a valve for relation. It's something that they've

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 4>talked about, you know, for a while now on their calls.

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 9>Now.

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 4>The reason why these are easier to produce is, you know,

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 4>the fill and finished capacity, so the capacity needed to

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 4>actually put the drug in the pens and the capacity

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 4>needed to manufacture at the pens of the subcutaneous ejection.

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 4>So overall, I think, you know, the move is you

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 4>know positive for Lily clearly broadens access or patients access

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 4>you know, to zet bound and also from you know,

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:57.439
<v Speaker 4>compounding pharmacy standpoint. The fact that they improved supply means

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 4>it could you know, possibly combat you know, competition from

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 4>you know, companies such as him, Hymns and Hers.

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:06.439
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, Lily not so subtly saying that they want to

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:09.679
<v Speaker 8>aim to protect patients from quote counterfeit, fake unsafe for

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 8>untested knockoffs. So how does that impact kind of the

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 8>business and demand If we're seeing a cheaper version being

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 8>sold and maybe trying to court some of those Hymns

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 8>and Hers GLP one users, how does that impact kind

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 8>of the total addressable market and expectations for sales of

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 8>zepp out.

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think if there's you know, if there's a

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 4>branded vowel formulation out there and there's obviously guarantees around

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 4>kind of purity, et cetera, I think that's going to

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 4>be the preferred choice. The fact that you're introducing these

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 4>valves into the market, would suggest that, you know, some

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 4>of that supply burden and supply shortage which is needed

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 4>for a compounding pharmacy to produce a drug that is

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 4>on pattern, you know, some of that will be alleviated there.

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 4>So that's kind of why we think it's positive for Lily.

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 4>As to whether you know, come to like him and

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 4>hers will continue producing you know, their versions of the

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 4>GEO beyond ones, I mean, that remains to be seen.

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 4>But I imagine if they do, you know, Lily would

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, probably challenge.

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 3>It when people then do their own shots, like administer it,

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 3>Like is there a risk in that? Like, well, what

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 3>what kind of uptake are we expecting from that? Because

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 3>I would be scared to do it. But maybe that's

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 3>just me.

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think judging by you know, what we

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 4>saw for uptake of these compounded drugs, there's clearly a

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 4>appetite for injectable injections. Now, you know, we look to

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 4>the diabetes market. You know, some of the incidents used

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 4>to be injections, So I mean, I think it's not

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 4>I mean, there's clearly kind of an increased kind of

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 4>dosing burden associated within these injections, so they're probably not

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 4>going to be suitable for all, but you know, I

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 4>think there is going to be an appetite for it.

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 8>What does this mean for the competitive landscape? So you

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 8>have Lily, you have Novo. To your point, you have

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 8>hymns and hers like, is this going to create a

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 8>pricing war? Am I reading too much into that now?

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean when we look at the I mean, the

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 4>headlines had fifty percent you know, discount, but we need

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 4>to remember that, you know, on a net price basis,

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 4>so you know, after taking account all the rebates and discounts,

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, the pricing is probably you know, fairly similar

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 4>to the current net prices that we're seeing now at

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 4>the moment. You know, it's an underpenetrated market. You know,

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 4>there's massive demand out there, there's tight supply, So I

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 4>don't think it's gonna you know, change too much in

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 4>terms of the dynamics between you know, Novo and Lily.

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 4>I think I think prescribing decisions are you know, less

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 4>about kind of the profiles of the drug at the

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 4>moment and more about you know, what is ensured, what

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 4>can people get their hands on? So near term, I

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 4>don't see you know that that changing from a lily perspective.

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 4>You know, as they ramp up supply over the over

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 4>the midterm of their you know, their pens. You could

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 4>put GC patients switching from the injectable onto the pen

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:06.679
<v Speaker 4>as in when that supply comes on board.

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:07.239
<v Speaker 6>All right.

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to Michael Schap, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Parma biotech analyst.

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:13.400
<v Speaker 5>We move next to one of the world's busiest seaports

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 5>and a leading gateway for international trade in North America,

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 5>the Port of Los Angeles.

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 2>This week, co hosts Alex Steele and I were joined

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:23.439
<v Speaker 2>by Geen Soroka, Executive Director of the Port of Los Angeles.

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:26.680
<v Speaker 2>We discussed his forecast for cargo volumes, the shipping industry,

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 2>and investing in ports moving forward, and we began by

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 2>asking Gene what the traffic is at the Port of LA.

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 10>We're up eighteen percent year on year off of very

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 10>modest comps, but we just crossed the five hundred thousand

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 10>container unit mark last month and it's only the fourth

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:44.639
<v Speaker 10>time in our history we've had more than half a

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 10>million imports coming through Los Angeles. Big number for US,

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 10>and it continues the trend that we've seen thus far

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 10>this year. In addition, exports are now up fourteen consecutive

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 10>months year on year, So the volume as a whole

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 10>is really great, based mainly on a strong economy and

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:07.120
<v Speaker 10>then some geopolitical issues around around the world that I'm

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:07.920
<v Speaker 10>sure we'll talk about.

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So, Gin, I'm curious how much are your customers

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 3>talking about the geopolitics abroad but also here in the

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:18.959
<v Speaker 3>US Anecdotally, I keep hearing that certain companies are just

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 3>holding back on investments until we get clarity on who's

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 3>going to be in the White House. Are you seeing

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 3>any of that.

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 10>In just about every conversation, alex It is an election

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 10>year and folks are looking to see and try to

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 10>hedge as to what type of policies will be in

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:36.360
<v Speaker 10>place after inauguration.

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 11>You've got a protracted labor.

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 10>Negotiation on the East Coast with the Dock Workers and

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 10>Employers Association that's coming up for expiry at the end

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 10>of September. The Panama Canal drought issues have been in

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 10>the news for well over a year and a half,

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 10>and the ongoing security concerns in the Red Sea have

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 10>stymied crossings at the Suez Canal for more than a

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 10>year as well. All of that put together fractionally, you

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 10>see cargo coming to the West coast of the United

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 10>States and specifically Los Angeles in addition to the strength

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 10>of that economy.

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 11>That shows where the numbers are going.

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Heyjean, just last week Bloomberg News published a really in

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 2>depth big Take story. Now look at your world ports

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 2>around seaports around the world and how some governments are

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 2>using them as really strategic tools here because they're becoming

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 2>so important for global trade. Just for the US, do

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 2>you feel like our ports are where they need to

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 2>be in terms of investments capacity or does the US,

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 2>whether it's a public private partnership, need to invest more.

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:43.479
<v Speaker 10>We absolutely need to invest more. But beginning with the

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 10>Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the Inflation Reduction Act, and

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 10>now applications that are in front of the Environmental Protection Agency,

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:53.920
<v Speaker 10>we've seen a focus on ports over the last three

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 10>and a half years here in the United States we

0:19:56.320 --> 0:20:00.040
<v Speaker 10>haven't seen in a generation. We'd like to have this

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:04.119
<v Speaker 10>type of federal investment budgeted annually. And I also know

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 10>that the work here in California under Governor Gavin Newsom

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:10.920
<v Speaker 10>has the same bent paying attention to these ports, investing

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:15.400
<v Speaker 10>not only in the infrastructure, but digitalization as well as

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 10>clean and green technologies. This has to continue. But I

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 10>like the trajectory that we're on right now.

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:24.360
<v Speaker 3>Going back to what you were mentioning about customers talking

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 3>about election uncertainty, what's your best guess as to what

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 3>happens after that. I'm trying to get a handle on, Like, Okay,

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 3>now I know who wins the White House. Are we

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 3>going to see a flood of money coming in like

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:37.199
<v Speaker 3>a flood of buying or is it just going to

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 3>be incremental?

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 11>Well, Alex take away the politics.

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 10>The presumptive Republican nominee and now Republican nominee has said

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:48.880
<v Speaker 10>he wants to put a ten percent tariff on all

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 10>three trillion dollars worth of imports that come to the

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 10>United States, sixty percent on those emanating from China, and

0:20:56.880 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 10>potentially sixty percent on automobiles and other products coming out

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:02.679
<v Speaker 10>in Mexico. That would change the landscape here at the

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 10>Port of Los Angeles forever, and it would create inflation.

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 11>On the Democratic side.

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 10>What we've seen is a continuation of this teriff regime

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 10>and get tough on China policy, but in very small

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:20.919
<v Speaker 10>targeted ways. What happens to investment after this has to

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 10>revolve around international and trade policy. What are we going

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 10>to do to stimulate not only the continuation of that

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 10>government investment federal and state level, but how we can

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:34.679
<v Speaker 10>give confidence to the private sector to invest behind us.

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Gee, nobody has a better view of China than you.

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 2>Guys in the Port of Los Angeles. Are the boats

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 2>still coming? Are they loaded as much? Because there's real

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 2>concern about the Chinese economy.

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:51.880
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, a couple things, Paul. When we concluded calendar year

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:56.159
<v Speaker 10>twenty twenty two, fifty seven percent of our business portfolio

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 10>here in Los Angeles was China cargo, imports and exports.

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 10>Right now it's about forty three percent. Yet we're still growing.

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 10>We've been nimble enough here in Los Angeles to attract

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 10>the cargo in Southeast and South Asia. There are more

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 10>NonStop services being put in place by the shipping lines.

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 11>Speed has always been.

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 10>Our selling point with cargo coming from Asia and distributing

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 10>throughout the country. We keep these NonStop services in place,

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 10>that speed variable remains in our favor.

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 3>What's your biggest problem right now, Gene, Like, what keeps

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 3>you up at night?

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 10>Well, looking across the board, making sure we keep our

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 10>costs in place. And we do that with a relatively

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 10>expensive landscape on how we move cargo. But more volume

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:44.360
<v Speaker 10>means our unit cost becomes much more competitive, and we're

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 10>trending in that direction nicely. We've got a very complex

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 10>labor landscape. Our dock workers have a contract for another

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 10>five years, but it's the trucker's warehouses folks in it

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 10>and manufacturing. We've got to keep trained up and moving

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 10>with this economy. And then lastly along the regulatory environment.

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 10>Got to make sure the clean air is a priority,

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 10>but making sure that we're balanced, because every four containers

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:09.639
<v Speaker 10>here in Los Angeles creates a job.

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 2>Interesting, So, Gin, you mentioned some of your partners there,

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:17.440
<v Speaker 2>whether that or at the docks, the warehouses, the transportation,

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 2>the rails and trucks. How is that supply chain, how

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:24.920
<v Speaker 2>is that the logistic chain performing in your area these days?

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 10>I look at the vital statistics every morning, and after

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:30.400
<v Speaker 10>just checking in with you all, I saw that they're

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 10>at or better than where they were pre COVID, with

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:37.120
<v Speaker 10>one exception. Are on dock rail cargo sitting a little

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 10>bit longer than I would like. We're working very closely

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 10>with both the Union Pacific Railroad and BNSF to make

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 10>sure we have railcars, engine power, and crewing to match

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 10>this surgeon cargo that we have coming.

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 11>Now.

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 10>Nothing sinister is happening on the ground. Just need to

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 10>keep that velocity going so the next ships, of which

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:57.920
<v Speaker 10>we have fifty six on the way from Asia, can

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 10>be worked expeditiously by our long shore remembers and they

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 10>gotten off into the American economy. And that's with all

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 10>this data, Paul, we see these micro in many spikes

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 10>or changes in the supply chain data, so we can

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 10>act much quicker than we ever have before.

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:15.880
<v Speaker 5>Our thanks to Gene Soroka, executive director of the Port

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:18.679
<v Speaker 5>of Los Angeles. Coming up on the program, we'll discuss

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 5>how the impact of a declining recount in the US

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 5>is impacting oil production.

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:26.639
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing indepth

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 2>research and data on two thousand companies and one hundred

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 2>and thirty industries that can access Bloomberg Intelligence via BIGE

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:33.640
<v Speaker 2>on the terminal. I'm Paul Sweeney and.

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:34.440
<v Speaker 5>I'm Emily Grafeo.

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:35.400
<v Speaker 11>This is Bloomberg.

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:47.959
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen live

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, Just

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 1>say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 5>I'm Paul Sweeney and I'm Grafo filling in for Alex Steele.

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 2>We move next to retail and the health of the consumer.

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 5>This week, we got earnings from retailers Coles, Abercrombie and

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 5>Fitch and Nordstrom, among others.

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 2>For more, guest hosts Michael Reagan and I were joined

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 2>by Mary Ross Gilbert Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Equity Animals. Covering retail,

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 2>we first asked Mary for her take on the most

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 2>recent results.

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:22.199
<v Speaker 9>I would say mixed results coming out of retailers. So

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 9>for example, on Coals, they missed on the sales line,

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 9>so the comp sales came in down about five percent

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 9>and analysts were expecting down two and a half percent.

0:25:33.119 --> 0:25:35.399
<v Speaker 9>But the good news was that they beat on the

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 9>bottom line and they raised their earnings guidance for the year,

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 9>so they're now expecting something closer to two dollars whereas

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 9>before they are expecting something less than a dollar eighty previously.

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:50.159
<v Speaker 9>So while that is good news, they do need to

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 9>get the top line right sided. And with Tom Kingsbury

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:58.879
<v Speaker 9>as the CEO, and he has an amazing track record.

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 9>He's the one who took Burlington from sort of a

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:07.439
<v Speaker 9>mall based type discount retailer to an off price, fast

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:11.120
<v Speaker 9>growing company, so there's a lot of faith in him.

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:14.360
<v Speaker 9>He's bringing in a new categories that so Fara business

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 9>did well. It was up load teens on a comp

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 9>basis with total beauty sales up forty five percent. But

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:24.560
<v Speaker 9>now we need conversion and yes there's headwinds from the consumer.

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:27.639
<v Speaker 9>So then if you take it over to Abercrombie on

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:31.359
<v Speaker 9>the other side of the picture, their customer base for

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:34.680
<v Speaker 9>both brands, Hollister and the Abercromby and Pitch brands, their

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:37.199
<v Speaker 9>household income is one hundred to one hundred and fifty thousand,

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 9>not like Cohal's where you're under seventy five in household income,

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 9>and so you really have to be very discerning. So

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 9>an Abercromby is executing very very well and that explains

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 9>why they had double digit increases in comp sales. The

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 9>Abercrombie brand was up twenty one percent on a comp basis,

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 9>and you had a fifteen percent increase on Hollister and

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 9>that on top of double digit increases a year ago.

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 9>So that's a company that's executing very well with just

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 9>great results. And then Nordstrom is sort of in that

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 9>similar category. The sales were a little lighter than consensus estimated,

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 9>but they had strong full price sales. That's very encouraging

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:22.360
<v Speaker 9>and the fact that the business is actually generating positive

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:26.360
<v Speaker 9>sales something that we're not seeing really in department stores.

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 12>You know, Mary, if I listen to everything you're saying

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:32.439
<v Speaker 12>from sort of a macro economics lens, I wonder if

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:35.439
<v Speaker 12>there's like a big theme to be taken away here,

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:39.479
<v Speaker 12>you know, excluding sort of the execution hits and misses

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:41.480
<v Speaker 12>from each company. But it sounds to me like, you know,

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 12>those lower income consumers are struggling a little bit, the

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:47.680
<v Speaker 12>higher income consumers are still spending. I mean, is it

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:51.119
<v Speaker 12>is that simple takeaway? Is that too simplified or is

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 12>that really kind of the story that we're is emerging

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 12>from the earning season for retailers.

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I think that's fair. And even you know, as

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 9>we get up in to the higher income. They're also

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 9>trying to save money too. I think that you saw

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:07.120
<v Speaker 9>that in the news out last week with walmartin Target,

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 9>and so a lot of them are taking advantage of

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:12.679
<v Speaker 9>the better prices there, but that also keeps them in

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 9>a good position to continue spending elsewhere, you know, so

0:28:17.000 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 9>for things that are more desirable. So yes, I think

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 9>clearly the lower income, lower middle income consumer and even

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 9>middle income consumer is just having a hard time dealing

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:32.960
<v Speaker 9>with high food and energy prices and that's showing up

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:37.360
<v Speaker 9>in their very discerning spending. That's exactly what you're seeing, you.

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 12>Know, Mary, I sent my youngest two kids off to

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 12>the school back to school already, we started early in

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 12>the touch in but it got me thinking about that

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 12>whole that really important back to school shopping season, especially

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 12>for you know, your Abercrombie's of the world. What's the

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 12>outlook there, I mean, if you could put, you know,

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 12>break out your crystal ball and tell us what the

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 12>next quarter numbers are going to look like, do you think,

0:28:57.720 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 12>you know, is there going to be some weakness because

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 12>of all these shoes you're describing.

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so it's a good question, I think, once again, well,

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 9>we'll probably have some mixed results. But Abercromby is seeing

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 9>very good reaction to some of the initial categories that

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 9>they have. So for example, in Hollister, they've got their

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:18.959
<v Speaker 9>collegiate line that they've launched and it's more extended. It

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 9>covers about thirty two universities. If you look at on

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 9>the Abercrome beside, they have the NFL line by Abercrombie

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 9>and they've had that this is the third year running now,

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 9>but each year they extend it further and further because

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 9>the demand is so strong and that's sort of part

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 9>of their strategy. So we are seeing I think good

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 9>results there now as we start to get more media

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 9>coverage of the election uncertainty we have seen in past

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 9>times around this election cycle where there is that uncertainty,

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 9>it can sometimes have an impact on consumer spending, but generally,

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 9>I think it's really going to come down to those

0:29:56.880 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 9>that are executing and those that are skewing to more

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 9>of a premium consumer or ones with greater discretionary income.

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 5>Our thanks to Mary Ross Gilbert Bloomberg Intelligence senior equity

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 5>analyst covering retail, we have.

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Something here at Bloomberg called Bloomberg New Energy Finance.

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 5>The idea behind it is to provide data on commodities, power, transport, industries, buildings,

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 5>and agriculture.

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 2>Bn EF also talks about how businesses and governments can

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 2>finance and navigate change as we transition to a green

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 2>energy future.

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 5>This week, we looked at US oil supply. There is

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 5>a falling redcount and the question is whether we'll see

0:30:33.800 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 5>falling oil production moving forward.

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 2>For more, co host Alex Steele and I were joined

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 2>by thy Lu bn EF global oil supply specialist. We

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 2>first asked Ty to talk to us about the impact

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:46.480
<v Speaker 2>of a declining recount.

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 13>I think the declining ricont in the US that we've

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 13>seen it's not going to have that much that big

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 13>over for the impact as it seems as much as

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 13>the headline numbers suggests. And part of the reasons is because,

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 13>like if shoot a catch the premium where we have

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 13>like the biggest all production region in the US the

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 13>world completions, it's only done about four and a half

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 13>percent compared to the recount which is done about fifteen percent.

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 13>And so and on top of that you have a

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:16.959
<v Speaker 13>lot of efficiency gains in the sector, so you are

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 13>able to complete a lot more wells with much fewer

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 13>freight crews across the industry. So I think the recont

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 13>number could be a little bit misceding if you're focusing

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 13>too much on that.

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 2>So I'm SPA just just looking at your report here

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 2>and seeing how production in the US continues to increase,

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 2>but maybe at a slower rate.

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 11>I don't know.

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 2>I got WTI Coroyal seventy seven bucks. Why don't I

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 2>drill some more? I can make money. I mean, it

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 2>only costs those guys forty fifty bucks to get it

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 2>out of the ground, right.

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, yeah, for sure.

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:47.960
<v Speaker 13>So when we look at the bricks evens, especially in

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:50.560
<v Speaker 13>the Perman it's probably around in the low to mid

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 13>forties for their Miden basin, and then for the Delrow

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 13>basin it's probably even lower than that because they produce

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 13>a lot more gas. But part of the reason is

0:31:57.600 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 13>because the US all patch has really pivoted and transform

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 13>itself in the past couple of years now. Before the pandemic,

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 13>oil producers were very much focused on production growth. But

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:12.960
<v Speaker 13>after the pandemic, the industry has changed and now they're

0:32:12.960 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 13>focusing on financial returns. In order to improve the financial returns,

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 13>they have to become more efficient. So in the past

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 13>few years you have seen a lot of cost cutting initiatives,

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 13>a lot of optimizations on logistics and supply chains, a

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 13>lot of investments in infrastructures. So the entire industry has

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 13>become a lot more efficient in the past couple of years.

0:32:33.680 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 13>And on top of that, they have also become a

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 13>lot more resilient. And what that means is that nowadays

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 13>the USR industry can produce a lot more oil with

0:32:43.440 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 13>much lower capital investments compared to like just five years ago.

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:48.800
<v Speaker 5>Also, what are the.

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 3>Cool things that oil companies are doing to extract more

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:54.120
<v Speaker 3>oil out of rock at the end of the day.

0:32:54.160 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I went to a conference but a year ago,

0:32:56.360 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 3>and everyone was like, ooh, three mile laterals. And what

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:00.920
<v Speaker 3>that means is you basically drill pipe down and then

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 3>you drill it across the rock basically lateral, and you

0:33:05.480 --> 0:33:08.480
<v Speaker 3>fracture it. And the longer you go, in theory, the

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 3>more rock you'll be able to access, and then in theory,

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 3>the more oil you'll get out of that rock.

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 11>Wow, is that too nerdy?

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:16.720
<v Speaker 12>No?

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay?

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 7>Cool?

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:20.040
<v Speaker 2>I wonder that frackening is short for fracturing.

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:21.480
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I didn't know that good job.

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 3>We learned things here at Boomberg Intelligence. So based on that,

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 3>what are the cool technologies that are coming up that's

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:30.480
<v Speaker 3>going to enable even more oil to come out of

0:33:30.480 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 3>the rock.

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, So during these longerleros is definitely like a big

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 13>part of these efficiency gags because you're reducing a lot

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:41.240
<v Speaker 13>of the service costs when you're teing longer letros, And

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 13>like you said, Alex, you're making a lot more contact

0:33:43.560 --> 0:33:46.760
<v Speaker 13>with the sauce rock, so you can pull out a

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:50.240
<v Speaker 13>lot more resources from the same well. Had some of these,

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 13>like I guess better practices would be having a lot

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 13>more building out the water handling infrastructure. Some of them

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:00.880
<v Speaker 13>will be optimizing your fractic size, some of them would

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:03.720
<v Speaker 13>be let me see what else I'm optimizing your spacing

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:06.680
<v Speaker 13>between the wells. So a lot of these, like see

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 13>many small things on individually. When they act together, they

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:13.440
<v Speaker 13>can have a big impact, especially over time. For example,

0:34:13.440 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 13>one of the big producers in the perman I was

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 13>looking at the data and they were able to reduce

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:22.359
<v Speaker 13>them courts per the well cause Perletto foot by about

0:34:22.400 --> 0:34:27.320
<v Speaker 13>thirty percent between twenty yes between twenty nineteen and twenty

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 13>twenty four, So there's a huge gains in terms of percentage.

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:33.239
<v Speaker 2>All right, So I thought, if you go into like

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 2>you find some shale somewhere, don't you don't you do

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:40.400
<v Speaker 2>your good wells, your easy wells first, and then shouldn't

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 2>the productivity decline over time?

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:45.920
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, that's exactly pretty mure. We've seen, like like you said,

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:48.920
<v Speaker 13>in the US, the OI and gas companies. So what they

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 13>do is they drew the best say which first, because

0:34:50.680 --> 0:34:52.279
<v Speaker 13>they want to realize that that person while you have

0:34:53.400 --> 0:34:56.360
<v Speaker 13>better weals. And when we look at the data for

0:34:56.400 --> 0:35:00.200
<v Speaker 13>the past five years, what we're seeing is that all

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 13>production on a well level basis has been declining every

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:05.400
<v Speaker 13>year for the past three four years, pretty much across

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 13>the board. But what's interesting is that in twenty twenty four,

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:11.239
<v Speaker 13>the data that are coming in so far is they're

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:14.560
<v Speaker 13>looking different. Oil production on a well level basis is

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:17.319
<v Speaker 13>actually better for the weals the camera line in twenty

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 13>twenty four compared to those last year. So what that

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:23.400
<v Speaker 13>means is that technology improvements could be turning back to tide.

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:26.440
<v Speaker 13>For this production declined on a well level basis.

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:29.399
<v Speaker 3>Which is why it's so cool when we talk about

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:33.040
<v Speaker 3>laterals now we're talking about three miles. That's a lot,

0:35:33.400 --> 0:35:36.399
<v Speaker 3>and a lot can go wrong in three miles. Now,

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:38.719
<v Speaker 3>just about five years ago, the talk was like, oh, well,

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:41.359
<v Speaker 3>if you frag here, then you're gonna hurt the rock

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 3>over here, and then it's gonna mess up the oil

0:35:43.640 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 3>distribution and all that kind of stuff. What are the

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:48.360
<v Speaker 3>problems that are emerging the longer out we go in

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 3>these rocks.

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:51.440
<v Speaker 13>I think one of the biggest risk rere factors, Like,

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:53.960
<v Speaker 13>like you said, if something goes wrong on alex, you

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:57.080
<v Speaker 13>lose production from three mileth worths worth of flat or

0:35:58.200 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 13>so that's going to be a big opertun need opportunity

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 13>costs for you. But at the same time, if things

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:06.400
<v Speaker 13>go right, you can save potentially save a lot of money.

0:36:07.080 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 13>I think not only during longer ledterals. Some of these

0:36:10.160 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 13>companies they're actually making U turns under the ground so

0:36:14.239 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 13>they can yeah, they can stay within the acreage and

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 13>so they can make more contact with the source rock.

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:21.359
<v Speaker 3>So if you do that, do they you turn into

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:23.360
<v Speaker 3>another layer of the rock or do you turn in

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:24.400
<v Speaker 3>the same layer the.

0:36:24.440 --> 0:36:25.440
<v Speaker 13>You turn in the same layer.

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 3>Oh my god, that feels like a lot can go

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:28.080
<v Speaker 3>wrong there.

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:31.840
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, Well, what companies are doing that. I remember Metady

0:36:32.000 --> 0:36:34.799
<v Speaker 13>Resources in the permit is doing our U turns on

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 13>the ledterals, and there are a couple other ones. I

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:37.759
<v Speaker 13>don't become on top of my head.

0:36:38.160 --> 0:36:40.400
<v Speaker 11>Oh man, or is this nerdy enough for you?

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:36:40.719 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 11>That's really cool.

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:45.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, here's my dumb question today. Never other than shale

0:36:45.320 --> 0:36:47.600
<v Speaker 2>oil oil coming from shale, do we still drill old

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 2>fashioned rigs and produce oil that way?

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:50.400
<v Speaker 13>We do? We do?

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:50.719
<v Speaker 3>We do.

0:36:50.880 --> 0:36:52.440
<v Speaker 13>We still do that quite a bit. But if you're

0:36:52.440 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 13>talking about on shore, the productivities of this world is

0:36:56.600 --> 0:37:00.000
<v Speaker 13>probably like ten percent or maybe twenty percent of these

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:03.320
<v Speaker 13>horizontal wells, So the impact is probably it's definitely a

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:05.320
<v Speaker 13>lot smaller than the horizontal ones.

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:08.880
<v Speaker 5>Our thanks to taylou Bnf, global oil supply Specialist.

0:37:09.239 --> 0:37:13.759
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on apples, Spotify,

0:37:13.960 --> 0:37:17.160
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you'll get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:37:17.200 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:37:20.680 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:27.160
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:37:27.440 --> 0:37:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal