WEBVTT - Stephen Marcussen

0:00:04.800 --> 0:00:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome, Welcome, Welcome to the Bob Left Sets podcast. My

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>guest today is my good friend and mastering engineer Stephen Marcuson. Hey, Bob, Now,

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>you've worked with literally who's who the music business, everybody

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:23.079
<v Speaker 1>from the Stones to Tom Petty to Stevie Wonder, I

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>go on and on, and then you're mentioning a new act.

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>You think it's gonna blow up, Ben Platt, anybody else

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>you want to throw in from my audience? Uh? Maybe

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:34.480
<v Speaker 1>as we go along, I'll well, M it's literally too

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>many to mention. Let's start from the beginning. What exactly

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>is mastering? You know? Mastering is uh, it's this gray

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>art that people don't really understand. It's do you understand it?

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I hope so forty years in right, I think I

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>got it. But it's sort of it's your last creative

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>stage of making a record. It's it's a chance to

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>take all of your work and put it together in

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:06.119
<v Speaker 1>a cohesive manner. You can change the sound. You can

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:12.400
<v Speaker 1>change tempos of tracks, you can enhance centers for vocals.

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 1>You can do any number of things to get a

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:21.320
<v Speaker 1>consistent sound that flows from beginning to end. There various

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>tools you use whether it's you can play it back

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>on tube type tape machines, if you're fortunate enough to

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>see things like that. Uh, files come in mainly these days,

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>but occasionally we see tape. So you can pick and

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>choose how you look at a project. And I shouldn't

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 1>say you, I should say I and uh I put

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:47.119
<v Speaker 1>it up. I listened to it just as it comes in,

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>and I think about what would do, what what I

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>could do to enhance this project and make it make

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>it deliberable to you know, a man us, I should

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>say numbers of ways to play it, whether it's radio,

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:08.919
<v Speaker 1>whether you're listening to a c D, whether you're listening

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to hires files, m fits. So it's I don't know

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>what m fits are. M fits are mastered for iTunes,

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know there was an acronym on that

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:22.519
<v Speaker 1>there is and it's uh it's interesting because m FIT

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>they tried to set a standard of quality to reduce

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 1>what they call inter sample overs and uh, well, let's

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:34.799
<v Speaker 1>slow down here. What are inter sample overs? I'm not

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>going to get into interstatt a little bit. Well, when

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>you're working in a digital scale, there's zero within the scale.

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>You can have these inter sample overs, which are these

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>spurious peaks that essentially can clip. They don't, but they can.

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>So Apple decided to try to enhance their format. The

0:02:56.200 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>A C and badget M F I T and it

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>gives the mastering house, or Apple gives the mastering house

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>an Apple it to drop it on. You can measure

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>your inner sample overs, and they don't really want to

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>see hundreds of thousands, which you can on a you know,

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a hot rock record. They want to see it brought,

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>brought down and contained within a reasonable amount. They don't

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:26.079
<v Speaker 1>define a number, they just want you to use good judgment.

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>So an m FANT can typically be as much as

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:33.119
<v Speaker 1>a dB, quieter than a c D or a digital

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>file source. So okay, let's just stay with there. If

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>you're mastering for iTunes, that's a downloadable track, do they

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>want the same track for the Apple Music service. That's

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a very good question and the answer is yes. Um,

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm going through something right now because all of these

0:03:56.480 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 1>services are looking at different features. Apple has the complete

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>my album feature, Spotify wants it to mirror the CD

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>UM and I literally got the email a half hour ago,

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>so I'm going to start dissecting it. When I'm done here,

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>but they they they want to have a standard that

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>is consistent with their platform. Okay, just going for left

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>field for one second. Prior to these streaming services, there

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>were the loudness wars, which will get back to. But

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>now since these I know they basically I don't know

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the technical turn off the top of my head. They

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:43.919
<v Speaker 1>basically average the sounds or everything is the same volume

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>normalized normalized, thank you, and uh does that affect the

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:54.159
<v Speaker 1>loudness wars? It does? It's uh. Loudness is measured on

0:04:54.240 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a left scale l ufs, and depending on you know,

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>who's releasing or playing your your your file, they like

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to target a certain number. The lower the number four

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 1>point three is louder than seven point two. Our testing

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 1>has shown that if you bring a CD level down

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a few dbs, and a few dbs is a lot.

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Remember six d b s is twice the volume. So

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:28.479
<v Speaker 1>if you bring it down three d b s, they're

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>normalizer isn't kicking in as much, and consequently your program

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>sounds better. There's you know, an example that comes to

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>mind is there's a piano vocal track that gets played

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:48.720
<v Speaker 1>up against you know, a slamming hard rock track. Well,

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:52.039
<v Speaker 1>the hard rock tracks got stack guitars, it's got bass,

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>it's got bombastic drums. Yet the piano and vocal so

0:05:56.400 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>much louder because it isn't as loud physically in the

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:06.799
<v Speaker 1>digital medium as the slamming track. So the normalizer doesn't

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>kick in. Normalizers can really bring your level down. You

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of dvs. So in addition, getting technical

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>for a second, if it's normalizer brings it down, obviously

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be quieter. How does that affect the

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>sound It's not beneficial. Let's go back to the beginning

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>of our discussion. Theoretically, especially in today's d I Y world, Uh,

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 1>could you just make a record on your laptop and

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>send it straight to a streaming service? People do every day.

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:45.599
<v Speaker 1>That's very common SoundCloud, you know, people that put post

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>their music up on services like that. It's a complete

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>d I Y. In many cases they get a little action.

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:56.359
<v Speaker 1>Then they want to actually master it or finish it,

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:59.719
<v Speaker 1>remix it, depending also, you know, it just depends on

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the kind of action they get. So I think a

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of people that are you know, breaking in as

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:09.279
<v Speaker 1>it were, go ahead d I Y at if there's uh,

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>if there's notice. They then maybe get get get noticed

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>by a professional and indie somebody that wants to you know,

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>join forces with them, and then they'll go rework the project. Okay,

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>asking something that's not quantifiable in a quantifiable way, what

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>percent can mastering effect attract? Yeah, you know that's that's

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of an impossible question, but I'll attempt to answer it.

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>If you've got a track that comes in and you

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>were working in a studio or just in your own studio,

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and your speakers weren't giving you reality, reality means the

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>balance of frequencies lows, mids, highs were you know, terribly skewed.

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>You take if you know, you take your track to

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>a professional mastering facility, you're in a room that your

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 1>engineers worked in for a period of time, in my case,

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>twelve years in my particular studio, I know the room

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>like the back of my hand. I put your track

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>up and I say, this is dull, or this is boomy,

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:21.119
<v Speaker 1>or what what what? Whatever the correction needs to be.

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>You take my judgment because you've now come to me

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>for my services, and I say, well, we can open

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 1>it up. In the vocal now is coming out of

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:33.599
<v Speaker 1>the track and clean and clear, and the bases and

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:37.680
<v Speaker 1>muddy and you know whoofing out your bottom end. So

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 1>that really is a big change and well worth doing.

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Um okay, so since I've known you almost forty years,

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>you're working precision. Then you worked at A and M

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.439
<v Speaker 1>before you established your own facility. I didn't really work

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:55.959
<v Speaker 1>at A and M A and M. I meant to

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>say work in a general term. That's where you your

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>worked reinspired. You did not work four AM and am.

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>You rented the space. But my question is all three

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>rooms are different. Is someone like you so professional? How

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>long does it take you to adjust to a different room.

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Mastering engineers are nervous types. Uh. To make a shift

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>in just your chain, in your chain as your processing

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 1>to plug in a new new piece of gear can

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>be daunting because it could change something. And you know,

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>back to the gray area of mastering. If you put

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:37.719
<v Speaker 1>something in that you think sounds good, and I can

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:40.320
<v Speaker 1>be fooled. Anybody can be fooled by sound. Its sound

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>is an elusive dragon. But you put something in your

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 1>chain and you don't notice it immediately, and it changes

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 1>your sounds. So you go from room to room, moving

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 1>from the place I learned to work to A and M.

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I took in my own loud speakers. Uh that they

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>were kind enough to let me place in a mastering

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>room and a lot of my own gear. So uh,

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's always scary making a change like that, going

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 1>from A and M to the first facility I I

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>built for myself. I fell in love with bing W

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:25.199
<v Speaker 1>loud speakers and really bought them site, you know, without

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:29.119
<v Speaker 1>having evaluated them. I knew that they were good speakers.

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Then how did you fall in love with them if

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 1>you hadn't evaluated them? Good point, I had heard them

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>in places I had never worked on them. The you

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>go to a hi fi shop and you listen to them,

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and you take your favorite CD and you go, oh,

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I can relate. The center is a little off center here,

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>The vocal sounds this way, the sibilance is what it

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>should be. So, and I've listened to a lot of speakers.

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Believe me, they were the only ones in a store

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I could say that's good. Okay, let's go back to

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the speakers. Forty years ago, there was a transition. There

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>was something called the aura tone, which was one speaker

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>meant to mimic the car dashboard. Then seemingly everybody went

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>to the Yamaha and as ten M and they might

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>take off the grill and put a little piece of

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 1>tissue paper over the tweeter. But obviously car radios have

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>become more sophisticated and less important. But every mastering room

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you go to, everybody is using different speakers. It's it's

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>a taste. You know. Some people like a t C S,

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>some people like homemade speakers. You know, there are many

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 1>facilities that incorporated a woofer here in the mid range

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>here and put them in big, big cabinets. It's really

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a taste. Okay, let's go just a home audio for

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>a second. You know, the big thing on home audio

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>is these digital testers. Now, Okay, you buy something and

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 1>it comes with a little microphone. Whether that's good or bad,

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that's not really my point. Are you so sophisticated that

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you could set up a room just by ear? That's

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:11.319
<v Speaker 1>how I did my last room, and I think it's

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>my best room yet, I mean, I don't think you

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:20.959
<v Speaker 1>could get a better place to listen to music loudsoft, direct, indirect,

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the back of the room, the front of the room.

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>And I've worked with acousticians George Ocksbird namely for decades now,

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:35.679
<v Speaker 1>and I brought him in just to help me. Um.

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:38.079
<v Speaker 1>Just you know, you're building a new room. You've got

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things on your plate, so it's good

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:44.719
<v Speaker 1>to have professional help there. But by and large, you

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 1>set the room up to please yourself. Uh. You know,

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I've got good equipment. I built a phenomenal room. George

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>designed the room. It's trapped properly. It's incredibly for the

0:12:56.000 --> 0:13:00.680
<v Speaker 1>people who don't know what it's contained, the low ends contained.

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't boom. It's uh, it's natural. It decays naturally.

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>It's not splashy. There are no reflections from left to right.

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, imagine a loudspeaker playing loud in a barn.

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>That wouldn't be a good room. Uh. You put a

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>loudspeaker in a room similar to what we have here,

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 1>you can see their sound dampening on the walls. It

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>just breaks up reflected sounds so that you can, you know,

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>focus on the direct sound in my case, the direct

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:33.320
<v Speaker 1>sounds coming out of loudspeakers. Okay, Now, there's been a

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>big transition in the Internet era. Back prior to the

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 1>year two thousand, there were a limited number of professional

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>mastering engineers. Literally you could count unless than five fingers

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 1>people in Los Angeles, and there were people in New York.

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>But suddenly, since the digital revolution, everybody thinks they're a

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>mastering engineer. There's a good amount of that. Okay, and

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I know I'm trying to think of way Roy would

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:04.839
<v Speaker 1>ask this question, But is basically all the newcomers, or

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 1>any of them, any good. There's always going to be

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 1>somebody younger, hungrier, and better. So I'm glad I asked that. Uh,

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 1>whether or not they're discovered remains to be seen, but

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>don't discount anybody that's young and trying hard. Okay, let's go.

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>There's Lander. Why do you explain for the people who

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know what lander is. I'm not fluent in lander,

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>but to the best of my knowledge, lander is a

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>computer algorithm that looks at your sound, analyzes your sound.

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>You say you want it to sound like X y Z.

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I think you can actually plug that criteria into the computer.

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>It will look at the frequencies, it will look at

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the level, and it will make sonic adjustments to your track.

0:14:58.080 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>But let's to be over, I should have put it.

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Lander is essentially automated mastering. Right. I think there are

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>actually a couple of programs out there that are doing

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>automated mastering. I think there's another unit in Florida. I

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>don't really keep up with that. Would any professional use

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>one of those automatic I mean professional act Would anybody

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 1>use one of those services? I would doubt it. Okay,

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>let's go back to the beginning. Now, you've had quite

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a peripatetic life. You were born in Africa and a

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>country that no longer exists. Well, it exists, it's just

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>changed its name. Okay, So how many years did you

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>live in what was then Rhodesia. I left Rhodesia at

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>a very early age. The pattern was we we left

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Rhodesia moved back to Northern Europe. As my parents were

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Northern European British and Danish. Realized that what they had

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 1>experienced in Rhodesia was very different than being in Northern Europe.

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Northern Europe where Denmark and England, and they sort of

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>followed the sun, if you will. So living in Rhodesia,

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 1>it's it's beautiful. It's like California. The climate's magnificent. You

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>can grow anything. It's a marvelous place. California was in

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 1>my in my parents sites, and so we we flew

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>to well, let's just go a little bit. So you

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>were in Rhodesia to what age three or three and

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a half, okay, and then you moved to northern Europe. Correct.

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 1>We floundered there for about a year, six months in

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 1>uh in England, six months in Denmark. We arrived in

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles on my fifth birthday. Okay. They were literally

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 1>following the sun, they were, and that was their last destination.

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>They never left, okay, but they sent you different places.

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>I was sent to boarding school in England for my

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>formative years. And so when did you start boarding school

0:16:56.640 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>in England? I started when I was ten and a

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>half and I left England when I was I think

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>just about fifteen, maybe just fifteen. And was there anything

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 1>good there? It was everything good there. It was a

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>great time to be in England. Uh. From four it

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>was fantastic. We turned onto music and I went to

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:27.719
<v Speaker 1>a very progressive boarding school and we one of my

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>classmates got a cassette, which was a portable way of

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:35.920
<v Speaker 1>listening to music. It was mono, but we taped out well,

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:40.159
<v Speaker 1>he taped albums and we would be out, you know,

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>in in the fields just with music and hanging out

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>with people. I mean, music was a really really big

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>part of my life. And this boarding school was were

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:51.920
<v Speaker 1>a relative to London. It's forty miles southwest of London.

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Did you go to London? Like? Positively? London was an

0:17:56.840 --> 0:18:00.920
<v Speaker 1>hour train ride from Frensham, and uh, we we get

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to London as often as we could. You have to

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:07.200
<v Speaker 1>remember we're boarding school. We don't We didn't have unlimited budgets.

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Once you're in London, you know, we'll see these cost

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>money and you could bum around London and we did

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and stayed, you know, dropped in on people that we knew.

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>But it was just a marvelous time to be in

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>London people, you know truly, you know, think of Austin

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Powers and Carnebie Street and that's really what it was. Like.

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Let's go back. Your father was a butcher, right, correct.

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:41.679
<v Speaker 1>So he moved to Los Angeles and where does he

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:45.119
<v Speaker 1>go to work? Uh? He went to work for a

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>supermarket chain. And uh, you know, my my parents really

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't have much to be to begin with. We came

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to America having left Rhodesia, um with not a lot

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>because Rhodesia was in a downturn, so selling your house

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't you know, it wasn't easy for them to

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>literally uproot and come here. My father worked at a supermarket.

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 1>My mother worked as you know, they referred to people

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>like my mother in those days as secretaries. You can't

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>say that anywhere, um. But she worked for a company

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>called the American Gem Society, which was a standard. It

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 1>was a company put in place for standards and jewelry.

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>She worked the balance of her work life there. My

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>father ended up migrating from one chain to the next,

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 1>ultimately landing it a shop that I'm sure you remember, Jorgensen's,

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>which is a very high end grocery store. And I

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 1>was forced into an early retirement. Okay, but a couple

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 1>of questions. If you're going to school in England during

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the winter, spending your summers in Los Angeles, I would

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:03.199
<v Speaker 1>come back twice a year. I'd come back for the

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Christmas break and I'd come back for summer. Now, the

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>English school year was divided differently than America. You got

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 1>a month off for Christmas and you only got seven

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 1>eight weeks for summer. So did you make any friends

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>when you were in l A over the summer. Well,

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I had my friends that were here, but England was

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a very, very uh changing experience. I left as a

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 1>fairly straight child and came back with my eyes opened.

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 1>And you come back to l A and you go

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to high school in Lafe. I negotiated my way through

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 1>high school from boarding school. I had my eyes set

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>on being in the music business. How did that revelation

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:48.639
<v Speaker 1>there was? I think it's the third Yes album called

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:51.199
<v Speaker 1>Close to the Edge, and there's a picture on the

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 1>back cover of Eddie offered in front of a console

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:58.639
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we we love music. I saw that

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and I said, this is for me, this is what

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:05.199
<v Speaker 1>I want to do. So I finished high school. You

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 1>say you negotiated your way What does that mean? Because

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 1>of the English education and l A Unified, there was

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:13.919
<v Speaker 1>no way to access what where I really was in

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:17.119
<v Speaker 1>my education. So they brought in specialists from u C.

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 1>L A to evaluate me and uh. I was actually

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>going to graduate when I was fifteen and a half,

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 1>but they couldn't allow it, so they forced me to

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:33.160
<v Speaker 1>stay an extra semester. I I did the one semester.

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I then did summer school to take care of some

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:42.400
<v Speaker 1>required courses government in history, US government history, and then

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>my last semester I had to take the the early

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 1>course for the advanced course I had already taken just

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:55.399
<v Speaker 1>to fulfill. So I made an arrangement with the teacher

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:59.120
<v Speaker 1>that I wouldn't show up and take the final. Meanwhile,

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I was working in to nine in grocery stores. Okay,

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 1>but then you do graduate, you have a dream of

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>being in the music business. What's the first step in

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>when um, I was working in a grocery store. I

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:18.879
<v Speaker 1>then decided I wanted to be in the music business

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and had to get out of that and had to

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:24.439
<v Speaker 1>pound the pavement. I found, Uh, never a thought to

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 1>go to college. I went to college j C to

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:33.159
<v Speaker 1>really fill time because I was at loose ends and

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I had to get out of my parents house because

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't be hanging out. UM. So I did that.

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I I took some electrical engineering courses, but I pounded

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the pavement and got a job at a radio commercial duplicator.

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 1>So I think it was a J. Walter Thompson was

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a big ad agency McDonald. So literally we stuffed a

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:00.679
<v Speaker 1>two cards which were like eight tracks, except they were

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty second or one minute spots. And from there one

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of the guys I worked with had I should say,

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 1>he came to work there. He had just left what

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:22.879
<v Speaker 1>was Richard Perry's studio, which was studio on Melrose. I

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 1>heard that and I thought, well, that's the door I've

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 1>got a knock on. So I noticed that there was

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a studio across the street called I think Radio and

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Records or something. It's still there on Melrows is gone.

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I knocked on the door. The receptionist had been involved

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>in a car accident, and the Carol Child's who ran

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:46.879
<v Speaker 1>Richard's publishing company at that point, let anybody in because

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:52.120
<v Speaker 1>it was seventy four it's a great time. And I waited, waited,

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:56.119
<v Speaker 1>and the studio manager interviewed me and then called me

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:59.640
<v Speaker 1>back and started, you know, from from the toilet up

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and okay, So the first job, I'm sure there was

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 1>not a job description, but it be what janitor? There

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 1>was a job description. Really, you were the janitor, truly,

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>you had literally had the foot in the door. Had

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:13.159
<v Speaker 1>the foot in the door, couldn't have been happier. And

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 1>that was the job of the guy was working to

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the grocery store janitor. No it was. He wasn't working

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:20.399
<v Speaker 1>in the grocery store. He was working at a T

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:26.119
<v Speaker 1>and T. That's I think that he had played his

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>cards wrong and said he was qualified and he wasn't.

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:34.639
<v Speaker 1>So I knew that there was a void, So okay,

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 1>so tell the people that didn't no longer exists. The

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 1>history of studio Studio fifty five was I think it

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:44.440
<v Speaker 1>was Decca where being recorded White Christmas. We always said

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the ghost of being resided in the attic there. Um

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Howard Steele, who was Richard's engineer, had owned it with

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and Howard, by the way, it was a part of

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>a console manufacturer called quant him. He had you may

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:08.159
<v Speaker 1>remember the name Vanjie Carmichael. She did all the jingles.

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:12.119
<v Speaker 1>He was married. Howard was married to Carol, so Carol's mom,

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Vanjie sort of funded this studio for Howard and it

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>just didn't happen for them, and somehow another Richard got involved,

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:26.879
<v Speaker 1>and part of the agreement was that Howard would be

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Richard's engineer, and Richard so that as a benefit because

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>he knew the room and and all of that, and

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Richard developed the studio. He rebuilt the big control room

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:40.160
<v Speaker 1>A made a beautiful studio out of it, and there

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 1>was B which was a smaller room. Both had quantum consoles,

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and it became an incredibly successful studio. Toto came from

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:54.920
<v Speaker 1>that studio. There was just a lot of great music

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:57.119
<v Speaker 1>made in those rooms. Okay, so you started out as

0:25:57.160 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the janitor, how do you get out of the ship hole? Well,

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Howard was He was interested enough to ask me to

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>come and assist him on on some demos he was

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 1>doing on a weekend session. So I'll never forget this.

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I knew nothing of what I was doing, and I

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 1>mean nothing. I didn't know that you had to tell

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>him microphone was in number sixteen or any of that.

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 1>So we we get this whole thing going. And in

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 1>those days you ran a tape machine and he says, okay, record,

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:41.119
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know how so that so I, you know,

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I just started assisting Howard and uh then you know,

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:48.719
<v Speaker 1>you just get more gained more and more experience. In

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:51.879
<v Speaker 1>those days, you could hang out in people's sessions and

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>observe and people weren't offended by that, and so I

0:26:56.320 --> 0:27:00.880
<v Speaker 1>made myself useful. And still still cleaning up, still cleaning up,

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:04.120
<v Speaker 1>still go fering, go you know. So, Okay, if you're

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:08.119
<v Speaker 1>working there, theoretically you have janitorial hours, how much do

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:12.119
<v Speaker 1>you working there? Are you essentially living there? I was

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 1>essentially living there. I'll I'll put some numbers in place

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 1>for you. When you're in the union and you're a

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:23.400
<v Speaker 1>checker in the supermarket, which I was, you make incredibly

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 1>good money. I left that job to go work for

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 1>a hundred dollars a week. I worked over eighty hours

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a week and took home seventy six dollars on a

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:41.440
<v Speaker 1>paycheck and was thrilled to do it. Okay, so what's

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the next step of the ladder there? Um? I started

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:51.920
<v Speaker 1>second engineering, then I started first engineering. And when you're

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>first you're running the session, you're doing the vocals, you're

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 1>tracking the drums, you know, whatever it is. Um, how

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:00.920
<v Speaker 1>long did it take to go from janitor a first engineering?

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:06.200
<v Speaker 1>That's a good question. It wasn't that long, relatively speaking.

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Maybe a year and a half, a couple of years. Um.

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I remember, my my first real date was working with

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:17.640
<v Speaker 1>earth Window basically earth Wind and Fire as the band

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:22.360
<v Speaker 1>without Maurice. We're doing uh, was it Denise Williams demos

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:25.400
<v Speaker 1>or something? It was really it was like as completely

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 1>out of my league, but you know, you just wing it,

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:33.399
<v Speaker 1>and that's what I did. So from there, I uh

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:37.159
<v Speaker 1>got involved with a producer, Bob Asteen. We made a

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of disco music. He was part of Neil Bogart's

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>camp and Neil treated him really well. And over the

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>course of making disco music, we would start mastering and

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't really get the sound of what was on

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:56.479
<v Speaker 1>the tape on a phonograph record, which was the medium

0:28:56.520 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 1>in those days, and there had to be a re reason.

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 1>So the people I was working with, we we were

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure it out, and we discovered that there

0:29:08.280 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>was a lathe, which is what you cut phonograph records on,

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 1>was made locally. It was a unique machine because with

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a phonograph lathe, the computer needs to know what it's

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 1>going to cut before it cuts it, because it's turning

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 1>a lead screw and moving a cutter head across the disk.

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 1>This lathe didn't need that, so suddenly you could use

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 1>a better tape machine. The next part of the equation

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 1>were the cutting package, which was an order phone package.

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm using one today. Actually, I would do a lot

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 1>of work with Dave Rawlings and Gillian Welsh when we're

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>committing their catalog into vinyl. So the order phone could

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 1>cut what no one else could cut, very delicate system.

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 1>UM but ended up hearing that Steve Wonder, Stevie Wonder

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>was having some problems mastering hotter than July, and people

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I was working with had the wisdom to send him

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 1>a brail letter and Steve was interested and we cut

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 1>a ref for him. Okay, let's go a little bit slower.

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 1>So you were working at studio bybe Bestie and you

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>have this problem with mastering, do you then commit yourself?

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm on the mastering dream or is just like a

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 1>side project, a side project. It's totally a side project.

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 1>The lathe and the cutting amps were set up at

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the back room at fifty five. It was on a table.

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, we were just learning, learning, learning, but we

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 1>knew there was something good about it. Okay, so you

0:30:47.440 --> 0:30:49.479
<v Speaker 1>had one of these leaves. You said it was made

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:51.719
<v Speaker 1>in Los Angeles. Did anybody else have one? There were

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 1>five in the world. UM one that was at the

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 1>place that made it so that they could keep it running.

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 1>UM two went to a company called Future Disc that's

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 1>now gone and Precision had the other two. So they

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 1>were finicky, delicate and really a miracle that they went

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>from day to day. So it was again it was

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 1>a learn while you earn experience. UM ended up building

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Precision well before you. But first you got ahold of

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Stevie Wonder before Precision. No Stevie came at Precisions. Okay,

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 1>So you ended up building Precisions. So you say, we're

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 1>going down this path. We're committed, We're committed. There were

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 1>three partners in on it. One was an experienced mastering

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 1>engineer that ended up not not coming through in ways

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 1>that should have, and so it was really it fell

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>on me, so you were learning on the job by

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the seat of my pants. Fortunately, Richard started his record

0:31:55.640 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 1>company at that point, Planet and Michael Solomon, who I've

0:31:59.840 --> 0:32:03.840
<v Speaker 1>just reacquainted with, put together one of the very first

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 1>compilation records of punk bands. It was called Sharp Cuts,

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we were all in the family and

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Michael came to me and, uh, you know, the plim

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>souls were I don't remember who all the acts were

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:21.720
<v Speaker 1>on it, but Michael came to me and, uh, to

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 1>master it. And I really didn't know what I was doing,

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 1>but it sounded pretty good. At the end of the day,

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the equipment wasn't so great, the meaning the lathe, but

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, truthfully, there was there was a lot of

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 1>tears for me on that because it just it was

0:32:39.880 --> 0:32:43.040
<v Speaker 1>frustrating knowing that the potential was there, but I just

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 1>couldn't get get it going right and it took a while.

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 1>But Michael worked with me. He brought me Mark Saffin's

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:54.400
<v Speaker 1>next So I got a little education doing that. But

0:32:54.520 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the best education I got was your friend Harold Bronson,

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 1>who had Ryan before we do that. This is before

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 1>or after Stevie Wonder. This is actually after tell us

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 1>to Stevie Wonder story. Stevie was interested. There was a

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 1>gentleman by the name of Arnie Acosta that was brought

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 1>into Precision to help teach me to master um. Arnie

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 1>it was really a gifted mastering engineer, and I mean

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 1>a really gifted mastering engineer, and Arnie helped put that

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:37.400
<v Speaker 1>all together. Arnie though did not live in Los Angeles,

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>he lived in San Louis Obispo, so he would commute

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 1>down for four days a week and we'd work so

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:48.719
<v Speaker 1>the other three days in the week because in those days.

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:52.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, it was a seven day haul. It was

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:55.320
<v Speaker 1>me and so I would be in there on the

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 1>weekends just trying to figure it out, and you know,

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 1>slowly people would come and well I finished the story

0:34:03.640 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 1>with Stevie Wonder though as well. We Steve came in.

0:34:07.280 --> 0:34:11.279
<v Speaker 1>We mastered Hotter in July. Um, he was he's a

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 1>critical customer. He really knows what he wants. Um, I

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 1>should say he didn't come in at that point, but

0:34:18.120 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 1>we kept sending refs to him. And this, incidentally was

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the infancy of digital audio. Stevie worked on these Sony

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 1>systems called sixteen hundreds, and Sony built Steve a braille editor,

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:37.399
<v Speaker 1>forum and stuff like that. So it was a lot

0:34:37.440 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of pioneering on my part, Sony's part, Steve's part. Uh,

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 1>it was it was just um, it was really the

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 1>order phone system that really spelled the difference. And Steve

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 1>could hear that. So he was ultimately happy that you

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 1>were doing a better version. Thrilled, thrilled. And we cut

0:34:55.080 --> 0:34:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the parts for the world. We you know, in those days,

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:02.880
<v Speaker 1>you cut lacquers, you cut who sets for Portugal, Spain,

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:07.839
<v Speaker 1>South Africa, you name it. We cut Stevie Wonder till

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the cows came home. There would you'd get at the

0:35:10.960 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, there'd be a stack of boxes

0:35:13.880 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to be picked up by motown and careered off to

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the to the regions. Okay, so then okay, so then

0:35:22.120 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 1>you do Stevie Wonder and you were telling this story

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:27.359
<v Speaker 1>with Harold Bronson. Another thing, well, Steve sort of put

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Precision on the map, Harold who was one of the

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:37.239
<v Speaker 1>co founders of Rhino correct Harold. I don't know how

0:35:37.320 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Harold got to Precision, but he did. And this was

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 1>really at the beginning of his reissue world. He was

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:49.480
<v Speaker 1>coming off the wild Man Fisher stuff and the Barnes

0:35:49.560 --> 0:35:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and Barns, and he struck a deal with Precision that

0:35:57.040 --> 0:36:01.239
<v Speaker 1>we would work together for a rate. But meanwhile, you know,

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:05.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing naz nas nas nas nas nas off off

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of the master tapes with Harold, and it was really, uh,

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 1>it was a great learning experience. I mean, Harold, who's

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 1>a fantastic music fan. You know, he would have all

0:36:16.160 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the originals to reflect on and then look at what

0:36:18.600 --> 0:36:21.920
<v Speaker 1>we were doing and he'd make corrections and it was

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:24.759
<v Speaker 1>really it was a great vehicle for me to learn

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:28.880
<v Speaker 1>how to master okay, so go on. I was gonna say,

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:31.799
<v Speaker 1>when I was learning to master, it's about a ten

0:36:31.880 --> 0:36:35.080
<v Speaker 1>year process until I think you were okay to good.

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, let's be real. You start something, you're never

0:36:38.160 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 1>great at it unless you're gifted. And Harold worked with

0:36:44.080 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 1>me through that. And I did a lot of work

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 1>with Harold over many years um mastering his catalogs, and

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it made me better. It certainly gave Harold

0:36:55.440 --> 0:37:00.720
<v Speaker 1>a good product to sell. And uh also now, because

0:37:00.719 --> 0:37:04.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Stevie Wonder connection, those days, people would look

0:37:05.000 --> 0:37:06.880
<v Speaker 1>at album credits and by the way, we were so

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:09.719
<v Speaker 1>late in the game. On the Stevie Wonder credit, they

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:12.160
<v Speaker 1>had to put it on the actual disc label as

0:37:12.200 --> 0:37:15.160
<v Speaker 1>opposed to in the artwork in the package. But they

0:37:15.200 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 1>credited us, which was the main thing. So I started

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 1>doing a lot of Solar Records, Gap Band, just a

0:37:25.120 --> 0:37:30.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of really great music, and again learning as I

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:35.480
<v Speaker 1>went along. I mean, it was in those days reading

0:37:35.520 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the album art sort of helped your career tremendously. So

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:42.040
<v Speaker 1>you weren't working at you were waiting and you're waiting

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:44.680
<v Speaker 1>to pick up the phone, right, We're waiting for the

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:48.439
<v Speaker 1>phone to ring. I mean, that's I've never been good

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:52.759
<v Speaker 1>at selling myself, and uh, it was just word of

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:56.600
<v Speaker 1>mouth that just you have the soul records, then how

0:37:56.600 --> 0:38:00.440
<v Speaker 1>do you break into the rock records. Well, as I'm

0:38:00.480 --> 0:38:06.280
<v Speaker 1>transitioning out of engineering, I'm really full time mastering. Jimmy

0:38:06.600 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Ivane and Shelly are coming to Los Angeles. That Shelly yakus.

0:38:12.280 --> 0:38:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Shelly his father was in the business, and Jimmy started

0:38:17.000 --> 0:38:20.600
<v Speaker 1>out as Shelly second, and then Shelly ended up working

0:38:20.640 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 1>for him, right, I think that's the way the story goes.

0:38:24.000 --> 0:38:29.719
<v Speaker 1>But they were coming west because Jimmy was doing Stevie's

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:34.960
<v Speaker 1>first record, Stevie Next, and uh, Shelly was staying in

0:38:35.000 --> 0:38:37.239
<v Speaker 1>New York finishing up. I think it was damn the

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Torpedoes of Tom. Jimmy needed an engineer. I got thrown

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:47.000
<v Speaker 1>in for two weeks with Jimmy, which is just great. Um,

0:38:47.320 --> 0:38:53.239
<v Speaker 1>and we started tracking the Belladonna record I was mastering,

0:38:54.360 --> 0:38:57.719
<v Speaker 1>but needless to say, I wasn't swamped with mastering work,

0:38:57.840 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 1>so I could do this work with Jimmy Stevie Nicks,

0:39:02.239 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 1>and uh it was time to do a single stop

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:09.160
<v Speaker 1>dragging my heart around. By this time, Shelley had come

0:39:09.200 --> 0:39:11.600
<v Speaker 1>in and I had shown Shelley the studio and what

0:39:11.640 --> 0:39:16.680
<v Speaker 1>we were doing, and I'm not sure where they mixed that.

0:39:16.760 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I think they may have mixed that in good Night

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:23.000
<v Speaker 1>l A. I don't really remember, but it wasn't mixed

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:27.960
<v Speaker 1>at fifty. But Shelly and Jimmy gave me the shot

0:39:28.120 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 1>at mastering that track. Um, I'm fairly certain it had

0:39:33.000 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 1>been mastered at the facility they were used using up

0:39:36.640 --> 0:39:40.680
<v Speaker 1>to that point. Once again, the order phone came through

0:39:41.760 --> 0:39:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and put on the disc what was on the tape,

0:39:45.239 --> 0:39:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and Jimmy and Shelly both heard that. So that was

0:39:49.160 --> 0:39:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of a great run with Jimmy and Shelley

0:39:53.280 --> 0:39:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and you know, which led through Jimmy's work with Tom

0:39:58.640 --> 0:40:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Stevie obviously, and then Jimmy started his label and I

0:40:02.800 --> 0:40:07.240
<v Speaker 1>did a lot of the really fun stuff on Jimmy's

0:40:07.320 --> 0:40:11.880
<v Speaker 1>label before he really got deep into the urban world.

0:40:12.680 --> 0:40:15.080
<v Speaker 1>So I did a lot of work with him over

0:40:15.120 --> 0:40:18.400
<v Speaker 1>many years. I it was a good run. So at

0:40:18.400 --> 0:40:22.839
<v Speaker 1>what point does it's to turn where you've got not

0:40:23.000 --> 0:40:28.160
<v Speaker 1>enough time to do? Everybody's looking for you, you know,

0:40:29.800 --> 0:40:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I never said no. So I can remember doing three

0:40:36.400 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 1>albums in a day, which was unthinkable. Um, But I

0:40:41.680 --> 0:40:45.480
<v Speaker 1>was hungry. I was eager. I really loved what I

0:40:45.560 --> 0:40:49.520
<v Speaker 1>was doing, and it was great. It was so okay.

0:40:49.560 --> 0:40:51.160
<v Speaker 1>But now let's say if you go to a regular

0:40:51.160 --> 0:40:54.680
<v Speaker 1>recording studio, of which are limited number these days, they're

0:40:54.719 --> 0:40:59.200
<v Speaker 1>loaded with equipment. Okay, you go into a mastering room,

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:02.879
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot less equipment. Well yeah, because first of all,

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:05.840
<v Speaker 1>you're only dealing with two tracks. You're dealing with the stereo,

0:41:06.440 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 1>so you don't need all the limiters and the pre

0:41:09.600 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 1>ampts and the microphone, this, that and the other. Excuse me.

0:41:14.440 --> 0:41:17.880
<v Speaker 1>So it's you know, I think I use the word

0:41:18.000 --> 0:41:22.400
<v Speaker 1>chain a little earlier in this conversation. Mastering engineers like chains,

0:41:22.480 --> 0:41:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and the chain is I come in off the tape machine.

0:41:26.120 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I like this wire, I like these connectors. I mean

0:41:29.920 --> 0:41:34.319
<v Speaker 1>it gets really pretty minutia. Like I like to go

0:41:34.360 --> 0:41:36.759
<v Speaker 1>into this piece of gear first. I like to have

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:39.279
<v Speaker 1>this piece of gear come in second. I like to

0:41:39.320 --> 0:41:42.919
<v Speaker 1>have and that's a great place to start. You may

0:41:43.960 --> 0:41:49.040
<v Speaker 1>change it up, but you're using the same stuff all

0:41:49.160 --> 0:41:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the time. It's not like, okay, we want to a funk,

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:56.480
<v Speaker 1>distorted guitar sound that all those types of pieces of

0:41:56.560 --> 0:42:01.719
<v Speaker 1>gear don't really apply. In mastering master ring is you

0:42:01.760 --> 0:42:05.920
<v Speaker 1>know David Manley, who's a name a lot of people

0:42:05.960 --> 0:42:09.760
<v Speaker 1>will know built equipment. Now Havanna's running the company. But David,

0:42:10.320 --> 0:42:14.600
<v Speaker 1>David really taught me a lot. He said, if you

0:42:14.640 --> 0:42:17.319
<v Speaker 1>don't have a clean chain, you've got nothing. You can

0:42:17.400 --> 0:42:20.920
<v Speaker 1>always make a dirty chain. And he's so right. You

0:42:20.960 --> 0:42:23.360
<v Speaker 1>know you you don't need to turn something down to

0:42:23.440 --> 0:42:25.640
<v Speaker 1>turn it up later in the chain. You have to

0:42:25.680 --> 0:42:32.759
<v Speaker 1>figure out a series of equipment of tools that you

0:42:32.880 --> 0:42:39.640
<v Speaker 1>work with and that worked for you. So the question

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:44.440
<v Speaker 1>was why so little gear? Well, in my opinion, there

0:42:44.480 --> 0:42:48.400
<v Speaker 1>aren't that many good sounding equalizers. So it took me

0:42:48.480 --> 0:42:51.160
<v Speaker 1>three years to find the last piece of gear I

0:42:51.160 --> 0:42:54.799
<v Speaker 1>I wanted in in an analog world. And it wasn't

0:42:54.800 --> 0:42:58.200
<v Speaker 1>for lack of trying. So now, if I remember correctly,

0:42:58.200 --> 0:43:00.759
<v Speaker 1>you met David Manly because you came in he said,

0:43:00.800 --> 0:43:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I have special wire, right this wire for those people.

0:43:03.920 --> 0:43:06.160
<v Speaker 1>This is something that's debated in the Stereo magazine that

0:43:06.320 --> 0:43:10.879
<v Speaker 1>infinitem to what degree is why are important? Um? I'm

0:43:10.920 --> 0:43:14.120
<v Speaker 1>going to take a very unusual position on this. If

0:43:14.160 --> 0:43:16.399
<v Speaker 1>wire is making a big difference for you, you've got

0:43:16.400 --> 0:43:21.000
<v Speaker 1>a big problem. Okay, I believe that. But for someone

0:43:21.080 --> 0:43:23.520
<v Speaker 1>like you or someone like Stevie wonder, can you hear

0:43:23.600 --> 0:43:27.799
<v Speaker 1>the difference in the wire? You can if there's a problem.

0:43:27.840 --> 0:43:33.919
<v Speaker 1>If if you're working with gear that's really good. I'm

0:43:33.960 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 1>not saying a piece of zip coord from a lamp

0:43:36.760 --> 0:43:39.239
<v Speaker 1>is what you should be using. But whether if you're

0:43:39.320 --> 0:43:43.160
<v Speaker 1>using a Macgami wire or a Belden wire or you know,

0:43:43.200 --> 0:43:48.560
<v Speaker 1>what are the quote studio standards, can you pick the difference?

0:43:48.600 --> 0:43:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure this is this is a big problem

0:43:51.440 --> 0:43:54.360
<v Speaker 1>in our audio world. People think they can pick the

0:43:54.400 --> 0:43:58.560
<v Speaker 1>difference until they do a double blindfold and then they're surprised.

0:43:58.760 --> 0:44:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Stunned is the word I to use. Okay, So once

0:44:10.200 --> 0:44:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you have your chain established, what are you actually working

0:44:13.800 --> 0:44:17.040
<v Speaker 1>on on each record? What are you changing on each record? Well,

0:44:17.080 --> 0:44:20.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it's on a case by case basis every terms

0:44:20.360 --> 0:44:25.680
<v Speaker 1>in terms of equipment. Well, I'll talk about a project

0:44:25.719 --> 0:44:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I just I'm in the middle of right now. I

0:44:31.080 --> 0:44:35.120
<v Speaker 1>had probably not the right take on the project. I

0:44:35.239 --> 0:44:37.840
<v Speaker 1>thought that they may want something that was a little

0:44:37.880 --> 0:44:43.239
<v Speaker 1>more forward commercial loud, if you will, But that's not

0:44:43.280 --> 0:44:48.360
<v Speaker 1>what they wanted. And so the producer I spoke to

0:44:48.440 --> 0:44:52.680
<v Speaker 1>on Monday said, and we've worked a lot together. He said,

0:44:53.080 --> 0:44:55.839
<v Speaker 1>it just seems like maybe the attack time on your

0:44:55.840 --> 0:45:00.839
<v Speaker 1>compressor needs to be you know, slow, or to let

0:45:00.960 --> 0:45:05.560
<v Speaker 1>more of the transience through. Well, that to me, men,

0:45:06.400 --> 0:45:08.919
<v Speaker 1>there's you know, I have my favorite pieces of gear

0:45:09.000 --> 0:45:12.279
<v Speaker 1>that I like to use. I knew exactly what he

0:45:12.320 --> 0:45:14.560
<v Speaker 1>was talking about. I said, no problem, I'll take that

0:45:14.600 --> 0:45:16.759
<v Speaker 1>piece out. I'm only getting a dB out of it,

0:45:17.680 --> 0:45:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm just actually in the middle of finishing that

0:45:22.160 --> 0:45:27.280
<v Speaker 1>record right now. But I completely understand what he was saying.

0:45:28.320 --> 0:45:32.359
<v Speaker 1>I completely understand what the artist was saying. It made

0:45:32.440 --> 0:45:37.759
<v Speaker 1>it too different than what they gave me. And so

0:45:38.920 --> 0:45:41.919
<v Speaker 1>what they gave me was excellent to begin with. And

0:45:42.040 --> 0:45:45.080
<v Speaker 1>so you know, my my my task is to put

0:45:45.120 --> 0:45:49.399
<v Speaker 1>a little frosting on this cake. Okay, generally speaking, I've

0:45:49.400 --> 0:45:52.000
<v Speaker 1>certainly been in the studio with you where at one

0:45:52.040 --> 0:45:54.880
<v Speaker 1>point you had a box that was basically, you know,

0:45:55.360 --> 0:45:57.080
<v Speaker 1>push it up for a little of this sound, push

0:45:57.120 --> 0:45:59.400
<v Speaker 1>it down for a little of that sound. Is that

0:45:59.520 --> 0:46:05.480
<v Speaker 1>general what you're doing? Absolutely? But you know, if um,

0:46:05.520 --> 0:46:10.520
<v Speaker 1>just from a creative perspective, some people want to eq

0:46:10.800 --> 0:46:14.160
<v Speaker 1>before they compress. Some people want to EQ into a

0:46:14.200 --> 0:46:20.200
<v Speaker 1>compressor and EQ afterwards too. So these are all choices.

0:46:20.440 --> 0:46:23.480
<v Speaker 1>There's not a right or wrong. It's how you want

0:46:23.480 --> 0:46:26.640
<v Speaker 1>to set up your workflow and how you or how

0:46:26.760 --> 0:46:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I think I can achieve my best result for the

0:46:29.719 --> 0:46:33.759
<v Speaker 1>criteria in front of me. Um At every tape that

0:46:33.840 --> 0:46:37.200
<v Speaker 1>comes or every file now that comes in, it is different,

0:46:37.480 --> 0:46:40.799
<v Speaker 1>and I mean it's different. Some of them come in

0:46:41.200 --> 0:46:44.120
<v Speaker 1>they haven't used a limited on the recording at all.

0:46:44.960 --> 0:46:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I just did this record for this isn't any thing,

0:46:47.560 --> 0:46:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and it was incredibly great music. Uh, and the guys

0:46:51.640 --> 0:46:55.960
<v Speaker 1>really really talented. He doesn't even know what a limitter is.

0:46:56.520 --> 0:47:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I saw his files and I thought, oh my goodness,

0:47:00.920 --> 0:47:03.120
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna be hard work. And it really was

0:47:03.200 --> 0:47:08.960
<v Speaker 1>hard work. But it was putting the right pieces to

0:47:09.400 --> 0:47:12.879
<v Speaker 1>put the good color in place for him preserve what

0:47:12.960 --> 0:47:16.120
<v Speaker 1>was great that he presented, which was the fact that

0:47:16.160 --> 0:47:20.360
<v Speaker 1>it was really dynamic. It was full of transients. But

0:47:20.480 --> 0:47:24.560
<v Speaker 1>he also wanted to compete. You know, in a modern

0:47:24.680 --> 0:47:26.960
<v Speaker 1>ish rock world, it's not the loudest record in the

0:47:26.960 --> 0:47:29.120
<v Speaker 1>world and it shouldn't be. Well that brings us to

0:47:29.160 --> 0:47:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the loudness wars, which I really think of being the nineties. No,

0:47:34.400 --> 0:47:40.240
<v Speaker 1>it's ongoing still ongoing never ends, okay, So explain what's

0:47:40.280 --> 0:47:47.480
<v Speaker 1>going on there and how you address it. People do

0:47:47.600 --> 0:47:52.719
<v Speaker 1>their mixes, mixers a mix and at the last part

0:47:52.719 --> 0:47:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of the process they'll strap a plug into plug ins

0:47:57.480 --> 0:48:04.200
<v Speaker 1>in to mimic a CD. That does two things. It

0:48:04.360 --> 0:48:08.200
<v Speaker 1>makes it super loud, but it now becomes part of

0:48:08.239 --> 0:48:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the sound that the artist hears. So whatever their choices

0:48:14.520 --> 0:48:20.680
<v Speaker 1>are of tools to make it loud, I think, become

0:48:20.760 --> 0:48:27.040
<v Speaker 1>integrated into what really is the master. So somebody will

0:48:27.080 --> 0:48:30.799
<v Speaker 1>come in with a file that's good to go. It

0:48:30.800 --> 0:48:32.920
<v Speaker 1>takes a lot more knowledge to know good to go

0:48:33.040 --> 0:48:36.239
<v Speaker 1>than it does to touch it. So it just depends.

0:48:36.360 --> 0:48:41.560
<v Speaker 1>It's some of them come in so loud you can't

0:48:41.600 --> 0:48:46.000
<v Speaker 1>do anything. You just literally can't do anything. Doesn't want

0:48:46.000 --> 0:48:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to go through an analog chain, it doesn't want to

0:48:48.200 --> 0:48:50.640
<v Speaker 1>go through a digital chain. It doesn't want to go

0:48:50.719 --> 0:48:54.440
<v Speaker 1>through a plug in chain. You try them all and

0:48:55.680 --> 0:48:57.960
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day you think, well it's

0:48:58.200 --> 0:49:02.560
<v Speaker 1>got It's a little harsh the high end, but this

0:49:02.640 --> 0:49:05.520
<v Speaker 1>is part of the sound that everybody's married too, and

0:49:05.600 --> 0:49:08.000
<v Speaker 1>they may hear it, they may not hear it, but

0:49:08.080 --> 0:49:10.400
<v Speaker 1>if you change it, they for sure hear it. Okay,

0:49:10.400 --> 0:49:13.480
<v Speaker 1>but the way the customer would look at it is

0:49:13.520 --> 0:49:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the loudness wars were based on making your record as

0:49:17.120 --> 0:49:19.600
<v Speaker 1>loud as possible, so it would jump out on radio.

0:49:19.920 --> 0:49:22.920
<v Speaker 1>No go back a little further, so it would jump

0:49:22.960 --> 0:49:27.640
<v Speaker 1>out on the jukebox. Okay, So we've all been in

0:49:27.960 --> 0:49:32.840
<v Speaker 1>bars with jukeboxes and a great Motown come track comes

0:49:32.880 --> 0:49:37.200
<v Speaker 1>on and it's just loud and fun and boisterous, and

0:49:37.239 --> 0:49:43.600
<v Speaker 1>then something that's uh a folk California, it's not as loud,

0:49:43.680 --> 0:49:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and suddenly you know you can talk over it. So

0:49:46.880 --> 0:49:50.200
<v Speaker 1>loudness wars started there where you got noticed if you

0:49:50.280 --> 0:49:53.080
<v Speaker 1>got a loud you know, they called him a hot

0:49:53.120 --> 0:49:57.200
<v Speaker 1>track coming in on a jukebox. You heard it made

0:49:57.200 --> 0:49:59.919
<v Speaker 1>you want to go buy it. So that is translated

0:50:00.320 --> 0:50:06.080
<v Speaker 1>for sure into radio and now streaming as well as

0:50:06.160 --> 0:50:10.760
<v Speaker 1>c d s and the all important feature called shuffle,

0:50:12.000 --> 0:50:15.480
<v Speaker 1>meaning one when you put your library or take your

0:50:15.520 --> 0:50:19.719
<v Speaker 1>library on shuffle and here comes you know. But based

0:50:19.760 --> 0:50:24.839
<v Speaker 1>on an earlier part of the conversation with this normalization, well,

0:50:24.880 --> 0:50:28.239
<v Speaker 1>there's an off switch for that, and I suggest you

0:50:28.400 --> 0:50:32.560
<v Speaker 1>use it. Most people don't dig deep enough to find it,

0:50:32.600 --> 0:50:37.520
<v Speaker 1>but there's they all have an off switch. Okay, so

0:50:37.560 --> 0:50:41.040
<v Speaker 1>in other words, the loudness wards are forever seemed to

0:50:41.040 --> 0:50:46.400
<v Speaker 1>be but the loudness wards were amplified both metaphorically and

0:50:46.480 --> 0:50:48.480
<v Speaker 1>literally when we went to the c D, because the

0:50:48.520 --> 0:50:51.520
<v Speaker 1>c D could hold a whole bunch more stuff, right,

0:50:52.680 --> 0:50:55.680
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't a question of holding a bunch more stuff.

0:50:57.920 --> 0:51:01.960
<v Speaker 1>There were tools that we will call brick wall limitters

0:51:02.120 --> 0:51:04.919
<v Speaker 1>that would stop you from going over so you could

0:51:04.960 --> 0:51:07.600
<v Speaker 1>push it to the point of distortion. And we can

0:51:07.640 --> 0:51:14.200
<v Speaker 1>all cite distorted records not gonna um, but people were

0:51:14.640 --> 0:51:20.840
<v Speaker 1>found that sound pleasing, so um, what was unusual became usual.

0:51:21.800 --> 0:51:25.240
<v Speaker 1>So now suddenly you've got a lot of really loud

0:51:26.160 --> 0:51:31.680
<v Speaker 1>records out there. And again, the shuffle feature really makes

0:51:31.760 --> 0:51:35.680
<v Speaker 1>an artist not want to be quiet. Artists are competitive

0:51:35.719 --> 0:51:39.080
<v Speaker 1>in in strange ways, so this is as about a

0:51:39.160 --> 0:51:44.760
<v Speaker 1>problem as ever. It's not improving. Let's switch it to vinyl. Okay,

0:51:45.239 --> 0:51:47.239
<v Speaker 1>what do we know. There's a Vinyl gets a lot

0:51:47.280 --> 0:51:51.839
<v Speaker 1>of ink, even though literally the number of sales are

0:51:51.880 --> 0:51:53.840
<v Speaker 1>small and a lot of people are paying them on

0:51:53.960 --> 0:51:57.719
<v Speaker 1>crappy systems. You obviously started out in vinyl. I'm still

0:51:57.800 --> 0:52:07.160
<v Speaker 1>doing vinyl. But let's start with raw sound. Okay, assuming

0:52:07.280 --> 0:52:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, you kids, vinyl sound better than if it's

0:52:10.560 --> 0:52:12.360
<v Speaker 1>a file to begin with, it is supposed to be

0:52:12.360 --> 0:52:16.720
<v Speaker 1>cutting on tape. Can a file sound better on vinyl

0:52:16.800 --> 0:52:22.120
<v Speaker 1>than it will on a streaming or purchase service. I

0:52:22.160 --> 0:52:25.840
<v Speaker 1>think the answer here is if you enjoy it, it

0:52:25.960 --> 0:52:32.000
<v Speaker 1>can sound better. I don't think there's a real answer. Technically, no,

0:52:32.360 --> 0:52:36.360
<v Speaker 1>it can't. It's a bankrupt system. But it's very pleasing.

0:52:36.600 --> 0:52:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I put on some of the phonograph records we've been cutting,

0:52:39.840 --> 0:52:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and I've been selectively doing vinyl on some of the

0:52:43.719 --> 0:52:47.719
<v Speaker 1>artists I've been working with. UM, I don't want to

0:52:47.760 --> 0:52:51.479
<v Speaker 1>cut you know, bombastic stuff because we're using an order phone.

0:52:51.520 --> 0:52:58.160
<v Speaker 1>It's very fragile, but it's incredibly pleasing. UM do you

0:52:58.200 --> 0:53:00.880
<v Speaker 1>get the same if you didn't know what you were playing,

0:53:00.920 --> 0:53:03.080
<v Speaker 1>If you could eliminate the ticks and the pops and

0:53:03.120 --> 0:53:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the surface noise, would you find the same satisfaction off

0:53:07.640 --> 0:53:10.799
<v Speaker 1>of a file? I think you would. You know, the

0:53:10.880 --> 0:53:15.359
<v Speaker 1>surface noise adds something to it. I like the conversion

0:53:15.600 --> 0:53:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of electrical to mechanical and mechanical back to electrical. There's

0:53:20.800 --> 0:53:28.400
<v Speaker 1>something that's good about it. But technically no, it's not better. Okay,

0:53:28.400 --> 0:53:31.480
<v Speaker 1>So let's go back to stuff that was cut on

0:53:31.680 --> 0:53:35.399
<v Speaker 1>tape to begin with, Are you gonna hear it better

0:53:35.480 --> 0:53:42.640
<v Speaker 1>on vinyl than you will on any digital system? Vinyl

0:53:42.800 --> 0:53:47.480
<v Speaker 1>is let's just talk about vinyl for a second. Vinyl

0:53:47.520 --> 0:53:51.560
<v Speaker 1>has its has really strict limitations. Okay, the low end

0:53:51.600 --> 0:53:54.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't go as deep as subs do off of a file,

0:53:54.320 --> 0:53:56.919
<v Speaker 1>and the high end is rolled off, but it's rolled

0:53:56.920 --> 0:54:02.319
<v Speaker 1>off musically, so tape does similar things. Tape is not

0:54:03.840 --> 0:54:07.840
<v Speaker 1>an exact image of what you've got. It's a color.

0:54:08.239 --> 0:54:14.160
<v Speaker 1>It can be very slight, it can be very very big. Um.

0:54:14.200 --> 0:54:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Back to David Guilt, they're complete analog people. We master

0:54:17.360 --> 0:54:22.200
<v Speaker 1>their stuff off the tube shooter. It's uh, it sounds

0:54:22.200 --> 0:54:27.960
<v Speaker 1>spectacular when we put it in vinyl. Their music doesn't

0:54:28.000 --> 0:54:32.120
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of high frequency component. Um, there's air,

0:54:32.280 --> 0:54:37.680
<v Speaker 1>there's dimension their space. If you're going to put in uh,

0:54:37.960 --> 0:54:42.000
<v Speaker 1>something that's done with files, it's all digital all the

0:54:42.000 --> 0:54:45.719
<v Speaker 1>way through comes in lout as ship. It can sound

0:54:45.719 --> 0:54:49.120
<v Speaker 1>okay on vinyl, but I think it sounds better off

0:54:49.160 --> 0:54:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the dig Okay, let me just ask you this though.

0:54:52.600 --> 0:54:55.560
<v Speaker 1>If you're mastering off the high REDS file straight from

0:54:55.600 --> 0:55:01.040
<v Speaker 1>pro tools, Okay, to vinyl. Is that gonna be better

0:55:01.680 --> 0:55:09.200
<v Speaker 1>then the commercially available file? You know, I can't qualify

0:55:09.360 --> 0:55:13.080
<v Speaker 1>better if you like it. It's better if you you

0:55:13.080 --> 0:55:16.480
<v Speaker 1>know it's it's it's a first of all, you've got

0:55:16.480 --> 0:55:18.560
<v Speaker 1>to have a great system to play back final. Okay,

0:55:18.760 --> 0:55:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you can't put in a cross USB turntable and think

0:55:22.640 --> 0:55:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you've got something good because you don't. So no, that

0:55:26.760 --> 0:55:30.040
<v Speaker 1>can't doesn't stand a chance. You're come into my room.

0:55:30.120 --> 0:55:32.960
<v Speaker 1>You've got a fancy turntable, You've got a fancy preamp.

0:55:33.080 --> 0:55:38.520
<v Speaker 1>You've got some nice speakers, very clean path, noise floor,

0:55:38.680 --> 0:55:41.240
<v Speaker 1>very low in the room, so you hear the rumble.

0:55:41.600 --> 0:55:46.320
<v Speaker 1>You can hear all kinds of crazy details in the vinyl,

0:55:46.560 --> 0:55:48.640
<v Speaker 1>but you will also hear those in the file because

0:55:48.640 --> 0:55:52.399
<v Speaker 1>they're not invented in the vinyl. You know, the vinyl

0:55:52.480 --> 0:55:57.360
<v Speaker 1>is just a capture medium that back to the electrical

0:55:57.400 --> 0:56:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to mechanical to electrical it there's something very good about that. Okay,

0:56:04.520 --> 0:56:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll ponder that. What is the So if I'm an

0:56:07.600 --> 0:56:10.760
<v Speaker 1>act trying to develop, what's the best thing to send

0:56:10.760 --> 0:56:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to you? If you're working on it, something that you've

0:56:14.680 --> 0:56:18.160
<v Speaker 1>mixed that you like and you say I feel really

0:56:18.280 --> 0:56:22.520
<v Speaker 1>good about this. So it doesn't matter what formatic comes in,

0:56:22.600 --> 0:56:25.279
<v Speaker 1>whether it comes in on a piece of tape or

0:56:25.440 --> 0:56:27.880
<v Speaker 1>it comes in and hires file or forty four, it

0:56:27.880 --> 0:56:31.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter. The best thing to send me is something

0:56:31.600 --> 0:56:36.480
<v Speaker 1>you like and are happy with it. It's satisfying. So

0:56:37.000 --> 0:56:41.120
<v Speaker 1>you've gotta you have to work at your mix until

0:56:41.160 --> 0:56:43.880
<v Speaker 1>you're happy. Don't don't come in with something that's limping

0:56:43.960 --> 0:56:45.239
<v Speaker 1>and think you're going to be a you know, a

0:56:45.239 --> 0:56:48.440
<v Speaker 1>thorough red racehorse. So what is the futuring of the

0:56:48.520 --> 0:56:54.480
<v Speaker 1>mastering world, Well, it's, uh, I think it's very much

0:56:54.800 --> 0:56:58.359
<v Speaker 1>a in the box future. I think that define that

0:56:58.400 --> 0:57:02.439
<v Speaker 1>for those unfamiliar. It's working with computers and plug ins. Um.

0:57:02.480 --> 0:57:05.719
<v Speaker 1>I think there's always going to be room for what

0:57:05.760 --> 0:57:10.000
<v Speaker 1>i'd call traditional mastering and analog chain fancy analog gear,

0:57:10.400 --> 0:57:16.000
<v Speaker 1>good great converters, um. But that's a special client to that.

0:57:16.320 --> 0:57:19.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, budgets come into this too, more than ever

0:57:19.160 --> 0:57:22.200
<v Speaker 1>now somebody that wants to take the time to do

0:57:22.280 --> 0:57:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a real, full on analog recording where they've got a

0:57:25.120 --> 0:57:29.360
<v Speaker 1>great machine, fantastic tape, and you have to remember they

0:57:29.400 --> 0:57:32.520
<v Speaker 1>don't make tape so much anymore. So good and bad batches,

0:57:32.760 --> 0:57:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, if you're fortunate enough to have

0:57:36.960 --> 0:57:39.800
<v Speaker 1>a budget that you can work like that and you

0:57:39.840 --> 0:57:43.520
<v Speaker 1>want to mix it down through your pristine NIV or

0:57:43.640 --> 0:57:47.360
<v Speaker 1>SSL console and put it on a fantastic piece of

0:57:47.440 --> 0:57:51.240
<v Speaker 1>quarter inch or half inch tape. Takes a lot of

0:57:51.240 --> 0:57:55.959
<v Speaker 1>time times money. It's so if someone is doing that

0:57:56.640 --> 0:57:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and they're doing a full on mastering, what would be

0:57:59.800 --> 0:58:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the rights for that? For my services, I charge an

0:58:04.760 --> 0:58:09.760
<v Speaker 1>hourly rate and then the goods um. You know it

0:58:09.880 --> 0:58:14.960
<v Speaker 1>gets expensive. Okay, so today, when you're finished, what do

0:58:15.040 --> 0:58:19.919
<v Speaker 1>you actually send to the manufacturer or to these varying outlets. Well,

0:58:19.920 --> 0:58:24.919
<v Speaker 1>we provide multiple files sources, so the m FIT, so

0:58:24.960 --> 0:58:28.560
<v Speaker 1>we we conform to Apple standards for the m FIT.

0:58:28.600 --> 0:58:32.520
<v Speaker 1>We're an infant sanctioned studio. There's the digital, which is

0:58:32.520 --> 0:58:40.320
<v Speaker 1>your Amazon um from the digitals. I think Amazon makes

0:58:40.360 --> 0:58:46.560
<v Speaker 1>their two fifty six MP three and a half. And

0:58:46.560 --> 0:58:49.560
<v Speaker 1>then there's the CD which is getting less and less.

0:58:49.640 --> 0:58:52.440
<v Speaker 1>And another thing I'm noticing is is that we get

0:58:52.520 --> 0:58:57.720
<v Speaker 1>less call for the super high res K two. It's

0:58:57.720 --> 0:59:01.680
<v Speaker 1>getting it's reducing. Yeah, we don't we see fewer requests

0:59:01.760 --> 0:59:05.280
<v Speaker 1>for that. Yeah, I think that I may not work

0:59:05.320 --> 0:59:07.960
<v Speaker 1>in the genre of music. I think that that's maybe

0:59:09.080 --> 0:59:13.200
<v Speaker 1>more jazz classical oriented than it ever you know, has been.

0:59:14.640 --> 0:59:17.440
<v Speaker 1>But we used to provide those high res files for

0:59:17.960 --> 0:59:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I forget the name of the company in New York,

0:59:19.880 --> 0:59:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the HD tracks or something. Okay, what about for a

0:59:23.800 --> 0:59:26.840
<v Speaker 1>long time, especially in the CD era which started in

0:59:26.920 --> 0:59:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Night two or so, remastered what was going on there? Wow?

0:59:34.720 --> 0:59:40.600
<v Speaker 1>In two not a lot of good stuff. But fast forward, Um,

0:59:40.640 --> 0:59:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I've been around long enough to have the privilege to

0:59:45.040 --> 0:59:48.520
<v Speaker 1>do people's twenty five year anniversary albums and stuff. So

0:59:49.360 --> 0:59:52.919
<v Speaker 1>I just did the last I did Monster and Out

0:59:52.920 --> 0:59:57.240
<v Speaker 1>of Time for R e M. And in those cases

0:59:58.400 --> 1:00:01.440
<v Speaker 1>R e M is really into quality be We actually

1:00:01.480 --> 1:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>get the half inch tapes from the vault and uh

1:00:07.680 --> 1:00:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I remaster them. I got to say, it's kind of

1:00:11.480 --> 1:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a daunting task because I put on those old CDs

1:00:15.160 --> 1:00:19.439
<v Speaker 1>and they're incredibly good sounding, and it's you know, it's

1:00:19.480 --> 1:00:23.479
<v Speaker 1>always different, and different can be good, different can be bad.

1:00:23.920 --> 1:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>It just depends on who's just is. It's such that

1:00:27.360 --> 1:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>there's been improvements in technology such that a master like

1:00:30.800 --> 1:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>you can literally do things better. Yeah, I mean, I

1:00:36.680 --> 1:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>experiences is a big contributing factor. I think that if

1:00:40.880 --> 1:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>you're dealing with somebody that works in the in the

1:00:43.440 --> 1:00:47.160
<v Speaker 1>world I work in, nobody's really got second rate anything.

1:00:47.720 --> 1:00:50.520
<v Speaker 1>We've been around long enough to pick and choose what

1:00:50.560 --> 1:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>it is we want and can use the tools to

1:00:54.040 --> 1:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>get out of the project what I'm looking for, and

1:00:58.200 --> 1:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>hopefully the client is satisfied with. So in a perfect world,

1:01:02.360 --> 1:01:04.439
<v Speaker 1>if you could snap your fingers, what would you change

1:01:04.440 --> 1:01:12.400
<v Speaker 1>about today's music industry? I wish loudness wasn't such a factor.

1:01:12.600 --> 1:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I like my loudness. I certainly get slagged by the

1:01:18.200 --> 1:01:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the people that like to finger people for making things loud.

1:01:23.360 --> 1:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>All of those people forget that somebody approved it. Um.

1:01:28.880 --> 1:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>But my personal taste would be for music to come

1:01:32.280 --> 1:01:36.400
<v Speaker 1>back a couple of notches, because you never run out

1:01:36.440 --> 1:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of volume on your volume control, but you sure run

1:01:39.800 --> 1:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>out of patients when it's too loud. You know. I

1:01:42.760 --> 1:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>we had a car when I when our son came

1:01:46.400 --> 1:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>into this world, we got a Mommy Mobile and it

1:01:49.440 --> 1:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>was interesting the first click of volume. You couldn't talk

1:01:52.800 --> 1:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>over with a modern c D. Wow Wow is right, okay,

1:01:58.040 --> 1:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>but inherently nal will be quieter. You know, Vinyl, you

1:02:03.560 --> 1:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>know you're you're at the limits of time and frequency,

1:02:10.360 --> 1:02:15.360
<v Speaker 1>so to reproduce a fifty cycle wave, and vinyl takes

1:02:15.440 --> 1:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>up space physical space on the disc. So if you've

1:02:18.840 --> 1:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>got something that's got a robust low end, you're not

1:02:22.520 --> 1:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>going to get it super loud without overly compressing or

1:02:27.080 --> 1:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>compromising the audio in ways. It's not to say it

1:02:30.800 --> 1:02:34.520
<v Speaker 1>can't be pleasing to do some of that, but that's

1:02:34.600 --> 1:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the Vinyl has those types of limitations. Um. You know,

1:02:39.960 --> 1:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>if you remember, there are numbers of your favorite records

1:02:43.680 --> 1:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that are nine tracks, you know, maybe thirty four minutes,

1:02:48.360 --> 1:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, seventeen minutes aside sixteen eighteen, whatever it happens

1:02:52.040 --> 1:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>to be, which is sort of an ideal time to

1:02:55.520 --> 1:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>for for a vinyl disc. When you get up into

1:02:58.600 --> 1:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>these twenty four minutes sides, they're okay because you know,

1:03:03.040 --> 1:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>again the level is not overly pushed. The problem is

1:03:05.880 --> 1:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>you start start having signal to noise problems. I did

1:03:10.360 --> 1:03:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I did Leonard Cohen's last record, and it was before

1:03:14.280 --> 1:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I was cutting vinyl, and I remember saying to the

1:03:22.160 --> 1:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>guy that was cutting it that could we hear it

1:03:25.040 --> 1:03:28.920
<v Speaker 1>a half dB quieter because I thought it might sound

1:03:29.000 --> 1:03:31.360
<v Speaker 1>a little better. And he said, well, you know, we

1:03:31.400 --> 1:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>can do that, but you're gonna start noticing the surface noise.

1:03:35.320 --> 1:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>And he was so right, you know, he was just

1:03:37.800 --> 1:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>so right. So it's all a delicate balance. Uh, you know,

1:03:42.520 --> 1:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>audios a, it's a funny thing to chase. It's a

1:03:44.840 --> 1:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>sure a lot of fun and well, especially today because

1:03:48.320 --> 1:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>people are not younger generations not into stereo like the boomers,

1:03:52.720 --> 1:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>so they're playing it back through earbuds and a lot

1:03:55.640 --> 1:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of crappy systems. Yeah they are. I mean, that's that's

1:03:59.040 --> 1:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the downfall of add O is is that there's no resolution.

1:04:01.760 --> 1:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, you're listening with such limited reproduction, you know,

1:04:05.520 --> 1:04:09.959
<v Speaker 1>reproducers meaning earbuds, even good headphones. There are very few

1:04:10.000 --> 1:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>good headphones. I know a lot of people take issue

1:04:13.160 --> 1:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>with that. I should say there are very few good

1:04:14.920 --> 1:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>affordable headphones. Um. And when the you know, the common

1:04:19.040 --> 1:04:24.360
<v Speaker 1>denominator is the handheld device, i e. Your phone. Um,

1:04:24.400 --> 1:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, if it jumps on that and that makes

1:04:26.360 --> 1:04:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you happy, great, And I'd like to make it jump

1:04:28.840 --> 1:04:31.600
<v Speaker 1>on that and make you happy. That's your job. You've

1:04:31.640 --> 1:04:36.439
<v Speaker 1>been listening to Steven Marcus in Mastering Engineer Extraordinary here

1:04:36.440 --> 1:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>on the Bob Left Sets podcast. We've gotten technical, you know.

1:04:40.080 --> 1:04:41.919
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people are intrigued. Some people

1:04:41.960 --> 1:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>are knowledgeable about this already. Other people can learn. I

1:04:45.640 --> 1:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly learned a couple of things. Stephen, Thank you so

1:04:48.600 --> 1:04:50.480
<v Speaker 1>much for being here. Thanks for having me, Bob. It's

1:04:50.520 --> 1:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>been a pleasure. Until next time, I'm Bob. Left sets