WEBVTT - Split Congress and Its Impact on Restaurants

0:00:01.240 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Bloomberg Intelligence. BI provides research on industries, companies

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:10.959
<v Speaker 1>and expert topics, delivering key data from BI analysts and

0:00:11.000 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>they're given industry. Now Here is your Bloomberg Intelligence research team.

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Chopping It Up Episode nine. I'm your host,

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:25.639
<v Speaker 1>Mike halon On, the senior restaurant and food service analyst

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg Intelligence. My pleasure to introduce my guest today,

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Joe key Faver. Joe is a founding partner of Aligned

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Public Strategies of Full Service Public Affairs and Creative Firm,

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and he's the host of the Weekly Working Lunch podcast.

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:43.160
<v Speaker 1>So you can find Joe's weekly restaurant pod on SoundCloud

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and Restaurant Business. Thanks for doing this, Joe, Mike did

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>to be your pa, did to talk to you. Happy news,

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Happy New Year to you as well. Um so Joe's

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:58.319
<v Speaker 1>might go to guy when it comes to politics. Uh

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>So that's what we're gonna get into today. So you know,

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>let's start out by asking what happened to the red wave?

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 1>And the red wave we're talking about an EBB tide.

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>There was no red wave. Um, you know, I think, um,

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, we were gonna we're in a kind of

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a big political transition in the country where UM UM,

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the technology of detecting voter moods and voter intensity has

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:33.759
<v Speaker 1>not kept up, and so polling is is probably as

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:39.919
<v Speaker 1>UMS inconsistent over the last five years has ever been UM,

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and the technology really hasn't caught up to to UM,

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, actively measured voter attitude. So what happens is

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>no one really knows right. And it's funny how everyone's wrong,

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>but everyone's saying, well, my polls are right with everybody else.

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>The poles are rocks. This is crazy that UM. You know,

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's difficult. It's going to be increasingly difficult

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>for the publicans two, you know, whether whether they win

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>here or win there, to create a working majority. You

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>see what's happening this week in Congress. I mean, they

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>can't even get a leader that I doesn't even sworn

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:18.799
<v Speaker 1>in yet. And you know, I'm not I'm not trying

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:21.639
<v Speaker 1>to be partisan, but you can't help being part of

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>that when you're talking about this stuff. It's you know,

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 1>it's it's they find themselves in a position where if

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you get remember, you know, for the first time, and

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I think American history a major political party did not

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>have the political platform and an election cycle. The Republicans

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>had no platform, you know, and that doesn't give you

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a blueprint for governance, right, And so they've they've they've

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of become the anti governments part of you seeing

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that playoff in Washington right now. So what that means

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 1>is for voters, to answer your question, there's not a

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:52.519
<v Speaker 1>lot to glomb on to except for, well, that is

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the other guy, right, and that is not a that's

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>not a winning long term strategy. It wasn't a winning

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>long term strategy this time. And I think what what

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:02.640
<v Speaker 1>they're finding and whether you know, who knows what in

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:07.639
<v Speaker 1>the back room, what's going on. But you know, Americans,

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, for better for worse. We can talk about

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:11.800
<v Speaker 1>we want limited government, we want this, but they like

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>to see Congress legislating. They like, you know, polling after polls,

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>polling for you know, generations, they wanted to see Congress legislating.

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:23.519
<v Speaker 1>And Congress, whether you're whether you agree with or not,

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I agree with what they did in the last two years.

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>They were legislating. And so I think there was a

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>well spring of support out there um that punditry didn't acknowledge.

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think the Republicans you know, just ran some

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>terrible candidates to just ran some terrible candidates, and these

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:44.119
<v Speaker 1>races can can can be very personal, you know, and

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and a real popular person that doesn't have real popular

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>views can can win, and an unpopular person that has

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, popular views can lose. And I think they

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 1>just combination of all those things. Mike, So that the

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>long winded answer to a short question. But um, there

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>was no way and as such, there's no politt there's

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>no mandate to govern going forward, which is difficult for

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>your you know, your clientele, the business community, restaurants, you know,

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>they want to manage risk, right, they want it. They

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>want some level of clarity, good or bad, and different

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>as to how to plan for what's coming after them

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>in this current environment does not allow restaurants executives to

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:27.039
<v Speaker 1>have any sense of certainty about what the next couple

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:31.919
<v Speaker 1>of years looks like. That's great, thanks, And you know,

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess that leads me right in my next question. Right, So,

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 1>what does the Republican House and a democratic setting me

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>for restaurants as stimulus done, and and what what can

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>we expect over the next two years? Well, you know,

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 1>it remains to be seen certainly, certainly in the first

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, let's say that's the bude up in the quarter.

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>So the first six months of the new Congress, you're

0:04:55.560 --> 0:05:00.599
<v Speaker 1>going to see especially if um, if McCart he pulls

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>out this, you know, he is contorting himself and conceding

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>by the minute and depending on what he gives away.

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think what you're gonna see from the

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Republican House is just investigations. They're not gonna be in

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the governing and legislating and talking about the tax law.

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:19.280
<v Speaker 1>The Senate will be pushing those types of things. Obviously

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the White House wills, but I think you're gonna see

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a stalemate. I think the big pieces for a restaurant

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>is the activism of the Biden administration. At the regulatory level.

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>We will go full on, and you know they are

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>doubling down. You saw this week he re nominated a

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>whole splew appointees to the e o C and other

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>other other governing bodies. Um not Jessica Lumin to wage

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>an hour, but we expect that any any time now.

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:51.159
<v Speaker 1>She's fairly you know, for that position, she's fairly uncontroversial.

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:54.839
<v Speaker 1>Into Republicans. Um, So they're gonna they're gonna double down

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and there you know, they can't govern legislatively, They're gonna

0:05:57.640 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 1>govern regulatorially. And we've already seen that in the first

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:01.719
<v Speaker 1>few year the Biden administration. But with this n LYB

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>National Relations Sports and Doing is some pretty unprecedented stuff.

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:08.039
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they have been pedal to the metal and

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that's not gonna abb anytime soon. Is there any regulations

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>on restaurants, um, you know outside of the n l

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>RB and and kinda. Um, the change the changes we

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 1>may see in franchise law will get to that later,

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>but are there any regulations that the restaurant industry should

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>be particularly concerned about right now? Yeah, we're in the

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>middle of a rulemaking process on a joint employer at

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 1>a number of agencies, and the restaurant industry estarch, the

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 1>franchise business community needs to watch that very very closely. Obviously,

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 1>the the powers that be want to um, you know,

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:48.479
<v Speaker 1>have shared responsibility between Mike Talent franchise Z and Company

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 1>X franchise or on workplace violations, labor protocols, unfair labor practices.

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:58.479
<v Speaker 1>Right now. You know, in our current world, you know,

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the company's kind of field that have from the franchise z.

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>The current administration wants that wants to remove that shield

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and make that joint liability because it's easier to go

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>after make it up McDonald's corporately than it is to

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>go after my kalon the you know, three unit franchise

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>z UM. So you're gonna see in every different every agency.

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>It was the Department of Labor, National Labor Relations Board. Uh,

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, other agencies will have their own joint employer rules.

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>So this is a you know, this is three or

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>four agencies were playing this. We obviously independent contractor and

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the restaurants don't employ a lot of independent contracts and

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff when it comes to some stared services maintenance services,

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the building and so forth. But all the laws around

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>independent contractors are getting rewritten. I think other pieces that

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>are important to restaurant tours. You know, we talk about

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the A twenty rule and and and regulations around work,

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, off the kind of off the clockwork, but

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>non skipped work for tipped employees and where is that

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>where is that guiding line? So there's gonna be more

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>energy in that space. Well, so it's a very you know,

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 1>labor is number one for these for this administration, and

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>we're the number one labor intensive industry. So there's there's

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>really nothing that you know, the Labor Department and its

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>sub agencies where it's OSHA, whether it's you know that

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>are doing that doesn't directly affect restaurant tours. I think

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 1>some of your bigger business model issues that we've seen

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>that the industry has worked on in the last couple

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>of years paid leave, for example, nothing's going to happen

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 1>federally at you paid leave. The Republicans have pivoted, not

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 1>insignificantly on this issue. There's a model that both um UH,

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Vermont and New Hampshire have adopted with Republican governors and

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Democratic legislatures. That's kind of a shared responsibility type of

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>model between employees and employers and and having private interests

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 1>bid on running those kind of those uh those those

0:08:57.000 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>insurance funds is paid leave funds. I think that's a

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>model that if anything happened in the federal level, which

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 1>is highly unlikely, it would be something like that you've

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>seen on the far political right. Instead of opposing paid

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>leave and this is kind of post pandemic, but opposing

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:18.079
<v Speaker 1>paid leave from a business perspective. They're embracing paid leave

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>as a pro family issue. So there's energy on the

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>right for the first time in a number of different ways.

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 1>In the paid lead issue. I don't think there's a

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>window in this particular Congngress for that. Um. But you'll

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>see states you know existing, You'll see states that have

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>paid lead programs to make them more robust. Um. I

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's gonna be any accent on minimum wage

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>at the federal level, um um. You know, issue enough

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:44.679
<v Speaker 1>to go back historically over the last three years for

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 1>many of the minimum wage uh increases, we've had Republicans

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>in charge of you know, one House of Congress or

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the White House when they've happened. So never say never,

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>but highly unlikely on the wage stuff. I think. I

0:09:56.559 --> 0:10:00.199
<v Speaker 1>think the regulatory piece is where companies really need to

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>be watching, and they have been for you know, the

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>last two years have been a good lesson than that,

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 1>gotcha all right? So there's been some back and forth

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>in California over the last week regarding the fast acts.

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>So where does that stand right now? So there's gonna

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>be a hearing so to bring the audience up to speed. Um.

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Just before the new year. UM, the the the state

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>UH said hey, we're going with this regulation as of

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:30.320
<v Speaker 1>January one. We're gonna started forth in it. And the

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>business from you said, hey, wait a minute. We were

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>told by current law and validated by you the state,

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>that if we uh uh submitted the appropriate number of

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>signatures that this basically creates to run our own ballot

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>initiatives on winding this law, that it creates a stay

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:50.679
<v Speaker 1>situation where this law will not go into effect. That's

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the guidance you've given us. That's the guidance we've had,

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, forever in this state. And for reasons not

0:10:58.000 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>yet clear, we can speculate and we'll go into that

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to why. The state said, math seddle the medal. We're

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:07.079
<v Speaker 1>gonna enforce this of January one. So the coalition, if

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you will, the Dating Restaurant Association, International Franchise Association, Chamber

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 1>of Commerce, other organizations UH collectively UH filed suit to

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>for a stay. Judge granted that day and the first

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 1>hearing and I believe it's January, so the end of

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>next week, UM, they'll be kind of first hearing in

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>court as to how to proceed here. Um, so you know,

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>we would all been speculating as to as to why, um,

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 1>why the state? You know, it was political pressure from

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the STIU, of course it was, But does does the

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:45.680
<v Speaker 1>state really believe it had legal standing because most of

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the legal minds in the industry they had no legal

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 1>standing here. Um. And it's pro form of you know,

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:58.199
<v Speaker 1>shameless giveaway to the union just to you know, it's

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>done unconscidtable use the taxpayer money if they know they

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>have no legal uh laid to stand on, yet they're

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>going to drag the state and tax payers into court.

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 1>So who knows what's happening. And maybe you know, they

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 1>have lawyers to maybe they have a pathway. I don't know,

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:13.959
<v Speaker 1>but it's up in the air and we'll know more

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:16.559
<v Speaker 1>on January and we'll know how serious they are about

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to enforce this and what their cractionales are. But

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>for right now, the next week and a half of

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the law is stayed. Um. And you know, my if

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, you know, you've been covering the industry

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 1>a long time. I've been tivering the industry a long time. Yeah,

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 1>this is this is some pretty big ball politics that

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the industry has been playing the last couple of years.

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>You know what what Sean Cannon the n r I

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>pulled off with the Restaurant Relief Fund is you know,

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable by partisan support for this industry, uh during during

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic and this activity in California is pretty pretty

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 1>epic as well for us to get together as an

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:51.320
<v Speaker 1>industry raise a kind of money that we did play

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the ballot game, which we don't really play a lot, uh,

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 1>get the signatures, get something on the bout and qualified

0:12:57.440 --> 0:12:59.199
<v Speaker 1>and now we're in the court. So you know, it's

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a kind of new your day in the industry,

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and the industry you know, knows that they're against the

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:07.559
<v Speaker 1>ropes against a very very well funded opponent. We still

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>tend to, you know, for you know, you add up

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:12.679
<v Speaker 1>the market caps of our big corporations, you get an

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 1>astronomical number. We still have very short short crocodile arms,

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>alligator arms relatives to our market caps are funding these

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>kinds of things. But we're doing a lot better than

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>we've ever done traditionally. So we'll we'll know on the

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 1>third teams kind of what what the environment looks like

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:30.200
<v Speaker 1>where this judge will be. But the broader question for

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the industry is, you know, what does it look like

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>if other states and cities, you know, pursue copycat legislation

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:41.439
<v Speaker 1>if you will, And and so the industry is mobilized,

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and there's a target. Listen about ten states, by the

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:48.119
<v Speaker 1>ten states where political winds are right in the political

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 1>environment is right for a fact act type of bill.

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>We see some at the municipal level right now. Mineapolis

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a hot pot where we may see

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 1>some level of fast Act like legislation. We already have

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:05.319
<v Speaker 1>a similar kind of model in Detroit. The one in

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Minneapolis doesn't directly it's all employers, not a q SR

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>specific thing. But this is this is the way man

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and um industry knows. I think soberly that the old

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 1>days of HR twenty two in Congress, you know, it's

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>those days have left us, and we're playing ball on

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the ballot in a lot of states, are playing ball

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>municipally in a lot of states, and it's gonna cost

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money. Yeah. Well, it's great that, you know,

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the the industry, which is so fragmented. I think that's

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 1>part of the reason why they haven't been able to

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>join hands and and fight some of these regulations, UM

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and legislation in the past. Uh, it's great that they're

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>starting to come together to fight for what's best for

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the industry. UM. So you mentioned, you know, Minneapolis being

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 1>a municipality. UM and you also mentioned five to tend states.

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>So what states do you think could be fast followers?

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>And and are they gonna wait? I guess you know,

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>obviously they're gonna wait until next week. But if this

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>goes to referendum, are they gonna wait until the referendum

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 1>comes through for them to start pushing harder on this?

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 1>How do you think that's coming? Yeah? Well yeah, so

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>let me take it kind of methodical order. You know,

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:21.000
<v Speaker 1>right after the fact at path in California, right after

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 1>it got in the process, within about half an hour

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>of the final vote. Literally, Michael, I'm coming thirty minutes

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>of the final vote. UM. The s c I you

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>put out on Twitter a you know, Victory laps spiked

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the ball and listed about fish or seven states where

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 1>they're taking their road show too. Next they're the ones

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that first said, hey, ain't saying nothing in the warm

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>up that right, So we're we're looking at a lot

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:48.880
<v Speaker 1>of those traditional you know, blue trifectus states and maybe

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>some of the new blue trufector states. Four states, uh

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>now have four more states after the elections now have

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 1>total blue control. Uh. So those are you know, Massachusetts

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and Maryland top of that list, but we're looking at Washington,

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>We're we're getting our act together in Oregon, Illinois, New York,

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey area where you are, Maryland, massachusettskind of the

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>usual suspects, um, but with Massachusetts and Maryland kind of

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 1>added to that list now because of changing their leadership

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>as well. So it's gonna be a busy year. UM.

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I do know that, um Um, the restaurant in you

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>know association, National Restaurant Association, I say, are really working

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>very well, very much in conjunction, very closely on this issue.

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>And we're seeing a lot of uh you know, cooperation,

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money being spent, a lot of money

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 1>being raised, and strategies put in place to really kind

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>of bolstress going forward. And you know, it seems that

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>SI you seems to have momentum here, but at the

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 1>unit level, you know, what we're seeing is that the

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:08.679
<v Speaker 1>unionization momentum seems to have slowed at Starbucks. You know,

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the effort seems to be stalling here and about two

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>seventy stores, they're not close to a C B A.

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, have the Union's lost some of the wind

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>in their sales at the unit level or is this

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:24.400
<v Speaker 1>something that's just unique to Starbucks now? I think I

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:28.159
<v Speaker 1>think they have, you know, in the Starbucks. It's a

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 1>good question and difficult want to answer. I mean, um,

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, with with an attrition rates in this industry,

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a no brainer for Starbucks to go into

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:41.399
<v Speaker 1>the old bean Smith four corners, you know, and just

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:44.639
<v Speaker 1>try to run the clock out on on on the process.

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:49.439
<v Speaker 1>Because you know, the first Starbucks votes were about twelve

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 1>months ago. It's tweluf thirteen months ago. And if you

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 1>look at those original stores, I bousically see what the

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>turnover rates, how many of those those people that voted

0:17:57.040 --> 0:17:59.439
<v Speaker 1>in that union lecture are still there? Right? Uh? And

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 1>even in Starbucks and he does pretty well relative to

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the competitor's net space, it's still just average attrician. You've

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>got a whole new cast of characters and in there

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 1>two years later. Starbucks is smart to kind of stress

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:13.359
<v Speaker 1>the process out. They know the math um and so

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 1>it has kind of dizzled a little bit. Um. But

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:19.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's interesting my dis your question at the

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 1>unit level, it's it's fizzled a little bit. But I think,

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, like everybody's business model changes over time. Look

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>look at look at Bloomberg's business model now versus twenty

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:33.919
<v Speaker 1>years ago. I mean night and day, right, the technology

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you guys are into, it's just a whole different company. Right. Similarly,

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:40.919
<v Speaker 1>the unions you know, for for fifties, sixties, seventy years,

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:45.400
<v Speaker 1>we're kind of, you know, my awfully focused on collective

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 1>bargain graments c b as were the goal and and

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>that's how you measured your success or not. How many

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:56.920
<v Speaker 1>places could you actually unionize? And over the last ten

0:18:57.000 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 1>or fifteen years, I mean they have figured out, and

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 1>probably more of the last five or ten years to

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>be specific, they have figured out that they don't need

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:07.679
<v Speaker 1>c b as to win. I mean they're winning the

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 1>conversation there they have they the labor community, I want

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the unit I'll say the labor community is a nonprofits

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:18.439
<v Speaker 1>and naturals groups, all the kind of stuff. They have

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 1>won the conversation around our business model. Look at our

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>business model now whis flat years ago? I mean, we

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:26.160
<v Speaker 1>used to laugh, we have bully laughed about fifteen bucks

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 1>of that I'm crazy that was Now you can't get

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:32.120
<v Speaker 1>anybody fifteen bucks now, right, And this is happening before

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. Obviously pandemic excited. But they've won the national

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:40.959
<v Speaker 1>conversation on our model. Most people don't think our business

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>model is a great model, right, Um, And so whether

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 1>it's paid leaves that they are, we're exposed in the

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>pandemic and a lack of paid leave policies. Obviously the

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:54.159
<v Speaker 1>wage stuff is worse than from us. So they have

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 1>forced so many changes to the business model this industry

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 1>outside of a cb A that you know, by any

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 1>means except for dues revenue they have they can be

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 1>spiking their football and I don't know of any time

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>you think about historically the relationship between the unions and

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Party, you can go back and you can

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 1>see George me you know, sitting at the desk of

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:20.399
<v Speaker 1>f d R right and and the unions have always

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 1>had a close association with Democratic Party. But for most

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:26.719
<v Speaker 1>of the last hundred years the Democratic Party has been

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:31.360
<v Speaker 1>run by Southerners, and um, they don't have any relationship

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 1>with unions. At all. The the union lack of a

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>better term, dominance ownership of the current Democratic Party and

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the progressive direction of it is unprecedented. I mean they

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:48.159
<v Speaker 1>have one. They have they have literally intellectual uh control

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:52.160
<v Speaker 1>over a big swath agenda of one of the two

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:54.959
<v Speaker 1>major governing parties in the in the country. I think

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>it's fascinating to watch. They've always been a big interest group.

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 1>They've always been a big you know, every president is

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:03.439
<v Speaker 1>always addressed the NFL, A meeting everyhere, you know. I mean,

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 1>but they run the show now, I mean they run

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 1>the show and a bunch of states that used to

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:11.920
<v Speaker 1>be when I when I first started this industry that

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 1>number one, I did it. I did it. The true story, Michael,

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I did an assessment when I was a Walmart Uh,

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:19.399
<v Speaker 1>how most powerful five most powerful unions need state capital

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:23.359
<v Speaker 1>and about going back, you know, twenty plus years. But

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 1>in so many of them, the vast majority was the

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 1>teachers Union. And now that the sd I you and

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>some of the unions that that touch our industry the most,

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>have resided prominence in so many state capital Sacramentos and

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the tip of the Iceberg, and they have really won

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the conversation. So it's at the unit level. You're Mike,

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:46.640
<v Speaker 1>you're my Kalent franchise d X. Your business model looks

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how it could look any different if

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 1>you were unionized for five years ago versus not being

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 1>ugunized now. It's not in a day if I and

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 1>five years ago. And so they've kind of won in

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:57.959
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ways. I always say that they might

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>have won the arbitration, but they on the conversation, Yeah,

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:03.679
<v Speaker 1>for sure. And I think part of it is is,

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, cultural right, Um, you know, I had a

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 1>guest on the UH months ago saying, you know, they

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 1>made unionization cool, right, And so I think that's the

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:14.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of helped them make some of the inroads at

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 1>the at the union level, right. And we we have

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 1>we have, you know, going back to the nineteen this

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:26.679
<v Speaker 1>is Gallup first started pulling this particular issue, union acceptance,

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:30.159
<v Speaker 1>union popularity. Never been hired there today and you know

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 1>what forty plus years of doing that polling. So again,

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I think the more because we haven't had a strong

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>union movement, so it's more hypothetical. And oh isn't this

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:42.280
<v Speaker 1>great blah blah blah? Would you get in the nooks

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and crannies of it and people start to you know,

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 1>really understand what's going on. I would assume those numbers

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 1>are gonna dropped significantly. Um. But when they realized that

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that the you know, that hourly label is going to

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:57.680
<v Speaker 1>be replaced by robotics, right, I mean it's just yeah,

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that issue in our in our industry, right is very

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:04.479
<v Speaker 1>under um kind of trade in terms of technology. So um.

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I think. So, I think one of the things harsh

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:09.159
<v Speaker 1>reality in our business that you know, people are going

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to be replaced. Yeah. And so I think you've got

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 1>three kind of political currents that are kind of or

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 1>four I should say, that are kind of presenting challenges

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 1>for restaurant companies and restaurant exactly. Obviously, you've got a

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:28.920
<v Speaker 1>very informant, mobilized employee base that you've never had of

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the last fifty years. Right, You've got customers that are

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 1>dialed in, you know, for better for worse on what

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>informed customer base that often doesn't see eye to eye

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:46.119
<v Speaker 1>with the industry position. Right, You've got um, um, you know,

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the our general backstop for the last fifty years, the

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:55.719
<v Speaker 1>Chamber of Commerce Republican Party has left the building. All

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>this has left the building and they're not. They're they're

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 1>attacking corporate America's much as anybody is, right, and so

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you've got these these cross currents. Uh, You've got a

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>completely cohesive Democratic Party on these labor model issues. I

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:15.399
<v Speaker 1>mean there is almost almost no except for Joe Mansion

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 1>on the minimum wage issue, which was a deal waiting

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:21.400
<v Speaker 1>to waiting to happen. You've got complete cohesion in one

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:23.680
<v Speaker 1>political party on your iss she said, you've never had before.

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>So if you're a restaurant company executive, that the political

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 1>environment is so different over the last three or four years,

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:33.199
<v Speaker 1>and it has been seeing thirty or forty years, it

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>all kind of looked the same, and it's it's hard

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 1>for some of our folks. As a general rule. You know,

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>we have a lot of exacts that are not politically

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:43.400
<v Speaker 1>dialed in. You know, we're not a regulated inditstry. We're

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>not banking, we're not finance. You know, we're not energy

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 1>that are just airlines that are just constant governments in

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>your business every day. We tend to be a little

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:54.400
<v Speaker 1>arms and length, you know, and a lot of our

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 1>executives grew up in that system and you know, aren't

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>his you know familiar with the nuances of it. And

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:06.679
<v Speaker 1>I think, in my point being, we tend as an

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>industry to be hell no on everything right now, would

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 1>pose that would that we're at for anything, And I

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 1>think time is kind of run out on that strategy.

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think you know, you see businesses, you know,

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>making major major announcements in the sustainability space or the

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>E s G space, and you know, the businesses are

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:34.440
<v Speaker 1>moving forward faster than kind of some of the political

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 1>allies are. So my point being, I think we're running

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:41.360
<v Speaker 1>out of out of friends in the process if we're

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:43.879
<v Speaker 1>in transigent, So we've got to I think businesses have

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to come to the people and say, hey, here's a

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 1>here's a paid leaves scheme that we can work with.

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's give this away. Hey, here's a portable benefit scheme,

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 1>let's have that conversation. Hey, here's a more proactive here's

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a a recycling thing that maybe we can we can

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 1>work into our model that won't damage you know that

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:08.959
<v Speaker 1>we're her a business model in our in our operations.

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 1>We've got to We've got to do that. We've never

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:12.920
<v Speaker 1>been really good in the industry of that, but we've

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 1>we've got no, we don't have a lot of allies

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 1>now to be that backstop that we used to have.

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:21.159
<v Speaker 1>And so I think it's the industries can have to

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 1>pivot the way it looks at these issues and manages

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 1>them going forward. That's not appeasing, that's just recognizing what

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the plane field is. Yeah, but they're on their heels though, right,

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Like I mean you mentioned at the beginning at the top,

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>right about the Republicans, I mean, they left has got

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>them on their heels and they're just the party of No,

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and and they don't really have a platform, and it's

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 1>an issue, right. So it seems like the restaurants are

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:44.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of in the same place where they're just kind

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 1>of playing defense and uh, reacting as opposed to being

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:52.400
<v Speaker 1>out in front and leading. So is there anything that

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:54.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, you had some great examples of how they

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>can kind of contribute to the legislative process, But is

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 1>there anything that they should be lobbying for? Yeah, you know,

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I've yes, I think there's some some big picture stuff

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 1>that they should at least be starting conversations on to

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:14.679
<v Speaker 1>to get enough traction that you can officially move on

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the lobby. But you know, we have this. We've got

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 1>a revamp how we look at labor in this country.

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>We we have a we have a an entry level gap.

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:29.680
<v Speaker 1>The labor shortage was happening in our space long before

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. I was, I was doing presentations in talking

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 1>about labor shorter staffed, never never, you know, and then

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:41.359
<v Speaker 1>and then we we we did all this this immigration

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 1>stuff in the wall and all this kind of stuff.

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:45.919
<v Speaker 1>Then we had the pandemic. You know, if you look

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 1>at you know you're a finance guy. Look what what's

0:27:48.359 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 1>happening in England with Brexit? I mean, who whose economies

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:55.439
<v Speaker 1>and worst shape in Europe? England because they know bodies,

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 1>they know they cut their immigrations. Now they have their bodies.

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:02.959
<v Speaker 1>They're the worst inflation of any country. Conversive, we we have,

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:09.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, this dearth of of available staff that we

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>wanted to work in our spaces. And it's like you're

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:15.679
<v Speaker 1>either you know, the entry level of the run of

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the letter or your or your white collar executive. You know,

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:24.680
<v Speaker 1>you're inside some company and we need to develop a

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 1>class of worker. Um it's kind of project of working

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:33.159
<v Speaker 1>onto It's not not fullid based, but we need to

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 1>we need to reform the labor model so that we

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>can develop a class of worker that we can have

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 1>some kind of pay scale around if you will have

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>some kind of training regiment, apprenticeship regiment around, have some

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>type of portable minimal safety, that portable benefit structure around,

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and then have the text code appreciate that and create

0:28:57.040 --> 0:29:00.959
<v Speaker 1>this worker that's in this hybrid between what we have

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 1>now the traditional FTE and a salary position. I think

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the economy, that modern economy has evolved passed

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 1>our old fashioned way of classifying in treating work. I

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>think it's a huge issue that this industry should be

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 1>leading finding the next way. I don't have only answers

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 1>about the next way is I just know that it's

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 1>this gap. And so if you're twenty year old my

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 1>kalent and you know you're you're you're walking into you're

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 1>looking for your first job, We're gonna lose everybody to

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Amazon because we don't have We're not competitive on the

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 1>wage front, we're not competitive on the benefit front, we're

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>competitive on the training front, and we're losing people out

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 1>of the industry. Isn't that we're losing Burger thing is

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:50.160
<v Speaker 1>not losing them to Popeye. It's we're all losing them

0:29:50.200 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 1>to Amazon and other industries because there's this eCos structure

0:29:54.760 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 1>around them that we have not formulated. And I don't

0:29:58.040 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 1>think we're going to do that. I don't think companies

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 1>are gonn do that on their own. But there's a

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:05.400
<v Speaker 1>way we can maintain our competitiveness by kind of creating

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 1>that space in the labor code. And I think, you know,

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 1>that would be a ten year process, but it's something

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 1>we could actually contribute a great deal of that conversation,

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the expertise and before something and have a very different

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 1>conversation about how wages and benefits fit in to the

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 1>overall thing. That's a big issue I think. I think

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>on the recycling, you know, how about we say, really,

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 1>let's recycling comes this. You know green you know Bernie

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 1>stand standal were an issue, but man, it's a it's

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 1>a it's an economic issue. You're your governor, your mayor,

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 1>you're running out of land and barry trash right, Chinese

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:42.000
<v Speaker 1>won't take our stuff anymore. We were we we have

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 1>an economic need. We're going to deal with this stuff. Um.

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the industry, especially so much waste and it's coming.

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 1>There's no way, it's not coming. So we can either

0:30:53.080 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of, you know, be in charge our own fate

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 1>or we can let it happen to it. And we've

0:30:57.160 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 1>seen with some of these producing responsibility bills in log

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:04.240
<v Speaker 1>In Maine and other places, it's it's happening. I think

0:31:04.280 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 1>we have to control our own destiny in that space.

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 1>And I think I think the energy kind of renewable

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:11.760
<v Speaker 1>energy space. You know, we're talking about natural gas bands

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I just think there's a lot of

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 1>big picture issues that we that that we should really

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>be um a voice in, and we still kind of

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>play small ball on some of these unit level in

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Nicol what I would consider Nicol dimond just scheduling or

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, real breaks, all this kind of stuff, Like, man,

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>we gotta revamp our entire labor structure if this industry

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to continue to survive and without being completely automated,

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 1>because we're losing our workers to other industries. So I

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 1>think that's a there's things that I think idea for

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, and and you know, for me, a federal

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 1>minimum wages. It's like it's archaic, right is A is

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 1>a sixteen year old that's starting at his first day

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Adam McDonald's worth what a two year old is at

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 1>his first day at McDonald's. Is that sixteen year old

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 1>working in say, Arkansas, you know, does he deserve the

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:09.239
<v Speaker 1>same pay as a sixteen year old in California? Right,

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>So just having one blanket wage for the entire country

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make sense. And we know that you're really just

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 1>legislating against those states that are you know, paying that

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>have lower minimum wages uh statewide right. Um, So to me,

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 1>it just seems like an archaic way to try to

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:29.600
<v Speaker 1>lift wages, right. That has to be a better way

0:32:29.600 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 1>to do it. Yeah, And I kind of follow, even

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 1>though I don't. I don't work in the space uber

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 1>lift you. They're not my clients, but I do watch.

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, they are a hybrid of our labor model.

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, they are independent contractors as drivers by and large. Um,

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 1>they're not full time employees that our employees. They are

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:52.959
<v Speaker 1>operating intentionally in this gray area. And you're seeing Australia

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 1>played with some some ideas that there's a kind of

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a beta project going on on Ontario right now about

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 1>a kind of portable benefits reasim for this class of workers,

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and some wrap around facing that, and you know, Uber

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and Lifts are probably doing it to retain drivers and

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 1>keep regulators off the back, right. But in that model,

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:14.440
<v Speaker 1>there's there's there's So if you're that sixteen year old,

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, let'st's say you're an eighteen year old, you're

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 1>high school graduate. You know, you're in school, you're you're

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 1>training for X. You don't have healthcare, blah blah blah.

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 1>If we could, if we could say, look, we're gonna

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 1>classify Mike Calon as a schedule P worker whatever you

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 1>wee I would call it. But here's that pay band.

0:33:36.280 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 1>He can make between thirteen and sixteen bucks an hour

0:33:39.360 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 1>depending on what he does. He's only gonna work thirty

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 1>hours a week. But we're gonna contribute like Social Security,

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 1>like any other employer, We're going to contribute some piece

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 1>of his paycheck to a portable benefits scheme so he

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 1>has paid lead where he can goes to see a doctor. Uh.

0:33:53.200 --> 0:33:55.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're gonna work with the state in their

0:33:56.760 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 1>workforce development training programs. We're gonna make sure Mike's and

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 1>those that he's building skills so that all this wrap

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:05.400
<v Speaker 1>around around that worker. We could probably start retaining some

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 1>workers in the future. Um, but we've got to get

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 1>out of the box of thinking about just by human

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and ways to get in, which we've been doing for

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 1>four years. So long, long winded answer to a short question.

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 1>But those are those are things we think about. Yeah,

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 1>some great topics. Um, all right, So I was reading

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 1>an article this morning about shareholder proposals targeting political expending

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 1>are expected to kind of ramp up this year. Um.

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, you know, I was thinking of Michael Jordan

0:34:34.160 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 1>at the time. It's like, if you're a restaurant, I'd

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 1>want to be Michael Jordan, right. I wouldn't want to

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:41.759
<v Speaker 1>make my political affiliations, knowing right, because I don't want

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 1>to piss off half my potential customer base. But you know,

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:48.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's me. But what's your advice to your clients

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:54.759
<v Speaker 1>about making political donations in such a charged environment? You know,

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 1>that's that's such a great question. I think there are

0:34:58.840 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 1>ways to you spend either corporate dollars or personal political

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:05.719
<v Speaker 1>dollars or pack dollars ever you want to whatever jar

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:09.759
<v Speaker 1>you want to pull them to impact public policy. Uh,

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 1>in a more effective way now than giving Congressman and

0:35:13.239 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Michael Halen five thousand bucks in this fundraiser. I think

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's a relative path, right, But there are ways,

0:35:20.239 --> 0:35:24.920
<v Speaker 1>um to either through policy organizations, you know, partnering with

0:35:24.960 --> 0:35:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the national governor. I'm just making it up. He's making them,

0:35:27.200 --> 0:35:31.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, but you know getting you know, if instead

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of having a three hundred thousand dollars to a bunch

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:37.839
<v Speaker 1>of congressmen that are can't even pick a speaker, Um,

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 1>why aren't you three hundred thousand dollars to the US

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Conference of Marriage to come up with a business friendly

0:35:42.960 --> 0:35:45.239
<v Speaker 1>recycling program, you know, whatever that is. I think they're

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 1>ways for dollars to impact the process other than the

0:35:49.640 --> 0:35:52.759
<v Speaker 1>way of here's a check for we're gonna go off

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 1>fundraising or I'm gonna stand around our studits in our

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:56.399
<v Speaker 1>cocktail and he's gonna tell us what we want to hear.

0:35:56.400 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 1>And you know, Mike, I love the convenience story industry.

0:36:00.680 --> 0:36:04.040
<v Speaker 1>If you're the greatest employers a way a restaurant, I

0:36:04.080 --> 0:36:06.280
<v Speaker 1>love the restaurant industry. You're the greatest. I mean, there's

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 1>a wind up, right, It's just such an antiquated way

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 1>to do stuff, and I think they're better used to

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:12.799
<v Speaker 1>our So I think a lot of companies. You've seen

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:16.280
<v Speaker 1>companies on our industry closed down their facts, right, Um,

0:36:16.360 --> 0:36:18.800
<v Speaker 1>because in the way, in the wake of the Citizens

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:24.439
<v Speaker 1>United case, was that two thousands twelves? Maybe? Yeah? The

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:28.319
<v Speaker 1>driving force and American political money are find net worth

0:36:28.320 --> 0:36:33.360
<v Speaker 1>an individual, you know, and when you know, millionaire X

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 1>can write a thirty million dollar checking this fun a

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:39.760
<v Speaker 1>millionaire I can write a thirty minute what is company

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 1>wise checking? Mike Hallen, it's a joke, you know, it

0:36:45.640 --> 0:36:48.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't even matter. So I think I think we have

0:36:48.239 --> 0:36:51.879
<v Speaker 1>to re examine our political business model. Um, it's been

0:36:52.360 --> 0:36:54.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, actress being for a long time. I don't

0:36:54.280 --> 0:36:56.960
<v Speaker 1>think pack is the way. But you know, the restaurant industry,

0:36:57.320 --> 0:37:00.320
<v Speaker 1>by and large, we we have and we just doubled.

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:03.799
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not complaining your point of fingers, but we've

0:37:03.800 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 1>struggled for years to harness our biggest political striketh, which

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:11.440
<v Speaker 1>is our footprints. Right. There's no you can't draw a

0:37:11.560 --> 0:37:16.240
<v Speaker 1>legislative municipal city council, you know, dog catch your district

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:18.160
<v Speaker 1>small enough that it has doesn't have a much of

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:20.600
<v Speaker 1>restaurant in it, right, and we if we could ever

0:37:20.760 --> 0:37:23.920
<v Speaker 1>mobilize that grassroots army, we really wouldn't need to play

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:26.360
<v Speaker 1>with bouts, but we haven't been able to do that. Again,

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to your point where such a spread out industry, you know,

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I've always kind of said, we're not an industry. We're

0:37:32.160 --> 0:37:36.080
<v Speaker 1>just an archipelago of billions of tiny little island out there,

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's hard to it's hard to be a nation

0:37:38.280 --> 0:37:42.840
<v Speaker 1>sometimes when you when structures like that, and that's our grassroom.

0:37:42.880 --> 0:37:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I've always said that we should, you know, we should

0:37:44.640 --> 0:37:46.960
<v Speaker 1>organize ourselves more like an interest groups, more more like

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:49.560
<v Speaker 1>interest groups and trade associations because of our footprints so

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:52.719
<v Speaker 1>spread out. We're on a capital tensively labor intensive, and

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:55.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, I would I'd rather us act like the

0:37:55.840 --> 0:38:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the the the National Rifle Association and stead of the

0:38:00.640 --> 0:38:03.719
<v Speaker 1>National Restaurant Association in terms of being a grassroots army

0:38:03.800 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 1>based you know entity and um, you know, a RP

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. It always thought that was a better model

0:38:09.760 --> 0:38:11.560
<v Speaker 1>for us, but that would take thirty years to change too.

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:14.040
<v Speaker 1>But they we're always been working with the scenes like that.

0:38:14.040 --> 0:38:17.000
<v Speaker 1>That's the case though, right, yeah, yeah, you know, And

0:38:17.200 --> 0:38:19.759
<v Speaker 1>and so it's hard because you know, in a lot

0:38:19.840 --> 0:38:22.920
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of industries, you know, the employees and

0:38:22.960 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the managers on a lot step want a lot of issues.

0:38:25.760 --> 0:38:28.160
<v Speaker 1>We've never enjoyed that in the industry. We always tend

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:30.279
<v Speaker 1>to be kind of cross purposes with our employees on

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:33.239
<v Speaker 1>political issues. So it's harder. We've got a lot of

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:35.319
<v Speaker 1>operators out there and a lot of restaurateurs out there.

0:38:35.360 --> 0:38:37.880
<v Speaker 1>We should have millions of voices on issues, you know.

0:38:37.920 --> 0:38:40.000
<v Speaker 1>And then going back to fast Act, we're starting this conversation.

0:38:40.040 --> 0:38:44.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, we had major, major employers that have major

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:47.040
<v Speaker 1>operations in California in five or six California based but

0:38:47.120 --> 0:38:51.759
<v Speaker 1>did almost nothing on on on Fast actors of you know,

0:38:51.840 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 1>weighing into the conversation and getting their franchisees or people

0:38:55.600 --> 0:38:57.759
<v Speaker 1>into those meetings. We we didn't get out spent in

0:38:57.840 --> 0:39:01.920
<v Speaker 1>California out lobby. We've got out political. We got out grassrooted,

0:39:02.400 --> 0:39:05.759
<v Speaker 1>you know. And and um, that's that's the worry for

0:39:05.800 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 1>these other states is in California if you think about it,

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and I know we're probably running over your time here,

0:39:10.719 --> 0:39:16.240
<v Speaker 1>but um, there was while the political bar was very high,

0:39:16.440 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, in terms of the Union's strength in California,

0:39:18.640 --> 0:39:20.839
<v Speaker 1>how much dominant they have over the government process there.

0:39:21.880 --> 0:39:24.279
<v Speaker 1>That was the high water mark for our organization as well.

0:39:24.320 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we have lots of companies based in California.

0:39:27.040 --> 0:39:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Every brand's got operations. We had, we have a huge

0:39:30.560 --> 0:39:34.799
<v Speaker 1>industry footprint in California, and we didn't realize, you know,

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:40.040
<v Speaker 1>in this fight, right, we're not set up that way

0:39:40.080 --> 0:39:42.759
<v Speaker 1>in Washington and Oregon. We're not set up that way

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:44.960
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of these New York, a lot of

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 1>these states. And so we if we underperformed in California

0:39:50.400 --> 0:39:53.160
<v Speaker 1>with the playing field as it was, man, we could

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:54.359
<v Speaker 1>be in a world of hurt in some of these

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:56.120
<v Speaker 1>other states. So it's be interesting to see how all

0:39:56.160 --> 0:40:00.480
<v Speaker 1>this plays out. All right, Well, fingers crossed for for

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:04.839
<v Speaker 1>good outcomes for our restaurant listeners. Man, Uh, we're gonna

0:40:04.920 --> 0:40:07.120
<v Speaker 1>leave it there. Jed, you're great, Thank you so much

0:40:07.160 --> 0:40:11.080
<v Speaker 1>for doing this again. Where can um members of the

0:40:11.080 --> 0:40:15.560
<v Speaker 1>audience find you if they're they're seeking your public affairs knowledge? Uh,

0:40:15.719 --> 0:40:18.920
<v Speaker 1>feel free to call us that Aligned Public Strategies and

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:21.080
<v Speaker 1>it's Joe dot keep op or K E F A

0:40:21.239 --> 0:40:24.040
<v Speaker 1>U v E R at Align Public Strategies dot com.

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:27.799
<v Speaker 1>Happy to uh engage any conversation, answer questions, whatever I

0:40:27.800 --> 0:40:30.120
<v Speaker 1>can do to help move the ball forward. My friends,

0:40:30.280 --> 0:40:33.160
<v Speaker 1>as do you. So appreciate all you do. Mike. Uh.

0:40:33.280 --> 0:40:37.040
<v Speaker 1>You have a great gift of taking very complicated stuff

0:40:37.080 --> 0:40:39.719
<v Speaker 1>and making it user friendly and simple. And I love

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:41.319
<v Speaker 1>reading your stuff because it's one of the few things

0:40:41.360 --> 0:40:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I can understand. So I do appreciate all that you

0:40:43.480 --> 0:40:46.640
<v Speaker 1>do as well. So good as you thing. I'm glad

0:40:46.680 --> 0:40:48.960
<v Speaker 1>you find it useful. Man, Well, listen, you're the man.

0:40:49.000 --> 0:40:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Thanks again for doing this. We'll speak soon, right, Thanks

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:55.759
<v Speaker 1>for listening, and all right, Joe, Thanks man, You're great.

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence is a service provided by Bloomberg Finance LP

0:41:04.760 --> 0:41:09.160
<v Speaker 1>and its affiliates. This recording does not constitute, nor should

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:14.360
<v Speaker 1>it be construed as investment advice, investment recommendations, or a

0:41:14.440 --> 0:41:19.319
<v Speaker 1>recommendation as to an investment or other strategy. Bloomberg Intelligence

0:41:19.320 --> 0:41:22.759
<v Speaker 1>should not be considered as information sufficient upon which to

0:41:22.840 --> 0:41:27.440
<v Speaker 1>base an investment decision. Neither Bloomberg Finance LP nor any

0:41:27.480 --> 0:41:31.279
<v Speaker 1>of its affiliates makes any representation or warranty as to

0:41:31.360 --> 0:41:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this recording,

0:41:35.920 --> 0:41:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and any liability as a result of this recording is

0:41:39.080 --> 0:41:40.840
<v Speaker 1>expressly disclaimed.