WEBVTT - Ivy Zelman Discusses Real Estate 

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>This is Masters in Business with Barry Riddholts on Bloomberg

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:12.119
<v Speaker 1>Radio this weekend. On the podcast, I have an extra

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>special guest. Her name is ivy's Elman, and I have

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>been following her research and writing for the better part

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>of a decade plus. UH. She has had a series

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of phenomenal calls within various aspects of the real estate industry,

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>be it the home builders, the mortgage originators, the credit underwriters.

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>She is definitely a contrarian. She is somebody who is

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>extremely astute as to the economic cycle and how it

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>affects housing. If you are at all interested in real estate,

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>credit homes, both single family and multi family, and all

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>of the latest innovations in either technology or UH financial

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>and sations and financing of of especially from the private

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>equity side. We we just spend some time talking about

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I buying the instantaneous buyers that have appeared that facilitate

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:15.959
<v Speaker 1>transactions of sellers. I think you're gonna find this conversation

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>filled with wonky goodness. So, with no further delay, my

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>conversation with real estate and equity analyst expert Ivy Selman.

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:33.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm Barry rit Halts. You're listening to Masters in Business

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. My special guest this week is Ivy Zellman.

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>She is the CEO and founder of Zellman and Associates,

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>a boutique research firm focusing exclusively on the housing industry.

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>She is an institutional investor, Hall of Fame Equity Analyst

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>UH The All American Research Team Rankings placed Ivy and

0:01:55.880 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 1>her team with eleven first place rankings between nineteen Then

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you know and and I V. S Ellman. Welcome to Bloomberg.

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for having me. Very so you cover one

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 1>of my very favorite areas because it's so fascinating, especially

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, housing, the pursuit, construction, financing of it.

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the early days of your career and

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>how you became a housing analysts. You began on Wall

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Street that about rights right? What path led you there? Well,

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>actually I didn't start out interested in housing admittedly. UM.

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I was UM really focused as an undergrad on accounting

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and I was working UM at Arthur Young now Ernst

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and Young, going to night school. So I went to

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>undergrad for six years and during the time that I

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>was studying at George Mason University and working in Ernst

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and young as an accounty major. I was asking a

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of these accountants that I worked with, do you

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>like what you do? And they hated it. They almost

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:03.679
<v Speaker 1>universally everyone I talked with said you don't want to

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>be an accountant. So I was like, well, what should

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I do? And they basically all said, go get a

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>job in Wall Street? And I'm like, what does that mean?

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Because at George Mason, Wall Street firms didn't recruit students there,

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>so I had to network and knock on doors, and

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>eventually it led me to Wall Street, where I got

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>a job at Solomon Brothers in investment banking and I

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 1>was there for a two year stint as an investment

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:29.359
<v Speaker 1>banking analysts prior to be coming in going into equity research.

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>And so well told you were there from nine about right, Yeah,

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of overlapping with the Michael Lewis Liars Poker era,

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite books. But so that that is

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>a very much a male dominated period in Wall Street.

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Not that Wall Street has has really done enough to

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>to even the gender levels, but back in the nineties

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>that had to be kind of a wild place to work.

0:03:57.600 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>It was a lot of fun, I think starting out

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>out first being in a class because I was in

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>a training program. I think I was one of three

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>women of seventy kids, and we were all there for

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>two years. I was intimidated because most of them were

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>from the Ivy League, and so I initially not even

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>being just a woman, but just you know, having from

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 1>a state university. UM. But you know, once you're once

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you're there, you know, you put your head down, you

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 1>work hard, and it was really just about proving myself

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and as working hard as I can. So I think

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 1>that today I look back on that time and I

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of fun, but it was about just

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, execution and working as hard as you can

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 1>to prove yourself. So how did you transition from investment

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 1>banking analysts to housing analysts? After two years you're out

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>of a job, which you know that's the case when

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:50.160
<v Speaker 1>you took the job. It's a it's a two year lifespan.

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a two year lifespan, and most of the seventy

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 1>odd plus or minus will go on to get their

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>m b A and then return, you know, back to

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street. And because I had student loans already through

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>undergrad and unfortunately didn't want to take on the responsibility

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:08.599
<v Speaker 1>or go back to school after six years. I just

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>was looking for a job to pay my rent. And

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>internally we had something called the you know, the Treasury

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>scandal going on at that time, and unfortunately John good

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Friend and the firm was in turmoil. So a lot

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of people period with Warren Buffett came in and right

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the ship pretty much. And prior to Warren Buffett writing

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the Ship, the view was there, you know, the lights

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>were going to go out at Solomon and a lot

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 1>of people were leaving, and there was an opportunity that

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>opened up in in equity research, in the housing space

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and the actually in corporate finance. I worked in Transportation group,

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:43.359
<v Speaker 1>and gentleman by the name of Julius Maldudas, which is

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>a famous airline analyst, he's like, you should go work

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>in equity research, you know, and and go help them.

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 1>So I got a job with his recommendation as an

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 1>associate in the UM. At that time, it was Bruce

0:05:56.800 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Harding who covered S n L's and Fanny Freddie, and

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>he was picking up homebuilding and housing as a favor

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 1>because Bob Bishop quit said I'm out of here, as

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>many other people were quitting, so I came an associate,

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and I was just happy to have a job. People

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:16.160
<v Speaker 1>like you don't want to be an equity research analyst.

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>They're just like monkeys. They just companies talma to write

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>and and I just wanted to get a job and

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>stay at the firm, and and there there, there you

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>have it. To be fair, some of them are not monkeys.

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Some of them are insightful researchers who put forth intelligent,

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>um actionable wealth generating research. Absolutely agree with that, and

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I certainly don't agree with the monkey comment, but it

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>was the beginning of now my nearly thirty year career

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 1>as an equity analyst. So not not as a monkey,

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>but but actually generating research. So so you're you're kind

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of thrown into housing. How did you suddenly discover such

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>a proficiency for it? What made you so astute as

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:03.280
<v Speaker 1>as someone without a background and housing going into that space?

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think what I really loved about it

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:08.679
<v Speaker 1>initially was the fact the challenge was to really find

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 1>ways to differentiate the work that I was doing. And

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>when you have a fragmented industry and housing is something

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>that you know, I could relate to lived in a home.

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I like the housing market. It was really about finding

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 1>companies that were privately held that are in the business

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>of housing, whether they were a home builder or a

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>realtor like your mom, or building product manufacturer, and talking

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to them about the business and learning from them, and

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>then you using that analysis to then try to correlate

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>or predict what public companies would do. Were other people

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>delving into private companies at that time as a way

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 1>to give them a little more color into what the

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>reality of the public situation was not that much, to

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>be honest with you, In fact, um not to give

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>too much credit to any one person, but it was

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>really I was assigned a buddy. Salomon Brothers decided that

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a salesperson and analysts would become buddies and they would

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>work closely together for the younger Alice to learn from

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the senior salesperson, and the senior salesperson really said, you know,

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you need to go dig in the channel. You need

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 1>to find private companies. And that was really the direction

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I went. Now, it just so happened I happened to

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>have married my buddy, but that's a longer story. But

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>my husband, David, really was the one who directed me

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to go find private companies and that will really help

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to ferentiate you. Quite fascinating. So let's talk a little

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>bit about Wall Street and housing. I think for the

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>most part, Wall Street has not done a distinguished job

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>covering housing in general, covering the retail and department store sector, um,

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>certainly the credit companies that are associated with residential housing.

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>What's your view is Wall Street? Am I overstanding this?

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Or does Wall Street not do a great job getting

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>housing right? Well? You know, looking at really our our firm,

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>which um, we think we do get it right. You know,

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>what we've built has enabled us to really um differentiate

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>our overall views because we're dependent not upon what economists

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>are predicting or um other outside parties perspectives, meaning publicly

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 1>traded management teams telling them what they should do. We're

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>really going outside through our own network, which again we

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>channel check developed relationships. We have nearly a thousand companies

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>that are throughout what I call the housing ecosystem. Whether

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:39.479
<v Speaker 1>they're a builder, they're a broker, there are a mortgage originator,

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>there are a manufacturing company that makes building products, or

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 1>they're in the single family rental business as as an

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 1>owner operator apartment. We're taking all of these silos, and

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>we're aggregating data that is proprietary data within each silo,

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and we're then triangulating it amongst this ecosystem to have

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>a firm view of what's going on in the market.

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think it's unique to Zelman. No one

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>else has anything like what we do, and it's been

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 1>built over the course of the decades that I've been

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:11.320
<v Speaker 1>in the business. So I can't say what other firms do,

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>but I think we get it right. Well, it sounds

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>like Wall Street is generally a little too close with

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>corporate management and they're looking for guidance and not doing

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 1>a sort of deep outside the box research UM dive

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>into various aspects of housing or again, am I overstanding that? Well? Again,

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I can't speak on behalf of what other firms are doing,

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>but I know what we don't do, and I can

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>tell you that back in the I guess Go Go

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>days of the housing market in you know, oh, three

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>oh four, oh five, I wasn't a very popular analyst

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 1>UM working at credit suites when I was negative and

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:52.959
<v Speaker 1>certainly the companies UM didn't see eye to eye with

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>my views. And it's like being the sober person at

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the party. Um so um, I was definitely a lone

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 1>range are at times. So let's talk about that period

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 1>of financial engineering was endemic. Securitization was a giant revenue

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 1>source and we ended up seeing that eventually spiral out

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 1>of control into the Great Financial Crisis. So what is

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>it about that era that led so many people astray?

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Especially the supposed smart guys doing the quantitative um research. Well,

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that you could put pen it on

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:39.079
<v Speaker 1>one thing. So then agreed um certainly the inability to

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>really take sort of the entire mosaic and see the

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>risk that was so in our opinion obvious. A lot

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:49.439
<v Speaker 1>of people started, I call it drinking their own kool

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 1>aid and believing that there was a secular shift in

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 1>home ownership rates and that the government was certainly supportive

0:11:56.920 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of continued you know, um enabling people to have the

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>American dream. But there was a optimism that was not

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>supported by the you know ingredients that go into you know,

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 1>creating that opportunity for people. So it it just was

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 1>a again, is if people just were convinced that it

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>was different this time and that housing housing was you know,

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna go up forever. So I want to point out

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>this is not a case of hindsight bias, where, of

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>course the risks where obvious, says everybody today. In real time,

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I recall reading some of your research oh four, oh five,

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>oh six, when did you leave? Oh seven, May of

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>oh seven, So in real time, before the bust, you

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 1>were effectively saying, there's a problem with credit, there's a

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:52.320
<v Speaker 1>problem with housing, this is unsustainable. What what was the

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 1>research that you were putting out at that time saying

0:12:54.679 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>how how blunt were you? Pretty blunt? Um? I remember

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>report that we untitled Investors Gone Wild in July of

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>two thousand five. I think we had like a thousand

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 1>people in our conference call across all of it, beyond equities,

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:13.959
<v Speaker 1>within you know, fixed income and rivers everywhere. Um, the

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>securitization guys were there, but generally speaking, the amount of investors.

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>When you go to let's say Las Vegas and you're

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>driving from the airport and your taxi drivers telling you

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>he's buying houses, and then you know, you go to

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:29.559
<v Speaker 1>the nail salon, the woman and the nail salon is

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:31.719
<v Speaker 1>during your nails is buying houses, and you realize we

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 1>have maybe we have a problem. I think that the

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>investors and the magnitude that we're buying both new and

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>existing homes with no money down and understanding the mortgage

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>piece was probably one of the biggest um parts of

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:47.719
<v Speaker 1>our conviction on why we had a real problem here,

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and and mentioning again affordability was clearly way out of

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:55.200
<v Speaker 1>reach from any historical perspective. Um. The other aspect of it,

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>besides investors gotten wild, was the amount that the builders

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 1>were willing to pay for land and having the ability

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to talk to private companies and who would be competing

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 1>with the builder for that land, and the private builders

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:10.199
<v Speaker 1>would tell us, oh my god, you cannot believe what

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 1>these guys are paying for the land. That was another

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>part of our analysis that really led us to understand

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the risks that these um companies were really willing to

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 1>absorb at the expense of shareholders. You put your finger

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>on a couple of things I want to bring up,

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>one of which is historically, most builders are pretty cognizant

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of the real estate cycle and the business cycle, and

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>they get aggressive when things are cheap, and when things

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>get expensive they pull back. But for some reason, it

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>seemed that a lot of people sort of stopped doing

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>that in oh five or six oh seven. What was

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>it about that period that made them forget, Oh no,

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to pay up for lands. It'll come

0:14:56.160 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>back down when the cycle turns well, you know, I

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>think there was a view that the demographics had shifted

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>and that um there was support for you know, a

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>secular growth in housing that we hadn't hadn't seen in

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>prior cycles. That was the That was what the companies

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>pitched to the investment community. They and they really believed

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>in many of them. Um, they also had Wall Street

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>pushing hard to drive top line. So what had been

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>matching short term assets with short term debt or long

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>term debt with long term assets. You know, what you

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 1>started seeing is builders willingly taking on more leverage, buying

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>larger parcels because it would feed the machine, enabling them

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to continue show strong growth. And so the market was

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>really demanding growth and they were willing to put the

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>capital to work. You know, it's one of the only

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>businesses that you know, once you build the factory and

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>then sell it, you have to rebuild your factory. And unfortunately,

0:15:57.320 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>this is one of a factory that you know, you

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 1>have to best fifty cents to seventy cents to make

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a dollar revenue capital intense business, and you start buying

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>land that won't be let's say, put into the manufacturing

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>capacity realization machine for a few years. You can really

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>put some significant risk on the balance sheet. Quite quite interesting.

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk a little bit about the timing of

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the launch of Zelman and Associates. You do this? Was

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>it later on? Oh seven? Is that right? We left

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Credit Suites in May and started Zelman October seven. Okay,

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>so October fifth, two thousand seven. The October October five,

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>two thousand seven is when the equity markets peaked and

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>would not see that level again until So your timing

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>was kind of interesting and coincidential. You obviously saw some

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 1>variation of what was coming. Why launch into that sort

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of Mayhew Or was the expectation, Hey, nobody's job is safe,

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 1>we might as well do it ourselves, or what were

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>you thinking? Well, my team's at Credit Suites. Dennis McGill

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>who was my UM partner associate and he's the co

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:17.400
<v Speaker 1>founder of his Element Associates, along with Alan Rattner, who

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>was also working with us on the team of Credit

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 1>SUITEZ we were working um as equity analysts, really focused

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 1>on housing, but we were servicing the entire firm because

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 1>we were such in the eye of the storm, and

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 1>we had such a controversial call, and I had such

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>an unbelievable network that we created through these private industry

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 1>contacts that we wanted. We weren't feeling that we were getting.

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>First of all, we were unfortunately a lot of people

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>internally within the salesforce and the traders and in the

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 1>in this curization, the ABS guys, they didn't agree with

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:56.400
<v Speaker 1>our call. So we were a little bit um. Hey,

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 1>somebody has to be on the wrong side of the trade, right. Well,

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 1>we were not very popular. And you know, I was

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 1>even told by the head of product management from Credit

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Suez is um perspective that your job could be at

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>risk if you don't make you know, you had your

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:13.919
<v Speaker 1>I think in two thousand six, this is what happened.

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Two thousand and six. The stocks were down about and

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>there was slowing and we were right. And then Bob

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 1>toll And told brothers say, hey, things are picking up.

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>This is back in September six and they called it

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the Zelman bottom, and and that you need to get

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:33.639
<v Speaker 1>with it. And you need to be more bullish. You

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>had your little good time. Now now you need to

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>turn around and be bullish. And I remember publishing Dennis

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and I we had fun writing this report. UM in

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:45.639
<v Speaker 1>December of two thousand six. We wrote twelve reasons or

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:49.439
<v Speaker 1>the ten reasons to sell homebuilding stocks. Wait, let me,

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 1>let's just make sure I understand the time in here.

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 1>So you're negative on on home builders and housing stocks.

0:18:57.040 --> 0:19:01.440
<v Speaker 1>They fall over the next twenty four months? Is that fair?

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it was July aboh five was when they

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>we started really seeing inventory starting to left twelve months,

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>let's say twelve months. So this is a fierce bear

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:17.720
<v Speaker 1>market and it's only the beginning down. Um. And and somebody,

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 1>not your direct boss, but somebody in the firm says,

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 1>all right, you've had you a little fun, you've had

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:26.120
<v Speaker 1>your little pullback. You better flip bullish and your contray

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>responses bullish. Watch this. No hesitation, not wondering about, hey,

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:35.359
<v Speaker 1>these guys can get me fired. There was no thought

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>about that, or was there. Um, Well, this this was

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 1>a managing director running all of the morning call product manager.

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:48.120
<v Speaker 1>And I was pretty piste off. And actually, UM went

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to my director of research and complained and and actually

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the research director was very supportive of me, and so

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:57.639
<v Speaker 1>with that it was they were great to me. But

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:01.159
<v Speaker 1>this particular person, unfortunately it was, was someone I was

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:04.879
<v Speaker 1>pretty upset with. But subsequent to that, sort of like

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the Zelman bottom, we published something in October o six

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 1>called wonder Land, and Wonderland was basically saying that the

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:14.160
<v Speaker 1>home building industry is going to have to write off

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:17.640
<v Speaker 1>equity because they've overpaid for so much land. We actually

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>estimated about equity right off. How much was that in

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 1>actual dollars and it actuality It turned out to be

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:31.680
<v Speaker 1>fifty six that they wrote off, So we were way off,

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 1>but we were so contrariant at this time, so that

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 1>was what else was off? No nor off, Yeah, no

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:40.679
<v Speaker 1>right offs or anything. So that was October six. That

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:44.159
<v Speaker 1>was another sort of flagship report. But in December the

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:46.400
<v Speaker 1>stocks kept going up, so they were rallying in our face.

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:49.439
<v Speaker 1>We're getting a lot of backlash. Salesforce was against us.

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>People internally were like, what's the story. And in December

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 1>we came out with the ten reasons to sell homebuilding

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 1>stocks and give us a few reasons out of the tent.

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:02.680
<v Speaker 1>The town was they were. You know, basically the mortgage

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>market was not sustainable. The fueling of the growth was

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 1>coming from you know, these ridiculous exotic mortgage products you had.

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Land prices were going to crash. We had consumers that

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:20.160
<v Speaker 1>were not buying because the investors were buying. Um. I'd

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>have to go back and look at all the specifics.

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>But any any big clients say, I don't care about that.

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>This is contrarian. I'm going to do this and put

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>giant bets to work. Sure. Um. John Paulson was one

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of our clients that we talked to regularly. Steve Eisman

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:40.439
<v Speaker 1>was one of my buddies. I probably spoke with him daily,

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 1>along with his team Danny Moses and Vinny Daniels. That

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 1>those guys were every day we were on the phone

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 1>with them. There were some people that were really convinced,

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>as we were, that this Barrish call at some point

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 1>was going to work. So the Selma Gomez character and

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the Big Short that that was supposed to be you,

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>is that right? I got one quote in there, but

0:21:59.840 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>not that one you did. What was the quote in

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the Big Short? Oh? I don't remember what the quote,

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>but Michael Lewis did stick me in there? You mentioned

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the you mentioned the cab driver in in Vegas on

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:15.119
<v Speaker 1>the way back from the airport. My favorite scene with

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:18.959
<v Speaker 1>Steve Carrell is he's I don't remember it was a stripper,

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>a waitress, but it was in a strip club and

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 1>he's asking her. They're talking about real estate, and he's saying,

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:28.399
<v Speaker 1>how do you afford the mortgage on that house? And

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 1>she goes, that house I own. I have four houses.

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 1>And that's the moment where okay, I think I have

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to I don't remember what character he was who he

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>was playing in real life. He was playing Steve. He

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>was Steve Eisman. Okay, so that character, that's the moment um.

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:45.679
<v Speaker 1>It's a little more dramatic in a strip club than

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:48.119
<v Speaker 1>speaking to a Wall Street analyst about oh you know

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:50.639
<v Speaker 1>I Actually my husband and I we owned um a

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>home in Florida and we go out to the beach

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's in a community. And the guy that was

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>putting the umbrellas in the San Chris, he told my

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:02.160
<v Speaker 1>husband that he owned about ten fifteen lots. And I

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 1>was like, this is probably two thousand four, two thousand five,

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and he was asking my husband, do you want to

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>go look at some loss with me, because you can

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:10.479
<v Speaker 1>buy them with no money down. And I was like,

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, David, do you hear this? This is crazy?

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:16.399
<v Speaker 1>So you know everywhere you know. But but Steve was

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 1>on it. He had the call, he really did. So

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 1>a friend of mine called called that era. Um, the

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 1>so called home owners were really renters with an option

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>to default, which which I thought was kind of amusing. Interesting.

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk a little bit about where we are in

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the housing market today. I've seen a couple of things

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that remind me a little bit of the early two thousands. Um.

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 1>HDTV is going strong and Flip this house is back,

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:48.439
<v Speaker 1>and although these days it seems to be more about

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:52.160
<v Speaker 1>renovating than it is about buying and selling them. Um.

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 1>But the housing market seems to have mostly recovered in

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>about half the country. I'm ballparking that. Where where do

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:02.120
<v Speaker 1>you see the housing market today? And does it remind

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you at all of the bad old days? I think

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the housing market right now is pretty healthy. Two eighteen

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:14.160
<v Speaker 1>was a tough year. The market decelerated pretty much most

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:18.199
<v Speaker 1>of the year, more month to month, worse than normal seasonality.

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:19.919
<v Speaker 1>But by the time we got to the end of

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the year. It ended with a big thud, and a

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:25.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of people thought housing was gonna lead us into

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:29.400
<v Speaker 1>a recession again, mainly due to the stock market turmoil,

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>getting the political turmoil global and certainties sort of perfect storm.

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 1>So housing came to kind of a screeching halt. And

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>yet the fundamentals actually were pretty favorable. We have strong

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 1>job growth, consumer confidence is high, and incomes are accelerating.

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:49.159
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at the housing market from supply

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and demand, we actually have a pretty significant deficit of

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a lack of supply, which we estimate to be about

0:24:57.800 --> 0:24:59.679
<v Speaker 1>So when you just look at what we need in

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:03.719
<v Speaker 1>order to provide shelter for the incremental households growing and

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:07.639
<v Speaker 1>those getting knocked down demolished, that that's a pretty strong

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>positive part of the thesis. Now, you mentioned half the

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>market for the United States recovered. That's in terms of

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:17.919
<v Speaker 1>home prices, so about half the country is actually below

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 1>its prior peak. Um. As you think about pricing, the

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>pricing in the in the housing market is a little

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 1>bit now um more challenging. So builders are in fact

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and brokers and real estate agents are seeing a momentum

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:33.400
<v Speaker 1>in spring um pick back up from the thud now

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 1>was the stock market close to record highs again. The

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 1>political turmoil has settled down, but spring selling season actually

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:44.640
<v Speaker 1>is definitely pretty good now. The entry level is much

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 1>stronger than the move up and luxury and depending on

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:50.920
<v Speaker 1>a market where job growth might be stronger versus another

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 1>city where it's not as strong, so all real estate

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:57.440
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't necessarily move in tandem. But right now I'd

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:00.879
<v Speaker 1>say it's healthy and affordability is still reasonable. Bowl I

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:03.359
<v Speaker 1>don't see a lot of concerns at this point. Things

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that we're watching I'm happy to elaborate, but generally i'd

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:09.920
<v Speaker 1>say we feel pretty good about the market today. So so,

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:15.159
<v Speaker 1>we have constrained supply, relatively low rates. Even after the

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>past year of increases, rates are still historically Um what

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>what is a mortgage today? Four for a quarter for

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 1>a quarter? I mean that's pretty reasonable, isn't it. So,

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:29.400
<v Speaker 1>So given the limited supply and low rates, what does

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that mean for home prices over the next couple of years. Well,

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:37.160
<v Speaker 1>home prices have been up. The first year they increase

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:39.680
<v Speaker 1>was two thousand twelve, and since two thousand twelve we've

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>been running out about a five to six percent growth.

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Kager and what we're seeing right now is some moderation

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and home price appreciation. You know, the inventory is available

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 1>for sale in the United States if you look at

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:54.160
<v Speaker 1>it over a long period of time, and we look

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>at it inventory those homes listed for sale as a

0:26:57.320 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>percent of households, which we think it provides a friend line.

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Unlike most realtors and your mom probably talked about months supply, um,

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 1>what we'd tell you is that inventories in the US

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 1>are actually at nearly at thirty year lows, so inventories

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and nationally are very very low. And what that means

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>is that that there's more demand and supply, so prices

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 1>continue to increase. But we're starting to see some moderation

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and how much pricing power there really is, more of

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 1>that being skewed to more challenging environment at the higher end.

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Some cities, for example, in the luxury price point, are

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:32.880
<v Speaker 1>actually seeing pretty significant inflation, like New York City, Miami

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and others are just challenged and buyers or sorry, sellers

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 1>need to capitulate, especially on older stock that's boxy or

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, dated that needs to be rehabbed and hasn't been.

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:48.360
<v Speaker 1>So there's sellers I need to be more. They need

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>to be more realistic. What about the ultra high ends? Uh,

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:55.919
<v Speaker 1>my friends, we we both know. Jonathan Miller, he calls

0:27:55.960 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 1>that aspirational pricing. When people slap a forty or fifth

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 1>you're a hundred million dollar priced egg on something that's

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:06.679
<v Speaker 1>really worth a fraction of it. Um. What's happening with

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the ultra high end uh end of the market? Is

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that finding a little reality or do we still see

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 1>crazy prices? Um? I think the markets in general are

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:22.440
<v Speaker 1>still seeing crazy prices. There has been some capitulation. Whereat

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:25.880
<v Speaker 1>sellers and Grenwage, for example, are starting to recognize it's

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 1>been three years, the helm's not moving, let me lower

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the price of it. So we do see some you know,

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:34.119
<v Speaker 1>um capitulation, but not nearly as much as we need to.

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:37.359
<v Speaker 1>In fact, yesterday as with a client visiting in New

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 1>York and when when a New York City prices gonna

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 1>go down more? And I said, well, they've come They've

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>come down quite a bit from their aspirational peak. Like

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan likes to say it. From two thousand fourteen, he says,

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>developers aren't willing to lower their prices or giving me

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>ten years of no maintenance and no taxes. But they

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 1>won't lower the price. I said, stay tuned, they will.

0:28:57.040 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 1>You think that will eventually they'll be forced to. I

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 1>think they have to otherwise there might be distressed for

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 1>some of these developers. I mean, the sales for the

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 1>luxury in New York City in the first quarter is

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 1>like non existent. Really, it's very, very weak. So so

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 1>what about the fat part of the distribution of housing.

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 1>The let's call at half a million to a million

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 1>dollar homes more than stut and by the way, that's

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 1>my New York bias price or San Francisco or Chicago

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:28.960
<v Speaker 1>is more reasonable. Um, lots of places in the rest

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>of the country more reasonable, but more than a starter home,

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 1>less than the really high end houses. How is that

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 1>area doing. It's really more market dependent, you know. I

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 1>can tell you in Dallas, for example, over four hundred

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand to six hundred thousand, it's very competitive and you're

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:50.479
<v Speaker 1>probably seeing um a little pressure there builders being forced

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to use more concessions. Whereas if you go into let's

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 1>say a market like um Phoenix, the four to six

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 1>is very healthy and you might even see some pricing power.

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 1>So generally that segment of the market has been more

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>um I think mature in terms of the cycle. And

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 1>when you think back to two thousand, really two thousand

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 1>level with the bottom, so as we saw growth, really

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the fat of the market really has had now seven

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 1>eight years recovery, whereas the entry level, believe it or not,

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the builders did not want to build that true affordable

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 1>product where we call it, you know, building out in

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the excerbs, the pioneers where you have to drive to qualify.

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Part of which it was because the mentality was that

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 1>consumers only want to walk to work and or you

0:30:44.160 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 1>can't get a mortgage. Now, the mortgage market was so tight,

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 1>builders were concerned about building affordable for lower credit quality.

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>So really the entry level, true entry level price point

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't start getting constructed until really in earnest, until two

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 1>thousand sixteen. In fact, we would argue to today the

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 1>entry level portion of new home sales is still materially

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 1>below where what would be perceived normal. So it's a

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 1>bit of a tale of two markets where you have

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 1>one of one. Meat of the market still has some legs,

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 1>but it's later stage and it's still reasonable healthy in

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 1>terms of inventories. Still the six months that that's a

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 1>balanced market. The move up is still below six months,

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 1>but you are seeing the low end entry level where

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 1>there's real robust demand but just not enough product. Quite

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 1>quite interesting what you mentioned how regional UM real estate

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 1>is what areas stand out, either for good or bad reasons,

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 1>as interesting or unusual around the country. UM. I was

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 1>just in Nashville last week and I was just unbelievable

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 1>booming market with you know, really a pro business stance

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 1>that you know, companies continue to move there and the

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 1>migrations moving there. But just top of mind because having

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:03.840
<v Speaker 1>just been there, were we were there, I was speaking

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:05.480
<v Speaker 1>as a guest for a real estate conference, and I

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 1>was sort of blown away by the growth. UM. What

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing a lot that we study the markets and

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 1>we understand where migration patterns, importantly, which states are winning

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and which are losing. And Florida is just a winner,

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 1>both with millennials and with the boomers. And you're seeing

0:32:23.120 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous amount of migration into Florida. And despite Miami

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Beaches softness right now at the higher price point, I

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 1>think Florida is going to continue to be a winner. UM.

0:32:33.040 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>You continue to see winners out west and the Southwest,

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 1>strength in Vegas, Arizona, and Colorado. California, on the other hand,

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 1>is where we see some concern and we've lost foreign

0:32:44.120 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 1>national buyers there, that for foreign national Chinese buyers pretty

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 1>much all but gone. People that are there Chinese buyers

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 1>are buying, but that foreign nationals are gone. The Bay

0:32:54.160 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Area despite Silicon Valley and you know, the benefits there

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 1>seems to be just not accelerating like the rest of

0:33:01.480 --> 0:33:05.960
<v Speaker 1>California off of what was the weaker period of eighteen um.

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 1>And some of that is it related to tax reform? Salt?

0:33:09.680 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Is it concerned just in terms of the continued pressure

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 1>literally literally my next question. So, so we keep reading

0:33:18.640 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 1>about the egress from New York to Florida and from

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 1>California to Arizona. And I know some of that is

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 1>just normal retirements. Hey, at a certain age. Um, if

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you live in in Westchester, Long Island, you may not

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 1>want to go to Florida, but it's the law you

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 1>have to move down there. Um. But you know the

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 1>David Tepper story leaving New Jersey because it saved him

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a bajillion dollars in taxes. How significant are those most

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:50.960
<v Speaker 1>recent tax changes and the loss of the state and

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 1>local tax deduction to the real estate market. Well, first

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 1>you have to look at it in totality and appreciate

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 1>that about eighty four percent of tax filers actually had

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 1>a reduction in the taxes that they pay, right, So really,

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:08.840
<v Speaker 1>but that's on a gross number, is it Is it

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:11.399
<v Speaker 1>a big deduction? Is it a little deduction? You mean,

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 1>after if you took everything into consideration, the benefit is

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 1>actually the majority actually had a benefit. Now, where the

0:34:20.160 --> 0:34:23.360
<v Speaker 1>negative impact is at the higher price or the higher

0:34:23.400 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 1>income brackets. So where the risk would be is for

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that eighty to eighty five percentile incomes percentile. So we're

0:34:31.719 --> 0:34:34.719
<v Speaker 1>if you're in the highest income bracket. But really the

0:34:34.800 --> 0:34:39.400
<v Speaker 1>question will be if you assumingly are in let's say Rye,

0:34:39.520 --> 0:34:42.200
<v Speaker 1>New York or Scarsdale, or you're living out in Long

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Island and your kids are in high school or your

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:46.840
<v Speaker 1>kids are in elementary school, are you really picking up

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:49.719
<v Speaker 1>where you work and leaving the state because the taxes? No,

0:34:50.680 --> 0:34:52.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, could you start to see some pricing pressure

0:34:53.239 --> 0:34:55.840
<v Speaker 1>because maybe my buddy and his wife that are empty

0:34:55.880 --> 0:34:59.160
<v Speaker 1>nesters and they can you know, everybody's mobile today. With

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:01.440
<v Speaker 1>today's technolo ology, you can work for from their home.

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:03.839
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna pick up and leave, So you're gonna see

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:07.360
<v Speaker 1>more inventory start to build for that marginal person that

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 1>can leave. That will put some more pressure on prices.

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:13.399
<v Speaker 1>So I think the lever is price and I don't

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:15.719
<v Speaker 1>think that it will create a collapse. But I think

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the coastal sort of tri state area California markets are

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:23.120
<v Speaker 1>going to see some more incremental inventory lead to moderation

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:26.319
<v Speaker 1>and pricing. Quite quite interesting. Can you stick around a bit?

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:28.759
<v Speaker 1>I have a ton of more questions for We have

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:32.440
<v Speaker 1>been speaking with I V. Selman, CEO and co founder

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:36.279
<v Speaker 1>of Zelman Associates. If you enjoy this conversation, be sure

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:38.600
<v Speaker 1>and come back for the podcast extras, where we keep

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the tape running and continue discussing all things real estate.

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 1>You can find that wherever Finder podcasts are sold, Apple, uh, Stitcher, Overcast,

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com. We love your comments, feedback and suggestions

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:58.239
<v Speaker 1>right to us at m IB podcast at Bloomberg dot net.

0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:01.440
<v Speaker 1>You could check out my daily column on Bloomberg dot

0:36:01.520 --> 0:36:04.600
<v Speaker 1>com slash Opinion. Follow me on Twitter at Rid Halts.

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm Barry Ridhults. You're listening to Masters in Business. I'm

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio Welcome to the podcast. Ivy. Thank you so

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:26.920
<v Speaker 1>much for doing this. I've been looking forward to this

0:36:26.960 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 1>for a long time. UM, I am a real estate junkie,

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:34.799
<v Speaker 1>not only because it was dinner table conversation every night

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 1>back in the days when mortgage race were um, but

0:36:40.719 --> 0:36:43.759
<v Speaker 1>it's just fascinating. Everybody has to live somewhere. Why not

0:36:43.920 --> 0:36:48.440
<v Speaker 1>live someplace fun, interesting, neat in the house that is

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:53.719
<v Speaker 1>um sort of representative of your style and tastes and

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:56.960
<v Speaker 1>values and interests. And it's really, uh, it's really a

0:36:57.000 --> 0:37:01.120
<v Speaker 1>fascinating space. You have to be thrilled that you found

0:37:01.120 --> 0:37:03.319
<v Speaker 1>your way into real estate, even though that was never

0:37:03.480 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 1>your intention when you began. I am I'm thrilled. I

0:37:07.520 --> 0:37:10.400
<v Speaker 1>love it so um. So let's let's go through a

0:37:10.400 --> 0:37:13.320
<v Speaker 1>few of the questions we missed during the broadcast section

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:18.880
<v Speaker 1>before we get to our favorite questions in a few minutes. UM,

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I have to ask about the launch of Zelmann Associate.

0:37:21.520 --> 0:37:24.360
<v Speaker 1>So October seven, we were talking about the date you

0:37:24.400 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 1>said you launched October three. I believe October five was

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the old time high back then, at least for the dow.

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:36.200
<v Speaker 1>What was it like launching right into the teeth of

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:40.759
<v Speaker 1>the rollover and slide down for the next eighteen months. Well,

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:45.760
<v Speaker 1>my partner and I Dennis mcguel, Um, we recruited our

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:50.760
<v Speaker 1>partners in crime. It's Credit Sweet, Alan Ratner and Melinda Greantedge,

0:37:50.800 --> 0:37:53.399
<v Speaker 1>who was my secretary at the time, kind of pulled

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:56.400
<v Speaker 1>her over from Credit Sweet, and my husband was also

0:37:56.560 --> 0:37:58.319
<v Speaker 1>in the beginning, so it was really the five of

0:37:58.440 --> 0:38:02.920
<v Speaker 1>us and um it was seven. We were working our

0:38:03.040 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 1>butts off in order to be prepared for our big

0:38:05.560 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 1>date that we set. But I think it was so

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:10.799
<v Speaker 1>much fun as well, because we at this point it

0:38:10.840 --> 0:38:15.000
<v Speaker 1>already had taste of victory where we knew that what

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:17.920
<v Speaker 1>we had predicted was actually not only coming to fruition,

0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:21.480
<v Speaker 1>but way worse than we had ever considered or or predicted.

0:38:21.560 --> 0:38:24.759
<v Speaker 1>And so while we were in the teeth of the

0:38:24.840 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 1>storm with not you know, clear certainty which direction and

0:38:28.600 --> 0:38:31.720
<v Speaker 1>how much more severe the storm could be, we had

0:38:32.080 --> 0:38:37.080
<v Speaker 1>um just a fantastic times circling investors and interest. We

0:38:37.080 --> 0:38:39.239
<v Speaker 1>were we were in the sweet spot. So it was

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:42.680
<v Speaker 1>so much fun. I mean, we had um crazy days

0:38:42.760 --> 0:38:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and nights and it was all consuming. I I can

0:38:46.520 --> 0:38:49.600
<v Speaker 1>tell you that it was difficult with three little babies

0:38:49.680 --> 0:38:53.279
<v Speaker 1>running around, but it was like where you'd wake up

0:38:53.320 --> 0:38:54.839
<v Speaker 1>at four in the morning and you just couldn't wait

0:38:54.880 --> 0:38:56.239
<v Speaker 1>to get in front of your computer. So it was

0:38:56.320 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 1>just thrilling, really thrilling. So I remember, I'm trying, I'm

0:39:00.000 --> 0:39:02.040
<v Speaker 1>want to do the get the years right. I could

0:39:02.040 --> 0:39:04.920
<v Speaker 1>be doing the My memory could be faulty. In in

0:39:05.640 --> 0:39:09.319
<v Speaker 1>I think it was OH five the home builders rolled over,

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:12.799
<v Speaker 1>and I don't remember that was that year, but it

0:39:12.840 --> 0:39:15.320
<v Speaker 1>was clear they were undistressed while the rest of the

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:19.280
<v Speaker 1>market was going higher. And then the next year, um,

0:39:19.400 --> 0:39:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the banks and brokers OH six started to come under pressure,

0:39:23.840 --> 0:39:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and again the market kept going up, and then OH seven,

0:39:27.080 --> 0:39:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember what segment rolled over. It was New Century,

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:35.160
<v Speaker 1>is that what it was? March of seven mortgage, So

0:39:35.400 --> 0:39:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that so is the mortgage and the writers in OH seven,

0:39:37.560 --> 0:39:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and the market kept going up. So when you're launching

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the firm, these are three calls that you had previously

0:39:45.160 --> 0:39:49.160
<v Speaker 1>talked about as a contrarian, as an outlier, who turned

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:51.960
<v Speaker 1>out to be correct. When you launched the firm, I

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:54.319
<v Speaker 1>have to assume a lot of clients came along with you.

0:39:54.800 --> 0:39:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Fortunately they did, so it was a very strong launch.

0:39:59.000 --> 0:40:02.200
<v Speaker 1>And um, you know we have had the ability to

0:40:02.239 --> 0:40:06.480
<v Speaker 1>continue to recruit new clients and really provide what we

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:11.040
<v Speaker 1>think is unique proprietary research that no one else UM

0:40:11.160 --> 0:40:14.360
<v Speaker 1>and on no one else on Wall Street does anything

0:40:14.400 --> 0:40:17.800
<v Speaker 1>like we do. So we really provide a significant advantages

0:40:17.840 --> 0:40:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to our institutional investors and private equity firms that use Selman.

0:40:21.680 --> 0:40:25.160
<v Speaker 1>So private equity are are also clients. Yeah, mostly it's

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:26.920
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds and mutual funds, but we also have some

0:40:26.960 --> 0:40:29.960
<v Speaker 1>private equity clients as well. So so let's talk a

0:40:29.960 --> 0:40:32.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit about that network. How do you go about

0:40:33.080 --> 0:40:35.719
<v Speaker 1>because the only thing I can even remotely compare it

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to In the early days, Ed Hyman started a UM

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:44.920
<v Speaker 1>on an economic side, building out a network of private

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:49.120
<v Speaker 1>companies that would report their data to him. And basically

0:40:49.719 --> 0:40:51.920
<v Speaker 1>part of the reason he was so successful in the

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:56.360
<v Speaker 1>economic space as a non economist is his data was

0:40:56.440 --> 0:41:00.400
<v Speaker 1>better than what BLS was generating. Right, sounds like you

0:41:00.400 --> 0:41:07.240
<v Speaker 1>you created something similar within the real estate space, builders, brokers,

0:41:07.480 --> 0:41:11.880
<v Speaker 1>real estate UM developers. Who who else was in that network?

0:41:12.200 --> 0:41:15.279
<v Speaker 1>And how do you go about reaching out to these folks?

0:41:15.360 --> 0:41:20.040
<v Speaker 1>So we we do follow Ed's model in going after

0:41:20.120 --> 0:41:24.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of understanding what is happening in various UM silos

0:41:24.360 --> 0:41:27.240
<v Speaker 1>within the economy. But ours is dedicated just to housing

0:41:27.280 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and housing related But so we've got UM survey of

0:41:30.719 --> 0:41:35.280
<v Speaker 1>private homebuilders, a survey of land developers, UM, a quarterly

0:41:35.320 --> 0:41:39.200
<v Speaker 1>survey UM for banks to discuss their lending to acquisition

0:41:39.320 --> 0:41:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and development financing for builders. UM. We have a apartment survey,

0:41:44.600 --> 0:41:48.320
<v Speaker 1>a building product manufacturing distribution survey. We just published that today,

0:41:48.760 --> 0:41:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Single family rental and home center survey. We just publish

0:41:52.360 --> 0:41:55.160
<v Speaker 1>published that one as well today, Chairman, to forget one

0:41:55.440 --> 0:41:59.280
<v Speaker 1>UM the broker survey, which we survey about ten percent

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:02.400
<v Speaker 1>of existing homes. Else So if you look at each silo,

0:42:02.800 --> 0:42:06.279
<v Speaker 1>the home building survey is the most mature and UM

0:42:06.520 --> 0:42:09.919
<v Speaker 1>most significant, probably in sample size. UM. Oh, I forgot

0:42:09.960 --> 0:42:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the mortgage Originator survey UM, which is also very significant

0:42:12.880 --> 0:42:17.120
<v Speaker 1>in size. But all of them we have not not

0:42:17.280 --> 0:42:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to discount what ed's survey does. But ED has a

0:42:19.880 --> 0:42:22.960
<v Speaker 1>very few questions. Most of the surveys we have will

0:42:22.960 --> 0:42:25.680
<v Speaker 1>be anywhere from twenty to thirty questions. So how do

0:42:25.719 --> 0:42:27.759
<v Speaker 1>you reach out to somebody and say, hey, listen, I

0:42:27.840 --> 0:42:30.600
<v Speaker 1>want you to participate in a quarterly thing. Don't worry,

0:42:30.600 --> 0:42:33.640
<v Speaker 1>it's only eight pages of questions. They'll take your less

0:42:33.640 --> 0:42:35.719
<v Speaker 1>than a week to fill it out. How do you

0:42:35.840 --> 0:42:39.960
<v Speaker 1>make that pitch? Well, first you go back years and

0:42:40.360 --> 0:42:42.800
<v Speaker 1>you have um A survey that's done over the phone,

0:42:42.840 --> 0:42:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and you build and cement relationships, and over time, with technology,

0:42:46.840 --> 0:42:49.680
<v Speaker 1>you create a platform where they can do it online.

0:42:49.760 --> 0:42:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Is all automated. But the exchange with the c suite

0:42:53.320 --> 0:42:57.600
<v Speaker 1>executives that taliated nearly a thousand throughout the ecosystem is

0:42:57.760 --> 0:43:01.200
<v Speaker 1>we will give you the research for free, for free

0:43:01.440 --> 0:43:04.120
<v Speaker 1>if you fill out the survey. And everybody who participates

0:43:04.120 --> 0:43:07.680
<v Speaker 1>wants to know what's happening in the ad Jason silos. Well,

0:43:08.160 --> 0:43:10.200
<v Speaker 1>they want to know what's going on within their peers,

0:43:10.239 --> 0:43:13.120
<v Speaker 1>within their own silo, but they want someone that can

0:43:13.120 --> 0:43:16.680
<v Speaker 1>triangulate all of it. And in fact, our institutional investors

0:43:16.719 --> 0:43:21.719
<v Speaker 1>are so data driven that sometimes the c suite executives

0:43:21.920 --> 0:43:25.080
<v Speaker 1>are information is almost too much for them, which is

0:43:25.120 --> 0:43:28.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons we developed a newsletter called the

0:43:29.040 --> 0:43:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Z Report, which is a much higher level um BI

0:43:32.200 --> 0:43:36.120
<v Speaker 1>monthly report that just gives you really that foot perspective,

0:43:36.160 --> 0:43:38.520
<v Speaker 1>seven to eight articles on all the pieces of the mosaic,

0:43:38.680 --> 0:43:41.040
<v Speaker 1>because some of them were like IVY, it's just too much,

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:44.440
<v Speaker 1>so they prefer that. So when you say bi monthly,

0:43:44.440 --> 0:43:47.680
<v Speaker 1>it's every other month, not I'm saying bi weekly, bi weekly. Sorry,

0:43:47.760 --> 0:43:51.200
<v Speaker 1>so twice a month off actively, Um, I never know

0:43:51.239 --> 0:43:53.560
<v Speaker 1>which is which. That's no, I said bi monthly, but

0:43:53.560 --> 0:43:56.799
<v Speaker 1>it's twice twice a month. So and that how how

0:43:56.840 --> 0:44:00.360
<v Speaker 1>big of a document is that? Is that something quickly?

0:44:00.560 --> 0:44:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Or I'd say you can read it an intent fifteen

0:44:02.680 --> 0:44:05.160
<v Speaker 1>minutes and it has some charts, but you know whether

0:44:05.200 --> 0:44:08.719
<v Speaker 1>the articles are on you know, rising healthcare costs as

0:44:08.760 --> 0:44:14.239
<v Speaker 1>an impedimental homeownership or affordability, you know, heat reaching a

0:44:14.320 --> 0:44:18.440
<v Speaker 1>new high or or low, whatever the topic, um might be,

0:44:18.480 --> 0:44:23.799
<v Speaker 1>the demographics millennials, you know, accelerate um family formation. We

0:44:23.960 --> 0:44:27.520
<v Speaker 1>take each of the pieces of our puzzle and we

0:44:27.600 --> 0:44:30.720
<v Speaker 1>take articles that we think are timely and it allows

0:44:30.719 --> 0:44:33.320
<v Speaker 1>people again to walk away from a ten to fifteen

0:44:33.320 --> 0:44:35.800
<v Speaker 1>minute read with hopefully a nice hot cuts heat or

0:44:35.840 --> 0:44:38.279
<v Speaker 1>coffee with wow, I really get what's going on now

0:44:38.280 --> 0:44:41.919
<v Speaker 1>in the housing market overall. That's very very interesting. So

0:44:42.600 --> 0:44:45.800
<v Speaker 1>if you want to express an idea in a trade,

0:44:46.400 --> 0:44:48.759
<v Speaker 1>how do you go about doing it? Is it long

0:44:48.840 --> 0:44:52.799
<v Speaker 1>or short? The home builders the credit side, how does

0:44:53.480 --> 0:44:55.560
<v Speaker 1>do some of these hedge funds. We know what happened

0:44:55.560 --> 0:44:58.360
<v Speaker 1>to know you know nine, But how to hedge funds today?

0:44:58.600 --> 0:45:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Take your research and apply it to capital well, because

0:45:03.560 --> 0:45:08.000
<v Speaker 1>we are an equity research firm, So our recommendations are

0:45:08.160 --> 0:45:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to buy, hold, or sell equities. Whether they're going to

0:45:12.560 --> 0:45:16.480
<v Speaker 1>do something that's outside of the equities, we don't recommend.

0:45:16.600 --> 0:45:19.440
<v Speaker 1>So are we're strictly going to recommend whether they short

0:45:19.719 --> 0:45:22.919
<v Speaker 1>or go long stocks? So that's all really the firm.

0:45:23.160 --> 0:45:25.760
<v Speaker 1>So what what sort of stocks do you cover? Obviously

0:45:25.800 --> 0:45:28.759
<v Speaker 1>the home builders are going to be one group, um

0:45:28.800 --> 0:45:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the mortgage originators or another. Do you go further afield

0:45:32.200 --> 0:45:35.360
<v Speaker 1>to reats or anything like that. So we have home builders,

0:45:35.400 --> 0:45:39.560
<v Speaker 1>building product manufacturers and distributors. We have real estate brokers.

0:45:39.840 --> 0:45:45.000
<v Speaker 1>We follow redfin, Zello, Relogy, Remax, We follow mortgage insurers,

0:45:45.200 --> 0:45:49.400
<v Speaker 1>mortgage title companies, and mortgage tech. We follow the home centers.

0:45:49.480 --> 0:45:53.399
<v Speaker 1>We follow single family rental rates and apartment reats. And

0:45:53.440 --> 0:45:56.319
<v Speaker 1>I think, do you do office space or storage or

0:45:56.440 --> 0:46:00.200
<v Speaker 1>or retail. No, we only do residential. So that's one

0:46:00.239 --> 0:46:02.879
<v Speaker 1>of the you know, I guess the way we think

0:46:02.920 --> 0:46:05.160
<v Speaker 1>of our niche that it has to be within residential.

0:46:05.320 --> 0:46:07.120
<v Speaker 1>So so let me take you a little off of

0:46:07.160 --> 0:46:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that niche a bit. There's a giant article, uh in

0:46:11.920 --> 0:46:16.719
<v Speaker 1>the Wall Street Journal about the big malls how they

0:46:16.760 --> 0:46:19.640
<v Speaker 1>continue to have some of their anchor stores going away,

0:46:19.719 --> 0:46:21.920
<v Speaker 1>and then once that goes away, everybody else starts to

0:46:21.960 --> 0:46:25.640
<v Speaker 1>fade and it becomes problematic. And there was some place

0:46:25.719 --> 0:46:28.040
<v Speaker 1>some going to get this wrong. I don't remember if

0:46:28.040 --> 0:46:32.360
<v Speaker 1>it was Minneapolis or somewhere where the mall essentially gets

0:46:32.360 --> 0:46:36.000
<v Speaker 1>sold to a developer who raises it and now is

0:46:36.040 --> 0:46:41.239
<v Speaker 1>putting in apartments, homes. It's it's a whole multi use.

0:46:41.440 --> 0:46:45.840
<v Speaker 1>So so is there something worth tracking on the retail

0:46:45.880 --> 0:46:49.080
<v Speaker 1>apocalypse side relative to housing or is that just so

0:46:49.200 --> 0:46:52.440
<v Speaker 1>distant and so far removed it's not worth paying close

0:46:52.480 --> 0:46:56.560
<v Speaker 1>attention to. Well, I think it makes sense to assume

0:46:56.560 --> 0:47:00.160
<v Speaker 1>it's getting repurposed, and as we think about shelter or

0:47:00.600 --> 0:47:03.400
<v Speaker 1>really you have to think about it with with the

0:47:03.440 --> 0:47:07.719
<v Speaker 1>complete eyes, with the complete view of rental as well

0:47:07.760 --> 0:47:11.480
<v Speaker 1>as for sale, and so it gets repurposed for for

0:47:11.680 --> 0:47:14.000
<v Speaker 1>sale or for rent in single family where we have

0:47:14.040 --> 0:47:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a deficit, then we'll be able to track that through

0:47:17.080 --> 0:47:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the land development survey that we're doing, and tracking that

0:47:20.760 --> 0:47:23.239
<v Speaker 1>will enable us to see where the growth is going

0:47:23.280 --> 0:47:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to be and whether or not the growth is justified.

0:47:25.920 --> 0:47:28.880
<v Speaker 1>But today, if you look at shelter, we believe the

0:47:28.960 --> 0:47:32.759
<v Speaker 1>multifamily market is actually above normal and there's plenty of

0:47:32.800 --> 0:47:35.279
<v Speaker 1>supply of that. It's above where it should be. In fact,

0:47:35.280 --> 0:47:39.400
<v Speaker 1>there's um if you look at multi family five plus units,

0:47:39.400 --> 0:47:43.080
<v Speaker 1>so multifamily high rise or generally where the problem is

0:47:42.800 --> 0:47:48.120
<v Speaker 1>is predominantly urban core multifamily is at multi decade highs

0:47:48.560 --> 0:47:52.640
<v Speaker 1>with what with the amount of inventory in backlog where

0:47:52.640 --> 0:47:56.680
<v Speaker 1>a suburban is not as let's say, problematic, but there's

0:47:56.719 --> 0:48:00.799
<v Speaker 1>a real core urban is where the inventories for we

0:48:00.840 --> 0:48:04.239
<v Speaker 1>believe multi family market is actually significant above normal. So

0:48:04.280 --> 0:48:06.480
<v Speaker 1>if we had a guess coming out of the crisis,

0:48:06.560 --> 0:48:10.880
<v Speaker 1>people were either reluctant to buy or unable to qualify

0:48:10.960 --> 0:48:13.360
<v Speaker 1>for a mortgage, so there was a ton of renters

0:48:13.440 --> 0:48:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and it seemed the builders went a little hog wild

0:48:15.960 --> 0:48:20.040
<v Speaker 1>over there. Is it safe to assume that the pendulum

0:48:20.120 --> 0:48:23.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to start swinging in the other direction or

0:48:23.239 --> 0:48:26.360
<v Speaker 1>do does this really have to do they really have

0:48:26.400 --> 0:48:29.120
<v Speaker 1>to run out the rope and and see some problems

0:48:29.200 --> 0:48:33.720
<v Speaker 1>before they adjust what they're building. So if I understand

0:48:33.760 --> 0:48:37.880
<v Speaker 1>your question correctly. You're you're asking, will the builders start

0:48:37.920 --> 0:48:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to build affordable product again? Um, when will they shift

0:48:40.880 --> 0:48:44.080
<v Speaker 1>from multi family to single family? If there's a a

0:48:44.280 --> 0:48:47.480
<v Speaker 1>plethora of multi family and a dearth of single family. Well,

0:48:47.520 --> 0:48:52.719
<v Speaker 1>they're completely different operators, um, different developers, different um operators

0:48:52.760 --> 0:48:55.960
<v Speaker 1>from the perspective that there within their silos, the multi

0:48:55.960 --> 0:48:59.040
<v Speaker 1>family operators would never just go do single fam very unusual.

0:48:59.520 --> 0:49:02.960
<v Speaker 1>You'll some times have like Lenar Corporation is a publicly

0:49:03.000 --> 0:49:04.959
<v Speaker 1>traded company and they're saying they're known for their single

0:49:05.000 --> 0:49:07.640
<v Speaker 1>family building, but they also have a multi family business.

0:49:08.280 --> 0:49:12.240
<v Speaker 1>But very few organizations companies have in the multi family

0:49:12.280 --> 0:49:14.640
<v Speaker 1>space do single family as well. So when when you

0:49:15.200 --> 0:49:17.640
<v Speaker 1>really what I'm wrestling with is if there's way too

0:49:17.719 --> 0:49:23.200
<v Speaker 1>much multi family multi family builders, they're not going to say, hey,

0:49:23.200 --> 0:49:25.719
<v Speaker 1>there's too much supply, let's take a year off. Do

0:49:25.800 --> 0:49:28.560
<v Speaker 1>they just keep building? Do they move towards luxury? What?

0:49:28.560 --> 0:49:33.359
<v Speaker 1>What do they do in the face of excess supply? Well,

0:49:33.480 --> 0:49:35.399
<v Speaker 1>right now, what you'll start to see is that they

0:49:35.440 --> 0:49:39.920
<v Speaker 1>have pressure on rents and they're underwriting requirements that are

0:49:40.000 --> 0:49:42.680
<v Speaker 1>what the way they underwrote the land, they won't be

0:49:42.760 --> 0:49:45.360
<v Speaker 1>hitting their hurdle rates at some point if this supply

0:49:45.800 --> 0:49:49.080
<v Speaker 1>that we believe is still in backlog actually gets delivered

0:49:49.280 --> 0:49:52.279
<v Speaker 1>and pressures their returns. So right now, there's a lot

0:49:52.320 --> 0:49:55.200
<v Speaker 1>of capital chasing this asset class because when you compare

0:49:55.239 --> 0:49:58.439
<v Speaker 1>it to malls or other reeds, it's actually a tall

0:49:58.480 --> 0:50:03.040
<v Speaker 1>midget in many respects, even though right even though it's expensive,

0:50:03.360 --> 0:50:06.799
<v Speaker 1>it's actually one of those very consistent businesses. Doesn't have

0:50:06.840 --> 0:50:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the kind of cylicality that the single family for sale market.

0:50:09.960 --> 0:50:12.680
<v Speaker 1>So it's still a very good business. But what may

0:50:12.719 --> 0:50:16.200
<v Speaker 1>happen from the supply being um in our opinion, at

0:50:16.239 --> 0:50:18.920
<v Speaker 1>excess levels, is that they won't get the returns that

0:50:19.000 --> 0:50:21.840
<v Speaker 1>they underwrote if rents start to come under pressure. We

0:50:21.920 --> 0:50:24.840
<v Speaker 1>do think they get least up. But the question is

0:50:24.920 --> 0:50:28.879
<v Speaker 1>will that spicket of growth start slow as those lease

0:50:29.000 --> 0:50:32.160
<v Speaker 1>rates come under pressure, That in itself will start to

0:50:32.200 --> 0:50:35.240
<v Speaker 1>slow the growth. And before I get to my favorite questions,

0:50:35.680 --> 0:50:39.239
<v Speaker 1>any other things standing out within the residential real estate

0:50:39.280 --> 0:50:43.960
<v Speaker 1>market that's unusual or interesting, be regional or what what

0:50:44.000 --> 0:50:47.800
<v Speaker 1>are you kind of going, huh, that's that's surprising. Well,

0:50:47.880 --> 0:50:50.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a few things UM I can talk about. The

0:50:50.200 --> 0:50:55.160
<v Speaker 1>eye buyer market being I Buyer. Today, we have companies

0:50:55.520 --> 0:50:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that are offering consumers to buy their homes for cash

0:50:59.200 --> 0:51:04.200
<v Speaker 1>within a few days. So Instant Buyer and UM open Door,

0:51:04.280 --> 0:51:06.719
<v Speaker 1>which is a private company, is the leader in this

0:51:06.760 --> 0:51:10.040
<v Speaker 1>business where at a discount to we have an algorithm

0:51:10.120 --> 0:51:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that basically will determine the price that they're willing to

0:51:13.080 --> 0:51:16.239
<v Speaker 1>pay for home, allowing that person to be able to

0:51:16.280 --> 0:51:19.759
<v Speaker 1>move to a move up home. And actually Lenar was

0:51:19.800 --> 0:51:22.480
<v Speaker 1>an investor in open Door, and the reason they invested

0:51:22.520 --> 0:51:25.120
<v Speaker 1>in open doors concept and these guys are a Silicon

0:51:25.280 --> 0:51:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Valley Eric Wu as a CEO, is because they found

0:51:27.920 --> 0:51:30.160
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of our buyers can't sell their homes

0:51:30.440 --> 0:51:32.399
<v Speaker 1>to move in our home. So that was conceptually why

0:51:32.400 --> 0:51:35.080
<v Speaker 1>they did it. So what happened Someone comes along and says,

0:51:35.120 --> 0:51:39.239
<v Speaker 1>we'll pay you cash theoretically at a discount, say let's

0:51:39.280 --> 0:51:43.040
<v Speaker 1>five seven discount to what is retail, and then they'll

0:51:43.080 --> 0:51:45.840
<v Speaker 1>turn around and sell it. They'll put with that money,

0:51:45.840 --> 0:51:47.640
<v Speaker 1>they'll fix it up and then they'll sell it. Now

0:51:48.760 --> 0:51:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Zillos in the business now Zilo offer Redfinn, now Um

0:51:53.920 --> 0:51:57.080
<v Speaker 1>offer pad Knocked. It's it's really growing to be a

0:51:57.160 --> 0:52:00.040
<v Speaker 1>very big business. In fact, Zillo, who we have a

0:52:00.040 --> 0:52:03.960
<v Speaker 1>cell rating on is actually changing their entire business model

0:52:04.000 --> 0:52:06.080
<v Speaker 1>to go after this I buyer market. So that's a

0:52:06.120 --> 0:52:10.800
<v Speaker 1>big interesting thing going on in generally speaking professional flippers, yes,

0:52:11.080 --> 0:52:14.880
<v Speaker 1>professional flippers. Another interesting thing that's going on is the

0:52:14.880 --> 0:52:17.840
<v Speaker 1>built to rent market. So I mentioned that we have

0:52:17.880 --> 0:52:20.920
<v Speaker 1>a deficit of housing, but not everyone can afford to

0:52:20.920 --> 0:52:24.840
<v Speaker 1>buy a home. So what consumers want today though, is

0:52:24.880 --> 0:52:28.080
<v Speaker 1>they want the American dream, they want the backyard, they

0:52:28.120 --> 0:52:31.200
<v Speaker 1>want their own home, but in many cases they can't

0:52:31.200 --> 0:52:33.920
<v Speaker 1>for whatever reason, either get a proof for a mortgage,

0:52:34.000 --> 0:52:35.919
<v Speaker 1>or they don't want to be committed and they don't

0:52:35.920 --> 0:52:38.200
<v Speaker 1>want to they want to have flexibility. So the built

0:52:38.200 --> 0:52:41.720
<v Speaker 1>to rent market is actually accelerating to help close the gap.

0:52:42.239 --> 0:52:43.960
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at the build for rent market,

0:52:44.000 --> 0:52:46.319
<v Speaker 1>it could be builders that are willing to sell the

0:52:46.440 --> 0:52:49.440
<v Speaker 1>last few units in a phase to a build or

0:52:49.800 --> 0:52:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a single family rental operator, or they in factor keeping

0:52:53.080 --> 0:52:55.799
<v Speaker 1>the asset themselves on the balance sheet and renting them

0:52:55.800 --> 0:52:58.440
<v Speaker 1>out to generate cash flow. But I believe that the

0:52:58.480 --> 0:53:01.880
<v Speaker 1>build for rent market will accelerate to become a bigger

0:53:02.000 --> 0:53:06.000
<v Speaker 1>portion of today's household So roughly twelve percent of the

0:53:06.040 --> 0:53:08.879
<v Speaker 1>households in this country live in a single family rental home,

0:53:09.200 --> 0:53:12.120
<v Speaker 1>rental home, not in a multi family no singal family rental.

0:53:12.480 --> 0:53:15.279
<v Speaker 1>And one of the misnomers in the marketplace is that

0:53:15.320 --> 0:53:16.799
<v Speaker 1>you either live in an apartment or you live in

0:53:16.800 --> 0:53:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a single family home. And and what people don't appreciate

0:53:20.040 --> 0:53:22.200
<v Speaker 1>is that if you just look at like living alone,

0:53:22.560 --> 0:53:24.520
<v Speaker 1>do you have any idea how many people that live

0:53:24.560 --> 0:53:27.080
<v Speaker 1>alone live in a single family home forgetting if they

0:53:27.080 --> 0:53:32.440
<v Speaker 1>rent it or own it? Just a guess what Really

0:53:33.680 --> 0:53:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that's a giant n well, I guess if you start

0:53:35.360 --> 0:53:40.359
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the older demographic, the second person, the survivor

0:53:40.560 --> 0:53:43.560
<v Speaker 1>once one of the husband wife passes away, that's got

0:53:43.560 --> 0:53:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to be a pretty hefty number. And then divorces, and

0:53:47.040 --> 0:53:48.799
<v Speaker 1>then people who just want to own a house. But

0:53:48.880 --> 0:53:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I would never have guessed. We'll keep in mind this

0:53:51.080 --> 0:53:53.640
<v Speaker 1>is we're not distinguishing between owning versus renting, So just

0:53:53.719 --> 0:53:56.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent. So then when you think about lifestyle, if

0:53:56.960 --> 0:53:59.719
<v Speaker 1>you go, okay, then roommates, then I get married, then

0:53:59.719 --> 0:54:02.319
<v Speaker 1>I have children by the time our data shows by

0:54:02.320 --> 0:54:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the time you're married with two children live in a

0:54:06.239 --> 0:54:09.800
<v Speaker 1>single family home. And that in fact is again not disinguishing.

0:54:09.880 --> 0:54:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Writing versus owning. But when you think about millennials, millennials

0:54:13.160 --> 0:54:16.360
<v Speaker 1>today call them seventy million. I've got two millennials or

0:54:16.400 --> 0:54:19.200
<v Speaker 1>young fourteen sixteen high Zoe and Zach. I got Zia two.

0:54:19.239 --> 0:54:22.319
<v Speaker 1>She's all youngest, but she's not a millennial. Um when

0:54:22.360 --> 0:54:26.440
<v Speaker 1>you start to see these millennials actually get married or

0:54:26.560 --> 0:54:31.000
<v Speaker 1>cohabitate and have families, this they're at the early they're

0:54:31.000 --> 0:54:33.920
<v Speaker 1>in their early thirties right now, there's seventy five million

0:54:33.960 --> 0:54:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of them. We're just at the beginning of this wave

0:54:36.719 --> 0:54:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of what will be an unbelievable tailwind too for the

0:54:40.719 --> 0:54:43.560
<v Speaker 1>demographics for the need for single family shelter, assuming you

0:54:43.640 --> 0:54:47.560
<v Speaker 1>believe that people will continue to get married to have children,

0:54:47.920 --> 0:54:50.239
<v Speaker 1>and we have some fun ways to analyze this. So

0:54:50.280 --> 0:54:53.760
<v Speaker 1>we do some obviously studying birthrates. A lot of people

0:54:53.760 --> 0:54:56.520
<v Speaker 1>see the national birth rate for the country is going down,

0:54:57.080 --> 0:55:00.000
<v Speaker 1>but when you look at the twenty five plus year old,

0:55:00.480 --> 0:55:02.960
<v Speaker 1>that birthrate has been growing at a very fast rate.

0:55:03.320 --> 0:55:06.960
<v Speaker 1>We called the good birth rate because nationally birthrates are

0:55:06.960 --> 0:55:10.799
<v Speaker 1>going down, because teenage birth rates are down over since

0:55:10.840 --> 0:55:13.160
<v Speaker 1>so seven, which is which is a good thing, right.

0:55:13.160 --> 0:55:15.120
<v Speaker 1>So what we really look at and I think it

0:55:15.440 --> 0:55:19.239
<v Speaker 1>just to reiterate, it's about lifestyle. Lifestyle drives a need

0:55:19.320 --> 0:55:22.359
<v Speaker 1>for shelter or changes in the type of shelter. So

0:55:22.760 --> 0:55:26.040
<v Speaker 1>when we look at build for rent and we see

0:55:26.040 --> 0:55:29.680
<v Speaker 1>that phenomena is a growing trend, I think that you'll

0:55:29.719 --> 0:55:32.399
<v Speaker 1>hear more about it, and there's more Wall Street money

0:55:32.480 --> 0:55:36.200
<v Speaker 1>contemplating it and builders that are selling to the single

0:55:36.200 --> 0:55:39.360
<v Speaker 1>family reads and doing it themselves, the I buyer market,

0:55:39.640 --> 0:55:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and then just technology. Um, you know, the real estate

0:55:42.719 --> 0:55:46.440
<v Speaker 1>industry is one that is is being disrupted. If you

0:55:46.440 --> 0:55:48.720
<v Speaker 1>think about you know, your mother is a real estate broker,

0:55:48.760 --> 0:55:52.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a very very tough time. They're being attacked from

0:55:52.080 --> 0:55:54.920
<v Speaker 1>all from all angles. I mean she's retired, but the

0:55:55.040 --> 0:55:58.319
<v Speaker 1>days of six percent commissions, that's pretty much gone, right.

0:55:58.320 --> 0:56:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that certainly has yet to be eliminated. But

0:56:01.760 --> 0:56:05.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot going on that can continue to pressure margin,

0:56:05.480 --> 0:56:08.759
<v Speaker 1>pressure splits. The market is being disrupted from a lot

0:56:08.800 --> 0:56:12.680
<v Speaker 1>of different angles. Huh. Quite fascinating. So the firm is

0:56:12.719 --> 0:56:15.640
<v Speaker 1>called Zelman and Associates. Is this really the I vs.

0:56:15.680 --> 0:56:19.759
<v Speaker 1>Elman show or is it something else? Actually, thank you

0:56:19.840 --> 0:56:22.000
<v Speaker 1>for asking, No, this is not just the I vs.

0:56:22.000 --> 0:56:25.239
<v Speaker 1>Aleman show. In fact, I've got probably close to thirty employees.

0:56:25.960 --> 0:56:29.560
<v Speaker 1>We have about a dozen analysts. Each analyst is responsible

0:56:29.680 --> 0:56:34.520
<v Speaker 1>for their silo and are very successful in aggregating data

0:56:34.560 --> 0:56:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and analyzing the industry that they're responsible for. So it's

0:56:38.239 --> 0:56:41.880
<v Speaker 1>it's really I'm a small piece of what really Zelman

0:56:41.920 --> 0:56:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Associates is, And there's a lot more of a strength

0:56:45.360 --> 0:56:49.120
<v Speaker 1>behind the person you see sitting here and whether it's

0:56:49.160 --> 0:56:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Alan Rattner, our senior homebuilding analysts justin Spear, these people

0:56:52.480 --> 0:56:55.560
<v Speaker 1>work their tails off and UH really appreciate all the

0:56:55.600 --> 0:56:57.399
<v Speaker 1>work and I get a lot of credit, but they're

0:56:57.440 --> 0:57:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the they're the power behind the firm. So before I

0:57:00.640 --> 0:57:02.440
<v Speaker 1>let you go, I have to get to my favorite

0:57:02.440 --> 0:57:05.440
<v Speaker 1>ten questions we ask all our guests sort of a

0:57:05.440 --> 0:57:08.160
<v Speaker 1>speed round. Are you ready for this? Ready? Tell us

0:57:08.200 --> 0:57:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the first car you ever owned? Your making model Toyota Corolla. Nine.

0:57:15.320 --> 0:57:18.560
<v Speaker 1>What's the most important thing we don't know about you?

0:57:19.560 --> 0:57:23.080
<v Speaker 1>That I live in Cleveland and I have three beautiful

0:57:23.200 --> 0:57:27.280
<v Speaker 1>children and they are my life. So you went over

0:57:27.320 --> 0:57:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland pretty quickly. How do you like? How do you

0:57:30.280 --> 0:57:34.120
<v Speaker 1>like living in Cleveland? Um? Well, I admittedly went kicking

0:57:34.120 --> 0:57:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and screaming married Cleveland boy who I met at Solomon Brothers, David,

0:57:38.240 --> 0:57:41.160
<v Speaker 1>But it's a wonderful place to raise a family, and

0:57:41.200 --> 0:57:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I get to be with my husband's family all the time,

0:57:44.320 --> 0:57:46.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's great for the kids. And if we could

0:57:46.600 --> 0:57:48.600
<v Speaker 1>just get the sun to come out. The weather is

0:57:48.600 --> 0:57:50.520
<v Speaker 1>not great in Cleveland, but the browns are supposed to

0:57:50.520 --> 0:57:52.640
<v Speaker 1>be good this year. So yes, they are supposed to.

0:57:52.760 --> 0:57:55.040
<v Speaker 1>So tell us. Tell us about your early mentors who

0:57:55.120 --> 0:57:58.640
<v Speaker 1>affected the way you you did UH analytics and thought

0:57:58.640 --> 0:58:02.600
<v Speaker 1>about housing well already Credit David, my my my buddy

0:58:02.600 --> 0:58:06.520
<v Speaker 1>at Solomon. Um, but I have to say when you yeah,

0:58:06.560 --> 0:58:08.960
<v Speaker 1>this husband was later, but um, when you think about

0:58:08.960 --> 0:58:10.640
<v Speaker 1>your life in the a list of people I had

0:58:10.680 --> 0:58:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the pleasure of working with, whether we're talking about people

0:58:13.160 --> 0:58:15.360
<v Speaker 1>on the South side of Credit, Swist and Sally, as

0:58:15.400 --> 0:58:17.920
<v Speaker 1>well as all the clients that I've interacted with. You know,

0:58:18.040 --> 0:58:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I can give you ten people that come to my

0:58:20.320 --> 0:58:23.040
<v Speaker 1>top of my head. But one that really stands out

0:58:23.360 --> 0:58:28.080
<v Speaker 1>is Melinda Greenwich, who was really my mentor early on

0:58:28.120 --> 0:58:30.880
<v Speaker 1>in my career, my secretary, but she had been at

0:58:30.920 --> 0:58:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Drexel and she was with me for over twenty years

0:58:34.640 --> 0:58:39.840
<v Speaker 1>and is a friend business, family life every day, and

0:58:39.960 --> 0:58:42.760
<v Speaker 1>she no longer works with me. Now, Kim Gray's my mentor.

0:58:42.840 --> 0:58:45.680
<v Speaker 1>And people think about mentor where you call someone up

0:58:45.680 --> 0:58:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and you know you have a challenge, you want to

0:58:48.160 --> 0:58:51.520
<v Speaker 1>talk something through. You know, these women are are there

0:58:51.520 --> 0:58:54.040
<v Speaker 1>for me through thick and thin, you know, call in

0:58:54.080 --> 0:58:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the night. Those are the people that

0:58:55.840 --> 0:58:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to highlight, the people that that mean everything

0:58:57.920 --> 0:59:02.680
<v Speaker 1>to me. Quite quite interesting, it um, what fill in

0:59:02.720 --> 0:59:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the blank investors, analysts, UM managers helped shape your thinking

0:59:10.520 --> 0:59:14.720
<v Speaker 1>about the housing market? Give me your list again. Investors

0:59:14.920 --> 0:59:19.200
<v Speaker 1>could be anybody, investors, strategist, analysts, economists. Who who has

0:59:19.320 --> 0:59:24.160
<v Speaker 1>influenced the way you approach the real estate market? Well,

0:59:24.680 --> 0:59:28.160
<v Speaker 1>it's so many. I think that builders themselves, a lot

0:59:28.200 --> 0:59:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of the private builders in the market that really helped

0:59:31.000 --> 0:59:33.200
<v Speaker 1>me to understand the business and give me from an

0:59:33.280 --> 0:59:37.320
<v Speaker 1>unbiased perspective. And there you know, the quality of information

0:59:37.400 --> 0:59:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and and and and being able to absorb from the

0:59:40.560 --> 0:59:45.040
<v Speaker 1>perspective of an open sort of white board. The builders,

0:59:45.040 --> 0:59:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the private builders. Bert's Silva, who's a good friend, and

0:59:48.280 --> 0:59:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and the CEO in the in the home building industry,

0:59:50.440 --> 0:59:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I just learned a tremendous amount from him. Um in

0:59:53.520 --> 0:59:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the investment world, you know, I think about today some

0:59:56.040 --> 0:59:59.560
<v Speaker 1>of my top clients, UM, certainly Richard Chiltern and Chiltern

0:59:59.560 --> 1:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>advisor 's learning about to go after the best in

1:00:02.880 --> 1:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>class managements and understand, you know, just a long term investing. Um,

1:00:08.000 --> 1:00:10.560
<v Speaker 1>there's an art to it and it doesn't necessarily mean

1:00:10.560 --> 1:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>you day trade, and that there's ways to differentiate. UM.

1:00:14.720 --> 1:00:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Bob Bishop at Impala, who was originally Solemn Brothers Housing Alice,

1:00:19.280 --> 1:00:21.960
<v Speaker 1>who's now a client. Um, he taught me a lot

1:00:22.000 --> 1:00:26.320
<v Speaker 1>about the business. UM. Ricky Sandler at Eminence Capital, who's

1:00:26.440 --> 1:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>UM someone I grew up with, but he was ahead

1:00:29.040 --> 1:00:31.320
<v Speaker 1>of the curve from that versus where I was. Taught

1:00:31.360 --> 1:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>me a lot about the business. So I can keep going.

1:00:33.920 --> 1:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>But that's a that's a healthy list. So let me

1:00:36.680 --> 1:00:38.640
<v Speaker 1>shift gears on you. What do you do for fun?

1:00:38.680 --> 1:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>What do you do when you're out of the office. Well,

1:00:42.080 --> 1:00:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I love to walk my beautiful Australian shepherd, go for

1:00:46.360 --> 1:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>long walks, UM hike. I do a lot of puzzles,

1:00:50.560 --> 1:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>jigsaw puzzles like the new Wood puzzles. That's been my

1:00:53.680 --> 1:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>new thing. And UM, I've been also doing brain games,

1:00:57.320 --> 1:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>which has been fun. And hang watch my kids and

1:01:01.680 --> 1:01:03.919
<v Speaker 1>watch the kids play sports. My daughter is a great

1:01:03.960 --> 1:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>soccer player, and she runs track and she keeps us

1:01:06.360 --> 1:01:09.120
<v Speaker 1>every weekend very busy. Oh and my oldest is off

1:01:09.160 --> 1:01:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to University of Miami, so hopefully I'll be there and

1:01:10.920 --> 1:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>seeing the sun more. Yeah, in the in the winter. UM,

1:01:14.000 --> 1:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>tell us about a time you failed and what you

1:01:16.080 --> 1:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>learned from the experience. Well, I would say that I

1:01:20.240 --> 1:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>was convinced I was gonna be an investment banker, and

1:01:22.840 --> 1:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I was going Well Street to be an investment banker,

1:01:25.400 --> 1:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and I found that it wasn't the right fit for me,

1:01:28.680 --> 1:01:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and I was pretty devastated. And what I learned from

1:01:32.080 --> 1:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that experience was that your first job won't necessarily be

1:01:35.200 --> 1:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>your last, and that even though you're convinced you think

1:01:38.160 --> 1:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you know what you are going to do with the

1:01:40.080 --> 1:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>rest of your life, you actually can evolve into something

1:01:42.600 --> 1:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>else and be successful. So for me, that's really the

1:01:45.600 --> 1:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>path that led me to where I am today. So

1:01:48.520 --> 1:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>what has you most excited about what's going on in

1:01:51.800 --> 1:01:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the real estate industry these days? Um? The uncertainty of

1:01:58.000 --> 1:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>what's next, from technology, from disruption, from sustainability. You know,

1:02:05.240 --> 1:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>it always is changing every day. What's you know? Unfortunately,

1:02:08.600 --> 1:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it's dependent upon the economic backdrop. But

1:02:11.320 --> 1:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of interesting new things that are going

1:02:13.160 --> 1:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>on in our sectors, so we have to stay on

1:02:15.440 --> 1:02:19.080
<v Speaker 1>top of them and obviously continue to guide our clients

1:02:19.640 --> 1:02:22.640
<v Speaker 1>down the right path for where to steer their investments,

1:02:22.760 --> 1:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and and sizing and and getting out before the market

1:02:26.320 --> 1:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>turns is going to be the next goal. So everybody's

1:02:30.120 --> 1:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>favorite question, tell us some of your favorite books, be

1:02:32.840 --> 1:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the fiction, nonfiction, real estate related, or whatever. I've got

1:02:36.720 --> 1:02:40.360
<v Speaker 1>a colectic a number, but I enjoyed and it was

1:02:40.440 --> 1:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>life changing. A book called Thrive by Arianna Huffington's Okay,

1:02:44.720 --> 1:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>remember one and um that was really impactful, life changing,

1:02:48.680 --> 1:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>life changing from a person who worked seven and learned

1:02:52.560 --> 1:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a little more balanced from things to Ariana. I read

1:02:56.120 --> 1:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>uh and loved an Acquendolen's Plenty of Cake Plant Candles,

1:03:00.000 --> 1:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>which really gave me a renewed optimism on aging. Much

1:03:05.200 --> 1:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>better than the alternative, much better than the alternative. I

1:03:08.280 --> 1:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>can't help but mentioned Liars Poker and The Big Short

1:03:11.880 --> 1:03:15.240
<v Speaker 1>my one of my friends and favorite authors, Michael Lewis

1:03:15.920 --> 1:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>um All the Light You Cannot See by Anthony Dough,

1:03:18.800 --> 1:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>which is um World War two fiction, but an incredible

1:03:23.240 --> 1:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>read if you like that period. UM. And then just lastly,

1:03:26.440 --> 1:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I've read a lot of a mother of teenage children

1:03:29.320 --> 1:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and UM Leonard Sachs Um the books that he's written

1:03:33.240 --> 1:03:36.160
<v Speaker 1>for parents. Girls on the Edge is a must read.

1:03:36.600 --> 1:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>And I'm a little bit anti social media parents for

1:03:39.760 --> 1:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>our children, and so I would recommend that highly for

1:03:43.080 --> 1:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>her parents. What sort of advice would you give to

1:03:46.560 --> 1:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a millennial or someone interested in uh financial real estate

1:03:51.200 --> 1:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>who is just beginning their career. I think that everyone

1:03:54.400 --> 1:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>should find a mentor everyone should appreciate your first job

1:03:58.120 --> 1:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>isn't your last, and read a lot I think UM.

1:04:03.360 --> 1:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>For me, it was networking as well. Never stopped networking.

1:04:07.400 --> 1:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I remember folding towels in a gym at six am

1:04:10.920 --> 1:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to pay for school, and I would talk to every

1:04:13.360 --> 1:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>gym member and ask them if they knew anybody. So

1:04:15.360 --> 1:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>network network Network. Our final question, what do you know

1:04:19.200 --> 1:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>about the world of real estate related investing today that

1:04:23.000 --> 1:04:25.600
<v Speaker 1>you wish you knew twenty five or so years ago

1:04:25.640 --> 1:04:29.920
<v Speaker 1>when you were first starting out? Well, I wish I understood.

1:04:31.040 --> 1:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I wish I had the benefit of hindsight and appreciating

1:04:34.920 --> 1:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>cycles and being UM willing to tolerate more risk that

1:04:40.600 --> 1:04:44.160
<v Speaker 1>there's opportunities and when there is disruption in the market

1:04:44.200 --> 1:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>to take advantage of it. I think I'm way too

1:04:46.520 --> 1:04:50.160
<v Speaker 1>conservative and I was way too risk averse makes perfect sense.

1:04:50.800 --> 1:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>We have been speaking with Ivy Zellman of Zelman and Associates.

1:04:55.120 --> 1:04:57.840
<v Speaker 1>If you enjoy this conversation, well look up an intro

1:04:57.960 --> 1:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>down an Inch on Apple iTunes and you can see

1:05:00.600 --> 1:05:03.479
<v Speaker 1>any of the other two d and fifty or so

1:05:03.640 --> 1:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>such conversations we've had over the previous h five or

1:05:07.120 --> 1:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>so years. We love your comments, feedback and suggestions right

1:05:11.480 --> 1:05:14.919
<v Speaker 1>to us at m IB podcast at Bloomberg dot net.

1:05:15.640 --> 1:05:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Be sure and give us a review on Apple iTunes.

1:05:18.920 --> 1:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>We we love your feedback, comments and suggestions right to

1:05:22.120 --> 1:05:25.160
<v Speaker 1>us at m IB podcast at Bloomberg dot net. I

1:05:25.200 --> 1:05:27.240
<v Speaker 1>would be remiss if I did not thank the crack

1:05:27.320 --> 1:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>staff that helps put together these conversations each week. Medina

1:05:30.960 --> 1:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Parwana is my producer slash audio engineer. Michael Boyle is

1:05:35.680 --> 1:05:39.280
<v Speaker 1>our booker, UH Michael Batnick is our head of research.

1:05:39.480 --> 1:05:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Atica Valbron is our project manager. I'm Barry Hults. You've

1:05:44.040 --> 1:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>been listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.