1 00:00:05,120 --> 00:00:09,200 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane, along 2 00:00:09,200 --> 00:00:13,039 Speaker 1: with Jonathan Ferrell and Lisa A. Brawmowitz Jailee. We bring 3 00:00:13,119 --> 00:00:17,119 Speaker 1: you insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and 4 00:00:17,239 --> 00:00:23,320 Speaker 1: international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg 5 00:00:23,360 --> 00:00:29,400 Speaker 1: dot com, and of course on the Bloomberg terminal at 6 00:00:29,400 --> 00:00:32,920 Speaker 1: More's Global headed Commodities Research. As City joins us, now add, 7 00:00:33,200 --> 00:00:35,720 Speaker 1: it's not all doom and gloom, as you say on 8 00:00:35,880 --> 00:00:39,880 Speaker 1: natural gas. This perfect storm shall pass, this market should 9 00:00:39,960 --> 00:00:42,519 Speaker 1: loosen up later on. It just walk us through the 10 00:00:42,520 --> 00:00:45,400 Speaker 1: current thinking at City compared to the consensus view that 11 00:00:45,400 --> 00:00:48,080 Speaker 1: I'm sure it's giving you some pushback at the moment. Well, 12 00:00:48,120 --> 00:00:50,760 Speaker 1: our natural gas, we're getting a significant amount of perspect 13 00:00:51,240 --> 00:00:55,080 Speaker 1: The issue that we see is where markets are loosening up. 14 00:00:55,640 --> 00:00:58,360 Speaker 1: And remember we're dealing with a problem that's in the 15 00:00:58,360 --> 00:01:01,760 Speaker 1: power generating sector, not at the moment, in the transportation sector, 16 00:01:01,840 --> 00:01:05,800 Speaker 1: not in buildings, not in industrial processes, are agricultural processes, 17 00:01:05,840 --> 00:01:09,759 Speaker 1: but very much, very specific to fuels. In the power 18 00:01:09,840 --> 00:01:14,680 Speaker 1: gen sector. We're seeing Germany, excuse me, China actually going 19 00:01:14,720 --> 00:01:18,960 Speaker 1: all out for coal. They are already looking at producing 20 00:01:18,959 --> 00:01:21,000 Speaker 1: thirteen and a half percent more coal this year than 21 00:01:21,080 --> 00:01:23,759 Speaker 1: last year. They're adding a hundred million tons of domestic 22 00:01:23,760 --> 00:01:26,440 Speaker 1: production this year and in the following two years each 23 00:01:26,480 --> 00:01:30,440 Speaker 1: another hundred million tons. That's going to displace imports into China, 24 00:01:30,920 --> 00:01:33,840 Speaker 1: making coal available for the rest of the world. And 25 00:01:33,880 --> 00:01:36,400 Speaker 1: at the same time they're reducing their imports of natural 26 00:01:36,440 --> 00:01:40,560 Speaker 1: gas unit date their way down. They have other supplies 27 00:01:40,560 --> 00:01:44,000 Speaker 1: of natural gas other than lerg imports. They have pipeline 28 00:01:44,000 --> 00:01:48,200 Speaker 1: gas from Uzbekistan, a big jump in pipeline gas from Russia. 29 00:01:48,560 --> 00:01:52,040 Speaker 1: Their domestic production of gas went up around six or 30 00:01:52,080 --> 00:01:53,960 Speaker 1: seven percent last year, it's going to go up eight 31 00:01:54,640 --> 00:01:58,000 Speaker 1: percent this year. And they just simply need less natural 32 00:01:58,040 --> 00:02:01,400 Speaker 1: gas that's gonna loosen up markets provide a significant amount 33 00:02:01,760 --> 00:02:06,360 Speaker 1: for Europe. So what we see happening is a progressive 34 00:02:06,840 --> 00:02:11,120 Speaker 1: reduction in where European UH and global gas prices are 35 00:02:11,400 --> 00:02:13,960 Speaker 1: and along with that gas prices in the US. How 36 00:02:14,040 --> 00:02:16,320 Speaker 1: much do you factor in at some sort of ban 37 00:02:16,639 --> 00:02:22,680 Speaker 1: or overall embargo on Russian gas imports to Germany. We 38 00:02:22,720 --> 00:02:25,400 Speaker 1: actually think that's a very low likelihood on both sides. 39 00:02:25,720 --> 00:02:30,920 Speaker 1: UH and if Germany is not gonna use its fetail power, 40 00:02:30,919 --> 00:02:33,480 Speaker 1: and the EU hungry certainly will. So we don't think 41 00:02:33,520 --> 00:02:37,880 Speaker 1: there's going to be an overall EU European community agreement 42 00:02:38,080 --> 00:02:43,480 Speaker 1: on not pulling in natural gas or oil from from Russia. 43 00:02:43,480 --> 00:02:45,160 Speaker 1: And we don't think the Russian is gonna pull back 44 00:02:45,200 --> 00:02:49,760 Speaker 1: because uh, income is better than no income. We actually 45 00:02:49,960 --> 00:02:54,200 Speaker 1: think that, And that's another kind of controversial point that 46 00:02:54,560 --> 00:02:58,120 Speaker 1: where Russia is now, the volumes of Russia's now exploiting 47 00:02:58,440 --> 00:03:01,280 Speaker 1: of natural gas could go down, but they also could 48 00:03:01,280 --> 00:03:04,720 Speaker 1: go up. There's tolerance in the contracts with European countries 49 00:03:05,200 --> 00:03:08,639 Speaker 1: to add on above the taker pay contracts that they 50 00:03:08,680 --> 00:03:11,680 Speaker 1: have and if they added on what they could by contract, 51 00:03:12,680 --> 00:03:16,440 Speaker 1: assuming that the rouble payment issue is dealt with, which 52 00:03:16,480 --> 00:03:19,680 Speaker 1: we think it would be. Uh. Actually more gas means 53 00:03:19,680 --> 00:03:22,480 Speaker 1: lower prices, and we get if we get the volume right, 54 00:03:22,480 --> 00:03:25,359 Speaker 1: it's lower revenue for Russia. So it's another it's another 55 00:03:25,400 --> 00:03:31,040 Speaker 1: strategy that maybe not politically satisfactory, but it could actually work. 56 00:03:31,919 --> 00:03:34,320 Speaker 1: For so long, many months now, we've been focused on 57 00:03:34,400 --> 00:03:37,760 Speaker 1: the supply equation, on how tight supply is. Now the 58 00:03:37,800 --> 00:03:41,520 Speaker 1: conversation shifting back it seems more so toward demand, especially 59 00:03:41,520 --> 00:03:44,560 Speaker 1: when you see a Chinese economy that is looking incredibly 60 00:03:44,560 --> 00:03:47,080 Speaker 1: weak in the face of persistent COVID zero policy. How 61 00:03:47,080 --> 00:03:49,840 Speaker 1: are you thinking about China and the demand story, not 62 00:03:49,960 --> 00:03:52,960 Speaker 1: just for fuels, but also the medals as well. Well, 63 00:03:52,960 --> 00:03:55,480 Speaker 1: it's not just China demand or other countries as well, 64 00:03:55,520 --> 00:03:58,320 Speaker 1: but for China it looks as though demand is down 65 00:03:58,360 --> 00:04:00,040 Speaker 1: more than a million dollars a day to day. It 66 00:04:00,720 --> 00:04:04,000 Speaker 1: doesn't look like that's gonna come back anytime soon. We 67 00:04:04,040 --> 00:04:07,520 Speaker 1: think they're gonna keep the the blockage on international travel 68 00:04:08,080 --> 00:04:11,040 Speaker 1: through the end of the year. So there there is 69 00:04:11,120 --> 00:04:14,080 Speaker 1: much less room for growth from China than people had thought. 70 00:04:14,560 --> 00:04:17,440 Speaker 1: Certainly not the seven hundred thousand barrels a day of 71 00:04:17,480 --> 00:04:21,280 Speaker 1: growth that the OPEC Secretariat has been thinking that's gonna 72 00:04:21,320 --> 00:04:23,000 Speaker 1: come from China. We think it's going to be negative 73 00:04:23,040 --> 00:04:25,680 Speaker 1: growth for the year. Maybe not a million barrels a 74 00:04:25,760 --> 00:04:28,200 Speaker 1: day under year on year, but but a negative number. 75 00:04:28,520 --> 00:04:31,719 Speaker 1: And it's also the US where where we've we've not 76 00:04:31,880 --> 00:04:35,960 Speaker 1: seen demand increasing at the degree to which we would Indeed, 77 00:04:36,240 --> 00:04:38,719 Speaker 1: for the last four weeks on a four week moving average, 78 00:04:39,080 --> 00:04:42,200 Speaker 1: US gasoline demand is lower than any year in the 79 00:04:42,279 --> 00:04:45,279 Speaker 1: last five except for that deep cut in demand during 80 00:04:46,360 --> 00:04:48,599 Speaker 1: part of the deepest part of the pandemic. So US 81 00:04:48,640 --> 00:04:52,800 Speaker 1: demand has actually stalled out, just as Chinese demand has 82 00:04:53,120 --> 00:04:56,000 Speaker 1: has been reduced. European demand is going to be lower, 83 00:04:56,200 --> 00:04:58,800 Speaker 1: Emergency market demand is going to be lower. Uh, it 84 00:04:58,839 --> 00:05:02,720 Speaker 1: would not be surprised and to see significant projections going 85 00:05:02,800 --> 00:05:04,880 Speaker 1: down for where demand is going for the rest of 86 00:05:04,880 --> 00:05:06,680 Speaker 1: the year. Just finished on. Supply in the US has 87 00:05:06,680 --> 00:05:09,040 Speaker 1: been creeping up recently, and where do you see that 88 00:05:09,080 --> 00:05:12,080 Speaker 1: topping up? Topping out? It's about eleven point nine million 89 00:05:12,080 --> 00:05:14,360 Speaker 1: barrels a day at the moment. Yeah, and that's nine 90 00:05:14,760 --> 00:05:17,279 Speaker 1: a day year on year, by the way, Um, we 91 00:05:17,320 --> 00:05:19,080 Speaker 1: think it's going to keep growing at this rate through 92 00:05:19,120 --> 00:05:21,480 Speaker 1: the end of the year. So if we add all liquids, 93 00:05:21,640 --> 00:05:26,359 Speaker 1: including natural gas liquids, we've just raised our outlook for 94 00:05:26,480 --> 00:05:29,400 Speaker 1: US production to be one point four million barrels a 95 00:05:29,480 --> 00:05:33,120 Speaker 1: day year on year deck deck. We think it will 96 00:05:33,200 --> 00:05:35,880 Speaker 1: be getting very close to that thirteen million barrels a 97 00:05:35,960 --> 00:05:40,080 Speaker 1: day that we saw in the winter of and the 98 00:05:40,120 --> 00:05:43,120 Speaker 1: momentum that's built from that should be adding another million 99 00:05:43,120 --> 00:05:46,880 Speaker 1: barrels a day in twenty three. So uh, we think 100 00:05:46,920 --> 00:05:50,080 Speaker 1: that you know, one of the reasons for type markets 101 00:05:50,080 --> 00:05:53,200 Speaker 1: has been that drop in US production. But US production 102 00:05:53,279 --> 00:05:56,200 Speaker 1: is coming back very strongly even and would be even 103 00:05:56,240 --> 00:05:58,839 Speaker 1: without the encouragement of the US government. And thank you, 104 00:05:58,880 --> 00:06:00,840 Speaker 1: sir for catching out with this this morning with a 105 00:06:00,839 --> 00:06:03,200 Speaker 1: bit of a different view on several topics that most 106 00:06:03,200 --> 00:06:12,240 Speaker 1: of citsy you ain't seen nothing yet. And what we 107 00:06:12,320 --> 00:06:15,960 Speaker 1: have seen, at least overnight was that manufacturing and non 108 00:06:16,040 --> 00:06:19,760 Speaker 1: serve and services sector in China plunge to the lowest 109 00:06:20,040 --> 00:06:24,440 Speaker 1: since February of twenty This is the reported data. How 110 00:06:24,520 --> 00:06:26,760 Speaker 1: bad are things getting as you start to get all 111 00:06:26,800 --> 00:06:30,080 Speaker 1: of these shutdowns that are locking up the major economic 112 00:06:30,240 --> 00:06:32,839 Speaker 1: engines of the second biggest economy in the world. Leland 113 00:06:32,880 --> 00:06:36,000 Speaker 1: Miller tracts that on the ground, international CEO of the 114 00:06:36,080 --> 00:06:39,560 Speaker 1: China Beige Book, Leland, how bad have things gotten economically 115 00:06:39,640 --> 00:06:43,320 Speaker 1: in China? Not an official level, but the unofficial nuts 116 00:06:43,320 --> 00:06:48,000 Speaker 1: and bolts surveys that you do in the in the mainland. Well, 117 00:06:48,120 --> 00:06:51,160 Speaker 1: April was the first period in which the lockdowns really 118 00:06:51,320 --> 00:06:54,080 Speaker 1: affected growth in a major way. And you know what 119 00:06:54,200 --> 00:06:56,800 Speaker 1: we saw from that was not just a tickdown you 120 00:06:56,800 --> 00:07:01,160 Speaker 1: know in Shanghai or tickdown in Beijing. We saw widespread 121 00:07:01,160 --> 00:07:04,880 Speaker 1: slowdown everywhere, and pretty intensively so it was not just 122 00:07:05,000 --> 00:07:07,680 Speaker 1: services at retail flailing like what happened at the beginning 123 00:07:07,680 --> 00:07:11,080 Speaker 1: of the you know, COVID shutdowns in China, where manufacturing 124 00:07:11,120 --> 00:07:12,960 Speaker 1: is kept up and running. The big thing now is 125 00:07:13,000 --> 00:07:15,920 Speaker 1: that manufacturing is being hit hard. Factories are being shut 126 00:07:16,000 --> 00:07:19,800 Speaker 1: down by the lockdowns, not not the outbreaks, but the lockdowns, 127 00:07:19,800 --> 00:07:22,960 Speaker 1: and so you no longer have manufacturing pushing growth forward. 128 00:07:23,080 --> 00:07:25,240 Speaker 1: At the same time retail services and all these other 129 00:07:25,240 --> 00:07:28,440 Speaker 1: sectors are flailing. So you've got widespread weakness right now, 130 00:07:28,680 --> 00:07:32,200 Speaker 1: and and there's no there's no definitive timeline for when 131 00:07:32,200 --> 00:07:35,040 Speaker 1: this will end. What's your impression of the proposals that 132 00:07:35,040 --> 00:07:38,400 Speaker 1: the Chinese authorities have put out there to potentially combat 133 00:07:38,480 --> 00:07:40,400 Speaker 1: some of this weakness, given the fact that even if they, 134 00:07:40,560 --> 00:07:43,880 Speaker 1: for example, have construction projects, who's going to be able 135 00:07:43,920 --> 00:07:46,480 Speaker 1: to go out there and actually do them if they're 136 00:07:46,520 --> 00:07:49,440 Speaker 1: locked down. Well, this this is what we've really been 137 00:07:49,440 --> 00:07:52,320 Speaker 1: stressing for the past several weeks. Uh, there is definitely 138 00:07:52,360 --> 00:07:55,080 Speaker 1: worry uh coming out of Beijing in terms of in 139 00:07:55,160 --> 00:07:56,760 Speaker 1: terms of not just what the growth is going to be, 140 00:07:56,800 --> 00:07:59,640 Speaker 1: but how you have a plausible story around they're not 141 00:07:59,720 --> 00:08:03,680 Speaker 1: being flailing flailing results and and and flailing growth and 142 00:08:04,040 --> 00:08:07,560 Speaker 1: flailing overall governance performance. So there's talk and this is 143 00:08:07,560 --> 00:08:10,480 Speaker 1: why you know, you saw the conversation move last week 144 00:08:10,840 --> 00:08:14,040 Speaker 1: from monetary stimulus to to moving into fiscal stimulus. All 145 00:08:14,040 --> 00:08:16,360 Speaker 1: out fiscal stimulos, we're gonna beat the USA and in 146 00:08:16,440 --> 00:08:19,400 Speaker 1: g d P. But like you said, if you're locking 147 00:08:19,440 --> 00:08:21,480 Speaker 1: down all these major cities, if you're closing down the 148 00:08:21,560 --> 00:08:24,840 Speaker 1: arteries between them, how do you do fiscal stimulus in 149 00:08:24,920 --> 00:08:26,800 Speaker 1: a meaningful way? And so I think a lot of 150 00:08:26,840 --> 00:08:29,920 Speaker 1: what you're seeing right now is still rara rhetoric. It 151 00:08:29,960 --> 00:08:31,680 Speaker 1: doesn't mean they're not going to move more and more 152 00:08:31,720 --> 00:08:33,800 Speaker 1: into into the fiscal side. We've seen that in our 153 00:08:33,920 --> 00:08:36,480 Speaker 1: data for for some time now. But the idea that 154 00:08:36,520 --> 00:08:38,560 Speaker 1: they're going to all out stimulus, they're going to recreate 155 00:08:38,600 --> 00:08:41,040 Speaker 1: some of the conditions in previous party conditions year, it's 156 00:08:41,120 --> 00:08:44,160 Speaker 1: way too early to make that jump, alright. So it's 157 00:08:44,200 --> 00:08:47,000 Speaker 1: talking the talk versus actually walking the walk to large 158 00:08:47,040 --> 00:08:49,720 Speaker 1: part to this point, Leland, Something else that authorities have 159 00:08:49,760 --> 00:08:52,800 Speaker 1: talked about, though, is wrapping up the regulatory crackdowns on 160 00:08:52,880 --> 00:08:56,320 Speaker 1: industries like technology. Do you think that actually will come 161 00:08:56,360 --> 00:08:59,679 Speaker 1: to fruition and what difference will that make it might? 162 00:08:59,760 --> 00:09:01,800 Speaker 1: But but here's here's what investors really need to take 163 00:09:01,840 --> 00:09:04,960 Speaker 1: note of. Uh. They are scrambling right now to send 164 00:09:05,000 --> 00:09:07,880 Speaker 1: positive signals to markets, which is why you're seeing positive 165 00:09:07,880 --> 00:09:11,719 Speaker 1: signals about a compromise over audits and delisting issues. You're 166 00:09:11,720 --> 00:09:15,880 Speaker 1: seeing uh, you know, positive signals about the regulatory crackdown ending. 167 00:09:15,880 --> 00:09:19,120 Speaker 1: You're seeing positive signals about fiscal stimulus coming. It doesn't 168 00:09:19,120 --> 00:09:20,839 Speaker 1: mean any of that is gonna happen. I don't think 169 00:09:20,880 --> 00:09:23,440 Speaker 1: any of this was part of their original trajectory for 170 00:09:23,559 --> 00:09:26,240 Speaker 1: policy going into the Party Congress. So they're saying this 171 00:09:26,360 --> 00:09:29,040 Speaker 1: and they're increasing sentiment. They may cut people to run 172 00:09:29,040 --> 00:09:31,080 Speaker 1: into the stock market for the fifteenth time this year. 173 00:09:31,520 --> 00:09:33,800 Speaker 1: But are they actually doing this? You know, it's it's 174 00:09:33,880 --> 00:09:35,800 Speaker 1: it's too early to tell on this stuff. I think 175 00:09:35,840 --> 00:09:38,520 Speaker 1: markets are getting ahead of themselves thinking that a pivot 176 00:09:38,559 --> 00:09:41,840 Speaker 1: has already happened. Well, and of course you have seen 177 00:09:41,880 --> 00:09:44,200 Speaker 1: some money coming back into Chinese equities, but still has 178 00:09:44,200 --> 00:09:46,240 Speaker 1: been absolutely brutal, and it does seem like that in 179 00:09:46,320 --> 00:09:49,280 Speaker 1: large part is where policymakers are focused. We're also looking 180 00:09:49,280 --> 00:09:51,720 Speaker 1: though leland at a Chinese juan at its weakest against 181 00:09:51,720 --> 00:09:54,599 Speaker 1: the dollar since November of how much weaker can it 182 00:09:54,720 --> 00:09:59,280 Speaker 1: get before Beijing starts to get really uncomfortable. Well, look, 183 00:09:59,280 --> 00:10:02,480 Speaker 1: the want all my all my friends who do for 184 00:10:02,760 --> 00:10:05,280 Speaker 1: X are excited about this because big, big movements and 185 00:10:05,320 --> 00:10:07,240 Speaker 1: again in big moments you want. But you know, the 186 00:10:07,520 --> 00:10:09,679 Speaker 1: U want has been range bound for for years and 187 00:10:09,760 --> 00:10:12,120 Speaker 1: years and years and and and there are political numbers 188 00:10:12,120 --> 00:10:15,560 Speaker 1: where they will not go past uh, you know, ultimately seven, 189 00:10:15,600 --> 00:10:17,840 Speaker 1: but that may even be six seven in the short 190 00:10:17,960 --> 00:10:22,079 Speaker 1: term because they're trying to maintain stability here. The importance 191 00:10:22,120 --> 00:10:23,679 Speaker 1: is you're not seeing that you want to fall off 192 00:10:23,679 --> 00:10:26,280 Speaker 1: a cliff. You're seeing a supercharged dollar because of what 193 00:10:26,280 --> 00:10:29,280 Speaker 1: you're seeing around the world, weakness in the euro uh, 194 00:10:29,360 --> 00:10:31,920 Speaker 1: you know, weakness in in in the end, weakness in 195 00:10:32,000 --> 00:10:34,480 Speaker 1: the want now, so you're you're not actually you're not 196 00:10:34,559 --> 00:10:37,280 Speaker 1: actually seeing a r wan disintegrate. You're seeing a dollar 197 00:10:37,360 --> 00:10:39,760 Speaker 1: and so there is not a a rush to try 198 00:10:39,800 --> 00:10:42,920 Speaker 1: to do something about this. There's again, stability is the mandate. 199 00:10:42,960 --> 00:10:46,800 Speaker 1: Stability is within within about within about Leland. We're hearing 200 00:10:46,800 --> 00:10:49,240 Speaker 1: from officials that we're looking to a four or perhaps 201 00:10:49,320 --> 00:10:53,320 Speaker 1: five handle on GDP this year. What realistically is the 202 00:10:53,360 --> 00:11:00,319 Speaker 1: GDP that you expect for China. Mm, look, sorry I 203 00:11:00,400 --> 00:11:02,920 Speaker 1: missed that. What what GDP do you think is realistic 204 00:11:03,120 --> 00:11:08,079 Speaker 1: in China? Not the official one but the actual one. Uh. Look, 205 00:11:08,440 --> 00:11:11,200 Speaker 1: if they can get lockdowns under control in the coming weeks, 206 00:11:11,200 --> 00:11:13,600 Speaker 1: then they're going to still shoot for for four plus. 207 00:11:13,920 --> 00:11:16,840 Speaker 1: You still have Chinese economists right now talking about five 208 00:11:16,880 --> 00:11:19,440 Speaker 1: and a half, which is which is rather silly. If 209 00:11:19,480 --> 00:11:21,439 Speaker 1: they're shut down for all of May, then the question 210 00:11:21,520 --> 00:11:23,920 Speaker 1: is is there a plausible enough story for for guiding 211 00:11:23,960 --> 00:11:26,000 Speaker 1: this over too? So I think what they want to 212 00:11:26,040 --> 00:11:28,640 Speaker 1: do is they want to be able to claim that 213 00:11:28,840 --> 00:11:30,800 Speaker 1: no matter how bad things get, they're still going to 214 00:11:30,880 --> 00:11:34,079 Speaker 1: report four. It just quite a question how whether the 215 00:11:34,120 --> 00:11:36,000 Speaker 1: lockdowns allow the optics for them to be able to 216 00:11:36,040 --> 00:11:38,720 Speaker 1: announce that. Leland Miller of China Beige Book, thank you 217 00:11:38,760 --> 00:11:40,720 Speaker 1: so much. We always love having you on and to 218 00:11:40,760 --> 00:11:44,760 Speaker 1: hear your insights and the more unofficial estimate of what 219 00:11:44,840 --> 00:11:53,680 Speaker 1: things are are happening in terms of the momentum in China. 220 00:11:54,360 --> 00:11:56,240 Speaker 1: It's the big question for our audience at the moment. 221 00:11:56,280 --> 00:11:58,640 Speaker 1: Did Tom Kane take off because the red silks lost 222 00:11:58,679 --> 00:12:01,640 Speaker 1: to the Orioles so now goes on to say they 223 00:12:01,679 --> 00:12:04,080 Speaker 1: destroyed the Red Sox, just curious because he has no 224 00:12:04,160 --> 00:12:07,360 Speaker 1: problem bashing the birds from Baltimore. Will he discuss the 225 00:12:07,400 --> 00:12:10,360 Speaker 1: big loss t k is on day two of a hangover. 226 00:12:10,559 --> 00:12:12,280 Speaker 1: On day three of a hangover, when he's forced to 227 00:12:12,280 --> 00:12:13,960 Speaker 1: come back into work, I'm going to ask him about 228 00:12:13,960 --> 00:12:17,080 Speaker 1: the Red Sox. Kylie, all right, you do that forward 229 00:12:17,080 --> 00:12:19,600 Speaker 1: to look forward to his reaction his Tots one though 230 00:12:19,640 --> 00:12:22,280 Speaker 1: I can't believe I call Spurs tots, but his football 231 00:12:22,320 --> 00:12:25,040 Speaker 1: team one. So he's a happy man. You can et it. 232 00:12:27,160 --> 00:12:29,840 Speaker 1: Let's get to junior manual I've ever caught Jillian. Your 233 00:12:29,960 --> 00:12:32,120 Speaker 1: view is that this is a market of stocks. It's 234 00:12:32,120 --> 00:12:36,240 Speaker 1: not about the index. Walk me three, you're thinking, so look, 235 00:12:36,480 --> 00:12:39,360 Speaker 1: going back to this whole idea of a rising cost 236 00:12:39,400 --> 00:12:44,800 Speaker 1: of capital is clearly the combination of yields moving higher 237 00:12:45,080 --> 00:12:48,120 Speaker 1: and inflation moving out of a twenty five year range 238 00:12:48,400 --> 00:12:51,920 Speaker 1: has changed. The correlation between stocks and bonds. Risk on 239 00:12:52,080 --> 00:12:55,319 Speaker 1: risk off doesn't exist anymore. Now it is risk on 240 00:12:55,520 --> 00:12:58,160 Speaker 1: risk one and lately risk off risk off, and in 241 00:12:58,160 --> 00:13:01,760 Speaker 1: that kind of environment, interest stingly enough, with volatility where 242 00:13:01,760 --> 00:13:05,880 Speaker 1: it is, correlation has been low. Picking stocks wins the day. 243 00:13:06,160 --> 00:13:09,000 Speaker 1: It's no longer longer an index game, and from our 244 00:13:09,040 --> 00:13:11,440 Speaker 1: point of view, there's a whole group of stocks out 245 00:13:11,440 --> 00:13:15,200 Speaker 1: there who actually have had their earnings estimates revised higher 246 00:13:16,600 --> 00:13:20,719 Speaker 1: and still have you know, a situation where they've been 247 00:13:20,800 --> 00:13:24,280 Speaker 1: crushed year to date. Uh And that's where the attractiveness 248 00:13:24,400 --> 00:13:27,319 Speaker 1: lies for us. Okay, So these are specific stocks. First 249 00:13:27,320 --> 00:13:28,800 Speaker 1: of all, can you mentioned which ones you see the 250 00:13:28,800 --> 00:13:32,320 Speaker 1: biggest opportunities in Well, we'll say it's it's across the 251 00:13:32,360 --> 00:13:36,800 Speaker 1: salou The semiconductors have been hit very, very hard in general, 252 00:13:37,240 --> 00:13:39,160 Speaker 1: and actually if you go back to last week, there 253 00:13:39,280 --> 00:13:42,600 Speaker 1: was several which had in an in a season of 254 00:13:42,880 --> 00:13:47,200 Speaker 1: very poor earnings responses, had good earnings responses. The home 255 00:13:47,240 --> 00:13:50,559 Speaker 1: builders is literally the group that everyone loves to hate 256 00:13:50,679 --> 00:13:54,600 Speaker 1: right now, huge short interest there um and you know, 257 00:13:54,679 --> 00:13:58,240 Speaker 1: to us any sign not even that rates are peaking, 258 00:13:58,679 --> 00:14:02,199 Speaker 1: but that the level of ascent of rates is likely 259 00:14:02,240 --> 00:14:05,640 Speaker 1: to moderate, which I think if Pale gives the market 260 00:14:05,760 --> 00:14:08,480 Speaker 1: what it wants, you get to see that those are 261 00:14:08,480 --> 00:14:10,719 Speaker 1: the places we think are worth a look. Do you 262 00:14:10,720 --> 00:14:12,920 Speaker 1: think that there have been pockets of capitulation already in 263 00:14:12,920 --> 00:14:16,880 Speaker 1: this market? Is that basically what you're saying? Uh? So, 264 00:14:17,120 --> 00:14:22,400 Speaker 1: profitless tech is certainly close to capitulation. But again, in 265 00:14:22,440 --> 00:14:26,400 Speaker 1: a rising cost of capital environment, it doesn't necessarily mean 266 00:14:26,440 --> 00:14:28,960 Speaker 1: that there's a bye, because if you look out one 267 00:14:29,000 --> 00:14:33,440 Speaker 1: to three years, clearly refinancing is a more difficult concept 268 00:14:34,320 --> 00:14:39,240 Speaker 1: going forward. But the problem here is, particularly when you 269 00:14:39,280 --> 00:14:42,440 Speaker 1: think about this week, is it's very difficult to explain 270 00:14:42,480 --> 00:14:46,920 Speaker 1: to the public that negative GDP print along with the 271 00:14:47,120 --> 00:14:50,000 Speaker 1: large inflation numbers, and the public is the one that 272 00:14:50,040 --> 00:14:53,800 Speaker 1: disproportionately owns fang, which has been hurt in recent weeks. Well, 273 00:14:53,840 --> 00:14:56,120 Speaker 1: talking of the public, Julian, let's talk about the consumer, 274 00:14:56,160 --> 00:14:58,200 Speaker 1: which by and large seems like it's holding in there, 275 00:14:58,280 --> 00:15:01,760 Speaker 1: is tolerating higher prices, is allowing companies to exercise pricing 276 00:15:01,800 --> 00:15:04,080 Speaker 1: power and retain margin. Do you expect that that's going 277 00:15:04,160 --> 00:15:06,440 Speaker 1: to continue to be the narrative as we move forward 278 00:15:06,440 --> 00:15:09,440 Speaker 1: through the remainder of this year. So we had AVERQUI 279 00:15:09,840 --> 00:15:12,480 Speaker 1: s I s I do really on the ground survey 280 00:15:12,560 --> 00:15:15,560 Speaker 1: work literally day to day and week to week, and 281 00:15:15,760 --> 00:15:19,080 Speaker 1: Ed Hyman's work is try as we might to find 282 00:15:19,200 --> 00:15:23,600 Speaker 1: material weakening. We don't see it. And so it's our 283 00:15:23,720 --> 00:15:25,880 Speaker 1: view that if you look at sort of years like 284 00:15:26,800 --> 00:15:30,920 Speaker 1: twenty sixteen, the last time that an exogenous shock like 285 00:15:31,080 --> 00:15:35,800 Speaker 1: China weakening spilled over into the US. It derailed the 286 00:15:35,840 --> 00:15:39,360 Speaker 1: consumer very briefly and then just kept on going. And 287 00:15:39,640 --> 00:15:41,880 Speaker 1: that's what we see at Julian before we run away. 288 00:15:42,160 --> 00:15:46,600 Speaker 1: The conclusion of your thoughts picking stocks wins the day, Yes, 289 00:15:46,760 --> 00:15:50,600 Speaker 1: and no, Julian, it's very, very difficult to pick stocks. 290 00:15:51,040 --> 00:15:53,640 Speaker 1: Michael Packman pointed out that the average draw down of 291 00:15:53,680 --> 00:15:57,040 Speaker 1: the average stock on the SMP five dred twenty one 292 00:15:57,640 --> 00:16:01,760 Speaker 1: to draw down on the SMP's thirteen point five. Judy, 293 00:16:01,760 --> 00:16:03,200 Speaker 1: and what do you say to people who maybe don't 294 00:16:03,200 --> 00:16:06,520 Speaker 1: have the skill set to pick stocks or the track 295 00:16:06,600 --> 00:16:08,920 Speaker 1: record to do so, and don't want to pay up 296 00:16:08,920 --> 00:16:10,720 Speaker 1: the phase to see if someone's going to be successful 297 00:16:10,760 --> 00:16:12,880 Speaker 1: or not for a very tricky twelve months. Do we 298 00:16:12,920 --> 00:16:15,200 Speaker 1: really want to give up on the index just now? So? 299 00:16:15,600 --> 00:16:18,200 Speaker 1: I think what you do is you really need to 300 00:16:18,280 --> 00:16:20,840 Speaker 1: take a different sort of look. First of all, it's 301 00:16:20,840 --> 00:16:24,280 Speaker 1: our view that given the likelihood that you're still going 302 00:16:24,320 --> 00:16:28,480 Speaker 1: to get above trend, and remember trend pre pandemic was 303 00:16:28,560 --> 00:16:31,040 Speaker 1: two percent growth, that you're going to get above trend 304 00:16:31,040 --> 00:16:33,880 Speaker 1: growth in the US this year and next. You're gonna 305 00:16:33,880 --> 00:16:37,000 Speaker 1: get rising rates. You're going to have to stand high inflation, 306 00:16:37,320 --> 00:16:41,520 Speaker 1: you want to tilt towards value. Value has outperformed this 307 00:16:41,600 --> 00:16:45,400 Speaker 1: year after fifteen years of underperformance. We think that continues. 308 00:16:45,680 --> 00:16:49,200 Speaker 1: But John, look, the fact is is that nothing lasts forever, 309 00:16:49,720 --> 00:16:54,760 Speaker 1: and index exposure has really literally one the day for fifteen, 310 00:16:54,840 --> 00:16:58,280 Speaker 1: perhaps twenty years. We think that good active management, and 311 00:16:58,320 --> 00:17:00,840 Speaker 1: this is where you got to do your research, is 312 00:17:00,880 --> 00:17:03,280 Speaker 1: going to look very attractive going for you know the 313 00:17:03,280 --> 00:17:05,280 Speaker 1: problem people have that Judy, and they've heard that over 314 00:17:05,320 --> 00:17:07,960 Speaker 1: the last fifteen years, and then passive one the day. 315 00:17:08,560 --> 00:17:10,280 Speaker 1: You know where I'm coming from that people have just 316 00:17:10,359 --> 00:17:12,560 Speaker 1: heard this so many times that is this really the 317 00:17:12,600 --> 00:17:15,879 Speaker 1: regime change? Is it finally here? Well? And I would 318 00:17:15,920 --> 00:17:18,560 Speaker 1: argue that that it is simply because if you think 319 00:17:18,560 --> 00:17:22,000 Speaker 1: about it again, we've had two other regime changes that 320 00:17:22,119 --> 00:17:24,880 Speaker 1: people probably hadn't thought that could happen in the last 321 00:17:24,920 --> 00:17:29,240 Speaker 1: twenty five years. That is a bond market that is 322 00:17:29,280 --> 00:17:33,320 Speaker 1: now reversed its bullish trend and is arguably having yields 323 00:17:33,320 --> 00:17:37,159 Speaker 1: headed higher um as well as an inflation breakout, and 324 00:17:37,200 --> 00:17:41,040 Speaker 1: we think these things cause a rethink of the investment landscape. Julian, 325 00:17:41,119 --> 00:17:44,600 Speaker 1: awesome having you in the building as well as you 326 00:17:44,640 --> 00:17:48,960 Speaker 1: exit the building, so weather New York City, Jinetman, you 327 00:17:48,960 --> 00:17:57,879 Speaker 1: would have a core our site. Kathy boss Jansits the 328 00:17:57,960 --> 00:18:01,239 Speaker 1: chief US financial economists for the Economics. Kathy, we love 329 00:18:01,240 --> 00:18:03,359 Speaker 1: catching up with you. Let's get straight to Wednesday that 330 00:18:03,440 --> 00:18:05,639 Speaker 1: news conference. What do you expect to hear from Sham 331 00:18:05,640 --> 00:18:09,080 Speaker 1: and Pale? Thanks John, happy to be with you. Well, 332 00:18:09,160 --> 00:18:11,840 Speaker 1: I think we're gonna have to rely on the forward 333 00:18:11,880 --> 00:18:14,440 Speaker 1: guidance and any tweaks to the policy statement because we're 334 00:18:14,440 --> 00:18:17,840 Speaker 1: not going to begin revised GDP or inflation or those 335 00:18:18,119 --> 00:18:22,760 Speaker 1: infamous UM interest rate that plot estimates. So um. You know, 336 00:18:22,760 --> 00:18:25,120 Speaker 1: it really does come down to the messaging and any 337 00:18:25,160 --> 00:18:28,399 Speaker 1: type of forward guidance UM he provides. I think he 338 00:18:28,600 --> 00:18:32,160 Speaker 1: is going to remain very hawkish. Um. They're very worried 339 00:18:32,200 --> 00:18:36,359 Speaker 1: about inflation. They see wage pressures picking up. Um. So 340 00:18:36,480 --> 00:18:39,240 Speaker 1: fifty basis points done the deal for Wednesday, and and 341 00:18:39,320 --> 00:18:42,320 Speaker 1: our view is probably another fifty basis points in June. 342 00:18:42,560 --> 00:18:44,640 Speaker 1: We don't think they're quite ready to go seventy five, 343 00:18:45,000 --> 00:18:47,280 Speaker 1: although you know, I know the markets have been flirting 344 00:18:47,320 --> 00:18:49,920 Speaker 1: with that. Kathy, what do you think has the more potential, 345 00:18:49,960 --> 00:18:53,960 Speaker 1: the most potential to move markets the Wednesday FED meeting 346 00:18:54,200 --> 00:18:58,520 Speaker 1: or the Friday Perils Report. I would I would bet 347 00:18:58,560 --> 00:19:02,920 Speaker 1: on the FED eating um. You know, payroll should be 348 00:19:03,000 --> 00:19:07,360 Speaker 1: slid um. You know, the wage data probably actually takes 349 00:19:07,880 --> 00:19:11,440 Speaker 1: front center um, you know, in terms of what's most 350 00:19:11,520 --> 00:19:14,720 Speaker 1: important of the data, maybe also the labor force participation rate, 351 00:19:15,359 --> 00:19:17,719 Speaker 1: because of view is at least our view is that 352 00:19:17,800 --> 00:19:22,520 Speaker 1: as labor force um conditions continue to improve, that's gonna 353 00:19:22,800 --> 00:19:25,280 Speaker 1: pull more workers into the labor force. You need that 354 00:19:25,359 --> 00:19:27,719 Speaker 1: to keep a cap on wages going forward. So I 355 00:19:27,720 --> 00:19:30,600 Speaker 1: think it'll really the FED right now sets the stage 356 00:19:31,040 --> 00:19:34,320 Speaker 1: um for the financial markets and really also for the economy. 357 00:19:34,560 --> 00:19:37,119 Speaker 1: Peleey ansked a really good question earlier about what the 358 00:19:37,200 --> 00:19:40,159 Speaker 1: bigger consequence from the China lockdowns would be for the 359 00:19:40,240 --> 00:19:42,760 Speaker 1: U S economy, whether it would be faster inflation or 360 00:19:42,800 --> 00:19:46,640 Speaker 1: slower growth, and the answer, unfortunately is probably some dose 361 00:19:46,760 --> 00:19:49,520 Speaker 1: of both of them. How are you viewing this as 362 00:19:49,880 --> 00:19:52,080 Speaker 1: with respect to the FED and how much more difficult 363 00:19:52,119 --> 00:19:55,800 Speaker 1: it makes their decision? Definitely makes it more difficult. It's 364 00:19:55,880 --> 00:19:59,919 Speaker 1: it's another stagflationary shock, even if we're not in staging 365 00:20:00,000 --> 00:20:03,720 Speaker 1: fflation per se, because we have stronger growth um and 366 00:20:03,840 --> 00:20:07,520 Speaker 1: momentum thankfully for the US still looks very good. The 367 00:20:07,560 --> 00:20:11,040 Speaker 1: consumer spending data on Friday showed the consumers can actually 368 00:20:11,119 --> 00:20:15,600 Speaker 1: outspend inflation um only by two tenths, but that's significant 369 00:20:15,600 --> 00:20:19,000 Speaker 1: because as it gives us a solid handoff the consumer 370 00:20:19,080 --> 00:20:22,320 Speaker 1: spending in in Q two UM. That all said, the 371 00:20:22,359 --> 00:20:28,159 Speaker 1: FEDS looking at still strong domestic demand backdrop UH, supply 372 00:20:28,240 --> 00:20:31,440 Speaker 1: chains are not correcting as you highlighted, as quickly as 373 00:20:31,480 --> 00:20:33,960 Speaker 1: we all thought or hoped um. And and on top 374 00:20:34,000 --> 00:20:36,960 Speaker 1: of that you have wages um picking up a bit. 375 00:20:36,960 --> 00:20:39,160 Speaker 1: So that's just going to keep them in a hawkiche 376 00:20:39,240 --> 00:20:42,840 Speaker 1: mood and they're gonna hope that they contain inflation without 377 00:20:42,920 --> 00:20:45,879 Speaker 1: you know, killing off the business expansion. Well, Kathy, to 378 00:20:45,920 --> 00:20:48,120 Speaker 1: your point on the consumer, that's not just something we're 379 00:20:48,160 --> 00:20:50,440 Speaker 1: getting out of the economic data. You're hearing it from 380 00:20:50,480 --> 00:20:52,560 Speaker 1: a large part of corporate America as well, that the 381 00:20:52,600 --> 00:20:56,000 Speaker 1: consumer is hanging in there and is tolerant of higher prices. 382 00:20:56,440 --> 00:20:58,919 Speaker 1: I'm wondering how long that can remain the case, and 383 00:20:59,000 --> 00:21:01,480 Speaker 1: if the American can sumer and the support from it 384 00:21:01,520 --> 00:21:04,240 Speaker 1: is actually going to allow and support the FED and 385 00:21:04,320 --> 00:21:08,880 Speaker 1: landing softly, we think it can last for quite a bit. 386 00:21:08,920 --> 00:21:12,280 Speaker 1: At least through UM this year. UM. The household balanty 387 00:21:12,359 --> 00:21:15,800 Speaker 1: it's really strong. Right. You have aggregate savings that were 388 00:21:15,840 --> 00:21:18,879 Speaker 1: built up during the pandemic. Uh, they've tapped into a 389 00:21:18,880 --> 00:21:21,320 Speaker 1: little bit. I mean, we estimate somewhere around forty billion, 390 00:21:21,359 --> 00:21:25,160 Speaker 1: but they built up two point seven trillion UM. Leverage 391 00:21:25,160 --> 00:21:28,119 Speaker 1: and debt is quite low UM. And you have the 392 00:21:28,440 --> 00:21:31,240 Speaker 1: wealth gains from housing and even the equity market, even 393 00:21:31,280 --> 00:21:33,680 Speaker 1: though it's faltering a little bit as of late, and 394 00:21:33,920 --> 00:21:36,320 Speaker 1: that still gives a powerful wealth effects. So we think 395 00:21:36,359 --> 00:21:39,200 Speaker 1: it carries us at least through this year and even 396 00:21:39,320 --> 00:21:41,480 Speaker 1: into next year. But that's it's really good to depend 397 00:21:41,480 --> 00:21:44,679 Speaker 1: on the Fed. If if they have to drive rates 398 00:21:44,800 --> 00:21:47,919 Speaker 1: much higher, UM, you know, let's say three or four percent, 399 00:21:47,960 --> 00:21:49,720 Speaker 1: that's not what we think. We think it's somewhere over 400 00:21:49,880 --> 00:21:52,159 Speaker 1: you know, to sixty or so on the Fed fund rate. 401 00:21:52,200 --> 00:21:54,680 Speaker 1: But if they get higher than that, because inflation stickier, 402 00:21:54,720 --> 00:21:57,720 Speaker 1: that's gonna be really difficult for the consumer and also 403 00:21:57,760 --> 00:22:02,240 Speaker 1: for businesses. How is your thinking on the balance sheet evolved, Kathy? 404 00:22:02,280 --> 00:22:03,840 Speaker 1: And do you think that what we hear from the 405 00:22:03,840 --> 00:22:06,160 Speaker 1: Federal Reserve on Wednesday on that for an in particular, 406 00:22:06,240 --> 00:22:11,280 Speaker 1: can hold any surprises I think they'd rather not surprise 407 00:22:11,440 --> 00:22:14,359 Speaker 1: us on that front. There's so much uncertainty around the 408 00:22:14,480 --> 00:22:18,359 Speaker 1: rate forecast and outlook, they want to keep it as 409 00:22:18,359 --> 00:22:20,720 Speaker 1: boring as possible. Of course, we know they've struggled to 410 00:22:20,800 --> 00:22:24,320 Speaker 1: do that. It's not as boring as watching page dry um. 411 00:22:24,359 --> 00:22:27,840 Speaker 1: So we we expect that they'll, you know, ramp up 412 00:22:28,119 --> 00:22:32,000 Speaker 1: the balance sheet reduction. They'll start off with maybe you know, 413 00:22:32,080 --> 00:22:35,280 Speaker 1: thirty billion in treasuries, fillion in mortgage backed securities and 414 00:22:35,320 --> 00:22:39,640 Speaker 1: eventually get to somewhere around which is what they floated 415 00:22:39,840 --> 00:22:42,600 Speaker 1: right in the FOMC minutes, and and it's largely what 416 00:22:42,760 --> 00:22:46,000 Speaker 1: the market store expecting looking at the moving real yields 417 00:22:46,000 --> 00:22:49,440 Speaker 1: taking place this morning, the high of the year happening 418 00:22:49,520 --> 00:22:52,240 Speaker 1: right now. On a closing basis, Lisa, on real yield, 419 00:22:52,240 --> 00:22:55,320 Speaker 1: it's just about positive, just about positive. We did that intro, 420 00:22:55,480 --> 00:22:57,040 Speaker 1: I think in the last couple of weeks. We did 421 00:22:57,040 --> 00:22:59,360 Speaker 1: that in today. But at the same time, people are 422 00:22:59,359 --> 00:23:01,200 Speaker 1: looking for this being a more sustained move, and we 423 00:23:01,240 --> 00:23:04,160 Speaker 1: haven't seen a more prolonged decline zero point zero one 424 00:23:04,280 --> 00:23:07,399 Speaker 1: five four. This is actually interesting because it's been so 425 00:23:07,480 --> 00:23:10,320 Speaker 1: deeply negative and was more than negative one percent lower 426 00:23:10,359 --> 00:23:13,520 Speaker 1: than negative one percent. As recently as March. This move 427 00:23:13,600 --> 00:23:16,560 Speaker 1: has been dramatic as people really assess how tight the 428 00:23:16,560 --> 00:23:19,040 Speaker 1: FED would like to go and really the ripple effects 429 00:23:19,080 --> 00:23:21,639 Speaker 1: through equities. I've got to say, John, could be what 430 00:23:21,680 --> 00:23:23,800 Speaker 1: we're seeing today in terms of the sentiment. Cathy, just 431 00:23:23,800 --> 00:23:25,520 Speaker 1: want to come to you on this so called FED 432 00:23:25,600 --> 00:23:28,800 Speaker 1: put and whether this FED is truly data dependent. Bob 433 00:23:28,800 --> 00:23:30,480 Speaker 1: middle of Blank Rock said to me on Friday that 434 00:23:30,520 --> 00:23:33,439 Speaker 1: they don't have the luxury of being data dependent. Maybe 435 00:23:33,440 --> 00:23:36,240 Speaker 1: they will later on in the year. Do you take 436 00:23:36,280 --> 00:23:38,120 Speaker 1: that particular position as well, and what do you think 437 00:23:38,119 --> 00:23:42,479 Speaker 1: they can become data dependent? Again, it's a good question. 438 00:23:42,840 --> 00:23:45,960 Speaker 1: I think they are data dependent, there's no doubt about it. 439 00:23:46,000 --> 00:23:48,160 Speaker 1: But part of the data they're looking at our financial 440 00:23:48,200 --> 00:23:51,160 Speaker 1: conditions broad financial conditions, So that is going to include 441 00:23:51,640 --> 00:23:54,440 Speaker 1: equity prices, that is going to include corporate bonds, but 442 00:23:54,480 --> 00:23:56,920 Speaker 1: it's going to include the dollar. Um. So how they 443 00:23:57,000 --> 00:23:59,960 Speaker 1: see financial conditions evolving is going to help them caliber 444 00:24:00,080 --> 00:24:02,160 Speaker 1: rate where they think that the funds rate is going 445 00:24:02,200 --> 00:24:04,960 Speaker 1: to be. But you know, I think right now front 446 00:24:04,960 --> 00:24:08,040 Speaker 1: and center for them is taming inflation. Uh, and that's 447 00:24:08,080 --> 00:24:11,080 Speaker 1: what we're gonna hear for now, um, as we progress 448 00:24:11,160 --> 00:24:14,000 Speaker 1: through two twenty two, and if things slow a little, 449 00:24:14,080 --> 00:24:16,480 Speaker 1: they may pull back a little bit on that really 450 00:24:16,520 --> 00:24:20,480 Speaker 1: hawkish rhetoric, Kathy, what would be a restrictive Fed policy rate? 451 00:24:21,840 --> 00:24:24,679 Speaker 1: And our view it's two percent neutral, So anything above 452 00:24:24,760 --> 00:24:28,000 Speaker 1: two percent will get you too restrictive. Now the fedserve things, 453 00:24:28,040 --> 00:24:31,720 Speaker 1: it's two point four, um, So there's a little tension there. Um. 454 00:24:31,840 --> 00:24:35,480 Speaker 1: Markets probably a little closer to our view frankly, but 455 00:24:36,000 --> 00:24:38,320 Speaker 1: it's an unknown, right, It's it's an estimate. It's very 456 00:24:38,359 --> 00:24:43,080 Speaker 1: difficult to really um pin down precisely. Um. But certainly 457 00:24:43,119 --> 00:24:45,520 Speaker 1: once you get above two percent, that is going to 458 00:24:45,680 --> 00:24:47,760 Speaker 1: have some repple effects. And we see that right in 459 00:24:47,800 --> 00:24:51,439 Speaker 1: the mortgage market, right, see mortgage rates already jumping, you know, 460 00:24:51,480 --> 00:24:53,440 Speaker 1: well above five percent that is going to start to 461 00:24:53,480 --> 00:24:56,040 Speaker 1: slow things down. So keep in mind what the market 462 00:24:56,040 --> 00:24:57,639 Speaker 1: has done is already doing some of the work for 463 00:24:57,680 --> 00:25:00,439 Speaker 1: the Fed reserve. And you've certainly seen that showing up 464 00:25:00,440 --> 00:25:03,159 Speaker 1: in financial conditions. We were joking earlier at Kathy that 465 00:25:03,200 --> 00:25:06,000 Speaker 1: the Fed's only actually moved twenty five basis points, and 466 00:25:06,080 --> 00:25:08,439 Speaker 1: yet looking at the market, you may think they moved 467 00:25:08,520 --> 00:25:11,600 Speaker 1: a lot more dramatically. Has the market done enough work 468 00:25:11,680 --> 00:25:13,600 Speaker 1: that the Federal Reserve may actually have to be less 469 00:25:13,640 --> 00:25:18,320 Speaker 1: aggressive than is currently the kind of consensus thinking, yeah, 470 00:25:18,400 --> 00:25:20,880 Speaker 1: we we think they're going to go less aggressive than 471 00:25:20,920 --> 00:25:24,160 Speaker 1: the markets believe. When I looked at your at Eller curve, 472 00:25:24,240 --> 00:25:26,520 Speaker 1: you know, with the front end short term rates, they 473 00:25:26,520 --> 00:25:29,800 Speaker 1: were predicting a fund funds rate topping out around three 474 00:25:29,840 --> 00:25:32,479 Speaker 1: per cent or so next year. Again, we think it's 475 00:25:32,480 --> 00:25:36,120 Speaker 1: about forty basis points lower, So within that ballpark, um so, 476 00:25:36,160 --> 00:25:38,800 Speaker 1: I think. But the fears, you know, the whisper fears 477 00:25:38,800 --> 00:25:42,199 Speaker 1: that they'll have to go even higher, I think are unfounded, 478 00:25:42,240 --> 00:25:44,680 Speaker 1: and we'll have to watch closely the financial conditions, will 479 00:25:44,720 --> 00:25:47,399 Speaker 1: have to watch inflation. But if inflation is close to 480 00:25:47,440 --> 00:25:51,080 Speaker 1: peeking despite you know, the supply chain problems and aggregate 481 00:25:51,160 --> 00:25:54,800 Speaker 1: demand for the consumers shifting from goods to services, that's 482 00:25:54,800 --> 00:25:56,760 Speaker 1: really going to help the fit out a lot, along 483 00:25:56,800 --> 00:26:00,000 Speaker 1: with you know, the tightening in financial conditions. That next 484 00:26:00,000 --> 00:26:02,600 Speaker 1: CPI print I think coming up next week, isn't it, Lisa, 485 00:26:02,720 --> 00:26:06,400 Speaker 1: I believe so, I'm looking at it right now, and 486 00:26:06,560 --> 00:26:08,199 Speaker 1: hold on a second. I will check that for you. 487 00:26:08,240 --> 00:26:10,520 Speaker 1: But the cp I print will be important for the 488 00:26:10,840 --> 00:26:13,359 Speaker 1: perhaps psychological impacts as well as the direction. Do you 489 00:26:13,400 --> 00:26:16,720 Speaker 1: think we're again it is the eleventh? On you? I 490 00:26:16,760 --> 00:26:18,840 Speaker 1: think I kind of knew it was the eleventh. I 491 00:26:18,920 --> 00:26:21,960 Speaker 1: was just imagining you'd have confirmation. Well you just imagine, 492 00:26:22,000 --> 00:26:24,199 Speaker 1: do you imagine more of me than what actually happened? 493 00:26:24,240 --> 00:26:28,919 Speaker 1: Thank you, Thank you. Next week mechanical peaking, you might 494 00:26:28,960 --> 00:26:30,879 Speaker 1: just say thank you to Kathy Kathy bus Jack six. 495 00:26:31,359 --> 00:26:33,720 Speaker 1: Thank you very much. Looking ahead to Wednesday in the 496 00:26:33,800 --> 00:26:37,960 Speaker 1: Federates seven. This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks for listening. 497 00:26:38,320 --> 00:26:41,680 Speaker 1: Join us live weekdays from seven to ten AMI Eastern 498 00:26:41,920 --> 00:26:45,880 Speaker 1: on Bloomberg Radio and on Bloomberg Television each day from 499 00:26:46,000 --> 00:26:51,280 Speaker 1: six to nine am for insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, 500 00:26:51,400 --> 00:26:56,439 Speaker 1: and international relations. And subscribe to the Surveillance podcast on 501 00:26:56,520 --> 00:27:00,320 Speaker 1: Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com, and of course, on 502 00:27:00,440 --> 00:27:04,480 Speaker 1: the terminal. I'm Tom keene In. This is Bloomer