WEBVTT - Chiefs dynasty OVER? Kelce & Mahomes WASHED? Jerry Jones calls Cowboys SOAP OPERA

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in episode three point fifty eight. What's right when

0:00:04.600 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Nick right in this episode has always brought to you

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>by our friends at boost Mobile. So here's the deal.

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna be totally transparent with the audience. I

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 1>am so ready for actual football season. We've been saying

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:22.319
<v Speaker 1>the last few weeks it's football season because we have

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>turned our attention to football. The problem is there's no news.

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Like the news we get is this, uh we hear,

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, And I think it's in the show somewhere,

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>but I'll discuss it for a moment. Anyway. James Cook

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty million guaranteed with the agents credited in the first

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:46.520
<v Speaker 1>paragraph of ESPN dot com story, and then, of course

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>a day later it's like, well, actually it's really fifteen

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:52.239
<v Speaker 1>million guaranteed, and you already had five million guaranteed, so

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>it's really just ten million extra guaranteed. But wait to

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>get those agents that pub Like, that's not real. I

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>guess he's back in camp. That's the news. The major

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>story in sports media today is Joe Burrow got knocked down.

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:15.839
<v Speaker 1>Like that's where we're at in the camp calendar, which

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:19.959
<v Speaker 1>is why we take vacation next week and then we

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 1>come back full fledged, first Things, first prediction week on

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 1>this show, back to back preseason gambling extravaganzas. So all

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of that is coming in short order. But today does

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>feel a little bit like the you know, seventeenth lap

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>in the fifteen thousand meters, like man, the we're trudging through.

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>So I understand I maybe shouldn't say that to the audience.

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you're turning off the podcast. Please don't do that,

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>like great, subscribe, review, do all those things. I'm just

0:01:56.640 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>being honest with you, guys, which is why I was

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>so thrilled that yesterday we got actual news in the

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>What's Right universe, which is demanse. Would you like to

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>share with the audience what happened yesterday?

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Owl snakes finally popped out yesterday? It was the day

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:22.839
<v Speaker 2>day fifty fifty five or fifty six got home on

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 2>saw some little heads, did the routine check, saw some

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:26.919
<v Speaker 2>heads pop.

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look at this picture.

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they're looking I mean like a little blanket.

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>It's really unbelievable. So let me can I all right, sorry,

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna put you on frontree to bit here. Did

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>you cry? I did? I think somebody you told me? Well,

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>you think something because you told me you thought you

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>would years ago, when Demand started this journey of teaching

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>himself how to read exotic snakes, he said, he was like,

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be honest with you. He's like, if it

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:09.239
<v Speaker 1>ever happens and they actually there's actually one that they

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>mate and they get pregnant and there's eggs and they're born,

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>he's like, I think I'll cry, And so I was

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>it was.

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 2>I was, Yes, no tears came out, but but yeah,

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean I think I always just start screaming.

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's like my default. Oh so you yelled, Yeah, definitely. Sorry.

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I love it. I love it, And I also love

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>that we have locked in a week from today, your

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>youngest sister coming traveling on her own cross country to

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>come visit you, and she'll get to see all these

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>baby snakes. It's everything's insane and perfect. Yes, So that's great.

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>So that's honestly the most exciting thing. Uh, I'll be

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 1>totally transparent. My most exciting part of this podcast just happened.

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>But we'll try to saying all the same straight to voicemail,

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by our friends at boost Mobile. Like

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I said, Temper's flare at Bengals camp because Joe Burrow

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>got knocked down. Chris STAPs Berzingis wants to pursue an

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>MMA career. I would He would be one of my

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>last picks of active NBA players that I think would

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>actually succeed in that. I understand he has reach, but

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>it seems like a huge injury risk and be a

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>guy that you could get on the ground broke. Yeah,

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:37.479
<v Speaker 1>I just he would not like Anthony Edwards high on

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>my MMA fighting list. Yeah, Joker, I think maybe would

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>be pretty good. I feel like Joker can take a punch,

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>tough guy, lean on you. Chris STAPs not. I'd even

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>put Wimby ahead of him, because I feel like Wimby,

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, with his embrace of the Far East, like

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:58.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe has learned some martial arts or something. I don't know,

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Like I christa far East, he has the Far East. Yeah. Uh.

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:10.799
<v Speaker 1>And Taylor Swift appeared on New Heights and What'll probably

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 1>go down as the you know, most viewed listened to

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>podcasts in the history of podcasts. All right, once again

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 1>reminder like rate, subscribe, review and because it's our last

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>day before vacation, let's just talk Cowboys. Oh my goodness.

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:28.839
<v Speaker 2>Uh so, winning is not a priority to our guard,

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 2>mister Jones. And that's Jerry Jones. He called his Cowboys

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 2>a year round soap opera and said, if we're not

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 2>being looked at, then I'll do my part to get

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 2>us looked at. H He also called controversy a good thing.

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Oh what's going on over there in Dallas?

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:48.039
<v Speaker 1>Well so, and he yesterday said he may or may

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>not talk with Micah with Micah's agent, pardon me. And

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:53.840
<v Speaker 1>then he's like that he's under contract. So we're gonna

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna try to hit ten topics. Say, I'm we'll

0:05:55.880 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>try to do him fast. I just want to hone

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>in on this one point here. There is no justification

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>or explanation for Jerry not talking to Micah's agent. None.

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:15.280
<v Speaker 1>We can argue about a lot of this. We can

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>argue about whether or not it's smart for the Cowboys

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 1>to pay Micah. I don't think that's a huge argument.

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>But someone was like, you know what, they already have

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the most expensive quarterback, one of the most expensive receivers.

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>They're probably not that close. Their better path is make

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>them play out this year. Franchise tag in order to trade. Like,

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>if somebody wanted to make that argument, I would listen

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to it. Okay, I would disagree with that. I would

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 1>listen to it. If there are a lot of things

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that you there are legitimate opinions on both sides on

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>With this thing, there is not a legitimate opinion that

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:01.839
<v Speaker 1>involves agreeing with Jarryry Jones' decision to never talk to

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Micah's agent. And if the justification on Jerry's end were, well,

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing to talk about because we are not signing

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Micah to an extension. The problem with that argument is

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Jerry's claim is we already agreed to an extension months ago.

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Jerry is not claiming I don't want to sign Micah.

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Jerry's claiming I did want to sign Micah. I had

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>an agreement with Micah. Micah now essentially reneged on it.

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Even if that is the case, then there is no

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>justification for not calling Micah's agent and saying, hey, here's

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the offer, and that I think through missed through all

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Jerry Jones nonsense has been the very simple

0:07:55.320 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>fact that he has not had a conversation with David Mulligata,

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Micah's agent, and that to me is the only possible

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>rationale for that is he wants to exert and show

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>who's in charge and who has the power here, that

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>he's trying to hold over them. And here would be

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>my biggest and then we can move on to other topics.

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>But my biggest concern if I were a Cowboys fan

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>that Jerry quote about basically, we want to be in

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the news three hundred and sixty five days a year.

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're a soap opera. It's my job to

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 1>drum up interest. Say what you want about Jerry. He

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>is a brilliant marketer. That part is undeniable. And if

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Jerry is looking down the horizon, it might occur to

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 1>him that if they sign Micah, there's no other like

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>football adjacent intrigue controversy left to satiate the masses next offseason.

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Dak is done and has a no trade, CD is done.

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 1>If they have if they sign Micah and they go

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 1>eight and nine, what is the Cowboys' news that keeps

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 1>them in the lead block of shows during the dog

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 1>days of summer. There's not another train coming down those tracks.

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>And so if Jerry is being earnest that his real

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>goal is to keep the Cowboys front page. The easiest

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>stretch there is dare Micah to play out this season,

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>franchise tag him next offseason, and run this entire storyline back.

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that is the likely outcome, but I

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 1>also think at this point it would be dumb to

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>dismiss it as a possibility, because the fact that we

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>have gotten here is a testament to the fact that

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Jerry is not leading with smart football team management. He

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 1>is leading with generating buzz. And you sign Micah, it's

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>hard to generate. If you sign Micah and you're just

0:10:54.040 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 1>average next year, where where does the next buzz come from? Done?

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Mike has done, CD's done. Micah will be de facto

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 1>untradeable the first year after signing a contract because of

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>what the signing bonus will be. Dak is literally untradeable.

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>They there's not a lot of paths, and you just

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>hired a brand new head coach, like not gonna fire

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a coach after year one? Like what is the sizzle

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>that the Cowboys can create other than just being awesome

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>football and awesome football team? And I don't think that's likely.

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 1>UFC three to nineteen is blowing back to the Windy City.

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I bet Colin's gonna be there for the first time

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>in six years. I'm just saying that I would be shocked. Actually,

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I think we're gonna Not only is Colin gonna be there,

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I think we're gonna see Colin with six seats on

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>pay per view. Check out the Fight Guard and get

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:53.319
<v Speaker 1>in on all the action at DraftKings Sportsbook, the official

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 1>sports betting partner of UFC. Drake is two plus C.

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:00.599
<v Speaker 1>I got it right that time is two plus E

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>puts his middleweight title up against kam Zat Tamaiev, who's

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a perfect fourteen and h who are you taking? First

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>time betting on UFC? At DraftKings, pick something simple like

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:15.439
<v Speaker 1>a fighter to win and make your pick. It's that easy.

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:17.680
<v Speaker 1>And if you're new to DraftKings check this out. New

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 1>customers who bet five dollars will get two hundred dollars

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 1>in bonus bets instantly. Don't miss out on all the

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 1>UFC three to nineteen action. Download the DraftKings Sportsbook app

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 1>now and use code right. That's code right for new

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>customers to get two hundred dollars in bonus bets instantly

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 1>when you bet just five bucks only on DraftKings the

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:43.679
<v Speaker 1>Crown is yours.

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 3>Gambling problem called one eight hundred gambler in New York

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 3>called eight seven seven eight open WI or text ope

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 3>and wy at four six seven three six nine. In Connecticut,

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 3>help is available for a problem gambling called eight eight

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:56.560
<v Speaker 3>eight seven eight nine seven seven seven seven or visit

0:12:56.640 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 3>CCPG dot org. Please play responsibly on behalf of boothill

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:03.080
<v Speaker 3>Cinna Win Resorting Kansas twenty one on over agent Eligibility

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 3>varies by jurisdiction VOYD and Ontario. Bet must win to

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 3>receive reward minimum minus five hundred odds required. Bonus bets

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 3>expire one hundred and sixty eight hours after issue. In

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 3>four additional terms and responsible gaming resources see DKNG dot

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:16.559
<v Speaker 3>co slash audio.

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, demonse, let's go to the chief.

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:22.199
<v Speaker 2>Use an Italian accent for that man. He's South Africa.

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I well, okay, well, I didn't mean to use an

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Italian accent, but I believe the name is I was

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:31.199
<v Speaker 1>trying to do French. Actually, I believe the name is French.

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I un du plus c. I wasn't trying to do Italian.

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:38.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't do accents, but I would. I'm guessing even

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>though he's South African, that that is a French name,

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>du plus c strikes me as no. Listen, the uh

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:51.839
<v Speaker 1>I say anything about Yeah? I mean I I that's

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>that production error. And that's also a Ronen Burgundy style

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 1>error by you. Just because it's written in the doc

0:13:57.080 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean you gotta read it like you gotta every

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 1>once in a while, you've gotta have some discretion. Yeah,

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you're allowed for some discretion here, all right, go ahead.

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:08.439
<v Speaker 2>Andy Reid down played all the naysayers saying that the

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Kansas City's window is closing for the dynasty. Colin was

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 2>also one of those naysayers, saying that the winning is over.

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that the win Do you think that

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 2>the dynasty is continuable if they win the super Bowl

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 2>this year?

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, hold on, I don't even think that's obviously. If

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 1>they win the super Bowl this year, the dynasty is

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>in progress. I want to focus more on. Listen. I

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>think it's well established how much I adore and love

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Colin Cowherd. His Chiefs Takes now, I mostly blame Jmack.

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that, like the proximity to Jmax's historically bad

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>chiefs takes have somehow there's been an osmosis of take

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>that has impacted Colin. But they've been to three straight

0:14:57.320 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowls. They they have the best record in the NFL.

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 4>Last year, they gotta go to the last one, right,

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 4>They say they made it to the last super Bowl,

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 4>Like I think they have to at least not make

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 4>a super Bowl for the dynasty to be over.

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, I would think so, yeah. I And by the way,

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>like when we talk about dynasties in the NFL, the

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh Steelers is probably the most famous one. They won

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>two Super Bowls. They then went two years without making

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the Super forget without winning it, without making the Super Bowl,

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and then they won two more. We look at that

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>as one dynasty. The Patriots is an interesting one. I

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 1>don't consider the Pants one continuous dynasty, but if you do,

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>it went like this, won a super Bowl, missed the playoffs,

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>then one two super Bowls. Then gosh, I'm gonna have

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to do this off the top of my head. O

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>six going for the three pat lost their first playoff game.

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, wait, oh five, going for the three p

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be hard to off top my head, but

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna try. Lost their first playoff Game. Six lost

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>in Round two. Oh seven lost the Super Bowl. Oh

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>eight missed the playoffs. Nine and twenty ten lost before

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the super Bowl, twenty eleven lost in the Super Bowl,

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty twelve, twenty thirteen lost before the super Bowl, fourteen

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 1>won the Super Bowl, fifteen lost in Conference Title Game,

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:49.240
<v Speaker 1>sixteen won the Super Bowl, seventeen lost the Super Bowl,

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>eighteen won the Super Bowl, nineteen lost in Round one.

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:56.119
<v Speaker 1>So if we want to do that as one long dynasty,

0:16:56.440 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>then it's gonna be impossible to say the Chiefs dynasty

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>is over if you consider the Patriots one long dynasty.

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 1>The Patriots went a decade without winning a Super Bowl.

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 1>The Chiefs have gone sixteen months, and so that part's

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 1>just ridiculous. It's just fundamentally ridiculous to say I'm declaring

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 1>it dead when the Chiefs are in the midst of

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>or just completed. I guess you would say the greatest

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>three year stretch in the history of the league. And

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 1>they have been to three consecutive Super Bowls and seven

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>straight AFC Championship Games. It's now If your take is

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:53.120
<v Speaker 1>they're just not good enough anymore, it's a bold take. Maybe,

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>like there's no evidence for it. But if it's just

0:17:56.680 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>your gut feeling, then so be it. Here is here

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 1>is what I find the most demands a ridiculous about

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>this Chief's fatalism stuff. And then we can move on

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:29.880
<v Speaker 1>every team in the AFC that is chasing them. If

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>this year they have the exact season Kansas City had

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:47.400
<v Speaker 1>last year, best last undefeated team, best record in the NFL,

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:54.439
<v Speaker 1>beat the Chiefs in the AFC playoffs, make the Super Bowl,

0:18:55.000 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 1>lose the super Bowl, it will be considered evidence that

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that team is getting closer, and the best season any

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>of those teams have had in this era, the Chiefs

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:14.159
<v Speaker 1>having that year is considered evidence of implosion. But I

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>am here to tell you if the Baltimore Ravens are

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the final, or the Buffalo Bills, or the Cincinnati Bengals

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>or the Los Angeles Chargers or god forbid, the Denver

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Broncos or any of those teams, if they are the

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>last undefeated team, if they are fifteen to one with

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the one seed locked up, they then beat the Chiefs

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs and then run into I don't care

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 1>who call it Philly or no, because Philly then would

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:49.199
<v Speaker 1>go back to back. That complicates things call it the

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Lions and get blown out in the Super Bowl. If

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>that were to happen, and then I were to go

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 1>on TV and be like, that's this year was the

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 1>end of that team. They're done Now they is a

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 1>time for a new chapter. People would say that, dude,

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>you're just a hater. And this is also an element

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 1>of my a lot of my Mahomes frustration in and

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to talk about this on the TV show

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 1>today in how he's discussed. Do you agree to Monsday

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:43.639
<v Speaker 1>that all Lamar josh Ann Burrow the year they had

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:49.880
<v Speaker 1>last year elevated them, even if not in their actual ranking,

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>but people elevated them their standing, and that the people

0:20:55.920 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>felt their seasons combined with the year Mahomes had narrowed

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:06.879
<v Speaker 1>the gap for best quarterback. And then some people flipped it.

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>You agree with that, right? Yeah, that's like conventional wisdom. Okay.

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 1>And this is where the point that I make that

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes is not judged against his peers, I think is crystallized.

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's pretend Patrick this year had any of their seasons

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>last year. Okay. Let's start with Joe Patrick puts up

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 1>insane numbers and the Chiefs miss the playoffs. Does that

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 1>help or does anyone be like, Okay, that helped Patrick's

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 1>back dynasty is definitely over. Okay, So all right, let's

0:21:56.160 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 1>do Lamar's year. Patrick puts up insane numbers. The Chiefs

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>are the you know, a good but not great seed.

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:10.919
<v Speaker 1>They're the three seed, and for the first time in

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:15.400
<v Speaker 1>his career, he does not make a conference championship game

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 1>because he loses in round two to one of the

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 1>other rival quarterbacks. Does that help or hurt Patrick's standing?

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Would hurt him? It would hurt him, all right, Stu.

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Josh Patrick wins league, MVP team has a really good record,

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 1>they get the two seed, and then to go back

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to the super Bowl, doesn't come through at the end

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and Josh beats him. Yeah. Is anybody then being like, Okay,

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Patrick has reclaimed or they're like, oh mvpb damn Josh

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>beat him? Now do the flip side for any of

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 1>those guys, all three of them, monse give them Patrick's year.

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Last year. They have mediocre stats but lead the league

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>in game winning drives and comebacks, and he beats two

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of those guys en route. I'm sorry. Any of the

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:24.879
<v Speaker 1>those guys are the one seed and beat Patrick to

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:30.200
<v Speaker 1>get to the Super Bowl. Imagine if I then went

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:34.440
<v Speaker 1>on TV and was like, yeah, but his touch there,

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, Lamar's touchdown interception ratio wasn't that impressive. I'm

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 1>actually dinging. It's just insane. And so I know I'm

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the Kansas City guy. I know I have the tattoo

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that I still don't know how to show on camera.

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I still don't know what I'm supposed to do here.

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:55.639
<v Speaker 1>It's just a disaster. There we go, I see, I

0:23:55.640 --> 0:24:01.160
<v Speaker 1>don't even know what I'm there we go. It is well,

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 1>it's just here's the thing. It's just boring. It's just boring.

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:15.120
<v Speaker 1>And I I also like, just one other thing because

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:20.199
<v Speaker 1>what has become very in vogue and Bruce says it

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot, and he and I talked about this, not

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>like to I'd like to talk about it, but discussed

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 1>it on the air the other uh the other day,

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>which is because it's become very in vogue to say

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>something along the lines of like, oh, Mahomes is doing

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Brady's career in reverse, where Brady in the beginning won

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 1>but didn't have the stats, and Mahomes and then later

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 1>in his career had the crazy numbers Mahomes are, but

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:55.400
<v Speaker 1>it's just inaccurate. And here's what I mean. Mahomes early

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:58.679
<v Speaker 1>and every year of his career except the last two.

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:05.199
<v Speaker 1>First five years one and had MVP caliber stats and

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the last two years he's won, but he hasn't had

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the crazy numbers until the playoffs. Right. But this idea

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 1>that Tom Brady post two thousand and seven was just

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 1>year in, year out, this statistical monster, it's just not true.

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>So Tom Brady two thousand and seven had what at

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>that point the greatest quarterback season ever. He then misses

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight due to injury. Two thousand and nine,

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 1>tom Brady's team was ten and six and he had

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight touchdowns thirteen interceptions, and they lost their first

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>playoff game. Then twenty ten, he had one of the

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:53.439
<v Speaker 1>greatest statistical seasons ever thirty six touchdowns, four picks, and

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty eleven he was in line with it thirty nine touchdowns,

0:25:57.280 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 1>twelve picks, and then twenty twelve it's down to a

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 1>ninety eight passer rating and twenty thirteen twenty five touchdowns,

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:11.679
<v Speaker 1>eleven picks and in eighty seven rating. That's in twenty

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 1>thirteen and then obviously, twenty fourteen, they win the Super

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Bowl twenty fifteen, he has an all time twenty fifteen, sixteen,

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:28.679
<v Speaker 1>seventeen all time stats years where he has a combined

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 1>doing the math on the fly, ninety six touchdowns fifteen

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>picks a one to oh eight rating over the course

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>of three years. But then the very next year twenty eighteen,

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:42.440
<v Speaker 1>they go eleven and five. He is twenty nine touchdowns

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 1>eleven picks, but they win the Super Bowl twenty nineteen

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty four touchdowns, eight picks in eighty eight rating and

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:52.160
<v Speaker 1>leaves the Patriots and then goes on the sick run

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 1>in Tampa. The point I'm making is this, even Pete

0:26:56.280 --> 0:27:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Brady had these season like the season where it's like, oh,

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine touchdowns, eleven picks, twenty four touchdowns eight picks,

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:08.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty five touchdowns eleven picks, it was not every single

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>year statistical excellence. It was every single year when the

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 1>division make the playoffs, and it is at the tail

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 1>end of his Patriots tenure, every single year make a

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:25.919
<v Speaker 1>conference championship game. But it's just it's we've got to

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:29.440
<v Speaker 1>be honest about what real expectations are, and we've got

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to be honest about what the guys who are allegedly

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:42.879
<v Speaker 1>in Patrick's league. If Patrick had the season they just had,

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and they just had the season Patrick just had, how

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:48.439
<v Speaker 1>would we view it? That's all I'm saying. All Right,

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 1>let's suck the bills.

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Buffalo just extended James Cook. They gave him that top

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 2>of the market running back money, so kind of.

0:27:57.240 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>The top of them mark. Again, it depends on the reporting,

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:03.119
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, they he certainly got a deal that appears

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 1>at least a little better than I would have done.

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:05.399
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead.

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 2>So with limited caprom going forward, if Buffalo cannot get

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:11.160
<v Speaker 2>it done this year, do you think that their window

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 2>is closed for the Super Bowl?

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>No, Listen, I think if I had to bet, here's

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a fun exercise super Bowl. I don't want to do

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 1>this right now. I was gonna say, like, divvy up

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:32.399
<v Speaker 1>super Bowls over the next five years between teams. Yeah,

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 1>like like I would say, the Chiefs get two, Josh

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 1>gets won, Raven's got to be in there at some point,

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore breaks through, Baltimore get one, and then is there.

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh you know, didn't see that one coming. Am I

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 1>underrating Philly? You know what I mean? But I don't

0:28:56.480 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 1>want to actually do that exercise, Like, I'd have to think.

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 2>More about Billy to repeat this year.

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 1>If Billy were to repeat, that's all, then we get

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>into a whole different ball game. Everybody's got it nasty well,

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 1>back to back. By itself, it's not a dynasty. But

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 1>when you add to it, they did make the super Bowl.

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 1>They did make the super Bowl two years prior. You

0:29:17.720 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean. I think you've got to have

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:22.959
<v Speaker 1>three in the NFL typically you've got to have at

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 1>least three championships. So like the people don't consider the

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins of the seventies of full blown dynasty. Dolphins lost

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to Super Bowl, then won a Super Bowl, won a

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>super Bowl. That's you know, So the how did I

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 1>rank the dynasties? I think I did this once. Let

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 1>me see if I can find it. Find it dynasty tiers.

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Do I have that somewhere? Some Google docs in somewhere. Yeah,

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 1>that's what I'm looking at. I'm trying to look for it.

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Holeng Dynasty. Uh No, I don't have it. I I

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 1>did do it at some point. The Daniel thinks he

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 1>can find it, that would be great. But the dynasties

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that are undeniable are either one or two for the Patriots.

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Either way, they have three championships. You know, if you

0:30:11.480 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 1>want to go, oh, one to eighteen with six titles

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 1>with a gap in the middle, or one to four

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and then fourteen to eighteen. Either way, that's a dynasty.

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 1>The Niners in the eighties from eighty to eighty eight,

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 1>uh or in the eighties, I should say they won

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>four Super Bowls. The Cowboys in the nineties winning three

0:30:33.800 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and four years obviously, the Steelers in the seventies. Those

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 1>are the only official reel in my opinion, dynasties. The

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 1>other ones that are close the Broncos who went back

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 1>to back in ninety seven ninety eight, the Packers who

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>went back to back to start the NFL. Now, the

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Packers would be higher up if we're doing pre Super

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Bowl York because they won championships. The Dolphins, as I mentioned,

0:31:02.320 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 1>who lost to Super Bowl then won back to back

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowls like those are the ones that are closer.

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 1>So the Eagles, if they were to win this year,

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 1>would be in that tier with the Dolphins of the seventies,

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:24.959
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos of the nineties, the Cowboys of the seventies.

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Those teams the Raiders from mid seventies to early eighties,

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 1>but they wouldn't, in my opinion, be a full Bowl.

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:39.120
<v Speaker 1>But they would then have Demond's a wide open window

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 1>to get that third one and to be considered, you

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean, If they win this year and

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:49.719
<v Speaker 1>then three years later they win another one, then that

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 1>definitively would make them a dynasty. But to get to

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the question about Josh Allen and the Bills, here's here's

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 1>where I stay. And tell me if you think it's unfair.

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:09.479
<v Speaker 1>I think Sean McDermott's a good coach. I think if

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 1>they lose in the playoffs this year pre Super Bowl again,

0:32:12.560 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 1>they probably have to fire him. I just don't especially

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 1>if they lose to Kansas City. I just don't think

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 1>you can. I think you would need something to make

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the team believe going into the next year that this

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 1>year will be different. And if for the fifth time

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 1>in six years, you lose to the same team, And honestly,

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, but what if it's just that guy on

0:32:46.680 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the other side. Man, if I know why, I can't.

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>That's why I said, tell me, if you think it's fair,

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 1>like maybe maybe you just keep running it back I

0:32:56.880 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know, but I the stat that should work. This

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 1>is a thing that Scott Kasmar tweets about a lot,

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and I do think is interesting. The stat that should

0:33:08.640 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 1>worry Bill's and Ravens fans is there has never been

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 1>a coach quarterback combo that won a super Bowl that

0:33:25.440 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't win their first super Bowl in their first five

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 1>years together. Do you follow what I'm saying? So there

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 1>has never been a coach quarterback combo that actually won

0:33:38.480 --> 0:33:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl together that didn't win their first super

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Bowl within their first five years of being together. So

0:33:50.040 --> 0:33:53.719
<v Speaker 1>like for Reid and Mahomes, this is their ninth year together,

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 1>but they won their first super Bowl in their technically

0:33:58.280 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 1>their third year together, but really their second year together,

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 1>second year's start for Lamar and for Josh with Harbaugh

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and McDermott this is year eight together, that part is

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:17.440
<v Speaker 1>And for Burrow and Zach Taylor, by the way, I

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:24.440
<v Speaker 1>think it's your six. So now maybe that's, you know,

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:28.279
<v Speaker 1>a nonsense stat, but it is the fact that it's

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 1>never happened in seventy five years of the NFL is

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 1>noteworthy to me. So I think the bill the Bills,

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:43.239
<v Speaker 1>I would I am in a position demons where If

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:49.279
<v Speaker 1>you were to tell me I've seen the future and

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the Kansas City Chiefs are not in the Super Bowl,

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:58.720
<v Speaker 1>who's who's in it and who wins it? My answer

0:34:58.760 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 1>would be Buffalo. They would be my number one pick.

0:35:02.360 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I think they're good enough. I think Josh is good enough.

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:08.759
<v Speaker 1>Even if I wouldn't have necessarily given James Cook multi

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:11.440
<v Speaker 1>year guarantees, he's obviously a good player and helps him

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:15.439
<v Speaker 1>this year. I like their secondary worries me a bit,

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 1>but I like the team a lot.

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:22.359
<v Speaker 2>But I just don't although I've got a follow up

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:23.960
<v Speaker 2>in here like where do you think that this Bill's

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 2>team ranks amongst other Bills teams?

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I think they're very similar. I think listen, I think

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 1>they're very similar, and I think that those teams have

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:39.680
<v Speaker 1>been I think last year's team was good enough. I

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 1>thought a few years ago those teams were a little overrated,

0:35:42.960 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 1>but I think last year's team was good enough. This

0:35:45.160 --> 0:35:48.920
<v Speaker 1>team should be as good as last year's team. And

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:51.720
<v Speaker 1>as long as Josh continues as trend of not being

0:35:52.600 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, like last year, who's great on not turning

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the ball over? Uh, They're gonna be right there alone. No,

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 1>because in the case, I've no, that's right, listen, I'm

0:36:05.840 --> 0:36:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm just fair, and I called him a roller coaster

0:36:10.160 --> 0:36:13.320
<v Speaker 1>when he was I didn't last year because he wasn't

0:36:14.160 --> 0:36:16.759
<v Speaker 1>ever sign up for a phone plan, thinking wow, what

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:19.200
<v Speaker 1>a price, and then a few months later it's like surprise,

0:36:19.560 --> 0:36:22.279
<v Speaker 1>Bill's hired Boost Mobile. You pay twenty five dollars a

0:36:22.280 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 1>month forever. That's unlimited talk, text and data starting at

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 1>just twenty five dollars a month, No price hikes, no

0:36:30.200 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 1>contract forever. Plus, boost Mobile is now a legit nationwide

0:36:35.080 --> 0:36:39.240
<v Speaker 1>five G network. They've invested billions building five G towers

0:36:39.239 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 1>across the country. Visit boostmobile dot com or head to

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:46.320
<v Speaker 1>your local Boost store today and get unlimited talk, text,

0:36:46.400 --> 0:36:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and data for twenty five dollars a month forever. Five

0:36:50.560 --> 0:36:53.960
<v Speaker 1>G speeds not available in all areas. After thirty gigabytes,

0:36:54.000 --> 0:36:57.399
<v Speaker 1>customers may experience slower speeds. Customers will pay twenty five

0:36:57.440 --> 0:36:59.840
<v Speaker 1>dollars a month as long as they remain active on

0:37:00.160 --> 0:37:04.480
<v Speaker 1>boost unlimited plan. All right, demonte Let's go to the giants.

0:37:04.840 --> 0:37:09.000
<v Speaker 2>So Dabel named Russ the starter earlier this summer, but

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:11.919
<v Speaker 2>Jackson Dark came out in that preseason game was using

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:16.120
<v Speaker 2>his legs throwing some darts with Giants' front office and

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:18.360
<v Speaker 2>the head coach on the hot seat, how soon do

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 2>you think that they'll want to throw Dart in if

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:20.960
<v Speaker 2>things start going wrong?

0:37:21.080 --> 0:37:26.239
<v Speaker 1>Listen. Dabels sure also seemed to really, you know, he

0:37:26.480 --> 0:37:30.279
<v Speaker 1>was more complementary of Jackson Dart than you've heard him

0:37:30.280 --> 0:37:34.280
<v Speaker 1>be of a quarterback in a long time. I here's

0:37:34.280 --> 0:37:38.400
<v Speaker 1>what I think. I don't think they are going to

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:44.320
<v Speaker 1>want I think that they're going to try to ride

0:37:44.360 --> 0:37:48.319
<v Speaker 1>with Russ for the first half of the season. I

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:52.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you've looked at what the Giants opening

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:57.959
<v Speaker 1>half of the season's schedule is, but not a lot

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of soft spots. They go at Washington, at Dallas, home

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:09.239
<v Speaker 1>for the Chiefs, home for the Chargers, a brief respite

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:14.440
<v Speaker 1>with Home for New Orleans, then Philly, Denver, Philly, San

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Francisco and so and they'll you know, playing Philly twice

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:24.480
<v Speaker 1>in three weeks with a rookie quarterback seems like a nightmare.

0:38:24.719 --> 0:38:28.200
<v Speaker 1>But then after that, as far as defenses you'll be

0:38:28.239 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 1>facing after that, Philly, Denver, Philly Stretch, San Francisco, Chicago,

0:38:33.400 --> 0:38:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay, Detroit, New England, your bye week Washington, Minnesota, Vegas, Dallas.

0:38:40.640 --> 0:38:44.839
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine they are going to want to give

0:38:44.960 --> 0:38:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Russ uh time to see, you know, if he can

0:38:52.280 --> 0:38:56.360
<v Speaker 1>just be fine and the team can be alive. The

0:38:56.640 --> 0:39:00.760
<v Speaker 1>ideal spot if they're not good to go to Dart.

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:04.239
<v Speaker 1>They play Philly on a Thursday, and they then have

0:39:04.320 --> 0:39:07.479
<v Speaker 1>ten days until the next game. That would that would

0:39:07.560 --> 0:39:12.680
<v Speaker 1>be a good spot. The problem is that team they

0:39:12.719 --> 0:39:15.839
<v Speaker 1>play after those ten days is Denver, which should have

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:19.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the better defenses in the entire NFL. And

0:39:19.600 --> 0:39:22.759
<v Speaker 1>so I think eventually, let me put it like this,

0:39:23.680 --> 0:39:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I will be shocked if post bye week Jackson Dart's

0:39:28.800 --> 0:39:32.319
<v Speaker 1>not the starter. But and I think there's a very

0:39:32.360 --> 0:39:34.719
<v Speaker 1>good chance. And the bye week, for they have the

0:39:34.800 --> 0:39:37.399
<v Speaker 1>last bye week, they're bye week's week fourteen, I think

0:39:37.400 --> 0:39:40.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a very good chance they go to him earlier

0:39:40.600 --> 0:39:44.600
<v Speaker 1>than that. I do not think it is realistic that

0:39:45.680 --> 0:39:48.880
<v Speaker 1>he is the Week one starter. I don't think that

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:53.360
<v Speaker 1>is in line or even on Dable's mind for that

0:39:53.440 --> 0:39:57.359
<v Speaker 1>to happen. But do I think that Brian Dable might

0:39:57.440 --> 0:40:03.440
<v Speaker 1>be you know, if we nine they're struggling the way

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:08.120
<v Speaker 1>to kind of potentially keep the job, go to the

0:40:08.200 --> 0:40:10.799
<v Speaker 1>rookie of the Rookie Show promise and be like, Hey,

0:40:10.840 --> 0:40:13.640
<v Speaker 1>that's what we've got coming next year. I think that's

0:40:13.680 --> 0:40:17.160
<v Speaker 1>on the board. All right, let's keep going.

0:40:17.719 --> 0:40:20.880
<v Speaker 2>Uh, Shauduur suffer an oblique injury or practice and his

0:40:20.920 --> 0:40:23.880
<v Speaker 2>status is currently up in the air. So Gabriel is

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:26.160
<v Speaker 2>in line to start in the next preseason game if

0:40:26.200 --> 0:40:29.120
<v Speaker 2>he's healthy. So well, Shador being fourth on the depth

0:40:29.200 --> 0:40:30.719
<v Speaker 2>chart right now, how big of a dinghy is it

0:40:30.760 --> 0:40:32.000
<v Speaker 2>for him if he misses a game?

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:35.799
<v Speaker 1>All Right, you're gonna really, really, you're gonna make that

0:40:35.840 --> 0:40:39.160
<v Speaker 1>face you make when you think I'm being unfair to people. Okay.

0:40:41.760 --> 0:40:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the best things that can happen

0:40:43.920 --> 0:40:48.719
<v Speaker 1>for Shaudor's chances of moving up the depth chart is

0:40:49.320 --> 0:40:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the player in the next game. It's not about him

0:40:52.480 --> 0:40:56.440
<v Speaker 1>not playing, it's about everyone seeing Dylan Gabriel and Kenny

0:40:56.480 --> 0:41:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Pickett actually play. I think that. I think that having

0:41:02.200 --> 0:41:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Dylan Deberl and Kenny Pickett play against Philly could be

0:41:06.880 --> 0:41:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the best thing possible for Shador Sanders to move up

0:41:10.520 --> 0:41:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that depth chart. Neither one of those guys have gotten

0:41:14.120 --> 0:41:18.160
<v Speaker 1>a full training camp because of the injuries they've suffered. Gabriel,

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:21.400
<v Speaker 1>whatever Philly starters that they're playing, and that is a

0:41:21.480 --> 0:41:25.880
<v Speaker 1>deep team in preseason game two, is a little less vanilla.

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I think Gabriel, who yesterday, according to the esp and

0:41:30.160 --> 0:41:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland training camp stats, was six of nineteen in eleven

0:41:35.400 --> 0:41:40.920
<v Speaker 1>on eleven and seven on seven. I just think that,

0:41:42.000 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 1>assuming Shaudor's injury is very minor and he's able to

0:41:46.080 --> 0:41:52.200
<v Speaker 1>practice by Monday, I think that him sitting and picket

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:57.760
<v Speaker 1>in Gabriel with the Browns offensive players against the Eagles

0:41:57.800 --> 0:42:01.840
<v Speaker 1>defensive players, the Browns backups against the Eagles backups, and

0:42:01.960 --> 0:42:06.040
<v Speaker 1>those guys, in my opinion, Pikett never and Gabriel not

0:42:06.160 --> 0:42:11.080
<v Speaker 1>at this point being NFL starting caliber quarterbacks. I don't

0:42:11.120 --> 0:42:13.120
<v Speaker 1>think this is the worst thing to happen to shit

0:42:13.239 --> 0:42:16.879
<v Speaker 1>or now. If it's a long lingering injury, I think

0:42:16.880 --> 0:42:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that's disastrous, but I don't it does not seem like

0:42:22.640 --> 0:42:25.160
<v Speaker 1>that is likely the case. All right, let's go to Caleb.

0:42:26.000 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 2>So after watching that preseason game week one from the sideline,

0:42:29.239 --> 0:42:31.719
<v Speaker 2>Caleb and the starters will be in this next game,

0:42:31.760 --> 0:42:34.560
<v Speaker 2>according to Ben Johnson, So what do you need to

0:42:34.560 --> 0:42:35.879
<v Speaker 2>see from Caleb in this game?

0:42:35.920 --> 0:42:38.000
<v Speaker 1>And what do you not want to see from him. Well,

0:42:38.000 --> 0:42:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I just don't want to see him running around. I

0:42:40.480 --> 0:42:43.520
<v Speaker 1>just want to see if listen. I think people have

0:42:43.600 --> 0:42:46.520
<v Speaker 1>gotten too far down on Caleb. I think people are

0:42:48.160 --> 0:42:53.280
<v Speaker 1>pre panicking about Ben Johnson overloading him with information. I again,

0:42:54.000 --> 0:42:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I think Ben Johnson, you know, knows what he's doing

0:42:58.520 --> 0:43:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and it will he at least is executing the plan

0:43:01.840 --> 0:43:04.839
<v Speaker 1>that he had. Ben Johnson was very judicious about which

0:43:04.920 --> 0:43:08.080
<v Speaker 1>head coaching job he was going to take. He waited

0:43:08.120 --> 0:43:10.040
<v Speaker 1>for this one, he took this one. He could have

0:43:10.120 --> 0:43:12.960
<v Speaker 1>coached Herbert, he could have coached Washington, he had other

0:43:13.040 --> 0:43:15.719
<v Speaker 1>jobs he could have taken. He wanted this one. So

0:43:15.760 --> 0:43:19.960
<v Speaker 1>he clearly thinks Caleb's style can work with him. But

0:43:20.040 --> 0:43:23.360
<v Speaker 1>he is also trying to make Caleb have to process

0:43:23.520 --> 0:43:27.719
<v Speaker 1>a ton early before they pare it back later. So

0:43:27.840 --> 0:43:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I would just like to see Caleb look sharp. And

0:43:31.480 --> 0:43:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I still I believe in Caleb. I think there has

0:43:34.640 --> 0:43:38.759
<v Speaker 1>been far, far too big of an over correction on

0:43:39.400 --> 0:43:42.719
<v Speaker 1>how good is Caleb Williams actually, and I will say

0:43:42.719 --> 0:43:47.560
<v Speaker 1>this demonse, if Jaden has earned the benefit of the

0:43:47.640 --> 0:43:53.239
<v Speaker 1>doubt of until proven otherwise, he's the best player from

0:43:53.320 --> 0:43:56.640
<v Speaker 1>his from that draft class. At the quarterback position, which

0:43:57.040 --> 0:44:01.680
<v Speaker 1>he's earned that like, you can't take calebe Bob Bo

0:44:01.840 --> 0:44:04.480
<v Speaker 1>actually had a good rookie year. Caleb and Drake May

0:44:04.520 --> 0:44:08.640
<v Speaker 1>both struggled, Pennis barely played, JJ didn't play, and Jaden

0:44:08.640 --> 0:44:12.160
<v Speaker 1>had arguably the greatest rookie season ever. So if we

0:44:12.239 --> 0:44:14.840
<v Speaker 1>take Jayden outside of it, if you were to ask

0:44:14.920 --> 0:44:23.400
<v Speaker 1>me who what quarterback from that draft class other than Jayden,

0:44:24.200 --> 0:44:26.879
<v Speaker 1>who do you think is gonna have the best year? Caleb, Bo,

0:44:27.440 --> 0:44:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Drake Pinnix, or McCarthy, I would pick Caleb Williams And

0:44:31.160 --> 0:44:33.960
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't be that hard for me. You guys know,

0:44:34.080 --> 0:44:36.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a believer the way other people are. In

0:44:36.400 --> 0:44:40.080
<v Speaker 1>bow Knicks. We've seen almost nothing from Pinnix, JJ, we

0:44:40.200 --> 0:44:43.439
<v Speaker 1>have seen nothing from and Drake May. I just don't

0:44:44.040 --> 0:44:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they have the offensive personnel for him

0:44:47.120 --> 0:44:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to thrive this year. So I will. I believe that

0:44:52.840 --> 0:44:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Caleb is going to have a better year than people expect,

0:44:56.120 --> 0:44:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think that he is. That Ben Johnson's approach

0:44:59.600 --> 0:45:03.960
<v Speaker 1>of overload him now then make it simpler later when

0:45:03.960 --> 0:45:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the games actually matter, I think that's pretty smart. All right,

0:45:08.719 --> 0:45:10.920
<v Speaker 1>let's go to uh, go ahead, pal.

0:45:11.160 --> 0:45:13.440
<v Speaker 2>What are you expecting out of the game, Like I mean,

0:45:13.440 --> 0:45:14.880
<v Speaker 2>I know it's a preseason game.

0:45:14.680 --> 0:45:23.319
<v Speaker 1>But I mean the all I so they play the

0:45:23.400 --> 0:45:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Bills on Saturday on Fox. I think that the Lions

0:45:32.200 --> 0:45:35.759
<v Speaker 1>passing offense should look good. I think the Bill's secondary,

0:45:35.800 --> 0:45:38.600
<v Speaker 1>as I said earlier, is already their weakness and their

0:45:38.680 --> 0:45:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, so that's their starting secondary. They're gonna be

0:45:41.920 --> 0:45:46.120
<v Speaker 1>playing backups at some point. And then five days later

0:45:46.160 --> 0:45:48.919
<v Speaker 1>they played the Chiefs in a game that I think

0:45:49.080 --> 0:45:51.759
<v Speaker 1>is While it was my Super Bowl pick last year,

0:45:52.400 --> 0:45:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's very possible that Caleb does not play

0:45:55.719 --> 0:45:58.560
<v Speaker 1>in that game. I think Caleb could get a lot

0:45:58.600 --> 0:46:03.160
<v Speaker 1>of work this Saturday night and then doesn't play in

0:46:03.200 --> 0:46:06.759
<v Speaker 1>the final preseason game. So listen, I I expect them

0:46:06.760 --> 0:46:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to look good. We'll see, but I expect them. I

0:46:11.000 --> 0:46:13.080
<v Speaker 1>expect them to look good. All right, let's go to

0:46:14.520 --> 0:46:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the Blazer sale.

0:46:16.040 --> 0:46:18.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so that Allen family is selling the trailer Blazers

0:46:18.800 --> 0:46:23.680
<v Speaker 2>and setting their evaluation at over four billion dollars.

0:46:23.760 --> 0:46:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So here's so, here's why this is news. The

0:46:29.160 --> 0:46:35.360
<v Speaker 1>news is Celtics sold for six, the Blazers just sold

0:46:35.400 --> 0:46:40.520
<v Speaker 1>for four, The Lakers obviously sold for ten. Do we

0:46:40.719 --> 0:46:46.200
<v Speaker 1>now know what an NBA the generic NBA team costs.

0:46:47.000 --> 0:46:50.600
<v Speaker 1>And my answer is I think we do. I think

0:46:50.640 --> 0:46:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that the generic NBA team now costs five billion dollars

0:46:56.160 --> 0:47:00.680
<v Speaker 1>because I think the Blazers, because of market size, are

0:47:01.040 --> 0:47:06.000
<v Speaker 1>a below average value NBA team, And it is in

0:47:06.120 --> 0:47:11.160
<v Speaker 1>line with Adam Silver wanting the expansion fee to be

0:47:11.320 --> 0:47:15.560
<v Speaker 1>six billion dollars. And but here's the thing, and I

0:47:15.640 --> 0:47:18.239
<v Speaker 1>will give after you know, even though I disagreed with

0:47:18.280 --> 0:47:23.560
<v Speaker 1>his quarterback pyramid, I will give Bill Simmons credit on this.

0:47:23.680 --> 0:47:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Simmons is usually way ahead of the curve on like

0:47:28.920 --> 0:47:36.080
<v Speaker 1>NBA ownership and league office going ons. And he he

0:47:36.360 --> 0:47:39.520
<v Speaker 1>keeps more than alluding to that they are pumping the

0:47:39.560 --> 0:47:42.960
<v Speaker 1>brakes on expansion. Now what does that mean for Lebron's

0:47:42.960 --> 0:47:45.520
<v Speaker 1>ability to own a team, and what does that mean

0:47:45.640 --> 0:47:51.080
<v Speaker 1>for you know, the potential competing not quite competing, but

0:47:51.320 --> 0:47:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, other league I'm not certain, but four billion

0:47:55.560 --> 0:47:59.200
<v Speaker 1>for the Blazers is a great number for the other

0:47:59.280 --> 0:48:03.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine In as summer winds down, it's nice to

0:48:03.440 --> 0:48:05.920
<v Speaker 1>get back into a routine. There's no one better to

0:48:05.960 --> 0:48:09.960
<v Speaker 1>help than Wayfair, from betting and Linen's to storage solutions

0:48:09.960 --> 0:48:13.000
<v Speaker 1>for every room in the house. Wayfares your one stop

0:48:13.040 --> 0:48:18.360
<v Speaker 1>shop to refresh your home, change up your workspace with desks, bookcases,

0:48:18.760 --> 0:48:23.040
<v Speaker 1>office chairs for way Less, or make weeknight dinners a

0:48:23.080 --> 0:48:27.360
<v Speaker 1>thing again. Quality cookwaar that makes meal time so simple.

0:48:27.400 --> 0:48:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Football season dright around the corner. Wayfairs set me up

0:48:30.640 --> 0:48:33.960
<v Speaker 1>perfectly with a new recliner to watch all the games.

0:48:34.200 --> 0:48:37.840
<v Speaker 1>But they offer so much more. Kitchen essentials, desks, lamps,

0:48:37.880 --> 0:48:41.600
<v Speaker 1>anything you need. Wayfair has it. There's something for every

0:48:41.640 --> 0:48:45.080
<v Speaker 1>style in every home, no matter your space or budget.

0:48:45.160 --> 0:48:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Wayfair makes it easy tackle your home goals with endless

0:48:48.880 --> 0:48:52.320
<v Speaker 1>inspiration for every space and budget. Free and easy delivery,

0:48:52.480 --> 0:48:55.520
<v Speaker 1>even on the big stuff. We had a couch delivered

0:48:55.560 --> 0:48:58.920
<v Speaker 1>from Wayfair not that long ago. Again, the free delivery

0:48:58.920 --> 0:49:02.200
<v Speaker 1>on something like that huge savings. No more huge delivery

0:49:02.200 --> 0:49:05.160
<v Speaker 1>fees for furniture. Get big stuff like sofa's, dining tables,

0:49:05.200 --> 0:49:09.680
<v Speaker 1>beds and more shipped for free. Good, organized, refreshed and

0:49:09.760 --> 0:49:14.480
<v Speaker 1>back routine for way Less. Head to wayfair dot com

0:49:14.560 --> 0:49:20.120
<v Speaker 1>right now to shop all things that's way fa ir

0:49:20.440 --> 0:49:24.920
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Wayfair, every style, every home all right, Demonse,

0:49:25.120 --> 0:49:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's do the lions real quick for we get out

0:49:27.440 --> 0:49:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of here.

0:49:28.400 --> 0:49:31.440
<v Speaker 2>Dan Campbell said he's motivated by people doubting his that

0:49:31.520 --> 0:49:34.760
<v Speaker 2>he can succeed without his star coordinators. But we've always

0:49:34.800 --> 0:49:39.120
<v Speaker 2>known that Dan Campbell's ever struggled with motivation. Besides motivation,

0:49:39.280 --> 0:49:41.080
<v Speaker 2>what do you think that Dan Campbell brings to the

0:49:41.120 --> 0:49:42.000
<v Speaker 2>table as a head coach?

0:49:42.200 --> 0:49:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, listen, I think he's a very good head coach.

0:49:45.080 --> 0:49:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I think he sets a culture and I think his

0:49:47.000 --> 0:49:51.960
<v Speaker 1>aggressiveness on fourth downs is that's a Dan Campbell, not

0:49:52.000 --> 0:49:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a Ben Johnson thing, and I think that instills a

0:49:55.480 --> 0:50:00.000
<v Speaker 1>real edge for them. But here is my overarching takes,

0:50:00.080 --> 0:50:06.200
<v Speaker 1>so to speak, that I think that I set on

0:50:06.320 --> 0:50:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the show yesterday that I hadn't I thought of while

0:50:10.880 --> 0:50:14.080
<v Speaker 1>we were within the segment, and I was like, you

0:50:14.120 --> 0:50:17.000
<v Speaker 1>know what, It just was kind of a Eureka moment.

0:50:17.000 --> 0:50:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I was like, I think that's right. I think setting

0:50:20.360 --> 0:50:25.279
<v Speaker 1>a culture and motivation and the things we know Dan

0:50:25.360 --> 0:50:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Campbell's great at are hugely important to turn a team around,

0:50:32.480 --> 0:50:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to get a team from where the Lions were to

0:50:35.040 --> 0:50:41.040
<v Speaker 1>a legitimate NFL team, But I think there are diminishing

0:50:41.239 --> 0:50:45.759
<v Speaker 1>returns on that once your team is a real contender,

0:50:46.080 --> 0:50:49.000
<v Speaker 1>because once your team is competing for championships. Once you

0:50:49.040 --> 0:50:52.440
<v Speaker 1>do have really good players, there's a lot of self

0:50:52.480 --> 0:50:57.640
<v Speaker 1>starting and self motivation and the culture is set once

0:50:57.680 --> 0:51:00.719
<v Speaker 1>you get to that point. Then I do think the

0:51:00.840 --> 0:51:05.640
<v Speaker 1>coordinators who are more your tacticians, those guys have an

0:51:05.640 --> 0:51:08.759
<v Speaker 1>increased value when you're actually trying to win a championship.

0:51:10.560 --> 0:51:17.840
<v Speaker 1>So that I have four significant concerns about the Lions

0:51:17.880 --> 0:51:20.319
<v Speaker 1>this year. Or one is what you're talking about right there,

0:51:20.320 --> 0:51:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the loss of coordinators. The second one is how does

0:51:24.280 --> 0:51:29.480
<v Speaker 1>golf respond to that playoff meltdown? I think that's a

0:51:29.520 --> 0:51:34.360
<v Speaker 1>fair question. Three is is this the worst offensive line

0:51:34.840 --> 0:51:37.440
<v Speaker 1>golf has had and the Lions have had since golf

0:51:37.440 --> 0:51:39.480
<v Speaker 1>has been there, I should say, And how does that

0:51:39.520 --> 0:51:46.640
<v Speaker 1>impact him? And four is the this schedule plus the

0:51:46.840 --> 0:51:51.040
<v Speaker 1>toll of being so close two years ago, having the

0:51:51.080 --> 0:51:53.640
<v Speaker 1>best record in the conference last year and not making

0:51:53.640 --> 0:51:56.359
<v Speaker 1>a Super Bowl? Does that is it just too much

0:51:56.400 --> 0:51:59.360
<v Speaker 1>to overcome? So with all that, for all those reasons,

0:51:59.400 --> 0:52:02.880
<v Speaker 1>like do I think it's on the board the Lions

0:52:02.920 --> 0:52:06.000
<v Speaker 1>go from the number one seed to missing the playoffs?

0:52:06.000 --> 0:52:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's on the board. Was that going to

0:52:08.120 --> 0:52:11.759
<v Speaker 1>be my pick? I don't. I'm not sure yet, but

0:52:11.880 --> 0:52:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that that team. They could take a major

0:52:17.080 --> 0:52:20.239
<v Speaker 1>step back this year, and I think the coordinators are

0:52:20.920 --> 0:52:22.600
<v Speaker 1>not all of it, but a big piece of it.

0:52:23.320 --> 0:52:30.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, reminder like rate, subscribe, review iTunes, Spotify, YouTube,

0:52:30.000 --> 0:52:31.600
<v Speaker 1>all of that. All right, de Monday, Let's go to

0:52:31.680 --> 0:52:33.759
<v Speaker 1>Zach's question. Yeah, it's pretty good.

0:52:33.800 --> 0:52:36.279
<v Speaker 2>If the Ravens have an MVP at quarterback and one

0:52:36.320 --> 0:52:39.359
<v Speaker 2>of the best rosters in the league each year, what when,

0:52:39.719 --> 0:52:41.640
<v Speaker 2>oh yeah, when does Harboe start to get on the

0:52:41.640 --> 0:52:44.399
<v Speaker 2>hot seat for not winning anything in years?

0:52:46.400 --> 0:52:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, honestly, a lot of what I said about McDermot,

0:52:51.920 --> 0:52:55.439
<v Speaker 1>Oh well, no about McDermott, about like if they lose again,

0:52:55.680 --> 0:52:57.400
<v Speaker 1>even if he's a good coach, do you have to

0:52:58.200 --> 0:53:03.759
<v Speaker 1>make a move would apply to Harbaugh. Except with the Ravens.

0:53:04.000 --> 0:53:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Prior to last year, folks, people didn't blame Harbaugh. They

0:53:09.200 --> 0:53:12.760
<v Speaker 1>were just like Lamar didn't. Yeah for real. Now last

0:53:12.840 --> 0:53:16.040
<v Speaker 1>year again, we don't have to relitigate it. But Lamar

0:53:16.280 --> 0:53:19.680
<v Speaker 1>wasn't horrific, you know what I mean? Like, there was

0:53:19.719 --> 0:53:26.399
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot that went into oh wow that

0:53:26.600 --> 0:53:34.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot that went into the the Ravens playoff loss.

0:53:34.480 --> 0:53:39.000
<v Speaker 1>But here is some news. Yeah, wow, this is shocking

0:53:39.080 --> 0:53:43.799
<v Speaker 1>to me. So Rashi Rice news and I don't know

0:53:43.960 --> 0:53:46.400
<v Speaker 1>how I feel about this, to be honest with you.

0:53:47.880 --> 0:53:52.640
<v Speaker 1>All Right, So Rashi Rice is expected to have his

0:53:52.840 --> 0:53:57.400
<v Speaker 1>disciplinary hearing with the NFL on Tuesday, September thirtieth in

0:53:57.520 --> 0:54:01.640
<v Speaker 1>New York. This means Rice is likely to be able

0:54:01.680 --> 0:54:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to play the first four weeks of the season before

0:54:05.600 --> 0:54:08.560
<v Speaker 1>any potential discipline is imposed for his role in a

0:54:08.640 --> 0:54:11.400
<v Speaker 1>multi car crash last you know in the twenty twenty

0:54:11.400 --> 0:54:15.320
<v Speaker 1>four offseason with Rashid. This is from schefter. With Rashi

0:54:15.400 --> 0:54:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Rice's hearing now dractor or September thirtieth, that would make

0:54:18.560 --> 0:54:22.560
<v Speaker 1>him eligible play in the Chiefs opening four games, the

0:54:22.680 --> 0:54:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Chargers in Brazil, the Eagles at the Giants, and the Ravens.

0:54:28.680 --> 0:54:35.840
<v Speaker 1>All Right, I gotta tell you, I assuming that he's

0:54:35.920 --> 0:54:40.439
<v Speaker 1>not going to get ten games, and I don't think

0:54:40.480 --> 0:54:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that's likely. I think the I think it is probably

0:54:45.160 --> 0:54:48.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna be four, five or six. That would be my guess.

0:54:50.239 --> 0:54:57.560
<v Speaker 1>This is kind of ideal for Kansas City because for

0:54:57.760 --> 0:55:02.960
<v Speaker 1>three reasons. Demonse One is that opening month is brutal,

0:55:04.840 --> 0:55:07.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, neutral site against the second best team in

0:55:07.880 --> 0:55:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the division, home game, super Bowl rematch. Week two, week

0:55:13.800 --> 0:55:16.160
<v Speaker 1>three at the Giants, and again the Giants are gonna

0:55:16.160 --> 0:55:17.640
<v Speaker 1>have a great pass rush, but they're not a very

0:55:17.640 --> 0:55:22.719
<v Speaker 1>good team. And then home for Baltimore two. To have

0:55:23.000 --> 0:55:26.920
<v Speaker 1>that be to know Rice is gonna be there for

0:55:26.960 --> 0:55:31.920
<v Speaker 1>those games when the next handful of games are at Jacksonville,

0:55:32.280 --> 0:55:36.240
<v Speaker 1>home for the Lions, home for the Raiders, home for Washington,

0:55:36.280 --> 0:55:38.960
<v Speaker 1>that stuff at Buffalo they lose that game every year.

0:55:39.280 --> 0:55:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Then a bye week like that timing I like a lot.

0:55:43.680 --> 0:55:47.319
<v Speaker 1>That's first of all. The other one is this, I

0:55:47.520 --> 0:55:51.200
<v Speaker 1>like the idea of the Chiefs being able to start

0:55:51.280 --> 0:55:54.799
<v Speaker 1>the season whole, like see what you know what I mean,

0:55:55.040 --> 0:55:58.520
<v Speaker 1>see what it looks like. And then you treat the

0:55:58.600 --> 0:56:02.480
<v Speaker 1>suspension like a pulled hamstring, like, oh, he's gonna be

0:56:02.480 --> 0:56:05.279
<v Speaker 1>out six weeks. That's a bummer. But we already saw it,

0:56:05.880 --> 0:56:11.520
<v Speaker 1>so I expected the suspension to be, you know, at

0:56:11.600 --> 0:56:16.359
<v Speaker 1>least those first four games. It's now not. I mean,

0:56:16.360 --> 0:56:18.920
<v Speaker 1>if he's not having his hearing until September thirtieth, he

0:56:19.120 --> 0:56:23.360
<v Speaker 1>definitely Now The concern would be if the NFL like

0:56:23.480 --> 0:56:26.840
<v Speaker 1>throws the book at him and all of a sudden

0:56:27.000 --> 0:56:30.839
<v Speaker 1>he misses the entirety of the rest of the year. Like,

0:56:30.880 --> 0:56:35.000
<v Speaker 1>what if the league gives him a twelve game suspension

0:56:35.680 --> 0:56:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and now instead of being back for the final month

0:56:38.040 --> 0:56:41.200
<v Speaker 1>of the year, he's out until the final game of

0:56:41.200 --> 0:56:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the year. But I don't think. I think when Jordan

0:56:44.280 --> 0:56:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Addison got three games for DUI, I think Rashi Rashi's

0:56:51.200 --> 0:56:59.000
<v Speaker 1>was different, Like it was wildly dangerous and irresponsible. There

0:56:59.040 --> 0:57:06.399
<v Speaker 1>were minor injuries, but he also wasn't impaired at least

0:57:06.440 --> 0:57:09.840
<v Speaker 1>they you know, wasn't proven to be. So I don't

0:57:10.320 --> 0:57:13.440
<v Speaker 1>so I think it will be probably double Jordan Addison

0:57:13.640 --> 0:57:15.800
<v Speaker 1>four or five or six is what I think will happen.

0:57:16.280 --> 0:57:20.920
<v Speaker 1>But the timing of that's really really lucky for Kansas City.

0:57:21.280 --> 0:57:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Start your chiefs conspiracy theories now, like rate, subscribe, review,

0:57:25.080 --> 0:57:28.560
<v Speaker 1>appreciate all you guys. We will be back a week

0:57:28.640 --> 0:57:34.040
<v Speaker 1>from Tuesday on this show with our gambling shows next

0:57:34.080 --> 0:57:38.640
<v Speaker 1>week Tuesday and Thursday. Demanday. Congrats on the Snakes. Thank

0:57:38.680 --> 0:57:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you to Blue Duck, thank you to Volume, thank you

0:57:41.040 --> 0:57:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to Booze, thank you to Wayfair, thank you to DraftKings.

0:57:44.280 --> 0:57:46.320
<v Speaker 1>See you guys all on TV in a few hours.

0:57:46.320 --> 0:57:46.720
<v Speaker 1>What's right