WEBVTT - Snap Earnings and Nikola CEO on 2023 Outlook

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm Caroline hired of Bloomberg's World Hoarders in New York

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and I made Ludlow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:22.119
<v Speaker 1>Technology and Carolina a great month and then has that

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>one d best since July ahead of a key FED meeting.

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>But right now all about earnings, and it's all about

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the share reaction after earnings. And first and foremost, we

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.879
<v Speaker 1>therefore got to dive into snap falling hard after it

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 1>forecasts is first ever quarterly revenue decline. Then my conversation

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>with the Nicholas CEO, Michael lost Seller is the company

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>reboots its electric truck offering and the Unicorn trying to

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>bring back the Dodo bird. We talked to Colossal Biosciences,

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>but first we want to get into the devil of

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the detail insider Intelligence. Principal analyst Jasmine and Burger's with

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>us for more on STAPs earnings. And you lead the

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>coverage of influencer marketing of social commerce. You focus on TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, Snapchat, Twitter, Facebook,

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I need not go on you know where the eyeballs are.

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:14.759
<v Speaker 1>What notices for me every time Snapchat does really well

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the amount of users. It has the

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>control has the thirteen year olds to the thirty year olds,

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:23.199
<v Speaker 1>the amount of impressions they get. Why can't they convert

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:27.320
<v Speaker 1>it into money? Well, you're absolutely right. I mean, snapchats

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>audience and its user growth is absolutely not its problem.

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:34.559
<v Speaker 1>It has a strong hold over gen Z, over teams

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:38.199
<v Speaker 1>who really love the platform. It's very different from any

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 1>other social platform. It's more focused on private sharing. It

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 1>has also, you know, invested heavily into augmented reality, which

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>its users love. But the reality is, at this point

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>most of its user growth is actually coming from the

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world, and the rest of the world

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>monetizes at a much lower rate than the US, and

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>that has hampered it's reven your growth as well, Jasmine

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the range of two to ten percent drop in top

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>line for the current period. Does that tell you Snap

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:10.839
<v Speaker 1>has no visibility on the ad market or Snap has

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>no visibility on how their tweaks around direct response is going. Yeah,

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think it's you know, a pretty difficult

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>sign for how the ad market is doing right now.

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 1>But I think the reality is is we have to

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>be ready for a period of much more modest growth

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>for social media in general. There are a lot of

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>challenges right now to social ad businesses, whether that is

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the privacy policy changes that have really impacted particularly performance advertisers,

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>as well as the volatile economic conditions. And you know,

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:46.079
<v Speaker 1>these challenges clearly continued to persist throughout two and I'm

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:49.399
<v Speaker 1>expecting there to be more challenges and much more competition

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>ahead as well. One headline on the terminal is about

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the forecast for the drop in revenue. The other headline

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:59.519
<v Speaker 1>is Snapchat Plus subscription draws more than two million users.

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>The stock down thirteen and a half percent in after hours.

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Does anyone care about Snapchat Plus? Well, you know, Snapchat

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>users care about Snapchat Plus. I think it's you know,

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a feature that has really been able to draw in

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>more engagement for a Snapchat. Whether it's going to be

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>a revenue boon is still an open question. I think,

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:21.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, more it will be a way for them

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>to keep their users engaged and keep them happy on

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Snapchat and and really just using the app more so

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>users like it. Let's talk about how they can convert

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the advertisers to liking. Is it as you say that

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>they need to just drive more conversion, more money from

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the international growth or how can they start proving that

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the direct response is really where the American purchaser needs

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to be. Yeah, I think one thing for Snapchat, of course,

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a much smaller platform, so it has been more

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>impacted by a lot of these challenges. One interesting thing

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>to note with Snapchat is that it is incredibly highly

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>associated with augmented reality, but it actually only makes a

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>fraction of its ad revenues. So there's a lot of

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>challenges that it has to you know, rise to this year,

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>and one of them is really helping advertisers to understand

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the platform and how to use the platform and its

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:19.600
<v Speaker 1>features to be able to reach those consumers. And let's

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>do the read across the ripple effect, the fact that

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:25.480
<v Speaker 1>metas trading lower pinterest and sympathy. Is that the right

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>view to take that this is something industry wide or

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:31.480
<v Speaker 1>is this idiosyncratic because I'm going to give another key

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 1>name that's also better an awful lot or not just

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>a are but VR. Yeah, I mean I think this,

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:40.839
<v Speaker 1>These challenges really are affecting all of these social platforms,

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I don't think it's wrong to be

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:46.720
<v Speaker 1>worried about the state of social media advertising right now.

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, at Insider Intelligence, we're actually forecasting metas first

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>ever ad revenue client decline for two So I think

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>that tells you kind of the state of social advertising

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>right now. Jazzmine, we've been covering a lot recently Twitter

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:05.159
<v Speaker 1>right and its aspirations to go from around two million

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>installed user base to about while a billion. Maybe my

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:11.239
<v Speaker 1>question is when you look at Twitter, you look at Snap,

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>is there growth there? How do they grow to be

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>more meaningfully global, to have much bigger factors of audience

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:23.159
<v Speaker 1>that use their platforms well, Twitter of course is unique

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and that a lot of its issues right now are

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:29.040
<v Speaker 1>are self inflicted. And the Insider Intelligence we're actually expecting

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Twitter's user base to decline both in the US and worldwide.

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:37.039
<v Speaker 1>Four We're expecting a decline of about thirty two million

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:40.719
<v Speaker 1>monthly users worldwide. So it's going to be an uphill

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:44.039
<v Speaker 1>battle really for Twitter to be able to grow its

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:46.600
<v Speaker 1>user base. I do think that there is an opportunity

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:50.159
<v Speaker 1>to be able to increase engagement among users as long

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:53.359
<v Speaker 1>as Twitter is able to hit on features that really

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:56.040
<v Speaker 1>appeal to its audience, and that is something that they

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:59.840
<v Speaker 1>haven't been able to do as if yet. All Right, well,

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 1>can continued to track snapshare reaction in after hours throughout

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the show, Insider Intelligence principal analysts Jasmine Enberg, thank you

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 1>very much. The d o J is looking into Tesla's

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>autopilot and self driving claim to the ev maker confirmed

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>in a regulatory filing it's received requests for documents from

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:27.479
<v Speaker 1>the US Justice Department. It's looking at claims the company

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>has made about features that it markets as autopilot and

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 1>for self driving or FSD, and it's all part of

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 1>growing scrutiny around Tesla's technology. Now Elon Musk company said, quote,

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>we have experienced and we expect to continue to face

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>claimed and regulatory scrutiny around what the company characterizes as

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>claimed failures or alleged misrepresentations. Tesla said it's unaware of

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>any government agency with an ongoing investigation that's reached the

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>conclusion any wrongdoing has occurred. Now on the company's most

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 1>recent earnings, called where it would be expectations, must said

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>that every time Tesla sells a car, it quote has

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the ability to have full self driving enabled, which he

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>sees as quote a tremendous upside potential. Now, Caroline, that's

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the d o J. It was just Friday, where Bloomberg

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>reported the SEC is also looking specifically at comments Musk

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>has made around this area of self driving as part

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 1>of its broader investigation. This regulatory overhang, though, seems to

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>not be as important to shareholders as ultimately the fundamentals

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>of the business, the prices of the cars, because today

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>we actually saw the shares rise, yes, mid risk appetite,

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>but also despite this d J headline and since its earnings,

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:46.239
<v Speaker 1>real momentum for Tesla. So I'm gonna move on actually

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Caroline to another ev maker because earlier today here in

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, I caught up with Michael lo Sheller, who

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>is the latest CEO of Nicola, who was here in

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>town for the Bloomberg any F conference, and after what

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>was frankly a tough year last year for Nicola, I

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>asked going to be a chance to reset. Here's what

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>he told me. So key message from our side will

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>be we have the trucks on the one side, zero

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 1>mission trucks. We started last year with a launch of

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:14.679
<v Speaker 1>the battery electric truck, launched this year the fuel sil truck,

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and we want to make sure that also the energy

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure is there. So in a way we want to

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>make sure we have an integrated solution, you can call it.

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>We want to put the chicken in the egg together.

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>A big focus of Bloomberg U energy finances research around

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>batteries and nichol is interesting. Multiple sources of cell supply.

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>But an acquisition of Romeo, how how has that gone?

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, how do you feel about your supply? Going

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>into very important decision for us to acquire all neal

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>power because obviously the battery is a very important element

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>component of the truck, and I think the vertical integration

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 1>is so important. Now we can control the battery, optimize it,

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:57.559
<v Speaker 1>improve it. We also will move from Cyprus to Coolist

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>so that everything is together and our stay of the

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>art facility. So I think it's a big benefit. And

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 1>of course there's a lot to do. We can on

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the battery and improve it further. I want to get

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to the kind of hydrogen infrastructure, but battery electrics where

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you've started. Um, you know that the guidance was just

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 1>short three hundred deliveries on the battery electric truck in

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Romeo is an interesting situation because before you bought them,

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 1>they were offering these kind of supply of seals packs

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>at a discount, then you acquired them and brought them in.

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 1>How are the economics of that transaction worked out? Is it?

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Is it the sort of most prudent financial decision to

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>just go out and buy your own sell supply rather

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>than do deals with the parties. First of all, it

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 1>was important for us to do the vertical integration. It's

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>much better that we have it in our hands, and

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>obviously we will improve the cross position going forward. Right

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 1>instead of having negotiations with suppliers and have lots of things,

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:55.679
<v Speaker 1>so to own the battery is really important for us

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and makes a lot of sense that I feel very

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:02.840
<v Speaker 1>good about that. I've been covering Nickless since early and

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>a part of the story that gets discussed less is

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>you're not just planning to make a hydrogen fuel cell

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>semi truck. You're planning to build out the infrastructure to

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>fuel the trucks literally hydrogen supply. What is the plan

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:20.199
<v Speaker 1>presently for that? And that's a very important point. So

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>last week we actually announced all our hydrogen energy related

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 1>things and we umbrella everything under the name of Hyler.

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:30.440
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's very important to have a brand

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>for our hydrogen energy activities and what we want to

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 1>do at Nicola is to offer the truck, so the

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>fuel sure truck, but every few side truck of course

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>needs hydrogen. And the customers are expecting that we offer books,

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and I think bringing these things together is really important

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and at the end of the day, I'm sure the

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>customer will value that a lot. Great interview there with

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:55.199
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of Nicola. Now let's turn to some earnings

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that we've just been getting again, Thick and Fast and

0:10:56.960 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 1>electronic arts one of them. The video game publisher behind

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the franchises, Fever, just gave a forecast for next bookings

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>in the fourth quarter that fell short of analyst estimates.

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>This is the company's holiday releases that they failed to

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>offset a broader decline in gaming revenue or down by

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>seven percent after ours as COVID related game delays pushed

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>several anticipated titles into three including as remake of the

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight survival horror game Dead Space coming up.

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Sony facing some challenges with its vr head site, one

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of them, of course, being all games are you gonna

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 1>be playing on it? What it all means for the

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:36.679
<v Speaker 1>virtual reality sectors fate next slush teachers rejoice open a

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 1>eyes got a tool to help classify content as AI

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>written but passed off as human or on that next

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>this is Blomberg. There might be a relief to some

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>teaching staff out there because open ai is coming out

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 1>with a new tool to tell when text is written

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>in AI, the company behind chat chypt. Of course it's

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>going to flag content written by its products as well

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>as other AI tools, but open ai does say that

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the tool quote still has a number of limitations, should

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:15.319
<v Speaker 1>be used as a complement to other methods of determining

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the source of text. It will be available as a

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 1>web ab and available to totally teachers. Let's bring in

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:24.079
<v Speaker 1>them bugs, Dina bas for more. I mean a lot

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>of the handwringing around chat chypt was around teaching staff

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that students are going to busy basically

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>getting chat gypt to write their studies. Absolutely, I don't

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 1>know if we should be excited about the extent to

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 1>which our students embrace innovation, but yes, some of the

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 1>earliest users of chat chypt were students who figured out

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that they could use it to do their homework and

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 1>do their essays. Also employees, people that work using it,

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and people pretending to be humans. There's real worry about

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>using it for misinformation for astroturfing campaigns. So open ai

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>as well as the people have been working on ways

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to flag when content is AI generated as opposed to

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 1>human author but not so fast. As you mentioned, open

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>ai flag that it's a bit limited. Right now, they're

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>only getting about a success rate and identifying AI generated content,

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and on some level, perhaps even more worrying, they're getting

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 1>a nearly ten percent false positive rate. So something is

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>human authored and it will be flagged as generated by

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the AI. Now imagine you're a high school student whose

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:32.439
<v Speaker 1>teacher is using this accuses you of cheating when you've

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>actually written the essay yourself. Also not great. So you know,

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate that the underlying technology that powers chat GPT

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:44.839
<v Speaker 1>is complicated, but as best you can how does this work?

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 1>How is it supposed to work? So all of the

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>things that underli chat GPT are large language models that

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 1>have been trained on the vast or ay of data

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>from the Internet. So what open ai did here was

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 1>also attempt to train and model. They took samples that

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>they believed to be human authored, they labeled them as

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 1>human author that they matched You know, a prompt to

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the output, and they did the same thing with things

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 1>that were AI authored and trying to use that to

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>teach an artificial intelligence model to guess for itself, predict

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>for itself which ones are human, which ones are not.

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Now you know some of the limitations here. It is

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 1>not reliable on very short amounts of text. So open

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 1>AI said below a thousand characters, it really can't do much. Um,

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 1>if it's looking at a text where there's automatically a

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>right answer, like they gave the example at the first

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 1>thousand prime numbers, you can't tell the correct answer will

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 1>be the same regardless of who is who's writing it.

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 1>There's also, you know, people have been very smart about

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 1>these things. There's ways to edit the AI generated content

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 1>in order to evade this classification tool. And so you

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 1>end up in a bit of a game of whack

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a mole where people figure out how to change the

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 1>AI content to make it hard of a classifier to

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>determine that it's written by about Bloomberg. Steena Bass, you

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>have been across every single step of this story since

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the start. Unbelievable, great reporting. Thanks for joining. Now let's

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>pivot a little bit Sony reduced projections for the initial

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>launch of its PlayStation VR two headset drastically. That's according

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>to sources. That's also as a result of week early

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 1>pre orders. I want to bring in Bloomberg's Mark German

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>all across the consumer electronics feed Mark, what have we

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>learned about this kind of reset from Sony. Yes, so

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News reported uh this week that orders have been

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>reduced for their new VR ps v R two headset. Now,

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a big deal slashing orders. It's right now

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the VR market does not have a lot of momentum

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Apples announcing it's headset in just a few months. But

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>at the same time you have this report, you have

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Meta actually reducing the price, at least on a limited basis,

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 1>of its Quest Pro headset by a few hundred dollars.

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 1>From so, I think overall this is not so much

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>a story about Sony but the virtual reality market in general.

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 1>And this is why you see some of the other

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 1>tech giants, including Apple, Samsung and Amazon really looking long

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>term more at a R rather than VR. That's fascinating, Mark,

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 1>because of course you bring our scooper to scoop on

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>what Apple is thinking about at the moment. The question

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>with Sony is whether it's the price point, whether the

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>fact that it's basically only servicing its own PS five

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>so it's a bit too much of a niche market.

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm interested is to what the read across four and

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Apple is for example, I mean, have they got enough content,

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 1>enough content creation to make you want to splurge on

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>these sorts of devices. Yes. So the Sony device, right,

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not too expensive if you compare the price point

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>to Apples three thou dollars versus you know, sub five

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 1>dollars for the VR headset. The problem is is that

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>it requires, like you said, a PlayStation, right, there are

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>still some people who want PlayStations who can't get their

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>hands on PlayStations. So this is a device for device

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that you can't even get your hands on in some cases,

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 1>and it only works with that product. The difference being

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 1>that the Meta headset, the Apple headset, some of the

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:13.360
<v Speaker 1>headsets from other providers, those are all completely stand abone devices. Right,

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>So Sony is limiting use cases, usability and the addressable

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>market right from the get go, just by including that,

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:26.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, required compatibility and required use with the PlayStation, right,

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Apples fully standalone requiring phone. Mark. We've covered Apple that

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>we've covered, so let's do Samsung as well. Why not

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 1>big week for them? You're excited about what's to come. No,

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not. Actually, I think Samsung's new devices this week

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>are actually going to be pretty marginal. We're talking minor

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:50.399
<v Speaker 1>camera improvements on the two base models. We're talking about

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:52.440
<v Speaker 1>a jump from a hundred eight megapixels to two d

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:55.200
<v Speaker 1>megapixels on the back camera of their highest end phone.

0:17:55.800 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>So you're not seeing major improvements, major design changes, AGR

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>processor upgrades here. These are going to be very smaller

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>year over your upgrades. For the Apple watchers out there,

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>there's this term where you call it an s year, right,

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you get the iPhone fives or success right the tenants.

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>This is like that for samtime. This's your small improvements.

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Mark German, fascinating. Thank you so much across the hardware conversation. Meanwhile,

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:27.360
<v Speaker 1>let's get you to the music conversation. Because Spotify reported

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:29.399
<v Speaker 1>fourth court to subscribe a growth that beat estimates a

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of that of course to do a podcasting to

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:34.679
<v Speaker 1>the monthly active users have now reached almost five million.

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 1>The gross margin also better than expected. Because all helping

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the shares jump the most in the year. Today now

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:42.919
<v Speaker 1>the ad supported revenue in the music streaming giant also

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:46.399
<v Speaker 1>climbed four and that's actually at a time when brands

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 1>have been slowing their spending. So the executives were staying

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty optimistic on the longer term goals of this business

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and also of course focused on the near term efficiency

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>after Spotify recently announced that it is planning to cut

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 1>about six percent of its employee Welcome back to Remo Technology.

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm Caroline Hide in New York and ed well the

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:16.199
<v Speaker 1>stories continue earnings but also sadly layoffs. Yeah, and a

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:18.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of that driving movement and after hours, so let's

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>get right to it. Some of the names we've been

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 1>talking about in the show, particularly snap down in a

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:25.479
<v Speaker 1>big way and after hours now more than fourteen percent.

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:29.639
<v Speaker 1>Forecasts for revenue that's going to drop two a wide range,

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and investors kind of shaking off this idea. It subscription

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 1>service has reached two million users quickly e A now

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 1>down eleven percent, really accelerating those declines in after hours.

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>It's forecast for bookings basically show that those new titles

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>out in the holidays have not gained traction. If there's

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>a bright spot, it's a m D in the chip

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:49.640
<v Speaker 1>sets are at one point seven percent, a strong forecast

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>for the current period, bucking the trend, a lot of

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 1>strength in server. I also want to pivots to fintech

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:57.439
<v Speaker 1>because there's actually a fair amount of newsflow and fintech,

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 1>particularly around layoffs. As you discussed PayPal in firming that

0:20:00.840 --> 0:20:03.640
<v Speaker 1>it's doing layoffs being cheered in after hours, up too,

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and Upstart a name that caught my eye. It is

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:10.120
<v Speaker 1>cutting around of staff Caroline, but that wasn't as far

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:13.439
<v Speaker 1>as it went. It also is scrapping development of a

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 1>small business loans program, citing macro economic conditions, which for

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:22.120
<v Speaker 1>a fintech company that basically deals in AI powered lending,

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>is a worrying sign. Yeah, good point on the macro there.

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's dig in a little bit more into the fintech

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:30.199
<v Speaker 1>space and really what some other key companies are seeing

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 1>as to where to invest on a MARS is with

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 1>us as American Express Glue president for Global Commercial Services,

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:39.439
<v Speaker 1>just introduced in fact Business Blueprint. It's a free digital

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:41.919
<v Speaker 1>tool that lets small businesses manage their cash flow. So

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:45.639
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about the business Blueprint on and what are

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 1>you responding to. Clearly you're seeing demand coming from small

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>businesses like absolutely, So we're really excited about the launch

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:56.120
<v Speaker 1>of Business Blueprint for a few reasons for American Express.

0:20:56.800 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>The first is American Express of the leader in small

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>business cards. You'll know that we have over three million

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:05.439
<v Speaker 1>small business card customers here in the US UH and

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:08.120
<v Speaker 1>we know that those customers want more. They want easier,

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 1>more integrated ways to manage your cash flow, which is

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 1>always a small business pain point, you know, in any

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>economic climate. And what Blueprint lets us does, let's us

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>do is engage with these customers in new ways so

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:21.920
<v Speaker 1>they can come onto the platform and log into access

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>a free insights tool, they could apply for a flexible

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 1>line of credit product, they can take an American Express

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>business checking account and access a great a p y

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:33.400
<v Speaker 1>all in one, easy to manage place. And we kind

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 1>of see it as one of the most important new

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 1>benefits that you've rolled out to small businesses really since

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>membership rewards. So we're very excited about the launch today.

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:46.400
<v Speaker 1>You see, it's a significant growth opportunity where why well,

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 1>small business already a big part of American Express and

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:51.439
<v Speaker 1>and We're a big part of small businesses here in

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the US. In fact, I talked about those three million

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 1>small businesses, but they represent about of all of all

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>US small business cards spending. That every time a small

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 1>business uses a card in the US on a billions

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>of making a payment, it comes through American Express. So

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>it's already a big part of the company. And it's

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 1>our goal really to support these small businesses as they grow.

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, the post pandemic period, we saw this incredible

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>small business formation in the US, over five million small

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>businesses forms. We want to make sure that as many

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>of them as possible become American Express customers. We help

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>them navigate whatever is ahead. And of course in the

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:32.400
<v Speaker 1>here term, the macro picture a bit bleaker. Longer term,

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, who knows where the cycle goes. I was

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 1>on the phone with Steve Square, your CEO, on Friday,

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:39.119
<v Speaker 1>and he was talking about some of the slowdown in

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 1>payments that he's seeing from small businesses. What are you

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 1>seeing at the moment and why is that? The company?

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Last Friday, as you know, that day you talked to Steve,

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 1>reported revenue growth for the full year in twenty two

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and we went out and gave guidance for twenty three

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>of revenue growth between fifteen and seventeen percent. So we're

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>seeing very strong spending trends across our customer base. We

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:02.399
<v Speaker 1>did to talk about was a moderation and small business

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 1>digital advertising spend. We have a very broad range of

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 1>small businesses that spent on many things they need to

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>run and grow their businesses. So interesting that maybe that

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:13.199
<v Speaker 1>more caution and I remember Steve saying whether or not

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:15.680
<v Speaker 1>it was being just a bit of confusion or whether

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 1>it was more than macro economy on that. Just talk

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:20.199
<v Speaker 1>to us a little bit about the fact that this

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 1>whole business blueprint comes from an acquisition you made of Cabbage,

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 1>one that I know well sort of a o G

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:28.440
<v Speaker 1>in the European fintech space. You're retiring the name Cabbage.

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Is that something that we're going to see a little

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:33.119
<v Speaker 1>bit more of Ressie for example? Will these things become

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>AMEX printed. Well, we try to be very led by

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 1>what works for our customers, and smallness has told us

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 1>very clearly given that big position that we have in cards,

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 1>that they know American Express, they love American Express, and

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 1>it was easier for them to understand the business blueprint

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:52.880
<v Speaker 1>from American Express as part of that overall relationship your purview,

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:58.400
<v Speaker 1>you're helping serve small, midsize but also big global companies here,

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and I'm interested in what you're seeing from a corporate

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:06.439
<v Speaker 1>vontage point. With Steve on the call again sort of

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:09.159
<v Speaker 1>and when chatting Tim talked about corporate travel just not

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 1>yet coming back. What are you hearing from the people

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 1>that you talked to about the desire corporate is willing

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:16.120
<v Speaker 1>to spend at the moment. So that's absolutely right. When

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic hit in early we saw corporate travel reduce,

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:23.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, materially I was down minus six percent I

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 1>think at this low point way back in and as

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 1>everyone got back on the road into begin to see

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>a gradual recovery. UM. It's still not back to levels,

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>but my clients tell me they are beginning to travel.

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:38.639
<v Speaker 1>You see a return to travel faster and some of

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:42.959
<v Speaker 1>those more customer facing, client facing industries like banking, aspetes

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of financial services. But it's been a slow ramp and

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:47.680
<v Speaker 1>we don't expect it to come back fully UM for

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:50.160
<v Speaker 1>for a while UM. But customers are getting out there,

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:52.159
<v Speaker 1>moving around and it's an exciting growth story. In the

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>years ahead, and a lot of that's technologically driven, and

0:24:56.240 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm interested as the tech shows sort of the talent

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 1>you have on board, the that you're rolling out these

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 1>new offerings small businesses. Are you making the most of

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:05.239
<v Speaker 1>the fact that, like some people are letting go of

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:07.440
<v Speaker 1>great engineering talent. Is that something you want to be

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 1>up on? How does it look like for you? In

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 1>amics we mentioned the Cabbage acquisition, and as we looked

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 1>at that opportunity, we were excited about the products that

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:17.440
<v Speaker 1>of course the tech platform, you know, being able to

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 1>make these interoperable products work together, but also the people

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>we had in Cabbage, a sort of digitally native small

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 1>business focus set of product and engineer, you know, leaders

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 1>in their industry. If you're really excited to bring them

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 1>into team AMICX, and we're excited to keep building and

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>we bought in the years ahead. All right, to have

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:37.160
<v Speaker 1>some time with you. Thanks coming into Thanks for having

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 1>me of course, Anama's American Express president of Global Commercial Services.

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Terrific interview. Thank you, Caroline. Meanwhile, Boeing has told Bloomberg

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:50.159
<v Speaker 1>that it's hiring engineers from laid off that have been

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 1>laid off from tech companies take a listen. Many are

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:57.360
<v Speaker 1>many are. All of them know, many of them are.

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 1>We've never had trouble with that do. I think the

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 1>layoffs make it maybe a little easier, of course, but

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 1>it's still about who you get. It's not an engineers

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:09.679
<v Speaker 1>an engineer. You're always looking for the best talent in

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the world to take on one of the great missions

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 1>in the world. Boeing CEO Dave Calhoun also told Guy

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Johnson that the company anticipates autonomous airlines in the future.

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 1>He believes it's a matter of when, not if self

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 1>flying planes will become the norm. Mhm. Now, it was

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the first ever e t F focused on n f

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:39.440
<v Speaker 1>t S non fungible tokens as closing the Definance Digital

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Revolution e t F ticker an f t Z or

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:46.399
<v Speaker 1>z I'm British launched at the end, but it's going

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:49.439
<v Speaker 1>to close in February. Why my sarsplomokes as well Lee

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:52.199
<v Speaker 1>who reported on it. So, I mean we know n

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 1>f t S the demand kind of collapsed. Is that

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>why this is then shutting down? It really is. When

0:26:57.320 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 1>we reached out of the CEO n c O Sylvia Jablanski,

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 1>she's a great person. She said the fund didn't attract assets.

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>It was as simple as that, and I guess that's

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:07.440
<v Speaker 1>just enough reason to close the fund. And you must

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 1>remember that this was launched at the height of everything.

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:14.119
<v Speaker 1>And if tease digital assets, if you didn't talk that language,

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:16.679
<v Speaker 1>you weren't cool. And then now where are they? I

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:18.960
<v Speaker 1>don't even hear any of my friends talk about those anymore.

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:23.119
<v Speaker 1>And obviously the prices we're talking about AI, yes, the

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 1>process of those have cratered. And so I guess if

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:27.880
<v Speaker 1>a fund doesn't attract enough, then it just makes sense

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:30.199
<v Speaker 1>to probably close it. Although because this is something I

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>also cover, they say that it's not just you just

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>close it. You know, you put a lot of thought

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:36.160
<v Speaker 1>into it. You probably speak to the management and stuff.

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:39.399
<v Speaker 1>So I'm pretty sure that they probably saw no future

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 1>for it. I don't want to speak so much for them,

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 1>but that's what the implication is, right, is about? Is

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:48.440
<v Speaker 1>this speaker is all it ts to have some association

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 1>with crypto, the crypto industry a suffering. Is this a

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 1>broad issue? It kind of is abroad issue, like we're

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 1>seeing a lot of crypto related e t f s,

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 1>liquid did. But the thing is funds is a friend

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 1>from the performance. So another crypto et F he wrote

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 1>about is called the Valkyrie Bitcoin E t F. So

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:09.159
<v Speaker 1>the ticker of that is w g M I. So

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 1>if you can guess, it stands for We're going to

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 1>make it. And that fun was among the best, if

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 1>not the best performer in all of the U S

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 1>E t F industry. It actually doubled, it rose. It

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:23.719
<v Speaker 1>tracks um a lot of mining companies and some crypto

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 1>related firms. And if you ask why, it's just because

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:30.879
<v Speaker 1>bitcoins prices around up in January, so it remains to

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 1>be seen. Funds aren't there, but performance of bitcoin is

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>there therefore kind of pulling up some of the crypto

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 1>E t F prices. I mean, let's talk about that

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 1>as well, because it kind of feels like a macro's

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>story at the moment because a lot of correlation between

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin as much we many would want to see it

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:51.680
<v Speaker 1>fall away from just how risk assets perform. It's basically

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>training like a risk asset. Is that all about the

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 1>ft at the moment for now? Yes, Actually, there was

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:57.719
<v Speaker 1>a very interesting that what I read today, it's by

0:28:57.800 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Arcane Research. So they said that big cooin trades volatility

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 1>in a volatile away every time around the f O

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:06.959
<v Speaker 1>m C press conference, So they did a minute by

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 1>minute rolling analysis and they found that bitcoin trades more volatile,

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 1>but it has eased a bit ever since the FED

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 1>increased its rate high cycle beginning March. So while it

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 1>increase a bit, it's still volatile, and that's why they

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>expect bitcoin to kind of downshift beginning tomorrow and to

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 1>lose momentum, and they expect that for the whole of February.

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 1>So that kind of goes in contrast with the stellar

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 1>January we've seen. And if you ask why, the note

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>just really said because the Fed's high fed's rate path

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 1>hike isn't clear yet. We don't know consensus estimates twenty

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 1>five basis point, but passer pivot it remains to be seen.

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 1>And while the decision, I think is largely set in stone,

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people will really look at the press

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 1>conference and how hawkish Jeran Powell will be. You have

0:29:47.680 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 1>a wonderful story on the Bloomberg terminal. Bitcoin's rally poised

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 1>to test old adage of don't fight the Fed. Happy

0:29:55.200 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>feedtie to you, Isabelle, is that lesson extendable to broader

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 1>crypto market beyond Bitcoin. I think it is because Bitcoin

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 1>is the biggest and a lot of coins moving lockstep

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 1>with that, so usually you'll see the correlation between Bitcoin

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and Ether, are the second largest coin really close, and

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 1>if Bitcoin falls, chances are that everything will fall with it.

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Although right now Bitcoin is trading around twenty three thousand

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>and there's a hefty resistance level at UM, so if

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 1>we break up of that then obviously there would that

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 1>would be an upside for the coin, But for now

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:31.480
<v Speaker 1>it's been stuck in a tight trading range in the

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 1>last two weeks and UM a lot of analysts are

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 1>really just waiting for the next big macro event. But

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 1>sentiment wise, it's still kind of sad in the crypto space.

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 1>People are pessimistic with all the fallout bankruptcies to scandals,

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 1>but you know, crypto faithfuls are still there as they say,

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:50.200
<v Speaker 1>we're all going to make it all right. Bloomberg's Isa,

0:30:50.240 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 1>really thank you so much for joining the show now.

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:55.959
<v Speaker 1>Shares have so far jumped after the company announced plans

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to reach profitability in three and Bloomberg caught up with

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>CEO Anthony no on Monday. Unfortunately, we had a portion

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of the interview that was dated. Here is some of

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Monday's actual wintervial view that we held with no after earnings.

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 1>We're ahead of where we expected to be at this point.

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 1>We've had seven record quarters of revenue in a row

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 1>UM and in this quarter of revenue growth actually accelerated

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to fifty eight percent year year up from fifty one

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:27.560
<v Speaker 1>percent in Q three, So we ended up exceeding expectations.

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:30.479
<v Speaker 1>And as we mentioned on the earnings call, we believe

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that the scout that we're driving in revenue will continue

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 1>into twenty three with about twenty five to thirty percent

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 1>year of year growth to a arrangement about one point

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 1>nine billion dollars in revenue to two billion dollars of revenue,

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and that will achieve GAT profitability by the fourth quarter

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand twenty three. One of the other important

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 1>milestones we achieved this quarter is that our IBADA of

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 1>seven million dollars, which was up significantly versus a year

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 1>ago and contribute to our total for the of one

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 1>three um of EBDA. That seven million dollars is equal

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 1>to our stock based compensation, which is a critical milestone

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 1>to hit on the way to gap profitability. Anthony, the

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 1>optimism the positivity coming out of so far right now

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 1>at a time with a lot of fintech's broadly basically

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 1>being washed out. In addition to as I should say, uh,

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 1>consumer businesses like Goldman of course you're Alma mater their

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 1>markets business for example, do you think those competitive headwinds

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of moving to the side is really boosting the

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:32.480
<v Speaker 1>momentum for your own business now? I think we took

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a very different approach to the market five years ago

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 1>when I joined, and that we wanted to become a

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 1>one stop shop for all the major financial decisions in

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 1>your life and all the days in between. And we

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:47.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't cherry pick the most popular products at the time

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 1>or the products that we're growing the fastest were the

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:51.720
<v Speaker 1>ones you can make the most money on. We picked

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 1>all the products that allow us to help you get

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 1>your money right, to help you borrow better, say better,

0:32:57.240 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 1>spend better, protect better, and invest better. And because we

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 1>were committed to those activities that help you get your

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 1>money right. Over the last five years, we've built a

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 1>durability in our business and a robustness that allows us

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 1>to allocate capital to those businesses that are most in

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 1>need at that moment in time and leaves us less

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable to different um exogenous factors that we've seen impact

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 1>other companies. That's not to say that we're bulletproof or perfect.

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 1>It just means more more robust and more um I

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 1>think stable, and that allows us to be more durable

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and the strategies really come together. In the last you know,

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 1>two years that was so far Ceo Anthony not are

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:40.320
<v Speaker 1>now coming up the unicorn trying to bring back the

0:33:40.440 --> 0:33:44.560
<v Speaker 1>do do as in the bird we'll discuss next. This

0:33:44.760 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 1>is Greenberg. Okay, so this next story is kind of

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 1>something out of a movie, specifically Jurassic part movie, because

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Colossal Biosciences, which just announced a hundred and fifty million

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:11.719
<v Speaker 1>dollar funding round. The Dallas based setup is trying to

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring back perhaps the most famously extinct animal of them all,

0:34:15.640 --> 0:34:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the Dodo. Here to explain Colossal's co founder Ben Lamb,

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean extraordinary. You You've got a lot of press

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:26.840
<v Speaker 1>around perhaps bringing back the Willie mammoth. Now it's the Dodo.

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:30.239
<v Speaker 1>You're raising serious money. Ben, talk to us how you

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 1>do it well? I mean for us, you know, as

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the world's first teak stinction company, I feel like the

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:38.759
<v Speaker 1>world actually is starting to pay attention not just to

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:41.640
<v Speaker 1>climate change in the effects that man is having on

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the environment, but loss of biodiversity is now at the

0:34:44.360 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 1>forefront of a lot of conversations. You know, with COP

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 1>fifteen in some of the great work that came out

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:53.360
<v Speaker 1>of the World Economic Forum, fifty of all biodiversity could

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 1>go extinct between now and we need better tools, we

0:34:56.640 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 1>need better technologies, and so we decided to build a company,

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 1>George Church and i UH to build a biosciences and

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:07.719
<v Speaker 1>synthetic biology company called Colossal Biosciences, which focuses on leveraging

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 1>crisper and other gene editing tools and technologies and advanced

0:35:11.200 --> 0:35:14.799
<v Speaker 1>reproductive technologies in order to bring back these kind of

0:35:15.120 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 1>iconic keystone species like the wooly mammot, the Tasmanian tiger.

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:21.680
<v Speaker 1>And then obviously what we're announcing today is our Avian

0:35:21.719 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Genomics Group UH focusing on the iconic dodo. And so

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:28.280
<v Speaker 1>our goal with this is to actually bring back these species,

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:32.319
<v Speaker 1>rewild them back into their natural habitat in partnerships with

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 1>local governments and indigenous people groups UH and and the

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:38.319
<v Speaker 1>brighter public at large, and then leverage these tools and

0:35:38.320 --> 0:35:41.200
<v Speaker 1>technologies both for human healthcare, and then give all the

0:35:41.200 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 1>technologies that we developed for conservation away to the world

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 1>so that conservations have more tools in fighting against loss

0:35:48.080 --> 0:35:52.399
<v Speaker 1>of Bouniversity spawned so many other questions, and I'm sure

0:35:52.440 --> 0:35:55.399
<v Speaker 1>many I've got questions about why and how you bring

0:35:55.440 --> 0:35:58.240
<v Speaker 1>them back into into the now world. But I'm interested

0:35:58.239 --> 0:36:00.960
<v Speaker 1>in the money pot, the hundred fifty million. What is

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the reward to invest us here? Is it more about

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the applications for people? It is? And and and you

0:36:07.040 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 1>know what's interesting is that in science and in the

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:12.399
<v Speaker 1>great universities there are worldwide, a lot of times you'll

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:15.400
<v Speaker 1>start working on an individual paper or problem, you'll published

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 1>paper and that's a great point solution, and some of

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 1>those points solutions become incredible companies and incredible innovations or

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:23.799
<v Speaker 1>healthcare and for human kind as a whole. Well, it's

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 1>really interesting is when you start to look at some

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:29.560
<v Speaker 1>of these big biology and synthetic biology problems as systems,

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot more innovations can come in a lot of

0:36:32.080 --> 0:36:35.080
<v Speaker 1>different areas. So with just the mammoth, for example, we're

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:39.240
<v Speaker 1>working on computational biology, we're working on cellular engineering, where

0:36:39.239 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 1>we're working on simpsori programming and advanced gestational technologies. All

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of those could spur additional technology, so very similar to

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the like moon landing or the which was an actual

0:36:49.040 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 1>moon shot, a lot of create technologies were developed that

0:36:52.080 --> 0:36:55.800
<v Speaker 1>could completely transferred that completely transformed the world, including fundamental

0:36:55.840 --> 0:36:59.120
<v Speaker 1>technologies that allow us ice conversation today. And so earlier

0:36:59.160 --> 0:37:02.440
<v Speaker 1>this year we actually spun out our first technology company

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:05.400
<v Speaker 1>called form Bio, which is a computational biology platform that

0:37:05.480 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 1>we did because what we needed just didn't exist in

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the market. We end up raising thirty million dollars for that,

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's a huge win for our investors. Hey, Ben,

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you talked about the money. A source told us your

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:17.200
<v Speaker 1>evaluations now at around one point five Ben, and we

0:37:17.239 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 1>asked our audience, is this a good use of funds?

0:37:19.760 --> 0:37:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Here's what our audience thinks about that. Frankly, No, they

0:37:23.040 --> 0:37:25.200
<v Speaker 1>think that, you know, research and funding can go into

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:28.319
<v Speaker 1>bigger problems. Um, I'm gonna ask you the same question

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 1>as Caroline. What is the business model here? Jurassic Cook? No, So,

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean for us, it's about developing technologies. Right. If

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:37.160
<v Speaker 1>you start to look at these things as systems problems,

0:37:37.160 --> 0:37:39.759
<v Speaker 1>you actually can develop a lot of really great technologies.

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:42.480
<v Speaker 1>In our first six months of business, we developed a technology,

0:37:42.719 --> 0:37:45.759
<v Speaker 1>raised thirty million dollars for it. It's a major technology

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and biogrammatical bioinformatics platform which can be really helpful for

0:37:49.760 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 1>human healthcare. And so what I would say is there's

0:37:52.040 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 1>nothing more pressing than climate change and loss of biodiversity,

0:37:56.239 --> 0:37:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and we need more tools. So it's on companies like

0:37:59.000 --> 0:38:01.840
<v Speaker 1>us to educate the public on what the value of

0:38:01.920 --> 0:38:04.359
<v Speaker 1>these tools are, not just in human healthcare into an

0:38:04.360 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 1>indust returns, but to conservation. Thank you for coming on,

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 1>listening to our questions, giving us some answers. Phil, We've

0:38:11.760 --> 0:38:14.760
<v Speaker 1>got to get you back. Colossal Biosance co founder Ben Lamb,

0:38:14.960 --> 0:38:17.520
<v Speaker 1>we thank you on that funding round and well extraordinary

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:20.239
<v Speaker 1>applications of the money. Meanwhile, and that does it for

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:23.560
<v Speaker 1>this edition and a Bloomberg Technology Wednesday, and you've got

0:38:23.560 --> 0:38:27.120
<v Speaker 1>a huge conversations talent here SEEO no less. Yeah, and

0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm very looking forward to that one. Don't forget recap

0:38:29.560 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 1>catch our podcast wherever you get its Spotify, I Heeart

0:38:32.200 --> 0:38:35.239
<v Speaker 1>or Apple. A lot to talk about. This is Bloomberg